Adaptive vaping device inhibition control system

Abstract

A vaping device inhibition control system includes a processor operably interfacing a control circuit of a vaping device and executing computer program code instruction controllers for regulating device operation. The system is configurable with adaptive control settings comprising user-configurable control parameters, conditions interdependently relating the parameters, and conditional logic routines dynamically evaluated by the processor. The processor determines an operational state of the vaping device based on these evaluations, enabling or inhibiting operation accordingly. The control parameters include temporal constraints and usage constraints, allowing for structured control over vaping activity. By dynamically adjusting vaping permissions and progressively modifying usage limits, the system enables a controlled reduction in vaping over time. A digital display provides real-time feedback on operational status and remaining usage limits. The structured and adaptive inhibition control system facilitates a personalised and automated approach to managing vaping behaviour, promoting a gradual reduction in consumption while maintaining user compliance.

Description

Adaptive Vaping Device Inhibition Control SystemField of the Invention

[0001] This invention relates to a vaping device inhibition control system for dynamically regulating and reducing vaping activity through an adaptive control framework. The system provides structured and configurable operational constraints based on interdependent temporal and usage parameters, allowing for a highly user configurable controlled and progressive reduction in vaping behaviour.Background of the Invention

[0002] A vaping device, often referred to as an e-cigarette, is a handheld electronic device designed to simulate smoking by producing an aerosol, commonly known as vapour, that the user inhales. This vapour typically contains nicotine, flavourings, and other chemicals. The device works by heating a liquid to generate the aerosol, which mimics the act and sensory experience of smoking. Vaping devices vary in design and functionality, ranging from simple pen-like models to more complex systems with adjustable settings.

[0003] The use of vaping devices has surged in popularity as an alternative to traditional smoking, with many users viewing them as a less harmful option or a tool for quitting smoking. However, this perception has led to significant public health concerns, especially regarding nicotine addiction and the potential for vaping to serve as a gateway to tobacco use among younger populations. There is also growing concern over the use of these devices for consuming cannabinoids, which introduces additional legal and health implications.

[0004] The need to inhibit the use of vaping devices stems from the goal of controlling nicotine or cannabinoid addiction. While vaping might offer a harm reduction strategy for long-term smokers, the increasing incidence of vaping among individuals who have never smoked tobacco products, particularly adolescents, raises alarm. This concern is compounded by evidence suggesting that nicotine exposure can affect brain development in young people, potentially leading to addiction, mood disorders, and reduced impulse control.

[0005] Moreover, the regulation and control of vaping devices are essential to prevent the normalization of smoking behaviours and to protect public health. Policies and interventions aimed at reducing the availability and appeal of vaping devices, such as restricting flavours that are attractive to younger people, implementing age verification safeguards, and educating the public about the risks of nicotine and cannabinoid use, are critical components of a comprehensive strategy to combat addiction.

[0006] Existing vaping devices incorporate various control mechanisms to restrict or regulate usage. For example, US20210401061 A1 (Davis et al) 2021 -12-30 discloses a vaping device with predefined restrictions based on time, location, or external conditions, allowing the device to be disabled under certain circumstances. However, such control mechanisms remain largely static, applying simple enabling or disabling functions without an adaptive approach to managing vaping habits over time.

[0007] Similarly, US20150181945A1 (Tremblay) 2015-07-02 discloses a vaping device that restricts usage based on static parameters such as inhalation count and time duration.

[0008] US20220095696A1 (Lin et al) 2022-03-31 discloses a method of controlling a vaporising device where an administrator can remotely set vaping limits and enforce shutdowns based on predefined conditions, though this approach relies on external intervention rather than autonomously adapting vaping restrictions.

[0009] The present invention seeks a way to regulate the control of vaping devices, which will overcome or substantially ameliorate at least some of the deficiencies of the prior art, or to at least provide an alternative.

[0010] It is to be understood that, if any prior art information is referred to herein, such reference does not constitute an admission that the information forms part of the common general knowledge in the art, in Australia or any other country.Summary of the Disclosure

[0011] The present system introduces an adaptive vaping device inhibition control system designed to regulate vaping device usage through a structured and dynamically configurable framework, overcoming limitations associated with priorsystems that rely on static enabling or disabling mechanisms, preset threshold restrictions, or remote administrative control. Unlike these prior approaches, which impose rigid constraints, the present system implements an adaptive inhibition framework in which multiple user-configurable parameters are evaluated in real time to determine the operational state of the device.

[0012] The system integrates a processor operably interfacing a control circuit within the vaping device to execute computer program code instruction controllers that dynamically manage the operational state of the device. The control system is configurable via a user interface that allows the setting of adaptive control settings, including user-configurable control parameters, user-configurable conditions interdependently relating these parameters, and conditional logic routines that dynamically determine whether the device should be operational or inhibited. These elements create a cascade of control, ensuring that vaping regulation is applied in a structured yet flexible manner rather than through isolated and inflexible restrictions.

[0013] The user-configurable control parameters include temporal constraints and usage constraints, such as predefined time-of-day limits, duration of use, maximum number of activations, and cumulative activation time. Unlike prior systems that impose static restrictions, the present invention enables the interdependent evaluation of these constraints, ensuring that vaping limitations adapt dynamically to real-time factors rather than applying a fixed rule set. The user-configurable conditions define structured relationships between these parameters, ensuring that the device transitions between operational and inhibited states in response to a range of dynamically evaluated inputs.

[0014] For example, the system supports structured vaping inhibition through the implementation of configurable routines that gradually adjust the number of permitted activations over time. A user may set a routine that permits 100 puffs per day in the first week, reducing to 80 puffs in the second week, and further reducing usage in subsequent weeks. Additionally, the system enables vaping restrictions to be adapted based on cumulative activation duration, ensuring that the total usage remains within predetermined thresholds while allowing for flexibility in individual sessions. Thesestructured control mechanisms enable progressive habit modification, addressing the shortcomings of prior systems that apply static restrictions without accommodating dynamic user behaviours.

[0015] The adaptive control settings may optionally include schedules that define how routines are initiated, repeated, and terminated based on predefined criteria. This provides a structured and automated means of managing vaping activity over time, ensuring that restrictions align with user preferences and behavioural patterns. By incorporating schedules, the system allows for further refinement of control logic, such as setting different vaping limitations depending on the time of day or the user's historical usage trends.

[0016] By integrating these structured, interdependent control mechanisms, the present invention provides a technical advancement over existing vaping inhibition systems. Unlike prior approaches that rely on simple threshold-based restrictions or external administrative controls, the present system enables a highly adaptable, usercentric framework that dynamically evaluates multiple interdependent conditions. This structured and automated approach enhances compliance and facilitates a controlled reduction in vaping activity, making it a more effective solution for managing and reducing vaping behaviour over time.

[0017] According to one aspect, there is provided a vaping device inhibition control system comprising a processor operably interfacing a control circuit of a vaping device and comprising a user interface, the control system executing computer program code instruction controllers configured for controlling the operation of the vaping device. The user interface is configured for user configuration of adaptive control settings, including user-configurable control parameters that define temporal constraints and usage constraints, user-configurable conditions that interdependently relate these constraints and are dynamically evaluated in real time, and user- configurable conditional logic routines that govern the application of vaping restrictions. The processor evaluates these conditions to determine an operational state and operates or inhibits the control circuit of the vaping device accordingly.

[0018] In some embodiments, the temporal constraints may include predefined time- of-day restrictions or duration-based limitations, allowing for structured control over when the vaping device is operational. The usage constraints may further include a threshold number of activations or a cumulative activation duration, ensuring that vaping activity remains within predefined limits.

[0019] In an embodiment, the adaptive control settings may incorporate user- configurable schedules that define criteria for executing conditional logic routines. These schedules may specify start conditions, ensuring vaping restrictions are applied at predetermined times, and may also include repeat and end criteria to regulate how often and for how long a vaping restriction is enforced.

[0020] Optionally, the start criteria of the schedules may define specific initiation points, such as a calendar date, a predefined time of day, or an elapsed period since a prior event. The repeat criteria may allow the schedules to be executed periodically, such as on a daily or weekly basis, ensuring consistent regulation of vaping activity. The end criteria may specify termination conditions, such as a fixed expiration date or a predefined number of repetitions.

[0021] In some instances, the system may further include user authentication functionality, allowing for a hierarchy of user accounts with different levels of permission to modify control settings. The vaping device may be configured with a user authentication module that receives credentials to determine the level of control granted to a specific user.

[0022] In certain embodiments, the computer program code instruction controllers may be configured to adjust the adaptive control settings dynamically based on historical usage data. The system may implement a structured reduction plan in which vaping limits are progressively decreased over time, facilitating a controlled reduction in nicotine consumption.

[0023] In one variation, the user-configurable control parameters may further include predefined vaping activity events that trigger a change in operational state. Such events may include manual lock or unlock commands, reaching a cumulativeactivation threshold, or surpassing a predefined activation count within a specified period.

[0024] The system may also be configured to transmit status data regarding the operational state of the vaping device to an external electronic device. This enables remote configuration and monitoring of the adaptive control settings, allowing for greater flexibility in managing vaping restrictions.

[0025] In an embodiment, the vaping device may comprise a digital display for presenting the user interface. The display may provide real-time feedback on the operational state of the device, indicate upcoming lock or unlock events, and display scheduled vaping limitations.

[0026] According to another aspect, there is provided a method of controlling a vaping device, comprising displaying a user interface for configuring adaptive control settings, including user-configurable control parameters defining temporal and usage constraints, user-configurable conditions interdependently relating these constraints, and user-configurable conditional logic routines for dynamically evaluating vaping restrictions. The method further includes evaluating the adaptive control settings in real time using a processor, determining an operational state of the vaping device based on the evaluation, and operating or inhibiting the device accordingly.

[0027] In some implementations, execution of a conditional logic routine may be initiated based on predefined start criteria, ensuring that vaping restrictions take effect at appropriate times.

[0028] The method may also include dynamically adjusting user-configurable control parameters in response to detected vaping activity events, allowing for adaptive modifications to vaping restrictions.

[0029] In certain embodiments, the user interface may display the operational state, scheduled vaping limitations, and applicable time-based or usage-based restrictions, ensuring transparency in the application of vaping controls.

[0030] Additionally, the method may include transmitting control status data to an external electronic device, allowing for remote configuration and monitoring of vaping restrictions.Brief Description of the Drawings

[0031] Notwithstanding any other forms which may fall within the scope of the present invention, preferred embodiments of the disclosure will now be described, by way of example only, with reference to the accompanying drawings in which:

[0032] Figure 1 provides a vaping device inhibition control system overview.

[0033] Figure 2 shows a programmable cascade of control settings.

[0034] Figure 3 illustrates schedules of control routines.

[0035] Figure 4 shows interaction with an electronic device and inbuilt digital display.

[0036] Figure 5 shows a simplified vaping device with diminished digital display.

[0037] Figure 6 show a basic vaping device without digital display.

[0038] Figures 7 and 8 shows user interface showing locked / unlocked status and configured schedules display on the electronic device.

[0039] Figure 9 shows an overview interface of configured schedules.

[0040] Figure 10 shows an interface for schedule configuration.

[0041] Figures 11 and 12 show interfaces having operational status and for viewing and configuring schedules interface according to the vaping device of Figure 4.

[0042] Figure 13 shows controls for configuring time and usage constraints.

[0043] Figure 14 shows an initialisation routine interface for setting vaping limits according to the embodiment of the vaping device of 5.

[0044] Figure 15 shows a status screen interface with variable use and time countdown.Description of Embodiments

[0045] Figure 1 shows a vaping device inhibition control system 100 comprising a processor 101 operably interfacing a control circuit 102 of a vaping device 103. The processor 101 is in operable communication with a memory device which is configured for storing digital data including computer program code instructions. These computer program code instructions may be logically divided into a plurality of computer program code instruction controllers. In use, the processor 101 fetches these computer program code instructions and associated data from the memory device for interpretation and execution of the inhibition functionality described herein.In the embodiment shown, the processor 101 is on board the vaping device 103 and may take the form of a low-power microprocessor device.

[0046] The control circuit 102 may control excitation of a heating coil 104 or atomiser which delivers liquid product 105 (such as liquid nicotine) in vaporised form via a mouthpiece 106 to the user. The processor 101 may operably interface a digital display 107 and may execute user interface controllers for the display of user interface as will be described in further detail below.

[0047] The processor 101 may further comprise a radiofrequency transceiver 108 which may have an antenna 109 for wireless transmission of data, including via short- range radiofrequency networks (such as Bluetooth networks), 802.1 1 a Wi-Fi and the like. In this regard, the processor 101 may be in operable communication with an electronic device 1 10. In embodiments, the electronic device 1 10 may take the form of a mobile communication device having a software application installed and executing thereon. The software application may display user interfaces using a digital display of the electronic device 1 10 and may be used to control the operation of the vaping device 103 wirelessly.

[0048] The various components may be mounted on a PCB 1 1 1 and may draw power from the rechargeable battery 1 12.

[0049] The computer program code instruction controllers are configured for controlling the operation of the vaping device. For example, the controllers may cause the processor 102 control the control circuit 102 so that the coil 104 cannot be energised.

[0050] With reference to Figure 2, the control system 100 is programmable with a cascade of adaptive control settings 1 13 for fine tune granular and customisable control of use of the vaping device 103. As will be apparent from the ensuing description, the adaptive control settings 1 13 may be configured for versatile and adaptable control of the vaping device 103 to , for example, limit user consumption in an adaptable and user centric manner.

[0051] More specifically, the adaptive control settings 1 13 comprise user configurable control parameters 1 14 which comprising temporal constraints and usage constraints.

[0052] As shown in the following table, these temporal constraints may comprise at least one of time of day and duration variables and the usage constraints may comprise at least one of number of puffs and total puff duration.

[0053] The temporal constraints and usage constraints within the adaptive control settings 1 13 provide a flexible and granular method for regulating the operation of the vaping device 103. By defining these parameters 1 14, the system 100 enables precise control over when and how the device 103 can be used, allowing for dynamic adjustment based on user-defined restrictions. These control parameters 1 14 form the foundation upon which the system 100 can enforce vaping limitations tailored to individual user needs.

[0054] The temporal constraints allow restrictions to be placed on vaping activity based on specific times or durations. For instance, a user may configure the system 100 to prevent vaping before 9:00 AM or after 10:00 PM, ensuring that usage is confined to predetermined time windows. Alternatively, a user may specify a continuous duration, such as limiting vaping sessions to no more than 30 minutes ata time or enforcing a mandatory cooldown period of one hour between sessions. These parameters ensure that vaping activity is structured around specific temporal conditions rather than being unrestricted.

[0055] Similarly, the usage constraints regulate vaping activity based on the quantity of vaporisation events rather than time alone. For example, a user may set a limit of 50 puffs per day, after which the device 103 becomes inoperable until the next day. Another approach may involve limiting vaping based on the total puff duration, ensuring that the cumulative activation of the heating coil 104 does not exceed a specific threshold. This would prevent excessive use within a given period, such as restricting vaping to a total of five minutes per hour, regardless of how many individual puffs are taken.

[0056] The adaptive control settings 1 13 further comprises user configurable conditions 1 15 interdependently relating to the user configurable control parameters 1 14 which are dynamically evaluated by the processor 101 . Examples of these user configurable conditions 1 15 are provided in the following table:

[0057] More complex conditions 1 15 are given by way of the following examples:

[0058] The user configurable conditions 1 15 function as logical rules that define the relationships between the user configurable control parameters 1 14, allowing the vaping device 103 to regulate vaping activity based on real-time evaluation of these parameters. These conditions 1 15 can interdependently relate temporal constraints and usage constraints, allowing for vaping restrictions that are based on a combination of time and consumption limits rather than a single factor in isolation.

[0059] For instance, a condition 1 15 may specify that when a particular time of day is reached, it becomes applicable for a lock or unlock event to be triggered. In this case, the temporal constraint interdependently relates to the broader control system, as it may be evaluated alongside a usage constraint. For example, if a condition 1 15 states that vaping is to be locked at 10:00 PM, then regardless of the number of puffs taken, the vaping device 103 will prevent further use at that time. However, a related condition 1 15 may also specify that if the user has already consumed 50 puffs before 10:00 PM, the vaping device 103 should lock earlier. In this way, the conditions 1 15 interdependently relate to both time and usage, ensuring that vaping is regulated dynamically rather than based on a single predetermined rule.

[0060] Similarly, a condition 1 15 may be structured such that a lock event can be triggered when a specific usage constraint is reached, but only after a defined period has elapsed. For example, if a condition 1 15 specifies that vaping can be locked after40 puffs, but another condition 1 15 states that at least one hour must pass since the last unlock event, then both conditions 1 15 must be evaluated together before the device 103 can be locked. This ensures that vaping restrictions are not solely dictated by either time or consumption, but rather by the interdependent relationship between these parameters 1 14.

[0061] More complex relationships between conditions 1 15 may further refine vaping restrictions by incorporating multiple temporal and usage constraints 1 14. For example, a condition 1 15 may specify that the vaping device 103 locks if 40 puffs have been taken before 3:00 PM. However, if the user has not yet reached 40 puffs by that time, another condition 1 15 may specify that vaping remains permitted until a later threshold, such as 5:00 PM. In this scenario, the conditions 1 15 interdependently relate the time of day to the number of puffs, ensuring that users are restricted in a flexible yet controlled manner.

[0062] Another example involves defining a condition 1 15 that requires both a timebased restriction and a usage threshold to be satisfied before a lock event can occur. For instance, the vaping device 103 may be configured to lock if either two hours have elapsed since the last unlock event or if 30 puffs have been taken within that period. In this case, the two conditions 1 15 work together to ensure that vaping is restricted not just by time or by consumption, but by a combination of both factors.

[0063] By structuring the conditions 1 15 to interdependently relate temporal and usage constraints 1 14, the system 100 provides a highly customisable approach to regulating vaping activity. This allows users to set precise limitations that align with individual habits and goals, ensuring that vaping is progressively reduced in a controlled and adaptable manner.

[0064] Furthermore, the adaptive control settings 1 13 comprise conditional logic routines 1 16 of the conditions 1 15 dynamically evaluated by the processor to determine an operational state of the vaping device 103. Example conditional logic routines 1 16 are provided as follows:

[0065] For example, the system 100 enables users to configure conditional logic routines 1 16 that impose increasingly stringent vaping restrictions over time, facilitating a structured reduction in usage. These routines 116 dynamically adjust the device's operational state based on real-time evaluation of conditions 1 15, allowing for gradual behavioural modification. For example, a user may initially configure a routine 116 that permits 100 puffs per day. After one week, a subsequent routine 1 16 could reduce this limit to 80 puffs per day, followed by another reduction to 50 puffs per day in the third week. By progressively tightening restrictions, the system 100 supports users in reducing vaping habits incrementally without abrupt limitations that may deter compliance.

[0066] The flexibility of these conditional logic routines 116 allows for highly customisable vaping reduction strategies. A user may configure different routines 116to apply on different days or times, such as allowing more lenient puff limits on weekends while imposing stricter restrictions on weekdays. Alternatively, the user may configure a routine 1 16 that allows unlimited vaping during a designated morning period but progressively reduces the allowable puffs in the afternoon and evening. By structuring these routines 1 16 over days, weeks, or months, the system 100 can provide a sustainable approach to controlled vaping reduction.

[0067] The processor 101 continuously evaluates these adaptive control settings 1 13 to determine the operational state of the vaping device 103. The operational state may be either operational / unlocked, allowing the user to vape, or nonoperational / locked, preventing use. This evaluation may be triggered by external events 1 17, such as a user attempting to activate the device 103, or by system - generated events 1 17, such as the expiration of a predefined time period or the user exceeding a puff limit. By dynamically enforcing these conditions 1 15 within the structured framework of conditional logic routines 1 16, the system 100 ensures that vaping activity is regulated in a manner aligned with user-defined constraints while providing a clear and structured path toward reducing nicotine consumption.

[0068] Optionally, the user configurable adaptive control settings 1 13 may further comprise user configurable schedules 1 18 of the conditional logic routines 1 16.

[0069] Figure 3 shows a series of schedules 1 18 of the conditional logic routines 1 16. Each schedule 1 18 may be initiated by the processor 101 according to start criteria 1 19, repeated according to repeat criteria 120 and terminated according to end criteria 121 .

[0070] Examples of start criteria 1 19 are provided as follows:

[0071] Examples of repeat criteria 120 are provided as follows:

[0072] Examples of end criteria 121 are provided as follows:

[0073] The inclusion of user configurable schedules 1 18 in the adaptive control settings 1 13 allows for precise timing and repetition of conditional logic routines 1 16, ensuring that vaping restrictions are implemented according to predefined schedules. The ability to define start criteria 1 19, repeat criteria 120, and end criteria 121 provides a structured and automated means of managing vaping activity without requiring continuous manual intervention.

[0074] For example, a user may configure a schedule 1 18 to initiate a conditional logic routine 1 16 at a specific time each day, such as starting at 8:00 AM and running until 10:00 PM, during which time vaping is permitted but limited to a maximum of 50 puffs. Alternatively, a schedule 1 18 could be set to initiate only on certain days of the week, such as allowing vaping restrictions to be more lenient on weekends while enforcing stricter limits on weekdays. This ensures that users can implement vaping restrictions that align with their personal schedules and goals.

[0075] The flexibility of start criteria 1 19 allows for dynamic activation of routines 1 16 beyond fixed times and dates. For instance, a schedule 1 18 may be set to start "in 2 hours" after a configuration change, ensuring that adjustments take effect with a delay. Similarly, a schedule 1 18 could be triggered by a system event, such as when the vaping device 103 is switched on, allowing conditional logic routines 1 16 to be applied from the moment the device 103 becomes active.

[0076] Repeat criteria 120 define how frequently a scheduled routine 1 16 is executed. A user may choose to repeat a routine 1 16 every day, ensuring that restrictions reset daily, or configure it to repeat on specific days of the week. For example, a user may set a routine 1 16 that permits 20 puffs per hour but only activates on weekdays, while a different schedule 1 18 applies a more lenient limit on weekends. Additionally, a schedule 1 18 may be configured to repeat continuously, ensuring that vaping restrictions remain in place indefinitely unless manually adjusted.

[0077] The ability to define end criteria 121 further enhances control over vaping activity by determining when a schedule 1 18 should conclude. For instance, a schedule 1 18 could be set to run for a fixed duration, such as "end after 30 days," allowing users to implement a gradual reduction plan. Alternatively, an open-ended schedule 1 18 may be configured with "no end," ensuring that a routine 1 16 continues indefinitely until an administrative user modifies the control settings.

[0078] By combining start criteria 1 19, repeat criteria 120, and end criteria 121 , users can create complex schedules 1 18 that automate vaping restrictions in a highly personalised manner. For instance, a schedule 1 18 could be configured to gradually reduce the number of permitted puffs over a multi-week period, with each new week imposing a stricter limit. Similarly, a schedule 1 18 may enforce strict limitations during working hours while allowing more flexibility during leisure periods, ensuring that restrictions align with real-world usage patterns.

[0079] The implementation of user configurable schedules 1 18 ensures that vaping restrictions are not only automated but also adaptable to various scenarios. Whether the goal is to reduce vaping gradually, enforce strict limitations at specific times, or allow for periodic flexibility, the ability to configure schedules 1 18 within the adaptive control settings 1 13 provides a powerful tool for managing vaping behaviour effectively.

[0080] Figure 4 shows the embodiment wherein the vaping device 104 is in operable communication with the electronic device 1 10 and furthermore comprises an inbuilt digital display 107. The inbuilt digital display 107 may display a user interface, examples of which are provided in further detail below with reference to Figures 1 1 - 13. The electronic device 1 10 may also display associated user interfaces which are described in further detail below with reference to Figures 7 - 10.

[0081] Figure 5 shows an embodiment of the simpler version of the vaping device 105 wherein the inbuilt digital display 107 is diminished and has a simplified user interface provided in further detail below with reference to Figures 14 and 15. This device 103 may have an operational button 123 and a series of control buttons 124.

[0082] Figure 6 shows a an even simpler version of the vaping device 103103 which is devoid of any digital display 107 and which comprises only and operational button 122.

[0083] Figures 7 - 8 show an exemplary user interface displayed by the electronic device 1 10 according to the embodiment shown in Figure 4

[0084] Figure 7 shows the user interface wherein the device 103 is inhibited / locked. The interface may comprise an operational status indicator 125 indicating the current operational status of the vaping device 103 and a time to next locked or unlocked event indicator 127 which, in the example shown may display the time that the device 103 will be next locked or unlocked and a countdown duration indicator.

[0085] The interface may further display configured schedules 1 18. The first example schedule 1 18A has a start criteria 1 19 set to Monday, an end criteria 120 set to Thursday and has two conditions 1 15 involving vaping activity user configurable control parameters 1 14 forming a routine 1 16.

[0086] Figure 9 shows the configured schedules 1 18 and Figure 10 is an example of an interface that may be used to configure these schedules 1 18 including having a day of the week selector 126, the repeat criteria 120 and the end criteria 121. The interface may further have a series of time and vaping activity user configurable control parameters 1 14.

[0087] Figures 1 1 - 13 show exemplary user interfaces which may be displayed by the inbuilt digital display 107 of the vaping device 103 according to the embodiment shown in Figure 4. Figure 1 1 shows an exemplary interface corresponding substantially to the aforedescribed operational status indicator 125 and time to next locked or unlocked event indicator 127.

[0088] Figure 12 shows interfaces substantially corresponding to the aforedescribed interface shown in Figures 9 and 10 allowing for the viewing and configuring of schedules.

[0089] Figure 13 shows a first control 128A usable to configure a temporal constraint and a further control 128B usable to configure a usage constraint.

[0090] Figures 14 and 15 shows the user interfaces displayed by the inbuilt display 107 of the simpler vaping device 103 shown in the embodiment of Figure 5.

[0091] Figure 14 shows an initialisation routine 129 wherein the user can configure a usage constraint 1 14, which in this example the number of puffs, according to a temporal constraint, which in this case is set to one hour. The end result according to this example is that user had configured a limitation of 10 puffs per hour.

[0092] Figure 15 shows a status screen interface 130 comprising a variable use countdown 131 indicating the number of puffs remaining for the time duration and a time countdown 132 indicating the time remaining for the time period. When either the vaping use or temporal constraint is depleted, the interface 130 shows a lock screen 132 which would remain locked until the next time period at which time the usage constraint would be replenished.

[0093] As an example, the control settings may be programmed to unlock for two specific periods each day, from 9am to 9:30am and then again from 6pm to 10pm, without imposing any limits on the number of puffs during these times. This unlocking schedule is set to recur indefinitely on a daily basis according to the following table:

[0094] In another example the control settings are designed to regulate the number of puffs a user can take on a per-hour basis, with the hourly limit adjusting according to the day of the week to suit the user's lifestyle and preferences. For instance, from Monday to Thursday, users are permitted 20 puffs every two hours. If the user does not use up the 20 puffs within this timeframe, the device remains unlocked until the next unlock event, which is also logged by the software. On the other hand, from Friday to Saturday, the allowance increases to 50 puffs every hour. This pattern is set to continue indefinitely, ensuring a recurring schedule. These control settings are shown in the following table:

[0095] In a yet further example, the control settings implement an hourly limit on the number of puffs a user can take, which tightens progressively, illustrating a gradual plan for reducing vaping. Initially, from the 6th to the 13th of May, the user is allowed 20 puffs per hour. If this limit isn't reached within the hour, the device remains unlocked until the onset of the next hour, although each new hour triggers a new Unlock Event as recorded by the software. The restrictions increase from the 13th to the 20th of May, reducing the allowance to 10 puffs per hour. Subsequently, from the 20th to the 27th of May, the allowance is further reduced to 5 puffs every two hours, reflecting a structured approach to decrease vaping frequency over time. These control settings are provided in the following table:

[0096] The control system 100 may be configurable with a hierarchy of user accounts and wherein the controllers are be configured to inhibit settings of the adaptive control settings 1 13 accordingly. The vaping device 103 may be configured to receive authentication credentials (such as a PIN code) to set a user account and thereby allow or restrict the setting of the adaptive control settings 1 13.

[0097] More specifically, the system’s 100 user and permissions framework may be structured to accommodate various roles, including Manufacturers, Suppliers, End Users, and Programmatic Users, each with distinct responsibilities and permissions to configure Control settings. Manufacturers, encompassing both physical producers of the vaping device and software developers, have the authority to set default control settings and decide on the level of administrative permissions available to Suppliers and End Users, as well as the possibility of implementing a Programmatic Administrative User program with specific configurations. Suppliers, which include distributors, vendors, consultants, and medical professionals, may also configure control settings to a degree permitted by Manufacturers, potentially extending certain administrative permissions to End Users for personal configuration. End Users, the individuals utilising the feature for vaping, have the capacity to configure Control settings based on the permissions granted by Manufacturers and Suppliers.

[0098] In embodiments, the controllers are further configured to adjust the adaptive control settings 1 13 over time, including according to a usage setpoint. For example,the controllers may control the user configurable control parameters 1 14 to gradually diminish dosage over time. For example, the controllers may reduce a total number of puffs per day by one each week. For example, Programmatic Users, being secondary programs employing algorithms, Al, or machine learning, could adjust control settings automatically, making dynamic and personalised modifications to vaping activity limits. This setup aims to facilitate automated, nuanced changes to control settings over time, using data from individual and collective vaping patterns to inform adjustments that support vaping reduction goals effectively.

[0099] A specific use case example involves a user aiming to systematically reduce their vaping activity over a six-week period using the adaptive control settings of the vaping device shown in Figure 4. The user configures the system 100 through the digital display 107 and user interface to implement a structured reduction plan.

[0100] Initially, the user sets a daily vaping limit of 100 puffs for the first week. The system 100 dynamically evaluates this constraint, ensuring that once the user reaches the 10O-puff threshold, the device 103 transitions to a locked state. The user configures a conditional logic routine that progressively reduces this limit over time, decreasing to 80 puffs in the second week, 60 puffs in the third week, and ultimately 20 puffs per day by the sixth week.

[0101] During each session, the digital display 107 of the vaping device 103 provides real-time feedback on usage status, as shown in Figure 1 1 . The operational status indicator informs the user whether the device is in an active or locked state, while the countdown indicator displays the remaining puffs before the next restriction is enforced. If the user reaches their limit before the end of the day, the display indicates the time at which vaping will next be permitted.

[0102] Using the control interface shown in Figure 12, the user can review and modify scheduled reductions, adjusting parameters such as vaping time windows or modifying puff limits based on changing personal goals. The interface provides an overview of past usage patterns, helping the user track progress toward a reduced vaping habit.

[0103] By implementing this structured approach, the system ensures a gradual and controlled reduction in vaping activity, offering the user a clear pathway toward lower nicotine consumption without abrupt restrictions that may lead to non-compliance. The interdependent evaluation of control parameters and conditions maintains a smooth, adaptive transition tailored to the user’s needs.

[0104] The foregoing description, for purposes of explanation, used specific nomenclature to provide a thorough understanding of the invention. However, it will be apparent to one skilled in the art that specific details are not required in order to practise the invention. Thus, the foregoing descriptions of specific embodiments of the invention are presented for purposes of illustration and description. They are not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to the precise forms disclosed as obviously many modifications and variations are possible in view of the above teachings. The embodiments were chosen and described in order to best explain the principles of the invention and its practical applications, thereby enabling others skilled in the art to best utilize the invention and various embodiments with various modifications as are suited to the particular use contemplated. It is intended that the following claims and their equivalents define the scope of the invention.

Claims

Claims1 . A vaping device inhibition control system comprising a processor operably interfacing a control circuit of a vaping device and comprising a user interface, the control system executing computer program code instruction controllers configured for controlling the operation of the vaping device, wherein the user interface is configured for user configuration of adaptive control settings comprising : user configurable control parameters comprising temporal constraints and usage constraints; user configurable conditions dynamically evaluated in real-time by the processor, the user configurable conditions interdependently relating the temporal constraints and the usage constraints; and user configurable conditional logic routines comprising the conditions, the user configurable conditional logic routines dynamically evaluated by the processor to determine an operational state, and wherein the processor operates or inhibits the control circuit of the vaping device depending on the operational state.

2. The system as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the temporal constraints comprise at least one of a predefined time of day and a duration period.

3. The system as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the usage constraints comprise at least one of a threshold number of activations of the vaping device and a cumulative activation duration.

4. The system as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the adaptive control settings further comprise user configurable schedules, the user configurable schedules comprising criteria configured for controlling execution of the conditional logic routines by the processor.

5. The system as claimed in claim 4, wherein the criteria comprise predefined start criteria and wherein the schedules are initiated by the processor evaluating the predefined start criteria.

6. The system as claimed in claim 4, wherein the criteria comprise repeat criteria and wherein schedules are repeated based on the processor evaluating the predefined repeat criteria.

7. The system as claimed in claim 4, wherein the criteria comprise predefined end criteria and wherein schedules are terminated by the processor evaluating the end criteria.

8. The system as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the system is further configured with a hierarchy of user accounts of different levels of control settings modification permissions.

9. The system as claimed in claim 8, wherein the vaping device comprises a user authentication module configured to receive authentication credentials to determine a user account permission level.

10. The system as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the computer program code instruction controllers are further configured to dynamically adjust the adaptive control settings based on historical usage data.1 1 . The system as claimed in claim 10, wherein the computer program code instruction controllers are further configured to adjust the user configurable control parameters based on a predefined usage reduction plan.

12. The system as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the user configurable control parameters further comprise predefined vaping activity events detected by the processor.

13. The system as claimed in claim 12, wherein the vaping activity events include at least one of a manual lock event, a manual unlock event, a predefined threshold of cumulative activation time, or a predefined number of activation instances within a specified period.

14. The system as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the processor is further configured to transmit status data regarding the operational state of the vaping device to an external electronic device.

15. The system as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the vaping device comprises a digital display for the user interface and wherein the user interface indicates the operational state.

16. A method of controlling a vaping device, the method comprising : displaying a user interface configured for user configuration of adaptive control settings comprising: user-configurable control parameters inputs for configuring temporal constraints and usage constraints; user-configurable conditions inputs for interdependently relating the control parameters; and user-configurable conditional logic routine input for defining conditional logic for evaluating the conditions; evaluating the adaptive control settings using a processor based in real-time to: determine an operational state of the vaping device based on the evaluation; andoperate or inhibit the vaping device based on the determined operational state.

17. The method as claimed in claim 16, further comprising initiating execution of a conditional logic routine based on start criteria defining when the routine is to be executed.

18. The method as claimed in claim 16, further comprising dynamically adjusting the user-configurable control parameters based on a detected vaping activity event.

19. The method as claimed in claim 16, wherein the user interface displays the operational state, scheduled vaping limitations, and time-based or usage-based restrictions.

20. The method as claimed in claim 16, further comprising transmitting control status data to an external electronic device for remote configuration of the adaptive control settings.

Images