Psychological test evaluation method and system

Abstract

The invention relates to a psychological test evaluation method and system, and relates to the field of psychological evaluation technology, the method comprises the following steps: obtaining a preliminary test result, and determining a test type score of each test dimension type according to the preliminary test result; determining a single body type score corresponding to each test dimension type in each question, and determining a single body type proportion according to each single body type score; determining an overall type proportion according to the test type score; determining a type deviation proportion according to the monomer type proportion and the overall type proportion, defining a deviation question according to the type deviation proportion, and determining a similar question according to the deviation question; outputting the similar questions to a reply platform to obtain single body type scores of the similar questions; and replacing the corresponding monomer type scores in the deviation questions according to the monomer type scores of the similar questions to determine a final test result. The method has the effect of improving the accuracy of the test result.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] The present application relates to the field of psychological assessment technology, and in particular to a psychological test assessment method and system. Background Art

[0002] Psychological testing is an important means of assessing an individual's psychological traits, emotional states, or behavioral tendencies through standardized tools. It is widely used in fields such as education, clinical psychology, and human resource management. Currently, common psychological testing methods include self-report scales, projective tests, and behavioral observation. Self-report scales are the most commonly used, in which users evaluate their own psychological state or traits by answering a series of fixed questions.

[0003] In the above-mentioned related technologies, since the questions that users need to answer are fixed, when some users have misunderstandings about certain questions, it will lead to deviations in the selection results. At this time, the selection of the question will cause deviations in the final test results, thereby affecting the accuracy of the test results. There is still room for improvement. Summary of the Invention

[0004] In order to improve the accuracy of test results, the present application provides a psychological test evaluation method and system.

[0005] In the first aspect, the present application provides a psychological test evaluation method, which adopts the following technical solutions:

[0006] A psychological test assessment method comprising:

[0007] Get the number of questions answered by the user;

[0008] Obtaining preliminary test results when the number of answered questions reaches a preset benchmark requirement, and determining the test type score for each preset test dimension type based on the preliminary test results;

[0009] Construct a set of question types based on the test dimension type of a single question;

[0010] Determine the individual type scores corresponding to each test dimension type in each question based on the question type set, and calculate the individual type proportion based on each individual type score;

[0011] The effective type score is determined based on the question type and the test type score is calculated based on each effective type score to determine the overall type proportion;

[0012] Under the same test dimension type, the difference between the individual type proportion and the overall type proportion is calculated to determine the type deviation proportion;

[0013] Questions with a type deviation ratio greater than a preset understanding deviation ratio are defined as deviation questions. Similar questions are identified in a preset answer database based on the deviation questions, and the similar questions are output to a preset answer platform to obtain individual type scores for the similar questions.

[0014] The mean type score of each test dimension type is determined by averaging the individual type scores of similar questions, and the corresponding individual type scores in the deviation questions are replaced according to the mean type scores, and the final test results are determined according to the test type scores determined after the replacement.

[0015] Optionally, the step of determining similar questions in a preset answer database based on the deviation question includes:

[0016] Get the basic information of the current user;

[0017] Determine alternative questions based on the question types of the deviation questions in the question bank;

[0018] Based on the user's basic information, similar users are identified in the preset historical test database, and the questions answered by similar users that are not biased questions are defined as similar valid questions;

[0019] Alternative topics that are similar to valid topics are defined as optional topics, and similar topics are selected from the optional topics based on a preset required number.

[0020] Optionally, after the optional topics are determined, the psychological test assessment method may also include:

[0021] Count the optional questions to determine the number of options;

[0022] Determine whether the optional quantity is greater than the required quantity;

[0023] If the number of optional questions is greater than the required number, then the required number of optional questions will be selected as the similar questions;

[0024] If the available quantity is not greater than the required quantity, the compensation quantity is determined by calculating the difference between the available quantity and the required quantity;

[0025] The alternative questions that are not optional questions are defined as compensation questions, and the number of compensation deviations is determined according to the number of times the compensation questions are used as deviation questions;

[0026] The compensation questions are sorted from small to large according to the number of compensation deviations to determine the compensation ranking, and the substitute questions with the compensation quantity are determined from front to back according to the compensation ranking, and the substitute questions and optional questions are determined as similar questions.

[0027] Optionally, the steps of selecting a required number of optional topics as similar topics from the optional topics include:

[0028] Obtain the deviation feature identifier of the deviation question and the optional feature identifier of the optional question;

[0029] Count the optional feature identifiers that are deviation feature identifiers in the optional questions to determine the number of included identifiers;

[0030] Sort the optional questions according to the number of included identifiers from small to large to determine the preliminary order of the questions;

[0031] Counting the optional feature identifiers of each optional question to determine the number of optional identifiers, and sorting the optional questions containing the same number of identifiers in the preliminary question sequence from small to large according to the number of optional identifiers to update the preliminary question sequence;

[0032] In the preliminary order of the questions, select the optional questions as similar questions according to the required number from the beginning to the end.

[0033] Optional, after the deviation questions are determined, psychological test evaluation methods include:

[0034] Count the deviation questions to determine the number of deviations;

[0035] Calculate the percentage of question deviations based on the number of deviations and the number of baseline requirements;

[0036] Determine whether the question deviation ratio is greater than the preset normal deviation ratio;

[0037] If the deviation ratio of the question is not greater than the normal deviation ratio, similar questions will be determined based on the deviation questions;

[0038] If the question deviation ratio is greater than the normal deviation ratio, an abnormal signal is output, and the question currently being answered is defined as an invalid question. A set of test plans that does not contain any invalid questions is generated in the answer database according to the preset answer generation rules, and the test plans are output to the answer platform to re-obtain the preliminary test results.

[0039] Optionally, after the abnormal signal is output, the psychological test evaluation method further includes:

[0040] Counting abnormal signals of the current user to determine the number of abnormalities;

[0041] Determine whether the number of exceptions is greater than the preset permitted number;

[0042] If the number of exceptions is not greater than the permitted number, a test plan is generated and output;

[0043] If the number of exceptions is greater than the permitted number, a test invalid signal is output.

[0044] Optionally, after obtaining the scores of individual types of similar questions, the psychological test evaluation method also includes:

[0045] Combine individual type scores under the same test dimension type to construct similar score combinations;

[0046] Randomly select one individual type score from the same score combination as the key type score, and define the remaining individual type scores as secondary type scores;

[0047] Calculate the representative coefficient based on the key type score and each secondary type score, define the key type score corresponding to the largest representative coefficient as the representative type score, and determine the score similarity range based on the representative type score and the preset similar type scores;

[0048] Count the scores of monomer types that are within a similar score range to determine the internal quantity, and calculate the internal proportion based on the internal quantity and the required quantity;

[0049] Determine whether all internal proportions are greater than the preset required proportions;

[0050] If all internal proportions are greater than the required proportions, the average type score is determined by averaging the individual type scores within a similar score range;

[0051] If all internal proportions are not greater than the required proportions, a test invalid signal is output.

[0052] In a second aspect, the present application provides a psychological test evaluation system, which adopts the following technical solutions:

[0053] A psychological test evaluation system, comprising:

[0054] The acquisition module is used to obtain the number of questions answered by the user;

[0055] A processing module, connected to the acquisition module and the judgment module, for storing and processing information;

[0056] The judgment module is connected with the acquisition module and the processing module and is used for judging the information;

[0057] The judgment module obtains a preliminary test result when the judgment module determines that the number of answered questions reaches a preset benchmark requirement number, and causes the processing module to determine a test type score for each preset test dimension type based on the preliminary test result;

[0058] The processing module constructs a question type set based on the test dimension type of a single question;

[0059] The processing module determines the individual type scores corresponding to each test dimension type in each question according to the question type set, and calculates the individual type proportions according to each individual type score;

[0060] The processing module determines a valid type score based on the question type set in the test type score, and performs calculations based on each valid type score to determine the overall type ratio;

[0061] The processing module calculates the difference between the individual type ratio and the overall type ratio under the same test dimension type to determine the type deviation ratio;

[0062] The processing module defines a question with a type deviation ratio greater than a preset understanding deviation ratio as a deviation question, and determines similar questions in a preset answer database based on the deviation question, and outputs the similar questions to a preset answer platform to obtain a single type score of the similar question;

[0063] The processing module calculates the mean based on the individual type scores of similar questions to determine the mean type score of each test dimension type, and replaces the corresponding individual type scores in the deviation questions based on the mean type score, and determines the final test result based on the test type score determined after the replacement.

[0064] In summary, this application includes at least one of the following beneficial technical effects:

[0065] 1. When conducting user psychological tests, the score distribution of individual questions can be compared with the score distribution of user test results to determine whether there is any answer bias. If there is an answer bias, similar questions can be generated to correct the results caused by the answer bias, thereby improving the accuracy of the test results;

[0066] 2. When selecting similar questions, choose questions that are as easy for the user to understand as possible based on the user's specific situation, thereby reducing the possibility of users answering similar questions and causing deviations;

[0067] 3. Based on the deviations in the answering process, it can intelligently identify whether the user is answering the questions seriously, effectively supervise the user's answering process, and improve the accuracy of the test results. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0068] Figure 1 It is a flow chart of the psychological test evaluation method.

[0069] Figure 2 It is a modular flow chart of the psychological test assessment method. DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0070] In order to make the purpose, technical solutions and advantages of this application more clear, the following Figure 1-Figure 2 It should be understood that the specific embodiments described herein are only used to explain the present application and are not intended to limit the present application.

[0071] The embodiments of the present application are described in further detail below with reference to the accompanying drawings.

[0072] The present application discloses a psychological test evaluation method, referring to Figure 1 ,The method flow of the psychological test evaluation method includes the following steps:

[0073] Step S100: Obtain the number of questions answered by the user.

[0074] The number of answered questions refers to the number of questions that the user has answered and completed when taking the psychological test.

[0075] Step S101: When the number of answered questions reaches a preset benchmark requirement number, a preliminary test result is obtained, and a test type score of each preset test dimension type is determined based on the preliminary test result.

[0076] The benchmark requirement number is the minimum number of questions required to answer when the staff determines that the user's psychological condition can be objectively tested. The preliminary test result is the psychological test result obtained based on the questions answered by the user. The test result is composed of a combination of multiple set test dimension types, such as aggressiveness, stress, self-confidence, loneliness, happiness, etc., which are specifically set by the staff according to actual conditions; the test type score is the score value obtained by the test dimension type in the preliminary test result.

[0077] Step S102: Construct a question type set according to the test dimension type of a single question.

[0078] The question type set is a type set formed by combining the test dimension types that need to be tested and assessed for a single question.

[0079] Step S103: Determine the individual type score corresponding to each test dimension type in each question according to the question type set, and perform calculations based on each individual type score to determine the individual type proportion.

[0080] The individual type score is the score obtained for the test dimension type in a single question. The individual type ratio is the ratio of the individual type score obtained based on the question type set to the sum of the individual type scores.

[0081] Step S104: Determine effective type scores based on the question type set in the test type score, and perform calculations based on each effective type score to determine the overall type ratio.

[0082] The effective type score is the test type score of the test dimension type in the question type set. The overall type proportion is determined by dividing the single effective type score by the sum of the effective type scores.

[0083] Step S105: Under the same test dimension type, a difference calculation is performed based on the individual type proportion and the overall type proportion to determine the type deviation proportion.

[0084] The type deviation ratio is the difference between the score ratio obtained by a single question and the score ratio obtained by all questions under the same test dimension type. It is determined by subtracting the overall type ratio from the single type ratio and taking the absolute value.

[0085] Step S106: Define questions with a type deviation ratio greater than a preset understanding deviation ratio as deviation questions, and determine similar questions in a preset answer library based on the deviation questions, and output the similar questions on a preset answer platform to obtain the individual type scores of the similar questions.

[0086] The understanding deviation ratio is the minimum type deviation ratio set by the staff to determine that the score in a single question does not conform to the overall test result of the user. For example, a single question tests the user to have a high sense of happiness, but the overall test shows that the user's happiness is low, which is a contradiction. When the type deviation ratio is greater than the understanding deviation ratio, it indicates that a contradiction has occurred, that is, this may be caused by the user's misunderstanding of the question. Therefore, it is defined as a deviation question for identification to facilitate subsequent analysis. The answer bank is a database that stores questions for psychological tests. There are a large number of questions for psychological tests in the answer bank. Similar questions are questions that are relatively similar to the test requirements of the deviation questions. The similarity between questions can be determined in the answer bank, or similar questions can be determined through steps S200-S203. The specific settings are made by the staff according to actual conditions. The answer platform is a platform for users to answer questions. By outputting similar questions to the answer platform, users can answer similar questions, thereby obtaining the individual type scores of similar questions.

[0087] Step S107: Calculate the mean of the individual type scores of similar questions to determine the mean type score of each test dimension type, and replace the corresponding individual type scores in the deviation questions according to the mean type score, and determine the final test result according to the test type score determined after the replacement.

[0088] By averaging the individual type scores of similar questions obtained under each test dimension type, we can obtain an average type score that is more consistent with the current user's psychological state. At this time, using the average type score to replace the individual type scores corresponding to the deviation questions can achieve effective correction of the scores. At this time, outputting the final test results can effectively determine the user's actual psychological state.

[0089] The steps for determining similar questions in the preset answer bank based on the deviation question include:

[0090] Step S200: Obtain basic user information of the current user.

[0091] The basic user information is the basic information of the user currently being tested, including age, gender, occupation, education level, and other information that may significantly affect the test results. The specific information can be set by the staff.

[0092] Step S201: Determine alternative questions in the question bank based on the question type of the deviation question.

[0093] The alternative questions are questions in the question bank that correspond to a question type set that is completely consistent with the question type set of the deviation questions, that is, questions that are consistent with the test requirements of the deviation questions.

[0094] Step S202: Determine similar users in a preset historical test database based on the user's basic information, and define the questions answered by the similar users that are not deviation questions as similar valid questions.

[0095] The historical test database is a database that records the people who have been tested in the past. Similar users are people whose basic information in the historical test database is consistent with the current user's basic information. By defining similar valid questions, questions that do not cause deviations for people with basically consistent information are identified, thereby determining the scope of questions that are easy for the current user to understand, which is convenient for subsequent analysis.

[0096] Step S203: defining candidate topics that are similar to the valid topic as optional topics, and selecting and determining similar topics from the optional topics according to a preset required number.

[0097] Optional questions are questions that meet both comprehension and testing requirements. At this time, similar questions can be selected from the optional questions. The required number is a fixed number of similar questions set by the staff, and the selection of similar questions can be random or selected according to steps S400-S404.

[0098] After the optional questions are determined, the psychological test assessment method also includes:

[0099] Step S300: Count the optional topics to determine the number of options.

[0100] The number of options is the total number of optional questions determined.

[0101] Step S301: Determine whether the optional quantity is greater than the required quantity.

[0102] The purpose of judgment is to know whether the number of optional questions meets the selection requirements.

[0103] Step S3011: If the number of optional topics is greater than the required number, then select the required number of optional topics from the optional topics as similar topics.

[0104] When the number of optional topics is greater than the required number, it means that the number of optional topics available meets the requirements. At this time, you can directly determine similar topics based on the optional topics.

[0105] Step S3012: If the optional quantity is not greater than the required quantity, a difference calculation is performed based on the optional quantity and the required quantity to determine the compensation quantity.

[0106] When the number of optional questions is not greater than the required number, it means that even if all optional questions are determined to be similar questions, the quantity requirement cannot be met, so further analysis is needed; the compensation quantity is the difference in the number of similar questions, which is determined by subtracting the optional number from the required number.

[0107] Step S302: defining the candidate questions that are not optional questions as compensation questions, and determining the number of compensation deviations according to the number of times the compensation questions are used as deviation questions.

[0108] Compensation questions are defined to distinguish different alternative questions for subsequent analysis; the number of compensation deviations is the number of times the compensation question is defined as a deviation question during historical testing.

[0109] Step S303: Sort the compensation questions from small to large according to the number of compensation deviations to determine a compensation ranking, and determine the number of substitute questions from front to back according to the compensation ranking, and determine the substitute questions and optional questions as similar questions.

[0110] Compensation sorting is to sort the compensation questions in order from front to back according to the number of compensation deviations from small to large, and determine the substitute question to indicate that the current substitute question has the lowest possibility of causing understanding deviation, so it is determined as a similar question to reduce the possibility of subsequent users having understanding deviation.

[0111] The steps for selecting the required number of optional topics as similar topics include:

[0112] Step S400: Obtain the deviation feature identifier of the deviation question and the optional feature identifier of the optional question.

[0113] The deviation feature identifier is the word identifier that comes with the question recorded by the deviation question, such as sense of security, campus, emptiness, etc.; the optional feature identifier is the word identifier that comes with the question recorded by the optional question. The feature identifier on the question is input synchronously by the staff when the question is stored in the answer database.

[0114] Step S401: Count the optional feature identifiers that are deviation feature identifiers in the optional questions to determine the number of included identifiers.

[0115] The number of included identifiers is the number of optional feature identifiers for deviation features in a single optional question.

[0116] Step S402: Sort the optional questions in ascending order based on the number of included identifiers to determine a preliminary order of the questions.

[0117] The preliminary order of the questions is the order of the questions obtained by sorting the optional questions according to the number of included identifiers from small to large.

[0118] Step S403: Count the optional feature identifiers of each optional question to determine the number of optional identifiers, and sort the optional questions in the preliminary question sequence that have the same number of identifiers from small to large according to the number of optional identifiers to update the preliminary question sequence.

[0119] The number of optional identifiers is the total number of optional feature identifiers in a single optional question. By sorting the optional questions with a smaller number of optional identifiers in front, on the premise that the number of included identifiers is consistent, the sorting of different optional questions can be achieved.

[0120] Step S404: Selecting optional questions as similar questions from the initial order of questions according to the required number.

[0121] During the selection process, questions with less information can be given priority, making it easier for users to understand the answers.

[0122] After the deviation questions are determined, the psychological test evaluation methods include:

[0123] Step S500: Count the deviation questions to determine the number of deviations.

[0124] The number of deviations is the number of deviation questions among the questions answered by the user.

[0125] Step S501: Calculate the problem deviation ratio based on the deviation quantity and the baseline requirement quantity.

[0126] The question deviation ratio is the ratio of deviation questions to all answered questions, which is determined by dividing the number of deviations by the number of baseline requirements.

[0127] Step S502: Determine whether the question deviation ratio is greater than a preset normal deviation ratio.

[0128] The normal deviation ratio is the maximum question deviation ratio allowed when the staff determines that the user is in a normal answering state and does not answer randomly or conceal information. The purpose of the judgment is to find out whether the user is resisting the psychological test.

[0129] Step S5021: If the question deviation ratio is not greater than the normal deviation ratio, similar questions are determined based on the deviation questions.

[0130] When the question deviation ratio is not greater than the normal deviation ratio, it means that the current user is taking the test normally, and data analysis can be performed normally.

[0131] Step S5022: If the question deviation ratio is greater than the normal deviation ratio, an abnormal signal is output, and the question currently being answered is defined as an invalid question. A set of test plans that does not include any invalid questions is generated in the answer database according to the preset answer generation rules, and the test plans are output to the answer platform to re-obtain the preliminary test results.

[0132] When the question deviation ratio is greater than the normal deviation ratio, it means that the user has answered randomly and the current test result is inaccurate. At this time, an abnormal signal is output to record the situation so that the staff can be aware of the situation and intervene to deal with it; at the same time, invalid questions are defined to mark the questions that the user has answered, so as to regenerate a set of test solutions that do not contain invalid questions for the user to answer again, reducing the situation where the user has a memory of the questions and unconsciously chooses the answers he originally chose; the answer generation rule is the method set by the staff to screen out a set of solutions for psychological tests from the answer bank, which is specifically set by the staff according to the actual situation and entered in advance.

[0133] After the abnormal signal is output, the psychological test evaluation method also includes:

[0134] Step S600: Count the abnormal signals of the current user to determine the number of abnormalities.

[0135] The number of abnormalities is the number of abnormal signals that appear when the current user takes the psychological test.

[0136] Step S601: Determine whether the number of abnormalities is greater than the preset permitted number of times.

[0137] The permitted number of times is the maximum number of exceptions allowed when the user can normally conduct the psychological test, as set by the staff. The purpose of the judgment is to know whether the user can currently conduct a normal psychological test.

[0138] Step S6011: If the number of exceptions is not greater than the permitted number, a test plan is generated and output.

[0139] When the number of exceptions is not greater than the permitted number, it means that the psychological test can continue to be conducted on the user, and a test plan can be generated at this time.

[0140] Step S6012: If the number of abnormalities is greater than the permitted number, a test invalidation signal is output.

[0141] When the number of abnormalities is greater than the permitted number, it indicates that the user's resistance behavior is more serious and the psychological test cannot be continued on the user. At this time, a test invalid signal is output to mark the situation so that the staff can be informed of the situation in time and intervene to deal with it.

[0142] After obtaining the scores of individual types of similar questions, the psychological test evaluation method also includes:

[0143] Step S700: combining individual type scores under the same test dimension type to construct a similar score combination.

[0144] The same type of score combination is a combination of individual type scores obtained under the same test dimension type in all similar questions.

[0145] Step S701: randomly selecting a single type score from the same type score combination as the key type score, and defining the remaining single type scores as secondary type scores.

[0146] The major type score and minor type score are defined to distinguish different monomer type scores for subsequent analysis.

[0147] Step S702: Calculate the representative coefficient based on the key type score and each secondary type score, define the key type score corresponding to the largest representative coefficient as the representative type score, and determine the score similarity range based on the representative type score and the preset similar type scores.

[0148] The representative coefficient is a parameter value that reflects whether the current key type score can represent the other secondary type scores. The larger the parameter value, the more representative it is. It is determined by subtracting the key type score from the secondary type scores, summing up the absolute values and finding the reciprocal. The representative type score is defined to identify the score that best represents the current test dimension type. The similar type score is the maximum difference score allowed between the score set by the staff that is close to the representative type score and the representative type score. The score similarity range is the range value obtained by adding and subtracting the similar type score from the representative type score.

[0149] Step S703: Count the scores of the monomer types that are within a similar score range to determine the internal quantity, and calculate the internal proportion based on the internal quantity and the required quantity.

[0150] The internal quantity is the total number of monomer type scores that are within a similar score range, and the internal proportion is the ratio obtained by dividing the internal quantity by the demand quantity.

[0151] Step S704: Determine whether all internal proportions are greater than the preset required proportions.

[0152] The required percentage is the minimum internal percentage set by the staff to determine that the user has answered similar questions seriously and has few misunderstandings. The purpose of the judgment is to know whether the answers to similar questions are counted.

[0153] Step S7041: If all internal proportions are greater than the required proportion, an average calculation is performed based on the monomer type scores within a similar score range to determine an average type score.

[0154] When all internal proportions are greater than the required proportions, it means that the answer effect of the current similar questions is better. At this time, using the individual type scores within a similar score range to calculate the average and determine the average type score can eliminate some values with understanding deviations, thereby improving the accuracy of the test results.

[0155] Step S7042: If all internal proportions are not greater than the required proportions, a test invalidation signal is output.

[0156] When all the internal proportions are not greater than the required proportions, it means that the current user is not answering seriously or there is still a large deviation in understanding. At this time, the psychological test cannot be carried out normally, and an invalid test signal can be output to inform the staff of the situation.

[0157] Reference Figure 2 Based on the same inventive concept, an embodiment of the present invention provides a psychological test evaluation system, comprising:

[0158] The acquisition module is used to obtain the number of questions answered by the user;

[0159] A processing module, connected to the acquisition module and the judgment module, for storing and processing information;

[0160] The judgment module is connected with the acquisition module and the processing module and is used for judging the information;

[0161] The judgment module obtains a preliminary test result when the judgment module determines that the number of answered questions reaches a preset benchmark requirement number, and causes the processing module to determine a test type score for each preset test dimension type based on the preliminary test result;

[0162] The processing module constructs a question type set based on the test dimension type of a single question;

[0163] The processing module determines the individual type scores corresponding to each test dimension type in each question according to the question type set, and calculates the individual type proportions according to each individual type score;

[0164] The processing module determines a valid type score based on the question type set in the test type score, and performs calculations based on each valid type score to determine the overall type ratio;

[0165] The processing module calculates the difference between the individual type ratio and the overall type ratio under the same test dimension type to determine the type deviation ratio;

[0166] The processing module defines a question with a type deviation ratio greater than a preset understanding deviation ratio as a deviation question, and determines similar questions in a preset answer database based on the deviation question, and outputs the similar questions to a preset answer platform to obtain a single type score of the similar question;

[0167] The processing module calculates the mean of the individual type scores of similar questions to determine the mean type score of each test dimension type, replaces the corresponding individual type score in the deviation question according to the mean type score, and determines the final test result according to the test type score determined after the replacement;

[0168] Similar topic determination module, which determines similar topics based on the user's basic information;

[0169] A compensation topic determination module is used to determine compensation topics when the number of optional topics is insufficient;

[0170] Optional topic selection module, used to select appropriate similar topics from the optional topics;

[0171] Test the abnormality monitoring module to effectively monitor abnormal situations during the user's answering process;

[0172] The invalid answer determination module is used to effectively determine whether the user has given a random answer or lied during the answering process;

[0173] The mean type score determination module is used to determine a relatively accurate mean type score for data analysis.

[0174] Those skilled in the art will clearly understand that for the sake of convenience and brevity, the division of the above-mentioned functional modules is only used as an example for illustration. In actual applications, the above-mentioned functions can be assigned to different functional modules as needed, that is, the internal structure of the device can be divided into different functional modules to complete all or part of the functions described above. The specific working processes of the above-mentioned systems, devices, and units can refer to the corresponding processes in the aforementioned method embodiments and will not be repeated here.

Claims

1. A psychological test evaluation method, characterized in that: include: Get the number of questions answered by the user; Obtaining preliminary test results when the number of answered questions reaches a preset benchmark requirement, and determining the test type score for each preset test dimension type based on the preliminary test results; Construct a set of question types based on the test dimension type of a single question; Determine the individual type scores corresponding to each test dimension type in each question based on the question type set, and calculate the individual type proportion based on each individual type score; The effective type score is determined based on the question type collection in the test type score, and the overall type proportion is determined based on the calculation of each effective type score; Under the same test dimension type, the difference between the individual type proportion and the overall type proportion is calculated to determine the type deviation proportion; Questions with a type deviation ratio greater than a preset understanding deviation ratio are defined as deviation questions. Similar questions are identified in a preset answer database based on the deviation questions, and the similar questions are output to a preset answer platform to obtain individual type scores for the similar questions. The mean type score of each test dimension type is determined by averaging the individual type scores of similar questions, and the corresponding individual type scores in the deviation questions are replaced according to the mean type scores, and the final test results are determined according to the test type scores determined after the replacement.

2. The psychological test evaluation method according to claim 1, characterized in that: The steps for determining similar questions in the preset answer bank based on the deviation question include: Get the basic information of the current user; Determine alternative questions based on the question types of the deviation questions in the question bank; Based on the user's basic information, similar users are identified in the preset historical test database, and the questions answered by similar users that are not biased questions are defined as similar valid questions; Alternative topics that are similar to valid topics are defined as optional topics, and similar topics are selected from the optional topics based on a preset required number.

3. The psychological test evaluation method according to claim 2, characterized in that: After the optional questions are determined, the psychological test assessment method also includes: Count the optional questions to determine the number of options; Determine whether the optional quantity is greater than the required quantity; If the number of optional questions is greater than the required number, then the required number of optional questions will be selected as the similar questions; If the available quantity is not greater than the required quantity, the compensation quantity is determined by calculating the difference between the available quantity and the required quantity; The alternative questions that are not optional questions are defined as compensation questions, and the number of compensation deviations is determined according to the number of times the compensation questions are used as deviation questions; The compensation questions are sorted from small to large according to the number of compensation deviations to determine the compensation ranking, and the substitute questions with the compensation quantity are determined from front to back according to the compensation ranking, and the substitute questions and optional questions are determined as similar questions.

4. The psychological test evaluation method according to claim 3, characterized in that: The steps for selecting the required number of optional topics as similar topics include: Obtain the deviation feature identifier of the deviation question and the optional feature identifier of the optional question; Count the optional feature identifiers that are deviation feature identifiers in the optional questions to determine the number of included identifiers; Sort the optional questions according to the number of included identifiers from small to large to determine the preliminary order of the questions; Counting the optional feature identifiers of each optional question to determine the number of optional identifiers, and sorting the optional questions containing the same number of identifiers in the preliminary question sequence from small to large according to the number of optional identifiers to update the preliminary question sequence; In the preliminary order of the questions, select the optional questions as similar questions according to the required number from the beginning to the end.

5. The psychological test evaluation method according to claim 1, characterized in that: After the deviation questions are determined, the psychological test evaluation methods include: Count the deviation questions to determine the number of deviations; Calculate the percentage of question deviations based on the number of deviations and the number of baseline requirements; Determine whether the question deviation ratio is greater than the preset normal deviation ratio; If the deviation ratio of the question is not greater than the normal deviation ratio, similar questions will be determined based on the deviation questions; If the question deviation ratio is greater than the normal deviation ratio, an abnormal signal is output, and the question currently being answered is defined as an invalid question. A set of test plans that does not contain any invalid questions is generated in the answer database according to the preset answer generation rules, and the test plans are output to the answer platform to re-obtain the preliminary test results.

6. The psychological test evaluation method according to claim 5, characterized in that: After the abnormal signal is output, the psychological test evaluation method also includes: Counting abnormal signals of the current user to determine the number of abnormalities; Determine whether the number of exceptions is greater than the preset permitted number; If the number of exceptions is not greater than the permitted number, a test plan is generated and output; If the number of exceptions is greater than the permitted number, a test invalid signal is output.

7. The psychological test evaluation method according to claim 6, characterized in that: After obtaining the scores of individual types of similar questions, the psychological test evaluation method also includes: Combine individual type scores under the same test dimension type to construct similar score combinations; Randomly select one individual type score from the same score combination as the key type score, and define the remaining individual type scores as secondary type scores; Calculate the representative coefficient based on the key type score and each secondary type score, define the key type score corresponding to the largest representative coefficient as the representative type score, and determine the score similarity range based on the representative type score and the preset similar type scores; Count the scores of monomer types that are within a similar score range to determine the internal quantity, and calculate the internal proportion based on the internal quantity and the required quantity; Determine whether all internal proportions are greater than the preset required proportions; If all internal proportions are greater than the required proportions, the average type score is determined by averaging the individual type scores within a similar score range; If all internal proportions are not greater than the required proportions, a test invalid signal is output.

8. A psychological test evaluation system, characterized in that: include: The acquisition module is used to obtain the number of questions answered by the user; A processing module, connected to the acquisition module and the judgment module, for storing and processing information; The judgment module is connected with the acquisition module and the processing module and is used for judging the information; The judgment module obtains a preliminary test result when the judgment module determines that the number of answered questions reaches a preset benchmark requirement number, and causes the processing module to determine a test type score for each preset test dimension type based on the preliminary test result; The processing module constructs a question type set based on the test dimension type of a single question; The processing module determines the individual type scores corresponding to each test dimension type in each question according to the question type set, and calculates the individual type proportions according to each individual type score; The processing module determines a valid type score based on the question type set in the test type score, and performs calculations based on each valid type score to determine the overall type ratio; The processing module calculates the difference between the individual type ratio and the overall type ratio under the same test dimension type to determine the type deviation ratio; The processing module defines a question with a type deviation ratio greater than a preset understanding deviation ratio as a deviation question, and determines similar questions in a preset answer database based on the deviation question, and outputs the similar questions to a preset answer platform to obtain a single type score of the similar question; The processing module calculates the mean based on the individual type scores of similar questions to determine the mean type score of each test dimension type, and replaces the corresponding individual type scores in the deviation questions based on the mean type score, and determines the final test result based on the test type score determined after the replacement.

Images