Construction project fire protection design review, acceptance and filing management system and method

Abstract

The embodiment of the present application relates to the technical field of construction project management, and discloses a construction project fire protection design review and acceptance filing management system and method. When the method of the present application determines that the fire protection review and acceptance of the construction project meets the self-service review and acceptance conditions based on the fire protection design drawing review data, the self-service review and acceptance is carried out to reduce excessive reliance on professionals and improve the efficiency of the review and acceptance. When construction problems that need to be rectified are found during the self-service review and acceptance process, on-site acceptance personnel are assigned to carry out on-site acceptance to improve the accuracy of the review and acceptance and ensure the quality of the review and acceptance. In this way, the solution of the present application can improve the review efficiency while taking into account the reliability and accuracy of the review and acceptance.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] The present invention relates to the technical field of construction project management, and in particular to a management system and method for reviewing, accepting and filing a fire protection design for a construction project. Background Art

[0002] Fire protection design review and acceptance for construction projects involves reviewing drawings, inspecting construction work, filing completion records, and conducting spot checks on fire protection designs for construction projects. Personnel involved in fire protection design review and acceptance, as well as employees in construction, design, construction, project supervision, and technical services, must possess relevant professional and technical skills and participate in regular professional training. Currently, construction projects rely on manual review and acceptance, which not only consumes a significant amount of human resources but also results in low efficiency. Summary of the Invention

[0003] The main purpose of the present invention is to provide a construction project fire protection design review and acceptance filing management system and method, aiming to solve the technical problems of high manpower consumption and low efficiency in the existing technology of construction project fire protection design review and acceptance.

[0004] To achieve the above objectives, in a first aspect, embodiments of the present application provide a construction project fire protection design review, acceptance, and filing management method, the method comprising:

[0005] Obtain fire protection design drawing review data for target construction projects;

[0006] Determining whether the fire protection review and acceptance of the target construction project meets the self-service review and acceptance conditions based on the fire protection design drawing review data;

[0007] When it is determined that the fire inspection and acceptance of the target construction project meets the self-service inspection and acceptance conditions, the fire scene inspection information collected by the collection equipment is obtained;

[0008] Performing deep feature extraction on the fire scene inspection information to obtain suspected problem features;

[0009] Inputting the suspected problem features into a pre-trained problem checking model for analysis to obtain suspected construction problems;

[0010] Conduct correlation feature analysis on the suspected construction problems to confirm and obtain fire protection construction rectification instructions;

[0011] According to the fire protection construction rectification instructions, on-site acceptance personnel are assigned to conduct on-site review and acceptance.

[0012] Furthermore, the fire protection design drawing review data includes the total review time and the number of drawing rectifications. The determination of whether the fire protection review and acceptance of the target construction project meets the self-service review and acceptance conditions based on the fire protection design drawing review data includes:

[0013] When it is determined that the total review time of the fire protection design drawings is less than a preset time threshold and the number of drawing rectifications is less than a preset number, it is determined that the fire protection review and acceptance of the target construction project meets the self-service review and acceptance conditions;

[0014] When it is determined that the total review time of the fire protection design drawings is greater than or equal to the preset time threshold, or the number of drawing revisions of the fire protection design drawings is greater than or equal to the preset number, it is judged that the fire protection review and acceptance of the target construction project does not meet the self-service review and acceptance conditions.

[0015] Furthermore, after determining whether the fire protection inspection and acceptance of the target construction project meets the self-service inspection and acceptance conditions based on the fire protection design drawing inspection data, the method further includes:

[0016] When it is determined that the fire protection inspection and acceptance of the target construction project does not meet the self-service inspection and acceptance conditions, an on-site inspection and acceptance personnel is assigned to conduct on-site inspection and acceptance based on the fire protection design drawing review data.

[0017] Furthermore, the fire protection design drawing review data includes a mapping assignment of the number of drawing rectifications and outstanding rectification issues, and the allocation of on-site acceptance personnel for on-site review and acceptance based on the fire protection design drawing review data includes:

[0018] Inputting the mapping values ​​of the number of rectifications of the fire protection design drawings and the outstanding rectification issues into the personnel allocation matching model to obtain the expected value of acceptance personnel allocation;

[0019] A target on-site acceptance personnel is obtained by matching the acceptance personnel allocation expectation value and the service evaluation score of the acceptance personnel in the on-site review and acceptance database, wherein the acceptance personnel allocation expectation value and the service evaluation score of the target on-site acceptance personnel are positively correlated;

[0020] Assigning the target on-site acceptance personnel to conduct on-site inspection and acceptance of the target construction project;

[0021] The personnel allocation matching model satisfies the following expression:

[0022] A is the expected value assigned to the acceptance personnel, B is the mapping assignment of outstanding rectification issues, B0 is the benchmark assignment, and Ф is the task-heavy index of the acceptance personnel in the on-site review and acceptance database.

[0023] Furthermore, after assigning the target on-site acceptance personnel to conduct on-site inspection and acceptance of the target construction project, the method further includes:

[0024] When it is determined that the service evaluation score of the target on-site acceptance personnel is less than or equal to the preset score, a remote guidance expert for on-site acceptance is randomly assigned;

[0025] The target on-site acceptance personnel and remote guidance experts will be formed into a team to cooperate in on-site review and acceptance.

[0026] Furthermore, the deep feature extraction of the fire scene inspection information to obtain suspected problem features includes:

[0027] A first physical quantity deep feature extraction is performed on the fire scene inspection information to obtain suspected problem features, wherein the first physical quantity is one of power, sound, light, surface damage, pressure, and water accumulation physical quantities.

[0028] Furthermore, the inputting of the suspected problem features into a pre-trained problem checking model for analysis to obtain suspected construction problems includes:

[0029] The suspected problem features are input into a pre-trained problem checking data model to perform big data analysis to obtain suspected construction problems.

[0030] Furthermore, the analysis of the correlation characteristics of the suspected construction problems to confirm the fire protection construction rectification instructions includes:

[0031] Obtaining a second physical quantity correlation feature of the suspected construction problem;

[0032] confirming that the second physical quantity association feature is a preset feature to obtain an association judgment result;

[0033] A fire protection construction rectification instruction is output based on the association judgment result, wherein the second physical quantity is different from the first physical quantity, and the second physical quantity is one of power, sound, light, surface damage, pressure, and water accumulation physical quantities.

[0034] Furthermore, the on-site inspection and acceptance personnel are assigned to conduct on-site review and acceptance according to the fire protection construction rectification instruction, including:

[0035] Randomly assign on-site acceptance personnel according to the fire protection construction rectification instructions to obtain target on-site acceptance personnel;

[0036] Obtaining the service evaluation score of the target on-site acceptance personnel;

[0037] When it is determined that the service evaluation score of the target on-site acceptance personnel is less than or equal to the preset score, a remote guidance expert for on-site acceptance is randomly assigned;

[0038] The target on-site acceptance personnel and remote guidance experts will be formed into a team to cooperate in on-site review and acceptance.

[0039] In the second aspect, an embodiment of the present application also provides a construction project fire protection design review and acceptance filing management system, including a memory and a processor, wherein the memory is used to store program code, and the processor is used to call the program code to execute the method described in the first aspect.

[0040] Different from the prior art, the construction project fire protection design review and acceptance filing management method provided in the embodiment of the present application first obtains the fire protection design drawing review data of the target construction project; then determines whether the fire protection review and acceptance of the target construction project meets the self-service review and acceptance conditions based on the fire protection design drawing review data; when it is determined that the fire protection review and acceptance of the target construction project meets the self-service review and acceptance conditions, obtains the fire protection site inspection information collected by the collection equipment; then performs deep feature extraction on the fire protection site inspection information to obtain suspected problem features; then inputs the suspected problem features into a pre-trained problem inspection model for analysis to obtain suspected construction problems; then performs correlation feature analysis on the suspected construction problems to confirm and obtain fire protection construction rectification instructions; finally, assigns on-site acceptance personnel to conduct on-site review and acceptance based on the fire protection construction rectification instructions. That is, when it is determined that the fire protection review and acceptance of the construction project meets the self-service review and acceptance conditions based on the fire protection design drawing review data, the review and acceptance is conducted in a self-service review and acceptance manner to reduce excessive reliance on professional personnel and improve the efficiency of the review and acceptance. When construction problems that need to be rectified are found during the self-service review and acceptance process, on-site acceptance personnel are assigned to conduct on-site acceptance to improve the accuracy of the review and acceptance and ensure the quality of the review and acceptance. In this way, the solution of this application can improve the review efficiency while taking into account the reliability and accuracy of the review and acceptance. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0041] In order to more clearly illustrate the embodiments of the present invention or the technical solutions in the prior art, the following briefly introduces the drawings required for use in the embodiments or the description of the prior art. Obviously, the drawings described below are only some embodiments of the present invention. For ordinary technicians in this field, other drawings can be obtained based on the structures shown in these drawings without paying any creative work.

[0042] Figure 1 This is a flowchart of a construction project fire protection design review, acceptance, and filing management method in some embodiments of this application;

[0043] Figure 2 A flowchart of a construction project fire protection design review, acceptance, and filing management method in other embodiments of the present application;

[0044] Figure 3 This is a schematic diagram of the hardware structure of the construction project fire protection design review, acceptance and filing management system in some embodiments of this application.

[0045] The purpose, features and advantages of the present invention will be further described with reference to the accompanying drawings and in conjunction with the embodiments. DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0046] The following will clearly and completely describe the technical solutions in the embodiments of the present invention in conjunction with the accompanying drawings. Obviously, the described embodiments are only part of the embodiments of the present invention, not all of the embodiments. All other embodiments obtained by ordinary technicians in this field based on the embodiments of the present invention without making any creative efforts shall fall within the scope of protection of the present invention.

[0047] It should be noted that all directional indications in the embodiments of the present invention (such as up, down, left, right, front, back, etc.) are only used to explain the relative position relationship, movement status, etc. between the various components under a certain specific posture (as shown in the accompanying drawings). If the specific posture changes, the directional indication will also change accordingly.

[0048] In addition, the descriptions of "first", "second", etc. in the present invention are only for descriptive purposes and cannot be understood as indicating or implying their relative importance or implicitly indicating the number of the indicated technical features. Therefore, the features defined as "first" and "second" may explicitly or implicitly include at least one of the features. In addition, "and / or" in the full text includes three solutions. Taking A and / or B as an example, it includes technical solution A, technical solution B, and technical solution that satisfies both A and B. In addition, the technical solutions between the various embodiments can be combined with each other, but they must be based on the ability of ordinary technicians in this field to implement them. When the combination of technical solutions is contradictory or cannot be implemented, it should be deemed that such a combination of technical solutions does not exist and is not within the scope of protection required by the present invention.

[0049] Fire protection design review and acceptance for construction projects refers to the review of drawings, construction acceptance, completion filing, and spot check management of fire protection designs for construction projects. Personnel involved in fire protection design review and acceptance, as well as employees in construction, design, construction, project supervision, and technical services, must possess appropriate professional and technical capabilities and participate in regular professional training. Currently, construction projects all rely heavily on manual review and acceptance, which not only consumes a large amount of social human resources but also has relatively low review and acceptance efficiency.

[0050] In response to the above problems, this application proposes a construction project fire protection design review, acceptance and filing management method, which includes the following steps:

[0051] S100, obtaining fire protection design drawing review data of the target construction project;

[0052] It's understandable that the fire protection design drawing review process can reveal the design capabilities of the construction engineering design company. Poor design capabilities and capabilities can be expected to lead to more problems during fire protection construction. Therefore, fire protection design drawing review data can directly or indirectly provide feedback on the level and quality of fire protection construction. When feedback indicates good fire protection construction quality, a self-service review and acceptance process can be used. When feedback indicates poor quality, a manual review and acceptance process can be used.

[0053] S200: Determine whether the fire protection inspection and acceptance of the target construction project meets the self-service inspection and acceptance conditions based on the fire protection design drawing inspection data;

[0054] In one embodiment, the fire protection design drawing review data includes the total review time and the number of drawing revisions. The determining, based on the fire protection design drawing review data, whether the fire protection review and acceptance of the target construction project meets the self-service review and acceptance conditions includes:

[0055] When it is determined that the total review time of the fire protection design drawings is less than a preset time threshold and the number of drawing rectifications is less than a preset number, it is determined that the fire protection review and acceptance of the target construction project meets the self-service review and acceptance conditions;

[0056] When it is determined that the total review time of the fire protection design drawings is greater than or equal to the preset time threshold, or the number of drawing revisions of the fire protection design drawings is greater than or equal to the preset number, it is judged that the fire protection review and acceptance of the target construction project does not meet the self-service review and acceptance conditions.

[0057] Specifically, when the total review time of the fire protection design drawings is less than the preset time threshold and the number of drawing revisions is less than the preset number, it means that there are fewer problems or defects in the fire protection design, and the design company has strong design capabilities. Generally speaking, there will be fewer problems caused by construction according to the design drawings. Therefore, in this case, it is judged that the fire protection review and acceptance of the target construction project meets the self-service review and acceptance conditions, and the self-service review and acceptance method can be used for acceptance, thereby reducing excessive reliance on professionals and improving the efficiency of review and acceptance; when the total review time of the fire protection design drawings is greater than or equal to the preset time threshold, or the number of drawing revisions of the fire protection design drawings is greater than or equal to the preset number, it means that there are more problems and defects in the fire protection design, and the design company has slightly poor design capabilities. Generally speaking, there will be more problems caused by construction according to the design drawings, and it is difficult for self-service review and acceptance to discover construction problems, that is, there is a certain difficulty for self-service review and acceptance. Therefore, in this case, in order to improve the quality and accuracy of the review and acceptance, manual review and acceptance is used for acceptance, which is conducive to ensuring the fire safety of the construction project.

[0058] S300: When it is determined that the fire inspection and acceptance of the target construction project meets the self-service inspection and acceptance conditions, fire scene inspection information collected by the collection equipment is obtained;

[0059] Specifically, the collection equipment can be some automatic collection equipment configured according to the requirements of the fire inspection department, such as water pump current, voltage or power collector, alarm sound or light signal collector, fire monitoring camera and other collection equipment.

[0060] Fire scene inspection information may include electrical information, sound and light information, pressure information, video information, picture information, etc. For example, electrical information may include physical quantities such as power, current, and voltage; sound and light information may include physical quantities such as sound and light; pressure information may include physical quantities such as water pressure and surface pressure; video information and picture information may include physical quantities such as surface damage and water on the ground.

[0061] S400: Perform deep feature extraction on the fire scene inspection information to obtain suspected problem features;

[0062] In one embodiment, deep feature extraction is performed on the fire scene inspection information to obtain suspected problem features, including:

[0063] A first physical quantity deep feature extraction is performed on the fire scene inspection information to obtain suspected problem features, wherein the first physical quantity is one of current, voltage, power, sound, light, surface damage, pressure, and water accumulation physical quantities.

[0064] For example, deep feature extraction is performed on the electrical parameters of the fire pump to obtain suspected problem features. For example, the working current of the fire pump has regular unstable fluctuation characteristics. By performing subsequent analysis on the suspected problem features, it can be determined whether there is a fire pump failure problem.

[0065] For example, hole and cavity features are extracted from an image of a fire protection pipe to obtain suspected problem features indicating the presence of holes in the pipe. By performing subsequent analysis on the suspected problem features, it can be determined whether there is a problem with the fire protection pipe being damaged.

[0066] For example, deep feature extraction is performed on the audio signal of the sound collector to obtain suspected problem features of unstable audio signals. By performing subsequent analysis on the suspected problem features, it can be determined whether there is an alarm failure problem.

[0067] S500: Input the suspected problem features into a pre-trained problem checking model for analysis to obtain suspected construction problems;

[0068] In one embodiment, the suspected problem features are input into a pre-trained problem verification data model to perform big data analysis to obtain suspected construction problems.

[0069] For example, in a big data model, a large amount of data shows that when the working current of a fire pump has a regular unstable fluctuation state, it is highly likely that the fire pump has a fire pump failure problem.

[0070] For example, in a big data model, a large amount of data shows that when there are hole features on the surface of a fire-fighting pipe, it is highly likely that the fire-fighting pipe has a pipe damage problem.

[0071] For example, in a big data model, a large amount of data indicates that when the audio signal of an alarm is unstable, it is highly likely that the alarm has an alarm failure problem.

[0072] S600: Analyze the related characteristics of the suspected construction problem to confirm and obtain a fire protection construction rectification instruction;

[0073] It is understandable that when suspected construction problems are obtained through big data verification models, it is necessary to further confirm whether the problem actually exists. Only when it is confirmed that the problem does exist will a construction rectification instruction or notice be issued. In this way, the accuracy and quality of fire protection design review and acceptance can be further improved.

[0074] In one embodiment, the performing of correlation feature analysis on the suspected construction problem to confirm and obtain a fire protection construction rectification instruction includes:

[0075] Obtaining a second physical quantity correlation feature of the suspected construction problem;

[0076] confirming that the second physical quantity association feature is a preset feature to obtain an association judgment result;

[0077] A fire protection construction rectification instruction is output based on the association judgment result, wherein the second physical quantity is different from the first physical quantity, and the second physical quantity is one of power, sound, light, surface damage, pressure, and water accumulation physical quantities.

[0078] Specifically, the second physical quantity correlation feature of the suspected construction problem is first obtained, and when the second physical quantity correlation feature is confirmed to be a preset feature, an correlation judgment result is obtained, that is, an correlation judgment result that the suspected problem does exist, and finally a fire construction rectification instruction is output based on the correlation judgment result.

[0079] For example, when a preliminary judgment is made based on the working current of the fire pump that there is a suspected fault in the fire pump, the water pressure characteristics in the fire water pipe can be further extracted. When the water pressure is lower than the preset water pressure value, it indicates that there is a fault in the fire pump, and a fire construction rectification instruction or notification is output at this time.

[0080] For example, when a preliminary judgment is made based on the surface hole characteristics of a fire-fighting pipe that a suspected problem exists in the fire-fighting pipe, the water accumulation on the ground corresponding to the fire-fighting pipe can be further extracted. When there is water accumulation on the ground, it indicates that the fire-fighting pipe is indeed damaged, and at this time, an instruction or notification for fire-fighting construction rectification is output.

[0081] For example, when the unstable characteristics of the alarm's audio signal are used to preliminarily determine that the alarm is suspected to be faulty, the alarm's light signal characteristics can be further extracted. When the alarm's light emission is also abnormal, it indicates that the alarm is indeed faulty, and at this time, instructions or notifications for fire protection construction rectification are output.

[0082] S700. Assign on-site acceptance personnel to conduct on-site review and acceptance according to the fire protection construction rectification instructions.

[0083] When problems are found during self-review and acceptance that require fire protection construction rectification, the difficulty of continuing to use self-review for acceptance to discover problems is greatly increased. Therefore, in order to further improve the accuracy and quality of fire protection review and acceptance, at this time, on-site acceptance personnel are assigned to conduct on-site review and acceptance according to the fire protection construction rectification instructions.

[0084] In one embodiment, assigning on-site acceptance personnel to conduct on-site review and acceptance according to the fire protection construction rectification instruction includes:

[0085] Randomly assign on-site acceptance personnel according to the fire protection construction rectification instructions to obtain target on-site acceptance personnel;

[0086] Obtaining the service evaluation score of the target on-site acceptance personnel;

[0087] When it is determined that the service evaluation score of the target on-site acceptance personnel is less than or equal to the preset score, a remote guidance expert for on-site acceptance is randomly assigned;

[0088] The target on-site acceptance personnel and remote guidance experts will be formed into a team to cooperate in on-site review and acceptance.

[0089] Specifically, first, a field acceptance personnel is randomly assigned to obtain the target field acceptance personnel. When it is determined that the service evaluation score of the target field acceptance personnel is less than or equal to the preset score, it means that the target field acceptance personnel has less experience and the acceptance level is relatively general. At this time, a guiding expert is randomly assigned to conduct remote acceptance guidance, realizing functions such as remote command of fire inspection, remote guidance of experts, and remote supervision, thereby improving the first-time pass rate of fire inspection.

[0090] In another embodiment, after determining whether the fire protection inspection and acceptance of the target construction project meets the self-service inspection and acceptance conditions based on the fire protection design drawing inspection data in step S200, the method further includes:

[0091] S800: When it is determined that the fire protection inspection and acceptance of the target construction project does not meet the self-service inspection and acceptance conditions, assign on-site inspection and acceptance personnel to conduct on-site inspection and acceptance based on the fire protection design drawing inspection data.

[0092] In a specific embodiment, the fire protection design drawing review data includes a mapping assignment of the number of drawing rectifications and outstanding rectification issues, and the assignment of on-site acceptance personnel for on-site review and acceptance based on the fire protection design drawing review data includes:

[0093] S810, inputting the mapping values ​​of the number of rectifications of the fire protection design drawings and the outstanding rectification issues into a personnel allocation matching model to obtain an expected value of acceptance personnel allocation;

[0094] S820: A target on-site acceptance personnel is obtained by matching the acceptance personnel allocation expectation value and the service evaluation score of the acceptance personnel in the on-site review and acceptance database, wherein the acceptance personnel allocation expectation value and the service evaluation score of the target on-site acceptance personnel are positively correlated;

[0095] S830: Assign the target on-site acceptance personnel to conduct on-site inspection and acceptance of the target construction project;

[0096] The personnel allocation matching model satisfies the following expression:

[0097] A is the expected value assigned to the acceptance personnel, B is the mapping assignment of outstanding rectification issues, B0 is the benchmark assignment, and Ф is the task-heavy index of the acceptance personnel in the on-site review and acceptance database.

[0098] Specifically, this application indicates the expected degree of competence requirement for on-site acceptance personnel by assigning an expected value A to acceptance personnel, and assigns a value to the importance of outstanding rectification issues. The greater the importance, the greater the assigned value B, and the smaller the importance, the smaller the assigned value B. Assigned value B can be queried through a mapping table. The number of times the fire protection design drawings are rectified and the importance of outstanding rectification issues will have a certain impact on the allocation of acceptance personnel. For example, the more times the fire protection design drawings are rectified, the greater the problem with the fire protection design, and the higher the competence requirement for on-site acceptance personnel. The higher the importance of outstanding rectification issues, the higher the competence requirement for on-site acceptance personnel. However, when the on-site review and acceptance database acceptance personnel have a heavy workload, making it impossible to assign on-site acceptance personnel with higher competence, at this time, through personnel allocation

[0099] Matching mode To match personnel, in this way, the right personnel can be accurately matched for on-site review and acceptance. It can be seen that when the task burden index of the on-site review and acceptance personnel in the on-site review and acceptance database increases (the task burden index is between 0 and 1), that is, the Ф value increases, it means that the on-site review and acceptance personnel in the on-site review and acceptance database have a heavy workload (higher-level acceptance personnel cannot spare time to conduct the review and acceptance of this project). At this time, the expected value of acceptance personnel allocation decreases. Therefore, target on-site acceptance personnel with lower service evaluation scores can be matched to conduct on-site review and acceptance, such as matching some newcomers to the industry for on-site inspections. When the task burden index of the on-site review and acceptance personnel in the on-site review and acceptance database decreases, that is, the Ф value decreases, it means that the on-site review and acceptance personnel in the on-site review and acceptance database have a light workload (higher-level acceptance personnel can be assigned to conduct the review and acceptance of this project). At this time, the expected value of acceptance personnel allocation increases. Therefore, target on-site acceptance personnel with higher service evaluation scores can be matched to conduct on-site review and acceptance, such as matching some experienced and highly rated personnel for inspections.

[0100] In one embodiment, when some newcomers to the industry are matched for on-site inspection (when it is determined that the service evaluation score of the target on-site acceptance personnel is less than or equal to the preset score), in order to improve the quality of fire inspection and acceptance of the construction project, on-site acceptance remote guidance experts are randomly assigned to conduct on-site inspection guidance for the newcomers to the industry, realizing functions such as remote command of fire inspection, expert remote guidance, and remote supervision, thereby improving the first-time pass rate of fire inspection.

[0101] Based on this, the review and acceptance management method of this application uses a self-service review and acceptance method to conduct the review and acceptance when it is determined that the fire protection review and acceptance of the construction project meets the self-service review and acceptance conditions based on the review data of the fire protection design drawings. This reduces excessive reliance on professionals and improves the efficiency of the review and acceptance. When construction problems that need to be rectified are found during the self-service review and acceptance process, on-site acceptance personnel are assigned to conduct on-site acceptance to improve the accuracy of the review and acceptance and ensure the quality of the review and acceptance. In this way, the solution of this application can improve the review efficiency while taking into account the reliability and accuracy of the review and acceptance.

[0102] The present application embodiment also provides a construction project fire protection design review and acceptance filing management system 100, please refer to the attached Figure 3 , Figure 3 This is a hardware structure diagram of the construction project fire protection design review, acceptance and filing management system provided in an embodiment of the present application. The construction project fire protection design review, acceptance and filing management system 100 includes a processor 110 and a memory 120.

[0103] Among them, the processor 110 is used to provide computing and control capabilities to control the construction project fire protection design review and acceptance filing management system to perform corresponding tasks, for example, controlling the construction project fire protection design review and acceptance filing management system to execute the construction project fire protection design review and acceptance filing management method in any of the above-mentioned method embodiments, the method including: obtaining the fire protection design drawing review data of the target construction project; judging whether the fire protection review and acceptance of the target construction project meets the self-service review and acceptance conditions based on the fire protection design drawing review data; when it is determined that the fire protection review and acceptance of the target construction project meets the self-service review and acceptance conditions, obtaining the fire protection site inspection information collected by the collection equipment; performing deep feature extraction on the fire protection site inspection information to obtain suspected problem features; inputting the suspected problem features into a pre-trained problem inspection model for analysis to obtain suspected construction problems; performing correlation feature analysis on the suspected construction problems to confirm and obtain fire protection construction rectification instructions; and assigning on-site acceptance personnel to perform on-site review and acceptance according to the fire protection construction rectification instructions.

[0104] The processor 110 may be a general-purpose processor, including a central processing unit (CPU), a network processor (NP), a hardware chip, or any combination thereof; it may also be a digital signal processor (DSP), an application-specific integrated circuit (ASIC), a programmable logic device (PLD), or any combination thereof. The PLD may be a complex programmable logic device (CPLD), a field-programmable gate array (FPGA), a generic array logic (GAL), or any combination thereof.

[0105] Memory 120, as a non-transitory computer-readable storage medium, can be used to store non-transitory software programs, non-transitory computer-executable programs, and modules, such as the program instructions / modules corresponding to the construction project fire protection design review, acceptance, and filing management method in the embodiments of this application. By executing the non-transitory software programs, instructions, and modules stored in memory 120, processor 110 can implement the construction project fire protection design review, acceptance, and filing management method in any of the aforementioned method embodiments.

[0106] Specifically, the memory 120 may include a volatile memory (VM), such as a random access memory (RAM); the memory 120 may also include a non-volatile memory (NVM), such as a read-only memory (ROM), a flash memory (flash memory), a hard disk drive (HDD) or a solid-state drive (SSD) or other non-volatile solid-state storage device; the memory 120 may also include a combination of the above types of memory.

[0107] To sum up, the construction project fire protection design review, acceptance and filing management system of this application adopts the technical solution of any one of the above-mentioned construction project fire protection design review, acceptance and filing management method embodiments. Therefore, it has at least the beneficial effects brought by the technical solutions of the above-mentioned embodiments, which will not be repeated here one by one.

[0108] The present application also provides a computer-readable storage medium, such as a memory including program code, which can be executed by a processor to implement the construction project fire protection design review, acceptance, and filing management method in the above embodiment. For example, the computer-readable storage medium can be a read-only memory (ROM), a random access memory (RAM), a compact disc read-only memory (CDROM), a magnetic tape, a floppy disk, an optical data storage device, or the like.

[0109] The present application also provides a computer program product comprising one or more program codes stored in a computer-readable storage medium. A processor of an electronic device reads the program code from the computer-readable storage medium and executes the program code to perform the steps of the construction project fire protection design review, acceptance, and filing management method provided in the above-described embodiment.

[0110] Those skilled in the art will understand that all or part of the steps of implementing the above embodiments can be completed by hardware, or by hardware related to program code, and the program can be stored in a computer-readable storage medium. The above-mentioned storage medium can be a read-only memory, a disk or an optical disk, etc.

[0111] It should be noted that the device embodiments described above are merely illustrative, wherein the units described as separate components may or may not be physically separate, and the components shown as units may or may not be physical units, that is, they may be located in one place or distributed across multiple network units. Some or all of the modules may be selected based on actual needs to achieve the objectives of this embodiment.

[0112] Through the description of the above embodiments, those skilled in the art can clearly understand that each embodiment can be implemented by means of software plus a general hardware platform, or of course by hardware. Those skilled in the art can understand that all or part of the processes in the above embodiment methods can be implemented by instructing the relevant hardware through a computer program, and the program can be stored in a computer-readable storage medium. When the program is executed, it can include the processes of the embodiments of the above methods. Among them, the storage medium can be a magnetic disk, an optical disk, a read-only memory (ROM) or a random access memory (RAM), etc.

[0113] The above description is only a preferred embodiment of the present invention and does not limit the patent scope of the present invention. All equivalent structural transformations made by using the contents of the present invention description and drawings under the inventive concept of the present invention, or direct / indirect application in other related technical fields are included in the patent protection scope of the present invention.

Claims

1. A construction project fire protection design review, acceptance and filing management method, characterized by: The method comprises: Obtain fire protection design drawing review data for target construction projects; Determining whether the fire protection review and acceptance of the target construction project meets the self-service review and acceptance conditions based on the fire protection design drawing review data; When it is determined that the fire inspection and acceptance of the target construction project meets the self-service inspection and acceptance conditions, the fire scene inspection information collected by the collection equipment is obtained; Performing deep feature extraction on the fire scene inspection information to obtain suspected problem features; Inputting the suspected problem features into a pre-trained problem checking model for analysis to obtain suspected construction problems; Conduct correlation feature analysis on the suspected construction problems to confirm and obtain fire protection construction rectification instructions; Assign on-site acceptance personnel to conduct on-site review and acceptance according to the fire protection construction rectification instructions; The fire protection design drawing review data includes the total review time and the number of drawing rectifications. The determination of whether the fire protection review and acceptance of the target construction project meets the self-service review and acceptance conditions based on the fire protection design drawing review data includes: When it is determined that the total review time of the fire protection design drawings is less than a preset time threshold and the number of drawing rectifications is less than a preset number, it is determined that the fire protection review and acceptance of the target construction project meets the self-service review and acceptance conditions; When it is determined that the total review time of the fire protection design drawings is greater than or equal to a preset time threshold, or the number of revisions of the fire protection design drawings is greater than or equal to a preset number, it is determined that the fire protection review and acceptance of the target construction project does not meet the self-service review and acceptance conditions; After determining whether the fire protection inspection and acceptance of the target construction project meets the self-service inspection and acceptance conditions based on the fire protection design drawing inspection data, the method further includes: When it is determined that the fire protection review and acceptance of the target construction project does not meet the self-service review and acceptance conditions, assigning on-site acceptance personnel to conduct on-site review and acceptance based on the fire protection design drawing review data; The fire protection design drawing review data includes mapping assignments of the number of drawing rectifications and outstanding rectification issues. The allocation of on-site acceptance personnel for on-site review and acceptance based on the fire protection design drawing review data includes: Inputting the mapping values ​​of the number of rectifications of the fire protection design drawings and the outstanding rectification issues into the personnel allocation matching model to obtain the expected value of acceptance personnel allocation; A target on-site acceptance personnel is obtained by matching the acceptance personnel allocation expectation value and the service evaluation score of the acceptance personnel in the on-site review and acceptance database, wherein the acceptance personnel allocation expectation value and the service evaluation score of the target on-site acceptance personnel are positively correlated; Assigning the target on-site acceptance personnel to conduct on-site inspection and acceptance of the target construction project; The personnel allocation matching model satisfies the following expression: A is the expected value assigned to the acceptance personnel, B is the mapping assignment of outstanding rectification issues, B0 is the benchmark assignment, and Ф is the task-heavy index of the acceptance personnel in the on-site review and acceptance database.

2. The construction project fire protection design review, acceptance and filing management method according to claim 1, characterized in that: After assigning the target on-site acceptance personnel to conduct on-site inspection and acceptance of the target construction project, the method further includes: When it is determined that the service evaluation score of the target on-site acceptance personnel is less than or equal to the preset score, a remote guidance expert for on-site acceptance is randomly assigned; The target on-site acceptance personnel and remote guidance experts will be formed into a team to cooperate in on-site review and acceptance.

3. The construction project fire protection design review, acceptance and filing management method according to claim 1, characterized in that: The deep feature extraction of the fire scene inspection information to obtain suspected problem features includes: A first physical quantity deep feature extraction is performed on the fire scene inspection information to obtain suspected problem features, wherein the first physical quantity is one of power, sound, light, surface damage, pressure, and water accumulation physical quantities.

4. The construction project fire protection design review, acceptance and filing management method according to claim 2, characterized in that: Inputting the suspected problem features into a pre-trained problem checking model for analysis to obtain suspected construction problems includes: The suspected problem features are input into a pre-trained problem checking data model to perform big data analysis to obtain suspected construction problems.

5. The construction project fire protection design review, acceptance and filing management method according to claim 2, characterized in that: The fire protection construction rectification instructions obtained by performing correlation feature analysis on the suspected construction problems include: Obtaining a second physical quantity correlation feature of the suspected construction problem; confirming that the second physical quantity association feature is a preset feature to obtain an association judgment result; A fire protection construction rectification instruction is output based on the association judgment result, wherein the second physical quantity is different from the first physical quantity, and the second physical quantity is one of power, sound, light, surface damage, pressure, and water accumulation physical quantities.

6. The construction project fire protection design review, acceptance and filing management method according to claim 1, characterized in that: The on-site inspection and acceptance personnel assigned according to the fire protection construction rectification instructions shall be carried out for on-site review and acceptance, including: Randomly assign on-site acceptance personnel according to the fire protection construction rectification instructions to obtain target on-site acceptance personnel; Obtaining the service evaluation score of the target on-site acceptance personnel; When it is determined that the service evaluation score of the target on-site acceptance personnel is less than or equal to the preset score, a remote guidance expert for on-site acceptance is randomly assigned; The target on-site acceptance personnel and remote guidance experts will be formed into a team to cooperate in on-site review and acceptance.

7. A construction project fire protection design review, acceptance and filing management system, characterized by: The method comprises a memory and a processor, wherein the memory is used to store program code, and the processor is used to call the program code to execute the method according to any one of claims 1 to 6.

Images