Safety production system coding method

Abstract

A safety production system coding method comprises the following steps: step 1, when a user newly creates a plan form, a system automatically allocates a preceding stage 'JH' according to a service type, and automatically judges a source according to a preset rule; automatically judging the type according to the execution condition; 2, automatically generating a task after the code in the step 1 is issued, automatically distributing a prefix RW by a system according to a service type, automatically judging a source according to a preset rule, and manually judging the type according to an execution condition; and step 3, automatically generating a closed-loop list after the coding in the step 2 is completed, automatically allocating a prefix 'BH' by the system according to a service type, automatically judging a source according to a preset rule, automatically judging a type according to an execution condition, and ending after the completion. Workflows (scheduled tasks and closed loops) are adopted as a main line, the content comprises an associated coding system which is automatically generated according to attributes, sources and types, and the method is suitable for digital system coding system application.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] The invention belongs to the field of safe production system coding, in particular to a safe production system coding method. Background Art

[0002] With the continuous development of society, the level of industrialization and mechanization has been continuously improved, and industrial production accidents have also occurred frequently. In order to ensure the safe production of industry, safety systems in different industries are currently being built to ensure the safety of industrial production. However, in the current information management of the whole process of safe production control, due to design and human factors, there is a situation where a closed loop has not been formed. As a result, the safety system cannot effectively supervise and manage the operations of some things and information work processes, which leads to safety hazards and affects safe production. Summary of the invention

[0003] The invention provides a production safety system coding method to solve the defects in the prior art.

[0004] The present invention is achieved through the following technical solutions:

[0005] A method for coding a production safety system comprises the following steps:

[0006] Step 1: When the user creates a new plan form, the system automatically assigns the previous level "JH" according to the business type, automatically determines the source according to the preset rules, and automatically determines the type according to the execution situation;

[0007] Step 2: After the code in step 1 is issued, the task is automatically generated. The system automatically assigns the prefix "RW" according to the business type, automatically determines the source according to the preset rules, and manually determines the type according to the execution situation;

[0008] Step 3: After the coding in step 2 is completed, a closed-loop order is automatically generated. The system automatically assigns the prefix "BH" according to the business type, automatically determines the source according to the preset rules, and automatically determines the type according to the execution situation. After completion, the order ends.

[0009] In the above-mentioned method for coding a production safety system, the coding includes attribute abbreviation, source abbreviation, type abbreviation, year, month, day, and serial number.

[0010] In the above-mentioned coding method for a production safety system, the attribute abbreviations include plan (JH), task (RW), and closed loop (BH).

[0011] In the above-mentioned coding method for a production safety system, the source abbreviations include evaluation (PJ), hidden danger (YH), ​​meeting (HY), and formulation (ZD).

[0012] In the above-mentioned method for coding a safe production system, the evaluation is a safety evaluation of the production process.

[0013] In the above-mentioned coding method for a safe production system, the hidden danger is a safety hazard.

[0014] In the above-mentioned method for coding a production safety system, the meeting is a production safety related meeting.

[0015] A production safety system coding method as described above, wherein the formulation is the formulation of production safety plans and measures.

[0016] In the above-mentioned coding method for a production safety system, the type abbreviations include problem (WT), supervision (DB), work order (GD), and non-work order (FGD).

[0017] In the above-mentioned coding method for a production safety system, the problem is a production safety problem.

[0018] In the above-mentioned coding method for a production safety system, the supervision is the supervision of work related to production safety.

[0019] In the above-mentioned method for coding a production safety system, the work order is a work document used to record and track the management and maintenance process of production safety, as well as the problems and requests generated in the process.

[0020] In the above-mentioned coding method for a safe production system, the non-work order refers to an action that is not recorded and tracked by a work document.

[0021] In the above-mentioned method for coding a production safety system, the year, month and day are the generation dates of the corresponding codes.

[0022] In the above-mentioned coding method for a production safety system, the serial number is a distinguishing number for the same attribute abbreviation, source abbreviation, and type abbreviation on the same date.

[0023] The above-mentioned coding method for a safe production system can be used in various modules of the safe production system.

[0024] The advantages of the present invention are: in order to ensure the coding standardization of the safe production system and the applicability of the system, the present invention adopts a coding system with workflow (planned tasks, closed loop) as the main line, and the content includes attributes, sources, and types to automatically generate related coding systems. The present invention is suitable for the application of digital system coding systems, while avoiding manual arbitrariness and the like. It adopts a multi-level structure, each level represents a different information dimension, ensures scalability, and reserves sufficient expansion space when designing the code so that large-scale reconstruction is not required when new types or attributes are added in the future. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0025] In order to more clearly illustrate the embodiments of the present invention or the technical solutions in the prior art, the following briefly introduces the drawings required for use in the embodiments or the description of the prior art. Obviously, the drawings described below are some embodiments of the present invention. For ordinary technicians in this field, other drawings can be obtained based on these drawings without paying creative labor.

[0026] Figure 1 It is a schematic diagram of the coding structure of the present invention;

[0027] Figure 2 is a schematic diagram of the evaluation plan of the present invention;

[0028] Figure 3 is a schematic diagram of the evaluation task of the present invention;

[0029] Figure 4 is a schematic diagram of the evaluation problem of the present invention;

[0030] Figure 5 It is a schematic diagram of the rectification problem task of the present invention;

[0031] Figure 6 It is a schematic diagram of the rectification problem acceptance form of the present invention. DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0032] In order to make the purpose, technical solution and advantages of the embodiments of the present invention clearer, the technical solution in the embodiments of the present invention will be clearly and completely described below in conjunction with the drawings in the embodiments of the present invention. Obviously, the described embodiments are part of the embodiments of the present invention, not all of the embodiments. Based on the embodiments of the present invention, all other embodiments obtained by ordinary technicians in this field without creative work are within the scope of protection of the present invention.

[0033] like Figure 1-6 As shown, a method for coding a safe production system comprises the following steps:

[0034] Step 1: When the user creates a new plan form, the system automatically assigns the previous level "JH" according to the business type, automatically determines the source according to the preset rules, and automatically determines the type according to the execution situation;

[0035] Step 2: After the code in step 1 is issued, the task is automatically generated. The system automatically assigns the prefix "RW" according to the business type, automatically determines the source according to the preset rules, and manually determines the type according to the execution situation;

[0036] Step 3: After the coding in step 2 is completed, a closed-loop order is automatically generated. The system automatically assigns the prefix "BH" according to the business type, automatically determines the source according to the preset rules, and automatically determines the type according to the execution situation. After completion, the order ends.

[0037] Specifically, the code described in this embodiment includes attribute abbreviation, source abbreviation, type abbreviation, year, month, day, and serial number.

[0038] Specifically, the attribute abbreviations described in this embodiment include plan (JH), task (RW), and closed loop (BH).

[0039] More specifically, the source abbreviations described in this embodiment include evaluation (PJ), hidden danger (YH), ​​meeting (HY), and formulation (ZD).

[0040] Preferably, the evaluation described in this embodiment is a safety evaluation during the production process.

[0041] Preferably, the hidden danger described in this embodiment is a safety hazard.

[0042] Preferably, the meeting described in this embodiment is a meeting related to production safety.

[0043] Preferably, the formulation described in this embodiment is the formulation of production safety plans and measures.

[0044] More specifically, the type abbreviations described in this embodiment include problem (WT), supervision (DB), work order (GD), and non-work order (FGD).

[0045] Preferably, the problem described in this embodiment is a production safety problem.

[0046] Preferably, the supervision described in this embodiment is the supervision of work related to production safety.

[0047] Preferably, the work order described in this embodiment is a work document, which is used to record and track the management and maintenance process of safe production, as well as the problems and requests generated in this process.

[0048] Preferably, the non-work order described in this embodiment is an action that is not recorded and tracked by a work document.

[0049] Furthermore, the year, month and day described in this embodiment are the generation dates of the corresponding codes.

[0050] Furthermore, the serial number described in this embodiment is a distinguishing number for the same attribute abbreviation, source abbreviation, and type abbreviation on the same date.

[0051] Furthermore, the encoding method described in this embodiment can be used in various modules of the safety production system.

[0052] Finally, it should be noted that the above embodiments are only used to illustrate the technical solutions of the present invention, rather than to limit it. Although the present invention has been described in detail with reference to the aforementioned embodiments, those skilled in the art should understand that they can still modify the technical solutions described in the aforementioned embodiments, or make equivalent replacements for some of the technical features therein. However, these modifications or replacements do not deviate the essence of the corresponding technical solutions from the spirit and scope of the technical solutions of the embodiments of the present invention.

Claims

1. A method for coding a production safety system, characterized in that: The steps include: Step 1: When the user creates a new plan form, the system automatically assigns the previous level "JH" according to the business type, automatically determines the source according to the preset rules, and automatically determines the type according to the execution situation; Step 2: After the code in step 1 is issued, the task is automatically generated. The system automatically assigns the prefix "RW" according to the business type, automatically determines the source according to the preset rules, and manually determines the type according to the execution situation; Step 3: After the coding in step 2 is completed, a closed-loop order is automatically generated. The system automatically assigns the prefix "BH" according to the business type, automatically determines the source according to the preset rules, and automatically determines the type according to the execution situation. The order ends after completion.

2. A method for coding a production safety system according to claim 1, characterized in that: The code includes attribute abbreviation, source abbreviation, type abbreviation, year, month, day, and serial number.

3. A method for coding a production safety system according to claim 2, characterized in that: The attribute abbreviations include plan (JH), task (RW), and closed loop (BH).

4. A method for coding a production safety system according to claim 2, characterized in that: The source abbreviations include evaluation (PJ), hidden danger (YH), ​​meeting (HY), and formulation (ZD).

5. A method for coding a production safety system according to claim 4, characterized in that: The evaluation is a safety evaluation of the production process; The hidden dangers described are safety hazards; The meeting mentioned is a meeting related to production safety; The formulation mentioned here refers to the formulation of safety production plans and measures.

6. A method for coding a production safety system according to claim 2, characterized in that: The abbreviations of the types include problem (WT), supervision (DB), work order (GD), and non-work order (FGD).

7. A method for coding a production safety system according to claim 4, characterized in that: The problem described is a production safety issue; The supervision mentioned here refers to the supervision of work related to production safety; The work order is a work document used to record and track the management and maintenance process of production safety, as well as the problems and requests generated during the process; The non-work order refers to the behavior that is not recorded and tracked by work documents.

8. A method for coding a production safety system according to claim 2, characterized in that: The year, month and day are the generation dates of the corresponding codes.

9. A method for coding a production safety system according to claim 2, characterized in that: The serial number is a distinguishing number for the same attribute abbreviation, source abbreviation, and type abbreviation on the same date.

10. A method for coding a production safety system according to claim 1, characterized in that: The encoding method can be used in various modules of the safety production system.

Images