Multi-dimensional technical achievement evaluation method and system

Abstract

The invention discloses a multi-dimensional technical achievement evaluation method and system, and the method comprises the following steps: extracting a technical keyword of a technical scheme, obtaining a related technical scheme, evaluating a technical innovation value, a technical width value, a technical independence value and a technical science and technology value of the technical scheme through a related technical file, and obtaining a scientific value grade; acquiring a market demand value, a marketization capability value and a market value grade according to the similar technical scheme; evaluating a cost feasible value, a technical benefit value and an economic value grade according to a difference value between the technical scheme and the similar technical scheme; extracting a first inventor and an invention unit of the technical scheme, and obtaining an authoritative value grade of the technical scheme; determining a weight by using an analytic hierarchy process and an entropy weight method and obtaining a technical scheme grade; the evaluation comprehensiveness is guaranteed through multi-aspect evaluation, the evaluation result is more accurate and effective, the weights are obtained through the analytic hierarchy process and the entropy weight method, the subjectivity of manually setting the weights is reduced, and the accuracy and comprehensiveness of weight distribution are guaranteed.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] The present invention relates to the technical field of technology achievement evaluation, and in particular to a multi-dimensional technology achievement evaluation method and system. Background Art

[0002] In recent years, with the transformation of my country's economic growth model, scientific and technological research and development and the transformation of technological achievements have received more and more attention. The evaluation of the value of technological achievements has also become an important topic of current research. In view of the multi-value characteristics of technological achievements, multi-level evaluation is needed.

[0003] At present, the Chinese invention patent with application number 201910479948.2 discloses an enterprise information technology achievement evaluation system based on big data, which extracts enterprise technology feature keywords, compares the enterprise technology feature keywords with the total integrated technology feature keyword set one by one, and calculates the enterprise technology achievement evaluation coefficient, thereby reducing the manpower and material resources consumed by human evaluation and facilitating the government to understand the technological level of the enterprise. However, the multidimensionality and comprehensiveness of the evaluation indicators are still single, and there is no detailed data to support the determination of the weights of each evaluation indicator, which may lead to overall distortion of the evaluation due to the strong subjectivity of the weight determination. Summary of the invention

[0004] The technical problem solved by the present invention is that the multidimensionality and comprehensiveness of the evaluation indicators in the prior art are still single, and there is no detailed data to support the determination of the weights of various evaluation indicators, which may lead to overall distortion of the evaluation due to the strong subjectivity of weight determination.

[0005] In order to solve the above technical problems, in a first aspect, the present invention provides a multi-dimensional technical achievement evaluation method, comprising the following steps:

[0006] Step S1, extracting keywords of the technical solution, defining the keywords as technical keywords, obtaining relevant technical solutions based on the technical keywords using big data technology, evaluating the technical innovation value, technical breadth value, technical independence value and technical science and technology value of the technical solution based on the relevant technical solution, and obtaining the scientific value level based on the technical innovation value, the technical breadth value, the technical independence value and the technical science and technology value;

[0007] Step S2, using big data technology to obtain similar technical solutions based on the technical keywords, and obtaining the market demand value and marketability value of the technical solutions through the similar technical solutions, and obtaining the market value level of the technical solutions based on the market demand value and the marketability value;

[0008] Step S3, obtaining similar technical solutions according to the technical keywords, and evaluating the cost feasibility value and technical benefit value of the technical solution according to the difference between the technical solution and the similar technical solutions, and obtaining the economic value level of the technical solution according to the cost feasibility value and the technical benefit value;

[0009] Step S4, extract the first inventor and the invention unit of the technical solution, obtain the title and number of inventions of the first inventor, and obtain the number of inventions and historical technical solution level of the invention unit in the relevant technical field, and obtain the authoritative value level according to the title and number of inventions of the first inventor and the number of inventions and historical technical solution level of the invention unit;

[0010] Step S5, using the analytic hierarchy process and the entropy weight method to determine the weights of the scientific value level, the market value level, the economic value level and the authority value level, and obtaining the technical solution level of the technical solution according to the weights;

[0011] As a preferred solution of the multi-dimensional technical achievement evaluation method described in the present invention, wherein:

[0012] The step S1 specifically includes the following steps:

[0013] Step S101, extracting keywords of the technical solution using keyword extraction technology, and determining the relevance of each keyword to the technical solution, and defining keywords with a relevance greater than or equal to an expected threshold as technical keywords;

[0014] Step S102, searching in big data according to the technical keywords to obtain relevant technical solutions matching the keywords;

[0015] Step S103, comparing the technical solution with the related technical solution to obtain a technical difference, and obtaining a technical innovation value of the technical solution according to the technical difference;

[0016] Step S104, obtaining patent documents corresponding to the technical solution, extracting classification numbers of each patent document, obtaining the number of classification numbers, and obtaining the technical width value of the technical solution according to the number of classification numbers;

[0017] Step S105, obtaining the number of citations of other technical solutions in the technical solution, and obtaining the technical independence value of the technical solution according to the number of citations;

[0018] Step S106, retrieve all technical papers and technical patents corresponding to the technical solution, obtain the related papers and related patents that cite the technical papers and the technical patents according to the paper numbers of the technical papers and the patent numbers of the technical patents using big data technology, obtain the number of citations of the technical papers and the technical patents, and obtain the technical technology value according to the number of citations;

[0019] Step S107, performing weighted addition calculation on the technology innovation value, the technology breadth value, the technology independence value and the technology science and technology value to obtain the scientific value level of the technology solution;

[0020] As a preferred solution of the multi-dimensional technical achievement evaluation method described in the present invention, wherein:

[0021] The step S2 specifically includes the following steps:

[0022] Step S201, obtaining the correlation between the related technical solutions and the technical solutions, defining the related technical solutions whose correlation is greater than or equal to the expected threshold as similar technical solutions, obtaining the marketability value of the similar technical solutions, defining the marketability value of the similar technical solutions as similar marketability value, and obtaining the marketability value of the technical solution according to the correlation and the similar marketability value;

[0023] Step S202, searching for relevant patents using big data technology according to the technical keywords, obtaining the trend of the number of relevant patents changing over time according to the publication date of the relevant patents, and obtaining the market demand value through the trend;

[0024] Step S203, performing weighted calculation on the marketability value and the market demand value to obtain the market value level of the technical solution;

[0025] As a preferred solution of the multi-dimensional technical achievement evaluation method described in the present invention, wherein:

[0026] The step S3 specifically comprises the following steps:

[0027] Step S301, obtaining the correlation between the similar technical solutions and the technical solution, extracting the similar technical solutions with the greatest correlation and the technical benefits of the similar technical solutions, and obtaining the technical benefits and technical costs of the technical solution according to the correlation between the similar technical solutions and the technical solution;

[0028] Step S302, obtaining the technical benefit value of the technical solution according to the technical benefit, and obtaining the cost feasibility value of the technical solution according to the technical cost;

[0029] Step S303, performing weighted calculation on the technical benefit value and the cost feasibility value to obtain the economic value level of the technical solution;

[0030] As a preferred solution of the multi-dimensional technical achievement evaluation method described in the present invention, wherein:

[0031] The step S4 specifically includes the following steps:

[0032] Step S401, extracting the first inventor and inventing unit of the technical solution;

[0033] Step S402, obtaining the professional title of the first inventor, obtaining the professional title value according to the professional title, using big data technology to retrieve and obtain the total number of papers and patents published by the first inventor, and obtaining the invention value according to the total number of papers and patents published, and obtaining the first authoritative value of the technical solution according to the professional title value and the invention value;

[0034] Step S403, searching the number of inventions of the invention unit and the historical technical solution level corresponding to each technical invention, and obtaining a second authoritative value according to the number of inventions and the historical technical solution level;

[0035] Step S404, performing weighted calculation on the first authority value and the second authority value to obtain the authority value level of the technical solution;

[0036] As a preferred solution of the multi-dimensional technical achievement evaluation method described in the present invention, wherein:

[0037] The step S5 specifically comprises the following steps:

[0038] Step S501, obtaining a judgment matrix A, wherein the importance of the scientific value grade to determining the grade of the technical solution is C1, the importance of the market value grade to determining the grade of the technical solution is C2, the importance of the economic value grade to determining the grade of the technical solution is C3, and the importance of the authority value grade to determining the grade of the technical solution is C4. If C i The importance is greater than C j , then a ij >1, if C i is less important than C j , then a ij <1, if C i The importance is equal to C j , then a ij =1, the mathematical expression of the judgment matrix A is:

[0039]

[0040] Among them, A is the judgment matrix, a ij is the relative importance value of each indicator, i is any natural number from 1, 2, 3, 4, and j is also any natural number from 1, 2, 3, 4;

[0041] Step S502, normalize the judgment matrix A. The calculation expression of normalization is:

[0042]

[0043] in, is the data of the i-th row and j-th column of the normal matrix of the judgment matrix A, a ij To determine the data in the i-th row and j-th column of matrix A, i is the number of rows in the matrix and j is the number of columns in the matrix;

[0044] Step S503, the normalized matrix is ​​added row by row, and normalization is performed to obtain the maximum eigenvalue of the judgment matrix A. The calculation expression for obtaining the maximum eigenvalue is:

[0045]

[0046] Regarding the Perform normalization and obtain the maximum eigenvalue of matrix A. The calculation expression for obtaining the maximum eigenvalue is:

[0047]

[0048] Among them, A is the judgment matrix, w i is the weight of the i-th indicator, λ max is the maximum eigenvalue of the judgment matrix A;

[0049] Step S504: for the maximum eigenvalue λ max A consistency test is performed to obtain the consistency index. If the consistency index is greater than or equal to the expected threshold, the judgment matrix is ​​reasonable. The expression for obtaining the consistency index is:

[0050]

[0051] Among them, CI is the consistency index, λ max is the maximum eigenvalue;

[0052] Step S505, using the entropy weight method to correct the weights of the scientific value level, market value level, economic value level and authoritative value level, the calculation expression for obtaining the weight is:

[0053]

[0054] Among them, w j represents the weight of the jth indicator, g jrepresents the coefficient of variation of the jth indicator, j = 1, 2, 3, 4;

[0055] Get the combined weights of each indicator. The calculation expression for the combined weights is:

[0056]

[0057] Among them, g i represents the coefficient of difference of the jth indicator, w j represents the weight of the jth indicator in the entropy weight method, v j It represents the weight of the jth indicator in the hierarchical analysis method;

[0058] Step S506, performing weighted calculation on the scientific value grade, the market value grade, the economic value grade and the authority value grade according to the weights to obtain the technical solution grade;

[0059] As a preferred solution of the multi-dimensional technical achievement evaluation method described in the present invention, wherein:

[0060] The step S101 specifically includes the following steps:

[0061] Step S1011, performing word segmentation preprocessing on the technical solution, and converting words in several word segmentation results into word vectors;

[0062] Step S1021, dividing all word vectors into a preset number of clusters according to a clustering algorithm, adding up the word vectors contained in each cluster, and defining the word vector with the largest word vector value as the keyword of the cluster;

[0063] Step S1023, determining the relevance between the keyword and the technical solution according to the vector value of the word vector of the keyword, and defining the keyword with a relevance greater than or equal to an expected threshold as a technical keyword;

[0064] As a preferred solution of the multi-dimensional technical achievement evaluation method described in the present invention, wherein:

[0065] The step S103 specifically includes the following steps:

[0066] Step S1031, extracting relevant technical keywords of the relevant technical solutions by using keyword extraction technology;

[0067] Step S1032, comparing the technical keyword with the related technical keyword, obtaining the similarity between the technical keyword and the related technical keyword, and obtaining the technical difference according to the similarity;

[0068] Step S1033: determining the technical innovation value of the technical solution through the technical difference.

[0069] In a second aspect, the present invention provides a multi-dimensional technology achievement evaluation system, including a collection module, an alarm module and a communication module;

[0070] The keyword extraction module is used to extract keywords of the technical solution using keyword extraction technology;

[0071] The value grade module is used to obtain the scientific value grade, market value grade, economic value grade and authoritative value grade of the technical solution;

[0072] The technical grade module is used to determine the weight coefficients of the scientific value grade, market value grade, economic value grade and authoritative value grade by using the hierarchical analysis method and the entropy weight method, and obtain the technical solution grade of the technical solution according to the weight coefficient, scientific value grade, market value grade, economic value grade and authoritative value grade;

[0073] As a preferred solution of the multi-dimensional technical achievement evaluation system described in the present invention, wherein:

[0074] The value grade module includes a science grade unit, a market grade unit, an economic grade unit and an authority grade unit;

[0075] The scientific grade unit is used to determine the scientific value grade of the technical solution by obtaining the technical innovation value, technical breadth value, technical independence value and technical science and technology value of the technical solution;

[0076] The market rating unit is used to obtain the market value rating of the technical solution by obtaining the marketability value and the marketability demand value;

[0077] The economic grade unit is used to obtain the economic value grade of the technical solution by obtaining the technical benefit value and cost feasibility value of the technical solution;

[0078] The authority level unit is used to obtain a first authority value of the technical solution according to the title of the inventor and the number of inventions of the technical solution, obtain a second authority value according to the number of inventions of the invention unit and the level of historical technical solutions, and obtain the authority value level of the technical solution through the first authority value and the second authority value.

[0079] Beneficial effects of the invention: The invention obtains the scientific value grade, market value grade, economic value grade and authoritative value grade of the technical solution, analyzes the results of the technical solution from multiple aspects and angles, obtains the technical solution grade of the technical solution, ensures the comprehensiveness and multi-dimensionality of the evaluation of the technical results, and makes the evaluation result more accurate and effective.

[0080] The analytic hierarchy process and entropy weight method are used to obtain the weights of the science and technology level, the market value level, the economic value level and the authority value level, which reduces the subjectivity of artificially setting weights and ensures the accuracy and comprehensiveness of the weight distribution. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0081] Figure 1 A basic flow chart of a multi-dimensional technology achievement evaluation method provided for one embodiment of the present invention.

[0082] Figure 2 A basic flow chart of a multi-dimensional technology achievement evaluation system provided for one embodiment of the present invention. DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0083] In order to make the above-mentioned objects, features and advantages of the present invention more obvious and easy to understand, the specific implementation methods of the present invention are described in detail below in conjunction with the drawings. It is obvious that the described embodiments are only part of the embodiments of the present invention, but not all of the embodiments.

[0084] Example 1, reference Figure 1 , as an embodiment of the present invention, provides a multi-dimensional technical achievement evaluation method, comprising the following steps:

[0085] Step S1, extracting keywords of the technical solution, defining the keywords as technical keywords, obtaining relevant technical solutions based on the technical keywords using big data technology, evaluating the technical innovation value, technical breadth value, technical independence value and technical science and technology value of the technical solution based on the relevant technical solution, and obtaining the scientific value level based on the technical innovation value, the technical breadth value, the technical independence value and the technical science and technology value;

[0086] Step S2, using big data technology to obtain similar technical solutions based on the technical keywords, and obtaining the market demand value and marketability value of the technical solutions through the similar technical solutions, and obtaining the market value level of the technical solutions based on the market demand value and the marketability value;

[0087] Step S3, obtaining similar technical solutions according to the technical keywords, and evaluating the cost feasibility value and technical benefit value of the technical solution according to the difference between the technical solution and the similar technical solutions, and obtaining the economic value level of the technical solution according to the cost feasibility value and the technical benefit value;

[0088] Step S4, extract the first inventor and the invention unit of the technical solution, obtain the title and number of inventions of the first inventor, and obtain the number of inventions and historical technical solution level of the invention unit in the relevant technical field, and obtain the authoritative value level according to the title and number of inventions of the first inventor and the number of inventions and historical technical solution level of the invention unit;

[0089] Step S5, using the hierarchical analysis method and the entropy weight method to determine the weights of the scientific value level, market value level, economic value level and authoritative value level, and obtaining the technical solution level of the technical solution according to the weights.

[0090] The AHP is a multi-index comprehensive evaluation algorithm that decomposes decision-making related elements into multiple levels such as goals, criteria, and plans, and conducts qualitative and quantitative analysis on this basis;

[0091] The entropy weight method determines the objective weight according to the magnitude of the indicator variability.

[0092] In this embodiment, by obtaining the scientific value level, market value level, economic value level and authoritative value level of the technical solution, the results of the technical solution are analyzed from multiple aspects and angles, and the technical solution level of the technical solution is obtained, which ensures the comprehensiveness and multi-dimensionality of the evaluation of the technical results, making the evaluation results more accurate and effective;

[0093] The analytic hierarchy process and entropy weight method are used to obtain the weights of the science and technology level, the market value level, the economic value level and the authority value level, which reduces the subjectivity of artificially setting weights and ensures the accuracy and comprehensiveness of the weight distribution.

[0094] The step S1 specifically includes the following steps:

[0095] Step S101, extracting keywords of the technical solution using keyword extraction technology, and determining the relevance of each keyword to the technical solution, and defining keywords with a relevance greater than or equal to an expected threshold as technical keywords;

[0096] Step S102, searching the big data according to the technical keywords, obtaining technical solutions matching the keywords and the matching degree, and if the matching degree is greater than or equal to the expected threshold, defining the matching technical solutions as related technical solutions;

[0097] Step S103, comparing the technical solution with the related technical solution to obtain a technical difference, and obtaining a technical innovation value of the technical solution according to the technical difference;

[0098] Step S104, obtaining patent documents corresponding to the technical solution, extracting classification numbers of each patent document, obtaining the number of classification numbers, and obtaining the technical width value of the technical solution according to the number of classification numbers;

[0099] Step S105, obtaining the number of citations of other technical solutions in the technical solution, and obtaining the technical independence value of the technical solution according to the number of citations;

[0100] Step S106, retrieve all technical papers and technical patents corresponding to the technical solution, obtain the related papers and related patents that cite the technical papers and the technical patents according to the paper numbers of the technical papers and the patent numbers of the technical patents using big data technology, obtain the number of citations of the technical papers and the technical patents, and obtain the technical technology value according to the number of citations;

[0101] Step S107, performing weighted addition calculation on the technology innovation value, the technology breadth value, the technology independence value and the technology science and technology value to obtain the scientific value level of the technology solution.

[0102] The technical innovation value represents a value used to evaluate the innovation of a technical solution;

[0103] The technical breadth value represents the value used to evaluate the breadth of the technical field and knowledge field involved in the technical solution;

[0104] The technical independence value refers to the value used to evaluate the degree to which a technical solution refers to or draws on other technical solutions;

[0105] The technical science and technology value represents the value used to evaluate the contribution of the technical solution in science and technology;

[0106] The relevant papers refer to papers that cite technical patents or technical papers;

[0107] The relevant patents refer to patents that cite technical patents or technical papers;

[0108] In this embodiment, the scientific value level of the technical scheme is obtained by obtaining the technical innovation value, technical breadth value, technical independence value and technical scientific and technological value of the technical scheme, and the scientific and technological value of the technical scheme is evaluated, providing a comprehensive and accurate scientific and technological value reference for the subsequent evaluation of the overall value of the technical scheme, that is, the technical scheme level.

[0109] The step S2 specifically includes the following steps:

[0110] Step S201, obtaining the correlation between the related technical solutions and the technical solutions, defining the related technical solutions whose correlation is greater than or equal to the expected threshold as similar technical solutions, obtaining the marketability value of the similar technical solutions, defining the marketability value of the similar technical solutions as similar marketability value, and obtaining the marketability value of the technical solution according to the correlation and the similar marketability value;

[0111] Step S202, searching for relevant patents using big data technology according to the technical keywords, obtaining the trend of the number of relevant patents changing over time according to the publication date of the relevant patents, and obtaining the market demand value through the trend;

[0112] Step S203, performing weighted calculation on the marketability value and the market demand value to obtain the market value level of the technical solution.

[0113] The step S201 specifically includes:

[0114] Extract the core technology text of the technical solution and the related core technology text of the related technical solution, use natural language understanding technology to extract the core key sentences of the core technology text and the related key sentences of the related core technology text, use the text comparison method to compare the core key sentences and the related key sentences to obtain the sentence relevance, if the sentence relevance is greater than or equal to the expected threshold, define the related technical solution as a similar technical solution, and obtain the marketability value of the similar technical solution by obtaining the market data of the similar technical solution, define the market capability value of the similar technical solution as a similar marketability value, and obtain the marketability value of the technical solution according to the similar marketability value and the relevance.

[0115] The marketability value refers to the value used to evaluate the marketability of technology solution transfer, licensing, pledge, etc.;

[0116] The market demand value represents a value used to assess the market demand for such technical solutions;

[0117] In this embodiment, the market transformation value of the technical solution is evaluated by obtaining the marketability value and the market demand value, and the market value level of the technical solution is obtained. A comprehensive evaluation of the market transformation value of the technical solution is made, providing detailed data reference for the subsequent evaluation of the overall value of the technical solution.

[0118] The step S3 specifically comprises the following steps:

[0119] Step S301, obtaining the correlation between the similar technical solutions and the technical solution, extracting the similar technical solutions with the greatest correlation and the technical benefits of the similar technical solutions, and obtaining the technical benefits and technical costs of the technical solution according to the correlation between the similar technical solutions and the technical solution;

[0120] Step S302, obtaining the technical benefit value of the technical solution according to the technical benefit, and obtaining the cost feasibility value of the technical solution according to the technical cost;

[0121] Step S303, performing weighted calculation on the technical benefit value and the cost feasibility value to obtain the economic value level of the technical solution.

[0122] The technical benefit value represents the value used to evaluate the expected economic benefit of the technical solution;

[0123] The cost feasibility value represents a value used to evaluate the feasibility of the input cost of the technical solution;

[0124] In this embodiment, the economic value of the technical solution is evaluated by obtaining the technical benefit value and cost feasibility value of the technical solution, which provides an accurate economic value evaluation reference for the subsequent evaluation of the overall value of the technical solution.

[0125] The step S4 specifically includes the following steps:

[0126] Step S401, extracting the first inventor and inventing unit of the technical solution;

[0127] Step S402, obtaining the professional title of the first inventor, obtaining the professional title value according to the professional title, using big data technology to retrieve and obtain the total number of papers and patents published by the first inventor, and obtaining the invention value according to the total number of papers and patents published, and obtaining the first authoritative value of the technical solution according to the professional title value and the invention value;

[0128] Step S403, searching the number of inventions of the invention unit and the historical technical solution level corresponding to each technical invention, and obtaining a second authoritative value according to the number of inventions and the historical technical solution level;

[0129] Step S404: Perform weighted calculation on the first authority value and the second authority value to obtain the authority value level of the technical solution.

[0130] In this embodiment, by obtaining a first authority value based on the inventor of the technical solution, obtaining a second authority value based on the invention unit of the technical solution, and obtaining the authority value level of the technical solution based on the first authority value and the second authority value, the authority of the technical solution in the relevant field is evaluated, providing accurate data basis for the subsequent evaluation of the overall value of the technical solution.

[0131] The step S5 specifically comprises the following steps:

[0132] Step S501, obtaining a judgment matrix A, wherein the importance of the scientific value grade to determining the grade of the technical solution is C1, the importance of the market value grade to determining the grade of the technical solution is C2, the importance of the economic value grade to determining the grade of the technical solution is C3, and the importance of the authority value grade to determining the grade of the technical solution is C4. If C i The importance is greater than C j , then a ij >1, if C i is less important than C j , then a ij <1, if C i The importance is equal to C j , then a ij =1, the mathematical expression of the judgment matrix A is:

[0133]

[0134] Among them, A is the judgment matrix, a ij is the relative importance value of each indicator, i is any natural number from 1, 2, 3, 4, and j is also any natural number from 1, 2, 3, 4;

[0135] Step S502, normalize the judgment matrix A. The calculation expression of normalization is:

[0136]

[0137] in, is the data of the i-th row and j-th column of the normal matrix of the judgment matrix A, a ij To determine the data in the i-th row and j-th column of matrix A, i is the number of rows in the matrix and j is the number of columns in the matrix;

[0138] Step S503, the normalized matrix is ​​added row by row, and normalization is performed to obtain the maximum eigenvalue of the judgment matrix A. The calculation expression for obtaining the maximum eigenvalue is:

[0139]

[0140] Regarding the Perform normalization and obtain the maximum eigenvalue of matrix A. The calculation expression for obtaining the maximum eigenvalue is:

[0141]

[0142] Among them, A is the judgment matrix, w i is the weight of the i-th indicator, λ max is the maximum eigenvalue of the judgment matrix A;

[0143] Step S504: for the maximum eigenvalue λ max A consistency test is performed to obtain the consistency index. If the consistency index is greater than or equal to the expected threshold, the judgment matrix is ​​reasonable. The expression for obtaining the consistency index is:

[0144]

[0145] Among them, CI is the consistency index, λ max is the maximum eigenvalue;

[0146] Step S505, using the entropy weight method to correct the weights of the scientific value level, market value level, economic value level and authoritative value level, the calculation expression for obtaining the weight is:

[0147]

[0148] Among them, w j represents the weight of the jth indicator, g j represents the coefficient of variation of the jth indicator, j = 1, 2, 3, 4;

[0149] Get the combined weights of each indicator. The calculation expression for the combined weights is:

[0150]

[0151] Among them, g i represents the coefficient of difference of the jth indicator, w j represents the weight of the jth indicator in the entropy weight method, v j It represents the weight of the jth indicator in the hierarchical analysis method;

[0152] Step S506, performing weighted calculation on the scientific value grade, the market value grade, the economic value grade and the authoritative value grade according to the weights to obtain the technical solution grade.

[0153] In this embodiment, the hierarchical analysis method and the entropy weight method are used to obtain the weights of the science and technology level, the market value level, the economic value level and the authority value level, which reduces the subjectivity of manually setting weights and ensures the accuracy and comprehensiveness of the weight distribution.

[0154] The step S101 specifically includes the following steps:

[0155] Step S1011, performing word segmentation preprocessing on the technical solution, and converting words in several word segmentation results into word vectors;

[0156] Step S1021, dividing all word vectors into a preset number of clusters according to a clustering algorithm, adding up the word vectors contained in each cluster, and defining the word vector with the largest absolute value as the keyword of the cluster;

[0157] Step S1023, determining the relevance between the keyword and the technical solution according to the absolute value of the word vector of the keyword, and defining the keyword with a relevance greater than or equal to an expected threshold as a technical keyword.

[0158] In this embodiment, keyword extraction technology is used to extract keywords of the technical solution, and the keywords are defined as technical keywords, which provides a detailed search basis for subsequent retrieval of related technical solutions based on technical keywords, obtaining the relevance of related technical solutions, and obtaining similar technical solutions.

[0159] The step S103 specifically includes the following steps:

[0160] Step S1031, extracting relevant technical keywords of the relevant technical solutions by using keyword extraction technology;

[0161] Step S1032, comparing the technical keyword with the related technical keyword, obtaining the similarity between the technical keyword and the related technical keyword, and obtaining the technical difference according to the similarity;

[0162] Step S1033: determining the technical innovation value of the technical solution through the technical difference.

[0163] In this embodiment, the technical innovation value of the technical solution is obtained by comparing the technical keywords of the technical solution with the relevant technical keywords of related technical solutions, which provides an accurate innovation value assessment reference for obtaining the scientific value level of the technical solution.

[0164] Example 2, reference Figure 2 ,The present invention provides a multi-dimensional technology achievement evaluation system, including a keyword extraction module, a value grade module and a technology grade module;

[0165] The keyword extraction module is used to extract keywords of the technical solution using keyword extraction technology;

[0166] The value grade module is used to obtain the scientific value grade, market value grade, economic value grade and authoritative value grade of the technical solution;

[0167] The technical grade module is used to determine the weight coefficients of scientific value grade, market value grade, economic value grade and authoritative value grade using the hierarchical analysis method and the entropy weight method, and obtain the technical solution grade of the technical solution based on the weight coefficient, scientific value grade, market value grade, economic value grade and authoritative value grade.

[0168] In this embodiment, by obtaining the scientific value grade, market value grade, economic value grade and authoritative value grade of the technical solution, the results of the technical solution are analyzed from multiple aspects and angles, and the technical solution grade of the technical solution is obtained, which ensures the comprehensiveness and multi-dimensionality of the evaluation of the technical results and makes the evaluation results more accurate and effective.

[0169] The analytic hierarchy process and entropy weight method are used to obtain the weights of the science and technology level, the market value level, the economic value level and the authority value level, which reduces the subjectivity of artificially setting weights and ensures the accuracy and comprehensiveness of the weight distribution.

[0170] The value grade module includes a science grade unit, a market grade unit, an economic grade unit and an authority grade unit;

[0171] The scientific grade unit is used to determine the scientific value grade of the technical solution by obtaining the technical innovation value, technical breadth value, technical independence value and technical science and technology value of the technical solution;

[0172] The market rating unit is used to obtain the market value rating of the technical solution by obtaining the marketability value and the marketability demand value;

[0173] The economic grade unit is used to obtain the economic value grade of the technical solution by obtaining the technical benefit value and cost feasibility value of the technical solution;

[0174] The authority level unit is used to obtain a first authority value of the technical solution according to the title of the inventor and the number of inventions of the technical solution, obtain a second authority value according to the number of inventions of the invention unit and the level of historical technical solutions, and obtain the authority value level of the technical solution through the first authority value and the second authority value.

[0175] In this embodiment, the scientific value grade is obtained by obtaining the technical innovation value, technical breadth value, technical independence value and technical science and technology value of the technical solution; the market value grade is obtained by obtaining the marketability capability value and marketization demand value of the technical solution; the economic value grade is obtained by obtaining the technical benefit value and cost feasibility value of the technical solution; the authoritative value grade is obtained by obtaining the first authority value and second authority value of the technical solution. The value of the results of the technical solution is evaluated from multiple aspects and angles, thereby ensuring the comprehensiveness and integrated nature of the value evaluation.

[0176] In this embodiment, by obtaining the scientific value grade, market value grade, economic value grade and authoritative value grade of the technical solution, the results of the technical solution are analyzed from multiple aspects and angles, and the technical solution grade of the technical solution is obtained, which ensures the comprehensiveness and multi-dimensionality of the evaluation of the technical results and makes the evaluation results more accurate and effective.

[0177] The analytic hierarchy process and entropy weight method are used to obtain the weights of the science and technology level, the market value level, the economic value level and the authority value level, which reduces the subjectivity of artificially setting weights and ensures the accuracy and comprehensiveness of the weight distribution.

[0178] It should be understood by those skilled in the art that the embodiments of the present invention can be provided as methods, systems or computer program products. Therefore, the present invention can take the form of a complete hardware embodiment, a complete software embodiment or an embodiment combining software and hardware. Moreover, the present invention can take the form of a computer program product implemented on one or more computer-usable storage media containing computer-usable program codes. Among them, the storage medium can be implemented by any type of volatile or non-volatile storage device or a combination thereof, such as static random access memory (Static Random Access Memory, referred to as SRAM), electrically erasable programmable read-only memory (Electrically Erasable Programmable Read-Only Memory, referred to as EEPROM), erasable programmable read-only memory (Erasable Programmable Read Only Memory, referred to as EPROM), programmable read-only memory (Programmable Red-Only Memory, referred to as PROM), read-only memory (Read-Only Memory, referred to as ROM), magnetic memory, flash memory, disk or optical disk. These computer program instructions may also be stored in a computer readable memory capable of directing a computer or other programmable data processing device to operate in a specific manner, so that the instructions stored in the computer readable memory produce an article of manufacture including an instruction device, which implements the process Figure 1 A process or multiple processes and / or boxes Figure 1 A function specified in one or more boxes.

[0179] It should be noted that the above embodiments are only used to illustrate the technical solutions of the present invention rather than to limit it. Although the present invention has been described in detail with reference to the preferred embodiments, those skilled in the art should understand that the technical solutions of the present invention may be modified or replaced by equivalents without departing from the spirit and scope of the technical solutions of the present invention, which should all be included in the scope of the claims of the present invention.

Claims

1. A multi-dimensional technology achievement evaluation method, characterized in that: The following steps are involved: Step S1, extracting keywords of the technical solution, defining the keywords as technical keywords, obtaining relevant technical solutions based on the technical keywords using big data technology, evaluating the technical innovation value, technical breadth value, technical independence value and technical science and technology value of the technical solution based on the relevant technical solution, and obtaining the scientific value level based on the technical innovation value, the technical breadth value, the technical independence value and the technical science and technology value; Step S2, using big data technology to obtain similar technical solutions based on the technical keywords, and obtaining the market demand value and marketability value of the technical solutions through the similar technical solutions, and obtaining the market value level of the technical solutions based on the market demand value and the marketability value; Step S3, obtaining similar technical solutions according to the technical keywords, and evaluating the cost feasibility value and technical benefit value of the technical solution according to the difference between the technical solution and the similar technical solutions, and obtaining the economic value level of the technical solution according to the cost feasibility value and the technical benefit value; Step S4, extract the first inventor and the invention unit of the technical solution, obtain the title and number of inventions of the first inventor, and obtain the number of inventions and historical technical solution level of the invention unit in the relevant technical field, and obtain the authoritative value level according to the title and number of inventions of the first inventor and the number of inventions and historical technical solution level of the invention unit; Step S5, using the hierarchical analysis method and the entropy weight method to determine the weights of the scientific value level, market value level, economic value level and authoritative value level, and obtaining the technical solution level of the technical solution according to the weights.

2. A multi-dimensional technical achievement evaluation method according to claim 1, characterized in that: The step S1 specifically includes the following steps: Step S101, extracting keywords of the technical solution using keyword extraction technology, and determining the relevance of each keyword to the technical solution, and defining keywords with a relevance greater than or equal to an expected threshold as technical keywords; Step S102, searching in big data according to the technical keywords to obtain relevant technical solutions matching the keywords; Step S103, comparing the technical solution with the related technical solution to obtain a technical difference, and obtaining a technical innovation value of the technical solution according to the technical difference; Step S104, obtaining patent documents corresponding to the technical solution, extracting classification numbers of each patent document, obtaining the number of classification numbers, and obtaining the technical width value of the technical solution according to the number of classification numbers; Step S105, obtaining the number of citations of other technical solutions in the technical solution, and obtaining the technical independence value of the technical solution according to the number of citations; Step S106, retrieve all technical papers and technical patents corresponding to the technical solution, obtain the related papers and related patents that cite the technical papers and the technical patents according to the paper numbers of the technical papers and the patent numbers of the technical patents using big data technology, obtain the number of citations of the technical papers and the technical patents, and obtain the technical technology value according to the number of citations; Step S107, performing weighted addition calculation on the technology innovation value, the technology breadth value, the technology independence value and the technology science and technology value to obtain the scientific value level of the technology solution.

3. A multi-dimensional technical achievement evaluation method as claimed in claim 2, characterized in that: The step S2 specifically includes the following steps: Step S201, obtaining the correlation between the related technical solutions and the technical solutions, defining the related technical solutions whose correlation is greater than or equal to the expected threshold as similar technical solutions, obtaining the marketability value of the similar technical solutions, defining the marketability value of the similar technical solutions as similar marketability value, and obtaining the marketability value of the technical solution according to the correlation and the similar marketability value; Step S202, searching for relevant patents using big data technology according to the technical keywords, obtaining the trend of the number of relevant patents changing over time according to the publication date of the relevant patents, and obtaining the market demand value through the trend; Step S203, performing weighted calculation on the marketability value and the market demand value to obtain the market value level of the technical solution.

4. A multi-dimensional technical achievement evaluation method as claimed in claim 3, characterized in that: The step S3 specifically comprises the following steps: Step S301, obtaining the correlation between the similar technical solutions and the technical solution, extracting the similar technical solutions with the greatest correlation and the technical benefits of the similar technical solutions, and obtaining the technical benefits and technical costs of the technical solution according to the correlation between the similar technical solutions and the technical solution; Step S302, obtaining the technical benefit value of the technical solution according to the technical benefit, and obtaining the cost feasibility value of the technical solution according to the technical cost; Step S303, performing weighted calculation on the technical benefit value and the cost feasibility value to obtain the economic value level of the technical solution.

5. A multi-dimensional technical achievement evaluation method according to claim 1, characterized in that: The step S4 specifically comprises the following steps: Step S401, extracting the first inventor and inventing unit of the technical solution; Step S402, obtaining the professional title of the first inventor, obtaining the professional title value according to the professional title, using big data technology to retrieve and obtain the total number of papers and patents published by the first inventor, and obtaining the invention value according to the total number of papers and patents published, and obtaining the first authoritative value of the technical solution according to the professional title value and the invention value; Step S403, searching the number of inventions of the invention unit and the historical technical solution level corresponding to each technical invention, and obtaining a second authoritative value according to the number of inventions and the historical technical solution level; Step S404: Perform weighted calculation on the first authority value and the second authority value to obtain the authority value level of the technical solution.

6. A multi-dimensional technical achievement evaluation method according to claim 1, characterized in that: The step S5 specifically comprises the following steps: Step S501, obtaining a judgment matrix A, wherein the importance of the scientific value grade to determining the grade of the technical solution is C1, the importance of the market value grade to determining the grade of the technical solution is C2, the importance of the economic value grade to determining the grade of the technical solution is C3, and the importance of the authority value grade to determining the grade of the technical solution is C4. If C i is more important than C j , then a ij >1, if C i is less important than C j , then a ij <1, if C i The importance is equal to C j , then a ij =1, the mathematical expression of the judgment matrix A is: Among them, A is the judgment matrix, a ij is the relative importance value of each indicator, i is any natural number from 1, 2, 3, 4, and j is also any natural number from 1, 2, 3, 4; Step S502, normalize the judgment matrix A. The calculation expression of normalization is: in, is the data of the i-th row and j-th column of the normal matrix of the judgment matrix A, a ij To determine the data in the i-th row and j-th column of matrix A, i is the number of rows in the matrix and j is the number of columns in the matrix; Step S503, the normalized matrix is ​​added row by row, and normalization is performed to obtain the maximum eigenvalue of the judgment matrix A. The calculation expression for obtaining the maximum eigenvalue is: Regarding the Perform normalization and obtain the maximum eigenvalue of matrix A. The calculation expression for obtaining the maximum eigenvalue is: Among them, A is the judgment matrix, w i is the weight of the i-th indicator, λ max is the maximum eigenvalue of the judgment matrix A; Step S504: for the maximum eigenvalue λ max A consistency test is performed to obtain the consistency index. If the consistency index is greater than or equal to the expected threshold, the judgment matrix is ​​reasonable. The calculation expression for obtaining the consistency index is: Among them, CI is the consistency index, λ max is the maximum eigenvalue; Step S505, using the entropy weight method to correct the weights of the scientific value level, market value level, economic value level and authoritative value level, the calculation expression for obtaining the weight is: Among them, w j represents the weight of the jth indicator, g j represents the coefficient of variation of the jth indicator, j = 1, 2, 3, 4; Get the combined weight of each indicator. The calculation expression for the combined weight is as follows: Among them, g i represents the coefficient of difference of the jth indicator, w j represents the weight of the jth indicator in the entropy weight method, v j It represents the weight of the jth indicator in the hierarchical analysis method; Step S506, performing weighted calculation on the scientific value grade, the market value grade, the economic value grade and the authoritative value grade according to the weights to obtain the technical solution grade.

7. A multi-dimensional technical achievement evaluation method as claimed in claim 2, characterized in that: The step S101 specifically includes the following steps: Step S1011, performing word segmentation preprocessing on the technical solution, and converting words in several word segmentation results into word vectors; Step S1021, dividing all word vectors into a preset number of clusters according to a clustering algorithm, adding up the word vectors contained in each cluster, and defining the word vector with the largest word vector value as the keyword of the cluster; Step S1023, determining the relevance between the keyword and the technical solution according to the vector value of the word vector of the keyword, and defining the keyword with a relevance greater than or equal to an expected threshold as a technical keyword.

8. A multi-dimensional technical achievement evaluation method as claimed in claim 2, characterized in that: The step S103 specifically includes the following steps: Step S1031, extracting relevant technical keywords of the relevant technical solutions by using keyword extraction technology; Step S1032, comparing the technical keyword with the related technical keyword, obtaining the similarity between the technical keyword and the related technical keyword, and obtaining the technical difference according to the similarity; Step S1033: determining the technical innovation value of the technical solution through the technical difference.

9. A multi-dimensional technology achievement evaluation system, characterized in that: It includes keyword extraction module, value level module and technical level module; The keyword extraction module is used to extract keywords of the technical solution using keyword extraction technology; The value grade module is used to obtain the scientific value grade, market value grade, economic value grade and authoritative value grade of the technical solution; The technical grade module is used to determine the weight coefficients of scientific value grade, market value grade, economic value grade and authoritative value grade using the hierarchical analysis method and the entropy weight method, and obtain the technical solution grade of the technical solution based on the weight coefficient, scientific value grade, market value grade, economic value grade and authoritative value grade.

10. A multi-dimensional technology achievement evaluation system as claimed in claim 9, characterized in that: The value grade module includes a science grade unit, a market grade unit, an economic grade unit and an authority grade unit; The scientific grade unit is used to determine the scientific value grade of the technical solution by obtaining the technical innovation value, technical breadth value, technical independence value and technical science and technology value of the technical solution; The market rating unit is used to obtain the market value rating of the technical solution by obtaining the marketability value and the marketability demand value; The economic grade unit is used to obtain the economic value grade of the technical solution by obtaining the technical benefit value and cost feasibility value of the technical solution; The authority level unit is used to obtain a first authority value of the technical solution according to the title of the inventor and the number of inventions of the technical solution, obtain a second authority value according to the number of inventions of the invention unit and the level of historical technical solutions, and obtain the authority value level of the technical solution through the first authority value and the second authority value.

Images