Intellectual property value evaluation method and device, storage medium and computer product
By obtaining the characteristic data of intellectual property products and entering a preset value evaluation model, the inconsistency problem of intellectual property value evaluation is solved, the accurate evaluation of the value of intellectual property products is achieved, and the efficiency of pledge financing business is improved.
Patent Information
- Application Number
- CN202411294396.5
- Authority / Receiving Office
- CN · China
- Patent Type
- Applications(China)
- Current Assignee / Owner
- Filing Date
- 2024-09-14
- Publication Date
- 2025-03-25
AI Technical Summary
In the prior art, the value evaluation of intellectual property rights lacks consistent evaluation standards, which makes it difficult, expensive and slow, and limits the development of intellectual property pledge financing business.
By obtaining characteristic data of the target intellectual property product, including the annual average intellectual property product transaction volume, the validity period of the intellectual property product, the intellectual property type adjustment coefficient and the additional adjustment coefficient, enter a preset intellectual property value evaluation model to evaluate the value of the target intellectual property product.
It has achieved objective and accurate assessment of the value of intellectual property products, solved the problems of difficulty, slowness and expensive assessment, and improved the quality and efficiency of intellectual property pledge financing business.
Smart Images
Figure CN119693017A_ABST
Abstract
Description
Technical Field
[0001] The present application relates to the field of intellectual property technology, and in particular to a method, device, storage medium and computer product for evaluating the value of intellectual property. Background Art
[0002] At present, the valuation of intellectual property collateral mainly relies on external evaluation agencies, resulting in a lack of consistent evaluation standards in the intellectual property value evaluation industry. Difficult, expensive and slow evaluations have limited the development of intellectual property pledge financing business. When intellectual property companies have financing needs, they are subject to problems such as long time limits and high costs for intellectual property pledge value evaluations.
[0003] The introduction of the internal evaluation method of intellectual property can effectively solve this problem, increase the financing amount of enterprises, and make valuable intellectual property rights come into full play. However, the internal evaluation method of intellectual property has some problems such as missing parts and lack of system, which restricts the development of intellectual property. Summary of the invention
[0004] The purpose of the embodiments of the present invention is to provide a method, device, storage medium and computer product for evaluating the value of intellectual property rights.
[0005] In order to achieve the above-mentioned purpose, the first aspect of the present application provides a method for intellectual property value assessment, which method includes: obtaining characteristic data of a target intellectual property product, wherein the characteristic data includes basic data related to an average annual transaction amount of the intellectual property product and an effective period of the intellectual property product, and also includes characteristic parameter data related to the type of the intellectual property product, the technical field to which it belongs, and characteristic index parameters; and inputting the characteristic data into a preset intellectual property value assessment model to assess the value of the target intellectual property product, wherein the preset intellectual property value assessment model is obtained based on the average annual transaction amount of the intellectual property product, the effective period of the intellectual property product, the intellectual property type adjustment coefficient, and the additional adjustment coefficient.
[0006] In an embodiment of the present invention, the preset intellectual property value assessment model is obtained based on the average annual intellectual property product transaction amount, the validity period of the intellectual property product, the intellectual property type adjustment coefficient and the additional adjustment coefficient, including: constructing an intellectual property value assessment basic model based on the average annual intellectual property product transaction amount, the intellectual property product validity period, the intellectual property type adjustment coefficient and the additional adjustment coefficient; and calculating the intellectual property type adjustment coefficient and the additional adjustment coefficient to obtain the preset intellectual property value assessment model.
[0007] In the embodiment of the present invention, the basic model for evaluating the value of intellectual property rights is represented by the following formula:
[0008]
[0009] Where I represents the average annual transaction amount of intellectual property products, T represents the validity period of the intellectual property products, C represents the adjustment coefficient of the intellectual property type, ∑A i represents the additional adjustment coefficient.
[0010] In an embodiment of the present invention, the calculation of the intellectual property type adjustment coefficient includes: obtaining first historical data of intellectual property products whose values have been assessed; based on the first historical data, constructing a data set including the type of intellectual property products, the technical field to which they belong, the innovation value and the historical assessment value; and based on the data set, determining the intellectual property type adjustment coefficient.
[0011] In the embodiment of the present invention, determining the intellectual property type adjustment coefficient based on the data set includes: constructing an intellectual property type adjustment coefficient model through the following formula:
[0012] V=f(aX, bY, Z(X, Y), C, d)
[0013] Wherein, X represents the type of intellectual property product, a represents the type weight, Y represents the technical field to which the intellectual property product belongs, b represents the technical field weight, Z(X, Y) represents the innovation value of the intellectual property product, V represents the historical evaluation value of the intellectual property product, C represents the intellectual property type adjustment coefficient, and d represents the error parameter. Based on the data set and the intellectual property type adjustment coefficient model, the relationship between the intellectual property type adjustment coefficient C and the type X and the technical field Y of the intellectual property product is determined to determine the intellectual property type adjustment coefficient.
[0014] In an embodiment of the present invention, the calculation of the additional adjustment coefficient includes: obtaining second historical data of an intellectual property product whose value has been assessed, the second historical data including the historical assessment value and the average annual intellectual property product transaction amount, the validity period of the intellectual property product and the calculated intellectual property type adjustment coefficient, and data of a characteristic index parameter set; based on the basic model for intellectual property value assessment, calculating an estimated value of the additional adjustment coefficient through the historical assessment value and the average annual intellectual property product transaction amount, the validity period of the intellectual property product and the calculated intellectual property type adjustment coefficient data; determining the weight of each characteristic index parameter in the characteristic index parameter set through the estimated value of the additional adjustment coefficient; and calculating the additional adjustment coefficient through the weight of the characteristic index parameter determined in the characteristic index parameter set.
[0015] In an embodiment of the present invention, after acquiring the characteristic data of the target intellectual property product, the method for intellectual property value assessment further includes: determining the weight of the corresponding characteristic index parameter in the characteristic index parameter set through the characteristic data based on a preset characteristic index parameter quantization table.
[0016] In an embodiment of the present invention, the evaluation of the value of the target intellectual property product includes: calculating the additional adjustment coefficient through the determined weight of the characteristic index parameter; and inputting the calculated additional adjustment coefficient into the preset intellectual property value evaluation model to evaluate the value of the intellectual property product.
[0017] In an embodiment of the present invention, the characteristic index parameters in the characteristic index parameter set include one or more of the stability parameters of the intellectual property product, protection scope parameters, achievement recognition parameters, reference value parameters, technical independence parameters, parameters of the technical field to which it belongs, parameters characterizing the pledge license situation, defensive parameters, control parameters and quality parameters.
[0018] A second aspect of the present application provides a control device for intellectual property value assessment, the control device comprising: a memory, a processor, and a computer program stored in the memory and executable on the processor, the processor executing the computer program to implement the above-mentioned method for intellectual property value assessment.
[0019] A third aspect of the present application provides a computer-readable storage medium, wherein the computer-readable storage medium stores computer-executable instructions, and when the computer-executable instructions are executed by a processor, they are used to implement the above-mentioned method for intellectual property value assessment.
[0020] A fourth aspect of the present application provides a computer program product, including a computer program, which implements the above-mentioned method for intellectual property value assessment when executed by a processor.
[0021] Through the above technical solution, the embodiment of the present invention inputs the characteristic data of the target intellectual property product into the preset intellectual property value assessment model to assess the value of the target intellectual property product, wherein the preset intellectual property value assessment model is obtained based on the average annual intellectual property product transaction amount, the validity period of the intellectual property product, the intellectual property type adjustment coefficient and the additional adjustment coefficient; through the intellectual property value assessment model, the value of the intellectual property product can be objectively and accurately assessed. The intellectual property value assessment model can solve the pain points and difficulties of difficult, slow and expensive evaluation of intellectual property products, and can improve the quality and efficiency of intellectual property pledge financing.
[0022] Other features and advantages of the embodiments of the present invention will be described in detail in the subsequent detailed description. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0023] The accompanying drawings are used to provide a further understanding of the embodiments of the present invention and constitute a part of the specification. Together with the following specific implementations, they are used to explain the embodiments of the present invention, but do not constitute a limitation on the embodiments of the present invention. In the accompanying drawings:
[0024] Figure 1 It is a flowchart of a method for evaluating the value of intellectual property rights provided by an embodiment of the present invention;
[0025] Figure 2 It is a schematic diagram of the example calculation of the basic model parameters for intellectual property value assessment;
[0026] Figure 3 is a schematic diagram of an example process for assessing the value of an intellectual property product; and
[0027] Figure 4 The internal structure of a computer device according to an embodiment of the present invention is schematically shown. DETAILED DESCRIPTION
[0028] In order to make the purpose, technical solution and advantages of the embodiment of the present invention clearer, the technical solution in the embodiment of the present invention will be clearly and completely described in conjunction with the drawings in the embodiment of the present invention. It should be understood that the specific implementation methods described herein are only used to illustrate and explain the embodiment of the present invention, and are not used to limit the embodiment of the present invention. Based on the embodiments in this application, all other embodiments obtained by ordinary technicians in this field without making creative work are within the scope of protection of this application.
[0029] It should be noted that if the embodiments of the present invention involve directional indications (such as up, down, left, right, front, back, etc.), the directional indications are only used to explain the relative position relationship, movement status, etc. between the components under a certain specific posture (as shown in the accompanying drawings). If the specific posture changes, the directional indication will also change accordingly.
[0030] In addition, if there are descriptions involving "first", "second", etc. in the embodiments of the present invention, the descriptions of "first", "second", etc. are only used for descriptive purposes and cannot be understood as indicating or suggesting their relative importance or implicitly indicating the number of the indicated technical features. Therefore, the features defined as "first" and "second" may explicitly or implicitly include at least one of the features. In addition, the technical solutions between the various embodiments can be combined with each other, but they must be based on the ability of ordinary technicians in the field to implement them. When the combination of technical solutions is contradictory or cannot be implemented, it should be deemed that such a combination of technical solutions does not exist and is not within the scope of protection required by this application.
[0031] Figure 1 1 is a flow chart of a method for evaluating the value of intellectual property rights provided by an embodiment of the present invention. Figure 1 The steps in the flowchart are shown in sequence with lines, but these steps are not necessarily executed in the order indicated. Unless otherwise specified in this document, there is no strict order restriction for the execution of these steps, and these steps can be executed in other orders. Moreover, Figure 1 At least part of the steps may include multiple sub-steps or multiple stages. These sub-steps or stages are not necessarily executed at the same time, but can be executed at different times. The execution order of these sub-steps or stages is not necessarily sequential, but can be executed in turn or alternately with other steps or at least part of the sub-steps or stages of other steps.
[0032] Please refer to Figure 1 , the method for evaluating the value of intellectual property rights may include the following steps:
[0033] Step S110: Acquire characteristic data of the target intellectual property product.
[0034] The characteristic data include basic data related to the average annual transaction volume of intellectual property products and the validity period of intellectual property products, and also include characteristic parameter data related to the type of intellectual property products, the technical field to which they belong and characteristic index parameters.
[0035] Step S120: inputting the characteristic data into a preset intellectual property value assessment model to assess the value of the target intellectual property product.
[0036] Among them, the preset intellectual property value assessment model is obtained based on the average annual intellectual property product transaction volume, the validity period of the intellectual property product, the intellectual property type adjustment coefficient and the additional adjustment coefficient.
[0037] Preferably, in step S120, the preset intellectual property value assessment model is obtained based on the average annual intellectual property product transaction amount, the validity period of the intellectual property product, the intellectual property type adjustment coefficient and the additional adjustment coefficient, which may include steps S121-S122: step S121, constructing a basic model for intellectual property value assessment based on the average annual intellectual property product transaction amount, the intellectual property product validity period, the intellectual property type adjustment coefficient and the additional adjustment coefficient; step S122, calculating the intellectual property type adjustment coefficient and the additional adjustment coefficient to obtain the preset intellectual property value assessment model.
[0038] Preferably, in step S121, the intellectual property value assessment basic model can be expressed by the following formula:
[0039]
[0040] Where I represents the average annual transaction amount of intellectual property products, T represents the validity period of the intellectual property products, C represents the adjustment coefficient of the intellectual property type, ∑A i represents the additional adjustment coefficient.
[0041] To illustrate by way of example, the average annual transaction amount of intellectual property products I can be determined based on the average annual contract amount of the intellectual property industry within a preset time period (for example, the past five years). The validity period T of an intellectual property product can be determined by the number of years that the expiration date of the intellectual property product exceeds the expiration date of the financing business. Among them, when the term exceeds half a year and is less than one year, it is calculated as half a year; when the term is less than half a year, it is not included in the calculation. Among them, the maximum calculation period of an intellectual property product shall not exceed the average license term in the implementation license contract of the major industry category to which it belongs. The intellectual property type adjustment coefficient C is used to reflect the impact of different types of intellectual property products on their value. Additional adjustment coefficient ∑A i Used to reflect the impact of the characteristics of intellectual property products on their value.
[0042] Preferably, step S122 may include step S1221: calculating the intellectual property type adjustment coefficient C; and step S1222: calculating the additional adjustment coefficient ∑A i .
[0043] Among them, the intellectual property type adjustment coefficient C can be determined based on the proportion of the number of different types of intellectual property products (for example, invention patents, utility model patents and design patents) in the patent implementation license statistics, combined with the innovation value corresponding to different types of intellectual property products in the innovation capability evaluation system.
[0044] Preferably, step S1221 may include: obtaining first historical data of intellectual property products whose values have been assessed; based on the first historical data, constructing a data set including the type of intellectual property products, the technical field to which they belong, the innovation value, and the historical assessment value; and based on the data set, determining the intellectual property type adjustment coefficient.
[0045] Among them, the types of intellectual property products include, for example, invention patents, utility model patents and design patents; the technical field to which the intellectual property products belong is, for example, the field corresponding to the classification number of the patent; and the innovation value is evaluated, for example, through an innovation capability evaluation system.
[0046] Preferably, determining the intellectual property type adjustment coefficient based on the data set may include: constructing an intellectual property type adjustment coefficient model through the following formula:
[0047] V=f(aX, bY, Z(X, Y), C, d) (2)
[0048] Wherein, X represents the type of intellectual property product, z represents the type weight, Y represents the technical field to which the intellectual property product belongs, b represents the technical field weight, Z(X, Y) represents the innovation value of the intellectual property product, V represents the historical evaluation value of the intellectual property product, C represents the adjustment coefficient of the intellectual property type, and d represents the error parameter.
[0049] Based on the data set and the intellectual property type adjustment coefficient model, the relationship between the intellectual property type adjustment coefficient C and the type X and the technical field Y of the intellectual property product is determined to determine the intellectual property type adjustment coefficient.
[0050] To illustrate with an example, by linearly fitting the intellectual property type adjustment coefficient model shown in formula (2) using a data set including the type of intellectual property products that have been evaluated, the technical field to which they belong, the innovation value, and the historical evaluation value, the relationship F between the intellectual property type adjustment coefficient C and the type X and technical field Y of the intellectual property product can be obtained. Among them, the innovation value Z(X, Y) of the intellectual property product can be obtained based on its type X and technical field Y. Based on the relationship F, when the type X and the technical field Y of the intellectual property product are determined, the intellectual property type adjustment coefficient C can be obtained. It should be noted that there may be other ways to determine the intellectual property type adjustment coefficient C, for example, by determining it through a clustering algorithm, and the embodiments of the present invention are not limited to this.
[0051] Preferably, step S1222 may include: obtaining second historical data of the intellectual property product whose value has been assessed, the second historical data including the historical assessed value and the average annual intellectual property product transaction amount, the validity period of the intellectual property product and the calculated intellectual property type adjustment coefficient, and data of the characteristic index parameter set; based on the intellectual property value assessment basic model, calculating the estimated value of the additional adjustment coefficient through the historical assessed value and the average annual intellectual property product transaction amount, the validity period of the intellectual property product and the calculated intellectual property type adjustment coefficient data; determining the weight of each characteristic index parameter in the characteristic index parameter set through the estimated value of the additional adjustment coefficient; and calculating the additional adjustment coefficient through the weight of the characteristic index parameter determined in the characteristic index parameter set.
[0052] Based on formula (1), the embodiment of the present invention can preferably obtain the additional adjustment coefficient ∑A by each characteristic index parameter in the characteristic index parameter set: i (∑A i<100%). For example, the data of the characteristic index parameter can be converted into a corresponding weight, and the weight of each characteristic index parameter can be used to represent the impact on the value of the intellectual property product.
[0053] The characteristic index parameters in the characteristic index parameter set preferably in the embodiment of the present invention may include one or more of the stability parameters of the intellectual property product, protection scope parameters, achievement recognition parameters, reference value parameters, technical independence parameters, parameters of the technical field to which it belongs, parameters characterizing the pledge license situation, defensive parameters, control parameters and quality parameters.
[0054] By way of example, the characteristics of intellectual property products related to value (e.g., legal value, technical value, and economic value) can be extracted. For example, characteristic index parameters related to legal value may include stability parameters and protection scope parameters of intellectual property products; characteristic index parameters related to technical value may include achievement recognition parameters, reference value parameters, technical independence parameters, and parameters of the technical field to which they belong; characteristic index parameters related to economic value may include parameters characterizing the status of pledge licensing, defensive parameters, control parameters, and quality parameters.
[0055] Among them, the stability parameter of the intellectual property product is used to indicate whether the patent is still valid after the review procedure or invalidation procedure. The protection scope parameter may include, for example, the first protection scope parameter (for example, used to indicate the number of patent claims), the second protection scope parameter (for example, used to indicate the number of pages of the patent specification) and the third protection scope parameter (for example, used to indicate the number of drawings in the specification). The achievement recognition parameter may include, for example, the first achievement recognition parameter (for example, used to indicate whether the patent has received the first-level reward in a preset time period) and the second achievement recognition parameter (for example, used to indicate whether the patent has received the second-level reward in a preset time period). The reference value parameter is used to indicate the number of times the patent has been cited. The technical independence parameter is used to indicate the number of similar patents. The technical field parameter indicates the number of patents in the technical field. The parameter characterizing the pledge and license situation is used to indicate whether the patent has been pledged or licensed. The defensive parameter is used to indicate the number of similar patents owned by the patentee in the technical field. The control parameter or market control parameter is equal to (the number of similar patents owned by the enterprise / the number of patents in the entire industry). The quality parameter is used to indicate the number of times the patent has been transferred.
[0056] Preferably, after step S110, the method for evaluating the value of intellectual property rights may further include: determining the weight of the corresponding characteristic index parameter in the characteristic index parameter set through the characteristic data based on a preset characteristic index parameter quantization table.
[0057] By way of example, the characteristic index parameters in the characteristic index parameter set may be quantized according to a preset characteristic index parameter quantization table. The preset characteristic index parameter quantization table is shown in Table 1, for example.
[0058] Table 1 Preset characteristic index parameter quantization table
[0059]
[0060] Taking an example, the historical evaluation value of the intellectual property products that have been evaluated, the average annual intellectual property product transaction amount I, the validity period T of the intellectual property products, the calculated intellectual property type adjustment coefficient C, and the characteristic index parameter set data are obtained; through formula (1), the additional adjustment coefficient ∑A can be calculated i The estimated value of; Through Table 1, the data of the characteristic index parameter set is quantified, for example, through The weight of each characteristic index parameter in the characteristic index parameter set (which may be referred to as a characteristic index vector) is represented. The weight of each characteristic index parameter in the characteristic index parameter set is obtained by machine learning (for example, by a neural network back propagation algorithm) through the estimated value of the additional adjustment coefficient obtained above and the corresponding characteristic index vector. Further, the additional adjustment coefficient ∑A may be calculated by the weight of the characteristic index parameter determined in the characteristic index parameter set. i That is, based on Table 1, according to the characteristic index parameters of the intellectual property product, the corresponding characteristic index parameter weights are obtained, and the obtained characteristic index parameter weights are added together to obtain the additional adjustment coefficient ∑A of the intellectual property product. i .
[0061] Preferably, step S120 can also directly calculate the intellectual property type adjustment coefficient C and the additional adjustment coefficient ∑A based on the first historical data and the second historical data of the intellectual property product whose value has been evaluated through deep machine learning. i Please refer to Figure 2 , the deep learning model can adjust the intellectual property type adjustment coefficient C and the additional adjustment coefficient ∑A i For example, through expert judgment and other methods, a training set is constructed based on the basic data (first historical data and second historical data). Through the deep learning model, a dynamic adjustment model is fitted to dynamically adjust the intellectual property type adjustment coefficient C and the additional adjustment coefficient ∑A i The dynamic adjustment model may be a fusion model including the two models of step S121 and step S122.
[0062] Preferably, in step S120, the evaluating the value of the target intellectual property product may include: calculating the additional adjustment coefficient by the weight of the determined characteristic index parameter; and inputting the calculated additional adjustment coefficient into the preset intellectual property value evaluation model to evaluate the value of the intellectual property product. Figure 3 , to illustrate, when it is necessary to evaluate the value of a certain intellectual property product, obtain the characteristic data of the intellectual property product (for example, the basic data includes the average annual intellectual property product transaction amount I, the intellectual property product validity period T; the characteristic parameter data includes the type of intellectual property product, the technical field to which it belongs and the data of the characteristic index parameter); the property type adjustment coefficient C can be calculated by the type of intellectual property product and the technical field to which it belongs; through Table 1, the data of the characteristic index parameter is quantified to determine the weight of the corresponding characteristic index parameter; through the determined weight of the characteristic index parameter, the additional adjustment coefficient ∑A can be calculated i ; Through the average annual intellectual property product transaction volume I, the validity period of intellectual property products T, the intellectual property type adjustment coefficient C and the calculated additional adjustment coefficient ∑A i , input formula (1), the value of the intellectual property product can be calculated.
[0063] Accordingly, the embodiment of the present invention inputs the characteristic data of the target intellectual property product into the preset intellectual property value assessment model to assess the value of the target intellectual property product, wherein the preset intellectual property value assessment model is obtained based on the average annual intellectual property product transaction amount, the validity period of the intellectual property product, the intellectual property type adjustment coefficient and the additional adjustment coefficient; through the intellectual property value assessment model, the value of the intellectual property product can be objectively and accurately assessed. The intellectual property value assessment model can solve the pain points and difficulties of difficult, slow and expensive evaluation of intellectual property products, and can improve the quality and efficiency of intellectual property pledge financing.
[0064] An embodiment of the present invention also provides a control device for evaluating the value of intellectual property rights, the control device comprising: a memory, a processor, and a computer program stored in the memory and executable on the processor, the processor executing the computer program to implement the above-mentioned method for evaluating the value of intellectual property rights.
[0065] The processor includes a kernel, which retrieves the corresponding program unit from the memory. One or more kernels may be provided, and the above-mentioned method for evaluating the value of intellectual property rights may be implemented by adjusting kernel parameters. The memory may include non-permanent memory in a computer-readable medium, random access memory (RAM) and / or non-volatile memory, such as read-only memory (ROM) or flash RAM, and the memory includes at least one memory chip.
[0066] An embodiment of the present invention further provides a computer-readable storage medium, characterized in that the computer-readable storage medium stores computer-executable instructions, and when the computer-executable instructions are executed by a processor, they are used to implement the above-mentioned method for intellectual property value assessment.
[0067] An embodiment of the present invention further provides a computer program product, including a computer program, which implements the above-mentioned method for evaluating the value of intellectual property rights when executed by a processor.
[0068] In one embodiment, a computer device is provided. The computer device may be a terminal, and its internal structure diagram may be as follows: Figure 4 As shown. The computer device includes a processor A01, a network interface A02, a display screen A04, an input device A05 and a memory (not shown in the figure) connected through a system bus. Among them, the processor A01 of the computer device is used to provide computing and control capabilities. The memory of the computer device includes an internal memory A03 and a non-volatile storage medium A06. The non-volatile storage medium A06 stores an operating system B01 and a computer program B02. The internal memory A03 provides an environment for the operation of the operating system B01 and the computer program B02 in the non-volatile storage medium A06. The network interface A02 of the computer device is used to communicate with an external terminal through a network connection. When the computer program is executed by the processor A01, a method for evaluating the value of intellectual property rights is implemented. The display screen A04 of the computer device can be a liquid crystal display or an electronic ink display, and the input device A05 of the computer device can be a touch layer covered on the display screen, or a key, trackball or touchpad set on the computer device housing, or an external keyboard, touchpad or mouse.
[0069] Those skilled in the art will understand that Figure 4 The structure shown in the figure is only a block diagram of a part of the structure related to the solution of the present application, and does not constitute a limitation on the computer device to which the solution of the present application is applied. The specific computer device may include more or fewer components than those shown in the figure, or combine certain components, or have a different arrangement of components.
[0070] The acquisition, transmission, storage, use, and processing of data in the technical solution of this application are in compliance with the relevant provisions of national laws and regulations. It should be noted that in the embodiments of the present invention, some existing solutions in the industry such as certain software, components, and models may be mentioned, which should be considered as exemplary, and their purpose is only to illustrate the feasibility of the implementation of the technical solution of this application, but it does not mean that the applicant has or will necessarily use the solution.
[0071] Those skilled in the art will appreciate that the embodiments of the present application may be provided as methods, systems, or computer program products. Therefore, the present application may adopt the form of a complete hardware embodiment, a complete software embodiment, or an embodiment in combination with software and hardware. Moreover, the present application may adopt the form of a computer program product implemented in one or more computer-usable storage media (including but not limited to disk storage, CD-ROM, optical storage, etc.) that include computer-usable program code.
[0072] The present application is described with reference to the flowcharts and / or block diagrams of the methods, devices (systems), and computer program products according to the embodiments of the present invention. It should be understood that each process and / or block in the flowchart and / or block diagram, as well as the combination of the processes and / or blocks in the flowchart and / or block diagram, can be implemented by computer program instructions. These computer program instructions can be provided to a processor of a general-purpose computer, a special-purpose computer, an embedded processor, or other programmable data processing device to generate a machine, so that the instructions executed by the processor of the computer or other programmable data processing device generate instructions for implementing the processes in the flowchart and / or block diagram. Figure 1 A process or multiple processes and / or boxes Figure 1 A device that provides the functions specified in a block or multiple blocks.
[0073] These computer program instructions may also be stored in a computer-readable memory capable of directing a computer or other programmable data processing device to operate in a specific manner, so that the instructions stored in the computer-readable memory produce an article of manufacture including an instruction device, which implements the process Figure 1 A process or multiple processes and / or boxes Figure 1 A function specified in one or more boxes.
[0074] These computer program instructions can also be loaded onto a computer or other programmable data processing device so that a series of operating steps are executed on the computer or other programmable device to produce a computer-implemented process, thereby providing instructions for implementing the process. Figure 1 A process or multiple processes and / or boxes Figure 1 The steps for the functions specified in one or more boxes.
[0075] In a typical configuration, a computing device includes one or more processors (CPU), input / output interfaces, network interfaces, and memory.
[0076] The memory may include non-permanent memory in a computer-readable medium, random access memory (RAM) and / or non-volatile memory in the form of read-only memory (ROM) or flash RAM. The memory is an example of a computer-readable medium.
[0077] Computer readable media include permanent and non-permanent, removable and non-removable media, and can be implemented by any method or technology to store information. Information can be computer readable instructions, data structures, program modules or other data. Examples of computer storage media include, but are not limited to, phase change memory (PRAM), static random access memory (SRAM), dynamic random access memory (DRAM), other types of random access memory (RAM), read-only memory (ROM), electrically erasable programmable read-only memory (EEPROM), flash memory or other memory technology, compact disk read-only memory (CD-ROM), digital versatile disk (DVD) or other optical storage, magnetic cassettes, magnetic tape magnetic disk storage or other magnetic storage devices or any other non-transmission media that can be used to store information that can be accessed by a computing device. As defined herein, computer readable media does not include temporary computer readable media (transitory media), such as modulated data signals and carrier waves.
[0078] It should also be noted that the terms "include", "comprises" or any other variations thereof are intended to cover non-exclusive inclusion, so that a process, method, commodity or device including a series of elements includes not only those elements, but also other elements not explicitly listed, or also includes elements inherent to such process, method, commodity or device. In the absence of more restrictions, the elements defined by the sentence "comprises a ..." do not exclude the existence of other identical elements in the process, method, commodity or device including the elements.
[0079] The above are only embodiments of the present application and are not intended to limit the present application. For those skilled in the art, the present application may have various changes and variations. Any modification, equivalent replacement, improvement, etc. made within the spirit and principle of the present application should be included within the scope of the claims of the present application.
Claims
1. A method for evaluating the value of intellectual property rights, characterized in that: The method for evaluating the value of intellectual property rights includes: Acquire characteristic data of the target intellectual property product, the characteristic data including basic data related to the average annual transaction amount of the intellectual property product and the validity period of the intellectual property product, and also including characteristic parameter data related to the type of the intellectual property product, the technical field to which it belongs, and characteristic index parameters; and The characteristic data is input into a preset intellectual property value assessment model to assess the value of the target intellectual property product. Among them, the preset intellectual property value assessment model is obtained based on the average annual intellectual property product transaction volume, the validity period of the intellectual property product, the intellectual property type adjustment coefficient and the additional adjustment coefficient.
2. The method for evaluating the value of intellectual property rights according to claim 1, characterized in that: The preset intellectual property value assessment model is obtained based on the average annual intellectual property product transaction amount, the validity period of the intellectual property product, the intellectual property type adjustment coefficient and the additional adjustment coefficient, including: Constructing a basic model for intellectual property value assessment based on the average annual intellectual property product transaction volume, the validity period of the intellectual property product, the intellectual property type adjustment coefficient and the additional adjustment coefficient; and The intellectual property type adjustment coefficient and the additional adjustment coefficient are calculated to obtain the preset intellectual property value assessment model.
3. The method for evaluating the value of intellectual property rights according to claim 2, characterized in that: The basic model for evaluating the value of intellectual property rights is expressed by the following formula: Where I represents the average annual transaction amount of intellectual property products, T represents the validity period of the intellectual property products, C represents the adjustment coefficient of the intellectual property type, ∑A i represents the additional adjustment coefficient.
4. The method for evaluating the value of intellectual property rights according to claim 2, characterized in that: The calculation of the intellectual property type adjustment coefficient includes: Get the first historical data of the intellectual property products whose value has been assessed; Based on the first historical data, construct a data set including the type of intellectual property products, the technical field to which they belong, the innovation value, and the historical evaluation value; and Based on the data set, the intellectual property type adjustment coefficient is determined.
5. The method for evaluating the value of intellectual property rights according to claim 4, characterized in that: Determining the intellectual property type adjustment coefficient based on the data set includes: The intellectual property type adjustment coefficient model is constructed through the following formula: V=f(aX, bY, Z(X, Y), C, d) Wherein, X represents the type of intellectual property product, a represents the type weight, Y represents the technical field to which the intellectual property product belongs, b represents the technical field weight, Z(X, Y) represents the innovation value of the intellectual property product, V represents the historical evaluation value of the intellectual property product, C represents the adjustment coefficient of the intellectual property type, and d represents the error parameter; and Based on the data set and the intellectual property type adjustment coefficient model, the relationship between the intellectual property type adjustment coefficient C and the type X and the technical field Y of the intellectual property product is determined to determine the intellectual property type adjustment coefficient.
6. The method for evaluating the value of intellectual property rights according to claim 2, characterized in that: The calculating of the additional adjustment coefficient comprises: Acquire second historical data of the intellectual property product whose value has been assessed, wherein the second historical data includes historical assessed value and the average annual transaction amount of the intellectual property product, the validity period of the intellectual property product, and the calculated intellectual property type adjustment coefficient and characteristic index parameter set data; Based on the basic model for intellectual property value assessment, the estimated value of the additional adjustment coefficient is calculated through the historical assessment value and the average annual transaction volume of intellectual property products, the validity period of the intellectual property products and the calculated intellectual property type adjustment coefficient; Determining the weight of each characteristic index parameter in the characteristic index parameter set by using the estimated value of the additional adjustment coefficient; and The additional adjustment coefficient is calculated by weighting the characteristic index parameters determined in the characteristic index parameter set.
7. The method for evaluating the value of intellectual property rights according to claim 6, characterized in that: After acquiring the characteristic data of the target intellectual property product, the method for evaluating the value of intellectual property further includes: Based on a preset feature index parameter quantization table, the weight of the corresponding feature index parameter is determined in the feature index parameter set through the feature data.
8. The method for evaluating the value of intellectual property rights according to claim 7, characterized in that: The evaluation of the value of the target intellectual property product includes: Calculating the additional adjustment coefficient by the determined weight of the characteristic index parameter; and The calculated additional adjustment coefficient is input into the preset intellectual property value assessment model to assess the value of the intellectual property product.
9. The method for evaluating the value of intellectual property rights according to claim 6, characterized in that: The characteristic index parameters in the characteristic index parameter set include one or more of the stability parameter, protection scope parameter, achievement recognition parameter, reference value parameter, technical independence parameter, technical field parameter, parameter characterizing the pledge license status, defensive parameter, control parameter and quality parameter of the intellectual property product.
10. A control device for evaluating the value of intellectual property rights, characterized in that: The control device includes: a memory, a processor, and a computer program stored in the memory and executable on the processor, and the processor executes the computer program to implement the method for intellectual property value assessment according to any one of claims 1-9.
11. A computer-readable storage medium, characterized in that: The computer-readable storage medium stores computer-executable instructions, which, when executed by a processor, are used to implement the method for intellectual property value assessment described in any one of claims 1 to 9.
12. A computer program product, characterized in that The invention comprises a computer program, which, when executed by a processor, implements the method for evaluating the value of intellectual property rights as described in any one of claims 1 to 9.