A pesticide composition containing feneptamidoquin and its application
By combining feneptamidoquin with blastifungin or blastamide, the problem of rice blast resistance has been solved, efficient and economical rice blast prevention and control has been achieved, and the generation and development of resistance has been delayed.
Patent Information
- Application Number
- CN202411884064.2
- Authority / Receiving Office
- CN · China
- Patent Type
- Patents(China)
- Current Assignee / Owner
- Filing Date
- 2024-12-20
- Publication Date
- 2025-09-23
- Estimated Expiration
- 2044-12-20
AI Technical Summary
In the existing technology, due to the problem of drug resistance of rice blast fungus, the field control effect of pesticides on rice blast has been greatly reduced, and new prevention and control measures are urgently needed to ensure stable and high rice yields.
Feneptamidoquin is rationally compounded with rice blast fungicide or rice blast amide, which are pesticides with different mechanisms of action, to form a pesticide composition for controlling rice blast fungi, thereby reducing the number of applications and the amount of medicine used.
Through reasonable compounding, the prevention and control effect is improved, the drug resistance of pathogens is delayed, the cost is reduced, and the durability of the drug effect is maintained while reducing the dosage.
Smart Images

Figure SMS_1 
Figure SMS_2 
Figure SMS_3
Abstract
Description
Technical Field
[0001] The present invention belongs to the technical field of pesticide compounding, and particularly relates to a pesticide composition containing feneptamidoquin and application thereof. Background Art
[0002] Rice blast, caused by the fungus Phyricularia gisea of the Deuteromycetes (also known as gray pear spore, the sexual form of which is Magnaporthe grisea), is a major threat to rice production stability, quality, and safety in rice-growing areas worldwide. Severe damage can lead to a 40% to 50% yield reduction or even total crop failure.
[0003] For a long time, pesticide control has remained the most rapid and effective measure for preventing and controlling rice blast. However, due to the mutation of the rice blast fungus and the irrational use of chemical pesticides, the problem of pesticide resistance has become increasingly serious in rice production, resulting in a significant decline in the effectiveness of pesticides against rice blast in the field. Therefore, new pesticides are urgently needed to prevent and control rice blast in rice production and provide a guarantee for the prevention and control of this disease.
[0004] The development of novel, highly effective fungicide combinations combining fungicides with different mechanisms of action is crucial for overcoming and delaying bacterial resistance, reducing pesticide dosage, effectively controlling the damage caused by rice blast, and ensuring stable and high rice yields. This study used a mycelial growth rate method to determine the indoor toxicity of different mixtures of feneptamidoquin with pyraclostrobin and pyraclostrobin against the rice blast fungus. The combined action patterns of the mixtures were analyzed, and field trials were conducted to evaluate the efficacy of selected mixtures against rice blast, aiming to provide technical support for the prevention and control of rice blast and the management of pesticide resistance. Summary of the Invention
[0005] Based on the above, the present invention aims to provide a pesticide composition containing feneptamidoquin and its use. This pesticide composition, through the rational combination of pesticides with different mechanisms of action, effectively reduces the number of applications and dosage, thereby lowering costs. This pesticide composition is effective for controlling rice blast fungi, reducing the dosage and delaying the development of drug resistance in pathogenic bacteria.
[0006] In order to achieve the above-mentioned object, the present invention adopts the following technical solution: a pesticide composition containing feneptamidoquin and its application, wherein the pesticide composition comprises active ingredient A and active ingredient B, wherein the active ingredient A is feneptamidoquin, and the active ingredient B is either pyraclostrobin or pyraclostrobin, and the mass ratio of the active ingredient A to the active ingredient B is 1:25 to 30:1, or any value within the above numerical range.
[0007] Furthermore, the active ingredient B is pyrimethamine, and the mass ratio of the active ingredient A to the active ingredient B is 1:25 to 16:1, or any value within the above numerical range;
[0008] The active ingredient B is rice blastifungin, and the mass ratio of the active ingredient A to the active ingredient B is 1:25 to 22:1, or any value within the above numerical range.
[0009] Furthermore, the active ingredient B is pyrimethamine, and the mass ratio of the active ingredient A to the active ingredient B is 1:20 to 8:1, or any value within the above numerical range;
[0010] The active ingredient B is rice blastolin, and the mass ratio of the active ingredient A to the active ingredient B is 1:18 to 22:1, or any value within the above numerical range.
[0011] Furthermore, the active ingredient B is pyrimethamine, and the mass ratio of the active ingredient A to the active ingredient B is 1:16 to 4:1, or any value within the above numerical range;
[0012] The active ingredient B is rice blastolin, and the mass ratio of the active ingredient A to the active ingredient B is 1:5 to 18:1, or any value within the above numerical range.
[0013] Furthermore, based on the total weight of the pesticide composition being 100 wt%, the sum of the contents of the active ingredient A and the active ingredient B in the pesticide composition is 1 to 80 wt%, or any value within the above numerical range;
[0014] Furthermore, based on the total weight of the pesticide composition being 100 wt%, the sum of the contents of the active ingredient A and the active ingredient B in the pesticide composition is 2 to 50 wt%, or any value within the above numerical range;
[0015] Furthermore, the pesticide composition includes agriculturally acceptable auxiliary ingredients in addition to the active ingredients.
[0016] Furthermore, the auxiliary ingredients include one or more of a wetting agent, a dispersant, an emulsifier, a thickener, a disintegrant, an antifreeze agent, a defoaming agent, a solvent, a stabilizer, a film former, a warning color, a penetrant, and a carrier;
[0017] Furthermore, the pesticide composition can be prepared into any dosage form permitted in agriculture, and the dosage form is a solid preparation or a liquid preparation;
[0018] Furthermore, the solid preparation is a wettable powder, and the liquid preparation is a suspension concentrate, emulsifiable concentrate, water emulsion, microemulsion, or seed treatment suspension concentrate.
[0019] The present invention also discloses the use of the above-mentioned feneptamidoquin-containing pesticide composition in preventing and controlling pathogenic bacteria in agriculture, forestry and horticulture plants.
[0020] Furthermore, the plant pathogenic bacteria is rice blast fungus (Pyricularia oryzae);
[0021] Furthermore, the pesticide composition or its formulation is applied to plants, plant propagation materials and their growth environment.
[0022] Compared with the prior art, the present invention has the following advantages:
[0023] 1) The pesticide composition of the present invention selects agents with different mechanisms for reasonable compounding and use. Pesticides with different mechanisms of action can complement each other and improve the control effect;
[0024] 2) The pesticide composition of the present invention can reduce the amount of a single pesticide used, thereby reducing costs, ensuring long-lasting efficacy, and reducing the number of pesticide applications. DETAILED DESCRIPTION
[0025] In order to better illustrate the effective control effect of the present invention, the present invention is described in the following specific examples using the above-mentioned examples to make the technical scheme, purpose and advantages of the present invention more clearly understood, but the present invention is not limited to these examples. The technical effect test of the present invention adopts a combination of indoor bioassay and field test.
[0026] Preparation Example Preparation process:
[0027] 1. Emulsifiable concentrate: Add the active ingredient, solvent, and cosolvent into a mixing kettle and stir to dissolve them. Then add the emulsifier and make up the balance with the remaining solvent. Stir evenly in a stirring kettle and filter to obtain the desired emulsifiable concentrate.
[0028] 2. Microemulsion: Mix the active ingredients, solvent, emulsifier, etc. to prepare the oil phase, mix the antifreeze and water to prepare the water phase, add the oil phase to the water phase while stirring, continue shearing for 10 minutes, then add the defoaming agent and stir evenly to obtain small droplets of oil phase particles of 0.01 to 0.1 microns, thus obtaining the microemulsion product.
[0029] 3. Emulsion in water: Mix the surfactant, antifreeze agent, density regulator and water to form an aqueous phase. Then dissolve the active ingredient in a solvent and add it to the aqueous phase under stirring. After stirring evenly, shear it to a particle size of D90 ≤ 5 microns. Add a thickener and preservative and continue shearing for 10 minutes. Then add a defoamer and stir evenly to form an O / W type emulsion in water.
[0030] 4. Suspension concentrate: Place the active ingredient, surfactant and other functional additives in a reactor in sequence, add water and mix evenly, and then undergo high-speed shearing, wet sand grinding, and finally homogenization filtration to obtain the suspension concentrate product.
[0031] 5. Wettable powder: The active ingredient, dispersant, wetting agent and filler are mixed according to the formula ratio, stirred evenly in a stirring tank, and pulverized and mixed evenly multiple times in a jet mill to prepare the wettable powder of the composition of the present invention.
[0032] Preparation Example:
[0033] Preparation Example 1: 9% feneptamidoquin·pamoate emulsifiable concentrate (1:8)
[0034] Formula composition: 1% feneptamidoquin, 8% pyramide, 15% EO / PO block copolymer, 12% acetophenone, 12% propylene glycol methyl ether, 2% calcium dodecylbenzenesulfonate, and xylene makes up the balance.
[0035] Preparation Example 2: 1.5% feneptamidoquin·pamoate microemulsion (3:2)
[0036] Formula composition: 0.9% feneptamidoquin, 0.6% pyrrolidone, 20% cyclohexanone, 15% phenylethylphenol polyoxyethylene polyoxypropylene ether, 3% triphenethylphenol polyoxyethylene ether, 2% alkylphenol polyoxyethylene ether methyl ether condensate sodium sulfate, 0.05% silicone defoamer, and deionized water to make up the balance.
[0037] Preparation Example 3: 1.0% feneptamidoquin·pamoate emulsion in water (2:3)
[0038] Formula composition: 0.4% feneptamidoquin, 0.6% pyramide, 4% xylene, 12% cyclohexanone, 1% BHT, 2% castor oil polyoxyethylene ether phosphate, 5% ethylene oxide-propylene oxide copolymer, 5% ethylene glycol, 0.05% silicone defoamer, 0.1% xanthan gum, 0.1% sodium benzoate, and deionized water to make up the balance.
[0039] Preparation Example 4: 25% feneptamidoquin·pamoate wettable powder (4:1)
[0040] Formula composition: 20% feneptamidoquin, 5% pyramide, 2% sodium lauryl sulfate, 2% sodium lignin sulfonate, 4% alkyl naphthalene sulfonate, 4% naphthalene sulfonate formaldehyde condensate, 10% kaolin, 8% white carbon black, and bentonite makes up the balance.
[0041] Preparation Example 5: 16% feneptamidoquin·Pyrrochlore suspension concentrate (3:1)
[0042] Formula composition: 12% feneptamidoquin, 4% rice blast, 1% Guerbet alcohol polyoxyethylene ether, 1% alkyl polyoxyethylene ether sodium sulfonate, 2% styrenated phenol polyoxyethylene ether phosphate, 2% ethylene glycol oxyethylene polyoxypropylene ether, 1% polycarboxylic acid sodium salt, 0.3% xanthan gum, 1% magnesium aluminum silicate, 5% glycerol, 0.1% potassium benzoate, 0.5% silicone oil, and deionized water to make up the balance.
[0043] Preparation Example 6: 12% feneptamidoquin·pyraclostrobin emulsifiable concentrate (1:5)
[0044] Formula composition: 2% feneptamidoquin, 10% rice blasting, 8% dimethyl sulfoxide, 10% castor oil polyoxyethylene ether, 2% calcium dodecylbenzenesulfonate, 18% propylene carbonate, and xylene makes up the balance.
[0045] Preparation Example 7: 30% feneptamidoquin·plasmolin wettable powder (9:1)
[0046] Formula composition: 27% feneptamidoquin, 3% blastifungin, 4% naphthalenesulfonate, 2% sodium lauryl sulfate, 5% sodium polycarboxylate, 5% white carbon black, and kaolin makes up the balance.
[0047] Indoor activity test
[0048] Example 1: Indoor joint effect test of feneptamidoquin mixed with blastifungin or blastamide on rice blast
[0049] The test is based on: NY / T 1156.2-2006 "Guidelines for Indoor Bioassay Tests of Pesticides - Fungicides Part 2: Inhibition of Pathogenic Fungal Mycelial Growth Test Plate Method" and NY / T 1156.6-2006 "Guidelines for Indoor Bioassay Tests of Pesticides - Fungicides Part 6: Determination of the Combined Action of Mixtures".
[0050] Test target: Rice blast fungus (Pyricularia oryzae Cav.).
[0051] Test agents: feneptamidoquin technical, pyraclostrobin technical, and pyraclostrobin technical.
[0052] Preparation of pharmaceutical agents: Dissolve the above test agents in a suitable solvent, and then dilute with 0.1% Tween-80 aqueous solution. Set the required series of mass concentrations according to the activity of the agent.
[0053] Test Method: Add the prepared agents to melted PDA medium, mix, and pour into sterilized culture dishes to create a series of drug-containing plates with a gradient concentration. Under sterile conditions, cut bacterial cakes from the edge of a 7-day-old colony and inoculate them into the center of each drug-containing plate, with one cake per plate. Each drug constitutes one treatment, with four replicates per treatment. Incubate inverted at 28°C in the dark. When the colonies in the blank control culture dish grow close to the edge of the dish, measure the colony diameter using the cross-hatch method. Measure each colony twice and take the average value.
[0054] Data statistics and calculation method: According to the survey results, the mycelial growth inhibition rate of each treatment concentration on the target bacteria was calculated according to the following formula. According to the logarithmic value of each agent concentration and the corresponding inhibition probability value, the statistical analysis system was used to analyze and obtain the toxicity regression equation, EC 50 The activity of the test agent on the biological test material was evaluated by using the value and correlation coefficient.
[0055]
[0056] Where:
[0057] I—colony growth inhibition rate;
[0058] D0—blank control colony growth diameter;
[0059] D t —The growth diameter of the colony after drug treatment.
[0060] The co-toxicity coefficient (CTC) of the mixture was calculated according to the Sun Yunpei method to evaluate the type of combined action.
[0061] CTC ≥ 120 showed a synergistic effect, CTC ≤ 80 showed an antagonistic effect, and CTC between 80 and 120 showed an additive effect.
[0062] The co-toxicity coefficient (CTC value) of the mixture is calculated as follows:
[0063]
[0064] Where:
[0065] ATI - measured toxicity index of mixture;
[0066] S——EC of standard fungicide50 , the unit is milligrams per liter (mg / L);
[0067] M——EC of the mixture 50 , the unit is milligrams per liter (mg / L).
[0068] TTI=TI A ×P A +TI B ×P B
[0069] Where:
[0070] TTI – Theoretical Toxicity Index of Mixtures;
[0071] TI A ——Agent toxicity index;
[0072] P A ——The percentage of agent A in the mixture, in percentage (%);
[0073] TI B ——Toxicity index of agent B;
[0074] P B ——The percentage of agent B in the mixture, in percentage (%).
[0075]
[0076] Where:
[0077] CTC – Co-toxicity coefficient;
[0078] ATI - measured toxicity index of mixture;
[0079] TTI - Theoretical Toxicity Index of Mixture.
[0080] The indoor test results are shown in the table below.
[0081] Table 1 Results of indoor combined effect test of feneptamidoquin and blastamide on rice blast
[0082] Test drug Virulence regression equation Correlation coefficient R <![CDATA[EC 50 (mg.L -1 )]]> Co-toxicity coefficient feneptamidoquin(A) y=1.8845x+4.4535 0.9882 1.9499 - Blastamide (B) y=1.4423x+4.3554 0.9989 2.7985 - A:B(1:25) y=1.3060x+4.5547 0.9942 2.1925 125.538 A:B(1:20) y=1.4849x+4.5638 0.9940 1.9670 139.384 A:B(1:16) y=1.4075x+4.6134 0.9992 1.8821 144.979 A:B(1:8) y=1.4177x+4.6738 0.9906 1.6986 157.154 A:B(1:4) y=1.3932x+4.7283 0.9942 1.5669 164.300 A:B(2:3) y=1.3274x+4.8219 0.9865 1.3619 175.018 A:B(3:2) y=1.2854x+4.8351 0.9723 1.3436 165.158 A:B(4:1) y=1.3300x+4.8086 0.9938 1.3927 149.048 A:B(8:1) y=1.2606x+4.7938 0.9946 1.4574 138.458 A:B(16:1) y=1.2642x+4.7352 0.9970 1.6198 122.565 A:B(20:1) y=1.4602x+4.6432 0.9979 1.7553 112.714
[0083] From the test results in the table above, we can see that feneptamidoquin has a high toxicity to rice blast. 50The combined effect of feneptamidoquin and blastamide showed good antibacterial activity against rice blast fungus. When the mass ratio of feneptamidoquin to blastamide was between 1:25 and 16:1, the co-toxicity coefficient was greater than 120, and the combined effect showed synergistic activity. When the mass ratio of feneptamidoquin to blastamide was between 1:20 and 8:1, the co-toxicity coefficient was greater than 130, indicating a significant synergistic effect. When the mass ratio of feneptamidoquin to blastamide was between 1:16 and 4:1, the co-toxicity coefficient was greater than 140, indicating a significant synergistic effect. When the mass ratio of feneptamidoquin to blastamide was 2:3, the co-toxicity coefficient reached a maximum of 175.018, indicating the most significant synergistic effect.
[0084] Table 2 Results of indoor combined effect test of feneptamidoquin and blasticide mixture on rice blast
[0085] Test drug Virulence regression equation Correlation coefficient R <![CDATA[EC 50 (mg.L -1 )]]> Co-toxicity coefficient feneptamidoquin(A) y=1.8845x+4.4535 0.9882 1.9499 - Blasticide(B) y=1.6127x+3.5942 0.9971 7.4423 - A:B(1:25) y=1.5628x+3.8495 0.9983 5.4476 123.262 A:B(1:18) y=1.4628x+4.0192 0.9970 4.6827 138.412 A:B(1:9) y=1.2135x+4.2772 0.9961 3.9418 147.311 A:B(1:5) y=1.4747x+4.3134 0.9982 2.9212 173.376 A:B(1:3) y=1.4558x+4.4718 0.9946 2.3060 189.378 A:B(3:1) y=1.4221x+4.9414 0.9921 1.0995 217.467 A:B(5:1) y=1.3578x+4.9460 0.9968 1.0959 202.881 A:B(9:1) y=1.5419x+4.8736 0.9923 1.2078 174.306 A:B(18:1) y=1.4360x+4.8657 0.9963 1.2404 163.552 A:B(22:1) y=1.4709x+4.7769 0.9974 1.4180 142.069 A:B(30:1) y=1.4453x+4.5879 0.9937 1.9280 103.602
[0086] The test results in the table above show that the combination of feneptamidoquin and blastifungin exhibits excellent antibacterial activity against rice blast fungi. When the mass ratio of feneptamidoquin to blastifungin is between 1:25 and 22:1, the cotoxicity coefficient is greater than 120, indicating synergistic effects. When the mass ratio of feneptamidoquin to blastifungin is between 1:18 and 22:1, the cotoxicity coefficient is greater than 130, indicating a significant synergistic effect. When the mass ratio of feneptamidoquin to blastifungin is between 1:5 and 18:1, the cotoxicity coefficient is greater than 150, indicating a significant synergistic effect. When the mass ratio of feneptamidoquin to blastifungin is 3:1, the cotoxicity coefficient reaches a maximum of 217.467, indicating the most significant synergistic effect.
[0087] Example 2: Field efficacy test on rice blast
[0088] Test basis: The test refers to GB / T 17980.19-2000 "Guidelines for field efficacy tests (I) Fungicides for the control of rice foliar diseases".
[0089] Test location: The test was conducted in the rice fields of Shenjiatun, Donghanjia Village, Shengshui Town, Liuhe County. The test site has flat terrain, uniform fertility, and white soil. The crop varieties, planting period, growth, fertilizer and water management conditions of each test plot are basically the same.
[0090] Test target: Rice blast fungus (Pyricularia oryzae Cav.).
[0091] Experimental crop: Rice (Hongke 689).
[0092] Experimental design: The experimental design consists of 8 treatments, each treatment is repeated 4 times, and clear water is used as a blank control. The plot area is 70m 2 , each plot is randomly arranged in blocks, and protection rows are set up in adjacent plots.
[0093] Application time and frequency: The test was conducted once at the initial stage of rice seedling breakout (breakout rate 5%-10%), using 30 kg of water per mu (approximately 100 kg / mu) and applying a uniform spray using a 3WBD-16L electric sprayer. Before and during the trial, all plots used the same pesticide (which had no impact on the experimental pesticide) for other pest and disease control, and management standards were consistent across all plots.
[0094] Survey method: Sampling was conducted at five points in each plot, with 50 ears at each point. A total of 250 ears were surveyed in each plot, and the survey was conducted once in total. Before the rice matured and was harvested, the number of diseased ears at all levels in each plot was surveyed, and the disease index and control effect were calculated.
[0095] Safety investigation of the pesticide: During the test, the rice grew normally, and the pesticides in the test concentrations did not cause any damage to the rice plants or other non-target organisms.
[0096] Classification records are made according to the following classification method:
[0097] Level 0: no disease;
[0098] Level 1: Loss of less than 5% per ear (individual branches and stalks are affected);
[0099] Level 3: 6% to 20% loss per ear (about one-third of the branches and stalks are diseased);
[0100] Level 5: 21% to 50% loss per ear (the neck or main axis is affected, and the grains are half-shrunken);
[0101] Level 7: 51% to 70% loss per ear (the ear neck is diseased and most of the grains are deflated);
[0102] Level 9: 71% to 100% loss per ear (the neck of the ear becomes diseased, resulting in white ears).
[0103] The efficacy is calculated according to the following formula:
[0104]
[0105] The results of the field efficacy test are shown in the table below:
[0106] Table 3 Field efficacy test results of feneptamidoquin and pyraclostrobin against rice blast (ear blast)
[0107] Pharmacy Active ingredient dosage (g / hectare) Disease Index Average control effect (%) Preparation Example 5: 16% feneptamidoquin·Pyrrochlore suspension concentrate (3:1) 120 0.71 94.25 Preparation Example 3: 1% feneptamidoquin·pamoate emulsion in water (2:3) 120 1.40 88.68 Preparation Example 1: 9% feneptamidoquin·pamoate emulsifiable concentrate (1:8) 120 2.16 82.57 Preparation Example 6: 12% feneptamidoquin·pyraclostrobin emulsifiable concentrate (1:5) 120 1.53 87.60 25% Paddyblastamide SC 300 4.60 62.80 20% feneptamidoquin water dispersible granules 150 3.62 70.71 40% Blastfurox EC 675 4.00 67.65 Clear water control / 12.37 /
[0108] The field efficacy test results in the table above show that the combination of feneptamidoquin with blastifungin and blastifungin has a good control effect on rice blast. A rice panicle blast survey was conducted before harvest after the rice matured after treatment. The control efficacy of the mixed agents Preparation Example 5: 16% feneptamidoquin·blastifungin SC (3:1), Preparation Example 3: 1% feneptamidoquin·blastifungin EW (2:3), Preparation Example 1: 9% feneptamidoquin·blastifungin EC (1:8), and Preparation Example 6: 12% feneptamidoquin·blastifungin EC (1:5) were 94.25%, 88.68%, 82.57%, and 87.60%, respectively.
[0109] Although the present application describes specific embodiments in detail by way of example, the disclosure of the present application may adopt various modifications and alternative forms. However, it should be understood that the disclosure of the present application is not limited to the specific forms disclosed. On the contrary, the disclosure of the present application covers all modifications, equivalents and alternative forms within the scope of the disclosure of the present application, and the scope of the present application is limited by the appended claims and their legal equivalents.
Claims
1. A pesticide composition containing feneptamidoquin, characterized in that: The pesticide composition consists of active ingredient A and active ingredient B, wherein the active ingredient A is feneptamidoquin, and the active ingredient B is either pyraclostrobin or pyraclostrobin; The active ingredient B is blastamide, and the mass ratio of the active ingredient A to the active ingredient B is 1:25 to 16:1; The active ingredient B is rice blasting agent, and the mass ratio of the active ingredient A to the active ingredient B is 1:25~22:
1.
2. The pesticide composition according to claim 1, characterized in that The active ingredient B is blastamide, and the mass ratio of the active ingredient A to the active ingredient B is 1:20 to 8:1; The active ingredient B is rice blasting agent, and the mass ratio of the active ingredient A to the active ingredient B is 1:18~22:
1.
3. The pesticide composition according to claim 1, characterized in that The active ingredient B is blastamide, and the mass ratio of the active ingredient A to the active ingredient B is 1:16 to 4:1; The active ingredient B is rice blasting agent, and the mass ratio of the active ingredient A to the active ingredient B is 1:5~18:
1.
4. The pesticide composition according to claim 1, characterized in that The total weight of the pesticide composition is 100 wt%, and the sum of the contents of the active ingredient A and the active ingredient B in the pesticide composition is 1 to 80 wt%.
5. The pesticide composition according to claim 4, characterized in that The total weight of the pesticide composition is 100 wt%, and the sum of the contents of the active ingredient A and the active ingredient B in the pesticide composition is 2 to 50 wt%.
6. The pesticide composition according to claim 1, characterized in that The pesticide composition contains auxiliary ingredients in addition to the active ingredients, and the auxiliary ingredients include one or more of a wetting agent, a dispersant, an emulsifier, a thickener, a disintegrant, an antifreeze agent, a defoaming agent, a solvent, a stabilizer, a film-forming agent, a warning color, a penetrant and a carrier.
7. The pesticide composition according to claim 1, characterized in that The pesticide composition is prepared into a solid preparation or a liquid preparation permitted in agriculture.
8. The pesticide composition according to claim 7, characterized in that The solid preparation is a wettable powder, and the liquid preparation is an emulsifiable concentrate, a microemulsion, a suspension concentrate, an aqueous emulsion, or a seed treatment suspension concentrate.
9. Use of the pesticide composition according to any one of claims 1 to 8 in controlling pathogenic bacteria in agriculture, forestry or horticulture plants.
10. The use according to claim 9, characterized in that The plant pathogen is rice blast fungus ( Pyricularia oryzae ).
11. The use according to claim 9, characterized in that The pesticide composition or its preparation is applied to plants, plant propagation materials and their growth environment.
Citation Information
Patent Citations
Microbiocidal quinoline (THIO)carboxamide derivatives
CN108697087A
Fungicidal compositions
CN111107745A