Quality evaluation method of medical laboratory, central server, terminal and medium

Abstract

According to the quality evaluation method provided by the embodiment of the invention, when the quality evaluation is carried out on the detection item of the medical laboratory, the indoor quality control data of all detections of the detection item developed in the medical laboratory are referred. The indoor quality control data of indoor quality control is referred, so that the detection equipment does not need to use a standard quality control product for quality control, the quality control flow of the standard quality control product is saved, and the quality control cost is reduced; in addition, the indoor quality control data of a plurality of detection devices are referred, so that the quality evaluation result of the medical laboratory can be prevented from being determined by a single standard machine, and the accuracy of the quality evaluation result of the medical laboratory can be improved; the batch numbers of the quality control products do not need to be consistent, and the quality evaluation process threshold is low. In addition, the embodiment of the invention also provides a quality evaluation method using the patient sample quality control data, a quality evaluation method applied to the quality evaluation terminal, a central server, a terminal and a readable storage medium.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] The present application relates to the field of medical equipment technology, and more specifically, to a quality evaluation method, a central server, a terminal, and a readable storage medium for a medical laboratory. Background Art

[0002] Medical laboratories usually include multiple sample testing equipment. Sample testing equipment is an instrument used to analyze and measure samples. Generally, reagents are added to the samples, and the samples reacting with the reagents are measured in a certain way to obtain the test results of the samples in a certain test item. In order to ensure the accuracy of the sample test results, it is usually necessary to evaluate the test quality of sample testing equipment in medical laboratories.

[0003] The current quality evaluation method for medical laboratories is to select a sample testing device in the medical laboratory, use standard quality control products to carry out quality control of a certain test item on the selected sample testing device, and obtain the quality evaluation results of the entire medical laboratory in the test item based on the quality control data of the sample testing device on the standard quality control product. However, the quality evaluation results obtained by the existing scheme are not accurate enough. Summary of the invention

[0004] In view of this, the present application provides a quality evaluation method, a central server, a terminal and a readable storage medium for a medical laboratory to improve the accuracy of the quality evaluation results of the medical laboratory.

[0005] A first aspect of an embodiment of the present application provides a quality evaluation method for a medical laboratory, which is applied to a central server, and the method includes:

[0006] For the test items carried out by the medical laboratory, collect the indoor quality control data of the test items carried out by multiple test equipments of the medical laboratory during the evaluation period;

[0007] According to the evaluation index corresponding to the indoor quality control data, statistical analysis is performed on the indoor quality control data of the plurality of detection devices to obtain the index results of the medical laboratory regarding the evaluation index within the evaluation period;

[0008] Compare the index result corresponding to the evaluation index with the preset standard corresponding to the evaluation index to obtain the quality evaluation result of the medical laboratory on the test item within the evaluation period

[0009] A second aspect of the present application embodiment provides a quality evaluation method for a medical laboratory, which is applied to a central server, and the method includes:

[0010] For the test items carried out by the medical laboratory, collect the patient sample quality control data of the test items carried out by the medical laboratory with multiple test equipments for the same test items within the evaluation period;

[0011] According to the evaluation index corresponding to the patient sample quality control data, statistical analysis is performed on the patient sample quality control data of the multiple detection devices to obtain the index results of the medical laboratory regarding the evaluation index within the evaluation period;

[0012] The indicator result corresponding to the evaluation indicator is compared with the preset standard corresponding to the evaluation indicator to obtain the quality evaluation result of the medical laboratory on the detection item within the evaluation period.

[0013] A third aspect of the present application embodiment provides a quality evaluation method for a medical laboratory, which is applied to a quality evaluation terminal. The method includes:

[0014] Determine the superior medical laboratories and subordinate medical laboratories with associated relationships;

[0015] Obtaining an index result of at least one evaluation index of at least one test item of the superior medical laboratory, and obtaining an index result of at least one evaluation index of at least one test item of the subordinate medical laboratory; wherein the index result of the same evaluation index of the same test item of the same medical laboratory is obtained by a plurality of test equipments of the medical laboratory carrying out the test item within an evaluation period at least based on the indoor quality control data of the test item, and the same medical laboratory is a superior medical laboratory or a subordinate medical laboratory;

[0016] Display a quality evaluation interface; wherein the quality evaluation interface includes the indicator results of at least one evaluation indicator of at least one test item of the superior medical laboratory, and / or the indicator results of at least one evaluation indicator of at least one test item of the subordinate medical laboratory.

[0017] A fourth aspect of the embodiments of the present application provides a central server, including: a central processing unit and a memory;

[0018] The memory is a short-term storage memory or a persistent storage memory;

[0019] The central processing unit is configured to communicate with the memory and execute instructions in the memory to perform any one of the quality assessment methods for medical laboratories.

[0020] A fifth aspect of an embodiment of the present application provides a terminal, including: a central processing unit and a memory;

[0021] The memory is a short-term storage memory or a persistent storage memory;

[0022] The central processing unit is configured to communicate with the memory and execute instructions in the memory to perform any one of the quality assessment methods for medical laboratories.

[0023] A sixth aspect of an embodiment of the present application provides a readable storage medium having a computer program stored thereon. When the computer program is loaded and executed by a processor, any one of the quality evaluation methods for medical laboratories is implemented.

[0024] It can be seen from the technical solutions provided by the above embodiments that when the embodiments of the present application conduct quality evaluation on the test items of the medical laboratory, the indoor quality control data of all tests conducted on the test items in the medical laboratory are referred to. Since the reference is to the indoor quality control data of the indoor quality control, the testing equipment no longer needs to use standard quality control products for quality control, which saves the quality control process of standard quality control products and reduces the quality control cost; in addition, since the indoor quality control data of multiple testing equipment are referred to, it can be avoided that the quality evaluation results of the medical laboratory are determined by a single standard machine, thereby improving the accuracy of the quality evaluation results of the medical laboratory; furthermore, the batch number of the quality control product does not need to be consistent, and the threshold of the quality evaluation process is relatively low. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0025] In order to more clearly illustrate the embodiments of the present invention or the technical solutions in the prior art, the drawings required for use in the embodiments or the description of the prior art will be briefly introduced below. Obviously, the drawings described below are only some embodiments of the present invention. For ordinary technicians in this field, other drawings can be obtained based on these drawings without paying creative work.

[0026] Figure 1 An architectural diagram of a quality evaluation system provided in an embodiment of the present application;

[0027] Figure 2 A flow chart of a quality evaluation method for a medical laboratory provided in an embodiment of the present application;

[0028] Figure 3A-3B Another architecture diagram of the quality evaluation system provided in the embodiments of the present application;

[0029] Figure 4 An example diagram of a quality control plan interface provided in an embodiment of the present application;

[0030] Figure 5 Another example diagram of the quality control plan interface provided in the embodiment of the present application;

[0031] Figure 6 An example diagram of a quality evaluation report provided in an embodiment of the present application;

[0032] Figure 7 Another flow chart of the quality evaluation method for a medical laboratory provided in an embodiment of the present application;

[0033] Figure 8 Another flow chart of the quality evaluation method of a medical laboratory provided in an embodiment of the present application;

[0034] Figures 9A-9B They are respectively an example diagram of a quality evaluation interface provided in an embodiment of the present application;

[0035] Fig.10 An example diagram of the abnormal indicator details interface provided in an embodiment of the present application. DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0036] The following will be combined with the drawings in the embodiments of the present application to clearly and completely describe the technical solutions in the embodiments of the present application. Obviously, the described embodiments are only part of the embodiments of the present application, not all of the embodiments. Based on the embodiments in the present application, all other embodiments obtained by ordinary technicians in this field without creative work are within the scope of protection of this application.

[0037] Usually, a clinical testing center (referred to as the clinical testing center) in a certain area is responsible for managing the medical laboratories in the area. One of the management contents is to evaluate the testing quality of each medical laboratory. The current quality evaluation scheme is that the clinical testing center sends standard quality control products of a unified batch number to each medical laboratory, and each medical laboratory selects a sample testing device (referred to as the testing device) in the room as a target machine. The target machine of each medical laboratory uses the standard quality control products of the same batch number to perform the same quality control items and obtain the quality control results under the quality control items. The clinical testing center compares the quality control results of the target machines of each medical laboratory with the standard values, or takes the quality control results of the target machines of each medical laboratory as a group of data, and compares the quality control results of each medical laboratory with the data within the group, so as to obtain the quality evaluation results of each medical laboratory.

[0038] The current quality evaluation plan requires that all medical laboratories use the same batch of standard quality control products. However, the production capacity of standard quality control products is limited and cannot fully cover all sample testing equipment in all medical laboratories. Therefore, a target drone is selected to represent the entire medical laboratory in the quality evaluation process, which leads to inaccurate quality evaluation results of the medical laboratory.

[0039] The inventor has found through research that medical laboratories conduct internal quality control (IQC) on a daily basis. Internal quality control refers to the use of certain methods and steps to continuously evaluate the reliability of medical laboratory work, aiming to monitor the precision of routine work in medical laboratories to determine whether the sample test results of medical laboratories are reliable. The daily internal quality control data of each sample testing equipment can be used as a basis for evaluating the quality of medical laboratory testing. In this regard, the present application provides a quality evaluation method for medical laboratories, which implements quality evaluation of medical laboratories by statistically analyzing the internal quality control data of sample testing equipment.

[0040] The quality evaluation method proposed in this application can be applied to Figure 1 The quality evaluation system shown in the figure includes a central server, and the central server is communicatively connected to at least one medical laboratory. Each medical laboratory can belong to a medical unit (such as a hospital or a clinic), or multiple medical laboratories can belong to the same medical unit (such as a central hospital, etc.). It should be noted that the communication connection between the medical laboratory and the central server only means that the indoor quality control data of each detection equipment in the medical laboratory can be collected by the central server to evaluate the quality of the medical laboratory, and does not constitute a limitation on the connection method between each detection equipment in the medical laboratory and the central server. Specifically, each detection equipment in the medical laboratory can be directly communicated with the central server, or it can be Figure 3A As shown, the intermediate device corresponding to the medical laboratory is connected to the central server for communication, and can also be connected as shown in FIG. Figure 3B As shown, the medical laboratory information management system corresponding to the medical laboratory is connected in communication with the central server.

[0041] The quality evaluation method of this application is applied to the central server, and the central server can perform the following evaluation on any medical laboratory connected to it: Figure 2 The quality evaluation method described. Figure 2 The quality evaluation method of the medical laboratory provided in this application includes steps S201-S203.

[0042] S201: For the testing projects carried out by medical laboratories, collect the indoor quality control data of multiple testing equipment used in the same testing project in the medical laboratory during the evaluation period.

[0043] Among them, the medical laboratory usually includes a plurality of testing equipment, each of which can carry out quality control of a plurality of testing items (also referred to as quality control items) on a daily basis, and obtain the indoor quality control data of each testing item. Since the testing quality of the medical laboratory is evaluated separately according to the testing items, when the quality evaluation is performed on a certain testing item of a medical laboratory, the indoor quality control data of the same testing item of the multiple testing equipments carrying out the testing item in the medical laboratory are collected. For example, the testing items may include the testing items under the liver function package, such as AFU (α-L-fucosidase) item, ALB (albumin) item, ADA (adenosine deaminase) item, etc., such as biochemical testing items, such as sodium, chloride, potassium, total cholesterol, triglycerides, aspartate aminotransferase, etc., such as blood cell testing items, mean corpuscular volume, platelet count, hemoglobin concentration, etc.

[0044] In addition, since the quality evaluation of medical laboratories can be carried out on a periodic basis, such as conducting a quality evaluation on a medical laboratory at the end of every two months to evaluate the testing quality of the medical laboratory in the last two months, the indoor quality control data collected for each testing equipment is the indoor quality control data within the same evaluation period. The duration of the evaluation period can be set according to actual needs, and the evaluation period is usually set in months, such as 1 month, 2 months, 3 months, and 6 months. The indoor quality control process is usually performed every day, so the indoor quality control data of the testing equipment is a set of indoor quality control data, including the indoor quality control data of the testing equipment on each evaluation day within the evaluation period.

[0045] It is understandable that the indoor quality control process of the testing equipment requires the use of quality control products (non-standard quality control products or standard quality control products), and the indoor quality control data is obtained by testing and analyzing the quality control products. It should be noted that, unlike the existing quality evaluation methods, the quality evaluation method of this application does not require that the batch numbers of the quality control products used by each testing equipment must be consistent, and the batch numbers can be different on the same evaluation day or on different evaluation days.

[0046] The batch numbers of the same day can be different, that is, the indoor quality control data of each testing equipment on the same evaluation day is obtained by indoor quality control of quality control products of different batches. The batch numbers of different days can be different, that is, the indoor quality control data of the same testing equipment on different evaluation days is obtained by indoor quality control of quality control products of different batches. Of course, the batch numbers can also be the same, that is, the indoor quality control data of each testing equipment on the same evaluation day is obtained by indoor quality control of quality control products of the same batch, and the indoor quality control data of the same testing equipment on different evaluation days is obtained by indoor quality control of quality control products of the same batch.

[0047] The present application does not limit the method for collecting indoor quality control data, and for example, it can be implemented through any of the following specific implementation methods.

[0048] Specific implementation method 1: The central server is connected to the intermediate device in communication, and the intermediate device is set in the communication channel between each detection device of the medical laboratory and the medical laboratory information management system, and is used to obtain the data uploaded by each detection device to the medical laboratory information management system from each communication channel, and extract the indoor quality control data of each detection device from each acquired data. The central server receives the indoor quality control data of each detection device sent by the intermediate device, wherein the indoor quality control data of each detection device is the indoor quality control data of each detection device on the same detection item in the same evaluation period.

[0049] like Figure 3A As shown, the detection equipment can be connected to the medical laboratory information management system (Laboratory Information System, LIS) to upload its own data to the LIS system, including but not limited to patient information, sample test results of patient samples, and indoor quality control data based on quality control products. An intermediate device is set on the communication channel between the detection equipment and the LIS system, wherein the communication channel between each medical laboratory and the LIS system can be set with an intermediate device separately, or multiple communication channels between multiple medical laboratories and the LIS system can share the same intermediate device.

[0050] The intermediate device is connected to the central server in communication, and the intermediate device can also be called a transparent transmission device. The intermediate device is used to obtain the data uploaded by the detection equipment to the medical laboratory information management system from the communication channel, extract the indoor quality control data of the detection equipment from the acquired data, and send the extracted indoor quality control data to the central server. The intermediate device can also send the data that needs to be uploaded to the LIS system to the LIS system.

[0051] Medical laboratories usually include testing equipment from different manufacturers. Different testing equipment may use different communication protocols and data formats, resulting in decentralized management of indoor quality control data. In this implementation, the extracted indoor quality control result data can be sent through a unified specific protocol to ensure the uniformity of indoor quality control data management. In addition, the entire process can ensure that users of related operations of the testing equipment and LIS system are unaware, and the central server can obtain indoor quality control data without affecting the data upload of the testing equipment.

[0052] Specific implementation method 2: The central server is connected to the medical laboratory information management system in communication, and the medical laboratory information management system is connected to each detection device of the medical laboratory in communication. The central server obtains indoor quality control data from the medical laboratory information management system, wherein the indoor quality control data is uploaded by each detection device to the medical laboratory information management system, and the indoor quality control data is the indoor quality control data of multiple detection devices on the same detection item within the evaluation period.

[0053] like Figure 3B As shown, each detection device is connected to the LIS system, and the central server is directly connected to the LIS system to obtain the indoor quality control data of each detection device from the LIS system. This implementation does not require the addition of additional intermediate equipment and has a lower implementation cost.

[0054] S202: According to the evaluation index corresponding to the indoor quality control data, statistical analysis is performed on the indoor quality control data of multiple testing equipment to obtain the index results of the medical laboratory regarding the evaluation index within the evaluation period.

[0055] Among them, when using indoor quality control data for quality evaluation, it is necessary to set corresponding evaluation indicators, and then statistically analyze the indoor quality control data of multiple testing equipment to obtain the indicator results of the evaluation indicators. This evaluation result serves as the indicator result of the medical laboratory for the evaluation indicator in the entire evaluation cycle.

[0056] In a specific implementation, the evaluation index may include at least one of the following: plan execution rate, out-of-control processing rate, quality control pass rate, and the quality control pass rate is the coefficient of variation CV or the compliance rate. The coefficient of variation is for quantitative detection items, and the compliance rate is for qualitative detection items. That is to say, a certain detection item selects one of the coefficient of variation CV and the compliance rate, and the selection is made according to the qualitative detection item or the quantitative detection item. The following describes how to statistically analyze each evaluation index to obtain the indicator result corresponding to the evaluation index.

[0057] 1. The evaluation index includes the coefficient of variation CV. The calculation process of the index result of the coefficient of variation CV includes:

[0058] For each batch number used by each testing equipment within the evaluation period, the single batch number index result of the testing equipment's batch number with respect to the coefficient of variation is calculated based on the indoor quality control data of the testing equipment's batch number used; for each batch number used by each testing equipment within the evaluation period, the single batch number weight coefficient of the testing equipment's batch number with respect to the coefficient of variation is calculated based on the number of indoor quality control data of the testing equipment's batch number used; based on the single batch number index result and the single batch number weight coefficient of the coefficient of variation of each batch number used by each testing equipment within the evaluation period, the index result of the medical laboratory with respect to the coefficient of variation within the evaluation period is obtained.

[0059] Specifically, each testing device may use one or more batches of quality control products for internal quality control during the evaluation period. Therefore, the coefficient of variation CV of each batch used by each testing device can be calculated according to the calculation rules of the coefficient of variation CV. Since this indicator result is for one batch, in order to distinguish it from other indicator results of the coefficient of variation CV below, it is referred to as the single batch indicator result of the testing device here.

[0060] For ease of understanding, an example is given. Assume that a medical laboratory includes two testing equipment (testing equipment A and testing equipment B), the evaluation period of the medical laboratory is 2 months, and the quality control product used by testing equipment A for testing project sodium within 2 months has two batches, namely batch 1 and batch 2, and the quality control product used by testing equipment B for testing project sodium within 2 months has two batches, namely batch 2, batch 3 and batch 4. Then:

[0061] For testing equipment A: To calculate the coefficient of variation CV1 of the test item sodium of testing equipment A under batch number 1 within 2 months, first select the indoor quality control data corresponding to batch number 1 from all the indoor quality control data of the test item sodium of testing equipment A within 2 months. Use the calculation rules of the coefficient of variation to calculate the indoor quality control data of the selected batch number 1, and obtain the index result of the coefficient of variation CV of testing equipment A under batch number 1 (recorded as CV A1 ). Similarly, the index result of the coefficient of variation CV of the detection device B under batch number 2 (recorded as CV A2 ).

[0062] For test device B: Calculate the coefficient of variation CV of test device B under batch number 2 in the same way as above (referred to as CV B2 ), and obtain the index result of the coefficient of variation CV of the detection device B under batch number 3 (recorded as CV B3 ), and obtain the index result of the coefficient of variation CV of the detection device B under batch number 4 (recorded as CV B4 ).

[0063] CV above A1 and CV A2 They are the single batch index results of testing equipment A under batch 1 and batch 2, CV B2 、CV B3 and CV B4 They are the single batch indicator results of testing equipment B under batch 2, batch 3 and batch 4 respectively.

[0064] In addition, for each batch number used by each testing device in the evaluation cycle, the number of indoor quality control data of the quality control product of the batch number is counted, that is, the number of times each batch number performs indoor quality control is counted. Usually each testing device performs indoor quality control once within an evaluation day, so it can also be considered that the number of days each batch number is used in the evaluation cycle is counted. According to the number (number of times or days) corresponding to each batch number of each testing device and the total number (total number of times or total number of days) corresponding to all batch numbers, the weight coefficient of each batch number with respect to the coefficient of variation CV can be obtained. Since the weight coefficient is associated with each batch number, that is, the weight coefficient is calculated for each batch number, the weight coefficient can be called a single batch number weight coefficient. It should be noted that the total number corresponding to all batch numbers can be the total number within different ranges, such as the total number corresponding to all batch numbers of multiple testing devices, or the total number corresponding to all batch numbers of a certain testing device. When using the weighted summation algorithm to calculate the index result of the coefficient of variation, if it belongs to the first case, the index result of the coefficient of variation of the medical laboratory is calculated; if it belongs to the second case, the index result of multiple batches of the coefficient of variation of a certain testing equipment is calculated. The following is a detailed description of each case, which will not be repeated here.

[0065] Obtain the index results of each testing device under a single batch number and the weight coefficient under a single batch number. Using these data, the index results of the coefficient of variation of the medical laboratory during the evaluation period can be calculated.

[0066] Calculation method 1: Comprehensive calculation method. Calculate the ratio of the number of indoor quality control data of the batch used by the testing equipment to the total number of indoor quality control data of multiple testing equipment as the single batch weight coefficient of the test equipment's batch used with respect to the coefficient of variation; weighted sum the single batch index results of the coefficient of variation of each batch used by multiple testing equipment within the evaluation period with respect to the single batch weight coefficient to obtain the index results of the medical laboratory with respect to the coefficient of variation within the evaluation period.

[0067] Specifically, the number (number of times or days) corresponding to each batch of each testing device is divided by the total number (total number of times or total days) corresponding to all batches of multiple testing devices to obtain the weight coefficient of variation CV for each batch.

[0068] Still taking the above example, suppose that testing equipment A uses batch number 1 for indoor quality control for 20 days in a 2-month testing cycle (which will generate 20 indoor quality control data), and batch number 2 for indoor quality control for 40 days (which will generate 40 indoor quality control data). Suppose that testing equipment B uses batch number 2 for indoor quality control for 20 days in a 2-month testing cycle (which will generate 20 indoor quality control data), batch number 3 for indoor quality control for 20 days (which will generate 20 indoor quality control data), and batch number 4 for indoor quality control for 20 days (which will generate 20 indoor quality control data).

[0069] Then: the single batch number weight coefficient of the coefficient of variation CV for testing equipment A under batch number 1 is: 20 / 120, and the single batch number weight coefficient of the coefficient of variation CV under batch number 2 is: 40 / 120; the single batch number weight coefficient of the coefficient of variation CV for testing equipment B under batch number 2 is: 20 / 120, the single batch number weight coefficient of the coefficient of variation CV under batch number 3 is: 20 / 120, and the single batch number weight coefficient of the coefficient of variation CV under batch number 4 is: 20 / 120.

[0070] The single batch index results of multiple testing equipment with respect to the coefficient of variation are weighted and summed with the single batch weight coefficient to obtain the index result of the coefficient of variation of the medical laboratory within the evaluation period. Still taking the above example, the single batch index result of testing equipment A under batch number 1 is multiplied by the single batch weight coefficient of testing equipment A with respect to the coefficient of variation CV under batch number 1, the single batch index result of testing equipment A under batch number 2 is multiplied by the single batch weight coefficient of testing equipment A with respect to the coefficient of variation CV under batch number 2, the single batch index result of testing equipment B under batch number 2 is multiplied by the single batch weight coefficient of testing equipment B with respect to the coefficient of variation CV under batch number 2, ..., the single batch index result of testing equipment B under batch number 4 is multiplied by the single batch weight coefficient of testing equipment B with respect to the coefficient of variation CV under batch number 4, and all products are added together to obtain the index result of the coefficient of variation of the medical laboratory. That is: the index result CV of the coefficient of variation CV of the medical laboratory 室 for:

[0071] CV A1 *20 / 120+CV A2 *40 / 120+CV B2 *20 / 120+CV B3 *20 / 120+CV B4 *20 / 120.

[0072] Calculation method 2: single device calculation method. Calculate the ratio of the number of indoor quality control data of the batch used by the testing equipment to the total number of indoor quality control data of the testing equipment as the single batch weight coefficient of the testing equipment's batch used with respect to the coefficient of variation; for each testing equipment, weighted sum the single batch index results of the testing equipment's batch used with respect to the coefficient of variation within the evaluation period and the single batch weight coefficient to obtain the multi-batch index results of the testing equipment with respect to the coefficient of variation within the evaluation period; average the multi-batch index results of the coefficient of variation of each testing equipment within the evaluation period to obtain the index results of the medical laboratory with respect to the coefficient of variation within the evaluation period.

[0073] Specifically, for each detection device, the number (number of times or days) corresponding to each batch number of the detection device is divided by the total number (total number of times or total days) corresponding to all batch numbers of the detection device to obtain the weight coefficient of the coefficient of variation CV under each batch number. This weight coefficient is also associated with the batch number, and is the weight coefficient of each batch number, so it can also be called a single batch number weight coefficient. In order to distinguish the single batch number weight coefficient obtained by the first method above from this single batch number weight coefficient, they can be respectively called the first single batch number weight coefficient and the second single batch number weight coefficient.

[0074] Taking the above example, the single batch number weight coefficient of the coefficient of variation CV of the testing equipment A under batch number 1 is: 20 / 60, and the single batch number weight coefficient of the coefficient of variation CV under batch number 2 is: 40 / 60; the single batch number weight coefficient of the coefficient of variation CV of the testing equipment B under batch number 2 is: 20 / 60, the single batch number weight coefficient of the coefficient of variation CV under batch number 3 is: 20 / 60, and the single batch number weight coefficient of the coefficient of variation CV under batch number 4 is: 20 / 60.

[0075] For each testing device, the single batch index result of the testing device on the coefficient of variation for each batch used in the evaluation period is weighted and summed with the single batch weight coefficient to obtain the multi-batch index result of the testing device on the coefficient of variation during the evaluation period. This index result comprehensively considers multiple batches, so it can be called the multi-batch index result of the testing device. It should be noted that the weighted average algorithm mentioned above can be used to calculate the multi-batch index result of the testing device. Finally, the multi-batch index results of each testing device are averaged to obtain the index result of the coefficient of variation of the medical laboratory.

[0076] The above example is still used for illustration. The coefficient of variation CV of the detection device A is the indicator result CV A For CV A1 *20 / 60+CV A2 *40 / 60, coefficient of variation CV of test equipment B B For CV B2*20 / 60+CV B3 *20 / 60+CV B4 *20 / 60. Then: The coefficient of variation CV of the medical laboratory is the indicator result CV 室 =(CV A +CV B ) / 2.

[0077] 2. Evaluation indicators include plan execution rate. The calculation process of the plan execution rate indicator results includes:

[0078] Based on the number of quality control plans for each testing equipment within the evaluation period, the total number of quality control plans of the medical laboratory within the evaluation period is counted; based on the indoor quality control data of each testing equipment, the total number of plan executions in the medical laboratory within the evaluation period is counted; based on the total number of quality control plans and the total number of plan executions in the medical laboratory, the indicator results of the plan execution rate of the medical laboratory within the evaluation period are obtained.

[0079] Among them, a corresponding quality control plan can be formulated for each test item of each test equipment, and the quality control plan is used to record various information of the test equipment performing indoor quality control on the test item. Figure 4 The quality control plan interface in the quality control evaluation system shown in the figure, the equipment module section of this interface is used to record multiple testing equipment included in the medical laboratory, such as CL6000M1, CL6000M2, and each testing equipment has a corresponding quality control plan. For example, the plan requirement for the test item ALT of CL6000M1 is that the quality control products of level 1 are quality controlled once a day, the quality control products of level 2 are quality controlled once a day, and the quality control products of level 3 are quality controlled once a day. It should be noted that Figure 4 The 18 data items numbered 1-18 are sample data for experiments, so they are only used as examples for illustration. In actual applications, they will vary according to specific circumstances. Figure 5 , 9A The same applies to the data in 9B and 10.

[0080] Similar to the above coefficient of variation, the quality control plan is also related to the test items. Each test item has its own quality control plan. Therefore, firstly, according to the number of quality control plans for each test equipment for the test item during the evaluation period, the total number of quality control plans is obtained. The quality control plan can be called the execution plan of indoor quality control. Usually, indoor quality control is performed once a day, so the total number of quality control plans can be considered as the number of executions of indoor quality control during the evaluation period. After obtaining the total number of quality control plans corresponding to each test equipment, the total number of quality control plans for the test item in the medical laboratory during the evaluation period is obtained.

[0081] For example, if the test items of test equipment A are all subject to indoor quality control every day, the number of quality control plans for the test items of test equipment A within the 2-month evaluation period is 60. Similarly, if the number of quality control plans for the test items of test equipment B within the 2-month evaluation period is 60, the number of quality control plans for the test items of the medical laboratory within the 2-month evaluation period is 120.

[0082] If the testing equipment performs indoor quality control on the testing project on a certain day, the indoor quality control data of the testing project will be obtained, otherwise the indoor quality control data of the testing equipment on the testing project will not be generated on that day. Therefore, according to the number of indoor quality control data of each testing equipment on the testing project, the total number of planned executions of the medical laboratory on the testing project can be obtained. For example, the number of times that testing equipment A performs indoor quality control on the testing project sodium during the 2-month evaluation period is 59, and the number of times that testing equipment B performs indoor quality control on the testing project sodium during the 2-month evaluation period is 60, then the total number of planned executions of the medical laboratory's testing project sodium during the 2-month evaluation period is 119.

[0083] The total number of quality control plans of the medical laboratory and the total number of plan executions are calculated in proportion to obtain the indicator results of the plan execution rate of the medical laboratory's test items during the evaluation period. For example, the indicator result of the plan execution rate of the medical laboratory's test item sodium is 119 / 120, which is about 0.99.

[0084] On the basis of being able to calculate the index results of the plan execution rate of the medical laboratory, the index results of the plan execution rate of each testing equipment can also be calculated. Similarly, the plan execution rate is also related to the test items. Specifically, for each testing equipment, the total number of quality control plans and the total number of plan executions of the testing equipment within the evaluation period are determined; based on the total number of quality control plans and the total number of plan executions of each testing equipment, the index results of the plan execution rate of each testing equipment within the evaluation period are obtained. In this case, the index results of the plan execution rate of the medical laboratory can also be obtained by averaging the plan execution rates of multiple testing equipment.

[0085] Taking the above example, the indicator result of the planned execution rate of the test item sodium by the testing device A is 59 / 60, about 0.98; the indicator result of the planned execution rate of the test item sodium by the testing device B is 60 / 60.

[0086] 3. The evaluation index includes the out-of-control handling rate. The calculation process of the out-of-control handling rate includes:

[0087] According to the indoor quality control data of each testing equipment, the number of quality control out-of-control cases in the medical laboratory during the evaluation period is counted; according to the out-of-control treatment volume of each testing equipment, the number of out-of-control treatments in the medical laboratory during the evaluation period is counted; according to the quality control out-of-control cases and out-of-control treatment volume of the medical laboratory, the indicator results of the out-of-control treatment rate of the medical laboratory during the evaluation period are obtained.

[0088] Among them, indoor quality control data can record whether the testing equipment is under control or out of control. If the quality control is out of control, it means that there is a problem with the testing equipment and the result is unreliable, so the out-of-control problem needs to be dealt with. The out-of-control processing rate indicates how many out-of-control items of the medical laboratory are out of control during the evaluation cycle and how many out-of-control items are handled. Therefore, according to the number of indoor quality controls recorded as out of control for each testing equipment, the total out-of-control amount of quality control in the medical laboratory is obtained. If the testing equipment handles the out-of-control situation, it will be reported to the central server after processing. Therefore, according to the out-of-control processing amount of each testing equipment, the out-of-control processing amount of the medical laboratory is obtained.

[0089] For example, the quality control out-of-control quantity of sodium test item of testing equipment A within the 2-month evaluation period is 3, and the out-of-control treatment quantity is 2; the quality control out-of-control quantity of sodium test item of testing equipment B within the 2-month evaluation period is 6, and the out-of-control treatment quantity is 6. Then, the quality control out-of-control quantity of sodium test item of the medical laboratory within the 2-month evaluation period is 9, and the quality control out-of-control quantity is 8. The out-of-control treatment rate of sodium test item of the medical laboratory within the 2-month evaluation period is 0.89.

[0090] Furthermore, the index result of the out-of-control treatment rate of each detection device can also be calculated. Similarly, the out-of-control treatment rate is also related to the detection items. Specifically, for each detection device, the quality control out-of-control amount and out-of-control treatment amount of the detection device within the evaluation period are determined; based on the quality control out-of-control amount and out-of-control treatment amount of each detection device, the index result of the out-of-control treatment rate of each detection device within the evaluation period is obtained. In this case, the index result of the out-of-control treatment rate of the medical laboratory can also be obtained by averaging the out-of-control treatment rates of multiple detection devices.

[0091] Taking the above example, the indicator result of the planned execution rate of the test item sodium by the testing device A is 2 / 3, about 0.67; the indicator result of the planned execution rate of the test item sodium by the testing device B is 6 / 6.

[0092] The above lists the calculation methods of the coefficient of variation, plan execution rate, and out-of-control handling rate. Other evaluation indicators can refer to the above calculation methods and are not repeated here.

[0093] S203: Compare the indicator results corresponding to the evaluation indicators with the preset standards corresponding to the evaluation indicators to obtain the quality evaluation results of the medical laboratory on the test items within the evaluation period.

[0094] Among them, the corresponding qualified standard is set in advance for the evaluation index of the test project, and this standard can be called the preset standard. The preset standard can be set manually. One setting method is to display the quality control plan interface on the quality evaluation terminal of the clinical inspection center. The quality control plan interface includes the reference standard corresponding to the evaluation index. The quality evaluation terminal of the clinical inspection center obtains the preset standard input by the user through the quality control plan interface. The preset standard is obtained by the user according to the reference standard corresponding to the evaluation index, so that the quality evaluation terminal of the clinical inspection center uploads the preset standard corresponding to the evaluation index to the central server.

[0095] like Figure 5 An example of a quality control plan interface is provided, which includes a reference value (reference standard) of 5% for the coefficient of variation CV of the test item ALT. The user can set the standard value (i.e., preset standard) of the coefficient of variation of the test item ALT based on the reference value. Similarly, preset standards for the coefficients of variation of other test items can be set, and preset standards for other evaluation indicators of the test item ALT can also be set. The calculation method of the coefficient of variation CV can be set in the quality control plan interface. For example, setting "weighted average CV of multiple batches" means that the calculation is performed according to any of the above-mentioned calculation methods of the coefficient of variation CV of the medical laboratory.

[0096] By comparing the index result of the evaluation index with the preset standard, it can be determined whether the evaluation index of the test item is qualified. According to whether the evaluation index of the test item is qualified, the quality evaluation result of the medical laboratory on the test item is obtained, and the quality evaluation result indicates whether the test quality of the test item of the medical laboratory is qualified. For example, the coefficient of variation CV corresponding to the test item sodium of the medical laboratory is 6.98, but the preset standard is 1.33. Since the coefficient of variation indicates the allowable imprecision of the test item, the coefficient of variation CV is higher than the preset standard, indicating that the coefficient of variation CV of the medical laboratory on the test item is unqualified.

[0097] The evaluation index for the same test item can be one or more. When the evaluation index includes multiple items, the corresponding evaluation results of the test item are calculated for each evaluation index, and then the final quality evaluation result is obtained by comprehensively analyzing each evaluation index. Specifically, for each evaluation index, the index result corresponding to the evaluation index is compared with the preset standard corresponding to the evaluation index to obtain the evaluation result of the evaluation index; the evaluation results of various evaluation indicators are combined to obtain the quality evaluation result of the medical laboratory on the test item within the evaluation period.

[0098] The comprehensive method can be to determine the proportion of qualified evaluation results to the total evaluation results. If the proportion meets the preset requirements, the quality evaluation result of the medical laboratory is determined to be qualified, otherwise the quality evaluation result of the medical laboratory is determined to be unqualified. For example, the evaluation indicators of the test item sodium include the coefficient of variation CV, the out-of-control treatment rate and the plan execution rate. Assuming that the evaluation result of the coefficient of variation CV is unqualified, and the evaluation results of the out-of-control treatment rate and the plan execution rate are qualified, it can be considered that the quality evaluation result of the test item of the medical laboratory is qualified.

[0099] It can be seen from the above description that the quality evaluation method provided by this application refers to the indoor quality control data of all tests carried out in the medical laboratory when conducting quality evaluation on the test items of the medical laboratory. On the one hand, since the reference is to the indoor quality control data of the indoor quality control, the testing equipment no longer needs to use standard quality control products for quality control, saving standard quality control products and the quality control process of standard quality control products, thereby reducing the quality control cost; on the other hand, since the indoor quality control data of multiple testing equipment are referenced, the quality evaluation results of the medical laboratory are avoided from being determined by a single standard machine, thereby improving the accuracy of the quality evaluation results of the medical laboratory. In addition, the batch number of the quality control product does not need to be consistent, and the threshold of the quality evaluation process is relatively low.

[0100] In practical applications, a quality evaluation report can be generated for a medical laboratory. The quality evaluation report includes at least one of the following:

[0101] Quality evaluation results of medical laboratories; index results of the medical laboratory regarding the coefficient of variation during the evaluation period, index results of multiple batches of the coefficient of variation for each testing equipment during the evaluation period, index results of each single batch of the coefficient of variation for each testing equipment during the evaluation period (these are the index results of the coefficient of variation); index results of the medical laboratory regarding the plan execution rate during the evaluation period, index results of the plan execution rate for each testing equipment during the evaluation period (these are the index results of the plan execution rate); index results of the medical laboratory regarding the out-of-control handling rate during the evaluation period, index results of each testing equipment regarding the out-of-control handling rate during the evaluation period (these are the index results of the out-of-control handling rate).

[0102] It can be understood that the quality evaluation result is evaluated based on the test items. Each test item can obtain a corresponding quality evaluation result. When there are multiple test items, the quality evaluation result of each test item can be obtained separately.

[0103] like Figure 6An example of a quality evaluation report is provided, which includes the quality evaluation results of a medical laboratory's test project sodium in a certain evaluation cycle. It is assumed that the medical laboratory has two testing equipment for the test project sodium, namely BS-800M / M1 BS830 and BS-800M / M2 BS830, which can be referred to as testing equipment M1 and testing equipment M2 respectively. There are two batch numbers of quality control products used by testing equipment M1, namely 376B86F and 376DF7F, and there are two batch numbers of quality control products used by testing equipment M2, namely 376B86F and 376DF7F.

[0104] According to the quality evaluation report, the index result of CV corresponding to the testing equipment M1 and batch number 376B86F is 5.80, and the index result of CV corresponding to the testing equipment M1 and batch number 376DF7F is 2.29. Similarly, the index results of CV corresponding to the two batches of the testing equipment M2 can be known. Furthermore, the CV index results of the testing equipment M1 in the two batches can be weighted averaged to obtain the multi-batch test results of the testing equipment M1. Similarly, the multi-batch test results of the testing equipment M2 can be known. The index result of CV of the medical laboratory is 4.98. After comparing with the target value of 1.33, it can be known that the index result is unqualified.

[0105] According to the quality inspection report, the index results of the planned execution rate of the inspection equipment M1 and the inspection equipment M2 are 100% and 96.77 respectively, and the index result of the planned execution rate of the medical laboratory is 97.56. After comparing with the target value of 90.00, it can be seen that the index result is qualified.

[0106] According to the quality inspection report, the index results of the out-of-control processing rate of the inspection equipment M1 and the inspection equipment M2 are 0 and 0 respectively, and the index result of the plan execution rate of the medical laboratory is 0.00. After comparing with the target value of 100, it can be seen that the index result is unqualified.

[0107] According to the quality inspection report, the quality evaluation result of the test item sodium in the medical laboratory is unqualified. It should be noted that the equipment name, batch number name, and index result value in this example are only examples, and the report results are presented based on actual testing and actual calculation results. In addition, the evaluation cycle can be divided into stages. For example, a 6-month evaluation cycle can be divided into 6 evaluation stages, with each month as an evaluation stage. At the end of each month, the medical laboratory's test quality for that month can be evaluated in stages. It should be noted that the process of staged evaluation can calculate the index results of multiple testing equipment under one or more evaluation indicators, and obtain the quality evaluation results based on the evaluation results. For details, please refer to the above-mentioned related processes, which will not be repeated here. The staged evaluation results can be presented in the quality inspection report.

[0108] In order to improve the comprehensiveness of quality evaluation, evaluation indicators can further include other types, such as flight inspection indicators, external quality control (EQC), and external quality assessment (EQA). The evaluation results of these evaluation indicators are combined with the evaluation results of any one or more of the above-mentioned evaluation indicators to obtain the quality evaluation results of the medical laboratory's testing items.

[0109] External quality assessment (EQA) is a process in which multiple medical laboratories analyze the same specimen, and an external independent organization collects and feedbacks the results reported by the medical laboratories to evaluate the operation of the medical laboratories. The calibration and detection capabilities of medical laboratories are determined by comparison between medical laboratories, as well as their continued capabilities are monitored. EQC is the same as its process, except that in the existing evaluation scheme, external quality control can be used as a daily self-testing exercise for medical laboratories, and the evaluation results are not actually used as evaluation indicators for quality evaluation results. This application can include it in the evaluation indicators for quality evaluation results to enrich the reference indicators for quality evaluation results and improve the accuracy of quality evaluation results.

[0110] Flight inspection indicators refer to inspection experts going to the medical laboratory site to evaluate the various indicators of the medical laboratory and give an evaluation result of whether it is qualified. Flight inspection indicators can include multiple inspection aspects, such as clinical inspection quality management, whether medical laboratory facilities meet the requirements, whether inspection personnel are qualified, whether the project is carried out in accordance with relevant regulations, the establishment of a quality management system covering the entire inspection process and normal operation, medical laboratory safety assurance, medical laboratory information management improvement, quality indicator monitoring and reporting. Some inspection aspects evaluate the entire medical laboratory. If it is unqualified, it means that the evaluation results of all inspection items of the medical laboratory are unqualified; some inspection aspects evaluate a certain inspection equipment. If it is unqualified, it means that the evaluation results of all inspection items of the inspection equipment are unqualified. Each inspection aspect can be evaluated by a score. If the score meets the standard, it means it is qualified, and if the score does not meet the standard, it means it is unqualified. Therefore, the quality evaluation results of the medical laboratory in a certain inspection project can be comprehensively evaluated in combination with flight inspection indicators.

[0111] Therefore, on the basis of collecting the above-mentioned evaluation indicators, it also includes: collecting the evaluation results of the medical laboratory within the evaluation cycle for the test items carried out by the medical laboratory, and the evaluation results include any one or more evaluation results of the flight inspection indicators, EQC, and EQA. The evaluation results indicate whether the test items of the medical laboratory are qualified. The EQA of the medical laboratory within the evaluation cycle can be obtained from the clinical inspection center system associated with the medical laboratory; or, the EQA within the evaluation cycle uploaded by the quality evaluation terminal associated with the medical laboratory can be received. For example, the quality evaluation terminal can manually input the EQA or identify the EQA through optical character recognition technology, and upload the EQA to the central server.

[0112] Thus, the indicator results corresponding to the above evaluation indicators (such as coefficient of variation, plan execution rate, and out-of-control processing rate) are compared with the preset standards corresponding to the evaluation indicators to obtain the evaluation results of the evaluation indicators; thus, the evaluation results obtained by comparison are integrated with the collected evaluation results to obtain the quality evaluation results of the medical laboratory on the test items during the evaluation cycle. The comprehensive method can be referred to in the above description, and the ratio of qualified evaluation results to the total evaluation results under the same test item is integrated. If it exceeds a certain ratio, it is considered that the quality evaluation results of the medical laboratory for the test item are qualified.

[0113] For example, if the evaluation result of the coefficient of variation of the same test item of a medical laboratory is unqualified, the evaluation result of the plan execution rate is qualified, the evaluation result of the out-of-control handling rate is qualified, the evaluation result of the flight inspection index is unqualified, the evaluation result of EQC is qualified, and the evaluation result of EQA is qualified, then the medical laboratory has 4 qualified evaluation results for this test item and 2 unqualified evaluation results. If more than half of the evaluation results are qualified, then the quality evaluation result of the medical laboratory for this test item is qualified.

[0114] The embodiment of the present application also provides a quality evaluation method for a medical laboratory applied to a central server. One of the differences between this quality evaluation method and the quality evaluation method provided in the above embodiments is that the detection substances used in the quality control process are different. The above embodiments collect indoor quality control data generated by the indoor quality control process executed using quality control products, and this embodiment collects patient sample quality control data obtained by quality control using patient samples. The quality control carried out by the medical laboratory in this embodiment can be considered as real-time quality control based on patient data (PBRTQC), which is a quality control method that uses the test results of patient clinical specimens to continuously monitor the detection process and analytical performance in real time.

[0115] As shown in 7, the quality evaluation method of the medical laboratory provided in this embodiment includes: S701-S703.

[0116] S701: For the testing projects carried out by medical laboratories, collect the patient sample quality control data of the testing projects carried out by multiple testing equipment of the medical laboratory during the evaluation period.

[0117] Among them, the medical laboratory includes multiple testing equipment, and the testing equipment can generate patient sample quality control data when performing real-time quality control based on patient data. Similarly to the above, the quality evaluation method of the embodiment of the present application is also based on the test items, and each test item can obtain the corresponding quality evaluation result according to the method. Therefore, this step collects the patient sample quality control data of each test equipment carrying out the same test item.

[0118] There are two ways to collect patient sample quality control data: upload through an intermediate device and obtain from a medical laboratory information system. The relevant introduction of the intermediate device and the medical laboratory information system can refer to the above description. It should be noted that the intermediate device here extracts not the indoor quality control data from the uploaded data of each detection device to the medical laboratory information management system, but the patient sample quality control data. Of course, in the embodiment combining the two quality evaluation methods, the intermediate device extracts both data.

[0119] S702: According to the evaluation indicators corresponding to the patient sample quality control data, statistical analysis is performed on the patient sample quality control data of multiple testing devices to obtain the indicator results of the medical laboratory regarding the evaluation indicators within the evaluation period.

[0120] Among them, due to different specific processes, the evaluation indicators of patient sample quality control data are different from those of indoor quality control data. Corresponding evaluation indicators can be set for patient sample quality control data, for example, the evaluation indicators include out-of-control processing rate. The specific method of calculating the indicator results of the medical laboratory regarding the out-of-control processing rate can be, according to the patient sample quality control data of each testing device, statistically analyzing the out-of-control amount of samples in the medical laboratory during the evaluation period; according to the out-of-control processing volume of each testing device, statistically analyzing the out-of-control processing volume of the medical laboratory during the evaluation period; according to the out-of-control amount of samples and out-of-control processing volume of the medical laboratory, obtaining the indicator results of the out-of-control processing rate of the medical laboratory during the evaluation period. The calculation process can refer to the calculation process related to the indoor quality control data mentioned above, which will not be repeated here.

[0121] The evaluation index may also be other indexes set according to actual needs, which are not specifically limited here.

[0122] S703: Compare the indicator results corresponding to the evaluation indicators with the preset standards corresponding to the evaluation indicators to obtain the quality evaluation results of the medical laboratory on the test items within the evaluation period.

[0123] It should be noted that other related explanations related to this embodiment can refer to the above embodiments, which will not be repeated here. The quality evaluation method provided in the embodiment of the present application can use the patient sample quality control data of each detection device to achieve the quality evaluation of the medical laboratory. Compared with the existing evaluation method, there is no need to use standard quality control products with a unified batch number, and the number of detection devices involved in the evaluation is larger, and the quality evaluation results are more accurate.

[0124] In order to further improve the accuracy of quality evaluation, this embodiment can also combine the evaluation results of any one or more of the flight inspection indicators, EQC, and EQA to perform quality evaluation. Specifically, the indicator result corresponding to the evaluation indicator is compared with the preset standard corresponding to the evaluation indicator to obtain the evaluation result of the evaluation indicator; the compared evaluation result is combined with the collected evaluation results to obtain the quality evaluation result of the medical laboratory on the test items within the evaluation period. Among them, the collection method of EQA can include: obtaining the EQA of the medical laboratory within the evaluation period from the clinical inspection center system associated with the medical laboratory; or, receiving the EQA within the evaluation period uploaded by the quality evaluation terminal associated with the medical laboratory. The quality evaluation terminal can manually input the EQA or automatically identify the EQA through optical character recognition technology.

[0125] According to the above-mentioned quality evaluation method, the index result of any test item of any medical laboratory in any evaluation index can be obtained. For the convenience of viewing, the embodiment of the present application also provides a quality evaluation method for medical laboratories applied to the quality evaluation terminal, which intuitively displays the index results of each evaluation index of each test item of each medical laboratory through an interface. Figure 8 As shown, the method may include steps S801-S803.

[0126] S801: Determine the superior medical laboratories and subordinate medical laboratories that have associated relationships.

[0127] Among them, the association relationship can be an association relationship in terms of administrative divisions. For example, a city has a city hospital, and each district under it has a district hospital. Then the laboratory department of the city hospital and the laboratory department of the district hospital are the superior medical laboratory and the subordinate medical laboratory respectively; for example, a district has a district hospital, and each street under it has a community health hospital. Then the laboratory department of the district hospital and the laboratory department of the community health hospital are the superior medical laboratory and the subordinate hospital medical laboratory respectively. The association relationship can also be an association relationship in terms of department affiliation. For example, a hospital group has a central hospital and branch hospitals are set up separately. Then the laboratory department of the central hospital and the laboratory department of each branch hospital are the superior medical laboratory and the subordinate hospital medical laboratory respectively. The above is an example, and the superior and subordinate medical laboratories with association relationships can also be set according to other actual needs. Usually, a superior medical laboratory is associated with multiple subordinate medical laboratories.

[0128] S802: Obtain the index result of at least one evaluation indicator of at least one test item of the superior medical laboratory, and obtain the index result of at least one evaluation indicator of at least one test item of the subordinate medical laboratory; wherein the index result of the same evaluation indicator of the same test item of the same medical laboratory is obtained by multiple test equipment used in the medical laboratory to carry out the test item within the evaluation period based on at least the indoor quality control data of the test item, and the same medical laboratory is a superior medical laboratory or a subordinate medical laboratory.

[0129] Among them, the quality evaluation terminal can be communicated with the central server to obtain the indicator results of at least one evaluation indicator of at least one test item of the upper-level medical laboratory from the central server, and obtain the indicator results of at least one evaluation indicator of at least one test item of the lower-level medical laboratory.

[0130] The central server can obtain the index results of one or more test items of the medical laboratory under one or more evaluation indicators for any medical laboratory (whether a superior medical laboratory or a subordinate medical laboratory) according to the quality evaluation method of any of the above embodiments. For example, for the superior medical laboratory "Bao'an People's Hospital", the index results of multiple test items such as the test item ALT and the test item ADA can be calculated, including: the index results of multiple evaluation indicators such as the coefficient of variation CV, the plan execution rate, and the out-of-control processing rate. Similarly, the index results of the same evaluation indicators of the same test items of multiple subordinate medical laboratories such as "Shajing Health Center", "Fuyong Health Center", and "Xixiang Health Center" can be calculated.

[0131] S803: Display the quality evaluation interface; wherein the quality evaluation interface includes the indicator result of at least one evaluation indicator of at least one test item of the superior medical laboratory, and / or the indicator result of at least one evaluation indicator of at least one test item of the subordinate medical laboratory.

[0132] Among them, the quality evaluation interface can display the index results of the superior medical laboratory and / or the subordinate medical laboratory in various ways. For example, the evaluation index can be used as a display dimension to compare and display the index results of the same test item of each medical laboratory under the same evaluation index; for example, the medical laboratory can be used as a display dimension to display the index results of each test item of each medical laboratory under the same evaluation index.

[0133] The quality evaluation terminal can be a quality evaluation terminal of a superior medical laboratory, which is used to summarize and display the indicator results of the superior medical laboratory and its associated subordinate medical laboratories. Fig. 9AAn example diagram of the quality evaluation interface displayed on a quality evaluation terminal of a superior medical laboratory is provided. The superior medical laboratory is the "Baoan People's Hospital". The quality evaluation interface includes display labels of the "Baoan People's Hospital" and its subordinate medical laboratories. If the display label of the "Baoan People's Hospital" is selected, the indicator results of CV, plan execution rate and out-of-control treatment rate of multiple test items such as ALT of the "Baoan People's Hospital" can be displayed. If the display label of the subordinate medical laboratory "Shajing Health Center" is switched, the indicator results of CV, plan execution rate and out-of-control treatment rate of multiple test items such as ALT of the "Shajing Health Center" can be displayed.

[0134] Alternatively, the quality evaluation terminal may be a clinical examination center quality evaluation terminal, which is used to summarize and display the indicator results of multiple upper-level medical laboratories and their associated lower-level medical laboratories. Fig. 9B The provided quality evaluation interface example is displayed on the quality evaluation terminal of the clinical inspection center. The clinical inspection center can manage multiple superior medical laboratories such as "Baoan People's Hospital", "Futian People's Hospital", "Luohu People's Hospital", etc. Each superior medical laboratory is associated with at least one subordinate medical laboratory. The display method of the indicator results of each medical laboratory can refer to the above Fig. 9A The relevant instructions are not repeated here.

[0135] From the above description, it can be seen that by displaying the evaluation indicators of each medical laboratory with a correlation through the interface, not only the indicator results of the evaluation indicators can be viewed intuitively, but also the indicator results of each test item or each evaluation indicator can be compared and viewed.

[0136] If the index result of the target test item of the target medical laboratory is unqualified, the unqualified index result is prompted; the target medical laboratory is a superior medical laboratory or a subordinate medical laboratory; if a detailed view instruction for the unqualified index result is received, the detailed interface is displayed, and the detailed interface includes: the index results of the target test item for multiple test equipments carrying out the target test item in the target medical laboratory. Select any test equipment to view the index results of the test equipment for the target test item.

[0137] Specifically, if the index result of a certain test item of a certain medical laboratory is unqualified, the medical laboratory is called the target medical laboratory, and the test item is called the target test item. Fig. 9A As shown in the figure, the out-of-control treatment rate of ALT in the test item of "Bao'an People's Hospital" is 50%. If the result of this indicator is unqualified, the result of this indicator will be marked in red. Click the "View Details" control to enter the following Fig.10The details interface shown includes the index results of the ALT test project carried out by multiple testing equipment (such as CL6000M1, CL6000M2...CL8000M2) in Baoan People's Hospital.

[0138] Furthermore, the qualified status of the test items of the medical laboratory can also be displayed, such as the total number of test items, the number of qualified test items, and the qualified rate of test items. Specifically, for the same medical laboratory, the total number of test items, the number of qualified test items, and the qualified rate of test items of the medical laboratory are obtained; the total number of test items, the number of qualified test items, and the qualified rate of test items of each medical laboratory are displayed on the quality evaluation interface.

[0139] Specifically, the qualified rate of the test items can also be called the qualified rate of the test items, which refers to the ratio of the number of qualified test items to the total number of test items. Specifically, the qualified rate of the test items of the superior medical laboratory is calculated according to the index result of at least one evaluation index of at least one test item of the superior medical laboratory; the qualified rate of the test items of the subordinate medical laboratory is calculated according to the index result of at least one evaluation index of at least one test item of the subordinate medical laboratory; the qualified rate of the test items of the superior medical laboratory and the qualified rate of the test items of the subordinate medical laboratory are displayed on the display quality evaluation interface.

[0140] Whether the test item is qualified, the index results of each evaluation index of the test item can be compared with the preset standard to determine whether the evaluation index of the test item is qualified. The qualification of the test item can be determined by comprehensively determining whether each evaluation index of the test item is qualified. For the same medical laboratory, the qualified test items of the medical laboratory can be calculated by the ratio of the total number of test items to obtain the qualified rate of the test items of the medical laboratory.

[0141] The qualified rate of the test items can be displayed in various forms such as comparison charts, such as Fig. 9A and 9B As shown, the total number of participating test items, the number of qualified test items, and the pass rate of the test items of each medical laboratory can be compared and displayed in the form of a bar chart, or the total number of participating test items, the number of qualified test items, and the pass rate of the test items of the medical laboratory can be displayed in text form as shown in the display label.

[0142] The embodiment of the present application also provides a central server, including: a central processor and a memory; the memory is a short-term storage memory or a persistent storage memory; the central processor is configured to communicate with the memory and execute the instruction operation in the memory to execute the quality evaluation method of the medical laboratory described in any of the above embodiments, such as executing Figure 2 , Figure 7 The quality evaluation process shown.

[0143] The present application also provides a terminal, comprising: a central processing unit and a memory; the memory is a temporary storage memory or a permanent storage memory; the central processing unit is configured to communicate with the memory and execute instructions in the memory to execute the quality evaluation method of the medical laboratory described in any of the above embodiments, such as executing Figure 8 The quality evaluation process shown.

[0144] The present application also provides a readable storage medium having a computer program stored thereon. When the computer program is loaded and executed by a processor, the quality evaluation method for a medical laboratory described in any of the above embodiments is implemented. Figure 2 , Figure 7 , Figure 8 The quality evaluation process shown.

[0145] For the above description of the disclosed embodiments, the features recorded in the various embodiments in this specification may be replaced or combined with each other, so that professionals and technicians in the field can implement or use the present application. This article is described with reference to various exemplary embodiments. However, those skilled in the art will recognize that changes and modifications may be made to the exemplary embodiments without departing from the scope of this article. For example, various operating steps and components for performing operating steps can be implemented in different ways (e.g., one or more steps may be deleted, modified, or incorporated into other steps) according to a specific application or considering any number of cost functions associated with the operation of the system.

[0146] The terms "first", "second", etc. in the specification and claims of this document and the above-mentioned drawings are used to distinguish different objects, rather than to describe a specific order. In addition, the terms "including" and "having" and any variations thereof are intended to cover non-exclusive inclusions. For example, a process, method, system, product or device that includes a series of steps or units is not limited to the listed steps or units, but optionally includes steps or units that are not listed, or optionally includes other steps or units inherent to these processes, methods or devices.

[0147] In addition, as will be appreciated by those skilled in the art, the principles of the present invention may be reflected in a computer program product on a computer-readable storage medium, which is pre-installed with a computer-readable program code. Any tangible, non-temporary computer-readable storage medium may be used, including magnetic storage devices (hard disks, floppy disks, etc.), optical storage devices (CD-ROMs, DVDs, Blu Ray disks, etc.), flash memory, and / or the like. These computer program instructions may be loaded onto a general-purpose computer, a special-purpose computer, or other programmable data processing device to form a machine, so that these instructions executed on a computer or other programmable data processing device may generate a device that implements a specified function. These computer program instructions may also be stored in a computer-readable memory, which may instruct a computer or other programmable data processing device to operate in a specific manner, so that the instructions stored in the computer-readable memory may form a manufactured product, including an implementation device that implements a specified function. The computer program instructions may also be loaded onto a computer or other programmable data processing device, so that a series of operating steps are performed on the computer or other programmable device to produce a computer-implemented process, so that the instructions executed on the computer or other programmable device may provide steps for implementing a specified function.

[0148] The foregoing specific description has been described with reference to various embodiments. However, those skilled in the art will recognize that various modifications and changes can be made without departing from the scope of the present disclosure. Therefore, the consideration of the present disclosure will be illustrative rather than restrictive, and all these modifications will be included in its scope. Similarly, the advantages, other advantages and solutions to the problems of various embodiments have been described above. However, the benefits, advantages, solutions to the problems and any elements that can produce these, or make them more clear, should not be interpreted as critical, necessary or necessary. The term "include" and any other variants used in this article are all non-exclusive inclusions, so that the process, method, article or device including the list of elements not only includes these elements, but also includes other elements that are not explicitly listed or do not belong to the process, method, system, article or device. In addition, the term "coupled" and any other variants used in this article refer to physical connections, electrical connections, magnetic connections, optical connections, communication connections, functional connections and / or any other connections.

[0149] The above embodiments only express several implementation methods, and the descriptions thereof are relatively specific and detailed, but they cannot be understood as limiting the scope of the patent of the present invention. It should be pointed out that, for a person of ordinary skill in the art, several variations and improvements can be made without departing from the concept of the present invention, and these all belong to the protection scope of the present invention. Therefore, the protection scope of the patent of the present invention shall be subject to the attached claims.

Claims

1. A quality evaluation method for a medical laboratory, characterized in that: Applied to a central server, the method comprises: For the test items carried out by the medical laboratory, collect the indoor quality control data of the test items carried out by multiple test equipments of the medical laboratory during the evaluation period; According to the evaluation index corresponding to the indoor quality control data, statistical analysis is performed on the indoor quality control data of the plurality of detection devices to obtain the index results of the medical laboratory regarding the evaluation index within the evaluation period; The indicator result corresponding to the evaluation indicator is compared with the preset standard corresponding to the evaluation indicator to obtain the quality evaluation result of the medical laboratory on the detection item within the evaluation period.

2. The quality evaluation method of a medical laboratory according to claim 1, characterized in that: The evaluation cycle includes multiple evaluation days. The indoor quality control data of each of the testing equipment on the same evaluation day is obtained by indoor quality control of quality control products with the same batch number, and the indoor quality control data of the same testing equipment on different evaluation days is obtained by indoor quality control of quality control products with the same batch number.

3. The quality evaluation method of a medical laboratory according to claim 1, characterized in that: The evaluation cycle includes multiple evaluation days. The indoor quality control data of each of the detection equipment on the same evaluation day is obtained by indoor quality control using quality control products of different batches, and / or the indoor quality control data of the same detection equipment on different evaluation days is obtained by indoor quality control using quality control products of different batches.

4. The quality evaluation method of a medical laboratory according to claim 1, characterized in that: The evaluation index includes coefficient of variation; Statistical analysis is performed on the indoor quality control data of the multiple detection devices to obtain the index results of the coefficient of variation of the medical laboratory during the evaluation period, including: For each batch number used by each of the detection devices in the evaluation period, calculate the single batch number indicator result of the batch number used by the detection device with respect to the coefficient of variation according to the indoor quality control data of the batch number used by the detection device; For each batch number used by each of the detection devices in the evaluation period, according to the number of indoor quality control data of the batch number used by the detection device, calculate the single batch number weight coefficient of the batch number used by the detection device with respect to the coefficient of variation; According to the single batch index results and single batch weight coefficients of the coefficient of variation of each batch used by each of the detection equipment within the evaluation period, the index results of the coefficient of variation of the medical laboratory within the evaluation period are obtained.

5. The quality evaluation method of a medical laboratory as claimed in claim 4, characterized in that: According to the number of indoor quality control data of the batch number used by the detection device, a single batch number weight coefficient of the batch number used by the detection device with respect to the coefficient of variation is calculated, including: Calculate the ratio of the number of indoor quality control data of the batch number used by the detection device to the total number of indoor quality control data of all the detection devices as the single batch number weight coefficient of the batch number used by the detection device with respect to the coefficient of variation; The method of obtaining the index result of the coefficient of variation of the medical laboratory during the evaluation period according to the single batch index result and the single batch weight coefficient of the coefficient of variation of each batch used by each of the detection equipment during the evaluation period includes: The single batch index results of the coefficient of variation of each batch number used by all the detection equipment in the evaluation period are weighted and summed with the single batch weight coefficient to obtain the index results of the coefficient of variation of the medical laboratory in the evaluation period.

6. The quality evaluation method of a medical laboratory according to claim 4, characterized in that: According to the number of indoor quality control data of the batch number used by the detection device, a single batch number weight coefficient of the batch number used by the detection device with respect to the coefficient of variation is calculated, including: Calculate the ratio of the number of indoor quality control data of the batch number used by the detection device to the total number of indoor quality control data of the detection device as a single batch weight coefficient of the batch number used by the detection device with respect to the coefficient of variation; The method of obtaining the index result of the coefficient of variation of the medical laboratory during the evaluation period according to the single batch index result and the single batch weight coefficient of the coefficient of variation of each batch used by each of the detection equipment during the evaluation period includes: For each of the detection devices, weighted sum of the single batch index results of the detection device on the coefficient of variation for each batch used in the evaluation period and the single batch weight coefficient, to obtain the multi-batch index results of the detection device on the coefficient of variation in the evaluation period; The index results of multiple batches of the respective detection equipment regarding the coefficient of variation within the evaluation period are averaged to obtain the index results of the medical laboratory regarding the coefficient of variation within the evaluation period.

7. The quality evaluation method of a medical laboratory according to claim 1, characterized in that: The evaluation indicators include plan implementation rate; Statistical analysis is performed on the indoor quality control data of the multiple testing devices to obtain the index results of the medical laboratory regarding the plan execution rate during the evaluation period, including: According to the number of quality control plans of each of the detection equipment within the evaluation period, the total number of quality control plans of the medical laboratory within the evaluation period is counted; According to the quantity of the respective indoor quality control data of each of the detection equipment, counting the total number of planned executions of the medical laboratory within the evaluation period; Based on the total number of quality control plans and the total number of plan executions of the medical laboratory, the indicator results of the medical laboratory on the plan execution rate during the evaluation period are obtained.

8. The quality evaluation method of a medical laboratory according to claim 7, characterized in that: Also includes: For each of the testing equipment, determine the total number of quality control plans and the total number of executed plans for the testing equipment within the evaluation period; According to the total number of quality control plans and the total number of plan executions of each of the testing equipment, the indicator results of the plan execution rate of each of the testing equipment within the evaluation period are obtained.

9. The quality evaluation method of a medical laboratory according to claim 1, characterized in that: The evaluation indicators include out-of-control processing rate; Statistical analysis is performed on the indoor quality control data of the multiple detection devices to obtain the index results of the medical laboratory regarding the out-of-control treatment rate during the evaluation period, including: According to the indoor quality control data of each of the detection equipment, statistics are collected on the amount of quality control failure of the medical laboratory during the evaluation period; According to the out-of-control processing volume of each of the detection equipment, the out-of-control processing volume of the medical laboratory within the evaluation period is counted; According to the out-of-control quantity and out-of-control processing quantity of the medical laboratory, the indicator result of the out-of-control processing rate of the medical laboratory during the evaluation period is obtained.

10. The quality evaluation method of a medical laboratory according to claim 9, characterized in that: Also includes: For each of the detection equipment, determining the out-of-control quantity and out-of-control processing quantity of the detection equipment within the evaluation period; According to the out-of-control quantity and out-of-control processing quantity of each detection device, the index result of the out-of-control processing rate of each detection device within the evaluation period is obtained.

11. The quality evaluation method of a medical laboratory according to claim 1, characterized in that: The evaluation indicators include at least two items, and each evaluation indicator has its own corresponding indicator result; Comparing the indicator result corresponding to the evaluation indicator with the preset standard corresponding to the evaluation indicator to obtain the quality evaluation result of the medical laboratory on the test item within the evaluation period, including: For each of the evaluation indicators, the indicator result corresponding to the evaluation indicator is compared with the preset standard corresponding to the evaluation indicator to obtain the evaluation result of the evaluation indicator; The evaluation results of each of the evaluation indicators are combined to obtain the quality evaluation results of the medical laboratory on the test items within the evaluation period.

12. The quality evaluation method of a medical laboratory according to claim 1, characterized in that: The evaluation indicators include at least one of the following: plan execution rate, out-of-control processing rate, and quality control pass rate, and the quality control pass rate is the coefficient of variation or the compliance rate.

13. The quality evaluation method of a medical laboratory according to claim 12, characterized in that: Also includes: Generate a quality evaluation report; the quality evaluation report includes at least one of the following: The quality evaluation results of the medical laboratory; The index results of the medical laboratory on the coefficient of variation during the evaluation period, the index results of multiple batches of each of the testing equipment on the coefficient of variation during the evaluation period, and the index results of each single batch of each of the testing equipment on the coefficient of variation during the evaluation period; The index results of the medical laboratory on the plan execution rate during the evaluation period, and the index results of each of the detection equipment on the plan execution rate during the evaluation period; The medical laboratory's indicator results on the out-of-control treatment rate during the evaluation period, and each of the detection equipment's indicator results on the out-of-control treatment rate during the evaluation period.

14. The quality evaluation method of a medical laboratory according to claim 12, characterized in that: Also includes: For the test items carried out by the medical laboratory, the evaluation results of the medical laboratory within the evaluation period are collected, and the evaluation results include any one or more evaluation results of the flight inspection indicators, EQC, and EQA; The step of comparing the indicator result corresponding to the evaluation indicator with the preset standard corresponding to the evaluation indicator to obtain the quality evaluation result of the medical laboratory on the test item within the evaluation period includes: Comparing the indicator result corresponding to the evaluation indicator with the preset standard corresponding to the evaluation indicator to obtain the evaluation result of the evaluation indicator; The evaluation results obtained by comparison are integrated with the collected evaluation results to obtain the quality evaluation results of the medical laboratory on the test items within the evaluation period.

15. The quality evaluation method of a medical laboratory according to claim 14, characterized in that: Collect the EQA of the medical laboratory during the evaluation period, including: Obtaining the EQA of the medical laboratory during the evaluation period from the clinical inspection center system associated with the medical laboratory; or Receive the EQA within the evaluation period uploaded by the quality evaluation terminal associated with the medical laboratory.

16. The quality evaluation method of a medical laboratory according to claim 1, characterized in that: The central server is in communication connection with the intermediate device, and the intermediate device is arranged in the communication channel between each detection device of the medical laboratory and the medical laboratory information management system, and is used to obtain the data uploaded by each detection device to the medical laboratory information management system from each communication channel, and extract the indoor quality control data of each detection device from each obtained data; The collecting of the indoor quality control data of the test item of the medical laboratory using multiple test equipments for the same test item during the evaluation period includes: Receive the indoor quality control data of each of the detection devices sent by the intermediate device, wherein the indoor quality control data of each of the detection devices is the indoor quality control data of each of the detection devices on the same detection item within the same evaluation period.

17. The quality evaluation method of a medical laboratory according to claim 1, characterized in that: The central server is connected in communication with a medical laboratory information management system, and the medical laboratory information management system is connected in communication with each detection device of the medical laboratory; The collecting of the indoor quality control data of the test item of the medical laboratory using multiple test equipments for the same test item during the evaluation period includes: Acquire indoor quality control data from the medical laboratory information management system, wherein the indoor quality control data is uploaded by each of the detection devices to the medical laboratory information management system, and the indoor quality control data is the indoor quality control data of the multiple detection devices on the same detection item within an evaluation period.

18. The quality evaluation method of a medical laboratory according to claim 1, characterized in that: The central server is in communication connection with the quality evaluation terminal of the clinical inspection center; The method further comprises: Obtain the preset standard corresponding to the evaluation index uploaded by the quality evaluation terminal of the clinical inspection center, wherein the quality evaluation terminal of the clinical inspection center obtains the preset standard input by the user through the quality control plan interface, and the preset standard is obtained by the user according to the reference standard corresponding to the evaluation index displayed on the quality control plan interface.

19. A quality evaluation method for a medical laboratory, characterized in that: Applied to a central server, the method comprises: For the test items carried out by the medical laboratory, collect the patient sample quality control data of the test items carried out by the medical laboratory with multiple test equipments for the same test items within the evaluation period; According to the evaluation index corresponding to the patient sample quality control data, statistical analysis is performed on the patient sample quality control data of the multiple detection devices to obtain the index results of the medical laboratory regarding the evaluation index within the evaluation period; The indicator result corresponding to the evaluation indicator is compared with the preset standard corresponding to the evaluation indicator to obtain the quality evaluation result of the medical laboratory on the detection item within the evaluation period.

20. The quality evaluation method of a medical laboratory according to claim 19, characterized in that: Evaluation indicators include out-of-control handling rate; Statistical analysis is performed on the patient sample quality control data of the multiple testing devices to obtain the index results of the medical laboratory regarding the out-of-control treatment rate during the evaluation period, including: According to the patient sample quality control data of each of the detection devices, the number of samples out of control in the medical laboratory during the evaluation period is counted; According to the out-of-control processing volume of each of the detection equipment, the out-of-control processing volume of the medical laboratory in the evaluation period is counted; According to the out-of-control sample quantity and out-of-control processing quantity of the medical laboratory, the indicator result of the out-of-control processing rate of the medical laboratory during the evaluation period is obtained.

21. The quality evaluation method of a medical laboratory according to claim 19, characterized in that: Also includes: For the test items carried out by the medical laboratory, the evaluation results of the medical laboratory within the evaluation period are collected, and the evaluation results include any one or more evaluation results of the flight inspection indicators, EQC, and EQA; The step of comparing the indicator result corresponding to the evaluation indicator with the preset standard corresponding to the evaluation indicator to obtain the quality evaluation result of the medical laboratory on the test item within the evaluation period includes: Comparing the indicator result corresponding to the evaluation indicator with the preset standard corresponding to the evaluation indicator to obtain the evaluation result of the evaluation indicator; The evaluation results obtained by comparison are integrated with the collected evaluation results to obtain the quality evaluation results of the medical laboratory on the test items within the evaluation period.

22. The quality evaluation method of a medical laboratory according to claim 21, characterized in that: Collect the EQA of the medical laboratory during the evaluation period, including: Obtaining the EQA of the medical laboratory during the evaluation period from the clinical inspection center system associated with the medical laboratory; or Receive the EQA within the evaluation period uploaded by the quality evaluation terminal associated with the medical laboratory.

23. The quality evaluation method of a medical laboratory according to claim 1, characterized in that: The central server is in communication connection with an intermediate device, and the intermediate device is arranged in a communication channel between each detection device of the medical laboratory and the medical laboratory information management system, and is used to obtain data uploaded by each detection device to the medical laboratory information management system from each communication channel, and extract patient sample quality control data of each detection device from each obtained data; The collecting of the patient sample quality control data of the same test project carried out by the medical laboratory using multiple test equipments during the evaluation period includes: Receive the patient sample quality control data of each of the detection devices sent by the intermediate device, wherein the patient sample quality control data of each of the detection devices is the patient sample quality control data of each of the detection devices on the same detection item within the same evaluation period.

24. The quality evaluation method of a medical laboratory according to claim 1, characterized in that: The central server is connected in communication with a medical laboratory information management system, and the medical laboratory information management system is connected in communication with each detection device of the medical laboratory; The collecting of the patient sample quality control data of the same test project carried out by the medical laboratory using multiple test equipments during the evaluation period includes: Acquire patient sample quality control data from the medical laboratory information management system, wherein the patient sample quality control data is uploaded by each of the detection devices to the medical laboratory information management system, and the patient sample quality control data is the patient sample quality control data of the multiple detection devices on the same detection item within an evaluation period.

25. A quality evaluation method for a medical laboratory, characterized in that: Applied to a quality evaluation terminal, the method comprises: Determine the superior medical laboratories and subordinate medical laboratories with associated relationships; Obtaining an index result of at least one evaluation index of at least one test item of the superior medical laboratory, and obtaining an index result of at least one evaluation index of at least one test item of the subordinate medical laboratory; wherein the index result of the same evaluation index of the same test item of the same medical laboratory is obtained by a plurality of test equipments of the medical laboratory carrying out the test item within an evaluation period at least based on the indoor quality control data of the test item, and the same medical laboratory is a superior medical laboratory or a subordinate medical laboratory; Display a quality evaluation interface; wherein the quality evaluation interface includes the indicator results of at least one evaluation indicator of at least one test item of the superior medical laboratory, and / or the indicator results of at least one evaluation indicator of at least one test item of the subordinate medical laboratory.

26. The quality evaluation method of a medical laboratory according to claim 25, characterized in that: Also includes: If the index results of the target test items of the target medical laboratory are unqualified, the unqualified index results will be prompted; The target medical laboratory is a superior medical laboratory or a subordinate medical laboratory; If an instruction to view details of the unqualified indicator result is received, a details interface is displayed, and the details interface includes: indicator results of the target detection project for multiple detection devices in the target medical laboratory that carry out the target detection project.

27. The quality evaluation method of a medical laboratory according to claim 25, characterized in that: Also includes: For the same medical laboratory, the total number of test items, the number of qualified test items and the qualified rate of test items of the medical laboratory are obtained; The total number of test items, the number of qualified test items and the qualified rate of test items of each medical laboratory are displayed on the quality evaluation interface.

28. A central server, characterized in that: include: CPU and memory; The memory is a short-term storage memory or a persistent storage memory; The central processing unit is configured to communicate with the memory and execute instructions in the memory to perform the quality assessment method for a medical laboratory according to any one of claims 1 to 24.

29. A terminal, characterized in that: include: CPU and memory; The memory is a short-term storage memory or a persistent storage memory; The central processing unit is configured to communicate with the memory and execute instructions in the memory to perform the quality assessment method for a medical laboratory as described in any one of claims 25 to 27.

30. A readable storage medium having a computer program stored thereon, characterized in that: When the computer program is loaded and executed by the processor, the quality evaluation method for a medical laboratory as described in any one of claims 1-24 or 25-27 is implemented.

Images