Multi-index price list verification method

Abstract

The invention relates to the technical field of data processing, and discloses a multi-index quotation list verification method, comprising: receiving a quotation list sent by a sales terminal for a target purchaser, the quotation list comprising a plurality of server accessory models and a demand quantity, original quotation information and accessory types corresponding to each server accessory model; dividing the plurality of server accessory models into a core server accessory model group and a non-core server accessory model group; obtaining a plurality of pre-configured compatibility test accessory groups, carrying out compatibility test on the core server accessory model group according to the compatibility test accessory groups, obtaining a compatibility score, comparing the compatibility score with a preset score threshold, and generating a compatibility verification result; if the compatibility risk does not exist, verifying the original quotation information to obtain a price verification result; adjusting the original quotation information according to the price verification result to obtain an adjusted quotation list; and sending the adjustment quotation to the sales terminal. Therefore, verification of the multi-index quotation list is realized.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] The present invention relates to the technical field of data processing, and in particular to a multi-index quotation verification method. Background Art

[0002] In the procurement process of enterprises, especially in the procurement process of servers and their accessories, it is often necessary to generate and quote according to different needs and budgets. The current quotation verification method is mostly based on a single indicator. Therefore, there is an urgent need for a quotation verification method that integrates multiple indicators to more accurately and comprehensively evaluate and adjust the rationality of the quotation.

[0003] The existing quotation verification method often has the following technical problems:

[0004] First, existing methods usually verify quotations based on a single indicator, which is difficult to meet the multiple needs in actual procurement, resulting in unreasonable and incomplete verification of quotations;

[0005] Second, when multiple server accessory models have compatibility risks, the existing quotation verification technology does not verify the quotation according to the actual needs of users. At the same time, due to the lack of a method to generate the selection probability of the compatibility test accessory group through historical data, the verification of the quotation is inaccurate.

[0006] Third, the existing technology does not consider the compatibility between accessories in actual application scenarios, and does not promptly issue warnings for server accessory models with compatibility issues, resulting in inaccurate verification of quotations. Summary of the invention

[0007] The summary of the invention is used to introduce concepts in a brief form, which will be described in detail in the detailed implementation section below. The summary of the invention is not intended to identify the key features or essential features of the technical solution claimed for protection, nor is it intended to limit the scope of the technical solution claimed for protection.

[0008] The present invention proposes a multi-index quotation verification method to solve one or more of the technical problems mentioned in the above background technology part.

[0009] The present invention provides a multi-index quotation verification method, comprising: receiving a quotation sent by a sales terminal for a target purchaser, the quotation comprising a plurality of server accessory models, a required quantity corresponding to each server accessory model, original quotation information corresponding to each server accessory model, and an accessory type corresponding to each server accessory model; dividing the plurality of server accessory models into a core server accessory model group and a non-core server accessory model group;

[0010] Obtain multiple pre-configured compatibility test accessory groups, each compatibility test accessory group includes multiple benchmark accessory models that have undergone compatibility testing, and compatibility scores of multiple benchmark accessory models; perform compatibility testing on the core server accessory model group according to the multiple compatibility test accessory groups to determine the compatibility score corresponding to the core server accessory model group, compare the compatibility score with a preset score threshold, and generate a compatibility verification result;

[0011] If the compatibility check result indicates that there is no compatibility risk for the multiple server accessory models included in the quotation, the original quotation information is checked to obtain a price check result; the original quotation information in the quotation is adjusted according to the price check result to obtain an adjusted quotation;

[0012] Send adjustment quotation to sales terminal.

[0013] Optionally, before sending the adjusted quotation to the sales terminal, the following is also included:

[0014] If the compatibility check result indicates that the multiple server accessory models included in the quotation sheet have compatibility risks, a first compatibility check result is sent to a sales terminal, and feedback information from the sales terminal regarding the first compatibility check result is received, the feedback information including permission information and / or a specified accessory model, wherein the permission information indicates whether adjustment of the multiple server accessory models included in the quotation sheet is allowed;

[0015] If the feedback information indicates that the multiple server accessory models included in the quotation are allowed to be adjusted, and the feedback information includes a specified accessory model, the specified accessory model is matched among multiple compatibility test accessory groups to obtain at least one compatibility test accessory group matching the specified accessory model;

[0016] For at least one compatibility test accessory group, sort them in descending order according to the compatibility scores to obtain a compatibility test accessory group sequence, and select a target number of compatibility test accessory groups with the highest sorting in the compatibility test accessory group sequence as candidate compatibility test accessory groups;

[0017] Sending the candidate compatibility test accessory groups to the purchasing terminal corresponding to the target purchaser, wherein the purchasing terminal is used to display the accessory type of each server accessory model among the multiple server accessory models, and display the target number of compatibility test accessory groups and the compatibility score and selection probability corresponding to each compatibility test accessory group; the purchasing terminal is also used to display selection prompt information;

[0018] Receiving user selection information returned by the purchasing terminal, the user selection information including a target compatibility test accessory group selected by the user from the candidate compatibility test accessory group;

[0019] According to the target compatibility test accessory group and the accessory type corresponding to each server accessory model, multiple server accessory models in the quotation are adjusted to obtain a compatibility adjustment quotation, and the original quotation information of the compatibility adjustment quotation is verified to obtain a price verification result;

[0020] The original quotation information in the compatibility adjustment quotation is adjusted according to the price verification result to obtain an adjusted quotation.

[0021] Optionally, the original quotation information is verified to obtain price verification results, including:

[0022] Obtain user purchase information of the target purchaser in the historical time period, including purchase frequency, purchase quantity, and total purchase price in the historical time period; obtain the purchase frequency level according to the purchase frequency and the preset purchase frequency threshold; calculate the purchase average unit price and the purchase average unit price level according to the purchase quantity and the total purchase price; generate the user consumption tendency index according to the purchase frequency level and the purchase average unit price level; generate the purchase price range according to the user consumption tendency index;

[0023] Verify the original quotation information according to the purchase price range to obtain a price verification result; and

[0024] The method also includes:

[0025] Obtaining inventory information corresponding to multiple server accessory models in the quotation or compatibility adjustment quotation, the inventory information including inventory quantities corresponding to the multiple server accessory models; determining server accessories with inventory quantities greater than the corresponding demand quantities as accessories with normal inventory; and determining server accessories with inventory quantities less than the corresponding demand quantities as accessories with insufficient inventory;

[0026] Corresponding price adjustment coefficients are set for accessories with tight inventory and accessories with normal inventory respectively. According to the corresponding price adjustment coefficients and price verification results, the original quotation information in the quotation or compatibility adjustment quotation is adjusted.

[0027] Optionally, the quotation also includes salesperson information, and the salesperson information includes a salesperson ID; and

[0028] The original quotation information in the quotation or the compatibility adjustment quotation is adjusted according to the corresponding price adjustment coefficient and the price verification result, including: querying the corresponding discount authority through the salesperson ID, and adjusting the original quotation information in the quotation or the compatibility adjustment quotation according to the corresponding price adjustment coefficient, the price verification result and the discount authority.

[0029] Optionally, the selection probability corresponding to each compatibility test accessory group is generated by the following steps:

[0030] Obtain a compatibility check result set within a historical time period, and filter multiple compatibility check results in the compatibility check result set that represent compatibility risks to form a compatibility check result group; count the accessory replacement plans corresponding to each compatibility check result in the compatibility check result group to obtain an accessory replacement plan set; wherein the accessory replacement plan includes the corresponding original quotation information, the candidate compatibility test accessory group, and the target compatibility test accessory group;

[0031] According to the price range to which the original quotation information belongs, the set of accessory replacement plans is divided into multiple accessory replacement plan groups; for each accessory replacement plan group, the first number of each compatibility test accessory group as a candidate compatibility test accessory group and the second number of times as a target compatibility test accessory group are counted, and based on the first number and second number corresponding to each compatibility test accessory group, the selection probability of each compatibility test accessory group in each price range is calculated.

[0032] The present invention has the following beneficial effects:

[0033] 1. Improved the rationality of quotation verification. Specifically, after receiving the quotation sent by the sales terminal, multiple server accessory models are divided into core server accessory model groups and non-core server accessory model groups; multiple compatibility test accessory groups are obtained, and the core server accessory model group is tested for compatibility based on the multiple compatibility test accessory groups to generate compatibility verification results; if there is no compatibility risk, the original quotation information is verified and adjusted, and the adjusted quotation is obtained and sent to the sales terminal; after confirming that there is no compatibility risk in the compatibility of the server accessory model, the original quotation information is automatically verified and adjusted to make the quotation more reasonable and in line with pricing rules. By using multiple indicators to verify the quotation, the verification of the quotation is more comprehensive;

[0034] 2. Improved the accuracy of quotation verification. Before sending the adjusted quotation to the sales terminal, if a compatibility risk is found in the quotation, the preliminary compatibility verification results will be sent to the sales terminal and feedback information will be obtained, including licensing information and / or specified accessory models; if the adjustment is allowed and the specified accessory model is included, the specified accessory model will be matched with the compatibility test accessory group and sorted by compatibility score, and the target number will be selected as the candidate compatibility test accessory group for display and selection by the purchasing terminal; after adjusting the quotation according to the compatibility test accessory group selected by the target purchaser, re-verify and adjust the original quotation information according to the results to generate the final adjusted quotation. When compatibility risks arise, the accessory group of the quotation is adjusted based on the actual needs of the user, so as to verify the quotation more accurately;

[0035] 3. Improve the accuracy of quotation verification. By receiving user feedback information from the after-sales service feedback terminal, the user feedback information includes compatibility feedback information for adjusting multiple server accessory models in the quotation, the corresponding feedback compatibility score and feedback time, and storing it in the user feedback information database; then, filter out the user feedback information group to be counted containing multiple server accessory models from the user feedback information in the historical time period, determine the feedback compatibility score level group of the user feedback information group to be counted through the feedback compatibility score level table, and count the number of occurrences of each value. If the number of occurrences of each value exceeds the preset threshold, the priority feedback compatibility score level is selected according to the number of occurrences, and the score of the corresponding compatibility test accessory group is adjusted; if the number of occurrences is the same, no adjustment is made. Subsequently, the adjusted score and time point in the second time period are obtained from the compatibility score history database, and a compatibility score bar chart is generated, and the number of declines in the score in the time period is judged according to the bar chart. Whether it exceeds the warning threshold. If the number of declines exceeds the warning threshold, the relevant compatibility test accessory group is set as a warning accessory group and sent to the procurement terminal to prompt the procurement personnel to perform quality control on the benchmark accessory model. Based on user feedback, we can effectively identify and adjust accessory combinations with compatibility issues to improve the reliability of the compatibility test accessory group, and use historical data and real-time scoring monitoring mechanisms to promptly warn of potential problems and prevent defective accessories from participating in the procurement process, thereby improving the accuracy of quotation verification. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0036] The above and other features, advantages and aspects of the embodiments of the present invention will become more apparent with reference to the following detailed description in conjunction with the accompanying drawings. Throughout the accompanying drawings, the same or similar reference numerals represent the same or similar elements. It should be understood that the drawings are schematic and that components and elements are not necessarily drawn to scale.

[0037] Figure 1 The present invention is a flowchart of a multi-index quotation verification method. DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0038] The present invention will be described in more detail below with reference to the accompanying drawings. Although certain embodiments of the present invention are shown in the accompanying drawings, it should be understood that the present invention can be implemented in various forms and should not be construed as being limited to the embodiments set forth herein. On the contrary, these embodiments are provided to provide a more thorough and complete understanding of the present invention. It should be understood that the drawings and embodiments of the present invention are only for exemplary purposes and are not intended to limit the scope of protection of the present invention.

[0039] It should also be noted that, for ease of description, only the parts related to the invention are shown in the drawings. In the absence of conflict, the embodiments of the present invention and the features in the embodiments can be combined with each other.

[0040] It should be noted that the concepts such as "first" and "second" mentioned in the present invention are only used to distinguish different devices, modules or units, and are not used to limit the order or interdependence of the functions performed by these devices, modules or units.

[0041] It should be noted that the modifications of "one" and "plurality" mentioned in the present invention are illustrative rather than restrictive, and those skilled in the art should understand that, unless otherwise clearly indicated in the context, it should be understood as "one or more".

[0042] The names of the messages or information exchanged between multiple devices of the present invention are only for illustrative purposes, and are not used to limit the scope of these messages or information.

[0043] The present invention will be described in detail below with reference to the accompanying drawings and in conjunction with embodiments.

[0044] like Figure 1 As shown, a multi-index quotation verification method of the present invention is shown, comprising the following steps:

[0045] Step 101, receiving a quotation sheet for a target purchaser sent by a sales terminal, the quotation sheet including multiple server accessory models, the required quantity corresponding to each server accessory model, the original quotation information corresponding to each server accessory model, and the accessory type corresponding to each server accessory model; dividing the multiple server accessory models into a core server accessory model group and a non-core server accessory model group;

[0046] In some embodiments, the execution subject of the multi-index quotation verification method of the present invention can be a user terminal, and the user terminal can be a laptop computer, a desktop computer, etc.

[0047] In practice, the execution entity establishes a communication connection with the sales terminal, thereby receiving a quotation for the target purchaser sent by the sales terminal. Among them, the quotation is mainly used for suppliers to quote to customers, similar to a price list, and the quotation is generated for the target purchaser. The quotation includes multiple server accessory models, the required quantity corresponding to each server accessory model, the original quotation information corresponding to each server accessory model, and the accessory type corresponding to each server accessory model. The target purchaser is the customer who purchases server accessories. The server accessory model refers to the model of the accessory used for the server. The original quotation information is the initial price information provided for each server accessory model in the quotation for the first time, reflecting the initial unit price or batch price of the server accessory model without any adjustment. The accessory type refers to the category corresponding to each server accessory model. On this basis, the execution entity divides the multiple server accessory models in the quotation into a core server accessory model group and a non-core server accessory model group according to the function and importance of the accessory type corresponding to each server accessory model. For example, the processor, memory, etc. determine the main performance of the server and are core accessories, while the network card, sound card, etc. are non-core accessories. The core server accessory model group refers to a collection of server accessory models that play a decisive role in the overall performance, reliability and function of the server. The non-core server accessory model group refers to a collection of server accessory models that have a minor impact on the basic operation and performance of the server.

[0048] Step 102, obtaining a plurality of pre-configured compatibility test accessory groups, each compatibility test accessory group including a plurality of benchmark accessory models that have undergone compatibility testing, and compatibility scores of the plurality of benchmark accessory models; performing compatibility testing on the core server accessory model group according to the plurality of compatibility test accessory groups to determine the compatibility score corresponding to the core server accessory model group, comparing the compatibility score with a preset score threshold, and generating a compatibility verification result;

[0049] In some embodiments, the execution subject has locally stored a plurality of pre-configured compatibility test accessory groups, each of which includes a plurality of benchmark accessory models that have undergone compatibility testing, and compatibility scores of the plurality of benchmark accessory models. Among them, the plurality of compatibility test accessory groups are composed of different combinations of a plurality of benchmark accessory models. Compatibility refers to the degree of mutual coordination between hardware, software, or software and hardware combination systems. The benchmark accessory model is a standard server accessory model that has undergone compatibility testing. The compatibility score reflects the degree of compatibility between the plurality of benchmark accessory models in each compatibility test accessory group, and each compatibility test accessory group corresponds to a compatibility score. On this basis, the execution subject performs a compatibility test on the core server accessory model group. Specifically, a compatibility test accessory group that is consistent with the core server accessory model group combination is selected from the plurality of compatibility test accessory groups, thereby obtaining a compatibility score for the core server accessory model group. Among them, the preset score threshold is a preset standard compatibility score. On this basis, the compatibility score corresponding to the core server accessory model group is compared with the preset score threshold. If the compatibility score reaches or exceeds the preset score threshold, the obtained compatibility verification result is that there is no compatibility risk; if the compatibility score is less than the preset score threshold, the obtained compatibility verification result is that there is a compatibility risk.

[0050] Step 103: If the compatibility check result indicates that there is no compatibility risk for the multiple server component models included in the quotation, the original quotation information is checked to obtain a price check result; the original quotation information in the quotation is adjusted according to the price check result to obtain an adjusted quotation;

[0051] In some embodiments, if the compatibility check result indicates that there is no compatibility risk for multiple server accessory models included in the quotation, a market price table can be set, which contains each server accessory model and the corresponding standard market price range. The price in the original quotation information is compared with the standard market price range to obtain a price verification result. For server accessory models with prices higher than the standard market price range, the price is lowered to within the market standard price range. For server accessory models with prices lower than the standard market price range, the price is increased to within the market standard price range to obtain an adjusted quotation. Among them, the price verification result indicates whether the original quotation information of each server accessory model in the quotation meets the market standard price range.

[0052] Step 104: Send the adjusted quotation to the sales terminal.

[0053] In some embodiments, the execution entity establishes a communication connection with the sales terminal, thereby sending an adjustment quotation to the sales terminal.

[0054] In these embodiments, the rationality of the quotation verification is improved. Specifically, after receiving the quotation sent by the sales terminal, multiple server accessory models are divided into a core server accessory model group and a non-core server accessory model group; multiple compatibility test accessory groups are obtained, and the core server accessory model group is tested for compatibility based on the multiple compatibility test accessory groups to generate a compatibility verification result; if there is no compatibility risk, the original quotation information is verified and adjusted, and an adjusted quotation is obtained and sent to the sales terminal; after confirming that there is no compatibility risk in the compatibility of the server accessory model, the original quotation information is automatically verified and adjusted to make the quotation more reasonable and in line with the pricing rules, and the verification of the quotation is made more comprehensive by using multiple indicators to verify the quotation.

[0055] In some embodiments, in order to further solve the second technical problem described in the background technology section, that is, "when multiple server accessory models have compatibility risks, the existing quotation verification technology does not verify the quotation according to the actual needs of the user; at the same time, due to the lack of a method for generating the selection probability of the compatibility test accessory group through historical data, the verification of the quotation is inaccurate", in some embodiments of the present invention,

[0056] Before sending the adjustment quotation to the sales terminal, it also includes:

[0057] Step 1: If the compatibility check result indicates that multiple server accessory models included in the quotation sheet have compatibility risks, a first compatibility check result is sent to a sales terminal, and feedback information from the sales terminal regarding the first compatibility check result is received, the feedback information including permission information and / or a specified accessory model, wherein the permission information indicates whether adjustment of the multiple server accessory models included in the quotation sheet is allowed;

[0058] In some embodiments, if the compatibility check result indicates that multiple server accessory models included in the quotation have compatibility risks, a first compatibility check result is sent to a sales terminal, and feedback information from the sales terminal regarding the first compatibility check result is received. The first compatibility check result is that multiple server accessory models included in the quotation have compatibility risks. On this basis, the execution entity establishes a communication connection with the sales terminal, thereby sending the first compatibility check result to the sales terminal, and receiving feedback information from the sales terminal regarding the first compatibility check result. The feedback information includes permission information and / or specified accessory models, wherein the permission information indicates whether adjustments to the multiple server accessory models included in the quotation are allowed; the specified accessory model is a server accessory model explicitly specified by the target purchaser and cannot be adjusted.

[0059] Step 2: If the feedback information indicates that the multiple server accessory models included in the quotation are allowed to be adjusted, and the feedback information includes a specified accessory model, the specified accessory model is matched among multiple compatibility test accessory groups to obtain at least one compatibility test accessory group that matches the specified accessory model;

[0060] In some embodiments, if the feedback information indicates that adjustments can be made to multiple server accessory models included in the quotation, and the feedback information includes a specified accessory model, the execution entity searches for a compatibility test accessory group that matches the specified accessory model among multiple compatibility test accessory groups, and obtains at least one compatibility test accessory group that matches the specified accessory model.

[0061] Step 3: sort at least one compatibility test accessory group according to the compatibility score from large to small to obtain a compatibility test accessory group sequence, and select a target number of compatibility test accessory groups with the highest ranking from the compatibility test accessory group sequence as candidate compatibility test accessory groups;

[0062] In some embodiments, the execution subject sorts the matched compatibility test accessory groups according to their compatibility scores from large to small to obtain a compatibility test accessory group sequence, wherein the groups with higher compatibility scores are arranged at the front, and the groups with lower compatibility scores are arranged at the back. A target quantity is set according to the needs of the target purchaser, for example, the target quantity is 2. From the compatibility test accessory group sequence, the first target quantity (2) compatibility test accessory groups are selected in turn as candidate compatibility test accessory groups.

[0063] Step 4: Send the candidate compatibility test accessory groups to the purchasing terminal corresponding to the target purchaser, wherein the purchasing terminal is used to display the accessory type of each server accessory model among the multiple server accessory models, and display the target number of compatibility test accessory groups and the compatibility score and selection probability corresponding to each compatibility test accessory group; the purchasing terminal is also used to display selection prompt information;

[0064] In some embodiments, the execution entity establishes a communication connection with the purchasing terminal, thereby sending the candidate compatibility test accessory group to the purchasing terminal corresponding to the target purchaser. Among them, the purchasing terminal is used to display the accessory type of each server accessory model among multiple server accessory models, and display the target number of compatibility test accessory groups and the compatibility score and selection probability corresponding to each compatibility test accessory group; the purchasing terminal is also used to display selection prompt information. Among them, the selection probability is a probability value, usually expressed as a percentage, which represents the priority of recommending the compatibility test accessory group among the candidate compatibility test accessory groups. The selection prompt information is specifically used to guide the target purchaser in the instructions or prompts when selecting the candidate compatibility test accessory group, helping the target purchaser understand how to make the correct choice based on the recommended information.

[0065] Step 5: receiving user selection information returned by the purchasing terminal, where the user selection information includes a target compatibility test accessory group selected by the user from the candidate compatibility test accessory group;

[0066] In some embodiments, the execution subject establishes a communication connection with the purchasing terminal, thereby receiving the user selection information returned by the purchasing terminal, and the user selection information includes the target compatibility test accessory group selected by the user from the candidate compatibility test accessory group. The target compatibility test accessory group refers to the compatibility test accessory group that is finally selected and best meets the requirements among multiple candidate compatibility test accessory groups based on the compatibility score and the selection probability.

[0067] Step 6: According to the target compatibility test accessory group and the accessory type corresponding to each server accessory model, multiple server accessory models in the quotation are adjusted to obtain a compatibility adjustment quotation, and the original quotation information of the compatibility adjustment quotation is verified to obtain a price verification result;

[0068] In some embodiments, the execution subject first reads the accessory type corresponding to each server accessory model in the quotation; secondly, finds the accessory models corresponding to these accessory types from the target compatibility test accessory group; finally, uses the matching server accessory models in the target compatibility test accessory group to adjust the original server accessory models in the quotation to obtain a compatibility adjusted quotation. On this basis, a market price table can be set to compare the price in the original quotation information with the standard market price range to obtain a price verification result. Among them, the price verification result indicates whether the original quotation information of each server accessory model in the quotation meets the market standard price range.

[0069] Step seven: adjust the original quotation information in the compatibility adjustment quotation according to the price verification result to obtain an adjusted quotation.

[0070] In some embodiments, for server accessory models with prices higher than the standard market price range, the prices are lowered to within the market standard price range. For server accessory models with prices lower than the standard market price range, the prices are raised to within the market standard price range to obtain an adjusted quotation.

[0071] Verify the original quotation information and obtain the price verification results, including:

[0072] Step 1: Obtain user purchase information of the target purchaser in the historical time period, the user purchase information includes purchase frequency, purchase quantity, and total purchase price in the historical time period; obtain the purchase frequency level according to the purchase frequency and the preset purchase frequency threshold; calculate the purchase average unit price and the purchase average unit price level according to the purchase quantity and the purchase total price; generate the user consumption tendency index according to the purchase frequency level and the purchase average unit price level; generate the purchase price range according to the user consumption tendency index;

[0073] In some embodiments, the execution entity has locally stored a user consumption behavior database, and the execution entity extracts the target purchaser's user purchase information from the user consumption behavior database. The user purchase information includes the purchase frequency, purchase quantity, and total purchase price in the historical time period. Among them, the purchase frequency refers to the number of purchases made by the target purchaser within a period of time, which measures the frequency of purchases by the target purchaser. The purchase quantity refers to the number of server accessory models purchased by the target purchaser within a period of time. The total purchase price refers to the total price of the server accessory models purchased by the target purchaser within a period of time. The database is a warehouse for storing data. The preset purchase frequency threshold is a pre-set standard for purchase frequency.

[0074] On this basis, the execution subject compares the purchase frequency with the preset purchase frequency threshold. If the purchase frequency exceeds or is lower than the preset purchase frequency threshold, it will be divided into different purchase frequency levels. The execution subject calculates the average purchase price in the historical time period, that is, the total purchase price divided by the purchase quantity. The preset purchase average unit price level threshold is compared with the purchase average unit price. If the purchase average unit price exceeds or is lower than the preset purchase average unit price level threshold, it will be divided into different purchase average unit price levels. On this basis, a score is assigned to each level of the purchase frequency level, and a score is also assigned to each level of the purchase average unit price level. Then, weights are preset for the purchase frequency level and the purchase average unit price level respectively. On this basis, the score corresponding to the purchase frequency level is multiplied by the corresponding weight, and the score corresponding to the purchase average unit price level is multiplied by the corresponding weight. The sum of their multiplication results is obtained to obtain the user consumption propensity index. On this basis, a price range table is set, wherein the table includes the user consumption propensity index and the corresponding price range. The price range corresponding to the user consumption propensity index is queried in the price range table to obtain the purchase price range.

[0075] Step 2: Verify the original quotation information according to the purchase price range to obtain a price verification result; and

[0076] In some embodiments, the purchase price range is compared with the original quotation information to obtain a price verification result, and the price verification result is used to verify whether the price of the original quotation information is reasonable.

[0077] The method also includes:

[0078] Step 1: Obtain inventory information corresponding to multiple server accessory models in the quotation or compatibility adjustment quotation, the inventory information including inventory quantities corresponding to the multiple server accessory models; determine server accessories whose inventory quantities are greater than the corresponding demand quantities as accessories with normal inventory; and determine server accessories whose inventory quantities are less than the corresponding demand quantities as accessories with insufficient inventory;

[0079] In some embodiments, the execution entity has locally stored an inventory management database. The inventory information of each server accessory model in the quotation or compatibility adjustment quotation is extracted from the inventory management database. The inventory information includes the inventory quantities corresponding to multiple server accessory models. Among them, the inventory quantity refers to the actual inventory quantity of each server accessory model. If the inventory quantity of the server accessory model is greater than the corresponding demand quantity, it is marked as a normal inventory accessory. If the inventory quantity of the server accessory model is less than the corresponding demand quantity, it is marked as a tight inventory accessory.

[0080] Step 2: Set corresponding price adjustment coefficients for the parts with tight inventory and the parts with normal inventory respectively, and adjust the original quotation information in the quotation or compatibility adjustment quotation according to the corresponding price adjustment coefficients and price verification results.

[0081] In some embodiments, a smaller price adjustment coefficient may be set for accessories with normal inventory, and a higher price adjustment coefficient may be set for accessories with tight inventory. If the price of the original quotation information is unreasonable, the quotation is determined to need adjustment. On this basis, the price adjustment coefficient corresponding to each server accessory model in the quotation or compatibility adjustment quotation is multiplied by the original quotation of the original quotation information to obtain the recommended adjusted price, and then the adjusted quotation or compatibility adjustment quotation is obtained.

[0082] The quotation also includes salesperson information, and the salesperson information includes a salesperson identification; and

[0083] The original quotation information in the quotation or the compatibility adjustment quotation is adjusted according to the corresponding price adjustment coefficient and the price verification result, including: querying the corresponding discount authority through the salesperson ID, and adjusting the original quotation information in the quotation or the compatibility adjustment quotation according to the corresponding price adjustment coefficient, the price verification result and the discount authority.

[0084] In some embodiments, the quotation also includes salesperson information, and the salesperson information includes a salesperson identification; wherein the salesperson identification is a code or number that uniquely identifies each salesperson, and is used to query the relevant authority information of the salesperson, including the salesperson's discount authority. Discount authority refers to the discount range allowed by the salesperson during the quotation adjustment process. On this basis, according to the corresponding price adjustment coefficient and price verification result, the original quotation information in the quotation or compatibility adjustment quotation is adjusted to obtain the basic adjusted price. Based on the basic adjusted price, combined with the price discount, the final adjusted quotation or compatibility adjustment quotation is calculated.

[0085] The selection probability corresponding to each compatibility test accessory group is generated by the following steps:

[0086] Step 1: obtain a compatibility verification result set within a historical time period, and screen multiple compatibility verification results in the compatibility verification result set that represent compatibility risks to form a compatibility verification result group; count the accessory replacement plans corresponding to each compatibility verification result in the compatibility verification result group to obtain an accessory replacement plan set; wherein the accessory replacement plan includes the corresponding original quotation information, the candidate compatibility test accessory group, and the target compatibility test accessory group;

[0087] In some embodiments, each time the execution entity performs a compatibility check, the compatibility check result is stored in a database. The execution entity extracts a set of compatibility check results within a historical time period from the database. From the compatibility check result set, the compatibility check results with compatibility risks are screened out and form a compatibility check result group. For each compatibility check result in the compatibility check result group, the corresponding accessory replacement plan is extracted, and all accessory replacement plans are summarized into a set to obtain an accessory replacement plan set. Among them, the accessory replacement plan includes the corresponding original quotation information, the candidate compatibility test accessory group, and the target compatibility test accessory group.

[0088] Step two, according to the price range to which the original quotation information belongs, divide the set of accessories replacement plans into multiple accessories replacement plan groups; for each accessories replacement plan group, count the first number of each compatibility test accessory group as a candidate compatibility test accessory group, and the second number of times as a target compatibility test accessory group, and calculate the selection probability of each compatibility test accessory group in each price range based on the first number and second number corresponding to each compatibility test accessory group.

[0089] In some embodiments, the set of accessory replacement solutions is classified according to the price range of the original quotation information to generate multiple groups to obtain multiple accessory replacement solution groups. The first number of each compatibility test accessory group as a candidate compatibility test accessory group and the second number of each compatibility test accessory group as a target compatibility test accessory group are counted, and the selection probability of each compatibility test accessory group in each price range is calculated based on the first number and the second number corresponding to each compatibility test accessory group. Among them, the first number refers to the number of times a certain compatibility test accessory group appears as a candidate compatibility test accessory group in the accessory replacement solution group. The second number refers to the number of times the compatibility test accessory group is selected as the target compatibility test accessory group in the accessory replacement solution group. The second number is ratioed to the first number to obtain the selection probability of each compatibility test accessory group in each price range.

[0090] In these embodiments, the accuracy of quotation verification is improved. Before sending an adjusted quotation to a sales terminal, if a compatibility risk is found in the quotation, a preliminary compatibility verification result is sent to the sales terminal and feedback information is obtained, including permission information and / or specified accessory models; if adjustment is allowed and the specified accessory model is included, the specified accessory model is matched with the compatibility test accessory group and sorted by compatibility score, and a target number of items are selected as candidate compatibility test accessory groups for display and selection by the purchasing terminal; after adjusting the quotation according to the compatibility test accessory group selected by the target purchaser, the original quotation information is re-verified and adjusted according to the results to generate a final adjusted quotation. When a compatibility risk occurs, the accessory group of the quotation is adjusted based on the actual needs of the user, so as to verify the quotation more accurately.

[0091] In some embodiments, in order to further solve the third technical problem described in the background technology section, that is, "the prior art does not consider the compatibility between accessories in actual application scenarios, and does not promptly warn server accessory models with compatibility issues, resulting in inaccurate verification of the quotation", some embodiments of the present invention also include:

[0092] Step 1: receiving user feedback information from an after-sales service feedback terminal; the user feedback information includes compatibility feedback information for adjusting the quotation sheet including multiple server accessory models; the compatibility feedback information includes whether there are compatibility problems with the multiple server accessory models during actual use and feedback compatibility scores corresponding to the multiple server accessory models; the user feedback information also includes feedback time; and the user feedback information is stored in a user feedback information database;

[0093] In some embodiments, the execution entity establishes a communication connection with the after-sales service feedback terminal to receive user feedback information. The user feedback information includes compatibility feedback information for adjusting the quotation to include multiple server accessory models. The compatibility feedback information includes whether there are compatibility issues with multiple server accessory models during actual use and the feedback compatibility scores corresponding to the multiple server accessory models. Among them, compatibility issues refer to compatibility defects that may exist in accessories during actual use. The feedback compatibility score refers to the score given by the user based on the compatibility performance of the accessories, which is used to quantify the compatibility of the accessories. The user feedback information also includes the feedback time, wherein the feedback time refers to the specific time point when the user feedback information is generated or submitted, and is usually used to mark the actual occurrence time of the feedback. The user feedback information is stored in the user feedback information database. The user feedback information database is a database for storing all user feedback information.

[0094] Step 2: obtaining multiple user feedback information within a historical time period from a user feedback information database; filtering out user feedback information containing the above-mentioned multiple server accessory models from the multiple user feedback information and using it as the user feedback information to be counted, thereby obtaining a user feedback information group to be counted;

[0095] In some embodiments, the historical time period is a time period within a specified time interval, which may be a few days, weeks, or months, and represents the user feedback information collected during this period. A query is performed from the user feedback information database according to the specified historical time period to find multiple user feedback information that meets the time range. The multiple user feedback information is compared with the above-mentioned multiple server accessory models, and feedback information containing the above-mentioned multiple server accessory models is filtered out. The filtered relevant user feedback information is marked as user feedback information to be counted, and this information is placed in the user feedback information group to be counted. Among them, the user feedback information group to be counted is a set that includes all user feedback information related to multiple server accessory models filtered out from the historical time period.

[0096] Step 3: for each user feedback information to be counted in the user feedback information group to be counted, query the feedback compatibility scoring table to obtain the feedback compatibility scoring level corresponding to each user feedback information to be counted, and obtain the feedback compatibility scoring level group corresponding to the user feedback information group to be counted; the feedback compatibility scoring level can be one of the following: level 1, level 2, level 3;

[0097] In some embodiments, the feedback compatibility rating table is a table that stores feedback compatibility ratings. Level 1, level 2, and level 3 are specific values ​​of the feedback compatibility ratings, which are used to indicate the severity of compatibility issues of multiple server accessory models. For example, level 1 may represent "full compatibility", level 2 represents "general compatibility", and level 3 represents "serious compatibility issues". On this basis, the execution subject searches for the feedback compatibility rating corresponding to each user feedback information to be counted by querying the feedback compatibility rating table based on each user feedback information to be counted. The execution subject collects the feedback compatibility rating corresponding to each user feedback information to be counted into a set to form a feedback compatibility rating group, which contains the ratings of all user feedback information to be counted.

[0098] Step 4: Count the number of occurrences of each value of the feedback compatibility score level in the feedback compatibility score level group. If the number of occurrences of each value of the feedback compatibility score level in the feedback compatibility score level group is greater than the preset value occurrence threshold, adjust the compatibility score of the compatibility test accessory group corresponding to multiple server accessory models through the following steps:

[0099] If the number of occurrences of each value in the feedback compatibility score level group is the same, the compatibility scores of the compatibility test accessory group corresponding to multiple server accessory models will not be adjusted;

[0100] If the number of occurrences of various values ​​in the feedback compatibility score level group is different, the value with the largest number of occurrences is selected as the priority feedback compatibility score level; the compatibility scores of the compatibility test accessory groups corresponding to multiple server accessory models are adjusted according to the priority feedback compatibility score level;

[0101] In some embodiments, the number of occurrences of each value of the feedback compatibility score level in the feedback compatibility score level group is calculated. The preset value occurrence number threshold is a set quantitative standard, which means that a certain value must at least meet the preset value occurrence number threshold in the feedback compatibility score level group before the feedback compatibility score level corresponding to the value is considered valid and can affect the adjustment process. On this basis, if the number of occurrences of each value of the feedback compatibility score level in the feedback compatibility score level group is greater than the preset value occurrence number threshold, then the compatibility scores of the compatibility test accessory groups corresponding to multiple server accessory models are adjusted through the following steps:

[0102] If the number of occurrences of each value is greater than the preset value occurrence threshold, and the number of occurrences of each value is the same, then the compatibility scores of the compatibility test accessory groups corresponding to multiple server accessory models will not be adjusted. If the number of occurrences of each value is greater than the preset value occurrence threshold, and the number of occurrences of each value is different, then the value with the largest number of occurrences is selected as the priority feedback compatibility score level. Among them, the priority feedback compatibility score level means that when there are multiple feedback compatibility score levels, the feedback compatibility score level with the largest number of occurrences is selected as the priority level to determine the subsequent adjustment. On this basis, a compatibility score adjustment table can be set, and the compatibility score adjustment table includes feedback compatibility score levels and corresponding score adjustment ratios. The query table determines the score adjustment ratios corresponding to the feedback compatibility score levels of multiple server accessory models, and the score adjustment ratios are used to adjust the compatibility scores of the compatibility test accessory groups corresponding to multiple server accessory models. The above steps one to four can be performed periodically in the second time period to obtain the updated compatibility score after each adjustment, and the updated compatibility score after each adjustment is stored in the compatibility score history database.

[0103] Step 6, obtaining each adjusted update compatibility score in the second time period and the time point corresponding to each adjusted update compatibility score from the compatibility score history database;

[0104] Generate a compatibility score bar graph using the updated compatibility score after each adjustment and the time point corresponding to the updated compatibility score after each adjustment; determine whether the number of decreases in the update compatibility score at adjacent time points within the second time period exceeds a decrease number threshold according to the compatibility score bar graph, and obtain a determination result;

[0105] If the judgment result indicates that the compatibility score has decreased more than the preset decrease threshold in the historical time period, the compatibility test accessory group corresponding to the updated compatibility score will be determined as the warning accessory group; the warning accessory group will be sent to the purchasing terminal to control the purchasing personnel of the purchasing terminal to perform quality control on multiple benchmark accessory models in the compatibility test accessories.

[0106] In some embodiments, the compatibility score history database is a database for storing historical data, which records each adjusted update compatibility score and the time points corresponding to these scores. The second time period is a specific time range, which generally refers to the time period after the compatibility score is adjusted. On this basis, each adjusted update compatibility score in the second time period and the time point corresponding to each adjusted update compatibility score are obtained from the compatibility score history database. Among them, the update compatibility score refers to the compatibility score after each adjustment.

[0107] The execution subject generates a compatibility score bar chart through ECharts for each adjusted update compatibility score and the time point corresponding to each adjusted update compatibility score. The compatibility score bar chart is a chart showing the update compatibility score after each adjustment within a certain time period. Each column of the bar chart represents the update compatibility score at a time point, the horizontal axis represents the time point, and the vertical axis represents the update compatibility score. ECharts (Enterprise Charts, commercial product chart library) is a JavaScript-based data visualization library for creating interactive and customizable data charts. Among them, JavaScript is a dynamic programming language that is widely used in web page development, mainly used to enhance the interactivity and dynamism of web pages. The preset drop count threshold is a preset standard. On this basis, the execution subject counts the number of drops of the update compatibility score at adjacent time points in the bar chart. If the number of drops exceeds the preset drop count threshold, the compatibility test accessory group corresponding to the update compatibility score is determined as a warning accessory group. The execution subject establishes a communication connection with the procurement terminal and sends the warning accessory group to the procurement terminal so that the procurement personnel of the procurement terminal can perform quality control on multiple benchmark accessory models in the compatibility test accessory group. Quality control refers to ensuring that the purchased server parts meet the predetermined quality standards through a series of inspections, tests or standardization procedures. This usually includes additional testing of server parts, requiring suppliers to provide quality assurance, or changing suppliers.

[0108] In these embodiments, the accuracy of quotation verification is improved. By receiving user feedback information from the after-sales service feedback terminal, the user feedback information includes compatibility feedback information for adjusting multiple server accessory models in the quotation, the corresponding feedback compatibility score and feedback time, and storing it in the user feedback information database; then, the user feedback information group to be counted containing multiple server accessory models is screened out from the user feedback information in the historical time period, and the feedback compatibility score level group of the user feedback information group to be counted is determined through the feedback compatibility score level table, and the number of occurrences of each value is counted. If the number of occurrences of each value exceeds the preset threshold, the priority feedback compatibility score level is selected according to the number of occurrences, and the score of the corresponding compatibility test accessory group is adjusted; if the number of occurrences is the same, no adjustment is made. Subsequently, the adjusted score and time point in the second time period are obtained from the compatibility score history database, and a compatibility score bar graph is generated, and the number of declines in the score in the time period is determined according to the bar graph. Whether it exceeds the warning threshold. If the number of declines exceeds the warning threshold, the relevant compatibility test accessory group is set as a warning accessory group and sent to the procurement terminal, prompting the procurement personnel to perform quality control on the benchmark accessory model. Based on user feedback, we can effectively identify and adjust accessory combinations with compatibility issues to improve the reliability of the compatibility test accessory group, and use historical data and real-time scoring monitoring mechanisms to promptly warn of potential problems and prevent defective accessories from participating in the procurement process, thereby improving the accuracy of quotation verification.

[0109] The above descriptions are only some preferred embodiments of the present invention and the explanation of the technical principles used. Those skilled in the art should understand that the scope of the invention involved in the present invention is not limited to the technical solutions formed by the specific combination of the above technical features, but also should cover other technical solutions formed by any combination of the above technical features or their equivalent features without departing from the above inventive concept. For example, the above features are replaced with the technical features with similar functions disclosed in the present invention (but not limited to) to form a technical solution.

Claims

1. A multi-index quotation verification method, characterized in that: include: Receive a quotation sheet for a target purchaser sent by a sales terminal, the quotation sheet including multiple server accessory models, the required quantity corresponding to each server accessory model, the original quotation information corresponding to each server accessory model, and the accessory type corresponding to each server accessory model; divide the multiple server accessory models into a core server accessory model group and a non-core server accessory model group; Acquire a plurality of pre-configured compatibility test accessory groups, each of which includes a plurality of benchmark accessory models that have undergone compatibility testing, and compatibility scores of the plurality of benchmark accessory models; Performing compatibility testing on the core server accessory model group according to the multiple compatibility test accessory groups to determine a compatibility score corresponding to the core server accessory model group, comparing the compatibility score with a preset score threshold, and generating a compatibility verification result; If the compatibility check result indicates that there is no compatibility risk for the multiple server accessory models included in the quotation, then verifying the original quotation information to obtain a price verification result; Adjusting the original quotation information in the quotation sheet according to the price verification result to obtain an adjusted quotation sheet; The adjustment quotation is sent to the sales terminal.

2. The multi-index quotation verification method according to claim 1, characterized in that: Before sending the adjustment quotation to the sales terminal, the method further includes: If the compatibility check result indicates that the multiple server accessory models included in the quotation have compatibility risks, the first compatibility check result is sent to the sales terminal, and feedback information from the sales terminal regarding the first compatibility check result is received, the feedback information including permission information and / or a specified accessory model, wherein the permission information indicates whether adjustment of the multiple server accessory models included in the quotation is allowed; If the feedback information indicates that the multiple server accessory models included in the quotation are allowed to be adjusted, and the feedback information includes a specified accessory model, the specified accessory model is matched among the multiple compatibility test accessory groups to obtain at least one compatibility test accessory group matching the specified accessory model; For the at least one compatibility test accessory group, sort them in descending order according to the compatibility score to obtain a compatibility test accessory group sequence, and select a target number of compatibility test accessory groups ranked at the top from the compatibility test accessory group sequence as candidate compatibility test accessory groups; The candidate compatibility test accessory group is sent to a purchasing terminal corresponding to the target purchaser, wherein the purchasing terminal is used to display the accessory type of each server accessory model among the multiple server accessory models, and to display the target number of compatibility test accessory groups and the compatibility score and selection probability corresponding to each compatibility test accessory group; the purchasing terminal is also used to display selection prompt information; Receiving user selection information returned by the purchasing terminal, wherein the user selection information includes a target compatibility test accessory group selected by the user from the candidate compatibility test accessory group; According to the target compatibility test accessory group and the accessory type corresponding to each server accessory model, multiple server accessory models in the quotation are adjusted to obtain a compatibility adjustment quotation, and original quotation information of the compatibility adjustment quotation is verified to obtain a price verification result; The original quotation information in the compatibility adjustment quotation is adjusted according to the price verification result to obtain an adjusted quotation.

3. The multi-index quotation verification method according to claim 2, characterized in that: The verifying the original quotation information to obtain a price verification result includes: Acquire user purchase information of the target purchaser in a historical time period, wherein the user purchase information includes purchase frequency, purchase quantity, and total purchase price in the historical time period; obtain a purchase frequency level according to the purchase frequency and a preset purchase frequency threshold; calculate an average purchase unit price and an average purchase unit price level according to the purchase quantity and the total purchase price; generate a user consumption tendency index according to the purchase frequency level and the purchase average unit price level; and generate a purchase price range according to the user consumption tendency index; Verifying the original quotation information according to the purchase price range to obtain a price verification result; and The method further comprises: Obtaining inventory information corresponding to multiple server accessory models in the quotation or the compatibility adjustment quotation, the inventory information including inventory quantities corresponding to the multiple server accessory models; determining a server accessory with an inventory quantity greater than a corresponding demand quantity as an accessory with normal inventory; and determining a server accessory with an inventory quantity less than a corresponding demand quantity as an accessory with insufficient inventory; Corresponding price adjustment coefficients are set for accessories with tight inventory and accessories with normal inventory, and the original quotation information in the quotation or the compatibility adjustment quotation is adjusted according to the corresponding price adjustment coefficients and price verification results.

4. The multi-index quotation verification method according to claim 3, characterized in that: The quotation also includes salesperson information, and the salesperson information includes a salesperson identification; as well as The adjusting the original quotation information in the quotation or the compatibility-adjusted quotation according to the corresponding price adjustment coefficient and the price verification result includes: querying the corresponding discount authority through the salesperson identifier, and adjusting the original quotation information in the quotation or the compatibility-adjusted quotation according to the corresponding price adjustment coefficient, the price verification result and the discount authority.

5. The multi-index quotation verification method according to claim 4, characterized in that: The selection probability corresponding to each compatibility test accessory group is generated by the following steps: Obtain a compatibility check result set within a historical time period, and filter multiple compatibility check results in the compatibility check result set that indicate compatibility risks to form a compatibility check result group; Counting the accessory replacement solutions corresponding to each compatibility check result in the compatibility check result group to obtain an accessory replacement solution set; wherein the accessory replacement solution includes the corresponding original quotation information, the candidate compatibility test accessory group, and the target compatibility test accessory group; According to the price range to which the original quotation information belongs, the set of accessory replacement plans is divided into multiple accessory replacement plan groups; for each accessory replacement plan group, the first number of each compatibility test accessory group as a candidate compatibility test accessory group and the second number of times as a target compatibility test accessory group are counted, and based on the first number and second number corresponding to each compatibility test accessory group, the selection probability of each compatibility test accessory group in each price range is calculated.

Images