Method and system for comprehensively evaluating zero-carbon building technology in conceptual design stage

Abstract

The invention belongs to the field of zero-carbon building technology evaluation, and provides a comprehensive evaluation method and system for a zero-carbon building technology in a conceptual design stage. The method comprises the following steps: decomposing low-carbon building technology evaluation in a project establishment stage into a target layer, a criterion layer and a selection layer; respectively calculating the weight of each dimension of the criterion layer and the weight of each dimension of each low-carbon building technology in the selection layer to the criterion layer; according to the emission reduction target and the cost control target determined by the project, the evaluation of the low-carbon building technology in the two aspects of carbon reduction target achievement and cost control target achievement is corrected; and determining the priority of the low-carbon building technology according to the descending order of the evaluation. According to the method, the zero-carbon building technology capable of being adopted by the engineering project can be preliminarily determined, and a zero-carbon building technology solution is provided for building scheme design and construction drawing design.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] The present invention belongs to the field of zero-carbon building technology assessment, and particularly relates to a comprehensive assessment method and system for zero-carbon building technology in the conceptual design stage. Background Art

[0002] The statements in this part only provide background technical information related to the present invention and do not necessarily constitute prior art.

[0003] Zero-carbon building technologies mainly include building envelope energy conservation, improvement of building equipment energy efficiency, utilization of renewable energy in buildings, and building greening. Each category of zero-carbon technologies includes several sub-category technologies. For example, building envelope energy conservation includes prefabricated structural systems, high-performance envelope structures, passive design technologies, etc. At the beginning of building design, with the energy conservation and emission reduction effect as the evaluation standard, the ranking of sub-category technologies in each major category of zero-carbon building technologies is relatively clear, but the ranking of all sub-category technologies of zero-carbon building technologies is not clear, resulting in architects being unable to determine the sub-category zero-carbon building technologies that can be preferentially adopted in the conceptual design stage.

[0004] Applying low-carbon building technologies to achieve energy conservation and emission reduction during the building operation process is the main way for the building field to achieve the dual-carbon goal. At present, during the project establishment process of construction projects, it is difficult for the construction unit to determine the low-carbon building technologies that the project can adopt. There are two reasons for this. One is that the construction unit does not have relevant professional knowledge in low-carbon emission reduction and energy conservation technologies and is unable to identify low-carbon building technologies suitable for construction projects. The other is that low-carbon building technologies involve multiple disciplines such as building envelopes, HVAC, intelligent control, and solar energy utilization, making it difficult to horizontally compare the suitability of different low-carbon technologies and unable to make a scientific selection of low-carbon technologies. Summary of the Invention

[0005] To solve the above technical problems, the present invention provides a comprehensive assessment method and system for zero-carbon building technology in the conceptual design stage, which can achieve the dual-carbon goal in the building field. In the conceptual design stage of the building, building designers need to initially determine the zero-carbon building technologies that can be adopted for the engineering project according to the general situation of the engineering project, and provide zero-carbon building technology solutions for building scheme design and construction drawing design.

[0006] To achieve the above purpose, the present invention adopts the following technical solutions: The first aspect of the present invention provides a comprehensive assessment method for zero-carbon building technology in the conceptual design stage.

[0007] In one or more embodiments, a comprehensive assessment method for zero-carbon building technology in the conceptual design stage is provided, including: Decompose the low-carbon building technology assessment in the project establishment stage into an objective layer, a criterion layer, and a selection layer. Among them, the objective layer is the selection of low-carbon building technologies in the project establishment stage, the criterion layer includes six dimensions: technology maturity, achievement degree of cost control objectives, achievement degree of carbon reduction objectives, regional adaptability, suitability of building types, and policy orientation; the selection layer is a number of known low-carbon building technologies. Conduct expert scoring on the importance of each dimension in the criterion layer, and then calculate the weights of each dimension in the criterion layer by constructing a judgment matrix for the criterion layer and performing consistency tests; conduct expert scoring on the importance of each low-carbon building technology in the selection layer, and then calculate the weights of each low-carbon building technology in the selection layer for each dimension in the criterion layer by constructing a judgment matrix for the selection layer and performing consistency tests. According to the emission reduction target and cost control target determined for the project, revise the evaluation of low-carbon building technologies in terms of the achievement degree of carbon reduction objectives and the achievement degree of cost control objectives. ; ; Among them, is the correction coefficient for the achievement degree of carbon reduction objectives; is the correction coefficient for the achievement degree of cost control objectives; are the weights of each dimension in the criterion layer respectively; are the weights of low-carbon technologies m for each dimension in the criterion layer respectively; According to in descending order to determine the priority order of low-carbon building technologies.

[0008] As an implementation method, the emission reduction targets are divided into three categories: zero-carbon buildings, nearly zero-carbon buildings, and low-carbon buildings.

[0009] As an implementation method, the incremental cost control targets are divided into three categories: strict control, appropriate control, and no control.

[0010] As an implementation method, when the engineering project aims at zero-carbon buildings, ; when aiming at nearly zero-carbon buildings, ; when aiming at low-carbon buildings, .

[0011] As an implementation method, when the engineering project strictly controls the incremental cost, ; when appropriately controlling the incremental cost, ; when not controlling the incremental cost, .

[0012] As an implementation, the selection layer includes 24 low-carbon building technologies, namely: steel structure system, wood structure system, precast concrete structure, integrated insulation structure board, high-performance enclosure structure, adjustable external sunshade, high building airtightness, natural lighting technology, natural ventilation technology, heat pump air-conditioning technology, fresh air heat recovery system, intelligent control system for artificial lighting, high-efficiency HVAC terminal, intelligent control system for HVAC, smart home / office system, solar air heating system, solar water heating system, solar air-conditioning system, building facade photovoltaic system, building roof photovoltaic system, building wind energy utilization system, roof greening, vertical greening and site greening.

[0013] The second aspect of the present invention provides a comprehensive evaluation system for zero-carbon building technologies in the conceptual design stage.

[0014] In one or more embodiments, a comprehensive evaluation system for zero-carbon building technologies in the conceptual design stage includes: A technology evaluation decomposition module, which is used to decompose the evaluation of low-carbon building technologies in the project establishment stage into an objective layer, a criterion layer and a selection layer; wherein, the objective layer is the selection of low-carbon building technologies in the project establishment stage, the criterion layer includes six dimensions: technology maturity, achievement degree of cost control target, achievement degree of carbon reduction target, regional adaptability, building type suitability and policy orientation; the selection layer is a number of known low-carbon building technologies; A weight calculation module, which is used to conduct expert scoring on the importance of each dimension of the criterion layer, and then calculate the weights of each dimension of the criterion layer by constructing a judgment matrix for the criterion layer and performing consistency test; conduct expert scoring on the importance of each low-carbon building technology in the selection layer, and then calculate the weights of each low-carbon building technology in the selection layer for each dimension of the criterion layer by constructing a judgment matrix for the selection layer and performing consistency test; A demand target evaluation module, which is used to correct the evaluation of low-carbon building technologies in terms of the achievement degree of carbon reduction target and the achievement degree of cost control target according to the emission reduction target and cost control target determined by the project ; ; wherein, is the correction coefficient for the achievement degree of carbon reduction target; is the correction coefficient for the achievement degree of cost control target; are the weights of each dimension of the criterion layer respectively; are low-carbon technologies m for the weights of each dimension of the criterion layer respectively; A low-carbon building technology ranking module, which is used to determine the priority order of low-carbon building technologies according to the descending order of.

[0015] The third aspect of the present invention provides a computer-readable storage medium.

[0016] A computer-readable storage medium stores a computer program thereon, and when the program is executed by a processor, it implements the steps in the comprehensive evaluation method of zero-carbon building technology in the conceptual design stage as described above.

[0017] The fourth aspect of the present invention provides a computer program product.

[0018] A computer program product includes a computer program / instructions, and when the computer program / instructions are executed by a processor, it implements the steps in the comprehensive evaluation method of zero-carbon building technology in the conceptual design stage as described above.

[0019] The fifth aspect of the present invention provides an electronic device.

[0020] An electronic device includes a memory, a processor, and a computer program stored on the memory and executable on the processor. When the processor executes the program, it implements the steps in the comprehensive evaluation method of zero-carbon building technology in the conceptual design stage as described above.

[0021] Compared with the prior art, the beneficial effects of the present invention are as follows: The present invention can achieve a horizontal evaluation of zero-carbon building technologies in different disciplines and specialties, breaking the barriers of zero-carbon building technologies between different specialties such as architecture, HVAC, building structure, landscape architecture, water supply and drainage, and electrical equipment; it can achieve a comprehensive evaluation of the evaluation objectives of different disciplines and specialties, and realize a comprehensive evaluation of zero-carbon building technologies in six aspects: technology maturity, regionality, suitability, achievement level, economy, and demonstration; it can achieve a rapid evaluation of zero-carbon building technologies in the building conceptual design stage, and can help project owners clarify the positioning of the project in terms of carbon emission reduction. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0022] The accompanying drawings forming a part of the present invention are used to provide a further understanding of the present invention. The schematic embodiments of the present invention and their descriptions are used to explain the present invention and do not constitute an improper limitation of the present invention.

[0023] Figure 1 It is a schematic flowchart of the comprehensive evaluation method of zero-carbon building technology in the conceptual design stage of an embodiment of the present invention; Figure 2 It is a schematic structural diagram of the comprehensive evaluation system of zero-carbon building technology in the conceptual design stage of an embodiment of the present invention; Figure 3 It is a schematic diagram of an electronic device of an embodiment of the present invention. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE EMBODIMENTS

[0024] The present invention will be further described below in conjunction with the accompanying drawings and embodiments.

[0025] It should be noted that the following detailed description is illustrative and aims to provide further explanation of the present invention. Unless otherwise specified, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by those of ordinary skill in the technical field to which the present invention belongs.

[0026] It should be noted that the terms used herein are only for describing specific embodiments and are not intended to limit the exemplary embodiments according to the present invention. As used herein, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise, the singular forms are also intended to include the plural forms. In addition, it should be understood that when the terms "comprising" and / or "including" are used in this specification, they indicate the presence of features, steps, operations, devices, components, and / or combinations thereof.

[0027] Figure 1 is a schematic flow chart of a comprehensive evaluation method for zero-carbon building technology in the conceptual design stage in an embodiment of the present invention. As Figure 1 shown, the comprehensive evaluation method for zero-carbon building technology in the conceptual design stage in this embodiment may include: S101. Decompose the low-carbon building technology evaluation in the project establishment stage into an objective layer, a criterion layer, and a selection layer; wherein, the objective layer is the selection of low-carbon building technology in the project establishment stage, the criterion layer includes six dimensions: technology maturity, achievement degree of cost control target, achievement degree of carbon reduction target, regional adaptability, building type suitability, and policy orientation; the selection layer is several known low-carbon building technologies.

[0028] Among them, the selection layer includes 24 low-carbon building technologies, namely: steel structure system, wood structure system, precast concrete structure, insulation structure integrated board, high-performance enclosure structure, adjustable external sunshade, high building airtightness, natural lighting technology, natural ventilation technology, heat pump air conditioning technology, fresh air heat recovery system, artificial lighting intelligent control system, high-efficiency HVAC terminal, HVAC intelligent control system, smart home / office system, solar air heating system, solar hot water system, solar air conditioning system, building facade photovoltaic system, building roof photovoltaic system, building wind energy utilization system, roof greening, vertical greening, and site greening.

[0029] Decompose the low-carbon building technology evaluation into an objective layer, a criterion layer, and a selection layer, as shown in Table 1.

[0030] Table 1 Decomposition of Low-Carbon Building Technology Evaluation

[0031] Determine the basic information of the construction project: ① According to the city where the project is located, determine the building thermal zoning of the project: severe cold region, cold region, hot summer and cold winter region, hot summer and warm winter region, mild region; the suitability of low-carbon building technology for different thermal zoning is different.

[0032] ② Determine the building type: residential building, public building, industrial building; the suitability of low-carbon building technologies varies for different building types.

[0033] ③ Determine the emission reduction target: zero-carbon building, nearly zero-carbon building, low-carbon building; ④ Determine the incremental cost control target: strict control, appropriate control, no control; ⑤ Determine the type of demonstration project to be applied for: high-star green building demonstration, ultra-low energy consumption building demonstration, renewable energy application demonstration, intelligent construction demonstration, prefabricated building demonstration; S102. Conduct expert scoring on the importance of each dimension in the criterion layer, and then calculate the weights of each dimension in the criterion layer by constructing a judgment matrix for the criterion layer and performing consistency tests; conduct expert scoring on the importance of each low-carbon building technology in the selection layer, and then calculate the weights of each low-carbon building technology in the selection layer for each dimension in the criterion layer by constructing a judgment matrix for the selection layer and performing consistency tests.

[0034] Expert scoring on the importance of the criterion layer: Invite N experts (N ≥ 5) in the field of low-carbon buildings to make pairwise comparisons on the technological maturity, achievement degree of cost control target, achievement degree of carbon reduction target, regional adaptability, building type suitability, and policy orientation in the criterion layer, and use the nine-scale (1 - 9 points) scoring standard to score the importance of the 6 criteria. Take the arithmetic mean of the scores of N experts as the importance score for pairwise comparisons in the criterion layer. 。

[0035] Calculation of criterion layer weights: Construct a judgment matrix A for the criterion layer, where the elements in A satisfy ; ; 。Use equations (1) - (3) to calculate the weights of the criterion layer. Use equations (4) - (6) for consistency tests.

[0036] A = =

[0037] Equation (1) Equation (2) Equation (3) Equation (5) Equation (6) Equation (7) When CR < 0.1, it indicates that the consistency degree of the judgment matrix A is considered within the allowable range; if CR ≥ 0.1, the judgment matrix A should be corrected.

[0038] Table 2 Weights of the Criterion Layer

[0039] Experts' scoring on the importance of the selection layer: Invite N experts (N≥5) in the field of low-carbon buildings to compare 24 technologies in the selection layer pairwise, and use the nine-scale (1-9 points) scoring standard to score the importance of the 24 technologies in six dimensions: technology maturity, achievement degree of cost control target, achievement degree of carbon reduction target, regional adaptability, suitability for building types, and policy orientation. Take the arithmetic mean of N experts to construct the score matrix B1 of the 24 technologies in terms of technology maturity, the score matrix B2 in terms of achievement degree of cost control target, the score matrix B3 in terms of achievement degree of carbon reduction target, the score matrix B4 in terms of regional adaptability, the score matrix B5 in terms of suitability for building types, and the score matrix B6 in terms of policy orientation.

[0040] B1 = =

[0041] B2 = =

[0042] …… B6 = =

[0043] Scoring instructions: ① Technology maturity: Compare the technology maturity of the 24 technologies pairwise and score according to the nine-scale (1-9 points) scoring standard.

[0044] ② Achievement degree of cost control target: Compare the cost of the 24 technologies pairwise and score according to the nine-scale (1-9 points) scoring standard.

[0045] ③ Achievement degree of carbon reduction target: Compare the emission reduction capabilities of the 24 technologies pairwise and score according to the nine-scale (1-9 points) scoring standard.

[0046] ④ Regional adaptability: According to the building thermal zoning of the city where the determined construction project is located, compare the suitability of the 24 technologies for the building thermal zoning pairwise and score according to the nine-scale (1-9 points) scoring standard.

[0047] ⑤ Suitability for building types: According to the building type of the determined construction project, compare the suitability of the 24 technologies for the building type pairwise and score according to the nine-scale (1-9 points) scoring standard.

[0048] ⑥ Policy orientation: According to the type of demonstration project proposed for the determined construction project, the 24 technologies are compared pairwise for their suitability for this type of demonstration project and scored according to the nine-scale (1-9 points) scoring standard.

[0049] Calculate the weights of the 24 technologies in six dimensions: technology maturity, achievement degree of cost control target, achievement degree of carbon reduction target, regional adaptability, suitability for building types, and policy orientation, and conduct a consistency test.

[0050] The weights of low-carbon technologies b1, b2... b24 for A1 are , and test whether it is less than 0.1.

[0051] The weights of low-carbon technologies b1, b2... b24 for A2 are , and test whether it is less than 0.1.

[0052] …… The weights of low-carbon technologies b1, b2... b24 for A6 are , and test whether it is less than 0.1.

[0053] Calculate the comprehensive evaluation of the 24 low-carbon technologies in six dimensions: technology maturity, achievement degree of cost control target, achievement degree of carbon reduction target, regional adaptability, suitability for building types, and policy orientation.

[0054]

[0055]

[0056] ……

[0057]

[0058] And test the consistency of the total hierarchical sorting.

[0059]

[0060] When <0.1, it indicates that the consistency degree of the total hierarchical sorting is considered within the allowable range; if ≥0.1, the scoring matrix should be corrected.

[0061] S103. According to the emission reduction target and cost control target determined by the project, correct the evaluation of low-carbon building technologies in terms of the achievement degree of carbon reduction target and the achievement degree of cost control target ; ; Among them, is the correction coefficient for the achievement degree of emission reduction targets; is the correction coefficient for the achievement degree of cost control targets; are the weights of each dimension in the criterion layer respectively; are low-carbon technologies respectively m for the weights of each dimension in the criterion layer; S104, according to the descending order to determine the priority of low-carbon building technologies.

[0062] Among them, the emission reduction targets are divided into three categories: zero-carbon buildings, near-zero-carbon buildings, and low-carbon buildings. The incremental cost control targets are divided into three categories: strict control, appropriate control, and no control.

[0063] When the engineering project aims at zero-carbon buildings, ; when aiming at near-zero-carbon buildings, ; when aiming at low-carbon buildings, . When the engineering project strictly controls the incremental cost, ; when appropriately controlling the incremental cost, ; when not controlling the incremental cost, .

[0064] Figure 2 is a schematic structural diagram of a comprehensive evaluation system for zero-carbon building technologies in the conceptual design stage in an embodiment of the present invention. This embodiment corresponds to Figure 1 the comprehensive evaluation method for zero-carbon building technologies in the conceptual design stage, as Figure 2 shown, the comprehensive evaluation system for zero-carbon building technologies in the conceptual design stage in this embodiment may include: The technology evaluation decomposition module 201, which is used to decompose the evaluation of low-carbon building technologies in the project establishment stage into the target layer, the criterion layer, and the selection layer; among them, the target layer is the selection of low-carbon building technologies in the project establishment stage, and the criterion layer includes six dimensions: technology maturity, achievement degree of cost control targets, achievement degree of carbon reduction targets, regional adaptability, building type suitability, and policy orientation; the selection layer is several known low-carbon building technologies; The weight calculation module 202, which is used to conduct expert scoring on the importance of each dimension in the criterion layer, and then calculate the weights of each dimension in the criterion layer by constructing a judgment matrix for the criterion layer and performing consistency tests; conduct expert scoring on the importance of each low-carbon building technology in the selection layer, and then calculate the weights of each low-carbon building technology in the selection layer for each dimension in the criterion layer by constructing a judgment matrix for the selection layer and performing consistency tests; The demand target evaluation module 203, which is used to correct the evaluation of low-carbon building technologies in terms of the achievement degree of carbon reduction targets and the achievement degree of cost control targets according to the emission reduction targets and cost control targets determined by the project ; ; among them, is the correction coefficient of the achievement degree of the emission reduction target; is the correction coefficient of the achievement degree of the cost control target; are the weights of each dimension of the criterion layer respectively; are respectively low-carbon technologies m for the weights of each dimension of the criterion layer; The low-carbon building technology sorting module 204 is used to determine the priority order of low-carbon building technologies according to the descending order.

[0065] It should be noted here that Figure 2 each module in the zero-carbon building technology comprehensive evaluation system in the conceptual design stage in Figure 1 corresponds one by one to each step in the zero-carbon building technology comprehensive evaluation method in the conceptual design stage in

[0066] Refer to Figure 3 and a schematic diagram of an electronic device is given. It should be noted that Figure 3 the electronic device 300 shown is only an example and should not impose any limitations on the functions and usage scope of the embodiments of the present invention.

[0067] As Figure 3 shown, the electronic device 300 includes a central processing unit (CPU) 301, which can perform various appropriate actions and processes according to the program stored in the read-only memory (ROM) 302 or the program loaded from the storage section 308 into the random access memory (RAM) 303. In the RAM 303, various programs and data required for system operation are also stored. The central processing unit 301, the ROM 302, and the RAM 303 are connected to each other via a bus 304. The input / output (I / O) interface 305 is also connected to the bus 304.

[0068] The following components are connected to the I / O interface 305: an input section 306 including a keyboard, a mouse, etc.; an output section 307 including a cathode ray tube (CRT), a liquid crystal display (LCD), etc. and a speaker, etc.; a storage section 308 including a hard disk, etc.; and a communication section 309 including a network interface card such as a local area network (LAN) card, a modem, etc. The communication section 309 performs communication processing via a network such as the Internet. A drive 310 is also connected to the I / O interface 305 as required. A removable medium 311, such as a magnetic disk, an optical disk, a magneto-optical disk, a semiconductor memory, etc., is installed on the drive 310 as required so that the computer program read from it can be installed into the storage section 308 as required.

[0069] When the central processing unit 301 in the electronic device of this embodiment executes the program, it implements the steps in the comprehensive evaluation method of zero-carbon building technology in the conceptual design stage as Figure 1 shown.

[0070] Specifically, according to the embodiments of the present application, the process described above with reference to the flowchart can be implemented as a computer software program. For example, the embodiments of the present application include a computer program product, which includes a computer program carried on a computer-readable medium, and this computer program contains program codes for executing Figure 1 the method shown. In such an embodiment, this computer program can be downloaded and installed from the network through the communication part 309, and / or installed from the removable medium 311. When this computer program is executed by the central processing unit 301, it executes various functions defined in the device of the present application.

[0071] Among them, Figure 1 the computer program instructions corresponding to the method shown can also be stored in a computer-readable memory that can guide a computer or other programmable data processing device to work in a specific manner, so that the instructions stored in this computer-readable memory generate a manufactured article including an instruction device, and this instruction device implements the functions specified in Figure 1 one process or multiple processes and / or Figure 1 one block or multiple blocks.

[0072] Those of ordinary skill in the art can understand that to implement all or part of the processes in the above-mentioned embodiment methods, it can be completed by instructing relevant hardware through a computer program. The said program can be stored in a computer-readable storage medium. When this program is executed, it can include the processes of the embodiments of the above-mentioned various methods. Among them, the said storage medium can be a magnetic disk, an optical disc, a read-only memory (ROM), or a random access memory (RAM), etc.

[0073] The above are only the preferred embodiments of the present invention and are not used to limit the present invention. For those skilled in the art, the present invention can have various changes and modifications. Any modifications, equivalent replacements, improvements, etc. made within the spirit and principle of the present invention shall be included within the protection scope of the present invention.

Claims

1. A comprehensive evaluation method for zero-carbon building technology in the conceptual design stage, characterized by: include: The evaluation of low-carbon building technology in the project establishment stage is decomposed into the target layer, the criterion layer and the selection layer; the target layer is the selection of low-carbon building technology in the project establishment stage, the criterion layer includes six dimensions: technology maturity, cost control target achievement, carbon reduction target achievement, regional adaptability, building type suitability and policy orientation; the selection layer is a number of known low-carbon building technologies; Experts scored the importance of each dimension of the criterion layer, and then calculated the weight of each dimension of the criterion layer by constructing a criterion layer judgment matrix and consistency test; Experts scored the importance of each low-carbon building technology in the selection layer, and then calculated the weight of each low-carbon building technology in the selection layer for each dimension of the criterion layer by constructing a selection layer judgment matrix and consistency test; According to the emission reduction targets and cost control targets determined by the project, the evaluation S of low-carbon building technology in terms of the degree of achievement of carbon reduction targets and cost control targets is revised. ′ m ; S ′ m =ω1b 1m +qω2b 2m +pω3b 3m +ω4b 4m +ω5b 5m +ω6b 6m ; Among them, p is the correction coefficient of emission reduction target achievement; q is the correction coefficient of cost control target achievement; ω1~ω6 are the weights of each dimension of the criterion layer; b 1m ~b 6m They are the weights of low-carbon technology m for each dimension of the criterion layer; According to S ′ m The low-carbon building technologies are prioritized in descending order.

2. The comprehensive evaluation method for zero-carbon building technology in the conceptual design stage as claimed in claim 1 is characterized in that: The emission reduction targets are divided into three categories: zero-carbon buildings, near-zero-carbon buildings and low-carbon buildings.

3. The comprehensive evaluation method for zero-carbon building technology in the conceptual design stage as claimed in claim 1 is characterized in that: The incremental cost control objectives are divided into three categories: strict control, appropriate control and no control.

4. The comprehensive evaluation method for zero-carbon building technology in the conceptual design stage as claimed in claim 1 is characterized in that: When the project aims at zero-carbon building, p=1.5; when the project aims at near-zero-carbon building, p=1.2; when the project aims at low-carbon building, p=1.

0.

5. The comprehensive evaluation method for zero-carbon building technology in the conceptual design stage as claimed in claim 1 is characterized in that: When the engineering project strictly controls the incremental cost, q=1.5; when the incremental cost is appropriately controlled, q=1.2; when the incremental cost is not controlled, q=1.

0.

6. The comprehensive evaluation method for zero-carbon building technology in the conceptual design stage as claimed in claim 1 is characterized in that: The selection layer includes 24 low-carbon building technologies, namely: steel structure system, wooden structure system, precast concrete structure, thermal insulation structure integrated panel, high-performance envelope structure, adjustable external shading, high building air tightness, natural lighting technology, natural ventilation technology, heat pump air-conditioning technology, fresh air heat recovery system, artificial lighting intelligent control system, high-efficiency HVAC terminal, HVAC intelligent control system, smart home / office system, solar air heating system, solar water heating system, solar air-conditioning system, building facade photovoltaic system, building roof photovoltaic system, building wind energy utilization system, roof greening, vertical greening and site greening.

7. A comprehensive evaluation system for zero-carbon building technology in the conceptual design stage, characterized by: include: The technical evaluation decomposition module is used to decompose the low-carbon building technology evaluation in the project establishment stage into the target layer, the criterion layer and the selection layer; the target layer is the selection of low-carbon building technology in the project establishment stage, the criterion layer includes six dimensions: technology maturity, cost control target achievement, carbon reduction target achievement, regional adaptability, building type suitability and policy orientation; the selection layer is a number of known low-carbon building technologies; The weight calculation module is used to perform expert scoring on the importance of each dimension of the criterion layer, and then calculate the weight of each dimension of the criterion layer by constructing a criterion layer judgment matrix and consistency test; perform expert scoring on the importance of each low-carbon building technology in the selection layer, and then calculate the weight of each low-carbon building technology in the selection layer for each dimension of the criterion layer by constructing a selection layer judgment matrix and consistency test; The demand target evaluation module is used to modify the evaluation of low-carbon building technology in terms of the degree of achievement of carbon reduction targets and cost control targets according to the emission reduction targets and cost control targets determined by the project. ′ m ; S ′ m =ω1b 1m +qω2b 2m +pω3b 3m +ω4b 4m +ω5b 5m +ω6b 6m ; Among them, p is the correction coefficient of emission reduction target achievement; q is the correction coefficient of cost control target achievement; ω1~ω6 are the weights of each dimension of the criterion layer; b 1m ~b 6m They are the weights of low-carbon technology m for each dimension of the criterion layer; Low Carbon Building Technology Ranking Module, which is used to sort the low carbon building technology by S ′ m The low-carbon building technologies are prioritized in descending order.

8. A computer-readable storage medium having a computer program stored thereon, characterized in that: When the program is executed by a processor, the steps in the comprehensive evaluation method of zero-carbon building technology in the conceptual design stage as described in any one of claims 1 to 6 are implemented.

9. A computer program product comprising a computer program / instructions, characterized in that When the computer program / instructions are executed by a processor, the steps in the comprehensive evaluation method of zero-carbon building technology in the conceptual design stage as described in any one of claims 1 to 6 are implemented.

10. An electronic device comprising a memory, a processor, and a computer program stored in the memory and executable on the processor, characterized in that: When the processor executes the program, the steps in the comprehensive evaluation method of zero-carbon building technology in the conceptual design stage according to any one of claims 1 to 6 are implemented.

Images