Exhibition authority regulation and control method based on collection state of museum

Abstract

The invention relates to the technical field of intelligent regulation and control, in particular to an exhibition authority regulation and control method based on the collection state of a museum, which comprises the following steps: analyzing the components of metal cultural relics through spectrum analysis, detecting the structure and surface state of chinaware through a three-dimensional laser scanning technology, and grading according to the detection result and the physical state of the collection; according to the temperature and humidity, the illumination intensity and the air quality, environment suitability grades are divided by combining the sensitivity degree of the collections to the environment; the historical exhibition times and duration of the collection and the state change after each exhibition are counted, and the influence of exhibition on the collection state is analyzed; and regulating and controlling the exhibition authority of the collection according to a collection state evaluation result. Through comprehensive and accurate collection state evaluation, the physical state of the collection can be monitored in real time, it can be ensured that the collection is always in an environment with appropriate temperature, humidity, illumination intensity and air quality, and the situation that the collection is damaged due to environmental factors is avoided.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] The present invention relates to the technical field of intelligent regulation and control, and particularly relates to an exhibition permission regulation method based on the state of museum collections. Background Art

[0002] With the rapid development of the museum industry, the number of collections has been increasing continuously and the types have become increasingly complex. In recent years, information technology has achieved rapid development, bringing new opportunities for the management of museum collections. Internet of Things technology, big data technology, cloud computing technology, and artificial intelligence technology have emerged continuously and have been gradually applied to various fields, providing technical support for building intelligent collection management.

[0003] Although some museums have established collection management at present, most of these management focuses on the basic information management of collections and the digitization of daily business processes. The dynamic monitoring and evaluation functions for the state of collections are relatively weak. Although the in-and-out situation of collections can be recorded, there is a lack of effective monitoring and warning mechanisms for the changes in environmental parameters and the development of diseases during the storage process of collections, and it is impossible to timely grasp the health status of collections, so it is difficult to reasonably regulate exhibition permissions according to the state of collections. Summary of the Invention

[0004] The present invention aims at the technical problems existing in the prior art and provides an exhibition permission regulation method based on the state of museum collections.

[0005] The technical solution of the present invention to solve the above technical problems is as follows: An exhibition permission regulation method based on the state of museum collections includes the following steps:

[0006] S101. Analyze the composition of metal cultural relics by using spectroscopy, detect the structure and surface state of ceramics through three-dimensional laser scanning technology, and classify according to the physical state of the collections based on the detection results;

[0007] S102. Divide the environmental suitability level according to the temperature and humidity, light intensity, and air quality, combined with the sensitivity of the collections to the environment;

[0008] S103. Count the historical exhibition times, durations, and state changes after each exhibition of the collections, and analyze the impact of exhibitions on the state of the collections;

[0009] S104. Regulate the exhibition permissions of the collections according to the evaluation results of the collection state.

[0010] In a preferred embodiment, in S101, an X-ray fluorescence spectrometer is used to scan the temperature of the metal to obtain the content data of various elements in the metal cultural relic. The content of these elements is compared with the known standard composition range, and the deviation of the element content is observed. For the metal cultural relic, assume that the number of detected element types is n, which are respectively denoted as E 1 , E 2 ,..., E n , and their actual contents are C 1 , C 2 ,..., C n . The lower limit of the standard content range is L 1 , L 2 ,..., L n , and the upper limit is U 1 , U 2 ,..., U n . Calculate its composition deviation. The specific calculation formula is as follows:

[0011]

[0012] where i = 1, 2,..., n, D i represents the composition deviation index, L i represents the lower limit of the standard content range of the i-th element, U i represents the upper limit of the standard content range of the i-th element, C i represents the actual content of the i-th element. Based on the deviation of the element content as the basis for judging the composition stability index of the metal cultural relic, the specific calculation formula of the composition stability index is as follows:

[0013]

[0014] where M represents the composition stability index. The ceramic ware is scanned from multiple angles through three-dimensional laser scanning technology to obtain comprehensive point cloud data of the ceramic ware. The filtering algorithm is used to remove the noise points generated by environmental interference and equipment errors. The point cloud data obtained from multiple perspectives is stitched together. By identifying the feature points in the overlapping area, the point cloud data from different perspectives is aligned to form a complete three-dimensional point cloud model of the ceramic ware. Search for the discontinuous points and the areas where the discontinuous points are distributed in the point cloud data as the areas with structural defects. Assume that point P i (x i , y i , z i ) is a point in the point cloud data, and its neighborhood point set is N i , and the number of neighborhood points is m. Calculate the average distance d i between point P i and its neighborhood points:

[0015]

[0016] Among them, P j (x j , y j , z j ) represents any neighborhood point in the neighborhood point set N i . (x j , y j , z j ) represents its coordinates in three-dimensional space. If d i > d threshold , then the point P i is a discontinuous point. Let B be the number of detected discontinuous points, and A be the total scanned area of the porcelain. Then the specific calculation formula for the structural integrity index of the porcelain is as follows:

[0017]

[0018] The comprehensive physical state determination of the collection is through weighted averaging of the stability and structural integrity of the cultural relics. Let ω M and ω S be the weights of compositional stability and structural integrity respectively, and ω M + ω S = 1. Then the specific calculation formula for the comprehensive physical state index is as follows:

[0019] P = ω M × M + ω S × S

[0020] Among them, P represents the comprehensive physical state index. When P ≥ a, the physical state of the collection is good. When b < P < a, the physical state of the collection is average. When P ≤ b, the physical state of the collection is fragile.

[0021] In a preferred embodiment, in S102, the temperature and humidity data of the collection storage environment are collected in real time through temperature and humidity sensors, the light intensity is monitored through light sensors, sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides, and particulate matter are detected by air quality monitoring equipment. According to the material and characteristics of the collection, the sensitivity of the collection to temperature, humidity, light, and air quality environmental factors is scientifically determined, and the temperature suitability index, light suitability index, and one of the air quality indexes are calculated. Let the actual temperature be T, the lower limit of the suitable temperature be T min , the upper limit of the suitable temperature be T max , the actual humidity be H, the lower limit of the suitable humidity be H min , the lower limit of the suitable humidity be H max . Then the specific determination formulas for the temperature suitability index T index and the humidity suitability index H index are as follows:

[0022]

[0023]

[0024] Let the actual light intensity be L, and the upper limit of the suitable light intensity be L max , then the light suitability index L index The judgment formula is as follows:

[0025]

[0026] Let the actual sulfur dioxide content be S actual , the upper limit of the suitable sulfur dioxide content be S upper , the actual nitrogen oxide content be N actual , the upper limit of the suitable nitrogen oxide content be N upper , the actual particulate matter content be P actual , the upper limit of the suitable particulate matter content be P upper , calculate their single-item indices respectively. The single-item index of sulfur dioxide The single-item index of nitrogen oxides The single-item index of particulate matter According to the importance of each pollutant to the collection, let the weight of sulfur dioxide be ω l , the weight of nitrogen oxides be The weight of particulate matter be ω PM , and The specific calculation formula of the comprehensive pollution index I is as follows:

[0027]

[0028] Let the upper limit of the suitable standard be β. When I ≤ β, it indicates that the comprehensive situation of these three pollutants in the overall environment is within the suitable range, which is more beneficial to the collection. When β < I ≤ β + Δβ, it is judged as relatively suitable, meaning that the overall environment has a certain degree of pollution. When I > β + Δβ, it is judged as unsuitable, indicating that the pollutant content in the overall environment has exceeded the suitable range for the collection.

[0029] In a preferred embodiment, in S103, comprehensively extract the historical exhibition times L of the collection from the exhibition record database Z , the duration t of each exhibition i and the state change data C after each exhibition i , calculate the exhibition influence coefficient according to the state change data and the exhibition duration. The specific calculation formula is as follows:

[0030]

[0031] Let the set of exhibition influence coefficients of all collections be {I1 , I 2 ,..., I y}, where y represents the total number of collections, and let the maximum exhibition influence coefficient be I max = max{I 1 , I 2 ,..., I y}, and the minimum exhibition influence coefficient is I min = min{I 1 , I 2 ,..., I y}. For D types of collections, the specific calculation formula for the exhibition evaluation weight W is as follows:

[0032]

[0033] This exhibition evaluation weight maps the exhibition influence coefficient I to the range of 0 - 1. A larger value of W indicates that this collection needs to be carefully considered during exhibition evaluation, meaning its influence coefficient is large and the exhibition has a more obvious impact on its state.

[0034] In a preferred embodiment, in S104, the exhibition permission is regulated based on the physical state evaluation result, environmental suitability evaluation result, and historical evaluation result of the collection. Collections with good physical state, high environmental suitability, and small historical exhibition influence are classified as first - level permission; collections with average physical state, relatively suitable environment, and large historical exhibition influence are classified as second - level permission; collections with fragile physical state, unsuitable environment, and obvious state changes after historical exhibitions are classified as third - level permission. When submitting an exhibition application, the exhibition planner automatically reviews according to the current permission level of the collection and the conditions of the applied exhibition. Through a visual interface, various state data of the collection are displayed in real - time, including physical state, environmental parameters, and historical exhibition information. When an abnormal state of the collection is detected, a warning message is sent to the staff, and an emergency handling mechanism is initiated.

[0035] The beneficial effects of the present invention are as follows: Through comprehensive and accurate evaluation of the status of collections, the present invention can monitor in real time the physical status of collections, the suitability of the environment they are in, and the impact caused by historical exhibitions. The evaluation of environmental suitability can ensure that collections are always in an environment with suitable temperature, humidity, light intensity, and air quality, avoiding damage to collections caused by environmental factors. These evaluation results provide a strong basis for the protection of collections, safeguarding the safety of collections to the greatest extent. The multiple exhibition permission levels set according to the status of collections enable exhibition planners to automatically review according to the current permission level of the collection and the application conditions when submitting exhibition applications, greatly saving the time and effort of manual review. At the same time, the permission level is automatically adjusted and relevant personnel are notified after regular evaluation of the collection status, ensuring the rationality and timeliness of exhibition arrangements. The evaluation of historical exhibition data provides important references for subsequent exhibitions by calculating the exhibition impact coefficient. Collections with a large impact coefficient are given higher weight consideration in subsequent exhibition evaluations, which prompts museums to formulate more reasonable exhibition plans and protection measures according to the characteristics and status of different collections when planning exhibitions, thereby optimizing the work of cultural relic protection. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0036] Figure 1 It is a flowchart of the present invention. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE EMBODIMENTS

[0037] The technical solutions in the embodiments of the present application will be clearly and completely described below with reference to the accompanying drawings in the embodiments of the present application. Obviously, the described embodiments are only a part of the embodiments of the present application, rather than all the embodiments. Based on the embodiments in the present application, all other embodiments obtained by those skilled in the art without creative efforts belong to the scope of protection of the present application.

[0038] In the description of the present application, the terms "first" and "second" are only used for descriptive purposes and cannot be understood as indicating or implying relative importance or implicitly specifying the quantity of the indicated technical features. Thus, the features defined with "first" and "second" may explicitly or implicitly include one or more of the described features. In the description of the present application, "a plurality of" means two or more unless otherwise specifically defined.

[0039] In the description of the present application, the term "for example" is used to mean "serving as an example, illustration, or explanation". Any embodiment described as "for example" in the present application is not necessarily construed as being more preferred or advantageous than other embodiments. The following description is provided to enable any person skilled in the art to implement and use the present invention. In the following description, details are set forth for purposes of explanation. It should be understood that the present invention can be implemented without these specific details by those of ordinary skill in the art. In other instances, well-known structures and processes are not elaborated in detail to avoid obscuring the description of the present invention with unnecessary details. Therefore, the present invention is not intended to be limited to the embodiments shown, but is to be accorded the widest scope consistent with the principles and features disclosed in the present application.

[0040] As Figure 1 , this embodiment provides: A method for regulating exhibition permissions based on the status of museum collections, specifically including the following steps:

[0041] S101. Analyze the composition of metal cultural relics using spectroscopy, detect the structure and surface status of ceramics through three-dimensional laser scanning technology, and classify them according to the physical status of the collections based on the detection results;

[0042] Furthermore, scan the metal temperature using an X-ray fluorescence spectrometer to obtain the content data of various elements in the metal cultural relics, compare the content of these elements with the known standard composition range, and observe the deviation of the element content. For metal cultural relics, assume that the number of detected element types is n, denoted as E 1 , E 2 ,..., E n , and their actual content is C 1 , C 2 ,..., C n , the lower limit of the standard content range is L 1 , L 2 ,..., L n , and the upper limit is U 1 , U 2 ,..., U n , calculate its composition deviation, and the specific calculation formula is as follows:

[0043]

[0044] where i = 1, 2,..., n, D i represents the composition deviation index, L i represents the lower limit of the standard content range of the i-th element, U i represents the upper limit of the standard content range of the i-th element, C iIt represents the actual content of the \(i\)-th element. Based on the deviation of the element content, it is used as the basis for judging the component stability index of metal cultural relics. The specific calculation formula of the component stability index is as follows:

[0045]

[0046] Among them, \(M\) represents the component stability index. The ceramic is scanned from multiple angles through three-dimensional laser scanning technology to obtain comprehensive point cloud data of the ceramic. The filtering algorithm is used to remove the noise points generated by environmental interference and equipment errors. The point cloud data obtained from multiple perspectives is spliced. By identifying the feature points in the overlapping area, the point cloud data from different perspectives is aligned to form a complete three-dimensional point cloud model of the ceramic. Search for the discontinuous points and the areas where the discontinuous points are distributed in the point cloud data as the areas with structural defects. Let point \(P\) i (\(x\) i , \(y\) i , \(z\) i ) be a point in the point cloud data, its neighborhood point set is \(N\) i , the number of neighborhood points is \(m\), and calculate the average distance \(d\) i between point \(P\) i and its neighborhood points:

[0047]

[0048] Among them, \(P\) j (\(x\) j , \(y\) j , \(z\) j ) represents any neighborhood point in the neighborhood point set \(N\) i , (\(x\) j , \(y\) j , \(z\) j ) represents its coordinates in three-dimensional space. If \(d\) i > \(d\) threshold , then point \(P\) i is a discontinuous point. Let \(B\) be the number of detected discontinuous points, and \(A\) be the total scanned area of the ceramic. The specific calculation formula of the structural integrity index of the ceramic is as follows:

[0049]

[0050] The comprehensive physical state of the collection is judged by weighted averaging the cultural relic stability and structural integrity. Let \(\omega\) M and \(\omega\) S be the weights of the component stability and structural integrity respectively, and \(\omega\) M + \(\omega\) S = 1. Then the specific calculation formula of the comprehensive physical state index is as follows:

[0051] \(P=\omega\) M×M + ω S ×S

[0052] Among them, P represents the comprehensive physical state index. When P ≥ a, the physical state of the collection is good; when b < P < a, the physical state of the collection is average; when P ≤ b, the physical state of the collection is fragile.

[0053] It should be noted that in the calculation of the structural integrity index of ceramics, 1 represents the reference quantity, which is used to construct a relative calculation system to better reflect the degree of structural integrity of ceramics. It can be understood as a theoretically ideal complete state. Since the number of discontinuity points B will have a negative impact on the structural integrity, subtracting B from 1 can obtain a value that is positively correlated with the structural integrity. Then, it is normalized by dividing by the total scanning area A, so that the index S can reflect the relative level of the structural integrity of ceramics within a reasonable range.

[0054] S102. According to the temperature and humidity, light intensity, and air quality, combined with the sensitivity of the collection to the environment, divide the environmental suitability level;

[0055] Furthermore, the temperature and humidity data of the storage environment of the collection are collected in real time through temperature and humidity sensors, the light intensity is monitored through light sensors, sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides, and particulate matter are detected by means of air quality monitoring equipment. According to the material and characteristics of the collection, scientifically determine the sensitivity of the collection to environmental factors such as temperature and humidity, light, and air quality, and calculate one of the temperature suitability index, light suitability index, and air quality index. Let the actual temperature be T, the lower limit of the suitable temperature be T min , the upper limit of the suitable temperature be T max , the actual humidity be H, the lower limit of the suitable humidity be H min , the lower limit of the suitable humidity be H max , then the temperature suitability index T index and the humidity suitability index H index The specific determination formulas are as follows:

[0056]

[0057]

[0058] Let the actual light intensity be L, the upper limit of the suitable light intensity be L max , then the light suitability index L index The determination formula is as follows:

[0059]

[0060] Let the actual sulfur dioxide content be S actual , the upper limit of the suitable sulfur dioxide content be S upper , the actual nitrogen oxide content be Nactual , the upper limit of the appropriate nitrogen oxide content is N upper , the actual particulate matter content is P actual , the upper limit of the appropriate particulate matter content is P upper , calculate their individual indices respectively. The individual index of sulfur dioxide The individual index of nitrogen oxides The individual index of particulate matter According to the importance of each pollutant to the collection, let the weight of sulfur dioxide be ω l , the weight of nitrogen oxides is The weight of particulate matter is ω PM , and The specific calculation formula of the comprehensive pollution index l is as follows:

[0061]

[0062] When the appropriate standard upper limit is β, when I ≤ β, it indicates that the comprehensive situation of these three pollutants in the overall environment is within the appropriate range, which is more beneficial to the collection. When β < I ≤ β + Δβ, it is determined to be relatively appropriate, meaning that the overall environment is polluted to a certain extent. When I > β + Δβ, it is determined to be inappropriate, indicating that the pollutant content in the overall environment has exceeded the appropriate range for the collection.

[0063] S103. Statistically record the historical exhibition times, durations, and the state changes after each exhibition of the collection, and analyze the impact of exhibitions on the state of the collection;

[0064] Furthermore, comprehensively extract the historical exhibition times L of the collection from the exhibition record database Z , the duration t of each exhibition i and the state change data C after each exhibition i , calculate the exhibition impact coefficient according to the state change data and the exhibition duration. The specific calculation formula is as follows:

[0065]

[0066] Let the set of exhibition impact coefficients of all collections be [I 1 , I 2 ,..., I y}], where y represents the total number of collections. Let the maximum exhibition impact coefficient be I max = max[I 1 , I 2 ,..., I y}], and the minimum exhibition impact coefficient be I min = min{I 1 , I 2 ,..., I y}, for the D-type collections, the specific calculation formula for the exhibition evaluation weight W is as follows:

[0067]

[0068] This exhibition evaluation weight maps the exhibition influence coefficient I to between 0 and 1. A large value of W indicates that this collection needs to be carefully considered during the exhibition evaluation, meaning its influence coefficient is large and the impact of the exhibition on its state is more obvious.

[0069] S104. Regulate the exhibition rights of the collections according to the evaluation results of the collection status;

[0070] Furthermore, regulate the exhibition rights according to the evaluation results of the physical state, environmental suitability, and historical evaluation of the collections. Consider the collections with good physical state, high environmental suitability, and small historical exhibition impact as the first-level rights, the collections with average physical state, relatively suitable environment, and large historical exhibition impact as the second-level rights, and the collections with fragile physical state, unsuitable environment, and obvious state changes after historical exhibitions as the third-level rights. When submitting an exhibition application, the exhibition planners automatically review according to the current rights level of the collection and the conditions of the applied exhibition. Through the visual interface, the various status data of the collection are displayed in real time, including the physical state, environmental parameters, and historical exhibition information. When an abnormal collection status is detected, a warning message is sent to the staff, and an emergency handling mechanism is activated.

[0071] It should be noted that in the above embodiments, the descriptions of each embodiment have their own emphases. For the parts not described in detail in a certain embodiment, reference can be made to the relevant descriptions of other embodiments.

[0072] Those skilled in the art should understand that the embodiments of the present invention can be provided as methods, systems, or computer program products. Therefore, the present invention can take the form of a completely hardware embodiment, a completely software embodiment, or an embodiment combining software and hardware aspects. Moreover, the present invention can take the form of a computer program product implemented on one or more computer-usable storage media (including but not limited to disk memories, CD-ROMs, optical memories, etc.) containing computer-usable program codes.

[0073] The present invention is described with reference to the flowcharts and / or block diagrams of methods, devices (systems), and computer program products according to the embodiments of the present invention. It should be understood that each process and / or block in the flowcharts and / or block diagrams, and the combination of processes and / or blocks in the flowcharts and / or block diagrams, can be implemented by computer program instructions. These computer program instructions can be provided to the processors of general-purpose computers, special-purpose computers, embedded computers, or other programmable data processing devices to generate a machine, so that the instructions executed by the processors of the computer or other programmable data processing devices generate for implementing in the processFigure 1 a process or processes and / or blocks Figure 1 means for the functions specified in a block or blocks.

[0074] These computer program instructions may also be stored in a computer-readable memory that can direct a computer or other programmable data processing apparatus to function in a particular manner, such that the instructions stored in the computer-readable memory produce an article of manufacture including instruction means that implement the functions in the process Figure 1 a process or processes and / or blocks Figure 1 specified in a block or blocks.

[0075] These computer program instructions may also be loaded onto a computer or other programmable data processing apparatus to cause a series of operational steps to be performed on the computer or other programmable apparatus to produce a computer-implemented process, whereby the instructions executed on the computer or other programmable apparatus provide steps for implementing the functions in the process Figure 1 a process or processes and / or blocks Figure 1 specified in a block or blocks.

[0076] Although the preferred embodiments of the present invention have been described, additional changes and modifications can be made by those skilled in the art once they learn the basic inventive concept. Therefore, the appended claims are intended to be construed to cover the preferred embodiments as well as all changes and modifications falling within the scope of the present invention.

[0077] It is obvious that those skilled in the art can make various changes and modifications to the present invention without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention. Thus, if these modifications and variations of the present invention fall within the scope of the claims of the present invention and their equivalent technologies, the present invention is also intended to include these modifications and variations.

Claims

1. A method for regulating exhibition rights based on the status of museum collections, characterized in that: The following steps are involved: S101. Use spectroscopy to analyze the composition of metal artifacts, use 3D laser scanning technology to detect the structure and surface condition of ceramics, and classify the collections according to their physical condition based on the test results; S102. Classify the environmental suitability level based on temperature, humidity, light intensity, air quality, and the sensitivity of the collection to the environment; S103, counting the number of historical exhibitions of the collections, their duration, and changes in their status after each exhibition, and analyzing the impact of the exhibitions on the status of the collections; S104. According to the collection status assessment results, the exhibition authority of the collection is regulated.

2. The method for controlling exhibition rights based on the status of museum collections according to claim 1, characterized in that: In S101, an X-ray fluorescence spectrometer is used to scan the metal temperature to obtain the content data of various elements in the metal cultural relics, and the content of these elements is compared with the known standard composition range to observe the deviation of the element content. For metal cultural relics, it is assumed that the number of detected elements is n, which are recorded as E1, E2, ..., E n , whose actual content is C1, C2, ..., C n , the lower limit of the standard content range is L1, L2, ..., L n , the upper limit is U1, U2, ..., U n , calculate its component deviation, the specific calculation formula is as follows: Where i = 1, 2, ..., n, D i Indicates the composition deviation index, L i Indicates the lower limit of the standard content range of the i-th element, U i Indicates the upper limit of the standard content range of the i-th element, C i It represents the actual content of the i-th element. The deviation of the element content is used as the basis for judging the stability index of the metal cultural relic composition. The specific calculation formula of the composition stability index is as follows: Among them, M represents the component stability index. The ceramics are scanned from multiple angles by 3D laser scanning technology to obtain comprehensive ceramic point cloud data. The noise points caused by environmental interference and equipment errors are removed by filtering algorithm. The point cloud data obtained from multiple perspectives are spliced. By identifying the feature points in the overlapping area, the point cloud data from different perspectives are aligned to form a complete 3D point cloud model of the ceramics. The discontinuous points in the point cloud data and the areas where the discontinuous points are distributed are searched as the areas with structural defects. Point P is set i (x i ,y i , Z i ) is a point in the point cloud data, and its neighborhood point set is N i , the number of neighboring points is m, and the calculation point P i The average distance d from neighboring points i : Among them, P j (x j ,y j , z j ) represents the neighborhood point set N i Any neighboring point in (x j ,y j , z j ) represents its coordinates in three-dimensional space. If d i >d threshold , then point P i Assume that B is the number of discontinuous points detected, and A is the total scanning area of ​​the ceramic. The specific calculation formula for the structural integrity index of the ceramic is as follows: The comprehensive physical state of the collection is determined by taking a weighted average of the stability and structural integrity of the cultural relics. M and ω S are the weights of component stability and structural integrity, respectively, and ω M +ω S =1, then the specific calculation formula of the comprehensive physical state index is as follows: P=ω M ×M+ω S ×S Among them, P represents the comprehensive physical condition index. When P≥a, the physical condition of the collection is good; when b<P<a, the physical condition of the collection is general; when P≤b, the physical condition of the collection is fragile.

3. The method for controlling exhibition rights based on the status of museum collections according to claim 1, characterized in that: In S102, the temperature and humidity data of the collection storage environment are collected in real time through the temperature and humidity sensor, the light intensity is monitored through the light sensor, and the sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides and particulate matter are detected with the help of air quality monitoring equipment. According to the material and characteristics of the collection, the sensitivity of the collection to temperature, humidity, light and air quality environmental factors is scientifically determined, and the temperature suitability index, light suitability index and one of the air quality indicators are calculated. Suppose the actual temperature is T and the lower limit of the suitable temperature is T. min , the upper limit of suitable temperature is T max , the actual humidity is H, and the lower limit of suitable humidity is H min The lower limit of humidity is H max , then the temperature suitability index T index And humidity suitable index H index The specific determination formula is as follows:

4. The method for controlling exhibition rights based on the status of museum collections according to claim 3, characterized in that: Assume that the actual light intensity is L and the upper limit of the appropriate light intensity is L max , then the light suitability index L index The judgment formula is as follows:

5. The method for controlling exhibition rights based on the state of museum collections according to claim 3 is characterized in that: The actual sulfur dioxide content is S actual The upper limit of sulfur dioxide content is S upper , the actual nitrogen oxide content is N actual The upper limit of nitrogen oxide content is N upper , the actual particle content is P actual The upper limit of the suitable particle content is P upper , calculate their individual indexes respectively, sulfur dioxide individual index Nitrogen oxide index Particle matter index According to the importance of each pollutant on the collection, the weight of sulfur dioxide is ω l , the weight of nitrogen oxides is The weight of the particles is ω PM ,and The specific calculation formula of the comprehensive pollution index I is as follows: Assuming the upper limit of the suitability standard is β, when I≤β, it indicates that the comprehensive conditions of the three pollutants in the overall environment are within the appropriate range, which is more beneficial to the collection. When β<I≤β+Δβ, it is judged to be relatively suitable, which means that the overall environment has a certain degree of pollution. When I>β+Δβ, it is judged to be unsuitable, indicating that the pollutant content in the overall environment has exceeded the suitable range of the collection.

6. The method for controlling exhibition rights based on the status of museum collections according to claim 1, characterized in that: In S103, the historical exhibition times L of the collection are fully extracted from the exhibition record database. Z , each exhibition duration t i And the status change data after each exhibition C i , according to the status change data and exhibition duration, calculate the exhibition impact coefficient. The specific calculation formula is as follows: Assume that the exhibition impact coefficient set of all collections is {I1, I2, ..., I y }, where y represents the total number of collections, and the maximum exhibition impact coefficient is I max =max{I1, I2, ..., I y }, the minimum exhibition influence coefficient is I min =min{I1, I2, ..., I y }, for D types of collections, the specific calculation formula for the exhibition evaluation weight W is as follows: The exhibition evaluation weight maps the exhibition impact coefficient I to between 0 and 1. A large value of W indicates that the collection needs to be carefully considered during exhibition evaluation, indicating that its impact coefficient is large and the exhibition has a more obvious impact on its status.

7. The method for controlling exhibition authority based on the status of museum collections according to claim 1, characterized in that: In S104, the exhibition authority is regulated based on the physical state assessment results, environmental suitability assessment results and historical assessment results of the collections. Collections with good physical state, high environmental suitability and little historical exhibition impact are set as first-level authority, collections with average physical state, relatively suitable environment and large historical exhibition impact are set as second-level authority, and collections with fragile physical state, unsuitable environment and obvious state changes after historical exhibition are set as third-level authority. When submitting exhibition applications, exhibition planners will automatically review them according to the current authority level of the collections and the conditions for applying for the exhibition. Through a visual interface, various status data of the collections, including physical state, environmental parameters and historical exhibition information, are displayed in real time. When an abnormal state of the collection is detected, an early warning message is sent to the staff and an emergency response mechanism is initiated.

Images