Method and device for determining relative acquisition operation cost of seismic acquisition scheme

Abstract

The embodiment of the invention provides a method and device for determining the relative acquisition operation cost of a seismic acquisition scheme. The method for determining the relative acquisition operation cost of the seismic acquisition scheme comprises the steps of determining calculation parameters, acquisition daily efficiency and a construction mode of the seismic acquisition scheme constructed in a target work area; and according to the calculation parameters, the acquisition daily efficiency and the construction mode, obtaining the relative acquisition operation cost of the seismic acquisition scheme by using the established function relation between the relative acquisition operation cost and the acquisition daily efficiency, the calculation parameters and the construction mode.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] The present application relates to the field of seismic exploration technology, and in particular to a method and device for determining the relative cost of a seismic acquisition scheme. Background Art

[0002] As the exploration level deepens, the construction conditions of seismic acquisition operations become more and more complex, and the quality requirements for seismic acquisition data are also getting higher and higher. Higher data quality requires higher acquisition operation costs. On the other hand, the rising costs of labor, materials, etc. year by year also increase the cost of acquisition operations. This requires designers to design a high-quality acquisition plan with the best cost.

[0003] In the relevant technology, there are many schemes for determining the cost of seismic exploration and acquisition operations. However, the existing schemes only consider the impact of the optimized observation system on the acquisition operation cost, and do not consider the impact of changes in construction parameters and construction methods on the acquisition operation cost. They are somewhat one-sided and cannot effectively provide theoretical guidance for improving the quality and efficiency of field acquisition construction.

[0004] Therefore, how to comprehensively and accurately determine the acquisition operation costs of different seismic acquisition schemes to provide effective guidance for selecting the most cost-effective field seismic acquisition scheme is a technical problem that needs to be solved urgently. Summary of the invention

[0005] The embodiments of the present application provide a method and device for determining the relative acquisition operation cost of a seismic acquisition scheme, which is used to comprehensively and accurately determine the acquisition operation costs of different seismic acquisition schemes, so as to provide effective guidance for selecting the most cost-effective field seismic acquisition scheme.

[0006] One of the embodiments of the present application provides a method for determining the relative acquisition operation cost of a seismic acquisition scheme, the method comprising: determining the calculation parameters, acquisition day efficiency and construction method of the seismic acquisition scheme constructed in a target work area; according to the calculation parameters, the acquisition day efficiency and the construction method, using the established functional relationship between the relative acquisition operation cost and the acquisition day efficiency, the calculation parameters and the construction method, the relative acquisition operation cost of the seismic acquisition scheme is obtained.

[0007] In some embodiments, the method further includes: adjusting one or a combination of multiple values ​​of the calculation parameters, the acquisition daily efficiency, and the construction method, and obtaining the relative acquisition operation costs of different seismic acquisition schemes using the functional relationship between the relative acquisition operation cost and the acquisition daily efficiency, the calculation parameters, and the construction method; and determining the final seismic acquisition scheme to be selected based on the relative acquisition operation costs of different seismic acquisition schemes.

[0008] In some embodiments, the functional relationship between the relative acquisition operation cost, the acquisition daily efficiency, the calculation parameters, and the construction method is as follows:

[0009] DirectCost = d × (C ai + C p + C v + C oil )

[0010] where DirectCost is the relative acquisition operation cost, d is the construction period of the seismic acquisition operation, C ai is the daily rental cost of the acquisition equipment, C p is the daily labor cost varying with the acquisition daily efficiency and the rolling arrangement number, C v is the daily rental cost of the vehicle, C oil is the daily fuel consumption cost; among them, the construction period d of the seismic acquisition operation is calculated by the following formula:

[0011]

[0012] where y t is the total number of shots in the construction work area, and y is the acquisition daily efficiency.

[0013] In some embodiments, the daily rental cost of the acquisition equipment is obtained by the following formula:

[0014] C ai = f ai (T dat , μ) = (r 1 + r 2 × μ) × T T = (r 1 + r 2 × μ) × (T dat + T c );

[0015] where r 1 is the single-channel daily cost of the acquisition instrument, r 2 is the single-channel daily cost of the geophone, T T is the total number of channels of the acquisition equipment input, T c is the fixed arrangement number, T dat is the rolling arrangement number, and μ is the number of strings of single-channel geophones; among them, the rolling arrangement number T dat is obtained by the following formula:

[0016] T dat = x i × y, i = 1, 2,..., n

[0017] where i is the number of the construction method, x iis the shot-to-shot ratio corresponding to the i-th construction method, y is the daily acquisition efficiency, and n is the number of alternative construction methods.

[0018] In some embodiments, the daily vehicle rental cost is obtained by using the following formula:

[0019]

[0020] where l 1 and l 2 are the daily rental cost of a single vehicle and the rental cost of a single excitation device respectively, β 1 is the number of geophones deployed and retrieved by a single layout crew per day, β 2 is the number of people in each layout crew, β 3 is the number of drivers in each layout crew, γ is the number of sets of excitation devices, and y p is the daily acquisition efficiency of a single excitation group.

[0021] In some embodiments, the daily personnel cost is obtained by using the following formula:

[0022]

[0023] where h 1 and h 2 and h 3 are the daily wages of the layout crew, drivers, and excitation personnel respectively, and β 4 is the number of people required for a single excitation device.

[0024] In some embodiments, the daily fuel consumption cost is obtained by using the following formula:

[0025]

[0026] where k 1 and k 2 are the daily fuel consumption of a single vehicle and the daily fuel consumption of a single excitation device respectively.

[0027] One embodiment of the present application provides a device for determining the relative acquisition operation cost of a seismic acquisition plan. The device includes: a determination module for determining the calculation parameters, acquisition daily efficiency, and construction method of the seismic acquisition plan for construction in the target work area; an acquisition module for obtaining the relative acquisition operation cost of the seismic acquisition plan by using the functional relationship established between the relative acquisition operation cost and the acquisition daily efficiency, calculation parameters, and construction method according to the calculation parameters, the acquisition daily efficiency, and the construction method.

[0028] An embodiment of the present application provides an electronic device. The electronic device includes a memory and a processor. The memory stores a computer program, and the processor executes the above-mentioned method when running the program.

[0029] An embodiment of the present application provides a storage medium for storing a computer-readable program, which, when run, executes the method described above.

[0030] The above technical solution provided by the embodiment of the present application has at least the following advantages compared with the prior art:

[0031] In the embodiment provided by the present application, calculation parameters, daily acquisition efficiency, and construction methods for a seismic acquisition plan for construction in a target work area are determined; according to the calculation parameters, daily acquisition efficiency, and construction methods, by using the established functional relationship between the relative acquisition operation cost and the daily acquisition efficiency, calculation parameters, and construction methods, the relative acquisition operation cost of the seismic acquisition plan is obtained. Thus, the acquisition operation costs of different seismic acquisition plans can be comprehensively and accurately determined, providing effective guidance for selecting the field seismic acquisition plan with the best cost performance. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0032] The present application will be further described by way of exemplary embodiments, which will be described in detail through the accompanying drawings. These embodiments are not restrictive. In these embodiments, the same reference numerals represent the same structures, where:

[0033] Figure 1 is an exemplary flowchart of a method for determining the relative acquisition operation cost of a seismic acquisition plan according to some embodiments of the present application;

[0034] Figure 2 is an exemplary schematic diagram showing the change of the relative acquisition operation cost with the daily acquisition efficiency according to some embodiments of the present application;

[0035] Figure 3 is an exemplary schematic diagram showing the influence of different geophone combinations on the relative acquisition operation cost according to some embodiments of the present application;

[0036] Figure 4 is an exemplary schematic diagram showing the influence of different construction methods on the relative acquisition operation cost according to some embodiments of the present application;

[0037] Figure 5 is an exemplary schematic diagram of a device for determining the relative acquisition operation cost of a seismic acquisition plan according to some embodiments of the present application;

[0038] Figure 6 is an exemplary structural schematic diagram of an electronic device according to some embodiments of the present application. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE EMBODIMENTS

[0039] To more clearly illustrate the technical solutions of the embodiments of the present application, the following will briefly introduce the drawings required for the description of the embodiments. Obviously, the drawings in the following description are only some examples or embodiments of the present application. For those of ordinary skill in the art, without creative efforts, the present application can also be applied to other similar scenarios based on these drawings. Unless obvious from the language context or otherwise stated, the same reference numerals in the drawings represent the same structure or operation.

[0040] It should be understood that the "system", "device", "unit" and / or "module" used herein is a method for distinguishing different components, elements, parts, portions or assemblies at different levels. However, if other words can achieve the same purpose, the words can be replaced by other expressions.

[0041] As shown in the present application and the claims, unless the context clearly indicates an exceptional situation, words such as "a", "an", "one" and / or "the" are not specifically singular and may also include plural. Generally speaking, the terms "comprising" and "including" only indicate the steps and elements that have been clearly identified, and these steps and elements do not constitute an exclusive list. The method or device may also include other steps or elements.

[0042] Flowcharts are used in the present application to illustrate the operations performed by the system according to the embodiments of the present application. It should be understood that the previous or subsequent operations do not necessarily need to be executed precisely in sequence. On the contrary, the steps can be executed in reverse order or simultaneously. At the same time, other operations can also be added to these processes, or one or more steps can be removed from these processes.

[0043] For ease of understanding, the following introduces the technical solutions of the present application in combination with the drawings and embodiments.

[0044] Figure 1 is an exemplary flowchart of a method for determining the relative acquisition operation cost of a seismic acquisition plan according to some embodiments of the present application. As Figure 1 shown, the method for determining the relative acquisition operation cost of a seismic acquisition plan includes the following steps:

[0045] Step S110, determine the calculation parameters, daily acquisition efficiency and construction method of the seismic acquisition plan for construction in the target work area.

[0046] The calculation parameters may include but are not limited to: the number of geophones deployed and retrieved by a single crew per day, the number of people in each crew, the number of drivers in each crew, and the daily acquisition efficiency of a single shooting crew, etc.

[0047] The above calculation parameters can be determined by collecting the acquisition parameters of the construction. The acquisition parameters may include, but are not limited to, parameters such as the number of vibrator groups, receiver interval, receiver line interval, shot point interval, and shot line interval.

[0048] The construction method may include construction methods such as rolling direction and block construction. The rolling direction is divided into longitudinal rolling of the array and transverse rolling of the array. Block construction means dividing the work area into several blocks along the direction of the geophone line to achieve transverse rolling construction of the array.

[0049] In seismic exploration, "daily acquisition efficiency" refers to the efficiency of seismic data acquisition within a specific day. This indicator is usually measured by the number of shots. For example, "daily efficiency of 6220 shots" or "daily efficiency of 8306 shots" indicates how many shots of seismic data acquisition are completed in a day. This value can be used to measure the work progress and efficiency of seismic data acquisition, helping the project team better grasp the project production situation.

[0050] Step S120, according to the calculation parameters, daily acquisition efficiency, and construction method, using the established functional relationship between the relative acquisition operation cost and the daily acquisition efficiency, calculation parameters, and construction method, obtain the relative acquisition operation cost of this seismic acquisition plan.

[0051] Since there are many cost items involved in seismic acquisition operations, the solution provided in this application only considers the cost items that change significantly with the number of acquisition channels invested and daily efficiency, and ignores those cost items that must be invested in seismic acquisition construction but have little relationship with the change in acquisition workload. Therefore, the obtained is the relative acquisition operation cost.

[0052] The functional relationship between the relative acquisition operation cost and the daily acquisition efficiency, calculation parameters, and construction method takes the calculation parameters and the shot-to-gun ratio determined according to the construction method as parameters, the daily acquisition efficiency as the independent variable, and the relative acquisition operation cost as the dependent variable.

[0053] In some embodiments, the functional relationship between the relative acquisition operation cost and the daily acquisition efficiency, calculation parameters, and construction method can be expressed by the following formula:

[0054] DirectCost={f i (y)}, i=1, 2,..., n (1)

[0055] Wherein, DirectCost is the relative acquisition operation cost, y is the daily acquisition efficiency, i is a specific construction method, which corresponds to different shot-to-gun ratios, and n is the number of alternative construction methods.

[0056] In the specific implementation process, the calculation parameters, daily acquisition efficiency, and shot-to-gun ratio determined according to the construction method of a certain seismic acquisition plan can be substituted into formula (1) to obtain the relative acquisition operation cost of this seismic acquisition plan.

[0057] In the specific implementation process, in order to obtain a seismic acquisition plan with a lower cost, one or a combination of numerical values of calculation parameters, daily acquisition efficiency, and construction methods can be adjusted. By using the functional relationship between the relative acquisition operation cost and the daily acquisition efficiency, calculation parameters, and construction methods, the relative acquisition operation costs of different seismic acquisition plans can be obtained. According to the relative acquisition operation costs of different seismic acquisition plans, the finally selected seismic acquisition plan is determined. In this case, the functional relationship between the relative acquisition operation cost and the daily acquisition efficiency, calculation parameters, and construction methods can be expressed by the following formula:

[0058] DirectCost = {f i (y, z)}, i = 1, 2,..., n (2)

[0059] where z is an adjustment parameter (for example, the number of strings of single-channel geophones, the shot-to-trace ratio determined according to the construction method, etc.).

[0060] In the specific implementation process, formula (2) can be used to obtain the relative acquisition operation costs of seismic acquisition plans corresponding to different calculation parameters and / or construction methods.

[0061] In some embodiments, the functional relationship between the relative acquisition operation cost and the daily acquisition efficiency, calculation parameters, and construction methods is as follows:

[0062] DirectCost = d × (C ai + C p + C v + C oil ) (3)

[0063] where d is the construction period of the seismic acquisition operation, C ai is the daily rental cost of acquisition equipment (mainly including the costs of acquisition instruments and geophones), C p is the daily personnel cost varying with the daily acquisition efficiency and the number of rolling spreads (including the personnel of the spread shift and the shooting crew), C v is the daily vehicle rental cost (mainly including the vehicles of the shooting crew and the spread shift), C oil is the daily fuel consumption cost (mainly including the fuel consumption of the source vehicle and the spread vehicles).

[0064] Among them, the construction period d of the seismic acquisition operation is calculated by the following formula:

[0065]

[0066] where y t is the total number of shots in the construction work area, and y is the daily acquisition efficiency.

[0067] In some embodiments, the daily rental cost of the acquisition equipment can be obtained using the following formula:

[0068] C ai = f ai (T dat , μ) = (r 1 + r 2 × μ) × T T = (r 1 + r 2 × μ) × (T dat + T c )(5)

[0069] Wherein, r 1 is the single-channel cost of the acquisition instrument per day, r 2 is the single-channel cost of the geophone per day, T T is the total number of channels of the acquisition equipment invested, T c is the fixed number of arrays, T dat is the rolling number of arrays, and μ is the number of strings of single-channel geophones.

[0070] In the specific implementation process, the rolling number of arrays T dat can be obtained according to the daily acquisition efficiency and the shot-to-trace ratio. The shot-to-trace ratio is the number of new rolling-in traces required for each shot during rolling shooting. The shot-to-trace ratio corresponds to the acquisition construction method. Assuming there are multiple alternative construction methods in the work area, there are corresponding multiple alternative shot-to-trace ratios. The rolling number of arrays T dat can be obtained using the following formula:

[0071] T dat = x i × y, i = 1, 2,..., n (6)

[0072] Wherein, i is the number of the construction method, x i is the shot-to-trace ratio corresponding to the i-th construction method, y is the daily acquisition efficiency, and n is the number of alternative construction methods.

[0073] In some embodiments, the daily equipment investment is divided into array vehicles and excitation equipment. The daily vehicle rental cost can be obtained using the following formula:

[0074]

[0075] Wherein, l 1 , l 2 are respectively the daily rental cost of a single vehicle and the rental cost of a single excitation equipment, β 1 is the number of geophones retracted and deployed by a single person in a single array per day, β 2 is the number of people in each array team, β 3 is the number of drivers in each array team, γ is the number of single-group excitation equipment, y pThe acquisition daily efficiency for a single excitation group.

[0076] In some embodiments, the daily personnel input can be divided into arrangement personnel, drivers, and excitation personnel. The daily personnel cost can be obtained using the following formula:

[0077]

[0078] where h 1 、h 2 and h 3 are the daily wages of the arrangement personnel, drivers, and excitation personnel respectively, and β 4 is the number of people required to be equipped for a single excitation device.

[0079] In some embodiments, the daily fuel consumption is divided into the fuel consumption of arrangement vehicles and excitation devices (if well shots are used for excitation, the excitation device has no fuel consumption k 2 = 0; if vibroseis is used for excitation, there is fuel consumption k 2 > 0). The daily fuel consumption cost can be obtained using the following formula:

[0080]

[0081] where k 1 、k 2 are the daily fuel consumption of a single vehicle and a single excitation device respectively.

[0082] Only for example, the following combines specific examples to illustrate the method for determining the seismic acquisition plan relative to the acquisition operation cost provided by this application.

[0083] When constructing in a certain work area in the western region, a 4S28L480T orthogonal observation system is adopted, with a trace interval and shotpoint interval both of 30m, a receiver line interval and shot line interval both of 120m, a work area length of 19.2km, and a width of 17.4km. The parameters required for collecting and calculating the relative acquisition operation cost are shown in Table 1 below.

[0084] Table 1 Parameter table for calculating the relative acquisition operation cost

[0085]

[0086]

[0087] Assuming a conventional horizontal rolling construction method is adopted, with a corresponding trace-to-shot ratio of 1.82 and the number of geophone strings per trace being 2, according to formulas (3) - (9), the functional relationship between the relative acquisition operation cost and the acquisition daily efficiency can be obtained: DirectCost = 1.243 * 10 7 + 5.027 * 10 10 / y, as Figure 2As shown, it can be seen that when the daily acquisition efficiency in this work area is relatively low, the relative acquisition operation cost is very high. When the daily acquisition efficiency reaches over 4000, the marginal effect of the relative acquisition operation cost brought by increasing the daily acquisition efficiency decreases.

[0088] In the specific implementation process, formula (2) can be used to compare the influence of key calculation parameters on the relative acquisition operation cost. For example, the number of strings of single-channel geophones can be used as an adjustment parameter. Figure 3 It shows the influence of single-string and two-string geophones on the relative acquisition operation cost. It can be seen that using single-string reception in this work area can save 10% of the cost. For another example, the shot-to-trace ratio corresponding to different construction methods can be used as an adjustment parameter to compare the influence of different construction methods on the relative acquisition operation cost. Figure 4 It shows the variation of the relative acquisition cost of conventional horizontal rolling construction and block (two-block) construction with the daily efficiency. It can be seen that when the daily efficiency is below 4000 shots, the relative acquisition operation cost of block acquisition is lower. When the daily efficiency is greater than 4000 shots, the difference in their relative acquisition operation costs is not significant, and the cost of conventional horizontal rolling construction is slightly lower.

[0089] In the embodiments provided by this application, by using the seismic acquisition operation duration, the daily rental cost of acquisition equipment, the daily personnel cost, the daily vehicle rental cost, and the daily fuel consumption cost that vary with the daily acquisition efficiency and the rolling array number, a functional relationship between the relative acquisition operation cost and the daily acquisition efficiency, calculation parameters, and construction methods is established. Furthermore, the relative acquisition operation cost of different seismic acquisition schemes can be obtained using this functional relationship, providing accurate and reasonable theoretical guidance for improving the quality and efficiency of field acquisition construction.

[0090] Figure 5 It is an exemplary schematic diagram of a device for determining the relative acquisition operation cost of a seismic acquisition scheme according to some embodiments of this application.

[0091] As Figure 5 shown, the device for determining the relative acquisition operation cost of a seismic acquisition scheme includes: a determination module 510 and an acquisition module 520.

[0092] The determination module 510 is configured to determine the calculation parameters, the daily acquisition efficiency, and the construction method of the seismic acquisition scheme for construction in the target work area.

[0093] The acquisition module 520 is configured to obtain the relative acquisition operation cost of this seismic acquisition scheme by using the established functional relationship between the relative acquisition operation cost and the daily acquisition efficiency, calculation parameters, and construction method according to the calculation parameters, the daily acquisition efficiency, and the construction method.

[0094] In the embodiments of the apparatus for determining the seismic acquisition plan relative to the acquisition operation cost, the specific processing of each module and the technical effects brought thereby can be respectively referred to the relevant descriptions in the corresponding method embodiments, which will not be elaborated herein.

[0095] Figure 6 It is an exemplary structural schematic diagram of an electronic device shown according to some embodiments of the present application.

[0096] As Figure 6 shown, the electronic device includes: at least one processor 601, at least one communication interface 602, at least one memory 603, and at least one communication bus 604; Optionally, the communication interface 602 may be an interface of a communication module, such as an interface of a GSM module; The processor 601 may be a processor CPU, or a specific integrated circuit ASIC (Application Specific Integrated Circuit), or one or more integrated circuits configured to implement the embodiments of the present invention. The memory 603 may include high-speed RAM memory, and may also include non-volatile memory, for example, at least one disk memory. Among them, the memory 603 stores a program, and the processor 601 calls the program stored in the memory 603 to execute some or all of the above method embodiments.

[0097] The present application relates to a storage medium for storing a computer-readable program, and when the computer-readable program is run, it executes some or all of the above method embodiments.

[0098] Optionally, the storage medium may be a non-transitory computer-readable storage medium. For example, the non-transitory computer-readable storage medium may be ROM, random access memory (RAM), CD-ROM, magnetic tape, floppy disk, and optical data storage device, etc.

[0099] Based on the same inventive concept, embodiments of the present application further provide a computer program product, including a computer program, and when the program is executed by a processor, it implements some or all of the above method embodiments.

[0100] The basic concepts have been described above. Obviously, for those skilled in the art, the above detailed disclosure is only an example and does not constitute a limitation to the present application. Although not explicitly stated herein, those skilled in the art may make various modifications, improvements, and corrections to the present application. Such modifications, improvements, and corrections are proposed in the present application, so such modifications, improvements, and corrections still belong to the spirit and scope of the exemplary embodiments of the present application.

[0101] Meanwhile, this application uses specific terms to describe the embodiments of this application. For example, "an embodiment", "one embodiment", and / or "some embodiments" mean a certain feature, structure, or characteristic related to at least one embodiment of this application. Therefore, it should be emphasized and noted that "an embodiment" or "one embodiment" or "an alternative embodiment" mentioned twice or more at different positions in this application does not necessarily refer to the same embodiment. In addition, certain features, structures, or characteristics in one or more embodiments of this application can be appropriately combined.

[0102] In addition, unless clearly stated in the claims, the order of the processing elements and sequences, the use of numerical letters, or the use of other names in this application are not used to limit the order of the processes and methods of this application. Although some currently considered useful embodiments of the invention are discussed through various examples in the above disclosure, it should be understood that such details only serve the purpose of illustration. The appended claims are not limited to the disclosed embodiments. On the contrary, the claims are intended to cover all modifications and equivalent combinations that conform to the essence and scope of the embodiments of this application. For example, although the system components described above can be implemented by hardware devices, they can also be implemented only through software solutions, such as installing the described system on existing servers or mobile devices.

[0103] Similarly, it should be noted that, in order to simplify the description of this application disclosure and thus help the understanding of one or more embodiments of the invention, in the previous description of the embodiments of this application, sometimes multiple features are merged into one embodiment, drawing, or description thereof. However, this disclosure method does not mean that the features required by the subject matter of this application are more than those mentioned in the claims. In fact, the features of the embodiments are fewer than all the features of the individual embodiments disclosed above.

[0104] In some embodiments, numbers describing the components and attribute quantities are used. It should be understood that such numbers used for the description of embodiments are modified by the modifiers "about", "approximately", or "substantially" in some examples. Unless otherwise stated, "about", "approximately", or "substantially" indicate that the said numbers allow a variation of ±20%. Accordingly, in some embodiments, the numerical parameters used in the specification and claims are approximate values, and these approximate values can change according to the characteristics required by individual embodiments. In some embodiments, the numerical parameters should consider the specified significant digits and adopt the method of retaining the general number of digits. Although the numerical ranges and parameters used to confirm the breadth of their scope in some embodiments of this application are approximate values, in specific embodiments, such numerical settings are made as precise as possible within the feasible range.

[0105] For each patent, patent application, patent application publication, and other materials cited in this application, such as articles, books, specifications, publications, documents, etc., their entire contents are hereby incorporated by reference into this application. This excludes application history documents that are inconsistent with or conflict with the content of this application, as well as documents that limit the broadest scope of the claims of this application (currently or subsequently appended to this application). It should be noted that if there are inconsistencies or conflicts between the descriptions, definitions, and / or uses of terms in the supplementary materials of this application and the content described in this application, the descriptions, definitions, and / or uses of terms in this application shall prevail.

[0106] Finally, it should be understood that the embodiments described in this application are only used to illustrate the principles of the embodiments of this application. Other variations may also fall within the scope of this application. Therefore, by way of example and not limitation, alternative configurations of the embodiments of this application may be considered to be consistent with the teachings of this application. Accordingly, the embodiments of this application are not limited to the embodiments explicitly presented and described in this application.

Claims

1. A method for determining the relative acquisition operation cost of a seismic acquisition plan, characterized in that, the method includes: determining the calculation parameters, daily acquisition efficiency, and construction method of the seismic acquisition plan for construction in the target work area; According to the calculation parameters, the daily acquisition efficiency, and the construction method, using the established functional relationship between the relative acquisition operation cost and the daily acquisition efficiency, calculation parameters, and construction method, obtaining the relative acquisition operation cost of this seismic acquisition plan.

2. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that, the method further includes: Adjusting one value or a combination of multiple values among the calculation parameters, the daily acquisition efficiency, and the construction method, and using the functional relationship between the relative acquisition operation cost and the daily acquisition efficiency, calculation parameters, and construction method, obtaining the relative acquisition operation costs of different seismic acquisition plans; Determining the finally selected seismic acquisition plan according to the relative acquisition operation costs of different seismic acquisition plans.

3. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that, the functional relationship between the relative acquisition operation cost and the daily acquisition efficiency, calculation parameters, and construction method is as follows: DirectCost=d×(C ai +C p +C v +C oil ) Among them, DirectCost is the relative acquisition operation cost, d is the construction period of the seismic acquisition operation, C ai is the daily rental cost of the acquisition equipment, C p is the daily personnel cost varying with the daily acquisition efficiency and the number of rolling arrangements, C v is the daily vehicle rental cost, C oil is the daily fuel consumption cost; Among them, the construction period d of the seismic acquisition operation is calculated by the following formula: Among them, y t is the total number of shots fired in the construction work area, and y is the daily acquisition efficiency.

4. The method according to claim 3, characterized in that, The daily acquisition equipment rental cost is obtained by the following formula: C ai = f ai (T dat , μ) = (r 1 + r 2 × μ) × T T = (r 1 + r 2 × μ) × (T dat + T c ) Among them, r 1 is the single-day single-channel cost of the acquisition instrument, r 2 is the single-day single-channel cost of the geophone, T T is the total number of channels invested in the acquisition equipment, T c is the fixed number of arrays, T dat is the rolling number of arrays, and μ is the number of strings of single-channel geophones; Among them, the rolling permutation number T is obtained by using the following formula dat :[[-END]] T dat = x i × y, i = 1, 2, …, n where i is the number of the construction method, x i is the blast hole ratio corresponding to the i-th construction method, y is the daily acquisition efficiency, and n is the number of alternative construction methods.

5. The method according to claim 4, characterized in that, The daily vehicle rental cost is obtained by the following formula: Among them, l 1 and l 2 are the rental costs of a single vehicle per day and the rental cost of a single excitation device respectively, β 1 is the number of geophones received and deployed by a single permutation operator per day, β 2 is the number of people in each permutation team, β 3 is the number of drivers in each permutation team, γ is the number of sets of excitation devices, and y p is the daily acquisition efficiency of a single excitation group.

6. The method according to claim 5, characterized in that, The daily personnel cost is obtained by the following formula: Among them, h 1 , h 2 and h 3 are the daily wages of the personnel for receiving, arranging and discharging, the driver and the firing personnel respectively, and β 4 is the number of people required to be equipped for a single firing device.

7. The method according to claim 6, characterized in that, The daily fuel consumption cost is obtained by the following formula: where k 1 and k 2 are the daily fuel consumption of a single vehicle and the daily fuel consumption of a single excitation device respectively.

8. A device for determining the relative acquisition operation cost of a seismic acquisition plan, characterized in that, the device includes: A determination module for determining the calculation parameters, daily acquisition efficiency, and construction method of the seismic acquisition plan for construction in the target work area; An acquisition module for obtaining the relative acquisition operation cost of this seismic acquisition plan according to the calculation parameters, the daily acquisition efficiency, and the construction method, using the established functional relationship between the relative acquisition operation cost and the daily acquisition efficiency, calculation parameters, and construction method.

9. An electronic device, the electronic device includes a memory and a processor, the memory stores a computer program, and when the processor runs the program, it executes the method according to any one of claims 1 to 7.

10. A storage medium for storing a computer-readable program, when the computer-readable program is run, it executes the method according to any one of claims 1 to 7.

Images