Design method for submitting and auditing electronic experiment records by sections and multiple times

Abstract

The invention provides a design method for submitting and auditing electronic experiment records for multiple times in a segmented mode. The auditing of the experimental records comprises auditing of newly added contents and auditing of content changes passing the auditing. The newly added content refers to the content added for the first time in an electronic experiment record or the content newly added at the end of the experiment record which is submitted to be audited. And submitting and auditing the newly-added content, submitting and auditing all the newly-added content which is not submitted and audited in the current electronic experiment record, protecting the submitted and audited content, and recording the submitting time. The change auditing refers to the auditing of the change of the submitted auditing content. All the protected contents after submission and auditing cannot be changed, if the contents submitted at a time need to be modified, a change application for the submission at the time needs to be initiated, and after the application is passed, the submitted contents can be unlocked and enter an editable state. And submitting a change application after the modification is completed, and recording a change history. The electronic experiment record can be set to be in a finished state when no newly-added content requirement exists. Contents cannot be newly added in the electronic experiment record in a finishing state, and only a change application can be submitted.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] The invention relates to a method for submitting and reviewing an electronic experiment record, and in particular to a method that requires multiple submissions in sections for review. Background Art

[0002] Electronic experimental record technology, as a key link in the digital transformation of scientific research, has completely revolutionized the traditional paper-based experimental record method and improved the efficiency and security of experimental data management. Based on electronic equipment and software applications, this technology integrates data entry, storage, analysis and sharing functions, providing researchers with a comprehensive experimental information management platform.

[0003] In traditional laboratories, experimental records rely on handwritten notes and paper documents, which not only easily lead to data loss, damage or difficulty in retrieval, but also limit the effective sharing and collaboration of data. In contrast, the electronic experimental record system uses a digital format to capture experimental design, reagent dosage, experimental steps, observation results and data analysis to ensure the integrity, accuracy and long-term traceability of the data.

[0004] The existing electronic lab record system cannot strike a good balance between regulatory requirements and ease of use. In order to meet regulatory requirements, some systems will split the record of an experiment into multiple electronic lab records and submit them for review separately, which creates obstacles to the subsequent reading continuity. Summary of the invention

[0005] In order to overcome the above technical defects, the present invention provides a design method for submitting electronic experiment records for review in sections for multiple times, which can perform multiple new content addition reviews and change reviews on the same electronic experiment record and set it to a completed status.

[0006] The newly added content refers to the content added before the first submission of the application in the electronic experimental record, or the content added at the end of the electronic experimental record that has been submitted for review.

[0007] The process of the new review of the electronic experiment record is that when submitting for review, all new content in the current electronic experiment record that has not been submitted for review will be submitted, and a submission timestamp will be generated. The content submitted for review will enter a protected state and cannot be modified or added or subtracted. Subsequent new content can only be added at the end of the experiment record.

[0008] The change review process of the electronic experimental record is as follows: a change application can be initiated for a content that has been submitted for review and is protected, and the changed part is submitted for change review, and a change record is added to the change history submitted at that time.

[0009] The completion status of the electronic experiment record is characterized in that no new content can be added to the completed electronic experiment record, and only change applications can be initiated for the content that has been submitted for review.

[0010] The steps of submitting the electronic experimental records for review in sections include: Step S1: Create an empty electronic experiment record; Step S2: Add a new paragraph to the electronic experimental record, whose content includes text, tables, pictures, links, videos, and files; Step S3: Submit the newly added content for review and generate a submission timestamp. Steps S2 and S3 can be repeated, that is, new content can be added and submitted for review multiple times; Step S4: The electronic experiment record can be set to a completed state. No new content can be added to the electronic experiment record in the completed state, and only a change application can be submitted; Step S5: You can initiate a change application for a content that has been submitted for review; Step S6: After the change application is approved, the protected content will enter an editable state and can be modified; Step S7: Submit the modified content for change review and generate a change record in the change history. Steps S5 to S7 can be repeated or interspersed with steps S2 to S3. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0011] Figure 1 This is a flowchart for submitting the electronic lab records for this application in sections for multiple reviews. DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0012] In order to make the purpose, technical scheme and advantages of the embodiments of the present application clearer, the technical scheme in the embodiments of the present application will be clearly and completely described in conjunction with the drawings in the embodiments of the present application. Obviously, the described embodiments are only a part of the embodiments of the present application, rather than all the embodiments. The components of the embodiments of the present application described and shown in the drawings here can be arranged and designed in various different configurations. Therefore, the following detailed description of the embodiments of the present application provided in the drawings is not intended to limit the scope of the application claimed for protection, but merely represents the selected embodiments of the present application. Based on the embodiments of the present application, each other embodiment obtained by those skilled in the art without making creative work belongs to the scope of protection of the present application.

[0013] Electronic lab record technology, as a key link in the digital transformation of scientific research, has completely revolutionized the traditional paper-based lab record method and improved the efficiency and security of lab data management. However, the existing electronic lab record system cannot strike a good balance between regulatory requirements and ease of use. In order to meet regulatory requirements, some systems will split the record of an experiment into multiple electronic lab records and submit them for review separately, which creates obstacles to subsequent reading continuity.

[0014] Based on this, an embodiment of the present application provides a method for submitting and reviewing electronic laboratory records, which can meet both regulatory requirements and reading convenience without splitting the complete laboratory records.

[0015] See also Figure 1 , Figure 1 This embodiment provides a flowchart corresponding to a method for submitting electronic experimental records for review in stages and multiple times. The operation flow of one embodiment is as follows: like Figure 1 As described in steps S1 and S2, create a new electronic experiment record and add paragraphs to it. The paragraph content can be text, pictures, tables, links, videos, and files.

[0016] In this embodiment, content is submitted and protected in paragraphs. For text content, paragraphs are separated by line breaks. For image and video content, one image or one video is a paragraph. For tables, each table is a paragraph. Links and files can be embedded in text paragraphs as inline elements. When submitting new content to the experimental record for review, the paragraph is the minimum submission unit.

[0017] like Figure 1 As described in step S3, the newly added content is submitted for review.

[0018] In this embodiment, the smallest unit for submitting new content is a paragraph, and it does not support submitting a specified part of the paragraphs, that is, each submission is all the paragraphs that can be submitted in the current state. After the submission is completed, the submitted paragraph will enter a protected state, and the protected paragraph cannot be edited.

[0019] There are two situations for submitting new content: one is the first submission of a newly created experimental record, in which case all paragraphs in the experimental record will be submitted as new content; the other is that the experimental record has already been submitted with new content, in which case the paragraphs added since the last submission will be submitted as new content. Obviously, for submitted experimental records, new content can only appear at the end of the experimental record, and no new paragraphs will appear between protected content.

[0020] For each submission of an experimental record, a unique timestamp will be generated, which is accurate to milliseconds and will serve as the technical ID of the submission. When a submission is completed, a new paragraph will be generated after the last paragraph contained in the submission for subsequent addition of new content. In this application, one submission will not complete the entire experimental record. For the continuity of the experimental record content, it is allowed to continue to add new paragraphs at the end of the submitted experimental record.

[0021] like Figure 1 As described in step S5, the submitted content can be changed.

[0022] In this embodiment, if you want to make partial changes to the protected content, you need to unlock the submission ID containing the paragraph to be changed. After unlocking, all paragraphs contained in the submission ID enter an editable state. After editing is completed, the content change submission review needs to be performed. Unlike the content addition submission review, the change submission is always performed on a specific submission ID. When submitting changes, the changes to all unlocked paragraphs under the submission ID are automatically calculated, the changed paragraphs are recorded and a change history record is generated. The change history record contains the content of the change, the time of the change, and the person who made the change. In the experimental record, click the submission ID to view all change records under the ID.

[0023] For an experiment record, as long as the corresponding experiment is not finished, you can continue to add content and submit it. If the experiment is finished, the experiment record will be set to the completed state, such as Figure 1 As described in step S4. When an experiment record is in the completed state, it means that the experiment has ended and no new paragraphs can be added to the experiment record. When an experiment record is set to the completed state, all the new content that has not been submitted will be automatically submitted once to ensure that all the content in the experiment record is in a protected state. Even so, it is still possible to make partial changes to the protected content by submitting changes and leaving a change history record.

[0024] It should be noted that the embodiments of the present invention have better practicability and do not impose any form of limitation on the present invention. Any technician familiar with the field may use the technical content disclosed above to change or modify it into an equivalent effective embodiment. However, any modification or equivalent changes and modifications made to the above embodiments based on the technical essence of the present invention without departing from the content of the technical solution of the present invention are still within the scope of the technical solution of the present invention.

Claims

1. A design method for submitting electronic experimental records for review in sections multiple times, characterized by: New content in the electronic experiment record is submitted for additional review, and content that has been submitted for review is submitted for change review. The new content refers to the content added before the first submission of the application in the electronic experiment record, or the content added at the end of the electronic experiment record that has been submitted for review. The change review of the electronic experiment record refers to initiating a change application for the content that has been submitted for review and protected, submitting a change review for the changed part, and adding a change record to the change history submitted that time.

2. A design method for submitting electronic experimental records for review in sections for multiple times as described in claim 1, characterized in that: After submitting the new content of the electronic experiment record for review, the electronic experiment record will be set to the completed status.

3. A design method for submitting electronic experimental records for review in sections for multiple times as described in claim 1, characterized in that: After submitting the change review for the content that has been submitted for review, the electronic experiment record will be set to the completed status.

4. A design method for submitting electronic experimental records for review in sections for multiple times as described in claim 1, characterized in that: When submitting for review, all new content in the current electronic experiment record that has not been submitted for review will be submitted, and the server will generate a submission timestamp that cannot be tampered with, and at the same time generate the electronic signature of the submitter. The content submitted for review will enter a protected state and cannot be modified or added or subtracted. Subsequent new content can only be added at the end of the experiment record.

5. The design method for submitting electronic experimental records for review in sections for multiple times as described in claim 1 is characterized by: New content cannot be added to an electronic experiment record that has been set as completed, and change requests can only be initiated for content that has been submitted for review.

6. A design method for submitting electronic experimental records for review in sections for multiple times as described in claim 1, characterized in that: Use the following steps: Step S1: Create an empty electronic experiment record; Step S2: Add a new paragraph to the electronic experimental record, whose content includes text, tables, pictures, links, videos, and files; Step S3: Submit the newly added content for review and generate a submission timestamp. Steps S2 and S3 can be repeated, that is, new content can be added and submitted for review multiple times; Step S4: Set the electronic experiment record to a completed state. No new content can be added to the completed electronic experiment record, and only a change application can be submitted.

7. A design method for submitting electronic experimental records for review in sections for multiple times as described in claim 2, characterized in that: Use the following steps: Step S1: Create an empty electronic experiment record; Step S2: Add a new paragraph to the electronic experimental record, whose content includes text, tables, pictures, links, videos, and files; Step S3: Submit the newly added content for review and generate a submission timestamp. Steps S2 and S3 can be repeated, that is, new content can be added and submitted for review multiple times; Step S4: Initiate a change application for a content that has been submitted for review; Step S5: After the change application is approved, the content corresponding to the application submitted in S5 will enter the editing state and the content will be modified; Step S6: Submit the modified content for change review and generate a change record in the change history; Step S7: Steps S4 to S6 can be repeated; Step S8: Set the electronic experiment record to a completed state. No new content can be added to the electronic experiment record in a completed state, and only a change application can be submitted.

Images