Nuclear power control station periodic test method and related equipment

Abstract

The invention provides a nuclear power control station periodic test method and related equipment, and the method comprises the steps: obtaining an online value of a target variable of a control station and an operation result of the control station based on the online value through a controller, and transmitting the online value to a target algorithm program equivalent to an algorithm program operated by a processing system of the control station, the operation result of the target algorithm program based on the online value is compared with the operation result of the control station, the comparison result is output, in the process, the target variable on the control station side is used as a test case, user writing is not needed, the system can automatically test all the control stations, the maintenance mode is simple, and the test process is rapid.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] The present invention relates to the technical field of equipment detection, and in particular to a periodic testing method for a nuclear power control station and related equipment. Background Art

[0002] In the nuclear power sector, with the increasing complexity of reactor protection system (RPS) algorithms, the increase in large-scale matrix operations, and the frequent design changes, traditional periodic testing methods are no longer able to meet the efficient, accurate, and intelligent O&M requirements of modern nuclear power plants. These methods often rely on manual operations and the hand-written limited test cases, leading to problems such as difficulty writing and maintaining test cases for complex algorithms, and long execution times. To address these challenges, the nuclear power sector needs to explore more efficient, accurate, and intelligent O&M methods. These include introducing automated testing tools to improve testing efficiency and accuracy, leveraging big data and artificial intelligence to identify potential issues and failure modes, adopting modular test case designs to facilitate writing, maintenance, and expansion, and strengthening training and talent development to enhance the skills of O&M personnel. These measures will help promote innovation and upgrade O&M methods in the nuclear power sector. Summary of the Invention

[0003] In view of this, an embodiment of the present invention provides a nuclear power control station periodic test method and related equipment to implement a nuclear power control station test plan with simple use case writing, low maintenance difficulty and fast testing.

[0004] To achieve the above objectives, the embodiments of the present invention provide the following technical solutions:

[0005] A periodic test method for a nuclear power control station, comprising:

[0006] Obtaining an intelligent data table, wherein the data information in the intelligent data table includes a target variable name, a target variable offset, a target variable length, and a target variable type of each target variable;

[0007] Obtaining an online value of a target variable of a control station output by a controller based on a preset frequency, and an operation result of the control station based on the online value of the target variable, which is recorded as a first operation result;

[0008] Saving the online value of the target variable to a local file according to the smart data table;

[0009] Running a target algorithm program according to the locally stored online value of the target variable to obtain a calculation result, recorded as a second calculation result, wherein the target algorithm program is equivalent to the algorithm program run by the processing system of the control station;

[0010] A comparison result of the output variables in the first operation result and the second operation result is output.

[0011] Optionally, in the above-mentioned nuclear power control station periodic test method, after outputting the comparison result of the output variables in the first operation result and the second operation result, the method further includes:

[0012] The detailed information of each target variable in the first operation result and the second operation result is stored in the database using the time stamp of the target variable in the first operation result and the second operation result as a key.

[0013] Optionally, in the above-mentioned nuclear power control station periodic test method, storing detailed information of each target variable in the first operation result and the second operation result in a database includes:

[0014] Based on the time scale of each target variable in the first operation result and the second operation result, the name, type, length and real-time value of each target variable in the first operation result and the second operation result are stored in the database.

[0015] Optionally, in the above-mentioned nuclear power control station periodic test method, obtaining an online value of a target variable of the control station output by the controller based on a preset frequency, and an operation result of the control station based on the online value of the target variable, includes:

[0016] Obtaining online values ​​of target variables of control stations corresponding to N controllers output based on preset frequencies, and operating results of the control stations based on the online values ​​of the target variables, where N is a positive integer not less than 1, and there is a one-to-one correspondence between the controllers and the control stations;

[0017] Outputting a comparison result of the output variables in the first operation result and the second operation result includes:

[0018] The comparison results of the output variables in the first operation results and the second operation results corresponding to the target variables output by each controller in the N control stations are output in sequence.

[0019] Optionally, in the above-mentioned nuclear power control station periodic test method, the processing systems of the control stations corresponding to the N controllers are the same or different;

[0020] Different types of processing systems have different corresponding target algorithm programs.

[0021] Optionally, in the above-mentioned nuclear power control station periodic test method, before running the target algorithm program according to the locally stored online value of the target variable, the method further includes:

[0022] parsing the first operation result to obtain an identity of a control station corresponding to the first operation result;

[0023] Obtain a target algorithm program that matches the identity of the control station.

[0024] A periodic test device for a nuclear power control station, comprising:

[0025] The gateway is configured to obtain an online value of a target variable of a control station output by a controller based on a preset frequency, and an operation result of the control station based on the online value of the target variable, recording the result as a first operation result, and store the first operation result in a local storage unit based on an intelligent data table, wherein the data information in the intelligent data table includes a target variable name, a target variable offset, a target variable length, and a target variable type of each target variable;

[0026] A local storage unit, configured to store the first operation result;

[0027] a functional virtual body unit, configured to run a target algorithm program according to the locally stored online value of the target variable to obtain a calculation result, recorded as a second calculation result, wherein the target algorithm program is equivalent to the algorithm program run by the processing system of the control station;

[0028] A data comparison unit is used to output a comparison result of the output variables in the first operation result and the second operation result.

[0029] A computer program product includes computer-readable instructions. When the computer-readable instructions are executed on an electronic device, the electronic device is enabled to implement any one of the above-mentioned nuclear power control station periodic test methods.

[0030] An electronic device comprising at least one processor and a memory connected to the processor, wherein:

[0031] The memory is used to store computer programs;

[0032] The processor is used to execute the computer program so that the electronic device can implement the nuclear power control station periodic test method as described in any one of the above.

[0033] A computer storage medium carries one or more computer programs, which, when executed by an electronic device, enable the electronic device to implement a nuclear power control station periodic test method as described in any one of the above.

[0034] Based on the above technical solution, the above solution provided by the embodiment of the present invention obtains the online value of the target variable of the control station and the operation result of the control station based on the online value through the controller, sends the online value to the target algorithm program equivalent to the algorithm program run by the processing system of the control station, compares the operation result of the target algorithm program based on the online value with the operation result of the control station, and outputs the comparison result. In this process, the target variable on the control station side is used as a test case, and no user writing is required, and the system can automatically test each control station, with a simple maintenance method and a fast testing process. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0035] In order to more clearly illustrate the embodiments of the present invention or the technical solutions in the prior art, the following briefly introduces the drawings required for use in the embodiments or the description of the prior art. Obviously, the drawings described below are merely embodiments of the present invention. For ordinary technicians in this field, other drawings can be obtained based on the provided drawings without paying any creative work.

[0036] Figure 1 A schematic flow chart of a periodic test method for a nuclear power control station disclosed in an embodiment of the present application;

[0037] Figure 2 This is a schematic structural diagram of a periodic test device for a nuclear power control station disclosed in an embodiment of the present application;

[0038] Figure 3 This is a schematic diagram of the structure of an electronic device for implementing a periodic test method for a nuclear power control station disclosed in an embodiment of the present application. DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0039] The following will clearly and completely describe the technical solutions in the embodiments of the present invention in conjunction with the accompanying drawings. Obviously, the described embodiments are only part of the embodiments of the present invention, not all of the embodiments. Based on the embodiments of the present invention, all other embodiments obtained by ordinary technicians in this field without making creative efforts are within the scope of protection of the present invention.

[0040] In response to the above problems, this application provides a nuclear power control station periodic test method, see Figure 1 , the method may include:

[0041] Step S101: obtaining an intelligent data table, wherein the data information in the intelligent data table includes a target variable name, a target variable offset, a target variable length, and a target variable type of each target variable.

[0042] In the real-time scenario of this solution, designers edit a smart data table on an engineering station and send it to the system and controller using this method. The controller and the control station have a one-to-one correspondence. The smart data table sent to the controller includes the target variable's address and length; the smart data table sent to the system using this method includes the target variable's name, offset, length, and type.

[0043] Step S102: obtaining an online value of a target variable of a control station output by a controller based on a preset frequency, and an operation result of the control station based on the online value of the target variable, which is recorded as a first operation result.

[0044] After obtaining the smart data table, the controller collects the online value of the target variable in the smart data table based on the variable address and variable length of the target variable in the smart data table, and the operation result of the control station based on the online value of the target variable based on the preset frequency, and uses the operation result as the first operation result. The online value of the target variable and the corresponding first operation result are packaged and sent to the system to which the present method is applied.

[0045] In this step, the controller automatically constructs test cases based on the online values ​​of the target variables of each control station and the output results of the control station based on the online values ​​of the target variables in real time. At this time, there is no need for users to manually write test cases, and the real-time performance is high.

[0046] Step S103: saving the online value of the target variable to a local file according to the smart data table.

[0047] After obtaining the online value of the target variable sent by the controller, this step saves the online value of the target variable in a local file based on the configuration of each target variable in the smart data table (target variable name, target variable offset, target variable length and target variable type).

[0048] Step S104: running the target algorithm program according to the locally stored online value of the target variable to obtain a calculation result, which is recorded as a second calculation result, wherein the target algorithm program is equivalent to the algorithm program run by the processing system of the control station.

[0049] After the online value of the target variable is obtained, the online value of the target variable is used as input data of the target algorithm program, and the target algorithm program is run, and the operation result of the target algorithm program is used as the second operation result.

[0050] Step S105: Output the comparison result of the output variables in the first operation result and the second operation result.

[0051] During the operation and maintenance of a nuclear power control station, after obtaining the first and second computation results, a key step is to compare the output variables of these two results to ensure consistency. This comparison mechanism is an important basis for assessing the reliability of the control system: if the output variables are consistent, it indicates that the control system in the control station is operating reliably and normally; conversely, if the output variables are inconsistent, it may indicate an abnormality or potential failure in the control system.

[0052] In order to further improve the efficiency and transparency of operation and maintenance, this solution also proposes the function of automatically generating test reports based on comparison results. This report, named T2 test report, is designed to visually display the experimental results, so that operation and maintenance personnel can quickly understand the system status. The T2 test focuses particularly on verifying the correctness of the protection logic function. Through intuitive data comparison and analysis, it can quickly identify potential logical errors or system inconsistencies, providing strong support for subsequent troubleshooting and maintenance work. By comparing the output variables of the calculation results and generating T2 test reports, this solution not only enhances the accuracy and efficiency of nuclear power control station operation and maintenance, but also improves information transparency through visualization, providing a solid guarantee for the safe operation and maintenance of nuclear power.

[0053] As can be seen from the above scheme, the present application proposes a nuclear power control station operation and maintenance test scheme, the core of which is to automatically obtain the online value of the control station target variable and its corresponding operation result through the controller. Subsequently, the online value is sent to the target algorithm program equivalent to the control station processing system operation algorithm program. Importantly, this process does not require the user to manually write test cases, but directly uses the actual target variables on the control station side as the test basis. The target algorithm program generates operation results based on these online values, compares them with the operation results of the control station, and finally outputs the comparison results. This scheme significantly simplifies the testing process and maintenance methods. Due to the use of automation, the system can automatically test each control station without manual intervention, thereby greatly improving the testing efficiency. In addition, since the test cases are directly derived from the actual operation data of the control station, the accuracy of the test and the advantage of being close to the actual operation scenario are ensured.

[0054] In summary, this application realizes an automated testing process without the need for users to write test cases by automatically acquiring online values ​​and using equivalent target algorithm programs for comparison. This not only simplifies the maintenance method, but also speeds up the testing process, providing strong support for the safe and efficient operation and maintenance of nuclear power control stations.

[0055] In the technical solution disclosed in this embodiment, to facilitate subsequent data collation, detailed information about each output variable in the first and second operation results can be stored in a database. When storing the output variables, the time stamp of each target variable can be used as a key to sequentially store the detailed information about each target variable. Specifically, to effectively store the detailed information about each output variable in the first and second operation results in the database, a database table can be pre-designed. This table can contain configurations that can be configured based on the detailed information about the target variable. For example, the detailed information can include the target variable's ID, name, type, length, time stamp, and real-time value. In this case, the database table can include fields such as ID (serving as the primary key, auto-incrementing to ensure uniqueness), type (an enumerated type used to distinguish between the first and second operations), target variable name (storing the name of the output variable), time stamp (using a timestamp or datetime type to record the time stamp of the output variable), length, real-time value, and other information (using a text or JSON type to store serialized detailed information about the output variable). During the storage process, the output variables in each operation result are traversed, the name, time stamp, and detailed information of each variable are extracted, and database records are constructed accordingly. These records are then inserted into the database table in sequence. To ensure the temporal sequence of data, the output variables can be sorted by time stamp before insertion. The database not only stores detailed information on the calculation results, but also provides the ability to retrieve output variables in chronological order through the time stamp field, making data query and analysis more convenient.

[0056] In the technical solution disclosed in this embodiment, the first operation result and the second operation result can be stored in a Redis database, and the output variables in the first operation result and the second operation result can be compared in real time through the Redis database. Then, the name, type, length, and real-time value of the output variable can be stored in the Redis database using the time stamp of the output variable as a keyword.

[0057] In this embodiment, there can be multiple controllers, each corresponding to a control station. Each controller can collect the online value of the target variable of the control system of its corresponding control station, as well as the operating result of the control system based on the online value of the target variable, and then send the online value of the target variable and the operating result to the system applying this method. Assuming that the number of controllers is N, in the above scheme, when obtaining the online value of the target variable of the control station output by the controller based on a preset frequency, and the operating result of the control station based on the online value of the target variable, it is specifically configured to: obtain the online value of the target variable of the control station corresponding to each controller output based on the preset frequency, and the operating result of the control station based on the online value of the target variable. In this case, outputting the comparison result of the output variable in the first operation result and the second operation result includes: sequentially outputting the comparison result of the first operation result output by the N controllers with the output variable in the second operation result corresponding to the online value of the target variable corresponding to the first operation result. That is, the comparison result of the output variable in the first output result corresponding to the online value of each group of target variables and the second output result is sequentially obtained, and each group of target variables refers to a combination of target variables belonging to the same control station. Through this approach, the solution can comprehensively monitor and optimize the control effects of multiple control stations, identify control stations with precise control and those that need improvement, and thus provide key support for improving the stability and operational efficiency of the entire system.

[0058] In the technical solution disclosed in this embodiment, the processing systems of the control stations corresponding to the N controllers can be the same or different. Because different types of processing systems require running different target algorithm programs, this application introduces a key step to determine the target algorithm program that matches a specific target variable before running the target algorithm program based on the online value of the locally stored target variable.

[0059] To achieve this goal, the present application pre-establishes a correspondence between control stations and target algorithm programs. This correspondence ensures that each system type's control station has a unique corresponding target algorithm program. In actual operation, the control station's identity is first embedded in the first run result. Subsequently, after obtaining the first run result, it is parsed to extract the control station's identity. Using this identity, the target algorithm program that matches the control station can be accurately found from the preset correspondence, and subsequent algorithm operation and result analysis can be performed accordingly. This method not only improves the flexibility and adaptability of the system, but also ensures the accuracy and efficiency of algorithm operation.

[0060] This embodiment discloses a periodic test device for a nuclear power control station. For the specific working contents of each unit in the device, please refer to the contents of the above method embodiment.

[0061] The following describes a nuclear power control station periodic test device provided by an embodiment of the present invention. The nuclear power control station periodic test device described below and the nuclear power control station periodic test method described above can be referenced to each other.

[0062] See also Figure 2 The embodiment of the present application discloses a nuclear power control station periodic test device 100, comprising:

[0063] The gateway 10 is configured to obtain an online value of a target variable of a control station output by a controller based on a preset frequency, and an operation result of the control station based on the online value of the target variable, recording the result as a first operation result, and store the first operation result in a local storage unit based on an intelligent data table, wherein the data information in the intelligent data table includes a target variable name, a target variable offset, a target variable length, and a target variable type for each target variable;

[0064] The local storage unit 20 is used to store the first operation result;

[0065] The functional virtual body unit 30 is configured to run a target algorithm program according to the locally stored online value of the target variable to obtain a calculation result, which is recorded as a second calculation result, wherein the target algorithm program is equivalent to the algorithm program run by the processing system of the control station;

[0066] The data comparison unit 40 is configured to output a comparison result of the output variables in the first operation result and the second operation result.

[0067] In which, the nuclear power control station periodic test device 100 can also include a virtual body algorithm generation unit 50, which is used to generate a target algorithm program equivalent to the budget method program of the control system of the control station corresponding to the controller, and load the generated target algorithm program into the functional virtual body unit 60. The functional virtual body is used to run the target algorithm program based on the online value of the target variable.

[0068] Corresponding to the above method, in the present application, the data comparison unit 40 can be implemented by a Redis database.

[0069] A computer program product includes computer-readable instructions. When the computer-readable instructions are executed on an electronic device, the electronic device is enabled to implement any one of the above-mentioned nuclear power control station periodic test methods.

[0070] An electronic device comprises at least one processor and a memory connected to the processor, wherein: the memory is used to store a computer program; and the processor is used to execute the computer program so that the electronic device can implement the nuclear power control station periodic test method as described in any one of the above items.

[0071] refer to Figure 3 , which shows a schematic diagram of the structure of an electronic device suitable for implementing the above solution. The electronic devices in the embodiments of the present application may include but are not limited to fixed terminals such as mobile phones, laptops, PDAs (personal digital assistants), PADs (tablet computers), desktop computers, etc. Figure 3 The electronic device shown is merely an example and should not limit the functions and scope of use of the embodiments of the present application.

[0072] like Figure 3 As shown, the electronic device may include a processor (e.g., a central processing unit, a graphics processing unit, etc.) 601, which can perform various appropriate actions and processes based on programs stored in a read-only memory (ROM) 602 or programs loaded from a storage device 608 into a random access memory (RAM) 603. When the electronic device is powered on, the RAM 603 also stores various programs and data required for the operation of the electronic device. The processing device 601, ROM 602, and RAM 603 are interconnected via a bus 604. An input / output (I / O) interface 605 is also connected to the bus 604.

[0073] Typically, the following devices may be connected to the I / O interface 605: an input device 606 including, for example, a touch screen, a touchpad, a keyboard, a mouse, a camera, a microphone, an accelerometer, a gyroscope, etc.; an output device 607 including, for example, a liquid crystal display (LCD), a speaker, a vibrator, etc.; a storage device 608 including, for example, a memory card, a hard disk, etc.; and a communication device 609. The communication device 609 may allow the electronic device to communicate with other devices wirelessly or by wire to exchange data. Although Figure 3 The electronic device is shown with various devices, but it should be understood that it is not required to implement or possess all of the devices shown. More or fewer devices may be implemented or possessed instead.

[0074] An embodiment of the present application also provides a computer program product including computer-readable instructions. When the computer-readable instructions are executed on an electronic device, the electronic device implements any one of the nuclear power control station periodic test methods provided in the embodiment of the present application.

[0075] A computer-readable storage medium is also provided in an embodiment of the present application. The storage medium carries one or more computer programs. When one or more computer programs are executed by an electronic device, the electronic device can implement any one of the nuclear power control station periodic test methods provided in the embodiment of the present application.

[0076] For the convenience of description, the above system is described as being divided into various modules according to their functions. Of course, when implementing the present invention, the functions of each module can be implemented in the same or multiple software and / or hardware.

[0077] Each embodiment in this specification is described in a progressive manner. The same or similar parts between the embodiments can be referred to each other. Each embodiment focuses on the differences from other embodiments. In particular, for system or system embodiments, since they are basically similar to method embodiments, the description is relatively simple. For relevant parts, refer to the partial description of the method embodiment. The system and system embodiments described above are merely schematic, wherein the units described as separate components may or may not be physically separated, and the components displayed as units may or may not be physical units, that is, they may be located in one place, or they may be distributed on multiple network units. Some or all of the modules can be selected according to actual needs to achieve the purpose of the solution of this embodiment. A person of ordinary skill in the art can understand and implement it without expending creative work.

[0078] Professionals may further appreciate that the units and algorithm steps of each example described in conjunction with the embodiments disclosed herein can be implemented in electronic hardware, computer software, or a combination of the two. In order to clearly illustrate the interchangeability of hardware and software, the above description has generally described the components and steps of each example according to their functions. Whether these functions are performed in hardware or software depends on the specific application and design constraints of the technical solution. Professionals and technicians may use different methods to implement the described functions for each specific application, but such implementation should not be considered beyond the scope of the present invention.

[0079] The steps of the methods or algorithms described in conjunction with the embodiments disclosed herein may be implemented directly using hardware, a software module executed by a processor, or a combination of the two. The software module may be placed in random access memory (RAM), internal memory, read-only memory (ROM), electrically programmable ROM, electrically erasable programmable ROM, registers, a hard disk, a removable disk, a CD-ROM, or any other form of storage medium known in the art.

[0080] It should also be noted that, in this document, relational terms such as first and second, etc., are used only to distinguish one entity or operation from another entity or operation, and do not necessarily require or imply any such actual relationship or order between these entities or operations. Moreover, the terms "comprises," "comprising," or any other variations thereof are intended to cover non-exclusive inclusion, such that a process, method, article, or device comprising a series of elements includes not only those elements, but also other elements not explicitly listed, or elements inherent to such process, method, article, or device. In the absence of further limitations, an element defined by the phrase "comprising a ..." does not exclude the presence of additional identical elements in the process, method, article, or device comprising the element.

[0081] The above description of the disclosed embodiments is intended to enable one skilled in the art to implement or use the present invention. Various modifications to these embodiments will be readily apparent to one skilled in the art, and the general principles defined herein may be implemented in other embodiments without departing from the spirit or scope of the present invention. Therefore, the present invention is not limited to the embodiments shown herein but is intended to conform to the widest scope consistent with the principles and novel features disclosed herein.

Claims

1. A periodic test method for a nuclear power control station, characterized in that: include: Obtaining an intelligent data table, wherein the data information in the intelligent data table includes a target variable name, a target variable offset, a target variable length, and a target variable type of each target variable; Obtaining an online value of a target variable of a control station output by a controller based on a preset frequency, and an operation result of the control station based on the online value of the target variable, which is recorded as a first operation result; Saving the online value of the target variable to a local file according to the smart data table; Running a target algorithm program according to the locally stored online value of the target variable to obtain a calculation result, recorded as a second calculation result, wherein the target algorithm program is equivalent to the algorithm program run by the processing system of the control station; A comparison result of the output variables in the first operation result and the second operation result is output.

2. The nuclear power control station periodic test method according to claim 1, characterized in that: After outputting the comparison result of the output variables in the first operation result and the second operation result, the method further includes: The detailed information of each target variable in the first operation result and the second operation result is stored in the database using the time stamp of the target variable in the first operation result and the second operation result as a key.

3. The nuclear power control station periodic test method according to claim 2, characterized in that: Storing detailed information of each target variable in the first operation result and the second operation result in a database includes: Based on the time scale of each target variable in the first operation result and the second operation result, the name, type, length and real-time value of each target variable in the first operation result and the second operation result are stored in the database.

4. The nuclear power control station periodic test method according to claim 1, characterized in that: The acquiring of the online value of the target variable of the control station output by the controller based on the preset frequency, and the operation result of the control station based on the online value of the target variable, includes: Obtaining online values ​​of target variables of control stations corresponding to N controllers output based on preset frequencies, and operating results of the control stations based on the online values ​​of the target variables, where N is a positive integer not less than 1, and there is a one-to-one correspondence between the controllers and the control stations; Outputting a comparison result of the output variables in the first operation result and the second operation result includes: The comparison results of the output variables in the first operation results and the second operation results corresponding to the target variables output by each controller in the N control stations are output in sequence.

5. The nuclear power control station periodic test method according to claim 4, characterized in that: The processing systems of the control stations corresponding to the N controllers are the same or different; Different types of processing systems have different corresponding target algorithm programs.

6. The nuclear power control station periodic test method according to claim 4, characterized in that: Before running the target algorithm program according to the online value of the target variable stored locally, the method further includes: parsing the first operation result to obtain an identity identifier of a control station corresponding to the first operation result; Obtain a target algorithm program that matches the identity of the control station.

7. A nuclear power control station periodic test device, characterized in that: include: The gateway is configured to obtain an online value of a target variable of a control station output by a controller based on a preset frequency, and an operation result of the control station based on the online value of the target variable, recording the result as a first operation result, and store the first operation result in a local storage unit based on an intelligent data table, wherein the data information in the intelligent data table includes a target variable name, a target variable offset, a target variable length, and a target variable type of each target variable; A local storage unit, configured to store the first operation result; a functional virtual body unit, configured to run a target algorithm program according to the locally stored online value of the target variable to obtain a calculation result, recorded as a second calculation result, wherein the target algorithm program is equivalent to the algorithm program run by the processing system of the control station; A data comparison unit is used to output a comparison result of the output variables in the first operation result and the second operation result.

8. A computer program product, characterized in that The method comprises computer-readable instructions, which, when executed on an electronic device, enable the electronic device to implement the nuclear power control station periodic test method according to any one of claims 1 to 6.

9. An electronic device, characterized in that: comprising at least one processor and a memory connected to the processor, wherein: The memory is used to store computer programs; The processor is configured to execute the computer program so as to enable the electronic device to implement the nuclear power control station periodic test method according to any one of claims 1 to 6.

10. A computer storage medium, characterized in that The storage medium carries one or more computer programs, which, when executed by an electronic device, enable the electronic device to implement the nuclear power control station periodic test method as described in any one of claims 1 to 6.

Images