B2B shopping mall supplier price intelligent adjustment method and system

Abstract

The invention discloses a B2B shopping mall supplier price intelligent adjustment method and system, and relates to the technical field of B2B shopping mall supplier price intelligent management, and the method comprises the following steps: S1, obtaining a historical cost price and a historical transaction price of a product, and formulating a today guidance price of the product according to the historical cost price and the historical price of the product; according to the scheme, the today guidance price of the product is formulated according to the historical cost price and the historical pricing of the product, and then the guidance price of the product is corrected again according to the selling price of the product in each supplier in the platform, so that the guidance price of the product is comprehensively determined by combining historical data and market information; therefore, the guidance price of the product is more accurate, the inaccurate guidance price can be quickly adjusted according to the market trend, and the guidance price is prevented from being excessively limited by historical data.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] The present invention relates to the technical field of intelligent price management of B2B mall suppliers, and in particular to a method and system for intelligent price adjustment of B2B mall suppliers. Background Art

[0002] B2B marketplaces are e-commerce platforms for online procurement and wholesale transactions between businesses. They focus on meeting the commercial needs of corporate clients, in stark contrast to B2C platforms targeting individual consumers. These platforms typically offer transactions for commodities, industrial products, or commercial services, supporting unique B2B features such as bulk purchasing, tiered pricing, and contractual transactions. Their core value lies in using digital tools to reduce corporate procurement costs, improve supply chain efficiency, and help suppliers expand sales channels. Modern B2B marketplaces are developing towards intelligent, collaborative supply chains, and a service ecosystem, integrating value-added services such as finance and logistics to build a complete Industrial Internet ecosystem.

[0003] B2B malls will provide suppliers with guiding commodity prices based on product market price trends. However, guiding prices are usually too dependent on historical data trends and cannot be adjusted quickly according to market changes. Therefore, guiding prices often have limitations and lags. At the same time, merchants in B2B malls often deliberately lower commodity prices based on guiding prices to attract buyers. This price control method is extremely unfair to other B2B mall peers. In serious cases, it will cause multiple parties to simultaneously lower prices, making the sales price far lower than the guiding price, resulting in vicious competition. To this end, we propose a method and system for intelligent price adjustment of B2B mall suppliers. Summary of the Invention

[0004] (1) Technical problems solved In view of the deficiencies in the prior art, the present invention provides a B2B mall supplier price intelligent adjustment method and system to solve the above-mentioned problems in the prior art.

[0005] (2) Technical solution To achieve the above objectives, the present invention is implemented through the following technical solutions: a method for intelligently adjusting supplier prices in a B2B mall, comprising the following steps: S1: Obtain the historical cost price and historical transaction price of the product, and formulate the product's current guide price based on the historical cost price and historical pricing; S2: Obtain the actual pricing of the supplier's products, and determine whether the supplier's actual pricing is reasonable based on the product guidance price. If it is unreasonable, record the supplier as a suspicious supplier, and determine whether the suspicious supplier is handling unsaleable and expiring products. If the suspicious supplier is handling unsaleable and expiring products, re-establish the product guidance price based on the situation of the unsaleable and expiring products and record it as the corrected guidance price. If the suspicious supplier is not handling unsaleable and expiring products, record the suspicious supplier as a supplier to be rectified. S3: Give reminders and warnings to suppliers to be rectified and urge them to adjust prices. Determine whether the price adjustment of suppliers to be rectified is qualified after the reminders and warnings. If the price adjustment of suppliers to be rectified is still unqualified after the reminders and warnings, select prices for the products of suppliers to be rectified according to the correction guidance price, and adjust the product exposure rate of the supplier to be rectified according to the number of historical reminders of the supplier to be rectified.

[0006] Preferably, S1 is specifically: S101: Obtain the historical cost price of the product, obtain the historical transaction price of the product, and calculate the daily historical gross profit of the product by subtracting the daily historical transaction price from the historical cost price of the product. S102: Arrange all historical gross profits of the product in order of date, and calculate the historical gross profit difference of the product by subtracting the historical gross profit of the product on the current day from the historical gross profit of the product on the previous day; S103: Sum and average all historical gross profit margins to obtain the mean of historical gross profit margins, obtain today's product cost price, and sum the mean of historical gross profit margins and today's product cost price to obtain today's product guide price.

[0007] Preferably, in S2, the actual product pricing of the supplier is obtained, and the supplier's actual product pricing is judged to be reasonable based on the product guide price. If it is unreasonable, the supplier is recorded as a suspicious supplier, specifically: S201: Obtain the product's current recommended price, and multiply the product's current recommended price by 0.85 to obtain the product's lowest recommended price; S202: Obtain the actual pricing of the supplier's products, and determine whether the supplier's actual pricing is reasonable by comparing the supplier's actual pricing with the product's minimum guide price. If the supplier's actual pricing is greater than or equal to the product's minimum guide price, then the supplier's actual pricing of the product is recorded as reasonable. If the supplier's actual pricing is less than the product's minimum guide price, then the supplier's actual pricing of the product is recorded as unreasonable, and the supplier is recorded as a suspicious supplier.

[0008] Preferably, in S2, it is determined whether the suspicious supplier is processing slow-selling and near-expiry products, specifically: S203: Obtain suspicious supplier information, obtain product prices of the supplier that are lower than the minimum guide price based on the suspicious supplier information, and record the product as a suspicious product; S204: Obtain the cost price of the suspicious product, obtain the actual price charged by the supplier of the suspicious product, and determine whether the actual price charged by the supplier of the suspicious product is less than the cost price of the suspicious product. If the actual price charged by the supplier of the suspicious product is less than the cost price of the suspicious product, record the suspicious product as a loss-making product. S205: Obtain the historical sales cycle of the supplier's loss-making products at a price lower than the cost price, and determine whether the historical sales cycle of the supplier's loss-making products at a price lower than the cost price is longer than 7 days. If the historical sales cycle of the supplier's loss-making products at a price lower than the cost price is longer than 7 days, record the supplier as a malicious competition supplier; if the historical sales cycle of the supplier's loss-making products at a price lower than the cost price is less than or equal to 7 days, record the supplier as a dumping supplier, and record the supplier's products as unsaleable and expiring products.

[0009] Preferably, in S2, the product guide price is re-established according to the situation of the unsaleable and near-expiry product and recorded as the corrected guide price, specifically: S206: Obtain the historical transaction prices of the unsaleable and near-expiry products from all merchants within 15 days up to today, and record them as the historical dumping transaction prices. Sum and average the daily historical dumping prices of all merchants to obtain the daily historical average dumping price. S207: Subtracting the historical average dumping price of each single day from the historical average dumping price of the previous day to obtain a historical average dumping price difference, summing all the historical average dumping price differences to obtain a historical dumping change value, and determining the relationship between the historical dumping change value and 0. If the historical dumping change value is greater than or equal to 0, the product is defined as a non-dumping product; if the historical dumping change value is less than 0, the product is defined as a dumping product. S208: Obtain the actual price of the dumped product from all merchants on the previous day and record it as the historical dumped transaction price. Sum and average all historical dumped transaction prices to obtain the corrected guide price of the product.

[0010] Preferably, in S3, it is determined whether the price adjustment is qualified after the supplier to be rectified is reminded and warned, specifically: S301: Set a rectification period, starting from the time a reminder warning is issued to the supplier. After the rectification period ends, obtain the actual price of the product of the supplier to be rectified and record it as the second actual price of the target product. S302: Obtain today's calibrated guidance price of the product, and obtain the lowest calibrated guidance price of the product by multiplying today's calibrated guidance price of the product by 0.85. Determine whether the target product's second actual pricing is less than the product's lowest calibrated guidance price. If the target product's second actual pricing is greater than or equal to the product's lowest calibrated guidance price, mark the product of the supplier to be rectified as qualified for price adjustment. If the target product's second actual pricing is less than the product's lowest calibrated guidance price, mark the product of the supplier to be rectified as unqualified for price adjustment.

[0011] Preferably, in S3, if the price adjustment of the supplier to be rectified is still unqualified after the reminder and warning, the pricing of the product of the supplier to be rectified is selected according to the correction guidance price, specifically: S301: Obtain the current calibrated guide price of the product. Multiply the current calibrated guide price of the product by 0.85 to obtain the lowest calibrated guide price of the product. Multiply the current calibrated guide price of the product by 1.15 to obtain the highest calibrated guide price of the product. The pricing selection range of the calibrated guide price is obtained with the lowest calibrated guide price of the product as the lowest value and the highest calibrated guide price as the highest value. S302: Displaying the pricing selection range of the correction guidance price to the supplier to be rectified, and generating the actual pricing of the product of the supplier to be rectified based on the final pricing selection of the supplier to be rectified.

[0012] Preferably, in S3, the product exposure rate of the supplier to be rectified is adjusted according to the number of historical reminders of the supplier to be rectified, specifically: S303: Setting a preset threshold for the number of historical reminders, obtaining the number of historical reminders for the supplier to be rectified, and obtaining the current product exposure rate of the supplier to be rectified; S304: Determine whether the number of historical reminders of the supplier to be rectified is greater than a preset threshold of historical reminders. If the number of historical reminders of the supplier to be rectified is less than or equal to the preset threshold of historical reminders, maintain the product exposure rate of the supplier to be rectified unchanged. If the number of historical reminders of the supplier to be rectified is greater than the preset threshold of historical reminders, execute S305. S305: Setting a preset threshold value for the reduction in product exposure rate, and obtaining the adjusted product exposure rate of the supplier to be rectified by subtracting the current product exposure rate of the supplier to be rectified from the preset threshold value for the reduction in product exposure rate.

[0013] A B2B mall supplier price intelligent adjustment system includes the following modules: The guidance price setting module obtains the historical cost price and historical transaction price of the product, and sets the product's current guidance price based on the historical cost price and historical pricing; The guide price correction module obtains the actual pricing of the supplier's products and determines whether the supplier's actual pricing is reasonable based on the product guide price. If it is unreasonable, the supplier is recorded as a suspicious supplier. It is also determined whether the suspicious supplier is handling slow-moving and expiring products. If so, the product guide price is re-established based on the situation of the slow-moving and expiring products and recorded as the corrected guide price. If the suspicious supplier is not handling slow-moving and expiring products, the suspicious supplier is recorded as a supplier awaiting rectification. The supplier rectification control module gives reminders and warnings to suppliers to be rectified and urges price adjustments. It determines whether the price adjustments of suppliers to be rectified are qualified after the reminders and warnings. If the price adjustments of suppliers to be rectified are still unqualified after the reminders and warnings, the pricing of the products of the suppliers to be rectified will be selected according to the correction guidance price. The product exposure rate of the supplier to be rectified will be adjusted according to the number of historical reminders of the supplier to be rectified.

[0014] (3) Beneficial effects The present invention provides a method and system for intelligently adjusting supplier prices in a B2B shopping mall, which has the following beneficial effects: (1) In this plan, the product's current guide price is formulated based on the product's historical cost price and historical pricing, so as to guide the supplier's pricing based on the guide price. Then, the supplier's actual pricing is judged to be reasonable based on the supplier's actual pricing. If the supplier's actual pricing is far lower than the guide price, it is judged whether the supplier is dumping unsold and expiring products, so as to facilitate the humane management of supplier pricing. The supplier who is dumping and clearing out the inventory is given a certain amount of time to deal with the expiring and unsold products. If the supplier is dealing with the expiring and unsold products, it means that the product is not ideal in the actual sales process and there is a phenomenon of oversupply. Then, the product's guide price is re-adjusted based on the dumped selling price of the product from each supplier on the platform, so as to facilitate the comprehensive determination of the product's guide price based on historical data and market conditions, making the product's guide price more accurate, and then facilitating the rapid adjustment of inaccurate guide prices based on market trends, avoiding the guide price being overly restricted by historical data.

[0015] (2) In this plan, suppliers who are not dealing with unsaleable or near-expiry products but whose prices are far below the guide price are marked, and the suppliers are warned and urged to make price adjustments. Such suppliers need to be urged to make price adjustments and their price adjustments need to be monitored continuously. If such suppliers still do not make adjustments to product prices on their own, a price selection range will be defined based on the corrected guide price, and the supplier will be forced to list product prices within the price selection range, thereby avoiding the phenomenon that such suppliers do not make adjustments after being reminded. The credit behavior of such suppliers will be judged based on the number of historical reminders of such suppliers, and finally the supplier will be punished by reducing the exposure rate of its products, thereby preventing suppliers from intermittently trying to lower product prices and not giving such suppliers the opportunity to exploit loopholes. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0016] Figure 1 This is a flowchart of a method for intelligently adjusting supplier prices in a B2B shopping mall according to the present invention; Figure 2 This is a schematic diagram of the module structure of a B2B mall supplier price intelligent adjustment system of the present invention; Figure 3 The figure is a schematic diagram of the logical steps of a method for intelligently adjusting supplier prices in a B2B mall according to the present invention. DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0017] The following will clearly and completely describe the technical solutions in the embodiments of the present invention in conjunction with the accompanying drawings. Obviously, the described embodiments are only part of the embodiments of the present invention, not all of the embodiments. Based on the embodiments of the present invention, all other embodiments obtained by ordinary technicians in this field without making creative efforts are within the scope of protection of the present invention.

[0018] See also Figure 1-Figure 3 The present invention provides a B2B mall supplier price intelligent adjustment method, comprising the following steps: S1: Obtain the historical cost price and historical transaction price of the product, and formulate the product's current guide price based on the historical cost price and historical pricing; S2: Obtain the actual pricing of the supplier's products, and determine whether the supplier's actual pricing is reasonable based on the product guidance price. If it is unreasonable, record the supplier as a suspicious supplier, and determine whether the suspicious supplier is handling unsaleable and expiring products. If the suspicious supplier is handling unsaleable and expiring products, re-establish the product guidance price based on the situation of the unsaleable and expiring products and record it as the corrected guidance price. If the suspicious supplier is not handling unsaleable and expiring products, record the suspicious supplier as a supplier to be rectified. S3: Give reminders and warnings to suppliers to be rectified and urge them to adjust prices. Determine whether the price adjustment of suppliers to be rectified is qualified after the reminders and warnings. If the price adjustment of suppliers to be rectified is still unqualified after the reminders and warnings, select prices for the products of suppliers to be rectified according to the correction guidance price, and adjust the product exposure rate of the supplier to be rectified according to the number of historical reminders of the supplier to be rectified.

[0019] In this embodiment, this solution formulates today's guidance price of the product based on the historical cost price and historical pricing of the product, thereby guiding the supplier's pricing based on the guidance price, and then judging whether the supplier's actual pricing is reasonable based on the supplier's actual pricing. If the supplier's actual pricing is far lower than the guidance price, then judging whether the supplier is dumping unsaleable and near-expiry products, thereby facilitating humane management of supplier pricing, and giving suppliers who are dumping and clearing out inventory a certain amount of time to deal with near-expiry and unsaleable products. If the supplier is dealing with near-expiry and unsaleable products, it indicates that the product is not ideal in the actual sales process and there is a phenomenon of oversupply. Then, based on the dumped selling price of the product from each supplier on the platform, the guidance price of the product is re-calibrated, thereby facilitating the comprehensive determination of the product's guidance price based on historical data and market conditions, making the product's guidance price more accurate, and then facilitating rapid adjustment of inaccurate guidance prices based on market trends, to avoid the guidance price being overly restricted by historical data. This solution flags suppliers that aren't dealing with unsold, near-expiry products but are selling at prices far below the recommended price, warning them and urging them to make price adjustments. Warnings target suppliers that consistently sell at prices below cost. These suppliers often attract buyers by selling below-cost prices, then recoup their costs and profit by selling non-low-priced products within their stores. This diversion strategy seriously undermines fairness within the industry and is suspected of violating anti-unfair competition laws. Therefore, these suppliers must be urged to make price adjustments and monitored continuously. If they still don't voluntarily adjust their prices, a price range will be established based on the revised recommended price, forcing them to list their products within this range. This prevents these suppliers from failing to make adjustments after being warned. The supplier's creditworthiness will be assessed based on the number of historical warnings, and penalties will be imposed by reducing their product exposure. This helps prevent suppliers from intermittently attempting to lower their prices and denying them opportunities to exploit loopholes.

[0020] S1 is specifically: S101: Obtain the historical cost price of the product, obtain the historical transaction price of the product, and calculate the daily historical gross profit of the product by subtracting the daily historical transaction price from the historical cost price of the product. S102: Arrange all historical gross profits of the product in order of date, and calculate the historical gross profit difference of the product by subtracting the historical gross profit of the product on the current day from the historical gross profit of the product on the previous day; S103: Sum and average all historical gross profit margins to obtain the mean of historical gross profit margins, obtain today's product cost price, and sum the mean of historical gross profit margins and today's product cost price to obtain today's product guide price.

[0021] In this embodiment, the historical profit of the product is calculated based on the historical cost price and the historical transaction price of the product, and then the guidance price is formulated based on the historical profit and the current cost price, so as to facilitate the formulation of the guidance price according to the cost change and avoid the situation where the guidance price is inaccurate due to the large change in cost price.

[0022] In S2, the actual pricing of the supplier's products is obtained, and the supplier's actual pricing is judged to be reasonable based on the product guide price. If it is unreasonable, the supplier is recorded as a suspicious supplier. Specifically: S201: Obtain the product's current recommended price, and multiply the product's current recommended price by 0.85 to obtain the product's lowest recommended price; S202: Obtain the actual pricing of the supplier's products, and determine whether the supplier's actual pricing is reasonable by comparing the supplier's actual pricing with the product's minimum guide price. If the supplier's actual pricing is greater than or equal to the product's minimum guide price, then the supplier's actual pricing of the product is recorded as reasonable. If the supplier's actual pricing is less than the product's minimum guide price, then the supplier's actual pricing of the product is recorded as unreasonable, and the supplier is recorded as a suspicious supplier.

[0023] In this embodiment, a minimum guide price is set by lowering the guide price by 15%, thereby obtaining a reasonable price range for the supplier's products. The rationality of the actual pricing of the supplier's products is judged based on the reasonable price range, and unreasonable supplier products are marked. In actual applications, the lowered value can be selected and formulated based on historical data and the average actual selling price of the product by all merchants on the platform, thereby making the price range more reasonable and accurate.

[0024] In S2, determine whether the suspicious supplier is dealing with slow-selling and near-expiry products, specifically: S203: Obtain suspicious supplier information, obtain product prices of the supplier that are lower than the minimum guide price based on the suspicious supplier information, and record the product as a suspicious product; S204: Obtain the cost price of the suspicious product, obtain the actual price charged by the supplier of the suspicious product, and determine whether the actual price charged by the supplier of the suspicious product is less than the cost price of the suspicious product. If the actual price charged by the supplier of the suspicious product is less than the cost price of the suspicious product, record the suspicious product as a loss-making product. S205: Obtain the historical sales cycle of the supplier's loss-making products at a price lower than the cost price, and determine whether the historical sales cycle of the supplier's loss-making products at a price lower than the cost price is longer than 7 days. If the historical sales cycle of the supplier's loss-making products at a price lower than the cost price is longer than 7 days, record the supplier as a malicious competition supplier; if the historical sales cycle of the supplier's loss-making products at a price lower than the cost price is less than or equal to 7 days, record the supplier as a dumping supplier, and record the supplier's products as unsaleable and expiring products.

[0025] In this embodiment, whether the supplier is selling the product at a loss is determined by judging whether the supplier's actual pricing is lower than the cost price, and whether the supplier is continuously selling the product at a loss is determined by the length of time the supplier has been selling in this way. In this way, it is determined whether the supplier is attracting buyers for a long time at a price far below the cost price, and then the cost is recovered and profited by selling non-low-priced products in the store. At the same time, a certain selling period is also given to suppliers who sell at a low price in the short term to clear out their inventory, so that it is convenient for suppliers to dump unsold and expiring products, making the judgment result more humane and accurate.

[0026] In S2, the product guidance price is re-established based on the situation of unsaleable and near-expiry products and recorded as the revised guidance price, specifically: S206: Obtain the historical transaction prices of the unsaleable and near-expiry products from all merchants within 15 days up to today, and record them as the historical dumping transaction prices. Sum and average the daily historical dumping prices of all merchants to obtain the daily historical average dumping price. S207: Subtracting the historical average dumping price of each single day from the historical average dumping price of the previous day to obtain a historical average dumping price difference, summing all the historical average dumping price differences to obtain a historical dumping change value, and determining the relationship between the historical dumping change value and 0. If the historical dumping change value is greater than or equal to 0, the product is defined as a non-dumping product; if the historical dumping change value is less than 0, the product is defined as a dumping product. S208: Obtain the actual price of the dumped product from all merchants on the previous day and record it as the historical dumped transaction price. Sum and average all historical dumped transaction prices to obtain the corrected guide price of the product.

[0027] In this embodiment, the price fluctuations of the historical transaction prices of the product by all merchants are used to determine whether the price of the product is continuously falling, thereby determining whether the product is in the off-season, and then finalizing the product as a dumping product. Finally, a correction guide price is formulated based on the historical transaction price of the dumping product, so as to facilitate the re-correction of the product's guide price, and then facilitate the comprehensive determination of the product's guide price based on historical data and market conditions, making the product's guide price more accurate, and then facilitate the rapid adjustment of inaccurate guide prices based on market trends, to avoid the guide price being overly restricted by historical data.

[0028] In S3, it is determined whether the price adjustment is qualified after the supplier is reminded and warned. Specifically: S301: Set a rectification period, starting from the time a reminder warning is issued to the supplier. After the rectification period ends, obtain the actual price of the product of the supplier to be rectified and record it as the second actual price of the target product. S302: Obtain today's calibrated guidance price of the product, and obtain the lowest calibrated guidance price of the product by multiplying today's calibrated guidance price of the product by 0.85. Determine whether the target product's second actual pricing is less than the product's lowest calibrated guidance price. If the target product's second actual pricing is greater than or equal to the product's lowest calibrated guidance price, mark the product of the supplier to be rectified as qualified for price adjustment. If the target product's second actual pricing is less than the product's lowest calibrated guidance price, mark the product of the supplier to be rectified as unqualified for price adjustment.

[0029] In S3, if the price adjustment of the supplier to be rectified is still unqualified after the warning, the pricing of the supplier's products to be rectified will be selected according to the correction guidance price, specifically: S301: Obtain the current calibrated guide price of the product. Multiply the current calibrated guide price of the product by 0.85 to obtain the lowest calibrated guide price of the product. Multiply the current calibrated guide price of the product by 1.15 to obtain the highest calibrated guide price of the product. The pricing selection range of the calibrated guide price is obtained with the lowest calibrated guide price of the product as the lowest value and the highest calibrated guide price as the highest value. S302: Displaying the pricing selection range of the correction guidance price to the supplier to be rectified, and generating the actual pricing of the product of the supplier to be rectified based on the final pricing selection of the supplier to be rectified.

[0030] In this embodiment, the price selection range is formulated by correcting the guide price by 15% above and below, and the supplier is forced to list the product price within the price selection range, so as to avoid the phenomenon that such suppliers do not make rectifications after being reminded. In actual applications, the numerical range of downward and upward adjustments can be selected and formulated based on historical data and the average actual selling price of the product by all merchants on the platform, so that the price range is more reasonable and accurate.

[0031] In S3, adjust the product exposure rate of the supplier to be rectified based on the number of historical reminders of the supplier, specifically: S303: Setting a preset threshold for the number of historical reminders, obtaining the number of historical reminders for the supplier to be rectified, and obtaining the current product exposure rate of the supplier to be rectified; S304: Determine whether the number of historical reminders of the supplier to be rectified is greater than a preset threshold of historical reminders. If the number of historical reminders of the supplier to be rectified is less than or equal to the preset threshold of historical reminders, maintain the product exposure rate of the supplier to be rectified unchanged. If the number of historical reminders of the supplier to be rectified is greater than the preset threshold of historical reminders, execute S305. S305: Setting a preset threshold value for the reduction in product exposure rate, and obtaining the adjusted product exposure rate of the supplier to be rectified by subtracting the current product exposure rate of the supplier to be rectified from the preset threshold value for the reduction in product exposure rate.

[0032] In this embodiment, the credit behavior of the supplier is determined based on the number of historical reminders for this type of supplier, and finally the supplier is punished by reducing the exposure rate of the supplier's products, thereby preventing the supplier from intermittently trying to lower product prices and not giving this type of supplier the opportunity to exploit loopholes.

[0033] See also Figure 1-Figure 3 The present invention provides a B2B mall supplier price intelligent adjustment system, including the following modules: The guidance price setting module obtains the historical cost price and historical transaction price of the product, and sets the product's current guidance price based on the historical cost price and historical pricing; The guide price correction module obtains the actual pricing of the supplier's products and determines whether the supplier's actual pricing is reasonable based on the product guide price. If it is unreasonable, the supplier is recorded as a suspicious supplier. It is also determined whether the suspicious supplier is handling slow-moving and expiring products. If so, the product guide price is re-established based on the situation of the slow-moving and expiring products and recorded as the corrected guide price. If the suspicious supplier is not handling slow-moving and expiring products, the suspicious supplier is recorded as a supplier awaiting rectification. The supplier rectification control module gives reminders and warnings to suppliers to be rectified and urges price adjustments. It determines whether the price adjustments of suppliers to be rectified are qualified after the reminders and warnings. If the price adjustments of suppliers to be rectified are still unqualified after the reminders and warnings, the pricing of the products of the suppliers to be rectified will be selected according to the correction guidance price. The product exposure rate of the supplier to be rectified will be adjusted according to the number of historical reminders of the supplier to be rectified.

[0034] The above embodiments can be implemented in whole or in part by software, hardware, firmware, or any other combination thereof. When implemented using software, the above embodiments can be implemented in whole or in part in the form of a computer program product. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that the units and algorithm steps of the various examples described in conjunction with the embodiments disclosed herein can be implemented in electronic hardware, or a combination of computer software and electronic hardware. Whether these functions are performed in hardware or software depends on the specific application and design constraints of the technical solution.

[0035] The units described as separate components may or may not be physically separate, and the components shown as units may or may not be physical units, that is, they may be located in one place or distributed across multiple network units. Some or all of these units may be selected to achieve the purpose of this embodiment according to actual needs.

[0036] The above is only a specific implementation method of the present application, but the scope of protection of the present application is not limited thereto. Any technician familiar with this technical field can easily think of changes or replacements within the technical scope disclosed in this application, which should be covered by the scope of protection of the present application.

Claims

1. A method for intelligently adjusting supplier prices in a B2B shopping mall, characterized in that: The steps include: S1: Obtain the historical cost price and historical transaction price of the product, and formulate the product's current guide price based on the historical cost price and historical pricing; S2: Obtain the actual pricing of the supplier's products, and determine whether the supplier's actual pricing is reasonable based on the product guidance price. If it is unreasonable, record the supplier as a suspicious supplier, and determine whether the suspicious supplier is handling unsaleable and expiring products. If the suspicious supplier is handling unsaleable and expiring products, re-establish the product guidance price based on the situation of the unsaleable and expiring products and record it as the corrected guidance price. If the suspicious supplier is not handling unsaleable and expiring products, record the suspicious supplier as a supplier to be rectified. S3: Give reminders and warnings to suppliers to be rectified and urge them to adjust prices. Determine whether the price adjustment of suppliers to be rectified is qualified after the reminders and warnings. If the price adjustment of suppliers to be rectified is still unqualified after the reminders and warnings, select prices for the products of suppliers to be rectified according to the correction guidance price, and adjust the product exposure rate of the supplier to be rectified according to the number of historical reminders of the supplier to be rectified.

2. A B2B mall supplier price intelligent adjustment method according to claim 1, characterized in that: S1 is specifically: S101: Obtain the historical cost price of the product, obtain the historical transaction price of the product, and calculate the daily historical gross profit of the product by subtracting the daily historical transaction price from the historical cost price of the product. S102: Arrange all historical gross profits of the product in order of date, and calculate the historical gross profit difference of the product by subtracting the historical gross profit of the product on the current day from the historical gross profit of the product on the previous day; S103: Sum and average all historical gross profit margins to obtain the mean of historical gross profit margins, obtain today's product cost price, and sum the mean of historical gross profit margins and today's product cost price to obtain today's product guide price.

3. The method for intelligently adjusting supplier prices in a B2B shopping mall according to claim 1, characterized in that: In S2, the actual pricing of the supplier's products is obtained, and the supplier's actual pricing is judged to be reasonable based on the product guide price. If it is unreasonable, the supplier is recorded as a suspicious supplier. Specifically: S201: Obtain the product's current recommended price, and multiply the product's current recommended price by 0.85 to obtain the product's lowest recommended price; S202: Obtain the actual pricing of the supplier's products, and determine whether the supplier's actual pricing is reasonable by comparing the supplier's actual pricing with the product's minimum guide price. If the supplier's actual pricing is greater than or equal to the product's minimum guide price, then the supplier's actual pricing of the product is recorded as reasonable. If the supplier's actual pricing is less than the product's minimum guide price, then the supplier's actual pricing of the product is recorded as unreasonable, and the supplier is recorded as a suspicious supplier.

4. A B2B mall supplier price intelligent adjustment method according to claim 3, characterized in that: In S2, determine whether the suspicious supplier is dealing with slow-selling and near-expiry products, specifically: S203: Obtain suspicious supplier information, obtain product prices of the supplier that are lower than the minimum guide price based on the suspicious supplier information, and record the product as a suspicious product; S204: Obtain the cost price of the suspicious product, obtain the actual price charged by the supplier of the suspicious product, and determine whether the actual price charged by the supplier of the suspicious product is less than the cost price of the suspicious product. If the actual price charged by the supplier of the suspicious product is less than the cost price of the suspicious product, record the suspicious product as a loss-making product. S205: Obtain the historical sales cycle of the supplier's loss-making products at a price lower than the cost price, and determine whether the historical sales cycle of the supplier's loss-making products at a price lower than the cost price is longer than 7 days. If the historical sales cycle of the supplier's loss-making products at a price lower than the cost price is longer than 7 days, record the supplier as a malicious competition supplier; if the historical sales cycle of the supplier's loss-making products at a price lower than the cost price is less than or equal to 7 days, record the supplier as a dumping supplier, and record the supplier's products as unsaleable and expiring products.

5. The method for intelligently adjusting supplier prices in a B2B shopping mall according to claim 4, characterized in that: In S2, the product guidance price is re-established based on the situation of unsaleable and near-expiry products and recorded as the revised guidance price, specifically: S206: Obtain the historical transaction prices of the unsaleable and near-expiry products from all merchants within 15 days up to today, and record them as the historical dumping transaction prices. Sum and average the daily historical dumping prices of all merchants to obtain the daily historical average dumping price. S207: Subtracting the historical average dumping price of each single day from the historical average dumping price of the previous day to obtain a historical average dumping price difference, summing all the historical average dumping price differences to obtain a historical dumping change value, and determining the relationship between the historical dumping change value and 0. If the historical dumping change value is greater than or equal to 0, the product is defined as a non-dumping product; if the historical dumping change value is less than 0, the product is defined as a dumping product. S208: Obtain the actual price of the dumped product from all merchants on the previous day and record it as the historical dumped transaction price. Sum and average all historical dumped transaction prices to obtain the corrected guide price of the product.

6. The method for intelligently adjusting supplier prices in a B2B shopping mall according to claim 1, characterized in that: In S3, it is determined whether the price adjustment is qualified after the supplier is reminded and warned. Specifically: S301: Set a rectification period, starting from the time a reminder warning is issued to the supplier. After the rectification period ends, obtain the actual price of the product of the supplier to be rectified and record it as the second actual price of the target product. S302: Obtain today's calibrated guidance price of the product, and obtain the lowest calibrated guidance price of the product by multiplying today's calibrated guidance price of the product by 0.

85. Determine whether the target product's second actual pricing is less than the product's lowest calibrated guidance price. If the target product's second actual pricing is greater than or equal to the product's lowest calibrated guidance price, mark the product of the supplier to be rectified as qualified for price adjustment. If the target product's second actual pricing is less than the product's lowest calibrated guidance price, mark the product of the supplier to be rectified as unqualified for price adjustment.

7. The method for intelligently adjusting supplier prices in a B2B shopping mall according to claim 1, characterized in that: In S3, if the price adjustment of the supplier to be rectified is still unqualified after the warning, the pricing of the supplier's products to be rectified will be selected according to the correction guidance price, specifically: S301: Obtain the current calibrated guide price of the product. Multiply the current calibrated guide price of the product by 0.85 to obtain the lowest calibrated guide price of the product. Multiply the current calibrated guide price of the product by 1.15 to obtain the highest calibrated guide price of the product. The pricing selection range of the calibrated guide price is obtained with the lowest calibrated guide price of the product as the lowest value and the highest calibrated guide price as the highest value. S302: Displaying the pricing selection range of the correction guidance price to the supplier to be rectified, and generating the actual pricing of the product of the supplier to be rectified based on the final pricing selection of the supplier to be rectified.

8. The method for intelligently adjusting supplier prices in a B2B shopping mall according to claim 1, characterized in that: In S3, adjust the product exposure rate of the supplier to be rectified based on the number of historical reminders of the supplier, specifically: S303: Setting a preset threshold for the number of historical reminders, obtaining the number of historical reminders for the supplier to be rectified, and obtaining the current product exposure rate of the supplier to be rectified; S304: Determine whether the number of historical reminders of the supplier to be rectified is greater than a preset threshold of historical reminders. If the number of historical reminders of the supplier to be rectified is less than or equal to the preset threshold of historical reminders, maintain the product exposure rate of the supplier to be rectified unchanged. If the number of historical reminders of the supplier to be rectified is greater than the preset threshold of historical reminders, execute S305. S305: Setting a preset threshold value for the reduction in product exposure rate, and obtaining the adjusted product exposure rate of the supplier to be rectified by subtracting the current product exposure rate of the supplier to be rectified from the preset threshold value for the reduction in product exposure rate.

9. A B2B mall supplier price intelligent adjustment system, applied to a B2B mall supplier price intelligent adjustment method according to any one of claims 1 to 8, characterized in that: Includes the following modules: The guidance price setting module obtains the historical cost price and historical transaction price of the product, and sets the product's current guidance price based on the historical cost price and historical pricing; The guide price correction module obtains the actual pricing of the supplier's products and determines whether the supplier's actual pricing is reasonable based on the product guide price. If it is unreasonable, the supplier is recorded as a suspicious supplier. It is also determined whether the suspicious supplier is handling slow-moving and expiring products. If so, the product guide price is re-established based on the situation of the slow-moving and expiring products and recorded as the corrected guide price. If the suspicious supplier is not handling slow-moving and expiring products, the suspicious supplier is recorded as a supplier awaiting rectification. The supplier rectification control module gives reminders and warnings to suppliers to be rectified and urges price adjustments. It determines whether the price adjustments of suppliers to be rectified are qualified after the reminders and warnings. If the price adjustments of suppliers to be rectified are still unqualified after the reminders and warnings, the pricing of the products of the suppliers to be rectified will be selected according to the correction guidance price. The product exposure rate of the supplier to be rectified will be adjusted according to the number of historical reminders of the supplier to be rectified.

Images