Progress assessment method and device of nuclear power project and electronic equipment

Abstract

The invention provides a progress evaluation method and device of a nuclear power project and electronic equipment, and relates to the technical field of data processing. The method comprises the following steps: acquiring the number of completed nodes in a current nuclear power project stage; wherein the nuclear power project stage is at least one of a factory site general selection stage, a preliminary feasibility research stage, a project proposal stage, a feasibility research stage and a project application stage; each nuclear power project stage comprises at least one node; obtaining a weight corresponding to the current nuclear power project stage; and determining the progress of the nuclear power project based on the number of completed nodes in the current nuclear power project stage and the weight corresponding to the current nuclear power project stage. Therefore, the project progress can be accurately calculated, and the progress evaluation efficiency and accuracy are improved.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] This application relates to the field of data processing technology, specifically to the field of nuclear power project management technology and the field of network and information technology, and in particular to a method, apparatus and electronic equipment for assessing the progress of nuclear power projects. Background Technology

[0002] Among related technologies, developing nuclear power is a crucial measure in energy strategy. The preliminary work for a nuclear power project refers to all preparatory work carried out before the first batch of concrete is poured for the nuclear island's foundation. This typically includes site selection, preliminary feasibility studies, and feasibility studies. Project approval is only pursued after the feasibility study stage. The preliminary work for nuclear power projects is a critical step in engineering safety, project investment control, and quality control, playing a decisive role in the safety of the entire nuclear power plant operation. Currently, the preliminary work assessment for nuclear power projects is usually conducted manually, resulting in a lengthy assessment process and low efficiency. Summary of the Invention

[0003] This application aims to at least partially address one of the technical problems in the related art.

[0004] To achieve the above objectives, the first aspect of this application proposes a method for assessing the progress of a nuclear power project, comprising:

[0005] Obtain the number of completed nodes in the current nuclear power project phase; wherein, the nuclear power project phase is at least one of the following: site selection phase, preliminary feasibility study phase, project proposal phase, feasibility study phase, and project application phase; each nuclear power project phase includes at least one node;

[0006] Obtain the weight corresponding to the current stage of the nuclear power project;

[0007] The progress of the nuclear power project is determined based on the number of completed nodes in the current nuclear power project phase and the weight corresponding to the current nuclear power project phase.

[0008] To achieve the above objectives, a second aspect of this application provides a nuclear power project progress assessment apparatus, comprising:

[0009] The data acquisition module is used to acquire the number of completed nodes in the current nuclear power project phase; wherein, the nuclear power project phase is at least one of the following: site selection phase, preliminary feasibility study phase, project proposal phase, feasibility study phase, and project application phase; each nuclear power project phase includes at least one node;

[0010] The weight acquisition module is used to acquire the weight corresponding to the current stage of the nuclear power project.

[0011] The progress assessment module is used to determine the progress of the nuclear power project based on the number of completed nodes in the current nuclear power project phase and the weight corresponding to the current nuclear power project phase.

[0012] To achieve the above objectives, a third aspect of this application provides an electronic device, comprising: at least one processor, and a memory communicatively connected to the processor;

[0013] The memory stores computer-executable instructions;

[0014] The processor executes computer execution instructions stored in the memory to implement the method as described in any of the first aspects above.

[0015] To achieve the above objectives, a fourth aspect of this application provides a computer-readable storage medium storing computer-executable instructions that, when executed by a processor, are used to implement the method described in any of the first aspects above.

[0016] To achieve the above objectives, a fifth aspect of this application provides a computer program product including a computer program that, when executed by a processor, implements the method described in any of the first aspects above.

[0017] The method, apparatus, and electronic equipment for assessing the progress of nuclear power projects provided in this application obtain the number of completed nodes in the current nuclear power project stage. The nuclear power project stage includes at least one of the following: site selection stage, preliminary feasibility study stage, project proposal stage, feasibility study stage, and project application stage. Each nuclear power project stage includes at least one node. The method obtains the weight corresponding to the current nuclear power project stage. Based on the number of completed nodes in the current nuclear power project stage and the corresponding weight, the progress of the nuclear power project is determined. Thus, by obtaining the number of completed nodes and their corresponding weights in the current nuclear power project stage, the project progress can be accurately calculated. This effectively shortens the assessment cycle and improves assessment efficiency. Furthermore, it avoids subjective judgment, reflects progress in real time, facilitates timely adjustments to the project plan, and improves the efficiency and accuracy of progress assessment.

[0018] Additional aspects and advantages of this application will be set forth in part in the description which follows, and in part will be obvious from the description, or may be learned by practice of this application. Attached Figure Description

[0019] The above and / or additional aspects and advantages of this application will become apparent and readily understood from the following description of the embodiments taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein:

[0020] Figure 1 A flowchart illustrating a method for assessing the progress of a nuclear power project, provided as an embodiment of this application;

[0021] Figure 2 This is a schematic diagram of the preliminary workflow of a nuclear power project provided in an embodiment of this application;

[0022] Figure 3 This is a schematic diagram of the structure of a nuclear power project progress assessment device provided in an embodiment of this application. Detailed Implementation

[0023] The embodiments of this application are described in detail below. Examples of these embodiments are shown in the accompanying drawings, wherein the same or similar reference numerals denote the same or similar elements or elements having the same or similar functions throughout. The embodiments described below with reference to the accompanying drawings are exemplary and intended to explain this application, and should not be construed as limiting this application.

[0024] The following description, with reference to the accompanying drawings, outlines a method, apparatus, and electronic equipment for assessing the progress of nuclear power projects according to embodiments of this application.

[0025] Figure 1 This is a flowchart illustrating a method for assessing the progress of a nuclear power project, as provided in an embodiment of this application.

[0026] like Figure 1 As shown, the progress assessment method for this nuclear power project includes the following steps:

[0027] S101, retrieve the number of nodes completed in the current nuclear power project phase.

[0028] The nuclear power project is divided into at least one of the following stages: site selection, preliminary feasibility study, project proposal, feasibility study, and project application; each nuclear power project stage includes at least one node.

[0029] In the embodiments of this application, the current stage of the nuclear power project can be determined first, such as at least one of the following: site selection stage, preliminary feasibility study stage, project proposal stage, feasibility study stage, and project application stage. Then, the number of completed nodes in the current nuclear power project stage can be determined. For example, during project progress, completed nodes in each stage can be marked in real time using project management software or paper records, and then a simple count can be performed on the completed nodes in the current stage to obtain the total number of completed nodes.

[0030] S102, obtain the weight corresponding to the current nuclear power project stage.

[0031] In embodiments of this application, the weight corresponding to the current nuclear power project stage can also be obtained. Each nuclear power project stage may have its own weight, and the weights of different nuclear power project stages may be the same or different. For example, after confirming the specific stage of the current project, the corresponding weight value can be directly looked up based on the current stage.

[0032] S103. Based on the number of completed nodes in the current nuclear power project phase and the weight corresponding to the current nuclear power project phase, determine the progress of the nuclear power project.

[0033] In the embodiments of this application, after obtaining the number of completed nodes in the current nuclear power project phase and the weight corresponding to the current nuclear power project phase, the completion progress of the current nuclear power project phase can be calculated based on the number of completed nodes in the current nuclear power project phase and the weight corresponding to the current nuclear power project phase, thereby determining the progress of the nuclear power project. For example, the progress of the entire nuclear power project can be determined by the contribution of the completed phases.

[0034] The method, apparatus, and electronic equipment for assessing the progress of nuclear power projects provided in this application obtain the number of completed nodes in the current nuclear power project stage. The nuclear power project stage includes at least one of the following: site selection stage, preliminary feasibility study stage, project proposal stage, feasibility study stage, and project application stage. Each nuclear power project stage includes at least one node. The method obtains the weight corresponding to the current nuclear power project stage. Based on the number of completed nodes in the current nuclear power project stage and the corresponding weight, the progress of the nuclear power project is determined. Thus, by obtaining the number of completed nodes and their corresponding weights in the current nuclear power project stage, the project progress can be accurately calculated. This effectively shortens the assessment cycle and improves assessment efficiency. Furthermore, it avoids subjective judgment, reflects progress in real time, facilitates timely adjustments to the project plan, and improves the efficiency and accuracy of progress assessment.

[0035] In some possible implementations, before obtaining the number of nodes completed in the current nuclear power project phase, the following steps are also included:

[0036] Define the number of nodes for each phase of a nuclear power project; the early stage of a nuclear power project includes the site selection phase, the preliminary feasibility study phase, the project proposal phase, the feasibility study phase, and the project application phase.

[0037] Define the weight corresponding to each stage of a nuclear power project; the sum of the weights for the site selection stage, preliminary feasibility study stage, project proposal stage, feasibility study stage, and project application stage is 1.

[0038] The site selection phase includes the preparation of the selection report and the review of the selection report, with two stages.

[0039] The preliminary feasibility study stage includes the preparation of a special report, the preparation of N supplementary preliminary feasibility study special reports, the preparation of the preliminary feasibility study report, and the review of the preliminary feasibility study report, with a+N+2 nodes in total.

[0040] The feasibility study phase includes the preparation of b special reports, the preparation of M supplementary feasibility study special reports, the preparation of the feasibility study report, and the review of the feasibility study report, with a total of b+M+2 nodes.

[0041] In the embodiments of this application, see Figure 2 The number of nodes and weights for each stage of a nuclear power project can be defined in advance. For example, the site selection stage is divided into two nodes: the preparation of the site selection report and the review of the site selection report, with a node count of 2 and a weight of i1. The preliminary feasibility study stage is divided into nodes including the preparation of a thematic reports (such as the collection and statistical analysis of regional climate and conventional meteorological observation data), the preparation of N supplementary preliminary feasibility study thematic reports, the preparation of the preliminary feasibility study report, and the review of the preliminary feasibility study report, with a node count of a+N+2 and a weight of i2. The project proposal stage has a weight of i4. The feasibility study stage is divided into nodes including the preparation of b thematic reports (such as the preparation of the water area survey report), the preparation of M supplementary feasibility study thematic reports, the preparation of the feasibility study report, and the review of the feasibility study report, with a node count of b+M+2 and a weight of i3. The project application stage has a weight of i5.

[0042] In some possible implementations, if the current nuclear power project phase is the site selection phase, the progress of the nuclear power project is calculated based on the number of completed milestones in the current phase and the weight corresponding to the current phase, as follows:

[0043]

[0044] Where P represents the progress of the nuclear power project at the current site selection stage; t1 represents the number of completed nodes in the site selection stage, t1≤2; i1, i2, i3, i4, and i5 represent the weights corresponding to the site selection stage, preliminary feasibility study stage, project proposal stage, feasibility study stage, and project application stage, respectively; a represents the number of special reports prepared in the preliminary feasibility study stage; N represents the number of supplementary preliminary feasibility study special reports prepared in the preliminary feasibility study stage; b represents the number of special reports prepared in the feasibility study stage; and M represents the number of supplementary feasibility study special reports prepared in the feasibility study stage.

[0045] In some possible implementations, if the current nuclear power project is in the preliminary feasibility study stage, the progress of the nuclear power project is calculated based on the number of completed milestones in the current stage and the corresponding weight of the current stage, as follows:

[0046]

[0047] Where P represents the nuclear power project progress at the current stage of the preliminary feasibility study; t1 represents the number of nodes completed in the site selection stage; t2 represents the number of nodes completed in the preliminary feasibility study stage, t2≤a+N+2; i1, i2, i3, i4, and i5 represent the weights corresponding to the site selection stage, preliminary feasibility study stage, project proposal stage, feasibility study stage, and project application stage, respectively; a represents the number of special reports prepared in the preliminary feasibility study stage; N represents the number of supplementary preliminary feasibility study special reports prepared in the preliminary feasibility study stage; b represents the number of special reports prepared in the feasibility study stage; and M represents the number of supplementary feasibility study special reports prepared in the feasibility study stage.

[0048] In some possible implementations, if the current nuclear power project stage is the project proposal stage, the progress of the nuclear power project is calculated based on the number of completed milestones in the current nuclear power project stage and the weight corresponding to the current nuclear power project stage, as follows:

[0049]

[0050] Where P represents the nuclear power project progress at the current stage of the project proposal stage; t1 represents the number of nodes completed in the site selection stage; t2 represents the number of nodes completed in the preliminary feasibility study stage, t2≤a+N+2; t3 represents the completion status of node d in the project proposal stage, t3=0 when not completed, and t3=1 when completed; i1, i2, i3, i4, and i5 represent the weights corresponding to the site selection stage, preliminary feasibility study stage, project proposal stage, feasibility study stage, and project application stage, respectively; a represents the number of special reports prepared in the preliminary feasibility study stage; N represents the number of supplementary preliminary feasibility study special reports prepared in the preliminary feasibility study stage; b represents the number of special reports prepared in the feasibility study stage; and M represents the number of supplementary feasibility study special reports prepared in the feasibility study stage.

[0051] In some possible implementations, if the current nuclear power project is in the feasibility study stage, the progress of the nuclear power project is calculated based on the number of completed milestones in the current stage and the weight corresponding to the current stage, as follows:

[0052]

[0053] Where P represents the nuclear power project progress at the current stage of feasibility study; t1 represents the number of nodes completed in the site selection stage; t2 represents the number of nodes completed in the preliminary feasibility study stage, t2≤a+N+2; t3 represents the completion status of node d in the project proposal stage, t3=0 when not completed, and t3=1 when completed; t4 represents the number of nodes completed in the feasibility study stage, t4≤b+M+2; i1, i2, i3, i4, and i5 represent the weights corresponding to the site selection stage, preliminary feasibility study stage, project proposal stage, feasibility study stage, and project application stage, respectively; a represents the number of special reports prepared in the preliminary feasibility study stage; N represents the number of supplementary preliminary feasibility study special reports prepared in the preliminary feasibility study stage; b represents the number of special reports prepared in the feasibility study stage; and M represents the number of supplementary feasibility study special reports prepared in the feasibility study stage.

[0054] In some possible implementations, if the current nuclear power project stage is the project application report stage, the progress of the nuclear power project is calculated based on the number of completed nodes in the current nuclear power project stage and the weight corresponding to the current nuclear power project stage, as follows:

[0055]

[0056] Where P represents the nuclear power project progress at the current stage of the project application report stage; t1 represents the number of nodes completed in the site selection stage; t2 represents the number of nodes completed in the preliminary feasibility study stage, t2≤a+N+2; t3 represents the completion status of node d in the project proposal stage, t3=0 when not completed, t3=1 when completed; t4 represents the number of nodes completed in the feasibility study stage, t4≤b+M+2; t5 represents the completion status of nodes in the project application report stage, t5=0 when not completed, t5=1 when completed; i1, i2, i3, i4, and i5 represent the weights corresponding to the site selection stage, preliminary feasibility study stage, project proposal stage, feasibility study stage, and project application stage, respectively; a represents the number of special reports prepared in the preliminary feasibility study stage; N represents the number of supplementary preliminary feasibility study special reports prepared in the preliminary feasibility study stage; b represents the number of special reports prepared in the feasibility study stage; and M represents the number of supplementary feasibility study special reports prepared in the feasibility study stage.

[0057] This approach enables accurate assessment of nuclear power project progress, effectively shortening the assessment cycle and improving assessment efficiency. Simultaneously, it avoids subjective judgment, reflects progress in real time, facilitates timely adjustments to project plans, and enhances the efficiency and accuracy of progress assessment.

[0058] Based on the same concept, a nuclear power plant pre-project management system is also provided, which includes modules for site selection, preliminary feasibility studies, project proposals, feasibility studies, and project applications. It features functions such as project schedule control, data and document management, and system authorization.

[0059] The nuclear power plant pre-project management system can perform the following processing:

[0060] ①Based on the agreed nuclear power early-stage progress evaluation method (nuclear power project progress assessment method), the system can calculate and display the progress of a specific project, visually evaluate the project progress, and carry out project management.

[0061] ②The site selection module, preliminary feasibility study module, project proposal module, feasibility study module, and project application module can provide the workflow for each stage, including a list of topics, the main templates and contents of topic reports, the average time to complete a topic, and the preceding and subsequent nodes.

[0062] ③ Each node prompts the key points of the current node's work, including relevant regulations and review requirements, work results reports of similar projects, and records and archives of work reports at each stage.

[0063] ④ The system is set to display a progress chart and calculate the completion percentage based on the project progress evaluation.

[0064] ⑤ The system has an authorization management system and completes the authorization of relevant personnel according to the work at each stage.

[0065] To achieve the above embodiments, this application also proposes a device for evaluating the progress of nuclear power projects.

[0066] Figure 3 This is a schematic diagram of the structure of a nuclear power project progress assessment device provided in an embodiment of this application.

[0067] like Figure 3 As shown, the progress assessment device 300 for the nuclear power project includes:

[0068] The data acquisition module 310 is used to acquire the number of completed nodes in the current nuclear power project stage; wherein, the nuclear power project stage is at least one of the following: site selection stage, preliminary feasibility study stage, project proposal stage, feasibility study stage, and project application stage; each nuclear power project stage includes at least one node;

[0069] The weight acquisition module 320 is used to acquire the weight corresponding to the current stage of the nuclear power project.

[0070] The progress assessment module 330 is used to determine the progress of the nuclear power project based on the number of nodes completed in the current nuclear power project phase and the weight corresponding to the current nuclear power project phase.

[0071] In some possible implementations, predefined modules are also included for:

[0072] Define the number of nodes for each phase of the nuclear power project; wherein, the early stage of a nuclear power project includes the site selection phase, the preliminary feasibility study phase, the project proposal phase, the feasibility study phase, and the project application phase;

[0073] Define the weight corresponding to each stage of the nuclear power project; wherein the sum of the weights corresponding to the site selection stage, preliminary feasibility study stage, project proposal stage, feasibility study stage and project application stage is 1.

[0074] In some possible implementations, the site selection phase includes the preparation of a selection report and the review of the selection report, with a total of 2 stages;

[0075] The preliminary feasibility study stage includes the preparation of a special report, the preparation of N supplementary preliminary feasibility study special reports, the preparation of the preliminary feasibility study report, and the review of the preliminary feasibility study report, with the number of nodes being a+N+2.

[0076] The feasibility study phase includes the preparation of b special reports, the preparation of M supplementary feasibility study special reports, the preparation of the feasibility study report, and the review of the feasibility study report, with a total of b+M+2 nodes.

[0077] In some possible implementations, if the current nuclear power project phase is the site selection phase, the calculation method for determining the progress of the nuclear power project based on the number of completed nodes in the current nuclear power project phase and the weight corresponding to the current nuclear power project phase is as follows:

[0078]

[0079] Where P represents the progress of the nuclear power project at the current site selection stage; t1 represents the number of completed nodes in the site selection stage, t1≤2; i1, i2, i3, i4, and i5 are the weights corresponding to the site selection stage, the preliminary feasibility study stage, the project proposal stage, the feasibility study stage, and the project application stage, respectively; a represents the number of special reports prepared in the preliminary feasibility study stage; N represents the number of supplementary preliminary feasibility study special reports prepared in the preliminary feasibility study stage; b represents the number of special reports prepared in the feasibility study stage; and M represents the number of supplementary feasibility study special reports prepared in the feasibility study stage.

[0080] In some possible implementations, if the current nuclear power project stage is the preliminary feasibility study stage, the calculation method for determining the progress of the nuclear power project based on the number of completed nodes in the current nuclear power project stage and the weight corresponding to the current nuclear power project stage is as follows:

[0081]

[0082] Where P represents the nuclear power project progress at the current stage of the preliminary feasibility study; t1 represents the number of nodes completed in the site selection stage; t2 represents the number of nodes completed in the preliminary feasibility study stage, t2≤a+N+2; i1, i2, i3, i4, and i5 represent the weights corresponding to the site selection stage, the preliminary feasibility study stage, the project proposal stage, the feasibility study stage, and the project application stage, respectively; a represents the number of special reports prepared in the preliminary feasibility study stage; N represents the number of supplementary preliminary feasibility study special reports prepared in the preliminary feasibility study stage; b represents the number of special reports prepared in the feasibility study stage; and M represents the number of supplementary feasibility study special reports prepared in the feasibility study stage.

[0083] In some possible implementations, if the current nuclear power project stage is the project proposal stage, the calculation method for determining the progress of the nuclear power project based on the number of completed nodes in the current nuclear power project stage and the weight corresponding to the current nuclear power project stage is as follows:

[0084]

[0085] Where P represents the nuclear power project progress at the current stage of the project proposal stage; t1 represents the number of nodes completed in the site selection stage; t2 represents the number of nodes completed in the preliminary feasibility study stage, t2≤a+N+2; t3 represents the completion status of node d in the project proposal stage, t3=0 when not completed, and t3=1 when completed; i1, i2, i3, i4, and i5 represent the weights corresponding to the site selection stage, the preliminary feasibility study stage, the project proposal stage, the feasibility study stage, and the project application stage, respectively; a represents the number of special reports prepared in the preliminary feasibility study stage; N represents the number of supplementary preliminary feasibility study special reports prepared in the preliminary feasibility study stage; b represents the number of special reports prepared in the feasibility study stage; and M represents the number of supplementary feasibility study special reports prepared in the feasibility study stage.

[0086] In some possible implementations, if the current nuclear power project stage is the feasibility study stage, the calculation method for determining the progress of the nuclear power project based on the number of completed nodes in the current nuclear power project stage and the weight corresponding to the current nuclear power project stage is as follows:

[0087]

[0088] Where P represents the nuclear power project progress at the current stage of feasibility study; t1 represents the number of nodes completed in the site selection stage; t2 represents the number of nodes completed in the preliminary feasibility study stage, t2≤a+N+2; t3 represents the completion status of node d in the project proposal stage, t3=0 when not completed, and t3=1 when completed; t4 represents the number of nodes completed in the feasibility study stage, t4≤b+M+2; i1, i2, i3, i4, and i5 are the weights corresponding to the site selection stage, the preliminary feasibility study stage, the project proposal stage, the feasibility study stage, and the project application stage, respectively; a represents the number of special reports prepared in the preliminary feasibility study stage; N represents the number of supplementary preliminary feasibility study special reports prepared in the preliminary feasibility study stage; b represents the number of special reports prepared in the feasibility study stage; and M represents the number of supplementary feasibility study special reports prepared in the feasibility study stage.

[0089] In some possible implementations, if the current nuclear power project stage is the project application report stage, the calculation method for determining the progress of the nuclear power project based on the number of completed nodes in the current nuclear power project stage and the weight corresponding to the current nuclear power project stage is as follows:

[0090]

[0091] Wherein, P represents the nuclear power project progress at the current stage of the project application report stage; t1 represents the number of completed nodes in the site selection stage; t2 represents the number of completed nodes in the preliminary feasibility study stage, t2≤a+N+2; t3 represents the completion status of node d in the project proposal stage, t3=0 when not completed, t3=1 when completed; t4 represents the number of completed nodes in the feasibility study stage, t4≤b+M+2; t5 represents the completion status of nodes in the project application report stage, t5=0 when not completed, t5=1 when completed; i1, i2, i3, i4, and i5 are the weights corresponding to the site selection stage, the preliminary feasibility study stage, the project proposal stage, the feasibility study stage, and the project application stage, respectively; a represents the number of special reports prepared in the preliminary feasibility study stage, N represents the number of supplementary preliminary feasibility study special reports prepared in the preliminary feasibility study stage, b represents the number of special reports prepared in the feasibility study stage, and M represents the number of supplementary feasibility study special reports prepared in the feasibility study stage.

[0092] To implement the above embodiments, this application also proposes an electronic device, including: a processor and a memory communicatively connected to the processor; the memory stores computer execution instructions; the processor executes the computer execution instructions stored in the memory to implement the method provided in the foregoing embodiments.

[0093] To implement the above embodiments, this application also proposes a computer-readable storage medium storing computer-executable instructions, which, when executed by a processor, are used to implement the methods provided in the foregoing embodiments.

[0094] To implement the above embodiments, this application also proposes a computer program product, including a computer program that, when executed by a processor, implements the methods provided in the foregoing embodiments.

[0095] The collection, storage, use, processing, transmission, provision, and disclosure of user personal information involved in this application all comply with the provisions of relevant laws and regulations and do not violate public order and good morals.

[0096] It should be noted that personal information collected from users should be used for legitimate and reasonable purposes and should not be shared or sold outside of these legitimate uses. Furthermore, such collection / sharing should only be conducted after receiving the user's informed consent, including but not limited to notifying the user to read the user agreement / user notice and sign an agreement / authorization that includes authorization of relevant user information before the user uses the function. In addition, any necessary steps must be taken to protect and safeguard access to such personal information data and ensure that others with access to personal information data comply with their privacy policies and procedures.

[0097] This application is intended to provide an implementation scheme for users to selectively prevent the use or access to their personal information data. Specifically, this application is intended to provide hardware and / or software to prevent or block access to such personal information data. Once personal information data is no longer needed, risks can be minimized by restricting data collection and deleting data. Furthermore, where applicable, such personal information is de-identified to protect user privacy.

[0098] In the foregoing descriptions of the embodiments, the terms "one embodiment," "some embodiments," "example," "specific example," or "some examples," etc., refer to specific features, structures, materials, or characteristics described in connection with that embodiment or example, which are included in at least one embodiment or example of this application. In this specification, the illustrative expressions of the above terms do not necessarily refer to the same embodiment or example. Furthermore, the specific features, structures, materials, or characteristics described may be combined in any suitable manner in one or more embodiments or examples. Moreover, without contradiction, those skilled in the art can combine and integrate the different embodiments or examples described in this specification, as well as the features of different embodiments or examples.

[0099] Furthermore, the terms "first" and "second" are used for descriptive purposes only and should not be construed as indicating or implying relative importance or implicitly specifying the number of the technical features being referred to. Thus, a feature defined as "first" or "second" may explicitly or implicitly include at least one of such features. Throughout the description of this application, "plurality" means at least two, for example, two, three, etc., unless otherwise specifically defined.

[0100] Any process or method description in the flowchart or otherwise herein can be understood as representing a module, segment, or portion of code comprising one or more executable instructions for implementing custom logic functions or processes, and the scope of the preferred embodiments of this application includes additional implementations in which functions may be performed not in the order shown or discussed, including substantially simultaneously or in reverse order depending on the functions involved, as should be understood by those skilled in the art to which embodiments of this application pertain.

[0101] The logic and / or steps represented in the flowchart or otherwise described herein, for example, can be considered as a sequenced list of executable instructions for implementing logical functions, and can be embodied in any computer-readable medium for use by, or in conjunction with, an instruction execution system, apparatus, or device (such as a computer-based system, a processor-included system, or other system that can fetch and execute instructions from, an instruction execution system, apparatus, or device). For the purposes of this specification, "computer-readable medium" can be any means that can contain, store, communicate, propagate, or transmit programs for use by, or in conjunction with, an instruction execution system, apparatus, or device. More specific examples (a non-exhaustive list) of computer-readable media include: an electrical connection having one or more wires (electronic device), a portable computer disk drive (magnetic device), random access memory (RAM), read-only memory (ROM), erasable and editable read-only memory (EPROM or flash memory), fiber optic devices, and portable optical disc read-only memory (CDROM). Alternatively, the computer-readable medium may be paper or other suitable media on which the program can be printed, since the program can be obtained electronically, for example, by optically scanning the paper or other medium, followed by editing, interpreting, or otherwise processing as necessary, and then stored in a computer memory.

[0102] It should be understood that various parts of this application can be implemented using hardware, software, firmware, or a combination thereof. In the above embodiments, multiple steps or methods can be implemented using software or firmware stored in memory and executed by a suitable instruction execution system. For example, if implemented in hardware as in another embodiment, it can be implemented using any one or a combination of the following techniques known in the art: discrete logic circuits having logic gates for implementing logical functions on data signals, application-specific integrated circuits (ASICs) having suitable combinational logic gates, programmable gate arrays (PGAs), field-programmable gate arrays (FPGAs), etc.

[0103] Those skilled in the art will understand that all or part of the steps of the methods in the above embodiments can be implemented by a program instructing related hardware. The program can be stored in a computer-readable storage medium, and when executed, the program includes one or a combination of the steps of the method embodiments.

[0104] Furthermore, the functional units in the various embodiments of this application can be integrated into a processing module, or each unit can exist physically separately, or two or more units can be integrated into a module. The integrated module can be implemented in hardware or as a software functional module. If the integrated module is implemented as a software functional module and sold or used as an independent product, it can also be stored in a computer-readable storage medium.

[0105] The storage medium mentioned above can be a read-only memory, a disk, or an optical disk, etc. Although embodiments of this application have been shown and described above, it is understood that the above embodiments are exemplary and should not be construed as limiting this application. Those skilled in the art can make changes, modifications, substitutions, and variations to the above embodiments within the scope of this application.

Claims

1. A method for evaluating the progress of a nuclear power project, characterized in that, include: Obtain the number of completed nodes in the current nuclear power project phase; wherein, the nuclear power project phase is at least one of the following: site selection phase, preliminary feasibility study phase, project proposal phase, feasibility study phase, and project application phase; each nuclear power project phase includes at least one node; Obtain the weight corresponding to the current stage of the nuclear power project; The progress of the nuclear power project is determined based on the number of completed nodes in the current nuclear power project phase and the weight corresponding to the current nuclear power project phase.

2. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that, in, Before obtaining the number of completed nodes in the current nuclear power project phase, the process also includes: Define the number of nodes for each phase of the nuclear power project; wherein, the early stage of the nuclear power project includes the site selection phase, the preliminary feasibility study phase, the project proposal phase, the feasibility study phase, and the project application phase; Define the weight corresponding to each stage of the nuclear power project; wherein the sum of the weights corresponding to the site selection stage, preliminary feasibility study stage, project proposal stage, feasibility study stage and project application stage is 1.

3. The method according to claim 2, characterized in that, in, The site selection phase includes the preparation of the selection report and the review of the selection report, with two stages. The preliminary feasibility study stage includes the preparation of a special report, the preparation of N supplementary preliminary feasibility study special reports, the preparation of the preliminary feasibility study report, and the review of the preliminary feasibility study report, with the number of nodes being a+N+2. The feasibility study phase includes the preparation of b special reports, the preparation of M supplementary feasibility study special reports, the preparation of the feasibility study report, and the review of the feasibility study report, with a total of b+M+2 nodes.

4. The method according to claim 3, characterized in that, in, If the current nuclear power project stage is the site selection stage, the calculation method for determining the progress of the nuclear power project based on the number of completed nodes in the current nuclear power project stage and the weight corresponding to the current nuclear power project stage is as follows: Where P represents the progress of the nuclear power project at the current site selection stage; t1 represents the number of completed nodes in the site selection stage, t1≤2; i1, i2, i3, i4, and i5 are the weights corresponding to the site selection stage, the preliminary feasibility study stage, the project proposal stage, the feasibility study stage, and the project application stage, respectively; a represents the number of special reports prepared in the preliminary feasibility study stage; N represents the number of supplementary preliminary feasibility study special reports prepared in the preliminary feasibility study stage; b represents the number of special reports prepared in the feasibility study stage; and M represents the number of supplementary feasibility study special reports prepared in the feasibility study stage.

5. The method according to claim 3, characterized in that, in, If the current nuclear power project stage is the preliminary feasibility study stage, the calculation method for determining the progress of the nuclear power project based on the number of completed nodes in the current nuclear power project stage and the weight corresponding to the current nuclear power project stage is as follows: Where P represents the nuclear power project progress at the current stage of the preliminary feasibility study; t1 represents the number of nodes completed in the site selection stage; t2 represents the number of nodes completed in the preliminary feasibility study stage, t2≤a+N+2; i1, i2, i3, i4, and i5 represent the weights corresponding to the site selection stage, the preliminary feasibility study stage, the project proposal stage, the feasibility study stage, and the project application stage, respectively; a represents the number of special reports prepared in the preliminary feasibility study stage; N represents the number of supplementary preliminary feasibility study special reports prepared in the preliminary feasibility study stage; b represents the number of special reports prepared in the feasibility study stage; and M represents the number of supplementary feasibility study special reports prepared in the feasibility study stage.

6. The method according to claim 3, characterized in that, in, If the current nuclear power project stage is the project proposal stage, the calculation method for determining the progress of the nuclear power project based on the number of completed nodes in the current nuclear power project stage and the weight corresponding to the current nuclear power project stage is as follows: Where P represents the nuclear power project progress at the current stage of the project proposal stage; t1 represents the number of nodes completed in the site selection stage; t2 represents the number of nodes completed in the preliminary feasibility study stage, t2≤a+N+2; t3 represents the completion status of node d in the project proposal stage, t3=0 when not completed, and t3=1 when completed; i1, i2, i3, i4, and i5 represent the weights corresponding to the site selection stage, the preliminary feasibility study stage, the project proposal stage, the feasibility study stage, and the project application stage, respectively; a represents the number of special reports prepared in the preliminary feasibility study stage; N represents the number of supplementary preliminary feasibility study special reports prepared in the preliminary feasibility study stage; b represents the number of special reports prepared in the feasibility study stage; and M represents the number of supplementary feasibility study special reports prepared in the feasibility study stage.

7. The method according to claim 3, characterized in that, in, If the current nuclear power project stage is the feasibility study stage, the calculation method for determining the progress of the nuclear power project based on the number of completed nodes in the current nuclear power project stage and the weight corresponding to the current nuclear power project stage is as follows: Where P represents the nuclear power project progress at the current stage of feasibility study; t1 represents the number of nodes completed in the site selection stage; t2 represents the number of nodes completed in the preliminary feasibility study stage, t2≤a+N+2; t3 represents the completion status of node d in the project proposal stage, t3=0 when not completed, and t3=1 when completed; t4 represents the number of nodes completed in the feasibility study stage, t4≤b+M+2; i1, i2, i3, i4, and i5 are the weights corresponding to the site selection stage, the preliminary feasibility study stage, the project proposal stage, the feasibility study stage, and the project application stage, respectively; a represents the number of special reports prepared in the preliminary feasibility study stage; N represents the number of supplementary preliminary feasibility study special reports prepared in the preliminary feasibility study stage; b represents the number of special reports prepared in the feasibility study stage; and M represents the number of supplementary feasibility study special reports prepared in the feasibility study stage.

8. The method according to claim 3, characterized in that, in, If the current nuclear power project stage is the project application report stage, the calculation method for determining the progress of the nuclear power project based on the number of completed nodes in the current nuclear power project stage and the weight corresponding to the current nuclear power project stage is as follows: Wherein, P represents the nuclear power project progress at the current stage of the project application report stage; t1 represents the number of completed nodes in the site selection stage; t2 represents the number of completed nodes in the preliminary feasibility study stage, t2≤a+N+2; t3 represents the completion status of node d in the project proposal stage, t3=0 when not completed, t3=1 when completed; t4 represents the number of completed nodes in the feasibility study stage, t4≤b+M+2; t5 represents the completion status of nodes in the project application report stage, t5=0 when not completed, t5=1 when completed; i1, i2, i3, i4, and i5 are the weights corresponding to the site selection stage, the preliminary feasibility study stage, the project proposal stage, the feasibility study stage, and the project application stage, respectively; a represents the number of special reports prepared in the preliminary feasibility study stage, N represents the number of supplementary preliminary feasibility study special reports prepared in the preliminary feasibility study stage, b represents the number of special reports prepared in the feasibility study stage, and M represents the number of supplementary feasibility study special reports prepared in the feasibility study stage.

9. A progress assessment device for a nuclear power project, characterized in that, include: The data acquisition module is used to acquire the number of completed nodes in the current nuclear power project phase; wherein, the nuclear power project phase is at least one of the following: site selection phase, preliminary feasibility study phase, project proposal phase, feasibility study phase, and project application phase; each nuclear power project phase includes at least one node; The weight acquisition module is used to acquire the weight corresponding to the current stage of the nuclear power project. The progress assessment module is used to determine the progress of the nuclear power project based on the number of completed nodes in the current nuclear power project phase and the weight corresponding to the current nuclear power project phase.

10. An electronic device, characterized in that, include: At least one processor; as well as A memory communicatively connected to the at least one processor; wherein, The memory stores instructions that can be executed by the at least one processor to enable the at least one processor to perform the method of any one of claims 1-8.

Images