Nuclear power quality control interactive inspection method, device, equipment and medium

Abstract

The invention provides a nuclear power quality control interactive inspection method, device and equipment and a medium, and the method comprises the steps: determining a plurality of project stages of a nuclear power plant project, and enabling the project stages to comprise at least one project processing item; determining a quality control demand corresponding to each item processing item; determining a risk coefficient of a processing item of the corresponding project according to the quality control requirement; determining the importance weight of each project stage; and determining a quality control measure corresponding to the project processing item according to the risk coefficient and the importance weight, and obtaining project quality data based on the quality control measure. By implementing the method disclosed by the invention, adaptive quality control measures can be determined for different project processing items, so that the practicability and applicability of the obtained project quality data are ensured, and the interactive inspection effect of nuclear power quality control is effectively improved.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] This disclosure relates to the field of nuclear power plant maintenance management technology, specifically to an interactive inspection method, apparatus, equipment, and medium for nuclear power quality control. Background Technology

[0002] Interactive inspection methods for nuclear power quality control aim to improve the effectiveness of quality monitoring in nuclear power projects by enhancing cross-departmental collaboration and information sharing. However, the quality control needs of different sub-items in a nuclear power plant project may vary. Some critical sub-items may require strict quality monitoring, while other less critical sub-items may not require as many resources for quality control.

[0003] In related technologies, the interactive inspection of nuclear power quality control is not effective and cannot be adapted to different projects. Summary of the Invention

[0004] This disclosure aims to at least partially address one of the technical problems in the related art.

[0005] Therefore, the purpose of this disclosure is to propose an interactive inspection method, apparatus, computer equipment, and storage medium for nuclear power quality control, which can determine appropriate quality control measures for different project handling matters, thereby ensuring the practicality and applicability of the obtained project quality data, and thus effectively improving the interactive inspection effect of nuclear power quality control.

[0006] To achieve the above objectives, the interactive inspection method for nuclear power quality control proposed in the first aspect of this disclosure includes:

[0007] The nuclear power plant project is defined as having multiple project phases, wherein each project phase includes at least one project processing item;

[0008] Determine the quality control requirements for each of the aforementioned project processing items;

[0009] Based on the aforementioned quality control requirements, determine the risk coefficients for the corresponding project handling items;

[0010] Determine the importance weight of each project phase;

[0011] Based on the risk coefficient and the importance weight, determine the quality control measures corresponding to the project handling items, and obtain project quality data based on the quality control measures.

[0012] To achieve the above objectives, the interactive inspection device for nuclear power quality control proposed in the second aspect of this disclosure includes:

[0013] The first determining module is used to determine multiple project phases of a nuclear power plant project, wherein the project phase includes at least one project processing item;

[0014] The second determining module is used to determine the quality control requirements corresponding to each of the project processing items;

[0015] The third determining module is used to determine the risk coefficient of the corresponding project handling items based on the quality control requirements;

[0016] The fourth determination module is used to determine the importance weight of each project phase;

[0017] The fifth determination module is used to determine the quality control measures corresponding to the project processing items based on the risk coefficient and the importance weight, and to obtain project quality data based on the quality control measures.

[0018] The computer device proposed in the third aspect of this disclosure includes: a memory, a processor, and a computer program stored in the memory and executable on the processor, wherein the processor executes the program to implement the interactive inspection method for nuclear power quality control as proposed in the first aspect of this disclosure.

[0019] The fourth aspect of this disclosure provides a non-transitory computer-readable storage medium having a computer program stored thereon that, when executed by a processor, implements the interactive inspection method for nuclear power quality control as proposed in the first aspect of this disclosure.

[0020] A fifth aspect of this disclosure provides a computer program product in which, when instructions are executed by a processor, the interactive inspection method for nuclear power quality control as described in a first aspect of this disclosure is performed.

[0021] The interactive inspection method, apparatus, computer equipment, and storage medium for nuclear power quality control disclosed herein determine multiple project phases of a nuclear power plant project, each phase including at least one project handling item; determine the quality control requirements corresponding to each project handling item; determine the risk coefficient of the corresponding project handling item based on the quality control requirements; determine the importance weight of each project phase; determine the quality control measures corresponding to the project handling item based on the risk coefficient and importance weight; and obtain project quality data based on the quality control measures. Therefore, it is possible to determine appropriate quality control measures for different project handling items, thereby ensuring the practicality and applicability of the obtained project quality data and effectively improving the interactive inspection effect of nuclear power quality control.

[0022] Additional aspects and advantages of this disclosure will be set forth in part in the description which follows, and in part will be obvious from the description, or may be learned by practice of this disclosure. Attached Figure Description

[0023] The above and / or additional aspects and advantages of this disclosure will become apparent and readily understood from the following description of the embodiments taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which:

[0024] Figure 1 This is a schematic flowchart of an interactive inspection method for nuclear power quality control proposed in one embodiment of this disclosure;

[0025] Figure 2 This is a flowchart illustrating an interactive inspection method for nuclear power quality control proposed in this disclosure;

[0026] Figure 3 It is based on a publicly available visual inspection process diagram;

[0027] Figure 4 This is a schematic diagram of the structure of an interactive inspection device for nuclear power quality control according to an embodiment of this disclosure;

[0028] Figure 5 A block diagram of an exemplary computer device suitable for implementing embodiments of the present disclosure is shown. Detailed Implementation

[0029] Embodiments of this disclosure are described in detail below, examples of which are illustrated in the accompanying drawings, wherein the same or similar reference numerals denote the same or similar elements or elements having the same or similar functions throughout. The embodiments described below with reference to the accompanying drawings are exemplary and are used only to explain this disclosure, and should not be construed as limiting this disclosure. Rather, embodiments of this disclosure include all variations, modifications, and equivalents falling within the spirit and scope of the appended claims.

[0030] It should be noted that the information (including but not limited to user device information, user personal information, etc.), data (including but not limited to data used for analysis, data stored, data displayed, etc.) and signals involved in this disclosure are all authorized by the user or fully authorized by all parties, and the collection, use and processing of related data must comply with the relevant laws, regulations and standards of the relevant countries and regions.

[0031] Figure 1 This is a flowchart illustrating an interactive inspection method for nuclear power quality control proposed in one embodiment of this disclosure.

[0032] It should be noted that the execution subject of the nuclear power quality control interactive inspection method in this embodiment is the nuclear power quality control interactive inspection device. This device can be implemented by software and / or hardware. The device can be configured in a computer device, which may include, but is not limited to, a terminal, a server, etc. For example, the terminal may be a mobile phone, a PDA, etc.

[0033] like Figure 1 As shown, this interactive inspection method for nuclear power quality control includes:

[0034] S101: Identify multiple project phases for a nuclear power plant project, wherein each project phase includes at least one project handling item.

[0035] This includes multiple project phases, such as the planning and design phase, the procurement phase, the construction and installation phase, the commissioning phase, and the operation and maintenance phase.

[0036] The "project handling matters" can refer to the handling matters corresponding to different project stages of a nuclear power plant project. For example, the planning and design stage may include: core design of the nuclear reactor, power plant layout and design of non-nuclear grade critical systems, as well as administrative facility design and non-critical area planning, etc., without limitation.

[0037] In this embodiment of the disclosure, when multiple project phases of a nuclear power plant project are determined, the phased division of the entire life cycle of the nuclear power plant project can be realized.

[0038] S102: Determine the quality control requirements for each item handled in the project.

[0039] Among these, quality control requirements can be used to indicate the relevant quality control needs for project-related matters. For example, they can be categorized as high-risk, medium-risk, low-risk, etc., without any restrictions.

[0040] In this embodiment of the disclosure, when the quality control requirements corresponding to each project processing item are determined, reliable data support can be provided for the subsequent determination of the risk coefficient of the corresponding project processing item.

[0041] S103: Determine the risk coefficient for the corresponding project handling items based on quality control requirements.

[0042] The risk coefficient can be used to indicate the level of quality control requirements for a given task. For example, when the quality control requirement is high-risk, the corresponding risk coefficient can be a larger value, while when the quality control requirement is low-risk, the corresponding risk coefficient can be a smaller value.

[0043] In this embodiment of the disclosure, when the risk coefficient of the corresponding project handling item is determined according to the quality control requirements, reliable data support can be provided for the subsequent determination of the quality control measures corresponding to the project handling item.

[0044] S104: Determine the importance weight of each project phase.

[0045] Among them, importance weight can be used to indicate the importance of the corresponding project phase throughout the entire project lifecycle.

[0046] In this embodiment of the disclosure, when determining the importance weight of each project stage, reference information at the project stage level can be provided for subsequently determining the quality control measures corresponding to the project processing items.

[0047] S105: Based on the risk coefficient and importance weight, determine the quality control measures corresponding to the project's handling items, and obtain project quality data based on the quality control measures.

[0048] Quality control measures can refer to relevant measures used to control the quality of matters in a nuclear power plant. For example, they may include monitoring indicator data.

[0049] Project quality data can be used to indicate relevant aspects of project quality. For example, it can include defect rates, delays, and safety issues, without limitation.

[0050] Optionally, in some embodiments, when determining the quality control measures corresponding to the project handling items based on risk coefficients and importance weights, it may be done by: determining the number of monitoring points and the data collection frequency of the monitoring points corresponding to the project handling items based on risk coefficients and importance weights. This allows for the rational use of limited resources during the quality control process, thereby effectively improving the practicality of quality control measures.

[0051] The number of monitoring points can be used to indicate the number of monitoring points configured for the project's processing tasks. The monitoring point data collection frequency, on the other hand, can be used to indicate how frequently the monitoring points collect relevant data.

[0052] Understandably, when the risk coefficient and importance weight are large, the number of monitoring points should be increased, and the data collection frequency of the monitoring points should be improved.

[0053] In this embodiment, multiple project phases are defined for a nuclear power plant project, each phase including at least one project handling item. Quality control requirements are determined for each project handling item. Based on these requirements, a risk coefficient is determined for each project handling item. The importance weight of each project phase is determined. Based on the risk coefficient and importance weight, quality control measures corresponding to the project handling items are determined, and project quality data is obtained based on these measures. This allows for the determination of appropriate quality control measures for different project handling items, ensuring the practicality and applicability of the obtained project quality data, and effectively improving the interactive inspection effect of nuclear power quality control.

[0054] Optionally, in some embodiments, the construction progress of the nuclear power plant project and the installation status of the target parts can be determined; based on the construction progress and installation status, an inspection plan corresponding to the target parts can be determined; the target parts can be inspected based on the inspection plan, and inspection process data and inspection results can be obtained, wherein the inspection process data includes: inspection date, inspection time, inspection location, and information of inspection participants; based on the inspection process data and inspection results, an inspection report can be generated. This allows for the rational inspection of the target parts and effectively improves the practicality of the resulting inspection report.

[0055] The target area can refer to the part of a nuclear power project that requires visual inspection by employees, such as the core design area of ​​the nuclear reactor.

[0056] The inspection plan can be used to instruct inspection participants, their division of labor, inspection time, inspection methods, etc., without any restrictions.

[0057] Among them, inspection process data can be used to indicate relevant data in the inspection process.

[0058] Optionally, in some embodiments, multiple anomalous factors can be identified based on project quality data; the correlation between different anomalous factors can be determined based on association rule learning methods; a predictive model can be established based on logistic regression methods, and the influence of each anomalous factor on the quality problem can be determined based on the predictive model. Thus, based on the results of association rule learning and logistic regression models, in-depth analysis of existing quality problems can be conducted, thereby providing reliable data support for subsequent quality control processes.

[0059] Optionally, in some embodiments, the functional information of different management departments of the nuclear power plant project can be determined; based on the functional information, target objects are identified from the management departments; and a joint review team is constructed based on the target objects of different management departments, wherein the joint review team is used to conduct project quality reviews. This ensures that the working capacity of the constructed joint review team can meet the project's quality review requirements.

[0060] Optionally, in some embodiments, the comparison results between the project quality data and the expected quality data can also be determined; based on the comparison results, the effectiveness of nuclear power quality control can be determined. This allows for an accurate assessment of the effectiveness of nuclear power quality control.

[0061] In summary, this disclosure provides an interactive inspection method for nuclear power quality control. This method strengthens the integration of information systems, improves the flexibility of collaboration mechanisms, optimizes conflict resolution processes, enhances training and communication, improves the technical support system, balances performance evaluation indicators, and clarifies continuous improvement mechanisms. Through these measures, the effectiveness of the interactive inspection method for nuclear power quality control is further enhanced, ensuring the success and safety of the project.

[0062] like Figure 2 As shown, Figure 2 This is a flowchart illustrating an interactive inspection method for nuclear power quality control proposed in this disclosure, comprising the following steps:

[0063] S1. During the construction of a nuclear power plant, visual inspections are conducted to identify potential defects in a direct and simple manner, ensuring that the construction quality meets the requirements. In step S1, visual inspections are mainly conducted on pipe welding points, pipe appearance, and valves.

[0064] like Figure 3 As shown, Figure 3 This is based on a publicly available visual inspection flowchart, the specific process of which is as follows:

[0065] S11. Based on the construction progress of the nuclear power plant and the installation status of key components, a detailed visual inspection plan should be developed in advance. The plan should include the date, time, location, personnel involved, and their responsibilities for the inspection.

[0066] S12. Inspect welded joints, important equipment interfaces, and critical components of safety valves. Any problems found during the inspection must be recorded in detail and clearly marked on-site. The record should include the location, nature, and size of the defect.

[0067] S13. Summarize all records of visual inspection, organize and archive them according to the established format, conduct preliminary analysis of the collected data, and screen out the problems that need to be dealt with immediately and the problems that can be dealt with later.

[0068] S14. Based on the visual inspection results, prepare a detailed inspection report, including the inspection process, problems found, and recommended improvement measures.

[0069] S2. Implement a quality grading control strategy, and clearly define the quality control requirements for different stages and links to achieve more precise and meticulous quality management and supervision, thereby improving the effectiveness of control.

[0070] Specifically, in step S2, based on the importance and risk level of each construction and operation stage of the nuclear power plant, the quality control requirements are divided into high-risk, medium-risk, and low-risk categories. At the same time, according to the construction and operation cycle of the nuclear power plant, the project is divided into the planning and design stage, procurement stage, construction and installation stage, commissioning stage, and operation and maintenance stage. Corresponding quality control measures are applied to each stage, regular monitoring points are set up to check the implementation of quality control measures, and relevant data is recorded. By analyzing the monitoring data, the effectiveness of the graded control strategy is evaluated, and existing problems and deficiencies are identified.

[0071] Furthermore, the high-risk items have a risk coefficient of 3, including: planning and design phase: core design of the nuclear reactor; procurement phase: procurement of nuclear-grade key equipment and materials; construction and installation phase: construction of the containment structure, installation and welding of the nuclear reactor; commissioning phase: nuclear reactor start-up testing and emergency shutdown system inspection; operation and maintenance phase: nuclear fuel replacement operation and maintenance.

[0072] The medium-risk items, with a risk coefficient of 2, include: Planning and Design Phase: Power plant layout and non-nuclear grade key system design; Procurement Phase: Procurement of conventional equipment and materials; Construction and Installation Phase: Installation of conventional equipment and electrical wiring; Trial Operation Phase: Auxiliary system commissioning; Operation and Maintenance Phase: Routine maintenance and periodic inspections.

[0073] The low-risk items, with a risk coefficient of 1, include: Planning and Design Phase: Design of administrative facilities and planning of non-critical areas; Procurement Phase: Procurement of office supplies and general materials; Construction and Installation Phase: Construction of non-critical buildings; Trial Operation Phase: Testing of fire protection and security systems; Operation and Maintenance Phase: Infrastructure maintenance.

[0074] The importance weights for each stage are as follows: Planning and Design Stage: 30%; Procurement Stage: 20%; Construction and Installation Stage: 25%; Trial Operation Stage: 15%; Operation and Maintenance Stage: 10%.

[0075] By setting up regular monitoring points, quality data at each stage is collected, including defect rates, delays, and safety issues. The effectiveness of the current control strategy is evaluated by comparing the deviation between the actual results and the expected goals.

[0076] S3. Review the quality records and related documents generated during the manufacturing process of nuclear power equipment to ensure the authenticity and traceability of the records;

[0077] S4. Analyze and summarize the quality problems that have occurred;

[0078] S41. Use association rule learning methods to identify the associations between different factors;

[0079] S42. Use logistic regression to build a predictive model and assess the influence of each factor.

[0080] S43. Based on the results of association rule learning and logistic regression models, conduct in-depth analysis of the quality problems that have occurred;

[0081] In step S4, the existing quality problems are analyzed, and association rule learning is used to identify the correlations between different factors. The expression is:

[0082]

[0083] Where Support represents the frequency of the event in all transactions, A represents an operational error, B represents a device malfunction, A→B is the association rule, and Confidence is the confidence level.

[0084] In step S4, for quality problems with multiple potential factors, logistic regression is used to build a predictive model to assess the influence of each factor. The expression is as follows:

[0085]

[0086] Where p is the probability of the problem occurring, x1, x2, ..., x n These are influencing factors, β0, β1, ..., β n These are model parameters.

[0087] S5. Cross-departmental collaboration, through close cooperation and information sharing among all participants, enables comprehensive quality monitoring;

[0088] The specific process of step S5 is as follows:

[0089] Clearly define the goals, responsibilities, processes, and standards for cross-departmental collaboration, and establish a quality management leadership group composed of representatives from each department to coordinate the quality control activities of the entire project;

[0090] Identify all key departments involved in the project and clearly define the responsibilities and roles of each department in quality control;

[0091] Organize a cross-departmental joint review team to review key equipment and structures, and arrange on-site inspections involving multiple departments to obtain quality feedback from different perspectives;

[0092] Establish an effective conflict resolution mechanism to handle potential contradictions and conflicts in cross-departmental collaboration, and adopt a joint decision-making model to ensure that the opinions and needs of all departments are fully considered;

[0093] It should be noted that the aforementioned conflict resolution mechanism is specifically as follows:

[0094] By developing a detailed responsibility matrix, the roles and responsibilities of each department can be clearly defined, reducing conflicts caused by unclear responsibilities. Regular cross-departmental meetings and reporting systems can be established to ensure the flow and transparency of information.

[0095] Use project management software or systems to track the work progress and resource usage of each department, identify potential conflict points early, and allow each department to share progress and challenges through regular project review meetings to expose problems as early as possible.

[0096] For example, implementing a quality grading control strategy, which involves detailed delineation of quality control requirements at different stages and stages, enables more precise and meticulous quality management and supervision, thereby improving the effectiveness of control. Specifically:

[0097] Risk assessment and classification

[0098] High-risk item (risk factor 3): The core design of the nuclear reactor has been identified as a high-risk item and requires special attention.

[0099] Medium-risk items (risk coefficient 2): Power plant layout and non-nuclear-grade critical system design are classified as medium-risk items.

[0100] Low-risk items (risk coefficient 1): Administrative facility design and non-critical area planning are identified as low-risk items.

[0101] 2. Apply quality control measures

[0102] For the core design of nuclear reactors, the highest level of quality control measures are adopted, including rigorous design review, direct supervision by senior engineers, and the use of advanced simulation and testing technologies.

[0103] For power plant layout and non-nuclear grade critical system design, a standardized design process is implemented, regular design reviews are conducted, and all designs are ensured to comply with international safety standards.

[0104] For the design of administrative facilities and the planning of non-critical areas, although the risks are low, it is still necessary to ensure that the basic safety and functional standards of the design are met.

[0105] 3. Set up monitoring points

[0106] At the end of each design phase, monitoring points are established to assess the quality of the design. For example, after each important part of the core design of a nuclear reactor is completed, a monitoring point is set up to check whether the design meets all safety and performance standards.

[0107] 4. Data Collection and Analysis

[0108] Collect quality data at each stage, such as defect rate, number of design changes, and delays.

[0109] Analyze these data and compare the deviations between the actual results and the expected goals to assess the effectiveness of the control strategy.

[0110] 5. Evaluation and Adjustment

[0111] The effectiveness of the current control strategy is evaluated based on the data and analysis results from the monitoring points.

[0112] If certain control measures are found to be ineffective, adjustments should be made promptly, such as adding more quality checks or changing the design methodology.

[0113] Based on the above, the following data is used:

[0114] Total number of design items: 100;

[0115] Total number of design flaws found: 5;

[0116]

[0117] The expected defect rate was 3%. Therefore, the actual defect rate was higher than expected, indicating a need for further analysis of the causes and adjustment of quality control measures. Through a tiered control strategy, nuclear power plant projects can implement corresponding quality control measures at different stages, thereby ensuring that the entire project, from design to operation, meets the highest quality and safety standards. This approach not only improves the effectiveness of control but also optimizes resource allocation, ensuring the smooth progress of the project.

[0118] For example, based on the above, applying it to actual work, the specifics are as follows:

[0119] A nuclear power plant project is in the initial stage of core reactor design, a stage identified as high-risk (risk factor 3). To ensure design quality and safety, the project management team has decided to adopt an interactive inspection method for nuclear power quality control.

[0120] S1. Visual inspection;

[0121] S11. Develop a visual inspection plan.

[0122] Date: May 1, 2024;

[0123] Time: 9:00 AM to 5:00 PM;

[0124] Location: Nuclear power plant construction site, especially the core design area of ​​the nuclear reactor;

[0125] Participants: Project Manager, Design Engineer, Quality Supervisor, Safety Officer;

[0126] Responsibilities are assigned as follows: the project manager is responsible for overall coordination, the design engineer is responsible for explaining technical details, the quality supervisor records inspection results, and the safety officer is responsible for on-site safety supervision.

[0127] S12. Perform visual inspection

[0128] Inspection items: welded joints, interfaces of important equipment, and key parts of safety valves;

[0129] Problems found: Two welded joints were found to have minor cracks, and one safety valve was not properly sealed.

[0130] Record:

[0131] Defect locations: Welded joints A and B, safety valve C;

[0132] Defect characteristics: minor cracks, poor sealing;

[0133] Defect sizes: Welded joint A (5mm), welded joint B (3mm), safety valve C (minor leakage);

[0134] S13. Summarize and record data

[0135] Organize and archive: Organize and archive all discovered issues according to the established format;

[0136] Preliminary analysis: Issues requiring immediate attention (the sealing problem of safety valve C) and issues that can be addressed later (cracks in welded joints A and B) have been identified.

[0137] S14. Prepare inspection report

[0138] Report Contents:

[0139] Inspection process: Describes the time, location, participants, and specific inspection content of the inspection;

[0140] Problems discovered: List all problems discovered and their detailed descriptions;

[0141] Recommended improvements: Repair welded joints A and B, and replace or repair safety valve C;

[0142] S2. Implement a quality grading control strategy.

[0143] Risk assessment and classification;

[0144] High-risk item: Core design of nuclear reactor;

[0145] Medium-risk items: Power plant layout and design of non-nuclear grade critical systems;

[0146] Low-risk items: Design of administrative facilities and planning of non-critical areas;

[0147] Apply quality control measures;

[0148] Nuclear reactor core design:

[0149] The highest level of quality control measures are adopted, including rigorous design reviews, direct supervision by senior engineers, and the use of advanced simulation and testing technologies;

[0150] Set up monitoring points and conduct checks after each important part is completed to ensure that all safety and performance standards are met;

[0151] Monitoring point setup: Monitoring points are set up after each important part of the nuclear reactor core design is completed;

[0152] Data collection and analysis: Collect and analyze quality data at each stage, such as defect rate, number of design changes, and delays.

[0153] Evaluation and Adjustment: Based on the data and analysis results from the monitoring points, evaluate the effectiveness of the current control strategy and make adjustments as necessary;

[0154] S3. Review quality records and related documents.

[0155] Review content: Ensure the authenticity and traceability of all quality records and related documents;

[0156] Issues found: Some records were found to be insufficiently detailed and need to be supplemented and improved;

[0157] S4. Analyze the quality problems that have occurred.

[0158] Learning about association rules:

[0159] Event frequency: The frequencies of operational errors (A) and equipment malfunctions (B) are 0.1 and 0.05, respectively;

[0160] Association rule: A→B, confidence level 0.75;

[0161] Logistic Regression Model:

[0162] Influencing factors: x1 (operator experience), x2 (equipment maintenance frequency), x3 (number of training sessions);

[0163] Model parameters: β0 = 0.2, β1 = 0.5, β2 = 0.3, β3 = 0.4;

[0164] The probability of the problem occurring is p = 0.68.

[0165] S5, Cross-departmental collaboration

[0166] Goals, responsibilities, processes, and standards:

[0167] Objective: To ensure the high-quality completion of the core design of the nuclear reactor;

[0168] Responsibility: Each department has a clear division of labor and is jointly responsible for quality control;

[0169] Joint Review Team: Organize a joint review team composed of design, construction, and safety departments to review the core design of the nuclear reactor;

[0170] Conflict resolution mechanism:

[0171] Responsibility Matrix: Clearly defines the role and responsibilities of each department;

[0172] Regular meetings: Weekly cross-departmental meetings to share progress and challenges;

[0173] Project management software: tracks the work progress and resource usage of each department, and identifies potential conflict points early.

[0174] Figure 4 This is a schematic diagram of the structure of an interactive inspection device for nuclear power quality control according to an embodiment of this disclosure.

[0175] like Figure 4 As shown, the nuclear power quality control interactive inspection device 40 includes:

[0176] The first determining module 401 is used to determine multiple project phases of a nuclear power plant project, wherein each project phase includes at least one project processing item.

[0177] The second determination module 402 is used to determine the quality control requirements corresponding to each project processing item;

[0178] The third determination module 403 is used to determine the risk coefficient of the corresponding project handling items based on quality control requirements;

[0179] The fourth module, 404, is used to determine the importance weight of each project phase.

[0180] The fifth determination module 405 is used to determine the quality control measures corresponding to the project handling items based on the risk coefficient and importance weight, and to obtain project quality data based on the quality control measures.

[0181] It should be noted that the foregoing explanation of the interactive inspection method for nuclear power quality control also applies to the interactive inspection device for nuclear power quality control in this embodiment, and will not be repeated here.

[0182] In this embodiment, multiple project phases are defined for a nuclear power plant project, each phase including at least one project handling item. Quality control requirements are determined for each project handling item. Based on these requirements, a risk coefficient is determined for each project handling item. The importance weight of each project phase is determined. Based on the risk coefficient and importance weight, quality control measures corresponding to the project handling items are determined, and project quality data is obtained based on these measures. This allows for the determination of appropriate quality control measures for different project handling items, ensuring the practicality and applicability of the obtained project quality data, and effectively improving the interactive inspection effect of nuclear power quality control.

[0183] Figure 5 A block diagram of an exemplary computer device suitable for implementing embodiments of the present disclosure is shown. Figure 5The computer device 12 shown is merely an example and should not be construed as limiting the functionality and scope of use of the embodiments disclosed herein.

[0184] like Figure 5 As shown, the computer device 12 is represented in the form of a general-purpose computing device. The components of the computer device 12 may include, but are not limited to: one or more processors or processing units 16, system memory 28, and a bus 18 connecting different system components (including system memory 28 and processing unit 16).

[0185] Bus 18 represents one or more of several bus architectures, including a memory bus or memory controller, a peripheral bus, a graphics acceleration port, a processor, or a local bus using any of the various bus architectures. Examples of these architectures include, but are not limited to, the Industry Standard Architecture (ISA) bus, the Micro Channel Architecture (MAC) bus, the Enhanced ISA bus, the Video Electronics Standards Association (VESA) local bus, and the Peripheral Component Interconnect (PCI) bus.

[0186] Computer device 12 typically includes a variety of computer system readable media. These media can be any available media that can be accessed by computer device 12, including volatile and non-volatile media, removable and non-removable media.

[0187] Memory 28 may include computer system readable media in the form of volatile memory, such as random access memory (RAM) 30 and / or cache memory 32. Computer device 12 may further include other removable / non-removable, volatile / non-volatile computer system storage media. By way of example only, storage system 34 may be used to read and write non-removable, non-volatile magnetic media (…). Figure 5 Not shown; usually referred to as a "hard drive".

[0188] although Figure 5Not shown, a disk drive for reading and writing to a removable non-volatile disk (e.g., a "floppy disk") and an optical disc drive for reading and writing to a removable non-volatile optical disc (e.g., a Compact Disc Read-Only Memory (CD-ROM), a Digital Video Disc Read-Only Memory (DVD-ROM), or other optical media). In these cases, each drive may be connected to bus 18 via one or more data media interfaces. Memory 28 may include at least one program product having a set (e.g., at least one) of program modules configured to perform the functions of the embodiments of this disclosure.

[0189] A program / utility 40 having a set (at least one) of program modules 42 may be stored, for example, in memory 28. Such program modules 42 include, but are not limited to, an operating system, one or more application programs, other program modules, and program data. Each or some combination of these examples may include an implementation of a network environment. Program modules 42 typically perform the functions and / or methods described in the embodiments of this disclosure.

[0190] Computer device 12 can also communicate with one or more external devices 14 (e.g., keyboard, pointing device, display 24, etc.), and with one or more devices that enable human interaction with the computer device 12, and / or with any device that enables the computer device 12 to communicate with one or more other computing devices (e.g., network card, modem, etc.). This communication can be performed via input / output (I / O) interface 22. Furthermore, computer device 12 can also communicate with one or more networks (e.g., local area network (LAN), wide area network (WAN), and / or public networks, such as the Internet) via network adapter 20. As shown, network adapter 20 communicates with other modules of computer device 12 via bus 18. It should be understood that, although not shown in the figures, other hardware and / or software modules can be used in conjunction with computer device 12, including but not limited to: microcode, device drivers, redundant processing units, external disk drive arrays, RAID systems, tape drives, and data backup storage systems.

[0191] The processing unit 16 executes various functional applications and data processing by running programs stored in the system memory 28, such as implementing the nuclear power quality control interactive inspection method mentioned in the foregoing embodiments.

[0192] To implement the above embodiments, this disclosure also proposes a non-transitory computer-readable storage medium storing a computer program that, when executed by a processor, implements the interactive inspection method for nuclear power quality control as proposed in the foregoing embodiments of this disclosure.

[0193] To implement the above embodiments, this disclosure also proposes a computer program product that, when executed by an instruction processor, performs the interactive inspection method for nuclear power quality control as proposed in the foregoing embodiments of this disclosure.

[0194] The collection, storage, use, processing, transmission, provision, and disclosure of user personal information involved in this disclosure all comply with the provisions of relevant laws and regulations and do not violate public order and good morals.

[0195] It should be noted that personal information collected from users should be used for legitimate and reasonable purposes and should not be shared or sold outside of these legitimate uses. Furthermore, such collection / sharing should only be conducted after receiving the user's informed consent, including but not limited to notifying the user to read the user agreement / user notice and sign an agreement / authorization that includes authorization of relevant user information before the user uses the function. In addition, any necessary steps must be taken to protect and safeguard access to such personal information data and ensure that others with access to personal information data comply with their privacy policies and procedures.

[0196] This disclosure is intended to provide implementation schemes for users to selectively prevent the use or access to their personal information data. Specifically, this disclosure is intended to provide hardware and / or software to prevent or block access to such personal information data. Once personal information data is no longer needed, risks can be minimized by restricting data collection and deleting data. Furthermore, where applicable, such personal information is de-identified to protect user privacy.

[0197] In the foregoing descriptions of the embodiments, the terms "one embodiment," "some embodiments," "example," "specific example," or "some examples," etc., refer to specific features, structures, materials, or characteristics described in connection with that embodiment or example, which are included in at least one embodiment or example of this disclosure. In this specification, the illustrative expressions of the above terms do not necessarily refer to the same embodiment or example. Furthermore, the specific features, structures, materials, or characteristics described may be combined in any suitable manner in one or more embodiments or examples. Moreover, without contradiction, those skilled in the art can combine and integrate the different embodiments or examples described in this specification, as well as the features of different embodiments or examples.

[0198] Furthermore, the terms "first" and "second" are used for descriptive purposes only and should not be construed as indicating or implying relative importance or implicitly specifying the number of technical features indicated. Thus, a feature defined as "first" or "second" may explicitly or implicitly include at least one of that feature. In the description of this disclosure, "a plurality of" means at least two, such as two, three, etc., unless otherwise explicitly specified.

[0199] Any process or method description in the flowchart or otherwise herein can be understood as representing a module, segment, or portion of code comprising one or more executable instructions for implementing custom logic functions or processes, and the scope of preferred embodiments of this disclosure includes additional implementations in which functions may be performed not in the order shown or discussed, including substantially simultaneously or in reverse order depending on the functions involved, as will be understood by those skilled in the art to which embodiments of this disclosure pertain.

[0200] The logic and / or steps represented in the flowchart or otherwise described herein, for example, can be considered as a sequenced list of executable instructions for implementing logical functions, and can be embodied in any computer-readable medium for use by, or in conjunction with, an instruction execution system, apparatus, or device (such as a computer-based system, a processor-included system, or other system that can fetch and execute instructions from, an instruction execution system, apparatus, or device). For the purposes of this specification, "computer-readable medium" can be any means that can contain, store, communicate, propagate, or transmit programs for use by, or in conjunction with, an instruction execution system, apparatus, or device. More specific examples (a non-exhaustive list) of computer-readable media include: an electrical connection having one or more wires (electronic device), a portable computer disk drive (magnetic device), random access memory (RAM), read-only memory (ROM), erasable and editable read-only memory (EPROM or flash memory), fiber optic devices, and portable optical disc read-only memory (CDROM). Alternatively, the computer-readable medium may be paper or other suitable media on which the program can be printed, since the program can be obtained electronically, for example, by optically scanning the paper or other medium, followed by editing, interpreting, or otherwise processing as necessary, and then stored in a computer memory.

[0201] It should be understood that various parts of this disclosure can be implemented using hardware, software, firmware, or a combination thereof. In the above embodiments, multiple steps or methods can be implemented using software or firmware stored in memory and executed by a suitable instruction execution system. For example, if implemented in hardware as in another embodiment, it can be implemented using any one or a combination of the following techniques known in the art: discrete logic circuits having logic gates for implementing logical functions on data signals, application-specific integrated circuits (ASICs) having suitable combinational logic gates, programmable gate arrays (PGAs), field-programmable gate arrays (FPGAs), etc.

[0202] Those skilled in the art will understand that all or part of the steps of the methods in the above embodiments can be implemented by a program instructing related hardware. The program can be stored in a computer-readable storage medium, and when executed, the program includes one or a combination of the steps of the method embodiments.

[0203] Furthermore, the functional units in the various embodiments of this disclosure can be integrated into a processing module, or each unit can exist physically separately, or two or more units can be integrated into a module. The integrated module can be implemented in hardware or as a software functional module. If the integrated module is implemented as a software functional module and sold or used as an independent product, it can also be stored in a computer-readable storage medium.

[0204] The storage medium mentioned above can be a read-only memory, a disk, or an optical disk, etc. Although embodiments of the present disclosure have been shown and described above, it is to be understood that the above embodiments are exemplary and should not be construed as limiting the present disclosure. Those skilled in the art can make changes, modifications, substitutions, and variations to the above embodiments within the scope of the present disclosure.

Claims

1. An interactive inspection method for nuclear power quality control, characterized in that, include: The nuclear power plant project is defined into multiple project phases, wherein each project phase includes at least one project processing item; Determine the quality control requirements for each of the aforementioned project processing items; Based on the aforementioned quality control requirements, determine the risk coefficients for the corresponding project handling items; Determine the importance weight of each project phase; Based on the risk coefficient and the importance weight, determine the quality control measures corresponding to the project processing items, and obtain project quality data based on the quality control measures.

2. The method as described in claim 1, characterized in that, The method further includes: Determine the construction schedule of the nuclear power plant project and the installation status of the target locations; Based on the construction progress and installation status, determine the inspection plan corresponding to the target location; The target area is inspected based on the inspection plan, and inspection process data and inspection results are obtained. The inspection process data includes: inspection date, inspection time, inspection location, and information of the personnel involved in the inspection. An inspection report is generated based on the inspection process data and the inspection results.

3. The method as described in claim 1, characterized in that, The step of determining the quality control measures corresponding to the project handling items based on the risk coefficient and the importance weight includes: Based on the risk coefficient and the importance weight, determine the number of monitoring points and the data collection frequency of the monitoring points corresponding to the project processing items.

4. The method as described in claim 1, characterized in that, The method further includes: Based on the project quality data, several abnormal factors were identified; Based on association rule learning methods, the associations between different anomalous factors are determined; A prediction model is established based on the logistic regression method, and the influence of each of the abnormal factors on the quality problem is determined based on the prediction model.

5. The method as described in claim 1, characterized in that, The method further includes: Determine the functional information of the different management departments of the nuclear power plant project; Based on the aforementioned functional information, target entities are identified from the aforementioned management departments; A joint review team is established based on the target objects of different management departments, wherein the joint review team is used to conduct project quality reviews.

6. The method as described in claim 1, characterized in that, The method further includes: Determine the comparison results between the project quality data and the expected quality data; Based on the comparison results, the effectiveness of nuclear power quality control is determined.

7. An interactive inspection device for nuclear power quality control, characterized in that, include: The first determining module is used to determine multiple project phases of a nuclear power plant project, wherein the project phase includes at least one project processing item; The second determining module is used to determine the quality control requirements corresponding to each of the project processing items; The third determining module is used to determine the risk coefficient of the corresponding project handling items based on the quality control requirements; The fourth determination module is used to determine the importance weight of each project phase; The fifth determination module is used to determine the quality control measures corresponding to the project processing items based on the risk coefficient and the importance weight, and to obtain project quality data based on the quality control measures.

8. A computer device, characterized in that, include: At least one processor; as well as A memory communicatively connected to the at least one processor; wherein, The memory stores instructions that can be executed by the at least one processor to enable the at least one processor to perform the method of any one of claims 1-6.

9. A non-transitory computer-readable storage medium storing computer instructions, characterized in that, in, The computer instructions are used to cause the computer to perform the method according to any one of claims 1-6.

10. A computer program product, characterized in that, Includes a computer program that, when executed by a processor, implements the steps of the method according to any one of claims 1-6.

Images