Decloaking system and method and computer readable medium

Abstract

The application provides a system and method for decoupling and a computer readable medium, wherein the system for decoupling comprises: a decoupling management module configured to store decoupled device information of a decoupled device, and determine whether to submit a decoupling application according to the decoupled device information; and a decoupling planning module configured to receive the decoupling application and obtain one or more decoupling associated devices of the decoupled device, and configured to determine a decoupling list according to the correlation degree between the decoupling associated devices and the decoupled device and the decoupled device information. The system and method for decoupling and the computer readable medium provided by the application can effectively plan the decoupling sequence and improve the decoupling management efficiency.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] This application relates primarily to the field of nuclear power technology, and more particularly to a de-labeling system and method, as well as a computer-readable medium. Background Technology

[0002] Before any equipment repair or routine maintenance at a nuclear power plant, an isolation zone must be defined and tagged components must be affixed. Maintenance work can only proceed after the tagged components are inspected and operated according to the instructions. After maintenance, an isolation engineer must develop a detagged component removal plan, which is then implemented and the tagged components removed. At this point, the isolated equipment returns to a usable state, forming a complete closed-loop management system that supports the normal operation of the power plant. Isolation detagged components are a core component of nuclear power plant safety management, directly impacting the safety of personnel, equipment, and the environment. Currently, the detagged component removal order is simply determined in reverse order of the tagged components being attached, which can easily lead to incorrect or missed removals, affecting the completeness, accuracy, and standardization of the detagged components operation. Summary of the Invention

[0003] The technical problem to be solved by this application is to provide a bidding system and method, as well as a computer-readable medium, which can effectively plan the bidding sequence and improve the efficiency of bidding management.

[0004] To address the aforementioned technical problems, this application provides a delisting system applicable to the management of reactor power plants. When the reactor power plant is in a fault recovery period, the reactor power plant at least partially includes delisted equipment and delisting-related equipment. The delisting system includes: a delisting management module configured to store delisting equipment information of the delisted equipment and determine whether to submit a delisting application based on the delisting equipment information; and a delisting planning module configured to receive the delisting application and obtain one or more delisting-related devices of the delisted equipment, and the delisting planning module configured to determine a delisting list based on the correlation between the delisting-related devices and the delisted equipment and the delisting equipment information.

[0005] Optionally, the bidding planning module is configured to obtain the correlation between the bidding-related device and the already bid-listed device based on the bidding device information and bidding association attributes, wherein the bidding association attributes include one or any combination of system boundary attributes, physical logic attributes, device status attributes, and permission constraint attributes.

[0006] Optionally, the delisting planning module is configured to: obtain the system boundary attributes based on the upstream and downstream hierarchical relationship between the delisted equipment and the delisting-related equipment; obtain the physical logic attributes based on the nuclear security level relationship between the delisted equipment and the delisting-related equipment; obtain the equipment status attributes based on the equipment recovery and qualification status of the delisted equipment and the delisting-related equipment; and / or obtain the permission constraint attributes based on the operation permissions and compliance processes of the delisted equipment and the delisting-related equipment.

[0007] Optionally, the bidding system also includes a conflict monitoring module, which is configured to monitor the number of license plates listed on the bidding-related devices and perform bidding conflict verification on the bidding-related devices based on the number of license plates listed. If there is a bidding status conflict on the bidding-related devices, the conflict monitoring module is configured to adjust the bidding status of the bidding-related devices to avoid bidding status conflicts.

[0008] Optionally, the delisting system also includes an audit module, which is configured to determine whether the delisting associated device is a shared listing device. If the delisting associated device is a shared listing device, the audit module is configured to parse the multiple shared listing statuses of the delisting associated device to determine whether to perform a delisting operation on the delisting associated device.

[0009] Optionally, the audit module is further configured to determine whether the delisting associated device is an independent verification device. If the delisting associated device is the independent verification device, the audit module is configured to check whether the independent verification operation corresponding to the independent verification device has been completed.

[0010] Optionally, the bidding system further includes an implementation module, which is configured to set a bidding interval based on the correlation between the bidding-related device and the already bid-off device. The bidding interval includes a bidding threshold. The implementation module is configured to determine whether the correlation is greater than or equal to the bidding threshold. If the correlation is greater than or equal to the bidding threshold, the implementation module is configured to add the bidding-related device to the bidding list.

[0011] Optionally, the delisting equipment information includes one or any combination of the delisting equipment's isolation directory, operation plate status, listing order, unit name, unit code, power plant name, and power plant code.

[0012] Optionally, the license plate removal system also includes an experience feedback module, which is configured to monitor the entire license plate removal process of the removed equipment and the related removal equipment and generate a license plate removal log.

[0013] To address the aforementioned technical problems, this application also provides a license plate removal method applicable to the license plate removal system described above, comprising the following steps: storing license plate removal device information of the removed device, and determining whether to submit a license plate removal application based on the license plate removal device information; receiving the license plate removal application and obtaining one or more license plate removal associated devices of the removed device, and determining a license plate removal list based on the association degree between the license plate removal associated devices and the removed device and the license plate removal device information.

[0014] Optionally, the delisting method further includes obtaining the correlation degree between the delisting associated device and the delisted device based on the delisting device information and delisting association attributes, wherein the delisting association attributes include one or any combination of system boundary attributes, physical logic attributes, device status attributes, and permission constraint attributes.

[0015] To address the aforementioned technical problems, this application also provides a computer-readable medium containing computer program code that, when executed by a processor, implements the method described above.

[0016] Compared with existing technologies, this application, during the fault recovery period of a reactor power plant, uses a delisting management module and a delisting planning module to plan the delisting of delisted equipment and related delisting equipment. By planning the delisting list based on the correlation between related delisting equipment and delisted equipment, it can grasp the equipment that needs to be delisted from a global perspective and avoid omissions. Furthermore, it can effectively plan the delisting of equipment that does not need to be delisted or cannot be delisted in this process to avoid erroneous delisting. This enables effective planning of the delisting sequence and improves the efficiency of delisting management. Attached Figure Description

[0017] The accompanying drawings are included to provide a further understanding of this application; they are incorporated into and constitute a part of this application. The drawings illustrate embodiments of this application and, together with this specification, serve to explain the principles of this application. In the drawings: Figure 1 This is a schematic diagram of the module structure of a license plate removal system according to one embodiment of this application; Figure 2 This is a schematic diagram of a license plate removal system at a certain working node in one embodiment of this application; Figure 3 This is a schematic flowchart of a method for removing a license plate in one embodiment of this application. Detailed Implementation

[0018] To more clearly illustrate the technical solutions of the embodiments of this application, the accompanying drawings used in the description of the embodiments will be briefly introduced below. Obviously, the drawings described below are merely some examples or embodiments of this application. For those skilled in the art, these drawings can be applied to other similar scenarios without creative effort. Unless obvious from the context or otherwise specified, the same reference numerals in the drawings represent the same structures or operations.

[0019] As indicated in this application and claims, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise, the words "a," "an," "an," and / or "the" are not specifically singular and may include plural forms. Generally speaking, the terms "comprising" and "including" only indicate the inclusion of explicitly identified steps and elements, which do not constitute an exclusive list, and the method or apparatus may also include other steps or elements.

[0020] Unless otherwise specifically stated, the relative arrangement, numerical expressions, and values ​​of the components and steps described in these embodiments do not limit the scope of this application. It should also be understood that, for ease of description, the dimensions of the various parts shown in the drawings are not drawn to actual scale. Techniques, methods, and devices known to those skilled in the art may not be discussed in detail, but where appropriate, such techniques, methods, and devices should be considered part of the specification. In all examples shown and discussed herein, any specific values ​​should be interpreted as merely exemplary and not as limitations. Therefore, other examples of exemplary embodiments may have different values. It should be noted that similar reference numerals and letters in the following drawings denote similar items; therefore, once an item is defined in one drawing, it need not be further discussed in subsequent drawings.

[0021] In the description of this application, it should be understood that the orientation or positional relationship indicated by directional terms such as "front, back, up, down, left, right", "horizontal, vertical, horizontal" and "top, bottom" is usually based on the orientation or positional relationship shown in the accompanying drawings, and is only for the convenience of describing this application and simplifying the description. Unless otherwise stated, these directional terms do not indicate or imply that the device or element referred to must have a specific orientation or be constructed and operated in a specific orientation, and therefore should not be construed as a limitation on the scope of protection of this application; the directional terms "inner" and "outer" refer to the inner and outer contours relative to the outline of each component itself.

[0022] Furthermore, it should be noted that the use of terms such as "first" and "second" to define components is merely for the purpose of distinguishing the corresponding components. Unless otherwise stated, these terms have no special meaning and therefore should not be construed as limiting the scope of protection of this application. In addition, although the terminology used in this application is selected from commonly known and used terms, some terms mentioned in this application's specification may have been chosen by the applicant according to his or her judgment, and their detailed meanings are explained in the relevant sections of this description. Moreover, this application should be understood not only through the actual terms used, but also through the meaning implied by each term.

[0023] It should be understood that when a component is referred to as "on another component," "connected to another component," "coupled to another component," or "in contact with another component," it can be directly on, connected to, coupled to, or in contact with that other component, or there may be an intervening component. In contrast, when a component is referred to as "directly on another component," "directly connected to," "directly coupled to," or "directly in contact with" another component, there is no intervening component. Similarly, when a first component is referred to as "electrically contacting" or "electrically coupled to" a second component, there is an electrical path between the first and second components that allows current to flow. This electrical path may include capacitors, coupled inductors, and / or other components that allow current to flow, even if there is no direct contact between the conductive components.

[0024] This application refers to Figure 1 A delisting system 10 is proposed for managing reactor power plants. When a reactor power plant is in a fault recovery period, it at least partially includes delisted equipment and delisted associated equipment. Specifically, refer to... Figure 1 The license plate bidding system 10 mainly includes a license plate bidding management module 11 and a license plate bidding planning module 12. The license plate bidding management module 11 is configured to store information about license plate-bidding devices that have already been bid on, and to determine whether to submit a license plate bidding application based on this information. The license plate bidding planning module 12 is configured to receive license plate bidding applications and obtain one or more related license plate bidding devices for license plate-bidding devices. The module is also configured to determine the bidding list based on the correlation between the related bidding devices and the license plate-bidding devices, as well as the license plate bidding device information. The license plate bidding system 10 can effectively plan the bidding order, improving the efficiency of license plate bidding management.

[0025] In some embodiments, the de-labeled equipment information includes the de-labeled equipment's isolation directory, operating plate status, labeling order, unit name, unit code, power plant name, and power plant code, or any combination thereof. In practical applications, staff can log into the de-labeling system 10 using their assigned work accounts to quickly obtain de-labeled equipment information. Once a problematic piece of equipment has been de-labeled (i.e., after maintenance is completed or the reactor fault is determined to be resolved), staff can quickly extract various de-labeled related equipment based on the de-labeled equipment information. They can also gain a comprehensive understanding of the operating plate status, unit name, unit code, power plant name, and power plant code of the de-labeled related equipment, which is beneficial for subsequent decisions on whether to de-label the related equipment, further saving management time and improving management efficiency.

[0026] In some embodiments, the delisting planning module 12 is configured to obtain the correlation between delisted related devices and delisted devices based on delisting device information and delisting association attributes. The delisting association attributes may include system boundary attributes, physical logic attributes, device status attributes, and permission constraint attributes. Specifically, system boundary attributes can be obtained based on the upstream and downstream hierarchical relationship between delisted devices and delisted related devices. For example, in a reactor, after a control rod assembly is delisted, since the control rod assembly plays a crucial role in the operation of the fuel assembly, and the control rod assembly and fuel assembly have a close upstream and downstream hierarchical relationship, it can be determined that the correlation between the control rod assembly and the fuel assembly is high, and the fuel assembly is set as a delisted related device. Similarly, when a heat exchanger in a waste heat removal system is delisted for maintenance, based on the upstream and downstream hierarchical relationship, its upstream inlet valve and downstream outlet valve have a strong correlation with it, affecting whether the medium is flowing normally; therefore, they must first be added to the delisting list. Furthermore, physical and logical attributes can be obtained based on the nuclear safety level relationship between delisted equipment and related delisted equipment. For example, after the heat exchanger of the waste heat removal system is delisted for maintenance, it belongs to nuclear safety level 2 equipment. Therefore, when searching for coupled equipment, pumps, valves, etc. of the same level should be included in the delisting candidate list, and lower-level equipment should be judged as related equipment to ensure the complete restoration of the function of the entire safety function link. Equipment status attributes can also be obtained based on the equipment recovery and qualification status of delisted equipment and related delisted equipment. For example, in the example above, there is a bypass isolation valve. Through testing, it was found that it is not isolated and therefore not tagged. So, naturally, there is no need to delist it. Furthermore, permission constraint attributes can also be obtained based on the operation permissions and compliance processes of delisted equipment and related delisted equipment. For example, after the judgment conditions above, there is an outlet temperature gauge whose maintenance process is still in progress. At this time, the equipment will not be filtered out. Instead, the equipment will be prompted that the maintenance process is in progress, and the submit button will be grayed out. Only after the process is completed can the delisting plan be submitted. In some embodiments, weights can be set for system boundary attributes, physical logic attributes, device status attributes, and permission constraint attributes to obtain the correlation between the delisted associated device and the delisted device. Obtaining the correlation between the delisted associated device and the delisted device through the delisting association attribute can comprehensively consider whether each component in the stack can be delisted, further avoiding the omission and misselection of delisted devices, and further ensuring the accuracy of delisting.

[0027] In some embodiments, the delisting system 10 further includes a conflict monitoring module 13. The conflict monitoring module 13 is configured to monitor the number of delisting associated devices and perform delisting conflict verification based on the number of listed devices. If a delisting status conflict exists between the associated devices, the conflict monitoring module is configured to adjust the delisting status of the associated devices to avoid the conflict. In practical applications, when multiple problematic devices exist (e.g., problematic device 1 and problematic device 2), multiple problematic devices may correspond to the same associated device during the delisting process. In this case, one associated device may have multiple operation tags. When problematic device 1 is delisted but problematic device 2 is not, the associated device corresponding to both problematic device 1 and problematic device 2 is in a state where delisting is possible for problematic device 1, but uncertain for problematic device 2. In this case, the conflict monitoring module 13 can identify a delisting conflict between the associated devices and can therefore prompt staff to review the delisting of the associated devices to avoid security issues caused by delisting conflicts and further ensure the operational security of the delisting system 10.

[0028] In some embodiments, the de-labeling system 10 further includes an audit module 14. The audit module 14 is configured to determine whether the de-labeling associated device is a shared-labeling device. If the de-labeling associated device is a shared-labeling device, the audit module 14 is configured to parse the multiple shared-labeling states of the de-labeling associated device to determine whether to perform a de-labeling operation on the de-labeling associated device. In practical applications, when multiple problematic devices occur, multiple isolation applications will be submitted. The submission times of the multiple isolation applications may be different. The same de-labeling associated device may appear in both the previously submitted isolation application list and the later submitted isolation application list, and the operation instructions for the de-labeling associated device are the same in both the previous and later isolation application lists, i.e., the labeled operation tags are the same. In this case, the de-labeling associated device can directly use the label from the previous isolation application list, and at this time, the de-labeling associated device is a shared-labeling device. Since one de-labeling associated device corresponds to multiple problematic devices, the de-labeling operation for de-labeling associated devices of different problematic devices requires further confirmation by the staff. Therefore, the setting of the audit module 14 can audit the de-labeling status of shared-labeling devices to avoid erroneous de-labeling and further ensure the safe operation of the reactor.

[0029] In some embodiments, the audit module 14 is further configured to determine whether the delisting-related equipment is an independent verification equipment. If the delisting-related equipment is an independent verification equipment, the audit module is configured to check whether the independent verification operation corresponding to the independent verification equipment has been completed. In some use cases, certain related equipment needs to undergo independent verification, that is, staff members perform verification independently and fill in independent verification information to ensure operational safety. Therefore, when delisting, the audit module 14 needs to audit and verify the independent verification operation of the independent verification equipment. If it is found that the delisting-related equipment has not undergone independent verification, a pop-up window is immediately displayed to report to the staff, prompting the staff to perform independent verification operation on the delisting-related equipment, thereby ensuring the safety of the delisting control of the delisting-related equipment and further ensuring the safe operation of the reactor power plant.

[0030] In some embodiments, the bidding system 10 further includes an implementation module 15. The implementation module 15 is configured to set a bidding interval based on the correlation between the bidding-related device and the already bid-off device. The bidding interval includes a bidding threshold. The implementation module 15 is configured to determine whether the correlation is greater than or equal to the bidding threshold. If the correlation is greater than or equal to the bidding threshold, the implementation module 15 is configured to add the bidding-related device to the bidding list. For example, as mentioned above, the correlation can be obtained by weighting system boundary attributes, physical logic attributes, device status attributes, and permission constraint attributes. The bidding planning module 12 can independently evaluate the correlation scores obtained by the bidding-related device and the already bid-off device in system boundary attributes, physical logic attributes, device status attributes, and permission constraint attributes based on the bidding device information. It calculates the correlation based on the weighting of different bidding attributes and compares it with the bidding threshold. If the correlation is greater than the bidding threshold, bidding can proceed. Through the above settings, effective planning of the bidding order can be achieved, improving the efficiency of bidding management.

[0031] In some embodiments, the license plate acquisition system 10 further includes an experience feedback module 16. The experience feedback module 16 is configured to monitor the entire acquisition process of acquired equipment and related equipment and generate acquisition logs. These acquisition logs record the entire acquisition planning process for related equipment, noting the reasons or conditions that might lead to incorrect or missed acquisitions, and identifying cumbersome steps that are difficult to implement on-site, thus prompting staff to optimize the process. The experience feedback module 16 enables staff to better understand the working mode and workflow of the license plate acquisition system 10, providing experience for subsequent process optimization and further improving the efficiency of the license plate acquisition system 10.

[0032] Further reference Figure 2 , Figure 2The diagram shows the front-end display of the delisting system 10 at a certain node. It can be seen that the delisting system 10 can arrange the delisting order of related devices. At the same time, the delisting system 10 can display the label number, device number, delisting status, independent verification and sharing information of the related devices, which helps staff to manage delisting and improves the efficiency of delisting management.

[0033] This application also refers to, in another respect, [the following text is missing from the original] Figure 3 A method 20 for removing license plates is proposed, applicable to the system 10 for removing license plates according to any embodiment of this application. Flowcharts are used in this application to illustrate the operations performed by the system according to embodiments of this application. It should be understood that the preceding or following operations are not necessarily performed in exact order. Instead, various steps can be processed in reverse order or simultaneously. Furthermore, other operations may be added to these processes, or one or more steps may be removed from these processes.

[0034] Specifically, the bidding method 20 includes steps S1 and S2. Step S1 includes storing the bidding device information of the already bid-listed devices and determining whether to submit a bidding application based on the bidding device information. Step S2 includes receiving the bidding application and obtaining one or more bidding-related devices of the already bid-listed devices, and determining the bidding list based on the correlation between the bidding-related devices and the already bid-listed devices, as well as the bidding device information. The bidding method 20 also includes obtaining the correlation between the bidding-related devices and the already bid-listed devices based on the bidding device information and bidding association attributes, and determining the final bidding list based on the correlation. The bidding method 20 enables effective planning of the bidding order and improves the efficiency of bidding management.

[0035] In addition, this application also proposes a computer-readable medium storing computer program code, which implements the above-described voice interaction method when executed by a processor.

[0036] This application, during the fault recovery period of a reactor power plant, utilizes a delisting management module and a delisting planning module to plan the delisting of delisted equipment and related delisting equipment. By planning the delisting list based on the correlation between related and delisted equipment, it can comprehensively grasp the equipment that needs to be delisted, avoiding omissions. Furthermore, it can effectively plan the delisting of equipment that does not need to be delisted or cannot be delisted in this process, avoiding erroneous delisting. This enables effective planning of the delisting sequence and improves the efficiency of delisting management.

[0037] The basic concepts have been described above. Obviously, for those skilled in the art, the above disclosure is merely illustrative and does not constitute a limitation of this application. Although not explicitly stated herein, those skilled in the art may make various modifications, improvements, and corrections to this application. Such modifications, improvements, and corrections are suggested in this application, and therefore remain within the spirit and scope of the exemplary embodiments of this application.

[0038] Furthermore, this application uses specific terms to describe embodiments of the application. For example, "an embodiment," "one embodiment," and / or "some embodiments" refer to a particular feature, structure, or characteristic related to at least one embodiment of the application. Therefore, it should be emphasized and noted that "an embodiment," "one embodiment," or "an alternative embodiment" mentioned twice or more in different locations in this specification do not necessarily refer to the same embodiment. In addition, certain features, structures, or characteristics in one or more embodiments of the application can be appropriately combined.

[0039] Some aspects of this application can be executed entirely by hardware, entirely by software (including firmware, resident software, microcode, etc.), or by a combination of hardware and software. The aforementioned hardware or software may be referred to as a "data block," "module," "engine," "unit," "component," or "system." The processor may be one or more application-specific integrated circuits (ASICs), digital signal processors (DSPs), digital signal processing devices (DAPDs), programmable logic devices (PLDs), field-programmable gate arrays (FPGAs), processors, controllers, microcontrollers, microprocessors, or combinations thereof. Furthermore, aspects of this application may manifest as computer products residing in one or more computer-readable media, including computer-readable program code. For example, computer-readable media may include, but are not limited to, magnetic storage devices (e.g., hard disks, floppy disks, magnetic tapes, etc.), optical discs (e.g., compressed CDs, digital multifunction DVDs, etc.), smart cards, and flash memory devices (e.g., cards, sticks, key drives, etc.).

[0040] A computer-readable medium may contain a propagated data signal containing computer program code, for example, on baseband or as part of a carrier wave. This propagated signal may take various forms, including electromagnetic, optical, and so on, or suitable combinations thereof. A computer-readable medium can be any computer-readable medium other than a computer-readable storage medium, which can be connected to an instruction execution system, apparatus, or device to enable communication, propagation, or transmission of a program for use. The program code located on the computer-readable medium can be propagated through any suitable medium, including radio, cable, fiber optic cable, radio frequency signals, or similar media, or any combination of the above media.

[0041] Similarly, it should be noted that, in order to simplify the description of the present application and thus aid in the understanding of one or more embodiments, the foregoing description of the embodiments of the present application sometimes combines multiple features into a single embodiment, drawing, or description thereof. However, this disclosure method does not imply that the subject matter of the present application requires more features than those mentioned in the claims. In fact, the embodiments contain fewer features than all the features of the single embodiments disclosed above.

[0042] In some embodiments, numbers describing the quantity of components and attributes are used. It should be understood that such numbers used in the description of embodiments are modified in some examples with the terms "approximately," "approximately," or "generally." Unless otherwise stated, "approximately," "approximately," or "generally" indicates that the numbers are allowed to vary by ±20%. Accordingly, in some embodiments, the numerical parameters used in the specification and claims are approximate values, which may be changed depending on the characteristics required by individual embodiments. In some embodiments, numerical parameters should take into account specified significant digits and employ a general method of digit reservation. Although the numerical ranges and parameters used to confirm their breadth of scope in some embodiments of this application are approximate values, in specific embodiments, such values ​​are set as precisely as feasible.

[0043] Although this application has been described with reference to specific embodiments, those skilled in the art should recognize that the above embodiments are only used to illustrate this application, and various equivalent changes or substitutions can be made without departing from the spirit of this application. Therefore, any changes or modifications to the above embodiments within the essential spirit of this application will fall within the scope of the claims of this application.

Claims

1. A delisting system for managing reactor power plants, wherein when the reactor power plant is in a fault recovery or maintenance period, the reactor power plant at least partially includes delisted equipment and delisting-related equipment, characterized in that, The delisting system includes: The license plate removal management module is configured to store the license plate removal information of the removed equipment and determine whether to submit a license plate removal application based on the license plate removal information; The license plate bidding planning module is configured to receive the license plate bidding application and obtain one or more license plate bidding associated devices of the license plate-bid-obtained device. The license plate bidding planning module is further configured to determine the license plate bidding list based on the association degree between the license plate bidding associated devices and the license plate-bid-obtained device and the license plate-bid-obtained device information.

2. The delisting system as described in claim 1, characterized in that, The bidding planning module is configured to obtain the correlation between the bidding-related device and the already bid-off device based on the bidding device information and bidding association attributes. The bidding association attributes include one or any combination of system boundary attributes, physical logic attributes, device status attributes, and permission constraint attributes.

3. The delisting system as described in claim 2, characterized in that, The bidding planning module is configured as follows: The system boundary attributes are obtained based on the upstream and downstream hierarchical relationship between the delisted equipment and the delisted associated equipment. The physical and logical attributes are obtained based on the nuclear security level relationship between the delisted equipment and the delisted associated equipment; The device status attributes are obtained based on the device recovery and qualification status of the delisted device and the delisted associated device. and / or The permission constraint attribute is obtained based on the operation permissions and compliance procedures of the delisted equipment and the associated delisted equipment.

4. The delisting system as described in claim 1, characterized in that, It also includes a conflict detection module, configured as follows: Monitor the number of license plates listed on the associated devices and perform license plate conflict verification on the associated devices based on the number of listed license plates. If there is a bidding status conflict between the bidding-related devices, the bidding status of the bidding-related devices shall be adjusted to avoid the bidding status conflict.

5. The delisting system as described in claim 1, characterized in that, It also includes an approval module, configured as follows: Determine whether the delisting associated device is a shared listing device; If the delisting associated device is the shared listing device, then the multiple shared listing states of the delisting associated device are parsed to determine whether to perform a delisting operation on the delisting associated device.

6. The delisting system as described in claim 5, characterized in that, The audit module is also configured as follows: Determine whether the delisting associated device is an independent verification device; If the delisting associated device is the independent verification device, then check whether the independent verification operation corresponding to the independent verification device has been completed.

7. The delisting system as described in claim 1, characterized in that, It also includes an implementation module, which is configured to set a bidding interval based on the correlation between the bidding-related device and the bidding-already device. The bidding interval includes a bidding threshold. The implementation module is configured to determine whether the correlation is greater than or equal to the bidding threshold. If the correlation is greater than or equal to the bidding threshold, the implementation module is configured to add the bidding-related device to the bidding list.

8. The delisting system as described in claim 1, characterized in that, The delisting equipment information includes the isolation directory of the delisting equipment, the status of the operating plate, the order of hanging the plate, the unit name, the unit code, the power plant name, and the power plant code, or any combination thereof.

9. The delisting system as described in claim 1, characterized in that, It also includes an experience feedback module, which is configured to monitor the entire process of the delisting of the delisted equipment and the delisting-related equipment and generate a delisting log.

10. A method for removing a tag, characterized in that, Includes the following steps: Store the delisting information of the delisted equipment, and determine whether to submit a delisting application based on the delisting information; The system receives the license plate removal application and obtains one or more license plate removal associated devices of the removed device, and determines the license plate removal list based on the association degree between the license plate removal associated devices and the removed device and the license plate removal device information.

11. The method for removing a license plate as described in claim 10, characterized in that, It also includes obtaining the correlation between the delisted associated device and the delisted device based on the delisting device information and delisting association attributes, wherein the delisting association attributes include one or any combination of system boundary attributes, physical logic attributes, device status attributes and permission constraint attributes.

12. A computer-readable medium storing computer program code that, when executed by a processor, implements the method as described in any one of claims 10-11.

Images