TRANSFECTION IMAGE FOR CELL WALL ANNOTATIONS
Patent Information
- Application Number
- DE102023116100
- Authority / Receiving Office
- DE · DE
- Patent Type
- Applications
- Current Assignee / Owner
- Filing Date
- 2023-06-20
- Publication Date
- 2024-12-24
Smart Images

Figure 00000000_0000_ABST
Abstract
Claims
[1] Computer-implemented method, the method comprising: - Obtaining (3005, 3105) transfection image data comprising a fluorescence channel (101) and a non-fluorescence channel (105), wherein the transfection image data depicts a collection of cells, not all of which express a dye, - performing (3010, 3110) an automated image processing of the fluorescence channel (105) to locate boundary regions (112) between fluorescence areas and non-fluorescence areas, - generating (3015, 3115) cell wall annotations (184) along the localized border regions, and - Training (3020, 3120) a machine-learned algorithm (190) based on the cell wall annotations as ground truth and the non-fluorescence channel (105) as input. [2] A computer-implemented method according to any one of the preceding claims, the method further comprising: - generating (3015, 3115) non-cell wall annotations (185) in image areas adjacent to the localized boundary regions (12), wherein the training (3020, 3120) is further based on the non-cell wall annotations as further ground truth. [3] A computer-implemented method according to any one of the preceding claims, the method further comprising: - generating (3015, 3115) unknown annotations in image areas that have a minimum distance to all localized boundary regions (112), wherein the training (3020, 3120) is further based on the unknown annotations as a further ground truth. [4] The computer-implemented method of claim 3, wherein the unknown annotations are further generated based on an estimate of the presence of cells in the corresponding image areas based on the non-fluorescence channel (105). [5] The computer-implemented method of claim 3 or 4, wherein, when training the machine-learned algorithm (190), a prediction of the machine-learned algorithm in regions with the unknown annotation is not included in a loss function. [6] Computer-implemented method according to claim 3 or 4, wherein, during training of the machine-learned algorithm (190), a prediction of the machine-learned algorithm in areas with the unknown annotation is weighted into a loss function, wherein a weighting is determined as a function of a distance to at least one other annotation. [7] A computer-implemented method according to any one of the preceding claims, the method further comprising: - Applying (3025, 3125) the machine-learned algorithm (190) to localize cell walls in a non-fluorescence channel of inference image data. [8] A computer-implemented method according to claim 7, the method further comprising: - based on the localized cell walls in an output of the machine-learned algorithm (190): performing (3030) an instance localization of individual cells in the inference image data. [9] The computer-implemented method of claim 8, wherein performing instance localization detects contiguous regions and then distinguishes between cell instance and background for each contiguous region. [10] A computer-implemented method according to any one of the preceding claims, the method further comprising: - applying (3125) the machine-learned algorithm to localize cell walls in the non-fluorescence channel of the transfection image data or other image data, - based on the detected cell walls: performing (3130) an instance localization of individual cells in the non-fluorescence channel, and - Training (3135) another machine-learned algorithm based on the instance localization as ground truth and the non-fluorescence channel as input. [11] A computer-implemented method according to any one of the preceding claims, further comprising: - Evaluating a spatial structure of fluorescent regions in the fluorescence channel, with the cell wall annotations still being generated based on the spatial structure. [12] The computer-implemented method of any preceding claim, wherein training the machine-learned algorithm (190) uses a consistency loss function or a loss function that minimizes an entropy measure of an output of the machine-learned algorithm (190) in at least some image regions. [13] Data processing device arranged to carry out a method according to one of the preceding claims.
Citation Information
Patent Citations
21200420.4
102021125575.9
102022114888
