Method for motion control of a forming plant

Abstract

The invention relates to a method for motion control for a forming plant, with which an adjustment and synchronization of motion sequences can be carried out and with which a necessary new adjustment for the synchronization of motion sequences in a partial area can be carried out with minimal effort without affecting other partial areas or an entire time of a working cycle of a forming plant, in particular a multi-stage press.

Description

[0001] The invention relates to a method for controlling the motion of a forming plant according to the preamble of claim 1.

[0002] In forming systems, particularly presses with multiple stages, complex motion sequences between various moving units must be coordinated during operation in such a way that the motion curves and states of individual moving units are defined and related to one another. The movements of the rams of the individual press stages must be coordinated with the movements of the transfer units for transporting the workpieces between the press stages to avoid collisions or other disruptions in the operating process. A fast work cycle requires precise coordination and control of the motion sequences during operation, which must be implemented across the entire press system.

[0003] The term "motion curve" of a press assembly refers to the temporal progression of the position or path of, for example, the press ram or transfer unit during a complete press operating cycle. The "state of motion" of a press assembly, in turn, refers to the current state or the way in which the moving units of the press assembly (e.g., ram, transfer) are moving at a specific point in time. It thus describes the dynamic properties of the press assembly during an operating cycle and encompasses several important parameters such as velocity, acceleration, and direction of motion.

[0004] The work cycle of a press can be divided into several sub-areas. Here, movement sequences can be divided into process-relevant movement sections, such as the actual forming process, and process-independent movement sections, such as the movement of the ram in the open state while the transfer unit inserts or removes a workpiece.

[0005] In a press, specific parameters are defined within the process-relevant area to ensure the production of defect-free pressed parts (so-called good parts). If parameters change or shift during the forming process, defective pressed parts (so-called bad parts) can result. For example, changes in workpiece lubrication or tolerances in material thickness may necessitate adjustments to the parameters. In such cases, the movements in this area must be adapted so that the process operates within the revised parameter set, thus enabling the production of defect-free pressed parts once again.

[0006] A change in only one area always affects the coordination of motion sequences, for example, between the transfer units and a forming tool, such as a press ram. Therefore, it cannot be ruled out that a collision of the affected moving units will occur after such a change. Moreover, the overall operating cycle of the system is not at risk. This is the case, however, when global settings have to be changed instead of a local modification. This occurs with press equipment when the line speed, and not the speed in the affected area, is changed to adjust the forming speed.

[0007] Systems that allow variable speed and synchronization states are typically only tested for one specific state and do not allow other states, or only after undergoing another complex testing procedure.

[0008] From JP 5 306 980 B2 a method for determining a conveying path is known, which includes the following steps: - a step to temporarily determine the position of a control point that indicates the conveying path of a conveying device; - Trajectory calculation steps for calculating a transport path along which the transport device passes the control point, based on the coordinates of the temporarily fixed control point, and for further calculating the trajectory of the representative point of a vacuum suction cup when the transport device is moved along the transport path; and - Transport path determination steps to compare the calculated path of the representative point of the vacuum suction cup with the shape of a lower form, to divide the path into several sections and to further adjust the position of the control point so that the distance between the path and the lower form approaches the target value set for each of the sections.

[0009] From EP 2 909 684 B1 a method for determining workpiece transport paths in a multi-station press is known, which comprises the following steps: - Providing a set of constraints for the workpiece transport paths, - where the restrictions include at least the number of pick-up and drop-down points for a workpiece in a multitude of stations of the multi-station press, - Providing machine features of the plurality of stations and at least one transfer device for transporting the workpiece from a first of the plurality of stations to a second of the plurality of stations, - Providing information about a possible workpiece transport path, - Simulating the multiple stations and the at least one transfer device based on the provided information to determine whether the possible workpiece transport path matches the provided machine parameters, and - Display the result of the determination.

[0010] From DE 10 2016 222 649 B3, a method for determining a path for a transfer device for moving a workpiece through a forming device is known, wherein the forming device comprises at least one tool station, which has a lower tool having a first interference contour and an upper tool having a second interference contour, which is movable back and forth in a vertical z-direction by means of a ram, wherein the transfer device comprises at least one holder movable in an x-direction parallel to a transport direction, in the z-direction perpendicular to the x-direction and in a y-direction perpendicular to the x- and z-directions for holding the workpiece, with which the workpiece received on the lower tool is lifted, transported in the transport direction and subsequently lowered, in the following steps: - Manual control of the transfer device with the workpiece held by it, so that the workpiece is moved along a first path in the x and z directions along the first interference contour formed by the lower tool, and determining first coordinates of the holder at at least three predetermined positions of the first path, and - Determining the trajectory by processing the first coordinates using a predefined algorithm.

[0011] From EP 3 315 267 A1, a method for optimizing motion profiles in a plant is known, wherein the plant has at least one press with a tool and a plurality of transfer systems, wherein the movement of the respective tool is described by a press motion profile and the movement of the respective transfer system is described by a transfer motion profile, wherein the optimization of the motion profiles comprises the following steps: - that the respective transfer movement profile is specified, - that synchronization points are specified based on the respective transfer movement profile, whereby a first synchronization point defines the entry of a first transfer system into the press and a second synchronization point defines the exit of the first transfer system from the press, a third synchronization point defines the entry of the second transfer system into the press, and a fourth synchronization point defines the exit of the second transfer system from the press, - that each synchronization point is assigned a specific time, - that a first time range is defined between the first synchronization point and the second synchronization point, - that a second time range is defined between the third synchronization point and the fourth synchronization point, - that the time periods are gradually shortened to minimum times while adhering to boundary conditions, - that the respective press movement profiles are created based on the minimum times.

[0012] From DE 10 2005 024 822 A1, a method for preparing and executing the motion sequence of a workpiece-specific workpiece transport depending on the tool or ram movement in a press, press line, large-part step press or the like is known, wherein the press or the like has press transfer units arranged between the processing stations, wherein a simulation program assigned to the press control is first supplied with a data set containing press machine data, tool-specific data and process-specific data, wherein the simulation program calculates a tool and / or workpiece motion curve for a first press transfer unit from the stored data sets, and performs a first collision check between tool or ram and workpiece, wherein in the event of a calculated collision between tool or ram and workpiece, a correction of the motion curve of the tool or ram is made.The collision of the ram and / or the workpiece is checked by changing the coordinates on the motion curve, whereby, in the event of a calculated collision no longer existing, this first collision check is extended equally to one or more subsequent press transfer units, taking into account a possible collision of the press transfer units among themselves, and whereby an overall collision-free motion pattern is transferred to the press control for carrying out the workpiece machining.

[0013] The object of the invention is to propose a method for motion control for a forming plant, with which an adaptation and synchronization of motion sequences can be carried out and with which a necessary new adjustment for the synchronization of motion sequences in a partial area can be carried out with minimal effort without affecting other partial areas or an entire time of a working cycle of a forming plant, in particular a multi-stage press.

[0014] It is crucial that changes in this area do not simultaneously alter other areas that have previously been process-stable.

[0015] This problem is solved by means of the characterizing features of claim 1, starting from the features of the preamble of claim 1. Advantageous and expedient embodiments are specified in the respective dependent claims.

[0016] The invention thus relates to a method for controlling the motion of a forming plant, wherein the forming plant comprises at least two moving units, in particular a press ram and a transfer unit.

[0017] To carry out the procedure, a multiple pairs of positions are determined, wherein a position pair comprises a position of a first moving unit, in particular a transfer unit, and a position of a second moving unit, in particular a press ram. In the method, each position pair is assigned a position criterion.

[0018] It is provided that at least one first unit of the forming plant will have a is assigned a boundary geometry which defines a distance from an outer contour of the unit.

[0019] A control device regulates the movements of the moving units. The forming system is adjusted in such a way that motion synchronization occurs during the coordinated operation of the forming system.

[0020] The invention is characterized in that - the position criterion includes a positive criterion (+) for a permitted position or a negative criterion (-) for a prohibited position, - where a positive criterion (+) is assigned to the pair of positions in which the second moving unit is located outside the limit geometry of the first moving unit, - where a negative criterion (-) is assigned to the pair of positions in which the second moving unit is at least partially within the limit geometry of the first moving unit, - wherein the control device uses position pairs to coordinate the movement sequences, which include a positive criterion (+), and thus the second moving unit is moved at a distance to the first moving unit in a positive movement space outside the limit geometry of the first moving unit, and which include a negative criterion (x) and thus represent an inadmissible negative movement space for the second moving unit (2).

[0021] This method uses a range definition instead of an actual distance analysis to determine permissible, positive states between units. Outside a prohibited range, all possible positions, and thus system states, are permitted, which provides the control system with significantly more degrees of freedom to synchronize the movements necessary for operation.

[0022] This allows the coordination of movement sequences within the control unit itself to be carried out reliably and with minimal effort.

[0023] Furthermore, it is provided that the control device for coordinating the movement sequences determines when the transition from a position pair with a negative criterion to a position pair with a positive criterion takes place, and defines from the transition the allowed, positive movement space of the second moving unit, outside the limit geometry of the first moving unit, in which a movement sequence of the second moving unit can be flexibly coordinated, in particular without determining further concrete position pairs.

[0024] By considering the transition at which a position pair first changes from a negative criterion to a positive criterion, the subsequent range of positions, assuming the direction of movement remains the same, is a permissible, positive range. Since the control device can assume a positive criterion for all subsequent positions within this permissible positive range, no further verification is required.

[0025] Furthermore, the motion sequences of the forming system's moving units are divided into process-relevant and process-independent motion sections, and the control unit is aware of these motion sections. The control unit then only adjusts the motion sequences based on position pairs and limit geometries outside the process-relevant motion sections if this is necessary due to a change in the setpoint parameters, for example, to produce good parts again.

[0026] The plan is for the control unit to recognize process-relevant areas within which the setpoint parameters should be maintained, and to prioritize other areas that can be used for movement coordination.

[0027] This also results in greater process stability, as most parameters remain unchanged. Generally, such simple adjustments also increase the willingness to implement changes. This, in turn, improves the quality of the workpieces. By making adjustments with minimal effort, output remains high despite the modifications.

[0028] Furthermore, it may be possible to determine virtual position pairs through simulation, in particular by using a CAD model of the forming plant.

[0029] In this way, a simulation, possibly also for the initial operation of the forming system, can determine the permissible (positive) ranges and the prohibited (negative) ranges using external computing resources. However, in some cases, the CAD models may deviate from the actual geometries of the units in a forming system, and depending on the available computing capacity, the accuracy of the determined virtual position pairs may be embedded in an error parameter.

[0030] Alternatively or additionally, it can therefore be provided that real position pairs are actually determined by stepping up to the positions of the moving units in the forming plant itself.

[0031] The step-by-step approach of the position pairs until a limit area, defined by the limit geometry, is determined allows the identification of permissible positive position pairs or the movement space outside the prohibited negative position pairs, without having to consider the dynamic motion sequences of the forming system in real operation.

[0032] For example, when a plunger is moved stepwise towards a transfer device, a minimum distance can be determined, representing the smallest permissible distance between the plunger and the transfer unit. Any distance above this minimum can therefore be considered permissible. By knowing the transition from a position pair with a negative criterion to a position pair with a positive criterion, a free movement space, particularly in the open state, can be determined, which is available for the plunger's movement trajectory.

[0033] This approach is conceivable both for the actual approach to the position pairs and for the virtual determination of the position pairs, whereby in the virtual approach a sufficient precision of the CAD objects used must be given.

[0034] Furthermore, it is intended that the control unit will again use dynamic criteria of the individual moving units to coordinate the motion sequences, in particular inertia criteria, drive criteria, and dynamic limit criteria such as load limits. The ranges of permissible position pairs for developing a coordinated, synchronized motion within the work cycle can then be weighted in such a way that they can be approached with the necessary dynamics for the continuous operation of the forming system.

[0035] To determine the positive position pairs or the limit area defined by the limit geometry, either a distance vector, which is preferably to be understood as a distance vector perpendicular to the surface, or several discrete distance vectors, which represent a set of distances to be maintained from the surface of the moving unit in question, can be used.

[0036] Furthermore, the use of discrete vectors simplifies the determination of permissible positive position pairs or the definition of a range outside the forbidden negative position pairs with low computational power. The distance vectors and their number depend on the complexity of the geometry of the moving unit itself. The higher the complexity of the geometry of the moving unit, the greater the number of distance vectors that generally need to be considered.

[0037] However, with sufficient computing capacity or choice of digital object model, it is also possible to define the boundary geometry by a circumferential, or partially circumferential, enveloping boundary surface at a given distance to the surface of the moving unit.

[0038] Then, defined geometric and enclosed spaces can be determined in which the moving units may be positioned. Likewise, exclusion criteria can be defined for spaces in which the units may not be arranged together.

[0039] The above-described method and its specific features minimize the effort required for adjustments, as these only need to be made for a specific sub-area, while no further checks are necessary for other sub-areas. This also results in greater process stability, since most parameters remain unchanged. Such simple adjustments generally increase the willingness to implement modifications, which in turn improves the quality of the workpieces. By requiring minimal effort for adjustments, output remains high despite the modifications.

[0040] It may also be necessary to implement an event-driven adjustment to a motion sequence in one of the sub-areas if the motion sequence of one or both units leads to a deterioration in the quality of the manufactured workpieces. This could occur, for example, if the workpieces are formed too quickly or too slowly. In this case, the adjustment is quality-related. Such an adjustment allows the desired quality level to be quickly restored.

[0041] For the purposes of this invention, synchronization of the motion sequences means that the moving units, with their spatial positions, are coordinated with one another at the same time during their movement in such a way that there is never any spatial superposition of the moving units in the sense of a collision. Naturally, synchronization of the motion sequences can also include stationary units, such as a die or a lower tool. Moving units can be, for example, a ram and / or a transfer device. The motion curves and motion states already described are defined in relation to each other between the units.

[0042] A boundary geometry of a moving unit is understood to be an imaginary geometry that extends into a surrounding space from the outer geometry of the moving unit. In a two-dimensional view, a boundary geometry can, in a special case, be formed, for example, by a parallel contour of the moving unit's contour. In a three-dimensional view, a boundary geometry can be understood as a cloud projecting into the surrounding space, whose surface is equidistant from, for example, the enveloping geometry of the moving unit.

[0043] For the purposes of the invention, an event-driven adaptation of the motion sequence of a moving unit is understood to mean any case in which it is necessary for the moving unit to exhibit a modified motion sequence, such that it assumes different positions at the same time. This can be caused by a change in travel distance and / or a change in speed profile. A triggering event could be, for example, a manual or automatic change in a predefined parameter such as a forming speed. A trigger for changing a predefined parameter could, for example, be a change in the quality of the formed workpiece, which is to be counteracted by adjusting the predefined parameter.

[0044] For the purposes of the invention, moving units are considered to be directly consecutive if they could theoretically collide with each other.

[0045] In one implementation of the procedure, it is provided that, once the position pairs and the position criteria are available, the curve of the movement of the moving units of the system can be adjusted in detail so that a boundary condition of the permitted positive position pairs is not violated. Permissible positive movement ranges exist outside the prohibited negative position pairs. Therefore, further examination of the movement curves, up to the positive criterion for movement in these ranges, is not necessary.

[0046] Further details of the invention are described in the drawing with reference to schematically illustrated embodiments.

[0047] This shows: Fig. 1: a schematic representation of a forming plant, a press device; Fig. 2: a schematic representation of a transfer unit with boundary geometry; Fig. 3: a schematic overview of the positions of the forming plant; Fig. 4: a first pair of positions with a positive criterion; Fig. 5: a second pair of positions with a positive criterion; Fig. 6: a third pair of positions with a negative criterion; Fig. 7: a fourth pair of positions with a positive criterion;

[0048] Identical components are marked with the same reference symbols.

[0049] In detail, it shows Fig. 1 A forming system 1, which comprises a press ram 2 and a press base 3. For transporting workpieces (not shown), a transfer unit 4 on an articulated arm 5 enters the working area 10 between the press ram 2 and the press base 3. The movement of the transfer unit 4 proceeds along a path 7, while the press ram moves along a closing movement 6 to perform a forming operation.

[0050] The movements are shown schematically and in reality represent considerably more complex curves and processes.

[0051] For the coordinated operation of a forming system 1, it is necessary to synchronize the movement sequences of the individual moving units 2 and 4 in their movement paths 6 and 7 in such a way that no collision occurs and the closing movement during the forming process is carried out in such a way that a defect-free component (good part) is produced.

[0052] Fig. Figure 2 shows a transfer unit 4. Distance vectors 21, 22, and 23 are arranged on a portion of the surface of the transfer unit 4. These vectors represent the area of ​​the transfer unit 4 that is most prone to collision when entering the working area of ​​the forming machine 1 between the press ram 2 and the press base 3. Depending on the geometry, these distance vectors 21 are larger in the area of ​​the articulated arm 5 because a greater distance must be maintained here compared to the distance vectors 22 and 23 on the beam 25 of the transfer unit to avoid collisions.

[0053] The ends of the distance vectors 21, 22 and 24 facing away from the transfer unit 4 define a limit geometry by means of discrete points, which serves as a limit geometry for the switching between a positive criterion and a negative criterion in the method according to the invention.

[0054] It is also possible to define a continuous boundary geometry 24 in the form of an envelope using these vectors or other means, which fulfills the purpose of the method. For illustrative purposes, the boundary geometry is shown here only on the side facing the press ram 2. It is understood that this geometry is also taken into account at other locations, particularly the underside, depending on where position pairs with other units can occur that necessitate a collision-avoiding distance.

[0055] In the following, the concept of limit geometry is represented by the envelope 24, whereby, in the sense of the invention, both types of determination, by the concrete point cloud of the distance vectors or the continuous envelope of a surface, are claimed as limit geometry.

[0056] Fig. Figure 3 shows a state of the forming machine 1 in which a position pair is set to determine a permissible position at the edge of the limit geometry. This can be done, for example, in a simulation or directly on the machine by stepwise approaching the distances defined by the distance vectors 21, 22, and 23. The press ram 2, which is in position A1, 32, is lowered from position 32 to position 31 (shown as a dashed line) in the closing direction 6. The transfer unit 4 is in position 1, so that the press ram 2 in position 31 is just at the boundary of the distance vector 23. This position pair can then be saved as a permissible, positive position pair with a positive position criterion +.

[0057] In addition to the position pair of press ram 2 in position 31 and transfer unit 4 in position T1, all positions outside the limit geometry 24 (or defined by 21, 22, 23, ....) of the press ram 2, i.e. e.g. also position 32, are permitted, so that only the distance criterion press ram outside the limit area needs to be checked.

[0058] The Fig. 4, Fig. 5, Fig. 6 and Fig. Figure 7 shows a procedure for determining position pairs with a positive position criterion.

[0059] In Fig. In position 4, the press ram 2 is in position B1. The transfer unit 4 is in position T1. When the transfer unit 4 moves in the direction of movement 41, it continuously enters the working area 10 with the beam 25. Since the press ram 2 is always located outside the limit geometry, this position pair PP-I receives a positive position criterion in the form of a positive criterion (+).

[0060] In Fig. As the transfer unit 4 moves further into the working area 10 along the direction of movement 41, the articulated arm 5 also enters the working area. This makes the distance vectors 21 of the articulated arm 5 relevant for determining the limit geometry and the position criterion. In the position T2 of the transfer unit shown, the position criterion is still a positive criterion, since the position B1 of the press ram 2 is still outside the limit geometry 24. The position pair PP-II is therefore permitted.

[0061] In Fig. Figure 6 illustrates the case where the transfer unit 4 has now moved further into the working area at position T3. The press ram 2, at its current position B1, now violates the boundary geometry 24 in the region of the distance vector 21. The position criterion of the position pair PP-III, consisting of positions B1 and T3, is therefore a negative criterion (x) and does not represent a permissible position pair for coordinating the movement sequences. The press would now have to move the press ram 2 abruptly to position B2 (shown as a dashed line) in order to achieve a positive criterion (+). However, this abrupt movement is not possible due to dynamic properties such as inertia, drive torques, and other factors.

[0062] To coordinate the movement sequences within position pairs with a positive position criterion (+), the control device will now use a different allowed position outside the limit geometry 24 of the transfer unit 4.

[0063] Is the press ram 2 now positioned as in Fig. As shown in section 7, the transfer unit 4 is held at position B2. Even when the transfer unit 4 moves further into working area 10 to position T3, this does not violate the boundary geometry. The position pair PP-IV, consisting of positions B2 and T3, thus receives a positive criterion (+) as its position criterion and can be used to coordinate the movement sequence.

[0064] The processes described above can therefore be used, given a known number of allowed and forbidden position pairs, to define a boundary condition based on discrete position pairs without significant computational effort. Outside of this boundary, all available positions are permitted. In this way, for adapting a motion sequence on a forming unit 1 of a press line (not shown), a change in the positions of the moving units relative to each other can be synchronized, ensuring that all process-relevant parameters are met. Furthermore, the change in the units' movements outside the process-relevant ranges allows for collision-free operation of all units within a state in which all sub-areas are again defined and coordinated in their new motion state.

[0065] For example, a press ram 2 can move slower or faster in a region above the limit, as long as it remains outside the limit of the transfer unit 4 at every relevant time. This allows degrees of freedom for the forming process and its speed and / or for the transfer movement to be flexibly introduced. Reference symbol list 1 converter plant 2 press rams 3 Press base 4 transfer units 5 articulated arm 6 Closing movement 7 Movement path 10 Work area 21 Distance vector 22 Distance vector 23 Distance vector 24 Limit geometry 25 bars 31 Position of the press ram 32 Position of the press ram 41 Direction of movement of the transfer unit A1 Position of the press ram T1 Position of the transfer unit B1 Position of the press ram T2 Position of the transfer unit B2 Position of the press ram T3 Position of the transfer unit PP-I Position Pair PP-II Position Pair PP-III Position Pair PP-IV position pair

Claims

Method for motion control of a forming machine (1), wherein the forming machine (1) comprises at least two moving units (2, 4), - wherein a plurality of position pairs (PP-I, PP-II, PP-III, PP-IV) is determined, - wherein a position pair (PP-I, PP-II, PP-III, PP-IV) comprises a position (T1, T2, T3) of a first moving unit (4), and a position (B1, B2) of a second moving unit (2), - wherein a position criterion is assigned to the position pair (PP-I, PP-II, PP-IV), - wherein a boundary geometry (24) is assigned to at least one first unit (4) of the forming machine (1), which defines a distance from an outer contour of the unit (2, 4), - wherein a control device coordinates the motion sequences of the moving units (2, 4) of the forming machine (1) such that motion synchronization is achieved in the coordinated operation of the forming machine (1). This is done, characterized by,that- the position criterion includes a positive criterion (+) for a permitted position or a negative criterion (x) for a prohibited position,- wherein a positive criterion (+) is assigned to the position pair (PP-I, PP-II, PP-IV) in which the second moving unit (2) is located outside the limit geometry (24) of the first moving unit (4),- wherein a negative criterion (x) is assigned to the position pair (PP-III) in which the second moving unit (2) is located at least partially within the limit geometry (24) of the first moving unit (4),- wherein the control device uses position pairs (PP-I, PP-II, PP-IV) to coordinate the movement sequences, which include a positive criterion (+), and thus the second moving unit (2) is moved at a distance from the first moving unit (4) in a positive movement space outside the limit geometry (24) of the first moving unit (4),and which include a negative criterion (x) and thus represent an inadmissible negative motion space for the second moving unit (2). Method according to claim 1, characterized in that the control device for coordinating the movement sequences determines when the transition from a position pair (PP-III) with negative criterion (x) to a position pair (PP-IV) with positive criterion (+) takes place, and defines from the transition the allowed, positive movement space of the second moving unit (2), outside the limit geometry (24) of the first moving unit (4), in which a movement sequence of the second moving unit (2) can be flexibly coordinated. Method according to claim 1 or 2, characterized in that the motion sequences of the moving units (2, 4) of the forming system (1) are divided into process-relevant motion sections and process-independent motion sections, wherein the control device makes an adjustment of the motion sequences on the basis of position pairs (PP-I, PP-II, PP-III, PP-IV) and limit geometries (24) only outside the process-relevant motion sections. Method according to one of the preceding claims, characterized in that virtual position pairs (PP-I, PP-II, PP-III, PP-IV) are determined by simulation. Method according to one of the preceding claims, characterized in that real position pairs (PP-I, PP-II, PP-III, PP-IV) are actually determined by stepwise approaching the positions (B, T) of the moving units (2, 4) in the forming plant itself. Method according to one of the preceding claims, characterized in that the control device uses dynamic criteria of the individual moving units (2, 4) to coordinate the movement sequences. Method according to one of the preceding claims, characterized in that the limit geometry (24) is defined by at least one distance vector (21, 22, 23). Method according to one of the preceding claims, characterized in that the boundary geometry (24) is defined by an enclosing boundary surface at a distance from the surface of the moving unit (2, 4). Method according to claim 1, characterized in that the two moving units (2, 4) are designed as a press plunger (2) and a transfer unit (4). Method according to claim 1, characterized in that the position pair comprises the position (T1, T2, T3) of the first moving unit (4) designed as a transfer unit (4), and the position (B1, B2) of the second moving unit (2) designed as a press ram (2). Method according to claim 2, characterized in that the movement sequence of the second moving unit (2) can be coordinated without determining further specific position pairs. Method according to claim 4, characterized in that virtual position pairs (PP-I, PP-II, PP-III, PP-IV) are virtually determined using a CAD model of the forming plant. Method according to claim 6, characterized in that the control device uses inertia criteria, drive criteria and dynamic limit criteria such as load limits as dynamic criteria for coordinating the movement sequences. Method according to claim 7, characterized in that the limit geometry (24) is defined by several discrete distance vectors.

Images