Ultrasonic thread joining

JP2024515608A5Active Publication Date: 2025-04-08BAYER OY
View PDF 0 Cites 0 Cited by

Patent Information

Application Number
JP2023562664
Authority / Receiving Office
JP · JP
Patent Type
Applications
Current Assignee / Owner
Priority Date
2021-04-14
Filing Date
2022-04-07
Publication Date
2025-04-08
Estimated Expiration
2042-04-07

AI Technical Summary

Technical Problem

Existing methods for attaching removal threads to intrauterine systems (IUS) increase the cross-sectional dimensions and can cause mechanical irritation to uterine tissue, and are not as efficient or reliable as desired.

Method used

An apparatus and method using a welding jig with a concave welding groove and a sonotrode with a concave shape for ultrasonic bonding of removal sutures, ensuring a smooth and reliable attachment without increasing the IUS diameter, utilizing a concave shape to prevent slipping and ensure a strong bond.

Benefits of technology

The ultrasonic bonding method provides a fast, reliable, and mechanically non-irritating attachment of removal threads to IUS, reducing the risk of burning and ensuring a smooth removal process with enhanced automation and improved tensile strength.

✦ Generated by Eureka AI based on patent content.

Smart Images

  • Figure 00000000_0000_ABST
    Figure 00000000_0000_ABST
Patent Text Reader

Abstract

According to one aspect of the present invention, there is provided an apparatus for ultrasonically bonding a removal thread (1) of an intrauterine system (2). The apparatus comprises a bonding tool (3) having a bonding groove (4), the bonding groove having a length Lg, a width Wg and a depth Dg, and a bottom (5) having a concave shape. The apparatus 5 further comprises a sonotrode (6) having a length Ls that is 150-200% of Lg, a width Ws and a depth Ds of a bonding tip (7) of the sonotrode that is 80-98% of Wg. Furthermore, the bonding tip of the sonotrode has a concave shape.
Need to check novelty before this filing date? Find Prior Art

Description

[Technical field]

[0001] Field The present invention relates to an apparatus for ultrasonically welding removal strings of an intrauterine system as well as a method for ultrasonically welding removal strings of an intrauterine system. [Background technology]

[0002] Background and Objectives Intrauterine systems (IUS) typically comprise a body and either a copper spring or a container containing a contraceptive compound disposed on the body. They also comprise a removal thread of sufficient length to protrude from the uterus once the IUS is placed in the uterus. Thus, the removal thread is used to withdraw the IUS when it reaches the end of its use time or needs to be removed for some other reason. Additionally, the removal thread is typically used to hold the IUS in the inserter during storage, transportation, and insertion procedures.

[0003] Typically, a removal thread is attached to the body of the IUS by a knot, for example as disclosed in WO 2012 / 107464. However, because the IUS is placed in the uterus using an introducer, which typically passes through the cervix, it is necessary to provide both the IUS and its introducer with a smaller diameter for patient comfort.

[0004] Ultrasonic joining itself is a known technique and is used in many industrial applications. It is based on high frequency ultrasonic acoustic vibrations that are applied locally to items being held together under pressure to create a solid-state bonding process. It is commonly used to join dissimilar materials, particularly for plastics and metals. Summary of the Invention

[0005] In view of the above drawbacks, it is an object of the present disclosure to provide an apparatus and method for attaching a removal thread to an IUS that provides a reliable attachment that does not increase the cross-sectional dimension of the IUS. Advantageously, the method is also fast, at least faster than known knotting processes. A further object is to provide a removal thread that does not cause mechanical irritation of the uterine tissue.

[0006] The invention is defined by the features of the independent claims. Some particular embodiments are defined in the dependent claims.

[0007] According to a first aspect, - a joining jig having a joining groove, the joining groove having a length Lg, a width Wg, a depth Dg, and a concave bottom surface; - a sonotrode having a length Ls between 150 and 220% of Lg, a width Ws at the joint tip of the sonotrode between 80 and 98% of Wg, and a depth Ds; An apparatus for ultrasonically welding a removal string of an intrauterine system is provided, comprising:

[0008] According to a second aspect, - placing a first thread at the bottom of the joining groove and along its length; - placing a second thread over and along the length of the first thread in the splice groove; - positioning the splice tip over and along the length of the second thread within the splice groove; and - joining the first and second yarns together; A method is provided for ultrasonically welding a removal string of an intrauterine system using the device, comprising:

[0009] According to a third aspect, there is provided an intrauterine system prepared by the apparatus described above and comprising a removal thread attached using the method described above. [Brief description of the drawings]

[0010] [Figure 1] FIG. 1 shows an apparatus for ultrasonic bonding according to one embodiment of the present invention. [Diagram 2] FIG. 2 shows the device of FIG. 1 when prepared for use. [Diagram 3] FIG. 3 shows the apparatus of FIG. 1 in use. [Figure 4] FIG. 4 illustrates a joint groove and sonotrode according to one embodiment. [Diagram 5] FIG. 5 shows a sonotrode according to another embodiment. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

[0011] The present invention relates to a device for ultrasonic welding of removal strings in an intrauterine system, the device - A joining jig having a joining groove, the joining groove having a length Lg, a width Wg, a depth Dg and a concave bottom surface; - a sonotrode having a length Ls of 150-220% of Lg, a width Ws at the joint tip of the sonotrode being 8098% of Wg, and a depth Ds; wherein the mating tip of the sonotrode has a concave shape.

[0012] Thus, the inventive device and method for attaching a removal thread to an IUS results in an attachment that has a slightly rounded shape, such as an oval, and has a specific length along the length of the removal thread. This attachment is therefore very unlikely to get stuck inside the inserter, and removal of the IUS from the inserter is smooth. Ultrasonic bonding also reduces the risk of burning off the thread in production and is faster than knotting. Ultrasonic bonding is also easier to automate and leads to a more reliable end result.

[0013] In the device of the invention, the joining groove is designed to ensure the correct positioning of the removal thread during joining. For this purpose, the bottom of the joining groove has a concave shape, preferably essentially such that the lower part of the first removal thread fits snugly therein, i.e. does not slip off when pressure is applied. Thus, when the second removal thread is placed on top of the first removal thread and the joining tip of the sonotrode is applied to the second removal thread, the two removal threads essentially remain in place. For this purpose, the joining tip of the sonotrode also has a concave shape, preferably essentially such that the upper part of the second removal thread fits snugly therein, i.e. does not slip off when pressure is applied. The width of the joining groove is preferably such that it can be placed in the joining groove without fraying due to forced friction against the walls of the joining groove, and also essentially such that the removal thread fits into it, so that it does not roll or slip off when pressure is applied thereon. The objective is therefore for the two removal threads to remain overlapping each other during bonding, i.e. the width of the bonding groove is selected so as not to allow the upper thread to slide or roll adjacent to the lower thread. These features of the bonding fixture and sonotrode ensure that the resulting ultrasonic bond is as smooth and homogenous as possible, thus resulting in a strong and reliable attachment of the removal thread to the IUS.

[0014] The sonotrode, and thus its joining tip, is applied against the removal yarn with a certain pressure, which influences the quality of the resulting joint. The joining tip is in contact with the removal yarn and ultrasonic energy is generated by vibrating the sonotrode. This leads to heating of the material of the removal yarn, leading to the two yarns being joined together. The sonotrode is preferably held in place until the joining joint has cooled to ambient temperature.

[0015] The bottom of the joining groove is concave in order to obtain an attachment that does not differ significantly from the overall appearance of the removal thread, i.e. it is not desirable to have a square or rectangular cross section on the removal thread, but rather a rounded cross section. Typically, the cross section obtained is elliptical, since two threads are attached above and below each other. Thus, according to one embodiment, the concave shape of the bottom of the joining groove has a radius of curvature of 0.1 to 0.2 mm. According to another embodiment, the concave shape of the joining tip has a radius of curvature of 0.1 to 0.2 mm. Most typically, the radius of curvature of the bottom of the joining groove is the same as the radius of curvature of the joining tip. In one embodiment, the radius of curvature of both of these parts is 0.16 mm. The radius of curvature of each of these portions may independently be, for example, 0.1, 0.11, 0.12, 0.13, 0.14, 0.15, 0.16, 0.17 or 0.18 mm to 0.12, 0.13, 0.14, 0.15, 0.16, 0.17, 0.18, 0.19 or 0.2 mm. The height of the curvature may be, for example, 0.06 mm (here height means the difference in distance between the level of the side of the curvature and the bottom of the curvature).

[0016] The dimensions of the device are selected to suit the removal string being used and to provide the desired strength characteristics. Some examples of suitable dimensions are provided below.

[0017] According to one embodiment, the length Lg of the joining groove of the joining jig is 2.5 to 20 mm. The length Lg can be, for example, from 2.5, 3, 4, 4.5, 5, 5.5, 6, 7, 9, 10, 12, 14, or 16 mm to 4, 4.5, 5, 5.5, 6, 7, 9, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, or 20 mm. According to another embodiment, the length Ls of the sonotrode is 180 to 210% of Lg. The length Ls of the sonotrode can be, for example, from 150, 155, 160, 165, 170, 175, 180, 185, 190, or 200% to 160, 165, 170, 175, 180, 185, 190, 195, 200, 205, 210, 215, or 220% of Lg. According to an embodiment, the length Ls of the sonotrode is 3.8-35 mm. The length Ls can be, for example, from 3.8, 4, 4.5, 5, 6, 6.5, 7, 8, 10, 12, 15, 18, 20 or 25 mm to 5, 6, 6.5, 7, 8, 10, 12, 15, 18, 20, 25, 28, 30, 32 or 35 mm. The length Ls of the sonotrode is therefore greater than the length Lg of the joining groove of the joining jig. According to yet another embodiment, the length of the joining tip of the sonotrode can be, for example, 4 to 30 mm, for example, 6 mm.

[0018] According to one embodiment, the width Wg of the joining groove of the joining tool is essentially the same as the maximum cross-sectional dimension of the threads to be joined. The width Wg of the joining groove must of course be such that the removal thread can be placed therein without friction (which could damage the thread). According to one embodiment, the width Wg is 0.25-0.5 mm. Thus, the width Wg can be, for example, from 0.25, 0.28, 0.3, 0.32, 0.35, 0.4 or 0.45 mm to 0.28, 0.3, 0.32, 0, 35, 0.4, 0.42, 0.45 or 0.5 mm. According to a further embodiment, the width Ws of the joining tip of the sonotrode is 84-98% of the width Wg of the joining groove. Thus, the width Ws can be, for example, 80, 82, 84, 86, 88, 90, 92, 93, 95 or 96% to 84, 86, 88, 90, 93, 98, 96, 97 or 98% of the width Wg. For example, the width Wg of the splice groove can be 0.01-0.05 mm greater than the width Ws of the splice tip of the sonotrode. The sonotrode thus also fits snugly into the splice groove, and its concave splice tip thus allows the formation of the above-mentioned elliptical cross-sectional shape for the spliced ​​yarn.

[0019] According to yet another embodiment, the depth Dg of the joining groove is greater than twice the maximum cross-sectional dimension of the yarns to be joined. Thus, the joining groove is deep enough to accommodate both of the two yarns to be joined to each other, as well as at least a part of the sonotrode. The depth Dg can be, for example, 0.5 to 1.5 mm. Thus, the depth Dg can be, for example, from 0.5, 0.6, 0.7, 0.8, 0.9, 1, 1.1, 1.2 or 1.3 mm to 0.7, 0.8, 0.9, 1, 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 1.4 or 1.5 mm.

[0020] The sonotrode is preferably made of a material suitable for manufacturing medical devices, such as titanium or precipitation-hardened aluminum. According to one embodiment, the sonotrode is made of titanium. The sonotrode can be manufactured, for example, by machining a rod of a suitable material. The sonotrode typically also comprises an adapter or other suitable parts that allow it to be attached to an ultrasonic bonding machine. However, with regard to the above dimensions, sonotrode is understood to mean the part that performs the actual bonding, i.e. that vibrates under ultrasonic energy.

[0021] The apparatus comprises typical equipment for an ultrasonic bonding apparatus, such as a booster and / or converter, etc. The ultrasonic bonding apparatus is typically a commercially available apparatus, for example the machine "Standard 50" sold by Rinco Ultrasonics AG.

[0022] According to the second aspect: - placing a first thread at the bottom of the joining groove and along its length; - placing a second thread over and along the length of the first thread in the joining groove; - positioning the splice tip over and along the length of the second thread within the splice groove; and - joining the first and second yarns together; A method is provided for ultrasonically welding a removal string of an intrauterine system using the device, comprising:

[0023] According to one embodiment, the method of the invention uses a bonding device in energy mode, while the afterpulse setting can be either on or off. If the afterpulse is set on, the afterpulse time can be set, for example, to 100 ms. Furthermore, the throttle parameter can be set, for example, to a setting of 4-10. For high longitudinal tensile strength of the bonded seam, a setting of 5-7 is preferred. This parameter adjusts the rate of force build-up between the bonding tip and the bonded objects, and thus the rate of bond force build-up. A hold time of 100-1000 ms can be used, for example 300 ms. The hold time is the time to hold pressure on the objects to be bonded by the sonotrode after the bond stop condition is met and bonding is stopped. When the bonding device is used in energy mode, the instantaneous power absorbed by the objects to be bonded is added at short intervals. Ultrasonic bonding is initiated when a predefined trigger pressure is reached. Ultrasonic bonding is stopped when a predefined trigger energy level is achieved.

[0024] The system pressure may be, for example, 1.4-3.0 bar, a preferred range being 1.5-2.4 bar, typically 2.0 bar. The trigger pressure may be, for example, 1.0-3.0 bar, for example 1.6 bar. A preferred range is 1.5-2.4 bar. Thus, the system pressure may be from 1.4, 1.6, 1.8, 2.0, 2.2 or 2.5 bar to 1.6, 1.8, 2.0, 2.2, 2.5, 2.8 or 3.0 bar. The trigger pressure may be, for example, from 1.0, 1.2, 1.4, 1.6, 1.8, 2.0, 2.2 or 2.5 bar to 1.4, 1.6, 1.8, 2.0, 2.2, 2.5, 2.8 or 3.0 bar. The trigger pressure is typically set relative to the system pressure and, for practical reasons, is preferably not to exceed the system pressure. The ultrasound is initiated when a determined contact force of the bonding tip on the bonding object (e.g., pressure difference in a pneumatic cylinder) is measured. The system pressure is the target value of this pressure difference.

[0025] The amplitude of the sonotrode can be, for example, 75-100%. A preferred range is 80-100% and the energy used can be 0.3-3.0 Ws. The preferred energy used is in the range of 0.5-1.5 Ws. For example, when using a converter with a gain of 2.50, a Standard 50 from Rinco Ultrasonics AG is used with a VST 50 actuator and an ADG 70-100 generator (70 kHz system), the full absolute amplitude range is 12.75 μm. In this system, the relative amplitude can be, for example, 75-100%, which corresponds to an absolute amplitude range of 9.56-12.75 μm. Thus, the gain settings of the sonotrode and the converter together determine the full absolute amplitude range. Different parameters of ultrasonic bonding affect the final result. In addition to the above information, the specific examples given below will enable the skilled person to find suitable conditions for a given yarn material and yarn thickness.

[0026] According to a third aspect, an intrauterine system is provided, comprising a removal thread prepared by the above device and attached using the above method. The intrauterine system may be any known system, such as a T-shaped body with a copper string wound around the axis of the body, or a capsule containing a therapeutically active agent(s) disposed around the body. The body of the IUS may also have any other form suitable for intrauterine use. Similarly, the material used for the IUS is as known in the art. Typically, the IUS has a loop at its proximal end (i.e., the end closest to the cervical canal when the IUS is in place in the uterus), to which the removal thread is attached. In some IUS, the removal thread is at the distal end of the IUS before and during insertion, and is pulled through the loop to a lock at the end of insertion, whereby the removal thread is at the proximal end of the IUS after insertion.

[0027] The removal thread can be made of any material suitable for such use, typically a medical grade thermoplastic polymer. Some suitable polymers are, for example, polypropylene (PP), polyethylene (PE), such as high density polyethylene (HDPE), polyamide PA, poly(vinylidene fluoride) (PVDF) or thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU). The water content of the polymer used should be fairly low, as more water leads to higher damping and poorer bonding (as blistering can occur). This appears to be relevant at least for semi-crystalline polyamines and thermoplastic polyurethanes.

[0028] In the experimental section below, specific examples of thread bonding and the strength of the resulting attachments are presented to further illustrate the invention. EXAMPLES

[0029] Experimental section The joining experiments were carried out with a removal thread made of polypropylene homopolymer designed for filament extrusion (e.g., Eltex MED 100-MG03 by Ineos) with an essentially circular cross section with a diameter of 0.27 mm. A removal thread with a diameter of 0.24 mm was also tested. The diameter of the removal thread can vary by about ±0.02 mm.

[0030] The ultrasonic bonder used was in "energy mode" (Standard 50 by Rinco Ultrasonics AG, with a VST 50 actuator and an ADG 70-100 generator), which ensures the same amount of bonding energy for each bonding operation. The bonding energy varied from 0.5 to 1.5 Ws, but the amplitude was 90% of the amplitude recommended by the manufacturer for polypropylene materials. In the majority of experiments (Table 1), the relative amplitude set on the ultrasonic bonder was 90%. This value was the value recommended by the manufacturer for polypropylene materials. With a gain value of 2.50 for the converter used, this corresponds to an absolute amplitude of 11.47 μm. Relative amplitudes of 83% and 86% were also tested (Table 1).

[0031] During preliminary testing, it was observed that for this material and configuration, a lower bonding energy meant that the threads were not fused together properly and therefore the strength was too low, while a higher bonding energy meant that the threads were over-fused and the joint was deformed and had a filmy excess around the joint. This resulted in a higher tear strength but lower tensile strength. The hold time was a constant 300 ms and the frequency was 69977 Hz. The width of the bonding fixture Wg and the width of the bonding tip of the sonotrode Ws are given in Table 1 below in millimeters.

[0032] The trigger pressure used in the tests was 1.6 bar, which refers to the contact force of the sonotrode on the workpieces to be joined. A throttle setting of 7 was used in the experiments and no afterpulsing was applied. Once the predetermined trigger pressure was reached, the joining process begins.

[0033] In Table 1 below, System Pressure is the target pressure difference measured between the upper and lower sides of the piston during the bonding process. This quantity is proportional to the contact force of the bonding tip on the yarn to be bonded. It is expressed in bar. Tests #1-7 were performed with yarns having a diameter of 0.27 mm, and tests #8 and 9 were performed with yarns having a diameter of 0.24 mm.

[0034] [Table 1]

[0035] During testing, it was observed that for this material and configuration, the welding travel (i.e., the degree to which the bond area is compressed during the bonding process) was actually the most useful value to observe (travel is not a control parameter and cannot be directly set as a control parameter when operating in energy mode, but can be targeted by setting other bonding parameters). No clear correlation with bond strength was observed when the bonding travel was between 0.09-0.17 mm, but slightly better consistency of results was observed when the bonding travel was between 0.09-0.13 mm. Outside of this bonding travel region, bond strength was lower. It is believed that if the bonding travel was too small, the yarns would not be fused together properly, and if the bonding travel was too long, the yarns would be too compressed together and excess film-like material would form around the bond and / or sharp edges would form at the ends of the bond, making the bond weaker.

[0036] The tensile strength of the resulting joints was tested according to the principles of the procedure of ISO (ISO 7439:2015(en), Copper-containing contraceptive intrauterine devices - Requirements and tests; tests were performed as per this standard, but without using a T-frame). The results of tests #1 to #9 above are shown in Table 2 below as the average tensile strength in N for 1 to 90 parallel specimens, depending on the test. The visual quality of the resulting joints was also rated on a scale of 1 to 4 (1 being the worst and 4 being the best), taking into account also any film-like material if formed (reducing the visual quality).

[0037] [Table 2]

[0038] The lower tensile strength results for the finer yarns are believed to be caused by the smaller diameter of the yarns as well as the smaller contact area of ​​the yarns in the bond region.

[0039] The bonded thread was also compared to the same thread material attached to the IUS using a traditional knot (sailor's knot; "overhand loop"), as used in the commercial product Kyleena™. The tensile strength of the samples from Test #6 above (maximum number of parallel samples, 90) averaged 21.19 N with a standard deviation of 1.36, while the tensile strength of the samples in which the thread was attached by a knot (48 parallel samples) averaged 21.36 N with a standard deviation of 1.83.

[0040] Similar to the experiments described above, further experiments were performed and are described below (Table 3).

[0041] In all the experiments described below, the following parameters were constant (Table 3): 1) Yarn: Eltex MED 100-MG03 yarn by Ineos, having an essentially circular cross section with a diameter of 0.27 mm. 2) Wg=0.32mm 3) Ws=0.30mm 4) Relative amplitude setting of ultrasonic bonding machine = 90% 5) Holding time=300ms 6) Afterpulse = 100ms

[0042] The data shown in Table 3 are averaged from the number of samples indicated by N (3 or 15).

[0043] [Table 3]

[0044] It is believed that a person skilled in the art can easily define the optimum bonding conditions for a given thread material by performing a few simple experiments.

[0045] Detailed Description of the Drawings 1 illustrates an apparatus for ultrasonic bonding according to one embodiment of the present invention, showing a bonding fixture 3. The figure shows various directions of height H, width W, and depth D used herein. Although the figure shows each direction generally, it should be understood that the directions are the same for the bonding fixture and the sonotrode.

[0046] FIG. 2 shows the device of FIG. 1, where the intrauterine system 2 and its removal string 1 are positioned such that the removal string 1 is located within the groove of the application jig (shown in more detail in FIG. 4).

[0047] In Fig. 3, a sonotrode 6 is placed over the removal thread 1 along a length in order to join the removal threads 1 together. Fig. 3 also shows a support element 3' arranged in connection with the joining fixture 3 in order to support the IUS and thread 1 over a longer distance than just the joining groove.

[0048] FIG. 4 shows a splice groove 4 and a sonotrode 6 according to an embodiment. The splice groove 4 has a concave bottom 5, i.e. the bottom of the splice groove is rounded. Ideally, as shown here, the concave shape of the bottom is essentially such that the first removal thread 1 fits in it first. The second removal thread is placed on top of the first removal thread, and then the splice tip 7 of the sonotrode 6 is applied to the top of the second removal thread. Again, the shape of the splice tip 7 is concave, ideally essentially identical to the shape of the removal thread. Similarly, as can be seen from this preferred embodiment, the width Ws of the splice jig is essentially identical to the diameter of the removal thread 1 (i.e. this embodiment is essentially spherical in its cross section).

[0049] Figure 5 shows a sonotrode (6) according to another embodiment. The figure also shows an adapter (8) for attaching the sonotrode to a joining machine. The joining tip (7) of the sonotrode is shown in a side view.

[0050] It is to be understood that the disclosed embodiments of the invention are not limited to the particular structures, process steps, or materials disclosed herein, but extend to equivalents thereof that would be recognized by one of ordinary skill in the art. It is also to be understood that the terminology used herein is used only for the purpose of describing particular embodiments, and is not intended to be limiting.

[0051] Furthermore, the described features, structures, or characteristics may be combined in any suitable manner in one or more embodiments. In this description, numerous specific details are provided, such as examples of lengths, widths, shapes, etc., to provide a thorough understanding of embodiments of the invention.

[0052] The verbs "to comprise" and "to include" are used in this specification as open limitations that neither exclude nor require the presence of unrecited features. Features recited in the dependent claims may be freely combined with each other, unless otherwise stated. Furthermore, it is to be understood that throughout this specification the use of "a" or "an", i.e. the singular, does not exclude the plural.

Claims

1. A device for ultrasonic welding of a removal thread (1) of an intrauterine system (2), comprising: A joining jig (3) having a joining groove (4), the joining groove having a length Lg, a width Wg and a depth Dg and a bottom (5) having a concave shape; a sonotrode having a length Ls that is 150-220% of Lg, a width Ws of the joint tip (7) of the sonotrode that is 80-98% of Wg, and a depth Ds, wherein the joint tip of the sonotrode has a concave shape.

2. 2. The device according to claim 1, wherein the concave shape of the bottom (5) of the joining groove (4) has a radius of curvature of 0.1 to 0.2 mm.

3. 3. The device according to claim 1 or 2, wherein the concave shape of the joining tip (7) has a radius of curvature of 0.1 to 0.2 mm.

4. The device of claim 1, wherein the length Lg is between 2.5 and 20 mm.

5. 2. The apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the width Wg is essentially the same as the maximum cross-sectional dimension of the yarns (1) to be joined.

6. The apparatus of claim 5, wherein the width Wg is between 0.25 and 0.5 mm.

7. 2. The apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the depth Dg is greater than twice the maximum cross-sectional dimension of the threads (1) to be joined.

8. The apparatus of claim 7, wherein the depth Dg is between 0.5 and 1.5 mm.

9. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the length Ls is 180-210% of Lg.

10. The apparatus of claim 1 , wherein the width Ws is 84 to 98% of the width Wg.

11. 2. The apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the sonotrode (6) is made of titanium or precipitation-hardened aluminium.

12. 2. A method for ultrasonic joining of a removal thread (1) of an intrauterine system (2) using a device according to claim 1, comprising: - placing a first thread (1) at the bottom (5) of said joining groove (4) and along its length; - placing a second thread over the first thread in said joining groove along its length; - placing said splice tip (7) over said second thread in said splice groove along its length; and - bonding said first and second yarns together.

13. The method of claim 12, wherein the system pressure is between 1.6 and 2.4 bar.

14. The method according to claim 11 or 12, wherein the ultrasonic energy is between 0.5 and 1.5 Ws.

15. An intrauterine system (2) comprising a removal thread (1) attached using the method according to claim 12.