Information processing device and method for storing measurement data

Abstract

To accurately save the measurement data as appropriate measurement data for the elevator to be measured.SOLUTION: An information processing device (10) includes an information acquisition unit (111) that acquires identification information and measurement data, a performance determination unit (112) that compares a comparative performance of an elevator (2) identified by the identification information with a measured performance calculated from the measurement data and determines whether or not a difference between the comparative performance and the measured performance is equal to or greater than a first predetermined value, a confirmation request unit (113) that requests a confirmation input as to whether or not the measured data may be saved, and a storage control unit (114) that associates the elevator (2) identified by the identification information with the measured data and saves them.SELECTED DRAWING: Figure 1

Description

[Technical field]

[0001] The present invention relates to an information processing device for elevator measurement data and a method for storing measurement data. [Background technology]

[0002] Conventionally, elevator maintenance work involves measuring the vibration and noise of the elevator. The measurement data obtained in the measurement work is stored in a predetermined storage unit together with information about the elevator being measured, and is used to diagnose whether or not the elevator being measured needs to be inspected. For example, Patent Document 1 discloses an inspection system that automatically identifies the elevator being measured from the measurement data obtained in the measurement work. [Prior art documents] [Patent documents]

[0003] [Patent Document 1] JP 2017-019605 A Summary of the Invention [Problem to be solved by the invention]

[0004] In measurement work as a maintenance task, the elevator may be operated with the settings of travel parameters such as acceleration and speed changed to reduce vibration and noise of the car, etc., and the vibration and noise of the elevator may be measured in this state. In the inspection system described in Patent Document 1, there is a problem that the measurement data measured by changing the settings of the travel parameters may not correctly identify the elevator to be measured, and the measurement data may not be accurately saved as appropriate measurement data for the elevator to be measured.

[0005] An object of one aspect of the present invention is to realize an information processing device that can accurately store measurement data obtained through measurement as appropriate measurement data for the elevator that is the subject of measurement. [Means for solving the problem]

[0006] In order to solve the above problems, an information processing device according to one embodiment of the present invention includes an information acquisition unit that acquires inputted elevator identification information and measurement data output by a sensor that detects the acceleration of the elevator to be measured, a performance determination unit that compares a comparative performance, which is a predetermined operational performance of the elevator identified by the identification information, with a measured performance, which is the predetermined operational performance calculated from the measurement data, and determines whether or not a difference between the comparative performance and the measured performance is equal to or greater than a first predetermined value, a confirmation request unit that requests a confirmation input as to whether or not the measurement data may be saved if a difference between the comparative performance and the measured performance for at least one of the predetermined operational performances is equal to or greater than the first predetermined value, and a storage control unit that, when a confirmation input indicating that the measurement data may be saved is received, saves the elevator identified by the identification information in association with the measurement data.

[0007] According to the above configuration, when the difference between the comparative performance of the elevator identified by the identification information and the measured performance calculated from the measurement data for at least one specified operating performance is equal to or greater than a first specified value, the confirmation request unit requests the maintenance worker to input a confirmation as to whether or not it is OK to save the measurement data.

[0008] Thereby, when the difference between the comparative performance and the measured performance is equal to or greater than the first predetermined value, the maintenance worker can check, for example, whether the measured data is data in which the running parameters (acceleration and speed) have been changed, and can instruct the measurement data to be stored after determining whether the elevator specified by the identification information and the measured data may be associated with each other and stored. As a result, the measured data obtained by the measurement can be accurately stored as appropriate measured data for the elevator to be measured.

[0009] An information processing device according to another aspect of the present invention includes a display unit that is visible to a maintenance worker and a display control unit that controls the display of the display unit, wherein the confirmation request unit identifies an operating performance for which the difference between the comparative performance and the measured performance is equal to or greater than the first predetermined value, and the display control unit may display on the display unit, together with the display of the confirmation input requested by the confirmation request unit, the operating performance for which the difference between the comparative performance identified by the confirmation request unit and the measured performance is equal to or greater than the first predetermined value.

[0010] According to the above configuration, the display unit displays the operational performance for which the difference between the comparison performance and the measured performance is equal to or greater than the first predetermined value, together with the confirmation input requested by the confirmation request unit. Therefore, the maintenance worker can determine whether to associate the elevator identified by the identification information with the measured data and store it by simply checking only the items related to the displayed operational performance. This reduces the workload of the maintenance worker.

[0011] In an information processing device according to another aspect of the present invention, the display control unit may display on the display unit, for operational performance for which the difference between the comparative performance identified by the confirmation request unit and the measured performance is equal to or greater than the first predetermined value, at least one of the difference between the comparative performance and the measured performance calculated by the performance determination unit, and the value of the comparative performance and the measured performance for the operational performance for which the difference is equal to or greater than the first predetermined value.

[0012] According to the above configuration, in the operational performance where the difference between the comparative performance specified by the confirmation request unit and the measured performance is equal to or greater than the first predetermined value, the display unit displays the difference between the calculated comparative performance and the measured performance, and at least one of these values. Therefore, the maintenance worker can determine whether or not to associate the elevator specified by the identification information with the measured data and store them, simply by checking the display on the display unit. This reduces the workload of the maintenance worker.

[0013] In another aspect of the information processing device of the present invention, the performance determination unit compares the comparison performance with the measured performance and further determines whether the difference between the comparison performance and the measured performance is equal to or greater than a second predetermined value that is greater than the first predetermined value, and the confirmation request unit stops the request for confirmation input when the performance determination unit determines that the difference between the comparison performance and the measured performance in at least one of the specified operating performances is equal to or greater than the second predetermined value, and the storage control unit may not need to store the measurement data when the request for confirmation input is stopped.

[0014] If the difference between the comparative performance and the measured performance is too large, there is a high possibility that the measured data contains an error or that the identification information has been entered incorrectly. According to the above configuration, if the difference between the comparative performance and the measured performance is equal to or greater than a second predetermined value that is greater than the first predetermined value, no confirmation input is requested and the measured data is not saved. Therefore, by appropriately setting the second predetermined value, it is possible to prevent erroneous measured data from being saved and to prevent measured data from being saved in association with an elevator identified by erroneously entered identification information.

[0015] In an information processing device according to another aspect of the present invention, when a confirmation input is received indicating that the measurement data may be saved, the storage control unit may save the measurement data separately from existing measurement data that is stored in association with the elevator identified by the identification information.

[0016] According to the above configuration, the measurement data in which the difference between the comparative performance and the measured performance is equal to or greater than the first predetermined value is stored separately from the existing measurement data stored in association with the elevator identified by the identification information. As a result, when using the measurement data accumulated for the elevator identified by the identification information, the measurement data in which the difference between the comparative performance and the measured performance was large can be used without including it as necessary, thereby improving the usability of the accumulated data.

[0017] In an information processing device according to another aspect of the present invention, the confirmation request unit requests re-input of the identification information if the difference between the comparative performance and the measured performance for at least one of the specified operating performances is equal to or greater than the first predetermined value, and when the identification information is re-input, the performance determination unit may compare the comparative performance of the elevator identified by the re-inputted identification information with the measured performance and determine whether the difference between the comparative performance and the measured performance is equal to or greater than the first predetermined value.

[0018] According to the above configuration, when the difference between the comparative performance and the measured performance in at least one predetermined operating performance is equal to or greater than a first predetermined value, the confirmation request unit requests the maintenance worker to re-input the identification information. Furthermore, when the identification information is re-input, the performance determination unit performs a process of determining whether the difference between the comparative performance and the measured performance of the elevator identified by the re-input identification information is equal to or greater than a first predetermined value. As a result, even if the identification information is input incorrectly, the measurement data obtained by the measurement can be accurately saved as measurement data of the correct elevator to be measured.

[0019] In an information processing device according to another aspect of the present invention, when the difference between the comparative performance and the measured performance in at least one of the specified operating performances is equal to or greater than a first specified value, the confirmation request unit requests a confirmation input as to whether the measured data is measured data obtained by setting running parameters different from reference running parameters, which are the running parameters of the elevator that define the comparative performance, and when there is a confirmation input that the measured data is measured data obtained by setting running parameters different from the reference running parameters, the storage control unit may store the measured data in association with the elevator identified by the identification information.

[0020] According to the above configuration, the confirmation input of whether the measurement data may be stored, which is requested by the confirmation request unit, is executed by a confirmation input of whether the measurement data is obtained by setting travel parameters different from the reference travel parameters. Therefore, by confirming whether the travel parameters of the measurement data are different from the reference travel parameters, the maintenance worker can determine whether to associate the elevator specified by the identification information with the measurement data and store it.

[0021] In order to solve the above problems, a measurement data storage method according to one embodiment of the present invention includes an information acquisition step of acquiring inputted elevator identification information and measurement data output by a sensor that detects the acceleration of the elevator to be measured, a performance determination step of comparing a comparative performance, which is a predetermined operational performance of the elevator identified by the identification information, with a measured performance, which is the predetermined operational performance calculated from the measurement data, and determining whether or not a difference between the comparative performance and the measured performance is equal to or greater than a first predetermined value, a confirmation request step of requesting a confirmation input as to whether or not the measurement data may be stored if a confirmation input indicating that the measurement data may be stored has been received, and a storage control step of storing the elevator identified by the identification information and the measurement data in association with each other when the confirmation input indicating that the measurement data may be stored has been received.

[0022] The information processing device according to each aspect of the present invention may be realized by a computer. In this case, the control program of the information processing device that realizes the information processing device on a computer by causing the computer to operate as each part (software element) of the information processing device, and the computer-readable recording medium on which the control program is recorded, also fall within the scope of the present invention. Effect of the Invention

[0023] According to one aspect of the present invention, it is possible to realize an information processing device that can accurately store measurement data obtained through measurement as appropriate measurement data for the elevator that is the measurement target. [Brief description of the drawings]

[0024] [Figure 1] 1 is a functional block diagram showing an overall configuration of a maintenance support system including an information processing device according to an embodiment of the present invention. [Diagram 2] 4A and 4B are diagrams illustrating examples of displays on a display unit of the information processing device. [Diagram 3] FIG. 4 is a flow chart showing an example of an operation of the information processing device. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

[0025] [Embodiment] An embodiment of the present invention will be described in detail below. However, the following description is an example of an information processing device 10 according to the present invention, and the technical scope of the present invention is not limited to the illustrated example.

[0026] <Maintenance support system overview> 1 is a functional block diagram showing the overall configuration of a maintenance support system 1 including an information processing device 10 according to an embodiment of the present invention. The maintenance support system 1 is a system for accurately storing measurement data obtained by measurement as appropriate measurement data of an elevator 2 that is the object of measurement.

[0027] The information processing device 10 of the maintenance support system 1 compares the comparative performance, which is a predetermined operational performance of the elevator 2 identified by the identification information, with the measured performance, which is a predetermined operational performance calculated from the measurement data. Then, if the difference between the comparative performance and the measured performance for at least one predetermined operational performance is equal to or greater than a first predetermined value, the information processing device 10 requests the maintenance worker to input a confirmation as to whether or not it is OK to save the measured data, and saves the measured data based on the confirmation input by the maintenance worker, thereby enabling the measured data obtained by the measurement to be accurately saved as appropriate measured data for the elevator 2 being measured.

[0028] <Maintenance support system> As shown in FIG. 1, the maintenance support system 1 includes an elevator 2, an information processing device 10, and a server device 50.

[0029] (Elevator) The elevator 2 includes a car 20 and a control panel 21. The car 20 is, for example, a housing that carries passengers and moves up and down inside a tower. The control panel 21 controls the operation of the elevator 2. The control panel 21 is installed separately from the car 20, for example, in a hoistway. The control panel 21 runs the elevator 2 based on standard running parameters of the elevator 2 or running parameters input by a maintenance worker. The running parameters are, for example, acceleration and speed.

[0030] The control panel 21 includes a control unit 22, a storage unit 23, and an input unit 24. The control unit 22 comprehensively controls each unit of the control panel 21. The functions of the control unit 22 may be realized by a CPU executing a program stored in the storage unit 23. The storage unit 23 stores various programs executed by the control panel 21 and data used by the programs.

[0031] A maintenance worker inputs running parameters through the input unit 24. When a maintenance worker detects a problem such as an abnormal noise during maintenance work, the maintenance worker can change the running parameters of the elevator 2 by inputting any running parameters into the input unit 24.

[0032] The driving parameters may be input to the control panel 21 using the information processing device 10. In that case, for example, the information processing device 10 may be wirelessly connected to the control panel 21, and the driving parameters may be input (changed) by transmitting a signal.

[0033] During maintenance work, the control unit 22 runs the elevator 2 with the reference running parameters. When running parameters are input to the input unit 24, the control unit 22 runs the elevator 2 with the running parameters input to the input unit 24.

[0034] (Server device) The server device 50 processes information from the information processing device 10 and transmits the processed information to the information processing device 10. As an example, the server device 50 may be a server device realized by cloud computing. The information processing device 10 and the server device 50 are connected to each other via a communication network 60 so as to be able to communicate with each other, as shown in FIG.

[0035] The server device 50 includes a control unit 51 and a storage unit 52. The control unit 51 may be realized by a CPU executing a program stored in the storage unit 52. The storage unit 52 stores various programs executed by the server device 50 and data used by the programs.

[0036] Moreover, the storage unit 52 stores operation performance information 521, first history information 522, and second history information 523. The operation performance information 521 is information in which identification information is associated with a predetermined operation performance of the elevator 2 identified by the identification information. The predetermined operation performance is, for example, a speed, an acceleration, a traveling distance, etc.

[0037] The predetermined operational performance in the operational performance information 521 is a value when each elevator 2 is run with reference running parameters, and is, for example, a value set in advance based on the rated performance of the elevator 2. The reference running parameters are running parameters of the elevator 2 that define comparative performance, which will be described later. In the operational performance information 521, the reference running parameters and the predetermined operational performance may be stored in a changeable manner.

[0038] The first history information 522 and the second history information 523 store past measurement data of each elevator 2. The first history information 522 stores past measurement data measured while each elevator 2 is running with reference running parameters, and the second history information 523 stores past measurement data measured while each elevator 2 is running with running parameters different from the reference running parameters. History information may be newly created for each measured running parameter. Note that, in practice, the first history information 522 and the second history information 523 are saved for each elevator 2 identified by the identification information.

[0039] The control unit 51 acquires the identification information transmitted from the information processing device 10, and transmits to the information processing device 10, based on the operation performance information 521, a predetermined operation performance of the elevator 2 associated with the acquired identification information.

[0040] (Information processing device) The information processing device 10 stores the measurement data obtained by the measurement in a memory unit 52 of the server device 50 in association with the elevator 2 to be measured. The information processing device 10 may be, for example, a smartphone or a portable PC (personal computer). The information processing device 10 includes a control unit 11, a memory unit 12, an acceleration sensor 13, an input unit 14, and a display unit 15.

[0041] The acceleration sensor 13 (sensor) detects the acceleration of the elevator 2. The acceleration sensor 13 detects the acceleration of the car 20, thereby detecting the acceleration of the elevator 2. When measuring the acceleration of the elevator 2, a maintenance worker, for example, brings the information processing device 10 into the car 20 and places the information processing device 10 on the floor of the car 20 to measure the acceleration of the car 20.

[0042] The acceleration sensor 13 outputs measurement data of the detected acceleration to the control unit 11. The acceleration sensor 13 does not have to be provided in the information processing device 10, and may be installed in the car 20 in advance.

[0043] The input unit 14 is used by a maintenance worker to input identification information, confirm the input, etc. For example, the input unit 14 is a touch panel, and each input is performed via the touch panel overlaid on the display unit 15 of the information processing device 10.

[0044] The display unit 15 is visible to a maintenance worker and displays various information based on the control of the display control unit 115. Display examples of the display unit 15 will be described later in detail.

[0045] The control unit 11 comprehensively controls each unit of the information processing device 10. The functions of the control unit 11 may be realized by a CPU executing a program stored in the storage unit 12. The details of the control unit 11 will be described later. The storage unit 12 stores various programs executed by the information processing device 10 and data used by the programs.

[0046] (Control unit) The control unit 11 includes an information acquisition unit 111, a performance determination unit 112, a confirmation request unit 113, a storage control unit 114, and a display control unit 115. Note that the performance determination unit 112, the confirmation request unit 113, and the storage control unit 114 may be included in the server device 50 instead of the information processing device 10.

[0047] The information acquisition unit 111 acquires the identification information of the elevator 2 input by the input unit 14. The identification information may be acquired by utilizing image recognition processing from an image captured by a camera, or may be acquired from a two-dimensional code or tag containing the identification information. In addition, the identification information of the elevator 2 located at the current position may be specified by acquiring the current position from a GPS (Global Positioning System) function.

[0048] The information acquiring unit 111 acquires measurement data output by the acceleration sensor 13 that detects the acceleration of the elevator 2 to be measured. The information acquiring unit 111 also accepts input from the input unit .

[0049] The performance determination unit 112 compares the comparative performance, which is a predetermined operating performance of the elevator 2 identified by the identification information, with the measured performance, which is a predetermined operating performance calculated from the measurement data, and determines whether the difference between the comparative performance and the measured performance is greater than or equal to a first predetermined value.

[0050] Specifically, the performance determination unit 112 transmits the identification information acquired by the information acquisition unit 111 to the server device 50. Then, the performance determination unit 112 receives from the server device 50 a predetermined operational performance of the elevator 2 identified from the identification information transmitted to the server device 50. The performance determination unit 112 sets the predetermined operational performance of the elevator 2 received from the server device 50 as a comparison performance.

[0051] The performance determination unit 112 calculates a predetermined operating performance from the measurement data acquired by the information acquisition unit 111, and sets the calculated operating performance as the measured performance. Then, the performance determination unit 112 compares the comparative performance with the measured performance, and determines whether or not the difference between the comparative performance and the measured performance is equal to or greater than a first predetermined value. A different first predetermined value may be set for each operating performance.

[0052] Furthermore, the performance determination unit 112 compares the comparative performance with the measured performance, and if the difference between the comparative performance and the measured performance is equal to or greater than a first predetermined value, determines whether the difference between the comparative performance and the measured performance is equal to or greater than a second predetermined value that is greater than the first predetermined value. The second predetermined value may be set to a different value for each operating performance.

[0053] (Verification supply section, display control section) The confirmation request unit 113 requests a confirmation input from the maintenance worker. A request for confirmation input means that the maintenance worker is requested to input the confirmation result for the items to be confirmed. The display control unit 115 controls the display of the display unit 15 based on the contents of the confirmation input requested from the maintenance worker. FIG. 2 is a diagram showing an example of the display on the display unit 15 of the information processing device 10. The confirmation request unit 113 and the display control unit 115 will be described with reference to FIG. 2.

[0054] When the difference between the comparative performance and the measured performance in at least one predetermined operating performance is equal to or greater than a first predetermined value, the confirmation request unit 113 requests a confirmation input as to whether or not the measured data may be stored. Specifically, when the difference between the comparative performance and the measured performance in at least one predetermined operating performance is equal to or greater than a first predetermined value, the confirmation request unit 113 requests a confirmation input as to whether or not the measured data is measured data obtained by setting driving parameters different from the reference driving parameters. In other words, the confirmation input requests a confirmation as to whether or not the driving parameters at the time of measuring the measured data are different from the reference driving parameters.

[0055] When the difference between the comparative performance and the measured performance in at least one predetermined operational performance is equal to or greater than a first predetermined value, the display control unit 115 displays, for example, as shown in Fig. 2, a display 31 stating "Measurement data does not match database", together with a display 32 stating "Settings have been changed" as a request for confirmation input on the display unit 15. The maintenance worker touches the display 32 to perform "confirmation input", that is, "input of approval to store the measurement data because it is measured with driving parameters different from the reference driving parameters".

[0056] In this way, the confirmation input of whether or not the measurement data may be saved, which is requested by the confirmation request unit 113, is executed by the confirmation input of whether or not the measurement data is obtained by setting running parameters different from the reference running parameters. Therefore, by confirming whether or not the running parameters of the measurement data are different from the reference running parameters, the maintenance worker can determine whether or not to save the measurement data in association with the elevator 2 specified by the identification information.

[0057] The confirmation request unit 113 identifies an operational performance for which the difference between the comparative performance and the measured performance is equal to or greater than a first predetermined value. In this case, the display control unit 115 displays on the display unit 15 a display indicating the operational performance for which the difference between the comparative performance identified by the confirmation request unit 113 and the measured performance is equal to or greater than a first predetermined value, together with a display 32 for the confirmation input requested by the confirmation request unit 113. For example, if the operational performances for which the difference between the comparative performance and the measured performance is equal to or greater than the first predetermined value are speed and acceleration, speed and acceleration are displayed as inconsistent data in the display 33 as shown in FIG. 2.

[0058] In this way, the display unit 15 displays the operational performance for which the difference between the comparison performance and the measured performance is equal to or greater than the first predetermined value, together with the confirmation input requested by the confirmation request unit 113. Therefore, the maintenance worker can determine whether to associate the elevator 2 identified by the identification information with the measured data and store it, simply by checking the items related to the displayed operational performance. This reduces the workload of the maintenance worker.

[0059] In addition, for operational performance for which the difference between the comparative performance and the measured performance identified by the confirmation request unit 113 is equal to or greater than a first predetermined value, the display control unit 115 displays on the display unit 15 at least one of the difference between the comparative performance and the measured performance calculated by the performance determination unit 112 and the value of the comparative performance and the measured performance for the operational performance for which the difference is equal to or greater than the first predetermined value.

[0060] For example, when the motion performances for which the difference between the comparative performance and the measured performance is equal to or greater than the first predetermined value are speed and acceleration, the display unit 15 displays the measured data (measured performance) and the database (comparative performance) values ​​for speed and acceleration (display 34). Note that when there are two or more motion performances for which the difference between the comparative performance and the measured performance is equal to or greater than the first predetermined value, the values ​​of the motion performances that could not be displayed on the display unit 15 (the acceleration values ​​in FIG. 2) may be displayed by operating the scroll shown in display 36 as shown in FIG. 2.

[0061] This allows the maintenance worker to simply check the display on the display unit 15 and decide whether or not to associate the elevator 2 identified by the identification information with the measurement data and save it, thereby reducing the workload of the maintenance worker.

[0062] The confirmation request unit 113 requests re-input of the identification information when the difference between the comparative performance and the measured performance in at least one predetermined operational performance is equal to or greater than a first predetermined value. At this time, the display control unit 115 displays a display 35 saying "RE-INPUT IDENTIFICATION INFORMATION" on the display unit 15 as a request for re-input of the identification information, as shown in Fig. 2. For example, when the display 35 is touched, a key for re-inputting the identification information is displayed, and the maintenance worker can re-input the identification information.

[0063] When the identification information is re-input, the performance determination unit 112 compares the comparative performance of the elevator 2 specified by the re-input identification information with the measured performance, and determines whether the difference between the comparative performance and the measured performance is equal to or greater than a first predetermined value. This makes it possible to compare the measurement data obtained by measurement with the correct elevator 2 to be measured, even if the identification information is input incorrectly.

[0064] Furthermore, when performance determining section 112 determines that the difference between the comparison performance and the measured performance in at least one predetermined operational performance is equal to or greater than a second predetermined value, confirmation request section 113 stops requesting confirmation input.

[0065] (Storage control unit) When there is a confirmation input that the measurement data may be saved, the save control unit 114 associates the elevator 2 identified by the identification information with the measurement data and saves them in the storage unit 52. Specifically, when there is a confirmation input that the measurement data is measurement data obtained by setting traveling parameters different from the reference traveling parameters, the save control unit 114 distinguishes the measurement data from existing measurement data that has been stored in association with the elevator 2 identified by the identification information, and saves the measurement data in the storage unit 52 in association with the elevator 2 identified by the identification information.

[0066] 2, when the display 32 is touched, the storage control unit 114 associates the measurement data with the elevator 2 identified by the identification information, distinguishes it from existing measurement data (first history information 522), and stores it in the second history information 523. As a result, when using the measurement data accumulated for the elevator 2 identified by the identification information, it is possible to use the measurement data without including the measurement data in which the difference between the comparative performance and the measured performance was large, as necessary, thereby improving the usability of the accumulated data.

[0067] Furthermore, the storage control unit 114 does not store the measurement data when the request for confirmation input is stopped. The request for confirmation input is stopped when the performance determination unit 112 determines that the difference between the comparison performance and the measurement performance in at least one predetermined operating performance is equal to or greater than a second predetermined value. If the difference between the comparison performance and the measurement performance is too large, there is a high possibility that the measurement data contains an error or the identification information has been input incorrectly. Therefore, by appropriately setting the second predetermined value, it is possible to prevent measurement data containing an error from being stored and to prevent measurement data from being stored in association with the elevator 2 identified by the erroneously input identification information.

[0068] <An example of the operation of the information processing device> Fig. 3 is a flow diagram showing an example of the operation of the information processing device 10. An example of the operation of the information processing device 10 will be described with reference to Fig. 3. First, the elevator 2 is run, and the information acquisition unit 111 acquires the measurement data (step S1, information acquisition step). Note that the running of the elevator 2 during measurement is performed, for example, by operating the elevator 2 using an operation panel provided in the car 20 and provided with destination floor buttons. The information acquisition unit 111 acquires the identification information input by a maintenance worker (step S2, information acquisition step).

[0069] The performance determination unit 112 calculates the measured performance from the measurement data (step S3), and determines whether the difference between the comparative performance from the operational performance information 521 and the measured performance is equal to or greater than a first predetermined value (step S4, performance determination step). If the difference between the comparative performance and the measured performance is less than the first predetermined value (NO in step S4), the storage control unit 114 associates the elevator 2 identified by the identification information with the measured data and stores them in the first history information 522 (step S5).

[0070] If the difference between the comparative performance and the measured performance is equal to or greater than the first predetermined value (YES in step S4), performance determination unit 112 determines whether the difference between the comparative performance from operational performance information 521 and the measured performance is equal to or greater than a second predetermined value (step S6). If the difference between the comparative performance and the measured performance is equal to or greater than the second predetermined value (YES in step S6), the process ends without storing the measured data.

[0071] If the difference between the comparative performance and the measured performance is less than the second predetermined value (NO in step S6), the confirmation request unit 113 requests confirmation input and re-input of the identification information (step S7, confirmation request step).Then, the storage control unit 114 determines whether or not there has been a confirmation input indicating that the measured data may be stored (step S8).

[0072] If a confirmation input is received indicating that the measurement data may be saved (YES in step S8), the storage control unit 114 distinguishes the measurement data from existing data, associates the measurement data with the elevator 2 identified by the identification information, and saves it in the second history information 523 (step S9, storage control step).

[0073] If there is no confirmation input to the effect that the measurement data may be saved (NO in step S8), the performance determination unit 112 determines whether or not the identification information has been re-input (step S10). If the identification information has been re-input (YES in step S10), the process returns to step S4, where the performance determination unit 112 compares the comparative performance of the elevator 2 identified by the re-input identification information with the measured performance, and determines whether or not the difference between the comparative performance and the measured performance is equal to or greater than a first predetermined value. If there is no re-input of the identification information (NO in step S10), the measurement data is not saved and the process ends.

[0074] By the operation process (measurement data storage process) of the information processing device 10 described above, when a confirmation input is requested, the maintenance worker can confirm whether the measurement data is one in which the running parameters have been changed from the reference running parameters, and can instruct the measurement data to be stored after determining whether the elevator 2 identified by the identification information and the measurement data can be associated with each other and stored. As a result, the measurement data obtained by measurement can be accurately stored as appropriate measurement data for the elevator 2 to be measured.

[0075] Furthermore, during maintenance work, a maintenance worker inspects multiple elevators 2 at once. With the information processing device 10, even when multiple pieces of measurement data are handled, the data can be reliably and accurately stored as appropriate measurement data for the elevator 2 being measured.

[0076] [Software implementation example] The functions of the information processing device 10 (hereinafter referred to as the "device") can be realized by a program for causing a computer to function as the device, and a program for causing a computer to function as each control block of the device (particularly each part included in the control unit 11).

[0077] In this case, the device includes a computer having at least one control device (e.g., a processor) and at least one storage device (e.g., a memory) as hardware for executing the program. The control device and storage device execute the program to realize each function described in each of the above embodiments.

[0078] The program may be non-transitory and may be recorded in one or more computer-readable recording media. The recording media may or may not be included in the device. In the latter case, the program may be provided to the device via any wired or wireless transmission medium.

[0079] In addition, some or all of the functions of each of the control blocks can be realized by a logic circuit. For example, an integrated circuit in which a logic circuit that functions as each of the control blocks is formed is also included in the scope of the present invention. In addition, the functions of each of the control blocks can be realized by, for example, a quantum computer.

[0080] Furthermore, each process described in each of the above embodiments may be executed by AI (Artificial Intelligence). In this case, the AI ​​may be operated by the control device or may be operated by another device (for example, an edge computer or a cloud server).

[0081] The present invention is not limited to the above-described embodiments, and various modifications are possible within the scope of the claims. Embodiments obtained by appropriately combining the technical means disclosed in different embodiments are also included in the technical scope of the present invention. [Explanation of symbols]

[0082] 1 Maintenance support system 2. Elevator 10. Information processing device 13 Acceleration sensor (sensor) 15 Display 20 Car 111 Information Acquisition Department 112 Performance judgment section 113 Confirmation request section 114 Storage control section 115 Display control unit

Claims

1. an information acquisition unit that acquires inputted elevator identification information and measurement data output by a sensor that detects the acceleration of the elevator being measured; a performance determination unit that compares a comparative performance, which is a predetermined operational performance of the elevator identified by the identification information, with a measured performance, which is the predetermined operational performance calculated from the measurement data, and determines whether or not a difference between the comparative performance and the measured performance is equal to or greater than a first predetermined value; a confirmation request unit that requests a confirmation input as to whether or not the measurement data may be stored when a difference between the comparison performance and the measurement performance in at least one of the predetermined operational performances is equal to or greater than the first predetermined value; a storage control unit that, when a confirmation input is received indicating that the measurement data may be stored, stores the measurement data in association with an elevator identified by the identification information; An information processing device comprising:

2. A display unit that can be viewed by a maintenance worker; A display control unit that controls the display of the display unit, the confirmation request unit identifies an operational performance for which a difference between the comparative performance and the measured performance is equal to or greater than the first predetermined value; 2. The information processing device according to claim 1, wherein the display control unit displays on the display unit, together with the confirmation input requested by the confirmation request unit, an operating performance for which the difference between the comparison performance identified by the confirmation request unit and the measured performance is equal to or greater than the first predetermined value.

3. 3. The information processing device of claim 2, wherein the display control unit displays, for operational performance where the difference between the comparative performance identified by the confirmation request unit and the measured performance is equal to or greater than the first predetermined value, at least one of the difference between the comparative performance and the measured performance calculated by the performance determination unit, and the value of the comparative performance and the measured performance for the operational performance where the difference between the comparative performance and the measured performance is equal to or greater than the first predetermined value.

4. the performance determination unit compares the comparison performance with the measurement performance, and further determines whether a difference between the comparison performance and the measurement performance is equal to or greater than a second predetermined value that is greater than the first predetermined value; the confirmation request unit stops the request for confirmation input when the performance determination unit determines that a difference between the comparison performance and the measurement performance in at least one of the predetermined operational performances is equal to or greater than a second predetermined value; The information processing apparatus according to claim 1 , wherein the storage control unit does not store the measurement data when the request for the confirmation input is stopped.

5. The information processing device according to claim 1 , wherein when a confirmation input is received indicating that the measurement data may be saved, the storage control unit saves the measurement data separately from existing measurement data that is stored in association with the elevator identified by the identification information.

6. the confirmation request unit requests re-input of the identification information when a difference between the comparison performance and the measurement performance in at least one of the predetermined operational performances is equal to or greater than the first predetermined value; When the identification information is re-input, the performance determination unit compares the comparative performance of the elevator identified by the re-input identification information with the measured performance, and determines whether or not a difference between the comparative performance and the measured performance is equal to or greater than a first predetermined value. The information processing device according to claim 1 .

7. when a difference between the comparative performance and the measured performance in at least one of the predetermined operational performances is equal to or greater than a first predetermined value, the confirmation request unit requests a confirmation input as to whether or not the measured data is measured data obtained by setting the traveling parameters different from a reference traveling parameter which is a traveling parameter of the elevator that defines the comparative performance, 2. The information processing device according to claim 1, wherein the storage control unit stores the measurement data in association with an elevator identified by the identification information when a confirmation input is received indicating that the measurement data is measurement data obtained by setting the travel parameters different from the reference travel parameters.

8. an information acquisition step of acquiring inputted elevator identification information and measurement data outputted by a sensor that detects the acceleration of the elevator to be measured; a performance determination step of comparing a comparative performance, which is a predetermined operational performance of the elevator identified by the identification information, with a measured performance, which is the predetermined operational performance calculated from the measurement data, and determining whether or not a difference between the comparative performance and the measured performance is equal to or greater than a first predetermined value; a confirmation request step of requesting a confirmation input as to whether or not the measurement data may be stored when a difference between the comparison performance and the measurement performance in at least one of the predetermined operational performances is equal to or greater than the first predetermined value; a storage control step of storing the measurement data in association with an elevator identified by the identification information when a confirmation input indicating that the measurement data may be stored is received; A method for storing measurement data, including:

Images