Method for removing makeup cosmetic

A low-viscosity oily makeup remover dispensed as a mist addresses the challenge of removing long-lasting makeup gently and efficiently, minimizing skin friction and product usage.

JP2025169235AActive Publication Date: 2025-11-12KAO CORP
View PDF 6 Cites 0 Cited by

Patent Information

Application Number
JP2025075614
Authority / Receiving Office
JP · JP
Patent Type
Applications
Current Assignee / Owner
Priority Date
2024-04-30
Filing Date
2025-04-30
Publication Date
2025-11-12
Estimated Expiration
2045-04-30

AI Technical Summary

Technical Problem

Consumers face challenges in effectively removing long-lasting makeup without causing significant skin friction and using excessive amounts of makeup remover, particularly with waterproof and water-resistant formulations.

Method used

A makeup remover using a low-viscosity oily composition dispensed as a mist from a container equipped with a mist dispenser, allowing direct application onto makeup without rubbing, thereby minimizing skin friction and reducing the amount of remover needed.

Benefits of technology

The method and remover enable quick and gentle makeup removal by evenly distributing the oily composition as a mist, reducing friction and the amount of product used, while effectively dissolving and lifting off makeup in a short time.

✦ Generated by Eureka AI based on patent content.

Smart Images

  • Figure 2025169235000001_ABST
    Figure 2025169235000001_ABST
Patent Text Reader

Abstract

To provide a method for removing makeup cosmetic and a makeup remover which can make skin massage during makeup-removing as short as possible, and remove makeup in a short time.SOLUTION: Provided are a method for removing a makeup cosmetic using a makeup remover in which an oily composition (A) having a viscosity of 40 mPa s or less at 25°C is filled into a container to which a mist-type dispenser is installed, wherein a makeup cosmetic is removed after spraying mist of the oily composition ejected from the container onto a makeup cosmetic on skin, and a method for removing a makeup cosmetic.SELECTED DRAWING: Figure 1
Need to check novelty before this filing date? Find Prior Art

Description

[Technical Field]

[0001] The present invention relates to a method for removing makeup cosmetics and a makeup remover. [Background technology]

[0002] In recent years, as people have been forced to wear masks, an increasing number of people are choosing long-lasting makeup cosmetics that are said to be resistant to rubbing and other factors. Long-lasting makeup cosmetics include waterproof mascaras that use solid fats as fixatives, and foundations, makeup bases, and UV protection products that use silicone resins such as trimethylsiloxysilicate as film-forming agents. Meanwhile, there has been an increase in consumer awareness of taking care of their skin without rubbing it, leading to a demand for makeup removers that are gentle on the skin. To remove makeup, makeup removers are applied by taking makeup remover in the hands, spreading it over the face, and rubbing it in a circular motion to thoroughly mix the makeup remover and makeup, followed by wiping or rinsing it off (Non-Patent Document 1). [Prior art documents] [Non-patent literature]

[0003] [Non-Patent Document 1] J.Soc.Cosmet.Chem.Japan,vol3,193-201(1991) Summary of the Invention [Problem to be solved by the invention]

[0004] However, based on the belief that leaving makeup on the skin is bad for the skin, most consumers tend to rub makeup and makeup removers together for long periods of time and with strong force, making it a challenge to achieve both cleansing power and the ability to remove makeup without rubbing. Therefore, an object of the present invention is to provide a makeup removal method and a makeup remover that can minimize the physical burden on the skin during makeup removal and remove highly lasting makeup in a short period of time. [Means for solving the problem]

[0005] The present inventors conducted research to solve the above-mentioned problems, and discovered that by using a makeup remover in which a low-viscosity oily composition is filled in a container equipped with a mist dispenser, and by discharging the oily composition from the container directly onto makeup cosmetics on the skin, the oily composition dispensed in mist form adheres evenly to a predetermined area of ​​the makeup cosmetics, blends quickly with the makeup cosmetics, and can lift the makeup cosmetics from the skin, making it possible to remove makeup cosmetics with less stress on the skin than conventional methods and with a smaller amount of makeup remover, and thus completed the present invention. Here, the makeup remover filled in a container equipped with a mist dispenser (also referred to as a "makeup removal product") in the present invention refers to a makeup remover in which an oily composition is filled in a non-aerosol mist dispenser, and does not include aerosol types. This is because aerosol types are formulations that consumers are reluctant to use due to issues such as not being able to see the remaining amount and the hassle of disposal. On the other hand, if a water-based composition is added to the contents, makeup cosmetics that claim to be waterproof, water-resistant, and long-lasting contain high-melting-point waxes and oil-soluble film-forming agents, and therefore cannot be sufficiently removed, and the purpose cannot be achieved.

[0006] That is, the present invention provides a method for removing makeup cosmetics using a makeup remover in which (A) an oily composition having a viscosity of 40 mPa s or less at 25°C is filled in a container equipped with a mist dispenser, the method comprising: The method for removing makeup cosmetics comprises spraying the mist of the oily composition discharged from the container onto the makeup cosmetics on the skin, and then removing the makeup cosmetics. The present invention also provides a makeup remover comprising (A) an oily composition having a viscosity of 40 mPa·s or less at 25°C, filled in a container equipped with a mist dispenser, The mist of the oily composition discharged from the container is sprayed onto makeup cosmetics on the skin, and then a makeup remover is provided which is used to remove the makeup cosmetics.

[0007] The mist dispenser of the present invention generally refers to a spray dispenser equipped with an extrusion mechanism such as a piston and cylinder, preferably a pump mechanism, and a flow path that uses the extrusion mechanism to pump the oily composition filled in a container to a discharge port of the mist dispenser, and the oily composition pumped to the discharge port is discharged from the discharge port in the form of a mist. Note that "mist" refers to a plurality of fine droplets sprayed from the discharge port. [Effects of the Invention]

[0008] According to the makeup removal method and makeup remover of the present invention, a low-viscosity oily composition is ejected as a mist directly onto the makeup on the skin from a container equipped with a mist dispenser, and adheres evenly to a predetermined area of ​​the makeup without the need for hands, blends easily with the makeup on the skin, and floats away quickly. Thus, makeup can be removed in a short time while minimizing friction on the skin, and further, because there is no need to use hands or cotton during application, makeup can be removed using a small amount of makeup remover. [Brief explanation of the drawings]

[0009] [Figure 1] FIG. 1 is a diagram showing the influence of the relationship between the viscosity of an oily composition and the diameter of the outlet of a mist-type dispenser container on the state of mist. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

[0010] Terms used in this specification are used in the sense commonly used in the art unless otherwise specified.

[0011] In this specification, the term "makeup cosmetics" refers to a concept that includes base makeup cosmetics and point makeup cosmetics. Base makeup cosmetics include makeup bases, UV care cosmetics, face powders, dusting powders, foundations, etc. Point makeup cosmetics include lipsticks, blushers, eyeliners, mascaras, eye shadows, eyebrow pencils, etc.

[0012] As used herein, makeup removers refer to cleansing agents known as makeup removers that are used to remove oily dirt from makeup cosmetics, etc. There are two types of makeup removers: one that is applied to makeup cosmetics on the skin and then wiped off, and one that is applied to makeup cosmetics and then rinsed off with water; both of these types are included in the present specification.

[0013] One aspect of the present invention is a method for removing makeup cosmetics using a makeup remover comprising (A) an oily composition having a viscosity of 40 mPa·s or less at 25°C filled in a container equipped with a mist dispenser, the method comprising: This is a method for removing makeup cosmetics, which comprises spraying the mist of the oily composition discharged from the container onto makeup cosmetics on the skin, and then removing the makeup cosmetics. Another aspect of the present invention is a makeup remover comprising (A) an oily composition having a viscosity of 40 mPa s or less at 25°C, filled in a container equipped with a mist dispenser, The mist of the oily composition discharged from the container is sprayed onto makeup cosmetics on the skin, and then the makeup remover is used to remove the makeup cosmetics.

[0014] The makeup remover used in the makeup cosmetic removal method of the present invention is a makeup remover comprising an oily composition (A) having a viscosity of 40 mPa·s or less at 25°C, filled in a container equipped with a mist dispenser. The oily composition (A) filled in the container preferably has a viscosity at 25°C of 40 mPa·s or less, more preferably 35 mPa·s or less, even more preferably 28 mPa·s or less, and even more preferably 20 mPa·s or less, from the viewpoints of being discharged as a mist from a container equipped with a mist dispenser, of quickly blending into the makeup cosmetic on the skin after being discharged as a mist, of quickly dissolving and dispersing the makeup cosmetic and lifting it off the skin, of being gentle on the skin, and of being able to recognize that the mist has adhered to the makeup cosmetic. Furthermore, from the viewpoint of being able to recognize that the mist has adhered to the makeup cosmetic, the viscosity at 25°C is preferably 2 mPa·s or more, more preferably 5 mPa·s or more, and even more preferably 8 mPa·s or more. Furthermore, the viscosity at 25°C is preferably 2 mPa·s or more and 40 mPa·s or less, more preferably 5 mPa·s or more and 35 mPa·s or less, even more preferably 8 mPa·s or more and 28 mPa·s or less, and even more preferably 8 mPa·s or more and 20 mPa·s or less. Here, viscosity is measured at 25°C using a B-type viscometer (TVB-10 viscometer, manufactured by Toki Sangyo Co., Ltd.). Viscosities less than 100 mPa·s are measured at 60 rpm with rotor No. 1 (rotation speed) for 1 minute. Viscosities of 100 mPa·s or more are measured at 30 rpm with rotor No. 1 (rotation speed) for 1 minute.

[0015] The oil (A1) used in the oily composition (A) may be any oil that is commonly used in makeup removers, and examples thereof include hydrocarbon oils, ester oils, ether oils, and silicone oils. More specifically, examples of hydrocarbon oils include isododecane, isohexadecane, light liquid isoparaffin, liquid isoparaffin, liquid paraffin, and hydrogenated polyisobutene. Among these, from the viewpoints of rapid makeup dissolution and increasing compatibility with nonionic surfactants to easily obtain a low-viscosity composition, isododecane, isohexadecane, light liquid isoparaffin, and liquid paraffin having a viscosity of 10 mPa s or less are preferred, and isododecane and isohexadecane are more preferred.

[0016] Ester oils include monoesters of aliphatic or aromatic monocarboxylic or dicarboxylic acids having 2 to 24 carbon atoms, and specific examples include cetyl 2-ethylhexanoate, cetyl octanoate, isononyl isononanoate, isotridecyl isononanoate, hexyl laurate, isopropyl myristate, octyldodecyl myristate, myristyl myristate, 2-hexyldecyl myristate, isopropyl palmitate, octyl palmitate, propylene glycol dicaprylate, neopentyl glycol dicaprate, caprylic / capric triglyceride, glycerin trioleate, glycerin tri-2-ethylhexanoate, olive oil, jojoba oil, and the like. Of these, from the viewpoint of quickly dissolving and dispersing makeup cosmetics and lifting them from the skin, and from the viewpoint of increasing the compatibility of nonionic surfactants to easily obtain a low-viscosity composition, isononyl isononanoate, isotridecyl isononanoate, isopropyl myristate, and isopropyl palmitate are preferred, and isononyl isononanoate and isopropyl myristate are more preferred.

[0017] The ether oils include dialkyl ethers, and specific examples thereof include dihexyl ether, dicaprylyl ether, and cetyl-1,3-dimethylbutyl ether. Of these, dicaprylyl ether is preferred from the viewpoint of quickly dissolving and dispersing makeup cosmetics and lifting them from the skin.

[0018] Examples of silicone oils include volatile and non-volatile linear dimethylpolysiloxanes such as dimethylpolysiloxane (1cs), dimethylpolysiloxane (1.5cs), dimethylpolysiloxane (2cs), dimethylpolysiloxane (6cs), dimethylpolysiloxane (10cs), etc. Of these, dimethylpolysiloxane (1.5cs) and dimethylpolysiloxane (2cs) are preferred from the viewpoints of quickly dissolving and dispersing makeup cosmetics and lifting them from the skin, and of increasing the compatibility with nonionic surfactants to easily obtain a low-viscosity composition.

[0019] The oil (A1) used in the oily composition (A) may be used alone or in combination of two or more. When two or more oils are used in combination, it is possible to use a combination of oils with a viscosity of more than 40 mPa·s to adjust the feel during use, etc. In this case, the mist quality tends to deteriorate due to the influence of the high-viscosity oil. Therefore, from the viewpoint of discharging the mist as a mist from a container equipped with a mist dispenser, the viscosity of the entire oil (A1) is preferably 40 mPa·s or less, more preferably 25 mPa·s or less, and even more preferably 15 mPa·s or less.

[0020] The content of the oil (A1) in the oily composition (A) is preferably 60% by mass or more, more preferably 65% ​​by mass or more, from the viewpoint of quickly blending the makeup cosmetic onto the skin after being ejected as a mist and quickly dissolving and dispersing the makeup cosmetic and lifting it from the skin. From the same viewpoint, the content of the oil (A1) in the oily composition (A) is preferably 100% by mass or less. The content of the oil (A1) in the oily composition (A) is preferably 60% by mass or more and 100% by mass or less, more preferably 65% ​​by mass or more and 100% by mass or less. When components other than the oil (A1) are combined, the content of the oil (A1) in the oily composition (A) is preferably 60% by mass or more, and more preferably 65% ​​by mass or more, from the viewpoints of quickly blending the makeup cosmetic onto the skin after being ejected as a mist and quickly dissolving and dispersing the makeup cosmetic and lifting it from the skin. Furthermore, the content of the oil (A1) in the oily composition (A) is preferably 60% by mass or more and 98% by mass or less, more preferably 65% ​​by mass or more and 97% by mass or less, and even more preferably 65% ​​by mass or more and 95% by mass or less.

[0021] In addition to the oil (A1), the oily composition (A) may contain a nonionic surfactant (B) from the viewpoint of improving compatibility between the oily composition and the makeup cosmetic, from the viewpoint of lifting the makeup cosmetic from the skin, and because the makeup cosmetic may be used after rinsing with water.

[0022] In the makeup removal method of the present invention, when the makeup cosmetic material floated on the skin is removed by rinsing it off with water, the HLB value of the nonionic surfactant is preferably 9.0 or higher, more preferably 10.5 or higher, and even more preferably 11.5 or higher, from the viewpoint of rinsing ease. Furthermore, from the viewpoint of atomized discharge, the HLB value is preferably 15.0 or lower, and even more preferably 13.5 or lower. Furthermore, the HLB value of the nonionic surfactant is preferably 9.0 or higher and 15.0 or lower, more preferably 10.5 or higher and 13.5 or lower, and even more preferably 11.5 or higher and 13.5 or lower. The nonionic surfactants may be used alone or in combination of two or more. When two or more types are used in combination, the combined HLB value is used.

[0023] Here, the HLB value is an index showing the hydrophile-lipophile balance, and in this specification is calculated by the following formula by Griffin.

[0024]

number

[0025] When two or more types of nonionic surfactants are contained, the HLB value of the mixed surfactant is the arithmetic average of the HLB values ​​of the individual nonionic surfactants based on their mass ratios. Mixed HLB=Σ(HLBx×Wx) / ΣWx HLBx indicates the HLB value of nonionic surfactant X. Wx represents the mass (g) of the nonionic surfactant X having the value of HLBx.

[0026] The content of the nonionic surfactant (B) in the oily composition (A) is preferably 0.05% by mass or more, more preferably 0.1% by mass or more, more preferably 6% by mass or more, and even more preferably 22% by mass or more, from the viewpoints of compatibility with the oil (A1), ease of blending with the makeup cosmetic, and rapid lifting of the makeup cosmetic from the skin. Furthermore, the content of the nonionic surfactant in the oily composition (A) is preferably 35% by mass or less, more preferably 28% by mass or less, from the viewpoint of mist-like discharge. Furthermore, the content of the nonionic surfactant in the oily composition (A) is preferably 0.05% by mass or more and 35% by mass or less, more preferably 0.1% by mass or more and 28% by mass or less. When this makeup remover is used by wiping, the content of the nonionic surfactant in the oily composition (A) is preferably 0.05% by mass or more, more preferably 0.1% by mass or more, and even more preferably 0.2% by mass or more, from the viewpoints of compatibility with makeup cosmetics, compatibility with the carrier used for wiping, and suppressing the influence on subsequent foam disappearance during face washing. Also, from the same viewpoint, the content in the oily composition (A) is preferably 10% by mass or less, more preferably 7% by mass or less, and even more preferably 5% by mass or less. Also, the content in the oily composition (A) is preferably 0.05% by mass or more and 10% by mass or less, more preferably 0.1% by mass or more and 7% by mass or less, and even more preferably 0.2% by mass or more and 5% by mass or less. For use by rinsing, the content of the nonionic surfactant (B) in the oily composition (A) is preferably 1% by mass or more, more preferably 3% by mass or more, even more preferably 7% by mass or more, and even more preferably 18% by mass or more, from the viewpoint of efficiently emulsifying and rinsing off the oil (A1). The content of the nonionic surfactant (B) in the oily composition (A) is preferably 35% by mass or less, more preferably 28% by mass or less, from the viewpoint of atomized discharge. The content of the nonionic surfactant (B) in the oily composition (A) is preferably 1% by mass or more and 35% by mass or less, more preferably 3% by mass or more and 28% by mass or less, even more preferably 7% by mass or more and 28% by mass or less, and even more preferably 18% by mass or more and 28% by mass or less. Furthermore, when the oil composition (A) contains a nonionic surfactant (B), the composition of the oil agent (A1) preferably contains 50 mass % or more, more preferably 60 mass % or more, and even more preferably 70 mass % or more of an oil agent having a viscosity of 10 mPa s or less in the entire oil agent (A1), from the viewpoints of atomized discharge and compatibility with the nonionic surfactant (B).

[0027] Examples of the nonionic surfactant (B) include POE fatty acid esters, POE alkyl ethers, POE sorbitol fatty acid esters, POE glycerin fatty acid esters, polyglycerin fatty acid esters, POE sorbitan fatty acid esters, alkyl glucosides, glycerin fatty acid esters, polyglycerin fatty acid esters, alkyl glyceryl ethers, and sorbitan fatty acid esters. Among these, from the viewpoints of compatibility with the oil (A1) and temperature stability, it is preferable to use or combine a multi-chain nonionic surfactant having multiple chain hydrocarbons. The chain hydrocarbon is preferably lauric acid, myristic acid, coconut oil fatty acid, oleic acid, or isostearic acid, and a nonionic surfactant selected from POE sorbitan fatty acid esters having 2 to 4 chain hydrocarbon groups, POE sorbit fatty acid esters having 2 to 4 chain hydrocarbon groups, POE glyceryl ether fatty acid esters having 2 to 3 chain hydrocarbon groups, and polyglycerin fatty acid esters having 2 to 4 chain hydrocarbon groups is more preferable. Furthermore, when considering rinsing, it is preferable to use a combination of a single-chain nonionic surfactant and a multi-chain nonionic surfactant from the viewpoint of rinsing property. Furthermore, the mass ratio of the single-chain type / multi-chain type is preferably 0.1 or more, more preferably 0.5 or more, from the viewpoint of rinsing property. Furthermore, the mass ratio of the single-chain type / multi-chain type is preferably 5.0 or less, from the viewpoint of compatibility with the oil agent. Furthermore, the mass ratio of the single-chain type / multi-chain type is preferably 0.1 or more and 5.0 or less, more preferably 0.5 or more and 5.0 or less. Examples of short-chain nonionic surfactants include POE fatty acid esters, POE alkyl ethers, POE sorbitol fatty acid esters, POE glycerin fatty acid esters, polyglycerin fatty acid esters, POE sorbitan fatty acid esters, alkyl glucosides, glycerin fatty acid esters, polyglycerin fatty acid esters, alkyl glyceryl ethers, sorbitan fatty acid esters, etc. Among these, from the viewpoint of temperature stability, it is preferable to select nonionic surfactants having a chain hydrocarbon selected from lauric acid, myristic acid, coconut oil fatty acid, oleic acid, and isostearic acid.

[0028] In addition to the oily agent (A1) and the nonionic surfactant (B), the oily composition (A) may contain a small amount of water (C) to improve the compatibility of the nonionic surfactant with the oily agent and to improve stability. The content of water (C) in the oily composition (A) is preferably 6% by mass or less, more preferably 5% by mass or less, even more preferably 3.5% by mass or less, even more preferably 1.5% by mass or less, and even more preferably 1% by mass or less, from the viewpoints of preventing an increase in viscosity of the oily composition and atomized discharge, and it is preferable that the composition contains substantially no water (C). On the other hand, the content of water (C) in the oily composition (A) is preferably 0.01% by mass or more, more preferably 0.08% by mass or more, and even more preferably 0.1% by mass or more, from the viewpoints of improving the compatibility of the nonionic surfactant (B) and the oil (A1) and improving stability.

[0029] Furthermore, in addition to the oil (A1) and the nonionic surfactant (B), small amounts of amphoteric surfactants, anionic surfactants, alcohols having 2 to 3 carbon atoms, and polyols can be added to the oily composition (A). However, from the viewpoint of preventing an increase in the viscosity of the oily composition and of atomized discharge, the content of these surfactants is preferably less than 5% by mass, preferably 3% by mass or less, more preferably 1% by mass or less, and even more preferably substantially 0% by mass.

[0030] Furthermore, the oily composition (A) may contain ultraviolet absorbers, antioxidants, fragrances, disinfectants, preservatives, antifouling agents, and the like.

[0031] The oily composition (A) can be produced by a conventional method. When a component that is solid at room temperature is to be contained, the composition can be produced by heating to dissolve the component, and then mixing and stirring the components.

[0032] The oily composition (A) can be filled into a container equipped with a mist dispenser to form the makeup remover used in the present invention. Furthermore, as a means for operation using a finger, either a finger-type mist dispenser or a trigger-type mist dispenser may be used, but considering the strength of contact with the skin and the sense of resistance when the user sprays it toward their face, a container equipped with a finger-type mist dispenser is preferred. Note that the finger-type mist dispenser in this invention is a dispenser that can be sprayed by pressing the head of the dispenser with a finger. Furthermore, the mist dispenser in this invention is preferably one equipped with a pump, i.e., an extrusion mechanism, and from the viewpoint of usability, a normal pressure type that does not use compressed gas is preferred. Since the oily composition can be applied uniformly in mist form to the makeup cosmetic on the skin, the oily composition can be applied uniformly in mist form directly to the makeup cosmetic on the skin without causing friction with the palm of the hand, etc., compared to when the liquid oily composition is taken from a liquid-discharge-type pump, spread on the palm of the hand, and then applied to the makeup cosmetic by touching the face, so that a predetermined amount (required amount) of makeup cosmetic can be applied to the desired area in a short time and without hassle. Note that the liquid-discharge-type pump dispenser in the present invention refers to a dispenser that does not have a spray structure at the discharge port and that discharges the amount to be applied in one go as a continuous liquid or a single lump of liquid.

[0033] Assuming that the mist is sprayed in a circular pattern, avoiding the front of the face, the container is preferably designed so that when it is dispensed 10 cm away from the face, the mist will adhere to a circle of 10 cm or less in diameter, more preferably 9 cm or less, and even more preferably 7 cm or less, from the viewpoint of efficient and accurate application to dirt. Furthermore, from the viewpoint of effortlessness in not increasing the number of sprays too much, it is preferable that the mist adhere to a circle of 2 cm or more. Furthermore, 2 cm to 10 cm is preferable, 2 cm to 9 cm is more preferable, and 2 cm to 7 cm is even more preferable. The size of the circle here refers to the diameter of the area where the mist droplets spread in a gradient and are concentrated without escaping. This area can be confirmed by spraying the mist onto a piece of paper from a distance of 10 cm and observing the trace it leaves.

[0034] Next, from the viewpoint of applying to the face with an appropriate number of sprays, it is preferable that 0.05 g or more is sprayed per spray, and 0.10 g or more is more preferable. Furthermore, from the viewpoint of the gentleness of the oil on the skin, it is preferable that 0.70 g or less is sprayed per spray, and 0.60 g or less is more preferable. Furthermore, it is preferable that 0.05 g or more and 0.70 g or less, and 0.10 g or more and 0.60 g or less is more preferable.

[0035] In addition, to prevent the agent from dripping and staining clothes and the surrounding area while spraying it over the entire face, the amount of agent that adheres to the skin when sprayed from a distance of 10 cm is 10 mg / cm. 2 Less than 8 mg / cm is preferred 2 Less than 3 mg / cm is more preferable (same as above) from the viewpoint of hassle. 2 More than 3 mg / cm is preferable. 2 More than 10mg / cm 2 Less than 3 mg / cm is preferred 2 Over 8mg / cm 2 The following is more preferred:

[0036] The spray structure used in the pump used in the mist dispenser can be not only a standard product (also known as a direct pressure type) but also a pressure-accumulator type, and from the viewpoint of being able to dispense oral liquids with a wide range of viscosities, it is preferable to use a pump equipped with a pressure-accumulator type spray structure.

[0037] Furthermore, the pressure to apply the mist containing the internal liquid is preferably 5 kgf or more and 35 kgf or less, and more preferably 10 kgf or more and 30 kgf or less, from the viewpoint of ease of application in actual use. The pressing pressure can be determined by measuring the maximum load applied when a container fixed on a balance is mechanically pressed from above at a speed of 40 mm / s.

[0038] The diameter of the outlet of the mist dispenser is preferably 0.8 mm or less from the viewpoint of discharging the appropriate amount of the oily composition. Also, 0.2 mm or more is more preferable, 0.24 mm or more is even more preferable, and 0.4 mm or more is even more preferable from the viewpoint of improving the mist state regardless of environmental conditions such as temperature. From the viewpoint of ensuring the mist state, the diameter of the outlet is preferably 0.8 mm or less, more preferably 0.7 mm or less, and even more preferably 0.6 mm or less. Specifically, 0.8 mm or less is preferable, more preferably 0.2 mm to 0.8 mm, more preferably 0.24 mm to 0.7 mm, and even more preferably 0.4 mm to 0.6 mm. Furthermore, it is preferable that the relationship between the viscosity (mPa s) of the oily composition at 25°C and the outlet diameter (mm) of the mist dispenser satisfies the following formula (1): Discharge port diameter (mm)≧0.23×loge (mPa s)-0.4 (1) It is more preferable that the following formula (2) be satisfied. Discharge port diameter (mm)≧0.25×loge (mPa s)-0.37 (2) The outlet diameter of a mist dispenser refers to the inner diameter of the outlet, which is usually circular, and means the diameter.

[0039] The makeup removal method of the present invention is a method in which the makeup cosmetic is removed after spraying the mist of the oily composition (A) discharged from the container onto the makeup cosmetic on the skin. The makeup remover of the present invention is a makeup remover that is used to remove makeup cosmetics after spraying a mist of the oily composition (A) ejected from the container onto the makeup cosmetics on the skin. Since the container is equipped with a mist dispenser, for example, by operating a trigger or finger-type head with a finger to activate the pump mechanism of the dispenser attached to the container (pulling the trigger or pressing the head), the oily composition becomes a mist and can be sprayed in a fixed amount onto the makeup cosmetic on the skin. By spraying the oily composition as a mist onto the makeup cosmetic in this way, the oily composition in a mist form adheres uniformly to the surface of the makeup cosmetic. Furthermore, because the oily composition has a low viscosity, it quickly penetrates into the makeup. Thus, the makeup cosmetic can be lifted from the skin in a short time by simply pressing the area where the oily composition has adhered with an extremely light load to blend it in. "Simply pressing with an extremely light load to blend it in" means, for example, "not including rubbing the skin," and specifically, after spraying the makeup cosmetic, preferably the action of sliding or rubbing the skin with a finger or the like for 30 seconds or less, more preferably 10 seconds or less, and even more preferably 5 seconds or less, and especially preferably only pressing, without any sliding (or rubbing) action. Therefore, by wiping off or rinsing off the makeup cosmetic that has floated to the skin with water, the makeup cosmetic can be removed in an extremely short time, and the burden of friction on the skin can be reduced. Furthermore, this makeup remover can also be used to remove makeup applied to areas other than the face. For example, when UV protection cosmetics, which are advertised as being resistant to sweat and water, are applied to the neck or body during outdoor sports, they are difficult to remove with regular body shampoo or soap. By applying this makeup removal method and makeup remover to such stains, they can be easily applied to a wide area and removed without rubbing. In addition to spraying directly onto the skin and then wiping and rinsing, the makeup removal composition of the present invention can also be used by wiping off the makeup and then rinsing it off to refresh the skin. In this case, it is preferable to use a makeup removal composition with a composition that is optimal for rinsing. Furthermore, according to the operation of the present invention, by spraying the makeup remover directly onto the face, a mist of the oily composition can be created that is uniformly adhered to the surface of the makeup cosmetic, which makes it possible to save makeup remover that is used not only for wetting the face but also for wetting the hands and fingers, and also allows for a significant reduction in the amount of makeup remover used.

[0040] By further reducing the viscosity of the oil (A1) contained in the oily composition (A), the makeup film solubility after mist spraying can be improved, allowing the nonionic surfactant (B) contained in the composition to reach the skin surface quickly. Preferably, by using a specific combination of nonionic surfactants (B), it becomes possible to remove makeup from the skin by simply rinsing after spraying without applying any physical force. In the oily composition (A) that enables such removal, the viscosity of the oil (A1) is preferably 10 mPa s or less, and more preferably 8 mPa s or less, from the viewpoint of increasing penetration into makeup. Furthermore, from the viewpoints of lowering the viscosity of the oil phase, improving the solubility of the makeup film after mist spraying, and enabling it to reach the skin surface quickly, the oil having a viscosity of 10 mPa s or less preferably accounts for 80 mass % or more, and more preferably 90 mass % or more, of the total oil (A1).

[0041] As for the nonionic surfactant (B), it is preferable to use the following nonionic surfactants b1 to b3 in combination. b1: One or more selected from multi-chain nonionic surfactants having oleic acid or isostearic acid as an alkyl group with an HLB value of 10 or more and 12 or less b2: one or more selected from short-chain alkylglucosides, POE fatty acid esters, POE glyceryl ether fatty acid esters, and POE sorbitan fatty acid esters, each having an HLB value of 11 to 19; b3: One or more nonionic surfactants having a short-chain oleic acid or isostearic acid with an HLB value of 3 or more and 10 or less The HLB value of the mixture of b1 to b3 is adjusted to 9.5 or more and 12.5 or less, and the mixture ratio (b2+b3) / b1 is preferably 5.0 or less, more preferably 4.0 or less, from the viewpoints of atomized discharge and makeup removal. Furthermore, from the viewpoint of rinsing performance, it is preferably 1.0 or more. Furthermore, the mixture ratio (b2+b3) / b1 is preferably 1.0 or more and 5.0 or less, more preferably 1.0 or more and 4.0 or less.

[0042] In relation to the above-described embodiment, the present invention further discloses the following makeup cosmetic removal method and makeup remover.

[0043] <1> (A) A method for removing makeup cosmetics using a makeup remover in which an oily composition having a viscosity of 40 mPa·s or less at 25°C is filled in a container equipped with a mist dispenser, The makeup removal method comprises spraying the mist of the oily composition discharged from the container onto the makeup on the skin, and then removing the makeup. <2> (A) A method for removing makeup cosmetics using an oily composition, comprising: (A) The oily composition has a viscosity of 40 mPa s or less at 25°C, A method for removing makeup cosmetics, comprising spraying (A) an oily composition filled in a container equipped with a mist dispenser onto makeup cosmetics on the skin from the outlet of the mist dispenser, thereby allowing (A) the oily composition to penetrate into the makeup cosmetics. <3> The viscosity of the oily composition at 25°C is preferably 3 mPa·s or more and 40 mPa·s or less, more preferably 3 mPa·s or more and 35 mPa·s or less, even more preferably 5 mPa·s or more and 35 mPa·s or less, still more preferably 8 mPa·s or more and 28 mPa·s or less, and even more preferably 8 mPa·s or more and 20 mPa·s or less. <1> or <2> The method for removing makeup cosmetics described above. <4> The oily composition contains one or more oils selected from hydrocarbon oils, ester oils, ether oils, and silicone oils. <1> ~ <3> 10. The makeup cosmetic removal method according to claim 9, wherein the makeup cosmetic is removed by applying a scrub onto the surface of the makeup material. <5> The hydrocarbon oil is one or more selected from isododecane, isohexadecane, light liquid isoparaffin, liquid isoparaffin, and liquid paraffin. <4> The method for removing makeup cosmetics described above. <6> The ester oil is a monoester of an aliphatic or aromatic monocarboxylic acid or dicarboxylic acid having 2 to 24 carbon atoms. <4> The method for removing makeup cosmetics described above. <7> The ether oil is a dialkyl ether. <4> The method for removing makeup cosmetics described above. <8> The silicone oil is a volatile or non-volatile linear dimethylpolysiloxane. <4> The method for removing makeup cosmetics described above. <9> The content of the oil agent in the oil-based composition is preferably 60% by mass or more and 100% by mass or less, and more preferably 65% ​​by mass or more and 100% by mass or less. <4> ~ <8> 10. The makeup cosmetic removal method according to claim 9, wherein the makeup cosmetic is removed by applying a scrub onto the surface of the makeup material. <10> The oily composition further contains (B) a nonionic surfactant. <1> ~ <9> 10. The makeup cosmetic removal method according to claim 9, wherein the makeup cosmetic is removed by applying a scrub onto the surface of the makeup material. <11> The HLB of the nonionic surfactant is 9.0 or more and 15.0 or less, preferably 10.5 or more and 13.5 or less, and more preferably 11.5 or more and 13.5 or less. <10> The method for removing makeup cosmetics described above. <12> The nonionic surfactant comprises a multi-chain nonionic surfactant, preferably a multi-chain nonionic surfactant and a single-chain nonionic surfactant, more preferably a single-chain nonionic surfactant and a multi-chain nonionic surfactant in a single-chain / multi-chain mass ratio of 0.1 or more and 5.0 or less, preferably 0.5 or more and 5.0 or less. <10> or <11> The method for removing makeup cosmetics described above. <13> The content of the nonionic surfactant in the oily composition is preferably 0.05% by mass or more and 35% by mass or less, and more preferably 0.1% by mass or more and 28% by mass or less. <10> ~ <12> 10. The makeup cosmetic removal method according to claim 9, wherein the makeup cosmetic is removed by applying a scrub onto the surface of the makeup material. <14> The oily composition contains water (C) in an amount of 6% by mass or less, preferably 5% by mass or less, more preferably 3.5% by mass or less, and even more preferably 1.5% by mass or less. <10> ~ <13> 10. The makeup cosmetic removal method according to claim 9, wherein the makeup cosmetic is removed by applying a scrub onto the surface of the makeup material. <15> The container is designed so that when it is dispensed 10 cm away from the face, the mist will adhere to a circular shape of 10 cm or less in diameter. <1> ~ <14> 10. The makeup cosmetic removal method according to claim 9, wherein the makeup cosmetic is removed by applying a scrub onto the surface of the makeup material. <16> The diameter of the outlet of the mist dispenser is preferably 0.8 mm or less, more preferably 0.2 mm or more and 0.8 mm or less, even more preferably 0.24 mm or more and 0.7 mm or less, and even more preferably 0.4 mm or more and 0.6 mm or less. <1> ~ <15> 10. The makeup cosmetic removal method according to claim 9, wherein the makeup cosmetic is removed by applying a scrub onto the surface of the makeup material. <17> It is preferable that the relationship between the viscosity (mPa s) of the oily composition at 25°C and the discharge opening diameter (mm) of the container satisfies the following formula (1): Discharge port diameter (mm)≧0.23×loge (mPa s)-0.4 (1) It is more preferable that the following formula (2) is satisfied: Discharge port diameter (mm)≧0.25×loge (mPa s)-0.37 (2) <1> ~ <16> 10. The makeup cosmetic removal method according to claim 9, wherein the makeup cosmetic is removed by applying a scrub onto the surface of the makeup material. <18> After spraying the mist onto your face, remove makeup by wiping it off or rinsing it off with water. <1> ~ <17> 10. The makeup cosmetic removal method according to claim 9, wherein the makeup cosmetic is removed by applying a scrub onto the surface of the makeup material. <19> The mist dispenser has a pressure-accumulating spray structure. <1> ~ <18> 10. The makeup cosmetic removal method according to claim 9, wherein the makeup cosmetic is removed by applying a scrub onto the surface of the makeup material.

[0044] <20> (A) A makeup remover containing an oily composition having a viscosity of 40 mPa·s or less at 25°C, the oily composition being filled in a container equipped with a mist dispenser, The makeup remover is used to remove makeup cosmetics after spraying the mist of the oily composition discharged from the container onto the makeup cosmetics on the skin. <21> A makeup removal product comprising: (A) an oily composition; and a container equipped with a mist dispenser, wherein the (A) oily composition has a viscosity of 40 mPa s or less at 25°C, the (A) oily composition is filled in the container, and the mist dispenser is a pump type. <22> The viscosity of the oily composition at 25°C is preferably 2 mPa·s or more and 40 mPa·s or less, more preferably 3 mPa·s or more and 35 mPa·s or less, even more preferably 5 mPa·s or more and 35 mPa·s or less, still more preferably 8 mPa·s or more and 28 mPa·s or less, and even more preferably 8 mPa·s or more and 20 mPa·s or less. <20> or <21> Make-up removal products as described. <23> The oily composition contains one or more oils selected from hydrocarbon oils, ester oils, ether oils, and silicone oils. <20> ~ <22> 10. A makeup removal product according to any one of the preceding items. <24> The hydrocarbon oil is one or more selected from isododecane, isohexadecane, light liquid isoparaffin, liquid isoparaffin, and liquid paraffin. <23> Make-up removal products as described. <25> The ester oil is a monoester of an aliphatic or aromatic monocarboxylic acid or dicarboxylic acid having 2 to 24 carbon atoms. <23> Make-up removal products as described. <26> The ether oil is a dialkyl ether. <23> The makeup remover described. <27> The silicone oil is a volatile or non-volatile linear dimethylpolysiloxane. <23> Make-up removal products as described. <28> The content of the oil agent in the oil-based composition is preferably 60% by mass or more and 100% by mass or less, and more preferably 65% ​​by mass or more and 100% by mass or less. <23> ~ <27> 10. A makeup removal product according to any one of the preceding items. <29> In the oily composition, the oil agent having a viscosity of 10 mPa·s or less preferably accounts for 80% by mass or more, and more preferably 90% by mass or more, of the oil phase. <23> ~ <28> 10. A makeup removal product according to any one of the preceding items. <30> The oily composition further contains (B) a nonionic surfactant. <23> ~ <29> 10. A makeup removal product according to any one of the preceding items. <31> The HLB of the nonionic surfactant is 9.0 or more and 15.0 or less, preferably 10.5 or more and 13.5 or less, and more preferably 11.5 or more and 13.5 or less. <30> Make-up removal products as described. <32> The nonionic surfactant comprises a multi-chain nonionic surfactant, preferably a multi-chain nonionic surfactant and a single-chain nonionic surfactant, more preferably a single-chain nonionic surfactant and a multi-chain nonionic surfactant in a single-chain / multi-chain mass ratio of 0.1 or more and 5.0 or less, preferably 0.5 or more and 5.0 or less. <30> or <31> Make-up removal products as described. <33> The content of the nonionic surfactant in the oily composition is preferably 0.05% by mass or more and 35% by mass or less, and more preferably 0.1% by mass or more and 28% by mass or less. <30> ~ <32> 10. A makeup removal product according to any one of the preceding items. <34> The oily composition contains water (C) in an amount of 6% by mass or less, preferably 5% by mass or less, more preferably 3.5% by mass or less, and even more preferably 1.5% by mass or less. <30> ~ <33> 10. A makeup removal product according to any one of the preceding items. <35> The diameter of the outlet of the mist dispenser is preferably 0.8 mm or less, more preferably 0.2 mm or more and 0.8 mm or less, even more preferably 0.24 mm or more and 0.7 mm or less, and even more preferably 0.4 mm or more and 0.6 mm or less. <20> ~ <34> 10. A makeup removal product according to any one of the preceding items. <36> It is preferable that the relationship between the viscosity (mPa s) of the oily composition at 25°C and the discharge opening diameter (mm) of the container satisfies the following formula (1): Discharge port diameter (mm)≧0.23×loge (mPa s)-0.4 (1) It is more preferable that the following formula (2) is satisfied: Discharge port diameter (mm)≧0.25×loge (mPa s)-0.37 (2) <35> A makeup removal product as described above. <37> The mist dispenser has a pressure-accumulating spray structure. <20> ~ <36> 10. A makeup removal product according to any one of the preceding items. [Example]

[0045] The present invention will now be described in more detail with reference to examples, but the present invention is not limited to these examples. In the examples, "%" refers to "mass %." Viscosity was measured at 25°C using a B-type viscometer (TVB-10 viscometer, manufactured by Toki Sangyo Co., Ltd.). Viscosities of less than 100 mPa·s were measured at 60 rpm with rotor No. 1 (rotation speed) for 1 minute. Viscosities of 100 mPa·s or more were measured at 30 rpm with rotor No. 1 (rotation speed) for 1 minute. All values ​​given in the examples represent values ​​of the active component.

[0046] Test Example 1 (Study of the effect of wiping off an oily composition by discharging it as a mist) Isododecane (Marukasol R, Maruzen Petrochemical Co., Ltd., viscosity 3 mPa·s at 25°C) was filled into a container fitted with a finger-type mist dispenser (Yoshino Seisakusho Y-150; dispenses 0.15 mL per spray), and the test mascara was removed under the following conditions, and its removability was visually evaluated. Preparation of test mascara plate: 30 mg of test mascara (Volume Express Magnum Waterproof N, manufactured by Maybelline New York, Inc.) was applied to a glass plate in a circle having a diameter of 1 cm and left overnight.

[0047] (Mascara removal test method) Condition (1): 0.12 g of oil (oily composition) was sprayed directly onto the test mascara, left for 10 seconds, and then gently wiped off with cotton. Condition (2): A cotton pad was soaked in 0.12 g of oil (oily composition), pressed against the test mascara for 10 seconds, and then slowly wiped off once. Condition (3): A cotton pad was soaked in 0.6 g of oil (oily composition), pressed against the test mascara for 10 seconds, and then slowly wiped off once. Condition (4): A cotton pad was soaked in 1.2 g of oil (oily composition), pressed against the test mascara for 10 seconds, and then slowly wiped off once. (Evaluation criteria for mascara removal score) 5; completely fall off 4; Almost falls 3: Falls by about half 2: Almost no fall off 1: Doesn't fall off at all A score of 3 or more for mascara removal was considered pass, and a score of 2 or less was considered fail.

[0048] [Table 1]

[0049] Test Example 2 (Study of the effect of rinsing off oily composition by discharging it as a mist) (Test Example 2-1) The oily compositions shown in Table 2 were filled into containers with a liquid-dispensing pump dispenser or a mist-type dispenser, and a practical use test was conducted by three expert panelists. Here, the container with a liquid-dispensing pump dispenser is a container from which the oily composition is dispensed in liquid form, and the oily composition dispensed from the pump was picked up by hand and applied to the skin, while the container with a mist-type dispenser is a container from which the oily composition is dispensed as a mist, and the mist was sprayed directly onto the skin for application. After applying the oily composition filled in the dispenser to the skin, the amount of composition on the hands and the amount of composition on the face were each measured by wiping them off with a paper towel (Kimtowel, manufactured by Nippon Paper Crecia), and the amounts used were compared. The liquid-dispensing pump dispenser (Yoshino Seisakusho SP-700) used dispenses 0.7 mL of liquid with one press, and the mist dispenser (Yoshino Seisakusho Y-150) dispenses 0.15 mL of mist with one spray, which forms a circular shape of approximately 5 cm when sprayed from a distance of 10 cm, resulting in a concentration of 60 mg / cm. 2 The results are shown in Table 3. Condition (1): An appropriate amount of the oily composition shown in Table 2, which was filled in a mist dispenser, was sprayed directly onto the face, and then gently pressed down with the hand to remove it. Condition (2): An appropriate amount of the oily composition shown in Table 2, which was filled in a liquid-dispensing pump dispenser, was taken into the palm of the hand and spread over the face, rubbing in a circular motion.

[0050] [Table 2]

[0051] [Table 3]

[0052] (Test Example 2-2) The oily composition shown in Table 2 was filled in a mist dispenser, and a common oil makeup remover (Kao Biore Perfect Oil, viscosity 51 mPa s) was filled in a liquid-dispensing pump dispenser, and the time it took to blend into the makeup (time spent rubbing against the skin) was measured under the following conditions. The mist dispenser used (Y-150, manufactured by Yoshino Seisakusho) dispensed a mist of 0.15 mL per spray, which formed a circular shape of approximately 5 cm when sprayed from a distance of 10 cm, resulting in a concentration of 60 mg / cm. 2 The results are shown in Table 4. Condition (1): An appropriate amount of the oily composition shown in Table 2, which was filled in a mist dispenser, was sprayed directly onto the face, and then gently pressed down with the hand to remove it. Condition (2): Take an appropriate amount of a typical oil makeup remover (Kao, Biore Perfect Oil, viscosity 51 mPa·s) filled in a liquid-dispensing pump dispenser in your hand, spread it over your face, and rub it in.

[0053] [Table 4]

[0054] Test Example 3 (Evaluation of the relationship between viscosity of oily composition, ejection property, and mist state) The oil solutions with different viscosities listed in Table 5 were placed in a finger-type mist dispenser container (Y-150 manufactured by Yoshino Seisakusho) with a discharge volume of 0.15 mL per dispense, and the sample was dispensed 2-3 times onto a piece of paper 10 cm away, and the dispensed state was observed. The results are shown in Table 5. Fog condition score evaluation criteria; 5s: Very fine mist discharge 5: Mist-like discharge 4: Slightly coarse granular discharge 3: Linear discharge split into multiple shower-like streams 2: Linear discharge split into 2-3 streams 1;Sprays in a single line like a water gun A fog score of 3 or above was considered a pass, and a score of 2 or below was considered a fail.

[0055] [Table 5]

[0056] Test Example 4 (viscosity of the entire oil (oil-based composition) and mist dischargeability when a high-viscosity oil with a viscosity of more than 40 mPa·s at 25°C is mixed) The single oil agent and the two-component mixture oil agent (oil-based composition) shown in Table 6 were placed in a finger-type mist dispenser container (Y-150 manufactured by Yoshino Seisakusho) that dispenses 0.15 mL per spray, and sprayed once, and the mist state was evaluated according to the same criteria as in Test Example 3. The results are shown in Table 6.

[0057] [Table 6]

[0058] Test Example 5 (Evaluation of desirable discharge properties of mist dispenser containers) The oily compositions shown in Table 7 were filled into various mist dispenser containers shown in Table 8 or 9, and the oily composition was ejected from a distance of 10 cm toward paper (commercially available graph paper), and the diameter of the circular portion of the oily composition (oily composition) applied to the paper was measured (the diameter of the wetted portion without gaps was measured, ignoring the thin spread that occurs around the edges), and then dripping of the oily composition was observed. The results are shown in Table 8. Dripping assessment criteria; A: No dripping B: It doesn't drip immediately afterwards, but starts dripping after a few seconds. C: Dripping immediately Dripping evaluation: A and B were considered pass scores, and C was considered fail scores.

[0059] [Table 7]

[0060] [Table 8]

[0061] [Table 9]

[0062] Test Example 6 (Example of optimal HLB value for achieving good rinsing properties) The rinsing properties of the makeup remover of the present invention were evaluated when the oily composition shown in Table 10 was applied and then rinsed off with water. Three pumps of the oily composition were applied to the forearm using a 0.15 mL finger-type mist dispenser container (Y-150, manufactured by Yoshino Seisakusho), and the composition was washed off with water by hand. The ease of rinsing the oily composition and the feeling of residue on the skin were evaluated. The mist state was evaluated in the same manner as in Test Example 3. The results are shown in Table 10. Rinseability evaluation criteria; 5. Easy to rinse and leaves no residue 4: Rinses easily, but leaves a slight residue 3: Can be rinsed off, but leaves a residue 2: Difficult to rinse and leaves a noticeable residue 1: Not recommended at all A rinsability score of 3 or more was considered pass, and a score of 2 or less was considered fail.

[0063] [Table 10]

[0064] Test Example 7 (Example showing optimal surfactant concentration for rinsing) The mist state and washability of the makeup remover of the present invention, in which the oily composition shown in Table 11 is applied and then rinsed off with water, were evaluated. The test was carried out in the same manner as in Test Examples 3 and 6. The results are shown in Table 11.

[0065] [Table 11]

[0066] Test Example 8 (Example of the mixing ratio of multi-chain and single-chain nonionic surfactants effective for rinsing) The mist state and washability of the makeup remover of the present invention, in which the oily composition shown in Table 12 was applied and then rinsed off with water, were evaluated. The test was carried out in the same manner as in Test Examples 3 and 6. The results are shown in Table 12.

[0067] [Table 12]

[0068] Test Example 9 (Illustration of the optimum amount of water contained in the composition) The mist state and washability of the makeup remover of the present invention, in which the oily composition shown in Table 13 is applied and then rinsed off with water, were evaluated. The test was carried out in the same manner as in Test Examples 3 and 6. The results are shown in Table 13.

[0069] [Table 13]

[0070] Test Example 10 (An example of a composition that spontaneously removes makeup by simply spraying it on, without the need for physical force, using a combination of a low-viscosity oil and a specific surfactant, and its cleaning effect) A 10x5cm model sheet with fine pore-like indentations (Okamoto Chemicals, artificial leather, Laforet white) 2 0.045 g of a long-lasting foundation (Revlon, Color Stay Makeup Foundation) was applied to the area and allowed to dry for at least one hour. Next, various oils (Table 14) and oil-based compositions containing nonionic surfactants (Table 15) were filled into a finger-type mist dispenser container (Y-150, manufactured by Yoshino Seisakusho), and three sprays were sprayed onto the area where the foundation was to be applied from a distance of 10 cm, and the mixture was left to stand for one minute. After rinsing with a shower and drying, the removability of the foundation from the applied area was evaluated visually according to the following criteria.

[0071] Foundation removal evaluation criteria: A: Completely removed B: A small amount remains in the recessed area C: Remaining in the recessed area D: Remains entirely (including the depression and other areas) E: Not falling at all The evaluation was passed if the evaluation was A, B, or C, and failed if the evaluation was D or E. The mist state and rinsing performance were evaluated in the same manner as in Test Examples 3 and 6. The results are shown in Table 15.

[0072] [Table 14]

[0073] [Table 15]

[0074] Test Example 11 (Evaluation of the effect of the relationship between the viscosity of the oily composition and the outlet diameter of the mist dispenser container on the mist state) Oil solutions of different viscosities listed in Tables 16 and 17 were placed in a trigger-type mist dispenser A (Yoshino Seisakusho PT-500), a finger-type mist dispenser B (Yoshino Seisakusho Y152), a finger-type mist dispenser A (Yoshino Seisakusho Y-150), or a trigger-type mist dispenser D (Yoshino Seisakusho PT-300). The sample was then ejected 2-3 times onto a piece of paper held 10 cm away, and the mist state was observed. The results are shown in Tables 16 and 17.

[0075] [Table 16]

[0076] [Table 17]

[0077] The results of Tables 16 and 17 are shown in Figure 1.

Claims

1. (A) A method for removing makeup cosmetics using an oily composition, comprising: (A) The oily composition has a viscosity of 40 mPa s or less at 25°C, (A) an oily composition filled in a container equipped with a mist dispenser is sprayed onto the makeup cosmetic on the skin from the discharge port of the mist dispenser; (A) A method for removing makeup cosmetics, comprising penetrating an oily composition into the makeup cosmetics.

2. 2. The makeup removal method according to claim 1, wherein the makeup is removed by wiping off or rinsing with water after spraying the oily composition (A) onto the face from the outlet of the mist dispenser, without including a step of rubbing the skin.

3. 2. The method for removing makeup according to claim 1, wherein the mist dispenser has a discharge port diameter of 0.8 mm or less.

4. 4. The makeup removal method according to claim 3, wherein the relationship between the viscosity (mPa·s) of the oily composition at 25° C. and the diameter (mm) of the discharge opening of the container satisfies the following formula (1): Discharge port diameter (mm)≧0.23×loge (mPa・s)-0.4...(1)

5. 2. The method for removing makeup according to claim 1, wherein the oily composition further comprises (B) a nonionic surfactant.

6. 6. The method for removing makeup according to claim 5, wherein the combined HLB of the nonionic surfactant (B) is 9.0 or more and 15.0 or less.

7. 6. The makeup removal method according to claim 5, wherein the content of the nonionic surfactant (B) in the oily composition is 0.05% by mass or more and 35% by mass or less.

8. 2. The method for removing makeup according to claim 1, wherein the oily composition further contains (C) water in an amount of 6% by mass or less.

9. 2. The method for removing makeup according to claim 1, wherein the container is a mist dispenser designed to deposit mist in a circular shape having a diameter of 10 cm or less when dispensed from a distance of 10 cm from the face.

10. A makeup removal product comprising: (A) an oily composition; and a container equipped with a mist dispenser, wherein the (A) oily composition has a viscosity of 40 mPa·s or less at 25°C, the (A) oily composition is filled in the container, and the mist dispenser is a pump type.

11. 11. The makeup removal product according to claim 10, wherein the oily composition further comprises (B) a nonionic surfactant.

12. 12. The makeup removal product according to claim 11, wherein the combined HLB of the nonionic surfactant (B) is 9.0 or more and 15.0 or less.

13. 12. The makeup removal product according to claim 11, wherein the content of the nonionic surfactant (B) in the oily composition is 0.05% by mass or more and 35% by mass or less.

14. The makeup removal product according to claim 10, wherein the oily composition further contains (C) water in an amount of 6% by mass or less.

15. 11. The makeup removal product according to claim 10, wherein the mist dispenser has a discharge opening diameter of 0.8 mm or less.

16. 16. The makeup removal product according to claim 15, wherein the relationship between the viscosity (mPa·s) of the oily composition at 25°C and the outlet diameter (mm) of the mist dispenser satisfies the following formula (1): Discharge port diameter (mm)≧0.23×loge (mPa・s)-0.4...(1)

Citation Information

Patent Citations

  • Composition for oily foaming aerosol

    JP2006347896A

  • Skin cleansing composition

    JP2023169784A

  • Cosmetic for oily foamy aerosol

    JP2024037328A

  • Machine learning system and method for operating machine learning system

    KR102144975B1

  • Micellar BI-phase makeup spray in a non-aerosol fine mist packaging

    US20240197580A1