Fecal antigen test using multiple analytes

Abstract

To provide a method, a composition and a system for testing a fecal sample containing a small amount of human fecal specimen for a plurality of different marker analytes, for example, a plurality of different human proteins, nucleic acids, and other molecular marker analytes.SOLUTION: There is provided a method for characterizing a human fecal specimen, the method including: (i) providing a dispersed sample containing a small amount of a human fecal specimen dispersed in a predetermined amount of a stabilizing solution; and (ii) analyzing the dispersed sample for various amounts of a plurality of different marker analytes.SELECTED DRAWING: None

Description

Detailed Description of the Invention

[0001] [Technical field]

[0002] This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62 / 923,300, filed October 18, 2019, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.

[0003] Provided herein are methods, compositions, and systems (e.g., sets of articles) for testing fecal samples, including small amounts of human fecal samples (e.g., samples collected with a fecal immunochemical test (FIT) sample collection device), for a plurality of different protein, nucleic acid, and other molecular marker analytes. [Background technology]

[0004] Fecal immunochemical testing (FIT) is an antibody-based assay that detects hemoglobin in fecal specimens and is widely used for screening for colorectal cancer (CRC). Several different laboratory-based or point-of-care FIT tests are available. Available FIT tests typically involve collecting a small sample from the fecal specimen using specialized equipment and placing the sample in a buffer solution contained within the device to stabilize hemoglobin from the time of sample collection until the sample can be analyzed. FIT is a convenient and affordable option for CRC screening.

[0005] Although other protein biomarkers potentially associated with colorectal adenoma and cancer have been identified in stool by screening relatively large specimens using electrophoresis and mass spectrometry (e.g., U.S. Patent Publication Nos. 2015 / 0141273A1 and 2017 / 0199196A1 to Bosch, both incorporated by reference herein for all purposes), laboratory-based and point-of-care rapid FIT tests remain limited to hemoglobin testing. [Summary of the Invention]

[0006] The present technology provides methods and compositions for collecting and stabilizing protein biomarkers other than or in addition to hemoglobin using a FIT sample collection device. Accordingly, in some embodiments, the present technology provides a method for characterizing a human fecal sample, comprising: i) providing a dispersed sample comprising a small amount of human fecal sample dispersed in a volume of stabilizing liquid; and ii) analyzing the dispersed sample for varying amounts of a plurality of different marker analytes. As used herein, different marker analytes may comprise different portions of a single molecule's location (e.g., different fragments or regions of a protein or nucleic acid analyte molecule). In certain embodiments, the different marker analytes are completely different molecules (e.g., different proteins and / or different genes or other nucleic acids). In preferred embodiments, the plurality of different marker analytes comprises a plurality of different protein marker analytes, preferably at least three different protein marker analytes.

[0007] The plurality of different marker analytes can be, for example, proteins expressed from three different genes. In certain embodiments, the plurality of different marker analytes comprises three or fewer different marker analytes. In some embodiments, the plurality of different marker analytes comprises human marker analytes (e.g., human protein analytes and / or nucleic acid analytes). In preferred embodiments, the plurality of different marker analytes consists of human marker analytes.

[0008] The techniques herein are used to analyze small fecal samples (e.g., fecal samples collected using a FIT sample collection device (e.g., a FIT sample collection device that includes a fluid for stabilizing small fecal samples)). Accordingly, in some embodiments, the volume of stabilizing liquid in the dispersed sample is preferably a volume suitable for use with a FIT sample collection device (e.g., less than 3 mL, preferably less than 2 mL). In some embodiments, the volume of stabilizing liquid is less than 1 mL. In some embodiments, the dispersed sample is provided within the FIT sample collection device.

[0009] Similarly, the mass of the fecal sample for analysis is not limited to a particular mass, but in certain embodiments, the mass of the fecal sample is the mass of a sample that can be collected using a FIT sample collection device. Thus, in certain embodiments, a small fecal sample has a mass of less than 100 mg, preferably less than 50 mg, and preferably less than 20 mg.

[0010] The present technology is not limited to particular marker analytes for detection, for example, in a dispersed sample. For example, in some embodiments, the plurality of different marker analytes comprises a plurality of human protein markers selected from the group consisting of hemoglobin (Hb), calprotectin, haptoglobin (Hp), complement component 3 (C3), complement component 3a (C3a), Fc fragment of IgG-binding protein (FCGBP), resistin-like beta (RETNLB / RELM), S100 calcium-binding protein A12 (S100A12), and serpin family F member 2 (SERPIN F2). In some embodiments, the plurality of different human protein marker analytes comprises Hb, Hp, and C3, and in some embodiments, the plurality of different human protein marker analytes consists of Hb, Hp, and C3.

[0011] Although the present technology is not limited to a particular method of analyzing the marker analytes, in certain embodiments, the analysis comprises an immunochemical assay.

[0012] In some embodiments, the stabilization solution includes a buffer (e.g., tris(hydroxymethyl)aminomethane (Tris) buffer). Other components may also be used in the stabilization solution, for example, to stabilize cells, stabilize proteins, retard microbial growth, etc. Thus, the present technology contemplates a stabilization solution including one or more components selected from a buffer, a carrier protein, a surfactant, a salt, a chelating agent, and an antimicrobial agent or antibiotic. In certain embodiments, the stabilization solution includes one or more of tris(hydroxymethyl)aminomethane (Tris) buffer, bovine serum albumin, polyethylene glycol sorbitan monolaurate (TWEEN-20), sodium azide, sodium chloride, ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), and gentamicin. In a particularly preferred embodiment, the stabilization solution comprises 20 mM Tris, 10% bovine serum albumin, 0.10% TWEEN 20, 0.095% sodium azide, 140 mM sodium chloride, 10 mM EDTA, and 15 μg / ml gentamicin.

[0013] Other stabilizing components may also be used, for example, in the stabilizing solution as described above, or in a solution with a different composition. In certain embodiments, components suitable for stabilizing hemoglobin may be included. For example, in some embodiments, the stabilizing solution includes one or more stabilizing reagents selected from protoporphyrin; a polyvalent cation; a sugar or polysaccharide; an osmolyte, and optionally a polyvalent cation; a horseradish peroxidase (HRP) stabilizing component, and optionally a polyvalent cation. In certain embodiments, the stabilizing solution includes one or more stabilizing reagents selected from protoporphyrin; a polyvalent cation; a sugar or polysaccharide; an osmolyte, and optionally a polyvalent cation; a horseradish peroxidase (HRP) stabilizing component, and optionally a polyvalent cation. 3+ and Co 3+ In some embodiments, the stabilizing liquid comprises protoporphyrin IX complexed with a multivalent cation selected from the group consisting of: In some embodiments, the stabilizing liquid comprises substituted or unsubstituted polygalacturonic acid, and optionally a multivalent cation.

[0014] It is contemplated that the amount of fecal sample remaining after removing the small amount of fecal sample can also be analyzed for one or more marker analytes.Therefore, in some embodiments, the present technology provides any of the embodiments described herein, wherein the small amount of human fecal sample is provided by a method comprising: a) collecting a whole fecal sample from a human subject; b) removing a portion of the whole fecal sample to generate a removed portion and a remaining portion of the fecal sample, wherein the removed portion is the small amount of fecal sample; c) mixing the small amount of fecal sample with a certain amount of stabilizing liquid to generate a dispersed sample; and d) stabilizing the remaining portion of the fecal sample.

[0015] The remaining portion of the fecal sample can be stabilized in several different ways. For example, in some embodiments, stabilizing the remaining portion of the fecal sample includes one or both of the following: i) adding a stabilization buffer to the remaining portion of the fecal sample, preferably homogenizing the remaining portion of the fecal sample in the stabilization buffer to form a fecal homogenate; and ii) freezing the remaining portion of the fecal sample. In certain preferred embodiments, the stabilization buffer contains about 100 to about 300 mM of a chelating agent, preferably a chelating agent including EDTA, and about 400 to about 600 mM of Tris-hydrochloride.

[0016] In some embodiments, analyzing the remainder of the fecal sample includes treating the fecal homogenate to separate solids from a clarified fluid fraction and analyzing the clarified fluid fraction. Producing the clarified fluid fraction can include, for example, filtration, e.g., to produce a clarified filtrate, and / or centrifugation, e.g., to produce a clarified supernatant. Methods for processing fecal samples to remove assay inhibitors and isolate target nucleic acid molecules include, for example, those disclosed in U.S. Patent No. 10,047,390, incorporated herein by reference for all purposes.

[0017] With respect to the analysis of the remainder of the fecal sample, the one or more marker analytes analyzed in the remainder of the fecal sample can include a marker analyte or analytes that are also analyzed in the dispersed sample. For example, in some embodiments, the dispersed sample and the remainder of the fecal sample are analyzed for the same set of marker analytes. In other embodiments, the one or more marker analytes analyzed in the remainder of the fecal sample consist of marker analytes that are not analyzed in the dispersed sample.

[0018] In some embodiments, the marker analytes analyzed in the remaining portion of the fecal sample include one or more human DNA marker analytes, preferably one or more human DNA marker analytes analyzed for at least one of mutations and cytosine methylation status. Examples of human DNA marker analytes that can be analyzed using the methods, compositions, and sets of articles described herein include, for example, the markers described in International Patent No. WO2015 / 153289 (PCT Application / US Patent No. 2015 / 022749), the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference. It is contemplated that the dispersed sample can be similarly analyzed for one or more DNA marker analytes or other nucleic acid analytes.

[0019] The present technology also provides articles (e.g., containers, collection devices, reagents, etc.) for characterizing human fecal samples using any one of the above-described methods. For example, in some embodiments, the present technology provides a set of articles including a FIT sample collection device that contains a dispersed sample containing a small amount of human fecal sample dispersed in a certain amount of stabilizing liquid, and a set of reagents for analyzing the dispersed sample for various amounts of multiple different human protein marker analytes. In a preferred embodiment, the amount of stabilizing liquid in the FIT sample collection device is less than 3 mL, preferably less than 2 mL.

[0020] In some embodiments, the plurality of different human protein marker analytes analyzable by the set of reagents comprises at least three different protein marker analytes, and in certain preferred embodiments, the plurality of different human protein marker analytes comprises three or fewer different marker analytes. Preferably, the plurality of different human protein marker analytes are selected from the group consisting of Hb, calprotectin, Hp, C3, C3a, FCGBP, RETNLB / RELM, S100A12, and SERPIN F2, and preferably comprise Hb, Hp, and C3. In certain embodiments, the plurality of different human protein marker analytes analyzable by the set of reagents consists of Hb, Hp, and C3. While the present technology is not limited to a particular analytical method, in certain embodiments, the set of reagents for analyzing a dispersed sample comprises a set of reagents for an immunochemical assay.

[0021] The mass of the human fecal sample is not limited to a particular amount, but in some embodiments, the small amount of human fecal sample has a mass of less than 100 mg, preferably less than 50 mg, and preferably less than 20 mg. Any suitable stabilizing liquid (e.g., any of the stabilizing liquids described above and variations thereof) can be used in the set of articles.

[0022] In some embodiments of the set of articles, in which the small human fecal sample comprises a portion removed from the whole fecal sample, the set of articles further comprises a stabilized remainder of the fecal sample. Preferably, the stabilized remainder of the fecal sample comprises a stabilization buffer. Any suitable stabilization buffer (e.g., any of the stabilization buffers described above and variations thereof) can be used in the set of articles. In some embodiments, the stabilized remainder of the fecal sample is homogenized in the stabilization buffer.

[0023] The set of articles may further include a set of reagents for analyzing the stabilized remainder of the fecal sample for varying amounts of one or more marker analytes. In some embodiments, the one or more marker analytes analyzable by the set of reagents for analyzing the stabilized remainder of the fecal sample include at least one human protein marker analyte analyzable by the set of reagents for analyzing a dispersed sample, and in some embodiments, the one or more marker analytes analyzable by the set of reagents for analyzing the stabilized remainder of the fecal sample include one or more human DNA marker analytes. In a preferred embodiment, the set of reagents for analyzing the stabilized remainder of the fecal sample for one or more human DNA marker analytes includes a reagent for analyzing at least one of mutations and cytosine methylation status.

[0024] definition To facilitate understanding of the technology of the present invention, several terms and phrases are defined below. Additional definitions are set forth throughout the detailed description.

[0025] As used herein, "a" or "an" or "the" can mean one or more. For example, "a" part can mean one part or multiple parts.

[0026] The terms "feces" and "stool" are used interchangeably herein with respect to a sample of feces (e.g., human feces).

[0027] As used herein, the term "metered" means having a reasonably reproducible measurement.

[0028] As used herein, the term "FIT sample collection device" refers to a device for collecting a fecal sample, preferably a metered fecal sample, for analysis. See, e.g., U.S. Patent Nos. 9,211,112, 7,780,915, and 6,780,160. In some embodiments, the FIT sample collection device includes a quantity of a stabilizing agent (e.g., a stabilizing buffer) appropriate for stabilizing components in the quantity of fecal sample collected by the FIT sample collection device.

[0029] As used herein, the term "FIT device sample" refers to a small fecal sample collected by a FIT sample collection device. A FIT device sample is preferably a small fecal sample as defined herein below, and more preferably a metered sample. In some embodiments, a FIT device sample comprises a small fecal sample combined with a volume of fluid (e.g., a stabilizing buffer) suitable for stabilizing one or more components of the sample (e.g., proteins, nucleic acids, carbohydrates, or other components of the fecal sample).

[0030] As used herein, a "small amount of fecal sample" refers to a fecal sample of less than about 100 mg, preferably less than 90 mg, preferably less than 80 mg, preferably less than 70 mg, preferably less than 60 mg, preferably less than 50 mg, preferably less than 40 mg, preferably less than 30 mg, preferably less than 20 mg, preferably less than 10 mg, preferably less than 9 mg, preferably less than 8 mg, preferably less than 7 mg, preferably less than 6 mg, preferably less than 5 mg, preferably less than 4 mg, preferably less than 2 mg, preferably less than 1 mg, including any integer value of micrograms and any fractional value of micrograms therebetween. In a preferred embodiment, the small amount of fecal sample is combined with a volume of a stabilizing fluid (e.g., a stabilizing buffer) suitable for stabilizing one or more components, preferably macromolecular components (e.g., proteins, nucleic acids, carbohydrates, and other components of the fecal sample).

[0031] As used herein, the term "whole fecal sample" refers to the undivided products of a stool sample by a subject, which can be collected, for example, directly on or in a stool collection device (e.g., a receptacle, container, or surface) by a defecation by the subject.

[0032] As used herein, the term "dispersed sample" refers to a sample (e.g., a fecal sample) mixed with a dispersion matrix (e.g., a fluid, a gel, etc.), with the sample material dispersed within the matrix. A dispersed sample does not need to be mixed to be uniform within the matrix. For example, the sample material can be mixed, e.g., by homogenization, to essentially uniformly distribute all sample present throughout the matrix, or the mixing may result in a portion of the original sample material remaining in a discernible form (e.g., the remaining semi-solid portion of a fecal sample) in the presence of the matrix, including the dispersed fraction of the sample.

[0033] The terms "stabilization liquid" and "stabilization buffer" are used interchangeably herein to refer to a fluid matrix suitable for stabilizing one or more components, preferably macromolecular components (e.g., proteins, nucleic acids, carbohydrates, and other components), of a fecal sample. Stabilization buffers include, but are not limited to, buffers selected to stabilize proteins (e.g., hemoglobin) or nucleic acids (e.g., DNA or RNA), or to stabilize both samples (e.g., blood or fecal samples). In some embodiments, the stabilization buffer comprises a protein stabilization buffer as described, for example, in U.S. Patent Publication No. 2019 / 0302129A1, PCT Patent Application / US 2019 / 022598, and U.S. Patent No. 9,211,112, or a nucleic acid stabilization buffer as described, for example, in U.S. Patent Nos. 6,551,777, 8,722,330, 10,064,404, 9,376,709, 9,657,227, and 9,926,590, 10,144,955, each of which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.

[0034] A fecal stabilization buffer solution for a FIT sample collection device is contemplated, comprising one or more hemoglobin stabilization reagents. In some embodiments, the one or more hemoglobin stabilization reagents may be selected from, for example, an osmolyte; a polyvalent cation; a sugar or polysaccharide, and optionally a polyvalent cation; protoporphyrin; and a horseradish peroxidase (HRP) stabilizing component, and optionally a polyvalent cation. Examples and concentrations of such reagents in solution are described in U.S. Patent Publication No. 2019 / 0302129A1.

[0035] In some embodiments, the solution may include an osmolyte (e.g., betaine). In these embodiments, the osmolyte (e.g., betaine) may be at a concentration ranging from 2M to 5M.

[0036] In some embodiments, the solution may include a sugar (e.g., sucrose or trehalose). In these embodiments, the sugar (e.g., sucrose or trehalose) may be at a concentration ranging from 0.1 M to 0.5 M. In either case, the solution may optionally contain a multivalent cation, such as Mg 2+ or Ca 2+ In these embodiments, the multivalent cation (e.g., calcium or magnesium ions) may be at a concentration ranging from 5 mM to 25 mM.

[0037] In some embodiments, the solution can include a polysaccharide (e.g., a substituted or unsubstituted polygalacturonic acid, such as α-(1-4) linked D-galacturonic acid). In these embodiments, the polysaccharide (e.g., a substituted or unsubstituted polygalacturonic acid) can be at a concentration ranging from 0.005% to 0.5% (e.g., 0.01% to 0.125%). In these embodiments, the solution can optionally include a multivalent cation. In embodiments where the solution includes a multivalent cation, the multivalent cation can be at a concentration ranging from 5 mM to 25 mM. In some embodiments, the solution can include substituted or unsubstituted polygalacturonic acid and a multivalent cation (e.g., a calcium salt or a magnesium salt) at a concentration ranging from 5 mM to 25 mM.

[0038] In some embodiments, the solution can include a protoporphyrin complexed with a metal ion, such as protoporphyrin IX or an analog thereof, such as octaethylporphyrin (H2OEP) or tetraphenylporphyrin (H2TPP). In these embodiments, the protoporphyrin can be hemin (protoporphyrin IX containing a ferric (Fe3+) ion with a coordinating chloride ligand) or hematin. In other embodiments, the protoporphyrin can be protoporphyrin IX complexed with a divalent or trivalent cation (e.g., Zn2+, Cr3+, or Co3+). In these embodiments, the protoporphyrin can be in solution at a concentration ranging from 0.1 μM to 100 μM (e.g., 1 μM to 10 μM). In some embodiments, the solution may contain an HRP stabilizing component selected from HRP conjugate stabilizer (PN85R-102; Fitzgerald Industries), HRP conjugate stabilizer (PN SZ02; Surmodics), and HRP conjugate stabilizer (PN ab171537; Abcam). Other HRP stabilizing components (e.g., AbGuard (BioRad)) may also be used. PN:BUF052; BioRad Laboratories Inc. 2000 Alfred Nobel Dr, Hercules, CA 94547) may be used. If the solution includes an HRP stabilizing component, the component may be at a concentration ranging from 1% to 20% (e.g., 5% to 15% or 5% to 20%).

[0039] In any embodiment, the solution may include a multivalent cation (e.g., calcium ions or magnesium ions). In these embodiments, the multivalent cation may be at a concentration ranging from 5 mM to 25 mM. In some embodiments, the solution further comprises a tris(hydroxymethyl)aminomethane (Tris) buffer (e.g., 10 mM to 50 mM Tris, pH 7.5), bovine serum albumin (e.g., 5% to 20% BSA), polysorbate 20 (e.g., 0.05% to 0.2% polyoxyethylene sorbitan monolaurate (TWEEN® 20)), a preservative such as sodium azide (e.g., 0.05% to 0.2% sodium azide), a salt such as sodium chloride (e.g., 50 mM to 250 mM sodium chloride), a chelating agent such as ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA, e.g., 5 mM to 20 mM ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid), and an antibiotic such as gentamicin (e.g., 5 μg / mL to 50 μg / mL).

[0040] As used herein, the term "marker analyte" is used in its broadest sense and refers to any component or feature of a sample that can be analyzed or assayed to characterize the sample (e.g., an indication of a disease or condition, or the absence of a disease or condition). [Brief description of the drawing]

[0041] [Figure 1] Table (Table 2) showing the results of testing for the presence of a panel of protein markers in whole fecal supernatant samples from subjects histopathologically classified as having colorectal cancer (CA), advanced adenoma (AA), or negative for cancer and advanced adenoma. [Figure 2] Table (Table 3) of the presence of a panel of protein markers in FIT device samples from subjects histopathologically classified as colorectal cancer (CA), advanced adenoma (AA), or negative for cancer and advanced adenoma. [Mode for Carrying Out the Invention]

[0042] Provided herein are techniques for analyzing multiple markers (e.g., multiple different protein markers) in a fecal sample, with or without analysis of hemoglobin. In some embodiments, multiple different markers are tested on a supernatant sample from a whole fecal specimen, while in some embodiments, multiple different protein markers are tested on a small sample volume, such as collected using a FIT sample collection device. FIT sample collection devices typically collect samples of less than 0.1 g, more commonly 10-20 mg. In yet other embodiments, results from testing multiple proteins in a whole fecal sample are combined with results from testing samples from the same fecal specimen collected using a FIT sample collection device. In still other embodiments, the fecal sample is additionally tested for non-protein markers (e.g., DNA markers). In the following description, the following abbreviations will be referenced: hemoglobin (Hb) calprotectin, haptoglobin (Hp), complement component 3 (C3), complement component 3a (C3a), Fc fragment of IgG-binding protein (FCGBP), resistin-like beta (RETNLB / RELM), S100 calcium-binding protein A12 (S100A12), and serpin family F member 2 (SERPIN F2).

[0043] All known fecal immunochemical tests (FITs) measure only hemoglobin in fecal samples. Examples include: 1.CAREprime Hb (Alfresa Pharma, Osaka, Japan) 2.Hb ELISA (Immundiagnostik, Bensheim, Germany) 3. OC Sensor (Eiken Chemical, Tokyo, Japan) (sold as Polymedco in the US) 4.RIDASCREEN Hb (R-Biopharm, Darmstadt, Germany) 5. SENTiFIT-FOB Gold (Sentinel Diagnostics, Milan, Italy) 6.Eurolyser FOB test (Eurolyser Diagnostics, Salzburg, Austria) 7.ImmoCARE-C (CARE Diagnostics, Voerde, Germany) 8.QuantOn Hem(Immundiagnostik, Bensheim, Germany) 9.QuikRead go iFOBT(Orion Diagnostica, Espoo, Finland)

[0044] Anton Gies et al. evaluated nine fecal immunochemical tests for colorectal cancer. The tests were evaluated and compared on the same sample set. The results of the comparison show that when a specificity of 93% or higher is set for all tests, approximately equal sensitivity for CRC detection is observed. However, the test characteristics of each test show that in this dataset, no test achieved a sensitivity of more than 82% for CRC detection at 93% specificity, and no test achieved a sensitivity of more than 75% for CRC detection at 97% specificity. (Anton Gies et al. Direct Comparison of Diagnostic Performance of 9 Quantitative Fecal Immunochemical Tests for Colorectal Cancer) Cancer Screening. Gastroenterology 2018;154:93-104). Conversely, the sensitivity of these tests can be adjusted upward by changing the cutoff value, but increasing sensitivity comes at the expense of specificity.

[0045] One of the challenges in testing for different protein analytes is the potential low stability of proteins in fecal samples. Low analyte concentrations and poor analytical sensitivity can further limit meaningful detection and analysis of proteins in feces, especially in the small amounts of feces typically collected by FIT sample collection devices. For example, sample collection devices for the FIT test described above are configured to provide small, metered amounts (typically 20 mg or less) for testing. Typically, these devices are configured to remove excess sample, for example, by scraping with a sampling spoon or rod, so that a metered amount of fecal sample can be delivered to a reservoir or container containing a set amount of buffer, as shown in the table below. [Table 1]

[0046] While each of the FIT collection devices described above has been shown to provide sufficient sample volumes to detect hemoglobin, detecting other protein markers in these same small sample volumes has proven more challenging. Of the 24 protein markers evaluated, only two markers showed potential for improving the sensitivity and specificity of FIT for Hb assays.

[0047] Experimental example FIT and whole fecal samples were collected using a device according to the COLOGUARD collection kit (Exact Sciences, Madison, Wis.) FIT samples were collected using a device as described in U.S. Patent No. 9,211,112, stabilized in buffer, and the resulting suspension samples were tested directly.

[0048] Whole fecal samples were collected and stabilized in Cologuard Fecal Buffer 200204, which contains ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) and tris(hydroxymethyl)aminomethane (Tris) buffer. The fecal samples were weighed and then combined with the buffer. Preferably, the buffer and feces are combined at a buffer-to-feces ratio of 4:1 (wt:wt or vol:wt). The samples were homogenized in the buffer and centrifuged to remove solids, and the supernatant was collected for biomarker testing.

[0049] Whole fecal supernatant and FIT samples were evaluated for the presence / detection of 24 additional protein markers. For the evaluation, commercially available analytical kits were purchased from several different vendors. A list of the protein marker assays used in the evaluation is provided in Table 1. [Table 2] JPEG2025172917000003.jpg237169 JPEG2025172917000004.jpg104169

[0050] Samples were tested according to the manufacturer's instructions, and the volume of liquid tested depended on various assay requirements. For all kits, sample volumes varied from 25 to 100 μL. In some procedures, samples from whole fecal supernatants required dilution before testing, e.g., to reduce inhibition by sample stabilization buffers and / or to generate samples containing target analytes within the measurement range of the quantitative assay. Dilutions ranged from undiluted to 150-fold dilution. FIT collection device samples were typically diluted 10-fold before testing.

[0051] The samples selected for evaluation consisted of populations with known pathologies. Not all samples were evaluated with each protein assay. A list of protein markers evaluated in whole fecal supernatant samples and their results are shown in Table 2 (Figure 1). Protein markers evaluated in FIT instrument samples and their results are shown in Table 3 (Figure 2).

[0052] Of the 24 protein biomarkers evaluated, haptoglobin (Hp) and complement component 3 (C3) showed improved sensitivity and specificity when combined with Hb results compared with Hb-only FIT. These two biomarkers, which showed the greatest potential for improving the sensitivity and specificity of FIT sample testing when combined with hemoglobin results, were tested on a large panel of samples with known pathologies. The sample panel consisted of 115 cancer samples (CA), 112 advanced adenoma samples (AA), and 488 cancer-negative samples. Whole stool samples were collected, and a small aliquot of each was removed using the FIT collection device to allow comparison of the results of whole stool supernatant testing with the corresponding small aliquot sample processed using the FIT collection device.

[0053] To evaluate the performance of each biomarker for detecting cancer, ROC curve analysis was performed and the area under the curve (AUC) was calculated.

[0054] Table 4 shows the AUC results obtained from the analysis of the markers shown in Figure 1 in whole fecal supernatant samples. Results with an AUC greater than 0.6 were selected for further analysis. Insufficient biomarker detection was observed in some cases, and these markers were not included in the AUC calculation. [Table 3]

[0055] Table 5 shows the AUC results obtained from the analysis of the markers shown in Figure 2 on the FIT device samples. Results with an AUC greater than 0.6 were selected for further analysis. Insufficient biomarker detection was observed in some cases, and these markers were not included in the AUC calculation. [Table 4]

[0056] Whole fecal samples and corresponding small sample volumes from FIT collectors were tested with the C3 and Hp assays. The C3 and Hp results were modeled, as were the specificity and sensitivity of the assays individually and in combination with hemoglobin results from samples collected on FIT collectors.

[0057] Whole fecal supernatant sample The results for the whole fecal supernatant samples are shown below in Table 6. These data show that in the whole fecal samples, only the C3 marker showed improved cancer sensitivity compared to the hemoglobin marker, with the greatest sensitivity achieved when the C3, Hp, and Hb markers were combined. [Table 5]

[0058] FIT instrument sample For samples collected with the FIT collection device (i.e., approximately 20 mg samples), the greatest sensitivity was achieved when C3, Hp, and Hb results were combined, as shown in Table 7. These data indicate that combining Hb results with C3 or Hp results improved the overall sensitivity of the analysis of FIT samples compared to results obtained with FIT Hb analysis alone. [Table 6]

[0059] Whole fecal supernatant sample data + FIT device sample data Data collected from whole fecal supernatants and corresponding FIT collector sample data (i.e., FIT samples taken from whole fecal samples and processed in parallel) were also combined. Table 8 shows the AUC results for the analysis of C3, Hp, and Hb markers when combining FIT and whole fecal supernatant data for that marker. [Table 7]

[0060] When both FIT and whole fecal supernatant samples were tested in combination, the results generally demonstrated improved sensitivity compared to individual marker testing on whole feces or FIT device sampling alone, as shown in Table 9 below. These data demonstrate that the overall sensitivity of Hb was improved when both FIT samples and corresponding whole fecal samples were tested and the results combined. Testing Hp and / or C3 in addition to Hb slightly improved sensitivity over Hb analysis alone. [Table 8]

[0061] The above-described assays may be further enhanced by additional assays for detecting one or more other molecules. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that detection of protein markers in fecal samples, including FIT device samples and whole fecal supernatant samples, may be further enhanced overall sensitivity by detecting other markers, individually or in any combination, such as methylation marker gene(s) or other nucleic acids in fecal samples, and / or markers in blood or blood product samples, including but not limited to RNA(s), methylation marker gene(s) and / or autoantibody(s).

[0062] All literature and similar materials cited in this application, including but not limited to patents, patent applications, articles, books, papers, and internet web pages, are expressly incorporated by reference in their entirety for all purposes. Unless otherwise defined, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which the various embodiments described herein belong. In the event that the definition of a term when incorporated by reference differs from the definition provided in the present teachings, the definition provided in the present teachings shall prevail.

[0063] Various modifications and variations of the compositions, methods, and uses of the described technology will be apparent to those skilled in the art without departing from the scope and spirit of the technology as described. Although the present technology has been described in connection with specific exemplary embodiments, it should be understood that the invention as claimed should not be unduly limited to such specific embodiments. Indeed, various modifications of the described modes for carrying out the invention that are obvious to those skilled in pharmacology, biochemistry, medicine, or related fields are intended to be within the scope of the following claims. [Brief explanation of the drawings]

[0064] [Figure 1-1] Table 2 shows the results of testing the presence of a panel of protein markers in whole fecal supernatant samples from subjects histopathologically classified as having colorectal cancer (CA), advanced adenoma (AA), or negative for cancer and advanced adenoma. [Figure 1-2] Continued from Figure 1-1. [Figure 1-3] Continued from Figure 1-2. [Figure 1-4] Continued from Figure 1-3. [Figure 1-5] Continued from Figure 1-4. [Figure 1-6] Continued from Figure 1-5. [Figure 1-7] Continued from Figure 1-6. [Figure 1-8] Continued from Figure 1-7. [Figure 1-9] Continued from Figure 1-8. [Figure 1-10] Continued from Figure 1-9. [Figure 1-11] Continued from Figure 1-10. [Figure 1-12] Continued from Figure 1-11. [Figure 1-13] Continued from Figure 1-12. [Figure 1-14] Continued from Figure 1-13. [Figure 1-15] Continued from Figure 1-14. [Figure 1-16] Continued from Figure 1-15. [Figure 1-17] Continued from Figure 1-16. [Figure 1-18] Continued from Figure 1-17. [Figure 1-19] Continued from Figure 1-18. [Figure 1-20] Continued from Figure 1-19. [Figure 1-21] Continued from Figure 1-20. [Figure 1-22] Continued from Figure 1-21. [Figure 1-23] Continued from Figure 1-22. [Figure 1-24] Continued from Figure 1-23. [Figure 1-25] Continued from Figure 1-24. [Figure 1-26] Continued from Figure 1-25. [Figure 1-27] Continued from Figure 1-26. [Figure 1-28] Continued from Figure 1-27. [Figure 1-29] Continued from Figure 1-28. [Figure 1-30] Continued from Figure 1-29. [Figure 1-31] Continued from Figure 1-30. [Figure 1-32] Continued from Figure 1-31. [Figure 2-1] Table 3 shows the presence of a set of protein markers in FIT device samples from subjects histopathologically classified as colorectal cancer (CA), advanced adenoma (AA), or negative for cancer and advanced adenoma. [Figure 2-2] Continued from Figure 2-1. [Figure 2-3] Continued from Figure 2-2. [Figure 2-4] Continued from Figure 2-3. [Figure 2-5] Continued from Figure 2-4. [Figure 2-6] Continued from Figure 2-5. [Figure 2-7] Continued from Figure 2-6. [Figure 2-8] Continued from Figure 2-7. [Figure 2-9] Continued from Figure 2-8. [Figure 2-10] Continued from Figure 2-9. [Figure 2-11] Continued from Figure 2-10. [Figure 2-12] Continued from Figure 2-11. [Figure 2-13] Continued from Figure 2-12. [Figure 2-14] Continued from Figure 2-13. [Figure 2-15] Continued from Figure 2-14. [Figure 2-16] Continued from Figure 2-15. [Figure 2-17] Continued from Figure 2-16. [Figure 2-18] Continued from Figure 2-17. [Figure 2-19] Continued from Figure 2-18. [Figure 2-20] Continued from Figure 2-19.

Claims

1. A method for characterizing a human fecal specimen for indications of colorectal adenoma or colorectal cancer, comprising: a) providing a human stool specimen comprising two samples: i) a first sample comprising a first portion of a human fecal specimen in a volume of a stabilization solution, the first sample having a milliliter (mL) volume of stabilization solution per gram (g) mass of the first portion of the human fecal specimen of at least 20:1; and ii) a second sample comprising a second portion of the human fecal specimen in a stabilizing buffer; b) analyzing said first sample for varying amounts of one or more different human protein marker analytes; c) analyzing the second sample for varying amounts of the same one or more different human protein marker analytes; and d) characterizing the human fecal specimen to indicate the presence or absence of colorectal adenoma and / or colorectal cancer based on a combination of the results of steps b) and c).

2. The method described in claim 1, wherein the volume of the stabilizing liquid in the first sample is less than 3 mL.

3. The method described in claim 1, wherein the volume of the stabilizing liquid in the first sample is less than 2 mL.

4. The method described in claim 2, wherein the first portion of the human fecal sample is less than 100 mg.

5. The method described in claim 2, wherein the first portion of the human fecal sample is less than 50 mg.

6. The method described in claim 2, wherein the first portion of the human fecal sample is less than 20 mg.

7. The method described in claim 1, wherein the volume in milliliters (mL) of stabilizing buffer per gram (g) mass of the second portion of the second sample is at least 4:

1.

8. The method described in claim 7, wherein the volume in milliliters (mL) of stabilizing buffer per gram (g) mass of the second portion of the human fecal specimen of the second sample is at least 4:

1.

9. The method described in claim 1, wherein the second portion of the human stool sample comprises the remaining portion of the stool sample after removing the first portion from the stool sample.

10. The method described in claim 1, wherein the second portion of the human fecal sample is homogenized in a stabilizing buffer.

11. The method of claim 10, further comprising freezing at least a portion of the second sample.

12. The method of claim 1 or 10, wherein analyzing the second sample comprises treating the second sample to separate solids from a clarified fluid fraction, and analyzing the clarified fluid fraction.

13. The method described in claim 1, wherein the one or more different human protein marker analytes include at least three different human protein marker analytes.

14. The method of claim 1, wherein the one or more different human protein marker analytes comprise one or more human protein markers selected from the group consisting of complement component 3 (C3), hemoglobin (Hb), haptoglobin (Hp), calprotectin, complement component 3a (C3a), Fc fragment of IgG binding protein (FCGBP), resistin-like beta (RETNLB / RELM), S100 calcium-binding protein A12 (S100A12), and serpin family F member 2 (SERPIN F2).

15. The method described in claim 14, wherein the one or more different human protein marker analytes include C3, Hb, and Hp.

16. The method of claim 14, wherein the one or more different human protein marker analytes consist of C3, Hb, and Hp.

17. The method of claim 1, wherein the analyzing comprises an immunochemical assay.

18. i) the stabilizing solution comprises 20 mM Tris, 10% bovine serum albumin, 0.10% TWEEN 20, 0.095% sodium azide, 140 mM sodium chloride, 10 mM EDTA, and 15 μg / ml gentamicin; ii) the stabilizing liquid is Protoporphyrin; multivalent cations; sugars or polysaccharides; osmolytes; multivalent cations; and a horseradish peroxidase (HRP) stabilizing component; iii) the stabilizing solution comprises protoporphyrin IX complexed with a multivalent cation; and iv) the stabilization liquid comprises substituted or unsubstituted polygalacturonic acid.

19. The method of claim 18, wherein the stabilizing solution comprises protoporphyrin IX complexed with a polyvalent cation selected from Cr 3+ and Co 3+ .

20. The human fecal specimen containing two samples, a) collecting a whole fecal specimen from a human subject; b) removing a portion of the whole fecal specimen to generate a removed portion and a remainder portion of the fecal specimen, wherein the removed portion is a first portion of a human fecal specimen; c) combining a first portion of the human fecal specimen with a volume of a stabilizing liquid to form the first sample; d) adding a stabilization buffer to the remaining portion of the fecal specimen to generate a second sample.

21. The method of claim 1, wherein the stabilizing buffer comprises a chelating agent and a buffer.

22. The method of claim 21, wherein the stabilizing buffer comprises 100 to 300 mM chelating agent and 400 to 600 mM Tris hydrochloride.

23. The method of claim 22, wherein the chelating agent comprises EDTA.

24. The method of claim 1, wherein the stabilizing buffer has a different composition from the stabilizing liquid.

25. The stabilizing solution comprising 20 mM Tris hydrochloride, 10% bovine serum albumin, 0.10% TWEEN 20, 0.095% sodium azide, 140 mM sodium chloride, 10 mM EDTA, and 15 μg / ml gentamicin; 25. The method of claim 24, wherein the stabilization buffer comprises 100-300 mM EDTA and 400-600 mM Tris-HCl.

26. The method of claim 1, further comprising analyzing the first sample and / or the second sample for one or more human nucleic acid marker analytes.

27. ​​The method described in claim 26, wherein the one or more human nucleic acid marker analytes include one or more human DNA marker analytes.

28. The one or more human DNA marker analytes, Mutations and and cytosine methylation status.

Images