Methods for reducing drug target interference in Anti-drug antibody (ADA) immunoassays

Abstract

To provide a method for reducing drug target interference in an anti-drug antibody (ADA) immunoassay.SOLUTION: The present disclosure provides methods for mitigating drug target interference in an anti-drug antibody (ADA) immunoassay, wherein the ADA immunoassay comprises one or more target blocking reagents under weakly basic pH assay conditions. In one aspect, the agents of the invention are therapeutic proteins used to treat humans, such as therapeutic binding molecules such as monoclonal antibodies (e.g., fully human monoclonal antibodies) or therapeutic fusion proteins such as receptor proteins fused to an immunoglobin Fc domain, e.g., a IgG1Fc domain designed to treat humans. In certain aspects, the drug is a therapeutic human monoclonal antibody.SELECTED DRAWING: None

Description

[Technical Field]

[0001] REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS This application claims the benefit of priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 62 / 696,016, filed July 10, 2018. The entire contents of the foregoing application are incorporated herein by reference. [Background technology]

[0002] Biotherapeutics (e.g., biological agents such as proteins, peptides, and nucleotides) have proven highly successful in clinical practice. However, biotherapeutics, even fully human therapeutic monoclonal antibodies, have the potential to generate anti-drug antibodies (ADAs), which can cause undesirable effects such as loss of drug exposure, loss of efficacy, and serious adverse events (Koren, E., et al. Curr Pharm Biotechnol, 2002, 3(4): pp. 349-60; Schellekens, H., Clin Ther, 2002, 24(11): pp. 1720-40). Therefore, immunogenicity assessment is an important part of safety testing for biotherapeutics, and several recommendations have been issued for immunogenicity testing at various stages of drug development, including those from regulatory authorities (Shankar, G., et al., J Pharm Biomed Anal, 2008, 48(5): pp. 1267-81; Shankar, G., et al. Nat Biotechnol,2007,25(5):p.555-61, Mire-Sluis,AR,et al.,J Immunol Methods,2004,289(1-2):p.1-16,Swanson,SJand J.Bussiere,Curr Opin Microbiol,2012,15(3):p.337-47,European Medicines Agency,CfMPfHU,Guideline on Immunogenicity Assessment of Biotechnology-Drived Therapeutic Proteins. European Medicines Agency, London, UK, 2007, and US Department of Health and Human Services, UFC, CBER, Guidance for Industry--Assay Development for Immunogenicity Testing of Therapeutic Proteins(Draft). US Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, DC, USA, 2009). [Prior art documents] [Non-patent literature]

[0003] [Non-Patent Document 1] Koren, E., et al.Curr Pharm Biotechnol,2002,3(4):p.349-60 [Non-patent document 2] Schellekens, H., Clin Ther, 2002, 24(11): p. 1720-40 [Non-patent document 3] Shankar,G.,et al.,J Pharm Biomed Anal,2008,48(5) Summary of the Invention [Means for solving the problem]

[0004] The present invention is directed to a method for reducing drug-target interference in an anti-drug antibody (ADA) bridging immunoassay used to determine the presence of ADA against a drug in a serum sample. The method of the present invention includes contacting a serum sample with a capture drug labeled with a first label, a detection drug labeled with a second label, and a drug-target blocking reagent. Following this contacting step, the capture drug, detection drug, and drug-target blocking reagent are then incubated, allowing the drug-target blocking reagent to interact with the drug target present in the sample, thereby reducing the drug-target interference in the ADA bridging immunoassay. Following this, the anti-drug antibody (ADA) bridging immunoassay can be performed. In one aspect of the invention, the serum sample is a human serum sample, and in a particular aspect, the sample is from a subject being treated with a drug.

[0005] In another aspect, the drug target blocking reagent is a binding molecule, such as, for example, an antibody. In one embodiment, where the binding molecule is an antibody, it may comprise a human constant region. Alternatively, in another embodiment, the drug target blocking antibody comprises a mouse constant region.

[0006] In one aspect, the incubation step is carried out at room temperature, hi another aspect, the incubation is carried out under mildly basic pH conditions.

[0007] In one embodiment, the drug of the invention is a therapeutic protein used to treat humans, such as a therapeutic binding molecule such as a monoclonal antibody (e.g., a fully human monoclonal antibody) or a therapeutic fusion protein such as a receptor protein fused to an immunoglobulin Fc domain, e.g., an IgG1 Fc domain, designed to treat humans. In a particular embodiment, the drug is a therapeutic human monoclonal antibody.

[0008] In one embodiment of the present invention, the drug target is a soluble protein, such as a ligand for a receptor. In a specific embodiment, the drug target blocking reagent comprises a portion of a receptor fused to an IgG Fc domain. In a further embodiment, the portion of the receptor is the extracellular portion of the receptor. The IgG Fc domain can be a mouse IgG Fc domain or a human IgG Fc domain.

[0009] In another embodiment, the drug target of the present invention is a soluble or shed dimeric or multimeric drug target. In a particular embodiment, the drug target is a homodimeric drug target.

[0010] In one embodiment, the capture drug of the present invention is attached to a solid surface. In a particular embodiment, the solid surface is a microtiter plate. In another embodiment, the solid surface is coated with streptavidin.

[0011] In one embodiment, the first label is selected from the group consisting of a biotin label, a protein A label, a protein G label, and a glutathione S-transferase (GST) label. In another embodiment, the second label is selected from the group consisting of a ruthenium label, a radiolabel, a photoluminescent label, a chemiluminescent label, a fluorescent label, an electrochemiluminescent label, and an enzyme label.

[0012] The method of the present invention can further comprise contacting the serum sample with a second drug target blocking reagent. The second drug target blocking reagent is, for example, a drug target blocking binding molecule such as an antibody. In one embodiment, the second drug target blocking antibody comprises a human constant region. Alternatively, the second drug target blocking antibody comprises a mouse constant region.

[0013] The present invention provides a method for reducing drug target interference in an anti-drug antibody (ADA) bridging immunoassay for determining the presence of ADA against a drug in a serum sample, comprising contacting the serum sample with a capture drug labeled with a first label, a detection drug labeled with a second label, a first drug target blocking binding molecule, and a second drug target blocking binding molecule, incubating the capture drug, detection drug, first drug target blocking binding molecule, and second drug target blocking binding molecule under weakly basic pH assay conditions, and allowing the first drug target blocking binding molecule and the second drug target blocking binding molecule to interact with the drug target present in the sample, thereby reducing drug target interference in the ADA bridging immunoassay. In certain embodiments, the first and second drug target blocking binding molecules are antibodies.

[0014] The present invention further provides a method for reducing drug-target interference in an anti-drug antibody (ADA) bridging immunoassay for determining the presence of ADA against a drug in a serum sample, wherein the drug target is a soluble protein such as, for example, a ligand for a receptor, the method comprising contacting the serum sample with a capture drug labeled with a first label, a detection drug labeled with a second label, and one or more drug-target-blocking binding molecules (e.g., antibodies), and incubating under weakly basic pH assay conditions, wherein the capture drug, the detection drug, and the one or more drug-target-blocking binding molecules interact with the drug target present in the sample, thereby reducing the drug-target interference in the ADA bridging immunoassay.

[0015] The present invention is illustrated by the following figures and detailed description, which do not limit the scope of the invention as defined in the claims. [Brief explanation of the drawings]

[0016] [Figure 1](Figure 1A-C) Depicts interference from soluble dimeric / multimeric targets in a crosslinking immunogenicity assay. (A) The positive control or ADA in a human serum sample crosslinks the biotinylated and ruthenylated drugs, generating a true-positive ADA signal. (B) However, the dimeric / multimeric target may also bind to both the biotinylated and ruthenylated drugs, generating a target-mediated false-positive signal. (C) Anti-target antibodies or other target-blocking reagents can prevent the dimeric target from binding to the biotinylated and ruthenylated drugs, abolishing the target-mediated false-positive signal. The labeling reagents in (C) represent the capture drug (1), the detection drug (2), and one or more drug-target-blocking molecules (3). [Figure 2] (Figure 2A-C) Depicts the effect of target-blocking antibody HuAb1 and assay pH on assay signal. (A) In the absence of a target-blocking antibody, acid dissociation increased the background assay signal of naive human serum samples, presumably by releasing the target from its endogenous binding protein. (B) Addition of 100 μg / mL of HuAb1 at neutral pH (approximately 3 ng / mL to 150 ng / mL) improved target tolerance levels, which were further improved (approximately 1.1 μg / mL) by combining HuAb1 with a weakly basic pH. (C) Addition of 100 μg / mL of HuAb1 at basic assay conditions (pH 8.3) significantly reduced the target-mediated signal of naive human serum samples. [Figure 3-1] (Figure 3A-D) Depicts that ADA signals obtained from the analysis of clinical study samples from different subjects using target-blocking antibody HuAb1 and assay pH 8.3 correlated with target levels but did not match their pharmacokinetic profiles. (A) Target concentrations in each clinical sample. (B) ADA signals using 100 μg / mL of target-blocking antibody HuAb1 and pH 8.3. (C) Drug X concentration profiles for the three subjects tested. (D) Addition of a second anti-target antibody (100 μg / mL HuAb2) in combination with HuAb1 (100 μg / mL) and a weakly basic pH effectively reduced target-mediated background signals in clinical samples. [Figure 3-2] Same as above. [Figure 4-1] (Figure 4A-C) Depicts the signal-to-noise ratio (sample assay signal compared to assay background signal) after further assay optimization to not only inhibit target interference but also avoid potential false-negative signals. (A) The combination of HuSR and HuAb2 was as effective as the combination of HuAb1 and HuAb2 in reducing target interference in clinical research samples. (B) and (C) The mouse Fc-based target blocking reagents (MsSR and MsAb2) are even more effective in reducing target interference in clinical research samples. [Figure 4-2] Same as above. [Figure 5] (Figure 5) Depicts the elimination of target interference in clinical study samples with 100 μg / mL MsSR, 100 μg / mL MsAb2, and assay pH 8.3. Only background assay signal was detected in clinical study samples from seven subjects at four different time points (days 1, 29, 57, and 113). [Figure 6-1] (Figure 6A-B) Depicts the minimal impact of weakly basic assay pH and target blocking reagents on polyclonal ADA detection in immune rabbit serum and rat toxicology samples. (A) Weakly basic pH 8.3 had no adverse effect on ADA detection in rabbit serum immunized with drug Fab. (B) The improved assay format reduces target-mediated signal and detects actual ADA signal in rat toxicology samples. [Figure 6-2] Same as above. [Figure 7-1](Figure 7A-B) Depicts target-to-drug binding at different assay pHs in the absence and presence of a target-blocking reagent. (A) Binding association and dissociation curves under different assay conditions. The wavelength shift (Δnm) is directly proportional to the change in biosensor chip thickness as a result of target-to-drug binding. Target-to-drug association and dissociation are shown at pH 7.3 and pH 8.2, in the presence of MsAb2 and MsSR at pH 7.3, and in the presence of MsAb2 and MsSR at pH 8.2. Buffer controls at pH 7.3 and pH 8.2 are also shown. Target-to-drug binding is only partially inhibited by pH 8.3. The combination of MsAb2 and MsSR at a neutral assay pH can significantly reduce target-to-drug binding, but complete inhibition of binding is achieved with the combination of MsAb2, MsSR, and a weakly basic pH. (B) Target-mediated signaling in clinical samples was partially inhibited by the presence of MsAb2 and MsSR at only weakly basic pH or at neutral pH. However, complete inhibition of target interference is achieved by the combination of MsAb2, MsSR, and pH 8.3. [Figure 7-2] Same as above. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

[0017] Immunogenicity of pharmaceuticals, especially therapeutic proteins, can potentially lead to serious side effects, loss of efficacy, and altered drug exposure. This poses a significant challenge in clinical and preclinical research due to the complexity of translating toxicity, pharmacodynamic (PK), and pharmacodynamic (PD) data. Antibody-drug (ADA) immunoassays for detecting and quantifying ADA are important in determining the immunogenicity of biotherapeutics. However, drug targets can interfere with ADA immunoassays, resulting in target-mediated false-positive results (see Figure 1B). Target levels can be elevated based on target upregulation during the acid dissociation step and release of the target from the target:drug and / or target:binding protein complex, and are typically used in ADA assays to improve the drug tolerance of the assay.

[0018] ADA is typically tested using a multi-tiered approach to detect, confirm, and titer ADA. Screening assays typically use a floating cutpoint to identify potentially ADA-positive samples, while confirmatory assays use a confirmatory cutpoint to determine whether the positive response observed in the screening assay can be inhibited by the presence of excess drug (confirming the sample as ADA-positive). Titer cutpoints are used in titer assays to assess the level of ADA in positive samples. ADA assays typically use a cross-linking format, using the drug as both the capture and detection reagents. These assays are relatively simple to set up and perform, detect most isotype responses except for most IgG4, and offer excellent sensitivity. They are not species-specific and are high-throughput. However, soluble or shed dimeric or multimeric drug targets can interfere with the assay, resulting in target-mediated false-positive results. For example, elevated IL-5 homodimers in post-dose samples from mepolizumab-treated patients contributed to the observed increase in ADA assay positivity by generating target-mediated false-positive signals in ADA crosslinking assays (Liao, K., et al., J Immunol Methods, 2017, 441: pp. 15-23). ​​The presence of NGF homodimers also created false-positive assay signals in samples from furanumab-treated patients by crosslinking biotin- and ruthenium-labeled furanumab (Dai, S., et al., AAPS J, 2014, 16(3): pp. 464-77). CD20 present in cell membrane fragments was also reported to cause matrix interference in the ofatumumab ADA assay (Chen, K., et al., J Immunol Methods, 2013, 394(1-2): pp. 22-31). Furthermore, it has recently been reported that acid dissociation dimerizes monomeric targets in serum samples, resulting in false-positive signals (Zoghbi, J., et al., J Immunol Methods, 2015, 426: p. 62-9).

[0019] Certain methods have been reported that attempt to limit target interference. For example, pretreatment with target-blocking antibodies or blocking with target-binding proteins, as well as target immunodepletion, have been used to reduce soluble target interference (Liao, K., et al., J Immunol Methods, 2017, 441: pp. 15-23; Dai, S., et al., AAPS J, 2014, 16(3): pp. 464-77; Zhong, ZD, et al., J Immunol Methods, 2010, 355(1-2): pp. 21-8; Weeraratne, DK, et al., J Immunol Methods, 2013, 396(1-2): pp. 44-55; and Maria M, LJ, Wakshull E, Quarmby V., AAPS National Biotechnology Conference, Seattle, WA, USA, 2009). Other strategies have been reported, including the use of wheat germ agglutinin (WGA) lectin to block interference from highly glycosylated target proteins without affecting ADA detection (Carrasco-Triguero, M., et al., Bioanalysis, 2012, 4(16):pp. 2013-26). Another alternative assay format using human soluble Fcγ receptor I (hsFcγRI) to detect the Fc region of ADA has also been reported to reduce soluble target interference, but this format may not detect all potential ADA isotypes (Wessels, U., et al., Bioanalysis, 2016, 8(20):pp. 2135-45). A white paper describing several strategies for mitigating drug-target interference in ADA and neutralizing antibody (NAb) assays has recently been published (Zhong, ZD, et al., AAPS J, 2017, 19(6): pp. 1564-1575). Therefore, it is important to develop reliable testing methods that can overcome target interference and provide valid immunogenicity assessments in both nonclinical and clinical studies.

[0020] The present invention provides a method for reducing target interference in ADA immunoassay, thereby reducing false positive results in ADA immunoassay, for example, in cross-linking immunogenicity assay.In particular, the present disclosure is based at least in part on the discovery that the combination of one or more target blocking reagents, for example, antibody or target receptor IgG Fc fusion protein, and weakly basic pH assay conditions results in high tolerance for recombinant target protein and reduced false positive results in research samples with PK profiles that do not show significant ADA response.Therefore, the method described herein provides for reducing target interference when standard acid dissociation procedures and target blocking antibodies alone are ineffective.

[0021] I. Definition In order that the present invention may be more readily understood, certain terms are first defined. Furthermore, it should be noted that whenever a value or range of values ​​for a parameter is listed, it is intended that values ​​and ranges intermediate to the listed values ​​are also part of the present invention.

[0022] In the following description, for purposes of explanation, specific numbers, materials, and configurations are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the present invention. However, it will be apparent to those skilled in the art that the present invention may be practiced without these specific details. In some instances, well-known features may be omitted or simplified so as not to obscure the present invention.

[0023] The articles "a" and "an" are used herein to refer to one or to more than one (i.e., to at least one) of the grammatical object of the article. By way of example, "an element" means one element or more than one element.

[0024] The term "antibody" includes immunoglobulin molecules composed of four polypeptide chains, two heavy (H) chains and two light (L) chains, interconnected by disulfide bonds. Each heavy chain is composed of a heavy chain variable region (abbreviated herein as HCVR or VH) and a heavy chain constant region (CH). The heavy chain constant region is composed of three domains: CH1, CH2, and CH3. Each light chain is composed of a light chain variable region (abbreviated herein as LCVR or VL) and a light chain constant region. The light chain constant region is composed of one domain: CL. The VH and VL regions can be further subdivided into regions of hypervariability called complementarity-determining regions (CDRs), interspersed with more conserved regions called framework regions (FRs). Each VH and VL is composed of three CDRs and four FRs, arranged from the amino terminus to the carboxy terminus in the following order: FR1, CDR1, FR2, CDR2, FR3, CDR3, FR4.

[0025] As used herein, the term "antigen" means any substance that causes the immune system to produce antibodies or a specific cell-mediated immune response against it. A disease-associated antigen is any substance associated with any disease that causes the immune system to produce antibodies or a specific cell-mediated response against it.

[0026] As used herein, a "binding domain" (also called a "binding region" or "binding moiety") refers to a molecule or portion thereof (e.g., a peptide, oligopeptide, polypeptide, protein) that has the ability to specifically and non-covalently associate, combine, or combine with a target. Binding domains include any naturally occurring, synthetic, semi-synthetic, or recombinantly produced binding partner for a biomolecule, molecular complex (i.e., a complex comprising two or more biomolecules), or other target of interest. Exemplary binding domains include single-chain immunoglobulin variable regions (e.g., scTCRs, scFvs), receptor ectodomains, ligands (e.g., cytokines, chemokines), or synthetic polypeptides selected for their specific ability to bind to a biomolecule, molecular complex, or other target of interest.

[0027] As understood herein, " binding molecule " is a molecule that specifically interacts with a specific target.Examples of such binding molecules include, but are not limited to, antibodies (including monoclonal antibodies) and their fragments, engineered antibodies, fusion proteins, and other similar antigen-binding molecules known to those skilled in the art.In addition, as used herein, the term binding molecule includes receptors or receptor-like molecules that can interact with targets.

[0028] "Anti-drug antibodies" or "ADAs" are antibodies that can be directed against any region of a drug, such as the variable domain, constant domain, or sugar structure of a drug. Such anti-drug antibodies can occur during antibody therapy as an immunogenic response in patients (see Pan, Y., et al., FASEB J.9 (1995) 43-49). Most "anti-drug antibodies" bind to one or more of the complementary determining regions of a drug. The affinity of anti-drug antibodies for the drug's antigen is generally lower than the affinity of the drug for its target antigen.

[0029] As used herein, the term "bridging immunoassay" or "ADA bridging immunoassay" refers to a sandwich-type immunoassay in which a bivalent ADA is bound by two different binding molecules (i.e., a capture drug and a detection drug), each binding to a different, non-overlapping, or non-interfering epitope of the ADA. In this assay, a sandwich is formed containing the capture antibody, the ADA, and the detection antibody, and thus the ADA bridges the two antibodies that bind to it (see FIG. 1A). The capture antibody can be attached to a solid surface, e.g., a microtiter plate or other solid surface. The bridging immunoassay can be a high-throughput assay. In one aspect, the ADA bridging immunoassay described herein comprises two antibody drugs, a "capture drug" and a "detection drug." In one embodiment, the detection drug and capture drug comprise the "same" antibody molecule, e.g., recombinantly produced in the same expression vector and comprising the same amino acid sequence.

[0030] pH is a logarithmic scale used to specify the acidity or basicity of an aqueous solution. It is approximately the negative of the common logarithm of molarity, measured in units of moles per liter of hydrogen ion. More precisely, it is the negative of the common logarithm of the activity of hydrogen ions. Solutions with a pH below 7 are acidic, and solutions with a pH above 7 are basic. As used herein with respect to assay conditions, the term "weakly basic pH" refers to a pH between about pH 7.5 and about pH 9.5. In one embodiment, a weakly basic pH includes a pH between about pH 8.0 and about pH 9.0. In another embodiment, a weakly basic pH includes a pH between about pH 8.5 and about pH 9.5. In another embodiment, a weakly basic pH includes a pH between about pH 7.5 and about pH 8.5. In another embodiment, a weakly basic pH includes a pH between about pH 7.6, 7.7, 7.8, 7.9, 8.0, 8.1, 8.2, 8.3, or 8.4.

[0031] As used herein, the term "drug" refers to a therapeutic protein or a therapeutically effective portion thereof that can be administered to an individual for the treatment of a disease. In one embodiment, the drug is a human therapeutic protein, such as a human therapeutic monoclonal antibody, or a human therapeutic fusion protein, such as a receptor protein fused to an immunoglobulin Fc domain, e.g., an IgG1 Fc domain. In another embodiment, the drug is a humanized therapeutic monoclonal antibody. In another embodiment, the drug is a chimeric antibody. In yet another embodiment, the drug is a murine antibody. In one embodiment, the therapeutic drug is being evaluated in a clinical trial.

[0032] Therapeutic drugs such as antibody drugs are widely used in the treatment of various diseases such as neoplastic diseases, immune diseases, central nervous system diseases, vascular diseases, and infectious diseases. The antibody drugs included in the methods of the present invention include any therapeutic antibodies approved by regulatory authorities or in clinical trials or preclinical trials. As of 2018, antibody drugs approved in the US and EU include bezlotoxumab, avelumab, dupilumab, durvalumab, ocrelizumab, brodalumab, reslizumab, olalatamab, daratumumab, elotuzumab, necitumumab, infliximab, obiltoxaximab, atezolizumab, secukinumab, mepolizumab, nivolumab, alirocumab, idarucizumab, evolocumab, dinutuximab, bevacizumab, pembrolizumab, ramucirumab, vedolizumab, siltuximab, alemtuzumab, pertuzumab, infliximab, obinutuzumab, brentuximab, and raxiba. These include, but are not limited to, cumab, belimumab, ipilimumab, denosumab, ofatumumab, besilesomab, tocilizumab, canakinumab, golimumab, ustekinumab, certolizumab pegol, catumaxomab, eculizumab, ranibizumab, panitumumab, natalizumab, catumaxomab, bevacizumab, omalizumab, cetuximab, efalizumab, ibritumomab tiuxetan, fanolesomab, adalimumab, tositumomab, alemtuzumab, trastuzumab, gemtuzumab ozogamicin, infliximab, palivizumab, necitumumab, basiliximab, and rituximab.

[0033] Drugs for use in the methods of the present invention also include therapeutic drugs that are in development or undergoing preclinical or clinical trials, ie, being evaluated in clinical trials.

[0034] Antibody drugs can include antibodies that target any antigen, including, for example, IL-4R, IL-6R, IL-33, PD-1, CD20XCD3, LAG-3, IL-33, Fel d1, C5, ANGPTL-3, ACTIVIN A, GDF8, PCSK9, VEGF, NGF, or viral antigens such as ebola or mers-cov.

[0035] Additional therapeutic drugs that may be used in the methods of the present invention include, for example, evinacumab, trevoglumab, cemiplimab, alirocumab, aflibercept, fasinumab, rilonacept, and sarilumab.

[0036] Therapeutic drugs also include biosimilar versions of approved drugs, such as antibodies or therapeutic fusion proteins. For example, ALT-L9 (Alteogen), M710 (Momenta / Mylan), FYB203 (Formycon (DE) / Santo Holding GmbH), and aflibercept biosimilars in development, including CHS-2020 (Coherus).

[0037] As used herein, "drug target" refers to the target of a drug. For example, in one embodiment, the drug target is a dimeric target. In one embodiment, the drug target is a homodimeric drug target. In another embodiment, the drug target is a multimeric drug target. In another embodiment, the drug target is a soluble or shed drug target. The drug target may interfere with ADA immunoassay, resulting in false positive assay results.

[0038] As used herein, a "drug target blocking reagent" refers to any reagent capable of binding to and / or blocking a drug target in an immunoassay, thereby preventing the drug target from binding to a capture or detection drug. In one embodiment, the drug target blocking reagent is an anti-target blocking antibody. The anti-target blocking antibody may comprise a human or mouse constant region. In another embodiment, the drug target blocking reagent is a target receptor-IgG Fc fusion protein, wherein the fusion protein comprises a portion of the target receptor linked or fused to an IgG Fc domain. In one aspect, the portion of the target receptor is the extracellular portion of the receptor. In a particular aspect, the IgG Fc domain is a human IgG Fc domain. In another aspect, the IgG Fc domain is a mouse IgG Fc domain. As detailed herein, ADA immunoassays, e.g., ADA bridging immunoassays, may include one or more drug target blocking reagents that reduce drug target interference in the immunoassay. For example, in one embodiment, the immunoassay may include one drug target blocking reagent. In another embodiment, the immunoassay may include two drug target blocking reagents. In one embodiment, both drug target blocking reagents may comprise drug target blocking antibodies. In another embodiment, the assay may comprise one or more drug target blocking antibodies and one or more target receptor IgG Fc fusion proteins.

[0039] As used herein, an entity or reagent (e.g., a binding molecule, capture drug, detection drug, anti-drug antibody (ADA), drug, protein, enzyme, antibody, antibody fragment, or related species) modified by the term "labeled" includes any entity that is conjugated to another molecule or chemical that is empirically detectable (e.g., a "detectable label"). Chemical species suitable as labels for labeled entities include, but are not limited to, ruthenium, radiolabels, photoluminescent labels, chemiluminescent labels, fluorescent labels, electrochemiluminescent labels, enzyme labels, quantum dots, or optical dye labels. Other labels include, for example, biotin, protein A, protein G, glutathione S-transferase (GST). These labels can be used to label capture drug antibodies, which can then be attached to a solid surface.

[0040] As used herein, the terms "fluorescent label" and "fluorophore" may be used interchangeably and may refer to any substance, which is intended to encompass a chemical or biochemical molecule or fragment thereof that emits electromagnetic energy, such as light, at a particular wavelength (emission wavelength) when the substance is illuminated by radiation of a different wavelength (excitation wavelength) and can specifically interact or react with an analyte of interest in a sample to provide one or more optical signals.

[0041] As used herein, "target tolerance level" is defined as the amount of target required to produce a target-mediated false positive signal in the assay (assay signal is above the plate cut point).

[0042] The term "sample" includes, but is not limited to, any quantity of material from an organism or originally an organism. Such organisms include, but are not limited to, humans, mice, monkeys, rats, rabbits, and other animals. In one embodiment, such a sample includes, but is not limited to, whole blood, serum, or plasma from a subject. In one embodiment, the sample, e.g., a serum sample, is a sample obtained from a subject during a clinical trial or preclinical trial of a drug. For example, a sample can be obtained from a subject after administration of a drug during a clinical trial.

[0043] As used herein, the term "subject" refers to a human or non-human organism. Thus, the methods and fusion complexes described herein are applicable to both human and livestock diseases and conditions. A subject can be a "patient," i.e., a living human or non-human organism undergoing medical treatment for a disease or condition, or a human or non-human organism with an undefined illness being investigated for signs of a pathology or the presence / absence of a specific condition. A subject also includes participants in a clinical trial of a drug, in which the subject is administered a drug for testing purposes.

[0044] The terms "Fc domain" or "immunoglobulin Fc" or "Ig Fc" refer to a "fragment crystallizable" region of an immunoglobulin heavy chain. Generally, an Fc domain can interact with a second Fc domain to form a dimeric complex. An Fc domain can bind to cell surface receptors called Fc receptors and / or proteins of the complement system, or can be modified to reduce or enhance their binding activity. Fc domains can be derived from IgG, IgA, IgD, IgM, or IgE antibody isotypes (referred to herein as IgG Fc domain, IgA Fc domain, IgD Fc domain, IgM Fc domain, and IgE Fc domain, respectively). Fc domains can affect immune activity, including opsonization; cell lysis; degranulation of mast cells, basophils, and eosinophils; and other Fc receptor-dependent processes; activation of the complement pathway; and in vivo protein stability.

[0045] The term "polypeptide" is meant to refer to any polymer containing any of the 20 naturally occurring amino acids, regardless of its size. The term "protein" is often used in reference to relatively large proteins, and "peptide" is often used in reference to small polypeptides, although the use of these terms in the art often overlaps. The term "polypeptide" generally refers to proteins, polypeptides, and peptides, unless otherwise specified. In general, peptides useful according to the present disclosure generally range in size from about 0.1 to 100 KD or greater up to about 1000 KD, preferably about 0.1, 0.2, 0.5, 1, 2, 5, 10, 20, 30, or 50 KD, as determined by standard molecular sizing techniques such as centrifugation or SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis.

[0046] As used herein, the term "soluble" means that the fusion molecule is soluble if it remains in aqueous solution at a neutral or near-neutral pH at temperatures above about 5-37°C and in the presence of low or no concentrations of anionic or nonionic detergents. Under these conditions, a soluble protein will often have a low sedimentation value, e.g., less than about 10-50 Svedberg units. Aqueous solutions referred to herein typically have a buffer compound to establish pH, ​​are typically within a pH range of about 5-9, and have an ionic strength range of about 2 mM to 500 mM. Protease inhibitors or mild nonionic detergents may be added. Additionally, carrier proteins such as bovine serum albumin (BSA) may be added up to several mg / mL, if desired. Exemplary aqueous buffers include standard phosphate-buffered saline, Tris-buffered saline, or other well-known buffers and cell culture media formulations.

[0047] The term "solid surface" refers to non-fluid materials, including particles (including microparticles and beads) made from materials such as polymers, metals (paramagnetic, ferromagnetic particles), glass, and ceramics; gel materials such as silica, alumina, and polymer gels; capillaries that may be made of polymers, metals, glass, and / or ceramics; zeolites and other porous materials; electrodes; microtiter plates; solid strips; cuvettes, tubes, or other spectrometer sample vessels.

[0048] The term "isolated" refers to a composition, compound, substance, or molecule that has been altered by the hand of man from its natural state. For example, a composition or substance that occurs in nature is isolated if it has been changed or removed from its original environment, or both. For example, a polynucleotide or polypeptide that naturally occurs in a living animal is not isolated, but the same polynucleotide or polypeptide separated from the coexisting materials of its natural state is isolated as that term is used herein.

[0049] II. Target Interference Mitigation As described in detail below, ADA cross-linking immunoassays for detecting ADA in a sample are susceptible to drug-target interference (false-positive ADA). In ADA cross-linking immunoassays, a sample is incubated with a capture drug (labeled or unlabeled) and a detection drug containing a detectable label. After sample incubation, a sandwich containing the capture drug, ADA, and detection drug is formed. Thus, the ADA cross-links the two drugs bound to it, and the bound ADA can be detected (see Figure 1A). A true-positive signal in an ADA cross-linking assay results from ADA bivalently binding to the capture drug and detection drug, forming a cross-link. However, if a dimeric or multimeric target cross-links the capture drug and detection drug, thereby forming a cross-link with the target, a false-positive result will occur (see Figure 1B, and for example, Liao, K., et al., J Immunol Methods, 2017, 441: pp. 15-23).

[0050] As shown in the examples provided herein, the present invention provides a method for mitigating drug-target interference in an ADA bridging immunoassay, thereby reducing false-positive results, which comprises incubating a sample with at least one drug-target blocking reagent under mildly basic pH assay conditions.

[0051] In one embodiment, the present invention provides a method for reducing drug target interference in an ADA bridging immunoassay for determining the presence of ADA against a drug in a serum sample. The method includes contacting a serum sample with a capture drug, a detection drug, and one or more drug target blocking reagents. These components are then incubated under weakly basic pH assay conditions, allowing the drug target blocking reagent to interact with the drug target present in the sample, thereby reducing the drug target interference in the ADA bridging immunoassay.

[0052] In one embodiment, the method further comprises performing an ADA bridging immunoassay, as described below.

[0053] In another embodiment, the one or more drug target blocking reagents can bind to and / or block the drug target in an immunoassay, thus preventing the drug target from binding to the capture drug and / or detection drug. In certain embodiments, the one or more drug target blocking reagents are target-blocking binding molecules such as antibodies. In yet another embodiment, the target-blocking antibody comprises a human constant region.

[0054] When target-blocking binding molecule (for example, antibody) and drug (for example, antibody drug) have the same human constant region, ADA in serum sample, which is specific to the Fc region of drug, can bind to target-blocking human antibody and may impair detection in assay.Replacing the human Ig region of target-blocking antibody with mouse Ig region can reduce the interference of drug target-blocking antibody with ADA detection.Therefore, in one embodiment, target-blocking antibody comprises mouse constant region.

[0055] An ADA bridging immunoassay can include one or more drug target blocking reagents. In one embodiment, the immunoassay includes two drug target blocking reagents. In a particular embodiment, the two drug target blocking reagents are drug target blocking antibodies, e.g., a first drug target blocking antibody and a second drug target blocking antibody. In a more particular embodiment, the first and / or second target blocking antibody include a human constant region. In another particular embodiment, the first and / or second target blocking antibody include a mouse constant region. In yet another embodiment, both the first and second target blocking antibodies include a human constant region. In yet another embodiment, both the first and second target blocking antibodies include a mouse constant region. In another embodiment, the first target blocking antibody includes a human constant region and the second target blocking antibody includes a mouse constant region. In yet another embodiment, the first target blocking antibody includes a mouse constant region and the second target blocking antibody includes a human constant region.

[0056] In one embodiment, the present invention provides a method for reducing drug target interference in an ADA bridging immunoassay for determining the presence of ADA against a drug in a serum sample, comprising contacting the plasma sample with a capture drug, a detection drug, a first drug target blocking antibody, and a second drug target blocking antibody. These components are incubated under weakly basic pH assay conditions, thereby allowing the first drug target blocking antibody and the second drug target blocking antibody to interact with the drug target present in the sample, thereby reducing drug target interference in the ADA bridging immunoassay.

[0057] As described herein, the present inventors have found that the target blocking antibodies used in ADA cross-linking immunoassays may share some common CDR VH rearrangements with the drugs being tested.Therefore, the ADA specific to these VH rearrangement regions may bind to the target blocking antibodies in the sample and impair their detection in the assay.In order to optimize detection, a target receptor fused to human IgG Fc is engineered and used in the method of the present invention instead of one of the target blocking antibodies.

[0058] In one embodiment, one or more of the drug target blocking reagents used in the methods of the present invention comprise a portion of a target receptor fused to an IgG Fc domain (target receptor-IgG Fc fusion protein). In one aspect, the portion of the target receptor is the extracellular portion of the receptor. In another aspect, the target receptor-IgG Fc fusion protein is soluble. In a specific aspect, the IgG Fc domain of the target receptor-IgG Fc fusion protein is a human IgG Fc domain.

[0059] When target receptor IgG Fc fusion protein and drug have human IgG Fc region, ADA in serum sample, which is specific to drug Fc region, can bind to target receptor IgG Fc fusion protein and may impair detection in assay.Replacing the human Ig Fc region of target receptor IgG Fc fusion protein with mouse Ig region can reduce the interference of target receptor IgG Fc fusion protein with ADA detection.Therefore, in another embodiment, the IgG Fc domain of target receptor IgG Fc fusion protein is mouse IgG Fc domain.

[0060] The assay may include one or more drug target blocking antibodies and one or more target receptor IgG Fc fusion proteins. Additionally, the assay may include a target blocking antibody and a target receptor IgG Fc fusion protein.

[0061] Thus, in one embodiment, the present invention provides a method for reducing drug target interference in an ADA bridging immunoassay for determining the presence of ADA against a drug in a serum sample, wherein the drug target is a soluble protein such as a ligand for a receptor, and the method comprises contacting the serum sample with a capture drug, a detection drug, a drug target blocking reagent comprising an extracellular portion of the receptor fused to an IgG Fc domain, and a drug target blocking antibody. These components are incubated under mildly basic pH assay conditions, allowing the drug target blocking reagent and drug target blocking antibody to interact with the drug target present in the sample, thereby reducing drug target interference in the ADA bridging immunoassay.

[0062] In one embodiment, the IgG Fc domain is a mouse IgG Fc domain. In another embodiment, the IgG Fc domain is a human IgG Fc domain. In yet another embodiment, the drug target blocking antibody comprises a human constant region. In yet another embodiment, the drug target blocking antibody comprises a mouse constant region. In one embodiment, the target receptor IgG Fc fusion protein comprises a mouse IgG Fc, and the target blocking antibody comprises a mouse constant region.

[0063] In one embodiment, the target blocking reagents each have a concentration in an ADA bridging immunoassay of about 10 μg / mL to about 200 μg / mL. In one aspect, the target blocking reagents each have a concentration of about 20 μg / mL to about 175 μg / mL. In another aspect, the target blocking reagents each have a concentration of about 30 μg / mL to about 150 μg / mL. In yet another aspect, the target blocking reagents each have a concentration of about 40 μg / mL to about 125 μg / mL. In yet another aspect, the target blocking reagents each have a concentration of about 50 μg / mL to about 100 μg / mL. In another aspect, the target blocking reagents each have a concentration of about 50, 60, 70, 75, 80, 85, 90, 95, or 100 μg / mL. In another aspect, the target blocking reagents each have a concentration of about 100 μg / mL.

[0064] The methods for reducing target interference described herein include performing an ADA immunoassay under weakly basic pH assay conditions. Weakly basic pH includes a range of pH values ​​slightly higher than neutral pH. In one embodiment, weakly basic pH refers to a pH of about pH 7.5 to about pH 9.5. In one aspect, weakly basic pH includes a pH of about pH 7.5 to about pH 8.5. In one aspect, weakly basic pH includes a pH of about pH 8.5 to about pH 9.0. In one aspect, weakly basic pH includes a pH of about pH 8.0 to about pH 9.0. In another aspect, weakly basic pH includes a pH of about pH 8.5 to about pH 9.5.

[0065] III. ADA Immunoassay Immunoassays are well known to those skilled in the art. Methods for carrying out such assays, as well as practical applications and procedures, are well known in the art and are described, for example, in Colowick, SP and Caplan, NO (eds.), "Methods in Enzymology", Academic Press, dealing with immunological detection methods, especially volumes 70, 73, 74, 84, 92, and 121. The principles of different immunoassays are described, for example, by Hage, DS (Anal. Chem. 71 (1999) 294R-304R). Lu, B., et al. (Analyst 121 (1996) 29R-32R), who describes the oriented immobilization of antibodies for use in immunoassays. Avidin-biotin-mediated immunoassays are described, for example, by Wilchek, M., and Bayer, EA, in Methods Enzymol. 184 (1990) 467-469.

[0066] A commonly used ADA assay method is a bridge immunoassay (see, for example, Liao, K., et al., J Immunol Methods, 2017, 441: p.15-23; Dai, S., et al., AAPS J, 2014, 16(3): p.464-77; and Zhong, ZD, et al., AAPS J, 2017.19(6): p.1564-1575, the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference). ADA bridge immunoassay is a sandwich immunoassay, in which multivalent ADA binds to two different antibody drugs (capture drug and detection drug), each of which binds to a different, non-overlapping or non-interfering epitope of ADA. Specifically, in this assay, the sample is incubated with a capture drug (labeled or unlabeled) and a detection drug that contains a detectable label. After incubation of the sample, a sandwich is formed containing the capture drug, the ADA, and the detection drug, such that the ADA bridges the two drugs that bind to it, and the bound ADA can be detected (see Figure 1A). In one embodiment, the immunoassay is a high-throughput assay.

[0067] ADA cross-linking immunoassay further comprises determining the presence or amount of ADA.Therefore, the present disclosure provides a detection agent that is conjugated to a detectable label.Non-limiting examples of detectable labels for any of the methods of the present invention include ruthenium, radiolabel, photoluminescent label, chemiluminescent label, fluorescent label, fluorophore, hapten, electrochemiluminescent label or enzyme label.Detectable label can be measured using equipment and devices known to those skilled in the art.

[0068] Representative fluorophores for use in the methods provided herein include, for example, green fluorescent protein, blue fluorescent protein, red fluorescent protein, fluorescein, fluorescein 5-isothiocyanate (FITC), cyanine dyes (Cy3, Cy3.5, Cy5, Cy5.5, Cy7), Bodipy dye (Invitrogen) and / or Alexa Fluor dyes (Invitrogen), dansyl, dansyl chloride (DNS-C1), 5-(iodoacetamida)fluorescein (5-IAF, 6-acryloyl-2-dimethylaminonaphthalene (acrylodan)), 7-nitrobenzo-2-oxa-1,3-diazol-4-yl chloride (NBD-Cl), ethidium bromide, Lucifer Yellow, rhodamine dyes (5-carboxyrhodamine 6G hydrochloride, Lissamine rhodamine B sulfonyl chloride, rhodamine-B-isothiocyanate (RITC (rhodamine-B-isothiocyanate), rhodamine 800); tetramethylrhodamine 5-(and 6-)isothiocyanate (TRITC)), Texas Red, sulfonyl chloride, 1-anilinonaphthalene-8-sulfonic acid (ANS), and 6-(p-toluidinyl)naphthalene-e-2-sulfonic acid (TN S), including but not limited to naphthalamine sulfonic acid, anthroyl fatty acid, DPH, parinaric acid, TMA-DPH, fluoronyl fatty acid, fluorescein-phosphatidylethanolamine, Texas Red-phosphatidylethanolamine, pyrenyl-phosphatidylcholine, fluorenyl-phosphatidylcholine, merocyanine 540, naphthylstyryl, 3,3'-dipropylthiadicarbocyanine (diS-C3-(5)), 4-(p-dipentylaminostyryl-1-methylpyridinium (di-5-ASP), Cy-3 rhodoacetamide, Cy-5-N-hydroxysuccinimide, Cy-7-isothiocyanate, IR-125, thiazole orange, azure B, Nile blue, Al phthalocyanine, oxaxine 1,4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole, (DAPI), Hoechst These include 33342, TOTO, acridine orange, ethidium homodimer, N(ethoxycarbonylmethyl)-6-methoxyquinolinium (MQAE), Fura-2, calcium green, carboxy SNARF-6, BAPTA, coumarin, phytofiuor, coronene, and metal-ligand complexes.

[0069] Haptens for use in the methods provided herein include, for example, digoxigenin and biotin.

[0070] Enzymes for use in the methods provided herein include, for example, alkaline phosphatase (AP), β-galactosidase, horseradish peroxidase (HRP), soybean peroxidase (SBP), urease, β-lactamase, and glucose oxidase.

[0071] In one embodiment, the capture drug is conjugated to a solid surface. In one aspect, the conjugation of the capture drug to the solid surface is carried out via a specific binding pair, wherein the capture drug is labeled or conjugated. In one aspect, the specific binding pair (first component / second component) is selected from streptavidin or avidin / biotin, biotin / neutravidin, biotin / captavidin, antibody / antigen (see, e.g., Hermanson, GT, et al., Bioconjugate Techniques, Academic Press, 1996), epitope / antibody, protein A / immunoglobulin, protein G / immunoglobulin, protein L / immunoglobulin, GST / glutathione, His tag / nickel, FLAG / M1 antibody, maltose binding protein / maltose, calmodulin binding protein / calmodulin, enzyme / enzyme substrate, lectin / polysaccharide, steroid / steroid binding protein, hormone / hormone receptor, and receptor-ligand binding pair. In one embodiment, the capture drug is conjugated to biotin (as the first component of a specific binding pair), in which case conjugation to the solid phase is performed via immobilized avidin or streptavidin (see Figure 1A).

[0072] In some embodiments, the GlcNac-binding protein is conjugated to a first member of a binding pair (e.g., biotin, avidin, neutravidin, captavid, antibody, antigen, protein A, protein G, protein L, GST, His tag, FLAG, MBP, calmodulin-binding protein, enzyme, receptor, or ligand).

[0073] In one embodiment, the sample tested in the ADA immunoassay is a serum sample. In one aspect, the serum sample comprises 1% to 20% serum. In one aspect, the serum sample comprises about 1% to about 10% serum. In another aspect, the serum sample comprises about 10% to about 15% serum. In yet another embodiment, the serum sample comprises about 10% to about 20% serum. In yet another embodiment, the serum sample comprises about 15% to about 20% serum. In a particular aspect, the serum sample comprises about 1% serum. In one aspect, the serum is human serum.

[0074] In one embodiment, the ADA bridging immunoassay includes an acid dissociation step. In one aspect, a serum sample is diluted 10-fold with an acid, such as acetic acid, and incubated at room temperature prior to incubation with the capture and detection agents.

[0075] In one embodiment, the capture and detection agents have a concentration of about 0.5 μg / mL to about 10 μg / mL in the immunoassay. In one aspect, the capture and detection agents have a concentration of greater than 0.5 μg / mL to less than 10 μg / mL. In another aspect, the capture and detection agents have a concentration of about 0.5 μg / mL to about 5 μg / mL. In yet another aspect, the capture and detection agents have a concentration of about 0.5 μg / mL to about 2.0 μg / mL. In yet another aspect, the capture and detection agents have a concentration of about 0.5 μg / mL to about 1 μg / mL. In a preferred aspect, the capture and detection agents have a concentration of about 0.5 μg / mL.

[0076] In one embodiment, the incubation of the sample, capture agent, and detection agent is carried out at room temperature. In one aspect, the incubation time of the sample, capture agent, and detection agent is at least 0.5 hours. In another aspect, the incubation time is at least 1 hour. In one aspect, the incubation time is at least 1.5 hours. In one aspect, the incubation time is up to 2 hours. In yet another aspect, the incubation time is 0.5 hours to 12 hours. In one aspect, the incubation time is 0.5 hours to 5 hours. In another aspect, the incubation time is 1 hour to 12 hours. In one aspect, the incubation time is 1 hour to 5 hours. In another aspect, the incubation time is 5 hours to 12 hours.

[0077] In one embodiment, after incubation of sample, capture drug and detection drug, the sample is transferred to a labeled solid surface, for example, a solid surface labeled with streptavidin, and further incubated, so that the capture drug adheres to the solid surface.In one aspect, incubation is at room temperature.In another aspect, after incubation, the sample is analyzed for binding to ADA using any method known in the art for detecting labeled antibodies, where the detection drug is detected based on the detection of drug label, for example, ruthenium.The true positive signal of ADA cross-linking assay is generated by ADA bivalently binding to capture drug and detection drug, forming cross-linkage.

[0078] Solid surfaces for immunoassays described herein have been widely described in the state of the art (see, for example, Butler, JE, Methods 22 (2000) 4-23, which is incorporated herein by reference). The solid surface component of the assay is distinct from an inert solid surface with which the assay may come into contact, in that the "solid surface" contains at least one moiety on its surface intended to interact with the capture drug. The solid surface may be an immobilized component, such as a tube, strip, cuvette, or microtiter plate, or a non-immobilized component, such as beads and microparticles. Microparticles may also be used as the solid phase of a uniform surface format. A variety of microparticles may be used that allow either non-covalent or covalent attachment of proteins and other substances. Such particles include polymeric particles, such as polystyrene and poly(methyl methacrylate), gold particles, such as gold nanoparticles and gold colloids, and ceramic particles, such as silica, glass, and metal oxide particles. See, for example, Martin, CR, et al., Analytical Chemistry-News & Features 70 (1998) 322A-327A, which is incorporated herein by reference.

[0079] The present invention is further illustrated by the following examples, which are not intended to be limiting in any way. The entire contents of all references, patents, and published patent applications cited throughout this application, as well as any figures, are hereby incorporated by reference. [Example]

[0080] Example 1: Mitigation of target interference in bridging immunogenicity assays with target blocking reagents and mildly basic pH material and method Materials and reagents For the functional drug and target assays described herein, all solutions were prepared in assay buffer (0.5% BSA, 0.05% Tween®-20, 1×PBS) unless otherwise stated. For the ADA assays described herein, all solutions were prepared in 1% BSA, 1×PBS unless otherwise stated. PBS was from Life Technologies (Grand Island, NY). 1.5M Trizma base was from Sigma (St Louis, MO). Glacial acetic acid was from Thermo Fisher Scientific (Waltham, MA). HBS-EP+ (10×) buffer was from GE Life Technologies (Grand Island, NY). The antibodies were from BioScience (Marlborough, MA). Human serum was from Bioreclamation (Hicksville, NY). Streptavidin-coated microplates were from Meso Scale Discovery (Rockville, Maryland). Recombinant human target protein was from R&D System (Minneapolis, MN). Black microwell plates, horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated NeutrAvidin™, and SuperSignal ELISA Pico Chemiluminescent Substrate™ were from Thermo Fisher Scientific (Rockford, IL). HRP-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG, an Fc fragment-specific antibody, was from Jackson The antibodies were from ImmunoResearch (West Grove, PA). The AHC biosensor (Anti human IgG Fc Capture) was from Pall ForteBio (Fremont, CA). Fully human monoclonal antibody drugs, mouse anti-drug monoclonal antibodies, biotinylated drugs, ruthenylated drugs, and all human and mouse anti-target monoclonal antibodies (referred to herein as HuAb1, HuAb2 (human), and MsAb2 (mouse)), soluble human and mouse receptor fusion proteins (referred to herein as HuSR and MsSR, respectively), and biotinylated human anti-target monoclonal antibodies (used in the ADA and target assays) were produced by Regeneron Pharmaceuticals (Tarrytown, NY).

[0081] pH measurement pH measurements were performed using a calibrated Metler Toledo meter (Columbus, Ohio) equipped with an InLab Expert Pro-ISM™ electrode. Pooled human serum was diluted 10-fold with 300 mM acetic acid. The acidified samples were then buffered 10-fold with different concentrations of Tris base solution. pH measurements were performed on the final assay solutions as shown in Table 1 below. [Table 1]

[0082] ADA assay Anti-drug antibodies (ADA) in human serum samples were detected using a non-quantitative ADA cross-linking immunoassay (Figure 1A-C). This ADA cross-linking assay uses a mouse anti-drug monoclonal antibody as a positive control and biotinylated and ruthenylated drugs as cross-linking components (Figure 1A). Serum samples were acidified by diluting 10-fold with 300 mM acetic acid and incubated at room temperature (RT) for at least 10 minutes. Biotinylated and ruthenylated drugs (0.5 μg / mL) were prepared in assay buffer containing 60 mM Tris base before addition to the serum samples. The acid-treated serum samples were then diluted 10-fold with the labeled drug solution. After approximately 60 minutes of incubation at room temperature, the samples were transferred to a blocked (5% BSA) streptavidin Multi-Array™ 96-well plate (MSD) and incubated for approximately 60 minutes at room temperature. The plate was washed, Read Buffer was added, and the plate was read using an MSD plate reader, e.g., a SECTOR Imager. Plates were read using a 2400. To block target-mediated interference (Figure 1B), anti-target monoclonal antibodies (100 μg / mL) and / or soluble receptor proteins (100 μg / mL) were also included in the labeled drug solution (Figure 1C). Furthermore, the labeled drug solution was prepared in 60 mM Tris to adjust the pH to a mildly basic condition, which minimizes target binding to both biotinylated and ruthenylated drugs.

[0083] Targeted Assays This procedure uses a microtiter plate coated with a mouse anti-target monoclonal antibody (1 μg / mL) and a recombinant target protein as a standard. Standards and QCs were prepared in media well known to those skilled in the art to avoid interference from endogenous target proteins from human serum. Standards, controls, and samples were diluted 10-fold with 300 mM acetic acid and incubated at room temperature for approximately 30 minutes. Prior to addition to the plate, the acid-treated samples were neutralized (1:2 dilution) using a 300 mM Tris-base solution spiked with an anti-drug monoclonal antibody (100 μg / mL) to minimize drug interference. Target proteins captured on the plate were detected using different biotinylated human anti-target monoclonal antibodies (200 ng / mL), followed by NeutrAvidin™ conjugated to horseradish peroxidase (NeutrAvidin-HRP™) (100 ng / mL). A luminol-based substrate specific for peroxidase was added to achieve a signal intensity proportional to the total target concentration.

[0084] Functional drug assays The functional drug assay quantifies the level of antibody drugs that are either unbound to the target or have only one arm bound to the target. This way, they can still bind to the target molecule. The procedure used a microtiter plate coated with the target (0.5 μg / mL) and the antibody drug as a standard. The captured drug was detected using a mouse anti-human IgG4 monoclonal antibody (250 ng / mL), followed by Fc-specific horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG (anti-mouse IgG-HRP) (100 ng / mL). A luminol-based substrate specific for the peroxidase was then added to achieve a signal intensity proportional to the concentration of the functional drug.

[0085] Biolayer Interferometry Target binding to antibody drugs in the absence and presence of mouse target-blocking antibody MsAb2 and soluble mouse receptor fusion protein MsSR was measured using Octet at pH 7.3 or 8.3. The AHC biosensor was studied in a RED96 system (Pall Forte Bio) at 30 °C and a shaking speed of 1000 rpm. The AHC biosensor was prepared in 10 mM HEPES, 150 mM NaCl, 3 mM EDTA, 0.02% (v / v) sodium azide, 1 mg / mL Pre-equilibrated with dilution buffer containing BSA at pH 7.3 for 30 min.

[0086] A loading step was performed for 20 seconds (to achieve a thickness of approximately 0.5 nm) at a drug concentration of 5 μg / mL in the same dilution buffer, followed by a 60-second baseline step in the same dilution buffer. After that, the biosensor was placed into a well containing 200 μL of target at a concentration of 60 nM with or without MsAb2 and MsSR at pH 7.3. The same procedure was performed in a pH 8.3 environment. Association curves were collected for a total of approximately 200 seconds, followed by a dissociation phase of approximately 300 seconds.

[0087] Results and Discussion Weakly basic pH assay conditions using the target-blocking antibody HuAb1 increase target acceptance levels and reduce background signals in human naive samples. Reported target levels in normal human serum are approximately 10 ng / mL. Targets form complexes with circulating antibody-drugs and several inhibitory binding proteins. Anti-drug antibodies were measured using a bridging ADA immunogenicity assay with an acid dissociation step (Figure 1A-C). While acid treatment typically increases drug tolerance levels, it also releases the target complexed with the drug and any target-binding proteins, resulting in high background signals in naive human serum samples (Figure 2A). Similar findings have been reported previously when acid pretreatment was used to dissociate ADA and furanumab. The NGF-furanumab complex also dissociated, releasing free NGF, which interfered with the ADA assay and led to false-positive results (Dai, S., et al., AAPS J, 2014, 16(3): pp. 464-77).

[0088] In the ADA assay without target-blocking antibodies and at a neutral assay pH, the target tolerance level (defined as the amount of target required to obtain an assay signal above the plate cutpoint) determined using recombinant target protein is approximately 3 ng / mL (Figure 2B). In the presence of 100 μg / mL of the target-blocking antibody HuAb1 at a neutral assay pH, the target tolerance level increases to approximately 150 ng / mL. Interestingly, when using an assay pH of 8.3 and the same concentration of the human target-blocking antibody HuAb1, the target tolerance level increased to approximately 1.1 μg / mL (Figure 2B). At an assay pH of 8.9, the target tolerance level was even higher, approximately 7.5 μg / mL. The assay sensitivity and drug tolerance limit (DTL) values ​​were similar at either neutral or pH 8.3. The assay signal of naive human serum samples also decreased to background levels at 100 μg / mL of HuAb1 and at a slightly basic pH (Figure 2C).

[0089] The mildly basic pH in combination with the two target blocking reagents inhibits target-mediated background signal in clinical research samples. To test whether the combination of the human target-blocking antibody HuAb1 and weakly basic pH conditions could further inhibit target interference in clinical study samples, we tested phase I clinical samples from three subjects from a single-dose study with the drug at four different time points (days 1, 29, 57, and 113). As measured by our in-house target assay, a 10- to 12-fold increase in target levels was observed in the day 29 and day 57 samples (Figure 3A), with target levels approaching baseline in the day 113 sample. The highest target concentration observed in these samples was approximately 60 ng / mL, far below the target tolerance level for the ADA assay. However, when these samples were tested with the ADA assay, using 100 μg / mL of the human target-blocking antibody HuAb1 at pH 8.3, a positive signal was detected in the day 29 and day 57 samples, with the assay signal approaching background levels in the day 113 sample (Figure 3B).

[0090] These subjects received a single dose of the antibody drug, and their PK profiles did not suggest a significant ADA response (Figure 3C). Furthermore, the ADA signal in these samples appears to correlate with target levels. Subsequently, a larger group of post-dose samples was also tested, and the majority showed a positive ADA signal. Therefore, the presence of elevated target levels likely accounts for the positive signal in the assay by creating target-mediated crosslinking with the labeled drug.

[0091] To further mitigate the apparent target interference observed in these clinical samples, a second human target-blocking antibody, HuAb2, was added to HuAb1 in combination with either neutral or weakly basic pH. Interestingly, target-mediated background signal, although not to baseline levels, was significantly reduced when using 100 μg / mL of target-blocking antibodies HuAb1 and HuAb2 with a neutral assay pH. However, a subset of post-dosing samples generated assay signals above the plate cutpoint. When these samples were retested using the same concentrations of target-blocking antibodies HuAb1 and HuAb2, all had assay signals below the plate cutpoint at an assay pH of 8.3 (Figure 3D).

[0092] The original assay format, using basic pH and 100 μg / mL of the target-blocking antibody HuAb1, appeared to be able to tolerate approximately 1.1 μg / mL of recombinant target protein (Figure 2A). However, target interference was observed in clinical samples with relatively low target protein levels (≦60 ng / mL). This suggests that the recombinant target protein may not perform as well as the native protein in the assay, and / or that different forms of the target protein with different binding properties compared to the recombinant protein may be expressed in patients, making the target-blocking antibody HuAb1 less effective at inhibiting target interference in clinical samples. This inconsistent result in the ADA assay between recombinant and endogenous target proteins highlights the importance of using actual research samples to characterize assay performance.

[0093] Another interesting finding was the effect of slightly basic pH on target tolerance levels. The combination of HuAb1 and HuAb2 did not completely inhibit target interference in these clinical samples under neutral pH conditions. Slightly basic conditions, along with the two target-blocking antibodies, were required to completely eliminate target interference.

[0094] The combination of the target receptor MsSR with the target-blocking antibody MsAb2 also reduces target interference. Because the target-blocking antibody HuAb1 shares several common CDR VH rearrangements with therapeutic antibody drugs, any ADA specific for these VH rearrangement regions may bind to HuAb1 in the assay buffer rather than to the labeled drug, potentially impairing its detection in the assay. To overcome this potential problem, HuSR, a target receptor with a human IgG Fc fusion, was initially used to replace the target-blocking antibody HuAb1. As shown in Figure 4A, the combination of 100 μg / mL HuAb2 and 100 μg / mL HuSR could effectively inhibit target-mediated background signals in phase I clinical samples. Indeed, similar target tolerance levels were obtained with either the HuAb2 / HuSR or HuAb1 / HuAb2 combinations.

[0095] Furthermore, the target-blocking antibody HuAb2 has the same human IgG4 constant region as the antibody drug, while the target receptor HuSR has a human IgG Fc region. Any anti-drug antibodies in patient serum samples specific for the Fc region of the antibody drug may bind to HuAb2 and HuSR, which could also impair detection in the assay. To overcome this potential issue, the Fc domain of HuSR and the entire constant region of HuAb2 were converted from human to mouse to further reduce the potential for interference in ADA detection. The combination of MsAb2 (HuAb2 with a mouse constant region) and MsSR (HuSR with a mouse Fc region) still effectively reduced target interference in clinical samples (Figure 4B and Figure 4C). Clinical samples from days 1, 29, 57, and 113 showed only background signals in this new assay format, despite having high levels of target in the serum (Figure 5).

[0096] The weakly basic pH and target blocking reagents have minimal impact on actual ADA detection in rabbit bleeds and rat toxicology samples. To ensure that the mildly basic pH and target blocking reagents had minimal effect on ADA stability and / or detection, early bleeds from drug Fab-immunized rabbits were analyzed in the current assay format.

[0097] Bleeds 1 and 2 from two rabbits collected approximately 30-40 days after immunization were assayed with two target-blocking reagents at either neutral pH or pH 8.3. These early rabbit bleeds typically have polyclonal antibody responses to drugs with low affinity, whose detection may be more affected by more stringent assay conditions. As shown in Figure 6A, ADA mean count values ​​were similar under each assay condition, regardless of assay pH, indicating that the weakly basic pH and the addition of target-blocking reagents had minimal or no effect on ADA stability or detection in these samples.

[0098] To further confirm that the format using two target-blocking reagents at pH 8.3 could detect ADA in post-dose samples, rat serum samples from two rats in the toxicology study were analyzed for both target and ADA levels. Compared to the baseline sample, target levels increased by at least 10-fold in the day 28 and day 85 samples from rat 1 and by approximately 10-fold in the day 28 sample from rat 2. However, no abnormal elevation of the ADA assay signal was observed in these samples, indicating that target interference was mitigated. At the same time, high levels of ADA were detected in both animals beginning on day 85, indicating that the addition of the two target-blocking reagents and the slightly basic pH assay conditions did not interfere with ADA detection (Figure 6B).

[0099] The mildly basic pH and target blocking reagent inhibits the binding of the target to the drug. To understand why a weakly basic pH and target-blocking reagents can help mitigate target interference in clinical samples, we performed octet experiments to test target-to-drug binding under different pH conditions, with and without a target-blocking reagent. The results are shown in Figure 7A. As can be seen from the binding association curves, in the absence of MsAb2 and MsSR, the response was slightly lower at pH 8.2 compared to pH 7.3, indicating that the association between the target and drug was slightly affected by the assay pH. However, a faster dissociation rate was observed at pH 8.2 compared to pH 7.3, indicating that the binding affinity between the target and drug was weaker at pH 8.2. At pH 7.3, a faster dissociation rate was also observed in the presence of MsAb2 and MsSR, similar to basic pH alone. However, the presence of a target-blocking reagent also significantly affected target-to-drug association. Finally, complete inhibition of binding was achieved with the combination of MsAb2 and MsSR at pH 8.2. The difference in pH dependence of binding could be due to either a conformational change of the target at weakly basic pH or better binding of the target-blocking reagent to the target at pH 8.2, thus indicating inhibition of target-to-drug association.

[0100] These binding data further support the ADA assay data, which show that only basic pH can partially inhibit target-mediated signaling in clinical samples. The combination of MsAb2 and MsSR at neutral pH significantly inhibits target-mediated signaling, but complete inhibition of target interference is only obtained with the combination of MsAb2, MsSR, and pH 8.3 (Figure 7B).

[0101] Ligand binding assays (LBAs) are highly susceptible to interfering molecules that can confound assay results by generating artifactual signals or blocking desired assay interactions. Target interference is a common problem and can be difficult to overcome due to the specificity of drugs and the highly diverse biology of each target protein. Targets typically form tight complexes with the drug and its binding protein in the circulation, which can be difficult to disrupt. Furthermore, target levels can increase to relatively high levels in the circulation due to the formation of target:drug and target:binding protein complexes or due to feedback mechanisms inherent in biological pathways. In ADA crosslinking assays, the presence of dimeric or multimeric targets can lead to false-positive results and confound immunogenicity assessments. This effect can be exacerbated by acid dissociation, a strategy commonly used to increase drug tolerance in ADA assays, which can also disrupt target-containing complexes, releasing the target and resulting in target-mediated false-positive signals. Therefore, careful consideration is required during assay development, weighing the benefits of each strategy against the risk of introducing potential artifacts into the assay. Based on biology, target-specific approaches must be evaluated to mitigate assay interference.

[0102] Target-blocking antibodies (as single antibodies or in combination), receptors, cofactors, and pretreatment with target-binding proteins can be used to mitigate target interference. Additionally, assay pH can be altered to mitigate target interference by directly affecting dimeric or multimeric targets or by altering drug binding affinity to the target. Furthermore, because native target proteins in serum samples may behave differently than their recombinant versions, it is important to evaluate the effectiveness of the selected target mitigation strategy / assay format by testing actual post-dose samples. The use of PK data and target levels can also help distinguish actual ADA responses from target-mediated signals.

[0103] The addition of target blocking reagents can be used to reduce target interference. However, in the case of antibody therapy, it is necessary to ensure that these reagents do not share similar CDR sequences with the drug (in the case of anti-target antibodies) or contain human IgG constant sequences (in the case of antibodies, receptors, and binding proteins), because these shared sequences can reduce the detection of ADA specific to these sequences. Finally, the use of low-affinity ADA-positive animal samples with polyclonal responses to the drug can help ensure that true low-affinity and low-titer ADA responses, whose detection is likely to be affected by assay changes, can still be detected under the final assay conditions.

[0104] In this disclosure, the drug target is a homodimer that forms multiple inactive complexes with its inhibitory binding protein in the circulation. Acid dissociation increases the drug tolerance limit (DTL) of the ADA assay, but releases the drug-bound target and the target bound to its inhibitory binding protein. The released target results in target interference in the ADA assay. Furthermore, treatment of mice with the drug upregulates target expression. Western blot analysis using antibodies specific for the precursor and mature forms of the target showed that different forms of the target were upregulated in mice 28 days after drug injection. Therefore, a robust ADA assay with as much target tolerance as possible is needed.

[0105] By including a target-blocking antibody (HuAb1) and using weakly basic pH assay conditions (pH 8.3), we were able to achieve a high tolerance level for the recombinant target protein. The assay was then optimized to include a second target-blocking antibody, HuAb2. This significantly improved target tolerance and significantly reduced the positive rate in clinical study samples. Further optimization of the assay was performed by replacing the HuAb1 anti-target antibody. Because HuAb1 shares some complementarity-determining region (CDR) sequences with the drug, it may bind to anti-drug ADAs, potentially reducing ADA detection. Therefore, we used the external portion of the target receptor fused to human IgG Fc (HuSR) instead of HuAb1. When combined with HuAb2, HuSR was able to block target interference, as was the HuAb1 / HuAb2 combination. Subsequently, the Fc domain of HuSR and the entire constant region of HuAb2 were converted from human to mouse (MsAb2 and MsSR) to further reduce potential interference with ADA detection. Characterization experiments using the octet system demonstrated that target-to-drug binding was inhibited by a weakly basic pH or the presence of an anti-target blocking reagent alone. However, complete inhibition of binding was achieved with the combination of MsAb2, MsSR, and a weakly basic pH. Analysis of low-titer ADA-positive bleeds from immunized rabbits and known ADA-positive samples from preclinical studies in rats confirmed the assay's ability to detect ADA-positive samples and the minimal effect of basic pH and target blocking reagents on ADA detection.

[0106] These findings provide an alternative strategy to overcome target interference in bridging immunogenicity assays when standard target-blocking antibodies are ineffective.

[0107] equivalent Those skilled in the art will recognize, or be able to ascertain using no more than routine experimentation, many equivalents to the specific embodiments of the invention described herein. Such equivalents are intended to be encompassed by the scope of the following claims. The contents of all references, patents, and published patent applications cited throughout this application are hereby incorporated by reference. The present invention provides, for example, the following items. (Item 1) 1. A method for mitigating drug-target interference in an anti-drug antibody (ADA) bridging immunoassay for determining the presence of ADA to a drug in a serum sample, comprising: The serum sample a capture drug labeled with a first label; a detection agent labeled with a second label, and contacting with a drug target blocking reagent; incubating the serum sample with the capture drug, the detection drug, and the drug target blocking reagent under weakly basic pH assay conditions; allowing the drug target blocking reagent to bind to the drug target present in the sample; thereby reducing interference of said drug target in said ADA bridging immunoassay. (Item 2) 2. The method of claim 1, further comprising performing the anti-drug antibody (ADA) bridging immunoassay. (Item 3) 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the drug target blocking reagent is a drug target blocking antibody. (Item 4) 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the drug target is a soluble protein, such as a ligand for a receptor. (Item 5) 5. The method of claim 4, wherein the drug target blocking reagent comprises a portion of the receptor fused to an IgG Fc domain. (Item 6) 6. The method of claim 5, wherein the portion of the receptor is an extracellular portion of the receptor. (Item 7) 6. The method of claim 5, wherein the IgG Fc domain is a mouse IgG Fc domain. (Item 8) Item 9. The method of Item 5, wherein the IgG Fc domain is a human IgG Fc domain. 2. The method of claim 1, further comprising contacting the serum sample with a second drug target blocking reagent. (Item 10) 10. The method of claim 9, wherein the second drug target blocking reagent is a drug target blocking antibody. (Item 11) 11. The method of claim 10, wherein the second drug target blocking antibody comprises a mouse constant region. (Item 12) Item 10. The method of item 1, wherein the drug is a human therapeutic monoclonal antibody. (Item 13) Item 10. The method of claim 1, wherein the drug is a humanized therapeutic monoclonal antibody. (Item 14) 14. The method of item 12 or 13, wherein the human therapeutic monoclonal antibody or the humanized therapeutic monoclonal antibody is being evaluated in a clinical trial. (Item 15) Item 16. The method of item 1, wherein the drug target is a soluble or shed multimeric drug target. 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the drug target is a homodimeric drug target. (Item 17) Item 2. The method according to item 1, wherein the weakly basic pH assay conditions comprise conditions of a pH of about 8.3 to about 8.9. (Item 18) 18. The method of claim 17, wherein the weakly basic pH assay conditions comprise conditions of a pH of about 8.3. (Item 19) 18. The method of claim 17, wherein the weakly basic pH assay conditions comprise conditions of a pH of about 8.9. (Item 20) 20. The method according to any one of items 1 to 19, wherein the serum sample is a human serum sample. (Item 21) 21. The method according to any one of items 1 to 20, wherein the serum sample is from a subject being treated with the drug. (Item 22) 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the incubation is carried out at room temperature. (Item 23) 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the anti-drug antibody (ADA) bridging immunoassay is a high-throughput assay. (Item 24) Item 10. The method of claim 1, wherein the capture drug is attached to a solid surface. (Item 25) 25. The method of claim 24, wherein the solid surface is a microtiter plate. (Item 26) 25. The method of claim 24, wherein the solid surface is coated with streptavidin. (Item 27) 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the capture label is selected from the group consisting of a biotin label, a protein A label, a protein G label, and a glutathione S-transferase (GST) label. (Item 28) 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the second label is selected from the group consisting of a ruthenium label, a radiolabel, a photoluminescent label, a chemiluminescent label, a fluorescent label, an electrochemiluminescent label, and an enzyme label. (Item 29) 1. A method for mitigating drug-target interference in an anti-drug antibody (ADA) bridging immunoassay for determining the presence of ADA to a drug in a serum sample, comprising: The serum sample a capture drug labeled with a first label; a detection agent labeled with a second label; a first drug target blocking antibody, and contacting with a second drug target blocking antibody; incubating the capture drug, the detection drug, the first drug target blocking antibody, and the second drug target blocking antibody under weakly basic pH assay conditions; allowing the first drug target blocking antibody and the second drug target blocking antibody to bind to the drug target present in the sample; thereby reducing interference of said drug target in said ADA bridging immunoassay. (Item 30) 1. A method for reducing drug target interference in an anti-drug antibody (ADA) bridging immunoassay for determining the presence of ADA to a drug in a serum sample, wherein the drug target is a soluble protein, the method comprising: The serum sample a capture drug labeled with a first label; a detection agent labeled with a second label; a drug target blocking reagent comprising the extracellular portion of said receptor fused to an IgG Fc domain; and contacting with a drug target blocking antibody; incubating the capture drug, the detection drug, the drug target blocking reagent, and the drug target blocking antibody under weakly basic pH assay conditions; allowing the drug target blocking reagent and the drug target blocking antibody to bind to the drug target present in the sample; thereby reducing interference of said drug target in said ADA bridging immunoassay.

Claims

[Claim 1] The invention as set forth in the drawings.

Images