Plants with increased photorespiration efficiency

Abstract

Methods for producing plants with increased growth or productivity are provided. [Solution] Plants with altered photorespiratory characteristics are presented herein. Disruption of transport proteins involved in shuttling glycolate and / or glycerate results in reduced photosynthetic rates, reduced plant growth, and altered gene expression and photosynthetic metabolite profiles. Such disruption can also be combined with the introduction of genes expressing components of alternative photorespiratory enzyme pathways to increase photosynthetic efficiency.

Description

[Technical Field]

[0001] cross reference This patent application claims priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119(e) to U.S. Provisional Application No. 62 / 467,993, filed March 7, 2017, which is incorporated herein by reference.

[0002] The present disclosure provides plants with modified photorespiratory characteristics.The disruption of transport proteins involved in shuttling glycolic acid and / or glyceric acid results in a decrease in photosynthesis rate, a decrease in plant growth, and changes in gene expression and photosynthetic metabolite profile.When this disruption is combined with the introduction of genes that express components of alternative photorespiratory enzyme pathways, it increases photosynthetic efficiency. [Background technology]

[0003] Ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase / oxygenase (RubisCO) catalyzes the fixation of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate (RuBP) with CO2 to produce two molecules of 3-phosphoglycerate (3-PGA). However, at 25°C and current CO2 levels, approximately 25% of RubisCO catalytic activity in plants with C3 photosynthetic metabolism is the fixation of RuBP with the competing substrate oxygen, rather than carbon dioxide, resulting in the conversion of RuBP to one molecule of 3-PGA and one molecule of 2-phosphoglycolate (2-PG) (Bowes et al., Biochem Bioph. Res. Co (1971) 45:716-22; Ogren and Bowes, Nature-New Biol. (1971) 230:159-60; Lorimer, GH, Ann. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. (1981) 32:349-83; Ogren, WL, Ann. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. (1984) 35:415-42; Sharkey, TD, Physiologia Plantarum (1988) 73:147-52). Accumulation of 2-PG in the chloroplast stroma can inhibit triosephosphate isomerase and phosphofructokinase, thereby reducing the ability to regenerate RuBP (Anderson, LE, Biochim Biophys Acta (1971) 235:237-44; Kelly and Latzko, Febs Lett (1976) 68:55-58). 2-PG is rapidly dephosphorylated by 2-phosphoglycolate phosphatase, but the resulting glycolate can also suppress the rate of photosynthesis in chloroplasts and is thought to be toxic to cells (Kelly and Latzko, supra; Gonzalez Moro et al., J. Plant Physiol. (1997) 150:388-94).The C2 photorespiratory pathway, which includes steps in chloroplasts, peroxisomes, mitochondria, and the cytosol, prevents the inhibition of photosynthesis by 2-PG / glycolic acid and partially restores the lost carbon (Somerville and Ogren, Plant Physiol (1979) 63:152; Eisenhut et al., Plant Biol. (2013) 676-85). Photorespiration converts two molecules of 2-PG to one molecule of 3-PGA, releasing one molecule of CO2.

[0004] Additionally, the photorespiration cycle utilizes ATP in mitochondria, producing ammonia (NH3) as a by-product of the conversion of glycine to serine. Plants then recycle the NH3 using the reducing equivalent NAD(P)H. As a result, photorespiration under current atmospheric CO2 concentrations results in an approximately 15-50% drag on seasonal C3 photosynthetic efficiency, depending on local growing-season temperature (Ogren, supra; Peterhansel et al., Photorespiration. The Arabidopsis Book (2010), 20130). Yield losses due to photorespiration total approximately 150 trillion calories per year in soybean and wheat production in the Midwestern US alone (Walker et al., Ann. Rev. Plant Biol. (2016) 107-29), with similar negative impacts on other major C3 crops such as rice and potato (Sharkey, TD supra, Zhu et al., Ann. Rev. Plant Biol. (2010) 61:235-61).

[0005] Photorespiration is essential for C3 plants but requires a significant expenditure of fixed carbon dioxide and energy. Photorespiration begins when ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase / oxygenase (Rubisco), the first enzyme in photosynthesis, reacts with oxygen instead of carbon dioxide, producing the toxic compound glycolic acid, which is then recycled through photorespiration. Photorespiration can be modeled at canopy and regional scales to determine its cost in the current and future atmospheric context. Regional-scale models have revealed that photorespiration currently reduces US soybean and wheat yields by 36% and 20%, respectively. Even a small improvement in this photorespiratory loss could be worth $100 million per year in the US alone, making photorespiration a potential target process for improving crop yields (Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2016 67:107-29). Advances in synthetic biology have made it possible to introduce several novel pathways into plant chloroplasts, including enzymes that metabolize glycolate in the chloroplast using less energy and by shifting the location of photorespiratory CO2 production from mitochondria to the chloroplast, thereby enabling rapid refixation by Rubisco, thereby short-circuiting the natural pathway (Kebeish et al., Nat Biotechnol (2007) 25:593-599; Maurino and Peterhansel, Curr Opin Plant Biol (2010) 13:249-256).

[0006] The soluble enzymes involved in photorespiration have been well studied over the past 40 years, providing a wealth of information about the biochemistry and genetics governing photorespiratory metabolism (Peterhansel et al., supra; Timm and Bauwe, Plant Biol. (2013) 15:737-47). In contrast, only a small number of transporters have been demonstrated to be involved in photorespiration, despite there being at least 25 proposed transport steps involved in carbon recycling in photorespiration (Eisenhut et al., supra). Importantly, photorespiration is a high-flux pathway that interacts with multiple other metabolic pathways, including the nitrogen cycle and amino acid biosynthesis (Fernie et al., Plant Biol. (2013) 15:748-53).

[0007] The first transporters identified to be involved in photorespiration were the chloroplast dicarboxylate transporters DiT1 and DiT2 (Woo et al., Plant Physiol. (1987) 84:624-32). Single point mutations in DiT2.1 and subsequent biochemical characterization revealed DiT2 to be a glutamate / malate transporter located in the chloroplast inner envelope (Renne et al., Plant J. (2003) 35:316-31). Antisense suppression of DiT1 resulted in a classic photorespiratory mutant phenotype, with reduced growth under ambient CO2 and complementation by elevated carbon dioxide ([CO2]), and reduced nitrate reassimilation due to reduced chloroplast 2-oxoglutarate transport (Schneidereit et al., Plant J. (2006) 45:206-24). Together, DiT1 and DiT2 are required for proper refixation of ammonia released from glycine decarboxylation during photorespiratory metabolism.

[0008] Recently, co-expression analysis has identified other transporters potentially involved in photorespiration (Bordych et al., Plant Biol. (2013) 15:686-93). Co-expression analysis identified the mitochondrial transporter A BOUT DE SOUFFLE (BOU), which is required for normal glycine decarboxylase (GDC) activity and meristem growth, and null mutants in this transporter exhibit photorespiratory mutant phenotypes complemented by elevated [CO2] (Eisenhut et al., Plant J. (2013) 73:836-49). Currently, the only identified photorespiratory pathway transporter that transports carbon derived directly from glycolate is the plastid glycolate / glycerate transporter protein, PLGG1. Plgg1 is co-expressed with many enzymes involved in photorespiration (Pick et al., Proc. Nat'l Acad. Sci. USA (2013) 110:3185-90). A Plgg1 T-DNA knockout line (plgg1-1) in Arabidopsis thaliana reveals a role for PLGG1 in the first and last transport steps in the photorespiratory pathway: export of glycolate from chloroplasts and import of glycerate into chloroplasts (Pick et al., supra). Nearly 30 years before the molecular identification of PLGG1, export of glycolate concomitant with import of glycerate was demonstrated in purified spinach chloroplasts (Howitz and McCarty, Biochem. (1985) 24:3645-50; Howitz and McCarty, Plant Physiol. (1986) 80:390-95; Howitz and McCarty, Plant Physiol. (1991) 96:1060-69; Young and McCarty, Plant Physiol. (1992) 96:1060-69). Physiol. (1993) 101:793-99). Additionally, PLGG1 was identified as a chloroplast protein in proteomics studies and initially thought to be involved in programmed cell death, but recent evidence suggests that its phenotype is linked to the accumulation of photorespiratory intermediates (Yang et al., New Phytol. (2012) 193:81-95; Pick et al., supra). However, the Arabidopsis plgg1-1 line showed no difference in the quantum efficiency of CO2 assimilation or an alteration in the photorespiratory CO2 compensation point compared to the wild type when measured under low light conditions (Walker et al., Photosyn Res. (2016) 129:93-103). Combined, these data indicate that the PLGG1 protein is involved in photorespiratory metabolism and also suggest an additional pathway for glycolate to exit the chloroplast, highlighting the difficulty of identifying transporters from phenotypes in the photorespiratory pathway (Hodges et al., J. Exp. Bot. (2016) 3015-26).

[0009] While both genetic and co-expression approaches have been successful in identifying genes involved in photorespiratory metabolism, many of the transporters involved in the flux of photorespiratory intermediates remain unknown. An alternative approach to co-expression analysis is to identify candidate chloroplast inner membrane transporters from chloroplast inner membrane proteomics studies and then screen tDNA insertion mutants of those candidate genes for photorespiratory phenotypes using chlorophyll fluorescence (Badger et al., Funct. Plant Biol. (2009) 36:867-73; Sun et al., Nucleic Acids Res., (2009) 37:D969-D974). Photorespiration-deficient mutants exhibit reduced Fv / Fm chlorophyll fluorescence due to impaired function of photosystem II (PSII) when exposed to illumination under low CO2 levels (Kozaki and Takeba, Nature (1996) 384:557-60; Wingler et al., Philosoph. Trans. Royal Soc. B-Biol. Sci. (2000) 355:1517-29; Takahashi et al., Plant Physiol. (2007) 144:487-94).

[0010] This high-throughput fluorescence-based approach, combined with forward genetics to target putative transporter-like chloroplast inner membrane proteins, has the potential to identify additional genes important for photorespiratory metabolite transport. The sodium bile acid symporter is a family of transport proteins first identified as bile acid transporters in the mammalian liver. Further analysis demonstrated that the BASS family of transporters exhibits a broad range of substrate specificity, including non-bile acid organic compounds such as pyruvate, steroids, and xenobiotics (Furumoto et al., Nature (2011) 476:472-75; Claro da Silva et al., Mol. Aspects of Med. (2013) 34:252-69). Although bile acids are not produced in plants, BASS family genes are present in both monocotyledonous and dicotyledonous plants (Gigolashvili et al., The Plant Cell (2009) 21:1813-29; Sawada et al., Plant and Cell Physiol. (2009) 50:1579-86; Furumoto et al., supra).

[0011] As detailed herein, we identified the sodium bile acid symporter 6 protein (BASS6) as a glycolate transporter involved in photorespiration. Analysis of bass6 knockout T-DNA lines (bass6-1 and bass6-2) in Arabidopsis revealed that loss of Bass6 resulted in a photorespiratory mutant phenotype and accumulation of the photorespiratory metabolic intermediates glycine and glycolate. In addition, localization of the BASS6 protein to the chloroplast envelope membrane and its ability to transport glycolate were demonstrated through a combination of yeast complementation and transport analysis. bass6-plgg1 double mutants exhibited additive developmental defects.

[0012] Our findings revealed that photorespiratory shunting or bypass pathways were less effective due to the rapid export of glycolate from chloroplasts via two glycolate transporters located in the chloroplast envelope. PLGG1 (Proc PLGG1 (Natl Acad Sci USA (2013) 110(8):3185-90) is a plastid glycolate-glycerate transporter that exchanges glycolate for glycerate in the chloroplast envelope. While PLGG1 is solely responsible for glycerate import, BASS6 and PLGG1 share responsibility for export of glycolate from the chloroplast. Thus, the combined activity of BASS6 and PLGG1 competes with the synthetic photorespiratory bypass pathway for glycolate, thereby limiting the effectiveness of the bypass in improving photosynthetic efficiency and plant growth / yield.

[0013] The toxic byproducts of RuBisCO oxygenation and glycine conversion during photorespiration (glycolate and ammonia, respectively) are refixed and converted to usable products between three organelles: chloroplasts, peroxisomes, and mitochondria, with high energy demands and a net loss of fixed carbon (Bauwe, et al. Trends Plant Sci. (2010) 15:330-6). Some photosynthetic algae, bacteria, and plants have evolved ways to reduce the stress of photorespiration through carbon-concentrating mechanisms (CCMs) and C4 photosynthesis (Price et al., J. Exp. Bot. (2013) 64:753-68). Alternatively, bypassing photorespiration using alternative metabolic pathways may be more efficient, reduce energy demands, and recapture the carbon lost in the process (Betti et al., J. Exp. Bot. (2016) 67:2977-88). Three different photorespiratory bypasses have been demonstrated in plants such as Arabidopsis, Camelina sativa, and potato (Dalal et al., Biotechnol. Biofuels (2015) 8; Kebeish et al., Nat. Biotechnol. (2007) 593-9; Maier et al., Front. Plant Sci. (2012) 3:12; Nolke et al., Plant Biotechnol. J. (2014) 12:734-42). Although these bypasses, including some variations, have shown improvements in plant productivity, their effectiveness under agricultural conditions has not been demonstrated, and no attempts are currently being made to fully optimize photorespiratory bypasses in farmer fields. Summary of the Invention [Problem to be solved by the invention]

[0014] To address these concerns, plants lacking chloroplast glycolate export capability and methods for producing them are presented herein, as well as plants containing one or more alternative photorespiratory bypass pathways to increase photosynthetic efficiency. The combination of the two approaches results in further efficiency. [Means for solving the problem]

[0015] Provided herein are genetically modified plants comprising one or more genetic modifications that result in the loss or reduction of the plant's ability to transport glycolate from at least a portion of its chloroplasts and the gain of the plant's ability to convert glycolate to energy within at least a portion of its chloroplasts. In one embodiment, the loss of chloroplast glycolate transport capability is due to the lack of production of a functional protein having at least 70% identity to SEQ ID NO:6. In another embodiment, the loss of chloroplast glycolate transport capability comprises inducing RNA interference by expressing an RNA molecule at least 95% identical to SEQ ID NO:46. In yet another embodiment, the gain of the ability to convert glycolate to energy within the chloroplast comprises the production of a transgenic malate synthase and a transgenic glycolate dehydrogenase in the chloroplast. In certain embodiments, the malate synthase is at least 95% identical to amino acid residues 41-607 of SEQ ID NO:43, and the glycolate dehydrogenase is at least 95% identical to amino acid residues 41-1136 of SEQ ID NO:45. In certain embodiments, the malate synthase comprises SEQ ID NO: 43, and the glycolate dehydrogenase comprises SEQ ID NO: 45. In another specific embodiment, the loss of chloroplast glycolate transport capability comprises a lack of production of a protein having at least 95% identity to SEQ ID NO: 3 and a lack of production of a protein having at least 95% identity to SEQ ID NO: 6, and the gain of the ability to convert glycolate to energy in chloroplasts comprises production of a protein having at least 95% identity to SEQ ID NO: 43 and production of a protein having at least 95% identity to SEQ ID NO: 45. The genetically modified plant can be any C3 plant. For example, in some embodiments, the plant of the present disclosure is rice, soybean, potato, cowpea, barley, wheat, or cassava.

[0016] Also disclosed herein are methods for producing plants with increased growth or productivity by introducing into a plant a genetic modification comprising: a) a loss of the ability to transport glycolic acid from at least a portion of the plant's chloroplasts; and b) a gain of the ability to convert glycolic acid to energy within the chloroplasts, thereby increasing the plant's growth or productivity. In some embodiments, the loss of the ability to transport glycolic acid from at least a portion of the plant's chloroplasts comprises a lack of production of a functional protein having at least 95% identity to SEQ ID NO:3, a lack of production of a functional protein having at least 95% identity to SEQ ID NO:6, or both. In yet additional embodiments, the gain of the ability to convert glycolic acid to energy within the chloroplasts comprises production of a transgenic malate synthase and a transgenic glycolate dehydrogenase in the chloroplasts. In some embodiments, the malate synthase is at least 95% identical to amino acid residues 41-607 of SEQ ID NO:43, and the glycolate dehydrogenase is at least 95% identical to amino acid residues 41-1136 of SEQ ID NO:45. In certain embodiments, the malate synthase comprises SEQ ID NO: 43, and the glycolate dehydrogenase comprises SEQ ID NO: 45. According to specific embodiments, the loss of chloroplast glycolate transport capability comprises a lack of production of a protein having at least 95% identity to SEQ ID NO: 3, a lack of production of a protein having at least 95% identity to SEQ ID NO: 6, or both, and the gain of the ability to convert glycolate to energy in chloroplasts comprises production of a protein having at least 95% identity to SEQ ID NO: 43 and production of a protein having at least 95% identity to SEQ ID NO: 45. Any C3 plant can be used with the methods of the present disclosure. In some embodiments, the plant is rice, soybean, potato, cowpea, barley, wheat, or cassava.

[0017] Additional embodiments provided herein are genetically modified plants comprising a first heterologous polynucleotide encoding a malate synthase and a second heterologous polynucleotide encoding a glycolate dehydrogenase, wherein the malate synthase and glycolate dehydrogenase are localized in the chloroplast of the plant. In preferred embodiments, the plant converts glycolate to energy within the chloroplast of the plant. In some embodiments, the malate synthase is derived from any source provided herein, including Cucurbita maxima. In specific embodiments, the malate synthase is at least 95% identical to amino acid residues 41-607 of SEQ ID NO: 43. In further embodiments, any of these plants express glycolate dehydrogenase from an organism selected from any source provided herein, including Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. In certain embodiments, the glycolate dehydrogenase is at least 95% identical to amino acid residues 41-1136 of SEQ ID NO: 45. In specific embodiments, the first heterologous polynucleotide encodes the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO:43, and the second heterologous polynucleotide encodes the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO:45. In some embodiments, the plant further comprises reduced levels, reduced activity, partial loss of activity, or complete loss of activity of one or more endogenous glycolate transport proteins in the chloroplasts of the plant. In some embodiments, the plant has reduced or no glycolate transport from the chloroplasts of the plant. In certain embodiments, the one or more glycolate transport proteins comprise PLGG1 and BASS6. In further embodiments, the one or more glycolate transport proteins have at least 70% sequence identity, at least 75% sequence identity, at least 80% sequence identity, at least 85% sequence identity, at least 90% sequence identity, or at least 95% sequence identity to SEQ ID NO:6.In further embodiments, at least one of the one or more glycolate transport proteins had at least 70% sequence identity, at least 75% sequence identity, at least 80% sequence identity, at least 85% sequence identity, or at least 90% sequence identity to SEQ ID NO:3. In other embodiments, at least one of the one or more glycolate transport proteins had at least 95% sequence identity to SEQ ID NO:3. In some embodiments, the plant contains a mutation in a DNA molecule encoding a glycolate transport protein. In additional embodiments, the plant contains a heterologous polynucleotide encoding an RNA molecule that inhibits expression of a glycolate transport protein, such as an RNA molecule that is at least 95% identical to SEQ ID NO:46. In further embodiments, the reduced level, reduced activity, partial loss of activity, or complete loss of activity of at least one of the one or more glycolate transport proteins was generated using a technology selected from the group consisting of CRISPR / Cas, TALEN, zinc-finger nucleases, and RNAi.

[0018] Another aspect of the present disclosure is a genetically modified plant, wherein the plant comprises a first heterologous polynucleotide encoding a first polypeptide having at least 95% identity to SEQ ID NO: 43 and a second heterologous polynucleotide encoding a second polypeptide having at least 95% identity to SEQ ID NO: 45, wherein the first polypeptide and the second polypeptide are localized to the chloroplast of the plant. In an additional embodiment, the plant further comprises reduced levels or reduced activity of a third polypeptide having at least 95% identity to SEQ ID NO: 3 and reduced levels or reduced activity of a fourth polypeptide having at least 95% identity to SEQ ID NO: 6. Exemplary plants include rice, soybean, potato, cowpea, barley, wheat, and cassava.

[0019] An additional aspect of the present disclosure provides a method for cultivating a plant with increased growth or productivity, comprising introducing into the plant a first heterologous polynucleotide encoding malate synthase and a second heterologous polynucleotide encoding glycolate dehydrogenase, wherein the malate synthase and glycolate dehydrogenase are localized in the chloroplasts of the plant, and the plant has an increased ability to convert glycolate to energy within the chloroplasts, thereby increasing plant growth or productivity. In some embodiments, the method also comprises introducing a genetic modification into the plant, wherein the plant has a reduced ability to transport glycolate from at least a portion of the chloroplasts of the plant. In additional embodiments, the malate synthase is derived from an organism provided herein, including Cucurbita maxima. In a specific embodiment, the malate synthase is at least 95% identical to amino acid residues 41-607 of SEQ ID NO: 43. In a further embodiment, the glycolate dehydrogenase is derived from an organism provided herein, including Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. In specific embodiments, the glycolate dehydrogenase is at least 95% identical to amino acid residues 41-1136 of SEQ ID NO: 45. In particular embodiments, the malate synthase comprises the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 43, and the glycolate dehydrogenase comprises the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 45. In some embodiments, introducing a genetic modification into the plant results in reduced levels, reduced activity, partial loss of activity, or complete loss of activity of one or more endogenous glycolate transport proteins in chloroplasts of the plant. In some embodiments of this methodology, reducing the levels, reduced activity, partial loss of activity, or complete loss of activity of at least one of the one or more endogenous glycolate transport proteins comprises introducing a mutation into an endogenous DNA molecule encoding the endogenous glycolate transport protein.In additional embodiments, reducing the level, reducing the activity, partially losing the activity, or completely losing the activity of at least one of one or more endogenous glycolate transport proteins comprises introducing a heterologous polynucleotide encoding an RNA molecule that inhibits expression of the endogenous glycolate transport protein, e.g., the RNA molecule is at least 95% identical to SEQ ID NO: 46. In specific embodiments, at least one of the one or more endogenous glycolate transport proteins is PLGG1 or BASS6. In some embodiments, at least one of the one or more endogenous glycolate transport proteins has at least 70% sequence identity, at least 75% sequence identity, at least 80% sequence identity, at least 85% sequence identity, or at least 90% sequence identity to SEQ ID NO: 6. In certain embodiments, at least one of the one or more endogenous glycolate transport proteins has at least 95% sequence identity to SEQ ID NO: 6. In other embodiments, at least one of the one or more endogenous glycolate transport proteins has at least 70% sequence identity, at least 75% sequence identity, at least 80% sequence identity, at least 85% sequence identity, or at least 90% sequence identity to SEQ ID NO: 3. In certain embodiments, at least one of the one or more endogenous glycolate transport proteins has at least 95% sequence identity to SEQ ID NO: 3. In specific embodiments, the one or more endogenous glycolate transport proteins are a first glycolate transport protein having at least 95% identity to SEQ ID NO: 6 and a second glycolate transport protein having at least 95% identity to SEQ ID NO: 3. In certain embodiments, the plant is rice, soybean, potato, cowpea, barley, wheat, or cassava.

[0020] INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE All publications, patents, and patent applications mentioned in this specification are herein incorporated by reference to the same extent as if each individual publication, patent, or patent application was specifically and individually indicated to be incorporated by reference.

[0021] The patent application file contains at least one drawing executed in color. Copies of this patent or patent application publication with color drawing(s) will be provided by the Office upon request and payment of the necessary fee.

[0022] The novel features of the present disclosure are set forth with particularity in the appended claims. The features and advantages of the present disclosure will be pointed out in the following detailed description and the accompanying drawings. [Brief explanation of the drawings]

[0023] [Figure 1] Diagram of the photorespiratory C2 cycle. [Figure 2] Photographs of representative bass6 and plgg1 mutants compared to wild-type A. thaliana grown in ambient CO2 (400 ppm CO2 in a growth chamber at 250 μmol m-2 s-1 light intensity and an 8-h light / 16-h dark cycle (22 °C / 18 °C) for 8 weeks). [Figure 3] Photographs of representative bass6 and plgg1 mutants compared to wild-type A. thaliana showing changes in Fv / Fm after 24 hours of low CO2 and constant light. Numbers represent the average of 12 plants from three replicate experiments. [Figure 4A-4B] Figure 4A shows the relative growth rates of bass6-1 and plgg1-1 mutants compared to wild-type A. thaliana at different CO concentrations. In Figure 4A, error bars indicate standard deviation, and asterisks (*) indicate significant differences between CO treatments. Double asterisks (**) indicate significant changes in growth rate between T-DNA lines and the WT. Statistical differences are based on Student's T-test, p<0.05. [Figure 5]Figure 1 shows reduced assimilation (A), internal CO2 concentration (Ci), and stomatal conductance (gs) in A. thaliana mutants lacking Bass6. Photosynthetic measurements were recorded for the indicated lines, assimilation (A), internal CO2 concentration (Ci), and stomatal conductance (gs) at 400 ppm CO2 and saturating light (1000 μmol m-2 s-1). Letters indicate statistical differences based on an ANOVA analysis, N=3. [Figures 6A-6B] Analysis of bass6, plgg1 double mutant A. thaliana, showing additive photorespiratory phenotypic effects. Figure 6A provides photographs showing Fv / Fm changes in growth and chlorophyll fluorescence of representative wild-type, bass6, plgg1, and double mutant bass6, plgg1 plants. The photographs represent the indicated plants grown at 2000 ppm CO2 for 4 weeks, then shifted to ambient CO2 for 5 days. Fv / Fm images show changes in chlorophyll fluorescence due to the formation of chloroplast lesions on the leaves. Images are representative of five replicates. Figure 6B provides a graph showing the extent of chloroplast lesion formation in these plants. The area in cm of leaf lesion size is based on pixel density measured using photo software (Adobe). [Figure 7]Confocal microscopy images of isolated Nicotiana benthamiana protoplasts showing the localization of GFP-tagged PLGG1 (panels D–F) and GFP-tagged BASS6 (panels G–I) to the chloroplast envelope membrane. These images are maximum projections of four consecutive planes, showing that both PLGG1 and BASS6 localize to the chloroplast envelope membrane (arrowheads), where they form stromules (arrowheads marked with stars). All protoplasts also express P19 and mCherry-tagged ER markers (not shown). Scale bar: 10 µm. Panels J–L provide light-sheet images of N. benthamiana leaf tissue transiently expressing Bass6-eGFP expressed from the 35s promoter. Arrows indicate GFP fluorescence not associated with chlorophyll autofluorescence. Arrows marked with stars indicate GFP fluorescence associated with the chlorophyll envelope membrane. Scale bar: 50 µm. In all panels, the GFP signal is shown in green and chloroplast autofluorescence is shown in magenta. [Figure 8A-8B] Analysis of bass6, plgg1 double mutant A. thaliana, showing additive photorespiratory phenotypic effects. Figure 8A is a graph showing the relative growth rate of the indicated Arabidopsis T-DNA lines at either 2000 ppm CO2 (dark gray bars) or 400 ppm CO2 (light gray bars). Error bars indicate standard deviations from at least five plants per three biological replicates. An asterisk (*) indicates a significant difference between CO2 treatments. A double asterisk (**) indicates a significant change in growth rate between the T-DNA line and the WT. Statistical differences are based on a Student's t-test, p<0.05. Figure 8B is a graph of photosynthesis measurements recorded at the indicated CO2 concentrations and saturating light (1000 μmol m-2 s-1) for the indicated lines. Letters indicate significant differences from ANOVA analysis and Tukey's post-hoc test. Error bars indicate standard deviations. [Figure 9]Figure 1 shows a graph depicting the accumulation of various photorespiratory intermediates in A. thaliana wild-type, bass6, plgg1, and double mutant bass6, plgg1 plants grown in elevated CO for 6 weeks. Black bars indicate 2000 ppm CO, and gray bars indicate 150 ppm CO. Numbers on the x-axis represent relative differences in the indicated photorespiratory metabolites based on an internal standard. Error bars indicate standard error of the mean. Letters indicate statistical differences based on ANOVA analysis; N=3. [Figure 10] Figure 1 shows a graph demonstrating the role of BASS6 and PLGG1 in glycolate metabolism in A. thaliana wild-type, bass6, plgg1, and the double mutant bass6, plgg1. The indicated plant lines were grown in elevated CO2 (2000 ppm) for 4 weeks, then shifted to ambient air (400 ppm CO2) for 24 hours. At the end of the 8-hour light cycle, tissues were collected as time 0. Each subsequent time point was sample collection during the dark period. X-axis values ​​represent the relative difference of the indicated photorespiratory metabolite based on an internal standard. Error bars indicate the standard error of the mean. Asterisks indicate statistical differences based on an ANOVA analysis comparing WT control to T-DNA lines; N=3. [Figure 11] Photographs of various yeast strains expressing A. thaliana PLGG1 or BASS6, showing the ability of both proteins to transport glycolate. [Figure 12] 1 is a graph showing the ability of various yeast strains expressing A. thaliana PLGG1 or BASS6 to take up radiolabeled glycolate. Error bars indicate standard deviation, and letters indicate statistical differences based on ANOVA analysis; N=3. [Figure 13]Figure 1: Graphs demonstrating some of the genetic regulatory mechanisms controlling the expression of BASS6 and PLGG1. Bass6 and Plgg1 expression in leaf tissue was determined by qRT-PCR analysis in plgg1-1 and bass6-1 mutants. In the left panel, error bars indicate the standard error of the mean from three biological replicates, each containing three technical replicates. Asterisks indicate significant changes (p<0.05). The relative growth rates of the indicated Arabidopsis transgenic lines are shown in the right panel. Error bars indicate the standard deviation of at least five plants per three biological replicates. Asterisks (*) indicate significant differences between transgenic lines grown under ambient atmospheric conditions. Statistical differences are based on Student's t-test. [Figure 14] Figure 1. Synthetic biology approaches to photorespiratory bypass. Models of three photorespiratory bypass designs. Bypass 1 (orange) uses five genes from the E. coli glycolate pathway: three genes, DEF glycolate dehydrogenase, glyoxylate carboligase, and tartronate semialdehyde reductase, to convert glycolate to glycerate. Bypass 2 (red / purple) utilizes three genes, glycolate oxidase, malate synthase, and catalase to remove hydrogen peroxide produced by glycolate oxidase. Bypass 3 (blue / purple) uses two genes, Chlamydomonas reinhadrtii glycolate dehydrogenase and Cucurbita maxima malate synthase. [Figures 15A-15B] Figure 15A shows representative photographs of 9-day-old transgenic tobacco lines in a fluorescence-based screen for improved photorespiratory bypass by altering Fv' / Fm' after 24 hours of low CO2 and constant illumination. Figure 15B shows the combined values ​​of three bypass construct designs with and without RNAi targeting the glycolate / glycerate transporter PLGG1. Error bars indicate SEM. * indicates a statistical difference compared to WT based on one-way ANOVA P≦0.05. [Figures 16A-16B] Gene expression and protein analysis of bypass3 lines. Figure 16A shows qRT-PCR analysis of two transgenes in bypass3 and the target gene PLGG1 of the RNAi construct. Figure 16B shows Western blot analysis using custom antibodies generated against the indicated target genes. 3 μg of protein was loaded per lane, except for the RbcS control (1.5 μg). Arrows (→) indicate detected proteins based on molecular weight. Error bars show SEM. * indicates statistical difference compared to WT based on one-way ANOVA P≦0.05. [Figures 17A-17B] Gene expression analysis of bypasses 1 and 2. Figure 17A shows qRT-PCR analysis of bypass 1 with the indicated transgenes and native PLGG1 targeted for RNAi: glycolate dehydrogenase subunits D, E, and F (GDH), tartronate semialdehyde reductase (TSR), glyoxylate carboligase (GCL), and plastid glycolate / glycerate transporter (PLGG1). Figure 17B shows qRT-PCR analysis of bypass 2 with the indicated transgenes and native PLGG1 targeted for RNAi: glycolate oxidase (GO), catalase (CAT), and malate synthase (MS). Error bars indicate SEM. [Figures 18A-18B] Figures 18A-18B show stem height and biomass from field trials. Figure 18A is an analysis of stem height based on measurements recorded 7 weeks after germination. Error bars indicate SD, and * indicates significance based on one-way ANOVA N=8. Figure 18B is the percent difference in combined stem, leaf, and total dry weight biomass with and without the PLGG1 RNAi module compared to the WT control. Error bars indicate SEM. * indicates significance based on one-way ANOVA N=8. [Figures 19A-19C]Figures 19A and 19B show photosynthetic efficiencies from field trials. Figure 19A shows the combined photosynthetic apparent quantum efficiency (Φa) of bypass 1, determined by linear regression of assimilation based on the available light response curve and saturation rate of CO2 assimilation at the indicated [CO2]. Figure 19B shows the combined photosynthetic apparent quantum efficiency (Φa) of bypass 2, determined by linear regression of assimilation based on the available light response curve and saturation rate of CO2 assimilation at the indicated [CO2]. Figure 19C shows the combined photosynthetic apparent quantum efficiency (Φa) of bypass 3, determined by linear regression of assimilation based on the available light response curve and saturation rate of CO2 assimilation at the indicated [CO2]. Error bars indicate SEM, and * indicates significance based on one-way ANOVA P≦0.05. [Figures 20A-20D] Figure 20 shows photosynthetic efficiency tested under greenhouse conditions. Figure 20A shows the maximum combined rate of Rubisco carboxylation (Vcmax). Figure 20B shows the maximum combined rate of electron transport (Jmax). The maximum rates of carboxylation and electron transport were modeled from the photosynthetic response under varying CO2 concentrations using the PS-Fit model. Figure 20C shows the combined apparent CO2 compensation point: gamma star (Γ*) calculated using the general intercept method and slope regression. Figure 20D shows CO2 assimilation based on internal [CO2] (Ci). Error bars indicate SEM. * indicates a statistical difference compared to WT based on one-way ANOVA. P values ​​are shown. [Figures 21A-21E]Figures showing plant productivity and photosynthetic efficiency from a 2017 field trial. Figure 21A shows the percent difference in combined leaf (left bar), stem (middle bar), and total (right bar) biomass for bypass 3 with and without the PLGG1 RNAi module compared to the WT control. Letters indicate statistical differences based on two-way ANOVA P≦0.05. Figure 21B shows the combined total accumulated leaf starch for the indicated lines. Figure 21C shows the combined apparent photosynthetic quantum efficiency (Φa) determined by linear regression of assimilation based on available light response curves. Figure 21D shows the combined accumulated CO2 assimilation (A') based on diurnal analysis of photosynthesis. Figure 21E shows the accumulated electrons used for combined electron transport determined from assimilation based on diurnal photosynthesis. Error bars indicate SD, and P values ​​are shown based on ANOVA analysis. [Figure 22] Figure 1 shows that knockdown of PLGG1 by RNAi leads to an increase in Fv' / Fm' after a shift from elevated CO2 to ambient atmosphere. Combined values ​​of five transgenic positive plants expressing only the PLGG1 RNAi module compared to transgene-negative plants derived from the same TO transformation event. Fv' / Fm' was measured 3 days after the shift from elevated CO2 to ambient atmosphere. Error bars indicate standard deviation. [Figure 23] Photorespiratory bypass increases biomass under greenhouse conditions. Percent difference in total dry weight biomass for the indicated plant lines. EV, empty vector; AP1, bypass 1; AP2, bypass 2; AP3, bypass 3. * indicates statistical difference based on one-way ANOVA. Error bars are SEM. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

[0024] Photorespiration is an energy-intensive process that recycles the toxic metabolite 2-phosphoglycolate, a product of the RubisCO oxygenation reaction. The photorespiratory pathway is highly compartmentalized, involving chloroplasts, peroxisomes, cytosol, and mitochondria (Figure 1). While soluble enzymes involved in photorespiration have been well characterized, few membrane transporters involved in photorespiration have been identified to date. Under photorespiratory conditions, Arabidopsis T-DNA insertions targeting the sodium bile acid symporter Bass6 inhibited photosynthesis and resulted in an ambient atmospheric growth phenotype that was rescued in elevated CO2. Additionally, metabolite analysis and genetic complementation of glycolate transport in yeast demonstrated that BASS6 is competent in glycolate transport, consistent with its involvement in photorespiratory export of glycolate from Arabidopsis chloroplasts. A double knockout Arabidopsis line containing Bass6 and the glycolate / glycerate transporter Plgg1 (bass6-1-plgg1-1) resulted in additive developmental defects, increased glycolate accumulation, and reduced photosynthetic rate compared with either single mutation alone. The data indicate that BASS6 is a glycolate transporter localized to the chloroplast inner envelope membrane and that exogenous expression of Bass6 can complement photorespiratory mutant phenotypes. Knowledge of the transporter responsible for glycolate export from chloroplasts in C3 plants is important information for designing strategies to introduce a more energy-efficient photorespiratory pathway and thereby improve photosynthetic efficiency.

[0025] Using multiple potential designs that can bypass photorespiration, computer modeling suggests that optimized expression of non-native genes and flux through the bypass pathway are required to maximize the benefits of cultivating plants under field conditions. Additionally, reducing or closing the native photorespiration pathway would further increase the benefits of expressing a photorespiratory bypass pathway in plants. We hypothesized that using a synthetic biology approach to create a library of gene constructs that simultaneously reduce glycolate transport from chloroplasts and express different photorespiratory bypass strategies could provide insight into the benefits of photorespiratory bypass and be used to engineer elite plant lines that increase crop productivity (Figure 14).

[0026] Thus, also provided herein are plants containing recombinant dsRNA (SEQ ID NO: 46) that result in RNAi knockdown of PLGG1 protein production combined with expression of the bypass pathway. Given the data showing similar results between such lines, either knockdown or knockout lines are expected to function similarly. Thus, in some embodiments, plants lacking functional PLGG1 protein are combined with bypass3 protein (malate synthase and glycolate dehydrogenase from C. reinhardtii) to produce plants with increased photosynthetic efficiency. Other embodiments provide plants that express bypass3 protein and lack functional BASS6 protein. Further contemplated herein are transgenic plants that express bypass3 protein and lack both functional BASS6 protein and functional PLGG1 protein (via knockout or knockdown).

[0027] Preferred embodiments of the present disclosure have been shown and described herein. It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that such embodiments are provided by way of example only. Numerous variations, changes, and substitutions may be devised by those skilled in the art without departing from the present disclosure. Various alternatives to the embodiments of the present disclosure described herein may be used in carrying out the present disclosure. It is intended that the following claims define the scope of the disclosure, and that methods and structures within the scope of these claims and their equivalents be covered thereby.

[0028] Technical and scientific terms used herein have the meanings commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which this disclosure pertains, unless otherwise specified. Various materials and methodologies known to those of ordinary skill in the art are referenced herein. Standard references illustrating the general principles of recombinant DNA technology include Sambrook et al., "Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual," 2nd ed., Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Plainview, NY, 1989; Kaufman et al., eds., "Handbook of Molecular and Cellular Methods in Biology and Medicine," CRC Press, Boca Raton, 1995; and McPherson, ed., "Directed Mutagenesis: A Practical Approach," IRL Press, Oxford, 1991. Standard references teaching the general methodologies and principles of fungal genetics useful in selected embodiments of the present disclosure include Sherman et al., "Laboratory Course Manual Methods in "Yeast Genetics", Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY, 1986; and Guthrie et al., "Guide to Yeast Genetics and Molecular Biology", Academic, New York, 1991.

[0029] Any suitable materials and / or methods known to those skilled in the art can be utilized in carrying out the present disclosure. Materials and / or methods for carrying out the present disclosure are described. Materials, reagents, etc. referred to in the following description and examples are available from commercial sources unless otherwise specified.

[0030] As used in this specification and the claims, the use of the singular forms "a," "an," and "the" includes plural references unless the context clearly dictates otherwise.

[0031] As used herein, the terms isolated, purified, or biologically pure refer to material that is substantially or essentially free from components that normally accompany the referenced material in its natural state.

[0032] The term "about" is defined as plus or minus ten percent of the recited value. For example, about 1.0 g means 0.9 g to 1.1 g and all values ​​within that range, whether specifically indicated or not.

[0033] The term "gene" refers to a DNA sequence involved in producing an RNA or polypeptide or a precursor thereof. The polypeptide or RNA can be encoded by a full-length coding sequence or by intron-interrupted portions of the coding sequence, such as exon sequences.

[0034] The term "primer" refers to an oligonucleotide capable of acting as a point of initiation of synthesis when placed under conditions that initiate primer elongation. Oligonucleotide "primers" may occur naturally, as in a purified restriction digest, or may be produced synthetically.

[0035] A primer is selected to be "substantially complementary" to a specific sequence strand of a template. The primer must be sufficiently complementary to hybridize with the template strand for primer elongation to occur. The primer sequence need not reflect the exact sequence of the template. For example, a non-complementary nucleotide fragment may be attached to the 5' end of the primer such that the remainder of the primer sequence is substantially complementary to the strand. Non-complementary bases or longer sequences may be interspersed within the primer, provided that the primer sequence is sufficiently complementary to the template sequence to hybridize and thereby form a template-primer complex for the synthesis of a primer extension product.

[0036] For purposes of this disclosure, the "sequence identity" of two related nucleotide or amino acid sequences, expressed as a percentage, refers to the number of positions with identical residues in the two optimally aligned sequences (x100) divided by the number of positions compared. Gaps, i.e., positions in the alignment where a residue is present in one sequence but not the other, are considered to be positions with non-identical residues. Alignment of two sequences is performed using the Needleman-Wunsch algorithm (Needleman and Wunsch, J Mol Biol, (1970) 48:3, 443-53). Computer-assisted sequence alignment can be conveniently performed using standard software programs such as GAP, part of the Wisconsin Package Version 10.1 (Genetics Computer Group, Madison, Wisconsin, USA), using a default scoring matrix with a gap creation penalty of 50 and a gap extension penalty of 3.

[0037] The terms "identical" or percent "identity," and grammatical variations thereof, in the context of two or more polynucleotide or polypeptide sequences, refer to two or more sequences or subsequences that are the same or have a specified percentage of nucleotides or amino acids that are the same (respectively) (e.g., 80%, 85% identity, 90% identity, 99%, or 100% identity), when compared and aligned for maximum correspondence over a designated region as determined using a sequence comparison algorithm or by manual alignment and visual inspection.

[0038] The phrases "high percent identical" or "high percent identity," and grammatical variations thereof, in the context of two polynucleotides or polypeptides refer to two or more sequences or subsequences that have at least about 80% identity, at least about 81%, 82%, 83%, 84%, 85%, 86%, 87%, 88%, 89%, 90%, 91%, 92%, 93%, 94%, 95%, 96%, 97%, 98%, 99%, or 100% nucleotide or amino acid identity when compared and aligned for maximum correspondence, as determined using a sequence comparison algorithm or by visual inspection. In an exemplary embodiment, the high percent identity exists over a region of the sequence that is at least about 16 nucleotides or amino acids in length. In another exemplary embodiment, the high percent identity exists over a region of the sequence that is at least about 50 nucleotides or amino acids in length. In yet another exemplary embodiment, the high percent identity exists over a region of the sequence that is at least about 100 nucleotides or amino acids in length. In one exemplary embodiment, the sequences are highly identical over the entire length of the polynucleotide or polypeptide sequence.

[0039] The term "BASS6" and its capitalized and italicized forms refer to plant genes and proteins described herein. In some embodiments, the term may refer to the A. thaliana genes and proteins described herein. In other embodiments, the term may refer to one or more homologs or orthologs of any C3 plant gene and protein. In some embodiments, the term may refer to one or more paralogs of any C3 plant gene and protein. In some embodiments, the C3 plant is rice, soybean, potato, cowpea, barley, wheat, or cassava. SEQ ID NO: 1 provides the genomic sequence of the A. thaliana BASS6 gene. SEQ ID NO: 2 provides the cDNA sequence of the A. thaliana BASS6 gene. SEQ ID NO: 3 provides the A. thaliana Bass6 protein. When all lowercase italics are used, mutant (e.g., knockout) versions of the gene / protein are intended. In A. thaliana, the mutant version may be a single gene / protein. In other C3 plants, the mutant versions may be homologs, orthologs, and / or paralogs of one, some, or all of the genes / proteins.

[0040] The term "PLGG1" and its capitalized and italicized forms refer to plant genes and proteins described herein. In some embodiments, the term may refer to the A. thaliana genes and proteins described herein. In other embodiments, the term may refer to one or more homologs or orthologs of any C3 plant gene and protein. In some embodiments, the term may refer to one or more paralogs of any C3 plant gene and protein. In some embodiments, the C3 plant is rice, soybean, potato, cowpea, barley, wheat, or cassava. SEQ ID NO: 4 provides the A. thaliana genomic sequence of the PLGG1 gene. SEQ ID NO: 5 provides the cDNA sequence of the A. thaliana PLGG1 gene. SEQ ID NO: 6 provides the A. thaliana Plgg1 protein. When all lowercase italics are used, mutant (e.g., knockout) versions of the gene / protein are intended. In A. thaliana, the mutant version may be a single gene / protein. In other C3 plants, the mutant versions may be homologs, orthologs, and / or paralogs of one, some, or all of the genes / proteins. SEQ ID NO: 46 provides a portion of the PLGG1 coding sequence utilized for RNAi knockdown via production of dsRNA in some transgenic plants of the present invention.

[0041] Unless specifically indicated otherwise, the terms "CmMS" or "MS" refer to the Cucurbita maxima malate synthase gene and protein. SEQ ID NO:43 provides the malate synthase protein (amino acid residues 41-607) fused to the Rubisco small subunit signal peptide (amino acid residues 1-40). SEQ ID NO:42 provides the DNA sequence encoding this protein with the signal peptide, used to generate the bypass 3 plants described herein. Variants of these nucleic acid and protein sequences are included, including DNA encoding proteins with 95% or greater identity to SEQ ID NO:43, and proteins utilizing alternative signal peptide sequences.

[0042] The terms "CrGDH" or "GDH" refer to the Chlamydomonas reinhardtii glycolate dehydrogenase gene and protein. SEQ ID NO:45 provides malate synthase (amino acid residues 41-1136) fused to the rubisco small subunit signal peptide (amino acid residues 1-40). SEQ ID NO:44 provides the DNA sequence encoding this protein with the signal peptide, used to generate the bypass 3 plants described herein. Variants of these nucleic acid and protein sequences are included, including DNA encoding proteins with 95% or greater identity to SEQ ID NO:45, and proteins utilizing alternative signal peptide sequences.

[0043] As used herein, the term "bypass" refers to a transgenic enzyme pathway introduced into and expressed by a recombinant plant cell. Three bypass pathways, 1, 2, and 3, are shown in Table 1. These are further detailed in the Examples section below.

[0044] [Table 1]

[0045] " dsRNA " refers to the double-stranded RNA that comprises the sense and antisense portions of selected target genes (or sequences with high sequence identity thereto, so that gene silencing can occur), as well as any smaller double-stranded RNA formed therefrom by RNase or Dicer activity.Such dsRNA may contain portions of single-stranded RNA, but comprises at least 19 nucleotides of double-stranded RNA. In one embodiment of the present disclosure, the dsRNA comprises a hairpin RNA containing a loop or spacer sequence between the sense and antisense sequences of the targeted gene; preferably, such a hairpin RNA spacer region comprises an intron, particularly the rolA gene intron (Pandolfini et al., 2003, BioMedCentral (BMC) Biotechnology 3:7 (www.biomedcentral.com / 1472-6750 / 3 / 7)), the double-oriented intron from pHellsgate 11 or 12 (see WO 02 / 059294 and SEQ ID NOS: 25 and 15 therein), or the pdk intron (Flaveria trinervia pyruvate orthophosphate dikinase intron 2, see WO 99 / 53050). SEQ ID NO: 46 provides the RNA sequence utilized to generate knockdown PLGG1 in some embodiments of the present disclosure.

[0046] The enzyme names provided in Table 1, glycolate carboligase, 2-hydroxy-3-oxopropionate reductase, tartronate semialdehyde reductase, glycolate dehydrogenase subunits D, E, and F, glycolate oxidase, malate synthase, catalase HPII, and glycolate dehydrogenase, refer to the categories of enzymes exemplified by the provided enzymes and sequences. These terms include homologs of these enzymes and enzymes capable of catalyzing the same reactions.

[0047] As used herein, the terms "increase growth" and "increase productivity," and grammatical variations thereof, refer to an increase in the growth rate or size of a plant at a given time, or an enhancement in the photosynthetic efficiency of a genetically modified plant compared to an unmodified plant of the same species.

[0048] molecular biological methods An isolated nucleic acid is a nucleic acid whose structure is not identical to that of any naturally occurring nucleic acid. Thus, the term encompasses, for example, (a) a DNA having the sequence of a portion of a naturally occurring genomic DNA molecule, but which is not adjacent to any coding or non-coding sequence adjacent to that portion of the molecule in the genome of the organism in which it occurs; (b) a nucleic acid that has been integrated into a vector or into the genomic DNA of a prokaryotic or eukaryotic organism in such a way that the resulting molecule is not identical to any naturally occurring vector or genomic DNA; (c) a separate molecule such as a cDNA, a genomic fragment, a fragment produced by polymerase chain reaction (PCR), or a restriction fragment; and (d) a recombinant nucleotide sequence that is part of a hybrid gene, i.e., a gene encoding a fusion protein. Specifically excluded from this definition are (i) DNA molecules, (ii) mixtures of transformed or transfected cells, and (iii) nucleic acids present in a mixture of cell clones, for example, present in a DNA library such as a cDNA or genomic DNA library.

[0049] The term recombinant nucleic acid refers to a polynucleotide produced by the combination of two otherwise separate portions of a sequence achieved by genetic engineering techniques or by chemical synthesis, by the artificial manipulation of isolated portions of polynucleotides so that desired functional polynucleotide portions can be joined together to produce the desired combination of functions.

[0050] In practicing some embodiments of the disclosure disclosed herein, it may be useful to modify the genomic DNA, chloroplast DNA, or mitochondrial DNA of a recombinant strain of host cell to introduce genetic elements that disrupt functional expression of one or more target proteins (e.g., BASS6 or PLGG1) and / or allow expression of the introduced gene. In a preferred embodiment, such a host cell is a plant cell.

[0051] Modifications intended to prevent functional expression of a target protein or to reduce the expression or activity of a target protein can include deletions of all or part of the target gene, including, but not limited to, the open reading frame of the target locus, transcriptional regulators such as the promoter of the target locus, and any other regulatory nucleic acid sequences located 5' or 3' of the open reading frame; mutations of the DNA or gene encoding the target protein, including the insertion of a stop codon prematurely in the open reading frame; and insertions or deletions that shift the reading frame, resulting in premature termination of translation. Such deletion mutations can be achieved using any technique known to those of skill in the art. Reduced levels of a target protein or reduced activity of a target protein can also be achieved by point mutations or insertions in the DNA or gene encoding the target protein. Mutation, insertion, and deletion variants of the disclosed nucleotide sequences and genes can be easily prepared using methods well known to those of skill in the art. Techniques used to achieve reduced levels and / or activity of a target protein can include CRISPR / Cas, TALEN, and zinc-finger nucleases. It is well within the skill of those skilled in the art to generate mutations, insertions, and deletions that are functionally equivalent to those disclosed herein.In addition, such modifications to functional protein production can be achieved through protein "knockdown" approaches, such as RNA interference (RNAi), mediated by double-stranded RNA (dsRNA), siRNA, or other techniques known in the art.The RNA molecule that inhibits the expression of target protein can reduce the expression of the gene encoding that protein, or can reduce the translation of that protein.

[0052] When a recombinant nucleic acid is intended for expression, cloning, or replication of a particular sequence, the DNA construct prepared for introduction into a host cell typically contains a replication system (i.e., a vector) recognized by the host, containing the intended DNA fragment encoding the desired polypeptide, and may also contain transcriptional and translational initiation control sequences operably linked to the polypeptide-encoding portion. In addition, such a construct may contain a cellular localization signal (e.g., a chloroplast localization signal). In a preferred embodiment, such a DNA construct is introduced into the genomic DNA, chloroplast DNA, or mitochondrial DNA of the host cell.

[0053] In some embodiments, a non-integrated expression system can be used to induce the expression of one or more introduced genes.The expression system (expression vector) can include, for example, an origin of replication or an autonomously replicating sequence (ARS), as well as expression control sequences, promoters, enhancers, and necessary processing information sites, such as ribosome binding sites, RNA splice sites, polyadenylation sites, transcription termination sequences, and mRNA stabilization sequences.Optionally, a signal peptide from a secreted polypeptide of the same or related species can also be included to allow the protein to cross and / or remain in the cell membrane, cell wall, or be secreted from the cell.

[0054] The selectable marker useful in carrying out the methodology of the present disclosure disclosed herein can be a positive selectable marker. Typically, positive selection refers to when genetically modified cells can survive in the presence of a toxic substance only when the recombinant polynucleotide of interest is present in the cell. Negative selectable markers and screening markers are also well known in the art and are contemplated by the present disclosure. Those skilled in the art will recognize that any available relevant marker can be used in carrying out the present invention disclosed herein.

[0055] Screening and molecular analysis of the recombinant lines of the present disclosure can be carried out using nucleic acid hybridization techniques. Hybridization procedures are useful for identifying polynucleotides, such as those modified using the techniques described herein, that have sufficient homology to the present control sequences to be useful as taught herein. A specific hybridization technique is not essential to the present disclosure. As hybridization techniques have advanced, they can be readily applied by those of skill in the art. Hybridization probes can be labeled with any suitable label known to those of skill in the art. Hybridization and wash conditions, such as temperature and salt concentration, can be varied to change the stringency of detection. For further guidance on hybridization conditions, see, for example, Sambrook et al. (1989) infra, or Ausubel et al. (1995) Current Protocols in Molecular Biology, John Wiley & Sons, NY, NY.

[0056] In addition, screening and molecular analysis of genetically modified strains and the production of desired isolated nucleic acids can be performed using polymerase chain reaction (PCR). PCR is a repetitive, enzymatic, primed synthesis of nucleic acid sequences. This procedure is well known and commonly used by those skilled in the art (see Mullis, U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,683,195, 4,683,202, and 4,800,159; Saiki et al., (1985) Science 230:1350-1354). PCR is based on the enzymatic amplification of a DNA fragment of interest flanked by two oligonucleotide primers that hybridize to opposite strands of the target sequence. The primers are oriented with their 3' ends pointing toward each other. Repeated cycles of thermal denaturation of the template, annealing of the primers to their complementary sequences, and extension of the annealed primers with DNA polymerase result in the amplification of the segment defined by the 5' ends of the PCR primers. Because the extension product of each primer can serve as a template for other primers, each cycle essentially doubles the amount of DNA template produced in the previous cycle. This results in exponential accumulation of a specific target fragment, up to millions of times over the course of a few hours. By using a thermostable DNA polymerase, such as Taq polymerase isolated from the thermophilic bacterium Thermus aquaticus, the amplification process can be fully automated. Other enzymes that can be used are known to those skilled in the art.

[0057] The nucleic acids and proteins of the present disclosure can also encompass homologs of the specifically disclosed sequences. Homology (e.g., sequence identity) can be 50% to 100%. In some cases, such homology is greater than 80%, greater than 85%, greater than 90%, or greater than 95%. The degree of homology or identity required for any intended use of the sequences is readily identified by one of ordinary skill in the art. As used herein, the percent sequence identity of two nucleic acids is determined using algorithms known in the art, such as those disclosed by Karlin and Altschul (1990) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 87:2264-2268, and modified as in Karlin and Altschul (1993) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90:5873-5877. Such an algorithm has been incorporated into the NBLAST and XBLAST programs of Altschul et al. (1990) J. Mol. Biol. 215:402-410. BLAST nucleotide searches are performed using the NBLAST program, score=100, word length=12, to obtain nucleotide sequences with the desired percent sequence identity. To obtain gapped alignments for comparison purposes, gapped BLAST is used as described in Altschul et al. (1997) Nucl. Acids. Res. 25:3389-3402. When utilizing BLAST and gapped BLAST programs, the default parameters of the respective programs (NBLAST and XBLAST) are used. See www.ncbi.nih.gov.

[0058] Preferred host cells are plant cells.Recombinant host cells in this context are host cells that have been genetically modified to contain isolated nucleic acid molecules, to contain one or more deleted or non-functional genes that are normally present in host cells and functional, or to contain one or more genes that produce at least one recombinant protein.The nucleic acid encoding the protein of the present disclosure can be introduced by any means known in the art that is suitable for specific cell type, including but not limited to, transformation, lipofection, electroporation, or any other methodology known by those skilled in the art.

[0059] Transgenic plants and plant cells (t-DNA and chloroplast expression) One embodiment of the present disclosure provides plants or plant cells containing one or more modified plant genes and / or introduced genes. For example, the present disclosure provides transgenic plants that lack the functional expression of genes encoding the chloroplast-localized transport proteins BASS6 and / or PLGG1. In addition, some plants or plant cells provided herein also express non-native genes, such as enzymes encoded by bacterial, plant, and algae-derived genes. Alternatively, some plants or plant cells provided herein can express native genes such that the produced protein is localized in an organelle (e.g., chloroplast) or other intracellular compartment where it is not naturally located. Expression of other genetic elements (e.g., dsRNA that causes knockdown of PLGG1 protein production) is also contemplated and described herein.

[0060] The transformation and production of genetically modified monocotyledonous and dicotyledonous plant cells are well known in the art.See, for example, Weising et al., Ann.Rev.Genet.22:421-477(1988); U.S. Patent No. 5,679,558; Agrobacterium Protocols, edited by Gartland, Humana Press Inc.(1995); and Wang et al., Acta Hort.461:401-408(1998). The choice of method depends on the type of plant to be transformed, the specific application, and / or the desired result.Suitable transformation techniques can be easily selected by skilled practitioners.

[0061] Any methodology known in the art for deleting, inserting, or altering cellular DNA (e.g., genomic and organellar DNA) can be used in practicing the inventions disclosed herein. For example, a disarmed Ti plasmid containing a genetic construct for target gene deletion or insertion in Agrobacterium tumefaciens can be used to transform plant cells, and transformed plants can then be regenerated from the transformed plant cells using procedures described in the art, for example, in EP 0116718, EP 0270822, PCT Publication WO 84 / 02913, and published European Patent Application ("EP") 0242246. Each Ti plasmid vector contains at least its genes located between the border sequences or to the left of the right border sequence of the T-DNA of the Ti plasmid. Of course, other types of vectors can be used for direct gene transfer (e.g., as described in EP 0233247), pollen-mediated transformation (e.g., as described in EP 0270356, PCT Publication WO 85 / 01856, and U.S. Pat. No. 4,684,611), plant RNA virus-mediated transformation (e.g., as described in EP 0067553 and U.S. Pat. No. 4,407,956), liposome-mediated transformation (e.g., as described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,536,475), and other methods, such as those described in maize (e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 6,140,553; Fromm et al., Bio / Technology (1990) 8, 833-839; Gordon-Kamm et al., The Plant Cell, (1990) 2, 603-618) and rice (Shimamoto et al., Nature, (1989) 338, 274-276; Datta Plant cells can be transformed using procedures such as those for transforming specific lines of plants (Wang et al., Bio / Technology, (1990) 8, 736-740) and for transforming monocotyledonous plants generally (PCT Publication WO 92 / 09696). For the transformation of cotton, the methods described in PCT Patent Publication WO 00 / 71733 can be used.For the transformation of soybean, reference is made to methods known in the art, for example to the methods of Hinchee et al., (Bio / Technology, (1988) 6, 915) and Christou et al., (Trends Biotech, (1990) 8, 145) or WO00 / 42207.

[0062] In some embodiments of the present disclosure, one or more genes are "knocked out" from a host plant cell. Typically, this refers to the deletion of all functional copies of the target gene (e.g., two or more copies, depending on the copy number of the target gene). Any alteration of the native sequence that renders the target gene or allele unable to produce a functional protein is included in the term "knockout." Such alterations include, but are not limited to, missense mutations, nonsense mutations, stop codon mutations, insertion mutations, deletion mutations, frameshift mutations, and splice site mutations.

[0063] The transgenic plants of the present disclosure can be used in conventional plant breeding methods to produce more transgenic plants with the same characteristics, or to introduce genetic modifications into other varieties of the same or related plant species.Seeds obtained from transformed plants preferably contain the genetic modification as a stable insert in chromosomes or organelle DNA.Plants containing genetic modifications according to the present disclosure include plants that contain or are derived from the rootstock of a plant containing the genetic modification of the present disclosure, such as fruit trees or ornamental plants.Therefore, any non-transgenic grafted plant parts inserted onto transformed plants or plant parts are included in the present disclosure.

[0064] The introduced genetic elements, whether in an expression vector or expression cassette, that drive expression of the introduced gene typically utilize a plant-expressible promoter. As used herein, "plant-expressible promoter" refers to a promoter that ensures expression of the genetic modifications of the present disclosure in plant cells.Examples of promoters directing constitutive expression in plants are known in the art and include the strong constitutive 35S promoter ("35S promoter") of the cauliflower mosaic virus (CaMV), e.g., isolate CM 1841 (Gardner et al., Nucleic Acids Res, (1981) 9, 2871-2887), CabbB-S (Franck et al., Cell (1980) 21, 285-294), and CabbB-JI (Hull and Howell, Virology, (1987) 86, 482-493); promoters from the ubiquitin family (e.g., the maize ubiquitin promoter of Christensen et al., Plant Mol Biol, (1992) 18, 675-689), the gos2 promoter (de Pater et al., The Plant J (1992) 2, 834-844), the emu promoter (Last actin promoters such as those described by An et al. (The Plant J, (1996) 10, 107); the rice actin promoter described by Zhang et al. (The Plant Cell, (1991) 3, 1155-1165); the cassava vein mosaic virus promoter (WO97 / 48819, Verdaguer et al. (Plant Mol Biol. (1998) 37, 1055-1067), the pPLEX series of promoters derived from subterranean clover stunt virus (WO 96 / 06932, particularly the S4 or S7 promoter), alcohol dehydrogenase promoters, such as pAdh1S (GenBank accession numbers X04049, X00581), and the TR1' and TR2' promoters (the "TR1' promoter" and "TR2' promoter", respectively) that drive expression of the 1' and 2' genes of the T-DNA (Velten et al., EMBO J. (1984) 3, 2723-2730).

[0065] Alternatively, the plant-expressible promoter may be a tissue-specific promoter, i.e., a promoter that directs higher levels of expression in some cells or tissues of a plant, such as green tissues (e.g., a promoter for PEP carboxylase). The plant PEP carboxylase promoter (Pathirana et al., Plant J, (1997) 12:293-304) has been described as a strong promoter for expression in vascular tissues and is useful in one embodiment of the present disclosure. Alternatively, the plant-expressible promoter may also be a wound-inducible promoter, such as the promoter for the pea cell wall invertase gene (Zhang et al., Plant Physiol, (1996) 112:1111-1117). As used herein, a "wound-inducible" promoter means that upon plant wounding, either mechanically or by insect feeding, expression of a coding sequence under the control of the promoter is significantly increased in such plants. These plant-expressible promoters can be combined with enhancer elements, which can be combined with minimal promoter elements or can contain repeated elements to ensure the desired expression profile.

[0066] In some embodiments, genetic elements that can be used to increase expression in plant cells can be utilized, such as introns at the 5' or 3' end of the introduced gene or within the coding sequence of the introduced gene, e.g., the hsp70 intron. Other such genetic elements include, but are not limited to, promoter-enhancer elements, double or triple promoter regions, 5' leader sequences that are different from another introduced gene or from the endogenous (plant host) gene leader sequence, and 3' trailer sequences that are different from another introduced gene used in the same plant or from the endogenous (plant host) trailer sequence.

[0067] The introduced gene of the present disclosure can be inserted into the host cell DNA such that the inserted gene portion is upstream (i.e., 5') of appropriate 3'-terminal transcriptional regulatory signals (i.e., transcript assembly and polyadenylation signals). This is preferably accomplished by inserting the gene into the plant cell genome (nucleus or chloroplast). Preferred polyadenylation and transcript assembly signals include the nopaline synthase gene signal (Depicker et al., J. Molec Appl Gen, (1982) 1, 561-573), the octopine synthase gene signal (Gielen et al., J. Molec Appl Gen, (1982) 1, 561-573), and the octopine synthase gene signal (Gielen et al., J. Molec Appl Gen, (1982) 1, 561-573), which serve as 3'-untranslated DNA sequences in transformed plant cells. al., EMBO J, (1984) 3:835-845), SCSV or malic enzyme terminator (Schunmann et al., Plant Funct Biol, (2003) 30:453-460), and T-DNA gene 7 (Velten and Schell, Nucleic Acids Res, (1985) 13, 6981-6998).

[0068] Protein homologues It will be understood by those skilled in the art that various homologs of the specific proteins disclosed herein can be targeted for deletion or knockdown approaches or utilized to create bypass pathways. The following are non-limiting, exemplary protein homologs of the specific proteins provided in this disclosure that can be utilized to implement the embodiments disclosed herein.

[0069] BASS6 homologs include the following (species and accession numbers): A. thaliana (NP_567671.1), A. thaliana (CAA16569.1), A. lyrata (XP_002867746.1), Eutrema salsugineum (XP_006413612.1), Capsella rubella (XP_006282633.1), Camelina sativa (XP_010433982.1), Camelina sativa (XP_010448822.1), Arabis alpine (KFK39256.1), and Brassica oleracea var. oleracea (XP_013593377.1), Brassica napus (XP_013737613.1), Brassica rapa (XP_009137288.1), and Raphanus sativus (XP_018484108.1).

[0070] The PLGG1 substrate is one of the (modified and active genes) of:Arabidopsis thaliana(NP_564388.1) and Arabidopsis thaliana (AAM65181.1), Arabidopsis lyrata (XP_020868671.1), Arabidopsis lyrata (EFH69957.1), Capsella rubella (XP_006307262.1), Camelina sativa(XP_010478626.1)、Camelina sativa(XP_010461027.1)、Camelina sativa(XP_010499753.1)、Brassica napus(XP_013733826.1)、Raphanus sativus(XP_018457661.1), Brassica oleracea var.oleracea(XP_013587088.1), Brassica napus(XP_013731498.1), Brassica rapa(XP_009114919.1), Eutrema salsugineum (XP_006415255.1) Brassica oleracea var.oleracea (XP_013587305.1) Brassica napus (XP_022559249.1) Brassica napus (CDY35540.1) Brassica rapa (XP_009145211.1), Raphanus sativus (XP_018486680.1), Arabis alpine (KFK44969.1), Brassica napus (CDY59206.1), Brassica napus (XP_013731491.1), Brassica napus (CDY22583.1), Tarenaya hassleriana (XP_010518925.1), Ricinus communis (XP_002519004.1), Hevea brasiliensis (XP_021652349.1), Citrus sinensis (XP_006471454.1), Brassica napus (XP_022575243.1), and Juglans regia(XP_018843901.1) is available.

[0071] The cucurbitaceae contains one of the products of:Cucurbita maxima(XP_023000792.1) Wing Cucurbit(XP_023519701.1) Fly Cucurbit(XP_022923624.1) Momordica charantia(XP_022137538.1) Cucumber sativus(XP_004152519.1)、Cucumis melo(XP_008439505.1)、Theobroma cacao(EOY22418.1)、Juglans regia(XP_018821986.1)、Eucalyptus grandis (XP_010037447.1), Eucalyptus grandis (KCW49165.1), Herrania umbratica (XP_021286625.1), Theobroma cacao (XP_007037917.2), Arachis duranensis (XP_020997255.1), Gossypium barbadense (PPR87616.1), Prunus avium (XP_021800964.1), Vitis vinifera (XP_002279452.1), Quercus suber (XP_023901530.1), Quercus suber (POF20494.1), Gossypium raimondii (XP_012468378.1), Cephalotus follicularis(GAV68244.1)、Gossypium barbadense(PPD76680.1)、Capsicum baccatum (PHT53703.1), Nicotiana tabacum (XP_016464464.1), Chinese Capsicum (PHU23662.1), Ricinus communis (XP_002511225.1), Capsicum annuum (XP_016563806.1) Gossypium arboretum (XP_017604788.1), Citrus clementina (XP_006440060.1), Medicago truncatula (XP_013444720.1), Durio zibethinus (XP_022737455.1), Trifolium pretense (PNY13237.1), Medicago truncatula (ACJ85740.1), Nicotiana tomentosiformis (XP_009595632.1), Citrus unshiu (GAY51023.1), Prunus mume (XP_008239432.1), Prunus sibirica (AIU64851.1), Prunus persica (XP_020420471.1), Solanum lycopersicum (XP_004236345.1), Parasponia andersonii (PON64176.1), Ricinus communis (NP_001310646.1), Citrus sinensis (XP_006476991.1), Glycine max (NP_001347240.1), Nicotiana attenuate (XP_019261379.1), Daucus carota subsp. Sativus (XP_017250345.1), Aquilegia coerulea (PIA33657.1), Trema orientalis (PON95652.1), Helianthus annuus (XP_022038983.1), Macleaya cordata (OVA17558.1), Nicotiana sylvestris (XP_009776635.1), Jatropha curcas (XP_012079884.1), Lupinus angustifolius (XP_019463065.1), Vigna angularis (XP_017425062.1), Solanum pennellii (XP_015070973.1), Glycine soja (KHN14088.1), Tarenaya hassleriana (XP_010555537.1), Solanum lycopersicum (XP_010319064.1), Solanum tuberosum (XP_006351486.1), Solanum pennellii (XP_015070972.1), Solanum tuberosum (XP_006351485.1), Cicer arietinum (XP_004510708.1), Vigna radiata var.radiate (XP_022639201.1), Lactuca sativa (XP_023732731.1), Populus euphratica (XP_011024067.1), Populus trichocarpa (PNT01248.1), Carica papaya (XP_021909023.1), Cajanus cajan (XP_020216385.1), Nicotiana tabacum (XP_016435566.1), Olea europaea var.sylvestris (XP_022878435.1), Malus domestica (XP_008374272.1), Olea europaea var.sylvestris (XP_022878436.1), Hevea brasiliensis (XP_021681023.1), Morus notabilis (XP_010103099.1), Punica granatum (OWM90581.1), Arabidopsis thaliana (NP_196006.1), Arabidopsis lyrata (XP_002873119.1), Ipomoea nil (XP_019198829.1), Erythranthe guttata(XP_012854673.1)、Eutrema salsugineum(XP_006398845.1)、Camelina sativa(XP_010490879.1)、Sesamum indicum(XP_011073010.1)、Ziziphus jujube(XP_015878765.1)、Brassica rapa(XP_009125524.1)、Fragaria vesca subsp.Vesca(XP_004297548.1)、Camelina sativa(XP_010423656.1)、Glycine max(XP_003525685.1), Capsella rubella(XP_006286626.1), Brassica napus(XP_013720273.1), Raphanus sativus(XP_018468682.1), Brassica napus (CDY14170.1), Arabis alpine (KFK24848.1), Brassica oleracea var.oleracea (XP_013621105.1), Solanum tuberosum (XP_006351487.1), Dorcoceras hygrometricum (KZV21744.1), Corchorus capsularis (OMO84006.1), Manihot esculenta (OAY30724.1), and Brassica napus (CAA73793.1).

[0072] Glycolate hydrogenase homologs include (species and accession numbers): Chlamydomonas reinhardtii (XP_001695381.1), Chlamydomonas reinhardtii (ABG36932.1), Volvox carteri f.nagariensis (XP_002946459.1), Gonium pectoralis (KXZ46746.1), Chlamydomonas eustigma (GAX77289.1), Chlorella variabilis (XP_005852216.1), Coccomyxa subellipsoidea (XP_005648725.1), Micromonas commode (XP_002506446.1), and Auxenochlorella protothecoides (XP_011399156.1), Ostreococcus tauri (XP_003074362.2), Ostreococcus lucimarinus (XP_001415862.1), Ostreococcus tauri (OUS42650.1), Bathycoccus prasinos (XP_007511439.1), Micromonas pusilla (XP_003063153.1), Chrysochromulina sp. (KOO33603.1), and Guillardia theta (XP_005827919.1).

[0073] Having generally described the invention, the invention will be better understood by reference to certain specific examples, which are included herein to further illustrate the invention and are not intended to limit the scope of the invention, which is defined by the claims. [Example]

[0074] material and method Plant materials and growth conditions A. thaliana Columbia (Col-0) was used as a wild-type reference. Salk_03569C (plgg1-1), CS859747 (bass6-1), and Salk_052903C (bass6-2) were obtained from the Arabidopsis Biological Resource Center (abrc.osu.edu). Plants were grown in a growth chamber (Conviron, USA) using LC1 Sunshine Mix under either elevated CO2 (2000 ppm CO2) or ambient CO2 (400 ppm CO2) conditions, with an 8-h light / 16-h dark cycle (22°C / 18°C), 250 μmol m -2 ·s -1 Grown under PAR and 65% relative humidity (RH).

[0075] Chlorophyll fluorescence measurement Arabidopsis plants were grown under ambient atmospheric conditions and transferred to sealed, transparent plastic containers under low CO2 conditions and constant illumination for 24 hours prior to chlorophyll fluorescence measurements, as described previously (Badger et al. 2009). Chlorophyll fluorescence measurements were performed as previously described (Oxborough and Baker, Plant, Cell & Environ. (1997) 20:1473-83; Badger et al., supra). Briefly, after 15 minutes of dark adaptation of 4-week-old plants, Fv / Fm images were acquired using a CF Imager Technologica (www.technologica.co.uk). The maximum flash intensity was 6800 μmol m for 800 ms. -2 ·s -1 For each individual plant, an image value was obtained by detecting colonies within the fluorimager software program defining each location.

[0076] Cloning All expression vectors are listed in Table 2. Promoters and open reading frames were synthesized based on sequences obtained from The Arabidopsis Information Resource (TAIR). Restriction sites and four-base-pair regions of homology were designed according to common syntax in plant synthetic biology (Patron et al., New Phytol. (2015) 208:13-19). Constructs were then assembled using the Golden Gate cloning protocol and subsequently subcloned into a binary vector (EC50505) (Werner et al., Bioengineered (2012) 3:38-43; Engler et al., ACS Synth. Biol. (2014) 3:839-43; Marillonnet and Werner, Glyco-engineering, edited by A. Castilho (Springer New York) 269-84 (2015); Patron et al., supra). For stable transformation, the binary vector was transformed into Agrobacterium tumefaciens C58C1 by electroporation, followed by floral dip transformation into Col-0 wild-type, plgg1-1, or bass6-1 T-DNA insertion lines (Clough and Bent, Plant J. (1998) 16:735-43). Transformed lines were selected based on BASTA resistance, and gene insertion was verified by PCR analysis. For transient expression, constructs driven by the CaMV35s promoter and carrying a C-terminal GFP fusion were designed as described above.

[0077] [Table 2]

[0078] For transient expression studies in isolated protoplasts, the BASS6-GFP construct was cloned as follows: The coding sequence of A. thaliana Bass6 (AT4G22840) along with a C-terminal tag containing mGFP6 (Haseloff, J., Methods Cell Biol. (1999) 58:139-51), 6xHIS, and MYC was synthesized by GENEWIZ Inc. and inserted into a modified gateway-compatible pUC57 plasmid, from which it was recombined into pMDC32. The AtPLGG1-GFP construct was previously published (Rolland et al., Front. Plant Sci. (2016) 7:185).

[0079] Agroinfiltration and microscopic observation of Nicotiana benthamiana Growth and infiltration experiments were performed as described (Rolland et al., supra). Briefly, Agrobacterium tumefaciens GV3101 (pMP90) was transformed with the plasmid of interest and grown in LB medium containing rifampicin (50 μg / ml) and kanamycin (30 μg / ml). Cultures were grown for approximately 24 hours in an incubator at 28–30°C and then used to transform N. benthamiana leaves. Bacteria containing P19 (OD600 = 0.3) were mixed with bacteria containing the plasmid of interest and / or an ER compartment marker (OD600 = 0.5) (plasmid CD3-959 (Nelson et al., 2007) from the Arabidopsis Biological Resource Center (http: / / abrc.osu.edu)). Cells were centrifuged at 2150 x g for 8 minutes, resuspended in 10 mM MES pH 5.6, 10 mM MgCl2, and 150 μM acetosyringone, incubated at room temperature for 2 hours, and infiltrated into 3- to 4-week-old N. benthamiana leaves.

[0080] Protoplast preparation was completed as previously described (Rolland et al., supra). Two days after infiltration, 4 cm of the infiltrated leaves were harvested. 2 The area was excised with a scalpel and transferred to a 5 ml syringe, to which 2 ml of digestion solution was added, and gentle vacuum was applied manually. The infiltration solution and leaf tissue were transferred to a 2 ml Eppendorf tube and incubated at room temperature for 1 h. Leaf debris was removed, and protoplasts were allowed to settle before the solution was replaced with imaging solution (0.4 M mannitol, 20 mM KCl, 20 mM MES pH 5.6, 10 mM CaCl, 0.1% [w / v] BSA).

[0081] Protoplasts were observed and imaged using an upright Zeiss LSM780 confocal laser scanning microscope (Carl Zeiss), a 40x water-immersion objective (NA = 1.1), and the Zen 2011 software package (Carl Zeiss). GFP and chlorophyll were excited at 488 nm and recorded between 499 and 534 nm and between 630 and 735 nm, respectively. In a separate track, mCherry was excited at 561 nm and recorded between 579 and 633 nm (not shown).

[0082] Whole leaf tissue slices from the infiltrated leaves described were visualized using a Lightsheet Z1 (Carl Zeiss INC., Oberkochen, Germany) microscope with a 40x objective (NA = 1.0) and the Zen lightsheet software package (Carl Zeiss). GFP and chlorophyll were excited at 488 nm, and emission spectra were recorded at 505–545 nm and 660 nm, respectively.

[0083] Metabolic profiling For metabolite analysis, approximately 40 mg of fresh leaf tissue was frozen in liquid nitrogen, pulverized, and then extracted with 500 μL of 100% methanol. Samples were then submitted to the Metabolomics Center, Roy J. Carver Biotechnology Center, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, where two additional extractions were performed: isopropanol:acetonitrile:water (3:3:2 v / v) and chloroform:methanol (2:2 v / v). Metabolites were analyzed using a GC-MS system (Agilent Inc., CA, USA) consisting of an Agilent 7890 gas chromatograph, an Agilent 5975 mass-selective detector, and an HP 7683B autosampler. Gas chromatography was performed on a ZB-5MS (60 m × 0.32 mm ID and 0.25 μm film thickness) capillary column (Phenomenex, CA, USA). The inlet and MS interface temperatures were 250 °C, and the ion source temperature was adjusted to 230 °C. 1 μL aliquots were injected with a 10:1 split ratio. Helium carrier gas was maintained at a constant flow rate of 2 ml / min. The temperature program was as follows: isothermal heating at 70 °C for 5 min, followed by a 5 °C / min oven temperature increase to 310 °C, and a final 10 min at 310 °C. The mass spectrometer was operated in positron impact mode (EI) with 69.9 eV ionization energy and a m / z 30–800 scan range. The spectra of all chromatographic peaks were compared with the electron impact mass spectral libraries NIST08 (NIST, MD, USA), W8N08 (Palisade Corporation, NY, USA), and a custom-built database (464 unique metabolites). All known artifacts were identified and removed. To allow comparison between samples, all data were normalized to an internal standard in each chromatogram and sample wet weight. The spectra of all chromatographic peaks were evaluated using the AMDIS 2.71 (NIST, MD, USA) program.Metabolite concentrations were calculated as the concentration relative to the internal standard per gram wet weight (i.e., the peak area of ​​hentriacontanoic acid divided by the peak area of ​​the target compound: N). i =X i *X -1 The instrument variation was within the standard acceptance limit of 5%.

[0084] Photosynthesis measurement The youngest fully expanded leaves of 30-40 day-old Arabidopsis plants grown in elevated CO2 were used for analysis of photosynthesis by gas exchange. Gas exchange measurements were performed using a 2 cm gasket with a gasket leakage correction as outlined in the manual (LI-COR Biosciences, Lincoln, NE, USA). 2 The measurements were performed using a Li-COR 6400XT with a fluorescence measurement head. Leaf temperature was 25 °C and saturating light (1000 μmol m -2 ·s -1 ) at the indicated CO2 concentration, A, g s , and C i After acclimation to ambient CO2, measurements were taken at a range of CO2 (50-2000 ppm) under the same temperature and light conditions as described above. i The curve was measured. c Max , J Max R d , and g s , AC i This was determined using data and the PsFit model (Bernacchi et al., Plant Cell. Environ (2003) 26:1419-1430).

[0085] RT-PCR Under an 8-h / 16-h day / night cycle, 180 μmol·m -2 ·s -1cDNA was generated from RNA extracted from 4-week-old Arabidopsis plants grown in PAR and at 22°C / 18°C temperature conditions with 65% RH using the Plant RNeasy Extraction Kit and Quantitec Reverse Transcription Kit (QIAGEN, USA). Three biological replicates, each with three technical replicates, were used for all samples. Samples were analyzed using a Bio-Rad CFX Connect Real-Time PCR System (Bio-Rad Laboratories, USA), and relative changes in transcripts were determined using the ΔΔCt method with primers directed to the transcripts of violaxanthin de-epoxidase (VDE), Plgg1, and Bass6. cDNA was amplified using SSO Advanced SYBR Green Master Mix (Bio-Rad). Primer sequences are listed in Table 3.

[0086] [Table 3]

[0087] Yeast complementation and glycolate uptake Yeast plasmids were constructed as previously described (South et al., J. Biol. Chem. (2010) 285:595-607). Briefly, RNA was obtained from Col-0 wild-type Arabidopsis and converted to cDNA using the RNeasy extraction kit and the Quantitec reverse transcription kit (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany). The full-length Bass6 and Plgg1 CDS sequences without the chloroplast localization signal (1-24) were amplified by PCR using the primers listed in Table 3. The PCR products were cloned into the pRS415-ADH1 vector (ATCC, VA USA) using the BamHI and XhoI restriction sites. Yeast transformations were performed using the BY4741 mat a wild-type and ady2Δ strains (GE Dharmacon) as previously described (South et al., supra; South et al., Proc. Nat'l Acad. Sci. USA (2013) 110:E1016-E1025).

[0088] Complementation of the ady2Δ strain was performed by comparative growth analysis using glycolate as the carbon source. Wild-type and ady2Δ strains transformed with expression plasmids for Bass6, Plgg1, or empty vector were grown at an OD of between 0.6 and 0.8 in 50 mL cultures in synthetic complete medium lacking leucine (SC-Leu). 600 The cells were grown until they reached an optical density of 0.1, after which they were washed twice in water and resuspended in water. Spot assays were performed on SC-Leu plates containing 2% glucose, lactate, or glycolate as the carbon source. 600 Five 5-μL spots were dropped onto the plates using five 10-fold serial dilutions starting from 1. The plates were then incubated at 30° C. Photographs of the plates were taken on days 1 (glucose), 2 (lactate), and 7 (glycolate).

[0089] Glycolic acid uptake measurements were performed using a previously described method for glycerol uptake (Oliveira Yeast strains were cultured at 30°C in SC-Leu at an OD of between 0.6 and 0.8 in 50 mL cultures. 600 The cells were grown until they reached an optical density of 1000 μg / ml. The cells were harvested, washed twice with water, and resuspended in 100 mM Tris / citrate buffer pH 5.0 at a concentration of 30 mg / ml dry weight. After a 2-minute incubation at 25°C, the concentration was 50 mCi / mmol (3.7*10 3 [Bq]Total)[ 14 The reaction was initiated by the addition of 150 μL of (SC-Leu / glycolate) containing 1 μL of aqueous solution of [C]-glycolic acid (American Radiolabeled Chemicals, MO USA). After 10 min, the reaction was stopped by the addition of 5 mL of ice-cold water. The reaction mixture was then filtered through a glass fiber filter (Fisher Scientific USA) and washed three times with 5 mL of ice-cold water. 14 C]-glycolate uptake was measured by scintillation using filters and 4 mL of scintillation fluid (RPI Bio-safe II) using a Packard Tri-Carb liquid scintillation counter (Perkin Elmer USA).

[0090] statistical analysis All experiments had at least three biological replicates, and data represent the mean values. Relative growth analyses and relative changes in mRNA levels include standard deviations and significance using Student's T-tests. Metabolite analyses and photosynthesis measurements were analyzed by either one-way ANOVA (genotype) or two-way ANOVA (genotype by CO2 treatment) with a significance threshold of P < 0.05. All ANOVAs were followed by Tukey's post-hoc test and were determined using statistical software (OriginPro 9.1, OriginLab, MA USA). [Example]

[0091] Analysis of Arabidopsis bass6 mutant phenotypes Two independent T-DNA insertion lines targeting the gene At4g22840, which is defective in expression of the putative chloroplast inner membrane protein BASS6, were analyzed. To determine whether BASS6 is involved in photorespiration, the two T-DNA lines (bass6-1 and bass6-2) were grown under ambient CO2 (400 ppm) conditions. Compared to the wild-type control, both bass6 mutant lines exhibited smaller rosette size, similar to the glycolate / glycerate transporter mutant plgg1-1, which is involved in photorespiration (Figure 2). Ambient CO2 (400 ppm CO2) was grown in a growth chamber for 8 weeks under an 8-hour light / 16-hour dark cycle (22°C / 18°C) with 250 μmol m O. -2 ·s -1 Representative photographs of bass6 and plgg1 mutants grown under different light intensities (i.e., 125 ppm CO2) compared with the wild-type (WT). Illumination of photorespiratory mutants under low CO2 resulted in a decrease in dark-adapted Fv / Fm chlorophyll fluorescence, which may be due to photodamage to photosystem II (Badger et al., supra). Both plgg1-1 and bass6-1 lines showed a significant decrease in Fv / Fm compared to the wild-type after 24 h under constant illumination, whereas no decrease in Fv / Fm was observed before low CO2 treatment (Figure 3). To verify the photorespiratory mutant phenotype, growth analysis of the bass6-1 mutant was performed under low CO2, ambient CO2, and elevated CO2. Consistent with the classic photorespiratory mutant phenotype, neither bass6-1 nor plgg1-1 mutants grew at 125 ppm CO2 (Figure 4B). Under ambient CO2 conditions, both the bass6-1 and plgg1-1 T-DNA lines exhibited a slow growth phenotype compared to the wild-type control (Figures 4A and 4B). Importantly, the slow growth phenotype was restored to the wild-type phenotype in both the bass6-1 and plgg1-1 mutants when grown under elevated [CO2] conditions (Figures 4A and 4B).

[0092] Mutants in the photorespiratory pathway often require high levels of CO2 for wild-type or near-wild-type growth, a condition in which RubisCO oxygenation is suppressed to very low levels (Timm and Bauwe, supra). At ambient [CO2], photorespiratory mutants generally require high levels of CO2 for carbon assimilation (A), RubisCO V, and ATP. c max , and J. max The photosynthesis rate was reduced, characterized by a decrease in the parameters of . Similar to previous reports (Pick et al., supra; Walker et al., Photosyn Res. (2016) 129:93-103), plgg1-1 plants exhibited a lower photosynthetic rate compared to the wild type (Figure 5). bass6-1 plants also exhibited a slight decrease in photosynthesis at ambient [CO2] and internal CO2 concentrations (C) compared to the WT. i ) and stomatal conductance (g s ) showed no detectable changes (Fig. 5). To evaluate the biochemical limitations on photosynthesis in the bass6-1 and plgg1-1 lines, intracellular [CO2] (C i ) were examined for carbon assimilation (A). Consistent with the single-point photosynthesis measurements, both bass6-1 and plgg1-1 showed a significant increase in V c max and J. max The values ​​were decreased (Table 3). For Table 4, letters indicate statistical differences based on ANOVA analysis p≦0.5. c Max is the maximum carboxylation rate allowed by Rubisco; J Maxhs is the maximum rate of photosynthetic electron transport; R d is the day breathing;g s is stomatal conductance. The reduction in photosynthetic rate in the bass6-1 line was not the same as in the plgg1-1 mutant, consistent with the comparison of rosette size and growth rate between bass6-1 and plgg1-1 mutant plants (compare Figures 2 and 4A with Figure 5 and Table 4).

[0093] [Table 4]

[0094] Previous characterization of plgg1-1 showed that plgg1-1 mutants developed chloroplast lesions in their leaves when grown at elevated CO2 levels and then shifted to ambient air (Pick et al., supra). Using chlorophyll fluorescence Fv / Fm detection, chloroplast lesions were detectable after 3 days in ambient air conditions. Consistent with previous studies, plgg1-1 mutants developed lesions on their leaves after shifting to ambient air (Figure 6A). While bass6-1 mutants alone did not develop observable chloroplast lesions in their leaves after shifting to ambient CO2 on day 3, or even as long as day 7, after transfer (Figure 6A), the homozygous F3 generation of a bass6-1 x plgg1-1 cross developed more severe chloroplast lesions than plgg1-1 lines alone, consistent with an additive photorespiration mutant phenotype (Figures 6A and 6B). The observation of a doubling of chloroplast lesion severity in the bass6, plgg1 double mutant led us to hypothesize that there would also be additive developmental abnormalities and a further reduction in photosynthetic rate. As expected, the growth phenotype observed in the F3 double mutant plants showed a further reduction, and the reduction in photosynthetic rate appears to be additive when both PLGG1 and BASS6 function are lost (Figures 8A and 8B). [Example]

[0095] BASS6 protein localizes to the chloroplast envelope membrane Previous studies have suggested that the BASS6 protein is localized to the chloroplast envelope membrane, but subcellular location prediction programs more strongly supported the mitochondrial localization of BASS6 (Gigolashvili et al., supra). To determine the localization of the BASS6 protein, transient expression of a BASS6-GFP fusion protein was analyzed in both protoplasts and whole leaf tissue in Nicotiana benthamiana. Chlorophyll autofluorescence was used to identify chloroplasts (Figure 7, panels B, E, H, and K). The BASS6-GFP signal surrounded chloroplast autofluorescence (Figure 7, panels G-I), similar to that of the known glycolate / glycerate transporter PLGG1 (Figure 7, panels D-F), indicating that BASS6 is localized to the chloroplast envelope membrane. Furthermore, expression of either BASS6-GFP or PLGG1-GFP induced the formation of stromules (arrowheads with stars in Figure 7, panels D–I), whose shape is typical of proteins localized to the chloroplast inner envelope (Breuers et al., Frontiers Plant Sci., (2012) 3:7). Light-sheet microscopy experiments from whole leaf tissue also showed localization to the chloroplast envelope and additional non-chloroplast regions, which may have been due to transient overexpression (Figure 7, panels J–L). As an additional control, a GFP control protein was compared with BASS6-GFP, demonstrating that BASS6 does not localize to the cytosol. [Example]

[0096] Analysis of bass6-1 metabolite profile When RubisCO2 oxygenation rates are substantial, mutant plants defective in photorespiration accumulate various metabolite intermediates in the photorespiratory pathway. To help identify the transport step of BASS6 in the photorespiratory pathway, we analyzed metabolite profiles in leaf tissue exposed to either high (2000 ppm) or low (150 ppm) [CO2]. Compared to wild-type controls under high [CO2] conditions, the bass6-1 line showed an increase in the amino acid serine, while the previously reported plgg1-1 line accumulated multiple photorespiratory intermediates, such as glycolate, glycine, and glycerate, even at high CO2 concentrations (Figure 9). When leaves were exposed to low levels of CO2 to increase the RubisCO2 oxygenation rate, the levels of glycine and glycolate in bass6-1 were significantly increased compared to the wild type (Figure 9). In comparison, bass6-1 accumulated similar glycine levels to plgg1-1 plants when leaves were exposed to low levels of CO2 (Figure 9).

[0097] To determine whether the combined deficiency of BASS6 and PLGG1 results in an additive increase in the levels of photorespiratory intermediates, homozygous F3 crosses between the plgg1-1 and bas6-1 lines were compared with the wild type and each single mutant. The F3 double mutant exhibited a significant increase in glycolate accumulation compared to the wild type and single mutant lines, as well as an increase in other intermediates, such as glycerate, similar to the plgg1-1 single mutant (Figure 9). Metabolite profile data indicate that loss of BASS6 function can result in the accumulation of photorespiratory metabolites. In addition, loss of both BASS6 and PLGG1 function results in a further increase in glycolate accumulation. The accumulation of photorespiratory metabolites upon exposure to low CO2 conditions is consistent with the slow growth phenotype and the role of BASS6 in photorespiratory metabolism.

[0098] Photorespiration is a light-dependent pathway. Metabolite analysis of plgg1-1 Arabidopsis lines showed light-dependent accumulation of glycolate, glycine, serine, and glycerate, consistent with impaired both glycolate export and glycerate import in chloroplasts (Pick et al., supra). During the night under ambient air, glycolate and glycine levels in the plgg1-1 mutant returned to wild-type levels, with a significant reduction in glycerate (Pick et al., supra). To determine changes in glycolate, glycerate, and glycine levels in bass6-1 plants and F3 double mutant plants compared to wild-type and plgg1-1, metabolite analysis was performed immediately after the light-to-dark transition at the end of the growth photoperiod after a shift from elevated [CO2] to ambient air. The plgg1-1 mutant exhibits reduced glycolate levels after the end of the light period (Figure 10). Metabolite profiles of bass6-1 plants showed the accumulation of glycolate and glycerate at the end of the light period, which significantly decreased within 10 min (Figure 10). Glycolate accumulation was significantly increased in the F3-bass6, plgg1 double mutant compared with plgg1-1 plants, whereas glycine and glycerate levels in the F3 mutant were very similar to those in the plgg1-1 mutant. These findings, combined with the localization of BASS6 to the chloroplast inner envelope membrane, strongly suggest that PLGG1 and BASS6 are both responsible for the export of glycolate from chloroplasts. [Example]

[0099] BASS6 and PLGG1 rescue yeast growth on glycolate as a carbon source Although there are no known glycolate transporters in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the acetate transporter ADY2 is homologous to Escherichia coli yjcG, which is known to transport both acetate and glycolate (Gimenez et al., J. Bacteriol., (2003) 185:6448-55). Therefore, we constructed yeast vectors expressing both BASS6 and PLGG1 and expressed them in both wild-type BY4741 and an isogenic ady2Δ strain. Spot assays measuring growth demonstrated that the ady2Δ strain expressing only the empty vector was unable to grow on glycolate as the sole carbon source (Figure 11). As expected, expression of PLGG1 in the ady2Δ yeast strain rescued growth back to wild-type levels using glycolate as the sole carbon source (Figure 11). Expression of the Bass6 gene also rescued growth in the ady2Δ strain, providing evidence that BASS6 can complement glycolate transport (Figure 11). Controls using glucose and lactate as carbon sources indicate that expression of BASS6 and PLGG1 in yeast does not negatively affect growth and that the ady2Δ strain can utilize both carbon sources (Figure 11).

[0100] Based on the observation that BASS6 and PLGG1 can complement yeast for growth on glycolate, we sought to determine the transport capabilities of both proteins. To test the transport properties of BASS6 and PLGG1 expressed in yeast, we performed 14 An uptake experiment using [C]-glycolic acid was carried out. 14C]-glycolate was incubated for 10 min before quenching and scintillation counting. Expression of PLGG1 protein showed an increased ability to uptake glycolate in both wild-type and ady2Δ strains, as did expression of BASS6 protein (Figure S12). The data indicate that both BASS6 and PLGG1 expressed in yeast promote transmembrane glycolate transport, leading to growth rescue in the glycolate uptake-deficient ady2Δ mutant (Figure S12). [Example]

[0101] Effects on gene expression Deletion of either Bass6 or Plgg1 in Arabidopsis resulted in a photorespiratory mutant phenotype with reduced growth rate compared to the wild type in ambient or lower CO2 atmospheres (Figure 2). Additionally, double mutant plants lacking expression of BASS6 and PLGG1 exhibited even reduced plant growth potential (Figure 6A). Although deletion of either BASS6 or PLGG1 resulted in a photorespiratory phenotype, neither T-DNA insertion line was lethal when grown in ambient air, as has been observed for numerous other photorespiratory mutants. This could be due to redundancy in the transport process and complementation of the loss of one gene by increased expression of another. To test whether deletion of Bass6 or Plgg1 resulted in altered expression of other genes, real-time PCR (RT-PCR) experiments were performed. There was no detectable difference in Bass6 expression in the plgg1-1 line compared to the wild type (Figure 13). However, Plgg1 expression was increased 4.8-fold in the bass6-1 line relative to the wild type, suggesting that Plgg1 expression was significantly increased to complement the metabolic changes caused by the loss of BASS6 (Figure 13). After determining that Plgg1 expression was increased in bass6-1 plants, we hypothesized that altered Plgg1 expression was the reason for the less severe phenotype observed in bass6-1 compared to plgg1-1. This led us to test whether expression of either Bass6 or Plgg1 could potentially complement the slow growth phenotype of each single mutant.

[0102] To exclude the possibility that either the plgg1-1 or bass6-1 phenotypes were due to separate mutations, Plgg1 and Bass6 were also transformed into the plgg1-1 and bass6-1 lines under the control of their native promoters. Expression of Bass6 under the control of its own promoter or the Plgg1 promoter rescued the growth rate phenotype in the bass6-1 line, confirming that BASS6 deficiency was the cause of the photorespiratory phenotype (Figure 13). In addition, expression of Plgg1 under the control of its own promoter rescued the photorespiratory phenotype (Figure 13). However, transformation of a Plgg1 expression plasmid into the bass6-1 line did not result in a significant change in growth rate compared to the bass6-1 mutant (Figure 13). This may be due to the fact that excessive expression of PLGG1 can have a negative effect on plant growth and that expression of the endogenous Plgg1 gene is already increased compared to the wild type (Yang et al., supra; Figure 13). Intriguingly, expression of Bass6 under the control of its native promoter slightly increased the growth rate of the plgg1-1 line compared to the empty vector but did not completely rescue it back to wild-type levels (Figure 13). [Example]

[0103] Enhancing glycolic acid flux through a synthetic bypass pathway to increase plant growth and yield plant material Nicotiana tabacum cv "Petite Havana" was transformed using Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation using standard methodologies (Glowacka et al., Plant Cell Environ., (2016) 39:908-17), and 18 binary plasmids were constructed as described and listed in Table 5: (TSR) tartronate semialdehyde reductase, (Spm) maize suppressor-mutator transposable element promoter ... The following abbreviations are used in the table: (RbcS) Rubisco small subunit promoter and signal peptide, (Ocs) Agrobacterium opine synthase, (GdD) E. coli glycolate dehydrogenase subunit D, (Act2) Actin 2 promoter and terminator, (35s) ​​Cauliflower mosaic virus 35s promoter and terminator, (Pgm) phosphoglucomutase signal peptide, (GdE) E. coli glycolate dehydrogenase subunit E, (GdF) E. coli glycolate dehydrogenase subunit F, (Gcl) glyoxylate carboligase, (GO) glycolate oxidase, (MS) malate synthase, (Cat) catalase, (Nos) Agrobacterium nopine synthase promoter and terminator, (2x35S) dual 35s promoter, and (Ubi) ubiquitin promoter.

[0104] As previously reported (Kebeish et al., Nat. Biotechnol. (2007) 25:593-99; Maier et al., Front. Plant Sci., (2012)), the bypass pathway 1 gene was derived from E. coli, and the bypass pathway 2 gene was derived from plant and E. coli sources. We developed a different pathway, bypass pathway 3, that utilizes the Chlamydomonas reinhardtii-derived gene for glycolate dehydrogenase (SEQ ID NO: 44) and the Cucurbita maxima-derived gene for malate synthase (SEQ ID NO: 42). Using these genes, we developed an RNAi module targeting the plastid glycolate / glycerate transporter PLGG1 from A. thaliana, designed using a 300-bp exon sequence (SEQ ID NO: 46) extracted from the Sol Genomics Network (solgenomics.net). All binary plasmids contained the BASTA resistance (bar) gene as a selectable marker for plant transformation. A minimum of 10 independent T0 transformations were generated to produce T1 progeny. T-DNA copy number was determined on T1 either by digital droplet PCR analysis or through qRT-PCR analysis (iDNA genetics, Norwich, UK). From these results, a minimum of five independent transformation events were selected and self-pollinated to produce T2 progeny. Copy number analysis was again performed to verify single-insert homozygous lines for each transformation event.

[0105] [Table 5] JPEG2026041908000007.jpg138159 JPEG2026041908000008.jpg48159

[0106] Chlorophyll fluorescence measurement Tobacco seeds were grown in a controlled environment chamber (Environmental Growth Chambers, Chagrin Falls, Ohio, USA) under a 14-h day (25°C) / 10-h night (22°C) and 500 μmol m -2 s -1 Seedlings were germinated on Murashige-Sukuk (MS) plates containing essential vitamins under ambient air at a light intensity of 1200 μmol m 24 h. Eight days after germination, seedling plates were transferred to a custom-built low CO chamber in a controlled-environment growth chamber. Light levels were maintained at 1200 μmol m 24 h. -2 s -1 The CO2 concentration was maintained below 35 μbar. Fv' / Fm' was determined on each plate using a CF Imager Technologica (www.technologica.co.uk). The maximum flash intensity was 6800 μmol m for 800 ms. -2 s -1 Image values ​​were obtained for each individual plant by detecting colonies within the fluorimager software program, defining each location, as previously described (South et al., Plant Cell (2017) 29:808-823; Badger et al., Funct. Plant Biol. (2009) 36:867-73; Schmidt & Delaney, Mol. Genet. Genomics (2010) 283:233-41).

[0107] Gene expression and protein detection Plants were grown under greenhouse or field conditions as described below. Five leaf discs were harvested from three plants per line (2.9 cm 2(approximately 100 mg). RNA and protein were extracted from the same leaf samples using the NucleoSpin RNA / Protein Kit (Macherey-Nagel GmbH & Co. KG, Düren, Germany). cDNA was generated from the extracted RNA using the Quantinova Reverse Transcriptase Kit (QIAGEN, USA). A minimum of three biological replicates, each with three technical replicates, were used for all samples. Gene expression was analyzed using a Bio-Rad CFX connect real-time PCR system (Bio-Rad Laboratories, USA). Relative changes in transcripts were determined using the ΔΔCt method with primers directed to the transgene transcripts and the L25 gene as a standard control gene (Brooks and Farquhar, Planta (1985) 165:397-406). cDNA was amplified using SSO advanced SYBR green master mix (Bio-Rad) and the primer sequences listed in Table 6.

[0108] [Table 6]

[0109] Total protein from bypass 3 or from frozen leaf material ground in liquid nitrogen and resuspended in lysis buffer (50 mM Hepes pH 7.6, 300 mM sucrose, 2 mM MgCl) supplemented with a plant protease inhibitor cocktail (Sigma-Aldrich) was extracted using the Nucleospin protein / RNA kit described above. Protein was quantified using a protein quantification assay (Macherey-Nagel GmbH & Co. KG, Düren, Germany). 3 μg of protein was loaded per lane and separated by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE). PAGE gels were transferred to PVDF membranes (Immobilon-P, Millipore, USA) using a Bio-Rad semi-dry transfer system. After blocking in 6% milk in TBS-T, the membrane was incubated with custom antibodies raised against malate synthase (MS) and PLGG1 (Agrisera, Vannas, Sweden) and glycolate dehydrogenase (GDH) (Genscript, USA). As a protein loading control, a commercially available antibody raised against the large subunit of Rubisco (RbcL) was used (Agrisera, Vannas, Sweden). After subsequent washing and incubation with an anti-rabbit secondary antibody (Bio-Rad, USA), chemiluminescence was detected using an ImageQuant LAS4010 scanner (GE Healthcare Life Sciences, Pittsburgh, USA).

[0110] Growth analysis (greenhouse) To determine whether the three bypasses of photorespiration resulted in increased growth potential and growth rate, stem height and dry weight biomass were determined. Single-insert T2 seeds were germinated on LC1 sunshine mix (Sun Gro 202 Horticulture, Agawam, MA, USA). Ten days after germination, seedlings were transferred to 4 L pots (400°C, Hummert International, Earth City, MO, USA) containing LC1 sunshine mix supplemented with slow-release fertilizer (Osmocote Plus 15 / 9 / 12, The Scotts Company LLC, Marysville, OH, USA). Pots were randomized within the greenhouse and repositioned before each watering. Light intensity within the greenhouse was measured using a quantum sensor (LI-190R, LI-COR, Lincoln, Nebraska, USA). Air temperature, relative humidity, and [CO2] were measured using a combined temperature and humidity sensor (HMP60-L, Vaisala Oyj, Helsinki, Finland) and an infrared gas analyzer (SBA-5, PPsystems, Amesbury, MA, USA). All climate data were recorded using a data logger (CR1000, Campbell Scientific Inc, Logan, UT, USA). The greenhouse growth conditions used were similar to those previously reported in the literature (Kromdijk et al., supra). Aboveground biomass was harvested 7 weeks after determining stem height, allowed to dry for 2 weeks, and dry weight was determined for each fraction.

[0111] 2016 field experiment As a proof-of-concept experiment, the effectiveness of each photorespiratory bypass design was evaluated under field conditions in central Illinois for the 2016 season. Five independent transformation events from bypass 3, four from bypass 1, and only two independent transformations from bypass 2, due to their poor performance compared to the WT, were planted in a randomized block design along with two wild-type (WT) and two empty vector (EV) controls. Homozygous single-insert T2 seeds were germinated on May 14, 2016, in pots containing soil mix (Sun Gro 202 Horticulture, Agawam, MA, USA), grown for 7 days, and then transferred to flotation trays, as previously described (Kromdijk et al., Science (2016) 354:857-61). Plants were transplanted to the University of Illinois Energy Farm field station (40.11°N, 88.21°W, Urbana, IL, USA) on June 6, 2016, after the field was prepared as described (Kromdijk et al., supra). Each block was 6 × 6, spaced 30 cm apart. The inner 16 plants per block were the indicated transgenic plant line surrounded by WT borders. Two additional rows of WT plants surrounded the experiment. Irrigation was provided as needed from six water towers placed within the plots. Weather data, including light intensity, air temperature, and precipitation, were measured for the 2016 field season as described (data not shown).

[0112] Photosynthetic apparent quantum efficiency (Φa), including light saturation levels of photosynthesis at ambient 400 μbar and low 100 μbar CO2 concentrations, was measured in the youngest fully expanded leaves 14–20 days after transplanting to the field. Φa was determined from assimilation measurements in response to light levels at the indicated [CO2]. Gas exchange measurements were performed using a 2 cm (1 / 2 in) irradiated ... 2CO2 assimilation measurements were performed using a LI-COR 6400XT with a fluorometric cuvette. CO2 assimilation measurements were performed at 1200, 380, 120, 65, 40, 30, 25, 18, and 10 μmol m -2 ·s -1 The experiment was carried out at different light intensities, and assimilation was recorded after a minimum of 120 seconds at each light level. Φa was calculated from the slope of the initial response of assimilation at low light levels. The saturation level of assimilation (A sat ) at the indicated [CO2] of 1200 μmol m -2 ·s -1 The aboveground biomass was determined from measurements. Stem height, leaf and stem biomass were determined for eight plants per plot at 7 weeks after planting. After assessing stem height, the aboveground biomass was harvested and separated into leaf and stem fractions. The plant material was allowed to dry for a minimum of two weeks before biomass measurements.

[0113] 2017 field experiment To obtain a more accurate assessment of the effect of bypass3 on plant productivity under agricultural conditions, a repeated randomized block design was used in the 2017 field season. Field plots consisted of five replicate blocks with seven randomized 6 × 6 plots per block. The central 16 plants were either the transgenic line being tested or WT, surrounded by WT border plants. The entire 35 plots were surrounded by an additional row of WT as border plants. Single-insert homozygous lines from the same crop season were transgenic with LC1 sunshine. Seedlings were sown on a 100% sown mix and allowed to germinate for 7 days. After 7 days, seedlings were transplanted to floating trays as described above. 14 days after transplanting to floating trays, plants were transplanted to the Energy farm field station at the University of Illinois, Urbana, IL, USA, on June 21, 2017. Irrigation was provided as needed using parallel drip irrigation (drip lines). Weather data, including light intensity, air temperature, and precipitation, were recorded for the 2017 field season. Photosynthetic measurements to determine Φa were performed from July 2 to 5, 2017, along with photosynthetic pigment collection in the youngest fully expanded leaves during the same period.

[0114] Φa was performed as previously described (Kromdijk et al., supra). Briefly, gas exchange measurements were performed using 2 cm 2 Measurements of CO2 assimilation responses to light were performed using a LI-COR 6400XT with a fluorometric cuvette. Measurements were performed at pre-dawn light levels of 0, 10, 18, 25, 30, 40, 65, 120, 380, 1200, and 2000 μmol mol. -1 The light intensity was 1000 s. Diurnal photosynthesis measurements were conducted on July 14, starting before dawn, with measurements every 2 hours for two plants per block. Light levels and temperature were determined prior to measurements based on incident light levels using the PAR sensor on the LI-COR 6400 and the built-in temperature sensor. CO2 concentrations were maintained at 400 ppm. Diurnal measurements continued until after dusk. 49 days after germination, eight plants per plot were harvested from all five replicate blocks. Aboveground biomass was separated into leaf and stem fractions and allowed to dry for two weeks before biomass measurements. For starch analysis, 10 mg of leaf material collected on July 14 was frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at -80°C until processing. Starch was assayed using the Enzychrom Starch Assay Kit (bioassay systems, Hayward, CA, USA). Colorimetric measurements were performed in a Biotek synergy HT plate reader (Biotek Winooski, VT, USA).

[0115] Gas exchange To determine the net photosynthetic assimilation rate from CO2 dose responses, the fifth basal leaf of 7-week-old N. tabacum plants was clamped into a fluorescence cuvette in a LI-COR 6800 infrared gas analyzer (Li-Cor Biosciences, Lincoln, NE, USA) under controlled leaf temperature of 25°C and light intensity of 1500 μmol m . -2 s -1 The leaves were then exposed to 400 μmol mol to reach a steady state. -1The CO2 concentrations in the response curve were 400, 200, 100, 50, 30, 400, 600, 800, 1000, 1500, and 2000 μmol mol -1 The maximum rate of carboxylation (V cmax ), maximum electron transport rate (J max ), and a model of leaf photosynthesis with temperature correction assuming infinite mesophyll conductance from the collected CO response curves was used to determine mitochondrial respiration rates. * and R d Measurements were performed using the general crossover method, and gas exchange was performed using a LI-COR 6800 (LI-COR Biosciences) using a fluorescent chamber. * was measured using the general crossover method by measuring the CO2 response of photosynthesis under various subsaturating irradiances. i * and R d To generate more accurate and consistent values ​​of CO2, slope-intercept regression was used to determine CO2 (Walker et al., Plant Cell Environ. (2016) 39:1198-1203). Plants were grown at 150 μBar CO2 and 250 μmol m 2 CO2 until photosynthesis reached steady state. -2 s -1 They were acclimated under light and maintained at 250, 165, 120, 80, and 50 μmol m at 150, 120, 90, 70, 50, and 30 μBar CO . -2 s -1 As previously reported (Walker et al., supra), the x-intersection was determined by Γ * was converted to.

[0116] statistical analysis All statistical analyses were performed using Origin Pro 2016 (version 9.3.226, Origin Lab Corporation, Northampton, MA, USA). For Fv' / Fm' measurements, each plate contained a minimum of 10 seedlings, and data represent mean values. Significance was assessed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Relative changes in gene expression were analyzed by one-way ANOVA with three technical replicates per biological replicate from samples grown in either the greenhouse or the field. Greenhouse biomass and stem height experiments were analyzed by one-way ANOVA with a minimum of eight biological replicates. Biomass and stem height experiments from the 2016 field period were analyzed by one-way ANOVA with eight biological replicates. Biomass data from the 2017 field period were analyzed by two-way ANOVA (genotype × block) with eight biological replicates per genotype per block. Greenhouse photosynthetic measurements were analyzed by one-way ANOVA with three organisms per measurement, and field photosynthetic measurements were analyzed by two-way ANOVA with two plant replicates per plot and five randomized replicate blocks. All ANOVA tests were performed with P < 0.05 or less, as indicated in the figures. All ANOVA analyses were followed by Tukey's post-hoc test for mean comparisons.

[0117] Results and Analysis Nicotiana tabacum was transformed with three different photorespiratory bypass designs expressing five genes (Figure 14, Table 5). Bypass 1 and bypass 2 have been previously reported in the literature. However, the newly developed bypass 3 was engineered utilizing Chlamydomonas reinhardtii glycolate dehydrogenase (SEQ ID NO: 45) instead of glycolate oxidase, which advantageously does not produce hydrogen peroxide as a by-product during the conversion of glycolate to glyoxylate (Abolemy et al., Plant Physiol. Biochem. (2014) 79:25-30).

[0118] Unlike single-gene insertion studies, multigene constructs may require coordinated gene expression to optimize flux through the designed pathway. Without a priori knowledge of the promoter-gene combinations that optimize photorespiratory bypass efficacy, we utilized multiple promoter-gene combinations for reported photorespiratory bypass designs to create five iterations of bypass 1, three iterations of bypass 2, and a single iteration of bypass 3 (Table 5). In addition to expressing photorespiratory bypass genes, we designed a long hairpin RNAi construct (SEQ ID NO: 46) and added it to the library of multigene constructs to reduce expression of the chloroplast glycolate / glycerate transporter PLGG1 in order to increase flux through the bypass pathway (Figure 14, Table 5). Overall, 17 of the 18 independent constructs designed were successfully transformed and examined to test the function of bypasses 1, 2, and 3 with or without the inclusion of an RNAi module targeting the PLGG1 transporter.

[0119] Photorespiratory stress-induced damage to photosystem II can be visualized using chlorophyll fluorescence by a decrease in the maximum operating efficiency of PSII in light (i.e., Fv' / Fm') (South et al., supra; Badger et al., supra). Using these changes in fluorescence as an index of apparent photorespiratory efficiency, we tested each photorespiratory bypass design under high light intensities (1200 μmol m ). -2 s -1 ) and near-zero CO2 for 24 hours, plants were screened and compared to wild-type (WT) and empty vector (EV) controls (Figures 15A and 15B). Overall, plants transformed with the bypass1 and bypass3 versions showed improved apparent photorespiratory efficiency compared to the WT and ET controls (Figure 15B). Lines from this initial screen that demonstrated enhanced apparent photorespiratory efficiency were selected from each design for further characterization in both greenhouse and field settings.

[0120] During and after the initial evaluation of multigene construct designs, many showed poor phenotypes due to either independent insertions or suboptimally designed promoter-gene combinations, with multiple insertion events having the same deleterious phenotype.

[0121] After successful screening, gene expression of the photorespiratory bypass pathway was verified for each construct, which was further tested in greenhouse and field trials (Figure 16A and Figures 17A and 17B). A minimum of three independent transformations of each construct design were evaluated under greenhouse conditions. We observed an increase in dry weight biomass in all three bypass designs, consistent with previously reported findings in other plant species (Dalal et al., Biotechnol Biofuels (2015) 8; Kebeish et al., supra; Maier et al., supra; Nolke et al., Plant Biotechnol. J. (2014) 12:734-42; Ahmad et al., Plant Biotechnol. Rep. (2016) 10:269-76), suggesting successful photorespiratory bypass. Overall, under greenhouse conditions, plants derived from the novel bypass 3 showed an unexpectedly large difference in biomass compared to plants derived from bypass 1 and 2 lines. We observed further enhancement in bypass 3 when the RNAi module targeting PLGG1 was present, with overall biomass increasing by up to 23% relative to WT and 13% and 7% compared to bypass 1 and 2 lines, respectively (Figure 23). When tested under field conditions, bypass 3 with RNAi targeting PLGG1 again showed the most significant increase in overall dry weight biomass, by up to 27% compared to the WT control (Figure 18B).

[0122] Promising lines from the greenhouse trials were then tested for increased photosynthetic efficiency and plant productivity under agricultural conditions in a single-block, replicated vegetable garden experiment in 2016. We hypothesized that plants with the bypass design would exhibit increased photosynthetic quantum efficiency (Φa) due to reduced metabolic flux through the native photorespiratory pathway. Overall, we observed increased Φa in plants derived from all bypass lines, including those containing an RNAi module targeting the PLGG1 transporter (Figures 19A-19C). We also measured performance under photorespiratory stress (i.e., low [CO2]) conditions and found that plants derived from the bypass 3 lineages exhibited increased light-saturated rates and quantum efficiencies of photosynthesis, again indicating reduced photorespiratory stress associated with the successful bypass design.

[0123] Fluorescence screening, greenhouse studies, and a 2016 field study combined showed that bypass3 was able to outperform WT, EV, and bypass1 and 2 in overall plant growth, and this design was advanced for further characterization. The bypass3 design was confirmed by Western blot analysis using custom-made antibodies to confirm the presence of CrGDH and MS, as well as reduced PLGG1 protein (Figure 16B). We further characterized the physiological impact of photorespiratory bypass3 in plants under greenhouse conditions. We investigated the maximum rate of carboxylation (V cmax ) and RuBP-limited electron transfer rate (J max ) was determined by modeling the photosynthetic rate (A) based on the internal CO2 concentration (Ci). Bypass3 significantly increased V cmax and J. maxThe authors showed an increase in Γ, suggesting more efficient photosynthesis at lower [CO2], where photorespiratory stress is highest (Figures 20A, 20B, 20D). We hypothesized that photorespiratory bypass would lower the photosynthetic compensation point, or the point at which internal [CO2] available for photosynthesis equals the CO2 produced by daytime respiration. Indeed, we observed a lower Γ in our bypass3 plants compared to WT controls. * The measurements observed suggest that the photorespiratory bypass increases photosynthetic efficiency at lower [CO] values, likely due to the increased concentration of CO in the chloroplasts expected after the decarboxylation step in the introduced pathway (Figure 14).

[0124] To more accurately evaluate how bypass3 performs under agricultural conditions, a larger replicate block design was used during the 2017 field season. Five randomized replicate blocks containing three independently transformed bypass lines with and without the PLGG1-targeting RNAi module were tested. During the 2017 field season, we evaluated leaf, stem, and total dry weight biomass, midday starch content, and photosynthetic apparent quantum efficiency (Φa). Overall, bypass3 showed a 25% increase in total dry weight biomass (22% leaf, 44% stem), and bypass3 with PLGG1 RNAi showed a 41% increase in total dry weight biomass (33% leaf, 50% stem) (Figure 21A). Additionally, the inclusion of the PLGG1 RNAi module in the bypass3 design showed a significant increase in leaf and total dry weight biomass compared to bypass3 alone (Figure 21A). Total starch content at midday was elevated by approximately 70% and 42%, respectively, in both bypass 3 designs compared to the WT control (Figure 21B). Photosynthetic apparent quantum efficiency increased in both bypass designs and was significantly increased in bypass 3 alone (Figure 21C).

[0125] With regard to the increased photosynthetic quantum efficiency and decreased compensation point in both bypass 3 designs, we hypothesized that total net photosynthesis throughout the light period was higher compared to the WT control, resulting in the observed increased biomass (Figures 18B and 21A). To determine this, we measured the combined diurnal CO2 assimilation and observed a significant increase in total net assimilation (A') and total number of electrons used for photosynthesis (J') in both bypass designs compared to the WT (Figures 21D and 21E).

[0126] Overall, our synthetic biology approach allowed us to design, construct, and test multiple photorespiratory bypass designs and compare different promoter-gene combinations. Additionally, this was the first study to describe the effects of photorespiratory bypass under agriculturally relevant conditions, where the final outcome cannot be clearly predicted. The bypass1 design, the first and currently most widely reported design, indeed showed improvements in plant growth and dry weight biomass (Figure 18B). In comparison, bypass1 was surprisingly less productive than bypass3, and the improvement from having bypass1 in place was reduced when the PLGG1 RNAi module was added in both greenhouse and field settings (Figures 18A and 18B). These data suggest that the bypass1 metabolic pathway cannot effectively convert glycolate when there is reduced flux through the native photorespiratory pathway, i.e., when PLGG1 expression is targeted for silencing or not expressed in knockout lines. Bypass2 showed the smallest improvement in plant productivity, with many transgenic lines exhibiting stunted growth and yellow leaves. The production of hydrogen peroxide as a by-product and suboptimal expression of catalase, which had previously been suggested, are likely causes of the bypass2 phenotype (Maier et al., supra).

[0127] Photorespiratory bypass 3, containing the C. maxima malate synthase and C. reinhardtii glycolate dehydrogenase enzymes, significantly increased plant biomass, demonstrating a surprising improvement in photosynthetic efficiency over potential bypass pathways previously reported in the literature. Additionally, inclusion of an RNAi module that reduces expression of the PLGG1 chloroplast glycolate glycerate transporter (Figure 22), resulting in an effect similar to that of PLGG1 knockout lines, significantly increased postharvest dry weight biomass compared to bypass 3 alone (Figure 18B).

[0128] The invention has been described with reference to details of illustrated embodiments, but these details are not intended to limit the scope of the invention as defined in the appended claims. The embodiments of the invention in which an exclusive right or privilege is claimed are defined as follows: [others] [1] A genetically modified plant comprising one or more genetic modifications, comprising a loss or reduction in the plant's ability to transport glycolic acid out of at least a portion of its chloroplasts, and comprising a gain in the plant's ability to convert glycolic acid into energy within at least a portion of its chloroplasts. [2] The plant of [1], wherein the loss of chloroplast glycolic acid transport ability includes a reduction in the level, a reduction in activity, a partial loss of activity, or a complete loss of activity of an endogenous protein having at least 70% sequence identity, at least 75% sequence identity, at least 80% sequence identity, at least 85% sequence identity, at least 90% sequence identity, or at least 95% sequence identity to SEQ ID NO:6. [3] The plant of [1] or [2], wherein the loss of chloroplast glycolic acid transport ability comprises RNA interference induced by expression of an RNA molecule at least 95% identical to SEQ ID NO: 46. [4] The plant according to any one of [1] to [3], wherein the acquisition of the ability to convert glycolic acid into energy in the chloroplasts comprises production of a transgenic malate synthase and a transgenic glycolic acid dehydrogenase in the chloroplasts. [5] The plant according to [4], wherein the malate synthase is at least 95% identical to amino acid residues 41 to 607 of SEQ ID NO: 43. [6] The plant according to [4] or [5], wherein the glycolate dehydrogenase is at least 95% identical to amino acid residues 41 to 1136 of SEQ ID NO: 45. [7] The malate synthase comprises SEQ ID NO: 43. The glycolate dehydrogenase comprises SEQ ID NO: 45. [4] Plants. [8] the loss of chloroplast glycolate transport ability comprises a lack of production of a protein having at least 95% identity to SEQ ID NO:3 and a lack of production of a protein having at least 95% identity to SEQ ID NO:6; The plant of [1], wherein the acquisition of the ability to convert glycolic acid into energy in the chloroplast includes production of a protein having at least 95% identity to SEQ ID NO: 43, and production of a protein having at least 95% identity to SEQ ID NO: 45. [9] The plant according to any one of [1] to [8], wherein the plant is selected from the group consisting of rice, soybean, potato, cowpea, barley, wheat, and cassava.

[10] a. introducing into a plant a genetic modification comprising a loss of the ability to transport glycolic acid from at least a portion of the plant's chloroplasts; b. introducing a genetic modification into a plant, the genetic modification comprising gaining the ability to convert glycolic acid into energy in the chloroplast, thereby increasing plant growth or productivity; 10. A method for producing a plant with increased growth or productivity, comprising:

[11] The loss of the ability to transport glycolic acid from at least a portion of the plant chloroplasts is a reduced level, reduced activity, partial loss of activity, or complete loss of activity of an endogenous protein having at least 95% identity to SEQ ID NO:3; and a reduced level, reduced activity, partial loss of activity, or complete loss of activity of a second endogenous protein having at least 95% identity to SEQ ID NO:6; or both,

[10] The method described in

[10] .

[12] The method of

[10] or

[11] , wherein the loss of chloroplast glycolic acid transport ability comprises inducing RNA interference by expressing an RNA molecule that is at least 95% identical to SEQ ID NO: 46.

[13] The method according to any one of

[10] to

[12] , wherein the acquisition of the ability to convert glycolic acid into energy in the chloroplast comprises production of a transgenic malate synthase and a transgenic glycolic acid dehydrogenase in the chloroplast.

[14] The malate synthase is at least 95% identical to amino acid residues 41 to 607 of SEQ ID NO: 43; The glycolate dehydrogenase is at least 95% identical to amino acid residues 41 to 1136 of SEQ ID NO: 45.

[13] method.

[15] The malate synthase comprises SEQ ID NO: 43. The glycolate dehydrogenase comprises SEQ ID NO: 45.

[13] method.

[16] the loss of chloroplast glycolate transport capability is due to a lack of production of a protein having at least 95% identity to SEQ ID NO:3, a lack of production of a protein having at least 95% identity to SEQ ID NO:6, or both; The acquisition of the ability to convert glycolic acid into energy in the chloroplast includes production of a protein having at least 95% identity to SEQ ID NO: 43, and production of a protein having at least 95% identity to SEQ ID NO: 45.

[13] method.

[17] The method according to any one of

[10] to

[16] , wherein the plant is selected from the group consisting of rice, soybean, potato, cowpea, barley, wheat, and cassava.

[18] a first heterologous polynucleotide encoding malate synthase; and a second heterologous polynucleotide encoding glycolate dehydrogenase; A genetically modified plant comprising: Malate synthase and glycolate dehydrogenase are localized in the chloroplasts of plants.

[19] The plant of

[18] , wherein glycolic acid is converted into energy within the chloroplasts of the plant.

[20] The malate synthase of the plant

[18] or

[19] , wherein the malate synthase is derived from Cucurbita maxima.

[21] The plant according to any one of

[18] to

[20] , wherein the malate synthase is at least 95% identical to amino acid residues 41 to 607 of SEQ ID NO: 43.

[22] The plant according to any one of

[18] to

[21] , wherein the glycolate dehydrogenase is derived from Chladymonas reinhardtii.

[23] The plant according to any one of

[18] to

[22] , wherein the glycolate dehydrogenase is at least 95% identical to amino acid residues 41 to 1136 of SEQ ID NO: 45.

[24] The first heterologous polynucleotide encodes the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 43; The second heterologous polynucleotide encodes the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 45. A plant according to any one of

[18] to

[23] .

[25] The plant of any one of

[18] to

[24] , further comprising a reduced level, reduced activity, partial loss of activity, or complete loss of activity of one or more endogenous glycolate transport proteins in the chloroplasts of the plant.

[26] The plant of

[25] , having reduced or lost glycolate transport from the chloroplasts of said plant.

[27] The plant according to

[25] or

[26] , wherein the one or more glycolate transport proteins include PLGG1 and BASS6.

[28] The plant of any one of

[25] to

[27] , wherein at least one of the one or more glycolic acid transport proteins has at least 70% sequence identity, at least 75% sequence identity, at least 80% sequence identity, at least 85% sequence identity, or at least 90% sequence identity to SEQ ID NO: 6.

[29] The plant of

[28] , wherein at least one of the one or more glycolic acid transport proteins has at least 95% sequence identity with SEQ ID NO:6.

[30] The plant according to any one of

[25] to

[29] , comprising a heterologous polynucleotide encoding an RNA molecule that inhibits the expression of a glycolate transport protein.

[31] The plant of any one of

[25] to

[29] , wherein the reduction in level, reduction in activity, partial loss of activity, or complete loss of activity of at least one of the one or more glycolic acid transport proteins is induced using a technique selected from the group consisting of CRISPR / Cas, TALEN, zinc-finger nucleases, and RNAi.

[32] The plant of

[30] , wherein the RNA molecule is at least 95% identical to SEQ ID NO: 46.

[33] The plant according to any one of

[18] to

[32] , which is selected from the group consisting of rice, soybean, potato, cowpea, barley, wheat, and cassava.

[34] A first heterologous polynucleotide encoding malate synthase; and a second heterologous polynucleotide encoding glycolate dehydrogenase; A genetically modified plant comprising: Malate synthase and glycolate dehydrogenase are localized in the chloroplasts of plants.

[35] A first heterologous polynucleotide encoding a first polypeptide having at least 95% identity to SEQ ID NO: 43; and a second heterologous polynucleotide encoding a second polypeptide having at least 95% identity to SEQ ID NO: 45; Including, A genetically modified plant, wherein the first polypeptide and the second polypeptide are localized in the chloroplasts of the plant.

[36] A method for producing a plant with increased growth or productivity, comprising introducing into the plant a first heterologous polynucleotide encoding malate synthase and a second heterologous polynucleotide encoding glycolate dehydrogenase, Malate synthase and glycolate dehydrogenase are localized in plant chloroplasts. The method wherein the plant has an increased ability to convert glycolic acid into energy in the chloroplasts, thereby increasing plant growth or productivity.

Claims

1. introducing a genetic modification into a plant, the genetic modification comprising the acquisition of the ability to convert glycolic acid into energy in chloroplasts, thereby increasing plant growth or productivity; said obtaining the ability to convert glycolate to energy in the chloroplasts comprises producing a heterologous or transfected algal glycolate dehydrogenase polypeptide and a heterologous or transfected malate synthase polypeptide in the chloroplasts; and The plant has an increased photosynthetic quantum efficiency and / or reduced photorespiratory stress compared to a plant lacking the genetic modification. Methods for producing plants with increased growth or productivity.

2. 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the algal glycolate dehydrogenase polypeptide and the malate synthase polypeptide are localized in the chloroplast of a plant.

3. 3. The method of claim 1 or 2, wherein the algal glycolate dehydrogenase polypeptide comprises a polypeptide having at least 90% sequence identity to amino acid residues 41 to 1136 of SEQ ID NO:

45.

4. 4. The method of any one of claims 1 to 3, wherein the malate synthase polypeptide comprises a polypeptide having at least 90% sequence identity to amino acid residues 41 to 607 of SEQ ID NO:

43.

5. the algal glycolate dehydrogenase polypeptide comprises amino acid residues 41 to 1136 of SEQ ID NO:45; the malate synthase polypeptide comprises amino acid residues 41 to 607 of SEQ ID NO:43; The method according to any one of claims 1 to 4.

6. The glycolate dehydrogenase polypeptide derived from algae is selected from Chlamydomonas reinhardtii, Volvox carteri f. Nagariensis, Gonium pectorale, Chlamydomonas eustigma, Chlorella variabilis, Coccomyxa subellipsoidea, Micromonas commoda, Auxenochlorella protothecoides, Ostreococcus tauri, Ostreococcus lucimarinus, Bathycoccus prasinos, Micromonas pusilla, Chrysochromulina sp.

3. The method according to claim 1, wherein the algae is derived from an alga selected from the group consisting of Glycosyltransferase, ...

7. The method of any one of claims 1 to 3, wherein the malate synthase polypeptide is derived from a higher plant species.

8. The method of any one of claims 1 to 3, wherein the malate synthase polypeptide is derived from Cucurbita maxima.

9. 9. The method of any one of claims 1 to 8, wherein the algal glycolate dehydrogenase polypeptide is operably linked to a first chloroplast targeting sequence and the malate synthase polypeptide is operably linked to a second chloroplast targeting sequence.

10. 10. The method of claim 9, wherein the first chloroplast targeting sequence and / or the second chloroplast targeting sequence comprises a Rubisco small subunit signal peptide comprising amino acid residues 1 to 40 of SEQ ID NO:43 or SEQ ID NO:

45.

11. The method according to any one of claims 1 to 10, wherein the plant is a C3 plant.

12. The plant is selected from the group consisting of rice (Oryza sativa), soybean (Glycine max), potato (Solanum tuberosum), cowpea (Vigna unguiculata), barley (Hordeum vulgare), wheat (Triticum aestivum), and cassava (Manihot esculenta); The method according to any one of claims 1 to 11.

13. The plant exhibits a greater genetic diversity than a plant lacking the genetic modification under greenhouse conditions, field conditions, or a controlled environment. (a) an increase in dry weight biomass; (b) an increase in total starch content; (c) increased plant growth, and / or (d) increased plant productivity; The method according to any one of claims 1 to 12, wherein

14. The plant exhibits a greater genetic diversity than a plant lacking the genetic modification under greenhouse conditions, field conditions, or a controlled environment. (a) an increase in the light saturation rate of photosynthesis; (b) an increase in the maximum rate of carboxylation; (c) increasing the rate of electron transport, and / or (d) a decrease in the photosynthetic compensation point; The method according to any one of claims 1 to 13, wherein

Images