Smoke Measurement Support System

Abstract

This system provides a smoke measurement work support system that enables the creation of work plans that allow for proactive measures to be taken if a worsening trend is observed in the measurement data. [Solution] The smoke measurement work support system 1 of the present invention comprises an input device 2 used for inputting various data and commands, a processing device 3 configured as a plurality of semiconductor chips or computer devices, a storage device 4 in which data and computer programs necessary for various processes performed by the processing device 3 are stored, and an output device 5 that outputs data read from the storage device 4 and results processed by the processing device 3.

Description

[Technical Field]

[0001] The present invention relates to the measurement of soot volume or soot concentration (hereinafter referred to as "soot measurement work") carried out in accordance with the Air Pollution Control Act, and more particularly to a soot measurement work support system that prevents errors in inputting measurement data, produces appropriate reports, and enables the efficient planning of measurement work. [Background technology]

[0002] "Soot and smoke" refers to sulfur oxides, soot, and harmful substances (cadmium, chlorine, hydrogen chloride, fluorine, hydrogen fluoride, silicon fluoride, lead, nitrogen oxides) generated as a result of the combustion of substances. Facilities that generate soot and smoke are required by Article 16 of the Air Pollution Control Act to periodically measure the amount and concentration of soot and smoke, record the results, and preserve them, as well as to create a record sheet as shown in Figure 6 (a record sheet specified as Form 7 in Article 15, Paragraph 2, Item 1 of the Enforcement Regulations of the Air Pollution Control Act). According to Article 15, Paragraph 1 of the Enforcement Regulations of the Air Pollution Control Act, smoke and soot measurement work must be carried out at least once for every work period not exceeding two months (according to the Q&A on Electricity Business Laws (Thermal Power Related), this refers to the number of operating days, which is the sum of the days from when boilers, etc., are ignited until when they are extinguished). The day on which smoke and soot measurement work is carried out (hereinafter referred to as the work day) is determined considering human resources. However, in the past, the plan for smoke and soot measurement work was created by the person in charge of the work, so when measurement work was concentrated in a certain period, there were cases where measurement work was not carried out due to misunderstanding (missed measurements). In addition, the record sheet in Form 7 is created by transcribing the report (measurement certificate, etc.) and attached calculation sheet submitted by the analysis contractor, but there was a problem in that it was difficult to create an accurate report including the record sheet due to the possibility of transcription errors or falsification. Furthermore, there was a risk of overlooking trends when the measurement results did not exceed the standard value but were gradually worsening.

[0003] Patent Document 1 discloses an invention under the title "Environmental Measurement Business Management Support System and Method for Managing the Business Thereof," which relates to a technology that prevents measurement errors and supports the preparation of reports to be submitted to local governments, etc. The invention disclosed in Patent Document 1 is characterized in that, after the measurement data is compared with past measurement results by a measurement data analysis means and a measurement error is determined, if it is determined that there is no measurement error, a report format output means generates a report based on the measurement data.

[0004] Patent Document 2 discloses an invention related to a technology that supports the planning and application preparation work for inspections of high-pressure gas equipment, under the title "High-Pressure Gas Equipment Inspection Management Support System and Inspection Management Method Thereof." Patent Document 2 describes a high-pressure gas equipment inspection management support system for creating inspection work plans and application forms for high-pressure gas equipment. The system is configured such that an operator uses an input device to store inspection work information in an inspection work information database, and when inspection item information is entered, the corresponding inspection content is searched using an inspection item input means. Furthermore, the system is characterized by the fact that, after the inspection cycle determination means determines whether or not it is time for an inspection, and the data information for the necessary inspection items is stored in the inspection result information database, the inspection content determination means compares it with past inspection results and makes a judgment on the inspection history, and if it is determined that there are no errors in the inspection content and cycle, the construction plan and schedule are output, and the application form format output means creates an application form from this inspection report data. [Prior art documents] [Patent Documents]

[0005] [Patent Document 1] Japanese Patent Publication No. 2013-145477 [Patent Document 2] Japanese Patent Publication No. 2013-145478 [Overview of the project] [Problems that the invention aims to solve]

[0006] The invention described in Patent Document 1, while capable of creating reports containing data free from measurement errors, had the problem of not being able to improve the situation when the measurement data showed a tendency to deteriorate. Furthermore, it also had the problem of not being able to prevent measurement errors caused by concentrated measurement work. On the other hand, in the invention described in Patent Document 2, although the inspection work plan and process are appropriately determined based on legal requirements, there is no means to prevent measurement errors or data input errors, so there is a risk that erroneous measurement data will be recorded in the report. Furthermore, there is no function to analyze the measurement data, and it is not possible to grasp in advance the tendency for the measurement data to deteriorate, so there is a problem in that countermeasures cannot be taken before actually performing the measurements.

[0007] This invention addresses the aforementioned conventional circumstances and aims to provide a smoke measurement work support system that enables the creation of a work plan that allows for proactive measures to be taken when a deterioration trend is observed in the measurement data. [Means for solving the problem]

[0008] To achieve the above objective, the smoke measurement work support system according to the first invention comprises an input device into which measurement information including measurement items, measurement date and reference value is input along with the measurement result; a storage device in which the measurement result is stored in association with the measurement information; and a processing device that controls the operation of the input device and the storage device and determines the work implementation date. The processing device is characterized in that, after obtaining a regression line from the measurement results performed on a number of consecutive measurement days, including the most recent measurement date, it sets the work implementation date as a candidate work date corresponding to the predicted value if the predicted value calculated using a conversion formula based on this regression line does not exceed the reference value.

[0009] The second invention is characterized in that, in the first invention, the processing device sets the work implementation date to a candidate work date included in the period specified in the first law.

[0010] The third invention is characterized in that, in the second invention, the processing device sets a work candidate date that does not overlap with the work days of other units as the work execution date.

[0011] The fourth invention is characterized in that, in any one of the first to third inventions, information about the person in charge of measurement who has performed the soot measurement work is stored in the storage device as measurement information, and when the measurement result read from the storage device exceeds the reference value, the processing device sends a warning email to the person in charge of measurement notifying that the measurement result exceeds the reference value, based on the information about the person in charge of measurement read from the storage device.

[0012] The fifth invention is characterized in that, in the fourth invention, the average value and the standard deviation are stored in the storage device as measurement information in a state associated with the measurement result, and when the measurement result read from the storage device is not within a predetermined allowable range determined by the average value and the standard deviation, the processing device sends a warning email to the person in charge of measurement notifying that the measurement result may exceed the reference value in the future.

[0013] The sixth invention is characterized in that, in any one of the first to third inventions, the format information of the report stipulated in the second law is stored in the storage device, and the processing device reads the measurement information and the measurement result from the storage device together with the format information, and creates a report based on the format information.

Advantages of the Invention

[0014] According to the first invention, it is possible to easily know whether the measurement result tends to deteriorate based on the slope of the regression line obtained from the measurement result. Also, by using the conversion formula based on the regression line, it is possible to predict the measurement result on a desired day after the most recent measurement date. Therefore, when the measurement result tends to deteriorate, it is possible to perform the measurement work before the measurement result exceeds the reference value, and to promptly perform the cleaning work of the equipment to prevent the deterioration of the measurement result.

[0015] According to the second invention, in addition to the effects of the first invention, since the work implementation date is set within the period stipulated by the first law, unlike the case where the worker creates an individual work plan, it is possible to prevent a situation (measurement omission) where the measurement work is not carried out due to the misunderstanding of the worker.

[0016] According to the third invention, in addition to the effects of the second invention, since there is no possibility that the work of other units will interfere with the measurement work, it is possible to create a work plan efficiently.

[0017] According to the fourth invention, in addition to the effects of any one of the first to third inventions, since it is possible to know in a short period of time that the measurement result exceeds the reference value, it is possible to quickly verify whether it is an input error by the measurement person and to re-do the measurement work and other corresponding measures.

[0018] According to the fifth invention, in addition to the effects of the fourth invention, since it is possible to know in a short period of time that the measurement result may exceed the reference value in the future, it is possible for the measurement person to quickly carry out corresponding measures such as cleaning work of the equipment.

[0019] According to the sixth invention, in addition to the effects of any one of the first to third inventions, unlike the case where the measurement worker or the like creates a report by himself / herself, it is possible to create an accurate report without transcription errors or the like.

Brief Description of the Drawings

[0020] [Figure 1] It is a block diagram showing the configuration of the soot measurement work support system of the present invention. [Figure 2] It is a flowchart showing the operation procedure of the soot measurement work support system of the present invention. [Figure 3] It is a flowchart showing the processing procedure by the measurement result checking means. [Figure 4] It is a flowchart showing the processing procedure by the work plan creation means. [Figure 5]This flowchart shows the processing procedure using the work plan creation method. [Figure 6] This diagram shows the record sheet (Form No. 7) for soot and smoke measurements as stipulated in the Air Pollution Control Act. [Modes for carrying out the invention] [Examples]

[0021] The configuration and operating procedure of the smoke measurement work support system of the present invention will be explained with reference to Figures 1 and 2. In Figures 1 and 2, the database is denoted as DM. As shown in Figure 1, the smoke measurement work support system 1 of the present invention is composed of a keyboard and mouse, as well as an optical reader and a receiving terminal from an information and communication network, and includes an input device 2 into which various data and commands are input, a processing unit 3 composed of multiple semiconductor chips and a computer device, a storage device 4 composed of RAM (Random Access Memory) that stores data and computer programs necessary for various processes performed by the processing unit 3, and an output device 5 consisting of a display and a printer that outputs data read from the storage device 4 and results processed by the processing unit 3.

[0022] The input device 2 consists of a mode selection means 2a for selecting one of the following modes: "measurement information input mode," "measurement result input mode," "measurement result check mode," "work plan creation mode," and "report creation mode," a measurement information input means 2b into which measurement information d1 is input, and a measurement result input means 2c into which measurement result d2 is input. The processing device 3 consists of a control means 3a for controlling the operation of each device, a temporary measurement information storage means 3b into which measurement information d1 is temporarily stored, a measurement result check means 3c for checking the measurement result d2, a work plan creation means 3d for determining the work implementation date, and a report creation means 3e for creating a report in accordance with the format prescribed by law. Meanwhile, the storage device 4 contains a measurement results database 4a that stores measurement information d1 and measurement results d2, a legal information database 4b that stores the Air Pollution Control Act, the Water Pollution Control Act, and prefectural ordinances, a measurement work information database 4c that stores information about the measurement personnel who carried out the smoke measurement work and information about the work dates for maintenance, inspections, and construction of other units that may interfere with the smoke measurement work, and a report information database 4d that stores the report format prescribed by law.

[0023] Here, the operating procedure for the smoke measurement support system 1 will be explained using Figure 2. First, the mode selection means 2a of the input device 2 is operated to select the "measurement information input mode." Then, measurement information d1 such as "measurement item," "measurement method," "measurement location," "measurement date," "measurement person in charge," "reference value," and "permissible value" is input from the measurement information input means 2b to the processing device 3 as shown by arrow A in Figure 1. This measurement information d1 is then stored by the measurement information temporary storage means 3b according to the instructions of the control means 3a (step S1 in Figure 2). The "permissible value" is the mean and standard deviation obtained from past measurement data. The "measurement item" refers to "exhaust gas volume," "oxygen concentration," "soot concentration," "soot volume," "nitrogen oxide concentration," and "nitrogen oxide volume" as shown in Figure 6. This data includes not only measurements by the measurement person in charge but also measured values ​​by certified measurement businesses. Furthermore, the input of measurement results d2 by the input device 2 may be performed not only by inputting data one by one into the processing device 3 through keyboard or mouse operation, but also by inputting an electronic file containing multiple data points into the input device 2, thereby inputting all of that data into the processing device 3 at once.

[0024] Next, the mode selection means 2a of the input device 2 is operated to select the "measurement result input mode." Then, the "measurement data" obtained by the smoke measurement operation is input to the processing device 3 from the measurement result input means 2c as the measurement result d2, as indicated by arrow A in Figure 1. This measurement result d2 is then sent to the storage device 4 along with the measurement information d1 read from the measurement information temporary storage means 3b, as indicated by arrow B in Figure 1, according to the instructions of the control means 3a. Finally, it is stored in the measurement result database 4a in association with the measurement information d1 (step S2 in Figure 2). Furthermore, after selecting the "measurement result check mode" by operating the mode selection means 2a of the input device 2, the "measurement item" and "measurement date" from the measurement information d1 are input to the processing device 3 from the measurement information input means 2b as shown by arrow A in Figure 1. Then, the measurement result d2 corresponding to this measurement information d1 is read from the measurement result database 4a of the storage device 4 as shown by arrow C in Figure 1, according to the instructions of the control means 3a. Specifically, after the "measurement data" corresponding to the "measurement item" and "measurement date" input from the measurement information input means 2b, along with the "measurement person in charge," "reference value," and "tolerance value," are read from the measurement result database 4a, all "measurement data" are checked by the measurement result check means 3c based on the "reference value" and "tolerance value" (step S3 in Figure 2).

[0025] Here, the processing flow by the measurement result checking means 3c will be explained using Figure 3. As shown in Figure 3, the measurement result checking means 3c first compares the "measurement data" with the "reference value" in step S3-1. Then, in step S3-2, if the measurement result checking means 3c determines that the "measurement data" exceeds the "reference value", in step S3-3, it warns the operator of the smoke measurement work support system 1 by displaying on the screen of the output device 5 that the "measurement data" exceeds the "reference value". In step S3-4, it warns the "measurement person" by sending a similar email based on the "measurement person information" read from the measurement work information database 4c of the storage device 4. As a result, the measurement person can quickly find out that the measurement result exceeds the reference value, and can promptly take action such as verifying whether or not there was an input error or redoing the measurement work. Furthermore, if the measurement result checking means 3c determines in step S3-2 that the "measurement data" is less than or equal to the "reference value", it bypasses the processing in steps S3-3 and S3-4 and proceeds to the processing in step S3-5.

[0026] If the measurement result checking means 3c determines in step S3-5 that the "measurement data" is below the "reference value" and exceeds 80% of the "reference value", then in step S3-6, it displays on the screen of the output device 5 that the "measurement data" may exceed the "reference value" in the future, thereby alerting the operator of the smoke measurement work support system 1, and in step S3-7, it sends a similar email to the "measurement person in charge" to alert them. Furthermore, if the measurement result checking means 3c determines in step S3-5 that the "measurement data" is 80% or less of the "reference value", it bypasses the processing in steps S3-6 and S3-7 and proceeds to the processing in step S3-8.

[0027] Next, in step S3-8, the measurement result checking means 3c evaluates the variability of the "measurement data". Specifically, in step S3-8, if the measurement result checking means 3c determines that the difference between the "measurement data" and the "mean value" is not within twice the "standard deviation" (i.e., the "measurement data" is not within the 95% confidence interval), in step S3-9, it displays a message on the display screen of the output device 5 indicating that the variability of the "measurement data" is large, thereby alerting the operator of the smoke measurement work support system 1. In step S3-10, it sends an email to the "measurement person" to similarly alert them. This has the advantage that the measurement person can quickly learn that the measurement results may exceed the standard value in the future, allowing them to promptly take action such as cleaning the equipment. Furthermore, if the measurement result checking means 3c determines in step S3-8 that the difference between the "measurement data" and the "mean value" is within twice the "standard deviation" (i.e., the "measurement data" is within the 95% confidence interval), it bypasses the processing in steps S3-9 and S3-10 and proceeds to the processing in step S3-11. Then, in step S3-11, if the measurement result checking means 3c does not determine that all "measurement data" has been checked, it returns to the process in step 3-1. However, if it determines that all "measurement data" has been checked, it terminates the process.

[0028] Next, we will explain the process of creating a work plan using Figures 4 and 5. First, the mode selection means 2a of the input device 2 is operated to select the "work plan creation mode." Then, the number of samples n (where 3 ≤ n ≤ 20) and the "measurement items" from the measurement information d1 are input to the processing device 3 from the measurement information input means 2b as shown by arrow A in Figure 1. Then, n "measurement data" corresponding to these "measurement items" are read from the measurement result database 4a of the storage device 4, as shown by arrow C in Figure 1, in accordance with the instructions of the control means 3a, and associated with the "measurement date." The work plan creation means 3d then reads this "measurement date," sets it with the "measurement data," and creates a work plan based on these n sets of data (step S4 in Figure 2).

[0029] As shown in Figure 4, the work plan creation means 3d first sets the value of x1 of the data with the oldest measurement date among the n sets of data to 0, sets the corresponding "measurement data" to y1, and sets the number of days elapsed from that measurement date to x i And the corresponding "measurement data" is y i Let's assume that, for example, if n is 3 and the "measurement data" for October 4th, November 7th, and December 13th are 3, 5, and 7 respectively, then (x1, y1), (x2, y2), and (x3, y3) will be (0, 3), (34, 5), and (70, 7), respectively.

[0030] Next, in step S4-2, the work plan creation means 3d uses n sets of data (x i , y i A 5% significance level test for no correlation was performed on ) and in step S4-3, (x i , y i If it is determined that there is a positive correlation between (x), then in step S4-4, a regression line (y=a+bx, b>0) is obtained, and then in step S4-5, an F-test with a 5% significance level is performed on the regression line by analysis of variance. However, in step S4-3, the work plan creation means 3d (x i , y i If it is determined that there is no positive correlation between the two, proceed to step S4-10. When the operation plan creation means 3d determines in step S4-6 that it is meaningful to define the regression line, in step S4-7, it obtains the 95% confidence interval for the regression line. However, if the operation plan creation means 3d determines in step S4-6 that it is not meaningful to define the regression line, the process proceeds to step S4-13.

[0031] In step S4-8, when x is the average value (hereinafter referred to as x m ), the operation plan creation means 3d calculates the difference (A) between the 95% confidence limit value of y and y on the regression line m , divides it by y m (A / y m : the relative error at x m ), and in step S4-9, if this relative error is 0.3 (30%) or less, it is considered that the conversion formula is determined and the process proceeds to step S4-12. If the relative error exceeds 0.3 (30%), it is considered inappropriate to perform the conversion using the conversion formula, and the process proceeds to step S4-13.

[0032] As shown in FIG. 5, in step S4-10, for n sets of data (x i , y i ), the operation plan creation means 3d obtains the coefficient of variation CV x , CV y . After that, in step S4-11, if it is determined that both the coefficient of variation CV x , CV y are 0.15 (15%) or less, in step S4-12, the regression line obtained in step S4-4 is set as the conversion formula. In the puff smoke measurement work support system 1, since it is configured to obtain the regression line in this way, it is possible to easily know whether the measurement result tends to deteriorate depending on the slope of the regression line. In addition, if the operation plan creation means 3d does not determine in step S4-11 that both the coefficient of variation CV x , CV y are 0.15 (15%) or less, it is considered that the conversion formula is not determined, and the process proceeds to step S4-13.

[0033] In step S4-13, the work plan creation means 3d, as shown by arrow C in Figure 1, reads legal information d3 and related facility information d4 from the legal information database 4b and measurement work information database 4c of the storage device 4, and uses this information to create a work plan within a predetermined period stipulated by law, without overlapping with the work days of other units, and with respect to the most recent measurement date (x n The day furthest from the corresponding measurement date will be designated as the candidate work date. If the work plan creation means 3d determines in step S4-14 that a conversion formula has been set, in step S4-15 it calculates the number of days elapsed from the measurement date corresponding to x1 to the candidate work date and converts this to x n+1 After that, in step S4-16, the predicted value y is calculated using the conversion formula. n+1 The calculation is performed. However, if the work plan creation means 3d determines in step S4-14 that no conversion formula has been set, it proceeds to the process in step S4-19.

[0034] In step S4-17, the work plan creation means 3d generates a predicted value y n+1 If it is determined that the value is above the standard value, in step S4-18, the candidate work date is moved forward by one day, and then the process returns to step S4-17. In addition, in step S4-17, the work plan creation means 3d determines y n+1 If it is determined that the value does not exceed the standard value, the process in step S4-18 is bypassed and the process proceeds to step S4-19. Then, in step S4-19, the work plan creation means 3d sets the candidate work date as the work implementation date, and in step S4-20, if it determines that the work implementation date does not overlap with the work dates of other units, it terminates the process. Note that in step S4-17, the work plan creation means 3d sets the predicted value y n+1 If it is determined that the value does not exceed the standard value, the process proceeds to step S4-19. Also, if it is determined in step S4-20 that the work execution date overlaps with the work execution date of another unit, the work execution date is moved forward by one day in step S4-21, and then the process returns to step S4-20.

[0035] Thus, the smoke measurement work support system 1 can predict measurement results for any desired date after the most recent measurement date using a conversion formula based on a regression line. Therefore, if the measurement results tend to deteriorate, the measurement work can be performed before the measurement results exceed the standard value. Furthermore, since equipment cleaning can be carried out promptly afterward, deterioration of the measurement results can be prevented. In addition, since the work implementation date is set within the period stipulated by law, it is possible to prevent situations where measurement work is not performed due to misunderstandings by the worker (missed measurement), unlike in the past when workers individually create work plans. Furthermore, since there is no risk of work by other units interfering with the measurement work, it is possible to create work plans efficiently.

[0036] In step S4-13 of Figure 5, the candidate work date is the day furthest from the most recent measurement date within the prescribed period stipulated by law. However, this is not the only option; for example, any day other than the day furthest from the most recent measurement date may be designated as a candidate work date, as long as it is within the prescribed period stipulated by law. Furthermore, after determining a candidate work date within the prescribed period stipulated by law, in step S4-17, the measurement data for that candidate work date is predicted, and if the predicted value exceeds the standard value, the candidate work date is moved forward by one day in step S4-18. However, instead of this procedure, for example, the candidate work date could be the day furthest from the most recent measurement date, and where the predicted value of the measurement data does not exceed the standard value. If this candidate work date is not within the prescribed period stipulated by law, the candidate work date may be moved forward. Furthermore, although step S4-1 sets the sample size n to 3 ≤ n ≤ 20, it is not limited to this, and the value of n can be changed as appropriate.

[0037] Furthermore, the processing performed by the report creation means 3e will be explained. After selecting "Report Creation Mode" by operating the mode selection means 2a of the input device 2, the "measurement items" to be entered in the report from the measurement information d1 are input to the processing device 3 from the measurement information input means 2b as shown by arrow A in Figure 1. Then, according to the instructions of the control means 3a, the "measurement data" corresponding to this "measurement item" is read from the measurement result database 4a of the storage device 4, along with other measurement information d1, as shown by arrow C in Figure 1. At the same time, the "report format" is read from the report information database 4d of the storage device 4 as format information d5. Based on this format information d5, the report creation means 3e creates a report as stipulated by law (see the record sheet in format 7 shown in Figure 6) (step S5 in Figure 2). With this configuration of smoke measurement work support system 1, unlike conventional methods where measurement workers create reports themselves, it is possible to create accurate reports without transcription errors. [Industrial applicability]

[0038] The smoke measurement support system of the present invention can be used in facilities such as factories and plants where it is necessary to regularly conduct environmental measurements to prevent air pollution. [Explanation of Symbols]

[0039] 1…Smoke Measurement Work Support System 2…Input Device 2a…Mode Selection Means 2b…Measurement Information Input Means 2c…Measurement Result Input Means 3…Processing Device 3a…Control Means 3b…Temporary Measurement Information Storage Means 3c…Measurement Result Check Means 3d…Work Plan Creation Means 3e…Report Creation Means 4…Storage Device 4a…Measurement Result Database 4b…Legal Information Database 4c…Measurement Work Information Database 4d…Report Information Database 4 5…Output Device d1…Measurement Information d2…Measurement Result d3…Legal Information d4…Related Facility Information d5…Format Information

Claims

1. An input device into which measurement information, including measurement items, measurement date, and reference values, is entered along with the measurement results. A storage device in which the measurement results are stored in association with the measurement information, The system includes a processing unit that controls the operation of the input device and the storage device and determines the work execution date, The smoke measurement work support system is characterized in that the processing device obtains a regression line from the measurement results obtained on a plurality of consecutive measurement days, including the most recent measurement day, and then, if the predicted value calculated using a conversion formula based on this regression line does not exceed the reference value, the candidate work day corresponding to the predicted value is set as the work implementation day.

2. The smoke measurement work support system according to claim 1, characterized in that the processing device sets the candidate work date included in the period specified in the first law as the work implementation date.

3. The smoke measurement work support system according to claim 2, characterized in that the processing device sets the candidate work date, which does not overlap with the work dates of other units, as the work implementation date.

4. Information regarding the measurement personnel who carried out the smoke measurement work is stored in the storage device as the measurement information. The smoke measurement work support system according to any one of claims 1 to 3, characterized in that when the measurement result read from the storage device exceeds the reference value, the processing device sends a warning email to the measurement person in charge, based on the information of the measurement person read from the storage device, informing the measurement person that the measurement result exceeds the reference value.

5. The mean and standard deviation are stored in the storage device as measurement information, associated with the measurement results. The smoke measurement work support system according to claim 4, characterized in that the processing device sends a warning email to the person in charge of measurement informing them that the measurement result may exceed the reference value in the future if the measurement result read from the storage device is not within a predetermined tolerance range determined by the mean value and the standard deviation.

6. The format information for the report prescribed in the second law is stored in the storage device. The smoke measurement work support system according to any one of claims 1 to 3, characterized in that the processing device reads the measurement information and the measurement results from the storage device together with the format information, and creates the report based on the format information.

Images