Traffic management device, traffic management system and program

Abstract

To provide an operation management device, operation management system, and program capable of detecting a fraudulent act by a crew.SOLUTION: An operation management device being connected to a network to transmit / receive information with an on-vehicle unit mounted on a vehicle, so as to manage the operation of the vehicle. The operation management device acquires operation data (operation information) recorded by the on-vehicle unit (S1). The operation management device compares the operation data with an operation instruction generated with respect to the vehicle (S2), and then, determines whether a deviation (YES in S3) from the operation instruction in the operation of the vehicle is fraudulent or not (S4, S5, S6).SELECTED DRAWING: Figure 7

Description

[Technical field]

[0001] The present invention relates to a traffic management device, a traffic management system, and a program. [Background technology]

[0002] Delivery companies and the like manage vehicle operations and the labor of drivers by collecting operation information collected by on-board devices such as digital tachographs mounted on vehicles such as trucks in an operation management device. Patent Document 1 discloses a center device that grasps the operation status of a shared vehicle while it is in motion, adjusts an operation plan, and transmits the adjusted operation plan to an on-board management device to give instructions to the driver. The center device of Patent Document 1 can adjust the operation plan according to operation status such as driving speed, delay status, and congestion status so as to maintain a normal operation schedule. [Prior art documents] [Patent documents]

[0003] [Patent Document 1] JP 2012-69136 A Summary of the Invention [Problem to be solved by the invention]

[0004] According to the above-mentioned operation management device, it is possible to grasp the state of the vehicle, such as whether the vehicle is running or stopped, the location of the vehicle, etc. However, the above-mentioned operation management device cannot grasp, for example, whether the stop of the vehicle is due to a legitimate action of the driver or an unnecessary stop (slacking off).

[0005] The present invention has been made in consideration of the above-mentioned circumstances, and has an object to provide a traffic management device, a traffic management system, and a program that are capable of detecting fraudulent behavior by crew members. [Means for solving the problem]

[0006] In order to achieve the above-mentioned object, the operation management device according to the present invention has the following features. A vehicle operation management device that is connected to a network and transmits and receives information to and from an on-board device mounted on a vehicle to manage the operation of the vehicle, an instruction storage unit for storing operation instructions created for the vehicle; An acquisition unit that acquires operation information recorded by the vehicle-mounted device; a determination unit that determines whether or not a deviation from the driving instructions in the driving of the vehicle is illegal by comparing the driving instructions stored in the instruction storage unit with the operation information acquired by the acquisition unit; Equipped with 、 The determination unit determines that the driver of the vehicle is taking a rest when the duration of the stopped state of the vehicle is longer than a first threshold value, and determines that the driver is suspected of slacking off when the determination unit determines that the stopped position of the vehicle during the rest state is other than a designated location or when the determination unit determines that the duration of the rest state is longer than a second threshold value. Operation control device.

[0007] In order to achieve the above-mentioned object, the traffic control system according to the present invention has the following features. The traffic management device; The vehicle-mounted device, a terminal connected to the network and configured to receive from the traffic management device a result of the determination made by the determination unit as to whether the deviation is fraudulent; An operation management system equipped with

[0008] Furthermore, in order to achieve the above-mentioned object, the program according to the present invention has the following features. A program for causing a computer to function as a vehicle operation management device that manages the operation of a vehicle by transmitting and receiving information to and from an on-board device mounted on a vehicle connected to a network, the program comprising: acquiring operation information recorded by the vehicle-mounted device; and determining whether or not a deviation from the driving instructions in the operation of the vehicle is illegal by comparing the operation information with the driving instructions created for the vehicle. 、 The step of determining whether the deviation is fraudulent includes determining that the driver of the vehicle is taking a rest when the duration of the stopped state of the vehicle is longer than a first threshold value, and determining that the driver is suspected of slacking off when the stopping position of the vehicle during the resting state is determined to be other than a designated location or when the duration of the resting state is determined to be longer than a second threshold value. program. Effect of the Invention

[0009] According to the operation management device, operation management system, and program of the present invention, it is possible to detect fraudulent behavior by crew members.

[0010] The present invention has been briefly described above. Furthermore, the details of the present invention will be further clarified by reading the following description of the embodiment of the present invention (hereinafter, referred to as "embodiment") with reference to the accompanying drawings. [Brief description of the drawings]

[0011] [Figure 1] FIG. 1 is a configuration diagram illustrating an example of a traffic management system according to an embodiment. [Diagram 2] FIG. 2 is a configuration diagram illustrating an example of the vehicle-mounted device illustrated in FIG. [Diagram 3] FIG. 3 is a diagram illustrating an example of the configuration of the server illustrated in FIG. [Figure 4] FIG. 4 is a flowchart showing a processing procedure performed by the vehicle-mounted device shown in FIG. [Diagram 5] FIG. 5 is a graph showing the speed and engine RPM over time, which are examples of the operation information stored in the DB by the server shown in FIG. [Figure 6] FIG. 6 is a graph showing the remaining fuel amount, which is an example of the operational information stored in the DB by the server shown in FIG. 1, over time. [Figure 7] FIG. 7 is a flowchart showing a procedure of a fraudulent activity determination process performed by the server shown in FIG. [Figure 8] FIG. 8 is a flowchart showing a processing procedure of the operation data analysis performed by the server shown in FIG. [Figure 9] FIG. 9 is a flowchart showing a processing procedure for determining the validity of an operation instruction, which is performed by the server shown in FIG. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

[0012] Specific embodiments of the present invention will be described below with reference to the accompanying drawings.

[0013] 1 is a configuration diagram showing an example of a traffic management system 1 according to an embodiment. The traffic management system 1 according to the embodiment is a system that detects fraudulent acts by drivers of trucks (vehicles) 10. As shown in the figure, the traffic management system 1 includes an on-board device 2 mounted on a truck 10, which is an example of a vehicle, a server 3 that can communicate with the on-board device 2 via an Internet communication network 11, and a terminal 6 that can communicate with the server 3 via the Internet communication network 11. The server 3 manages the operation of the truck 10 by transmitting and receiving information to and from the on-board device 2 via the Internet communication network 11.

[0014] 2, the in-vehicle device 2 includes an Internet communication unit 21, a GPS communication unit 22, an external connection terminal 23, a CAN interface 24, and a control unit 25. The Internet communication unit 21 is composed of a circuit and an antenna for connecting to the Internet communication network 11. As is well known, the GPS communication unit 22 receives radio waves transmitted from a plurality of GPS (Global Positioning System) satellites, obtains a current position and time from the received radio waves, and outputs them to the control unit 25 described later. The external connection terminal 23 is connected to external devices such as a display unit 30 and a speaker 40. The display unit 30 displays a driving route to a destination, etc. The speaker 40 outputs audio that guides the driver about the driving route, etc.

[0015] The CAN interface (I / F) 24 is provided for connection to a CAN (Controller Area Network) bus in the vehicle. The vehicle-mounted device 2 can acquire operational data such as the remaining fuel amount, speed, G value (acceleration), and engine speed from the CAN by performing CAN communication.

[0016] The control unit 25 is equipped with memories such as a RAM (Random Access Memory) and a ROM (Read Only Memory), is configured with a CPU (Central Processing Unit) that operates according to a program, and is responsible for controlling the entire vehicle-mounted device 2. The control unit 25 periodically acquires the current position from the GPS communication unit 22 in association with time information and transmits it to the server 3. The control unit 25 also periodically acquires the remaining fuel amount, speed, engine speed, and other operation data from the CANI / F 24 and transmits it to the server 3.

[0017] As shown in FIG. 3, the server 3 includes an Internet communication unit 31, an instruction data database (DB) 32, an operation data DB 33, and a control unit .

[0018] The Internet communication unit 31 is composed of a circuit for connecting to the Internet communication network 11 and the like.

[0019] The instruction data DB 32 functions as an instruction storage unit that stores operation instructions created for the truck 10. As an example, the operation instructions are created by the manager at the terminal 6 and stored in the instruction data DB 32. The operation instructions indicate the operation plan for the truck 10 for the day, i.e., the instructions to the driver, and may include information such as the destination (destination) of the truck 10, the driving route, rest times, rest locations, and the type of cargo to be transported.

[0020] The operation data DB 33 records the vehicle position, vehicle speed, engine RPM, remaining fuel amount, etc., which are periodically transmitted from the vehicle-mounted device 2, in association with time information. That is, the operation data DB 33 stores operation data, which is an example of the operation information acquired by the Internet communication unit 31 from the vehicle-mounted device 2. The operation data DB 33 stores the operation data acquired by each vehicle-mounted device 2 mounted on the multiple trucks 10.

[0021] The control unit 34 is configured with a CPU (computer) equipped with memories such as RAM and ROM, which operates according to a program, and controls the entire server 3. The control unit 34 compares the driving instructions stored in the instruction data DB 32 with the driving data acquired from the vehicle-mounted device 2 to determine whether or not the deviation from the driving instructions in the operation of the truck 10 is illegal.

[0022] The terminal 6 is composed of, for example, a PC or a smartphone, and is connected to the Internet communication network 11 to communicate with the server 3. The terminal 6 is a terminal operated by an administrator of the delivery company. The terminal 6 receives from the server 3 the result of the server 3 determining whether or not the deviation from the driving instructions in the operation of the truck 10 is illegal.

[0023] Next, the operation of the operation management system 1 having the above-mentioned configuration will be described with reference to Fig. 4 to Fig. 9. Fig. 4 is a flowchart showing a processing procedure performed by the μCOM 25 (hereinafter abbreviated as the in-vehicle device 2) of the in-vehicle device 2 shown in Fig. 1. The in-vehicle device 2 judges whether or not an ignition switch (hereinafter abbreviated as the IG) is turned on (S1). If the IG is turned on (YES in S1), the in-vehicle device 2 periodically acquires operation data (S2) and transmits the acquired operation data to the server 3 (S3).

[0024] Thereafter, the vehicle-mounted device 2 determines whether the IG is turned off (S4). If the IG is not turned off (NO in S4), the vehicle-mounted device 2 returns to S2 again and periodically repeats acquiring operation data and transmitting it to the server 3. If the IG is turned off (YES in S4), the vehicle-mounted device 2 returns to S1. The operation data acquired and transmitted by the vehicle-mounted device 2 is acquired and stored by the server 3.

[0025] Fig. 5 is a graph showing speed and engine RPM over time, which are examples of operation information stored in the operation data DB 33 by the server 3, and Fig. 6 is a graph showing remaining fuel over time, which is an example of operation information stored in the operation data DB 33 by the server 3. In Fig. 5, graph L1 shows the time when the IG was on, graph L2 shows the engine RPM, and graph L3 shows the speed. As shown in Figs. 5 and 6, the operation data DB 33 of the server 3 stores operation data of the truck 10 during one operation in association with time information. In addition, the operation data DB 33 stores position information of the truck 10 in association with time information, and is displayed, for example, superimposed on a map.

[0026] Fig. 7 is a flowchart showing an outline of the processing procedure for determining fraudulent activity performed by the server 3. The control unit 34 of the server 3 (hereinafter abbreviated as server 3) checks the driving status of the crew, for example, at a predetermined timing or in response to a request from an administrator. The processing shown in Fig. 7 and Figs. 8 and 9 described below is performed by executing a program pre-installed in the server 3.

[0027] First, the server 3 acquires the operation instructions created for the truck 10 from the instruction data DB 32, and acquires the operation data (operation information) of the truck 10 for the day from the operation data DB 33 (S1). The server 3 compares the operation data with the operation instructions (S2), and judges whether there is a deviation from the operation instructions (S3), and if there is a deviation (YES in S3), judges whether the deviation satisfies a condition (S4). Details of the judgment of the presence or absence of a deviation and the judgment of whether the deviation satisfies a condition will be described later. If the deviation satisfies the condition (YES in S4), the server 3 judges that there is a suspicion of fraudulent activity (S5). On the other hand, if there is no deviation from the operation instructions (NO in S3) or the deviation does not satisfy the condition (NO in S4), the server 3 judges that there is no fraudulent activity (S6).

[0028] Next, with reference to FIG. 8, a specific procedure for checking the operation status of the truck 10 by the driver, that is, whether or not there is any misconduct, will be described. FIG. 8 is a flowchart showing the processing procedure of the operation data analysis performed by the server 3. The server 3 checks whether or not there is any misconduct by analyzing the operation data. If there is no speed data in the operation data for one operation, that is, if the speed is 2 km / h or less (YES in S11), the server 3 determines that the truck 10 is in a stopped state (S12). If the stopped time is longer than a threshold (YES in S13), the server 3 determines that the driver is in a resting state (S14). For example, a value determined by an administrator can be used as this threshold. In this way, when the driver is determined to be in a resting state based on the speed of the truck 10, the server 3 compares the operation data with the operation instructions to determine whether or not there is a deviation from the operation instructions and whether or not the deviation satisfies the conditions. For example, the server 3 identifies a data set of the time determined to be in a resting state for all the operation data for one operation, and performs the following determination for each data set.

[0029] If the location included in the data set determined to be the resting state is other than the designated location (YES in S15), the server 3 determines that there is a suspicion of slacking (S16). Also, if the resting time, which is the duration of the resting state, is longer than a threshold (YES in S17), the server 3 determines that there is a suspicion of slacking (S16, S18).

[0030] If the engine speed included in the data set determined to be in a rest state is higher than the idling speed (YES in S19), the server 3 determines that fuel theft is suspected (S20). A known method of fuel theft is to remove the return pipe for returning fuel from the engine compartment to the fuel tank from the fuel tank and connect it to a plastic container to drain the fuel. Increasing the engine speed while the vehicle is stopped is highly likely to be an attempt to increase the amount of fuel returned to the plastic container and drain the fuel efficiently, in this method of fuel theft. Therefore, if the engine speed is high in S19, the server 3 determines that fuel theft is suspected.

[0031] For example, when there is abnormal data indicating suspicious vehicle behavior such as repeated driving and stopping, unnecessary idling, etc. (YES in S21), the server 3 determines that there is a suspicion of fraudulent activity (S22).

[0032] The server 3 judges whether or not each of the above-mentioned conditions S15, S17, S19, and S21 is satisfied, and if any of them is YES, it judges that there is a deviation from the operation instructions and that the condition is satisfied, and judges that there is a suspicion of fraudulent activity, and stores the judgment result in the operation data DB 33. Depending on which of the multiple conditions the deviation satisfies, the server 3 judges the type of fraud to be, for example, slacking, fuel theft, or other fraudulent activity. On the other hand, if none of the conditions are satisfied (NO in all of S15, S17, S19, and S21), the server 3 judges that there is no fraudulent activity and returns to the process of S11.

[0033] When the server 3 judges that there is a suspicion of fraudulent activity, it identifies the parts of the operation data stored in the operation data DB 33 that deviate from the operation instructions and are judged to be fraudulent, and presents them on the terminal 6. By extracting only the parts judged to be fraudulent from the operation data and presenting them in an emphasized manner, the manager can easily grasp the parts of the operation data that are judged to be fraudulent. Therefore, the manager can confirm and instruct the driver, for example, by pointing out the operation time and location.

[0034] As described above, according to the processing procedure of Fig. 8, when there is a deviation from the operation instructions in the actual operation data, the server 3 can determine whether or not the deviation is suspected of being a fraudulent act. Therefore, when there is a suspicion of a fraudulent act, the manager can check with the driver and provide guidance.

[0035] However, depending on the road conditions on the day or if there is an error in the work instructions, the server 3 may not be able to correctly determine whether the driver has committed a wrongdoing, or the determination process itself may be in vain. Therefore, the server 3 has a function of determining the validity of the operation instructions based on the operation data of multiple trucks 10 on the day.

[0036] FIG. 9 is a flowchart showing a processing procedure for determining the validity of an operation instruction performed by the server 3. The server 3 acquires operation data of a plurality of trucks 10 that received the same operation instruction on the day from the operation data DB 33 (S31). The server 3 determines whether or not construction has occurred on the planned route (instructed travel route) (S32), whether or not there has been congestion on the planned route (S33), and whether or not there has been any other obstacle on the planned route (S34) from the operation data of the plurality of trucks 10. For example, when the operation data of the plurality of trucks 10 commonly indicates that they have traveled on a specific route different from the planned route, the server 3 determines that construction or the like has occurred (YES in S32, S33, and S34) and determines that the planned route is inappropriate (S37). In addition, when the server 3 determines that an erroneous input of the planned route has occurred due to, for example, an input operation by the administrator (YES in S35), the server 3 determines that the planned route is inappropriate (S37). On the other hand, if all of S32 to S36 are NO, the server 3 determines that the planned route is appropriate (S36).

[0037] According to the operation instruction validity determination process shown in Fig. 9, the server 3 can collect data on the road conditions on the day by using the operation data of multiple trucks 10, and can therefore determine whether the operation instructions were valid in light of the actual road conditions. Also, if the planned route is input incorrectly, the server 3 can determine that the operation instructions are invalid. Therefore, the server 3 can determine the validity of the operation instructions in advance, and if the operation instructions are valid, check the operation status of the truck 10 as shown in Figs. 7 and 8, and determine whether the driver is suspected of misconduct.

[0038] As described above, according to the operation management system 1 of this embodiment, by comparing the operation instructions with the actual operation data (operation information), it is determined whether there is a deviation from the operation instructions in the actual operation of the truck 10, and whether the deviation is illegal or not, so that it is possible to detect the driver's misconduct. Furthermore, if a misconduct is detected, the driver's misconduct can be prevented by confirming and instructing the driver. Furthermore, it is possible to promote improvement in the driver's morale and reduce fuel costs during transportation.

[0039] Furthermore, depending on whether or not the deviation from the driving instructions in the driving data satisfies any one of a plurality of conditions, the server 3 can determine that the type of fraud is, for example, fuel theft or slacking.

[0040] In addition, it is possible to accurately determine whether or not there is fraudulent activity by taking into consideration the operating conditions of other trucks 10. For example, if the actual operation of truck 10 deviates from operating instructions, and the operations of other trucks 10 also deviate from operating instructions, it can be determined that the behavior is appropriate in accordance with the road conditions of the day, etc., and that there is no fraudulent activity.

[0041] Furthermore, the server 3 can determine whether or not there is fraudulent activity with greater accuracy by taking into account the result of determining the validity of the route specified in the driving instructions. For example, if the planned route is invalid, the server 3 does not determine whether or not the deviation is fraudulent, or, if the deviation is determined to be fraudulent but the planned route was invalid, the server 3 can re-determine that the deviation is not fraudulent.

[0042] The present invention is not limited to the above-described embodiment, and can be modified, improved, etc., as appropriate. The material, shape, dimensions, values, configurations, numbers, locations, etc. of each component in the above-described embodiment are arbitrary and not limited as long as they can achieve the present invention. In the above-described embodiment, the server 3 performs all the determination processing, but the terminal 6 or the vehicle-mounted device 2 can also perform part or all of the processing shown in Figures 7, 8, and 9 by transmitting and receiving necessary information via the Internet communication network 11.

[0043] For example, conditions other than the above-mentioned conditions (S15, S17, S19, and S21 in FIG. 8) can be used as conditions for determining whether or not there is fraudulent activity. In the case where the operation data includes information on the type of transported goods, such as goods that require temperature control, such as refrigerated or frozen goods, or precision parts, different conditions may be set according to the type. For example, for normal goods that do not require temperature control, it is determined that there has been misconduct when the rest time exceeds a first threshold, and for refrigerated goods, it is determined that there has been misconduct when the rest time exceeds a second threshold that is smaller than the first threshold. Furthermore, specific location information may be registered in advance as a caution location, and if stopping at a caution location is included, it may be determined to be fraudulent activity.

[0044] Here, the features of the traffic management device, the traffic management system, the program, the traffic management method, and the recording medium according to the above-mentioned embodiments of the present invention will be briefly summarized and listed in the following [1] to

[11] .

[0045] [1] A traffic management device (server 3) that is connected to a network (Internet communication network 11) and manages the operation of a vehicle (truck 10) by transmitting and receiving information to and from an on-board device (2) mounted on the vehicle, An instruction storage unit (instruction data DB 32) that stores driving instructions created for the vehicle; An acquisition unit (Internet communication unit 31) that acquires operation information recorded by the vehicle-mounted device; a determination unit (control unit 34) that determines whether or not a deviation from the driving instructions in the driving of the vehicle is illegal by comparing the driving instructions stored in the instruction storage unit with the operation information acquired by the acquisition unit; An operation management device (server 3) equipped with the above.

[0046] According to the traffic management device having the above configuration [1], by comparing the traffic instructions with the operating information, it is determined whether deviation from the traffic instructions in the actual operation of the vehicle is illegal or not, so that the illegal behavior of the driver can be detected. Therefore, according to this traffic management device, the illegal behavior of the driver can be suppressed. Furthermore, according to this traffic management device, it is possible to promote improvement of the driver's morale and reduce fuel costs during transportation.

[0047] [2] The acquisition unit (Internet communication unit 31) acquires, as the operation information, at least information on vehicle speed among vehicle speed, vehicle position, and engine speed in association with time information. The traffic management device (server 3) described in [1] above.

[0048] According to the traffic management device having the configuration of [2] above, stopping for a specified time or longer can be determined as an illegal act based on at least the vehicle speed information and the time information. Also, according to this traffic management device, stopping at a place other than the designated place can be determined as an illegal act based on the vehicle position information in addition to the vehicle speed information and the time information.

[0049] [3] The determination unit (control unit 34) determines the type of the fraud depending on which of a plurality of conditions the deviation satisfies (S15 to S22). The traffic management device (server 3) described in [1] or [2] above.

[0050] According to the traffic management device having the configuration of [3] above, the type of misconduct can be classified and determined as, for example, fuel theft or slacking, depending on which of a plurality of conditions the deviation satisfies.

[0051] [4] An operation information storage unit (operation data DB 33) for storing the operation information acquired by the acquisition unit, The acquisition unit (control unit 34) acquires other operation information acquired by other vehicle-mounted devices (2) mounted on other vehicles (10) other than the vehicle, The operation information storage unit (operation data DB33) further stores the other operation information, The determination unit (control unit 34) determines whether or not the deviation from the driving instructions in the driving of the vehicle is illegal, using the other operation information. An operation management device according to any one of the above [1] to [3].

[0052] According to the traffic management device having the configuration of [4] above, by taking into consideration the traffic conditions of other vehicles, it is possible to accurately determine whether or not there is fraudulent behavior. According to this traffic management device, for example, when the traffic of a vehicle deviates from the traffic instructions, if the traffic of other vehicles also deviates from the traffic instructions, it is determined that the behavior is appropriate according to the road conditions of the day, and therefore there is no fraudulent behavior.

[0053] [5] The determination unit (control unit 34) determines the validity of the route specified in the driving instruction based on the operation information and the other operation information, and determines whether the deviation is illegal or not, taking into account the result of the determination of the validity (see FIG. 9 ). The traffic management device (server 3) described in [4] above.

[0054] According to the traffic management device having the configuration of [5] above, by taking into account the result of the judgment of the validity of the route specified in the operation instruction, it is possible to judge whether or not there is fraudulent behavior with greater accuracy. According to this traffic management device, for example, if the planned route is not valid, it is possible to avoid erroneously judging that a driver who drives appropriately has engaged in fraudulent behavior by not judging whether or not there is fraud. Alternatively, according to this traffic management device, if the deviation is judged to be fraudulent, and the planned route is not valid, it is possible to accurately judge whether or not there is fraudulent behavior by re-judging that the deviation is not fraudulent.

[0055] [6] A presentation unit (Internet communication unit 31) is provided that, when the determination unit determines that the operation information is fraudulent, indicates a portion of the operation information that deviates from the operation instructions and is determined to be fraudulent. The traffic management device (server 3) according to any one of the above [1] to [5].

[0056] According to the operation management device having the configuration of [6] above, the manager can show the part of the operation information that is determined to be fraudulent to the driver and provide confirmation and guidance to the driver.

[0057] [7] An operation management device according to any one of [1] to [6] above, The vehicle-mounted device, a terminal connected to the network and configured to receive from the traffic management device a result of the determination made by the determination unit as to whether the deviation is fraudulent; An operation management system equipped with

[0058] According to the traffic control system of the configuration of [7] above, by comparing the operation instructions with the operating information, it is determined whether deviation from the operation instructions in the actual operation of the vehicle is illegal or not, so that the illegal behavior of the driver can be detected. Therefore, this traffic control system can prevent the illegal behavior of the driver. In addition, this traffic control system can promote the improvement of the driver's morale and reduce fuel costs during transportation.

[0059] [8] A program for causing a computer to function as an operation management device that manages the operation of a vehicle by transmitting and receiving information to and from an on-board device mounted on a vehicle connected to a network, the program comprising: A step (S1) of acquiring operation information recorded by the vehicle-mounted device; A program for executing steps (S4, S5, S6) of determining whether or not a deviation from the driving instructions in the operation of the vehicle (YES in S3) is illegal by comparing (S2) the operating information with the driving instructions created for the vehicle.

[0060] According to the program of the above configuration [8], by comparing the operation instructions with the operating information, it is determined whether deviation from the operation instructions in the actual operation of the vehicle is illegal or not, so that the driver's illegal behavior can be detected. Therefore, according to this program, the driver's illegal behavior can be suppressed. Furthermore, according to this program, it is possible to promote improvement of the driver's morale and reduce fuel costs during transportation.

[0061] [9] The instruction storage unit stores, as the operation instruction, information including a type of transported goods to be transported by the vehicle, The determination unit determines whether the deviation is fraudulent or not according to the type. The traffic management device according to any one of the above [1] to [6].

[0062]

[10] A method for managing a vehicle operation in a vehicle operation management device that is connected to a network and manages the operation of a vehicle by transmitting and receiving information to and from an on-board device mounted on the vehicle, comprising: Acquire the operation information recorded by the in-vehicle device, comparing the operation information with driving instructions created for the vehicle to determine whether a deviation from the driving instructions in the operation of the vehicle is illegal; Operation management method.

[0063]

[11] A computer-readable recording medium having recorded thereon a program for causing a computer to function as an operation management device that manages the operation of a vehicle by transmitting and receiving information to and from an on-board device mounted on the vehicle through a network, The program causes the computer to acquiring operation information recorded by the vehicle-mounted device; and determining whether or not a deviation from the driving instructions in the operation of the vehicle is illegal by comparing the operation information with the driving instructions created for the vehicle. Recording medium. [Explanation of symbols]

[0064] 1 Traffic control system 2 Onboard equipment 3 Server 6 Terminal 10 Trucks (vehicles) 11 Internet communication network 21,31 Internet Communication Department 22 GPS communication unit 23 External connection terminal 24 CAN interface (I / F) 25,34 Control section 30 Display section 31 Internet Communications Department 32 Instruction data database (DB) 33 Operational Data Database (DB) 40 Speaker

Claims

1. A vehicle operation management device that is connected to a network and transmits and receives information to and from an on-board device mounted on a vehicle to manage the operation of the vehicle, an instruction storage unit for storing operation instructions created for the vehicle; An acquisition unit that acquires operation information recorded by the vehicle-mounted device; a determination unit that determines whether or not a deviation from the driving instructions in the driving of the vehicle is illegal by comparing the driving instructions stored in the instruction storage unit with the operation information acquired by the acquisition unit; Equipped with The determination unit determines that the driver of the vehicle is taking a rest when the duration of the stopped state of the vehicle is longer than a first threshold value, and determines that the driver is suspected of slacking off when the determination unit determines that the stopped position of the vehicle during the rest state is other than a designated location or when the determination unit determines that the duration of the rest state is longer than a second threshold value. Operation control device.

2. A vehicle operation management device that is connected to a network and that manages the operation of a vehicle by transmitting and receiving information to and from an on-board device mounted on the vehicle, an instruction storage unit for storing operation instructions created for the vehicle; An acquisition unit that acquires operation information recorded by the vehicle-mounted device; a determination unit that determines whether or not a deviation from the driving instructions in the driving of the vehicle is illegal by comparing the driving instructions stored in the instruction storage unit with the operation information acquired by the acquisition unit; Equipped with the determination unit determines that a driver of the vehicle is resting when the duration of the stopped state of the vehicle is longer than a first threshold value, and determines that there is a suspicion of fuel theft when the engine speed during the resting state is higher than an idling speed. Operation control device.

3. A vehicle operation management device that is connected to a network and transmits and receives information to and from an on-board device mounted on a vehicle, and manages the operation of the vehicle, an instruction storage unit for storing operation instructions created for the vehicle; An acquisition unit that acquires operation information recorded by the vehicle-mounted device; a determination unit that determines whether or not a deviation from the driving instructions in the driving of the vehicle is illegal by comparing the driving instructions stored in the instruction storage unit with the operation information acquired by the acquisition unit; Equipped with The instruction storage unit stores, as the operation instruction, information including a type of transported goods to be transported by the vehicle; The determination unit determines whether the deviation is fraudulent or not according to the type. Operation control device.

4. A vehicle operation management device that is connected to a network and transmits and receives information to and from an on-board device mounted on a vehicle to manage the operation of the vehicle, an instruction storage unit for storing operation instructions created for the vehicle; An acquisition unit that acquires operation information recorded by the vehicle-mounted device; a determination unit that determines whether or not a deviation from the driving instructions in the driving of the vehicle is illegal by comparing the driving instructions stored in the instruction storage unit with the operation information acquired by the acquisition unit; an operation information storage unit for storing the operation information acquired by the acquisition unit; Equipped with The acquisition unit acquires other operation information acquired by other in-vehicle devices mounted in other vehicles other than the vehicle, The operation information storage unit further stores the other operation information, The determination unit determines whether or not the deviation from the operation instructions in the operation of the vehicle is fraudulent by using the other operation information. Operation control device.

5. the determination unit determines the validity of a route specified in the driving instruction based on the operation information and the other operation information, and determines whether the deviation is fraudulent or not, taking into account a result of the determination of the validity. The operation management device according to claim 4.

6. a presentation unit that displays, when the determination unit determines that the operation is fraudulent, a portion of the operation information that deviates from the operation instructions and is determined to be fraudulent, The traffic management device according to any one of claims 1 to 5.

7. A traffic management device according to any one of claims 1 to 6, The vehicle-mounted device, a terminal connected to the network and configured to receive from the traffic management device a result of the determination made by the determination unit as to whether the deviation is fraudulent; An operation management system equipped with

8. A program for causing a computer to function as a vehicle operation management device that manages the operation of a vehicle by transmitting and receiving information to and from an on-board device mounted on a vehicle connected to a network, the program comprising: acquiring operation information recorded by the vehicle-mounted device; and determining whether or not a deviation from the driving instructions in the operation of the vehicle is illegal by comparing the operation information with the driving instructions created for the vehicle; The step of determining whether the deviation is fraudulent includes determining that the driver of the vehicle is resting when the duration of the stopped state of the vehicle is longer than a first threshold value, and determining that the driver is suspected of slacking off when the stopping position of the vehicle during the resting state is determined to be other than a designated location or when the duration of the resting state is determined to be longer than a second threshold value. program.

Images