Penalty Payment Collection System

Abstract

Promote compliance with the specified rules by making it easy and certain to recover the penalty fines imposed for violations of the specified rules. 【Solution means】A penalty fine collection system 100 having a central management server 1 capable of claim procedures, wherein the central management server 1 determines the occurrence of a violation of the specified rules and the violator among a plurality of registered players subject to the specified rules, and a subrogation payment claim process for claiming the penalty fine levied for the violation against a supporter having a specific relationship with the violator by subrogation payment.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] The present invention relates to a penalty fine collection system for collecting penalty fines imposed due to violations of specified rules.

Background Art

[0002] Conventionally, as described in, for example, Patent Document 1, there is known a system that executes a subrogation waiver process when a subrogation waiver in a rent debt guarantee company is detected based on a delinquency report from a real estate management company.

Prior Art Documents

Patent Documents

[0003]

Patent Document 1

Summary of the Invention

Problems to be Solved by the Invention

[0004] On the other hand, in a specific community or the like, a policy may be taken to impose a large penalty fine on serious violators for the purpose of thoroughly enforcing compliance with specified rules. In contrast, although the delinquent rent as in the above prior art can be easily recovered as a legally recognized claim, in many cases, the above-mentioned penalty fines are ignored by violators due to their nature and are likely to be difficult to recover.

[0005] An object of the present disclosure is to provide a penalty fine collection system that can easily and surely collect penalty fines imposed due to violations of specified rules and promote compliance with the specified rules.

Means for Solving the Problems

[0006] In order to achieve the above object, the invention of the present application is a penalty fine collection system having a central management server capable of claim procedures, wherein the central management server executes a violation determination process for determining the occurrence of a violation of a specified rule and the violator among a plurality of subjects to whom the specified rule is imposed, and a subrogation payment claim process for claiming, by subrogation payment, a penalty fine levied for the violation against a related party having a specific relationship with the violator.

[0007] The penalty fine collection system of the invention of the present application does not directly collect the penalty fine from the registered player individual who is the violator, but claims the penalty fine by subrogation payment from a responsible supporter such as a corporate legal person having a specific relationship with the registered player, so there is a high possibility of quick collection. As a result, it is possible to easily and surely collect the penalty fine from the registered player who is the violator, and accordingly, it is possible to enhance the economic deterrence against the registered player and thoroughly enforce the compliance with the specified rules.

Effects of the Invention

[0008] According to the present disclosure, it is possible to promote compliance with the specified rules by making it possible to easily and surely collect the penalty fine imposed due to violation of the specified rules.

Brief Description of the Drawings

[0009]

Figure 1

Figure 2

Figure 3

Figure 4

Figure 5

Figure 6

Figure 7

Figure 8

Figure 9

Figure 10

Mode for Carrying Out the Invention

[0010] <First Embodiment> The first embodiment of the present invention will be described with reference to the drawings. In the first embodiment, it relates to a penalty fine collection system that targets a large number of international soccer players belonging to a predetermined international players association and collects penalty fines imposed on violators who have committed serious violations of the rules stipulated by the international players association. Note that, as an example of the subjects to whom the stipulated rules are applied, the case of the above-mentioned soccer players will be described, but it is not limited to natural persons such as other sports players, entertainers, cultural figures, celebrities, politicians, etc., or corporations.

[0011] <Outline of the Network Connection Configuration in the Penalty Fine Collection System> FIG. 1 shows an example of the overall configuration of the penalty fine collection system 100 according to the present embodiment. As shown in FIG. 1, the penalty fine collection system 100 includes one central management server 1 and a plurality of input terminals 2. The central management server 1 is a server maintained and operated by the international players association in which a large number of international soccer players (four players A to D in the illustrated example) are registered. The input terminal 2 is a terminal device held and operated by each registered player of the international players association. These central management server 1 and input terminal 2 are connected so as to be able to transmit and receive information via a wide area communication network NT such as the Internet that covers a wide area.

[0012] <Central management server> As shown in FIG. 2, the central management server 1 has a processor 110, a storage device 115, and a communication interface 190. These processor 110, storage device 115, and communication interface 190 are connected to each other via a bus 105 so as to be able to transmit and receive data.

[0013] The storage device 115 includes a volatile storage device 120 and a non-volatile storage device 130. The volatile storage device 120 is, for example, a DRAM and stores various programs and data to be processed. The non-volatile storage device 130 is, for example, a hard disk drive or a solid state drive, and has a program storage area 131 and a player-specific related person database 135. Programs 132 and 133 for executing violation determination processing and subrogation repayment claim processing, which will be described later, are stored in the program storage area 131. As will be described in detail later, the player-specific related person database 135 stores related person information such as supporters and support amounts in the player-specific community formed for each registered player.

[0014] The processor 110 is a device for performing data processing, for example, a CPU, and executes various programs stored in the program storage area 131. The processor 110 receives the above-mentioned related person information from the input terminal 2 held by each registered player via the wide area communication network NT and stores it in the player-specific related person database 135.

[0015] The communication interface 190 is a network interface for connecting to the wide area communication network NT and transmitting and receiving information.

[0016] <Input terminal> The input terminal 2 is, for example, a general-purpose personal computer equipped with a display function for image information, an operation input function, a communication function for sending and receiving data, and an information processing function for processing data. Note that the input terminal 2 may be another information terminal such as a tablet computer or a smartphone instead of the above general-purpose personal computer.

[0017] <Regarding the player-specific community> In the present embodiment, each registered player forms an official community with related parties having some specific relationship as shown in FIG. 3. In the case of the present embodiment, this specific relationship is mainly a relationship of economically supporting the registered players A to D. For example, supporters such as companies, organizations, or individuals acting as sponsors become related parties.

[0018] The above input terminal 2 is held for each player-specific community, and it is necessary to register the registered players A to D and the supporters constituting each player-specific community with the central management server 1 via the input terminal 2. Then, during normal operation, every time each supporter pays an individual support amount to the registered players A to D, the individual support amount is input into the input terminal 2 as shown in the figure and transmitted to the central management server 1 for storage.

[0019] As a result, in the central management server 1, a player-specific related party database 135 as shown in FIG. 4 is recorded. As shown in the figure, the names of all registered players are recorded in the player-specific related party database 135. And for each registered player, the names of all corresponding supporters and the total amount of individual support amounts paid by each supporter so far are recorded as relational parameters.

[0020] Here, regarding the total amount of individual support, the value of the burden ratio is also calculated as supplementary information. The burden ratio means the ratio that each supporter, who is related to the violating registered player, bears respectively with respect to the penalty fine imposed on one violating registered player, as described later. The burden ratio in the example of this embodiment is calculated as the ratio of the total individual support amount of each supporter to the total support amount paid to the registered player. In the illustrated example, for example, in the case of player D, the total individual support amount of supporter 1 = ¥△△△, the total individual support amount of supporter 2 = ¥***, and the total individual support amount of supporter 1 = ¥×××. Therefore, the burden ratio of supporter 1 (++%) = ¥△△△ / (¥△△△ + ¥*** + ¥×××), the burden ratio of supporter 2 (##%) = ¥*** / (¥△△△ + ¥*** + ¥×××), and the burden ratio of supporter 3 (!!%) = ¥××× / (¥△△△ + ¥*** + ¥×××) are calculated respectively.

[0021] Although not particularly illustrated, in the player-specific related person database 135, for each registered player and each supporter, contact information such as address, residence, phone number, email address, etc., as well as financial account information enabling money transfer, is recorded together with information on their respective names. Based on this financial account information, the central management server 1 enables a billing procedure via various financial networks.

[0022] <Regarding the International Players Association and the Recovery of Penalty Fines> In the example of this embodiment, the International Players Association is a voluntary organization of soccer players who are active internationally. As described above, the central management server 1 is operated by the International Players Association, that is, the International Players Association manages the entire penalty fine recovery system 100 of this embodiment. As one of the membership conditions for the International Players Association, each registered player is required to form the above-mentioned player-specific community and manage the input of information on supporters and support amounts via the input terminal 2 therein.

[0023] The International Athletes Association has established regulatory rules that registered athletes under its jurisdiction must strictly abide by. These regulatory rules cover not only regulations regarding contracts with teams and joining / leaving the association, but also regulations related to social and ethical norms, for example. However, when the athletes' own awareness is low, the regulatory rules themselves may be disregarded. Therefore, in order to thoroughly enforce compliance with these rules, a penalty fee is imposed on violators. This penalty fee is set at a rather large amount for the purpose of suppressing violations. However, if the International Athletes Association's enforcement power and social restraint are low, individual athletes may ignore the payment of such penalty fees.

[0024] In contrast, in the penalty fee collection system 100 of the present embodiment, as shown in FIG. 5, the central management server 1 determines the occurrence of violations and the violators. Then, instead of directly collecting the penalty fee imposed for the violation from the registered athlete who is the violator, the central management server 1 requests the supporters belonging to the community of the registered athlete to make a subrogation payment.

[0025] The amount requested for each supporter's subrogation payment is the amount obtained by multiplying the respective burden ratios described above by the total penalty fee. In the illustrated example, for a penalty fee of ¥***** generated by a violation, the supporter 1 is requested to pay an amount of (¥***** × ++%), which is the product of the burden ratio ++% and the penalty fee. Also, the supporter 2 is requested to pay an amount of (¥***** × ##%), which is the product of the burden ratio ##% and the penalty fee, and the supporter 3 is requested to pay an amount of (¥***** ×!!%), which is the product of the burden ratio!!% and the penalty fee. This enables a fair sharing of the social responsibilities of each supporter towards the registered athlete who is the violator. The above subrogation payment request process is performed by executing the subrogation payment request processing program 133 stored in the program storage area 131 of the central management server 1.

[0026] Regarding the violation determination process, various determinations are required according to the content of the specified rules. For example, an automatic determination process based on a predetermined mathematical algorithm may be performed based on the published numerical data. This may be performed by executing the violation determination process program 132 stored in the program storage area 131 of the central management server 1. Alternatively, an appropriate person in charge of the International Athletes Association may make a determination based on the reported content conveyed by each media or the information obtained independently. Or, a determination may be made by a so-called AI that has learned past case data.

[0027] Since individual registered athletes may delay or ignore the payment of the penalty fine in case of violating the public specified rules due to the dilution of their social responsibility, for example, when a supporter such as a corporate legal person is claimed for subrogation payment, it is highly likely that a responsible and prompt payment will be made due to its high social credit. Thereafter, the supporter obtains the right of recourse in exchange for the payment of the subrogation payment and claims the amount of the subrogation payment from the registered athlete, and may conduct a recovery with a time grace period. Applying the above subrogation payment mechanism to a corporate legal person does not amount to the confiscation of private property and does not violate international law.

[0028] According to this embodiment, as a result, the International Athletes Association can easily and surely collect the penalty fine from the violating registered athlete, and accordingly, can enhance the economic deterrence against the registered athlete and thoroughly enforce the compliance with the specified rules.

[0029] <Effects of the First Embodiment> As described above, in the penalty fine collection system 100 of this embodiment, there is a central management server 1 capable of performing a claim procedure. This central management server 1 executes a violation determination process for determining the occurrence of a violation act and the violator among a plurality of registered athletes subject to a predetermined specified rule, and a subrogation payment claim process for claiming the penalty fine levied for the violation act from a supporter having a specific relationship with the violator by way of subrogation payment.

[0030] Thus, in this embodiment, instead of directly collecting the penalty fine from the individual registered athlete who is the violator, the penalty fine is claimed for subrogation payment from a socially responsible supporter such as a corporate legal person having a specific relationship with the registered athlete. As a result, there is a high possibility of prompt collection. Consequently, since it is possible to easily and surely collect the penalty fine from the registered athlete who is the violator, the economic deterrence against the registered athlete can be enhanced accordingly, and compliance with the regulatory rules can be thoroughly enforced.

[0031] In addition, the penalty fine collection system 100 of this embodiment further includes input terminals 2 corresponding to each of a plurality of registered athletes. Each input terminal 2 inputs relationship parameters indicating a specific relationship between the corresponding registered athlete and the supporter and transmits them to the central management server 1. In the process of claiming subrogation payment, the central management server 1 calculates the claim amount for the corresponding supporter based on each relationship parameter. Thereby, the social responsibilities of each supporter to the registered athlete who is the violator can be fairly shared.

[0032] In this embodiment, the specific relationship between the registered athlete and the supporter is the economic support from the supporter to the registered athlete. The input terminal 2 inputs the total amount of individual support from each supporter to the registered athlete as a relationship parameter. In the process of claiming subrogation payment, the central management server 1 calculates the claim amount with the ratio of the total amount of individual support from each supporter to the total amount of support to the registered athlete as the burden ratio for the penalty fine. Thereby, the social responsibilities of each supporter to the registered athlete who is the violator can be numerically and fairly shared.

[0033] Note that the persons related to the athlete-specific community of the registered athlete are not limited to the supporters who provide economic support. For example, other blood relatives or close relatives with a specific relationship such as a blood relationship may also be regarded as related persons. In that case, parameters such as the kinship and the number of years of relationship among the blood relatives may be applied as relationship parameters.

[0034] <Second Embodiment> A second embodiment of the present invention will be described with reference to the drawings. In the second embodiment, it relates to a compensation collection system that targets countries and collects compensation from violators who have committed serious violations against the war-starting prohibition rules defined by a predetermined international peacekeeping organization such as the United Nations. Note that, although the case where the above country is an example of the entity to which the defined rules apply will be described, it is not limited to groups or individuals such as military groups and regions.

[0035] <Outline of the network connection configuration in the compensation collection system> FIG. 6 shows an example of the overall configuration of a compensation collection system 200 according to this embodiment. As shown in FIG. 6, the compensation collection system 200 includes one central management server 11 and a plurality of input terminals 12. The central management server 11 is a server held and operated by the compensation collection agency of an international peacekeeping organization to which a large number of countries (four countries A to D in the illustrated example) belong. The input terminal 12 is a terminal device held and operated by each member country of the compensation collection agency. These central management server 11 and input terminal 12 are connected so as to be able to transmit and receive information via a wide area communication network NT such as the Internet that covers a wide area.

[0036] <Central management server and input terminal> As shown in FIG. 7, the central management server 11 used in this embodiment is substantially equivalent in hardware configuration to the central management server 1 used in the first embodiment shown in FIG. 2 above. The difference is that a war start determination processing program 134, a subrogation payment claim processing program 133, and a compensation payment processing program 136 are stored as programs stored in the program storage area 131 of the non-volatile storage device 130. The non-volatile storage device 130 also stores a country-specific related person database 137. In the country-specific related person database 137, related person information such as supporters and support amounts in the country-specific community formed for each member country, which will be described in detail later, is stored. The same reference numerals are given to other equivalent configurations and the description thereof is omitted. Also, the input terminal 12 is equivalent to the input terminal 2 used in the first embodiment above, and the description thereof is omitted here.

[0037] <Regarding Country-Specific Communities> In this embodiment, each of the member countries forms an official community with certain specific related parties as shown in FIG. 8. In the case of this embodiment, this specific relationship is mainly a relationship of economically supporting the member countries A to D. For example, supporters such as enterprises, organizations, or individuals that pay taxes or provide funds become the related parties.

[0038] The above input terminal 12 is held for each such country-specific community, and it is necessary to register the member countries A to D and the supporters that constitute each country-specific community via the input terminal 12 with the central management server 11. During normal operation, each time a supporter pays an individual support amount to the member countries A to D, as shown in the figure, the individual support amount is input into the input terminal 12 and transmitted to the central management server 11 for storage.

[0039] As a result, in the central management server 11, a country-specific related party database 137 as shown in FIG. 9 is recorded. As shown in the figure, the names of all member countries are recorded in the country-specific related party database 137. And for each member country, the names of all corresponding supporters and the total amount of individual support amounts paid by each supporter so far are recorded as relational parameters.

[0040] Here, for the total amount of individual support, the value of the burden ratio is also calculated as supplementary information. The burden ratio means the ratio that each supporter, who is a person related to the violating member state, bears respectively for the compensation imposed on one violating member state, as will be described later. In the example of this embodiment, the burden ratio is calculated as the ratio of the total individual support amount of each supporter to the total support amount paid to the member state. In the illustrated example, for example, in the case of Country B, the total individual support amount of Supporter 1 = ¥△△△, the total individual support amount of Supporter 2 = ¥***, and the total individual support amount of Supporter 3 = ¥×××. Therefore, the burden ratio of Supporter 1 (++%) = ¥△△△ / (¥△△△ + ¥*** + ¥×××), the burden ratio of Supporter 2 (##%) = ¥*** / (¥△△△ + ¥*** + ¥×××), and the burden ratio of Supporter 3 (!!%) = ¥××× / (¥△△△ + ¥*** + ¥×××) are calculated respectively.

[0041] Although not particularly shown in the figure, in the country - specific person database 137, for each member state and each supporter, contact information such as the main address, residence, phone number, email address, etc., as well as financial account information through which money can be transferred, are recorded together with the information of their respective names. The central management server 11 enables a billing procedure via various financial networks based on this financial account information.

[0042] <Regarding the Compensation Recovery Institution and the Recovery of Compensation> In the example of this embodiment, the compensation recovery institution is a part of the above - mentioned predetermined international peace - keeping organization. As described above, the central management server 11 is operated by the compensation recovery institution, that is, the compensation recovery institution manages the entire compensation recovery system 200 of this embodiment. As one of the conditions for joining the international peace - keeping organization, each member state forms the above - mentioned country - specific community and manages the input of information on supporters and support amounts through the input terminal 12 therein.

[0043] And for the compensation recovery mechanism, there are regulatory rules that member states must strictly abide by. The most important regulatory rule is the prohibition of the start of war. However, when the state's own sense of norms is low, the regulatory rules themselves may be disregarded. Therefore, in order to thoroughly enforce the compliance with the regulatory rules, compensation will be imposed on violators. This compensation is for compensating the damaged party against whom war was waged by the violating state, and is set at a rather large amount as it also aims to suppress acts of war. However, if the recovery enforcement power and social restraint power of the compensation recovery mechanism are low, there may be cases where the violating state ignores the payment of such compensation.

[0044] In contrast, in the compensation recovery system 200 of the present embodiment, as shown in FIG. 10, the central management server 11 determines the occurrence of a violation and the violator. Then, instead of directly recovering the compensation imposed for the violation from the violating state (state B in the illustrated example), the central management server 11 requests a supporter belonging to the community of the member state to make a subrogation payment.

[0045] The amount requested for each supporter to make a subrogation payment is the amount obtained by multiplying the above-mentioned respective burden ratios by the total compensation. In the illustrated example, for the compensation of ¥***** generated by the violation, the supporter 1 is requested to pay an amount of (¥***** × ++%), which is the amount obtained by multiplying the burden ratio of ++% to the compensation. Also, the supporter 2 is requested to pay an amount of (¥***** × ##%), which is the amount obtained by multiplying the burden ratio of ##% to the compensation, and the supporter 3 is requested to pay an amount of (¥***** ×!!%), which is the amount obtained by multiplying the burden ratio of!!% to the compensation. This enables a fair sharing of the social responsibilities of each supporter towards the member state of the violator. The above subrogation payment request process is performed by executing the subrogation payment request process program 133 stored in the program storage area 131 of the central management server 11.

[0046] Regarding the violation determination process, various determinations are required according to the content of the specified rules. For example, an automatic determination process based on a predetermined mathematical algorithm may be performed based on the published numerical data. This may be performed by executing the war start determination process program 134 stored in the program storage area 131 of the central management server 11. Alternatively, an appropriate person in charge of the compensation recovery mechanism may make a judgment based on the reported content transmitted by each media or the information obtained independently. Alternatively, a determination by a so-called AI that has learned past case data may be performed.

[0047] When a member country alone violates public regulations due to the dilution of its social responsibility, it may delay or ignore the payment of compensation. However, for example, when a supporter such as a corporate legal person is claimed for subrogation payment, there is a high possibility that a responsible and prompt payment will be made due to its high social credit. After that, the supporter obtains the right of recourse in exchange for the payment of the subrogation payment and claims the amount of the subrogation payment from the violating country, and can conduct a recovery with a time grace period. Applying the above subrogation payment mechanism to a corporate legal person does not amount to the confiscation of private property and does not violate international law.

[0048] Then, the recovered compensation is promptly paid from the violating country (country B in the illustrated example) to the victim country (country D in the illustrated example) that has suffered damage due to the act of war. This is performed by executing the compensation payment process program 136 stored in the program storage area 131 of the central management server 11. For example, by designating the compensation recovery mechanism as a correspondent bank (Corres Bank), the remittance process (ISO20022) based on the code determined by the Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunications is performed. As a result, a mechanism is established in which compensation is paid to the victim country even during the war without waiting for the end of the war, which can compensate for the damage caused by improper infringement acts and provide economic support to the victim country.

[0049] According to this embodiment, as a result, the compensation recovery mechanism can easily and surely recover the compensation from the member state of the violator, and accordingly, it is possible to enhance the economic deterrence against the member state and thoroughly enforce the compliance with the regulatory rules.

[0050] <Effect of the Second Embodiment> As described above, in the compensation recovery system 100 of this embodiment, the target is a country, the predetermined regulatory rule in the violation determination process is the prohibition of acts of war, and the penalty payment in the subrogation payment claim process is the compensation for acts of war. As a result, the compensation recovery mechanism can easily and surely recover the compensation from the member state of the violator, and accordingly, it is possible to enhance the economic deterrence against the member state and thoroughly enforce the compliance with the regulatory rules, that is, the prohibition of war.

[0051] Also, in this embodiment, the central management server 11 executes a compensation payment process of paying the compensation recovered by the claim in the subrogation payment claim process to the victim country that has suffered damage due to acts of war. As a result, a mechanism is established in which the compensation is paid to the victim country even during the war without waiting for the end of the war, which can compensate for the damage caused by improper infringement acts and provide economic support to the victim country.

[0052] In addition, other than those already described above, the methods according to the above embodiments and each modification example may be appropriately combined and used.

[0053] In addition, although not exemplified one by one, the present disclosure can be implemented with various modifications within the scope not departing from its gist.

Explanation of Reference Numerals

[0054] 1, 11 Central management server 2, 12 Input terminal 100 Penalty payment recovery system 132 Violation determination process program 133 Subrogation payment claim process program 134 War start determination process program 135 Player-Related Person Database 136 Compensation Payment Processing Program 137 Country-Related Person Database 200 Compensation Recovery System NT Wide-Area Communication Network

Claims

A penalty fine collection system comprising a central management server equipped with a memory device and capable of claim procedures, and input terminals corresponding to a plurality of subjects for which predetermined rules are imposed, wherein: the central management server:[[]] a recording process of recording relational parameters including the names of supporters and the amounts of support for the plurality of subjects in the memory device to form a database; a violation determination process of determining, for the occurrence of violations of the predetermined rules among the plurality of subjects and the violators, based on a predetermined numerical algorithm based on numerical data published by executing a determination processing program pre-stored in the memory device; Among the penalty fines levied for the violation, calculating the amount of the claim borne by a person having a specific relationship with the violator determined by the amount of support and the name of the supporter included in the relational parameters in the database, and using the amount of the claim as a subrogation payment exchangeable for the right of recourse against the violator, making a claim against the person based on the financial account information of the person recorded in the database for the subrogation payment claim process; A penalty fine collection system characterized by executing the above.

2. The subject is a country, The predetermined rule in the violation determination process is the prohibition of acts of war, The penalty fine in the subrogation payment claim process is the compensation for the act of war, The central management server further:[[]] A compensation payment process of paying the compensation recovered by the claim in the subrogation payment claim process to the victim country affected by the act of war by a remittance process according to a code determined by the Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication using a compensation payment processing program pre-stored in the memory device The penalty fine collection system according to claim 1, characterized by executing the above.

Images