Weeding / weed control device and weeding / weed control method

Abstract

To provide an environmentally friendly weeding and weed prevention implement, and a weeding and weed prevention method excellent in weeding and weed prevention effects, which achieves labor saving in work and maintains effects over a long period of time.SOLUTION: A weeding and weed prevention implement includes an electrode 2 laid in a weed prevention target region, and a power source device 3 for applying a voltage to the electrode 2. The electrode 2 consists of a positive electrode 4 connected to a positive side of the power source device 3 and a negative electrode 5 connected to a negative side of the power source device 3. The positive electrode 4 and the negative electrode 5 are disposed separately, and an electric stimulus is given to a plant 6 interposed between the electrodes by an electric action generated between the positive electrode 4 and the negative electrode 5 by a voltage being applied to the electrode 2.SELECTED DRAWING: Figure 1

Description

[Technical Field]

[0001] The present invention relates to a weeding / weed control device and a weeding / weed control method that use electrical stimulation to control weeds. [Background technology]

[0002] Labor-saving and cost-effective weed control is required in all areas, including agriculture and construction sites. Common methods for weed control include chemical control using pesticides and physical control using brush cutters. The former, chemical control, poses environmental concerns, including impacts on ecosystems, potential drift into nearby areas, and potential impacts on water systems due to underground runoff. There are also concerns about the impact of inhaling pesticide ingredients on the human body. Furthermore, the latter, physical control, requires more frequent weeding because weeds quickly regrow from the remaining roots underground after cutting the stems and leaves above ground. This increases labor costs and poses challenges, such as the risk of heatstroke during intense heat and the health hazards posed by the vibrations and noise of brush cutters.

[0003] In addition to the chemical and physical control methods mentioned above, electrical control methods have been developed in recent years, in which high voltage is discharged or applied to weeds. This electrical control method involves applying a high voltage between electrodes and applying the discharged current to the weeds to electrically stimulate them, or by directly contacting the weeds with electrodes to which a high voltage has been applied, thereby destroying their cells and tissues and causing them to wither and die.

[0004] As an example of such an electrical control method, Patent Document 1 below discloses an electric weeding machine equipped with a high-voltage generator as an electric discharge weeding device that simultaneously uses the discharge or application of high voltage or static electricity to wither and kill plants and to cut or crush them. This electric weeding machine is equipped with an upper cutting blade connected to a positive electrode led from the high-voltage generator and a lower cutting blade connected to a negative electrode led from the high-voltage generator, and when weeds come into contact with the cutting blades and are cut, a spark discharge occurs, and the weeds that are subjected to this discharge have their root, stem and leaf cells destroyed and are crushed and removed. [Prior art documents] [Patent documents]

[0005] [Patent Document 1] Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 2002-186324 Summary of the Invention [Problem to be solved by the invention]

[0006] However, the weeding device disclosed in Patent Document 1 has the risk of electric shock due to electrical leakage, making it impossible to ensure the safety of the operator. In addition, although a discharge device is attached to the brush cutter, it is expected that the frequency of mowing will be reduced, so as a person must still move around to mow the grass with the brush cutter, as in the past, so it does not reduce labor and has other drawbacks, such as increased labor costs.

[0007] In particular, in the case of fields, weed control sheets are laid on the rows where crops are planted to suppress weeds, but because weed control sheets are not installed in the paths between the rows, there is a problem of weeds growing and robbing the field of nutrients.

[0008] Therefore, the main object of the present invention is to provide an environmentally friendly weeding / weed control device and method that are excellent in weeding and weed control effects, reduce labor required for the work, and maintain the effects over a long period of time. [Means for solving the problem]

[0009] In order to solve the above problems, the present invention according to claim 1 provides a weed control system comprising an electrode laid in an area where weeds are to be controlled, and a power supply device that applies a voltage to the electrode, the electrodes include a positive electrode connected to a positive side of the power supply device and a negative electrode connected to a negative side of the power supply device, the positive electrode and the negative electrode being disposed apart from each other; A weeding and weed prevention device is provided in which, when a voltage is applied to the electrodes, an electrical reaction occurs between the positive and negative electrodes, which gives an electrical stimulus to plants located between the electrodes.

[0010] The invention described in claim 1 above defines the basic form of the weed killing / weed prevention device according to the present invention. The weed killing / weed prevention device comprises electrodes installed in an area where weeds are to be controlled and a power supply device that applies a voltage to the electrodes. The electrodes consist of a positive electrode and a negative electrode, which are spaced apart. When a voltage is applied to the electrodes, an electrical action occurs between the positive and negative electrodes, which electrically stimulates plants located between the electrodes. The electrical action can be any one or a combination of two or more of an electric field generated between the positive and negative electrodes, a current flowing from one electrode to the other through at least the plant when the plant comes into contact with the electrode, and an electric discharge occurring in the gap between the electrode and the plant. Plants exposed to such electrical stimulation die. In particular, plants exposed to high-intensity electrical stimulation experience irreversible cell perforation, resulting in the leakage of cellular contents and ensuring death. Furthermore, the electric field generated between the electrodes also acts on seeds held by plants and seeds that have fallen to the ground, suppressing the germination rate of these seeds and providing a weed control effect. This type of weed control using electrical stimulation is environmentally friendly, as there is no risk of pesticides being dispersed or leaking into groundwater.

[0011] As a second aspect of the present invention, the weed control area is a field having ridges for planting crops and passages between the ridges, one electrode is disposed in each passage, and the positive and negative electrodes are disposed alternately in adjacent passages, A weed killing / weed prevention device as described in claim 1 is provided in which, when a voltage is applied to the electrodes, an electrical reaction occurs between the positive electrode and the negative electrode, which electrically stimulates plants growing in the ridges and paths between these electrodes.

[0012] The invention described in claim 2 above is a first embodiment relating to the arrangement of electrodes, and in the case where the area to be weed-controlled is a field, one electrode is arranged in each path of the field, and the positive and negative electrodes are arranged alternately in adjacent paths. This causes an electrical interaction between the positive and negative electrodes arranged in adjacent paths separated by a ridge, and an electrical stimulus is given to the plants growing in the ridges and paths between these electrodes.

[0013] As a third aspect of the present invention, the weed control area is a field having ridges for planting crops and passages between the ridges, and the positive electrode and the negative electrode are installed at a distance from each other on both sides of the passage, A weed killing / weed prevention device as described in claim 1 is provided, in which when a voltage is applied to the electrodes, an electrical reaction occurs between the positive electrode and the negative electrode, which electrically stimulates plants growing in the path between these electrodes.

[0014] The invention described in claim 3 above is a second embodiment relating to the arrangement of electrodes, in which, in the case where the area to be weed-controlled is a field, the positive electrode and the negative electrode are installed at a distance from each other on both sides of the same path in the field, and an electrical stimulus is applied to plants growing in the path between these electrodes. This embodiment is suitable for suppressing weeds that grow in the path after crops have been planted in the ridges.

[0015] As a fourth aspect of the present invention, there is provided a weeding / weed prevention device according to the first aspect, wherein the electrodes are formed in a net shape in which the positive electrodes and negative electrodes are alternately arranged at a distance from each other.

[0016] The invention described in claim 4 above is a third embodiment relating to the arrangement of electrodes, in which the electrodes are formed in a net shape with positive and negative electrodes alternately spaced apart. Net-shaped electrodes can be easily carried by rolling or folding, and can be easily laid out in an area where weeds are to be controlled. By applying a voltage to the net-shaped electrodes, weeds in the area can be easily controlled.

[0017] As a fifth aspect of the present invention, there is provided a method for weeding a ridge without planting crops in the ridges, using the weeding and weed prevention device according to the second aspect of the present invention to electrically stimulate plants growing in the ridges and paths, and then: There is provided a weeding / weed prevention method, characterized in that, with crops planted in the ridges, an electrical stimulus is applied to plants growing in the paths using the weeding / weed prevention device described in claim 3 or 4.

[0018] The invention described in claim 5 above is a method for weeding and preventing weeds in fields, in which, before planting crops in the ridges, weeds growing in the ridges and paths are controlled using the weeding and weed prevention device described in claim 2 above, and after planting crops in the ridges, weeds growing in the paths are controlled using the weeding and weed prevention device described in claim 3 or 4 above, so as not to affect the crops planted in the ridges.

[0019] The present invention according to claim 6 provides the weeding / weed control device or the weeding / weed control method according to any one of claims 1 to 5, wherein the electric field strength between the positive electrode and the negative electrode is 1.1 kV / cm or more.

[0020] In the invention described in claim 6 above, an electric field of a predetermined electric field strength or greater is applied between the electrodes to give a strong electrical stimulus to the plant, causing irreversible cell perforation and thereby ensuring the plant's death. [Effects of the Invention]

[0021] As explained above in detail, the present invention makes it possible to provide an environmentally friendly weeding / weed control device and method that are excellent in weeding and weed prevention effects, can reduce labor required for work, and maintains effects over a long period of time. [Brief explanation of the drawings]

[0022] [Figure 1] 1 is a perspective view of a field in which a weeding / weed-prevention device 1 according to a first embodiment is used. [Figure 2] FIG. 10 is a perspective view of a field in which a weeding / weed-prevention device 1 according to a second embodiment is used. [Figure 3] FIG. 10 is a perspective view of a field in which a weeding / weed-prevention device 1 according to a third embodiment is used. [Figure 4] FIG. 2 is a plan view of a net-shaped electrode 7. [Figure 5] FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram of a PFN type single pulse generating circuit. [Figure 6] FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram of the experimental setup. [Figure 7] 10 is a graph showing the relationship between the total weight of lettuce leaves and the applied pulse electric field strength. [Figure 8] 1 is a graph showing the percentage increase or decrease in the total weight of lettuce leaves. [Figure 9] FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram of an experimental device for current flow experiment 1. [Figure 10] FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram (part 1) of the experimental device for current flow experiment 2. [Figure 11] FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram (part 2) of the experimental device for current flow experiment 2. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

[0023] Hereinafter, embodiments of the present invention will be described in detail with reference to the drawings.

[0024] [First embodiment] As shown in Figure 1, the weeding and weed control device 1 according to the first embodiment of the present invention comprises an electrode 2 laid in an area where weeds are to be controlled, and a power supply device 3 that applies a voltage to the electrode 2.

[0025] The weed control area shown in Figure 1 is a field with ridges 10 for planting crops and passages 11 between the ridges, but there are no particular restrictions as long as it is land where we want to suppress the growth of weeds.For example, in addition to fields, it could be rice paddies, orchards, construction sites, or unused vacant lots.

[0026] The electrode 2 is a conductive member, and may be made of a rod, wire, strip, plate, or the like. The electrode 2 may be buried in the soil in the area where weeds are to be controlled, or may be placed along the ground surface. When buried in the soil, the depth from the ground surface is not particularly limited as long as it is within the depth range that allows weed roots to extend, but is preferably about 10 to 50 cm.

[0027] The electrode 2 consists of a positive electrode 4 connected to the positive side of the power supply device 3 and a negative electrode 5 connected to the negative side of the power supply device 3, and the positive electrode 4 and the negative electrode 5 are arranged spaced apart in the planar direction.

[0028] The distance between the positive electrode 4 and the negative electrode 5 is not particularly limited as long as it is within a range that allows the electrical action generated between these electrodes to electrically stimulate plants located between them, as will be described in detail later, but is preferably 10 to 200 cm, and more preferably 30 to 100 cm. If it is narrower than 10 cm, the spacing between the electrodes 2 becomes too small, making work difficult. On the other hand, if it is greater than 200 cm, the electric field strength between the electrodes becomes weak, and a high voltage is required to kill weeds.

[0029] When a voltage is applied to the electrode 2, an electrical action occurs between the positive electrode 4 and the negative electrode 5, which gives an electrical stimulus to the plant 6 located between these electrodes. The electrical action can be any one of or a combination of two or more of the following: an electric field generated between the positive electrode 4 and the negative electrode 5; a current flowing from one electrode 2 to the other electrode 2 through at least the plant 6 in contact with one of the electrodes 2; and an electric discharge occurring in the gap between the electrode 2 and the plant 6.

[0030] Plants 6 located between the electrodes eventually die due to the electrical action generated between the positive electrode 4 and the negative electrode 5. In particular, when the electrical action is an electric field, the high-strength electrical stimulation caused by the electric field causes irreversible cell perforation, resulting in the loss of cell contents and cell destruction, which impedes nutrient absorption and eventually leads to death. Burying the electrodes in the soil severely damages the roots of plants 6, resulting in a long-lasting herbicidal effect. Furthermore, the electrical action generated between the positive electrode 4 and the negative electrode 5 also affects seeds held by plants 6 and seeds spilled onto the ground, thereby suppressing the germination rate of these seeds, thereby achieving a herbicidal effect. Weed control using such electrical stimulation is environmentally friendly compared to chemical control methods, as it eliminates the risk of pesticides scattering or flowing into groundwater.

[0031] As described in the non-patent literature below, it has been confirmed that applying a certain electric field to plants promotes their growth through the electroporation effect. However, electric field strengths higher than this are too strong for plants, causing irreversible cell perforation and resulting in the loss of cellular contents, which has adverse effects on plants. Based on the experimental results described in the non-patent literature below, the electric field strength that causes irreversible cell destruction in plants should be 1.1 kV / cm or higher, preferably 1.5 kV / cm or higher.

[0032] In the weeding and weed control device 1 according to the first embodiment, when a voltage is applied to the electrodes, an electrical action occurs between the positive electrode 4 and the negative electrode 5, which electrically stimulates the plants 6 growing in the ridges 10 and the passages 11 between these electrodes 4, 5. In other words, the electrical action occurs between the positive electrode 4 and the negative electrode 5, which are respectively arranged in the passages 11, 11 on both sides of the ridge 10, and this electrically stimulates the plants 6 growing in the ridges 10 and the passages 11, thereby controlling weeds in the ridges 10 and the passages 11. On the other hand, because the electrical action generated between the positive electrode 4 and the negative electrode 5 passes through the ridges 10, it is preferable not to apply a voltage to the electrodes between planting crops in the ridges 10 and harvesting them to prevent the crops from dying due to the electrical stimulation.

[0033] [Second embodiment] 2, in the second embodiment, a positive electrode 4 and a negative electrode 5 are installed at a distance from each other on both sides of the same passage 11. That is, the positive electrode 4 is installed on one side of the passage 11, and the negative electrode 5 is installed on the other side.

[0034] When a voltage is applied to the electrode 2, an electrical reaction occurs between the positive electrode 4 and the negative electrode 5, which electrically stimulates the plants 6 growing in the passage 11 between these electrodes 4 and 5.

[0035] In this embodiment, electrodes 4 and 5 are placed on both sides of each passage 11, and an electrical stimulus is applied to the plants 6 located between these electrodes 4 and 5, making it possible to control weeds growing in the passages 11 even after crops have been planted in the ridges 10.

[0036] [Third embodiment] In the third embodiment, as shown in FIG. 3, a net-shaped electrode 7 in which positive electrodes 4 and negative electrodes 5 are alternately arranged at a distance from each other is disposed in each passage 11.

[0037] As shown in Fig. 4, the net-shaped electrode 7 is a lattice-shaped net-shaped substrate 8 made of an electrically insulating material, with a positive electrode 4 and a negative electrode 5 fixed along the net-shaped substrate 8. The arrangement of the positive electrode 4 and the negative electrode 5 relative to the net-shaped substrate 8 is arbitrary, but examples include an arrangement in which the positive electrode 4 and the negative electrode 5 are arranged along the longitudinal direction of the net-shaped substrate 8 and spaced apart in the lateral direction, as shown in Fig. 4(A), and an arrangement in which the positive electrode 4 and the negative electrode 5 are arranged along the lateral direction of the net-shaped substrate 8 and spaced apart in the longitudinal direction, as shown in Fig. 4(B).

[0038] In this way, the net-type electrode 7 has the positive electrodes 4 and negative electrodes 5 arranged at approximately equal intervals over the entire surface, which generates an electric field of approximately equal strength over almost the entire surface of the net-type electrode 7, making weed control more reliable. By making the net-type electrode 7 small and able to be rolled or folded, it can be easily carried and can be easily installed in the area where weeds are to be controlled, making weed control even easier.

[0039] In the example of Figure 3, the net-shaped electrode 7 is laid in the path 11 of the field, but it may also be laid on the ridges 10 to be used for weed control on the ridges 10, or it may be laid in an area other than the field.

[0040] [Weed control and prevention methods] Next, a weeding / weed prevention method using the first embodiment and the second or third embodiment will be described.

[0041] First, before crops are planted in the ridges 10, weeds are controlled in the ridges 10 and paths 11 using the weeding and weed control device 1 according to the first embodiment shown in Figure 1. Specifically, one electrode 2 is placed in each path 11, and positive electrodes 4 and negative electrodes 5 are alternately placed in adjacent paths 11, 11. By applying a voltage to these electrodes 2, an electrical action occurs between the positive electrodes 4 and negative electrodes 5, which electrically stimulates the plants 6 growing in the ridges 10 and paths 11 between these electrodes. This allows weeds in the ridges 10 and paths 11 to be controlled before crops are planted in the ridges 10.

[0042] Thereafter, with crops planted in the ridges 10, weeds in the paths 11 are controlled using the weeding / weed control device 1 according to the second embodiment shown in Fig. 2 or the third embodiment shown in Fig. 3. Specifically, as shown in Fig. 2, the positive electrode 4 and the negative electrode 5 are installed at a distance from each other on both sides of the same path 11, or as shown in Fig. 3, a net-shaped electrode 7 is installed and a voltage is applied to the electrode 2, which generates an electrical action between the positive electrode 4 and the negative electrode 5, thereby electrically stimulating the plants 6 growing in the paths 11 between these electrodes.

[0043] In this way, before crops are planted in the ridges 10, weeds within the ridges 10 can be controlled by applying an electrical action that passes through the ridges 10, and weeds in the ridges 10 can also be suppressed after the crops are planted. On the other hand, after crops are planted in the ridges 10, applying a strong electrical action to the crops may cause them to wither and die, so the device of the second or third embodiment above is used to apply an electrical action only to weeds growing in the passages 11 to control them.

[0044] After planting the crops, it is up to the user to decide whether to use the second or third embodiment, but it is preferable to use the second embodiment because the rod-shaped or wire-shaped electrode 2 of the first embodiment can be reused.

[0045] [Experiment on electric field strength] Electroporation, a technique for perforating cells using a pulsed electric field, has been known for some time and has recently begun to be applied to the agricultural field. In a non-patent document (Wang Douyan, Goto Takahiro, Yoshida Takashi, Namihira Takao, Akiyama Hidenori, Fujiwara Toshiyuki, Sato Daigo; "Lettuce Growth Control Using Pulsed Electric Fields," Institute of Electrical Engineers of Japan Pulsed Power Study Group Materials, PPT-12, March 2012, pp. 13-16), the inventors of the present application reported the results of an experiment conducted to examine the relationship between the strength of the applied pulsed electric field and the yield of lettuce grown on hydroponic lettuce, a major variety cultivated in plant factories, with the aim of controlling plant growth by applying a pulsed electric field to the roots of the plant, thereby shortening the number of days required for agricultural crop cultivation, which is one solution for promoting the widespread use of plant factories. The following is an outline of the experiment.

[0046] 1. Experimental Method <Sample to which pulse electric field is applied> In the experiment, a pulsed electric field was applied to the roots of hydroponic lettuce (variety: Early Impulse). For cultivation, lettuce seeds were sown in seedling pots filled with culture soil and grown in the pots until the planting period (approximately 20 days after sowing), after which the seedling pots were immersed in liquid fertilizer and the liquid fertilizer was circulated. The seedling pots were made of thin resin and had multiple slits spaced around the periphery on the lower side. The liquid fertilizer was absorbed through these slits and the grown roots extended outward. The lettuce leaves were harvested approximately 40 days after sowing.

[0047] In the experiment, the plants were transferred to an incubator (M-230F, manufactured by Taitec Corporation) at the time of planting and cultured for approximately 20 days until harvest. During this time, a pulsed electric field application experiment was conducted. Culture conditions were a temperature of 20-21°C, humidity of 30-95%, fluorescent lighting 24 hours a day, and illuminance of 6,800-10,000 lux. Within the incubator, seedling pots were placed in plastic trays soaked in liquid fertilizer, and a constant amount of liquid fertilizer was maintained by adding more liquid fertilizer to replace the amount lost by evaporation within the incubator.

[0048] <Pulse electric field generator> A PFN (Pulse Forming Network) type single pulse generator circuit was used to generate the pulsed electric field. An outline is shown in Figure 5. The PFN was connected in seven stages, with an inductance of 2 μH and a capacitance of 2.7 nF for each stage. The theoretical output pulse width was 400 ns and the power supply characteristic impedance was 10 Ω. The characteristic impedance was calculated from the conductivity (approximately 1 ms / cm) of the liquid fertilizer used in hydroponic lettuce cultivation and the electrode shape for applying the electric field. By connecting a matched load of 10 Ω to the input end of the PFN, the reflected wave generated at the load end was absorbed on the input side, resulting in a single pulse output.

[0049] A DC high-voltage power supply (PS / EW40R15.0-10, manufactured by GLASSMAN HIGH VOLTAGE) was used to charge the PFN. In addition, a negative pulse voltage was applied to the load to prevent discharge between the electrodes.

[0050] The voltage waveform applied between the electrodes was measured using a high-voltage probe (P6015A-R3, manufactured by Tektronix), and the current to the load was measured using a current probe (Pearson current monitor, Model 110, manufactured by Pearson Electronics) with an oscilloscope (TDS3054B, manufactured by Tektronix).

[0051] To apply a pulsed electric field to the lettuce roots, stainless steel parallel-plate electrodes (80 mm diameter, disk-shaped) were fixed to the opposing walls of an acrylic container. To vary the applied pulsed electric field strength, several acrylic containers of different lengths were created, and the parallel-plate electrodes were attached to the container corresponding to the desired electric field strength.

[0052] <Method for applying a pulsed electric field and method for evaluating the growth of lettuce> The pulsed electric field application began around the 20th day before the planting period, and was applied once daily in the morning until the harvest day. The pulsed electric field application procedure was to first fill the reactor with new liquid fertilizer, then remove the lettuce plants from the incubator and place them between parallel plate electrodes so that the entire seedling pot was immersed in the liquid fertilizer (see Figure 6). After applying the pulsed electric field to the lettuce roots, the seedling pot was removed from the reactor and returned to the incubator. The liquid fertilizer used during the electric field application in the reactor was discarded and not used for lettuce cultivation.

[0053] Based on the findings of the preliminary experiment, the frequency of the pulsed electric field applied to the lettuce roots was determined to be 1 Hz, the number of applications was determined to be 100, and the electric field strength was varied from 0.2 to 2.0 kV / cm. Taking into consideration the biological balance of the lettuce itself, three samples were used for each parameter. In addition, control samples were treated in the same way as the pulsed electric field-applied samples, and the electric field strength was set to 0.0 kV / cm (no electric field applied).

[0054] Growth was evaluated by comparing the total weight of the harvested lettuce leaves with the samples for each electric field application parameter and the control sample. At harvest, the lettuce leaves were cut to the height of the top edge of the seedling pot, and the total weight of the leaves was measured using an electronic balance (PL3002, Mettler-Toledo). To assess reproducibility, the experiment was performed three times, and the average value was used.

[0055] 2. Experimental Results Figure 7 shows the dependence of lettuce leaf weight on the applied pulsed electric field strength at harvest. Table 1 and Figure 8 show the percentage increase or decrease in the average lettuce leaf weight at each electric field strength compared to the control, with the control set at 100%. Figures 7, 8, and Table 1 clearly demonstrate that lettuce growth can be controlled by applying a pulsed electric field to the lettuce roots. Furthermore, there is an optimum electric field strength for growth promotion, and applying an electric field that is too strong can inhibit growth. Under the experimental conditions of this study (pulse duration of 400 ns, 1 Hz, 100 pulses applied once daily after planting), the optimum electric field strength for promoting lettuce leaf growth was 0.5–1.0 kV / cm, while a strong electric field of 2.0 kV / cm or higher inhibited leaf growth. Furthermore, at 0.4 kV / cm, the greatest growth promotion effect was observed, resulting in an approximately 20% increase in production compared to when no pulsed electric field was applied.

[0056] Furthermore, at harvest, the lettuce roots of the plants exposed to 0.4 kV / cm, which had the greatest growth promotion effect, were thicker and longer, and had a higher density of root hairs than the control plants.On the other hand, the plants exposed to 2.0 kV / cm, which showed growth inhibition, had less developed roots than the control plants, and the tips of the roots were brittle and crumbled when touched with a finger.

[0057] As shown in Table 1 and Figure 8, the electric field strength at which the total weight of lettuce leaves decreases compared to the control plant is approximately 1.1 kV / cm or higher, and at an electric field strength of 1.5 kV / cm or higher, the reduction rate is particularly significant, exceeding 20%.

[0058] [Table 1]

[0059] [Electrical experiment 1] An experiment on passing electricity through plants was conducted using an experimental device simulating the above-mentioned weed killing / weed prevention device 1. This experiment 1 assumed that when a plant comes into direct contact with one of the two electrodes (power applying electrode 2a, power receiving electrode 2b) (power applying electrode 2a), a current flows from this electrode through the plant and soil to the other electrode (power receiving electrode 2b), giving the plant an electrical stimulus.

[0060] As shown in Figure 9, the experimental setup consisted of a cultivation pot containing three plants 6 (sorghum), a horizontally stretched linear application electrode 2a, a power-receiving electrode 2b inserted into the soil from the bottom of the cultivation pot, and a power supply unit that generated pulsed power. The experimental conditions were a power output of 20 kV (open load) and a pulse frequency of 1 kpps. The height of the application electrode 2a relative to the plants 6 was set to two different heights: 65 mm and 30 mm above the soil surface. The experimental method involved applying a current to the application electrode 2a in contact with the plants 6 for approximately one minute, and observing the state of the plants 6. This experiment was performed on two of the three plants in the same cultivation pot, and then the plants were continuously cultivated in an incubator for one week, during which the state of the plants 6 was observed.

[0061] As a result, after the current was applied, the plant 6 broke at the part that had been in contact with the application electrode 2a, and black scorch was observed at the broken part. Partway through the period when the current was being applied, discharge was confirmed visually from the part of contact between the application electrode 2a and the plant 6. After about a week, the two plants 6 that had been applied with current were confirmed to have died visually, and some of their roots had become assimilated with the soil and could not be recovered, but the one plant 6 that had not been applied with current continued to grow. The above phenomenon was the same whether the height of the application electrode 2a was 65 mm or 30 mm.

[0062] [Electrical experiment 2] An experiment on passing electricity through plants was conducted using an experimental device simulating the above-mentioned weed killing / weed prevention device 1. This current passing experiment 2 assumed that when a plant comes into direct contact with one of the two electrodes (power applying electrode 2a, power receiving electrode 2b), current flows from this electrode through the plant and soil to the other electrode (power receiving electrode 2b), giving the plant an electrical stimulus.

[0063] The experimental apparatus consists of a cultivation pot containing one plant 6 (sorghum), a linear power-applying electrode 2a stretched horizontally, a power-receiving electrode 2b installed at a predetermined position according to the experimental conditions, and a power supply unit that generates pulsed power.

[0064] As a preliminary experiment, a current-carrying experiment was conducted for Pattern 1-1 shown in FIG. 10(A) and Pattern 1-2 shown in FIG. 10(B). In Pattern 1-1, the power-receiving electrode 2b, a metal rod, was inserted vertically into the soil to a depth of 30 mm from its tip, a horizontal distance L of 30 mm from the application-side electrode 2a. The load resistance value was small, approximately 3 kΩ. In Pattern 1-2, the power-receiving electrode 2b, a metal rod, was placed in the air outside the cultivation pot, a horizontal distance L of 60 mm from the application-side electrode 2a. The load resistance value was significantly higher than that of Pattern 1-1, exceeding several MΩ. The experimental conditions were a power supply output of 20 kV (open load) and a pulse frequency of 1 kpps. The height of the application-side electrode 2a relative to the plant 6 was 15 mm above the soil surface. As a result, in pattern 1-1, current flowed through a closed circuit from the applying electrode 2a → plant 6 → soil → receiving electrode 2b, and discharge was visually confirmed from the contact point between the applying electrode 2a and the plant 6 partway through the current-carrying period, and after a certain period of time (several days), the plant 6 died. On the other hand, in pattern 1-2, no current flowed (or even if it did, it was below the detection sensitivity of the measuring device), and the plant 6 continued to grow. From these results, it is clear that to ensure the plant dies, it is necessary to pass a larger current through it.

[0065] In this experiment, plant 6 (sorghum) was grown in pots in well-moistened soil, so the closed circuit formed between the power supply and the load had a low resistance. However, in actual grassland with overgrown weeds, the resistance increases depending on the moisture content of the soil, the distance between the power-applying electrode 2a and the power-receiving electrode 2b, and the ground contact area of the power-receiving electrode 2b. If this resistance becomes excessive, a closed loop like the one in pattern 1-2 above can be expected. Therefore, it is important to devise ways to allow a larger current to flow through grassland.

[0066] To ensure a larger current flows, an experiment was conducted to confirm the effect of watering. The experiment measured and compared the resistance of the earth before and after watering the grass. An insulation resistance meter was used as the measuring instrument, and the tips of the test leads on the earth side and lead side were inserted vertically into the soil, 10 cm apart horizontally. Before watering and after watering, the resistance of the earth was measured and compared. 2 When the resistance was measured before and after watering, it was found to have decreased from 14 kΩ before to 5 kΩ after watering. This confirmed that watering can reduce the earth resistance, allowing a larger current to flow.

[0067] Next, to increase the current flow, we conducted a current flow experiment by varying the distance L between the applying electrode 2a and the receiving electrode 2b and the ground contact area A of the receiving electrode 2b. The experimental setup is shown in Figure 11. The receiving electrode 2b may be any metal body with a tip, preferably a flat plate. In this experiment, a crimp terminal with a ring-shaped tip was used. The horizontal distance between the receiving electrode 2b and the applying electrode 2a was defined as L. When the receiving electrode 2b is inserted into the soil (as shown in the figure), both the front and back surfaces of the crimp terminal come into contact with the soil. When the receiving electrode 2b is in contact with the soil surface, the contact surface with the soil is one side of the crimp terminal. Therefore, if the ground contact area A when the receiving electrode 2b is in contact with the soil surface is 1, the ground contact area A when the receiving electrode 2b is inserted into the soil is 2. The experimental conditions were a power supply output of 20 kV (open load) and a pulse frequency of 1 kpps. As shown in Table 2, current experiments were conducted for patterns 2-1 to 2-3, in which the height H from the soil surface to the power-applying electrode 2a, the horizontal distance L from the power-applying electrode 2a to the power-receiving electrode 2b, and the ratio of the ground contact area A of the power-receiving electrode 2b were changed. The applied voltage for pattern 2-1 was 10 kV and 16 A, while the applied voltage for patterns 2-2 and 2-3 was 6 to 7 kV and 10 A.

[0068] [Table 2]

[0069] For comparison with these electrically treated plants, we also prepared plants treated with a commercially available herbicide (BASF Japan, BASTA liquid). 10 ml of a 100-fold diluted herbicide was applied dropwise evenly to the surface of the aboveground parts of the plants.

[0070] As a result, herbicide-treated plants began to wilt one day after treatment, and by the fifth day, they had begun to wilt, mainly around the area where the solution was dripped. All electrically treated plants began to wilt by the second day after treatment, and by the fifth day, they had begun to wilt, mainly around the above-ground part below the wire electrode contact point. In both treatments, the above-ground parts had wilted by the seventh to tenth day. For the above-ground parts of Plant 6, electrically treated plants showed the same effect as herbicide-treated plants. For the underground parts of Plant 6, electrically treated plants became so brittle that they were difficult to separate from the soil, while herbicide-treated plants thinned but maintained their shape. Since the herbicide used in this experiment primarily contained ingredients that kill the above-ground parts of plants, it is likely that the shape of the underground parts (roots) was maintained. In any case, while herbicides only partially kill weeds, electrically treated plants are effective in killing both above-ground and underground parts by creating a closed loop current circuit (allowing current to flow through the plant's roots as well). Furthermore, this tendency was more pronounced in patterns 2-2 and 2-3, in which the distance L between the power application electrode 2a and the power reception electrode 2b was reduced and the ground contact area A of the power reception electrode 2b was increased, than in pattern 2-1.

[0071] From the above experiments, it was found that in order to achieve plant death through electrical treatment (pulsed power application treatment), it is desirable to pass a larger current by reducing the resistance value (impedance) of the soil as much as possible in the closed circuit formed by the applying electrode 2a → plant 6 → soil → receiving electrode 2b.

[0072] The above experiments clearly show that the following three methods are effective for reducing the resistance (impedance) of soil. (1) Watering the soil (2) The horizontal distance between the power-applying electrode 2 and the power-receiving electrode 2b should be as short as possible. (3) The contact area of the power receiving electrode 2b is made as large as possible. Hereinafter, specific embodiments in which the above three items are applied to the weed killing / weed prevention device 1 according to the present invention will be illustrated.

[0073] (1) Watering the soil In order to reduce the resistance value of the soil, it is preferable to water the soil before applying an electrical stimulus to the plants 6 using the weeding / weed prevention device 1 according to the present invention. The timing of watering may be any time before the application-side electrode 2a comes into contact with the plants 6 and a current flows through the plants 6, but it is preferable to water the soil when it is sufficiently moist before the current is passed through the soil.

[0074] As a method of watering the soil, water can be sprayed in advance on the area to be weeded or prevented with a hose or a sprinkler truck.

[0075] (2) The horizontal distance between the power-applying electrode 2a and the power-receiving electrode 2b should be as short as possible. In order to reduce the resistance value of the soil, the power application electrode 2a and the power receiving electrode 2b can be installed close to each other with a horizontal distance therebetween that does not cause an electrical short circuit.

[0076] (3) The contact area of the power receiving electrode 2b is made as large as possible. To increase the contact area between the power-receiving electrode 2b and the ground, multiple power-receiving electrodes 2b can be provided. For example, multiple power-receiving electrodes 2b can be connected in parallel to one application electrode 2a. This makes it easier for the current applied by the application electrode 2a to flow from the soil through the plants 6 to the multiple power-receiving electrodes 2b. [Explanation of symbols]

[0077] 1...weeding / weed prevention device, 2...electrode, 3...power supply device, 4...positive electrode, 5...negative electrode, 6...plant, 7...net-shaped electrode, 8...net-shaped substrate, 10...ridge, 11...path

Claims

1. The device comprises an electrode laid in a weed control target area and a power supply device that applies a voltage to the electrode; the electrodes include a positive electrode connected to a positive side of the power supply device and a negative electrode connected to a negative side of the power supply device, the positive electrode and the negative electrode being disposed apart from each other; A weeding and weed prevention device characterized in that when a voltage is applied to the electrodes, an electrical action occurs between the positive electrode and the negative electrode, which gives an electrical stimulus to plants located between the electrodes.

2. the weed control area is a field having ridges for planting crops and passages between the ridges, one electrode is disposed in each passage, and the positive electrodes and negative electrodes are disposed alternately in adjacent passages; A weeding and weed prevention device as described in claim 1, wherein when a voltage is applied to the electrodes, an electrical reaction occurs between the positive electrode and the negative electrode, which electrically stimulates plants growing in the ridges and paths between the electrodes.

3. the weed control area is a field having ridges for planting crops and passages between the ridges, and the positive electrode and the negative electrode are installed at a distance from each other on both sides of the passage, 2. A weeding and weed prevention device as described in claim 1, wherein when a voltage is applied to the electrodes, an electrical reaction occurs between the positive electrode and the negative electrode, which electrically stimulates plants growing in the path between the electrodes.

4. 2. The weed killing and weed prevention device according to claim 1, wherein the electrodes are formed in a net shape with the positive electrodes and negative electrodes alternately arranged at a distance from each other.

5. After applying electrical stimulation to plants growing in the ridges and paths using the weeding and weed control device according to claim 2 in a state where no crops are planted in the ridges, A weeding and weed control method comprising the steps of: applying an electrical stimulus to plants growing in paths of ridges in which crops have been planted; and using the weeding and weed control device according to claim 3 or 4.

6. 6. The weeding / weed control device or weeding / weed control method according to claim 1, wherein the electric field strength between the positive electrode and the negative electrode is 1.1 kV / cm or more.

Images