Information processing device

Abstract

To provide an information processor capable of reducing a burden of an input operation while considering reliability of a website.SOLUTION: An information processor includes: a user information storage unit that stores user information for input; a first evaluation unit that evaluates reliability of a website that sells a commodity or a service; an automatic input processing unit that performs automatic input to an input form of the website by using the user information in the user information storage unit on the basis of an evaluation result by the first evaluation unit; and an input data storage unit that stores input data of the user information for the input form on the website, which is input data related to a plurality of users.SELECTED DRAWING: Figure 1

Description

[Technical Field]

[0001] The present disclosure relates to an information processing device that handles user information for input. [Background technology]

[0002] Patent Document 1 discloses a technology for providing input support during registration. [Prior art documents] [Patent documents]

[0003] [Patent Document 1] Japanese Patent Application Publication No. 2019-179297 Summary of the Invention [Problem to be solved by the invention]

[0004] There are cases where users are required to input personal information on website registration screens, etc. Systems that support such input operations must reduce the burden of input operations while also taking into consideration the reliability of the website.

[0005] Therefore, in one aspect, an object of the present invention is to provide an information processing device that can reduce the burden of input operations while taking into consideration the reliability of a website. [Means for solving the problem]

[0006] (1) In one aspect, a user information storage unit that stores user information for input; a first evaluation unit for evaluating the trustworthiness of a website that sells a product or service; The method is characterized by comprising an automatic input processing unit that uses the user information in the user information storage unit to automatically input information into an input form of the one website based on the evaluation result by the first evaluation unit.

[0007] (2) In the above aspect, preferably, an input data storage unit that stores the input data of the user information input to the input form on the one website, the input data relating to a plurality of users; a second evaluation unit that evaluates the reliability of the input data for each input field of the input form; an input item identification processing unit that identifies input items assigned to each input field of the input form based on the evaluation result by the second evaluation unit, The automatic input processing unit performs the automatic input based on the result of identification by the input item identification processing unit.

[0008] (3) In the above aspect, it is preferable that the input form further includes a tag input processing unit that generates the input data for each input field of the input form based on tagging of each input field of the input form with various tags.

[0009] (4) In the above aspect, it is preferable that the various tags are configured so that the user information can be input in one selected format from two or more different formats into an input field of the same attribute.

[0010] (5) In the above aspect, preferably, the system further comprises an acquisition unit that acquires evaluation information from registered users who have received the product or service via the one website, the evaluation information being related to the reliability of the one website; The first evaluation unit evaluates the reliability of the one website based on the evaluation information.

[0011] (6) In the above aspect, the automatic input processing unit is preferably characterized in that it becomes operable for the one website when the evaluation result for the one website by the first evaluation unit is equal to or greater than a predetermined standard.

[0012] (7) In the above aspect, preferably, the system further comprises a display processing unit that displays the evaluation result of the one website by the first evaluation unit in association with the one website.

[0013] (8) In the above aspect, preferably, the system further comprises a generation processing unit that generates a user interface that allows input of an automatic input instruction for the one website when the automatic input processing unit for the one website is operable, The automatic input processing unit performs the automatic input in response to the automatic input instruction. [Effects of the Invention]

[0014] According to one aspect of the present invention, it is possible to reduce the burden of input operations while taking into consideration the reliability of a website. [Brief explanation of the drawings]

[0015] [Figure 1] FIG. 1 is a diagram illustrating a configuration of an information processing apparatus according to a first embodiment. [Figure 2] FIG. 10 is a diagram illustrating an example of a questionnaire for collecting evaluation information on a website. [Figure 2A] FIG. 10 is a diagram illustrating an example of the data structure of a survey information storage database that stores survey results. [Figure 2B] 10A and 10B are diagrams illustrating examples of the data structure of a site evaluation master that stores evaluation results of websites, and the data structure of a site master that associates websites (site codes) with URLs. [Figure 3] FIG. 10 is a diagram showing an example of an evaluation result displayed on a display screen of a terminal device. [Figure 4] FIG. 2 is a diagram illustrating functions of a tag input processing unit. [Figure 4A] 10 is a diagram illustrating an example of the data structure of a personal information management master in which user information (personal information) is stored by a user information storage unit; FIG. [Figure 4B]10 is a diagram illustrating an example of a data configuration of a tagging information storage database in which input data is stored by an input data storage unit. FIG. [Figure 4C] 10 is a diagram illustrating an example of a data structure of a tagging master that stores input items identified by an input item identification processing unit. FIG. [Figure 5] 10 is a flowchart showing processing by an automatic input processing unit and a generation processing unit. [Figure 5A] FIG. 10 is a diagram showing a display screen when automatic input is executed. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

[0016] Each embodiment will be described in detail below with reference to the accompanying drawings.

[0017] (First Example) FIG. 1 is a diagram showing the configuration of an information processing apparatus according to the first embodiment.

[0018] As shown in FIG. 1, the information processing device of this embodiment is exemplified as a device configured by an information processing unit 10 and a plurality of terminal devices 30 connected to the information processing unit 10 via a communication path such as the Internet. The elements configuring the information processing device of the present invention are not limited to the configuration shown in the embodiment described below, and can be arbitrarily assigned to the information processing unit 10, the terminal devices 30, and other devices. Furthermore, for example, a specific element may be configured by cooperation of functions provided in the information processing unit 10 and the terminal devices 30. For convenience of explanation, the embodiment described below shows a configuration in which each element is provided in the information processing unit 10.

[0019] As shown in FIG. 1, the information processing unit 10 includes a first evaluation unit 11 that evaluates the reliability of a website selling a product or service, an acquisition unit 12 that acquires evaluation information on the reliability of the website from registered users who have received the product or service via the website, a display processing unit 13 that displays the evaluation results of the website by the first evaluation unit 11 in association with the website, an input data storage unit 14 that stores input data of user information for an input form on the website, which is input data relating to a plurality of users, a second evaluation unit 15 that evaluates the reliability of input data for each input field of the input form, and a display processing unit 16 that displays the evaluation results of the website by the first evaluation unit 11 in association with the website. The system includes an input item identification processing unit 16 that identifies the input items assigned to each input field of the input form based on the tagging of each input field of the input form with various tags, a tag input processing unit 17 that generates input data for each input field of the input form based on the tagging of each input field of the input form with various tags, a user information storage unit 21 that stores user information for input, an automatic input processing unit 22 that performs automatic input into the input form of the website using the user information in the user information storage unit 21 based on the evaluation result by the first evaluation unit 11, and a generation processing unit 23 that generates a user interface that allows automatic input instructions to be input into the website when the automatic input processing unit 22 for the website is operable.

[0020] Here, the user information is, for example, personal information of a user who receives a service provided by the information processing device of the present invention.

[0021] Next, the operation of the information processing apparatus of this embodiment will be described.

[0022] The information processing device of this embodiment evaluates the trustworthiness of a website that sells a product or service. Regarding the evaluation of the website's trustworthiness, the acquisition unit 12 acquires evaluation information on the website's trustworthiness from users who have received the product or service via the website.

[0023] Fig. 2 is a diagram illustrating an example of a questionnaire for collecting website evaluation information. Fig. 2A illustrates the data structure of a questionnaire information accumulation database 51 that accumulates the results of the questionnaire. The questionnaire information accumulation database 51 is provided within the information processing unit 10.

[0024] As the survey results, for example, survey results from users who receive services provided by the information processing device of the present invention can be used, but survey results from persons (users) other than the users may also be used.

[0025] In this example, websites selling products or services are rated based on evaluation information (answers) to multiple questions from users of the website. The evaluation information can include a site code that identifies the website, the date the site was used, the answers to each question, and the trustworthiness of the respondent.

[0026] Here, the reliability of each website can be evaluated by giving more weight to the evaluation information of highly reliable respondents than to less reliable respondents. For example, when the answers to the questions are converted into scores, the scores of the evaluation information of highly reliable respondents may be weighted, and the average score or the like may be calculated as a parameter for the reliability of each website.

[0027] The trustworthiness of a respondent can be determined based on the number of responses to the survey (the number of sites to which the respondent responded), the degree of agreement with other respondents regarding the evaluation information, etc. For example, if a respondent has a large number of responses to the survey and the tendency of the evaluation information is highly consistent with that of other respondents, the trustworthiness of that respondent may be determined to be high.

[0028] 2B illustrates the data structure of the site evaluation master 52 that stores the evaluation results of websites, and the data structure of the site master 53 that associates websites (site codes) with URLs. The site evaluation master 52 and the site master 53 are provided within the information processing unit 10.

[0029] 2B, the site evaluation master 52 includes, as evaluation results by the first evaluation unit 11, a site code that identifies the website, the first date the site was used, the most recent date the site was used, the site reliability that indicates the evaluation result as a score, and the number of evaluation information pieces (accumulation degree) of highly reliable respondents. The number of evaluation information pieces (accumulation degree) of highly reliable respondents can be used to indicate the degree of credibility of the answers, and this degree of credibility can ultimately be reflected in the site reliability.

[0030] The first evaluation unit 11 can update the data in the site evaluation master 52 as needed based on the data stored in the questionnaire information storage database 51. For example, the data in the questionnaire information storage database 51 may be reflected in the data in the site evaluation master 52 by periodic batch processing.

[0031] The display processing unit 13 displays the evaluation result of the website by the first evaluation unit 11 in association with the website.

[0032] When a user of the terminal device 30 accesses a specific website, the display processing unit 13 obtains the evaluation result of the website corresponding to the URL being accessed based on the data in the site master 53 and the site evaluation master 52, and transmits the evaluation result or its display data to the terminal device 30.

[0033] FIG. 3 is a diagram showing an example of an evaluation result displayed on the display screen of a terminal device. FIG. 3 shows a display example when a predetermined website is accessed and the user of the terminal device 30 has set the display by the display processing unit 13 to be active. As shown in FIG. 3, an evaluation score indicating the site reliability of the website is displayed in an area 61 on the display screen of the terminal device 30. The display color of the area 61 also changes depending on the evaluation score. This allows a user who accesses the website to recognize the reliability of the website at a glance. In addition, an area 62 on the display screen of the terminal device 30 displays information about the track record of users who have used the website.

[0034] FIG. 4 is a diagram showing the function of the tag input processing unit.

[0035] As shown in FIG. 4, for example, when a user of a terminal device 30 accesses a registration page of a website, the tag input processing unit 17 generates user information, which is input data for each input field of the input form, based on tagging each input field of the input form on the registration page with various tags.

[0036] Each input field in the input form is assigned an input item, and the input data must be correct, that is, the input data must match the input item.

[0037] When a user of the terminal device 30 accesses a registration page for membership registration on a predetermined website, the tag input processing unit 17 displays tags corresponding to input data in an area 73 on the display screen of the terminal device 30. In the example of Fig. 4, tags corresponding to input data such as name, date of birth, email address, and telephone number are provided as input items to be entered in input fields 74A to 74D in the area 73.

[0038] In addition, multiple name tags are prepared and displayed in the area 73. Each tag has a different format, and tags 81 to 84 are arranged corresponding to the first name in kanji, the last name only in kanji, the first name only in kanji, the first name in katakana, and the like. All of these are tags that can be input into the input field 74A for inputting the name. In this way, multiple types of tags corresponding to the name are prepared in correspondence with two or more different formats of input data that can be input into an input field with the same attribute, name. Multiple tags corresponding to multiple different formats can also be prepared for input data other than the name. The user can select a tag corresponding to the format of the input item required by the input form and input it into the input fields 74A to 74D.

[0039] In this embodiment, by dragging and dropping the tags displayed in area 73 into each of input fields 74A to 74D, input data associated with each tag can be input into the corresponding input field 74A to 74D. For example, by moving tag 81 in Fig. 4 from area 73 to input field 74A, which requests input of a name in kanji, the function of tag input processing unit 17 causes the user's name to be input in kanji into input field 74A, and the user's name is written in kanji in input field 74A.

[0040] For example, some websites require input in kanji characters as an input field in their input forms. Furthermore, in addition to or instead of kanji characters, some websites require the name to be written in katakana as an input field. Furthermore, there may be separate input fields for a family name and a given name, and therefore the family name and given name input fields are provided. In this embodiment, by selecting the required tag from multiple tags corresponding to multiple input formats for input fields with the same attributes, input data in an appropriate format according to the input field assigned to the input field can be selected.

[0041] For user information other than name, different tags may be prepared for each of multiple formats. For example, for an input field where distinctions such as lowercase and uppercase letters or the presence or absence of hyphens in a string are expected, multiple tags corresponding to each format are prepared.

[0042] FIG. 4A illustrates an example of the data structure of the personal information management master 54 in which the user information storage unit 21 stores user information (personal information).

[0043] The personal information management master 54 stores user information about users who receive services related to the information processing device of this embodiment. The user information stores, in association with the user's user ID (customer ID), name data such as the user's first and last name in kanji, the last name only in kanji, the first name only in kanji, and the first and last name in katakana, as well as other user information required for input into an input form. The user information is registered via each user's terminal device 30 when the user registers for the above-mentioned service, or can be added to and registered in the personal information management master 54 as needed.

[0044] The tag input processing unit 17 can obtain user information (including first and last name in kanji, last name only in kanji, first name only in kanji, first and last name in katakana, etc.) corresponding to the selected tag from the personal information management master 54, and input the obtained user information into the input field as the above-mentioned input data.

[0045] The input data storage unit 14 stores input data entered into an input form on a website.

[0046] 4B illustrates an example of the data configuration of the tagging information storage database 55 in which the input data is stored by the input data storage unit 14. The tagging information storage database 55 is provided within the information processing unit 10.

[0047] For each tag input operation, the user ID of the user who performed the input operation is recorded in the tagging information accumulation database 55. Also, as shown in Fig. 4B, for each tag input operation, the tagging information accumulation database 55 accumulates a site code that identifies the website, a URI that identifies a registration page within the website, an HTML element name that identifies an input field within the registration page, the tag entered in the input field, and a tag selection reliability that evaluates the reliability of the selection of the entered tag.

[0048] Each time input data (user information) is entered into an input field using a tag, the input data storage unit 14 obtains from the tag input processing unit 17 or the corresponding terminal device 30 the user ID that identifies the user who performed the input operation, the site code that identifies the website, the URL that identifies the registration page within the website, the HTML element name that identifies the input field within the registration page, and the tag that was entered into the input field, and stores them in the tagging information storage database 55.

[0049] 4B shows data for only one input field (HTML element name) on one website, and shows the results of multiple users performing input operations using tags in this input field. In reality, tagging information storage database 55 stores the individual results (history) of multiple users performing input operations using tags in each of the many input fields on registration pages on various websites.

[0050] In the example of Figure 4B, there are users who have entered their first and last names in Kanji in the same input field, and users who have entered only their last names in Kanji. In other words, there are users who have entered their names in a format that does not match the input items in the input field.

[0051] The tag selection reliability corresponds to the reliability of input data for each input field in the input form, and is evaluated by the second evaluation unit 15. The tag selection reliability can also be said to indicate the possibility that the user selected the correct tag (input data) that matches the input item. The tagging reliability can be evaluated by any method, but may also be evaluated based on the user's history stored in the tagging information accumulation database 55. For example, the tagging reliability can be evaluated taking into account the rate at which the user's history matches the tags stored in the tagging master 56 (described later), the frequency of tag use indicated in the user's history, etc.

[0052] The input item identification processing unit 16 identifies the input items assigned to each input field of the input form based on the tagging information accumulation database 55.

[0053] The input item identification processing unit 16 assigns an input item that it considers to be a correct input item for each input field of the input form to that input field. For example, if tags entered into a specific input field in the tagging information accumulation database 55 are concentrated around one specific tag, the input item identification processing unit 16 considers that the input item assigned to that specific input field corresponds to that specific tag. Therefore, the tag identified by the input item identification processing unit 16 is likely to correspond to the correct input field associated with the input field, but there is also a possibility that it does not correspond to the correct input field.

[0054] Furthermore, the input item identification processing unit 16 can identify the input item assigned to each input field based on the evaluation of the reliability of the input data by the second evaluation unit 15. For example, the input item identification processing unit 16 may identify the input item assigned to the input field based only on data evaluated by the second evaluation unit 15 as having a relatively high reliability from the history stored in the tagging information storage database 55. For example, for an input field having a sufficient number of data in the tagging information storage database 55 (FIG. 4B), only data with a tag selection reliability of 4 or higher (data with a tag selection reliability of "4: medium-high reliability" or "5: high reliability") may be extracted from the tagging information storage database 55, and the input item assigned to each input field may be identified based only on this data. This makes it possible to identify the input item assigned to the specific input field with higher accuracy.

[0055] FIG. 4C illustrates an example of the data structure of the tagging master 56 that stores the input items identified by the input item identification processing unit 16.

[0056] In the example of Figure 4C, the tagging master 56 stores, in association with each other, a site code that identifies a website, the URI of the registration page of the website, an HTML element name that identifies an input field on the registration page, a tag corresponding to an input field identified by the input field identification processing unit 16, and a tagging reliability that indicates the reliability of the tag.

[0057] The tagging master 56 can be updated as needed by the input item specification processing unit 16. For example, the input item specification processing unit 16 updates the tagging master 56 by periodic batch processing.

[0058] In this embodiment, the automatic input processing unit 22 is operable for a website only when the evaluation result for the website by the first evaluation unit 11 is equal to or greater than a predetermined standard. Furthermore, in response to the operation of the automatic input processing unit 22, the generation processing unit 23 generates a user interface that allows input of automatic input instructions for the website, and provides the generated interface to the terminal device 30. This simplifies the input operation of user information on highly reliable sites, while preventing the user from carelessly inputting personal information on less reliable sites.

[0059] FIG. 5 is a flowchart showing the processing by the automatic input processing unit and the generation processing unit, and FIG. 5A is a diagram showing a display screen when automatic input is executed.

[0060] In step S102 of FIG. 5, the automatic input processing unit 22 determines whether a website or a new web page has been accessed on the terminal device 30, and waits for the determination to be affirmative before proceeding to step S104.

[0061] In step S104, the automatic input processing unit 22 acquires the URL of the web page to which the terminal device 30 is currently connected.

[0062] In step S106, the automatic input processing unit 22 accesses the site evaluation master 52 and determines whether the site reliability score of the website to which the terminal device 30 is connected is equal to or greater than a predetermined threshold. Note that in this example, the site reliability score is calculated so that the higher the site reliability score, the more reliable the site. If the automatic input processing unit 22 determines that the answer is yes, the process proceeds to step S108; if the answer is no, the process proceeds to step S102.

[0063] In step S108, the automatic input processing unit 22 accesses the tagging master 56 and determines whether the URL acquired in step S104 is registered as the URL of the registration page in the tagging master 56. If the determination is affirmative, the automatic input processing unit 22 proceeds to step S110, and if the determination is negative, the automatic input processing unit 22 proceeds to step S102.

[0064] In step S110, the automatic input processing unit 22 sets, based on the tagging master 56, an HTML element name that identifies the input field associated with the URL of the web page to which the terminal device 30 is connected, and a tag that corresponds to the input item identified by the input item identification processing unit 16, in the generation processing unit 23.

[0065] In step S112, the automatic input processing unit 22 acquires the user information associated with the tag set in the generation processing unit 23 from the personal information management master 54, and sets the user information in the generation processing unit 23.

[0066] In step S114, the generation processing unit 23 generates a user interface that reflects the settings in steps S110 and S112, that is, a user interface that allows input of an automatic input instruction for the web page, and provides the generated user interface to the terminal device 30.

[0067] In step S116, the automatic input processing unit 22 determines whether a new web page has been accessed on the terminal device 30, and if the determination is affirmative, proceeds to step S104, and if the determination is negative, proceeds to step S118.

[0068] In step S118, the automatic input processing unit 22 determines whether an automatic input instruction has been input, and if the determination is affirmative, the process proceeds to step S120, and if the determination is negative, the process proceeds to step S116. Here, if the "execute automatic input" button 90 in the area 63 for assisting the input operation shown in Fig. 5A is clicked, the determination in step S118 is affirmative.

[0069] In step S120, the automatic input processing unit 22 executes the automatic input process using the interface generated by the generation processing unit 23, and the process proceeds to step S116. That is, when the user operates the "execute automatic input" button 90, the automatic input processing unit 22 responds to this and inputs the user information into the input form on the registration page.

[0070] As shown in FIG. 5A, when the automatic input process is executed, input data associated with the tags is input into the input fields 74A to 74D, and the input of the input data is also reflected in the screen display of the terminal device 30.

[0071] In this way, in this embodiment, the automatic input processing unit 22 is enabled for highly reliable sites, while the automatic input processing unit 22 is disabled for low-reliability sites, preventing automatic input. This simplifies the input operation of user information on highly reliable sites. It also prevents the user from carelessly inputting personal information on low-reliability sites.

[0072] 5 shows an example in which automatic input is enabled for all input fields within a registration page at the same time. However, even within the same registration page, there may be variations in the tagging reliability of the input fields stored in the tagging master 56. In such a case, for input fields with high tagging reliability, the user information of the corresponding tag may be set in the generation processing unit 23 so that automatic input is enabled, while for input fields with low tagging reliability, the user information of the corresponding tag may not be set in the generation processing unit 23, and the automatic input instruction may be ignored.

[0073] Instead of using the operation of the "execute automatic input" button 90 as a trigger for automatic input, automatic input of input data may be executed at the stage when a user interface capable of inputting an automatic input instruction is generated.

[0074] In the process shown in FIG. 5, even after the automatic input process has been executed, corrections to the input data by the user can be accepted as long as the input data is not sent to the website. In this case, the input data in the corresponding input field can be overwritten by dragging and dropping a tag into the input field via the tag input processing unit 17. When such corrections to the input data are made, there is a high possibility that the corrected input data is correct input data that matches the input item. Therefore, the second evaluation unit 15 may evaluate the reliability of the corrected re-input data as high.

[0075] Furthermore, if such corrections to input data are made by a large number of users, the corrected input data will match the required input items, and the probability that the data entered by the automatic input process is incorrect will increase. Therefore, in such a case, the automatic input processing unit 22 may correct the tagging master 56 so that the data entered by the automatic input matches the corrected input data.

[0076] (Second Example) In the first embodiment, the data required for automatic input must be available for the corresponding registration page before the automatic input process can be performed. In other words, automatic input is possible only when data in the tagging master 56 is available for the corresponding registration page. However, if there is no user access to a particular site or if the number of accesses is low, sufficient data will not be accumulated in the tagging information accumulation database 55, and naturally, tagging information in the tagging master 56 will not be available.

[0077] Here, the information processing unit 10 may be provided with a function for analyzing the image of the site to be tagged. In this case, the registration page is extracted from the image of the site, and the input items to be entered in the input fields of the registration page are recognized, so that the recognition results can be reflected in the tagging master 56. The user may confirm and confirm the results of the tag recognition by the processing unit 10. This allows the user to reduce the effort required for tagging. Furthermore, the analysis by the processing unit 10 may not only involve image analysis, but may also involve analyzing the HTML of the site to recognize the items to be entered in the input fields.

[0078] (Third Example) In the first embodiment, the input data storage unit 14 identifies the user information entered in the input field based on the tag entered in the input field. However, the input data storage unit 14, or a function of the information processing unit 10, may recognize the attributes of the user information (including the format) based on the character string of the final user information entered in the input field. For example, the attributes of the user information can be identified by comparing the character string of the entered user information with the user information stored in the personal information management master 54. Furthermore, even if there is no corresponding user information in the personal information management master 54, it may be possible to identify or determine the attributes of the user information based on the character string.

[0079] In this way, when the attributes of user information are identified or determined without being based on tags entered in the input field, it becomes possible for the user to customize the tags associated with the user information, for example.

[0080] That is, in the first embodiment, a common tag is assigned to a specific attribute of user information (an attribute including the format, for example, the user's name in kanji) for all users (all terminal devices 30). Therefore, the input data storage unit 14 can identify the attribute of the user information (an attribute including the format) based only on the tag entered in the input field, regardless of who the user is who entered the input data.

[0081] In contrast, if users are allowed to customize tags associated with user information, it is not possible to identify the attributes of the user information (including the format) based solely on the tags entered in the input field. However, if the attributes of the user information (including the format) are identified or determined based on the character string of the entered user information, the attributes can be identified or determined without standardizing the tags. Therefore, users can customize tags to improve their usability in input operations that use tags.

[0082] Although each embodiment has been described in detail above, it is not limited to the specific embodiment, and various modifications and changes are possible within the scope of the claims. It is also possible to combine all or a plurality of components of the above-described embodiments. [Explanation of symbols]

[0083] 10 Information Processing Section 11 First Evaluation Section 12 Acquisition Department 13 Display processing section 14 Input data storage unit 15 Second Evaluation Section 16 Input item specific processing section 17 Tag input processing section 21 User information storage unit 22 Automatic input processing section 23 Generation processing section

Claims

1. a user information storage unit that stores user information for input; a first evaluation unit for evaluating the trustworthiness of a website that sells a product or service; an automatic input processing unit that automatically inputs information into an input form of the one website using the user information stored in the user information storage unit based on the evaluation result by the first evaluation unit, an input data storage unit that stores the input data of the user information input to the input form on the one website, the input data relating to a plurality of users; a second evaluation unit that evaluates the reliability indicating the possibility of the input data matching the input items assigned to each input field of the input form; an input item identification processing unit that identifies input items assigned to each input field of the input form based on the input items of the input data evaluated by the second evaluation unit as having high reliability, The automatic input processing unit performs the automatic input based on a result of identification by the input item identification processing unit.

2. The information processing apparatus according to claim 1 , further comprising a tag input processing unit that generates the input data for each input field of the input form based on tagging of each input field of the input form with various tags.

3. The information processing device according to claim 2 , wherein the various tags are configured so that the user information can be input in one selected format from two or more different formats into an input field of the same attribute.

4. an acquisition unit that acquires evaluation information from registered users who have received the product or service via the one website, the evaluation information relating to the reliability of the one website; The information processing device according to claim 1 , wherein the first evaluation unit evaluates the reliability of the one website based on the evaluation information.

5. The information processing device according to claim 4 , wherein the automatic input processing unit is operable for the one website when the evaluation result for the one website by the first evaluation unit is equal to or greater than a predetermined standard.

6. The information processing device according to claim 1 , further comprising: a display processing unit that displays the evaluation result of the one website by the first evaluation unit in association with the one website.

7. a generation processing unit that generates a user interface that allows input of an automatic input instruction for the one website when the automatic input processing unit for the one website is operable, The information processing apparatus according to claim 1 , wherein the automatic input processing unit performs the automatic input in response to the automatic input instruction.

Images