Method for constructing a physical parameter database for volatile liquid compounds and a prediction model
The method and system address inaccuracies in fragrance evaporation prediction by constructing a physical parameter database and simulating scent release, offering precise, real-time fragrance performance metrics for optimized fragrance design.
Patent Information
- Application Number
- JP2022560004
- Authority / Receiving Office
- JP · JP
- Patent Type
- Patents
- Current Assignee / Owner
- Priority Date
- 2020-04-30
- Filing Date
- 2021-04-30
- Publication Date
- 2025-09-08
- Estimated Expiration
- 2041-04-30
AI Technical Summary
Current fragrance evaporation prediction models are inaccurate, computationally intensive, and fail to account for real-time performance metrics, leading to inefficiencies in perfumery and fragrance design.
A method and system for constructing a physical parameter database of volatile liquid compounds, measuring evaporation rates and volatilities, and predicting scent release by simulating airflow and compound deposition on a virtual surface, using evaporation rates and volatilities to model scent behavior over time.
Provides accurate, real-time predictions of fragrance performance, enabling optimized fragrance formulation and faster development cycles by accounting for compound interactions and wearing conditions.
Smart Images

Figure 0007735304000001 
Figure 0007735304000002 
Figure 0007735304000003
Abstract
Description
[Technical Field]
[0001] The present invention relates to a method for constructing a physical parameter database of volatile liquid compounds and a method for predicting the release of scent physical compositions, and a corresponding system. The present invention is particularly applicable to the fields of scent design, perfumery, fine fragrance perfumery, and flavor design.
[0002] Background of the Invention Fragrance design can be defined as the selection of at least one fragrance ingredient to form a composition intended to provide a targeted fragrance. Fragrance design is most prominently known in the field of perfumery and is carried out by perfumers.
[0003] Scent evaluation is based on performance metrics and scent preference. Several metrics are in use today, such as the detectability of a scent by the human nose. While such metrics can be measured, few can be accurately predicted.
[0004] One such poor metric prediction is the prediction of scent evaporation over time.
[0005] Fragrance evaporation determines the persistence, olfactory properties, and variability of intensity over time. There are many classical approaches described in the literature to predict fragrance evaporation over time, mainly based on Fick's law or Raoul's law, which are based on diffusion equations, mass transfer, equilibrium vapor partial pressures, etc.
[0006] An example of such an approach is disclosed in WO 2019 / 238680 filed by Givaudan. This patent application is directed to a computer-implemented method for predicting the temporal aroma profile of a fragrance composition containing multiple fragrance components. The method includes using a processor to retrieve a diffusion measure of how quickly each fragrance component diffuses into headspace, form groups of fragrance components with the same or similar diffusion measure, determine the olfactory contribution of each fragrance component, and calculate the total olfactory contribution of the group of fragrance components as the sum of the olfactory contributions of all fragrance components forming the group. Additionally, a graphical user interface (GUI) is used to visualize the temporal aroma profile of the fragrance composition by displaying the total olfactory contribution of each group of fragrance components in the order of their respective diffusion measures.
[0007] In such patent applications, models are based on the diffusion of scent compounds and these diffusion indices are used in scent release prediction methods.
[0008] However, such models suffer from several major performance drawbacks: - We are primarily interested in predicting fragrance evaporation from a bulk liquid (fragrance bottle) and not representing fragrance stripped from a surface (i.e., skin); - it is based on complex theoretical laws (Stephan tube evaporation theory) that require significant computational time to provide results, and therefore cannot be used in real time; - it is based on measuring the vapor pressure of the compound, which does not give satisfactory results at room temperature; and - considering the fragrance composition as a whole, without taking into account the internal release of the composition over time - the most potent component is considered to be the only perceptible component; It has.
[0009] At this stage, it is important to understand that the way evaporation is measured in current models does not represent the way scents move through the air.
[0010] Furthermore, it is important to note that measuring the vapor pressure of a compound at room temperature is extremely difficult, and such an approach requires the use of highly sensitive pressure sensors placed around the compound mass being measured. These pressure-sensitive sensors cannot measure at room temperature; instead, the temperature must be increased by several orders of magnitude. Vapor pressure values collected at higher temperatures are then extrapolated to the vapor pressure at room temperature. Therefore, such an approach is inaccurate.
[0011] Evaporation is defined as "the loss of water by evaporation from an aqueous solution of a non-volatile substance." Modern systems for measuring evaporation are shown in Figure 1. These systems use a Stephan tube, where the composition is deposited and an airflow flows through it. This allows a given amount of evaporated composition to be measured downstream of the airflow. In these systems, the airflow is kept away from the surface of the liquid, and the surface-to-depth ratio of the liquid does not represent its spread on the surface (i.e., skin).
[0012] Apart from scent transport in the airstream, no predictive performance metrics are available that use this information to estimate other key performance metrics. Finally, current scent performance models are based on simulating vapor pressure values to determine the amount of evaporated compound. However, such models are inaccurate at room temperature because they cannot be empirically verified.
[0013] Currently, there are no satisfactory systems that can provide real-time, predictive fragrance performance metrics, resulting in lost time for perfumers who are constrained by a trial-and-error approach and a lack of insight that allows for more predictable fragrance design.
[0014] Therefore, fragrance designers currently rely on empirical expertise to design scents.
[0015] Summary of the Invention The present invention is intended to remedy all or some of these drawbacks.
[0016] To this end, according to a first aspect, the present invention provides a method for constructing a physical parameters database of volatile liquid compounds, comprising the steps of: - controlled deposition of the compound in an inert container; - generating an airflow directed towards the deposited compound; - measuring the amount of evaporated compound at various measurement times; - calculating the evaporation rate depending on the measured amount of evaporated compound; - calculating the volatility in response to the calculated evaporation rate; - storing the calculated evaporation rate and the calculated volatility in a database; The present invention relates to a method of construction, including:
[0017] These arrangements allow for accurate measurement of the evaporation rate and volatility of the compounds through a database construction method. Preferably, these compounds are selected as a single entity to provide a method for constructing a database of physical parameters for a single compound. In the case of fragrance design, these evaporation rate and volatility data allow for prediction of fragrance behavior over time.
[0018] Such an approach links evaporation rate to volatility, as opposed to the prior art which links vapor pressure to volatility. Evaporation rate provides accurate results, as opposed to vapor pressure, which is very difficult to measure reliably, especially at room temperature.
[0019] In a particular embodiment, the method of the present invention comprises the steps of: - calculating at least one gas phase concentration of a compound for a given volatility of the compound; - measuring a psychophysical potency of the compound for at least one of said gas phase concentrations; - modeling a mathematical expression of psychophysical intensity as a function of gas-phase concentration based on at least two of the measured gas-phase concentration values; - recording the modeling parameters of the psychophysical intensity formula in a database; Further includes:
[0020] These definitions allow the perceived intensity of a compound's scent to be related to the concentration of said compound in the user's headspace.
[0021] In the case of scent design, these provisions allow prediction of the perceived intensity of the scent over time.
[0022] In a particular embodiment, the method of the present invention further comprises a plurality of steps of controlled deposition of the compound at different temperatures, wherein the evaporation rate is calculated for each of said temperatures and stored during the storing step.
[0023] For scent design, these evaporation rate and volatility data allow prediction of scent behavior over time for a number of temperatures that can represent the temperatures the scent is intended to be used in. Such data allows for more accurate prediction of scent performance behavior.
[0024] According to a second aspect, the present invention provides a method for predicting the release of a scent physical composition to provide predictive, real-time scent performance metrics, comprising: - selecting at least one compound identifier in a computer interface; - for each selected compound, inputting the amount of said compound; - modeling the deposition of each selected compound on a virtual surface; - calculating by a computing system for at least one (modeled) deposited compound the amount of said compound released in the airflow at at least two different times; - the amount of each of said compounds; - a first value representing the virtual surface size of the deposited compound; a second value representing a virtual airflow directed at the deposited compound and configured to virtually strip the compound from the surface; - a third value representing an activity coefficient for each of said compounds; and - evaporation rates or volatilities associated with said compounds stored in a database constructed according to the method for constructing a database object of the present invention, as a function of - displaying, for each compound, an indicator representing the calculated vaporized mass of said compound over time; The present invention relates to a prediction method, including:
[0025] These arrangements allow users of the system to accurately model the behavior of a composition over time, with the scent remaining on the modeled surface or in the gas phase. Such a system is much more accurate than current Stephan tube models, which do not represent the dispersion of the composition on the substrate.
[0026] By such provisions, - speeding up the process of preparing compositions (e.g. perfumes); - optimizing the performance of the composition; - easy re-establishment of the composition's performance, - Providing perfumers with a new understanding of the formulation itself; and - comparing the performance of formulations (e.g. long-lastingness or olfactory profile); becomes even more possible.
[0027] It should be noted that such modeling represents the wearing conditions of a fragrance and allows for an assessment of how an actual consumer will perceive the fragrance while wearing it, but does not assess what may occur with the fragrance in an open bottle.
[0028] In certain embodiments, the method of the present invention further comprises a step of calculating a gas phase concentration of the virtually stripped compound as a function of the calculated amount of stripping, and the displaying step is configured to display the calculated gas phase concentration.
[0029] These specifications allow for accurate prediction of the amount of each composition component in gaseous form, which components in such state have the ability to be sensed by the intended composition target.
[0030] In certain embodiments, the subject method of the present invention further comprises calculating a psychophysical intensity for each selected compound as a function of the calculated gas phase concentration, and the displaying step is configured to display the calculated psychophysical intensity over time.
[0031] These specifications allow for accurate prediction of the perceived intensity of the entire composition and of each compound used separately, which allows for much more precise predictions than current bulk models, in which only the most fragrant compounds are considered to represent the entire composition.
[0032] In certain embodiments, at least two compounds are selected and the method further comprises calculating an overall psychophysical strength, the calculating step comprising: - a first step of matching the concentration values for each compound against a corresponding dose-response curve to provide a perceived intensity value for that compound; - a second step of matching each of said perceived intensity values against a dummy dose-response curve to provide an artificial compound concentration value; - adding each artificial compound concentration value to form a virtual concentration value; a third step of matching the virtual concentration values against a dummy dose-response curve to provide a total perceived intensity value for the composition; and wherein the displaying step is configured to display the calculated overall psychophysical strength over time.
[0033] These specifications allow for accurate prediction of the perceived intensity of the entire composition and of each compound used separately, which allows for much more precise predictions than current bulk models, in which only the most fragrant compounds are considered to represent the entire composition.
[0034] In certain embodiments, at least two compounds are selected, and the method further comprises calculating the linearity of the psychophysical strength of the composition of the at least two compounds based on the calculated psychophysical strength over time of each selected compound, and the displaying step is configured to display the linearity of the psychophysical strength of the composition of the at least two compounds.
[0035] These specifications allow for accurate prediction of the evolution of perceived intensity across the composition and the release of each compound used separately, which allows for much more precise predictions than current bulk models, in which only the most fragrant compounds are considered to represent the entire composition.
[0036] In certain embodiments, the subject method of the present invention further comprises the steps of selecting a compound identifier that is selected if the psychophysical intensity at a predetermined time is less than the determined value, and displaying said compound identifier.
[0037] These specifications allow the identification of compounds that provide insufficient contribution at a given time after dispersion on the substrate, which then allows the correction of the composition by removing said compound or increasing the initial amount of said compound.
[0038] In certain embodiments, at least two compounds are selected to form a composition, and the method further comprises calculating the release of the composition over time as a function of the calculated amount of shedding over time.
[0039] These provisions allow for the measurement of compound-compound interactions as a factor in the release of the composition over time.
[0040] In a particular embodiment, the method of the present invention further comprises a step of building a database of physical parameters of liquid compounds, said building step comprising: - controlled deposition of the compound in an inert container; - generating an airflow directed towards the deposited compound; - measuring the amount of evaporated compound at various measurement times; - calculating the evaporation rate depending on the measured amount of evaporated compound; - calculating the volatility according to the calculated maximum evaporation rate; - storing the calculated evaporation rate and the calculated volatility in a database; Includes.
[0041] Such an embodiment provides the same advantages as the method for constructing a physical parameter database of liquid compounds that is the object of the present invention.
[0042] According to a third aspect, the present invention provides a system for building a physical parameter database of a liquid compound, comprising: - means for controlled deposition of the compound in an inert container; - means for generating an air current directed towards the deposited compound; - means for measuring the amount of evaporated compound at various measurement times; - means for calculating the evaporation rate according to the measured amount of evaporated compound; - means for calculating the volatility according to the calculated maximum evaporation rate; - means for storing the calculated evaporation rate and the calculated volatility in a database; The purpose of this is to provide a building system, including
[0043] Such a definition provides the same advantages as the method for constructing a physical parameter database of liquid compounds, which is the object of the present invention.
[0044] According to a fourth aspect, the present invention provides a system for predicting the evolution of scent physical parameters for providing predictive real-time scent performance metrics, comprising: - means for selecting at least one compound identifier in the computer interface; - for each selected compound, means for inputting the amount of said compound; - means for modeling the deposition of each selected compound on a virtual surface; - by a computing system determining, for at least one (modeled) deposited compound, the amount of said compound released in the airflow at at least two different times; - the amount of each of said compounds; - a first value representing the virtual surface size of the deposited compound; a second value representing a virtual airflow directed at the deposited compound and configured to virtually strip the compound from the surface; - a third value representing an activity coefficient for each of said compounds; and - evaporation rates or volatilities associated with said compounds stored in a database constructed according to the method for constructing a database object of the present invention, as a function of - means for displaying, for each compound, an indicator representing the calculated vaporized mass of said compound over time; The present invention relates to a prediction system including:
[0045] Such a definition provides the same advantages as the method for predicting the transition of odor physical parameters that is the object of the present invention.
[0046] Other advantages, objects and specific features of the present invention will become apparent from the following non-exhaustive description of at least one specific method or system that is the subject of the invention, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings. [Brief explanation of the drawings]
[0047] [Figure 1]FIG. 1 is a schematic representation of a Stephan tube used in the current evaporation model. [Figure 2] 1 represents, in schematic and flow chart form, certain successive steps of the method for building a database that is the object of the present invention; FIG. [Figure 3] 1 represents, in schematic and flow chart form, certain successive steps of the prediction method that is the object of the present invention. FIG. [Figure 4] 1 is a diagrammatic representation of a particular embodiment of a system capable of implementing the method for building a database that is the object of the present invention; [Figure 5] 1 is a diagrammatic representation of a particular embodiment of a system capable of implementing the prediction method that is the object of the present invention; FIG. [Figure 6] FIG. 1 is a schematic representation of the results of a mathematical equation relating the psychophysical perceived intensity of a compound to the gas phase concentration of said compound. [Figure 7] FIG. 1 shows sample curves representing the residual mass of a compound at various time steps. [Figure 8] FIG. 2 shows the results of the calculating step 230. [Figure 9] FIG. 10 shows the results of the calculating step 235.
[0048] Detailed Description of the Invention This description is not exhaustive, as each feature of one embodiment may be advantageously combined with any other feature of any other embodiment.
[0049] Please note that the figures are not drawn to scale.
[0050] In the context of the present invention, a "compound" denotes a molecule, a mixture of isomers, a polymer, a component or a solvent.
[0051] It should be noted herein that volatility itself does not have a defined general thermodynamic quantity or value, but is often described using vapor pressure or boiling point (for liquids). A high vapor pressure indicates high volatility, while a high boiling point indicates low volatility. Vapor pressures and boiling points are often presented in tables and charts that can be used to compare chemicals of interest.
[0052] In the context of the present invention, volatility is preferably expressed in units of concentration of compound, e.g., grams, per liter of air, which corresponds to the maximum concentration that a gaseous compound can have in equilibrium with its liquid or solid phase in a closed system.
[0053] Volatility can be used to measure the intensity of a component as a function of gas phase concentration, which can define the odor detection threshold - the gas phase concentration at which an odor can be detected.
[0054] In the context of the present invention, a "volatile compound" refers to a compound that exhibits a high vapor pressure at room temperature. Such compounds evaporate at temperatures above a minimum temperature threshold, which represents the lowest temperature at which the compound is intended to be used. For example, if a compound is intended to be used for a scent that should be perceived in daily life, the minimum temperature may be 0°C. In this example, at temperatures above 0°C, the compound forms a vapor, referred to as a "gas phase." Such compounds can also be defined by their molecular weight. According to this definition, a volatile compound is a compound that exhibits a molecular weight of less than 350 Da. Preferably, a volatile compound is a compound that exhibits a molecular weight of less than 325 Da. Preferably, a volatile compound is a compound that exhibits a molecular weight of less than 300 Da.
[0055] It should be noted that the term "inert" is intended to mean "not providing chemical interaction with the compound of interest." For example, in the context of Figure 2, the inert container may be made of aluminum.
[0056] 2 shows the specific successive steps of the method that is the subject of the present invention. This method 100 for building a database of physical parameters of volatile liquid compounds comprises: - a step 105 of controlled deposition of the compound in an inert container; - generating 110 an air flow directed towards the deposited compound; - a step 115 of measuring the amount of evaporated compound at different measuring times; - step 120 of calculating the evaporation rate depending on the measured amount of evaporated compound; - a step 125 of calculating the volatility depending on the calculated evaporation rate; - storing 130 the calculated evaporation rate and the calculated volatility in a database; Includes.
[0057] The controlled deposition step 105 is performed, for example, by transferring a predetermined amount of compound into or onto a container configured to spread over a predetermined surface. Such predetermination allows for comparison of results, since evaporation is due in part to the size of the compound's surface in contact with the surrounding environment. The more parameters are configured and predetermined, the more accurate the evaporation rate measurement.
[0058] The transfer of a quantity of compound can be carried out using any means known for transferring liquids, such as a pipette, preferably in small volumes. Such transfers can be carried out manually or automatically.
[0059] The compounds under consideration may be in liquid form or in solid form to be diluted in a liquid. Preferably, such compounds are pure. In this context, "pure" is intended to mean "predominantly containing said compound."
[0060] This controlled deposition step 105 is preferably carried out at a controlled temperature while the amount evaporated is measured.
[0061] The evaporation rate is preferably measured under quasi-equilibrium conditions: controlled temperature, airflow, and velocity, to essentially mimic a closed thermodynamic system. Such an approach confirms that the evaporation rate can be easily related to thermodynamic quantities, such as vapor pressure.
[0062] The step of generating airflow 110 is performed using, for example, a pump or other airflow generating means. Preferably, the airflow represents the average airflow across a person's skin. In a variant, multiple measurements 115 are performed for a set number of airflow intensities to calculate 120 the effect of the airflow on the evaporation rate of the compound.
[0063] The measuring step 115 can be performed, for example, using a microbalance compound sensor downstream of the compound deposit along the airflow. Such a sensor is configured to determine the amount of compound sensed over time, thereby allowing the amount of vaporized compound to be determined.
[0064] Alternatively, the measuring step 115 is performed by lifting off the remaining material with a solvent or by capturing the evaporated material on a cartridge followed by quantification by gas phase chromatography.
[0065] Step 120 of calculating the evaporation rate is performed, for example, by a computational means, e.g., a computer or server, depending on the nature of the information architecture of the particular embodiment under consideration. The calculated evaporation rate corresponds to the change in the amount of compound measured during a given period of time divided by the length of said period.
[0066] Therefore, the evaporation rate is - temperature, - the surface of the container, - the amount of compound deposited, and - airflow, may be a function of
[0067] Preferably, the maximum evaporation rate is used, which is considered to be when the concentration of the component is 100%. As the component is diluted, the evaporation rate will decrease proportionately.
[0068] The evaporation rate is constant over the entire measurement period under quasi-equilibrium conditions (constant mass, temperature, constant pressure). Mass loss due to evaporation is very small and does not affect the system, and measurements are very close to equilibrium conditions.
[0069] Step 125 of calculating volatility is performed, for example, by a computational means, e.g., a computer or server, depending on the nature of the information architecture of the particular embodiment under consideration. To obtain such volatility, a linear regression model linking evaporation rate to concentration is preferably obtained. Such a model can be achieved by measuring evaporation rate and relative gas-phase concentration for multiple initial component concentrations in the liquid or solid phase at preset experimental conditions corresponding to equilibrium conditions. This allows for the construction of a linear model linking evaporation rate to concentration at equilibrium.
[0070] Using the model described above, volatility is measured using a linear regression function that converts the quasi-equilibrium evaporation rate (at standard conditions) to volatility.
[0071] In this embodiment, the evaporation rate is measured and then converted to volatility using the linear regression function. This relationship between evaporation rate at quasi-equilibrium conditions and volatility at equilibrium is a discovery made by the present inventors.
[0072] Volatility is preferably measured on the pure compound and corresponds to the maximum evaporation rate of said compound at equilibrium.
[0073] The storing step 130 is performed, for example, by a computer database accessible by a computing means configured to perform the evaporation rate and volatility calculations. Such a database may be stored, for example, on a server.
[0074] In a more advanced embodiment, the method 100 further comprises a plurality of steps 105 of controlled deposition of the compound at various temperatures, and an evaporation rate is calculated for each said temperature and stored in a storing step 130 .
[0075] In certain embodiments, the method 100 comprises: - calculating 135 at least one gas phase concentration of a compound for a given volatility of the compound; - measuring 140 the psychophysical potency of the compound for at least one of said gas phase concentrations; - modeling 145 a mathematical expression of psychophysical intensity as a function of gas-phase concentration based on at least two of the measured gas-phase concentration values; - recording 150 the modelling parameters of the psychophysical intensity equation in a database; Further includes:
[0076] The gas phase concentration can vary from zero to a maximum concentration of the compound equal to the volatility of the compound.
[0077] The step 135 of calculating at least one gas phase concentration is carried out, for example, by a calculation means, for example a computer or a server, depending on the nature of the information architecture of the particular embodiment under consideration. During this calculating step 135, such value can be set as a function of the volatility, which itself is the maximum concentration, for example to the volatility, half the volatility, or one hundredth of the volatility, etc.
[0078] In a variant, calculating step 135 uses an indirect calculation method in which at least one concentration value is approximated from the amount of compound deposited on the olfactory strip. Thus, calculating step 135 can use a direct or indirect calculation method.
[0079] A quantity of the vaporized compound can then be presented to the user by inserting it into the air stream, and it is this concentration that allows the calculation of the gas phase concentration of the compound, which is taken as the ratio of the amount of compound to the volume of air.
[0080] In more advanced embodiments, the compound is already vaporized and is not provided in liquid form, and the airflow is configured to carry the amount of vaporized liquid compound. In such embodiments, by setting the volume of the airflow, it is possible to determine the amount of vaporized compound over a given time period using the calculated corresponding evaporation rate.
[0081] Measuring 140 the psychophysical potency of the compound may be performed empirically, for example, by registering inputs representing the potency as perceived by a panel of users. Such inputs may be registered via any type of human-machine interface. Such inputs are stored in a registry. Preferably, measuring 140 is performed at various predetermined gas concentrations.
[0082] The modeling step 145 is performed by computational means, e.g., a computer or a server, depending on the nature of the information architecture of the particular embodiment under consideration. Such modeling is intended to perform a fitting between a mathematical formula and sample data representing the average intensity perceived by a panel of users. Such a mathematical formula can be, for example, a sigmoid curve whose parameters are set to match the perceived intensity.
[0083] Such a sigmoid curve can be seen in Figure 6. - an axis representing increasing gas-phase concentration of the compound modeled on a logarithmic scale; - an axis representing an increase in perceived psychophysical intensity, - a sample of the intensity perceived by a pool of users for a given gas-phase concentration, and - a sigmoid curve fitted to the sample distribution for a given gas phase concentration; Shows.
[0084] Such a modeled curve is called a "dose-response curve."
[0085] Preferably, the cycle of calculating 135, measuring 140, and modeling 145 gas-phase concentrations is repeated for several gas-phase concentrations of a given compound. For example, compounds can be tested using this methodology for gas-phase concentrations ranging from zero to the volatility of the compound.
[0086] Preferably, at least two gas phase concentrations of a given compound are treated in this manner. Preferably, at least two gas phase concentrations of a given compound are treated in this manner. Preferably, at least eight gas phase concentrations of a given compound are treated in this manner. The more gas phase concentrations that are evaluated, the more accurate the modeling.
[0087] The recording step 150 is functionally similar to the storing step 130 .
[0088] 3 illustrates the specific sequential steps of the method that is the subject of the present invention. The method 200 for predicting the release of a scent physical composition to provide predictive, real-time scent performance metrics includes: - in a computer interface, a step 205 of selecting at least one compound identifier; - for each selected compound, a step 210 of inputting the amount of said compound; - modeling 215 the deposition of each selected compound on the virtual surface; - determining by the computing system, for at least one modeled deposited compound, the amount of detachment of said compound in the airflow at at least two different times; - the amount of each of said compounds; - a first value representing the virtual surface size of the deposited compound; a second value representing a virtual airflow directed at the deposited compound and configured to virtually strip the compound from the surface; - a third value representing an activity coefficient for each of said compounds; and - the evaporation rate or volatility associated with said compound stored in a database constructed according to the database construction method of FIG. 2; a step 220 of simulating as a function of - displaying 225, for each compound, an indicator representing the calculated vaporized mass of said compound over time; Includes.
[0089] Step 205 of selecting at least one compound identifier is performed by any human-machine interface that allows for the selection of at least one such identifier. In one particular embodiment, the human-machine interface is a mouse and / or keyboard that allows for the selection in the interface of at least one identifier. Such an identifier may be a compound name, a compound logo or icon, or any reference in a compound classification system.
[0090] The inputting step 210 can be either automatic or manual. If the step is performed manually by an operator, this inputting step 210 is performed by any human machine interface that allows the input of said quantities. Such a human machine interface can be a mouse and / or keyboard that allows the input of said quantities in an interface.
[0091] It should be noted that the term "amount" refers to either an absolute or relative value in grams, moles, or liters of a portion of the total composition. For example, in a composition containing 15 parts of compound A and 10 parts of compound B, after determining the total volume of the composition, it is possible to determine the amounts of compounds A and B. Such portions can be expressed, for example, by volume, molar amount, or mass.
[0092] The modeling step 215 is performed, for example, by computational means, such as a computer or a server, depending on the nature of the information architecture of the particular embodiment under consideration. In certain embodiments, parameters are set during this step, and these parameters correspond to the intended use of the composition. For example, these parameters can correspond to the intended airflow over the composition or the intended dispersion surface of the compound. In variants, more complex parameters can be set, such as the dispersion distance of the composition, from which the surface of deposition can be inferred. Such parameters can be set automatically or manually. In automatic variants, the operator can select a parameter setting profile that automatically sets at least one parameter value.
[0093] The simulating step 220 is performed, for example, by a computational means, such as a computer or a server, depending on the nature of the information architecture of the particular embodiment under consideration.
[0094] During this simulating step 220, it is important to understand the difference between traditional diffusion assessment methods and delamination assessment. Diffusion represents the sole consideration of evaporation as a means for transferring compounds from the liquid bulk to the gas volume. Such models are extremely incomplete for modeling compositions that spread over a surface, such as fragrances on the skin.
[0095] On the skin, in a real fragrance application, there is only a very thin layer of fragrance, which spreads depending on how the fragrance is applied, the amount applied, the viscosity of the fragrance, its dilution in ethanol, and other such parameters. What is happening is that this spreading defines the surface of the fragrance that evaporates, and this surface is the dominant factor that determines fragrance release. The larger the surface, the faster the fragrance will be released.
[0096] This is why it makes more physical sense to evaluate aroma stripping, as defined in chemical engineering textbooks: "Stripping or desorption is the transfer of gas, dissolved in a liquid, into a gas stream." It is this phenomenon that is simulated herein.
[0097] Another way to understand this phenomenon is to consider this thin layer of volatile compounds as actually gas dissolved in a liquid, since the volatiles exist as both gas and liquid under the conditions in which the fragrance is worn (obviously, fragrances, as they exist in the air, are of comparable composition to the ingredients on the skin).
[0098] The modeled delamination process is - The fragrance spread - the surface on which the scent is spread - has a strong influence on the release of the scent; - Air convection is the dominant force responsible for mass transfer liquid / gas, - the volatility of a compound is obtained by a conversion function from empirically measured evaporation rates, and not from the theoretical or equilibrium vapor pressure, which is defined as the pressure exerted by a vapor in thermodynamic equilibrium with a condensed phase (solid or liquid) at a given temperature in a closed system; instead, this model uses the evaporation rate, which is the rate at which a component evaporates (expressed as mass / unit of time); Preferably, the equilibrium conditions are considered in short time steps and the scent composition on the skin is predicted in time steps; and - Gas phase concentrations are modeled by using air convection rather than diffusion based on determined airflow; Considering the release of fragrance from the skin.
[0099] Such a model is novel and distinctly different from diffusion models that use Stephan tubes, as it describes a different phenomenon—the peeling off of a thin layer of gas dissolved in a liquid, which reflects the reality of wearing a fragrance over a 6-8 hour period.
[0100] Such a model may, for example, estimate the release mass of a compound at a given time interval using the following formula: dm i / dt=D i / e·A·x i γ i Vol. i During the ceremony, -D i is the diffusion coefficient of the compound in air (m 2 s -1 ) and - e is the thickness of the stagnant layer, which in particular represents the second value representing the virtual airflow, - A(t) is the evaporation area (m 2 ) or a value representing the virtual surface size of the deposited compound, -x i (t) is the liquid mole fraction of the compound, - γ i (t) is the activity coefficient of the compound, which can be set to a value of 1, for example; - Vol i is the volatility of the compound (micrograms / m 3 air).
[0101] Validation of such models also uses values representing the surface properties of a virtual surface onto which compounds are deposited and peeled over time, with the calculated parameters configured to provide compound interaction properties similar to those of human skin.
[0102] These values can be set to common or separate empirical constants for simplicity.
[0103] In such a simplified model, Eq. dm i / dt=K·m i (t) / sum(t)·Vol i and can be set as During the ceremony, - K is the evaporation constant that represents the specific experimental conditions that mimic fragrance evaporation from the skin. K is an empirical value obtained by fitting fragrance evaporation experiments under standard conditions to the model. -m i (t) is the mass of compound i at time t, - sum(t) is the total mass of all compounds at time t, - Vol i is the volatility of the compound (micrograms / m 3 air).
[0104] The step 220 of calculating the simulation can be performed after the compounds are selected and the amounts are set or in advance, where the calculation results are stored and addressed after the compounds are selected and the amounts are set.
[0105] The displaying step 225 is performed, for example, by a screen configured to display a user interface that allows an operator to view the results of the simulation.
[0106] Figure 7 shows sample curves representing the residual mass of the compound at various time steps. - a horizontal axis 705 representing time measured in time steps, a vertical axis 710 representing the residual amount of the compound, and - curve 715 or curve approximation or extrapolation or interpolation curve, Shows.
[0107] In certain embodiments, the method 200 of FIG. 3 further includes a step 230 of calculating a vapor phase concentration of the virtually stripped compound as a function of the calculated amount of stripping, and the displaying step 225 is configured to display the calculated vapor phase concentration.
[0108] The step 230 of calculating the gas phase concentrations is performed, for example, by a computational means, such as a computer or server, depending on the nature of the information architecture of the particular embodiment under consideration.
[0109] This calculating step 230 preferably establishes a fixed air volume over which stripping is occurring. The more compound stripped from the surface, the higher the gas-phase concentration. The gas-phase concentration is calculated by dividing the total stripped mass in a given time period by the air volume from which the mass is stripped over that time period. More complex embodiments provide a dynamic air volume that increases over time, with the stripped mass for each time interval being divided by the maximum air volume.
[0110] It should be noted that the compounds in the composition compete for the ability to evaporate, so the release of the compound blend and the relative amount ratio between the compounds will change the concentration of each compound in the air, which in turn will change the perceived scent of the composition.
[0111] The results of such a calculating step 230 are shown in Figure 8. - a horizontal axis 805 representing time measured in time steps, a vertical axis 810 representing the concentration of the compound, and - curve 815 or curve approximation or extrapolation or interpolation curve, Shows.
[0112] Figure 8 shows that the concentration of compounds in the air space can shift over time in a given composition formulation, for example, where the compound being studied may be preferentially released in the first moments after dispersion of the composition. After a given time, this first compound can be released in a second manner, as opposed to the second compound. Thus, compound interactions significantly affect the performance of a composition in terms of relative compound concentrations in the headspace over time.
[0113] In certain embodiments, method 200 of FIG. 3 further includes step 235 of calculating a psychophysical intensity for each selected compound as a function of the calculated gas phase concentration, and displaying step 225 is configured to display the calculated psychophysical intensity over time.
[0114] The step 235 of calculating the psychophysical intensities is performed by a computing means, for example a computer or a server, depending on the nature of the information architecture of the particular embodiment under consideration.
[0115] Such a calculating step 235 can be performed by matching the gas phase concentration of the compound with the corresponding dose-response curve value.
[0116] The results of such a calculating step 235 are shown in FIG. - a horizontal axis 905 representing time measured in time steps, - a vertical axis 910 representing the intensity of the compound perceived at said time step, and - curve 915 or curve approximation or extrapolation or interpolation curve, Shows.
[0117] In certain embodiments, at least two compounds are selected, and the method 200 shown in FIG. 3 further includes a step 240 of calculating an overall psychophysical potency of the concentration of each selected compound, and the displaying step 225 is configured to display the calculated overall psychophysical potency over time.
[0118] At this stage, it should be understood that the psychophysical potency of a compound at a given vapor phase concentration is better represented when the psychophysical potency is considered logarithmic.
[0119] To assess the overall intensity of a composition made up of several scents, the step 240 of calculating the overall psychophysical intensity comprises: - a first step 241 of matching the concentration values for each compound against a corresponding dose-response curve to provide a perceived intensity value for that compound; - a second step 242 of matching each of said perceived intensity values against a dummy dose-response curve to provide an artificial compound concentration value; - a step 243 of adding each artificial compound concentration value to form a virtual concentration value; a third step 244 of matching the virtual concentration values against a dummy dose-response curve to provide a total perceived intensity value for the composition; It may further include:
[0120] This is in stark contrast to the prior art, which uses Steven's power law, which states that the strength of a mixture corresponds to the strength of its strongest component, and is an oversimplification. Such a method produces results that are empirically verified.
[0121] Certain embodiments further include calculating 240 the overall odor intensity, wherein the calculating 240 comprises: - a first step of matching the concentration values for each compound against a corresponding dose-odor descriptor intensity curve to provide a perceived intensity of odor value for that compound; - a second step of matching each of said perceived intensity values against a dummy dose-odor descriptor intensity curve to provide an artificial compound concentration value; - adding each artificial compound concentration value to form a virtual concentration value; - a third step of matching the virtual concentration values against a dummy dose-odor descriptor intensity curve to provide a total perceived odor descriptor intensity value for the composition; Further includes:
[0122] It should be appreciated that such embodiments require prior modeling of the odor descriptor intensity equation with respect to concentration, which can be derived from empirical measurements of the psychophysical intensity for a given odor at various compound concentration levels.
[0123] In a further embodiment, if a compound is associated with multiple odors, the concentration of said compound can be divided by two before the first matching step, or can be divided according to a specific weighing rule.
[0124] The step 240 of calculating the overall psychophysical intensity is performed by a computing means, for example a computer or a server, depending on the nature of the information architecture of the particular embodiment under consideration.
[0125] In certain embodiments, at least two compounds are selected, and method 200 shown in FIG. 3 further comprises step 245 of calculating the linearity of the psychophysical strength of the composition of the at least two compounds based on the calculated psychophysical strength over time of each selected compound, and displaying step 225 is configured to display the linearity of the psychophysical strength of the composition of the at least two compounds.
[0126] Linearity can be understood as a measure of the uniformity of relative psychophysical intensities over time in a composition. If compound A is perceived twice as intense as compound B for most time intervals, the composition is more linear than if compound B becomes more perceptible than compound A after a given time interval.
[0127] The step 245 of calculating the linearity of the psychophysical intensities is performed by a computing means, for example a computer or a server, depending on the nature of the information architecture of the particular embodiment under consideration.
[0128] In certain embodiments, the method 200 shown in FIG. 3 further comprises selecting 250 a compound identifier that is selected if the psychophysical intensity at a predetermined time is less than a determined value, and displaying 255 the compound identifier.
[0129] The selecting step 250 is performed, for example, by a computational means, such as a computer or server, depending on the nature of the information architecture of the particular embodiment under consideration. This selecting step 250 is preferably performed automatically.
[0130] During this selection step 250, the corresponding compound is selected if the calculated psychophysical intensity is below a specified threshold, which may be statically or dynamically set, e.g., the threshold varies with the highest recorded psychophysical intensity for a given time interval.
[0131] This allows prediction of compounds that will fail in terms of perceived intensity at a given time from initial deposition.
[0132] The displaying step 255 is similar to the displaying step 225, albeit for example, a different interface or element of an interface.
[0133] In certain embodiments, where at least two compounds are selected to form a composition, the method 200 shown in FIG. 3 further includes step 260 of calculating the release of the composition over time as a function of the calculated amount of shedding over time.
[0134] The step 260 of calculating the release of the composition over time is performed by a computational means, such as a computer or server, depending on the nature of the information architecture of the particular embodiment under consideration, for example.
[0135] Such a calculating step 260 simulates the amount of each compound released, which makes it possible to determine the amount of each compound in the liquid state, and thus the remaining amount of the composition in the liquid state.
[0136] The release of a composition can be measured, for example, by the relative amount of compound that is not yet suspended in the volume of air.
[0137] In certain embodiments, the method 200 of FIG. 3 further comprises a step 100 of constructing a physical parameter database of liquid compounds, the step 100 comprising: - a step 105 of controlled deposition of the compound in an inert container; - generating 110 an air flow directed towards the deposited compound; - a step 115 of measuring the amount of evaporated compound at different measuring times; - step 120 of calculating the evaporation rate depending on the measured amount of evaporated compound; - a step 125 of calculating the volatility depending on the calculated evaporation rate; - storing 130 the calculated evaporation rate and the calculated volatility in a database; Includes:
[0138] Such a process is disclosed with respect to FIG.
[0139] Such a method 200 may be implemented as follows: - A user of the air freshener design interface logs into the platform via a computer interface; - the user prepares a new fragrance by preparing a composition containing at least one compound; - The user specifies the intended compound amount, either relative or absolute, The computational architecture then calculates the amount of each compound evaporated over a determined number of time steps; - displaying, via the interface, one or more graphs showing the evolution of the composition's release or vapor phase concentration or perceived intensity for the compound or composition as a whole; It should be understood that the present invention can be used in various ways.
[0140] The present invention allows for increasing scent production by, for example, predicting the outcome of scent production, scent persistence and formulation, odor release over time and intensity over time.
[0141] 4, a particular embodiment of the system 300 object of the present invention is shown, not drawn to scale, in a schematic manner. The system 300 for building a database of physical parameters of liquid compounds comprises: - means 305 for controlled deposition of the compound in an inert container 306; - means 310 for generating an air flow directed towards the deposited compound; - means 315 for measuring the amount of evaporated compound at different measuring times; - means 320 for calculating the evaporation rate depending on the measured amount of evaporated compound; - means 325 for calculating the volatility depending on the calculated evaporation rate; means 330 for storing the calculated evaporation rate and the calculated volatility in a database; Includes:
[0142] The means for controlled deposition 305 corresponds to the variants disclosed for the controlled deposition step 105 shown in Figure 2. Such means 305 is, for example, a manual or automatic pipette.
[0143] The airflow generating means 310 correspond to the variants disclosed for the airflow generating step 110 shown in Figure 2. Such means 310 are, for example, a pump.
[0144] The measuring means 315 correspond to the variants disclosed for the measuring step 115 shown in Figure 2. Such means 315 are for example sensors of the presence and amount of compounds.
[0145] The evaporation rate calculation means 320 corresponds to the variant disclosed for the step 120 for calculating the evaporation rate shown in Figure 2. Such means 320 is for example a computer or a server.
[0146] The volatility calculation means 325 corresponds to the variant disclosed for the step 125 for calculating volatility shown in Figure 2. Such means 325 is for example a computer or a server.
[0147] The storage means 330 correspond to the variants disclosed with respect to the storing step 130 shown in Figure 2. Such means 330 are, for example, a database accessible over an information network.
[0148] A particular embodiment of the system 400 of the subject of the present invention is shown in schematic form, not drawn to scale, in Figure 5. The system 400 for predicting the evolution of scent physical parameters to provide predictive, real-time scent performance metrics includes: - means 405 for selecting at least one compound identifier in a computer interface; - for each selected compound, means 410 for inputting the amount of said compound; - means 415 for modelling the deposition of each selected compound on a virtual surface; - determining by the computing system, for at least one modeled deposited compound, the amount of detachment of said compound in the airflow at at least two different times; - the amount of each of said compounds; - a first value representing the virtual surface size of the deposited compound; a second value representing a virtual airflow directed at the deposited compound and configured to virtually strip the compound from the surface; - a third value representing the activity coefficient of each of said compounds; - evaporation rates associated with said compounds stored in a database constructed according to the database construction method of FIG. 2; a fourth value representing the surface properties of a virtual surface on which the compound is deposited and peeled off over time, said calculated parameters being configured to provide compound interaction properties like those of human skin; means 420 for simulating as a function of - means 425 for displaying, for each compound, an indicator representing the calculated vaporized mass of said compound over time; Includes:
[0149] The selection means 405 correspond to the variants disclosed with respect to the selecting step 205 shown in Figure 3. Such means 405 are, for example, a keyboard and / or a mouse allowing control of a computer interface.
[0150] The input means 410 correspond to the variants disclosed for the inputting step 210 shown in Figure 3. Such means 410 are, for example, a keyboard and / or a mouse allowing the control of a computer interface.
[0151] The modeling means 415 corresponds to the variants disclosed for the modeling step 215 shown in Figure 3. Such means 415 is for example a computer or a server.
[0152] The modeling means 420 corresponds to the variants disclosed with respect to the modeling step 220 shown in Figure 3. Such means 420 is for example a computer or a server.
[0153] The display means 425 correspond to the variants disclosed for the displaying step 225 shown in Figure 3. Such means 425 are for example a computer screen.
Claims
1. A method (100) for building a physical parameter database of volatile liquid compounds, comprising: - a step (105) of controlled deposition of a compound in an inert container, wherein a predetermined amount of compound is spread over a predetermined surface of said container; - generating (110) a gas flow directed towards the deposited compound; - measuring (115) the amount of evaporated compound at different measuring times; - measuring relative gas-phase concentrations for a plurality of initial component concentrations in the liquid compound at predetermined experimental pseudo-equilibrium conditions corresponding to equilibrium conditions; - calculating (120) the evaporation rate as a function of the amount of evaporated compound measured under pseudo-equilibrium conditions; - calculating (125) the volatility as a function of the calculated evaporation rate by means of a linear model relating the evaporation rate to the concentration at equilibrium and a linear regression function using said linear model to convert the quasi-equilibrium evaporation rate to a volatility; - storing (130) the calculated evaporation rate and the calculated volatility in a database; A method of construction (100) comprising:
2. The method comprises: - calculating (135) for a compound of predetermined volatility at least one gas phase concentration of said compound; - measuring (140) the psychophysical potency of said compound for at least one of said gas phase concentrations; - modeling (145) a mathematical expression of the psychophysical potency of said compound as a function of gas-phase concentration based on at least two of the measured gas-phase concentration values, referred to as a "dose-response curve"; - recording (150) in a database the modelling parameters of the formula of said psychophysical potency of said compound; The method (100) of claim 1 further comprising:
3. 3. The method of construction (100) of claim 1 or 2, wherein the method comprises a plurality of steps (105) of controlled deposition of a compound at various temperatures, and the evaporation rate is calculated for each of the temperatures and stored during the storing step.
4. 1. A scent physical composition release prediction method (200) for providing predictive, real-time scent performance metrics, comprising: - selecting (205) at least one compound identifier in a computer interface; - for each selected compound, inputting (210) the amount of said compound; - modelling (215) the deposition of each of said selected compounds on a virtual surface by setting at least one parameter of the model; - calculating by a computing system, for at least one modeled deposited compound, the amount of said compound released in the airflow at at least two different times; the amount of each of said compounds, a first value representing the virtual surface size of said deposited compound, a second value representing a virtual airflow directed at the deposited compound and configured to virtually strip the compound from the surface; a third value representing the activity coefficient of each of said compounds, and - volatilities associated with said compounds stored in a database constructed according to the method for constructing a database according to any one of claims 1 to 3, simulating (220) as a function of - displaying (225) for each compound an indicator representing the calculated vaporized mass of said compound over time; A prediction method (200) comprising:
5. the method further comprising calculating (230) a gas phase concentration of the virtually stripped compound as a function of the calculated stripped amount; the displaying step (225) is configured to display the calculated gas phase concentration. The prediction method (200) of claim 4.
6. the method further comprising calculating (235) a psychophysical potency for each selected compound as a function of the calculated gas phase concentration; The displaying step (225) is configured to display the calculated psychophysical intensities over time. The prediction method (200) of claim 5 when claim 4 is dependent on claim 2.
7. At least two compounds are selected, and the method further comprises calculating (240) an overall psychophysical strength; The calculating step (240) a first step (241) of matching the concentration values for each compound against the corresponding dose-response curve to provide a psychophysical potency value for that compound; a second step (242) of matching the psychophysical intensity values against a dummy dose-response curve to provide artificial compound concentration values; - adding (243) each artificial compound concentration value to form a virtual concentration value; a third step (244) of matching the virtual concentration values against the dummy dose-response curve to provide an overall psychophysical potency value for the composition; Including, wherein the displaying step is configured to display the calculated overall psychophysical strength over time. The prediction method (200) of claim 6.
8. At least two compounds are selected, and the method further comprises the step of calculating (245) the linearity of the psychophysical potency of the composition of the at least two compounds based on the calculated psychophysical potency over time of each selected compound; the displaying step (225) is configured to display the linearity of the psychophysical potency of the composition of the at least two compounds. The prediction method (200) according to claim 6 or 7.
9. The method comprises: selecting (250) a compound identifier that is selected if the psychophysical intensity at a predetermined time is less than a determined value; Displaying the compound identifier (255); The prediction method (200) of any one of claims 6 to 8, further comprising:
10. 10. The predictive method (200) of any one of claims 4 to 9, wherein at least two compounds are selected to form a composition, and the method further comprises a step (260) of calculating the release of the composition over time as a function of the calculated amount of shedding over time.
11. A prediction method (200) described in any one of claims 4 to 9, further comprising the step of constructing a physical parameter database of the liquid compound that stores the volatility associated with the liquid compound by implementing the method of claims 1 to 3.
12. A system (300) for constructing a physical parameter database of a liquid compound, comprising: - means (305) for controlled deposition of the compound in an inert container (306); means (310) for generating a gas flow directed towards said deposited compound; means (315) for measuring the amount of evaporated compound at different measuring times; - means for measuring relative gas-phase concentrations for a plurality of initial component concentrations in a liquid compound at predetermined experimental pseudo-equilibrium conditions corresponding to the equilibrium conditions; means (320) for calculating the evaporation rate as a function of the amount of evaporated compound measured under pseudo-equilibrium conditions; means (325) for calculating the volatility as a function of the calculated evaporation rate, using a linear model relating the evaporation rate to the concentration at equilibrium and a linear regression function that uses said linear model to convert the quasi-equilibrium evaporation rate to a volatility; means (330) for storing the calculated evaporation rate and the calculated volatility in a database; A construction system (300) comprising:
13. A scent physical parameter progression prediction system (400) for providing predictive, real-time scent performance metrics, comprising: means (405) for selecting at least one compound identifier in a computer interface; - for each selected compound, means (410) for inputting the amount of said compound; means (415) for modelling the deposition of each of said selected compounds on a virtual surface by setting at least one parameter of the model; - by a computing system determining, for at least one (modeled) deposited compound, the amount of said compound released in the airflow at at least two different times; the amount of each of said compounds, a first value representing the virtual surface size of said deposited compound, a second value representing a virtual airflow directed at the deposited compound and configured to virtually strip the compound from the surface; a third value representing the activity coefficient of each of said compounds, and means (420) for simulating as a function of the volatility associated with said compounds stored in a database constructed according to the method for constructing a database according to any one of claims 1 to 3; - for each compound, means (425) for displaying an indicator representing the calculated vaporized mass of said compound over time; A prediction system (400) comprising:
Citation Information
Patent Citations
Fragrance composition building system
JP2018109099A
System and method for scent perception measurements and for construction of a scent database
US20190369073A1
Method related to organic compositions
WO2019238680A1