Dentifrice containing a carboxylic acid or an alkali metal salt thereof and a source of free fluoride ions

Abstract

To provide a dentifrice composition for strengthening and protecting enamel of natural teeth, thereby providing protection against acidic challenges.SOLUTION: A dentifrice composition comprises a carboxylic acid or alkali metal salt thereof, a source of free fluoride ions and optionally a copolymer of methyl vinyl ether with maleic anhydride or maleic acid. The dentifrice composition is mildly acidic, having a slurry pH in the range greater than 5.0 to less than 6.5. The composition enhances fluoride uptake into teeth and provides protection against acidic challenges.SELECTED DRAWING: None

Description

[Technical Field]

[0001] The present invention relates to dentifrice compositions that strengthen and protect natural tooth enamel, thereby protecting it from acid stress. The compositions according to the present invention comprise a specific carboxylic acid or its alkali metal salt, a source of free fluoride ions, and optionally a copolymer of methyl vinyl ether (MVE) and maleic anhydride or maleic acid. Importantly, the dentifrice compositions are slightly acidic, having a slurry pH ranging from greater than 5.0 to less than 6.5. [Background technology]

[0002] The mineral in teeth is calcium hydroxyapatite, Ca 10 It is composed primarily of (PO4)6(OH)2, which may be partially substituted with anions such as carbonate or fluoride, and cations such as zinc or magnesium. Tooth mineral may also contain non-apatite mineral phases such as octacalcium phosphate and calcium carbonate.

[0003] Dental caries can result from dental caries, a multifactorial disease in which bacterial acids, e.g., lactic acid, produced by the metabolism of dietary sugars, cause subsurface demineralization that does not adequately remineralize during sugar exposure, resulting in progressive tissue loss and ultimately cavity formation. The presence of a plaque biofilm is a prerequisite for dental caries, and acid-producing bacteria, e.g., Streptococcus mutans, can become pathogenic when levels of sugars (i.e., easily fermentable carbohydrates, e.g., sucrose) are high for extended periods.

[0004] Even in the absence of plaque biofilm, dental hard tissue loss can occur as a result of acid erosion and / or physical tooth wear, and these processes are thought to act synergistically. Exposure of dental hard tissue to acid can cause demineralization, resulting in surface softening and loss of mineral density. This softened mineral is vulnerable to abrasion from physical contact. Under normal physiological conditions, partially demineralized tissue repairs itself through the remineralizing effects of saliva. Saliva is supersaturated with respect to calcium and phosphate, and in healthy individuals, salivary secretion serves to flush out the acid load and raise the pH to alter the equilibrium for mineral deposition.

[0005] Dental erosion (i.e., acid erosion or acid abrasion) is a surface phenomenon involving the demineralization and ultimately complete dissolution of tooth surfaces by acids of non-bacterial origin. The acids are most commonly from dietary sources, such as citric acid from fruit or carbonated drinks, phosphoric acid from cola drinks, and acetic acid, e.g., vinaigrette. Dental erosion can also be caused by repeated contact with hydrochloric acid (HCl) produced by the stomach, which can enter the oral cavity by an involuntary response, e.g., gastroesophageal reflux, or by a provoked response, such as may occur in patients with bulimia.

[0006] Tooth wear (i.e., physical tooth wear) is caused by friction and / or abrasion. Friction occurs when tooth surfaces rub against each other in the form of two-body abrasion. A frequently dramatic example is observed in subjects with bruxism, a sleep-related tooth grinding habit characterized by high applied forces and accelerated wear, particularly on the occlusal surfaces. Abrasion typically results from three-body abrasion, the most common example of which is associated with brushing with toothpaste. In the case of fully mineralized enamel, the level of abrasion caused by commercial toothpastes is minimal and of little or no clinical significance. However, when enamel is demineralized and softened by exposure to erosive stress, it becomes more susceptible to abrasion. Enamel is thinnest at its junction with dentin, which, in healthy cases, is located just below the gingival margin. However, gum recession (especially associated with aging) can expose the enamel-dentin junction, and wear of the enamel in this area can expose the dentin and cause sensitivity, as described below.

[0007] Dentin is a living tissue that is usually covered by enamel or cementum depending on its location in the body, i.e., at the crown and root, respectively. Dentin has a much higher organic content than enamel, and its structure is characterized by the presence of fluid-filled tubules that flow from the surface of the dentin-enamel or dentin-cementum junction to the pulp interface. Dentin is much softer than enamel and, as a result, is more susceptible to abrasion. Subjects with exposed dentin should avoid the use of highly abrasive toothpastes. Softening of dentin due to erosive loads also increases the tissue's susceptibility to abrasion. It is widely accepted that the origin of dentin hypersensitivity is related to altered fluid flow in the exposed tubules (fluid dynamics theory), resulting in stimulation of mechanoreceptors thought to be located close to the pulp interface. Not all exposed dentin is hypersensitive because dentin is generally covered with a smear layer (an occlusive mixture composed primarily of minerals and proteins from the dentin itself, but also containing organic components from saliva). Over time, the tubule lumens can become completely occluded with mineralized tissue. Furthermore, the formation of reparative dentin in response to pulp trauma or chemical irritation is well documented. Nevertheless, erosive stress can remove the smear layer and tubule "plugs," freeing dental fluid flow and making the dentin much more susceptible to external stimuli, such as heat, cold, and pressure. As previously indicated, erosive stress can also make the dentin surface much more susceptible to abrasion. Furthermore, dentin hypersensitivity worsens as the diameter of the exposed tubules increases, and because tubule diameter increases as you move toward the pulp interface, progressive dentin wear, especially if dentin wear is rapid, may result in increased sensitivity.

[0008] Therefore, erosion and / or acid-mediated tooth wear are major etiologic factors in the development of dentin hypersensitivity.

[0009] It has been postulated that increased dietary acid intake and deviations from regular meal times are associated with a rise in the incidence of dental erosion and tooth wear in developed populations. In light of this, oral care compositions that can help prevent dental erosion and tooth wear and can protect against dental caries would be advantageous.

[0010] Oral care compositions often contain a source of fluoride ions to promote tooth remineralization and increase the acid resistance of dental hard tissues. To be effective, fluoride ions must be available for incorporation into the hard tissues of the teeth being treated.

[0011] Decalcified enamel has been observed to take up more fluoride from acidic solutions than from neutral solutions (e.g., Friberger, *The effect of pH upon fluoride uptake in intact enamel*. Scand. J. Dent. Res. (1975) 83:339-344). Friberger's study examined in vitro fluoride uptake from dentifrice slurries of different pHs, ranging from 7.1 to 4.5, and from sodium fluoride solutions. pH was adjusted using small drops of 0.1 M HCl acid or NaOH. Tests showed no significant differences between the agents (i.e., sodium fluoride dentifrice, potassium fluoride and manganese chloride dentifrices, and sodium fluoride solutions of the same fluoride concentration), but the effect of pH was significant. At lower pH levels, fluoride uptake in the form of fluorapatite was more than five-fold.

[0012] GB 1,018,665 (Unilever Ltd) describes a fluoride dentifrice incorporating an aqueous buffer system containing weak organic acids and alkali metal salts, such as acetic acid / sodium acetate and malic acid / sodium malate, and the pH of the dentifrice slurry in simulated saliva is 5 to 6. It is disclosed that the dentifrice can reduce enamel solubility compared to solutions at neutral pH.

[0013] US 2009 / 0087391A1 (Joziak) describes a foamable fluoride dental composition comprising a surfactant selected from the group consisting of nonionic, zwitterionic or betaine surfactants or mixtures thereof, and an acidifying agent in an amount sufficient to adjust the pH to between 3 and 5. Suitable acidifying agents are organic acids such as malic acid, hydrosuccinic acid, citric acid and tartaric acid or mixtures thereof.

[0014] WO 01 / 66074 (Colgate) describes a dual-component dentifrice in which one phase is alkaline and contains fluoride ions and another phase is acidic and contains phosphate ions, which when mixed before use give an acidic fluoride phosphate composition (pH 4-6). It is suggested that delivery of the dentifrice at an acidic pH can enhance the uptake of fluoride ions into tooth enamel.

[0015] US 4,363,794 (Lion Corporation) discloses an oral composition containing a stannous salt, such as stannous fluoride, a water-soluble fluoride salt, such as sodium fluoride, and an orally acceptable acid, such as L-ascorbic acid, lactic acid, malonic acid, tartaric acid, citric acid, hydrochloric acid, and pyrophosphoric acid, wherein the molar ratio of fluoride ion to stannous ion in an aqueous solution is in the range of 3.2 to 7:1, preferably 3.5 to 6:1, and the pH of the composition is in the range of 2 to 4. The composition is disclosed to be highly effective in inhibiting dental caries. According to US 4,363,794, a specific pH range results in increased effectiveness in increasing the acid resistance of treated enamel and in the stability of stannous ion. While a low pH (less than 2) tends to be an obstacle to oral application of the composition, a pH greater than 4 often leads to reduced availability and stability of stannous ion.

[0016] The use of fluoride-containing dentifrices formulated at a substantially neutral pH has also been described in the art for remineralizing and strengthening teeth. WO 2006 / 1000071 (Glaxo Group Ltd) discloses a dentifrice composition containing, among other ingredients, a fluoride ion source and having a pH in the range of 6.5 to 7.5. Such a composition has been commercialized as SENSODYNE Pronamel toothpaste for use in protecting teeth from dietary acid loads.

[0017] In one aspect, the present invention is based on the discovery that the incorporation of certain carboxylic acids described herein in a weakly acidic dentifrice composition containing a source of fluoride ions advantageously enhances the uptake of fluoride ions into tooth enamel when compared to the same composition at neutral pH, or when compared to the same weakly acidic composition but containing a different carboxylic acid (e.g., malic acid), or an inorganic acid (e.g., phosphoric acid).

[0018] In a further aspect, the present invention is based on the discovery that the incorporation of a copolymer of methyl vinyl ether and maleic anhydride or maleic acid provides the additional benefit of significantly increasing the reduction in enamel solubility without adversely affecting fluoride uptake.

[0019] The use of copolymers based on methyl vinyl ether and maleic acid in oral care compositions is known in the art. For example, US 4,485,090 discloses a dentifrice composition containing a polymeric anionic film-forming material, such as "Gantrez AN." According to US 4,485,090, this material adheres to the tooth surface and forms a substantially continuous barrier thereon by complexing with calcium present on the tooth. The formed barrier is said to substantially reduce the elution of previously applied therapeutic agents (e.g., dental fluoride treatments), thereby prolonging the effectiveness of such agents. According to US 4,485,090, the inventive composition therein only requires periodic application (e.g., once a day) to achieve the desired reduction in elution and the resulting control of caries and plaque.

[0020] Subsequent application US2004 / 0146466 (Baig et al.) discloses that certain polymeric inorganic surfactants, such as synthetic anionic polymers (e.g., polyacrylates and copolymers of maleic anhydride or maleic acid with methyl vinyl ether (e.g., Gantrez)), have a strong affinity for tooth enamel surfaces, and such polymers deposit a layer or coating on the enamel surface. Effective amounts of the polymeric inorganic surfactant are described as ranging from about 1% to about 35% by weight of the total oral composition, preferably from about 2% to about 30% by weight, more preferably from about 5% to about 25% by weight, and most preferably from about 6% to about 20% by weight.

[0021] WO2007 / 069429 (Lion Corporation) discloses (A) 0.3 to 1.2 mass % of a compound of formula M n+2 P n O 3n+1 (wherein M represents Na or K, and n is an integer of 2 or 3), (B) 0.1 to 2.0% by mass of a methyl vinyl ether / maleic anhydride copolymer (a 2.0% by mass aqueous solution having a viscosity of 5 to 1000 mPa s at 25°C and pH 7.0), (C) 0.6 to 2.0% by mass of lauryl sulfate, and (D) 0.2 to 1.0% by mass of a betaine-type amphoteric surfactant, with a mass composition ratio of (C) / (D) in the range of 1 to 4. Such a composition is described as having low irritation to the oral mucosa, favorable foaming during use, and excellent effectiveness in preventing staining from adhering to the tooth surface.

[0022] WO 2011 / 094499 (Colgate-Palmolive Company) discloses an anti-erosion oral care formulation containing a copolymer of methyl vinyl ether and maleic anhydride, e.g., Gantrez, and a metal compound or salt that becomes more soluble at acidic pH. According to WO 2011 / 094499, the mucoadhesive polymer, e.g., Gantrez, may be incorporated into an orally acceptable vehicle in an amount ranging from 0.01 to 20% by weight of the ingredients, preferably 0.1 to 10% by weight, and most preferably 0.5 to 7% by weight. The "low polymer formulation" and "high polymer formulation" exemplified in WO 2011 / 094499 contain 0.5% and 2.0% by weight of Gantrez, respectively.

[0023] A Technical Information Sheet, Bulletin VC-862A, published by Ashland Specialty Chemicals (Rev. 02-2015) reported that after enamel preparation with a toothpaste containing 2% Gantrez S-97 polymer, superior resistance to acid erosion of enamel was observed in in vitro tests, and the presence of Gantrez was thought to be the primary reason for the observed improvement in reducing acid erosion.

[0024] WO2015 / 171836 (Procter & Gamble) describes an oral care composition containing 5% metal ions, at least 0.001% stannous ions and optionally about 0.001% to about 4% zinc ions; at least about 100 ppm by weight of fluoride ions, and at least about 0.03% by weight of an inorganic surfactant selected, inter alia, from maleic anhydride or copolymers of maleic acid and methyl vinyl ether; at least 5% water; less than 10% by weight of fused silica, calcium-based abrasives and mixtures thereof, less than 5% of polyphosphates having n+3 or greater, wherein the total metal ion (stannous and optionally zinc) weight ratio is 0.5 or less. WO 2015 / 171836 discloses that by properly balancing the ratio of total metal ions to a selected group of inorganic surfactants, fluoride uptake can be improved and the specific effects (antibacterial efficacy, fluoride uptake, reduced demineralization, and staining) required to reach the "sweet spot" of oral care can be achieved in a single composition. According to WO 2015 / 171836, the compositions described therein provide remineralization-enhancing and demineralization-inhibiting effects by controlling the deposition of surface protectants, which, if deposited in excess, negatively impact fluoride uptake and the remineralization of subsurface dental lesions. The inclusion of a buffering agent is optional, and oral compositions typically have a pH of about 4 to about 7, preferably about 4.5 to about 6.5, and more preferably about 5 to about 6. WO 2015 / 171836 discloses that the inclusion of Gantrez does not affect fluoride uptake from NaF-containing formulations. Summary of the Invention [Means for solving the problem]

[0025] In one aspect, the present invention provides a dentifrice composition comprising a carboxylic acid or an alkali metal salt thereof selected from the group consisting of malonic acid, glutaric acid, tartaric acid, lactic acid, and mixtures thereof, and a source of free fluoride ions, the dentifrice composition having a slurry pH in the range of greater than 5.0 and less than 6.5.

[0026] In a further aspect, the present invention provides a dentifrice composition comprising a carboxylic acid or an alkali metal salt thereof selected from the group consisting of malonic acid, glutaric acid, tartaric acid, lactic acid, and mixtures thereof, a source of free fluoride ions, and a copolymer of methyl vinyl ether and maleic anhydride or maleic acid, wherein the dentifrice composition has a slurry pH in the range of greater than 5.0 and less than 6.5.

[0027] Such compositions are useful in protecting teeth from dental erosion. Such compositions are also useful in protecting teeth from dental caries. [Brief explanation of the drawings]

[0028] [Figure 1] FIG. 1 shows the effect of malonic acid and pH on EFU. [Figure 2] FIG. 1 shows the effect of malonic acid and citric acid (at pH 5.50) on EFU. [Figure 3] FIG. 1 shows the effect of malonic acid and pH on EFU. [Figure 4] FIG. 1 shows the effect of certain carboxylic acids and phosphoric acids on EFU. [Figure 5] FIG. 1 shows the effect of lactic acid and pH on EFU. [Figure 6] FIG. 1 shows the effect of PVM / MA (pH 6.2) on EFU. [Figure 7] FIG. 1 shows the effect of PVM / MA (pH 6.2) on ESR. [Figure 8] FIG. 1 shows a summary of SMHR after 4 hours of remineralization. [Figure 9] FIG. 1 shows a summary of mean %RER after 4 hours of remineralization. [Figure 10] FIG. 1 shows a summary of EFU for 4-hour remineralization. [Figure 11] FIG. 1 shows tissue loss data after treatment of human enamel with dentifrice followed by erosion challenge. [Figure 12] FIG. 1 shows the variation of average fluoride uptake over a 50 μm depth. [Figure 13] FIG. 1 shows the average relative 44Ca uptake over a 20 μm depth. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

[0029] The composition according to the present invention comprises a carboxylic acid or an alkali metal salt thereof selected from the group consisting of malonic acid, glutaric acid, tartaric acid, lactic acid, and mixtures thereof. In one embodiment, the carboxylic acid is lactic acid or an alkali metal salt thereof. Typical examples of suitable alkali metal salts include sodium and potassium salts of the carboxylic acids. In one embodiment, the alkali metal salt is potassium salt of malonic acid, glutaric acid, tartaric acid, lactic acid, and mixtures thereof. In one embodiment, the alkali metal salt is selected from sodium salt of malonic acid, glutaric acid, tartaric acid, lactic acid, and mixtures thereof. In one embodiment, the carboxylic acid salt is potassium lactate. In one embodiment, the carboxylic acid salt is sodium lactate.

[0030] The carboxylic acid or salt may be provided in the form of a solid or an aqueous solution, for example a sodium lactate solution (60% w / w).

[0031] Suitably, the carboxylic acid or alkali metal salt thereof is present in an amount of from 0.5% to 5.0% by weight of the total composition, for example from 1.0% to 4.5% or from 1.5% to 3.0% by weight of the total composition, with preferred amounts being 2.0% by weight of acid or 2.5% by weight of salt.

[0032] The composition according to the present invention includes a source of free fluoride ions. Suitable examples of the source of free fluoride ions include an alkali metal fluoride, such as sodium fluoride or potassium fluoride, in an amount providing 25 to 5000 ppm, preferably 100 to 1500 ppm, of fluoride ions; a polyvalent metal ion fluoride salt, such as stannous fluoride; or a salt of fluoride with a cationic organic ion, such as ammonium fluoride or bis-(hydroxyethyl)amino-propyl-N-hydroxyethyloctadecylamine-dihydrofluoride (amine fluoride), or a mixture thereof. In one embodiment, the source of free fluoride ions is stannous fluoride. In one embodiment, the source of free fluoride ions is not stannous fluoride. In one embodiment, the source of free fluoride ions is an alkali metal fluoride, such as sodium fluoride. Suitably, the composition comprises 0.05% to 0.5% by weight of sodium fluoride, for example 0.1% by weight (equivalent to 450 ppm fluoride ions), 0.205% by weight (equivalent to 927 ppm fluoride ions), 0.2542% by weight (equivalent to 1150 ppm fluoride ions) or 0.3152% by weight (equivalent to 1426 ppm fluoride ions).

[0033] The compositions according to the present invention are weakly acidic, i.e., have a slurry pH ranging from greater than 5.0 to less than 6.5, e.g., pH 5.1-6.4, 5.4-6.3, or 5.5-6.2. The pH values ​​mentioned are measured when the dentifrice composition is slurried with water in a 1:3 weight ratio of composition to water. Suitably, the slurry is prepared by slurrying the dentifrice composition with water in a weight ratio of 1 part dentifrice composition to 3 parts distilled water. The pH is measured using a standard pH meter.

[0034] Suitably, the dentifrice compositions of the present invention include a pH adjuster to adjust the pH of the composition to a desired pH. Suitable pH adjusters include alkali metal hydroxides, such as sodium hydroxide and potassium hydroxide, or inorganic acids, such as hydrochloric acid or sulfuric acid. In one embodiment, the pH adjuster is sodium hydroxide. The pH adjuster may be used in an amount of 0.005% to 5% by weight of the composition, for example, 0.01% to 2% or 0.02% to 1% by weight of the composition.

[0035] In one aspect, a composition according to the present invention includes a surface protectant that is a copolymer of methyl vinyl ether (MVE) and maleic anhydride or maleic acid. In one embodiment, the surface protectant is a copolymer of MVE and maleic acid. Generally, the copolymer is a linear copolymer containing alternating units of MVE and maleic anhydride or maleic acid. In one embodiment, the copolymer includes a 1:4 to 4:1 ratio of MVE:maleic anhydride or maleic acid, for example, a 1:1 ratio of MVE:maleic anhydride or maleic acid (i.e., about 50 mol % MVE content and about 50 mol % maleic anhydride or maleic acid content). In one embodiment, the copolymer is the acid form of a copolymer of MVE and maleic anhydride, where the anhydride is fully or partially hydrolyzed to the corresponding acid, for example, after copolymerization. In one embodiment, the copolymer has a molecular weight in the range of 100,000 to 2,000,000, for example, 500,000 to 1,900,000 or 1,000,000 to 1,800,000. Suitably, the copolymer for use in the present invention is commercially available under the trade name GANTREZ®, for example GANTREZ® S-97 HSU Solution (Mw 1,500,000), GANTREZ® S-97 BF (Mw 1,200,000), GANTREZ® S-96 (Mw 700,000) and GANTREZ® S-95 (Mw 150,000), all of which are copolymers of MVE and maleic acid. In one embodiment, the copolymer is GANTREZ® S-97, a copolymer of MVE and maleic acid having an approximate molecular weight of 1,200,000 or 1,500,000.

[0036] GANTREZ® S-97 may be provided in solid (powder) form or as a liquid, e.g., an aqueous solution, such as GANTREZ® S-97 HSU solution. In one embodiment, the copolymer comprises a GANTREZ® polymer having the following structure and properties shown below:

[0037] [ka] Dibasic acid with pKa1=3.5 and pKa2=6.5

[0038] [Table 1]

[0039] Suitably, the rheological properties of the copolymer can be modified by the addition of salts and bases. GANTREZ® copolymers are commercially available from a variety of sources, including Ashland Specialty Chemicals, Bound Brook, NJ 08805, USA, and International Specialty Products, Wayne, NJ, USA.

[0040] Providing a dentifrice composition that achieves high fluoridation efficacy is challenging when the composition includes a surface protectant (i.e., the copolymer used in the present invention as defined above). This is due to the surface coverage of the tooth surface where fluoridation typically occurs by this agent. Advantageously, in the present invention, the copolymer can be combined with a source of fluoride ions without adversely affecting fluoride delivery to tooth enamel. It has now been unexpectedly discovered that small amounts of the copolymer provide improvement in terms of enamel solubility reduction without significantly negatively affecting fluoride uptake. Thus, when present, the copolymer is used in an amount of 0.05% to 2% by weight of the composition, e.g., 0.1% to 1%, 0.15% to 0.5%, or 0.2% to 0.4% by weight of the composition. In one embodiment, the copolymer is used in an amount of about 0.25% by weight of the composition. Surprisingly, in the in vitro tests reported herein, it was found that when small amounts of the copolymer (0.2% to 0.3% by weight, exemplified herein at about 0.25% by weight), significant improvements in demineralization inhibition can be observed without adversely affecting fluoride uptake. These findings are further supported by the results of in situ erosion tests, also reported herein, in which a composition according to the present invention comprising about 0.25% by weight of methyl vinyl ether-maleic acid copolymer was found to be superior to all other dentifrice compositions tested with respect to fluoride uptake, remineralization enhancement, and demineralization inhibition. In one embodiment, the copolymer is used in an amount of about 0.25% by weight of the composition, and the composition has a slurry pH of about 6.2.

[0041] In one embodiment, the compositions of the present invention are free of stannous ions and / or zinc ions. For example, in one embodiment, the compositions of the present invention are free of about 0.001% to about 5% metal ions, including at least 0.001% stannous ions and, optionally, about 0.001% to about 4% zinc ions. In one embodiment, the compositions are free of metal compounds or salts that are more soluble at acidic pH. In one embodiment, the compositions are free of calcium or zinc compounds or salts.

[0042] The compositions of the present invention may contain suitable formulating agents, such as dental abrasives selected from those commonly used for such purposes in the oral care composition art, surfactants, thickeners, humectants, flavoring agents, sweetening agents, opacifying or coloring agents, preservatives, and water.

[0043] Examples of suitable dental abrasives include silica abrasives such as those sold under the trade names Zeodent, Sident, Sorbosil, or Tixosil by Huber, Degussa, Ineos, and Rhodia, respectively. The silica abrasive should be present in an amount sufficient to ensure adequate cleaning of the teeth by the dentifrice without promoting tooth abrasion.

[0044] The silica abrasive is generally present in an amount of up to 15% by weight of the total composition, for example, 2% to 10% by weight of the total composition, and preferably at least 5%, for example, 5% to 7%, especially 6% by weight. Reducing the level of silica abrasive has the advantage not only of making the dentifrice less abrasive, but also of minimizing any interaction of the abrasive with fluoride ions, thereby increasing the availability of free fluoride ions.

[0045] Suitable surfactants for use in the present invention include amphoteric surfactants, such as long-chain alkyl betaines, such as those sold by Albright & Wilson under the trade name "Empigen BB," preferably long-chain alkylamido alkyl betaines, such as cocamidopropyl betaine, or low-ionic surfactants, such as sodium cocoate methyl taurate sold by Croda under the trade name Adinol CT, or mixtures thereof. The amphoteric surfactants can be used alone as the sole surfactant or can be combined with low-ionic surfactants. In one embodiment, the surfactant is C 10~18 It is not an alkyl sulfate surfactant, such as sodium lauryl sulfate, which is commonly used in oral compositions.

[0046] Suitably, the surfactant is present in the range of 0.1% to 10%, preferably 0.1% to 5%, and more preferably 0.5% to 1.5% by weight of the total composition.

[0047] Suitable thickeners include, for example, nonionic thickeners, such as (C1-6) alkyl cellulose ethers, e.g., methylcellulose; hydroxy(C1-6) alkyl cellulose ethers, e.g., hydroxyethyl cellulose and hydroxypropyl cellulose; (C2-6) alkylene oxide-modified (C1-6) alkyl cellulose ethers, e.g., hydroxypropyl methylcellulose; and mixtures thereof. Other thickeners, such as natural and synthetic gums or gum-like materials, such as chestnut, xanthan gum, tragacanth gum, sodium carboxymethylcellulose, polyvinylpyrrolidone, starch, and thickening silica, may also be used. Preferably, the thickener is a mixture of thickening silica and xanthan gum.

[0048] Advantageously, the thickener is present in the range of 0.1% to 30%, preferably 1% to 20%, more preferably 5% to 15% by weight of the total composition.

[0049] Suitable humectants for use in the compositions of the present invention include, for example, glycerin, xylitol, sorbitol, propylene glycol or polyethylene glycol, or mixtures thereof, and may be present in the range of 10% to 80% by weight of the total composition, preferably 20% to 60% by weight, more preferably 25% to 50% by weight.

[0050] A preferred opacifying agent is titanium dioxide, which may be present in the range of 0.05% to 2%, preferably 0.075% to 0.2%, for example 0.1% by weight of the total composition, which amount enhances the appearance of the composition.

[0051] Flavoring agents that may be used in the compositions of the present invention include various flavor aldehydes, esters, alcohols, and similar materials, as well as menthol, carvone, and anethole, and mixtures thereof. Examples of essential oils include spearmint, peppermint, wintergreen, sassafras, clove, sage, eucalyptus, marjoram, cinnamon, lemon, lime, grapefruit, and orange. Suitably, flavoring agents may be used in an amount ranging from 0.01% to 4% by weight of the composition, for example, from 0.1% to 3% by weight, or from 0.5% to 2% by weight.

[0052] Sweeteners that may be used in the compositions of the present invention include, for example, sucrose, glucose, saccharin, sucralose, dextrose, levulose, lactose, mannitol, sorbitol, fructose, maltose, xylitol, saccharin salts (e.g., sodium saccharin), acesulfame, and mixtures thereof. In one embodiment, sodium saccharin is used as the sweetener. Suitably, the sweetener may be used in an amount ranging from 0.005% to 10% by weight of the composition, for example, from 0.01% to 3% by weight, or from 0.1% to 1% by weight.

[0053] Suitably, the dentifrice compositions of the present invention are aqueous dentifrice compositions. Water may comprise the remainder of the dentifrice composition. In one embodiment, the composition comprises 5% to 80% by weight of water, for example, 10% to 60%, 15% to 40%, or 20% to 30% by weight of water. This amount of water includes free water added and the amount introduced with other components of the dentifrice composition, such as sorbitol.

[0054] The dentifrice compositions of the present invention are typically formulated in the form of a toothpaste or gel.

[0055] Additional oral care active ingredients may be included in the compositions of the present invention.

[0056] The compositions of the present invention may further comprise a desensitizing agent effective in treating dentin hypersensitivity. Examples of desensitizing agents include tubule blocking agents or neurodesensitizing agents and mixtures thereof, for example as described in WO 02 / 15809.

[0057] Suitable tubule blockers include strontium salts such as strontium chloride, strontium acetate or strontium nitrate. Suitably, the strontium salts are generally used in an amount of from 5% to 15% by weight of the composition.

[0058] In one embodiment, the tubule blocker is arginine calcium carbonate. Suitably, the arginine salt is present in an amount ranging from 0.5% to 30% by weight of the composition, such as from 1% to 10% by weight of the composition, or from 1% to 10% by weight of the composition, such as from 2% to 8% by weight of the composition.

[0059] In one embodiment, the tubule blocking agent is a bioactive glass. Suitably, the bioactive glass is composed of 45% by weight of silicon dioxide, 24.5% by weight of sodium oxide, 6% by weight of phosphorus oxide, and 24.5% by weight of calcium oxide. One such bioactive glass is commercially available under the trade name NOVAMIN, also known as 45S5 BIOGLASS. Suitably, the bioactive glass is generally used in an amount of 1% to 10% by weight of the composition.

[0060] In one embodiment, the tubule blocking agent is stannous fluoride. Stannous fluoride forms an insoluble metal salt through hydrolysis and oxidation reactions, which precipitates in the dentin tubules and on the dentin surface, effectively reducing dentin hypersensitivity. Stannous fluoride may also be used to provide a source of fluoride that can provide protection from caries and plaque / gingivitis.

[0061] Suitable nerve desensitizing agents include potassium salts such as potassium citrate, potassium chloride, potassium bicarbonate, potassium gluconate, and especially potassium nitrate. A desensitizing amount of potassium salt will generally be between 2 and 8% by weight of the total composition; for example, 5% by weight of potassium nitrate can be used.

[0062] The compositions of the present invention may, for example, comprise a whitening agent selected from polyphosphates, such as sodium tripolyphosphate (STP), and / or any additional silica abrasives present, which may have enhanced cleaning properties. The STP may be present in an amount of from 2% to 15% by weight of the total composition, for example from 5% to 10% by weight.

[0063] The compositions of the present invention may also include a breath freshener, such as a zinc salt, for example zinc oxide, or zinc chloride.

[0064] The compositions of the present invention are suitable for containment and dispensing in aluminum-plastic laminate tubing or plastic pumps, as commonly used in the industry.

[0065] The compositions of the present invention may be prepared by mixing the ingredients in suitable relative amounts in any convenient order and adjusting the pH to obtain the desired value.

[0066] An exemplary dentifrice composition according to the present invention comprises an alkali metal salt of lactic acid, e.g., sodium lactate, in an amount of 0.5% to 5.0%, a source of free fluoride ions, e.g., sodium fluoride, in an amount of 0.05% to 0.5%, a copolymer of MVE and maleic anhydride or maleic acid, e.g., GANTREZ® S-97, in an amount of 0.05% to 2%, and the composition has a slurry pH ranging from greater than 5.0 to less than 6.5.

[0067] The present invention provides a composition as defined above for use in protecting teeth from dental erosion. The present invention further provides a composition as defined above for use in protecting teeth from dental caries.

[0068] The present invention provides a composition as defined above for use in the treatment and / or inhibition of dental erosion on a tooth surface.The present invention provides a composition as defined above for use in the treatment and / or inhibition of dental caries on a tooth surface.

[0069] The present invention also provides a method for protecting teeth from dental erosion, comprising applying an effective amount of the composition defined above to an individual in need thereof.The present invention also provides a method for protecting teeth from dental caries, comprising applying an effective amount of the composition defined above to an individual in need thereof.

[0070] The present invention provides a method of treating and / or inhibiting dental erosion on a tooth surface comprising contacting the tooth surface with a composition as defined above.

[0071] The present invention provides a method of treating and / or inhibiting dental caries on a tooth surface comprising contacting the tooth surface with a composition as defined above. The present invention is further illustrated by the following examples. [Example]

[0072] [Example 1] A dentifrice composition (Formulation I) as described in Table 1 was prepared as follows: Purified water, sorbitol, and glycerin were added to a suitable container. Sodium hydroxide, sodium lactate solution, sodium saccharin, sodium fluoride, potassium nitrate, Gantrez, titanium dioxide, and 20% of the flavoring were then added and mixed at high shear until the solids were dissolved. Dental silica was then added while mixing under vacuum and mixed until wetted. The remaining 80% of the cocamidopropyl betaine solution and flavoring were added and mixed. Separately, in a premix container, xanthan gum was mixed with approximately 95% of the polyethylene glycol to form a slurry. This slurry was added to the main container while mixing under high shear under vacuum. The remainder of the polyethylene glycol was added to the premix container, and the resulting mixture was poured into the main container. The resulting paste was mixed under vacuum until homogeneous and then transferred to a suitable tube.

[0073] [Table 2]

[0074] [Example 2] Enamel Fluoride Uptake (EFU) This example describes enamel fluoride uptake testing performed on dentifrice compositions of the present invention.

[0075] Preparation of Dentifrice Compositions Formulations 2 to 4 were prepared with the detailed compositions shown in Table 2.

[0076] [Table 3]

[0077] Preparation of Dentifrice Slurry Dentifrice slurries were prepared using Formulations 2-4. Slurries were prepared consisting of 1 part paste (Formulation 2, 3, or 4) mixed with 3 parts diluent. The diluent consisted of 2 parts acid solution and 1 part water. As a "control," the acid solution was replaced with water. The total volume of the slurry was 36 g in all cases, and therefore the overall slurry composition was 9 g paste: 18 g acid solution: 9 g water. This approach was taken to allow for the creation of slurries from a common base with the appropriate composition, as if the paste contained all of the ingredients. For example, if Formulation 3 contained 2% malonic acid and was mixed with water only, the concentration in the final slurry would be 0.5% (9 g paste + 27 g water, a 4-fold dilution). Eighteen grams of a 1% malonic acid solution was added to 9 grams of malonic acid-free base paste plus 9 grams of water, again resulting in a final slurry concentration of 0.5% (18 grams of malonic acid plus 18 grams of paste and water, a two-fold dilution of the malonic acid solution). The resulting slurry was then centrifuged at 10,000 rpm (approximately 16,000 g) for 10 minutes. Table 3 below provides details of the slurry composition and their respective pH values.

[0078] [Table 4]

[0079] method The EFU test procedure was based on the procedure described in the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) testing procedures. 40 In this study, initial lesions were created using 0.1 M lactic acid, pH 5.0, containing 0.2% w / v polyacrylic acid (Carbopol 907) 50% saturated with hydroxyapatite.

[0080] Healthy upper central bovine incisors were cleaned of all adhering soft tissue. 3 mm diameter enamel cores were prepared from each tooth using a hollow-core diamond drill bit under running water. Specimens were embedded in the end of Plexiglas rods using methyl methacrylate and polished with 600 grit wet / dry sandpaper, followed by fine gamma alumina. 12 specimens per group were used in the study.

[0081] Each enamel specimen was etched by immersion in 0.5 ml of 1 M perchloric acid (HCl04) solution for 15 seconds with continuous agitation.

[0082] The fluoride content of this solution was determined by use of a fluoride electrode to determine the background fluoride content of the enamel specimens.

[0083] The specimens were again crushed and polished as described above. Initial lesions were created on each enamel specimen by immersion in a 0.1 M lactic acid / 0.2% Carbopol 907 solution at 37°C for 24 hours. The specimens were rinsed with water and stored in a humid environment until use.

[0084] The pH of a particular slurry was adjusted by dropwise addition of 1 M hydrochloric acid or 1 M sodium hydroxide to achieve the desired pH specified in Table 3. Specimens were immersed in 25 ml of the supernatant of the assigned slurry with constant agitation (350 rpm) for 30 minutes. After treatment, specimens were rinsed with water. One layer of enamel was removed from each specimen by etching as described above. The etching solutions were analyzed for fluoride (ion-specific electrode) and calcium. The pretreatment fluoride (intrinsic) level of each specimen was then subtracted from the posttreatment value to determine the change in enamel fluoride due to the test treatment.

[0085] statistical analysis Statistical analysis of individual means was performed using a one-way analysis of variance model, and the significance of differences was analyzed by the Student-Newman-Keuls test.

[0086] result The results of the study are shown in Table 4 below (mean EFU±standard error of the mean) and in Figures 1-3.

[0087] [Table 5]

[0088] In Figure 1, all treatments were statistically significantly different from each other at the 5% significance level. A modest effect was observed at neutral pH with malonic acid, and a slightly larger effect was observed by reducing the pH to pH 5.5 by dropwise addition of 1 M HCl without adding a carboxylic acid. The combination of pH 5.5 and a carboxylic acid had a substantially larger effect than either alone, demonstrating an unexpected synergistic effect of reducing pH and adding certain carboxylic acids.

[0089] In Figure 2, the effect of 2% malonic acid at pH 5.5 was much greater than the effect of 2% citric acid at pH 5.5, demonstrating an unexpected dependence on the nature of the acid used.

[0090] In Figure 3, EFU increased as pH decreased until pH 5.5 was reached. There was no further increase in EFU by lowering pH 5.5 to pH 5.25.

[0091] conclusion A synergistic effect on EFU was observed by lowering the pH to pH 5.5 and adding 2% of the carboxylic acid malonic acid. The greatest effect on EFU of 2% carboxylic acid was observed at pH 5.5 for malonic acid, below which there was no increase in EFU. Under these conditions, the increase in EFU due to the inclusion of malonic acid was much greater than the increase due to the inclusion of citric acid.

[0092] [Example 3] Enamel Fluoride Uptake (EFU) This example describes enamel fluoride uptake testing performed on dentifrice compositions of the present invention.

[0093] Dentifrice compositions (Formulations 5-11) were prepared (see Table 5 below) and EFU determined as described above in Example 2. The results are shown in Table 6 and Figure 4.

[0094] [Table 6]

[0095] result

[0096] [Table 7]

[0097] At the 5% significance level, all treatments with added acid at pH 5.5 had statistically significantly greater EFU values ​​than the acid-free toothpaste at pH 7.2. The 2% lactic acid product was superior to all other treatments, followed by the 2% tartaric acid product.

[0098] The EFU values ​​for the phosphoric acid example and the malic acid example were significantly lower than those observed with the carboxylic acids used in the present invention.

[0099] conclusion When added to toothpaste at 2% w / w at pH 5.5, different acids showed substantially different effects on EFU. Lactic acid was the most effective of those tested. The results from this study indicate that significant effects on fluoride uptake are not achieved solely by formulating a dentifrice composition at an acidic pH (5.5), nor by using any carboxylic acid. The results observed with phosphoric and malic acids were significantly less impressive than those observed with the carboxylic acids used in the present invention.

[0100] [Example 4] Enamel Fluoride Uptake (EFU) The following dentifrice composition formulations 12-14 (see Table 7) were prepared and the EFU determined as described above in Example 2. The results are shown in Table 8 and Figure 5.

[0101] [Table 8]

[0102] result

[0103] [Table 9]

[0104] conclusion Formulation 14 was superior to the fluoride control formulation. Both fluoride-containing formulations were superior to the fluoride-free control formulation.

[0105] [Example 5] EFU Test The following dentifrice composition formulations 15-21 (see Table 9) were prepared and the EFU determined as described above in Example 2. The results are shown in Table 10 and Figure 6.

[0106] [Table 10]

[0107] result

[0108] [Table 11]

[0109] At the 5% significance level, all fluoride-containing formulations were statistically significantly better than the fluoride-free placebo. The formulation containing 0.25% PVM / MA copolymer (formulation 19) was statistically significantly superior to all other formulations tested. There were no significant differences between the other formulations.

[0110] conclusion All fluoride-containing preparations were superior to the non-fluoride placebo.

[0111] However, there was evidence to suggest that the use of 0.25% polymer was surprisingly beneficial to EFU.

[0112] [Example 6] Enamel solubility reduction test The above dentifrice compositions 15 to 21 in Table 10 were prepared and the ESR was determined as follows. The results are shown in Table 11 and Figure 7.

[0113] Tooth preparation Three healthy human molars were placed in wax so that only the enamel surface was exposed, then cleaned and polished. Twelve pairs of three teeth each were prepared for testing.

[0114] Preparation of lactate buffer A 0.1 M lactic acid solution buffered to pH 4.5 was prepared.

[0115] Deprotection The tooth surfaces were etched twice in 0.1 M lactate buffer at room temperature for 1 hour, then rinsed thoroughly with water.

[0116] Pretreatment Etching Testing was performed using preheated (37°C) tooth sets in an incubator and lactate buffer. The acid-pretreated tooth sets were mounted on the end of an acrylic rod using molten wax. Small holes were drilled in the lid of each container to accommodate the plastic rod with the tooth set. A 40 ml portion of 0.1 M lactate buffer was placed in each container. The rod of the first tooth set was pressed into the hole in the lid and placed in the first container, adjusting the position so that all enamel surfaces were immersed in the lactic acid solution. After 15 minutes of agitated exposure to the buffered lactate solution, the tooth sets were removed from the container and rinsed in water. The lactate buffer was retained and analyzed for phosphorus. The tooth sets were then returned to the 37°C water bath for the treatment process.

[0117] treatment All sets of teeth were treated simultaneously (one for each product). The treatment procedure was similar to the etching procedure, except that dentifrice slurry was used instead of acid. A 30 ml portion of preheated dentifrice slurry was added to each container, and the teeth were then immersed in the dentifrice slurry and agitated for 5 minutes. The other sets of teeth were treated in the same manner with the other dentifrice slurries. At the end of treatment, the sets of teeth were removed and rinsed thoroughly with water.

[0118] Post-treatment A second lactic acid exposure was performed on the dentifrice-treated samples using the same method as the pre-treatment etch, and the treatment solution was analyzed for phosphorus. The pre-treatment and post-treatment solutions were analyzed for phosphorus using a Klett-Summerson Photoelectric Colorimeter.

[0119] The tooth sets were etched once more and the procedure was repeated an additional number of times to treat each tooth set with each dentifrice. Treatments were assigned in a Latin square design to ensure variability in treatment sequence.

[0120] ESR calculation The percent of enamel solubility reduction was calculated by dividing the difference in the amount of phosphorus in the pre- and post-acid solutions by the amount of phosphorus in the pre-acid solution and multiplying by 100.

[0121] result

[0122] [Table 12]

[0123] result All fluoride-containing dentifrices provided statistically superior ESR values ​​to the fluoride-free placebo. A clear dose response to PVM / MA copolymer content was observed between 0% and 0.25%. An approximately 15% increase in ESR was observed with the presence of 0.25% PVM / MA copolymer. Above 0.25%, no further increase in ESR was observed with at least 1% PVM / MA copolymer.

[0124] conclusion Addition of up to 0.25% PVM / MA copolymer resulted in a significant increase in enamel solubility reduction. No further increase was observed with the addition of higher levels of copolymer.

[0125] [Example 7] Introduction To evaluate the efficacy of the test formulation, a clinical in situ study was conducted to compare its effectiveness against a fluoride-free placebo control and a comparison toothpaste also indicated for enamel erosion. The test design used here has been used extensively previously to investigate the performance of formulations in remineralizing acid-softened enamel [Creeth, 2018; Zero, 2006; Barlow, 2009; Creeth, 2015].

[0126] The trial protocol was posted to the ClinicalTrials.gov website on September 28, 2017 (Clinicaltrials.gov (Identifier: NCT03296072)).

[0127] formulation The test formulation, Formulation 1, is described in Example 1. The fluoride-free placebo had the same treatment visit regimen as the study, but fluoride was replaced with water, and the comparator toothpastes were Crest ProHealth Sensitivity and Enamel Shield.

[0128] Exam details This study was a single-center, controlled, single-blind (for tooth examiners and specimen analysts), randomized, three-treatment, three-period, crossover in situ design to test the remineralization potential of dentifrices. Treatments were administered once and assessed 2 and 4 hours after application. A two-day rinse-out phase (using a fluoride-free dentifrice) was performed prior to each treatment visit.

[0129] In this study, subjects were fitted with an oral appliance capable of holding eight enamel specimens on the roof of their mouths. Enamel specimens were cut from permanent bovine incisors and polished to a mirror finish. The specimens were demineralized in vitro by contact with grapefruit juice for 25 minutes. The specimens were then placed in the oral appliance and worn by the subjects for the duration of the study. The buccal surfaces of the teeth were brushed with toothpaste treatment for 25 seconds, and the resulting slurry was then used to scrub the oral cavity for 95 seconds, expectorate, and rinse with water. Four enamel specimens were removed from the appliances two hours after treatment, and the remaining four specimens were removed four hours after treatment. The enamel specimens were then immersed in grapefruit juice for a second time in vitro.

[0130] The amount of remineralization that occurred was determined by measuring the microhardness of the enamel surface using a Knoop microindenter. Indentations were made on healthy enamel before contact with grapefruit juice, before insertion in the mouth, after the 2-hour or 4-hour remineralization period, and after the second grapefruit juice challenge. The indentation length was used to calculate the percent surface microhardness recovery (%SMHR) and relative erosion resistance (%RER). % SMHR = [(E1-R) / (E1-B)]×100 [from Gelhard, 1979] % RER = [(E1-E2) / (E1-B)] x 100 [from Corpron, 1986] where B = indentation length of healthy enamel at baseline (μm), E1 = indentation length after the first grapefruit juice challenge (μm), R = indentation length after in situ remineralization (μm), and E2 = indentation length after the second grapefruit juice challenge (μm).

[0131] The amount of fluoride incorporated into the remineralized lesions (enamel fluoride uptake (EFU)) was determined chemically (using the method of Sakab [Sakkab 1984]) after the enamel specimens were removed from the mouth but before the second grapefruit juice challenge.

[0132] result The results are shown in Figures 8-10. The test toothpastes demonstrated statistically significantly greater remineralization (as indicated by %SMHR) than either the placebo control or the comparator toothpaste. The test toothpastes also demonstrated statistically superior prevention of demineralization (as indicated by %RER) than either the placebo or the comparator toothpaste. Furthermore, enamel treated with the test toothpastes had statistically greater fluoride uptake (EFU) into remineralized lesions than enamel treated with either the fluoride-free placebo or the comparator toothpaste.

[0133] conclusion The results show that the test toothpaste was more effective at remineralizing acid-softened enamel and preventing further demineralization than either the fluoride-free control or the comparison product indicated for erosion.

[0134] References Barlow AP, Sufi F, Mason SC. Evaluation of different fluoridated dentifrice formulations using an in-situ erosion remineralization model. The Journal of Clinical Dentistry. 2009;20(6):192-8. Corpron RE, Clark JW, Tsai A, More FG, Merrill DF, Kowalski CJ, Tice TR, Rowe CE. Intraoral effects of a fluoride-releasing device on acid-softened enamel. The Journal of the American Dental Association. 1986 Sep 1;113(3):383-8. Creeth JE, Kelly SA, Martinez-Mier EA, Hara AT, Bosma ML, Butler A, Lynch RJ, Zero DT. Dose-response effect of fluoride dentifrice on remineralisation and further demineralisation of erosive lesions: A randomised in situ clinical study. Journal of Dentistry. 2015 Jul 1;43(7):823-31. Creeth JE, Parkinson CR, Burnett GR, Sanyal S, Lippert F, Zero DT, Hara AT. Effects of a sodium fluoride-and phytate-containing dentifrice on remineralisation of enamel erosive lesions-an in situ randomised clinical study. Clinical oral investigations. 2018 Feb 8:1-0. Gelhard TB, Ten Cate JM, Arends J. Rehardening of artificial enamel lesions in vivo. Caries Research. 1979;13(2):80-3. Sakkab NY, Cilley WA, Haberman JP. Fluoride in deciduous teeth from an anti-caries clinical study. Journal of Dental Research. 1984 Oct;63(10):1201-5. Zero DT, Hara AT, Kelly SA, Gonzalez-Cabezas C, Eckert GJ, Barlow AP, Mason SC. Evaluation of a desensitizing test dentifrice using an in-situ erosion remineralization model. The Journal of Clinical Dentistry. 2006;17(4):112-6.

[0135] [Example 8] White light interferometry (enamel protection) Introduction The purpose of this study was to monitor and quantify the effect of in vitro treatment of human enamel with a dentifrice formulation on subsequent erosion by dietary acids.

[0136] White light interferometry techniques can provide rapid visualization of surface topography. The determination of roughness parameters can be performed in a non-contact manner, and nanometer-scale height resolution is available.

[0137] Test Products

[0138] [Table 13]

[0139] method Twenty human enamel specimens were polished flat and their surface areas were affixed with acid-resistant tape. The specimens were then divided into four treatment groups (n=5 per group), hand-brushed for 2 minutes, and immersed in one of the dentifrice slurries (1:3 wt.% in deionized water). The specimens were then rinsed with deionized water for 1 minute. After dentifrice treatment, the specimens were suspended in 1% citric acid, pH 3.8, for 5 minutes without agitation. The specimens were rinsed with deionized water, air-dried, and then analyzed using a white light interferometer.

[0140] The surface topography of the specimens was examined using an ADE PhaseShift MicroXAM White Light Interferometer. Data were obtained from multiple areas (687 μm x 511 μm and 215 μm x 160 μm) for each specimen. After removing the tape cover, additional measurements were taken to assess bulk tissue loss. Statistical analysis was performed using a two-tailed, unequal variance Student's t-test with a confidence level of >95%.

[0141] result The results are shown in Figure 11.

[0142] Material losses for the treatment groups followed the following trends: [Maximum step] C3>C2>C1>T1 [Minimum step]. The differences in step height between all treatment groups are statistically significant at the 95% confidence level.

[0143] Surface roughness for the treatment groups followed the following trends: [Maximum Sa] C3>C2>C1>T1 [Minimum Step].

[0144] All Sa differences between treatment groups are statistically significant at the 95% confidence level except in cases C2 and C1.

[0145] conclusion The above data show that pretreatment with T1 provided the greatest protection against erosive stress, followed by pretreatment with C1, then C2, with pretreatment with C3 offering the least protection.

[0146] [Example 9] Dynamic Secondary Ion Mass Spectrometry (Fluoride Incorporation) Introduction Dynamic secondary ion mass spectrometry (DSIMS) can be used to semiquantitatively determine depth profiles of material elements at nanometer scale intervals. This technique was used to determine the extent of fluoride and calcium incorporation into human enamel surfaces after treatment of the erosion lesions with dentifrices and mouthrinses. The purpose of this study was to determine the extent of fluoride incorporation into artificial erosion lesions of human enamel after treatment with the four dentifrices tested in the white light interference study detailed above.

[0147] Twenty human enamel specimens were polished and suspended in 1% citric acid, pH 3.8, without agitation for 5 minutes to create artificial erosion lesions. After rinsing with deionized water, specimens were divided into four treatment groups (n=5) and immersed in a dentifrice slurry (1:3 wt%) for 2 minutes, followed by a 1-minute rinse with deionized water. After treatment, specimens were air-dried and analyzed using fluoride DSIMS.

[0148] Cameca ims 6f machine with 15keV O2 + DSIMS image analysis was performed using a primary ion beam (approximately 50 picoamps) and an electron gun for charge compensation. Images were acquired from an area measuring 100 μm × 100 μm. Negative secondary ion detection was used with a nominal extraction field of view of -5.0 keV. Fluorine / oxygen integrals were determined over a 50 μm depth range, i.e., measuring the relative uptake of fluoride into the upper 50 μm of the tooth enamel surface. A graphical comparison of fluoride uptake results across the four treatment groups is shown in Figure 3.

[0149] Test product (same as in Example 8)

[0150] [Table 14]

[0151] method Twenty human enamel specimens were polished and suspended in 1% citric acid, pH 3.8, without agitation for 5 minutes to create artificial erosion lesions. After rinsing with deionized water, specimens were divided into four treatment groups (n=5) and immersed in a dentifrice slurry (1:3 wt%) for 2 minutes, followed by rinsing with deionized water for 1 minute. After treatment, specimens were air-dried and analyzed using fluoride DSIMS.

[0152] Cameca ims 6f machine with 15keV O2 + DSIMS image analysis was performed using a primary ion beam (approximately 50 picoamps) and an electron gun for charge compensation. Images were acquired from an area measuring 100 μm x 100 μm. Negative secondary ion detection was used with a nominal extraction field of view of -5.0 keV. Fluorine / oxygen integrals were determined over a 50 μm depth range, i.e., measuring the relative uptake of fluoride into the upper 50 μm of the tooth enamel surface. A graphical comparison of fluoride uptake results across the four treatment groups is shown in Figure 12.

[0153] result Results of fluoride DSIMS analysis and retrospective line scan analysis showed that fluoride uptake was highest for specimens treated with T1 dentifrice, followed by C2, then C1 dentifrice. Treatment with C3 dentifrice resulted in very little fluoride uptake. Student's "T" tests were performed to assess statistical significance of differences in fluoride uptake between treatment groups. All differences between treatment groups were found to be statistically significant.

[0154] [Example 10] Dynamic Secondary Ion Mass Spectrometry (Calcium Uptake) Introduction The purpose of this study was to determine the extent of calcium incorporation into artificial erosive lesions of human enamel after treatment with three different dentifrices.

[0155] Test product (same as in Example 8)

[0156] [Table 15]

[0157] method Twenty human enamel specimens were polished and suspended in 1% citric acid, pH 3.8, for 5 minutes without agitation. After rinsing with deionized water, the specimens were then divided into four treatment groups (n=5) and immersed in a dentifrice slurry (1:3 wt%) for 2 minutes, followed by rinsing with deionized water for 1 minute. Enamel specimens from two of the four treatment groups were incubated in a slurry made from dentifrice T1. The enamel was then placed in an artificial saliva solution for 24 hours. This solution was used to determine the effect of the three treatments. 44 The enamel in the second dentifrice, C3 (placebo for T1), contained significantly enriched calcium (as calcium chloride). A standard artificial saliva solution was used as a control (identical to the artificial saliva used for the other treatments, but 40 (Calcium is contained as calcium chloride). The specimens were then washed with deionized water for 1 minute, air-dried, and 44 Calcium was analyzed using DSIMS.

[0158] DSIMS image analysis was performed using a Cameca ims 4F machine utilizing a 15 keV O2+ primary ion beam (approximately 100 picoamperes). 40 Ca, 42 Ca, 44 Ca and 40 Ca 19 Images of F were acquired from a minimum of two regions per sample, typically measuring 100 μm × 100 μm. Positive secondary ion detection was used with a normal incidence electron gun for charge correction and an extracted field of view at the sample surface at +4.5 keV. Line scans were then acquired from each image using Cameca ims 4f data processing software. A graphical representation of the results is shown in Figure 13.

[0159] result DSIMS images and retrospective line scan analysis of enamel showed that specimens treated with C3 but subsequently incubated in an artificial saliva solution composed of calcium of normal isotopic composition 44Calcium uptake was shown to be negligible. 44 For specimens incubated in calcium-rich artificial saliva, 44 The extent of calcium uptake was highest for specimens pretreated with T1 dentifrice, followed by those treated with C2 dentifrice, followed by C1 dentifrice (Figure 13). 44 Calcium uptake occurred to a depth of more than 20 μm for the first three treatments, but the average 44 The greatest intergroup difference in calcium uptake occurs approximately 10 μm above the enamel surface. In this region, treatment with T1 was approximately 3.5-fold higher than treatment with C2 and approximately 5-fold higher than treatment with C1. 44 C2 results in calcium uptake that is approximately 1.5 times higher than treatment with C1 44 Calcium uptake between treatment groups. 44 A Student's "T" test was performed to assess statistical significance of differences in calcium uptake. All differences in calcium uptake were observed to be statistically significant.

[0160] conclusion The greater calcium uptake values ​​observed for the test dentifrice (T1) compared to the comparator formulations (C1 and C2) indicate enhanced remineralization of tooth enamel surfaces for the test dentifrice. The following is one embodiment of the present invention. (1) A dentifrice composition comprising a carboxylic acid or an alkali metal salt thereof selected from the list consisting of malonic acid, glutaric acid, tartaric acid, lactic acid, and mixtures thereof, and a source of free fluoride ions, wherein the dentifrice composition has a slurry pH in the range of greater than 5.0 to less than 6.5. (2) A dentifrice composition according to (1), wherein the alkali metal salt is a sodium salt of the carboxylic acid. (3) The composition according to (2), wherein the alkali metal salt is sodium lactate present in an amount of 0.5% to 5.0% by weight of the total composition. (4) The composition according to any one of (1) to (3), wherein the source of free fluoride ions is an alkali metal fluoride. (5) The composition according to (4), wherein the alkali metal fluoride is sodium fluoride present in an amount of 0.05% to 0.5% by weight of the composition. (6) The composition according to any one of (1) to (5), having a slurry pH in the range of 5.4 to 6.3. (7) The composition according to any one of (1) to (6), further comprising a pH adjuster. (8) The composition according to (7), wherein the pH adjuster is sodium hydroxide. (9) A composition according to any one of (1) to (8), comprising a copolymer of methyl vinyl ether (MVE) and maleic anhydride or maleic acid. (10) The composition according to (9), wherein the copolymer is a copolymer of MVE and maleic acid. (11) The composition according to (10), wherein the copolymer is a 1:1 copolymer of MVE and maleic acid. (12) The composition according to any one of (9) to (11), wherein the copolymer has a molecular weight in the range of 100,000 to 2,000,000. (13) The composition according to any one of (9) to (12), wherein the copolymer is used in an amount of 0.05% to 2% by weight of the composition. (14) The composition according to any one of (1) to (13), further comprising a desensitizing agent. (15) A composition according to any one of (1) to (14) for use in protecting teeth from dental erosion. (16) A composition according to any one of (1) to (15) for use in protecting teeth from caries.

Claims

1. 1. A dentifrice composition comprising an alkali metal salt, the alkali metal salt being sodium lactate present in an amount of 0.5% to 5.0% by weight of the total composition, a copolymer of methyl vinyl ether (MVE) and maleic acid, and a source of free fluoride ions, the dentifrice composition having a slurry pH in the range of greater than 5.4 to less than 6.

3.

2. 10. The composition of claim 1, wherein the source of free fluoride ions is an alkali metal fluoride.

3. 3. The composition of claim 2, wherein the alkali metal fluoride is sodium fluoride present in an amount of 0.05% to 0.5% by weight of the composition.

4. 4. The composition of claim 1, further comprising a pH adjuster.

5. 5. The composition of claim 4, wherein the pH adjuster is sodium hydroxide.

6. 6. The composition of claim 1, wherein the copolymer is a 1:1 copolymer of MVE and maleic acid.

7. 7. The composition of claim 1, wherein the copolymer has a molecular weight in the range of 100,000 to 2,000,000.

8. 8. The composition according to any one of claims 1 to 7, wherein the copolymer is used in an amount of 0.1% to 0.4% by weight of the composition.

9. 9. The composition of claim 1, further comprising a desensitizing agent.

10. 10. A composition according to any one of claims 1 to 9 for use in protecting teeth from dental erosion.

11. 10. A composition according to any one of claims 1 to 9 for use in protecting teeth against caries.

Images