Dentifrice containing PVM-MA copolymer and a source of free fluoride ions

Abstract

A dentifrice composition is described that includes a source of free fluoride ions and from 0.1% to less than 0.5% by weight of the composition of a copolymer of methyl vinyl ether and maleic anhydride or maleic acid, the composition having a slurry pH of 6.0 to 7.5, and is free of a carboxylic acid selected from the group consisting of malonic acid, glutaric acid, tartaric acid, lactic acid, and mixtures thereof, or an alkali metal salt thereof. The composition enhances fluoride uptake into teeth and provides protection from acidic loads. [Selection diagram] None

Description

[Technical Field]

[0001] The present invention relates to a dentifrice composition that strengthens and protects natural tooth enamel, thereby protecting it from acid stress. The composition according to the present invention comprises a source of free fluoride ions and a small amount, typically from 0.1% to less than 2% by weight of the composition, e.g., from 0.1% to less than 0.5% by weight, of a copolymer of methyl vinyl ether (MVE) and maleic anhydride or maleic acid, and has a slurry pH of 6.0 to 7.5. The composition does not contain certain carboxylic acids or alkali metal salts thereof. In particular, the composition according to the present invention does not contain carboxylic acids or alkali metal salts thereof selected from the list of malonic acid, glutaric acid, tartaric acid, and lactic acid, and mixtures thereof. [Background technology]

[0002] The mineral in teeth is calcium hydroxyapatite, Ca 10 It is composed primarily of (PO4)6(OH)2, which may be partially substituted with anions such as carbonate or fluoride, and cations such as zinc or magnesium. Tooth mineral may also contain non-apatite mineral phases such as octacalcium phosphate and calcium carbonate.

[0003] Dental caries can result from dental caries, a multifactorial disease in which bacterial acids, e.g., lactic acid, produced by the metabolism of dietary sugars, cause subsurface demineralization that does not adequately remineralize during sugar exposure, resulting in progressive tissue loss and ultimately cavity formation. The presence of a plaque biofilm is a prerequisite for dental caries, and acid-producing bacteria, e.g., Streptococcus mutans, can become pathogenic when levels of sugars (i.e., easily fermentable carbohydrates, e.g., sucrose) are high for extended periods.

[0004] Even in the absence of plaque biofilm, dental hard tissue loss can occur as a result of acid erosion and / or physical tooth wear, and these processes are thought to act synergistically. Exposure of dental hard tissue to acid can cause demineralization, resulting in surface softening and loss of mineral density. This softened mineral is vulnerable to abrasion from physical contact. Under normal physiological conditions, partially demineralized tissue repairs itself through the remineralizing effects of saliva. Saliva is supersaturated with respect to calcium and phosphate, and in healthy individuals, salivary secretion serves to flush out the acid load and raise the pH to alter the equilibrium for mineral deposition.

[0005] Dental erosion (i.e., acid erosion or acid abrasion) is a surface phenomenon involving the demineralization and ultimately complete dissolution of tooth surfaces by acids of non-bacterial origin. The acids are most commonly from dietary sources, such as citric acid from fruit or carbonated drinks, phosphoric acid from cola drinks, and acetic acid, e.g., vinaigrette. Dental erosion can also be caused by repeated contact with hydrochloric acid (HCl) produced by the stomach, which can enter the oral cavity by an involuntary response, e.g., gastroesophageal reflux, or by a provoked response, such as may occur in patients with bulimia.

[0006] Tooth wear (i.e., physical tooth wear) is caused by friction and / or abrasion. Friction occurs when tooth surfaces rub against each other in the form of two-body abrasion. A frequently dramatic example is observed in subjects with bruxism, a sleep-related tooth grinding habit characterized by high applied forces and accelerated wear, particularly on the occlusal surfaces. Abrasion typically results from three-body abrasion, the most common example of which is associated with brushing with toothpaste. In the case of fully mineralized enamel, the level of abrasion caused by commercial toothpastes is minimal and of little or no clinical significance. However, when enamel is demineralized and softened by exposure to erosive stress, it becomes more susceptible to abrasion. Enamel is thinnest at its junction with dentin, which, in healthy cases, is located just below the gingival margin. However, gum recession (especially associated with aging) can expose the enamel-dentin junction, and wear of the enamel in this area can expose the dentin and cause sensitivity, as described below.

[0007] Dentin is a living tissue that is usually covered by enamel or cementum depending on its location in the body, i.e., at the crown and root, respectively. Dentin has a much higher organic content than enamel, and its structure is characterized by the presence of fluid-filled tubules that flow from the surface of the dentin-enamel or dentin-cementum junction to the pulp interface. Dentin is much softer than enamel and, as a result, is more susceptible to abrasion. Subjects with exposed dentin should avoid the use of highly abrasive toothpastes. Softening of dentin due to erosive loads also increases the tissue's susceptibility to abrasion. It is widely accepted that the origin of dentin hypersensitivity is related to altered fluid flow in the exposed tubules (fluid dynamics theory), resulting in stimulation of mechanoreceptors thought to be located close to the pulp interface. Not all exposed dentin is hypersensitive because dentin is generally covered with a smear layer (an occlusive mixture composed primarily of minerals and proteins from the dentin itself, but also containing organic components from saliva). Over time, the tubule lumens can become completely occluded with mineralized tissue. Furthermore, the formation of reparative dentin in response to pulp trauma or chemical irritation is well documented. Nevertheless, erosive stress can remove the smear layer and tubule "plugs," freeing dental fluid flow and making the dentin much more susceptible to external stimuli, such as heat, cold, and pressure. As previously indicated, erosive stress can also make the dentin surface much more susceptible to abrasion. Furthermore, dentin hypersensitivity worsens as the diameter of the exposed tubules increases, and because tubule diameter increases as you move toward the pulp interface, progressive dentin wear, especially if dentin wear is rapid, may result in increased sensitivity.

[0008] Therefore, erosion and / or acid-mediated tooth wear are major etiologic factors in the development of dentin hypersensitivity.

[0009] It has been postulated that increased dietary acid intake and deviations from regular meal times are associated with a rise in the incidence of dental erosion and tooth wear in developed populations. In light of this, oral care compositions that can help prevent dental erosion and tooth wear and can protect against dental caries would be advantageous.

[0010] Oral care compositions often contain a source of fluoride ions to promote tooth remineralization and increase the acid resistance of dental hard tissues. To be effective, fluoride ions must be available for incorporation into the hard tissues of the teeth being treated.

[0011] The use of fluoride-containing dentifrices formulated at a substantially neutral pH has been described in the art for remineralization and tooth strengthening. WO 2006 / 1000071 (Glaxo Group Ltd) discloses a dentifrice composition containing, among other ingredients, a fluoride ion source and having a pH in the range of 6.5 to 7.5. Such a composition has been commercialized as SENSODYNE Pronamel toothpaste for use in protecting teeth from dietary acid loads.

[0012] The use of copolymers based on methyl vinyl ether and maleic acid in oral care compositions is known in the art. US 4,485,090 discloses a dentifrice composition containing a polymeric anionic film-forming material, such as "Gantrez AN." According to US 4,485,090, this material adheres to the tooth surface and forms a substantially continuous barrier thereon by complexing with calcium present on the tooth. The formed barrier is said to substantially reduce the elution of previously applied therapeutic agents (e.g., dental fluoride treatments), thereby prolonging the effectiveness of such agents. According to US 4,485,090, the inventive composition therein requires only periodic application (e.g., once a day) to achieve the desired reduction in elution and the resulting control of caries and plaque.

[0013] US 2004 / 0146466 (Baig et al.) discloses a method for treating and protecting teeth against erosion by using an oral composition containing a polymeric inorganic surfactant, metal ions such as stannous, zinc, and combinations thereof. The polymeric inorganic surfactants described include synthetic anionic polymers, including polyacrylates and copolymers of maleic anhydride or maleic acid and methyl vinyl ether (e.g., Gantrez). Effective amounts of the polymeric inorganic surfactant are described as ranging from about 1% to about 35%, preferably from about 2% to about 30%, more preferably from about 5% to about 25%, and most preferably from about 6% to about 20% by weight of the total oral composition.

[0014] WO2007 / 069429 (Lion Corporation) discloses (A) 0.3 to 1.2 mass % of a compound of formula M n+2 P n O 3n+1 (wherein M represents Na or K, and n is an integer of 2 or 3), (B) 0.1 to 2.0% by mass of a methyl vinyl ether / maleic anhydride copolymer (a 2.0% by mass aqueous solution having a viscosity of 5 to 1000 mPa s at 25°C and pH 7.0), (C) 0.6 to 2.0% by mass of lauryl sulfate, and (D) 0.2 to 1.0% by mass of a betaine-type amphoteric surfactant, with a mass composition ratio of (C) / (D) in the range of 1 to 4. Such a composition is described as having low irritation to the oral mucosa, providing favorable foaming during use, and also having an excellent effect in preventing staining from adhering to the tooth surface.

[0015] WO 2011 / 094499 (Colgate-Palmolive Company) discloses an anti-erosion oral care formulation containing a copolymer of methyl vinyl ether and maleic anhydride, e.g., Gantrez, and a metal compound or salt that becomes more soluble at acidic pH. According to WO 2011 / 094499, the mucoadhesive polymer, e.g., Gantrez, may be incorporated into an orally acceptable vehicle in an amount ranging from 0.01 to 20% by weight of the ingredients, preferably 0.1 to 10% by weight, and most preferably 0.5 to 7% by weight. The "low polymer formulation" and "high polymer formulation" exemplified in WO 2011 / 094499 contain 0.5% and 2.0% by weight of Gantrez, respectively.

[0016] A Technical Information Sheet, Bulletin VC-862A, published by Ashland Specialty Chemicals, reported that after enamel preparation with a toothpaste containing 2% Gantrez S-97 polymer, superior resistance to acid erosion of the enamel was observed in in vitro tests, and the presence of Gantrez was thought to be the primary reason for the observed improvement in reducing acid erosion. Summary of the Invention [Means for solving the problem]

[0017] In one aspect, the present invention is based on the discovery that small amounts, ranging from 0.1% to less than 2% by weight, e.g., from 0.1% to less than 0.5% by weight, of a copolymer of methyl vinyl ether and maleic anhydride or maleic acid can be advantageously incorporated into dentifrice compositions containing a source of free fluoride ions. In particular, it has been observed that certain small amounts of the copolymer (0.2% to 0.3% by weight, exemplified herein by about 0.25% by weight) provide a significant improvement in fluoride uptake (e.g., compared to formulations containing no copolymer), while simultaneously resulting in a reduction in enamel solubility similar to that achieved with compositions containing significantly more (i.e., two or four times more) of the copolymer.

[0018] In one aspect, the present invention provides a dentifrice composition comprising a source of free fluoride ions and from 0.1% to less than 2%, e.g., from 0.1% to less than 0.5%, by weight of the composition of a copolymer of methyl vinyl ether and maleic anhydride or maleic acid, the dentifrice composition having a slurry pH of 6.0 to 7.5, and being free of a carboxylic acid selected from the group consisting of malonic acid, glutaric acid, tartaric acid, lactic acid, and mixtures thereof, or an alkali metal salt thereof.

[0019] Such compositions are useful in protecting teeth from dental erosion. Such compositions are also useful in protecting teeth from dental caries. [Brief explanation of the drawings]

[0020] [Figure 1] FIG. 1 shows the effect of PVM / MA (pH 6.2) on EFU. [Figure 2] FIG. 1 shows the effect of PVM / MA (pH 6.2) on ESR. [Figure 3] FIG. 1 shows the results of a TMR test. [Figure 4] FIG. 1 shows tissue loss data after treatment of human enamel with dentifrice followed by erosion challenge. [Figure 5] FIG. 1 shows enamel surface roughness data after treatment of human enamel with dentifrice followed by erosion challenge. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

[0021] The composition according to the present invention includes a source of free fluoride ions. The term "source of free fluoride ions" refers to a compound containing fluoride ions. The source of free fluoride ions is not an alkali metal monofluorophosphate, such as sodium monofluorophosphate. Suitable examples of the source of free fluoride ions include alkali metal fluorides, such as sodium fluoride or potassium fluoride, polyvalent metal ion fluoride salts, such as stannous fluoride, or salts of fluoride and cationic organic ions, such as ammonium fluoride or bis-(hydroxyethyl)amino-propyl-N-hydroxyethyloctadecylamine-dihydrofluoride (amine fluorides), or mixtures thereof. Suitably, the source of free fluoride ions is used in an amount that provides 25 to 5000 ppm, preferably 100 to 1500 ppm, of fluoride ions. In one embodiment, the source of free fluoride ions is stannous fluoride. In one embodiment, the source of free fluoride ions is an alkali metal fluoride, such as sodium fluoride.Suitably, the composition comprises 0.05% to 0.5% by weight of sodium fluoride, for example, 0.1% by weight (equivalent to 450 ppm of fluoride ions), 0.205% by weight (equivalent to 927 ppm of fluoride ions), 0.2542% by weight (equivalent to 1150 ppm of fluoride ions), or 0.3152% by weight (equivalent to 1426 ppm of fluoride ions).

[0022] The compositions according to the present invention are weakly acidic, neutral, or weakly alkaline, i.e., have a slurry pH in the range of 6.0 to 7.5, e.g., pH 6.1 to 7.4, 6.2 to 7.3, or 6.2 to 7.2. In one embodiment, the composition has a pH of about 6.2. In a further embodiment, the composition has a pH of about 7.0. The pH referenced is measured when the dentifrice composition is slurried with water in a 1:3 weight ratio of composition to water. Suitably, the slurry is prepared by slurrying the dentifrice composition with water in a weight ratio of 1 part dentifrice composition to 3 parts distilled water. The pH is measured using a standard pH meter.

[0023] Suitably, the dentifrice compositions of the present invention contain a pH adjuster to adjust the pH of the composition to a desired pH. Suitable pH adjusters include alkali metal hydroxides, such as sodium hydroxide and potassium hydroxide, or inorganic acids, such as hydrochloric acid or sulfuric acid. In one embodiment, the pH adjuster is sodium hydroxide, for example, a 10.2% sodium hydroxide solution. The pH adjuster may be used in an amount of 0.005% to 5% by weight of the composition, for example, 0.01% to 2% or 0.02% to 1% by weight of the composition.

[0024] The composition according to the present invention includes a surface protectant that is a copolymer of methyl vinyl ether (MVE) and maleic anhydride or maleic acid. In one embodiment, the surface protectant is a copolymer of MVE and maleic acid. Generally, the copolymer is a linear copolymer containing alternating units of MVE and maleic anhydride or maleic acid. In one embodiment, the copolymer contains a 1:4 to 4:1 ratio of MVE:maleic anhydride or maleic acid, for example, a 1:1 ratio of MVE:maleic anhydride or maleic acid (i.e., about 50 mol % MVE and about 50 mol % maleic anhydride or maleic acid). In one embodiment, the copolymer is the acid form of a copolymer of MVE and maleic anhydride, in which the anhydride is fully or partially hydrolyzed to the corresponding acid, for example, after copolymerization. In one embodiment, the copolymer has a molecular weight in the range of 100,000 to 2,000,000, for example, 500,000 to 1,900,000 or 1,000,000 to 1,800,000. Suitably, the copolymer for use in the present invention is commercially available under the trade name GANTREZ®, for example GANTREZ® S-97 HSU Solution (Mw 1,500,000), GANTREZ® S-97 BF (Mw 1,200,000), GANTREZ® S-96 (Mw 700,000) and GANTREZ® S-95 (Mw 150,000), all of which are copolymers of MVE and maleic acid. In one embodiment, the copolymer is GANTREZ® S-97, a copolymer of MVE and maleic acid having an approximate molecular weight of 1,200,000 or 1,500,000.

[0025] GANTREZ® S-97 may be provided in solid (powder) form or as a liquid, e.g., an aqueous solution, such as GANTREZ® S-97 HSU solution. In one embodiment, the copolymer comprises a GANTREZ® polymer having the following structure and properties shown below:

[0026] [ka] Dibasic acid with pKa1=3.5 and pKa2=6.5

[0027] [Table 1]

[0028] Suitably, the rheological properties of the copolymer can be modified by the addition of salts and bases. GANTREZ® copolymers are commercially available from a variety of sources, including Ashland Specialty Chemicals, Bound Brook, NJ 08805, USA, and International Specialty Products, Wayne, NJ, USA.

[0029] Providing a dentifrice composition that achieves high fluoridation efficacy is challenging when the composition includes a surface protectant (i.e., the copolymer used in the present invention, as defined above) intended to provide a shield or barrier over the surface of tooth enamel to protect the enamel from acid attack. This is typically due to surface coverage of the tooth surface site by the agent that causes fluoridation. Advantageously, in the present invention, the copolymer is combined with a source of fluoride ions without adversely affecting the delivery of fluoride to the tooth enamel. In one embodiment, fluoride uptake is significantly enhanced in the presence of the copolymer. Without being bound by theory, the polymer may function to promote fluoride uptake by the enamel and / or prolong the contact of fluoride at the tooth surface, allowing for the promotion of fluoroapatite formation and remineralization. Advantageously, the compositions according to the present invention seek to provide not only an effective physical barrier to protect the enamel surface from acid attack and consequently inhibit demineralization of the tooth surface, but also, through the action of fluoride, effective remineralization of acid-damaged enamel surfaces.

[0030] The copolymer is used in an amount of 0.1% to less than 2% by weight of the composition, e.g., 0.1% to less than 1.5% by weight of the composition, or 0.1% to 1% by weight of the composition, or 0.1% to less than 1% by weight of the composition. In one embodiment, the copolymer is used in an amount of 0.1% to 0.5% by weight of the composition, or 0.1% to less than 0.5% by weight of the composition, e.g., 0.15% to 0.4% by weight, or 0.2% to 0.3% by weight of the composition. In one embodiment, the copolymer is used in an amount of about 0.25% by weight of the composition. Surprisingly, in vitro testing reported herein found that when such specific small amounts of copolymer are used, significant improvements can be observed in terms of demineralization inhibition and fluoride uptake. In one embodiment, the copolymer is used in an amount of about 0.25% by weight of the composition, and the composition has a slurry pH of 6.0 to 7.5, e.g., about 6.2. In one embodiment, the copolymer is used in an amount of about 0.25% by weight of the composition, and the composition has a slurry pH of about 7.0.

[0031] In one embodiment, the compositions of the present invention do not contain stannous ions and / or zinc ions. For example, in one embodiment, the compositions of the present invention contain from about 0.001% to about 5% metal ions, including at least 0.001% stannous ions and, optionally, from about 0.001% to about 4% zinc ions. In one embodiment, the compositions of the present invention do not contain calcium and zinc salts or compounds that become more soluble at acidic pH, as disclosed in WO 2011 / 094499. In one embodiment, the compositions do not contain calcium or zinc compounds or salts thereof.

[0032] The compositions of the present invention may contain suitable formulating agents, such as dental abrasives selected from those commonly used for such purposes in the oral care composition art, surfactants, thickeners, humectants, flavoring agents, sweetening agents, opacifying or coloring agents, preservatives, and water.

[0033] Examples of suitable dental abrasives include silica abrasives such as those sold under the trade names Zeodent, Sident, Sorbosil, or Tixosil by Huber, Degussa, Ineos, and Rhodia, respectively. The silica abrasive should be present in an amount sufficient to ensure adequate cleaning of the teeth by the dentifrice without promoting tooth abrasion.

[0034] The silica abrasive is generally present in an amount of up to 15% by weight of the total composition, for example, 2% to 10% by weight of the total composition, and preferably at least 5%, for example, 5% to 7%, especially 6% by weight. Reducing the level of silica abrasive has the advantage not only of making the dentifrice less abrasive, but also of minimizing any interaction of the abrasive with fluoride ions, thereby increasing the availability of free fluoride ions.

[0035] Suitable surfactants for use in the present invention include amphoteric surfactants, such as long-chain alkyl betaines, such as the product sold by Albright & Wilson under the trade name "Empigen BB", preferably long-chain alkylamido alkyl betaines, such as cocamidopropyl betaine, or low-ionic surfactants, such as sodium cocoate methyl taurate sold by Croda under the trade name Adinol CT, or mixtures thereof. The amphoteric surfactants can be used alone as the sole surfactant or can be combined with low-ionic surfactants. Suitably, the surfactant is a C 10~18 It is not an alkyl sulfate surfactant, such as sodium lauryl sulfate, which is commonly used in oral compositions.

[0036] Suitably, the surfactant is present in the range of 0.1% to 10%, preferably 0.1% to 5%, and more preferably 0.5% to 1.5% by weight of the total composition.

[0037] Suitable thickeners include, for example, nonionic thickeners, such as (C1-6) alkyl cellulose ethers, e.g., methylcellulose; hydroxy(C1-6) alkyl cellulose ethers, e.g., hydroxyethyl cellulose and hydroxypropyl cellulose; (C2-6) alkylene oxide-modified (C1-6) alkyl cellulose ethers, e.g., hydroxypropyl methylcellulose; and mixtures thereof. Other thickeners, such as natural and synthetic gums or gum-like materials, such as chestnut, xanthan gum, tragacanth gum, sodium carboxymethylcellulose, polyvinylpyrrolidone, starch, and thickening silica, may also be used. Preferably, the thickener is a mixture of thickening silica and xanthan gum.

[0038] Advantageously, the thickener is present in the range of 0.1% to 30%, preferably 1% to 20%, more preferably 5% to 15% by weight of the total composition.

[0039] Suitable humectants for use in the compositions of the present invention include, for example, glycerin, xylitol, sorbitol, propylene glycol or polyethylene glycol, or mixtures thereof, and may be present in the range of 10% to 80% by weight of the total composition, preferably 20% to 60% by weight, more preferably 25% to 50% by weight.

[0040] A preferred opacifying agent is titanium dioxide, which may be present in the range of 0.05% to 2%, preferably 0.075% to 0.2%, for example 0.1% by weight of the total composition, which amount enhances the appearance of the composition.

[0041] Flavoring agents that may be used in the compositions of the present invention include various flavor aldehydes, esters, alcohols, and similar materials, as well as menthol, carvone, and anethole, and mixtures thereof. Examples of essential oils include spearmint, peppermint, wintergreen, sassafras, clove, sage, eucalyptus, marjoram, cinnamon, lemon, lime, grapefruit, and orange. Suitably, flavoring agents may be used in an amount ranging from 0.01% to 4% by weight of the composition, for example, from 0.1% to 3% by weight, or from 0.5% to 2% by weight.

[0042] Sweeteners that may be used in the compositions of the present invention include, for example, sucrose, glucose, saccharin, sucralose, dextrose, levulose, lactose, mannitol, sorbitol, fructose, maltose, xylitol, saccharin salts (e.g., sodium saccharin), acesulfame, and mixtures thereof. In one embodiment, sodium saccharin is used as the sweetener. Suitably, the sweetener may be used in an amount ranging from 0.005% to 10% by weight of the composition, for example, from 0.01% to 3% by weight, or from 0.1% to 1% by weight.

[0043] The dentifrice compositions of the present invention are aqueous compositions. Water can comprise the remainder of the dentifrice composition. In one embodiment, the composition comprises 5% to 80% by weight of water, e.g., 10% to 60%, 15% to 40%, or 20% to 35% by weight of water. This amount of water includes free water added and the amount introduced with other components of the dentifrice composition, such as sorbitol.

[0044] The dentifrice compositions of the present invention are typically formulated in the form of a toothpaste or gel.

[0045] Additional oral care active ingredients may be included in the compositions of the present invention.

[0046] The compositions of the present invention may further comprise a desensitizing agent effective in treating dentin hypersensitivity. Examples of desensitizing agents include tubule blocking agents or neurodesensitizing agents and mixtures thereof, for example as described in WO 02 / 15809.

[0047] Suitable tubule blockers include strontium salts such as strontium chloride, strontium acetate or strontium nitrate. Suitably, the strontium salts are generally used in an amount of from 5% to 15% by weight of the composition.

[0048] In one embodiment, the tubule blocking agent is a bioactive glass. Suitably, the bioactive glass is composed of 45% by weight of silicon dioxide, 24.5% by weight of sodium oxide, 6% by weight of phosphorus oxide, and 24.5% by weight of calcium oxide. One such bioactive glass is commercially available under the trade name NOVAMIN, also known as 45S5 BIOGLASS. Suitably, the bioactive glass is generally used in an amount of 1% to 10% by weight of the composition.

[0049] In one embodiment, the tubule blocking agent is stannous fluoride. Stannous fluoride forms an insoluble metal salt through hydrolysis and oxidation reactions, which precipitates in the dentin tubules and on the dentin surface, effectively reducing dentin hypersensitivity. Stannous fluoride may also be used to provide a source of fluoride that can provide protection from caries and plaque / gingivitis.

[0050] Suitable nerve desensitizing agents include potassium salts such as potassium citrate, potassium chloride, potassium bicarbonate, potassium gluconate, and especially potassium nitrate. A desensitizing amount of potassium salt will generally be between 2 and 8% by weight of the total composition; for example, 5% by weight of potassium nitrate can be used.

[0051] The compositions of the present invention may, for example, comprise a whitening agent selected from polyphosphates, such as sodium tripolyphosphate (STP), and / or any additional silica abrasives present, which may have enhanced cleaning properties. The STP may be present in an amount of from 2% to 15% by weight of the total composition, for example from 5% to 10% by weight.

[0052] The compositions of the present invention are suitable for containment and dispensing in aluminum-plastic laminate tubing or plastic pumps, as commonly used in the industry.

[0053] The compositions of the present invention may be prepared by mixing the ingredients in suitable relative amounts in any convenient order and adjusting the pH to obtain the desired value.

[0054] An exemplary dentifrice composition according to the present invention comprises: a source of free fluoride ions, e.g., sodium fluoride, in an amount of 0.05% to 0.5%, a copolymer of MVE and maleic anhydride or maleic acid, e.g., GANTREZ® S-97, in an amount of 0.1% to less than 0.5%, and the composition has a slurry pH of 6.0 to 7.5.

[0055] The present invention provides a composition as defined above for use in protecting teeth from dental erosion. The present invention further provides a composition as defined above for use in protecting teeth from dental caries.

[0056] The present invention provides a composition as defined above for use in the treatment and / or inhibition of dental erosion on a tooth surface.The present invention provides a composition as defined above for use in the treatment and / or inhibition of dental caries on a tooth surface.

[0057] The present invention also provides a method for protecting teeth from dental erosion, comprising applying an effective amount of the composition defined above to an individual in need thereof.The present invention also provides a method for protecting teeth from dental caries, comprising applying an effective amount of the composition defined above to an individual in need thereof.

[0058] The present invention provides a method of treating and / or inhibiting dental erosion on a tooth surface comprising contacting the tooth surface with a composition as defined above.

[0059] The present invention provides a method of treating and / or inhibiting dental caries on a tooth surface comprising contacting the tooth surface with a composition as defined above. The present invention is further illustrated by the following examples. [Example]

[0060] [Example 1] Dentifrice composition formulations F15 to F21 below (see Table 1) were prepared.

[0061] [Table 2]

[0062] [Example 2] Enamel Fluoride Uptake (EFU) This example describes enamel fluoride uptake tests performed on the dentifrice compositions listed in Table 1 (F15-F21).

[0063] method The EFU test procedure was based on the procedure described in the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) testing procedures. 40 In this study, initial lesions were created using 0.1 M lactic acid, pH 5.0, containing 0.2% w / v polyacrylic acid (Carbopol 907) 50% saturated with hydroxyapatite.

[0064] Healthy upper central bovine incisors were cleaned of all adhering soft tissue. 3 mm diameter enamel cores were prepared from each tooth using a hollow-core diamond drill bit under running water. Specimens were embedded in the end of Plexiglas rods using methyl methacrylate and polished with 600 grit wet / dry sandpaper, followed by fine gamma alumina. 12 specimens per group were used in the study.

[0065] Each enamel specimen was etched by immersion in 0.5 ml of 1 M perchloric acid (HCl04) solution for 15 seconds with continuous agitation.

[0066] The fluoride content of this solution was determined by use of a fluoride electrode to determine the background fluoride content of the enamel specimens.

[0067] The specimens were again crushed and polished as described above. Initial lesions were created on each enamel specimen by immersion in a 0.1 M lactic acid / 0.2% Carbopol 907 solution at 37°C for 24 hours. The specimens were rinsed with water and stored in a humid environment until use.

[0068] The specimens were immersed in 25 ml of the supernatant of a slurry of 1 part by weight of the assigned dentifrice and 3 parts by weight of distilled water for 30 minutes with constant agitation (350 rpm). After treatment, the specimens were rinsed with water. One layer of enamel was removed from each specimen by etching as described above. The etching solution was analyzed for fluoride (ion-specific electrode) and calcium. The pretreatment fluoride (intrinsic) level of each specimen was then subtracted from the posttreatment value to determine the change in enamel fluoride due to the test treatment.

[0069] statistical analysis Statistical analysis of individual means was performed using a one-way analysis of variance model, and the significance of differences was analyzed by the Student-Newman-Keuls test.

[0070] result The results are shown in Table 2 and Figure 1.

[0071] [Table 3]

[0072] At the 5% significance level, all fluoride-containing formulations were statistically significantly better than the fluoride-free placebo. The formulation containing 0.25% PVM / MA copolymer (formulation 19) was statistically significantly superior to all other formulations tested. There were no significant differences between the other formulations.

[0073] conclusion All fluoride-containing preparations were superior to the non-fluoride placebo.

[0074] There was evidence to suggest that the use of 0.25% polymer was surprisingly beneficial to EFU.

[0075] [Example 3] Enamel solubility reduction test The above dentifrice compositions 15 to 21 in Table 1 were prepared and the ESR was determined as follows. The results are shown in Table 3 and Figure 2.

[0076] Tooth preparation Three healthy human molars were placed in wax so that only the enamel surface was exposed, then cleaned and polished. Twelve pairs of three teeth each were prepared for testing.

[0077] Preparation of lactate buffer A 0.1 M lactic acid solution buffered to pH 4.5 was prepared.

[0078] Deprotection The tooth surfaces were etched twice in 0.1 M lactate buffer at room temperature for 1 hour, then rinsed thoroughly with water.

[0079] Pretreatment Etching Testing was performed using preheated (37°C) tooth sets in an incubator and lactate buffer. The acid-pretreated tooth sets were mounted on the end of an acrylic rod using molten wax. Small holes were drilled in the lid of each container to accommodate the plastic rod with the tooth set. A 40 ml portion of 0.1 M lactate buffer was placed in each container. The rod of the first tooth set was pressed into the hole in the lid and placed in the first container, adjusting the position so that all enamel surfaces were immersed in the lactic acid solution. After 15 minutes of agitated exposure to the buffered lactate solution, the tooth sets were removed from the container and rinsed in water. The lactate buffer was retained and analyzed for phosphorus. The tooth sets were then returned to the 37°C water bath for the treatment process.

[0080] treatment All sets of teeth were treated simultaneously (one for each product). A 30 ml portion of preheated dentifrice slurry was added to each container, and the teeth were then immersed in the dentifrice slurry and agitated for 5 minutes. The other sets of teeth were treated in the same manner as the other dentifrice slurries. At the end of treatment, the sets of teeth were removed and rinsed thoroughly with water.

[0081] Post-treatment A second lactic acid exposure was performed on the dentifrice-treated samples using the same method as the pre-treatment etch, and the treatment solution was analyzed for phosphorus. The pre-treatment and post-treatment solutions were analyzed for phosphorus using a Klett-Summerson Photoelectric Colorimeter.

[0082] The tooth sets were etched once more and the procedure was repeated an additional number of times to treat each tooth set with each dentifrice. Treatments were assigned in a Latin square design to ensure variability in treatment sequence.

[0083] ESR calculation The percent of enamel solubility reduction was calculated by dividing the difference in the amount of phosphorus in the pre- and post-acid solutions by the amount of phosphorus in the pre-acid solution and multiplying by 100.

[0084] result

[0085] [Table 4]

[0086] All fluoride-containing dentifrices provided statistically superior ESR values ​​to the fluoride-free placebo. A clear dose response to PVM / MA copolymer content was observed between 0% and 0.25%. An approximately 15% increase in ESR was observed with the presence of 0.25% PVM / MA copolymer. Above 0.25%, no further increase in ESR was observed with at least 1% PVM / MA copolymer.

[0087] conclusion Addition of up to 0.25% PVM / MA copolymer resulted in a significant increase in enamel solubility reduction. No further increase was observed with the addition of higher levels of copolymer.

[0088] [Example 4] Transverse Microradiography (TMR) Study to Quantify Mineral Loss in Early Lesions After Dentifrice Treatment Dentifrice compositions according to the present invention, Formulations 22-24, set out in Table 4 below, were prepared for use in this study. In addition, two commercially available control formulations, Sensodyne Pronamel and Colgate Total, were included. The TMR test, detailed below, was performed and the results are shown in Figure 3 and Table 5. The model is a modification of the pH cycling model described by Featherstone et al.

[1986] .

[0089] Featherstone JDB, O'Reilly MM, Shariati M, Brugler S. Enhancement of remineralization in vitro and in vivo. In: Leach SA, ed.Factors Relating to Demineralization and Remineralization of the Teeth, pp. 23-34 (IRL Press Ltd, Oxford, 1986

[0090] [Table 5]

[0091] method Specimen preparation Enamel specimens were obtained from human permanent teeth. Crowns were cut into 4 × 4 mm specimens using a Buehler Isomet low-speed saw. Teeth were stored in thymol during the sample preparation process. Specimens were ground and polished using a Struers Rotopol 31 / Rotoforce 4 polishing system (Struers Inc., Cleveland, PA, USA) to create flat, parallel-plane dentin and enamel surfaces. The dentin side of the specimen was ground flat to a uniform thickness using 500-grit silicon carbide grinding paper. The enamel side of the specimen was ground sequentially using 1,200-, 2,400-, and 4,000-grit paper. The specimens were then polished using a 1 μm diamond abrasive suspension on an abrasive cloth until a minimum of a 2 × 4 mm highly polished surface was obtained across the enamel surface of the specimen. The resulting specimens ranged in thickness from 1.7 to 2.2 mm. Specimens were evaluated under a Nikon SMZ 1500 stereomicroscope at 20x magnification for cracks, hypomineralized (white spots), or other defects on the enamel surface that would preclude use in the study. Using acid-resistant colored nail polish (Sally Hansen Advanced Hard As Nails Nail Polish, USA), experimental windows measuring approximately 1.7 x 4 mm were created in the specimens, leaving healthy enamel (reference) areas on either side. Prepared specimens were stored at 4°C and 100% relative humidity until use. A total of 135 specimens were required for this study.

[0092] Microradiography After the pH cycling test was completed, approximately 100 μm-thick sections were cut from one side of the specimen after lesion creation (lesion baseline) through the lesion window and healthy enamel (control) areas using a Silverstone-Taylor Hard Tissue Microtome (Scientific Fabrications Laboratories, USA). The sections were mounted with aluminum step wedges on high-resolution glass plates, Type IA (Microchrome Technology Inc., San Jose, CA), and radiographed at a distance of 42 cm at 20 kV and 30 mA for 65 minutes. The film was developed in Kodak d-19 developer for 3 minutes, placed in a stop bath (Kodak 146-4247) for 45 seconds, and then fixed for 3 minutes (Kodak 146-4106). The plates were then rinsed thoroughly in deionized water for 15 minutes and air-dried. Microradiographs were examined using a Zeiss EOM microscope in conjunction with TMR software v.3.0.0.11. Healthy enamel was considered to be 87% v / v inorganic.

[0093] Test Variables All reported variables are summarized as follows: ΔZ - Lesion volume (the product of lesion depth and mineral loss over that depth) L - Lesion depth (83% mineral, i.e., 95% of the mineral content of healthy enamel) SZmax - maximum mineral density in the lesion surface area

[0094] Specimen randomization Specimens were randomized into five treatment groups of n=24 (n=18 for internal control).

[0095] Specimens were allocated to four stoppers (three for internal control) with six specimens per stopper per treatment group.

[0096] pH cycling phase (15 treatment days) Toothpaste slurries were prepared by mixing 1 part dentifrice with 3 parts deionized water in a beaker using a magnetic stirrer (e.g., 8 g toothpaste + 24 g deionized water). Fresh slurries for each subgroup were prepared immediately before each treatment. All treatments were stirred at 350 rpm.

[0097] All treatment regimens used a decalcification solution with the following composition (renewed at each cycle): compound m m Acetic acid 75 CaCl2× 2H2O 2.0 KH2PO4 2.0 (pH was adjusted to 4.4 with KOH)

[0098] All treatment regimens used a remineralization solution at pH 7 with the following composition: compound m m CaCl2× 2H2O 1.5 KH2PO40.9 KCl 130 HEPES 20

[0099] The cycling treatment regimen consisted of the following pH cycling regimen repeated daily for 15 treatment days: pH circulation method: 1 minute treatment Decalcification solution (37°C) for 6 hours 1 minute treatment Remineralization solution (37°C) for 16 hours

[0100] The specimens were left in the remineralization solution overnight. The specimens were not pH cycled over weekends and public holidays. On the eve of dawn, the specimens were exposed to the remineralization solution for one hour after the second treatment. The specimens were then rinsed with running deionized water and stored at approximately 4°C and 100% relative humidity until the next pH cycling day, at which point pH cycling began as outlined above.

[0101] After each treatment with the test product or exposure to the demineralization solution, the specimens were rinsed under running deionized water. They were then all placed back into the remineralization solution.

[0102] Data Management and Statistical Analysis The test variables ΔZ, L, and SZmax were calculated for each specimen. Test variables were analyzed using analysis of variance with test product included as a factor. The primary outcome measure was ΔZ. All statistical tests were two-sided with a nominal significance level of α = 0.05.

[0103] Results and Conclusions The data shown in Figure 3 and Table 5 indicate that the ΔZ value was lower for Formulation 22 containing 0.25% Gantrez. This ΔZ value was statistically lower than that of the two commercial control toothpastes and directionally lower than either of the formulations containing a higher percentage of Gantrez. This lower ΔZ value represents shallower lesions with higher mineral content at the end of the experiment, indicating greater enamel protection by Formulation 22 against the acid challenge administered during the experiment.

[0104] [Table 6]

[0105] [Example 5] White light interferometry (enamel protection) The purpose of this study was to monitor and quantify the effect of in vitro treatment of human enamel with a dentifrice formulation on subsequent erosion by dietary acids.

[0106] White light interferometry techniques can provide rapid visualization of surface topography. The determination of roughness parameters can be performed in a non-contact manner, and nanometer-scale height resolution is available.

[0107] method Twenty-five human enamel specimens were polished flat and their surface areas were affixed with acid-resistant tape. The specimens were then divided into five treatment groups (n=5 per group), hand-brushed for 2 minutes, and immersed in one of the following dentifrice slurries (1:3 wt.% in deionized water): Formulation 22, Formulation 23, Formulation 24, Formulation 25, or Formulation 26. Formulations 22-24 are as described in Table 4 above, and Formulations 25 and 26 are detailed in Table 5 below. The specimens were then rinsed with deionized water for 1 minute. After dentifrice treatment, the specimens were suspended in 1% citric acid, pH 3.8, for 5 minutes without agitation. The specimens were rinsed with deionized water, air-dried, and then analyzed using white light interferometry.

[0108] The surface topography of the specimens was examined using an ADE PhaseShift MicroXAM White Light Interferometer. Data were obtained from multiple areas (687 μm x 511 μm and 215 μm x 160 μm) for each specimen. After removing the tape cover, additional measurements were taken to assess bulk tissue loss. Statistical analysis was performed using a two-tailed, unequal variance Student's t-test with a confidence level of >95%.

[0109] The results of the analysis are displayed in Figures 4 and 5 below.

[0110] [Table 7]

[0111] result Material Loss [Step Height] Analysis: Material losses for the treatment groups followed the following trends: [Maximum step] Formulation 26 > 25 ≥ 23 ≥ 24 > 22 [Minimum step]. The step height advantage for formulation 22 is statistically significant at the 95% confidence level compared to all other formulations.

[0112] Surface Roughness (Sa) Analysis: Surface roughness for the treatment groups followed the following trends: [Maximum Sa] Formulation 26>25≧23≧24>22 [Minimum Sa] The lower surface roughness of enamel treated with formulation 22 is statistically significant at the 95% confidence level compared to all other formulations.

[0113] conclusion The above data show that pretreatment with a dentifrice containing 0.25% Gantrez (Formulation 22) provides the greatest protection against erosive challenge. The least protection is provided by pretreatment with a dentifrice containing the most Gantrez (2%, Formulation 26). Some embodiments are given below. Item 1 1. A dentifrice composition comprising a source of free fluoride ions and from 0.1% to less than 2%, by weight of the composition, of a copolymer of methyl vinyl ether (MVE) and maleic anhydride or maleic acid, wherein the dentifrice composition has a slurry pH of 6.0 to 7.5 and is free of a carboxylic acid selected from the group consisting of malonic acid, glutaric acid, tartaric acid, lactic acid, and mixtures thereof, or an alkali metal salt thereof. Section 2 Item 1. The composition according to item 1, wherein the source of free fluoride ions is an alkali metal fluoride. Section 3 Item 3. The composition according to item 2, wherein the alkali metal fluoride is sodium fluoride present in an amount of 0.05% to 0.5% by weight of the composition. Section 4 Item 4. The composition according to any one of items 1 to 3, having a slurry pH of 6.2 to 7.2. Section 5 Item 5. The composition according to any one of items 1 to 4, further comprising a pH adjuster. Section 6 Item 6. The composition according to item 5, wherein the pH adjuster is sodium hydroxide. Section 7 7. The composition of any one of paragraphs 1 to 6, wherein the copolymer is a copolymer of MVE and maleic acid. Section 8 Item 8. The composition of item 7, wherein the copolymer is a 1:1 copolymer of MVE and maleic acid. Section 9 Item 9. The composition of any one of items 1 to 8, wherein the copolymer has a molecular weight in the range of 100,000 to 2,000,000. Section 10 Item 10. The composition of any one of items 1 to 9, wherein the copolymer is used in an amount of 0.25% by weight of the composition. Section 11 Item 11. The composition of any one of items 1 to 10, further comprising a desensitizing agent. Section 12 Item 12. The composition according to any one of items 1 to 11, for use in protecting teeth from dental erosion. Section 13 Item 12. The composition according to any one of items 1 to 11, for use in protecting teeth from caries.

Claims

1. 1. A dentifrice composition comprising: a source of free fluoride ions, the source being a fluoride ion-containing compound; 0.15% to 0.4% by weight of the composition of a copolymer of methyl vinyl ether (MVE) and maleic acid; and a desensitizing agent, wherein the source of free fluoride ions is an alkali metal fluoride, the alkali metal fluoride being sodium fluoride present in an amount of 0.05% to 0.5% by weight of the composition; the desensitizing agent is potassium nitrate; the composition has a slurry pH of 6.0 to 7.5; and the composition does not contain a carboxylic acid selected from the group consisting of malonic acid, glutaric acid, tartaric acid, lactic acid, and mixtures thereof, or an alkali metal salt thereof.

2. The composition of claim 1, wherein the composition has a slurry pH of 6.2 to 7.

2.

3. The composition described in claim 1 or 2, wherein the composition contains a pH adjuster.

4. 4. The composition of claim 3, wherein the pH adjuster is sodium hydroxide.

5. 5. A composition according to any one of claims 1 to 4 for use in protecting teeth from dental erosion.

6. 5. A composition according to any one of claims 1 to 4 for use in protecting teeth against caries.

Images