Method, apparatus, equipment, and medium for evaluating the condition of a hydroelectric power generation unit.

Abstract

This application relates to the technical field of condition assessment and discloses a method, apparatus, device, and medium for assessing the condition of a hydroelectric power unit. The method includes: acquiring a first data set over the entire life cycle of the hydroelectric power unit to be assessed; performing a full-life cycle analysis of the condition of the hydroelectric power unit to be assessed based on the first data set to obtain a full-life cycle condition analysis result for the hydroelectric power unit to be assessed; and determining a condition assessment result for the hydroelectric power unit to be assessed based on the full-life cycle condition analysis result. The full-life cycle analysis of the condition of the hydroelectric power unit improves the accuracy of the condition analysis without over-inspection or under-inspection, or by determining a corresponding condition assessment result based on the full-life cycle condition analysis result. Therefore, by implementing this application, the condition of a hydroelectric power unit can be assessed effectively and accurately.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] This application relates to the technical field of condition assessment, and specifically to a condition assessment method, apparatus, equipment, and medium for a hydroelectric power unit.

Background Art

[0002] As the core power generation device in a hydropower plant, in order to ensure normal operation, it is necessary to regularly perform inspection and maintenance work. Due to inconsistent factors such as the equipment production and manufacturing quality and operation and maintenance levels of the hydroelectric power units in each power plant, regular inspections may result in over-inspection or under-inspection of the units, further deteriorating the condition assessment results.

Summary of the Invention

Problems to be Solved by the Invention

[0003] In view of this, this application provides a condition assessment method, apparatus, equipment, and medium for a hydroelectric power unit to solve the problem that over-inspection or under-inspection of the unit occurs due to regular inspections, further deteriorating the condition assessment results.

Means for Solving the Problems

[0004] In a first aspect, this application provides a condition assessment method for a hydroelectric power unit, and the condition assessment method for the hydroelectric power unit includes: obtaining a first dataset in the entire life cycle of the hydroelectric power unit to be evaluated; based on the first dataset, analyzing the condition of the hydroelectric power unit to be evaluated throughout its life cycle to obtain an analysis result of the entire life cycle condition of the hydroelectric power unit to be evaluated; and determining a condition assessment result of the hydroelectric power unit to be evaluated based on the analysis result of the entire life cycle condition.

[0005] The hydroelectric power generation unit condition evaluation method according to this application analyzes the condition of the hydroelectric power generation unit throughout its entire lifecycle, preventing situations of over-inspection or under-inspection, improving the accuracy of the condition analysis, or improving the accuracy of the condition evaluation results by determining the corresponding condition evaluation results based on the results of the entire lifecycle condition analysis. Therefore, by implementing this application, the condition of the hydroelectric power generation unit can be evaluated effectively and without error.

[0006] In one selectable embodiment, the method is This further includes obtaining at least one influencing factor of the hydroelectric power unit under evaluation, and reflecting the impact of that factor on the state of the hydroelectric power unit under evaluation.

[0007] This invention can further improve the accuracy of state analysis by obtaining relevant influencing factors that affect the state of a hydroelectric power generation unit.

[0008] In one selectable embodiment, based on a first dataset, the state of the hydroelectric power unit under evaluation is analyzed throughout its entire lifecycle to obtain the results of the analysis of the state of the hydroelectric power unit under evaluation. This includes obtaining a second dataset for each lifecycle of the hydropower unit under evaluation based on the first dataset, analyzing the state of the hydropower unit under evaluation at each lifecycle based on each second dataset and each influencing factor to obtain state analysis results for each lifecycle of the hydropower unit under evaluation, and determining the overall lifecycle state analysis results for the hydropower unit under evaluation based on the state analysis results within each lifecycle.

[0009] This invention considers multiple influencing factors that affect the state of a hydroelectric power generation unit when analyzing its condition, thereby further improving the accuracy of the condition analysis.

[0010] In one selectable embodiment, the state evaluation result of the hydroelectric power generation unit under evaluation is determined based on the results of the entire lifecycle state analysis. This includes obtaining a predetermined set of condition evaluation conditions, and then, based on the results of the entire lifecycle condition analysis, performing processing according to the predetermined set of condition evaluation conditions to obtain the condition evaluation results for the hydroelectric power generation unit to be evaluated.

[0011] This invention enables the rapid and accurate acquisition of state evaluation results for a hydroelectric power generation unit using a predetermined set of state evaluation conditions, thereby shortening evaluation time and improving the accuracy of the state evaluation results.

[0012] In one selectable embodiment, a predetermined set of state evaluation conditions includes a first predetermined state evaluation condition, a second predetermined state evaluation condition, a third predetermined state evaluation condition, and a fourth predetermined state evaluation condition.

[0013] The predetermined set of state evaluation conditions obtained in this application includes state evaluation conditions corresponding to different states, and thereafter provides a basis for quickly and accurately obtaining state evaluation results for the hydroelectric power generation unit.

[0014] In one selectable embodiment, based on the results of the entire lifecycle state analysis, processing is performed according to a predetermined set of state evaluation conditions to obtain the state evaluation result of the hydroelectric power generation unit to be evaluated. This includes comparing the results of the entire lifecycle state analysis with a predetermined set of state evaluation conditions, determining that the hydroelectric power unit under evaluation is in a normal state if the results of the entire lifecycle state analysis satisfy a first predetermined state evaluation condition, determining that the hydroelectric power unit under evaluation is in a potentially dangerous state if the results of the entire lifecycle state analysis satisfy a second predetermined state evaluation condition, determining that the hydroelectric power unit under evaluation is in a defective state if the results of the entire lifecycle state analysis satisfy a third predetermined state evaluation condition, and determining that the hydroelectric power unit under evaluation is in a faulty state if the results of the entire lifecycle state analysis satisfy a fourth predetermined state evaluation condition.

[0015] This invention enables the rapid and accurate acquisition of state evaluation results for a hydroelectric power generation unit by comparing the results of the entire lifecycle state analysis with a predetermined set of state evaluation conditions, thereby shortening evaluation time and improving the accuracy of the state evaluation results.

[0016] In one selectable embodiment, the method is This further includes determining whether or not the hydroelectric power generation unit under evaluation needs repair based on the condition evaluation results, obtaining a repair method based on the condition evaluation results if the hydroelectric power generation unit under evaluation needs repair, and repairing the hydroelectric power generation unit under evaluation using the repair method.

[0017] This invention makes it possible to immediately and effectively identify whether or not a hydroelectric power generation unit needs repair based on the condition evaluation results, or to immediately repair the hydroelectric power generation unit that needs repair, to fundamentally resolve equipment failures, or to significantly improve the reliability of the hydroelectric power generation unit.

[0018] In a second aspect, the present application provides a device for evaluating the condition of a hydroelectric power generation unit, the device for evaluating the condition of a hydroelectric power generation unit is The system comprises an acquisition module for obtaining a first dataset for the entire lifecycle of the hydroelectric power unit to be evaluated; an analysis module for performing a full-lifecycle analysis of the state of the hydroelectric power unit to be evaluated based on the first dataset to obtain the full-lifecycle state analysis results of the hydroelectric power unit to be evaluated; and a determination module for determining the state evaluation results of the hydroelectric power unit to be evaluated based on the full-lifecycle state analysis results.

[0019] In a third aspect, the present invention provides a computer device comprising memory and a processor, wherein the memory and the processor are connected to each other in communication, computer instructions are stored in the memory, and the processor executes the computer instructions to perform a method for evaluating the state of a hydroelectric power generation unit according to the first aspect or any one of the corresponding embodiments.

[0020] In a fourth aspect, the present application provides a computer-readable storage medium, in which computer instructions for causing a computer to execute the method for evaluating the state of a hydroelectric power generation unit according to the first aspect or any one of the corresponding embodiments thereof are stored.

Brief Description of the Drawings

[0021] To more clearly explain the specific embodiments of the present application or the technical solutions of the prior art, the drawings necessary for use in the description of the specific embodiments or the prior art will be briefly described below. Obviously, the drawings in the following description are part of the embodiments of the present application, and those skilled in the art can obtain other drawings based on these drawings without creative efforts.

[0022] [Figure 1] It is a schematic flowchart of the method for evaluating the state of a hydroelectric power generation unit according to an embodiment of the present application. [Figure 2] It is a schematic flowchart of the method for evaluating the state of another hydroelectric power generation unit according to an embodiment of the present application. [Figure 3] It is a schematic diagram of the entire life cycle state evaluation process of a hydroelectric power generation unit according to an embodiment of the present application. [Figure 4] It is a schematic flowchart of the method for evaluating the state of yet another hydroelectric power generation unit according to an embodiment of the present application. [Figure 5] It is a block configuration diagram of the state evaluation device of a hydroelectric power generation unit according to an embodiment of the present application. [Figure 6] It is a schematic diagram of the hardware structure of a computer device according to an embodiment of the present application.

Modes for Carrying Out the Invention

[0023] To further clarify the purpose, technical concept, and advantages of the embodiments of this application, the technical concept of the embodiments of this application will be described clearly and completely below with reference to the drawings of the embodiments of this application, and it is clear that the embodiments described are a part of the embodiments of this application, not the entirety of the embodiments. Any other embodiments that a person skilled in the art can obtain without creative effort based on the embodiments of this application are all within the scope of protection of this application.

[0024] As hydroelectric power generation units are the core power generation equipment of hydroelectric power plants, regular inspection and maintenance work is necessary to ensure that they can operate normally. Currently, inspections of hydroelectric power generation units in China are often carried out using periodic inspections in accordance with inspection technical standards, and these periodic inspections are divided into Class A, Class B, Class C, and Class D inspections.

[0025] Among these, Class A inspection refers to an inspection method in which a hydroelectric generator is completely disassembled and inspected and repaired in order to maintain, restore, or improve the performance of the equipment.

[0026] A Class B inspection involves partially disassembling a hydroelectric generator system for inspection and repair.

[0027] A Class C inspection involves inspecting, evaluating, repairing, and cleaning equipment where wear and deterioration are regular.

[0028] A Class D inspection is a repair performed to eliminate defects in the main equipment and its associated systems, assuming that the overall operation of the equipment is in good condition.

[0029] Generally, the inspection cycle for Class A inspections is 8 to 12 years, for Class B inspections it is 4 to 7 years, and for Class C inspections it is 1 to 3 years.

[0030] Because factors such as the equipment production quality and operation and maintenance levels of the hydroelectric power generation units at each power plant are not consistent, periodic inspections can result in situations of over-inspection or under-inspection of the units. To solve this problem, each power plant is successively researching the content of condition inspections, and the determination of inspection items for the condition of hydroelectric generators is generally based on an evaluation of the condition of the hydroelectric power generation unit. However, since the evaluation of the current condition is generally based on the unit's condition monitoring system and some other factors, the condition evaluation results are not satisfactory.

[0031] Therefore, the embodiment of the present invention provides a method for evaluating the condition of a hydroelectric power generation unit, and achieves the effect of effectively and accurately evaluating the condition of the hydroelectric power generation unit by analyzing its condition throughout its entire lifecycle.

[0032] According to the embodiments of the present application, an embodiment of a method for evaluating the state of a hydroelectric power generation unit is provided. The steps shown in the flowchart of the drawings may be executed, for example, in a computer system of a set of computer executable instructions. Although the flowchart shows a logical order, in some cases the steps shown or described may be executed in an order different from that shown.

[0033] This embodiment provides a method for evaluating the condition of a hydroelectric power generation unit. Figure 1 is a flowchart of the method for evaluating the condition of a hydroelectric power generation unit according to an embodiment of the present invention. As shown in Figure 1, the process includes the following steps S101 to S103.

[0034] Step S101: Obtain the first dataset for the entire lifecycle of the hydroelectric power unit under evaluation.

[0035] Here, the entire lifecycle may include all processes of design, model selection, manufacturing, assembly, adjustment, testing, operation, maintenance, inspection, technical improvement, and disposal of the hydroelectric power unit.

[0036] The first dataset shows equipment-related data throughout the entire lifecycle of the hydroelectric power unit being evaluated.

[0037] Step S102: Based on the first dataset, perform a full-life cycle analysis of the hydroelectric power generation unit to be evaluated and obtain the results of the full-life cycle state analysis of the hydroelectric power generation unit to be evaluated.

[0038] Specifically, the first dataset can reflect the equipment status of the hydroelectric power generation unit under evaluation throughout its entire lifecycle. Therefore, based on this first dataset, a full-lifecycle analysis of the hydroelectric power generation unit under evaluation can be performed to obtain the corresponding full-lifecycle state analysis results.

[0039] Step S103: Based on the results of the overall lifecycle state analysis, determine the state evaluation result for the hydroelectric power generation unit being evaluated.

[0040] Specifically, the results of the full lifecycle state analysis can reflect the state of the hydroelectric power generation unit under evaluation throughout its entire lifecycle. Therefore, based on the results of the full lifecycle state analysis obtained, the current state of the hydroelectric power generation unit under evaluation can be further assessed.

[0041] The hydroelectric power generation unit condition evaluation method according to this embodiment analyzes the hydroelectric power generation unit's condition throughout its entire lifecycle, preventing situations of over-inspection or under-inspection, improving the accuracy of the condition analysis, or improving the accuracy of the condition evaluation results by determining the corresponding condition evaluation results based on the results of the entire lifecycle condition analysis. Therefore, by implementing this invention, the condition of the hydroelectric power generation unit can be evaluated effectively and reliably.

[0042] This embodiment provides a method for evaluating the condition of a hydroelectric power generation unit. Figure 2 is a flowchart of the method for evaluating the condition of a hydroelectric power generation unit according to an embodiment of the present invention. As shown in Figure 2, the process includes the following steps S201 to S204.

[0043] Step S201: Obtain the first dataset for the entire lifecycle of the hydroelectric power unit under evaluation. For details, refer to step S101 in the embodiment shown in Figure 1, and a detailed explanation is omitted here.

[0044] Step S202: Obtain at least one influencing factor of the hydroelectric power unit under evaluation.

[0045] Here, the influencing factors reflect their impact on the state of the hydroelectric power generation unit being evaluated.

[0046] Specifically, the influencing factors for the hydroelectric power generation unit being evaluated may include the safety of the power plant, the operating environment, and inspection costs.

[0047] In one selectable embodiment, as shown in Figure 3, the influencing factors of the hydroelectric power generation unit under evaluation include the following:

[0048] (1) Manufacturing stage in the factory (design, model selection, manufacturing, shipping inspection) 1) Accuracy of design calculations for the mechanical and electrical parameters of hydroelectric power generation units, 2) Whether the unit's parameters satisfy the environmental conditions at the site, such as temperature, humidity, and altitude. 3) Whether the redundancy of functions such as unit control, temperature, pressure, flow rate monitoring, and power supply satisfies current technical standards. 4) Accuracy of the unit's start / stop process, 5) Rationality of the equipment layout, 6) Rationality of equipment model selection, 7) Accuracy of the design drawings, 8) Whether production and manufacturing match the design drawings. 9) Accuracy of the manufacturing process, 10) Whether or not it passed acceptance testing for functions and performance.

[0049] (2) On-site operation phase (assembly and adjustment, operation and maintenance, inspection technology improvement, disposal) 1) Whether the on-site assembly process and quality meet the design requirements. 2) Whether the adjustment test items and results are correct, and whether the technical requirements are satisfied, 3) Whether the operation of the equipment is suitable for the site environment. 4) Whether the driving operation process is correct and can be improved, 5) Whether the inspection and maintenance work conforms to the standards, 6) Whether the custom settings for the control parameters related to the unit are correct and complete. 7) Whether or not a malfunction or defect during the assembly and adjustment of the equipment falls under the category of a familial defect. 8) Whether the software version is correct or not, 9) Whether the vibration amplitude value of the unit satisfies the requirements of the design standard. 10) Whether the consistency and reasonableness of the operating temperatures of the upper guide shoe temperature, lower guide shoe temperature, thrust shoe temperature, and water guide shoe temperature satisfy the design requirements. 11) Reasonableness and consistency of the stator core temperature and stator bar temperature of the generator, 12) Whether the flow rate and pressure values ​​of liquids such as the generator's air cooler, bearing oil cooler, and the top cover drainage system of the hydraulic turbine meet the requirements. 13) Whether the inspection and maintenance items and quality meet the requirements. 14) Whether the adjustments and test items are fully correct, and whether the results satisfy the requirements.

[0050] Step S203: Based on the first dataset, perform a full-life cycle analysis of the hydroelectric power generation unit under evaluation to obtain the results of the full-life cycle state analysis of the hydroelectric power generation unit under evaluation.

[0051] Specifically, step S203 above includes steps S2031 to S2033 below.

[0052] Step S2031: Based on the first dataset, obtain the second dataset for each lifecycle stage of the hydroelectric power unit being evaluated.

[0053] Specifically, based on the first dataset, a second dataset can be obtained representing each lifecycle stage of the hydroelectric power unit being evaluated.

[0054] In one selectable embodiment, the first dataset includes a second dataset in which the hydroelectric power unit under evaluation is in the design and manufacturing stage, the assembly and adjustment stage, the operation and maintenance stage, and the inspection technology improvement stage, respectively.

[0055] (1) Design and manufacturing stage 1) Parameter data in the design drawings of a hydroelectric power generation unit can reflect the accuracy of the calculations. 2) The equipment model selection data can reflect the rationality of the model selection. 3) The design data can reflect the redundancy of the hydroelectric power generation unit. 4) The purchasing data can reflect the quality of the hydroelectric power generation unit. 5) Production and manufacturing process data can reflect the control quality of the hydroelectric power generation unit. 6) The equipment layout data can reflect the rationality of the layout of the hydroelectric power generation unit. 7) Data such as unit start / stop can reflect the rationality of the control process of the hydroelectric power unit. 8) Design and on-site operating environment data can reflect the environmental adaptability of the hydroelectric power generation unit. 9) Interface data between the equipment and external equipment can reflect the rationality of the coordination between the hydroelectric power generation unit and external equipment.

[0056] (2) Assembly and adjustment stage 1) The on-site assembly and design drawing data can reflect the consistency between the on-site assembly and design of the hydroelectric power generation unit. 2) The on-site assembly process and quality data can reflect the accuracy and efficiency of the assembly of the hydroelectric power unit. 3) The control parameters of the hydroelectric generator can reflect the rationality of the constant control of the hydroelectric unit. 4) The vibration amplitude value of the hydroelectric generator unit can reflect whether or not the hydroelectric generator unit satisfies the design requirements. 5) Operating temperature data for the upper guide shoe temperature, lower guide shoe temperature, thrust shoe temperature, and water guide shoe temperature can reflect whether the consistency and rationality of the different guide shoe temperatures of the hydroelectric power generation unit satisfy the design requirements. 6) Generator stator core temperature and stator bar temperature data can reflect the temperature rationality of the hydroelectric power unit. 7) Flow rate and pressure data of liquids in the generator's air cooler, bearing's oil cooler, and the top cover drainage system of the hydraulic turbine in a hydroelectric power generation unit. 8) Adjustment and test item data can reflect whether the adjustment and testing of the hydroelectric power generation unit were comprehensive and correct, and whether the results met the requirements. 9) Process acceptance data and hidden item data can reflect the quality of the hydroelectric power generation unit.

[0057] (3) Assembly and adjustment stage 1) The setting data, current standard data, and accident prevention measures data in the operation and maintenance technology standard system can reflect the adaptability and rationality of the operation and maintenance of hydroelectric power generation units. 2) Equipment inspection data and daily maintenance data can reflect the comprehensiveness and quality of the inspection and daily maintenance of the hydroelectric power generation unit (there should be no omissions or blind spots in the inspection). 3) The operating data of the equipment can reflect defects and failures of the hydroelectric power generation unit and the processing status (including familial defects). 4) Operating environment and operating conditions of the equipment (temperature, humidity, air quality, vibration), etc. 5) The vibration amplitude data of the unit can reflect the online status information of the hydroelectric power generation unit. 6) Operating data for the shoe temperature and oil temperature of the upper guide bearing, lower guide bearing, water guide bearing, and thrust bearing of the unit. 7) Lubricant quality detection data in the unit, 8) Temperature data of the unit's stator windings and core, 9) Operating temperature data of the unit's air cooler, 10) Trip operation data for relay protection and electricity quantity protection of hydroelectric power generation units. 11) Data on non-electrical protection operations such as mechanical overspeed protection and over-temperature tripping of hydroelectric power generation units. 12) Constant data of the equipment, 13) Technical operating data of water supply and air supply equipment in the unit, 14) Operating data for water leaks, oil leaks, gas leaks, and sealing components of the unit can reflect the operating life of the hydroelectric power unit. 15) Number of alarms, frequency, and type analysis data for unit defects, 16) Statistical and analytical data on the operating life of each component of a hydroelectric power generation unit (number of circuit breaker operations, operating hours of rotating devices, number of relay operations or long-term excitation time or long-term non-operating time, etc.), 17) Storage, use, and inventory data for spare equipment.

[0058] (4) Stage of improving inspection technology 1) The data in the inspection technology standard system, current standard data, and accident prevention measures data can reflect the applicability and rationality of the inspection technology for hydroelectric power generation units. 2) Data on the items, cycle data, and inspection effectiveness data of the previous equipment inspection technology improvements, 3) Number and duration data of abnormal operating conditions, 4) Statistical and analytical data on the operating life of each component of the hydroelectric power generation unit (number of circuit breaker operations, operating hours of rotating devices, number of relay operations or long-term excitation time or long-term non-operating time, etc.), 5) Storage, use, and inventory data for spare equipment.

[0059] Step S2032: Based on each second dataset and each influencing element, analyze the state of the hydroelectric power unit under evaluation at each stage of its lifecycle to obtain the state analysis results for each stage of the hydroelectric power unit under evaluation.

[0060] Specifically, based on the second dataset for each lifecycle of the hydroelectric power unit under evaluation and each influencing factor that affects the state of the hydroelectric power unit under evaluation, the state of the hydroelectric power unit under evaluation at each lifecycle is analyzed, and the state analysis results for each lifecycle of the hydroelectric power unit under evaluation can be obtained.

[0061] By considering multiple influencing factors that affect the state of a hydroelectric power generation unit, the accuracy of the state analysis can be further improved.

[0062] Step S2033: Based on the state analysis results within each lifecycle, determine the overall lifecycle state analysis results for the hydroelectric power unit being evaluated.

[0063] Specifically, based on the state analysis results for each lifecycle of the hydroelectric power generation unit under evaluation, it is possible to obtain the state analysis results for the entire lifecycle of the hydroelectric power generation unit under evaluation, i.e., the total lifecycle state analysis results.

[0064] Step S204: Based on the results of the entire lifecycle state analysis, the state evaluation result of the hydroelectric power generation unit to be evaluated is determined. For details, please refer to step S103 in the embodiment shown in Figure 1, and a detailed explanation is omitted here.

[0065] The hydroelectric power generation unit condition evaluation method according to this embodiment analyzes the hydroelectric power generation unit's condition throughout its entire lifecycle, preventing situations of over-inspection or under-inspection. Furthermore, it considers multiple influencing factors that affect the condition of the hydroelectric power generation unit, thereby further improving the accuracy of the condition analysis. Alternatively, the accuracy of the condition evaluation results can be improved by determining the corresponding condition evaluation results based on the results of the entire lifecycle condition analysis.

[0066] This embodiment provides a method for evaluating the condition of a hydroelectric power generation unit. Figure 4 is a flowchart of the method for evaluating the condition of a hydroelectric power generation unit according to an embodiment of the present invention. As shown in Figure 4, the process includes the following steps S401 to S406.

[0067] Step S401: Obtain the first dataset for the entire lifecycle of the hydroelectric power generation unit under evaluation. For details, refer to step S101 in the embodiment shown in Figure 1, and a detailed explanation is omitted here.

[0068] Step S402: Based on the first dataset, a full-life cycle analysis is performed on the hydroelectric power generation unit under evaluation to obtain the full-life cycle state analysis results for the hydroelectric power generation unit under evaluation. For details, please refer to step S203 in the embodiment shown in Figure 2, and a detailed explanation is omitted here.

[0069] Step S403: Based on the results of the overall lifecycle state analysis, determine the state evaluation result for the hydroelectric power generation unit being evaluated.

[0070] Specifically, step S403 above includes steps S4031 and S4032 below.

[0071] Step S4031: Obtain a predetermined set of state evaluation conditions.

[0072] Here, the predetermined set of state evaluation conditions may include a first predetermined state evaluation condition, a second predetermined state evaluation condition, a third predetermined state evaluation condition, and a fourth predetermined state evaluation condition, each reflecting the evaluation conditions for different states of the hydroelectric power generation unit under evaluation.

[0073] Step S4032: Based on the results of the entire lifecycle state analysis, processing is performed according to a predetermined set of state evaluation conditions to obtain the state evaluation results for the hydroelectric power generation unit to be evaluated.

[0074] Here, the condition evaluation results of the hydroelectric power generation unit under evaluation are intended to reflect the current state of the hydroelectric power generation unit under evaluation, and may include normal state, potential hazard state, defective state, and failure state.

[0075] (1) A normal state means that the hydroelectric power generation unit is in a stable operating state.

[0076] (2) A potential hazardous condition means that the unit may be at any time during operation due to some design flaws in the hydroelectric power unit, some components being prone to damage, some parameter settings being unreasonable, or certain bugs in the logic of some programs in the unit control software.

[0077] (3) A defective condition means that a component or function of the hydroelectric power generation unit is damaged or malfunctioning, but the system will not shut down for a while and will only be able to maintain operation temporarily.

[0078] (4) A malfunction means that a critical component or function of the hydroelectric power unit is damaged or malfunctioning, which directly causes the unit to shut down and renders it inoperable.

[0079] Specifically, the state of the hydroelectric power generation unit being evaluated, corresponding to the results of the entire lifecycle state analysis, can be determined based on a predetermined set of state evaluation conditions.

[0080] In some selectable embodiments, step S4032 includes the following steps a1 to a5.

[0081] Step a1: Compare the results of the entire lifecycle state analysis with a predetermined set of state evaluation conditions.

[0082] Step a2 If the results of the overall lifecycle state analysis satisfy the first predetermined state evaluation condition, it is determined that the hydroelectric power generation unit under evaluation is in a normal state.

[0083] Step a3 If the results of the overall lifecycle state analysis satisfy the second predetermined state evaluation condition, it is determined that the hydroelectric power unit under evaluation is in a potentially dangerous state.

[0084] Step a4 If the results of the entire lifecycle state analysis satisfy the third predetermined state evaluation condition, it is determined that the hydroelectric power generation unit under evaluation is in a defective state.

[0085] Step a5 If the results of the entire lifecycle state analysis satisfy the fourth predetermined state evaluation condition, it is determined that the hydroelectric power generation unit under evaluation is in a faulty state.

[0086] Specifically, by combining the results of the entire lifecycle state analysis with the failure conditions described in step S4032 above, a correspondence between the results of the entire lifecycle state analysis and a predetermined set of state evaluation conditions can be obtained. (1) If there are no problems in the overall lifecycle state analysis results, it indicates that the hydroelectric power generation unit under evaluation is in a stable operating state, i.e., in a normal state. (2) If the results of the full lifecycle state analysis show that some of the designs of the hydroelectric power unit are not rational, some components are likely to be damaged, some parameter settings are not rational, and some programs in the unit control software have certain bugs, then the hydroelectric power unit under evaluation may be at risk of becoming defective or failing at any time during operation, that is, the hydroelectric power unit under evaluation is in a potentially dangerous state. (3) If the results of the overall life cycle state analysis indicate that a component or function of the hydroelectric power generation unit is damaged or malfunctioning, the hydroelectric power generation unit under evaluation will not shut down for a period of time, but will only be able to maintain an operating state temporarily, that is, the hydroelectric power generation unit under evaluation will be in a defective state. (4) If the results of the full life cycle condition analysis indicate that a critical component or function of the hydroelectric power unit is damaged or malfunctioning, it indicates that the hydroelectric power unit under evaluation has stopped and is inoperable, i.e., that the hydroelectric power unit under evaluation is in a faulty state.

[0087] In one selectable embodiment, as shown in Figure 3, a process is provided to perform a full-life cycle analysis of the state of the hydroelectric power unit under evaluation based on a first dataset containing data from the four aspects of design and manufacturing, assembly and adjustment, operation and maintenance, and inspection technology improvement, and related influencing factors, thereby obtaining a full-life cycle state analysis result corresponding to the hydroelectric power unit under evaluation.

[0088] Step S404 Based on the condition evaluation results, determine whether or not the hydroelectric power generation unit being evaluated needs to be repaired.

[0089] Specifically, the condition evaluation results can reflect the condition of the hydroelectric power generation unit being evaluated, and therefore, based on the obtained condition evaluation results, it is possible to determine whether or not the hydroelectric power generation unit being evaluated needs to be repaired.

[0090] For example, if the condition evaluation result indicates that the hydroelectric power unit being evaluated is in one of the following states: potentially dangerous, defective, or malfunctioning, it indicates that the hydroelectric power unit being evaluated needs to be repaired. Conversely, if the condition evaluation result indicates that the hydroelectric power unit being evaluated is in a normal state, it indicates that the hydroelectric power unit does not need to be repaired.

[0091] Step S405: If the hydroelectric power generation unit under evaluation requires repair, obtain a repair method based on the condition evaluation results.

[0092] Specifically, if a hydroelectric power generation unit under evaluation needs repair, it may be in one of the following conditions: a potential hazardous condition, a defective condition, or a failure condition. In this case, different repair methods will be used depending on the condition.

[0093] Step S406: Repair the hydroelectric power generation unit under evaluation using the repair method.

[0094] Specifically, based on the acquired repair methods, repair operations can be completed on the hydroelectric power generation unit under evaluation, further improving the reliability of the hydroelectric power generation unit.

[0095] The hydroelectric power generation unit condition evaluation method according to this embodiment allows for the rapid and accurate acquisition of the hydroelectric power generation unit condition evaluation results by comparing the results of the entire lifecycle condition analysis with a predetermined set of condition evaluation conditions, thereby shortening evaluation time and improving the accuracy of the condition evaluation results. Alternatively, it allows for the immediate and effective identification of whether or not a hydroelectric power generation unit needs repair based on the condition evaluation results, enabling immediate repair of the hydroelectric power generation unit that requires repair, fundamentally resolving equipment failures, and significantly improving the reliability of the hydroelectric power generation unit.

[0096] In this embodiment, a device for evaluating the condition of a hydroelectric power generation unit is further provided, and this device is for realizing the above embodiment and selectable embodiments, and detailed explanations of those already described are omitted. As used below, the term "module" refers to a combination of software and / or hardware that can realize a predetermined function. The devices described in the following embodiments are preferably realized by software, but they can also be realized by hardware, or a combination of software and hardware, and are conceived.

[0097] This embodiment provides a device for evaluating the condition of a hydroelectric power generation unit, and as shown in Figure 5, it comprises an acquisition module 501, an analysis module 502, and a determination module 503.

[0098] Acquisition module 501 is for acquiring the first dataset for the entire lifecycle of the hydroelectric power unit being evaluated.

[0099] Analysis module 502 is used to perform a full-life cycle analysis of the state of the hydroelectric power generation unit under evaluation based on the first dataset, and to obtain the results of the full-life cycle state analysis of the hydroelectric power generation unit under evaluation.

[0100] The decision module 503 is used to determine the condition evaluation result of the hydroelectric power generation unit under evaluation based on the results of the entire lifecycle condition analysis.

[0101] In some selectable embodiments, the condition evaluation device for the hydroelectric power generation unit is The system is for acquiring at least one influencing element of the hydroelectric power unit under evaluation, and further comprises a first acquisition module that reflects the impact of the influencing element on the state of the hydroelectric power unit under evaluation.

[0102] In some selectable embodiments, the analysis module 502 includes a first acquisition unit, an analysis unit, and a decision unit.

[0103] The first acquisition unit is used to acquire a second dataset for each lifecycle stage of the hydroelectric power unit being evaluated, based on the first dataset.

[0104] The analysis unit analyzes the state of the hydroelectric power unit under evaluation at each stage of its lifecycle based on each second dataset and each influencing factor, in order to obtain the state analysis results for each stage of the hydroelectric power unit under evaluation.

[0105] The decision unit is used to determine the overall lifecycle state analysis results for the hydroelectric power generation unit being evaluated, based on the state analysis results within each lifecycle.

[0106] In some selectable embodiments, the decision module 503 includes a second acquisition unit and a processing unit.

[0107] The second acquisition unit is for acquiring a predetermined set of state evaluation conditions.

[0108] The processing unit is designed to obtain the state evaluation results for the hydroelectric power generation unit being evaluated by processing the results of the entire lifecycle state analysis according to a predetermined set of state evaluation conditions.

[0109] In some selectable embodiments, a predetermined set of state evaluation conditions in the second acquisition unit includes a first predetermined state evaluation condition, a second predetermined state evaluation condition, a third predetermined state evaluation condition, and a fourth predetermined state evaluation condition.

[0110] In some selectable embodiments, the processing unit includes a comparison subunit, a first decision subunit, a second decision subunit, a third decision subunit, and a fourth decision subunit.

[0111] The comparison subunit is used to compare the results of the entire lifecycle state analysis with a predetermined set of state evaluation conditions.

[0112] The first decision subunit is for determining whether the hydroelectric power generation unit under evaluation is in a normal state if the results of the entire lifecycle state analysis satisfy the first predetermined state evaluation conditions.

[0113] The second decision subunit is for determining whether the hydroelectric power unit under evaluation is in a potentially dangerous state if the results of the entire lifecycle state analysis satisfy the second predetermined state evaluation conditions.

[0114] The third decision subunit is for determining whether the hydroelectric power generation unit under evaluation is in a defective state if the results of the entire lifecycle state analysis satisfy the third predetermined state evaluation condition.

[0115] The fourth decision subunit is for determining that the hydroelectric power generation unit under evaluation is in a faulty state if the results of the entire lifecycle state analysis satisfy the fourth predetermined state evaluation condition.

[0116] In some selectable embodiments, the hydroelectric power generation unit condition evaluation device further comprises a judgment module, a second acquisition module, and a repair module.

[0117] The decision module is used to determine, based on the condition evaluation results, whether or not the hydroelectric power generation unit being evaluated needs repair.

[0118] The second acquisition module is for obtaining repair methods based on the condition evaluation results when the hydroelectric power generation unit under evaluation needs repair.

[0119] The repair module is intended to repair the hydroelectric power generation unit being evaluated using the repair method.

[0120] Further explanations of the functions of each of the above modules and units are the same as in the corresponding embodiments described above, and therefore, detailed explanations are omitted here.

[0121] In this embodiment, the hydroelectric power generation unit condition evaluation device is shown in the form of a functional unit, where a unit refers to an ASIC (Application Specific Integrated Circuit) circuit, a processor and memory that executes one or more software or fixed programs, and / or other devices that can provide the above functions.

[0122] The embodiment of the present invention further provides a computer device comprising a device for evaluating the condition of a hydroelectric power generation unit as shown in Figure 5.

[0123] Referring to Figure 6, which is a schematic diagram of the structure of a computer device according to a selectable embodiment of the present invention, as shown in Figure 6, the computer device comprises one or more processors 10, memory 20, and interfaces including high-speed and low-speed interfaces for connecting to each component. Each component communicates with one another via different buses and is mounted on a common motherboard, or may be mounted in other ways as needed. The processors can process instructions executed within the computer device, including instructions that are stored in memory or that display graphical information of a GUI on an external input / output device (e.g., a display device coupled to an interface) on memory. In some selectable embodiments, multiple processors and / or multiple buses may be used together with multiple memories as needed. Similarly, multiple computer devices may be connected, each providing a portion of the required operations (e.g., as a server array, a set of blade servers, or a multiprocessor system). In Figure 6, one processor 10 is used as an example.

[0124] The processor 10 may be a central processor, a network processor, or a combination thereof. Here, the processor 10 may further include a hardware chip. The hardware chip may be an application-specific integrated circuit, a programmable logic device, or a combination thereof. The programmable logic device may be a complex programmable logic device, a field-programmable logic gate array, a general-purpose array logic, or any combination thereof.

[0125] Here, the memory 20 stores instructions that can be executed by at least one processor 10, thereby causing at least one processor 10 to execute the method shown in the above embodiment.

[0126] The memory 20 may include a program storage area and a data storage area, where the program storage area may store an operating system and application programs necessary for at least one function, and the data storage area may store data created based on the use of the computer device. The memory 20 may also include high-speed random-access memory and may further include non-temporary memory, such as at least one magnetic disk storage device, a flash memory device, or other non-temporary solid-state storage devices. In some selectable embodiments, the memory 20 may optionally include memory remotely installed from the processor 10, and these remote memories may be connected to the computer device via a network. Examples of the network include, but are not limited to, the Internet, an intranet, a local area network, a mobile communication network, and combinations thereof.

[0127] The memory 20 may include volatile memory, such as random access memory, and the memory may also include non-volatile memory, such as flash memory, a hard disk, or a solid-state drive. The memory 20 may further include combinations of the above types of memory.

[0128] The computer device further comprises a communication interface 30 used for communication between the computer device and other devices or a communication network.

[0129] Embodiments of the present application further provide a computer-readable storage medium, and the methods according to embodiments of the present application may be implemented in hardware, firmware, or as recordable on a storage medium, or as computer code downloaded over a network and originally stored on a remote or non-temporary machine-readable storage medium and intended to be stored on a local storage medium, thereby enabling the methods described herein to be processed by a general-purpose computer, a dedicated processor, or software stored on a storage medium using programmable or dedicated hardware. Here, the storage medium may be a magnetic disk, an optical disk, read-only memory, random access memory, flash memory, a hard disk, or a solid-state drive, or the storage medium may further include combinations of the above types of memory. To understand that a computer, processor, microprocessor controller, or programmable hardware includes a storage component capable of storing or receiving software or computer code, and when the software or computer code is accessed and executed by the computer, processor, or hardware, the methods shown in the embodiments are implemented.

[0130] While embodiments of the present application have been described with reference to the drawings, those skilled in the art can make various modifications and alterations without departing from the spirit and scope of the present application, and such modifications and alterations are all included within the scope limited by the attached claims.

Claims

1. A method for evaluating the condition of a hydroelectric power generation unit, wherein the method is: To obtain the first dataset for the entire lifecycle of the hydroelectric power unit being evaluated, Based on the first dataset, the state of the hydroelectric power generation unit to be evaluated is analyzed throughout its entire lifecycle to obtain the results of the analysis of the state of the hydroelectric power generation unit to be evaluated. This includes determining the condition evaluation result of the hydroelectric power generation unit to be evaluated based on the results of the overall lifecycle state analysis, The aforementioned method, The method further includes obtaining at least one influencing element of the hydroelectric power generation unit under evaluation, and reflecting the influence of the influencing element on the state of the hydroelectric power generation unit under evaluation, Based on the first dataset, performing a full-life cycle analysis of the state of the hydroelectric power generation unit under evaluation and obtaining the results of the full-life cycle state analysis of the hydroelectric power generation unit under evaluation is: Based on the first dataset, a second dataset is obtained for each lifecycle of the hydroelectric power generation unit under evaluation. Based on each of the second datasets and each of the influencing elements, the state of the hydroelectric power generation unit under evaluation at each of the lifecycles is analyzed to obtain the state analysis results for each of the lifecycles of the hydroelectric power generation unit under evaluation. A method for evaluating the condition of a hydroelectric power generation unit, characterized by comprising determining the overall lifecycle state analysis results of the hydroelectric power generation unit to be evaluated based on the state analysis results within each of the aforementioned lifecycles.

2. Determining the condition evaluation result of the hydroelectric power generation unit to be evaluated based on the results of the overall lifecycle state analysis is: To obtain a predetermined set of state evaluation conditions, The method according to claim 1, characterized in that it includes performing processing according to a predetermined set of condition evaluation conditions based on the results of the overall lifecycle condition analysis to obtain the condition evaluation result of the hydroelectric power generation unit to be evaluated.

3. The method according to claim 2, characterized in that the predetermined set of state evaluation conditions includes a first predetermined state evaluation condition, a second predetermined state evaluation condition, a third predetermined state evaluation condition, and a fourth predetermined state evaluation condition.

4. Based on the results of the overall lifecycle state analysis, processing according to a predetermined set of state evaluation conditions is performed to obtain the state evaluation results for the hydroelectric power generation unit to be evaluated. The results of the entire lifecycle state analysis are compared with the predetermined set of state evaluation conditions, If the results of the overall lifecycle state analysis satisfy the first predetermined state evaluation conditions, it is determined that the hydroelectric power generation unit being evaluated is in a normal state. If the results of the overall lifecycle state analysis satisfy the second predetermined state evaluation condition, it is determined that the hydroelectric power generation unit under evaluation is in a potentially dangerous state. If the results of the overall lifecycle state analysis satisfy the third predetermined state evaluation condition, it is determined that the hydroelectric power generation unit being evaluated is in a defective state. The method according to claim 3, further comprising determining that the hydroelectric power generation unit under evaluation is in a faulty state if the results of the overall lifecycle state analysis satisfy the fourth predetermined state evaluation condition.

5. The aforementioned method, Based on the condition evaluation results, it is determined whether or not the hydroelectric power generation unit being evaluated needs to be repaired. If the hydroelectric power generation unit subject to evaluation needs repair, a repair method shall be obtained based on the condition evaluation results. The method according to claim 1, further comprising repairing the hydroelectric power generation unit to be evaluated using the repair method described above.

6. A device for evaluating the condition of a hydroelectric power generation unit, wherein the device is An acquisition module for obtaining the first dataset for the entire lifecycle of the hydroelectric power unit under evaluation, An analysis module for performing a full-life cycle analysis of the state of the hydroelectric power generation unit to be evaluated based on the first dataset and obtaining the results of the full-life cycle state analysis of the hydroelectric power generation unit to be evaluated, The system includes a determination module for determining the state evaluation result of the hydroelectric power generation unit to be evaluated based on the results of the overall lifecycle state analysis, The aforementioned device is This is for acquiring at least one influencing element of the hydroelectric power generation unit under evaluation, and further comprises a first acquisition module that reflects the influence of the influencing element on the state of the hydroelectric power generation unit under evaluation, The aforementioned analysis module is A first acquisition unit for obtaining a second dataset for each lifecycle of the hydroelectric power generation unit under evaluation, based on the first dataset, An analysis unit for analyzing the state of the hydroelectric power generation unit under evaluation at each of its lifecycles based on each of the second datasets and each of the influencing elements, and for obtaining state analysis results for each of the hydroelectric power generation unit under evaluation at each of its lifecycles, A hydroelectric power generation unit condition evaluation device comprising a determination unit for determining the overall lifecycle condition analysis results of the hydroelectric power generation unit to be evaluated based on the condition analysis results within each of the aforementioned lifecycles.

7. A computer device, A computer device comprising memory and a processor, wherein the memory and the processor are connected to each other in communication, computer instructions are stored in the memory, and the processor executes the computer instructions to perform the hydroelectric power generation unit state evaluation method described in any one of claims 1 to 5.

8. A computer-readable storage medium, A computer-readable storage medium characterized in that it stores computer instructions for causing a computer to execute the hydroelectric power generation unit state evaluation method described in any one of claims 1 to 5.

Images