Life design proposal system and life design proposal method

Abstract

This life design proposal system comprises a computer having a calculation device that executes a predetermined calculation process, and a storage device connected to the calculation device, wherein the calculation device includes a reception unit that receives a life plan desired by a user and a balance of well-being desired by the user; an extraction unit that extracts a subject that matches the received life plan; and an output unit that outputs data on a plurality of role models including the age at which a life event occurred and well-being at the time of each life event, on the basis of the satisfaction level of the extracted subject in the life events.

Description

Life design proposal system and life design proposal method

[0001] The present invention relates to a life design proposal system.

[0002] There is a system that presents a life plan to a user according to the lifestyle desired by the user.

[0003] The following prior art exists as background art in this technical field. For example, Patent Document 1 (Japanese Patent Laid-Open Publication No. 2003-76819) describes a planning system for childcare workers in which a server and a user terminal are connected via a communications network, the server is equipped with a data processing unit and a data storage unit, and when registration information identifying an individual, an expected date of delivery, and an expected date of return to work are input, the data processing unit calculates a busy childcare period by counting forward from the expected date of delivery and a preparation period for returning to work by counting backward from the expected date of return to work, and automatically creates a schedule based on the calculated busy childcare period and preparation period, and also has the function of storing the automatically created schedule in the data storage unit.

[0004] Furthermore, Patent Document 2 (JP 2003-76819 A) describes a life plan utilization system in which a server, a terminal device, and an external service can communicate with each other via a network, in which the server comprises a creation means for creating a life plan based on information input by a user, an acquisition means for acquiring the user's household account book information, a comparison means for comparing the difference between the user's actual total assets and the total projected assets in the life plan, and a proposal means for proposing to the user a plan to cover the difference based on the difference.

[0005] JP 2003-76819 A JP 2022-184208 A

[0006] Everyone's life is different, and each individual has different goals. It is expected that by forming a life plan based on examples of life plans that can enrich their lives and address each goal, they can improve their happiness. In particular, when it comes to major events such as pregnancy, childbirth, and child-rearing, people often plan these events while balancing goals such as career development, financial security, and relationships. Deciding when, where, and how to conceive, give birth, and raise children is one of life's major concerns. For example, if users such as high school students considering college, students searching for jobs, and women considering pregnancy and childbirth could be provided with example life plans tailored to their preferences (occupation, number of children, etc.), they could use these examples as references and help create a life plan that is more tailored to their needs. However, there is no precedent for determining what criteria to use and how to create example life plans for each goal.

[0007] For example, conventional methods have proposed systems that present pregnancy and child-rearing plans based on the known timing of childbirth, but these systems cannot suggest the appropriate timing for childbirth or returning to work to realize the individual's desired life plan. Additionally, systems have been proposed that present life plans for clear goals such as asset formation, but these systems cannot present examples of life plans that are tailored to the individual's priorities in life (career development, financial strength, relationships, etc.).

[0008] Furthermore, simply presenting role models or optimal life plans may result in users feeling frustrated or finding it difficult to make calm decisions when they consider and try to carry out their own life plans based on the presented life plans.

[0009] The object of the present invention is to realize a system that presents examples of life plans that meet the user's wishes and allow them to feel at ease regarding life events such as pregnancy, childbirth, childcare, and returning to work, in a form that the user can refer to, and that generates advice to further improve the life plan.

[0010] A representative example of the invention disclosed in the present application is as follows: That is, a life design proposal system is configured by a computer having an arithmetic unit that executes predetermined arithmetic processing and a storage device connected to the arithmetic unit, wherein the arithmetic unit comprises: a reception unit that receives a user's desired life plan and the user's desired balance of well-being; an extraction unit that extracts subjects who match the received life plan; and an output unit that outputs data on a plurality of role models, including the age at which a life event occurred and the well-being at the time of each life event, based on the satisfaction level of the extracted subjects with the life events.

[0011] According to one aspect of the present invention, a user can find role models that match their desired life plan. Problems, configurations, and effects other than those described above will become apparent from the following description of the preferred embodiment of the present invention.

[0012] FIG. 1 is a diagram showing the configuration of a life design proposal system in an embodiment of the present invention. FIG. 2 is a diagram showing the configuration of a role model extraction and proposal unit in an embodiment of the present invention. FIG. 3 is a diagram showing an example of a questionnaire for measuring well-being in an embodiment of the present invention. FIG. 4 is a diagram showing an example of a questionnaire for measuring well-being related factors in an embodiment of the present invention. FIG. 5 is a diagram showing the results of principal component analysis using the results of responses to the well-being questionnaire in FIG. 3. FIG. 6 is a diagram showing the results of principal component analysis using the results of responses to the well-being questionnaire in FIG. 3. FIG. 7 is a diagram showing an example of calculating weights for well-being elements that a user places importance on in an embodiment of the present invention. FIG. 8 is a diagram showing an example of an input screen for a user in an embodiment of the present invention. FIG. 9 is a diagram showing an example of an output screen presented to a user in an embodiment of the present invention. FIG. 10 is a flowchart of life design proposal processing executed by the life design proposal system in an embodiment of the present invention.

[0013] In the following examples, when necessary for convenience, the description will be divided into multiple sections or examples, but unless otherwise specified, they are not unrelated to each other, and one is related to the other as a partial or complete modification, detail, supplementary explanation, etc. Furthermore, in the following examples, when the number of elements, etc. (including the number, numerical value, amount, range, etc.) is mentioned, it is not limited to that specific number, and may be more or less than the specific number, unless otherwise specified or when it is clearly limited in principle to a specific number, etc.

[0014] Furthermore, in the following examples, the components (including element steps, etc.) are not necessarily essential unless otherwise specified or considered to be clearly essential in principle, etc. Similarly, in the following examples, when referring to the shape, positional relationship, etc. of components, etc., it includes those that are substantially similar or similar to the shape, etc., unless otherwise specified or considered to be clearly not essential in principle, etc. This also applies to the aforementioned numerical values ​​and ranges.

[0015] Hereinafter, embodiments of the present invention will be described in detail with reference to the drawings. In all the drawings for explaining the embodiments, the same components are generally designated by the same reference numerals, and repeated explanations thereof will be omitted.

[0016] FIG. 1 is a diagram showing the configuration of a life design proposal system 10 according to an embodiment of the present invention.

[0017] The life design proposal system 10 has a web application unit 20, a database 40, and a role model extraction and proposal unit 30. The web application unit 20 provides an input / output interface for the life design proposal system 10 to a terminal. A user terminal 51 is connected to the life design proposal system 10 via the web application unit 20. The user terminal 51 can access the life design proposal system 10 using a web browser. The database 40 stores retrospective data of sample users and background information of users who will receive life design proposals. Details of the database 40 will be described later with reference to FIG. 2. The role model extraction and proposal unit 30 references the data stored in the database 40 and outputs a life design to be proposed to the user.

[0018] A plurality of user terminals 51 used by users are connected to the life design proposal system 10 via a network (e.g., the Internet 60). The user terminals 51 are computers with communication capabilities and can access the life design proposal system 10 using a web browser with a predetermined protocol (e.g., HTTP). Note that the user terminals 51 may also access the life design proposal system 10 using a dedicated application rather than a web browser. A life plan request 71 entered by the user is transmitted from the user terminal 51 to the life design proposal system 10, and display information 72 such as a role model corresponding to the request is transmitted to the user terminal 51. This configuration enables prompt display on the terminal in response to a user request.

[0019] The life design proposal system 10 is configured by a computer having a processor (CPU), memory, auxiliary storage device, and communication interface (not shown).

[0020] The processor is a computing device that executes programs stored in memory. The processor executes various programs to realize the functions of each unit of the life design proposal system 10 (e.g., the role model extraction and proposal unit 30, etc.). Note that some of the processing performed by the processor by executing the programs may be executed by another computing device (e.g., hardware such as an ASIC or FPGA).

[0021] The memory includes ROM, which is a non-volatile storage element, and RAM, which is a volatile storage element. ROM stores unchanging programs (e.g., BIOS), etc. RAM is a high-speed, volatile storage element such as DRAM (Dynamic Random Access Memory), and temporarily stores programs executed by the processor and data used during program execution.

[0022] The auxiliary storage device is, for example, a large-capacity, non-volatile storage device such as a magnetic storage device (HDD) or flash memory (SSD). The auxiliary storage device also stores data (e.g., database 40) used by the processor when executing a program, and the program executed by the processor. In other words, the program is read from the auxiliary storage device, loaded into memory, and executed by the processor to realize each function of the life design proposal system 10.

[0023] The communication interface is a network interface device that controls communication with other devices according to a predetermined protocol.

[0024] The life design proposal system 10 may have an input / output interface for an operator to input and output data. The input / output interface is connected to an input device such as a keyboard or a mouse and has the function of receiving input from the operator. The input / output interface is also connected to an output device such as a display device or a printer (not shown) and has the function of outputting the results of program execution in a format that can be viewed by the operator.

[0025] The programs executed by the processor of the life design proposal system 10 are provided to the life design proposal system 10 from removable media (such as a CD-ROM or flash memory) or via a network, and are stored in a non-volatile auxiliary storage device, which is a non-transitory storage medium. For this reason, the life design proposal system 10 preferably has an interface for reading data from removable media.

[0026] The life design proposal system 10 is a computer system configured on a single physical computer or on multiple logically or physically configured computers, and may operate on a virtual computer constructed on multiple physical computer resources.

[0027] FIG. 2 is a diagram showing the configuration of the role model extraction and proposal unit 30 in the embodiment of the present invention.

[0028] The role model extraction and proposal unit 30 is connected to a database 40 so as to be accessible.

[0029] The database 40 includes reflection (WB) data 41 on well-being (WB) based on a reflection questionnaire (to be described later), reflection (factor) data 42 on factors that affect well-being, and data on background information 43 .

[0030] In this specification, well-being is a concept that refers to mental, physical, and social health, and indicates a sustained state of happiness in which one is physically and mentally healthy and socially fulfilled. It is believed that employees' continued physical and mental health has a positive impact on an organization, and this concept is emphasized in the fields of management and human resources.

[0031] Here, we discuss the necessity of retrospective surveys. One of the concerns of users considering upcoming life events (such as childbirth) is the impact on career development and financial stability of leaving work due to pregnancy, childbirth, and childcare. In order to present role models that users can accept while taking career development and financial stability into consideration, it is appropriate to use actual examples that are close to the user's expectations, rather than fictional examples, as role models. Everyone seeks different types of happiness; some prioritize their careers, while others prioritize family happiness. To create role models that are compatible with diverse lifestyles, it is preferable to present role models that reference the lives (half-lives) of many people who have experienced diverse lifestyles. By collecting the happiness and satisfaction levels of many people in their lives for each event, it is possible to present role models based on actual experience, resulting in role models that are highly convincing to users.

[0032] The retrospective questionnaire asks users (e.g., women aged 30 or older) who have experienced life events such as marriage, pregnancy, and childbirth about their level of satisfaction at the time of each life event and matters related to each life event. For example, a questionnaire for measuring well-being may ask about satisfaction with each life event, as shown in FIG. 3 . Such a questionnaire can measure satisfaction at the time for each life event (marriage, pregnancy, first childbirth, retirement, returning to work, etc.). The questionnaire for measuring well-being may be created based on, for example, a questionnaire for the Cabinet Office's Happiness Survey. Related factors and background information can be measured using the items shown in FIG. 4 . In this way, by collecting questionnaire responses from users who have experienced all or some of the life events such as marriage, pregnancy, first childbirth, retirement, and returning to work, it is possible to extract role models from the subjects based on the collected responses and create an information processing model for providing advice to improve well-being.

[0033] The collected results of the questionnaire (FIG. 3) for measuring well-being are recorded in reflection (WB) data 41, and the results of the questionnaire (FIG. 4) on related factors and background information are recorded in reflection (factor) data 42 and background information 43. For this reason, the response values ​​for each item in the questionnaire (FIG. 3) are recorded in the reflection (WB) data 41, the response values ​​for each item of x3, x8 to x10, and xk in the questionnaire (FIG. 4), for example, are recorded in the reflection (factor) data 42, and the response values ​​for each item of x1, x2, and x4 to x7 in the questionnaire (FIG. 4), for example, are recorded in the background information 43.

[0034] The role model extraction and proposal unit 30 has a reception unit 31, a data processing unit 32, and an output unit 33. User information such as the user's desired life plan (desired occupation, number of children, desired marriage date, etc.) and the user's desired well-being balance (e.g., important well-being elements) is input to the reception unit 31. The data processing unit 32 has a correction unit 321, a subject extraction unit 322, an analysis unit 323, a calculation unit 324, and a selection unit 325.

[0035] The correction unit 321 takes into account the age of the person who responded to the retrospective questionnaire and corrects the difference between the social situation at the time and the present (e.g., age at first marriage, age at first birth, economic situation, etc.). According to a Cabinet Office survey, the average age at first marriage for women in Japan was 25.2 years old in 1980, but increased to 29.5 years old in 2021. The average age at first birth was 26.4 years old in 1980, but increased to 30.9 years old in 2021. Both of these figures represent an increase of more than four years. Furthermore, according to a survey on economic conditions conducted by the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare, the median household income was 5.45 million yen in 1995, but decreased to 4.37 million yen in 2019. Therefore, the data of the retrospective questionnaire respondents is calculated to correct the population so that the average age at first marriage and age at first birth are equal. Furthermore, with regard to economic situation, the data of the retrospective questionnaire respondents is calculated to correct the population so that the median annual household income is equal. The population may be corrected by equalizing the mean and median to correct the position of the population distribution, or by further correcting the shape of the population distribution taking into account the variance. In this way, the correction unit 321 can correct the population to match the current situation, making it possible to propose role models that are less susceptible to the changing times.

[0036] The subject extraction unit 322 has selectors 3221, 3222, and 3223, and extracts subjects matching the user's preferences (e.g., occupation, number of children, etc.) from the database 40. Specifically, the selector 3223 selects subjects matching the user's preferences from the background information 43. The selected subjects become role model candidates to be presented to the user. Furthermore, the selectors 3221 and 3222 extract information on the subjects selected by the selector 3223 from the review (WB) data 41 and the review (factor) data 42, respectively. For example, if the user's preferences are agriculture as the desired occupation and two or more children, a group of subjects with agricultural experience and two or more children is selected from the background information 43, and data on the selected subject group is extracted from the review (WB) data 41 and the review (factor) data 42 and sent to the analysis unit 323.

[0037] The analysis unit 323 has a principal component analysis unit 3231, a clustering analysis unit 3232, and an association analysis unit 3233, and uses the extracted data from the retrospective questionnaire to analyze well-being and factors that have a strong influence on well-being. The principal component analysis unit 3231 performs principal component analysis (PCA) on the well-being data from the extracted subject's retrospective questionnaire. The clustering analysis unit 3232 clusters the obtained results of the principal component analysis to extract well-being items that have a strong influence. Next, the association analysis unit 3233 performs correlation analysis to calculate the degree of association between the extracted well-being with a strong influence and the factors.

[0038] Figures 5A and 5B show the results of principal component analysis using responses to the well-being questionnaire in Figure 3. The questionnaire responses shown in Figure 5A are not actual responses, but rather pseudo-response results, with multiple items aggregated on two axes (PC1 and PC2). These results show how groups are divided based on whether participants are currently working. Well-being questionnaire items that are strongly correlated with the separating axis (PC1), as shown in Figure 5B, include satisfaction with leaving or returning to work and satisfaction with continuing work. The graph in Figure 5B shows the principal component loadings, which indicate the degree of contribution to the principal components set on the axes. By searching for factors that strongly influence these items, factors that improve well-being while achieving the user's desired occupation and number of children can be identified and presented to the user.

[0039] The calculation unit 324 includes a factor calculation unit 3241 and a well-being calculation unit 3242, and calculates related factors and overall well-being from the analysis results output by the analysis unit 323. The well-being calculation unit 3242 calculates overall well-being by weighting the subject's well-being based on factors the user values ​​(e.g., three factors: career, economic strength, and interpersonal relationships). Hereinafter, these factors will be referred to as career well-being, economic strength well-being, and interpersonal well-being, respectively. Career well-being refers primarily to satisfaction with achieving success or achieving status at work. Economic strength well-being refers primarily to satisfaction with income. Interpersonal well-being refers to satisfaction with marriage, childbirth, and interpersonal relationships with family, friends, and the community. These important factors can be represented, for example, by positions within an equilateral triangle defined by point D in FIG. 6. The user then selects a point within the triangle on the screen shown in FIG. 7. In this equilateral triangle, perpendicular lines drawn from each vertex to the opposing side serve as the axes of the three elements. The closer the user-selected point D is to the vertex of the triangle, the more importance the user places on that element. The subject's reflection (WB) data 41 is weighted using the distances LA, LB, and LC from the vertex along each perpendicular line to calculate overall well-being. For example, if point D in Figure 6 is selected, the distance from vertex A to point D is LA, the distance from vertex B to point D is LB, the distance from vertex C to point D is LC, and the length of the perpendicular line is L. The weights for the elements corresponding to each vertex are (L - LA) ÷ L, (L - LB) ÷ L, and (L - LC) ÷ L, respectively. The weighted overall well-being WBt is expressed by the following formula: WBa, WBb, and WBc represent career well-being, economic well-being, and interpersonal well-being, respectively. WBt = WBa×(L-LA)÷L+WBb×(L-LB)÷L+WBc×(L-LC)÷L...Formula (1)

[0040] By performing weighting calculations in this way, it is possible to calculate overall well-being according to the well-being elements that the user values. Although the weighted sum is calculated in equation (1), the root mean square may also be calculated.

[0041] The factor calculation unit 3241 calculates factors that are strongly related to well-being using the analysis results of the relevance analysis unit 3233. For example, it is preferable to derive strongly related factors by correlation analysis that calculates the correlation between well-being and factors.

[0042] The selection unit 325 has selection logic 3251 for selecting factors and selection logic 3252 for selecting well-being, and selects one or more role models and one or more related factors to be presented to the user based on the overall well-being and related factors calculated by the calculation unit 324. Preferably, multiple (M) role models and multiple (N) related factors are selected. For example, the selection logic 3251 selects factors that are highly correlated and associated with well-being. Instead of selecting a single factor, multiple factors may be selected by ranking them in descending order of correlation. For example, the selection logic 3252 selects a subject to be presented to the user as a role model based on the magnitude of overall well-being calculated for each life event, the magnitude of variance, and the like. More specifically, the ages and magnitude of overall well-being for each life event of the subject with the highest total well-being are presented to the user as role models. The user can use the presented role models as a reference for their own life design. However, this presentation method may give the wrong impression that there is a problem with a life design that deviates from the presented role model, or may lead to behavior that avoids deviation from the role model. Therefore, it is advisable to present an acceptable range of ages for life events. For example, the range of ages at which the extracted subjects will give birth to their first child (ranging from the lowest to the highest ages at which they will give birth to their first child) may be presented. Alternatively, the range of ages at which the subjects will give birth to their first child may be presented from the first quartile to the third quartile within the subject group. By presenting the timing of life events for the main subjects in the subject group in this way, the user can design their life using the presented range as a guide.

[0043] The output unit 33 outputs the role model that is closest to the user's preference, the well-being of the role model, and factors related to well-being on an output screen shown in FIG. 8, for example.

[0044] FIG. 7 is a diagram showing an example of a screen for user input. The user's input is the selection of the user's desired life plan (desired occupation, number of children, desired marriage date, etc.) and the user's desired balance of well-being (for example, the well-being elements that are prioritized). Physical information (fertility) and the like may also be input. By inputting fertility such as ovarian age, a life plan that is more tailored to the individual's childbearing age can be presented. The value of each of the prioritized well-being elements may be automatically calculated from the answers to the questions.

[0045] 8 is a diagram showing an example of an output screen presented to the user. The output screen presented to the user has, for example, a well-being display area, a life event display area, and a suggestion display area.

[0046] The well-being display area displays the ages of life events and the overall well-being WBt of multiple subjects from among the extracted subjects. Furthermore, since presenting only one role model pinpoints the life events, it is preferable to display the well-being data of multiple subjects. For example, the age at first birth and the overall well-being WBt of one role model are displayed, and the overall well-being WBt of subjects whose age at first birth is close to the first quartile and the overall well-being WBt of subjects whose age at first birth is close to the third quartile are displayed.

[0047] The life event display area presents the range of life events that occurred for the subject, for example, the range of the timing of the main subject's life events. More specifically, the first and third quartiles of the age at first birth may be selected to display the range of the main subject's life events. This broadens the range of the user's life design, reduces the user's psychological burden, and contributes to the implementation of a relaxed life plan. Furthermore, if a user desires two or more children, the birth interval may be displayed, where N is a positive integer, because the interval between the birth of the Nth child and the birth of the N+1th child (when N = 1, the first and second child) is also an important element of life design.

[0048] The suggestion display area displays factors related to well-being. In addition to suggestions for improving well-being, which are related factors that improve well-being, suggestions for preventing well-being from decreasing, which are related factors that decrease well-being, may be presented.

[0049] FIG. 9 is a flowchart of the life design proposal process executed by the life design proposal system 10 according to the embodiment of the present invention.

[0050] First, in step 81 , the subject extraction unit 322 extracts subjects from the database 40 who match the user's preferences (for example, occupation, number of children, etc.), and extracts the review data 41 and 42 of the subjects from the database 40 .

[0051] Next, in step 82, the well-being calculation unit 3242 calculates the overall well-being WBt weighted by the factors that the user values ​​(for example, the three factors of career development, economic strength, and interpersonal relationships). Next, in step 83, the selection logic 3252 selects subjects to present to the user as role models based on the magnitude of the overall well-being calculated for each life event.

[0052] Regarding the presentation of related factors, in step 84, the analysis unit 323 analyzes factors that have a strong influence on well-being based on the well-being results of the extracted subject group, using principal component analysis that clusters the extracted retrospective questionnaire data. Next, in step 85, the factor calculation unit 3241 derives factors that are highly related to well-being using the analysis results of the relevance analysis unit 3233. Next, in step 86, the selection logic 3251 selects factors that are highly correlated with well-being and have a strong association with well-being.

[0053] Then, in step 87, the output unit 33 outputs the role model that is closest to the user's preference, the well-being of the role model, and factors related to well-being.

[0054] Through this process, role models and related factors that match the characteristics and desires of the user can be presented.

[0055] As described above, according to the embodiment of the present invention, a user can find role models that match their desired life plan and the well-being of those role models. In addition, by knowing the age range in which life events will occur and advice for improving well-being, the user can consider a more specific life plan and carry out the life plan with peace of mind.

[0056] The present invention is not limited to the above-described embodiments, and includes various modifications and equivalent configurations within the spirit and scope of the appended claims. For example, the above-described embodiments have been described in detail to clearly explain the present invention, and the present invention is not necessarily limited to configurations including all of the described configurations. Furthermore, part of the configuration of one embodiment may be replaced with the configuration of another embodiment. Furthermore, the configuration of another embodiment may be added to the configuration of one embodiment. Furthermore, part of the configuration of each embodiment may be added, deleted, or replaced with other configurations.

[0057] Furthermore, the aforementioned configurations, functions, processing units, processing means, etc. may be realized in part or in whole in hardware, for example by designing them as integrated circuits, or may be realized in software by having a processor interpret and execute a program that realizes each function.

[0058] Information such as programs, tables, and files that realize each function can be stored in a storage device such as a memory, hard disk, or SSD (Solid State Drive), or in a recording medium such as an IC card, SD card, or DVD.

[0059] In addition, the control lines and information lines shown are those that are considered necessary for explanation, and do not necessarily represent all the control lines and information lines that are necessary for implementation. In reality, it can be assumed that almost all components are interconnected.

[0060] DESCRIPTION OF SYMBOLS 10 Life design proposal system 20 Web application unit 30 Role model extraction / proposal unit 31 Reception unit 32 Data processing unit 321 Correction unit 322 Subject extraction unit 3221, 3222, 3223 Selector 323 Analysis unit 3231 Principal component analysis unit 3232 Clustering analysis unit 3233 Relevance analysis unit 324 Calculation unit 3241 Factor calculation unit 3242 Well-being calculation unit 325 Selection unit 3251 Selection logic 3252 Selection logic 33 Output unit 40 Database 41 Reflection (WB) data 42 Reflection (factor) data 43 Background information 51 User terminal 60 Internet

Claims

1. A life design proposal system, The computer is configured by a computing device that executes predetermined computational processing and a storage device connected to the computing device, the computing device has a reception unit that receives a life plan desired by a user and a balance of well-being desired by the user; an extraction unit that extracts subjects who match the received life plan; A life design proposal system characterized by comprising an output unit that outputs data on multiple role models including the age at which the life event occurred and well-being at the time of each life event based on the satisfaction level of the extracted subject with the life event.

2. The life design proposal system according to claim 1, A life design proposal system comprising a calculation unit that calculates an overall well-being of a subject by weighting the well-being of the subject according to the balance of well-being desired by the user.

3. The life design proposal system according to claim 2, A life design proposal system characterized by comprising a selection unit that selects individuals to be presented to a user as role models based on the magnitude of overall well-being calculated for each life event.

4. The life design proposal system according to claim 3, A life design proposal system characterized in that the selection unit outputs the range of times of life events for the main subject among the times of life events for the extracted multiple subjects.

5. The life design proposal system according to claim 1, A life design proposal system comprising a factor calculation unit that calculates the correlation between well-being and factors and calculates factors that are strongly related to well-being.

6. The life design proposal system according to claim 1, A life design proposal system characterized in that the satisfaction level of the extracted subjects with life events is obtained by conducting a retrospective questionnaire that includes questions to the subjects regarding their satisfaction with each of the life events.

7. The life design proposal system according to claim 1, A life design proposal system characterized in that the balance of well-being includes well-being related to each of career development, economic strength, and human relationships.

8. The life design proposal system according to claim 1, A life design proposal system characterized by having a correction unit that corrects the age of a life event of a person to be extracted for differences between the background of the time when the event occurred and the current background of each person.

9. The life design proposal system according to claim 8, The life design proposal system is characterized in that the correction unit corrects the subject's age at first birth using the change in the average age at first birth over time.

10. A life design proposal method executed by a computer, comprising: the computer is configured by a computer having an arithmetic unit that executes predetermined arithmetic processing and a storage device connected to the arithmetic unit, The life design proposal method includes: a receiving step in which the computing device receives a user's desired life plan and a balance of well-being desired by the user; an extraction step of extracting subjects who match the received life plan; A life design proposal method characterized by including an output procedure for outputting data on multiple role models including the age at which the life event occurred and well-being at the time of each life event, based on the satisfaction with the life event of the extracted subject.