SYNERGICALLY EFFECTIVE FUNGICIDAL COMPOSITION COMPRISING CHOLINE PHOSPHONATE AND AT LEAST ONE ADDITIONAL FUNGICIDE

Abstract

The present invention relates to a synergistically effective fungicidal composition comprising, as component (A), a fungicidally active amount of choline phosphonate and, as component (B), at least one additional fungicide selected from the group comprising quinone fungicides, succinate dehydrogenase inhibitors, benzamide fungicides, sulfur fungicides, carboxylic acid amide fungicides, demethylation inhibitor fungicides, phenylamide fungicides, copper fungicides, piperidinyl thiazol isoxazoline fungicides, and sugar alcohols, wherein the weight ratio of components (A) and (B) is in the range of 1:1000 to 1000:1. The invention further relates to a kit for using the fungicidal composition according to the invention in an amount effective for controlling one or more types of fungal infections by applying the fungicidal composition to the fungal infections.

Description

> ω N C N C O σ SYNERGICALLY EFFECTIVE FUNGICIDAL COMPOSITION COMPRISING CHOLINE PHOSPHONATE AND AT LEAST ONE ADDITIONAL FUNGICIDE Technical meat The invention relates to a synergistically effective fungicidal composition comprising choline phosphonate and at least one additional fungicide selected from the group comprising quinone fungicides, succinate dehydrogenase inhibitors, benzamide fungicides, sulfur fungicides, carboxylic acid amide fungicides, demethylation inhibitor fungicides, phenylamide fungicides, copper fungicides, piperidiniol tlazol isoxazoline fungicides, and sugar alcohols; and to a kit comprising choline phosphonate and at least one additional fungicide selected from the group comprising quinone fungicides, succinate dehydrogenase inhibitors, benzamide fungicides, sulfur fungicides, carboxylic acid amide fungicides, demethylation inhibitor fungicides, phenylamide fungicides, copper fungicides, piperidiniol tlazol isoxazoline fungicides, and sugar alcohols. sugar,and to the use of a fungicidal composition according to the invention to control one or more types of fungal infections. Background of the invention In crop protection, it is generally desirable to increase the specific action of a fungicidal substance and its operational safety. The fungicidal activity of many fungicides against fungal infections is already high, but it generally depends on the application rate, the formulation, the specific fungal infection being controlled, the spectrum of fungal infections, climatic and soil conditions, and other factors. Therefore, there is often a need for synergistic activity targeting specific types of infections. Fungal control offers improved overall selectivity, typically requiring lower quantities of active compounds to achieve equally good control results, and reducing the release of active compounds into the environment to prevent, for example, leaching and runoff effects. However, when using multiple active ingredients in combination, chemical, physical, or biological incompatibility issues frequently arise, such as the decomposition of one active ingredient or antagonism in the biological activity of the active ingredients. The present invention aims to address at least some of the aforementioned problems. Furthermore, an object of the present invention is to provide fungicidal compositions as alternatives to, or improvements upon, prior art.Brief Description of the Invention 15 A first aspect of the present invention relates to a synergistically effective fungicidal composition according to claim 1. In the fungicidal composition according to the first aspect of the present invention, choline phosphonate has shown an unexpected increase in fungicidal activity when combined with at least one additional fungicide selected from the group comprising quinone fungicides, succinate dehydrogenase inhibitors, benzamide fungicides, sulfur fungicides, carboxylic acid amide fungicides, demethylation inhibitor fungicides, phenylamide fungicides, copper fungicides, piperidinyl thalazol isoxazoline fungicides, and sugar alcohols. This increase in fungicidal activity is caused by a synergistic effect when choline phosphonate and at least one of said additional fungicides are combined in a ratio. weight according to the first aspect of the present invention. A second aspect of the present invention relates to a kit according to claim 13. A third aspect of the present invention relates to a use in accordance with claim 15. Detailed description of the invention Mentioning numerical ranges by one or two endpoints includes all numbers and fractions subsumed within that range, as well as the one or two endpoints listed. The term fungal infection, as used in this document, refers to an infection of a plant substrate, and even more preferably of a crop, by a phytopathogenic fungus that causes a plant disease. Fungal infection in crops is a major agricultural problem, causing a pronounced loss of crop quality and usability. Preferably, the fungicidal compositions according to the invention are used to prevent the growth of phytopathogenic fungi and / or to control, more preferably to eliminate, one or more phytopathogenic fungi in crops. By specifically inhibiting or killing the phytopathogenic fungi, the fungal disease caused by hypopathogenic fungi is controlled. The term phosphonate, as used in this document, should be understood as a salt of phosphorous acid, H3PO3. Phosphite is used herein as a synonym for phosphonate. Phosphonates are fungicidal active compounds and belong to Group 33 of the Fungicide Resistance Action Committee. The mode of action of phosphonates is both indirect and direct, and involves the induction of resistance in the host plant and the inhibition of oxidative phosphorylation. Phosphonates are known as environmentally benign fungicides with low toxicity to users and consumers. In addition to being fungicidal active compounds, phosphonates can be used as fertilizers in agriculture. The term choline, as used in this document, is a chemical compound with the molecular formula C5H14NO* and is also called (2-hydroxyethyl)trimethylammonium. Choline is a ubiquitous substance in nature, known as a plant biostimulant, as described in T.G. Mason, G. Blunden (1989) Bot. Mar. 3_2 313-316. Choline is an example of a quaternary salt. Quaternary salts are compounds known to be soluble in both hydrophilic and lyophilic environments. Furthermore, choline, within plants, is readily oxidized to glycine betaine. In the agronomic field, when administered, for example, to fruit trees, glycine betaine helps control abiotic and nutritional stress during growth, reducing fruit peel imperfections and the tendency of the peel to crack during ripening, as described in document EP- A-0806897, acting as an osmolyte regulator. Choline has demonstrated unexpected activity as a fungicidal and bactericidal product in the agricultural field, and shows prolonged protective action on plants against phytopathogenic fungi and bacteria. The term “choline phosphonate” as used in this document and “phosamine-choline” are synonymous. The term protectant, as used in this text, should be understood as a compound or mixture of compounds that compensates for or reduces the phytotoxic properties of a fungicide towards useful plants without substantially reducing the fungicidal action against fungal infections. frQicm / ιζηζ / Β / γΐΛΐ The fungicidal activity of fungicides comprising phosphonates against fungal infections is already at a high level, but it generally depends on the application rate, the respective preparation method, the respective fungal infection to be controlled or the spectrum of fungal infections, climatic and soil conditions, etc. 5 Other criteria in this context are the duration of action, or the degradation rate, of the fungicide, the general compatibility of the crop plants and the speed of action (faster onset of action), the spectrum of activity and behavior towards subsequent crops (replanting problems) or the general flexibility of application (control of fungal infections at their various stages of infection).If appropriate, 10 changes in susceptibility to fungal infections, which can occur with prolonged use of fungicides or in limited geographical regions (control of infections by tolerant or resistant fungi), should also be taken into account. Compensating for losses in action against fungal infections by increasing fungicide application rates is only possible to a certain extent, 15 for example, because such a procedure reduces the selectivity of the fungicides or because the action does not improve even when applying higher rates.Therefore, there is often a need for synergistic activity directed against specific types of fungal infections, controlling fungal infections with better overall selectivity, generally using lower quantities of the 20 active compounds to achieve equally good control results, and reducing the input of active compounds into the environment to avoid, for example, leaching and runoff effects. There is also a need to control fungal infections that are not yet controlled (gaps) and to control fungal infections that are tolerant or resistant to individual fungicides or to several 25 fungicides. There is also a need to develop single-use applications for these purposes. > ω Ν C Ν C Ü σ 5. Avoid multiple applications that require a lot of labor, and also develop systems to control the speed of action, where, in addition to rapid initial control of fungal infections, there is also slow curative control. One possible solution to the problems mentioned above may be to provide combined fungicidal compositions, that is, combinations of a plurality of fungicides and / or other components from the group of agrochemically active compounds of different types and formulation aids and additives commonly used in crop protection that provide the desired additional properties. 10. However, in the combined use of a plurality of active ingredients, there are frequently phenomena of chemical, physical, or biological incompatibility, for example, decomposition of an active ingredient or antagonism in the biological activity of the active ingredients.For these reasons, potentially suitable combinations of active compounds must be specifically selected and experimentally tested to determine their suitability, as negative or positive results cannot be discarded with certainty a priori. A first aspect of the present invention provides a synergistically effective fungicidal composition comprising as component (A) a fungicidally active amount of choline phosphonate and as component (B) at least one additional fungicide selected from the group comprising quinone fungicides, succinate dehydrogenase inhibitors, and benzamide fungicides.sulfur fungicides, carboxylic acid amide fungicides, demethylation inhibitor fungicides, phenylamide fungicides, copper fungicides, piperidinyl thalazol isoxazoline fungicides and sugar alcohols, wherein the weight ratio of components (A) and (B) is in the range of 1:1000 to 1000:1, more preferably 1:900 to 900:1, more preferably 1:800 to 800:1, more preferably 1:700 to 700:1, more preferably 1:600 ​​to 1000:1. froicin / iznz / B / YiAi 600:1, more preferably from 1:500 to 500:1, even more preferably from 1:400 to 400:1, even more preferably from 1:300 to 300:1, even more preferably from 1:200 to 200:1, even more preferably from 1:180 to 180:1, and even more preferably from 1:160 to 160:1. In a more preferred embodiment, said ratio in weight of components (A) and (B) is in a range of 1:150 to 150:1, more preferably from 1:130 to 140:1, and even more preferably from 1:110 to 130:1. Quinones are known to exhibit pesticidal activity. Dithianone, 5,10-dihydro-5,10-dioxonaphtho[2,3-b]-dithion-2,3-dicarbonyl, chloranyl, 2,3,5,6-tetrachloro-1,4-benzoquinone, and diclone, 2,3-dichloronaphthoquinone-1,4, are non-limiting examples of quinone fungicides. Succinate dehydrogenase inhibitors are fungicides that act by targeting the enzyme succinate dehydrogenase. Examples, but not limited to, succinate dehydrogenase inhibitors include adepidin, benodanil, benzovindiflupyr, bixafen, boscalid, carboxin, fenfuram, fluindapyr, fluopyram, flutolanil, fluxapyroxad, furamethpyr, inpirfluxam, isofetamid, isopirazam, mepronil, oxicarboxin, penflufen, penthiopyrad, pidiflumetofen, sedaxane, and tiflazamide. Benzamide fungicides act by destroying microtubules, which affect mitosis and cell division, thus inhibiting germ tube and mycelium growth. Non-limiting examples of benzamide fungicides include benzohydroxamic acid, fluopicolide, fluopimomide, fluopyram, thioximide, triclamide, zarilamide, and zoxamide. Demethylation inhibitor fungicides, also known as steral biosynthesis inhibitor fungicides, act by inhibiting the biosynthesis of ergosterol, a major component of the plasma membrane of certain fungi25 and necessary for fungal growth. Demethylation inhibitor fungicides They belong to FRAC code 3 and include triazoles and imidazolides. Non-limiting examples of demethylation-inhibiting fungicides are propiconazole, myclobutanil, tebuconazole, and triflumizole. Phenylamid fungicides are a class of highly active fungicides that specifically control oomycete plant pathogens (such as downy mildews of the Peronosporales and Sclerosporaies, as well as most members of the Pythiae (e.g., Phytophthora and Pythium spp.) and Saprolegniales). They act by inhibiting rRNA biosynthesis (polymerase complex I) in the target plant pathogens. When applied to fungal plant pathogens, they rapidly penetrate plant tissue and translocate acropetally within the plant. Non-limiting examples of phenyllamid fungicides include metalaxyl, metalaxyl-M (also known as mefenoxam), furalaxyl, oxadixyl, benalaxyl, benalaxyl-M (also known as kiralaxyl), and ofurace.Copper has a very broad spectrum of control over fungal and bacterial pathogens and has been used worldwide to control more than 200 disease species. Copper also has the advantage of being safe for plants, animals, and the environment and is accepted in organic production. Copper fungicides are preventative and must be applied before infection; they have no curative or systemic action. They provide multisite activity, and the Cu++ ions interfere with biomolecules (due to their electrophoretic properties) and affect protein structure, enzyme function, energy transport systems, and membranes. Non-limiting examples of copper fungicides include copper oxychloride, copper hydroxide, copper sulfate, copper octanoate, and cuprous oxide, or any hydrate or derivative thereof. Piperidinyl isoxazoline fungicides are a newly discovered class of fungicides believed to act on a unique site of action in oomycete pathogens without known cross-resistance to other fungicides. A non-limiting example of this class is oxatyapiproline (ISO approved common name). Oxatyapiproline is highly effective for the control of Phytophthora infestans and other economically important oomycete pathogens at much lower usage rates than current commercial fungicides. Its novel mode of action makes oxatyapiproline a valuable option for fungicide resistance management strategies. According to a preferred embodiment of the first aspect of the present invention, said at least one additional fungicide is selected from the group consisting of dithianone, isofetamide, zoxamide, fluopicolide, sulfur, valifenalate, and iagate. According to another preferred embodiment of the first aspect of the present invention, cuprous oxide is selected as said at least one additional fungicide. In a preferred embodiment, the fungicidal composition comprises as component (A) a fungicidally active amount of choline phosphonate and as component (B) dithianone, wherein the weight ratio of components (A) and (B) is in the range of 2:1 to 32:1, more preferably 3:1 to 26:1, even more preferably 4:1 to 20:1, even more preferably 5:1 to 14:1 and most preferably 6:1 to 10:1. In a preferred embodiment, the fungicidal composition comprises as component (A) a fungicidally active amount of choline phosphonate and as component (B) isofetamide, wherein the weight ratio of components (A) and (B) is in the range of 5:1 to 120:1, more preferably from 14:1 to 95:1, even more preferably from 20:1 to 70:1, even more preferably from 26:1 to 45:1 and most preferably from 30:1 to 34:1. In a preferred embodiment, the fungicidal composition comprises as component (A) a fungicidally active amount of cophine phosphonate and as component (B) zoxamide, wherein the weight ratio of components (A) and (B) is in the range of 6:1 to 100:1, more preferably 8:1 to 80:1, even more preferably 10:1 to 60:1, and even more preferably 12:1 to 30:1. In a preferred embodiment, the fungicidal composition comprises as component (A) a fungicidally active amount of cophine phosphonate and as component (B) fluopicoid, wherein the weight ratio of components (A) and (B) is in the range of 6:1 to 100:1, more preferably 11:1 to 80:1, even more preferably 16:1 to 60:1, even more preferably 21:1 to 40:1 and most preferably 24:1 to 26:1. In a preferred embodiment, the fungicidal composition comprises as component (A) a fungicidally active amount of cophine phosphonate and as component (B) sulfur, wherein the weight ratio of components (A) and (B) is in the range of 1:8 to 1:1, more preferably from 1:6 to 1:1.3, even more preferably from 1:5 to 1:1.6, and even more preferably from 1:4 to 1:1.8. In a preferred embodiment, the fungicidal composition comprises as component (A) a fungicidally active amount of cophine phosphonate and as component (B) vafifenaiate, wherein the weight ratio of components (A) and (B) is in the range of 2.5:1 to 40:1, more preferably 5:1 to 32:1, even more preferably 7:1 to 24:1, even more preferably 8.1 to 16:1 and most preferably 9:1 to 11:1. In a preferred embodiment, the fungicidal composition comprises as component (A) a fungicidally active amount of cophine phosphonate and as component (B) tagatose, wherein the weight ratio of components (A) and (B) is in the range of 1:5 to 4:1, more preferably from 1:4 to 3:1, even more preferably from 1:3 to 2:1, even more preferably from 1:2 to 1.5:1 and most preferably from 1:1.4 to 1:1. In a preferred embodiment, the fungicidal composition comprises as component (A) a fungicidally active amount of choline phosphonate and as component (B) cuprous oxide, wherein the weight ratio of components (A) and (B) is in the range of 1:5 to 10:1, more preferably from 1:3 to 8:1, even more preferably from 1:2 to 6:1, even more preferably from 1:1 to 4:1 and most preferably from 2:1 to 3.2:1. In the fungicidal composition according to the first aspect of the present invention, choline phosphonate has shown an unexpected increase in fungicidal activity when combined with at least one additional fungicide selected from the group comprising quinone fungicides, succinate dehydrogenase inhibitors, benzamide fungicides, sulfur fungicides, carboxylic acid amide fungicides, demethylation inhibitor fungicides, phenylamide fungicides, copper fungicides, piperidinyl thalazol isoxazoline fungicides, and sugar alcohols. This increase in fungicidal activity is caused by a synergistic effect when choline phosphonate is combined with at least one of the aforementioned additional fungicides in the specified weight ratio. Choline phosphonate and at least one of the aforementioned additional fungicides interact particularly favorably, for example, when used to control fungal infections of sown and / or planted crops, lawns, fruit orchards (plantation crops), or cultivated areas (e.g., recreational areas such as squares in residential areas or industrial sites, railway lines). Remarkably, the activity of the combination of the two active ingredients according to the invention, when used against fungal infections, is higher than the activities of the individual components. Therefore, a true synergistic effect exists that could not be predicted, not merely a complementary action (additive effect). Choline phosphonate offers the additional advantages of serving as a fertilizer, as a root formation promoter, and may also have a plant-strengthening effect. To control the five fungal infections, it is particularly suitable to apply this fungicidal composition, according to the first aspect of the present invention, in a diluted form in water.The synergistic effect allows for a reduction in the application rates of individual fungicides, such as choline phosphonate, with at least one additional fungicide; greater and / or longer-lasting efficacy at the same application rate; control of fungal infections that were previously uncontrolled (gaps); control of fungal infections that are tolerant or resistant to individual or multiple fungicides; an extension of the application period; and / or a reduction in the number of individual applications required. As a result, the user benefits from fungal infection control systems that are more economically and ecologically sound. Choline phosphonate is a choline salt of phosphorous acid. Choline phosphite may be used synonymously with choline phosphonate. Choline phosphonate may also be called trimethyl hydroxyethyl ammonium phosphite. Choline phosphonate has been described in document W02007 / 071428A2.Due to the fungicidal properties of both choline and phosphonate, as described above, choline phosphonate is a fungicidal compound with the desired fungicidal action. Dithianone (IUPAC name: 5,10-dioxobenzo[g][1,4]benzoditiin-2,3-dicarbonifryl) is a chemical compound belonging to the quinone fungicide group. Dithianone's mode of action is that it is a multi-site inhibitor of protein formation, acting by modifying the sulfhydryl groups located at cysteine ​​residues 25 in many proteins. This protein inhibition prevents germination. spores and germ tube growth. Dithianone is effective in controlling a wide range of fungal foliar diseases, including scab in pome fruit; Stigmina carpophila, Coccomyces htemalis and scab in cherries; Morel spp., rust and leaf curl in peaches and apricots; leaf spot and rust in currants; Didymella applanata in raspberries; Mycosphaerella fragarias and Diplocarpon eariiana in strawberries; Piasmopara viticola in grapevines; downy mildew in hops; scab and Phomopsis citri in citrus fruits; Ascochyta chrysanthemion in chrysanthemums; Glomerella cingulata in coffee; and Marssonina leaf spot in poplars. Isofetamide (IUPAC name: N-[1 !1-dimethyl-2-(4-isopropoxy-o-tolyl)-2- 10 oxoethyl]-3-methylthiophene-2-carboxamide) is a broad-spectrum fungicide belonging to SDHI (succinate dehydrogenase inhibitors).It inhibits succinate dehydrogenase in complex II of fungal mitochondrial respiration and is used to control fungal pathogens belonging to the Ascomycetes and Deuteromycetes groups. Zoxamid (IUPAC name: (RS)-3,5-didoro-N43) <doro-4rotiM-metilo 15 oxopropilVptoluamida), también llamado zoxamida, es un fungicida de benzamida. Zoxamid inhibe inhibe la polimerización de tubulina y detiene la división nuclear al unirse a la subunidad β de los microtúbuios. Entre otras aplicaciones, el zoxamid se puede usar para controlar el mildiú velloso de la uva. La fluopicolida (nombre IUPAC: 2,6-dicloro-N¿[3-cloro-5~ 20 (trinuorometil)piridin-2-!l]meti!]benzamida) es un fungicida de benzamida. La fluopicolida es eficaz a bajas tasas de aplicación contra una amplia gama de enfermedades de los oomicetos (ficomicetos), incluidos el mildiú velloso (Piasmopara, Pseudoperonospara, Peronospora, Bremia), el tizón tardío (Phytophthora) y algunas especies de Pythium.Fluopicolide can be used for foliar application on grapes, raisins, cucurbits and corn, and is also suitable for non-food uses for the treatment of lawns and plants. Ornamentals. The use of sulfur as a fungicide is well known. Sulfur, in its elemental form, also called elemental sulfur, is used extensively against various plant pathogenic fungi, for example, Venturia inequalis, the cause of apple scab, and Uncinuia necator, the cause of powdery mildew in grapevines, but also against mites and insects. The term elemental sulfur refers to S° sulfur. The term includes allotropes of elemental sulfur such as plastic (amorphous) sulfur, monoclinic sulfur, rhombic sulfur composed of S8 molecules, and other ring molecules such as S7 and S12. Bio-sulfur can also be selected as a type of sulfur. “Bio-sulfur” can be provided by a recently discovered process called the THIOPAQ™ process (US patent 6,656,249 issued December 2, 2003). The Thiopaq process was developed as an alternative to the Claus process.The Thiopaq process uses biological sulfur conversion processes that lead to a type of elemental sulfur called bio-sulfur, for biologically produced sulfur. This bio-sulfur has some unique properties compared to chemically produced sulfur, such as that produced by the Claus process. Most importantly, bio-sulfur is more hydrophilic than chemically produced sulfur. The reason for this is unknown. The purity of the bio-sulfur is preferably more than 80% of the total dry mass, preferably more than 90% of the total dry mass, very preferably more than 95% of the total dry mass, and most preferably more than 99% of the total dry mass. That bio-sulfur differs from chemically produced sulfur is known and recognized in the art. For example, Kleinjan et al. (Kleinjan et al. 2003).Topics in Current Chemistry 230: 44-57) indicates that the density of biologically produced particles is less than the density of orthorhombic sulfur. Furthermore, biologically produced sulfur-25 particles have hydrophilic properties, whereas it is known that... > ω Ν C Ν C « σ ί Orthorhombic sulfur is hydrophobic (Janssen et al. 1999. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects 151: 389-397). In addition, other properties of chemically produced sulfur have been reported to differ from microbially produced sulfur (Seidel et al. 2006. Chemosfere 62:1444-1453). Except for elemental sulfur and bio-sulfur, other non-limiting examples of sulfur fungicides include zinc bis dimethyldithiocarbamate, tetramethylthiuram disulfide, isoprotehilane, mancozeb, zineb, amobam, and nabam. Valiferalate (IUPAC name: methyl 3-(4-chlorophenyl)-3-[[(2S)-3-methyl-2-(propan-2-hydroxycarbonylamino)butanoyl]amino]propanoate) is a carboxylic acid amide (CAA) fungicide that acts by inhibiting cellulose synthesis in phytopathogenic fungi. Known uses of vaiferalate include the control of Plasmopara viticola, Phytophthora infestans, and Pseudoperonospora cubensis. Document US9125409B2 demonstrated that tagatose (name IUPAC: (3S,4S:5R)-2-(hydroxymethyl)oxane-2,3,4,5-tetrol) has high efficacy in controlling various plant diseases, such as powdery mildew, streak, and oomycete-related diseases. US patent 9125409B2 demonstrates that tagatose can be applied as a fungicide. In addition to tagatose, other sugar alcohols may also exhibit fungicidal activity. Cuprous oxide, also known as copper(I) oxide, is an inorganic copper fungicide and insecticide that can also be used as a mineral supplement for livestock. It is known for its effective control of various fungal pathogens, including those that cause downy mildew and leaf spots. Examples of crops to which cuprous oxide can be applied for fungal control include mango, avocado, grapes, kiwifruit, plums, olives, nuts, and cacao. In this text, choline phosphonate derivatives and / or salts and / or derivatives of al Less than one additional fungicide selected from the group comprising quinone fungicides, succinate dehydrogenase inhibitors, benzamide fungicides, sulfur fungicides, carboxylic acid amide fungicides, demethylation inhibitor fungicides, phenylamide fungicides, copper fungicides, piperidinyl thiazolyl isoxazoline fungicides, and sugar alcohols, also fall within the above definitions of choline phosphonate, and at least one additional fungicide selected from the group comprising quinone fungicides, succinate dehydrogenase inhibitors, benzamide fungicides, sulfur fungicides, carboxylic acid amide fungicides, demethylation inhibitor fungicides, phenylamide fungicides, copper fungicides, piperidinyl thiazolyl isoxazoline fungicides, and sugar alcohols. Any salt is possible provided it is agriculturally acceptable.Examples of these include alkali metal salts such as a sodium salt and a potassium salt, alkaline earth metal salts such as a magnesium salt and a calcium salt, ammonium salts such as a monomethylammonium salt, a dimethylammonium salt, and a triethylammonium salt, inorganic acid salts such as a hydrochloride salt, a perchlorate salt, a sulfate salt, and a nitrate salt, and organic acid salts such as an acetate salt and a methanesulfonate salt. Where applicable, at least one of these additional fungicides may also be used in the form of a metal chelate, such as a copper chelate. Although choline phosphonate has been shown to be most effective in the fungicidal composition according to the first aspect of the present invention, alternative embodiments provide other fungicidal compositions formulated by applying at least one other phosphonate in addition to or instead of choline phosphonate.Relative quantities of tai by at least one other phosphonate with respect to at least one additional fungicide selected from the group comprising quinone fungicides. Succinate dehydrogenase inhibitors, benzamide fungicides, sulfur fungicides, carboxylic acid amide fungicides, demethylation inhibitor fungicides, phenylamide fungicides, copper fungicides, piperidinii, thiazole, isoxazoline fungicides, and sugar alcohols may be included within the ranges described above, or they may be situated within other or broader ranges. At least one other phosphonate may be selected from, but is not limited to, the list containing potassium phosphites such as KH₂PO₃ and K₂HPO₃, sodium phosphites, ammonium phosphites, ethyl hydrogenphosphonate, fosetyl-aluminum complexes, alkali metal or alkaline earth metal salts of phosphorous acid, and mixtures of these compounds. Although dithianone, isofetamide, and zoxamide...Fluopicolide, sulfur, valifenalate, and tagatose have been shown to be more effective in the fungicidal composition according to the first aspect of the present invention. Alternative embodiments provide other fungicidal compositions that are formulated by applying at least one other additional fungicide selected from the group comprising quinone fungicides, 15 succinate dehydrogenase inhibitors, benzamide fungicides, sulfur fungicides, carboxylic acid amide fungicides, demethylation inhibitor fungicides, phenylamide fungicides, copper fungicides, piperidiniol, tlazol, isoxazoline fungicides, and sugar alcohols in addition to or instead of ditidianone, zoxamidianone, fluopicolide, sulfur, valifenalate, and / or tagatose. Relative quantities of such fungicides with respect to choline phosphonate 20, and / or alternative phosphonates, may fall within the ranges described above, or may fall within other or broader ranges.The combined application described above can offer foliar, curative, and systemic action. In this document, the term foliar action refers to fungicidal activity obtained by application to aboveground or exposed plant portions, such as crops, that have been raised above the soil surface. c ü σ that are infected with fungal infections. By the term curative action, fungicidal action refers to fungal infections already present in plants. The term systemic action means that a fungicide is easily translocated as such within a plant, making the penetrated tissues toxic to fungi. This synergistic effect of choline phosphonate with at least one additional fungicide selected from the group comprising quinone fungicides, succinate dehydrogenase inhibitors, benzamide fungicides, sulfur fungicides, carboxylic acid amide fungicides, demethylation inhibitor fungicides, phenylamide fungicides, copper fungicides, piperidinyl thalazoleide fungicides, and sugar alcohols 10 can be observed, for example, in the case of an application of ready-mix concrete, of, for example, a ready-to-use (RTU) formulation, an emulsifiable concentrate (EC) formulation, a microemulsifiable concentrate, an emulsion concentrate (EW) formulation, a microemulsion (ME) formulation, a suspension concentrate (SC) formulation, preferably an aqueous SC formulation, an oil dispersion (OD) formulation, a suspension emulsion (SE) formulation, a microcapsule suspension (CS) formulation, or a soluble liquid (SL) formulation.Wettable powder (WP) formulation, water-dispersible granule (WG) formulation, water-soluble powder (SP) formulation, water-soluble granule (SG) formulation, and in the case of a tank mix; however, they can also be observed when the active compounds are applied at different times (splitting) (packaged, for example, as a combipack or single-dose). It is also possible to apply the fungicides or the fungicidal composition in a plurality of portions (sequential application). If choline phosphonate and at least one of these additional fungicides are to be applied as a tank mix, it must be ensured that the resulting spray liquor is applied relatively quickly after preparation. Preferably, such formulations or concentrates comprise between c, ü σ 0.1 to 99.9% by weight of active compound, preferably between 0.15 and 95% by weight, and preferably between 0.2 and 90% by weight. According to preferred embodiments of the first aspect of the present invention, the fungicidal composition comprises from 5 to 90% by weight, more preferably from 10 to 80% by weight, more preferably from 15 to 70% by weight, even more preferably from 20 to 60% by weight, more preferably from 25 to 50% by weight and even more preferably from 30 to 40% by weight of choline phosphonate, and also comprising from 5 to 90% by weight, more preferably from 8 to 75% by weight, more preferably from 11 to 65% by weight, even more preferably from 14 to 55% by weight, more preferably from 18 to 45% by weight and even more preferably from 20 to 35% by weight of one or more sulfur fungicides. According to preferred embodiments of the first aspect of the present invention, the fungicidal composition comprises from 5 to 90% by weight, more preferably from 10 to 80% by weight, more preferably from 15 to 70% by weight, even more preferably from 20 to 60% by weight, more preferably from 25 to 55% by weight, and still more preferably from 35 to 45% by weight of choline phosphonate, and also comprising from 0.1 to 90% by weight, more preferably from 0.5 to 60% by weight, more preferably from 0.9 to 40% by weight, even more preferably from 1.3 to 20% by weight, more preferably from 1.7 to 10% by weight, and even more preferably from 2 to 5% by weight of one or more carboxylic acid amide fungicides. Preferably, valifenalate is selected as the carboxylic acid amide fungicide. According to embodiments of the first aspect of the present invention, the choline phosphonate fungicidal components and at least one additional fungicide selected from the group comprising quinone fungicides, succinate dehydrogenase inhibitors, benzamide fungicides, sulfur fungicides, carboxylic acid amide fungicides, demethylation inhibitor fungicides, phenylaryl fungicides, Copper fungicides, piperidinyl thalazol isoxazoline fungicides, and sugar alcohols can be formulated together in an appropriate ratio of the present invention (combination formulation), along with conventional formulation adjuvants as known in the art, such as, for example, one or more carriers. 5 In a preferred embodiment, the fungicidal composition according to the first aspect of the present invention further comprises one or more additional components selected from the group comprising other fungicides, other pesticides such as herbicides, insecticides, or other active pesticide ingredients, protectants, antioxidants, chemical stabilizers, adhesives, fertilizers, perfumes, colorants, 10 liquid carriers, solid vehicles, surfactants, crystallization inhibitors, viscosity modifiers, suspending agents, spray droplet modifiers, pigments, foaming agents, light-blocking agents,Compatibility agents, antifoaming agents, sequestering agents, neutralizing agents and pH regulators, wetting and dispersing agents, preservatives, thickening agents, corrosion inhibitors, freezing point depressants, odorants, spreading agents, penetration aids, micronutrients, emollients, lubricants, and adhering and wetting agents, such as, for example, propylene glycol. According to preferred embodiments, the fungicidal composition may also comprise various agrochemically active compounds, for example, from group 20 acaricides, nematicides, bird repellents, and soil structure improvers. Non-limiting examples of colorants include inorganic pigments such as iron oxide, titanium oxide, and Prussian blue and / or organic dyes such as alizarin dyes, azo dyes, and metallic phthalocyanine, and trace elements such as iron, manganese, boron, copper, and cobalt.molybdenum and zinc. 25 In a preferred embodiment of the first aspect of the invention, the, The fungicidal composition froicin / iznz / B / YiAi comprises one or more dispersing agents and / or wetting agents, and preferably in an amount of 0.1 to 10% by weight, more preferably 0.5 to 7% by weight and even more preferably 0.7 to 4% by weight, based on the total weight of the composition.Non-limiting examples of dispersing and / or wetting agents include ethylene oxide / propylene oxide condensates; polyaminoamide resins or derivatives thereof; ethylene oxide / propylene oxide block copolymers, alkyl, aryl and aryl, aryl ethoxylates and derivatives thereof, such as tristyrylphenol ethoxylates, such as tristyrylphenol ethoxylate phosphate ester or a salt thereof, for example, a triethanolamine salt thereof; lignosulfonates such as calcium lignosulfonates, sodium lignosulfonates or derivatives thereof; alkyl naphthalenesulfonates, such as alkyl naphthalenesulfonic acid, sodium salt; cresol and naphthaleneformaldehyde condensates and their sulfonates; polyarylsulfonate condensates; polycarboxylates, polymer comb copolymers, alkyl ether phosphates, ether sulfates and derivatives thereof; an acrylic ester / acrylic acid copolymer including polyethylene glycol ester side chains; and mixtures thereof. In a preferred embodiment of the first aspect of the invention, the fungicidal composition comprises one or more freezing point depressants, preferably in an amount of 0.5 to 10% by weight, more preferably 1 to 8% by weight, and even more preferably 2 to 6% by weight, based on the total weight of the composition. Non-limiting examples of freezing point depressants include glycol-based freezing point depressants such as monopropylene glycol. In a preferred embodiment of the first aspect of the invention, the fungicidal composition comprises one or more antifoaming agents, preferably in an amount of 0.01 to 2% by weight, more preferably 0.04 to 1% by weight, and even more preferably 0.07 to 0.4% by weight, based on the total weight of the composition. Non-limiting examples of antifoaming agents include antifoam silicone oil emulsions, preferably aqueous silicone oil emulsions. In a preferred embodiment of the first aspect of the invention, the fungicidal composition comprises one or more preservatives, and preferably in an amount of 0.01 to 2% by weight, more preferably 0.05 to 1% by weight, and even more preferably 0.06 to 0.4% by weight, based on the total weight of the composition. Non-limiting examples of preservatives include isothiazolone acids, such as methyl-isothiazol-3-one (methiisothiazol-3-one) (MIT), 5-chloro-2-methyl-410 isothiazolin-3-one (5-chloro-2-methyl-4-isothiazolin-3-one) (CMIT), 4,5-dichloro-2-n-octyl-4isothiazolin-3-one (4,5-dichloro-2-n-octy¡-4-isothiazolin-3-one) (DCOIT), octyl-isothiazol-3-one (octllisothiazol-3-one) (OIT), 1,2-benzisothiazol-3(2H)-one (1,2-benzisothiazol-3(2H)-one) (BIT), N-methii-1,2-isothiazol-3One (N-methyl-1,2-benzisothiazol-3~one) MBIT) and N~(n”butíi)-1,2isothiazol-3-one (N-(n-butyl)-l^-benzisothiazol-S-one) (BBIT). In a preferred embodiment of the first aspect of the invention, the fungicidal composition comprises one or more chemical stabilizers, preferably in an amount of 0.01 to 2% by weight, more preferably 0.05 to 1% by weight, and even more preferably 0.1 to 0.4% by weight, based on the total weight of the composition. Non-limiting examples of chemical stabilizers include citric acid and phosphoric acid. In a preferred embodiment of the first aspect of the invention, the fungicidal composition comprises one or more viscosity modifiers, preferably in an amount of 0.01 to 2% by weight, more preferably 0.05 to 1% by weight, and even more preferably 0.1 to 0.5% by weight, based on the total weight of the composition. Non-limiting examples of viscosity modifiers include xanthan gum, guar gum, succinoglycan gum, sodium alginate, swellable clays, silica, and cellulose derivatives. In a preferred embodiment of the first aspect of the invention, the fungicidal composition comprises one or more spreading agents and / or adhering agents, preferably in an amount of 0.5 to 8% by weight, more preferably 0.05 to 10% by weight, and even more preferably 1 to 5% by weight, based on the total weight of the composition. Non-limiting examples of spreading agents and / or adhering agents include ethyl hydroxyethyl cellulose, hydroxyethyl cellulose, hydroxypropyl cellulose, hydroxyethyl methyl cellulose, hydroxypropyl methyl cellulose, methyl cellulose, ethyl cellulose, ethyl methyl cellulose, crosslinked sodium carboxymethylcellulose, low molecular weight carboxymethylcellulose, and enzymatically hydrolyzed carboxymethylcellulose. In a preferred embodiment, said one or more additional herbicides are selected from the group comprising acetochlor, acifluorfen, aclonifen, acrolein, AKH 7088, aiachlor, alloxidim, ametrin, amicarbazone, amidosulfuron, amitroi, ammonium sulfamate, anilofos, asulam, atrazine, azafenidin, azimsulfuron, BAS 625 H, beflubutamid, benazoline, benfluralin, benfuresate, bensulfuron-methyl, bensulide, bentazone, benzofenap, benzobicyclon, bicyclopyrone, bifenox, bilanafos, bispiribac-sodium borax, bromacil, bromobutide, bromoxynil, butachlor, butafenacil, butamifos, butralin, butroxydim, butylate, cafenstrol, carbetamide, carfentrazone-ethyl, chloramben, chlorbromuron, chlorflurenol-methyl, chloridazone, chlorimuron-ethyl, acid chloroacetic acid, chlorotoluron, chlorpropham, chlorsulfuron, chlorthal-dimethyl, chlorthiamid, cinidon-ethyl, cinmethylin, cinosulfuron, clethodim, clodinafop-propargyl, clomazone, clomeprop, clopyralid, chloransulam-methyl, cumiluron, cyanazine, cycloate, cyclosulfamuron, cycloxlidim, cyhalofop-butyl, 2,4-D, daimuron, daiapon, dazomet, 2,4-DB, desmedipham, dicamba, diclobenyl, dichlorprop diciorprop-P, diclofop-metiio, diclosulam, metüsulfato de difenzoquat, diflufenican, diflufenzopir, dimefuron, dimepiperate, dimetachlor, dimetamethrin, dimetenamid, dimetipin, ácido dimeíüarsinico, dinitramina, dinoterb, difenamid, dibromide de diquat, ditiopir, diuron, DNOC, endotai, EPTC, esprocarb, etalfluralin, etametsulfuron-metilo, etofumesato, 5 etoxisulfuron, etobenzanid, fenoxaprop-P-eiilo, fentrazamida, fenuron, sulfato ferroso, Hamprop-M, flazasulfuron, florasulam, fluazifop-butiio, fluazifop-P-butilo, fluazoate, flucarbazone-sodium, fluchloralin, flufenacet, flumetsulam, flumictarac-pentyl, flumioxazin, fluometuron, fluoroglicofen-ethyl, flupropanate, flupirsulfuron-methyl-sodium, flurenol, fluridona, ffurochloridona, fluroxypir, flurtamona, Hutiacet-methiol, fomesafen, fosamine, glufosinate-10 ammonium, glyphosate, halauxifen, halauxifen-metita, halosulfuran-methylo, haloxifop, HC-252, hexazinona, imazametabenz-methylo, imazamox, imazapic, ímazapir, imazaquin, imazetapir,imazosulfuron, indanofan, iodosulfuron-methyl-sodium, ioxinil, isoproturon, isouron, isoxaben, isoxachlortol, isoxaflutoi, lactofen, lumber, linuron, MCPA, MCPAthioethyl, MCPB, mecoprop, mecoprop-P, mefenacet, mefluidide, mesotrione, metam, 15 meiamitron, metazachlor, metabenzthiazuron, methylarsonic acid, methyldimron, methyl isothiocyanate, methobenzuron, metobromuron, metolachlor, S-metolachlor, metosulam, metoxuron, metribuzin, metsulfuron-methyl, MK-616, MKH 6561, mofinate, monolinuron, naproanilide, napropamide, naptalam, neburon, nicosulfuron, nonanoic acid, norflurazon, oleic acid (fatty acids), orbencarb, oryzalin, oxadiargyl, oxadiazon, 20 oxasulfuron, oxaziclomefone, oxyfluorfen, paraquat dichloride, pebulate, pelargonic acid, pendimethalin, pentadorophenol, pentanochlor, pentoxazone, petroleum oils, phenmedipham, picforam, picalinafen, piperofos, pretilachlor, primísulfuron-methyl, prodiamine, prometan, prometan, propactar, propanil, prapaquízafop, propazine, profam,propisoctar, propyzamide, prosulfocarb, prosulfuron, piraflufen-ethyl, pirasuifotol, pyrazolinate, 25 pyrazosulfuron-etiio, pyrazoxifen, piribenzoxim, piributicarb, pyridafol, pyridate, piriminobac-, frQicin / iznz / B / YiAi methyl, pyritiobac-sodium, quinclorac, quinmerac, quinoclamine, quizalofop, quizalofop-P, rimsulfuron, sethoxydim, siduron, simazine, symmetry, sodium chlorate, sulcotrione, sulfentrazone, sulfometuron-methyl, sulfosulfuron, sulfuric acid, coal tar oils, 2,3,6-TBA, TCA-sodium, tebutam, tebutiuron, tefuryltrione, tembotrione, tepraloxydim, 5 terbaciio, terbumeton, terbuiilazine, terbutrin, tenylchlor, thiazopyr, tifensulfuron-methyl, thiobencarb, thiocarbaziio, tolpyralate, topramezone, tralcoxydim, tri-alate, triasulfuron, triazilam, tribenuron-methyl, triclopyr, trietazine, trifluralin, triflusulfuron-methyl, and vernolate. In a preferred embodiment, said one or more additional insecticides are selected from the group comprising 5-(2-chloropyrid-5-ylmethyl)-3-methyl-4-nitroiminoperhydro-1,3,5-oxadiazine, 5-(2-chlorothiazo-5-ylmethyl)-3-methyl-4-nitroiminoperhydro-1,3,5-oxadiazine, 3-methyl-4-nitroimino-5-(1-oxido-3-pyridinomethyl)perhydro-1,3,5-oxadiazine, 5-(2-chloro-1-oxido-5-pyridiniomethyl)-3-methyl-4-nitroiminoperhydro-1,3,5-oxadiazine, 3-methyl-5(2-methylpyrid-5-ylmethyl)-4-nitroiminoperhydro-1,3,5-oxadiazine, and methoxam. (CAS RN 153719-23-4), acetamiprid ((E)-N-[(6-chloro-3-pyridinyl)methyl]-N'-cyano-N-methyleneimidamide, CAS RN 135410-20-7), imidacloprid (1-[(6-chlorO“3“pyridin¡l)met¡!]-Nnítro-2imidazolidinimime, CAS RN 138261-41-3), nitenpyram (N-[(6-chloro-3-pyridinyl)methyl]-N-ethiiN-metjl^-nitro-U-ethenediamine, CAS RN 120738-89-8), clothianidin (TI-435; 210880-92-5), dinotefuran (N-methyl-N'-nitro-N”-[(tetrahydro-3-furanyl)methyl)]guanidine; CAS RN 165252-70-0) malathion (CAS RN 121-75-5), aldicarb (CAS RN 116-06-3), carbaryl (CAS RN 63-25-2), carbofuran (CAS RN 1563-66-2), oxamil (CAS RN 23135-22-0) and thiodicarb (CAS RN 59669-26-0). In a preferred embodiment, said one or more additional fungicides are selected from the group comprising respiration inhibitors selected from frQicm / ιζηζ / Β / γΐΛΐ grupo que comprende azoxystrobin, dimoxyslrobin, enestroburin, íluoxastrobin, kresoximmetilo, metominostrobin, orisastrobin, picoxi-strobin, piradosirobin, pirametostrobin, piraoxistrobin, piribencarb, trifloxistrobin, (2-cloro-5[1-(3-metilbenc¡l-oxHmino)-ethyl]bencii)carbamato de metilo, 2(2-(3-(2,6-di-clorofenil)-1”metil-alilidene-aminooxi-metil)-fenil)-2- 5 metoxiimino-N-metil-acetamida, famoxadona, fenamidona, benodanilo, bixafen, boscaiid, carboxin, fenfuram, fenhexamid, fluopiram, flutolanilo, furametpyr, isopirazam, isotianilo, mepronilo, oxicarboxin, penflufen, pentiopyrad, sedaxane, tecloftalam, tifluz-amida, tiadinilo, 2-am¡no-4-niethyl-t¡azol-5-carbox-anilida, N~(3'14',5'-tri-fluoro-bi~phenyl-2-yl)~3~dífluoro~ methyl-1~methyl-1 H-pyrazol~4-carboxamida, N-(4-lri-fluoro-methyl-thiobi-phenyl-2-yl)-3-difluoromethfl- 10 1-methyl-1 H-pyrazol-4-carboxamide, N-(2-(1 ,3,3-trimethyli-butyl)-phenyl)-1,3-dimethyl-5-fluoro-1 Hpirazol-4-carboxamida, cyazofamid, amisulbrom, diflumetorim, binapacriio,dinobuton, dinocap, fluazinam, nitrtal-isopropyl, tecnazen, ferimzone, fentin salts, ametoctradin, and siltiofam; inhibitors of ester biosynthesis! (SBI fungicides) selected from the group comprising azaconazole, bitertanol, bromuconazole, cyproconazole, difenoconazole, diniconazole, diniconazol-M, epoxiconazole, fenbuconazole, fluquinconazole flusilazole, flutriafol, hexaconazole, imibenconazole, ipconazoi, metconazole, myclobutanil, paclobutrazol, penconazole, propiconazoi, prothio-conazole, simeconazole, tebuconazole, tetraconazo!, triadimefon, triadimenol, triticonazole, uniconazole, imazalil, pefurazoate, oxpoconazo!, prochloraz, triflumizo!, fenarimol, nuarimol, pirifenox, triforina, aldimorf, 20 dodemorf, dodemorf-acetate, fenpropimorph, tridemorph, fenpropidin, piperalin, spiroxamine, fenhexamid, benalaxyl, benalaxyl-M, kiralaxil, metalaxyl, metalaxyl-M (mefenoxam), ofurace, oxadixil, himexazole, octylinone, oxolinic acid, bupirimate, benomyl, carbendazim, fuberidazole,thiabendazole, thiophanato-methiio, 5-chloro-7(4-methyl-piperidin-1-yl)-6-(2,4,6trifluorophenyl)-[1,2,4]tri-azolo-[1,5a]pyrimidine, dietophencarb, etaboxam, pencicuron, 25 metraphenone, cyprodinyl, mepanipyrim,; nitrapyrine, pyrimethanol, blasticidin-S, kasugamycin, kasugamycin hydrochloride, miidiomycin, streptomycin, oxytetracycline, poioxine, validamycin A, fluoroimid, iprodione, procymidone, vinclozoin, fenpiclonil, fidioxonil, quinoxyfen, edifenfos, iprobenfos, pyrazofos, isoprothiolane, dichloran, quintozene, tecnazene, tolclofos-methyl, biphenyl, chloroneb, etridiazole, dimethomorph, flumorph, 5-mandiproamid, pirimorph, bentiavalicarb, iprovalicarb, piribencarb, N-(1-(1-(4-cyanophenyl)-ethansulfanyl)-but-2-ii)carbamic acid ester (4-fluorophenyl), propamocarb, propamocarb hydrochloride, Bordeaux mixture, acetate of copper, copper hydroxide, copper oxychloride, basic copper sulfate, ferbam, mancozeb, maneb, metam, metasulfocarb, metiram, propineb, tiram, zineb, ziram, anilazine, ctorotaionyl, captafol, captan, folpet, diclofluanid, dichlorophen, flusulfamide, hexachlorobenzene, pentachlorophenol and its salts, phthalate, tolylfluanid, N-(4-chloro-2-nitrophenyl)-N-ethyl-4-methylbenzenesulforamide, guanidine, dodine,Dodine-free base, guazatine, guazatine-acetate, iminoctadine, iminoctadine triacetate, iminoctadine-tris(albesilate), validamycin, polyoxin B, pyroquiion, tricyclazole, carpropamide, dicyclomet, phenoxanil, acibenzolar-S-methyl, probenazole, isotianyl, thiadinyl, 15-prohexadione-calcium, fosetyl, fosetyl-aluminum, phosphorous acid and its salts, bronopol, chinomethionate, cyflufenamid, cymoxanil, dazomet, debacarb, diclomezine, difenzoquat, difenzoquat-methyl sulfoate, difeniiamin, fluumetover, flusulfamide, flutianyl, metasulfocarb, natamycin, oxin-copper, proquinazid, tebufloquine, teclophthalam triazoxide, 2-butox!-6-yoclo3-propylchromen-4-one, N-(cyclo-propy!methoxyimino-(6~difluoro-methoxy-2,3-difluoro-phenyl)-20 methyl)-2-phenyl acetamide, N'-(4-(4-chloro-34rifluoromethyl-phenoxy)-2,5-dimethyl-phenyl)-N-ethii-N methyl formamidine,N ~(2~methyl·5-tlΊfluoΓomephyl-4-(3-tΓ!methyl-silanyl·propoxy)-phenyl)-N-eth!lN~methyl formamidine, N'-(5-difluoromethyl-2 methyl-4-(3-tri-methylsilanii-ethylphenylformylene)N-meth¡-) methyl-(1,2,3,4-tetrah¡dro-naphthalen-1-yl)-acid amlda 2-{Ί-[2-(5-methi!~3~ 25 trifluoromethyl-pyrazol-1-¡l)-acetyl]-piperidin-4-yl}-2,2,iazole(R3,4-carboxtii tephrahydro-naphthalene-1-Acid lamide 2~{1-[2-(5~πΐθίίΙ-3-ίπΐΙυοΓθπιβίίΙ-ρίΓ3ζοΙ-1-ίΙ)-3θβίίΙ-3θβίίΙ-}p!4-periticara¡n-4-il ester e-terc-butii-e-fluora-ZS-dimethyl-quinoHn-í-íhco of methoxy-acetic acid, N-methyl-2-{1-[(5-me¢¡l-3-trifluoro-met¡l·1H-pyrazol-1-ίi)acetyl[N“1-1Q)-p ,2,3,4“tetrah!dro-naphthalene-1-yl]-4“thiazolcarbox¡da, 3[5-(4-chloro-fers¡l)-2,3“ 5 dimethyl-isoxazolidine-3-ylj-pyridine, 3-[5-(4”methylfenyl,ethyl ester)~methyl-pyridine S-allylic acid 5-amino-2-iso-propyl-3-oxo-4-ortho-tolyl-2,3-dihydro-pyrazol-1carbothioic, N-(6-methoxy-pyridin-3-yl)cyclopropancarboxylic acid amide, 5-doro-1-(4,6dimethoxy~pyrimidine-2-yl)-2-met¡l-1 H-bencimidazole, 2-(4~doro-phenyl)-N-[4-(3,4-dimethoxy-phen¡l)isoxazol-S-ylJ^-prop^-amyloxycycphoroacetamide,ab ancimidol, 6- 10 benthiiaminopurine, brassinolide, butraline.ciormequat (ciormequat chloride), choline chloride, cyclanilide, daminozide, dicegulac, dimethipin, 2,6-dimethylpuridine, ethephon, flumethralin, fiurprimido, fluti-acet, forchlorfenuron, gibberellic acid, inabenfide, indole-3-acetic acid, maleic hydrazide, mefiuidida, mepiquat (mepiquat chloride), naphthaleneacetic acid, N-6-benzyladenine, paclobutrazol, prohexadione (prohexadione-calcium), prohydrojasmona, 15-thidiazuron, triapentenol, tributyl phosphorotrithioate, 2,3,5-triiodobenzoic acid, trinexapac-ethyl and uniconazole, and biological control antifungal agents.While compositions comprising choline phosphonate and at least one additional fungicide selected from the group comprising quinone fungicides, succinate dehydrogenase inhibitors, benzamide fungicides, sulfur fungicides, carboxylic acid amide fungicides, demethylation inhibitor fungicides, phenylamide fungicides, copper fungicides, piperidinyl thiazol isoxazoline fungicides and sugar alcohols according to the first aspect of the invention and also one or more additional pesticides such as other fungicides, insecticides, herbicides or other additional active pesticide ingredients were described above, the person skilled in the art will appreciate that the invention extends to various combinations. Additional froicin / iznz / B / YiAi comprising the above mixtures. For the avoidance of doubt, even if not explicitly stated here, the mixing partners may also be in the form of any suitable agrochemically acceptable ester or salt, as mentioned, for example, in The Pesticide Manual, thirteenth edition, British Crop Protection Council, 2003. Suitable agricultural adjuvants and carriers that are useful for formulating the compositions of the invention in the formulation types described above are well known to those skilled in the art. Suitable examples of the different classes are found in the following non-limiting lists. Liquid carriers that may be employed include water and one or more solvents selected from the group comprising toluene, xylene, petroleum naphtha, p-diethylbenzene, isopropylbenzene, m-xylene, o-xylene, p-xylene; cyclohexane, hexadecane, isooctane, n-hexane; paraffin oil, mineral oil, cultivation oil; chlorobenzene, 1,2-dichloropropane, 1,1-trichloroethane, methylene chloride, trichloroethylene, perchloroethylene; alpha-pinene, d-limonene; ester derivatives and lactic acid, such as methyl lactate, ethyl lactate, butyl lactate, 2-ethylhexyl lactate; octadecanoic acid, oleic acid, propionic acid, xylenesulfonic acid and their ester forms; cyclohexanol, diacetone alcohol, diethylene glycol, dipropylene glycol, 2-ethylhexanol, ethylene glycol, phenol, polyethylene glycol (PEG400), propylene glycol, triethylene glycol, methanol, ethanol, isopropanol and high molecular weight alcohols such as amyl alcohol, tetrahydrofurfuryl alcohol, hexanol, octanol, ethylene glycol, propylene glycol, glycerol, benzyl alcohol; acetone, methyl ethyl ketone, cyclohexanone, acetophenone, 2-butanone, 2-heptanone, gamma-butyrolactone, glycerol, isophorone, mesityl oxide, methyl isoamyl ketone, methyl isobutyl ketone;diethylene glycol butyl ether, diethylene glycol ethyl ether, 1,4-dioxane, dipropylene glycol methyl ether, 25 propylene glycol ethers (diproxitol), ethylene glycol butyl ether, ethylene glycol methyl ether, froicin / iznz / B / YiAi methoxy propanol, propylene glycol monomethyl ether; alkyl acetates such as ethyl acetate, propyl acetate, n-butyl acetate, amyl acetate, isoamyl acetate, isobomyl acetate, octylamine acetate, glycerol monoacetate, glycerol diacetate, glycerol triacetate, 2-ethylhexyl stearate, methyl oleate, n-butyl oleate, isopropyl myristate, methyl laurate, methyl ocyanoate, diethylene glycol abiate, dipropylene glycol dibenzoate, propylene glycol dioleate, dioctyl succinate, dibutyl adipate, dioctyl phthalate, triethyl phosphate, dibasic esters (dimethyl glutarate + dimethyl succinate + dimethyl adipate), butyl benzoate;ethylene carbonate, propylene carbonate and butylene carbonate; diethanolamine, laurylamine, n-octylamine, oleylamine; N,N-dimethyl alkylamides such as N,N-dimethylformamide, N,N-dimethylacetamide, N,N-dimethyloctane / decanamide, N,N-dimethyldecanamide, N,N-dimethyldodecanamide, dimethyl lactamide; methyl 5-(dimethylamino)-4-methyl-5-oxopentanoate; alkylpyrrolidinumones, such as N-methyl-2-pyrrolidinum, N-ethyl-2-pyrrolidinum; dimethyl sulfoxide; acetonitrile; acetic anhydride; and similar oils, soybean oil, rapeseed oil, sunflower seed oil, corn oil, cottonseed oil, linseed oil, safflower oil, olive oil, peanut oil, castor oil, palm oil, coconut oil, sesame oil, tung oil, and similar oils; esters of the above vegetable oils and similar oils. Water is generally the carrier of choice for diluting concentrates. Suitable solid carriers include talc, titanium dioxide, pyrophyllite clay, silica, kaolin clay, attapulgite clay, kieselghur, chalk, diatomaceous earth, lime, montmorillonite clay, lime, calcium carbonate, bentonite clay, fuller's earth, cottonseed hulls, wheat flour, soybean meal, pumice, wood flooring, nutshell meal, lignin, cellulose, and the like. A wide range of surfactants are used appropriately. both in such liquid and solid compositions, especially those designed to be diluted with a carrier before application. Surfactants, also known as surface-active agents, are compounds that reduce the surface tension (or interfacial tension) between two liquids or between a liquid and a solid. Surfactants can be anionic, cationic, nonionic, or polymeric and can act as detergents, wetting agents, emulsifiers, foaming agents, and dispersants. Many organic compounds exhibit some surfactant properties; however, specifically for the purposes of the invention, nonionic surfactants can be used. These include fatty alcohols, such as cetyl alcohol, stearyl alcohol, and cetostearyl alcohol (which consists predominantly of cetyl and stearyl alcohols), and oleyl alcohol;but also polyethylene glycol alkyl ethers such as octaethylene glycol monododecyl ether and pentaethylene glycol monododecyl ether; polypropylene glycol alkyl ethers; polyethylene glycol-polypropylene glycol alkyl ethers; glucoside alkyl ethers such as 15-decyl glucoside, lauryl glucoside and octyl glucoside; octylphenol ethers of polyethylene glycol; nonylphenol ethers of polyethylene glycol; tributylphenyl ethers of polyethylene glycol; polyethylene glycol tristyrylphenol ethers; polyethylene glycol-polypropylene glycol tristyrylphenol ethers; glycerol alkyl esters such as glyceryl urate; alkyl esters of polyoxyethylene glycol sorbitan, such as polysorbates; alkyl esters of 20 sorbitan, such as spans, cocamide MEA or DEA, dodecyl dimethylamine oxide; block copolymers of polyethylene glycol and polypropylene glycol, such as poloxamers; polyethoxylated tallow amine (POEA);vegetable oil ethoxylates, such as castor oil ethoxylates, rapeseed oil ethoxylates, soybean oil ethoxylates; and the like, alkyl sulfate salts, such as diethanolammonium lauryl sulfate; 25-alkylaryl sulfonate salts, such as calcium dodecylbenzenesulfonate; soaps, such as; sodium stearate; alkylnaphthalenesulfonate salts, such as sodium dibutylnaphthalenesulfonate; dialkyl esters of sulfosuccinate salts, such as sodium di(2-ethylhexyl)sulfosuccinate; mono- and dialkyl phosphate ester salts; quaternary amines, such as lauryl trimethylammonium chloride and the like. The compositions can be formulated with liquid and solid fertilizers, such as particulate fertilizers like ammonium nitrate, urea and the like. In a preferred embodiment, the fungicidal composition according to the first aspect of the present invention further comprises one or more compounds that function to improve crop plant compatibility, selected from the group comprising 4-dichloroacetyl-1-oxa-4-aza-spiro[4.5]-decane (AD-67, MON-4660), 1-dichloroacetylhexahydro-3,3,8a-trimethylpyrrolo[1,2-a]-pyriridin-6(2H)one (dicyclonon, BAS-145138), 4-dichloroacetyl-3,4-dihydro-3-methyl-2H-1,4-benzoxazine (benoxacor), 1-methylhexyl S-chloroquinolin-S-oxyacetate (cyanoquintocet-methylhexyl) - see also related compounds in EP-A-86750, EP-A-94349, EP-A-191736, EP-A15 492366) 4-(2,4-dichloro-phenoxy)butyric (2,4-DB), 1-(1-methyl-1-phenyl-ethyl)-3-(4-methyl-phenyl)-urea (daimuron, dimron), 3,6-dichloro~2-methoxy-benzoic acid (dicamba),S-1-methyl-1-phenylethyl piperidin-1-thiocarboxylate (dimepiperate), 2,2-dichloro-N-(2-oxo-2-(2-propenylamino)ethyl)-N-(2-propenyl)20 acetamide (DKA-24), 2,2-dicyro-N,N-di-2-propenyl-acetamide (dichlormid), 4,6-dichloro-2-phenylpyrimidine (fenchlorim), ethyl 1-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-5-trichloromethyl-1H-1,2,4-triazol-3-carboxylate (fenclorazol-ethyl—see also related compounds in EP-A-174562 and EP-A-346620), phenylmethyl 2-chloro-4-trifluoromethylthiazol-5-carboxylate (flurazole), 4-chloro-N-(1,3-dioxolan-24l-methoxy)-a-trifluoroacetophenone oxime (fluxofenim), 3-dichloroacetyl·, 5-(2-furanyl)-2,2-dimethyl-oxazolidine (furylazol, MON-13900), 4,5-dihydro-5,5-diphenyl-333 isoxazolecarboxilato de ethyl (isoxadifen-etil—also also related compounds in WO-A-95 / 07897), 3,6-dícloro-2-metoxibenzoato de 1-(etoxicarbonyl)-eiilo (laciidiclor), ácido (4-cloro-o-tilyloxi)-aceetic (MORA), ácido 2-(4-cloro-o-tolyloxi)-propionico (mecoprop), 1-(2,4-dichloro-phenyl)-4,5-dichloro-5-metyl-1H-pirazol-3,5-dicarboxyl-5 (mefenpir-dietil) also related compounds WO-A-91 / 07874) (oxabetrinil), 2,2-dicloro-N-(1,3-dioxolan-2-yl-metil)-N-(2-propenil)-acetamide (PPG-1292), S-dicloroacet^^-dimethyl-oxazolidina (R-28725), 3-dicloroaceti!- 10 2,2,5-tnmetil-oxazolidina (R-29148)1-(2-chloro-phenyl)-5-phenyl-1H-pyrazol-3-methyl carboxylate, 1-(2,4dichloro-phenyl)-5-methyl-1 H-pyrazol-3-ethyl carboxylate, 1-(2,4-d!chloro-phenyl)“5-isopropyl·1 Hpyrazol-3-ethyl carboxylate, 1-(2,4-dichloro-phenyl)-5-(1,1-dimethyl-ethyl)-1 H-pyrazol-3- 15 ethyl carboxylate, 1 -(2,4-άΐεΙθΓθ-ΐθηίΙ)-5-ίθηίΙ-1 H-pyrazol-3-ethyl carboxylate (see also compounds related in EP-A-269806 and EP-A-333131), 5-(2,4-dichlorobencyl)-2-isoxazolin-3-ethyl carboxylate, 5-phenyl-2-isoxazolin-3-ethyl carboxylate, 5-(4fíuoro-phenyl)-5-phenyl-2-isoxazolin-3-carboxylate of ethyl (see also related components in WO-A-91 / 08202), 5-chloro-quinolin-S-oxy-acetate of 1,3-dimethyl-but-l-yl, 5- 20 chloro-quinolin-8-oxy-acetate de 4-aliloxy-butyl, 5-chloro-quinolin~8-oxy~acetate de 1-aliloxiprop-2-yl, 5-chloro-quinoxalin-8-oxi-acetato de methylo, 5-chloro-quinolin-8-oxi-acetato de ethylo, 5-chloro-quinoxalin-8-oxi-acetato de alilo, 5-chloro~quinolin-8-oxi-acetato de 2-oxoprop-1-yl,diethyl 5-chloroquinolin-8-oxymalonate, diallyl 5-chloroquinoxalin-8-oxymalonate, diethyl 5-chloroquinolin-8-oxymalonate (see also related compounds 25 in EP-A-582198), 4-carboxychroman-4-ylacetic acid (AC-304415, see, EP-A-613618), 4-chlorophenoxyacetic acid, 3,3-dimethyl-4-meloxybenzophenone, 1-bromo4-chloromethylsulfonylbenzene, 1-[4-(N-2-methoxybenzoylsulfamoyl)-phenyl]-3-methylurea (aka N(2-methoxybenzoyl)-4-[(methylaminocarbonyl)-amino]-bencensulfonamida)> 1-[4-(N-2-methoxybenzoylsulfamoyl)-phenyl]-3,3-dimethylurea, 1-4-(N-4,5-dimethylbenzoylsulfamoyl)-phenyl]-3-methylurea, 1-[4-(N-naphthylsulfamoyl)phenyl]-3,3“d¡metil“Urea, and N-(2methoxy5-met¡l·benzoyl)-4(cyclopropylaminocarbonyl)-bencensulfonam!da.A second aspect of the present invention provides a kit comprising one or more spatially separated components to be used as a fungicidal composition, comprising as component (A) a fungicidally active amount of choline phosphonate and as component (B) at least one additional fungicide selected from the group comprising quinone fungicides, succinate dehydrogenase inhibitors, benzamide fungicides, sulfur fungicides, carboxylic acid amide fungicides, demethylation inhibitor fungicides, phenylamide fungicides, copper fungicides, piperidinyl thalazol isoxazoline fungicides and sugar alcohols, the components of which are for simultaneous, separate or sequential use.In a preferred embodiment, the present invention provides a kit according to the second aspect of the invention, comprising one or more spatially separated components with a fungicidal composition according to the first aspect of the present invention. A kit according to the embodiments of the second aspect of the present invention allows for the flexible and modular control of unwanted vegetation. In particular, the uses of such a kit include the simultaneous, separate, or sequential use of the fungicidal components. In certain embodiments, the use of a kit according to the second aspect of the invention... > The invention involves the separate application of the kit components, or the use of a mixture of one or more kit components, for example, such as tank mixes. In one configuration, the kit can be used sequentially, or in sequence, with different fungicidal components. This allows for the application of several components over different periods, possibly multiple times. As a result, for example, one or more fungicidal components can be applied to one or more crops before fungal infection or at an early stage of fungal infection, while one or more other kit components can only be applied later. However, a user can still provide a combined formulation, such as a ready-to-use formulation, for the purpose of applying the fungicidal components together, either in a prescribed, desired, or adapted weight ratio. The use of a kit according to the second aspect of the present invention allows for a high degree of control. This has the advantage that a user can adjust the applied quantity, dosage, and / or composition of one or more fungicidal components and / or a combined formulation thereof as desired, for example, depending on the relative amount of specific undesirable vegetation. A third aspect of the present invention provides for the use of a fungicidal composition according to the first aspect of the present invention to control one or more types of fungal infections by applying the fungicidal composition to the fungal infections. The fungicidal composition according to the first aspect of the present invention has very good fungicidal properties and can be used to control fungal infections caused by phytopathogenic fungi. The fungicidal composition according to the first aspect of the present invention can be used, for example, in relation to one or more of the following frQicm / ιζηζ / Β / γΐΛΐ phytopathogenic fungi: Plasmopara viticola, Sphaerotheca fuliginea, Erysife necator, Ventaría inaequalis, Microdochium nivale, Diplocarpon rosae, Marssonina rosae, Dipiocarpon rosae, Phytophthora cinnamomi, Podosphaera aphanis, Podosphaera xanthíi, Pseudoperonospora cubensis, Spííogea oieagina, Phytophthora infestans, Leveillula 5 taurica, Erysife lycopersica, and / or one or more species of Erísyfe, Leveillula, Microsphaera, Podosphaera, Odiurn, and Sphaerotheca. In one embodiment, the fungicidal composition according to the first aspect of the present invention can be used as a total fungicide to control fungal infections, for example, particularly in non-cultivated areas such as recreational areas like roads, squares, and also under trees and shrubs, railways, etc. The fungicidal composition according to the first aspect of the present invention is distinguished by an action that has a particularly rapid onset and lasts a long time.The fungicidal composition according to the first aspect of the present invention can be prepared by known processes, for example, by premixing applications of, for example, a ready-to-use (RTU) formulation, emulsifiable concentrate (EC) formulation, microemulsifiable concentrate, suspension concentrate (SC) formulation, oil dispersion (OD) formulation, soluble liquid (SL) formulation, wettable powder (WP) formulation, water-dispersible granule (WG) formulation, or water-soluble granule (SG) formulation, if applicable, with additional common active ingredients, additives, and / or formulation aids, combinations of which are then applied in the usual manner diluted with water, or as tank mixes by diluting components, formulated separately or partially formulated separately, with water. Split application of the individual components, formulated separately or partially, is also possible. froicin / iznz / B / YiAi formulated separately. It is also possible to use choline phosphonate or at least one additional fungicide selected from the group comprising quinone fungicides, succinate dehydrogenase inhibitors, benzamide fungicides, sulfur fungicides, carboxylic acid amide fungicides, demethylation inhibitor fungicides, phenylamide fungicides, copper fungicides, piperidinii thiazol isoxazoline fungicides and sugar alcohols or the combination of fungicides in a plurality of portions (sequential application). A preferred embodiment of the invention relates to processes for controlling fungal infections, wherein component (A) and component (B) of the fungicidal combination according to the invention are mixed only shortly before application to the fungal infections. According to the invention, “shortly before application” means that component (A) and component (B) are mixed preferably less than 6 hours, more preferably less than 3 hours, and even more preferably less than 1 hour before application to the fungal infections. Apart from that, choline phosphonate and at least one additional fungicide selected from the group comprising quinone fungicides, succinate dehydrogenase inhibitors, benzamide fungicides, sulfur fungicides, carboxylic acid amide fungicides, demethylation inhibitor fungicides, phenylamide fungicides, copper fungicides, piperidiniol, tlazol, isoxazoline fungicides, and sugar alcohols provided according to the first aspect of the present invention, can be converted together or separately into common formulations such as solutions, emulsions, suspensions, powders, foams, pastes, granules, aerosols, natural and synthetic materials impregnated with the active compound, and microencapsulations in polymeric materials. The formulations may contain the usual auxiliaries and additives. These formulations are produced in a known manner, for example, by mixing the active compounds with diluents, i.e., liquid solvents, pressurized liquefied gases, and / or solid carriers, optionally with the use of surfactants, i.e., emulsifiers, dispersants, and / or foaming agents. 5 If the diluent used is water, it is also possible to use, for example, organic solvents as auxiliary solvents. Suitable liquid solvents are essentially: aromatics such as xylene, toluene or alkylnaphthalenes, chlorinated aromatics or chlorinated aliphatic hydrocarbons such as chlorobenzenes, chloroethylenees or methylene chloride, aliphatic hydrocarbons such as cyclohexane or paraffins, for example mineral oil fractions, mineral and vegetable oils, such as soybean oil, alcohols such as butanol or glycol and the ethers and esters thereof, ketones such as acetone, methyl ethyl ketone, methyl isobutyl ketone or cidohexanone,Strongly polar solvents such as dimethylformamide or dimethyl sulfoxide and water. Useful solid carriers include: for example, ammonium salts and 15 ground natural minerals, such as kaolins, clays, talc, chalk, quartz, attapulgite, montmorillonite or diatomaceous earth and ground synthetic minerals, such as finely divided silica and hydrophobic silica, alumina and silicates; useful solid carriers for granules include: for example, crushed and fractionated natural rocks, such as calcite, marble, pumice, sepiolite, dolomite and synthetic granules of inorganic and 20 organic flours, and granules of organic material, such as sawdust, coconut husks, corn cobs and tobacco stalks; Useful emulsifiers and / or foam formers include: for example, non-ionic and anionic emulsifiers, such as polyoxyethylene fatty acid esters, polyoxyethylene fatty alcohol ethers, for example, alkylaryl polyglycol ethers,alkylsulfonates, alkyl sulfates, arylsulfonates, and hydrolysates of 25 proteins; useful dispersants include, for example, lignosulfite residual liquors, and frQicm / ιζηζ / Β / γΐΛΐ I added cellulose. Tackifying agents such as carboxymethylcellulose, natural and synthetic polymers in the form of powders, granules, or latex, such as gum arabic, polyvinyl alcohol, and polyvinyl acetate, or natural phospholipids such as cephalins and lecithins and synthetic phospholipids, can be used in the formulations. Other additives may include mineral and vegetable oils. Colorants such as inorganic pigments, for example, iron oxide, titanium oxide, and Prussian blue, and organic colorants such as alizarin dyes, azo dyes, and metallic phthalocyanine dyes, and trace elements such as salts of iron, manganese, boron, copper, cobalt, molybdenum, and zinc, can be used. Preferably, the formulations comprise between 0.1 and 99.9% by weight of active compound, preferably between 0.15 and 95% by weight, and preferably between 0.2 and 90% by weight.15 In a preferred embodiment of use according to the third aspect of the present invention, said fungicidal composition is applied to one or more crops to control one or more types of fungal infections, wherein the fungicidal composition is reapplied at specified time intervals of 1 day to 50 days, more preferably from 2 to 40 days and more preferably from 5 to 23 days until harvest of said one or more crops. In preferred embodiments, the crops selected are apple, cucumber, strawberry, grape, potato, and / or tomato. In a preferred embodiment of use according to the third aspect of the present invention, said fungicidal composition is applied by spraying, misting, showering, spritzing, droplet spreading, irrigation, atomizing, splashing, dispersing, diffusing, spreading, and / or showering. In a preferred embodiment of use according to the third aspect of the present invention, said fungicidal composition is applied at a target dose rate of 5 to 10,000 g, more preferably 150 to 9,000 g, even more preferably 250 to 8,000 g, even more preferably 350 to 7,000 g, even more preferably 5,400 to 6,000 g, even more preferably 450 to 5,000 g, and most preferably 500 to 4,000 g of choline phosphonate per hectare of land and 5 to 10,000 g, more preferably 10 to 9,000 g, even more preferably 20 to 8,000 g, even more preferably 25 to 7,000 g, even more preferably 30 to 6,000 g, even more preferably 35 to 5,500 g, and most preferably 40 to 5000 g of at least one additional fungicide selected from the group comprising quinone fungicides, succinate dehydrogenase inhibitors, benzamide fungicides, sulfur fungicides, carboxylic acid amide fungicides,Demethylation inhibitor fungicides, phenylamide fungicides, copper fungicides, piperidinyl thalazole isoxazoline fungicides, and sugar alcohols per hectare of land. Such quantities of choline phosphonate and at least one additional fungicide selected from the group comprising quinone fungicides, succinate dehydrogenase inhibitors, benzamide fungicides, sulfur fungicides, carboxylic acid amide fungicides, demethylation inhibitor fungicides, phenylamide fungicides, copper fungicides, piperidinyl thalazole isoxazoline fungicides, and sugar alcohols are to be interpreted as quantities of active substance, i.e., as quantities of 100% active substance. Within such target dose rate ranges,The composition comprising choline phosphonate and at least one of said additional fungicides can be used to control a relatively broad spectrum of fungal infections. The fungicidal composition according to the first aspect of the present invention can be used as such, in the form of its formulations or in the forms of use, Froicin / iznz / B / YiAi prepared from the same by further dilution, such as solutions, suspensions, emulsions, powders, pastes, and granules. The fungicidal composition according to the first aspect of the present invention can be applied in the form of finished formulations. However, the active compounds contained in the fungicidal composition, as individual formulations, can also be mixed prior to use, i.e., applied in the form of tank mixes or a tank blend. In a preferred embodiment of use according to the third aspect of the present invention, said fungicidal composition is applied as a tank mix, wherein the choline phosphonate and at least one additional fungicide selected from the group comprising quinone fungicides, succinate dehydrogenase inhibitors, benzamide fungicides, sulfur fungicides, carboxylic acid amide fungicides, demethylation inhibitor fungicides, phenylamide fungicides, copper fungicides, piperidiniol isoxazoline fungicides, and sugar alcohols are combined prior to use. In a preferred embodiment of use according to the third aspect of the present invention, the fungicidal composition is applied to a crop, preferably to the surface of a plant, more preferably to a leaf surface. In another embodiment of the present invention, the fungicidal composition is applied to plant seeds. In another embodiment of the present invention, the fungicidal composition is applied to uncultivated areas, such as, but not limited to, the soil where the target crop grows. The good fungicidal action of the fungicidal composition according to the present invention can be seen in the following examples. While the individual active compounds show weaknesses in their fungicidal action, all the combinations show very good action against fungal infections that exceeds a simple sum of their individual effects. A synergistic effect in fungicides is always present when the fungicidal action of the combination of active compounds exceeds the action of the 5 active compounds when applied individually. The expected activity of a given combination of two or three fungicides can be calculated as follows according to a calculation method by Colby (cf. COLBY, SR: “Calculating synergistic and antagonistic responses of herbicide combinations”, Weeds 15, pages 20-22, 1967): If X - % of fungicide damage (A) at an application rate of mg / ha, Y = % of damage caused by fungicide (B) at an application rate of π g / ha, E = expected damage from fungicides (A) and (B) at application rates of myn kg / ha and then for a combination: E = X + Y - (X * Y) / 100 If the actual damage exceeds the calculated value, the combination's activity is superadditive, meaning it exhibits a synergistic effect. In this case, the damage actually observed must exceed the values ​​calculated using the formulas above for the expected damage E. EXAMPLES The invention is further described by the following non-limiting examples which further illustrate the invention and are not intended, nor should they be interpreted, as limiting the scope of the invention. froicin / iznz / B / YiAi frQicm / ιζηζ / Β / γΐΛΐ EXAMPLES 1-10 The fungicidal activity of the fungicidal compositions according to the first aspect of the present invention with respect to different types of fungal infections was determined during field trials (5 field trials). The individual compositions comprising choline phosphonate and the individual compositions comprising a defined fungicide selected from the group comprising quinone fungicides, succinate dehydrogenase inhibitors, benzamide fungicides, sulfur fungicides, carboxylic acid amide fungicides, and sugar alcohols are compared with a fungicide composition according to the invention comprising both choline phosphonate and said defined fungicide.The expected activity of the combination of the active compounds choline phosphonate and a defined fungicide was calculated according to the calculation method described above by Colby, in order to assess a synergistic effect between choline phosphonate and a defined fungicide. If the actual fungicidal activity exceeds the calculated value, the activity of the combination is superadditive, i.e., it exhibits a synergistic effect. The fungicidal activity was determined by applying fungicidal compositions to crops infected with fungal infections in the fields where the crops were grown. Choline phosphonate and a defined fungicide were applied as a tank mix by blending these active compounds before use in a spray tank. The resulting mixture was in the form of a spray liquor.In addition, spray liquors of individual compositions comprising choline phosphonate and of individual compositions comprising a defined fungicide were used. The crops were sprayed with the active compound preparations so that particular desired amounts of active compounds were applied per 25 unit area. The crops were sprayed with several applications of the preparations. active compounds. The spray liquor was diluted with water to achieve an application volume of 200 to 1000 L / ha. On a specific number of days after a last application (DA-An; with DA referring to days after and An referring to a specific application, n being a positive integer), the degree of damage to fungal infections was evaluated. Example 1 relates to a fungicidal composition comprising a combination of choline phosphonate and valifenalate, which was applied to European grapevine (Vitis vinifera var. Chardonnay) infected with downy mildew (Piasmopara viticola), according to the trial conditions mentioned above. The results according to Example 1 are shown in Table 1. Table 1 - Results of the Example 1 trial, showing the fungicidal effect (fe) against Piasmopara viticola of a fungicidal composition according to the first aspect of the present invention comprising choline phosphonate (CP) and valifenalate (VAL), referred to as 'CP + VAL', compared to fungicidal compositions comprising CP or VAL individually. The fungicidal composition was applied to Vitis vinifera var. Chardonnay (the crop) infected with Piasmopara viticola. The data shown are average values ​​of Fe observed for 100 leaves of Vitis vinifera var. Chardonnay or 50 clusters of Vitis vinifera var. Chardonnay.The fungicidal effect, for example, was evaluated according to two different assessment protocols: (i) 100 leaves per plot of uniform age, or the leaves of 50 bunches, were inspected on both the upper and lower sides for infection with Piasmopara viticola, with the number of infected leaves expressed as a percentage (PESINC), and (ii) 100 leaves per plot, or the leaves of 50 bunches, of uniform age were inspected on both the upper and lower sides for infection with Piasmopara viticola, with the leaf surface area of ​​the infected leaves expressed as a percentage (PESSEV). The effect. > ω N C The synergistic N of CP + VAL is evaluated by comparing it with the expected Fe of the combination of active compounds calculated according to the Colby calculation method described above. The tests were carried out in South Africa and the crops were sprayed with several applications of the active compound preparations, according to the following scheme: A1 (first application), A2 - A1 + 14 days, A3 - A2 + 13 days, A4 - A3 + 14 days and A5 ~ A4 + 11 days. Evaluation protocol / Sample size (# of leaves or bunches) / DA-A3* / Crop growth stage CP (g ac** / ha) CP fe (%) VAL (g ac / ha) VAL fe (%) CP + VAL (g ac CP* / ha + Q VAL H3 ) CP + VAL fe (%) Colb and fe( %) PESSEV / 100 leaves / 14 DA-A3 / BBCH 77 1620 83.8 120 66.9 1200* + 120* 99.7 94.6 PESSEV / 50 bunches / 14 DA-A3 / BBCH 77 1620 34.1 120 75.9 1200* + 120* 93.7 84.1 PESSEV / 50 bunches / 14 DA-A5 / 1620 32.5 120 73.3 1200* + 120* 91.4 82.0 froicin / iznz / B / YiAi BBCH 83 PESINC / 100 sheets / 14 DA-A3 i BBCH 77 1620 74.5 120 57.6 1200^+120* 91.5 89.2 PESINC / 50 bunches / 14 DA-A3 / BBCH 77 1620 7.2 120 64.0 1200* +120* 86.5 66.6 PESINC / 50 bunches / 14 DA-A5 / / BBCH 83 1620 8.2 120 53.6 1200* + 120* 80.9 57.4 * DA-An = days after the last application (with DA referring to days after and An referring to a specific application, n being a positive integer); ** ac ~ active compound Example 2 refers to a fungicidal composition comprising a combination of choline phosphonate and valifenalate, which was applied to cucumber (Cucumis sativo) infected with cucumber downy mildew (Peronospora cumensis), according to the test conditions mentioned above. The results according to Example 2 are shown in Table 2. Table 2 - Results of the Example 2 test, showing the fungicidal effect (fe) against Peronospora cumensis of a fungicidal composition according to the first aspect of the present invention comprising choline phosphonate (CP) and valifenalate (VAL), referred to as 'CP + VAL', compared to fungicidal compositions comprising CP or VAL individually. The fungicidal composition was applied to Cucumis sativa (the crop) infected with Peronospora cumensis. The data shown are average values ​​of fe observed for 20 leaves from a plot. The fungicidal effect fe was evaluated according to the following evaluation protocols: crops of uniform age were inspected for infection by Peronospora cumensis, with the surface area of ​​the infected crops expressed as a percentage (PESSEV). The synergistic effect of CP + VAL is evaluated by comparing it with the feexpected from the combination of active compounds calculated according to the Colby calculation method indicated above. The tests were carried out in France and the crops were sprayed with several applications of the active compound preparations, according to the following scheme: A1 (first application), A2 - A1 + 7 days, A3 = A2 + 7 days and A4 = A3 + 8 days. evaluation protocol / DA-An* / crop growth stage CP (g ac** / ha) CP fe (%) VAL (g ac / ha) VAL fe (%) CP + VAL (g ac CP* / ha + g ac VALVha) CP + VAL fe (%) Colb and fe( %) PESSEV / 7 DA-A1 / BBCH 16 1500 78.1 150 43.6 1500* + 150* 96.3 87.7 PESSEV / 6 DA-A2 / BBCH 19 1500 63.8 150 31.7 1500* + 150* 88.3 75.3 PESSEV / 8 DA-A3 / BBCH 19 1500 63.9 150 31.7 1500*+150* 88.3 75.3 PESSEV / 7 DA-A4 / 1500 73.8 150 62.1 1500* 150* 96.6 90.1 > ω N C N BBCH 19 PESSEV / 14 DA-A4 / BBCH 19 1500 60.1 150 27.0 1500*+150* 85.8 70.9 * DA-An = days after the last application (with DA referring to days after and An referring to a specific application, n being a positive integer); “ ac = active compound Example 3 refers to a fungicidal composition comprising a combination of choline phosphonate and sulfur, which was applied to cucumber crops (Cucumis sativus var. Sosco) infected with bean powdery mildew (Sphaerotheca fuliginea), according to the test conditions mentioned above. The results according to Example 3 are shown in Table 3. Table 3 - Test results of Example 3, showing the fungicidal effect (Le.) against Sphaerotheca fuliginea of ​​a fungicidal composition according to the first aspect of the present invention comprising choline phosphonate (CP) and sulfur (S), referred to as 'CP + S', compared to fungicidal compositions comprising CP or S individually. The fungicidal effectIt was evaluated according to four different evaluation protocols: (i) per plot, 20 leaves of uniform age were inspected on both the upper and lower sides for infection with Sphaerotheca fuliginea, with the number of infected leaves expressed as a percentage (PESINC), (ii) per plot, 20 leaves of uniform age were inspected on both the upper and lower sides for infection with Sphaerotheca fuliginea, with the leaf surface of infected leaves expressed as a percentage (PESSEV), (iii) 2 leaves on 5 plants were marked and analyzed again in a successive evaluation, the leaves were inspected on both the upper and lower sides for infection with Sphaerotheca fuliginea, with the number of infected leaves expressed as > ω Ν C Ν C. Ü σ percentage (PESINC curative), (iv) 2 leaves on 5 plants were marked and re-examined in a successive evaluation, inspecting the leaves on both the upper and inner sides for Sphaerotheca fuliginea infection, with the leaf surface area of ​​infected leaves expressed as a percentage (PESSEV curative). For each protocol, the results were compared to an untreated control. The synergistic effect of CP + S is evaluated by comparing it with the expected effect of the combination of the individual active compounds calculated according to the Colby calculation method described above. The trials were carried out in Italy, and the crops were sprayed with several applications of the active compound preparations, according to the following schedule: A1 (first application), A2 - A1 + 7 days, A3 - A2 + 7 days, and A4 - A3 + 7 days. evaluation protocol / DA-An* / cultivation stage CP (g ac** / ha) CP fe (%) S (g a.cJha) S fe (%) CP + S (g ac CP* / ha + g ac SVha) CP + s fe (%) Co Iby fe (%) PESSEV / 7 DA-A2 / BBCH 73 3500 92.5 2080 96.7 1500*+ 2000* 100 99. 8 PESINC / 7 DA-A2 / BBCH 73 3500 74.3 2080 88.1 1500* + 2000* 100 96. 9 Curative PESSEV i 7 DA-A2 / BBCH 73 3500 88.6 2080 93.6 1500* + 2000* 100 99. 3 PESINC 3500 77.1 2080 85.1 1500* + 2000* 100 96. frQicm / ιζηζ / Β / γΐΛΐ curativo i 7 DA-A2 ¡ BBCH 73 6 RESINO ! 7 DA-A3 i BBCH 76 3500 78.8 2080 95 1500* + 2000* 100 98. 9 PESSEV curativo ! 7 DA-A3 / BBCH 76 3500 89.4 2080 96 1500*+ 2000* 100 99. 6 RESINO curative / 7 DA-A3 / BBCH 76 3500 71.7 2080 87.5 1500* + 2000* 100 96. PESSEV / 7 DA-A4 / BBCH 77 3500 91.7 2080 97.6 1500* + 2000* 100 99. 8 PESINC / 7 DA-A4 / BBCH 77 3500 70.0 2080 85.0 1500* + 2000* 100 95. 5 PESSEV curative / 7 DA-A4 / BBCH 77 3500 89.9 2080 95 1500* + 2000* 100 99. 5 PESINC curativo / 7 DA-A4 / BBCH 77 3500 60 2080 77.5 1500* + 2000* 100 91 0 PESSEV i 14 DA-A4 / / BBCH 78 3500 89.0 2080 96.3 1500*+ 2000* 100 99. 6 PESINC 3500 59.5 2080 75.2 1500* + 2000* 100 90. / 14 DA-A4 / BBCH 78 0 PESSEV curative / 14 DA-A4 / BBCH 78 3500 91.2 2080 93.4 1500* + 2000* 100 99. 4 PESINC curative i 14 DA-A4 / BBCH 78 3500 38.6 2080 58.9 1500*+ 2000* 100 74. 8 PESSEV / 21 DA-A4 / BBCH 79 3500 93.4 2080 96.9 1500* + 2000* 100 99. 8 PESINC / 21 DA-A4 / BBCH 79 3500 55.7 2080 69.7 1500*+ 2000* 100 86. 6 * DA-An - days after the last application (with DA referring to days after and An referring to a specific application, n being a positive integer); ” ac - active compound Example 4 relates to a fungicidal composition comprising a combination of choline phosphonate and dithianone, which was applied to apple (Malus domestica var. Golden Deliclous) crops infected with codling moth (Venturia inaequalis) under the test conditions described above. The results obtained according to Example 4 are shown in Table 4. Table 4 - Results of the Example 4 test, showing the effect frQicm / ιζηζ / Β / γΐΛΐ The fungicidal effect (f) against Venturia inaequalis of a fungicidal composition according to the first aspect of the present invention comprising choline phosphonate (CP) and dithianone (DIT), referred to as 'CP + DIT', was compared to fungicidal compositions comprising CP or DIT individually. The fungicidal composition was applied to Malus domestica var. Golden delicious (the crop) infected with Venturia inaequalis. The tests were carried out at three different locations, France, the United Kingdom, and Belgium, hereinafter referred to as locations 1-3, respectively. The fungicidal effect f was evaluated according to two different evaluation protocols: (i) 200 leaves per plot of uniform age were inspected on both the upper and lower sides for infection with Venturia inaequalis.(ii) 200 leaves per plot of uniform age were inspected on both the upper and lower sides for infection with Venturia inaequalis, with the number of infected leaves expressed as a percentage (PESINC), and (ii) 200 leaves per plot were inspected on both the upper and lower sides for infection with Venturia inaequalis, with the leaf area of ​​infected leaves expressed as a percentage (PESSEV). For each protocol, the results were compared to an untreated control. The synergistic effect of CP + DIT was evaluated by comparing it with the expected effect of the combination of the individual active compounds calculated according to the Colby calculation method described above.The crops were sprayed with several applications of the active compound preparations, according to the following schemes for location 1: Al 20 (first application), A2 - Al + 11 days, A3 - A2 + 12 days and A4 ~ A3 + 9 days, A5 - A4 + 11 days, A6 = A5 + 10 days, A7 = A6 + 12 days; location 2: Al (first application), A2 = A1 + 9 days, A3 = A2 + 8 days and A4 = A3 + 7 days, A5 = A4 + 11 days, A6 = A5 + 11 days, A7 ~ A6 + 10 days, A8 ~ A7 + 17 days, A9 ~ A8 + 13 days; and location 3: A1 (first application), A2 = A1 + 7 days, A3 = A2 + 10 days and A4 = A3 + 8 days, A5 = A4 + 7 days, A6 = 25 - A5 + 10 days, A7 = A6 + 8 days, A8 = A7 + 29 days, A9 = A8 + 9 days. evaluation protocol / plant location / DA-An' / cultivation stage CP (g ac** / ha) CP fe (%) DIT (g ac / ha) DIT fe (%) CP + DIT (g ac CP' / ha + g ac DlTYha) CP + DIT fe (%) Co Iby fe (% PESSEV / location 1 / 6 DA-A4 / BBCH 72 1950 32.7 250 75.4 1950* +250* 92.2 83. 5 PESSEV / location 1 / ! 1 DA-A6 / BBCH 74 1950 35.7 250 63.0 1950* + 250* 84.6 76. 2 PESINC / location 1 i 6 DA-A4 i BBCH 72 1950 12.5 250 38.6 1950* + 250* 72.0 46. 3 PESINC l location 1 / 1 DA-A6 / BBCH 74 1950 7.4 250 19.8 1950* + 250* 56.3 25. 7 PESINC / location 2 / 5 DA-A8 / BBCH 74 1950 61.0 250 59.0 1950* + 250* 91.0 84. 0 frQicm / ιζηζ / Β / γΐΛΐ froicin / iznz / B / YiAi PESINC / location 3 / 31 DA-A9 / BBCH 73 1950 41.1 250 51.8 1950+ + 2501 89.7 71. 6 PESINC / location 3 i 80 DA-A9 / BBCH 73 1950 31.7 250 42.6 1950+ + 250^ 85.7 60. 8 DA-An - days after the last application (with DA referring to days after and An referring to a specific application, n being a positive integer); ** ac = active compound Example 5 refers to a fungicidal composition comprising a combination of choline phosphonate and isofetamide, which was applied to apple (Malus domestica var. Golden Delicious) crops infected with codling moth (Venturia inaequalis), according to the test conditions mentioned above. The results according to Example 5 are shown in Table 5. Table 5 - Test results of Example 5, showing the fungicidal effect (fe) against Venturia inaequalis of a fungicidal composition according to the first aspect of the present invention comprising choline phosphonate (CP) and isofetamide (ISO), referred to as 'CP + ISO', compared to fungicidal compositions comprising CP or ISO individually. The fungicidal composition was applied to Matas domestica var. Golden delicious (the crop) infected with Venturia inaequalis. The tests were carried out at three different locations, France, Italy, and Belgium, hereinafter referred to as locations 1-3, respectively. The fungicidal effect fe was evaluated according to two different evaluation protocols: (i) 200 leaves per plot of uniform age were inspected on both the upper and lower sides for > ω N C N C Ü σ (ii) 200 leaves per plot of uniform age were inspected on both the upper and lower sides for Venturia inaequalis infection, with the number of infected leaves expressed as a percentage (PESINC), and (iii) 200 leaves per plot were inspected on both the upper and lower sides for Venturia inaequalis infection, with the leaf surface area of ​​infected leaves expressed as a percentage (PESSEV). For each protocol, the results were compared to an untreated control. The synergistic effect of CP + ISO was evaluated by comparing it to the expected effect of the combination of the individual active compounds calculated according to the Colby calculation method described above.The crops were sprayed with several applications of the active compound preparations, according to the following schemes for location 1: A1 (first application), A2 - A1 + 11 days, A3 - A2 + 12 days and A4 = A3 + 9 days, A5 - A4 + 11 days, A6 = A5 + 10 days, A7 = A6 + 12 days; location 2: A1 (first application), A2 = A1 + 8 days, A3 = A2 + 8 days and A4 - A3 + 8 days, A5 = A4 + 8 days, A6 = A5 + 7 days, A7 = A6 + 7 days, A8 = A7 + 9 days, A9 = A8 + 8 days, A10 - A9 + 9 days, A11 = A10 + 8 days, A12 = A11 + 7 days, A13 = A12 + 7 days; and location 3: A1 (first application), A2 - A1 + 7 days, A3 = A2 + 10 days and A4 ~ A3 + 8 days, A5 = A4 + 7 days, A6 = A5 + 10 days, A7 = A6 + 8 days, A8 = A7 + 29 days, A9 = A8 + days. evaluation protocol / test location / DA-An* / crop growth stage CP (g ac** / ha) CP fe (%) ISO (g ac / ha) ISO fe (%) CP + ISO (g ac CPVha + g ac ISO^'ha) CP + ISO fe (%) Co Iby fe (% PESINC / location 1 / 6 DA-A4 / BBCH 72 1950 10.0 60 13.3 1950* + 60* 23.1 21.9 PESSEV / location 2 Z 7 DA-A6 / BBCH 72 1950 81.7 60 32.9 1950* + 60* 88.2 87.7 PESSEV / location 2 / 6 DA-A9 / BBCH 74 1950 66.6 60 25.3 1950* + 60* 82.7 75.1 PESSEV / location 2 / 4 DA-A11 / BBCH 75 1950 65.6 60 22.6 1950* + 60* 79.7 73.3 PESSEV / location 2 / 6 DA-AI 3 / BBCH 77 1950 57.8 60 27.7 19501 + 60* 64.4 69.5 PESINC / location 2 / 7 DA-A6 / BBCH 72 1950 45.7 60 16.8 1950* + 60* 59.5 54.8 PESINC / location 2 / 6 DA-A9 / 1950 50.7 60 12.1 1950* + 60* 65.2 56.7 froicin / iznz / B / YiAi BBCH 74 PESINC / location 2 / 4 DA-A11 / BBCH 75 1950 29.3 60 4.1 1950* + 60* 46.2 32. 1 PESINC / location 2 / 6 DA-A13 / BBCH 77 1950 19.7 60 5.5 1950* + 60* 25.3 24. 1 PESINC / location 3 / 31 DA-A9 / BBCH 73 1950 41.1 60 8.7 1950* + 60* 54.8 46. 2 PESINC / location 3 / 80 DA-A9 / BBCH 73 1950 31.7 60 2.2 1950* + 60* 45.1 33. 2 * DA-An - days after the last application (with DA referring to days after and An referring to a specific application, n being a positive integer); ” ac = active compound Example 6 relates to a fungicidal composition comprising a combination of choline phosphonate and zoxamide, which was applied to European grapevine (Vitis vinifera) infected with downy mildew (Piasmopara viticola) under the test conditions described above. The results obtained according to Example 6 are shown in Table 6. Table 6 - Results of the Example 6 test, showing the effect A fungicidal composition comprising choline phosphonate (CP) and zoxamide (ZOX), designated 'CP + ZOX', was compared to fungicidal compositions comprising CP or ZOX individually. The fungicidal composition was applied to Vitis vinifera (the crop) infected with Piasmopara viticola. The tests were carried out at three different locations: two in France and one in Germany, hereinafter referred to as locations 1-3, respectively. At location 1, the crop was of the Negrette variety. At location 2, the crop was of the Grenache variety. At location 3, the crop was of the Mueller-Thurgau variety. The fungicidal effect of the composition was compared to the fungicidal composition comprising either CP or ZOX individually.The evaluation was conducted according to two different protocols: (i) 100 leaves per plot, or the leaves of 50 clusters of uniform age, were inspected on both the upper and lower sides for infection with Piasmopara viticola, with the number of infected leaves expressed as a percentage (PESINC); and (ii) 100 leaves, or the leaves of 50 clusters, per plot of uniform age were inspected on both the upper and lower sides for infection with Piasmopara viticola, with the leaf surface area of ​​the infected leaves expressed as a percentage (PESSEV). For each protocol, the results were compared to an untreated control. The synergistic effect of CP + ZOX was evaluated by comparing it to the expected effect of the combination of the individual active compounds, calculated according to the Colby calculation method described above.The crops were sprayed with several applications of the active compound preparations, according to the following schemes for location 1: A1 (first application), A2 = A1 + 13 days, A3 = A2 + 10 days and A4 ~ A3 + 7 days, A5 - A4 + 6 days, A6 = A5 + 7 days, A7 ~ A6 + 11 days, A8 ~ A7 + 8 days, A9 = A8 + 14 days; location 2: A1 (first application), A2 = A1 + 13 days, A3 = A2 + 10 days and A4 = A3 + 12 days, A5 = A4 + 14 days, A6 = A5 + 13 days; and location 3: A1. > ω NCN C Ü σ (first application), A2 = A1 + 12 days, A3 = A2 + 11 days and A4 = A3 + 14 days, A5 = A4 + days, A6 = A5 + 10 days, A7 = A6 + 13 days, A8 = A7 + 14 days. evaluation protocol / trial location / sample size / DA-An' / crop growth stage CP (g ac** / ha) CP fe (%) zox (g ac / ha) ZOX fe (%) CP + ZOX (g ac CP* / ha + g ac ZOX* / ha) CP + ZOX fe (%) Co Iby fe (% PESSEV / location 1 / 50 clusters / 1). DA-A8 / BBCH 75 3250 30.0 120 75.2 3250* + 120* 85.9 82. 6 PESSEV / location 1 i 50 clusters / 16 DA-A9 i BBCH 81 3250 19.2 120 51.7 3250* + 120* . 69.4 60. 9 PESINC / location 1 / ! 50 clusters i 1 DA-A6 / BBCH 69 3250 32.5 120 73.0 3250* + 120* 88.0 81. 8 PESINC / 3250 6.0 120 18.0 3250* + 120* 23.0 22 . location 1 i 50 bunches / 1 DA-A8 / BBCH 75 9 PESINC / location 1 i 50 bunches i 16 DA-A9 / / BBCH 81 3250 0.0 120 1.0 3250*+120* 10.0 1.0 PESSEV / location 2 / 100 sheets / 9 DA-A4 i BBCH 71 3250 57.8 120 67.7 3250* + 120* 90.7 86. 4 PESSEV / location 2 / 100 sheets / 6 DA-A5 / BBCH 77 3250 21.4 120 15.1 3250* + 120* 71.2 33. 3 PESINC l location 2 / 100 sheets / 9 DA-A4 i BBCH 71 3250 0.8 120 22.8 3250* + 120* 40.2 23. 3 PESINC / location 2 / 100 sheets / 3250 0.0 120 0.0 3250* + 120* 2.0 0.0 frQicm / ιζηζ / Β / γΐΛΐ 6 DA-A5 i BBCH 77 PESSEV / location 2 / 50 bunches / 9 DA-A4 / BBCH 71 3250 4.5 120 81.3 3250* + 120* 93.3 82. 1 PESSEV / location 2 / 50 bunches / 8 DA-A5 / BBCH 77 3250 0.4 120 21.4 3250* + 120* 61.8 21. 7 PESSEV / location 2 / 50 bunches / 9 DA-A6 / BBCH 79 3250 0.0 120 1.3 3250* + 120* 17.9 1.3 PESINC / location 2 / 50 bunches i 9 DA-A4 / BBCH 71 3250 0.0 120 10.0 3250* + 120* 27.0 10.0 PESINC / location 2 / 50 clusters / 9 DA-A4 / BBCH 77 3250 0.0 120 0.0 3250* + 120* 0.5 0.0 PESSEV / location 3 3250 25.9 120 52.1 3250* + 120* 69.4 64.5 frQicm / ιζηζ / Β / γΐΛΐ / 100 sheets / 13 DA-A6 / BBCH 83 PESINC / location 3 / 100 sheets / 13 DA-A6 / BBCH 83 3250 0.3 120 18.7 3250* + 120* 27.4 18.9 PESINC / location 3 / 100 sheets / 7 DA-A8 / BBCH 83 3250 0.0 120 16.0 3250* + 120* 24.8 16.0 PESSEV / location 3 / 50 bunches / 11 DA-A4 i BBCH 75 3250 66.5 120 80.2 3250* + 120* 100.0 93.4 PESSEV / location 3 / 50 bunches / 13 DA-A6 / BBCH 83 3250 14.4 120 49.2 3250* + 120* 56.8 56.5 PESSEV / location 3 / 50 clusters 3250 8.7 120 48.9 3250* + 120* 53.5 53.3 frQicm / ιζηζ / Β / γΐΛΐ u / 7 DA-A8 / BBCH 83 PESINC / location 3 i 50 bunches / 11 DA-A4 i BBCH 75 3250 55.5 120 48.8 3250* + 120* 100 77. 2 * DA-An = days after the last application (with DA referring to days after and An referring to a specific application, n being a positive integer); “ ac = active compound Example 7 relates to a fungicidal composition comprising a combination of choline phosphonate and fluopicolide, which was applied to European grapevine (Vitis vinifera var. Merlot) infected with downy mildew (Píasmopara viticola), according to the test conditions mentioned above. The results according to Example 7 are shown in Table 7. Table 7 - Test results of Example 7, showing the fungicidal effect (fe) against Piasmopara viticola of a fungicidal composition according to the first aspect of the present invention comprising choline phosphonate (CP) and fluopicolide (FLU), referred to as 'CP + FLU', compared to fungicidal compositions comprising CP or FLU individually. The fungicidal composition was applied to Vitis vinifera var. Merlot (the crop) infected with Piasmopara viticola. The fungicidal effect feIt was evaluated according to two different assessment protocols: (i) 100 leaves per plot, or the leaves of 50 bunches per plot, of uniform age, were inspected on both the upper and lower sides for Plasmopara viticola infection, with the number of infected leaves expressed as a percentage (PESINC), and (ii) 100 leaves per plot, or the leaves of 50 bunches per plot, of uniform age, were inspected on both the upper and lower sides for Plasmopara viticola infection, with the leaf area of ​​infected leaves expressed as a percentage (PESSEV). For each protocol, the results were compared to an untreated control. The synergistic effect of CP + FLU is assessed by comparing it to the expected effect of the combination of the individual active compounds calculated according to the Colby calculation method described above.The tests were carried out in a field in France and the crops were sprayed with several applications of the active compound preparations, according to the following scheme: A1 (first application), A2 = A1 + 11 days, A3 - A2 + 10 days, A4 - A3 + 11 days, A5 - A4 + 14 days and A6 = A5 + 14 days. Evaluation protocol / Sample size / DA-An* / Crop growth stage CP (g ac** / ha) CP fe (%) FLU (g ac / ha) FLU fe (%) CP + FLU (g ac CP* / ha + ga .c. FLUVha) CP + FLU fe (%) Co Iby fe (%) PESINC / 100 leaves / 0 DA-A3 i BBCH 73 3250 59.2 130 62.3 3250* + 130* 86.7 84.6 PESINC / 100 leaves / 0 DA-A5 / BBCH 77 3250 23.5 130 47.8 3250* + 130* 76.0 60.1 PESINC / 100 leaves / 3250 16.2 130 32.2 3250* + 130* 56.7 43. 2 froicin / iznz / B / YiAi 9 DA-A6 i BBCH 83 PESSEV / 50 bunches / 0 DA-A5 / BBCH 77 3250 54.9 130 83.6 3250* + 130* 96.7 92. 6 PESSEV / 50 bunches / 9 DA-A6 / BBCH 83 3250 26.5 130 46.8 3250* + 130* 85.8 60. 9 PESINC / 50 bunches / or DA-A3 / BBCH 73 3250 50.6 130 84.4 3250* + 130* 94.5 92. 3 PESINC / 50 bunches / 0 DA-A5 / BBCH 77 3250 12.0 130 37.5 3250* + 130* 75.0 45. 0 PESINC / 50 bunches i 9 DA-A6 / BBCH 83 3250 10.0 130 14.5 3250* + 130* 53.5 23. 1 * DA-An ~ days after the last application (with DA referring to days after and An referring to a specific application, n being a positive integer); ** ac = active compound Example 8 refers to a fungicidal composition comprising a combination of choline phosphonate and tagatose, which was applied to cucumber (Cucumis sativus) crops infected with bean powdery mildew (Sphaerotheca faiginea), according to the test conditions mentioned above. The results according to Example 8 are shown in Table 8. Table 8 - Results of the Example 8 test, showing the effect u The fungicidal effect (fe) against Sphaerotheca fuiiginea of ​​a fungicidal composition according to the first aspect of the present invention comprising choline phosphonate (CP) and tagatose (TAG), referred to as 'CP + TAG', was compared to fungicidal compositions comprising CP or TAG individually. The fungicidal composition was applied to Cucumis sativa (the crop) infected with Sphaerotheca fuiiginea. The fungicidal effect (fe) was evaluated according to the following evaluation protocols: (i) leaves of uniform age in a plot were inspected for infection with Sphaerotheca fuiiginea, with the number of infected leaves expressed as a percentage (PESINC), and (ii) leaves of uniform age in a plot were inspected on both the upper and lower sides for infection with Piasmopara viticola, with the leaf area of ​​infected leaves expressed as a percentage (PESSEV). The results were compared to an untreated control.The synergistic effect of CP + TAG is evaluated by comparing it with the expected effect of the combination of the individual active compounds, calculated according to the Colby calculation method described above. The tests were carried out in a field in Spain, and the crops were sprayed with several applications of the active ingredient preparations, according to the following schedule: A1 (first application), A2 = A1 + 7 days, A3 = A2 + 7 days, A4 ~ A3 + 7 days, A5 - A4 + 7 days. evaluation protocol i DA-An* crop growth stage CP (g ac** / ha) CP fe (%) TAG (g ac / ha) TAG fe (%) CP + TAG (g ac CPVha + g ac TAGVha) CP + TAG fe (%) Co Iby fe (% PESSEV i 7 DA-A3 / 430 90.8 500 93.2 4301 + 500* 100.0 99.4 BBCH 63 PESINC / 7 DA-A3 / BBCH 63 430 80.6 500 83.9 430ψ + 500* 100. 0 96. 9 * DA-An = days after the last application (with DA referring to days after and An referring to a specific application, n being a positive integer); “ ac = active compound Synergistic actions are observed for the fungicide combinations of Examples 1-8, as shown in Tables 1-8. When the observed synergistic actions are taken into account, the environmental burden will be lower when applying tank mixtures of choline phosphonate and at least one additional fungicide selected from the group comprising quinone fungicides, succinate dehydrogenase inhibitors, benzamide fungicides, sulfur fungicides, carboxylic acid amide fungicides, and sugar alcohols compared to applying individual compositions comprising only one of these fungicides. EXAMPLE 9 Table 9 shows a fungicidal suspension concentrate composition, according to the first aspect of the invention, comprising choline phosphonate, valifenalate, a dispersing agent, an antifoaming agent, a preservative, a spreading agent, a viscosity modifier, and water. The composition shown in Table 9 is a suspension concentrate with excellent formulation stability and good atomization properties. Table 9 - Fungicidal composition of suspension concentrate according to the first aspect of the present invention comprising choline phosphonate and valifenalate, wherein the amounts of all components are shown in weight percentages Weight Percentage (% by weight) choline phosphonate 36-42 valifenalate 1-5 dispersing agent 1-5 antifoaming agent 0.01-0.3 preservative 0.01-0.2 spreading agent 1-5 viscosity modifier 0.1-0.5 water 49-55 Total 100 EXAMPLE 10 Table 10 shows a fungicidal suspension concentrate composition, according to the first aspect of the invention, comprising choline phosphonate, sulfur, a dispersing agent, a wetting agent, a freezing point depressant, an antifoaming agent, a preservative, a chemical stabilizer, a viscosity modifier, and water. The composition shown in Table 10 is a suspension concentrate with excellent formulation stability and good physical atomization performance. Table 10. Fungicide composition of suspension concentrate according to the first aspect of the present invention comprising choline phosphonate and sulfur, wherein the amounts of all components are shown in weight percentages. Percentage by weight (% by weight) Sample 1 Sample 2 Sample 3 choline phosphonate 31-38 22-28 43-50 sulfur 24-32 32-38 18-25 dispersing agent 0.5-5 0.5-5 0.5-3 wetting agent 0.1-2 0.1-2 0.1-1.5 freezing point depressant 0.5-4 0.5-4 0.5-3 antifoaming agent 0.01-0.3 0.01-0.3 0.01-0.15 preservative 0.01-0.2 0.01-0.2 0.01-0.1 chemical stabilizer 0.01-0.3 0.01-0.3 0.01-0.3 viscosity modifier 0.1-0.5 0.1-0.5 0.1-0.4 water 28-36 30-36 24-32 Total 100 100 100 EXAMPLE 11 Example 11 relates to a fungicidal composition comprising a combination of choline phosphonate and cuprous oxide, which was applied to potato (Solanum tuberosum L. var. Bintje) infected with late blight of potato (Phytophthora infestanos). The potato plants were grown in pots until they reached a height of 30 cm. Subsequently, these potted potato plants were sprayed with spray liquors comprising a mixture of active fungicidal compounds or with spray liquors comprising one of the active fungicidal compounds. This spraying with spray liquors is defined as the first application of active fungicidal compounds. One day after the first application, the upper and lower sides of the potato leaves were The plants were infected with Phytophthora infestans at a concentration of 5000 spores / ml. Seven days after the first application, a second application of the spray solutions was made. For both applications, the spray solution was diluted with water to achieve an application volume of 218 L / ha. Fourteen days after the second application, the degree of damage to the potato plants due to Phytophthora infestans infection was evaluated. In the evaluation, the total number of potato leaves and the number of infected potato leaves were counted. Even the smallest lesion was counted as infected. The results according to Example 11 are shown in Table 11. Table 11 - Results of the Example 11 trial, showing the fungicidal effect (feagainst Phytophthora infestaos of a fungicidal composition according to the first aspect of the present invention comprising choline phosphonate (CP) and cuprous oxide (CUP), referred to as 'CP + CUP', compared to fungicidal compositions comprising CP or CUP individually. The fungicidal composition was applied (first application) to Solanum tuberosum L. var. Bintje (the crop) on day one, after which the upper and lower sides of the crop leaves were infected with 5000 spores / ml of Phytophthora infestaos at the time of one day after the first application, and after which the fungicidal composition was applied a second time 7 days after the first application. The data shown are average values ​​of fe observed for all leaves evaluated in several test trials, wherein in each test trial several potted potato plants were tested. The synergistic effect of CP + CUP is evaluated by comparing it with feThe expected yield from the combination of active compounds was calculated according to the Colby calculation method described above. The tests were carried out on 25 potted potato plants in Belgium. Fourteen days after the second application of the composition. > ω NCN C Ü σ The degree of damage to potato plants due to Phytophthora infestans infection was evaluated using the fungicide (14 DA-A2). The evaluation involved counting the total number of potato leaves and the number of infected leaves, with the number of infected leaves expressed as a percentage (PESINC). Even the smallest lesion was counted as infected. evaluation protocol / DA-An* CP (g ac** / ha) CP fe (%) CUP (g ac / ha) CUP fe (%) CP + CUP (g ac CP* / ha g ac CUP* / ha) CP + CUP fe (%) Co Iby fe (% PESINC / 14 DA-A2 3316 10.1 1125 46.8 3316* + 1125* 58.5 52. 2 * DA-An = days after the last application (with DA referring to days after and An referring to a specific application, n being a positive integer); “ ac = active compound EXAMPLE 12 Example 12 relates to a fungicidal composition comprising a combination of choline phosphonate and sulfur, which was applied to European grapevine (Vitis vinifera var. Carignan) infected with powdery mildew of grapevine (Uncinula necator), according to the test conditions mentioned above for Example 1. The results according to Example 12 are shown in Table 12. Table 12 - Results of the Example 12 trial, showing the fungicidal effect (fe) against Uncinula necator of a fungicidal composition according to the first aspect of the present invention comprising choline phosphonate (CP) and sulfur (S), referred to as 'CP + S', compared to fungicidal compositions comprising CP or S individually. The fungicidal composition was applied to Vitis vinifera var. Carignan (the crop) infected with Uncinula necator. The data shown are average values ​​of fe observed for 100 leaves of Vitis vinifera var. Carignan or 50 clusters of Vitis vinifera var. Carignan. The fungicidal effect feIt was evaluated according to two different assessment protocols: (i) 100 leaves per plot of uniform age, or the leaves of 50 bunches, were inspected on both the upper and lower sides for infection with Uncinula necator, with the number of infected leaves expressed as a percentage (PESINC), and (ii) 100 leaves per plot, or the leaves of 50 bunches, of uniform age were inspected on both the upper and lower sides for infection with Uncinula necator, with the leaf area of ​​the infected leaves expressed as a percentage (PESSEV). The synergistic effect of CP + S is assessed by comparing it with the expected effect of the combination of the active compounds calculated according to the Colby calculation method described above.The tests were carried out in France and the crops were sprayed with several applications of the active compound preparations, according to the following scheme: A1 (first application), A2 = A1 + 10 days, A3 - A2 + 10 days, A4 = A3 + 8 days, A5 = A4 + 3 days, A6 = A5 + 7 days, A7 = A6 + 10 days, A8 = A7 + 7 days, A9 = A8 + 8 days, A10 - A9 + 10 days and A11 = A10 10 days. Evaluation protocol / Sample size (# of leaves or clusters) / DA-An* CP (g ac** / ha) CP fe (%) S (g ac / ha) S fe (%) CP + s (g ac CP+ / ha g ac S* / ha) CP + s fe (%) Colb and fe( %) PESSEV / 100 leaves and 14 DA- AS / BBCH 77 1740.9 15.9 2320 18.7 1728* + 2304* 40.2 31.6 PESSEV / 50 bunches and 14 DA- AS / BBCH 77 1740.9 48.3 2320 50.8 1728* + 2304* 84.4 74.6 PESSEV / 50 bunches / 14 DAAS / BBCH 83 1740.9 12.8 2320 14.2 1728* + 2304* 50.9 25.2 PESINC / 100 leaves / 14 DA- AS / BBCH 77 1740.9 34.1 2320 42.8 1728* + 2304* 80.7 62.3 PESINC / 50 bunches / 14 DA- AS / BBCH 77 1740.9 3.8 2320 5.1 1728* + 2304* 29.9 8.7 PESINC / 50 bunches / 14 DA- AS / BBCH 83 1740.9 38.6 2320 37.6 1728* + 2304* 69.2 61.7 frQicm / ιζηζ / Β / γΐΛΐ PESSEV / 100 leaves i 14 DA- AS / BBCH 77 1740.9 8.7 2320 13.9 1728* + 2304* 31.9 21.4 PESSEV / 50 bunches / 14 DA- AS / BBCH 77 1740.9 4.0 2320 6.0 1728* + 2304* 10.6 9.8 PESSEV / 50 bunches / 14 DAAS / BBCH 83 1740.9 17.4 2320 18.9 1200* + 120* 40.1 33.0 PESINC / 100 leaves / 14 DAAS / BBCH 77 1740.9 6.7 2320 6.3 1728*+ 2304* 14.6 12.6 PESINC / 50 bunches / 14 DA- AS / BBCH 77 1740.9 0.8 2320 1.2 1728* + 2304* 8.7 2.0 PESINC / 50 bunches / 14 DA- AS / BBCH 83 1740.9 0 2320 0 1728* + 2304* 0.5 0 froicin / iznz / B / YiAi * DA-An = days after the last application (with DA referring to days after and An referring to a specific application, n being a positive integer);A* ac = active compound EXAMPLE 13 Example 13 relates to a fungicidal composition comprising a combination of choline phosphonate and sulfur, which was applied to apple crops (Malus domestica var. Gold Rush and Malus domestica var. Morgenduft Dallago) infected with apple powdery mildew (Podosphaera leucotricha), according to the test conditions mentioned above for Example 1. The results according to Example 13 are shown in Table 13. Table 13 - Test results of Example 13, showing the fungicidal effect (f) against Podosphaera leucotricha of a fungicidal composition according to the first aspect of the present invention comprising choline phosphonate (CP) and sulfur (S), referred to as 'CP + S', compared to fungicidal compositions comprising CP or S individually. The fungicidal composition was applied to Malus domestica var. Golden Rush and Malus domestica var. Morgenduft Dallago (the crop) infected with Podosphaera leucotricha. The tests were carried out at two different locations, France and Italy, hereinafter referred to as locations 1 and 2, respectively. For Italy, the fungicidal compositions were diluted with water to achieve application volumes exceeding 1000 L / ha, and in particular in the range of 1000 to 1300 L / ha. The fungicidal effect of fe was evaluated according to two different evaluation protocols: (i) specific quantities of leaves, or the leaves of a specific quantity of shoots, per uniform-age plot were inspected on both the upper and lower sides for Podosphaera leucotricha infection, with the number of infected leaves expressed as a percentage (PESINC), and (II) specific quantities of leaves, or the leaves of a specific quantity of shoots, per uniform-age plot were inspected on both the upper and lower sides for Podosphaera leucotricha infection, with the foliar surface area of ​​infected leaves expressed as a percentage (PESSEV). For each protocol, the results were compared to an untreated control. The synergistic effect of CP + S is evaluated by comparing it with feThe expected yield from the combination of individual active compounds was calculated according to the Colby calculation method described above. The crops were sprayed with several applications of the active compound preparations, according to the following schedules for location 1: A1 (first application), A2 - A1 + 8 days, A3 = A2 + 8 days, A4 = A3 + 8 days, A5 - A4 + 7 days, A6 = A5 + 7 days, A7 = A6 + 7 days, A8 = A7 + 7 days; and location 2: A1 (first application), A2 - A1 + 4 days, A3 - A2 + 6 days, A4 - A3 + 7 days, A5 - A4 + 7 days, A6 - A5 + 6 days, A7 = A6 + 5 days, A8 - A7 + 6 days, A9 = A8 + 7 days, A10 = A9 + 7 days, A11 = A10 + 9 days. CP protocol CP SS CP + s CP + Co of (g ac** fe (g ac / ha) fe (g ac CPf / ha + S Iby evaluation / / ha) (%) (%) g ac sVha) fefe test location / sample size (# shoots or leaves) i DAAn* / crop growth stage (%) / o / L ( / 0 PESINC / location 1 / 20 shoots / 7 DA-A5 / BBCH 71 1948.15 56.5 2640 80.0 1958.4* + 2611.2* 96.5 91. 3 PESSEV / location 1 and 100 leaves / 6 DA-A6 / BBCH 74 1948.15 53.1 2640 64.1 1958.4* + 2611.2* 87.5 83. 2 PESINC / location 1 / 100 leaves and 6 DA-A6 / BBCH 74 1948.15 44.2 2640 59.1 1958.4* + 2611.2* 83.3 77. 2 PESINC / location 1 / 100 leaves / 5 DA-A8 / BBCH 74 1948.15 34.0 2640 88.1 1958.4* + 2611.2* 93.7 92. 1 PESSEV / location 1 / 100 leaves / 15 DA-A8 i BBCH 76 1948.15 34.2 2640 88.2 1958.4* + 2611.2* 96.2 92. 3 PESINC / location 1 / 100 leaves / 15 DA-A8 / BBCH 76 1948.15 18.6 2640 80.7 1958.4* + 2611.2* 93.7 84. 3 PESINC / location 2 / 40 shoots / 6 DA-A5 / 1948.15 2.7 2640 57.8 1958.4* + 2611.2* 79.4 58. 9 frQicm / ιζηζ / Β / γΐΛΐ froicin / iznz / B / YiAi BBCH 71 PESSEV / location 2 / 5 leaves / 5 DA-A6 / BBCH 74 1948.15 30.4 2640 72.7 1958.4* + 2611.2* 81.8 81.0 PESINC / location 2 / 5 leaves / 5 DA-A6 BBCH 74 1948.15 23.6 2640 63.9 1958.4* + 2611.2* 75.3 72.4 PESINC / location 2 / 40 shoots / 2 DA-A10 / BBCH 74 1948.15 19.3 2640 62.4 1958.4* + 2611.2* 90.6 69.7 PESSEV / location 2 / 5 leaves / 2 DA-AI 0 / BBCH 74 1948.15 37.7 2640 82.1 1958.4* + 2611.2* 96.4 88. 8 PESINC / location 2 / 40 outbreaks / 6 DA-A11 / BBCH 74 1948.15 12.2 2640 59.4 1958.4* + 2611.2* 80.2 64. 4 PESSEV ! location 2 i 5 sheets Z 6 DA-A11 / BBCH 74 1948.15 14.1 2640 84.4 1958.4* + 2611.2* 94.4 86. 6 * DA-An - days after the last application (with DA referring to days after and An referring to a specific application, n being a positive integer); ” ac = active compound EXAMPLE 14 Example 14 refers to a fungicidal composition comprising a combination of choline phosphonate and tagatose, which was applied to apple crops (Malus domestica var. Gold Rush and Malus domestica var. Morgenduft Dallago) infected with apple powdery mildew (Podosphaera leucotricha), according to the test conditions mentioned above for Example 1. The results according to Example 14 are shown in Table 14. Table 14 - Test results of Example 14, showing the fungicidal effect (fe) against Podosphaera leucotricha of a fungicidal composition according to the first aspect of the present invention comprising choline phosphonate (CP) and tagatose (TAG), referred to as 'CP + TAG', compared to fungicidal compositions comprising CP or TAG individually. The fungicidal composition was applied to Malus domestica var. Golden Rush and Malus domestica var. Morgenduft Dallago (the crop) infected with Podosphaera leucotricha. The tests were carried out at two different locations, France and Italy, hereinafter referred to as locations 1 and 2, respectively. For Italy, the fungicidal compositions were diluted with water to achieve application volumes exceeding 1000 L / ha, and in particular in the range of 1000 to 1300 L / ha. The fungicidal effect feIt was evaluated according to two different assessment protocols: (i) specific quantities of leaves, or the leaves of a specific quantity of shoots, per uniform-age plot were inspected on both the upper and lower sides for Podosphaera leucotricha infection, with the number of infected leaves expressed as a percentage (PESINC); and (ii) specific quantities of leaves, or the leaves of a specific quantity of shoots, per uniform-age plot were inspected on both the upper and lower sides for Podosphaera leucotricha infection, with the foliar surface area of ​​infected leaves expressed as a percentage (PESSEV). For each protocol, the results were compared to an untreated control. The synergistic effect of CP + TAG is evaluated by comparing it with the feexpected from the combination of the individual active compounds calculated according to the Colby calculation method indicated above. The crops were sprayed with several applications of the active compound preparations, according to the following schemes for location 1: A1 (first application), A2 = A1 + 8 days, A3 = A2 + 8 days and A4 = A3 + 8 days, A5 = A4 + 7 days, A6 = A5 + 7 days, A7 - A6 + 7 days, A8 - A7 + 7 days; and location 2: A1 (first application), A2 - A1 + 4 days, A3 = A2 + 6 days and A4 - A3 + 7 days, A5 - A4 + 7 days, A6 - A5 + 6 days, A7 = A6 + 5 days, A8 = A7 + 6 days, A9 = A8 + 7 days, A10 = A9 + 7 days, A11 = A10 + 9 days. evaluation protocol / test location / sample size (# of shoots or leaves) / DAAn* / crop growth stage CP (g ac** / ha) CP fe (%) TAG (g ac / ha) TAG fe (%) CP + TAG (g ac CPf / ha + g ac TAGVha) CP + TAG fe (%) Co Iby fe (% PESINC / location 1 / 20 shoots / 7 DA-A5 / 1948.15 56.5 840 26.7 1948.151 + 840* 69.9 68. 1 BBCH 71 PESSEV / location 1 / 100 sheets / 6 DA-A6 / BBCH 74 1948.15 53.1 840 15.6 1948.151 + 8401 62.5 60. PESINC / location 1 / 100 sheets / 6 DA-A6 / BBCH 74 1948.15 44.2 840 14.5 1948.15' + 840* 59.2 52. 3 PESSEV / location 1 i 100 sheets / 5 DA-A8 / BBCH 74 1948.15 62.5 840 38.4 1948.151 + 840* 86.8 76. 9 PESINC / location 1 / 100 sheets i 5 DA-A8 / BBCH 74 1948.15 34.0 840 18.8 1948.151 + 8401 60.7 46. 4 PESSEV / location 1 / 100 sheets / 15 DA-A8 i BBCH 76 1948.15 34.2 840 2.6 1948.15' + 840* 60.2 35. 9 PESINC / location 1 i 100 sheets / 15 DA-A8 1948.15 18.6 840 8.7 1948.15T + 840* 45.9 25. 7 / BBCH 76 PESINC / location 1 / 20 shoots / 7 DA-A5 / BBCH 71 1948.15 2.7 840 0.6 1948.15* + 840* 25.2 3.3 PESSEV / location 1 / 100 leaves / 6 DA-A6 / BBCH 74 1948.15 30.4 840 44.9 1948.15* + 840* 63.9 61. 7 PESINC / location 1 / 100 leaves / 6 DA-A6 / BBCH 74 1948.15 23.6 840 36.4 1948.15* + 840* 57.5 51. 4 PESSEV / location 1 / 100 leaves i 5 DA-A8 / BBCH 74 1948.15 19.3 840 1.6 1948.15* + 840* 43.5 20. 6 PESINC / location 1 / 100 sheets / 5 DA-A8 / BBCH 74 1948.15 37.7 840 2.4 1948.15* + 840* 63.6 39. 2 PESSEV ! Location 1 i 100 sheets / 15 DA-A8 / BBCH 76 1948.15 12.2 840 3.5 1948.15* + 840* 33.2 15. 3 PESINC / Location 1 / 100 sheets 1948.15 14.1 840 5.9 1948.15* + 840* 65.2 19. 2 frQicm / ιζηζ / Β / γΐΛΐ u / 15 DA-A8 | i BBCH 76 | I * DA~An ~ days after the last application (with DA referring to days after and An referring to a specific application, n being a positive integer); ** ac - active compound EXAMPLE 15 Example 15 relates to a fungicidal composition comprising a combination of choline phosphonate and tagatose, which was applied to apple (Malus domestica var. Gala) crops infected with apple scab (Venturia inaequalis), according to the test conditions mentioned above for Example 1. The results according to Example 15 are shown in Table 15. Table 15 - Test results of Example 15, showing the fungicidal effect (fe) against Venturia inaequalis of a fungicidal composition according to the first aspect of the present invention comprising choline phosphonate (CP) and tagatose (TAG), referred to as 'CP + TAG', compared to fungicidal compositions comprising CP or TAG individually. The fungicidal composition was applied to Malus domestica var. Gala (the crop) infected with Venturia inaequalis. The tests were carried out in France. The fungicidal effect feThe evaluation was conducted according to two different protocols: (i) 200 leaves per plot of uniform age were inspected on both the upper and lower sides for infection with Venturia inaequalis, with the number of infected leaves expressed as a percentage (PESINC), and (ii) 200 leaves per plot of uniform age were inspected on both the upper and lower sides for infection with Venturia inaequalis, with the leaf area of ​​infected leaves expressed as a percentage (PESSEV). For each protocol, the results were compared to an untreated control. The synergistic effect of CP + TAG was evaluated by comparing it to the expected effect of the combination of the two. Individual active compounds calculated according to the Colby calculation method indicated above. The crops will be sprayed with several applications of the active compound preparations, according to the following scheme: A1 (first application), A2 - A1 + 7 days, A3 - A2 + 6 days and A4 - A3 + 3 days, A5 - A4 + 6 days, A6 = A5 + 6 days, A7 - A6 + 7 days, A8 - A7 + 3 days, A9 - A8 + 7 days, A10 - A9 + 7 days, A11 - A10 + 6 days, A12 ~ A1 + 4 days. CP protocol CP TAG TAG CP + TAG CP + Co of (g ac** fe (g ac / ha) fe (g ac CP* / ha + TAG Iby 10 evaluation / sample size (# of leaves) / DA-An* crop growth stage / ha) (%) (%) g ac TAG* / ha) fe (%) fe (%) 15 PESINC / 200 leaves / 28 DA-A12 / BBCH 73 3316 67.7 1200 28.1 3316*+1200* 81.6 76. 8 20 PESINC / 200 leaves / 56 DA-A12 / BBCH 75 3316 65.3 1200 28.0 3316*+1200* 79.1 75. 0 DA-An - days after the last application (with DA referring to days after and An referring to a specific application, n being a positive integer); “ac = active compound

Claims

CLAIMS 1. A synergistically effective fungicidal composition characterized in that it comprises as component (A) a fungicidally active amount of choline phosphonate and as component (B) at least one additional fungicide selected from the group comprising quinone fungicides, succinate dehydrogenase inhibitors, benzamide fungicides, sulfur fungicides, carboxylic acid amide fungicides, demethylation inhibitor fungicides, phenylamide fungicides, copper fungicides, piperidinyl thalazol isoxazoline fungicides and sugar alcohols, wherein the weight ratio of components (A) and (B) is in the range of 1:1000 to 1000:1, and wherein said at least one additional fungicide is selected from the group consisting of dithianone, isofetamide, zoxamide, fluopicolide, sulfur, valifenalate and tagatose.

2. The fungicidal composition according to claim 1, characterized in that said weight ratio of components (A) and (B) is in the range of 1:150 to 150:

1.

3. The fungicidal composition according to claim 1, characterized in that the fungicidal composition comprises as component (A) a fungicidally active amount of choline phosphonate and as component (B) dithianone, wherein the weight ratio of components (A) and (B) is in a range of 2:1 to 32:

1.

4. The fungicidal composition according to claim 1, characterized in that the fungicidal composition comprises as component (A) a fungicidally active amount of choline phosphonate and as component (B) isofetamide, wherein the weight ratio of components (A) and (B) is in the range of 5:1 to 120:

1.

5. The fungicidal composition according to claim 1, characterized in that the fungicidal composition comprises as component (A) a fungicidally active amount of choline phosphonate and as component (B) zoxamide, wherein a weight ratio of components (A) and (B) is in a range of 6:1 to 100:

1.

6. The fungicidal composition according to claim 1, characterized in that the fungicidal composition comprises as component (A) a fungicidally active amount of choline phosphonate and as component (B) fluopicolide, wherein a weight ratio of components (A) and (B) is in a range of 6:1 to 100:

1.

7. The fungicidal composition according to claim 1, characterized in that the fungicidal composition comprises as component (A) a fungicidally active amount of choline phosphonate and as component (B) sulfur, wherein the weight ratio of components (A) and (B) is in the range of 1:8 to 1:

1. 15 8. The fungicidal composition according to claim 1, characterized in that the fungicidal composition comprises as component (A) a fungicidally active amount of choline phosphonate and as component (B) valifenalate, wherein the weight ratio of components (A) and (B) is in the range of 2.5:1 to 40:

1. 20 9. The fungicidal composition according to claim 1, characterized in that the fungicidal composition comprises as component (A) a fungicidally active amount of choline phosphonate and as component (B) tagatose, wherein a weight ratio of components (A) and (B) is in the range of 1:5 to A-1.25 10. The fungicidal composition according to any of claims 1 to 9, characterized in that it further comprises one or more additional components selected from the group comprising other fungicides, other pesticides such as herbicides, insecticides or other active pesticide ingredients, protectants, antioxidants, chemical stabilizers, adhesives, fertilizers, perfumes, colorants, liquid carriers, solid carriers, surfactants, crystallization inhibitors, viscosity modifiers, suspending agents, spray droplet modifiers, pigments, foaming agents, light-blocking agents, compatibility agents, antifoaming agents, sequestering agents, neutralizing agents and pH regulators, wetting and dispersing agents, preservatives, thickening agents, corrosion inhibitors, freezing point depressants, odorants, spreading agents,penetration aids, micronutrients, emollients, lubricants, adherent agents and humectants.

11. A kit characterized in that it comprises one or more spatially separated components to be used as a fungicidal composition, comprising as component (A) a fungicidally active amount of choline phosphonate and as component (B) at least an additional fungicide according to the fungicidal composition according to any one of claims 1 to 10.

12. Use of the fungicidal composition according to any of claims 1 to 10 in an amount effective to control one or more types of fungal infections by applying the fungicidal composition to the fungal infections.

13. Use in accordance with claim 12, wherein said fungicidal composition is effective in controlling one or more types of fungal infections in a crop, seeds and soil.