World ethical charters based compliance (WECBC)

Description

[0001]

[0002] World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Patent Registration for Prof. Rev. 'Public Friend' Felipe Ribeiro

[0003] 1 . Patent Request:

[0004] I request to the most honorable World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO); through the Electronic Patent Cooperation Treaty (ePCT) and the Brazilian National Institute of Industrial Property (RO / BR); to grant the international patent of the World Ethical Charters Based Compliance (WECBC); including its processes, methodologies, and computational usages, such as the World Charters Database (WECDb); due to its verifiable novelty and inventive nonobviousness; for its inventor, Prof. Rev. 'Public Friend1Felipe Ribeiro, director of The Common Good Society (CoGS), resident at Av. Da Aclimaqao 547, apartment 171 , Sao Paulo City, State of Sao Paulo (SP), Brazil.

[0005] 2. Patent Description:

[0006] 2.1. Title of the Invention:

[0007] World Ethical Charters Based Compliance (WECBC).

[0008] 2.2. Abstract of the Invention:

[0009] The World Ethical Charters Based Compliance (WECBC) is an unique and unprecedented industrial procedural methodology for rule-of-law regulatory compliance of ethics-based processes; through the analysis of, free for public use open source, official ethical documents from respectable international institutions; that has many foreseeable uses in every industrial ecosystem that requires ethical processes involving humans, alone or in relations, such as health welfare analysis, cultural diplomacy, organizational governance, projects management, and computer algorithmic softwares regulation. 2.3. Technical Fields of the Invention:

[0010] • Ethics Rule-of-Law Evidence-Data-Based Regulatory Compliance,

[0011] • World Documents Glocal Ethical Analysis;

[0012] • Ethics-Based Methodological Development of Constitutions, Bylaws, Standards, Codes of Conducts, and Guidelines;

[0013] • Health and Welfare Consultancy;

[0014] • Cultural Rights Based Cultural Diplomacy Analysis and Projects Development;

[0015] • Education, Pedagogy, and Instructional Design;

[0016] • Organizational DevSecOps Open Governance;

[0017] • Sustainable Development Green Logistics Projects Management;

[0018] • Computational Algorithms, Data, and Softwares Regulation;

[0019] • Semantic Web Compliance Ontological Architecture;

[0020] • Semantic Web Ontologies and Inter-Ontological Alignment;

[0021] • Compliant Computational Algorithms, Softwares, Machine Learning (ML), and Artificial Intelligence (Al) Development;

[0022] • Individual Certification and Institutional Accreditation.

[0023] 2.4. Methodology of the Invention:

[0024] • Rule-of-Law development of a regulatory compliance database, the World Ethical Charters Database (WECDb), composed of, licensed for public use, international charters of principles, codes of conduct, and guidelines for ethics involving processes;

[0025] • Peer-Review by recognized specialist scholars, along qualitative research and big-data-analysis, of this database's documents' legal and ethical values vocabularies presence and usages;

[0026] • Establishment of The Common Good Society (CoGS), in compliance with transparent accountable audited open governance, for the invention's coherent safeguard, research, projects implementation, and promotion;

[0027] • Establishment of an evidence-data-based ethical principles hierarchy and open source methodology to categorize the international charters of the database, according to their rule-of-law compliance dependencies and usefulness for the planetary common good;

[0028] • Processes and products sharing in free-libre copyleft or open source licenses;

[0029] • Development of peer-reviewing standards and guidelines;

[0030] • Development of an online platform with our open science research disclosure and other projects;

[0031] • Curatorship of more compliant charters along their full disclosure, selected or not, concerning the processes, documents, and technologies used;

[0032] • Development of controlled vocabularies of these documents most recurring common values, as a whole and in each different category;

[0033] • Development of techno-philanthropy consultancy based on our researches;

[0034] • Continued learning through qualitative and quantitative analysis of available international regulatory compliances, training courses, individual certifications, and institutional accreditations for ourselves and to promote in our platform;

[0035] • Development of rule-of-law compliant evidence-data-based algorithmic guidelines for different sustainable development procedures ethical processes; • Development of rule-of-law compliant evidence-data-based pedagogical guides for the ethical algorithmic guidelines and procedures;

[0036] • Qualitative research and quantitative big-data analysis of common good projects cultural diplomacy rule-of-law regulatory compliance implementation with health and welfare for everyone involved;

[0037] • Development of a semantic web upper ontology concerning the rule-of-law compliant usage and governance of the database and our evidence-data- based ethical principles hierarchy main charter;

[0038] • Development of semantic web domain-specific ontologies;

[0039] • Development of semantic web inter-ontological alignment frameworks;

[0040] • Development of semantic web ontologies based softwares, machine learning (ML) and artificial intelligence (Al) technologies to base computational applications, softwares, and platforms;

[0041] • Development of rule-of-law individual certification programs;

[0042] • Development of rule-of-law institutional accreditation programs;

[0043] • Development of nonviolence rule-of-law secular interfaith advocacy programs for the common good through the world ethical charters based compliance.

[0044] • Complete publishing of all our own accountability and auditorship data.

[0045] 2.5. Nonprejudicial Disclosure of the Invention Analysis:

[0046] The World Ethical Charters Based Compliance (WECBC), along its World Ethical Charters Database (WECDb), was sparsely shared, mostly in very incomplete forms, with scholars and agents from its prior art as open educational resources (OER), course syllabi, and cultural diplomacy projects; because, as a poor man, Prof. Rev. 'Public Friend1Felipe Ribeiro only survived, literally, through their gratefulness-based gift-solidarity-economy humanitarian and cultural projects philanthropic charities. tent of the Invention Prior Art Analysis:

[0047] 3.1. The Methodology and Content of the Prior Art Analysis:

[0048] To prove the WECBC patent urgent relevance; based on evidences and data, in compliance with rule-of-law and the scientific method; we will present you how; from (3.2.) the variety of regulatory compliances of distinct international institutions; created through specific sets of principles, in diverse glocal settings; as present in their official, free for public use, constitutions, bylaws, standards, codes of conducts, and guidelines documents; Prof. Rev. 'Public Friend' Felipe Ribeiro could (3.3.) map our prior art industrial ecosystem best mode exemplars to, (3.4.) avoiding any industrial secret conflicts with them, being able to (3.5) summarize their objective technical limitations and synthesize (4.) the invention's unique, unprecedented, novel, and inventively nonobvious methodology, so that we may present its beneficial advantageous effects for the common good along with (5.) the improvements it makes available for ecosystemic industriousness and industrial ecosystems as a whole through (6.) his patented subject matter embodiments. 3.2. The Scope of the Prior Art Analysis:

[0049] The World Ethical Charters Based Compliance (WECBC) itself started as a personal analytical project of Prof. Rev. 'Public Friend1Felipe Ribeiro on the invention's prior art; necessary because the inventor couldn't find a methodology to establish dialogue and cooperation between the vast diversity of glocal international institutions he works with in the fields of peace culture, rule-of-law promotion, humanitarian aid, social service, solidarity economy, open source software, open science, open education, heritage safeguard, social ecomuseology, art curatorship, cultural diplomacy, secular interfaith diplomacy, ecological sustainable development, and diversity equitable inclusivity (DEI). Because of the magnitude of the invention, we will analyze the best prior art exemplars in all these fields.

[0050] 3.3. Prior Art Analysis:

[0051] To analyze the World Ethical Charters Based Compliance (WECBC) level of inventive nonobviousness, to those skilled in the pertinent prior arts; who have protected, nourished, teached, and encouraged the Prof. Rev. 'Public Friend' Felipe Ribeiro to pursue and fulfill his invention's purposes to reach planetary harmony; we shall use the WECBC methodology itself, determining the extension of our industrial ecosystems and their current best methodologies' objective technical problems to my purpose in promoting the common good.

[0052] A few of their best exemplars are:

[0053] • The International Bar Association (IBA) Rule-of-Law (RoL) Directory, although having developed a database where the users may add juridical institutions and lawyers working to promote rule-of-law, never shared regulatory compliance methodologies on the issue nor on ethical charters;

[0054] • The World Ethics Organization (WEO), although having developed a methodology for philanthropic organizations governance, never developed any for world ethical common values regulatory compliance analysis or creation;

[0055] • The International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC), although having developed the "International Humanitarian Law (IHL)" and implemented it in the imprescindible safeguard of nonviolence and peacebuilding in war situations, never developed peace culture nor humanitarian social service culture promotion programs because of the lack of regulatory compliance on these issues;

[0056] • The United Nations (UN); although having developed a system of rule-of-law nonviolence peacebuilding compliant organizations to promote the "Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR)" as world's first international principles charter and releasing statements defending principles; even having developed a research on "The World’s Top Universal Concerns", through its Department of Global Communications (DGC), and stating to "protect and promote global values" and to "foster inclusion and transparency" in its "Secretary General's Strategy on New Technologies" charter; because it is an emergencial rescue and advisory system and not a legislative body; never developed a regulatory compliance methodology for ethical issues based on international charters; • The World Federalism Movement (WFM), although having developed "The Earth Constitution" for international regulatory compliance implementation methodology, never developed the necessary methodology for an international common values ethical principle charters collaborative analysis;

[0057] • The International Criminal Justice (ICC), although having developed regulatory compliance jurisprudence methodologies for litigations between individuals and legal entities from different countries, never developed a world common values principles charter;

[0058] • The International Civil Rights Movements many institutions, although having developed hundreds of imprescindible ethical emergencial rescue programs and principles safeguard advocacy charters, never developed rule-of-law regulatory compliance implementation public methodologies, not even for their own works, even less any sort of charters compilation and analysis;

[0059] • The Nonviolence International (NVI), along many other peace culture institutions; although having developed guidelines, such as the Nonviolence Tactics Guide, to try to make civil rights movements more compliant to rule-of- law; never developed catalog of nonviolence in world's charters;

[0060] • The Interfaith Diplomacy Movement many respectable institutions, although having developed a series of ethical principles charters and guidelines through more than a century of international dialogues that included secular accountable peer-review and auditorship, never developed an ethical regulatory compliances implementation methodology for its own worldwide works, even less including secular ethical charters;

[0061] • The Free Software Foundation (FSF); although having developed the GNU non-institutional free-libre license; never developed any ethical compliance methodologies for open technologies;

[0062] • The Open Source Initiative (OSI). as other domain-specific educational and regulatory compliance institutions; although having developed libraries of open source licenses that served as jurisprudence precedent for diamond open access to knowledge and developing individual certifications and institutional accreditations, in compliance with international rule-of-law; never developed methodologies for ethical licenses nor interdisciplinary ethical alignments principles methodologies, not even for computational DevSecOps;

[0063] • The Open Group; although having developed The Open Group Architecture Framework (TOGAF) standard for enterprise architecture; never developed rule- of-law regulatory compliance governance methodologies; not even for open source, open governance, open law. or open compliance; nor has created any codes-of-conducts or ethical guidelines development methodologies;

[0064] • The World Bank Open Knowledge Repository; as many other ethics-based diamond open access libraries and universities; although having developed some of the best ethical guidelines for practical implementation of humanitarian solidarity service projects, that point to different institutions supplying individual certifications and institutional accreditations; never developed regulatory compliance standards for rule-of-law world common values ethics nor methodologies for such; • The Transparency International (Tl); although having developed many rule-of- law governmental civil auditorship and informational disclosure methodologies; never developed any ethical transparency standards charter, guidelines, nor methodology;

[0065] • The Accountable Now International, although having developed standards for organizational accountability and auditorship, never developed methodologies or technologies to include ethical compliance in these;

[0066] • The Amnesty International, although having developed the "International Non Governmental Organizations Accountability Charter" and many other projects for ethics safeguard, never developed a world ethical charters based methodology or platform;

[0067] • The Avaaz Platform, although having developed a technology for online civil movements advocacy demonstrations, never developed a public database of its charters, even less published its decision-making ethical principles or procedures methodologies;

[0068] • The Wikimedia Movement; although having developed many methodologies for free online educational resources open governance rule-of-law regulatory compliance, including the creation and implementation of codes-of-conducts; never developed rule-of-law ethics specific public repositories, technologies, nor methodologies for ethical compliance implementation, of anything like a 'Wikiethics1or 'Wikilaw' platform; even less based on world ethical charters and guidelines common values analysis;

[0069] • The Worldwide Initiatives for Grantmaker Support (WINGS); as other nonprofit and endowment promotion institutions; although having developed methodologies and guidelines for philanthropic rating; never developed a world ethical charters based rule-of-law regulatory compliance nor any methodology;

[0070] • The Effective Altruism Movement, as other international actions for the common good ethics regulatory compliance research institutions, although having developed many global-evidence-data-based methodologies for specific local urgent problems, never developed a world ethical charters based methodology for glocal conflicts resolution;

[0071] • The World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), although having developed the semantic web ontology framework for metadata inter-institutional analysis, never developed ethical regulatory compliance implementation technologies for the internet based on it nor methodologies for this purpose;

[0072] • The Internet Governance Forum (IGF), although having developed civil landmarks for national regulation on internet usage, never developed ethicalbased technologies for regulatory compliance of the internet nor methodologies for this purpose;

[0073] • The Center for Open Science (COS), although having developed the Open Science Framework (OSF) for pre-registering researches to improve their auditorship, never developed ethical principles of scientific inquiry standards nor methodologies, not even developed semantic web ontology compliance, even less based on world international accepted ethical charters;

[0074] • The Lens Search Engine, although having developed an algorithm to search for open source patents, never developed one for international ethical standards charters; • The United Nations Education. Science, and Culture Organization (UNESCO). although having developed many programs to protect the heritage of humanity since its "Roerich Peace Culture Pact", never developed a common values charter of principles, methodologies, nor a world standard for education, science, culture, and media institutions to comply with international rule-of-law;

[0075] • The International Council of Museums (ICOM); although having developed many imprescindible guidelines, regulatory compliance implementation frameworks, and projects for the safeguard of the heritage of humanity through culture; never developed charters or methodologies neither for international ethical cultural rights, nor cultural diplomacy, nor art markets regulatory compliance;

[0076] • The Creative Commons (CC). although having developed licenses for creative industry and art labor copyright conflict resolution and open justice initiatives, never developed ethical licensing for fair use regulatory compliance nor any methodology for these purposes;

[0077] • The Digital Labour Institute (DigiLabour), although having developed many researches on platform economy cooperativism, never developed any guideline or ethical standards for its compliance, even less databases for these purposes;

[0078] • The Latin-American Network of Art Workers (RLATA), although having developed many documents templates for labor contracts, never developed standards or methodologies for art, as a cultural diplomacy, development ethical conduct;

[0079] • The Motion Picture Content Rating System many initiatives, although having developed many different classification methods, never developed a full cultural ethical rule-of-law regulatory compliance charter, methodology, nor guidelines based on international common values analysis;

[0080] • The Institute for Cultural Diolomacy (ICD). although having developed many methodologies for cultural diplomacy and its education, never developed any public ethical rule-of-law regulatory compliance charter, methodology, nor guidelines based on international common values analysis;

[0081] • The Fair Trade International (FTI). as many international labor categories unions, although having developed guidelines and certifications for labor justice and ethical standards, never developed an overall standard for corporate ethical conduct based on international rule-of-law regulatory compliance, nor any methodology for this purpose;

[0082] • The Twelve Steps Program Groups (AA, NA, N / A); as other temperance movements; although having developed faith-based harm-reduction principles charters, codes-of-conduct based on these, governance guidelines based on the previous, and educational methodologies; never developed ethical principles charters or guidelines nor rule-of-law regulatory compliance implementation methodologies, even less based on international ethics charters; • The Greater Good Science; although having developed researches on the roots of happy and compassionate action, which they present as principles for their courses; due to leaving out of their approach to science any glocal social welfare issues; never developed any regulatory compliance basement for their health principles on international rule-of-law regulatory compliance;

[0083] • The Chaplaincy Innovation Lab (CIL). and other secular interfaith health and welfare educational certification institutes, although having developed standards on psycho-physical care, never developed any public guidelines nor world rule-of-law regulatory compliance implementation methodology on the theme, even less based on international charters;

[0084] • The Good Faith Partnership, although having developed the Virtues of Faith local public opinion qualitative research report on common values among religious institutions, never developed international qualitative and quantitative big-data-analysis based research on world ethical rule-of-law regulatory compliance, nor its methodologies, in compliance with the interfaith movement; even less including secular charters;

[0085] • The Institute of Physics (IOP) Publishing; as many universities, research institutes, and academic journals publishing companies; although having developed methodologies for scientific inquiry regulatory compliance through peer review excellence; never developed international qualitative and quantitative big-data-analysis based research on world ethical rule-of-law regulatory compliance, nor methodologies for its applications in peer-review;

[0086] • The Extropy Institute, as other health prolonging research centers, although making remarkable discoveries on possible medical implementations, never developed any methodology for researching the implications of ethics in health or welfare, even less for its rule-of-law regulatory compliance;

[0087] • The Deep Knowledge Group; although having developed Philanthropy International and other health and technological methodologies, databases of institutions and funds, algorithms, machine learning (ML) procedures, and artificial intelligences (Al); never developed any of these for ethical rule-of-law regulatory compliance, nor methodologies for these purposes, even less based on international common values qualitative research and big-data-analysis altogether;

[0088] • The International Compliance Association (IGA), although having developed many educational methodologies, never developed public standards or guidelines for the area;

[0089] • The Open Invention Network (QIN); although having developed a methodology to open the source code and guidelines of technological patents necessary for the common good; never developed any such program for ethical issues;

[0090] • The Open Data Institute (ODI); and other data regulations research institutions; although having developed guidelines for the regulatory compliance of the technical issues of computational development, including their corporate governance; never developed a public implementation program methodology for these as ethical processes, nor their implications in the DevSecOps of algorithms, machine learning (ML), nor artificial intelligence (Al), even less based on international rule-of-law regulatory compliance;

Claims

• The National Religious Broadcast (NRB); although having developed nationlevel policymaking rule-of-law advocacy for ethical-based regulatory compliance; never developed a world ethics charter nor rule-of-law regulatory compliance methodologies;• The Archive for Religious Data Association (ARDA), and other censuses- based data-analysis repositories, although having developed many hierarchies of ethical principles, never developed any based on international charters, even less including secular ethics ones;• The Harvard Tribal Justice System Toolkit; although having developed a rule- of-law regulatory compliance methodology; only did it based on local ethical principles, charters, and guidelines; never developed a methodology based worldwide charters for open justice, even less for other fields such as cultural diplomacy or interfaith diplomacy;• The United Nations (UN) Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) Program: although having developed many planetary ethical goals and sub-goals , with their guidelines for green logistics in every industrial ecosystem, as the UNESCO open educational resources (OER) recommendation, in full conformance with diversity eguity inclusivity (DEI); never developed a world common values research on ethical principles sustainable development regulatory compliance methodology;• The World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) itself; along its network of institutions that hold rule-of-law mandate upon patent, trademarking, and copyright; as some of our most important planetary rule-of-law regulatory compliance standards and their implementations ethical jury; apart from patenting itself, never developed public world ethical principles standards;3.

4. Prior Art Ex Post Facto Impermissible Hindsight Analysis: Since the World Ethical Charters Based Compliance (WECBC) is composed of many different, free for public use open source, methodologies and technologies of its prior art, developed through centuries of international solidarity service for the common good; which includes the very patent examiner; and has as its mission the very promotion of all those official documents along their institutions through open source scientific, educational, cultural, and technological projects that will bring several facilitation and promotional possibilities to them all; we believe the safe, transparent, and fair publication of the invention will be viewed by its prior art as both, an inevitable natural unfolding of their own works under rule-of-law and as an overall benefit for humankind and planetary ecology regulatory compliance.3.

5. Prior Art Analysis Conclusion:Whereas the World Ethical Charters Based Compliance (WECBC) honorable previous art; although being imprescindible for our world and had inspired Prof Rev. 'Public Friend1Felipe Ribeiro himself; never developed anything near to the unigue and unprecedentedly novel invention of the latter, which engineers all their inventions in a very specific and precise manner;Whereas all the prior art technologies used are licensed for free public use and none of them got any close to engineering more than their own best practices and methodologies;Whereas we have no other public ethical rule-of-law regulatory compliance methodology for ethical processes based on international, secular and interfaith, principles charters, institutional constitutions, organizational governance bylaws, and peer-reviewed guidelines worldwide;Whereas we have no ethical computational framework for algorithmic softwares, machine learning (ML), nor artificial intelligence (Al);Whereas we don't have any institution working in analysis that encompass worldwide nonviolence, peace culture, humanitarian aid, social service, solidarity economy, open source science access education, cultural diplomacy, ecomuseology, heritage safeguard, secular interfaith intercultural, health welfare, sustainable development, diversity equity inclusivity, and environmental social governance ethics;Therefore we claim the WECBC to be, rightfully, patented for its inventor, due to its nonobviousness for the utmost skilled specialists worldwide in all of its prior art, which proves its uniquely novel inventivity. tent Claims:4.

1. Distinguishing Solutions of the Invention;The World Ethical Charters Based Compliance (WECBC) inventive nonobviousness to those skilled in the pertinent prior art, whether individuals or institutions, is verifiable in the fact that none of them, alone or in collaboration, ever developed any sort of world rule-of-law ethical regulatory compliance based on international charters nor any methodologies for this purpose, as we vastly based with evidential data in our (3.) analysis of the prior art of the invention. The invention's novelty nonobviousness is even more perceptible in the fact that, although the prior art had the same access to the raw materials Prof Rev. 'Public Friend' Felipe Ribeiro used in his reliability engineering, they never developed anything near to it, probably because they are too busy with their own imprescindible missions and can't work with all other agents of our industrial ecosystem, which the inventor had the necessity to do to save countless lives and to promote the common good.4.

2. Common Good Advantageous Effects of the Invention:The World Ethical Charters Based Compliance (WECBC) is a benefit for the whole world because it allows new transparent open source ways of analyzing ethical processes to develop more humane and healthy technologies for the development of individuals, relations, communities, and organizations. This happens because its rule-of-law international charters evidence-data-based analysis provides a social responsibility reliability engineering framework for the glocal development of auditable new standards for populations' health welfare, cultural projects, corporative architecture, environmental social governance (ESG), civil participation, and other data acquisition by assisting in the implementation of regulatory compliance.4.2.

1. Already Developed Minimum Viable Products (MVP):Prof. Rev. 'Public Friend1Felipe Ribeiro established The Common Good Society (CoGS) to research and analyze the World Ethical Charters Based Compliance (WECBC) and its database (WECDb), which started by analyzing for two years the more than 250 policies' vocabularies and establishing, through peer-reviewed open research, a hierarchy of priorities as found in them. These universal common values were, and are, used in all developments of the WECBC, WECDb, and CoGS to avoid any possible danger from the invention to the glocal community, in special the prior art and industrial ecosystem. This ethical minimum viable product (MVP) allowed the inventor to assist a multitude of the prior art for several years, in an internationally awarded manner, and developing various other open knowledge databases, secular interfaith cultural diplomacy projects, courses syllabi, and open educational resources (OER) that have been of utmost importance for many endangered communities. This way WECBC already have supported, safeguarded, and promoted works for many imprescindible areas for the common good internationally.4.2.

2. Open Source Development Framework of the Invention:To research, safeguard, implement, and promote the World Ethical Charters Based Compliance (WECBC) and its derivative projects; and to, following the virtuous example of all its prior art as well as the principles The Common Good Society (CoGS) found in the international charters, Prof. Rev. 'Public Friend' Felipe Ribeiro found imprescindible to make the organization a nonprofit philanthropic charity for the development of social services and our industrial ecosystems' solidarity economy markets. For this purpose the inventor has guided it to only use his invention for the planetary internationally glocal common good; in the most vast rule-of-law compliance necessary, as proposed by the WECBC itself; to share as much processes and methodologies as possible to those most in need with free-libre copyleft licenses, which shall promote new industrial ecosystems, solidarity markets, social enterprises, civil sustainable development projects, and compliant cultural businesses. This Way WECBC is also a tool for further developing and promoting the open source industrial ecosystem in a massively scale, including: open infra, open research, open science, open education, open heritage, open justice, open production, open ethics, open data, open governance, open hardware, open cities, open philanthropy, open access, open innovation, open game engines, open governments, open societies, etc.4.2.

3. Some Institutions the Inventor Assisted Using the Invention: Prof. Rev. 'Public Friend' Felipe Ribeiro, along The Common Good Society (CoGS), has used the World Ethical Charters Based Compliance (WECBC) in works with: United Nations UNAOC UNOCT, UNESCO, UNEP, UNDP, United Religions Initiative (URI), Religions for Peace (RfP), Open Data Institute (ODI), Open Ethics Initiative, Open Heritage Platform, Open Invention Network (01 N), World Wide Wb Consortium (W3C), OMNIA Interfaith Peacemakers, Wikieducation, Creative Commons Education & Arts Platform, Danish Royal Academy of Arts and Sciences, Open Ethics, Open Heritage, ICOM DROPS Ecomuseology Platform, Parliament of World's Religions, Brazilian Lawyers Bar (OAB), SESC Training Culture Center, Latin American Network of Art Workers, MuseWeb Museum Technology Member, WikiGLAM Network, IC0M0S Summit, among many others.tent Industrial Applications:5.

1. Nonconflict of Interest of the Invention's Patent:The World Ethical Charters Based Compliance (WECBC) most honorable previous art; having developed the utmost imprescindible technologies to implement our world ethics governance through international rule-of-law regulatory compliance that inspired Prof. Rev. 'Public Friend1Felipe Ribeiro to develop the invention's unique and unprecedented novelty; led him to commit himself, his invention, and The Common Good Society (CoGS) to:• Never pursue any sort of litigation for conflict of interests with any prior art or other industry or ecosystem, always searching for alternative paths of development;• Sharing as much as possible all WECBC's developments as free-libre copyleft processes and products, and whenever not possible to do so at least as fully transparent audited and accountable open source;• Fully transparent audited accountable development of CoGS, as well, through collaborative participative open governance;• The use of the invention's future developments and every derivatives of it, process or product, solely for the purpose of the planetary glocal common good, as best as possible.5.

2. Patent Importance for the Invention's Prior Art:Some agents of the prior art themselves indicated Prof. Rev. 'Public Friend' Felipe Ribeiro to get to know about The World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) and to patent the World Ethical Charters Based Compliance (WECBC) and The Common Good Society (CoGS), in order to defend and protect the invention, due to its utmost importance for humanitarian services and educational purposes, access to the invention's novel ethical analysis and compliance methodologies for the common good. They have pointed specially the catastrophic danger of such technology being used without nonviolence, rule-of-law, philanthropic, open source, heritage safeguard, intercultural diplomacy, and health welfare principles underlying it. This way, WECBC patent will support its prior art's institutions and industrial ecosystems to fully participate in its development transparently in a democratic audited accountable process avoiding any bad consequence to anyone at the same time that allowing the inventor's, along CoGS, to finance the sustainable development of the invention meanwhile promoting world peacebuilding humanitarian culture as a standard for the benefit of all generations.5.

3. Risk-Mitigating Safeguard Necessary for the Invention:The World Ethical Charters Based Compliance (WECBC); as a civil society educational consultancy rule-of-law regulatory compliance methodology, even without having any legal authority or official advisory legality; can be a very dangerous invention if its technologies for ethical compliance may be used for non-democratic, violent, or selfish purposes that don't take into account the planetary glocal common good; because it, as a whole or through the unregulated use of its prior art methodologies, may be remixed, rearranged, or retro-engineered with hazardous consequences for the whole planet sustainable ecological and economical systems, international diplomacy, governments, industrial ecosystems, civil rights organizations, communities, families, and individuals. Because of this, the invention's communication to its prior art and other world authorities is urgently needed, as soon as possible; at least for them to prepare to respond to any similar technology that may be being developed for unethical purposes, perhaps in secrecy, and that could shutdown specific industries or communities.5.3.

1. Industrial Risks- Analysis Necessary for the Invention:The World Ethical Charters Based Compliance (WECBC), as a complex ethical operational system, is able to improve almost any human-based logistics through promoting free-libre open source processes rule-of-law regulatory compliance, but it may also become a risk for other industries, if not properly regulated to avoid monopolies. But because of the unbearable sufferings Prof. Rev. 'Public Friend' Felipe Ribeiro, The Common Good Society (CoGS) volunteers, and the invention's prior art have seen and been through, trying to diminish planetary suffering, he understands that we are facing a real planetary ethical urgency which will need your patenting of WECBC to establish its international humanitarian use testing programs to find support for such a risk-mitigating program for its further development.5.

4. Patent Importance for the World Intellectual Property:Since the inventor, Prof. Rev. 'Public Friend' Felipe Ribeiro, is afraid of disclosing his invention further to the prior art without it being safeguarded from unethical uses; he begs the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) to patent the World Ethical Charters Based Compliance (WECBC) as soon as possible and to, also, support and assist us in the invention's development in the best mode possible; without any conflict of interests with anyone; so that the whole world may, respectfully, know more about the invention's uses for the common good; improving even more the urgent regularization of the ethical-based processes and logistics of industrial ecosystems concerned with sustainable development goals (SDGs) diversity equity inclusivity (DEI) environmental social governance (ESG) that are our current international emergencial agenda, as established by all our prior art. This way, he looks after also promoting WIPO and its imprescindible works for industrial social responsibilities, through glocal governance rule-of-law regulatory compliance, which may increase popular patenting professionalization.

6. Patentable Subject Matter Embodiments of the Invention:The World Ethical Charters Based Compliance (WECBC); does not deal directly with any "law of nature", nor "abstract ideas", even less with "natural phenomenas"; but instead, develops rule-of-law methodological regulatory compliance through the research and application of international legal policies historical establishments of principles and conducts standards and guidelines. For this purpose, Prof. Rev. 'Public Friend1Felipe Ribeiro claims the intellectual property, as its inventor, of the following patentable subject matters embodiments: The World Ethical Charters Based Compliance (WECBC) Trademark; The World Ethical Charters Based Compliance (WECBC) Methodology; The World Ethical Charters Database (WECDb); The Common Good Society (CoGS) Trademark, as already registered in the Instituto Nacional de Propriedade Intelectual (INPI) Brazil eMadrid responsible agency; The Common Good Society (CoGS) Open Governance Methodology. . Patent Trademarks Brand Design:

8. Patent References:• "Interim Guidelines for Examination of Patent Applications for Patent Subject Matter Eligibility" by United States Patent and Trademark Office• "Can You Patent a Process: Everything You Need to Know" by UpCounsel• "Humanitarian Use License" by Wikipedia• "Philanthropic Supported Innovation: Trends, Areas, and Impact" by Guan Cheng Li, Lingyun He & Lee Fleming• "Interfacing Intellectual Property Rights and Open Innovation" by Max Planck Institute for Intellectual Property "Patents in Open Source" by Google Open Source & Github "The Rule of Law" by Tom Bingham "The Rule of Laws: A 4000-year Quest to Order the World" by Fernanda Pirie "The Rule of Law" by Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy "The World of Science and the Rule Law" by John Ziman, Paul Sieg hart, & ohn Humphrey "Legal Ethics and the Rule of Law" by W. Bradley Wendel "The Common Good" by Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy "Technology Transfer Process" by MIT Technology Licensing Office

Images