Synergistic pesticidal composition comprising strobilurin fungicide and insecticides

A synergistic pesticidal composition of Compound of Formula I, Emamectin, and Dinotefuran addresses the limitations of existing pest control by providing enhanced fungal and insect pest control with reduced dosages, broader spectrum, and environmental safety, while being cost-effective and stable.

WO2025163604A1PCT designated stage Publication Date: 2025-08-07RANI PRIYA
View PDF 4 Cites 0 Cited by

Patent Information

Application Number
PCT/IB2025/051110
Authority / Receiving Office
WO · WO
Patent Type
Applications
Current Assignee / Owner
Priority Date
2024-02-02
Filing Date
2025-02-02
Publication Date
2025-08-07

AI Technical Summary

Technical Problem

Existing pesticidal compositions fail to provide effective, broad-spectrum, and synergistic control of fungal and insect pests, leading to resistance issues and environmental toxicity concerns, while also being costly and complex to manufacture.

Method used

A stable synergistic pesticidal composition comprising Compound of Formula I, Emamectin, and Dinotefuran, which are combined with agrochemically acceptable salts, esters, and derivatives, along with optional excipients, to enhance pest control efficacy and stability.

Benefits of technology

The composition achieves significant reduction in pest populations, improved crop yield, and environmental safety with reduced dosage, broadened activity spectrum, and extended shelf life.

✦ Generated by Eureka AI based on patent content.

Smart Images

  • Figure IMGF000009_0001
    Figure IMGF000009_0001
  • Figure IMGF000009_0002
    Figure IMGF000009_0002
Patent Text Reader

Abstract

The present invention relates to a stable synergistic pesticidal composition capable of protecting plant propagation materials such seeds, seedlings; and plants / crops from harmful effects of pathogenic fungi and / or insect pests. The present invention also relates to a process for preparation of such stable synergistic pesticidal composition for synergistic and efficacious control of various pests including pathogenic fungi and / or insect pests.
Need to check novelty before this filing date? Find Prior Art

Description

[0001] SYNERGISTIC PESTICIDAL COMPOSITION COMPRISING STROBILURIN FUNGICIDE AND INSECTICIDES FIELD OF THE INVENTION The present invention relates to a stable synergistic pesticidal composition capable of protecting plant propagation materials such seeds, seedlings; and plants / crops from pathogenic fungi and / or insect pests. More particularly, the present invention relates to a stable synergistic pesticidal composition comprising A) Compound of Formula I, chemically known as Methyl (E)- (methoxyimino) {α-({[(E)-1-(α,α,α-trifluoro-m-tolyl)ethylidene]amino}oxy)-o-tolyl}acetate or its agrochemically acceptable salts, esters and derivatives; B) Emamectin or its agrochemically acceptable salts, esters and derivatives or its agrochemically acceptable salts, esters and derivatives; and C) Dinotefuran or its agrochemically acceptable salts, esters and derivatives .The present invention also relates to a process for preparation of such stable synergistic pesticidal composition for synergistic and efficacious control of various pests including pathogenic fungi and / or insect pests. BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION Background description includes information that may be useful in understanding the present invention. It is not an admission that any of the information provided herein is prior art or relevant to the present invention, or that any publication specifically or implicitly referenced is prior art. In the field of agriculture and pest control, the development of effective and efficient pesticide compositions is of paramount importance to ensure crop yield and quality. Fungicides are compounds, of natural or synthetic origin, which act to protect and / or cure plants against damage caused by agriculturally relevant fungi. Generally, no single fungicide is useful in all situations. Consequently, research is ongoing to produce fungicides that may have better performance, are easier to use, and cost less. The control of plant diseases caused by fungal plant pathogens is extremely important in achieving high crop efficiency. Plant disease damage to vegetable, field, cereal, and fruit crops can cause significant reduction in productivity and thereby result in increased costs to the consumer. Many products are commercially available for these purposes, but the need continues for new compounds, which are more effective, less costly, less toxic, environmentally safer or have different modes of action. The control of phytopathogenic fungi is of great economic importance since fungal growth on plants or on parts of plants, e.g., fruits, blossoms, foliage, stems, tubers, roots, etc., inhibits production of foliage, fruit or seed and reduces the overall quantity and quality of the harvested crop. The continuous economic toll taken by phytopathogenic fungi establishes a continuing need to develop new, more effective fungicides which possess curative, preventative and systemic action to protect cultivated plants and the seeds from which they develop. Those requirements must be accomplished without any significant adverse side effects to the plants of the desired crops. Combination of insecticides and fungicides are used to broaden the spectrum of control of insect and fungi, to improve the pest control with synergistic effect, reduce dosage, thereby reducing environmental impact, to broaden the spectrum of control, i.e. insect pests and fungal disease at a time, decrease chances of resistance development and to enhance residual control so lesser the number of sprays for crop protections and minimizing the pesticidal load in ecosystem. The combination of insecticides and fungicides which demonstrate synergistic effect that results in an improved control of pests and diseases is the need of the hour in agrochemicals. Fungicides kill fungi by damaging their cell membranes, inactivating critical enzymes or proteins, or by interfering with key processes such as energy production or respiration. Others impact specific metabolic pathways such as the production of sterols or chitin. In recent developments, the newly developed fungicides are unique in that they do not directly affect the pathogen itself. Strobilurin fungicides are now more properly referred to as QoI fungicides. QoI fungicides are excellent as preventive fungicides, because they all effectively kill germinating spores. All QoI fungicides share a common biochemical mode of action: they all interfere with energy production in the fungal cell. They block electron transfer at the site of quinol oxidation (the Qo site) in the cytochrome bc1 complex, thus preventing ATP formation. These fungicides control an unusually wide array of fungal diseases, including diseases caused by water molds, downy mildews, powdery mildews, leaf spotting and blighting fungi, fruit rotters, and rusts. They are used on a wide variety of crops, including cereals, field crops, fruits, tree nuts, vegetables, turfgrasses, and ornamentals. Various strobilurin fungicides are known in the art. They are also categorised as systemic and translaminar strobilurin fungicides. Each of the strobilurin fungicide has different effective activity against fungal pests. Out of the known strobilurin fungicides, the Compound of Formula I i.e. Methyl (E)-(methoxyimino) {α-({[(E)-1-(α,α,α-trifluoro-m-tolyl)ethylidene]amino}oxy)-o- tolyl}acetate, has shown to have better fungal pest control in comparison to other strobilurin fungicides. Insecticides are used widely and very frequently in commercial agriculture and have enabled an enormous increase in crop yields and product quality which ultimately increased the ease to farmers in term of economic advantage as well as ease of farming activities. It is always preferable to be able to reduce the amount of chemical agents released into the environment while still ensuring effective insect-pest control. Although insect-pest control agent and fungicide combinations have been studied, a high synergistic action and efficacy has not always been found. There is however a need for improvement of these combinations. Single active compositions used over a long period of time has resulted in resistance. With the onset of resistance to certain pests, there is a need in the art for a combination of actives that decrease the chances of resistance and improves the spectrum of fungal disease and insect pest control. By combining active compounds having different mechanisms of action, it is possible to ensure successful control of pests over a relatively long period of time. It is therefore an object of the present invention to provide pesticidal composition which (i) reduces dosage rate, (ii) enhances the spectrum of activity or combining knock-down activity with prolonged control or (iii) provides resistance management or (iv) is stable for longer period and has extended, improved shelf life. There is a need for pesticidal composition comprising insecticides and strobilurin fungicide that is highly efficient, non- toxic, covers a broader spectrum of fungal and insects-pests and is environment friendly and economical. Accordingly, there exists a continuous need for new pesticidal combinations to be applied so as to provide an economical and effective solution in terms of fungal and insect pest control, yield, plant growth, broader crop protection spectrum, reduce the burden on the environment / farmers, healthy foliage, saves labour cost and is yet cost- effective to the end user. The prior art formulations, compositions have not been found to be effective for control of wide range of fungal and insect pests affecting the crops and plants at the same time. Thus, there is a need for a composition which overcomes some of the existing problems and can be prepared easily without much complex manufacturing process. Furthermore, in developing a ternary composition for fungal and insect pest control, formulators face issues related to the stability of composition and product handling. Thus, to prepare a formulation having desired suspensibility and dispersibility of active ingredients selecting appropriate auxiliary agents such as emulsions, stabilizers, dispersing agents, surfactants and particle size is critical. In light of the above, there is still a need for novel pesticidal composition that exhibit synergistically enhanced action, a broader scope of activity and reduced cost of treatment. So, there is a need for a composition comprising insecticides and strobilurin fungicide, which overcomes some of the existing problems and can be prepared easily without much complex manufacturing process. The interaction between the insecticidal and fungicidal components in this composition is anticipated to provide multifaceted approach to pest management. The potential synergy, if harnessed effectively, could lead to a reduced reliance on high dosages of individual compounds, resulting in not only enhanced efficacy but also a more sustainable approach to pest and disease control in agriculture. Accordingly, the present invention provides a stable synergistic pesticidal composition comprising compounds having different basic structures and different functions which are well-suited to each other, and a method for controlling fungal and insect pests. Therefore, the present invention provides a stable synergistic pesticidal composition comprising A) Compound of Formula I, chemically known as Methyl (E)-(methoxyimino) {α-({[(E)-1-(α,α,α-trifluoro-m- tolyl)ethylidene]amino}oxy)-o-tolyl}acetate or its agrochemically acceptable salts, esters and derivatives; B) Emamectin or its agrochemically acceptable salts, esters and derivatives or its agrochemically acceptable salts, esters and derivatives; and C) Dinotefuran or its agrochemically acceptable salts, esters and derivatives. Compound of Formula I, chemically known as Methyl (E)-(methoxyimino) {α-({[(E)-1-(α,α,α- trifluoro-m-tolyl)ethylidene]amino}oxy)-o-tolyl}acetate is a member of strobilurin class of fungicides. It used to control foliar, stem and Root diseases. It is known to possess wide range of fungicidal action with good preventive and curative properties. It has the characteristics of high efficiency, broad spectrum, protection, treatment, eradication, permeation, systemic activity, rain wash resistance, long lasting period and the like. It has good activity on almost all fungal diseases (ascomycetes, basidiomycetes, oomycetes and fungi imperfecti) such as powdery mildew, rust disease, septoria nodorum, net blotch, downy mildew, rice blast, Alternaria, black root, black spot, Botrytis, leaf spot, rhizoctonia stem & root rot, scab, blossom blight and the like. This compound is safe to crops, and is safe to the environment. The chemical structure of compound of Formula I is as under:

[0002] Emamectin is avermectin insecticide. The mode of action of Emamectin is that it has non- systemic action by causing insect paralysis by suppressing muscle contraction. Emamectin is effective against many insect pests particularly Caterpillars, mites, micers, thrips. Chemical structure of Emamectin is

[0003] Emamectin is used in its ester, salt or derivative forms. Commonly used form of Emamectin is Emamectin Benzoate. Emamectin benzoate is the 4'-deoxy-4'-epi-methyl-amino benzoate salt of avermectin B1 (abamectin). Emamectin benzoate is a broad-spectrum insecticide for vegetables and has a very low application rate. The mechanism of action involves stimulation of high-affinity GABA receptors and a consequent increase in membrane chloride ion permeability. Emamectin benzoate with the chemical name of 4 '-methylamino-4' -deoxyabamectin B1 benzoate is a high- efficiency semisynthetic antibiotic type insecticidal and acaricidal pesticide and the action mechanism of the emamectin benzoate is to interfere the nerve physiological activity of insects, stimulate and release gamma-aminobutyric acid and inhibit the conduction of nerve impulse of the insects. It is more effective when ingested, but it also somewhat effective on contact. When sprayed to foliage, emamectin benzoate penetrates the leaf tissue and forms reservoir within treated leaves, which provides residual activity against pests that ingest the substance when feeding. It is board spectrum insecticide for the effective control of Boll worms, Fruit & shoot borer, Diamond back moth, Thrips, mites, Pod borer, Tea lopper, Leaf folder & Hispa, Green Semi looper, Girdle beetle & Tobacco caterpillar, Yellow stem borer, (scirpophaga incertulus), Diamond back moth ( Plutella xylostella), Fruit borer ( Spodotera litura & Helicoverpa armigera) , Thrips (Scritothripsn dorsalis) , Mites ( Polypagotarsone muslatus), Whiteflies, Jassids, Aphids and Pink Boll Worm, Yellow Mites, Fall Armyworm for Cotton, Okra( Bhindi) , Cabbage, Chilli, Brinjal, Red Gram( Arhar / Tur), Chickpea, Grapes, Tea, Paddy, Soybean, Rice, Cauliflower, Maize. Emamectin benzoate has the structure provided below:

[0004] Dinotefuran is a furanicotinyl insecticide which belongs to the third generation of neonicotinoids and has the below structure: 5 Neonicotinoids are a class of insecticides, which act on the nervous system of insects with lower toxicity to mammals. It is used to control wide range of sucking pests. It is effective against various insects pests such as whiteflies, mealybugs, thrips, plant hoppers, leafminers, aphids and effective on crops such as fruits, turf, rice crops. Its mechanism of action involves the disruption of the insect’s nervous system and thus paralyzing them The present invention further provides a novel method of preparing composition comprising above mentioned active ingredients, which composition is stable as well as provide desired bio-efficacy, synergy. Embodiments of the present invention may therefore ameliorate one or more of the above- mentioned problems. OBJECTIVES OF THE INVENTION: Accordingly, the main objective of the present invention is to provide a stable synergistic pesticidal composition for synergistic and efficacious control of various pests including pathogenic fungi and insect pests. It is another objective of the present invention to provide improved composition comprising insecticides and fungicide for broad spectrum control of pests. Another objective of the present invention is to provide a stable synergistic pesticidal composition comprising A) Compound of Formula I, chemically known as Methyl (E)-(methoxyimino) {α- ({[(E)-1-(α,α,α-trifluoro-m-tolyl)ethylidene]amino}oxy)-o-tolyl}acetate or its agrochemically acceptable salts, esters and derivatives; B) Emamectin or its agrochemically acceptable salts, esters and derivatives or its agrochemically acceptable salts, esters and derivatives; and C) Dinotefuran or its agrochemically acceptable salts, esters and derivatives . It is another objective of the present invention to provide a novel and a stable synergistic pesticidal composition for controlling insect pests and fungal diseases. It is another objective of the present invention to provide improved, stable and ready to use synergistic pesticidal composition having synergistic and superior properties compared to prior art formulations or mixtures or compositions. Another objective of the present invention is to provide a process for the preparation of a stable synergistic pesticidal composition comprising A) Compound of Formula I, chemically known as Methyl (E)-(methoxyimino) {α-({[(E)-1-(α,α,α-trifluoro-m-tolyl)ethylidene]amino}oxy)-o- tolyl}acetate or its agrochemically acceptable salts, esters and derivatives; B) Emamectin or its agrochemically acceptable salts, esters and derivatives or its agrochemically acceptable salts, esters and derivatives; and C) Dinotefuran or its agrochemically acceptable salts, esters and derivatives . It is another objective of the present invention to provide, a synergistic pesticidal composition, which, has improved activity against the harmful pests and a broadened activity spectrum. It is a further objective of the present invention to provide, a synergistic pesticidal composition, which provides effective resistance management and pests control, at application rates which are as low as possible. Further objective of the present invention is to provide a stable synergistic pesticidal composition that provides effective immediate and long-term pest control. A further objective of the present invention is to provide a method for pest control that is both effective in the short and long term. It is another objective of the present invention to provide a stable synergistic pesticidal composition which can be easily formulated. Yet another objective of the present invention is to provide a stable synergistic pesticidal composition that promotes plant health and increases plant yield in the field. It is another objective of the present invention to provide a novel and effective stable synergistic pesticidal composition which is environmentally safe, possesses broad spectrum bio-efficacy, is non-phytotoxic. It is another objective of the present invention to provide a novel and effective stable synergistic pesticidal composition, which improves plant health and provides increased crop yield. It is yet another objective of the present invention to provide a novel and effective stable synergistic pesticidal composition, which has improved stability during the desired shelf life. It is another objective of the present invention to provide a novel and effective stable synergistic pesticidal composition, which is economically more beneficial. Another objective of the present invention is to further reduce the costs of pest management operations and thus improvement in benefit: cost ratio. Another objective of the present invention is to provide synergistic pesticidal composition which is simple, easy and convenient to carry out its application on crops, plants. Yet another objective of the present invention is to provide a method of synergistic and efficacious control of broad spectrum of insect pests by using a stable synergistic pesticidal composition comprising A) Compound of Formula I, chemically known as Methyl (E)-(methoxyimino) {α- ({[(E)-1-(α,α,α-trifluoro-m-tolyl)ethylidene]amino}oxy)-o-tolyl}acetate or its agrochemically acceptable salts, esters and derivatives; B) Emamectin or its agrochemically acceptable salts, esters and derivatives or its agrochemically acceptable salts, esters and derivatives; and C) Dinotefuran or its agrochemically acceptable salts, esters and derivatives. Some or all these and other objects of the invention can be achieved by way of the invention described hereinafter. Advantages of the Present Invention: 1. The stable synergistic pesticidal composition of the present invention resulted in significantly lower pest population of Thrips and Powdery mildew disease in Chilli crop as compared to the binary composition, solo composition and untreated check. 2. The stable synergistic pesticidal composition of the present invention is significantly superior from its individual product specifically manufactured by inventor or readily available in market in reducing the Thrips and Powdery mildew disease population in Chilli crop. 3. The stable synergistic pesticidal composition of the present invention provides improved yield as compared to the untreated control and binary and solo treatments applied in the Chilli crop. 4. The stable synergistic pesticidal composition shows no phytotoxicity effect on Chilli crop. 5. The results of experiments indicate that the stable synergistic composition of the present invention is highly effective in controlling insect pest and increasing production of Chilli at lower doses of the products in the composition, thus the invention will be cost effective and safer to the environment. SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION: Accordingly, the main aspect of the present invention is to provide a synergistic pesticidal composition having high insect pests and fungus control efficacy. Accordingly, the present invention relates to a stable synergistic pesticidal composition comprising A) Compound of Formula I i.e. Methyl (E)-(methoxyimino) {α-({[(E)-1-(α,α,α-trifluoro-m- tolyl)ethylidene]amino}oxy)-o-tolyl}acetate or its agrochemically acceptable salts, esters and derivatives; B) Emamectin or its agrochemically acceptable salts, esters and derivatives or its agrochemically acceptable salts, esters and derivatives; and C) Dinotefuran or its agrochemically acceptable salts, esters and derivatives . In one embodiment of the present invention, the synergistic pesticidal composition comprises: A) Compound of Formula I i.e. Methyl (E)-(methoxyimino) {α-({[(E)-1-(α,α,α-trifluoro-m- tolyl)ethylidene]amino}oxy)-o-tolyl}acetate or its agrochemically acceptable salts, esters and derivatives; B) Emamectin or its agrochemically acceptable salts, esters and derivatives or its agrochemically acceptable salts, esters and derivatives; C) Dinotefuran or its agrochemically acceptable salts, esters and derivatives; and D) One or more agrochemically acceptable excipients. In one preferred, embodiment, the present invention provides a stable synergistic pesticidal composition comprising: A) Compound of Formula I i.e. Methyl (E)-(methoxyimino) {α-({[(E)-1-(α,α,α-trifluoro-m- tolyl)ethylidene]amino}oxy)-o-tolyl}acetate or its agrochemically acceptable salts, esters and derivatives, in the range of 0.1 to 90% by weight of the composition; B) Emamectin or its agrochemically acceptable salts, esters and derivatives or its agrochemically acceptable salts, esters and derivatives, in the range of 0.1 to 90% by weight of the composition and C) Dinotefuran or its agrochemically acceptable salts, esters and derivatives, in the range of 0.1 to 90% by weight of the composition. In one another preferred, embodiment, the present invention provides a stable synergistic pesticidal composition comprising A) Compound of Formula I i.e. Methyl (E)-(methoxyimino) {α-({[(E)-1-(α,α,α-trifluoro-m- tolyl)ethylidene]amino}oxy)-o-tolyl}acetate or its agrochemically acceptable salts, esters and derivatives, in the range of 0.1 to 65% by weight of the composition; B) Emamectin or its agrochemically acceptable salts, esters and derivatives or its agrochemically acceptable salts, esters and derivatives, in the range of 0.1 to 65% by weight of the composition and C) Dinotefuran or its agrochemically acceptable salts, esters and derivatives, in the range of 0.1 to 65% by weight of the composition. In one another preferred, embodiment, the present invention provides a stable synergistic pesticidal composition comprising A) Compound of Formula I i.e. Methyl (E)-(methoxyimino) {α-({[(E)-1-(α,α,α-trifluoro-m- tolyl)ethylidene]amino}oxy)-o-tolyl}acetate or its agrochemically acceptable salts, esters and derivatives, in the range of 0.1 to 35% by weight of the composition; B) Emamectin or its agrochemically acceptable salts, esters and derivatives or its agrochemically acceptable salts, esters and derivatives, in the range of 0.1 to 35% by weight of the composition and C) Dinotefuran or its agrochemically acceptable salts, esters and derivatives, in the range of 0.1 to 35% by weight of the composition. In an embodiment, the present invention provides a method of improving plant health and increasing crop yield by using synergistic pesticidal composition comprising: A) Compound of Formula I i.e. Methyl (E)-(methoxyimino) {α-({[(E)-1-(α,α,α-trifluoro-m- tolyl)ethylidene]amino}oxy)-o-tolyl}acetate or its agrochemically acceptable salts, esters and derivatives; B) Emamectin or its agrochemically acceptable salts, esters and derivatives or its agrochemically acceptable salts, esters and derivatives; and C) Dinotefuran or its agrochemically acceptable salts, esters and derivatives. In yet another embodiment of the present invention, there is also provided a process for the preparation of synergistic pesticidal composition comprising A) Compound of Formula I i.e. Methyl (E)-(methoxyimino) {α-({[(E)-1-(α,α,α-trifluoro-m- tolyl)ethylidene]amino}oxy)-o-tolyl}acetate or its agrochemically acceptable salts, esters and derivatives; B) Emamectin or its agrochemically acceptable salts, esters and derivatives or its agrochemically acceptable salts, esters and derivatives; and C) Dinotefuran or its agrochemically acceptable salts, esters and derivatives. In one another embodiment, the synergistic pesticidal composition of the present invention further comprises one or more agrochemically acceptable excipients. In one embodiment of the present invention, the present pesticidal composition is stable and has enhanced shelf life. In an embodiment of the present invention the present pesticidal composition controls various pests in field crops, vegetables, oil seed and pulses, horticulture & forestry, veterinary, etc. In yet another embodiment of the present invention, the present pesticidal composition can be applied to crops, plants including but not limited to paddy(rice), wheat, sugarcane, cotton, cabbage, cauliflower, tomato, chilli, brinjal, okra (Bhindi), soybean, Tea, Red Gram (Arhar / Tur), Chickpea, Grapes, Maize, Pigeon Pea, Groundnut, Bengal Gram, wheat, mango, Black gram, Cumin, Coffee, Onion, Green Pea, Cucumber, Grains Millet, Pulses Dry Fruits, Nuts Spices & Oil Seeds, turf and forage, cruciferous, cucurbits, grapevines, pepper, fodder beet, oil seed rape, pansy etc. In an embodiment of the present invention the present pesticidal composition can be applied as a foliar spray, soil drenching, seed dressing, application as paste of the targeted plants / trees, broadcasting, spraying, rubbing, atomizing, irrigating, evaporating, dusting, fogging, broadcasting, pouring, mist blowing, soil mixing, foaming, painting, spreading-on, drenching, dipping or drip irrigation etc. In an aspect, the present invention provides a synergistic pesticidal composition which has enhanced efficacy and penetration capacity. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION In describing the embodiments of the invention, specific terminology is resorted for sake of clarity. However, it is not intended that the invention be limited to specific terms so selected and it is to be understood that each specific term includes all technical equivalents that operate in a similar manner to accomplish a similar purpose. Discussed below are some representative embodiments of the present invention. The invention in its broader aspects is not limited to the specific details and representative methods. All technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meanings as commonly understood by someone ordinarily skilled in the art to which the present subject matter belongs. The terminology used, in the present disclosure, is only for the purpose of explaining a particular embodiment and such terminology shall not be considered to limit the scope of the present disclosure. Variations or modifications to the composition of this invention, within the scope of the invention, may occur to those skilled in the art upon reviewing the disclosure herein. Such variations or modifications are well within the spirit of this invention. The expression of various quantities in terms of “% w / w” or “%” means the percentage by weight, relative to the weight of the total formulation or composition unless otherwise specified. The term “active ingredient” (a.i.) or “active agent” used herein refers to that component of the composition responsible for control and killing of pest. The terms “plants” and “vegetation” include, but are not limited to, germinant seeds, emerging seedlings, plants emerging from vegetative propagules, and established vegetation. The term “crop” shall include a multitude of desired crop plants or an individual crop plant growing at a locus. The term “synergistic”, as used herein, refers to the combined action of two or more active agents blended together and administered conjointly that is greater than the sum of their individual effects. “Bioactive amounts” as mentioned herein means that amount which, when applied for treatment of crops, is sufficient to give effect in such treatment. The term “control” means to inhibit the ability of insect pests to survive, grow, feed and / or reproduce, or to limit the pests’ related damage or loss in crop plants. The term “health of a plant” or “plant health” is defined as a condition of the plant and / or its products. As a result of the improved health; yield, plant vigour, quality and tolerance to abiotic or biotic stress is increased. As a result, the health of a plant is increased even in the absence of pest pressure. Accordingly, in an especially preferred embodiment according to the invention, the health of a plant is increased both in the presence and absence of biotic or abiotic stress factors. The above identified indicators for the health condition of a plant may be interdependent or they may result from each other. An increase in plant vigor may for example result in an increased yield and / or tolerance to abiotic or biotic stress. One indicator for the condition of the plant is the yield. “Yield” is to be understood as any plant product of economic value that is produced by the plant such as grains, fruits, vegetables, nuts, grains, seeds, wood (e.g. in the case of silviculture plants) or even flowers (e.g. in the case of gardening plants, ornamentals). The plant products may in addition be further utilized and / or processed after harvesting. In an especially preferred embodiment of the invention, the yield of the treated plant is increased. In another preferred embodiment of the invention, the yield of the plants treated according to the method of the invention, is increased synergistically. According to the present invention, “increased yield” of a plant, in particular of an agricultural, silvicultural and / or horticultural plant means that the yield of a product of the respective plant is increased by a measurable amount over the yield of the same product of the plant produced under the same conditions, but without the application of the composition according to the invention. In another especially preferred embodiment of the invention, the plant vigour of the treated plant is increased. In another preferred embodiment of the invention, the plant vigour of the plants treated according to the composition of the present invention is increased synergistically. Another indicator for the condition of the plant is the “quality” of a plant and / or its products. In an especially preferred embodiment of the invention, the quality of the treated plant is increased. In another preferred embodiment of the invention, the quality of the plants treated according to the method of the invention, is increased synergistically. The present invention includes within its scope, all possible salts, esters and derivatives of the active ingredients of the composition. In one embodiment, the term " agrochemically acceptable salts, esters and derivatives " as used herein refers to the different chemical forms of agrochemical compounds that are suitable for agricultural use. It further comprises: salts which refers to the compounds that are formed by reacting agrochemical(s), or agrochemical active compound(s) or any other agrochemically acceptable compound with an acid or base. Esters refer to the compounds which are resulted from the reaction of agrochemical(s) or agrochemically active compound(s) or any other agrochemically acceptable compound with alcohol. Derivatives refer to the chemical modifications in the agrochemical(s) or agrochemically active compound(s) or any other agrochemically acceptable compound that retain the functional properties of the original / parent compound (i.e., compound from which it has been derived) while having some enhanced properties compared to its parent compound. For instance, but not limited to solubility, stability, or bioavailability or other characteristics that are beneficial in the agricultural practices. It has been observed that the composition of present invention not only has enhanced bio-efficacy and provides synergistic effect but also gives control of pests and diseases caused by insect pests and fungi for a longer duration as compared to solo and binary formulations of insecticides and fungicides. In one embodiment of the present invention, the synergistic pesticidal composition comprises: A) Compound of Formula I i.e. Methyl (E)-(methoxyimino) {α-({[(E)-1-(α,α,α-trifluoro-m- tolyl)ethylidene]amino}oxy)-o-tolyl}acetate or its agrochemically acceptable salts, esters and derivatives; B) Emamectin or its agrochemically acceptable salts, esters and derivatives or its agrochemically acceptable salts, esters and derivatives; and C) Dinotefuran or its agrochemically acceptable salts, esters and derivatives. In one embodiment of the present invention, the synergistic pesticidal composition comprises: A) Compound of Formula I i.e. Methyl (E)-(methoxyimino) {α-({[(E)-1-(α,α,α-trifluoro-m- tolyl)ethylidene]amino}oxy)-o-tolyl}acetate or its agrochemically acceptable salts, esters and derivatives; B) Emamectin or its agrochemically acceptable salts, esters and derivatives or its agrochemically acceptable salts, esters and derivatives; C) Dinotefuran or its agrochemically acceptable salts, esters and derivatives; and D) One or more agrochemically acceptable excipients. In one preferred, embodiment, the present invention provides a stable synergistic pesticidal composition comprising: A) Compound of Formula I i.e. Methyl (E)-(methoxyimino) {α-({[(E)-1-(α,α,α-trifluoro-m- tolyl)ethylidene]amino}oxy)-o-tolyl}acetate or its agrochemically acceptable salts, esters and derivatives, in the range of 0.1 to 90% by weight of the composition; B) Emamectin or its agrochemically acceptable salts, esters and derivatives or its agrochemically acceptable salts, esters and derivatives, in the range of 0.1 to 90% by weight of the composition and C) Dinotefuran or its agrochemically acceptable salts, esters and derivatives, in the range of 0.1 to 90% by weight of the composition. In one another preferred, embodiment, the present invention provides a stable synergistic pesticidal composition comprising A) Compound of Formula I i.e. Methyl (E)-(methoxyimino) {α-({[(E)-1-(α,α,α-trifluoro-m- tolyl)ethylidene]amino}oxy)-o-tolyl}acetate or its agrochemically acceptable salts, esters and derivatives, in the range of 0.1 to 65% by weight of the composition; B) Emamectin or its agrochemically acceptable salts, esters and derivatives or its agrochemically acceptable salts, esters and derivatives, in the range of 0.1 to 65% by weight of the composition and C) Dinotefuran or its agrochemically acceptable salts, esters and derivatives, in the range of 0.1 to 65% by weight of the composition. In one another preferred, embodiment, the present invention provides a stable synergistic pesticidal composition comprising A) Compound of Formula I i.e. Methyl (E)-(methoxyimino) {α-({[(E)-1-(α,α,α-trifluoro-m- tolyl)ethylidene]amino}oxy)-o-tolyl}acetate or its agrochemically acceptable salts, esters and derivatives, in the range of 0.1 to 35% by weight of the composition; B) Emamectin or its agrochemically acceptable salts, esters and derivatives or its agrochemically acceptable salts, esters and derivatives, in the range of 0.1 to 35% by weight of the composition and C) Dinotefuran or its agrochemically acceptable salts, esters and derivatives, in the range of 0.1 to 35% by weight of the composition. In an embodiment, the present invention provides a method of improving plant health and increasing crop yield by using synergistic pesticidal composition comprising: A) Compound of Formula I i.e. Methyl (E)-(methoxyimino) {α-({[(E)-1-(α,α,α-trifluoro-m- tolyl)ethylidene]amino}oxy)-o-tolyl}acetate or its agrochemically acceptable salts, esters and derivatives; B) Emamectin or its agrochemically acceptable salts, esters and derivatives or its agrochemically acceptable salts, esters and derivatives; and C) Dinotefuran or its agrochemically acceptable salts, esters and derivatives. In yet another embodiment of the present invention, there is also provided a process for the preparation of synergistic pesticidal composition comprising A) Compound of Formula I i.e. Methyl (E)-(methoxyimino) {α-({[(E)-1-(α,α,α-trifluoro-m- tolyl)ethylidene]amino}oxy)-o-tolyl}acetate or its agrochemically acceptable salts, esters and derivatives; B) Emamectin or its agrochemically acceptable salts, esters and derivatives or its agrochemically acceptable salts, esters and derivatives; and C) Dinotefuran or its agrochemically acceptable salts, esters and derivatives. In accordance with an embodiment of the present invention, there is provided a synergistic pesticidal composition comprising active ingredients present in the weight % range as given below: Compound of Formula I i.e. Emamectin or its Methyl (E)-(methoxyimino) Dinotefuran or its agrochemically acceptable {α-({[(E)-1-(α,α,α-trifluoro-m- agrochemically acceptable salts, esters and derivatives tolyl)ethylidene]amino}oxy)-o- salts, esters and derivatives. or its agrochemically tolyl}acetate or its acceptable salts, esters and agrochemically acceptable derivatives salts, esters and derivatives 0.1-90 % 0.1-90 % 0.1-90 % In an embodiment, the stable synergistic pesticidal composition further comprises one or more agrochemically acceptable excipients. In another embodiment, “agrochemically acceptable excipients” are substances used in agrochemical formulation that are compatible with the active substance and do not negatively impact the efficacy or safety of the active ingredient and do not pose any risk to the environment and health of non-target organisms. In another embodiment of the present invention, the synergistic pesticidal composition of the present invention further comprises one or more agrochemically acceptable excipients including but not limited to the group comprising surfactant(s), dispersing agent(s), anti-freezing agent(s), emulsifier(s), anti-foaming agent / defoamer(s), wetting agent(s), antimicrobial / anti-bacterial agent(s), thickening agent / thickener(s), quick coating agent(s) or sticking agents / sticker(s), spreader(s), binder(s), pH-adjusting agent(s), anti-caking agent(s), adjuvant(s), filler(s) / suspension aid(s), colorant(s), carrier(s), buffering agent(s), rheology modifier(s), solvent(s), co-solvent(s) or a combination thereof. Additional components may also be included, e.g., protective colloids, carriers, adhesives, thixotropic agents, penetration agents, stabilisers, sequestering agents. More generally, the active materials can be combined with any solid or liquid carrier / additive, which complies with usual formulation techniques. An adjuvant used in the present invention is any material that is added to an agrochemical formulation to enhance or modify the performance of the formulation. An adjuvants used in the present invention to make it a safer to ecological environmental, having low toxicity and having no phytotoxicity effects on any part of the plant. Examples of dispersing agent and co-dispersant used herein include but not limited to non-ionic proprietary surfactant, polyarylphenyl ether phosphate, tristyryl phenol ethoxylate, acrylic graft copolymer, ethoxylated tristryl phenol Sulphate, alkyl naphthalene formaldehyde condensate ,naphthalene sulfonic acid, sodium salt condensate with formaldehyde, sodium alkyl or aryl naphthalene sulfonate formaldehyde condensate, ethoxylated oleyl cetyl alcohol, polyalkelene glycol ether, ethoxylated fatty alcohol, Sodium polymethyl methacrylate, polymethyl methacrylate, sodium polyacrylate, sodium lignosulphonate, calcium lignosulphonate, alkylphenol polyoxyethylene ether, polycarboxylate, fatty alcohol polyoxyethylene ether, alcohol polyglycol ether or mixtures thereof and present in the range of 0.1-20% by weight of the composition. Examples of wetting agent used herein include but not limited to tristyrylphenol ethoxylate non- ionic emulsifier, mixture of non-ionic surfactants, alkoxylated alcohol, block copolymer, alcohol polyglycol ether, alkyl olefin sulphates, dioctyl sulpho succinate, alkyl naphthalene sulphate ,Di- isopropyl Napthalene sulphonate, Polyalkoxy ethers, alkyl phenol ethoxylates, tri-styrenated phenol ethoxylate, EO / PO block co-polymers, sodium lauryl sulphate, sodium ligno sulphates or mixtures thereof and present in the range of 0.1-20% by weight of the total composition. Examples of defoamer or antifoaming agent used herein include but not limited to silicon emulsion based anti-foam agents, Siloxane polyalkyleneoxide, Polydimethylsiloxane, trisiloxane ethoxylates, silicone oil, silicone compound, C10~C20 saturated fat acid compounds or C8~C10 aliphatic alcohols compound, vegetable oil based antifoam, tallow based fatty acids, polyalkyleneoxide polydimethylsiloxane and mixtures thereof and present in the range of 0.01-5.0 % by weight of the composition. Examples of anti-freezing agent used herein include but not limited to glycol, propylene glycol, mono ethylene glycol, glycerine, diethylene glycol, sorbitol, urea, mannitol, polyethylene glycol or mixtures thereof and present in the range of 1.0-20% by weight of the composition. Examples of fillers used herein include but not limited to silicon dioxide, china-clay, kaolin, starch, bentonite, precipitated silica, fumed silica, anhydrous lactose, talcum powder, lactose, ammonium sulphate, water, sodium Sulphate, magnesium sulphate, sodium citrate, sodium chloride, potassium chloride and mixtures thereof and present in the range of 5-50 % by weight of the composition. Examples of anti-caking agent used herein include but not limited to group of talc, hydrous magnesium silicate, magnesium carbonate, calcium carbonate,precipitate silica , hydrophobic fumed silica and mixtures thereof and present in the range of 2.0-10% by weight of the composition. Examples of carrier used herein include but not limited to silicon dioxide, china clay, kaolin, starch, bentonite, precipitated silica, fumed silica, talcum powder, lactose, ammonium sulpha or mixture there of present in the range of 1.0-45 % by weight of the composition. Examples of biocide or anti-microbial agent used herein include but not limited to 1, 2,- Benzisothiazolin -3-one, blends of 1,2,- benzisothiazolin-3-one and 2-methyl-4-isothiazolin-3- one, 5-chloro-2-methyl-4-isothiazolin-3-one, blends of 5-chloro-2-methyl-4-isothiazolin-3-one and 2-methyl-4-isothiazolin-3-one, zinc 1-hydroxy-2(1H)-pyridinethione, blends of zinc l- hydroxy-2(1H)-pyridinethione and zinc oxide, , poly-vinyl alcohol ,and 2-n-octyl-4- isothiazolin- 3-one or mixtures thereof and present in the range of 0.01 to 10 % by weight of the composition. Examples of emulsifier(s) used herein include but not limited to araliphatic or aliphatic non-ionic emulsifier such as ethoxylated mono-, di- and trialkylphenols, ethoxylates of long-chain alcohols and polyethylene oxide / polypropylene oxide homo- and copolymers, EO / PO block copolymers. Ethoxylates of long-chain alkanols, ethoxylated monoalkylphenol, ethoxilates of cetyl alcohol and / or stearyl alcohol ; and Anionic emulsifier such as alkali metal and ammonium salts of alkyl sulfates, of hemisulfates of ethoxylated alkanols and ethoxylated alkylphenols, alkylsulfonic acids, bis(phenylsulfonic acid) ethers and their alkali metal or ammonium salts, sodiumlaurylsulfate, sodium (cetyl / stearyl) sulfate, blend of anionic and non-ionic or mixture thereof and present in the range of 0.1 -20 % by weight of the composition. Examples of solvent(s) and co-solvent(s) used herein include but not limited to polar and non- polar solvent from the group comprising heavy aromatic hydrocarbon, N methyl pyrollidone, Solvent Naphtha (Solvent C-9), Di methyl sulfoxide, Dimethylformamide (DMF), N- alcohol, alkyl amide, vegetable oil, mineral oil, aromatic solvents, water or mixtures thereof and present in the range of 5.0 to 20.0 % by weight of the composition. Examples of polymer(s) used herein include but not limited to polyisocyanate used is toluene-2, 4-diisocyanate (TDI), diethylenetriamine (DETA),ethylene diamine (EDA), triethylenetetramine (TETA), and / or hexamethylene diamine (HMDA), diethanolglycine sodium salt, ethanoldiglycine disodium salt, hydroxymonocarboxylic acid compounds, hydroxydicarboxylic acid compounds, tetrasodium N,N-bis(carboxylatomethyl)-L-glutamate (GLDA), methylene diisocyanate (MDI), and / or low molecular weight polydiisocynates present in the range of 0.5- 5.0 % by weight of the composition. Examples of rheology modifier used herein include but not limited to xanthan gum, gum arabic, gun ghatti, gum karaya, gum tragacanth, guar gum, or locust bean gum; silica, silicon dioxide, attagel, agar, alginic acid or mixture thereof and present in the range of 0.01-5.0 % by weight of the composition. In still another embodiment, the present invention provides a kit-of-parts comprising a plurality of components, wherein said plurality of components comprises: A) Compound of Formula I i.e. Methyl (E)-(methoxyimino) {α-({[(E)-1-(α,α,α-trifluoro-m- tolyl)ethylidene]amino}oxy)-o-tolyl}acetate or its agrochemically acceptable salts, esters and derivatives; B) Emamectin or its agrochemically acceptable salts, esters and derivatives or its agrochemically acceptable salts, esters and derivatives; and C) Dinotefuran or its agrochemically acceptable salts, esters and derivatives. In an embodiment, the present invention provides a method for controlling a plant disease caused by a plant-pathogens comprising applying to the plant or portion thereof or soil, a pesticidal effective amount of the pesticidal composition. The composition of the present invention can also comprise or may be applied together and / or sequentially with further active compounds. These further compounds can be selected from fertilizers or micronutrient donors or microorganisms or other preparations that influence plant growth, such as inoculants (e.g. a strain of nitrogen-fixing bacteria), and plant inducers. In yet another embodiment of the present invention, the pesticidal composition is formulated as but not limited to Capsule suspension (CS), Dispersible concentrate (DC), Dustable powder (DP), Powder for dry seed treatment (DS), Emulsifiable concentrate (EC), Emulsifiable granule (EG), Emulsion water-in-oil (EO), Emulsifiable powder (EP), Emulsion for seed treatment (ES), Emulsion oil-in-water (EW), Flowable concentrate for seed treatment (FS), Granules (GR), Micro- emulsion (ME), Oil-dispersion (OD), Oil miscible flowable concentrate (OF), Oil miscible liquid (OL), Oil dispersible powder (OP), Suspension concentrate (SC), Suspension concentrate for direct application (SD), Suspo-emulsion (SE), Water soluble granule (SG), Soluble concentrate (SL), Spreading oil (SO), Water soluble powder (SP), Water soluble tablet (ST), Ultra-low volume (ULV) suspension, Tablet (TB), Ultra-low volume (ULV) liquid, Water dispersible granules (WG), Wettable powder (WP), Water dispersible powder for slurry seed treatment (WS), Water dispersible tablet (WT), a mixed composition of CS and SC (ZC) or a mixed composition of CS and SE (ZE) or a mixed composition of CS and EW (ZW). In yet another embodiment of the present invention, the invention further provides the process for preparation of the said pesticidal composition wherein, the said composition can be one or more of Capsule suspension (CS), Dispersible concentrate (DC), Dustable powder (DP), Powder for dry seed treatment (DS), Emulsifiable concentrate (EC), Emulsifiable granule (EG), Emulsion water- in-oil (EO), Emulsifiable powder (EP), Emulsion for seed treatment (ES), Emulsion oil-in-water (EW), Flowable concentrate for seed treatment (FS), Granules (GR), Micro-emulsion (ME), Oil- dispersion (OD), Oil miscible flowable concentrate (OF), Oil miscible liquid (OL), Oil dispersible powder (OP), Suspension concentrate (SC), Suspension concentrate for direct application (SD), Suspo-emulsion (SE), Water soluble granule (SG), Soluble concentrate (SL), Spreading oil (SO), Water soluble powder (SP), Water soluble tablet (ST), Ultra-low volume (ULV) suspension, Tablet (TB), Ultra-low volume (ULV) liquid, Water dispersible granules (WG), Wettable powder (WP), Water dispersible powder for slurry seed treatment (WS), Water dispersible tablet (WT), a mixed composition of CS and SC (ZC) or a mixed composition of CS and SE (ZE) or a mixed composition of CS and EW (ZW). In an embodiment of the present invention the present pesticidal composition controls various pests in field crops, vegetables, oil seed and pulses, horticulture & forestry, veterinary, etc. In yet another embodiment of the present invention, the present pesticidal composition can be applied to crops, plants including but not limited to paddy(rice), wheat, sugarcane, cotton, cabbage, cauliflower, tomato, chilli, brinjal, okra (Bhindi), soybean, Tea, Red Gram (Arhar / Tur), Chickpea, Grapes, Maize, Pigeon Pea, Red gram, Groundnut, Bengal Gram, wheat, mango, Black gram, Soybean, cumin, Coffee, onion, Green pea, Cucumber, Tomato, Grains Millet, Pulses Dry Fruits, Nuts Spices & Oil Seeds, turf and forage, cruciferous, cucurbits, grapevines, pepper, fodder beet, oil seed rape, pansy etc. In yet another embodiment of the present invention, the present pesticidal composition can be used wide range of insects-pests but not limited to Brown plant hopper, Jassids,Aphids & Thrips, Jassids, Aphids and Whitefly, White Backed Plant Hopper and Green leaf Hopper, Thrips (Thrips palmi), Jassids (Amrasca bigutulla bigutulla), Whiteflies (Bemisia tabaci), Mites (Tetranychus urticae), Leaf folder, Brown plant hopper (Nilparvata lugens), White backed plant hoppers (Sogatella furcifera), Rice Ear Head Bug, Blast disease, Boll worms, Fruit & Shoot Borer, Diamond back moth, Mites , Pod borer, Tea looper, Hispa, Green semi looper,pod borer, Girdle beetle & Tobacco caterpillar, Yellow stem borer (Scirpophaga incertulas), Pink Bollworm, Red Spider Mites, Fruit borer (Helicoverpa armigera), Thrips (Thrips tabaci), Mites (Tetranychus urticae), Diamond Back Moth (Plutella xylostella) Fruit borer (Spodoptera litura & Helicoverpa armigera), Thrips (Scritothrips dorsalis), Mites (Polypagotarsonem uslatus), Spodoptera frugiperda (FAW), Pink Boll Worm, Fall armyworm, Aphid (Aphis gossypii), Jassid (Amrasca devastans), Whitefly (Bemisia tabaci), Shoot and fruit borer (Earias vittela), Fall armyworm (Spodoptera litura), Mites (Polyphagotarsonem us latus), Diamond Back Moth (Plutella xylostella), Tobacco Caterpillar (Spodoptera litura), Gram Pod Borer (Helicoverpa armigera), Tobacco Caterpillar (Spodoptera litura) , Stem Borer (Scirpophaga incertulas), Stem borer (Chilo partellus), Gram Pod Borer, Stem Borer (Scirpophaga incertulas), Seed and Seedling rot disease, Brown leaf spot, Leaf blast, Sheath blight, Leaf, Neck Blast, Glume discoloration (dirty panicle), Early blight, Powdery mildew, Anthracnose, Alternaria leaf spot, Yellow rust, Alternaria Blight , Rust, Purple blotch, Leaf spot (Alternaria Sp, and Cercospora sp.) , Leaf Blight , Blast like disease, Damping off (Rhizoctonia solani, American cockroach (Periplaneta americana) and German Cockroach (Blattella germanica) etc. In an embodiment of the present invention the present pesticidal composition can be applied as a foliar spray, soil drenching, seed dressing, application as paste of the targeted plants / trees, broadcasting, spraying, rubbing, atomizing, irrigating, evaporating, dusting, fogging, broadcasting, pouring, mist blowing, soil mixing, foaming, painting, spreading-on, drenching, dipping or drip irrigation etc. In one embodiment, the composition according to the present invention acts synergistically to control various pests including fungal and insect pests in various crops, plants. The novel composition of the present invention has very advantageous, curative, preventive and systemic pesticidal properties for protecting cultivated plants and crops. As has been mentioned, said active ingredient composition can be used to inhibit or destroy the pathogens that occur on plants or parts of plants (fruit, blossoms, leaves, stems, tubers, roots) of different crops or useful plants, while at the same time those parts of plants which grow later are also protected from attack by such pathogens. The composition of the present invention also provides control of diseases caused by a broad spectrum of pests including fungal and insect pests, preventatively or curatively by applying an effective amount of the composition either pre-or post-infection. Plant disease control is ordinarily accomplished by applying an effective amount of a synergistic composition of the present invention either pre-or post-infection, to the portion of the plant to be protected such as the roots, stems, foliage, fruit, seeds, tubers or bulbs, or to the media (soil or sand) in which the plants to be protected are growing. The composition can also be applied to the seed to protect the seed and seedling. The process for preparing the present novel synergistic composition can be modified accordingly by any person skilled in the art based on the knowledge of the manufacturing the formulation. However, all such variation and modification are still covered by the scope of present invention. Thus, before describing the present invention in detail, it is to be understood that this invention is not limited to particularly exemplified systems or process parameters that may of course, vary. It is also to be understood that the terminology used herein is for the purpose of describing particular embodiments of the invention only and is not intended to limit the scope of the invention in any manner. The use of examples anywhere in this specification including examples of any terms discussed herein is illustrative only, and in no way limits the scope and meaning of the invention or of any exemplified term. Likewise, the invention is not limited to various embodiments given in this specification. Unless otherwise defined, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which this invention pertains. In the case of conflict, the present document, including definitions will control. The composition of the present invention can also comprise or may be applied together and / or sequentially with further active compounds. These further compounds can be selected from fertilizers or micronutrient donors or microorganisms or other preparations that influence plant growth, such as inoculants (e.g., a strain of nitrogen-fixing bacteria), and plant inducers. The present invention includes within its scope, all possible salts, esters and derivatives of the active ingredients of the composition. Through the pesticidal composition of present invention, the number of applications to control wide range of pests appearing at the same time is minimised. The composition of present invention is highly safe to the user and to the environment. The composition offers the user a single homogenous application eliminating the need for tank mix. The composition also is cost-effective as it provides much greater simultaneous control and can be used in a variety of crops with a broader spectrum of protection. Representative examples of the present composition of this invention are provided below and is not to be construed as limiting in any manner: Compound of Formula I, pertains to Methyl (E)-(methoxyimino) {α-({[(E)-1-(α,α,α-trifluoro- m-tolyl)ethylidene]amino}oxy)-o-tolyl}acetate or its agrochemically acceptable salts, esters and derivatives Examples: General recipe S.No. Ingredients %(w / w) 1 Compound of Formula I Technical 0.1-90.0 2 Emamectin benzoate Technical 0.1-90.0 3 Dinotefuran Technical 0.1-90.0 Surfactant / Dispersing agent(s)- non-ionic proprietary surfactant, polyarylphenyl ether phosphate, tristyryl phenol ethoxylate, acrylic graft copolymer, ethoxylated tristryl phenol Sulphate, alkyl naphthalene formaldehyde condensate ,naphthalene sulfonic acid, sodium salt 4 condensate with formaldehyde, sodium alkyl or aryl naphthalene 0.1-20 sulfonate formaldehyde condensate, ethoxylated oleyl cetyl alcohol, polyalkelene glycol ether, ethoxylated fatty alcohol, Sodium polymethyl methacrylate, polymethyl methacrylate, sodium polyacrylate, sodium lignosulphonate, calcium lignosulphonate, alkylphenol polyoxyethylene ether, polycarboxylate, fatty alcohol polyoxyethylene ether, alcohol polyglycol ether or mixtures thereof Wetting agent(s)- tristyrylphenol ethoxylate non-ionic emulsifier, mixture of non-ionic surfactants, alkoxylated alcohol, block copolymer, alcohol polyglycol ether, alkyl olefin sulphates, dioctyl sulpho succinate, alkyl naphthalene sulphate ,Di-isopropyl Napthalene sulphonate, 0.1-20 Polyalkoxy ethers, alkyl phenol ethoxylates, tri-styrenated phenol ethoxylate, EO / PO block co-polymers, sodium lauryl sulphate, sodium ligno sulphates or mixtures thereof Defoamer / Anti-foaming agent- silicon emulsion based anti-foam agents, Siloxane polyalkyleneoxide, Polydimethylsiloxane, trisiloxane ethoxylates, silicone oil, silicone compound, C10~C20 saturated fat acid 0.01-5.0 compounds or C8~C10 aliphatic alcohols compound, vegetable oil based antifoam, tallow based fatty acids, polyalkyleneoxide polydimethylsiloxane and mixtures thereof Anti-freezing agent(s)- glycol, propylene glycol, mono ethylene glycol, Glycerol, glycerine, diethylene glycol, sorbitol, urea, mannitol, 1.0-20 polyethylene glycol or mixtures thereof Filler(s)-silicon dioxide, china-clay, kaolin, starch, bentonite, precipitated silica, fumed silica, anhydrous lactose, talcum powder, lactose, ammonium sulphate, water, sodium Sulphate, magnesium 5-50 sulphate, sodium citrate, sodium chloride, potassium chloride and mixtures thereof Anti-caking agent(s)-group of talc, hydrous magnesium silicate, magnesium carbonate, calcium carbonate, precipitate silica, hydrophobic 2.0-10 fumed silica and mixtures thereof Carrier(s)-silicon dioxide, china clay, kaolin, starch, bentonite, precipitated silica, fumed silica, talcum powder, lactose, ammonium 1.0-45 sulpha or mixture thereof Biocide / Anti-microbial agent (s)- 1, 2,- Benzisothiazolin -3-one, blends of 1,2,- benzisothiazolin-3-one and 2-methyl-4-isothiazolin-3-one, 5- chloro-2-methyl-4-isothiazolin-3-one, blends of 5-chloro-2-methyl-4- isothiazolin-3-one and 2-methyl-4-isothiazolin-3-one, zinc 1-hydroxy- 0.01-10.0 2(1H)-pyridinethione, blends of zinc l-hydroxy-2(1H)-pyridinethione and zinc oxide, , poly-vinyl alcohol ,and 2-n-octyl-4- isothiazolin-3-one or mixtures thereof Emulsifier(s)-araliphatic or aliphatic non-ionic emulsifier such as ethoxylated mono-, di- and trialkylphenols, ethoxylates of long-chain alcohols and polyethylene oxide / polypropylene oxide homo- and copolymers, EO / PO block copolymers. Ethoxylates of long-chain alkanols, ethoxylated monoalkylphenol, ethoxilates of cetyl alcohol and / or stearyl alcohol ; and Anionic emulsifier such as alkali metal and 0.1-20 ammonium salts of alkyl sulfates, of hemisulfates of ethoxylated alkanols and ethoxylated alkylphenols, alkylsulfonic acids, bis(phenylsulfonic acid) ethers and their alkali metal or ammonium salts, sodiumlaurylsulfate, sodium (cetyl / stearyl) sulfate, blend of anionic and non-ionic or mixture thereof Solvent or co-solvent(s) - heavy aromatic hydrocarbon, N methyl pyrollidone, Solvent Naphtha (Solvent C-9), Di methyl sulfoxide, 5.0-20 Dimethylformamide (DMF), N- alcohol, polyvinyl alcohol, alkyl amide, vegetable oil, mineral oil, aromatic solvents, water or mixtures thereof Polymer(s)-polyisocyanate used is toluene-2, 4-diisocyanate (TDI), diethylenetriamine (DETA),ethylene diamine (EDA), 0.5-5.0 triethylenetetramine (TETA), and / or hexamethylene diamine (HMDA), diethanolglycine sodium salt, ethanoldiglycine disodium salt, hydroxymonocarboxylic acid compounds, hydroxydicarboxylic acid compounds, tetrasodium N,N-bis(carboxylatomethyl)-L-glutamate (GLDA), methylene diisocyanate (MDI), and / or low molecular weight polydiisocynates Rheology modifier(s) / Thickening agent / thickener(s)- xanthan gum, gum arabic, gun ghatti, gum karaya, gum tragacanth, guar gum, or locust 15 0.01-5.0 bean gum; silica, silicon dioxide, attagel, agar, alginic acid or mixture thereof 16 Distilled water or China Clay QS Total 100 Example 1. Compound of Formula I 10.4% + Emamectin 1.6% + Dinotefuran 10.0% ME CHEMICAL COMPOSITION: S.No. Ingredients Quantity (Kg) 1 Compound of Formula I Technical 10.40 2 Emamectin Technical 1.60 3 Dinotefuran Technical 10.00 4 Emulsifier (Blend of Anionic and Non-ionic) 15.00 5 N-Methyl-2-pyrrolidone (NMP) Q.S. TOTAL 100.00 FORMULATION PROCESS 1. Into a clean and dry reactor, charged solvent N-Methyl-2-pyrrolidone and started stirring. 2. To the above, added technical Compound of Formula I, technical Emamectin and technical Dinotefuran. Mixed well to dissolve and get a clear solution. 3. Then to the above, added Emulsifier (Blend of Anionic and Non-ionic) and mixed well to form an Emulsifiable concentrate. 4. Filtered this solution through sparkler filter and collected the filtrate into another clean and dry vessel. 5. Packed the formulation in QA approved containers. STABILITY DATA: Compound of Formula I 10.4% + Emamectin 1.6% + Dinotefuron 10.0% ME S.No Test Specification Observatio Cold Test HST at 54 Parameter n at °C 0°C 7 14 days days 1. Yellowish to slightly Appearance brown colored clear Complies Complies Complies liquid 2. Active Content Compound of 10.4% (+5%, -5%) 10.48 10.46 10.36 Formula I 3. Active Content Emamectin 1.6% (+10%, -5%) 1.68 1.65 1.61 4. Active Content 10.0% (+5%, -5%) Dinotefuran 10.37 10.35 10.29 5. Persistent Foaming, mL Max.60 15 12 11 6. pH of 1% aqueous 6.0-8.0 6.75 6.70 6.68 emulsion 8. Flash Point, °C (Closed cup Above 24.5°C 48°C 49°C 48°C Abel) 9. Emulsion Emulsion stability stability and re-emulsification 0 h Initial emulsification complete 0. 0.5 h "Cream", Complies Complies Complies maximum: 0.2 ml 2.0 h "Cream", maximum: 2ml 'Oil’, maximum: trace 24 h Re- emulsificati on complete 24.5 h "Cream", maximum: 2 ml " oil", maximum: trace Example 2. Compound of Formula I 10.4% + Emamectin 1.6% + Dinotefuran 10.0% WDG CHEMICAL COMPOSITION: Sr. Ingredients Quantity (Kg) No. 1 Compound of Formula I Technical 10.40 2 Emamectin Technical 1.60 3 Dinotefuran Technical 10.00 4 Sodium Alkylnaphthalene Sulfonate Formaldehyde 10.0 Condensate 5 Di-isopropyl Naphthalene sulphonate 5.0 6 Sodium Polycarboxylate 5.0 7 Polydimethylsiloxane emulsion 1.0 8 Lactose anhydrous 10.0 9 China Clay Q.S. TOTAL 100.00 PREPARATION PROCESS A. Formulation process 1. Took China Clay in the ribbon blender and satrted mixing. To this added, Sodium Alkylnaphthalene Sulfonate Formaldehyde Condensate, Di-isopropyl Napthalene sulphonate, Sodium Polycarboxylate, anhydrous lactose, Compound of Formula I technical, Emamectin benzoate technical and Dinotefuran technical and mixed well. 2. Continued to mix this till the material became completely homogenised. B. Grinding process 1. Allowed to pass the premix through the Air jet mill at 6 to 7 kg / cm2of grinding pressure and 100 to 150 kg / hr feeding rate so as get a particle size of D90less than 10 micron. The grinded material was collected in post blender. 2. WP is then checked for AI content and suspensibility parameter. 3. After approval from QC the process was taken further for extrusion and drying. C. Extrusion process 1. Into the post blender the solution of water and Polydimethyl siloxane was added by means of spraying and dough was prepared. This dough was mixed well to get a well hydrated dough for extrusion. 2. This dough was then allowed to pass through the screw valve fitted with post blender and then passed through basket extruder (Sieve size of 0.8 mm / 1.0 mm). D. Drying Process 1. These wet extruded granules were then passed through VFBG (vibro fluid bed drier) which was brought to a consistent temperature of 50℃ prior to drying of wet granules. 2. These granules were checked for moisture content which should not more than 3%. 3. Once the parameter got set then the process continued. E. Sieving and packing ➢ The dried granules were passed through vibro siever machine to separate any lumps or dust and desired size granules were collected and packed. STABILITY DATA: Compound of Formula I 10.4% + Emamectin 1.6% + Dinotefuran 10.0% WDG S. No Test Specification Observation Cold Test HST at 54 Parameter at 0˚C ˚C 14 7days days 1 Description The material shall Complies Not Complies be in form of off applicable white colored free flowing granules. 2 Compound of 10.4% (+5,-5%) 10.45 Not 10.44 Formula I applicable Content (%w / w) 3 Emamectin 1.6% (+10,-5%) 1.68 Not 1.62 Content applicable (% w / w)) 4 Dinotefuran 10.0% (+5,-5%) 10.23 Not 10.42 Content (% applicable w / w) 5 Suspensibility Min 80% 98.22 Not 97.65 of Compound applicable of Formula I (% w / w) 6 Suspensibility Min 80% 98.01 Not 98.11 of Emamectin applicable (% w / w) 7 Suspensibility Min 80% 96.21 Not 95.87 of Dinotefuran applicable (% w / w) 8 pH 1.0% 5.0 to 7.50 6.95 Not 6.56 Aqueous applicable Solution 9 Wettability Max 120 s 50 Not 60 applicable 10 Wet Sieve test Min 98.0% 99.0 Not 99.2 (Passes through applicable 75 micron) 11 Moisture Max 5.0% 1.2 Not 1.2 Content applicable Example 3. Compound of Formula I 10.4% + Emamectin 1.6% + Dinotefuran 10.0% SC CHEMICAL COMPOSITION: Sr. No. Ingredients Concentration(%w / w) 1 Compound of Formula I Technical 10.4 2 Emamectin Technical 1.6 3 Dinotefuran Technical 10.0 4 Acrylic graft copolymer 3.5 5 Non-ionic proprietary surfactant 1.5 6 Propylene glycol5.07 1,2-benzisothiazolin-3-one0.18 Polydimethylsiloxane emulsion 1.0 9Xanthan Gum0.2510 Distilled Water Q.S. Total 100.0 FORMULATION PROCESS- 1. The mixture of surfactants (Acrylic graft copolymer, Non-ionic proprietary surfactant), Polydimethylsiloxane emulsion & Propylene Glycol (PG) were first diluted in required D.M. Water, and solubilized by high shear mixing. 2. Then to the above, added Compound of Formula I Technical, Emamectin Technical, and Dinotefuran Technical mix to make homogeneous mass. 3. The above mixed mass was grinded in Bead Mill. Grinding was carried out until a mean particle size of below 5 microns was obtained. 4. Preparations of 2% gum solution – Took 100 g DM water, added 0.2 g of 1,2- Benzisothiazolin-3-one and then under slow stirring added 2 g xanthan gum. 5. After the grinding, added 2% water solution of xanthan gum under low stirring and mixed till homogeneous. 6. Finally checked for quality parameter. STABILITY DATA : Compound of Formula I 10.4% + Emamectin 1.6% + Dinotefuran 10.0% SC S. No Test Specification Observation Cold Test HST at 54 Parameter at 0˚C ˚C 14 days 7days 1 Description The material shall Complies Complies Complies be off-white colour homogenous viscous liquid, free from extraneous matte 2 Compound of 10.4% (+5,-5%) 10.45 10.42 10.44 Formula I Content (%w / w) 3 Emamectin 1.6% (+10,-5%) 1.67 1.69 1.62 Content (% w / w)) 4 Dinotefuran 10 % (+5,-5%) 10.25 10.22 10.21 Content (% w / w) 5 Suspensibility Min 80% 98.24 98.54 97.55 of Compound of Formula I (% w / w) 6 Suspensibility Min 80% 98.04 98.45 98.21 of Emamectin (% w / w) 7 Suspensibility Min 80% 96.41 96.55 95.97 of Dinotefuran (% w / w) 8 pH 1.0% 5.0 to 8.00 6.55 6.85 6.76 Aqueous Solution 9 Viscosity 300 to700 494 569 456 @25°C Spindle 63 60 rpm (CPS) 10 Wet Sieve test 2.0 Max 0.16 0.15 0.16 (Retained on 45 micron) (% w / w) 11 Persistent foam 40 Max 13 12 12 after 1min (ml) Evaluation of synergistic effect of pesticidal composition of the present invention A synergistic effect of two or more products exists whenever the action of an active ingredient combination is greater than the sum of the actions of the individual components. Synergism was calculated by using Colby’s method (Weeds, vol.15 No.1 (Jan 1967), pp.20-2. The synergistic action expected for a given combination of two active components can be calculated as follows: XY E = (X + Y) – --------- 100 The synergistic action expected for a given combination of three active components can be calculated as follows: (XY+YZ+XZ) (XYZ) E = (X + Y + Z) – ----------------- + ------------ 100 10000 Where: E represents expected percentage of pesticidal control for the combination of the two or three actives ingredients at defined doses (for example equal to x, y and z, respectively). X is the percentage of pesticidal control observed by the compound (Compound of Formula I) at a defined dose (equal to x). Y is the percentage of pesticidal control observed by the compound (Emamectin benzoate) at a defined dose (equal to y). Z is the percentage of pesticidal control observed by the compound (Dinotefuran) at a defined dose (equal to z). When the percentage of pesticidal control observed for the combination is greater than the expected percentage, there is a synergism effect. Observed control (%) Ratio = ----------------------------- Expected control (%) Ratio of O / E > 1, synergism observed The present invention is illustrated by way of examples, the examples are meant for illustrative purposes and should not be construed as limiting. Experiment for Synergistic activity of composition of present invention: Example 1 - Details of experiment on Chilli crop: Field experiment for synergistic activity of Compound of Formula I, Emamectin benzoate and Dinotefuran for the control of Thrips and Powdery mildew disease in chilli crop was conducted. To evaluate the synergistic effect, Chilli (Pusa Jwala) crop was sown in 5 m x 5 m plots at 75 cm x 75 cm plant distance with three replications and in Randomized Block Design (RBD). The treatments were applied as foliar application in the form of ME formulation @ 500 ml / ha. Each active component was applied at recommended dose in different ternary and binary combinations, Solo component was also taken for comparison. The treatment details are as under: Sr. No. Treatments Concentration % T1 Compound of Formula I, Emamectin benzoate and Dinotefuran 31% + 8% +0.1% T2 Compound of Formula I, Emamectin benzoate and Dinotefuran 10.4% + 1.6% +10% T3 Compound of Formula I, Emamectin benzoate and Dinotefuran 0.1% + 15% + 30% T4 Compound of Formula I, Emamectin benzoate and Dinotefuran 21% + 0.1% + 20% T5 Compound of Formula I and Emamectin benzoate 31% + 8% T6 Compound of Formula I and Emamectin benzoate 10.4% + 1.6% T7 Compound of Formula I and Emamectin benzoate 0.1% + 15% T8 Compound of Formula I and Emamectin benzoate 21% + 0.1% T9 Compound of Formula I and Dinotefuran 31% + 0.1% T10 Compound of Formula I and Dinotefuran 10.4% + 10% T11 Compound of Formula I and Dinotefuran 0.1% + 30% T12 Compound of Formula I and Dinotefuran 21% + 20% T13 Emamectin benzoate and Dinotefuran 8% +0.1% T14 Emamectin benzoate and Dinotefuran 1.6% +10% T15 Emamectin benzoate and Dinotefuran 15% + 30% T16 Emamectin benzoate and Dinotefuran 0.1% + 20% T17 Compound of Formula I 31% T18 Compound of Formula I 10.4% T19 Compound of Formula I 0.1% T20 Compound of Formula I 21% T21 Emamectin benzoate 8% T22 Emamectin benzoate 1.6% T23 Emamectin benzoate 15% T24 Emamectin benzoate 0.1% T25 Dinotefuran 0.1% T26 Dinotefuran 10% T27 Dinotefuran 30% T28 Dinotefuran 20% T29 Untreated check - The treatments T1 to T28 were used as foliar application whereas no treatment was done for T29 control treatment. All the treatments were applied at the Economic Threshold Level (ETL) of insect-pest in the plots. Observations for Thrips (Scirtothrips dorsalis) and Powdery mildew disease (Leveillula taurica) were recorded at Before spray, 7 and 15 days after sprays by observing 10 random plant per plot and based on number of thrips and reduction over control was calculated and Powdery mildew disease reduction of PDI was calculated over control. Based on the per cent reduction in reduction of Thrips population and powdery mildew disease PDI Expected control was calculated and compared with Observed control. The results of the trial have been presented here under in Table 1. Table 1: Synergistic effect of composition of the present invention (Compound of Formula I, Emamectin benzoate and Dinotefuran) against Thrips and Powdery mildew disease in Chilli crop. Colby Ratio Observed per Expected per (Observed cent control cent control Control % Sr. Co / Expected No. Treatments ncentrati on % Control % ) Powd Powd Powd Thrip ery Thri ery Thri ery s milde ps milde ps milde w w w Compound of Formula I, T1 Emamectin benzoate and 31% + 8% 62.83 74.7 25.5 notefuran +0 2 43.66 2.46 1.71 Di .1% 3 Compound of Formula I, T2 Emamectin benzoate and 10.4% + 93.47 32.7 1.6 76.54 42.92 2.86 1.78 Dinotefuran % + 10% 1 Compound of Formula I, T3 Emamectin benzoate and 0.1% + 15% 35.4 + 30% 92.67 44.33 4 26.44 2.61 1.68 Dinotefuran Compound of Formula I, T4 Emamectin benzoate and 21% + 0.1% 28.6 efuran + 20% 73.33 76.33 42.78 2.56 1.78 Dinot 0 T5 Compound of Formula I and 31% + 8% 34.3 18.8 Emamectin benzoate 9.33 3 7 41.39 0.49 0.83 T6 Compound of Formula I and 10.4% + Emamectin benzoate 1.6% 8.88 29.42 16.0 8 38.67 0.55 0.76 T7 Compound of Formula I and in benzoate 0.1% + 15% 10.67 15. 18.1 Emamect 90 0 18.87 0.59 0.84 T8 Compound of Formula I and 2 10.3 Emamectin benzoate 1% + 0.1% 7.46 31.21 9 38.03 0.72 0.82 Compound of Formula I and 12.7 T9 31% + 0.1% 9.21 39.44 40.49 0.72 0.97 Dinotefuran 3 Compound of Formula I and 10.4% + 22.7 T10 16.98 37.67 40.12 0.75 0.94 Dinotefuran 10% 6 Compound of Formula I and 22.8 T11 0.1% + 30% 17.95 18.10 19.38 0.79 0.93 Dinotefuran 4 Compound of Formula I and 23.7 T12 21% + 20% 17.02 38.33 41.21 0.72 0.93 Dinotefuran 8 T13 Emamectin benzoate and furan 8% +0.1% 17.64 21.6 Dinote 6.27 8 8.99 0.81 0.70 T14 Emamectin benzoate and 1.6% + 10% 25 30.1 Dinotefuran .33 7.47 5 11.27 0.84 0.66 T15 Emamectin benzoate and Dinotefuran 15% + 30% 29.75 9.67 34.0 4 17.27 0.87 0.56 T16 Emamectin benzoate and 0.1% + 25.3 Dinotefuran 20% 21.29 7.03 7 10.14 0.84 0.69 T17 Compound of Formula I 31% 4.92 38.09 - - - - T18 Compound of Formula I 10.4% 3.67 35.67 - - - - T19 Compound of Formula I 0.1% 2.12 11.08 - - - - T20 Compound of Formula I 21% 4.33 36.33 - - - - T21 Emamectin benzoate 8% 14.67 5.33 - - - - T22 Emamectin benzoate 1.6% 12.88 4.67 - - - - T23 Emamectin benzoate 15% 16.33 8.76 - - - - T24 Emamectin benzoate 0.1% 6.33 2.67 - - - - T25 Dinotefuran 0.1% 8.21 3.87 - - - - T26 Dinotefuran 10% 19.82 6.92 - - - - T27 Dinotefuran 30% 21.17 9.33 - - - - T28 Dinotefuran 20% 20.33 7.67 - - - - T29 Untreated check - - - - - - - It is clearly evident from the data shown in above Table 1 for per cent Thrips control and per cent powdery mildew control in chilli crop that the ternary composition of the present invention comprising Compound of Formula I, Emamectin benzoate and Dinotefuran T1 to T4 are synergistic for both insect-pest control with > 1 Colby’s Ratio. The binary composition of two insecticides (Emamectin benzoate and Dinotefuran) T13 to T16 is more effective for the control of thrips but being a combination of being insecticides, it shows antagonistic effect for the control of Powdery mildew disease. The binary composition of one fungicide and one insecticide (Compound of Formula I & Emamectin benzoate and Compound of Formula I & Dinotefuran) T5 to T8 and T9 to T12 are more effective to control powdery mildew control as compared to binary composition of Emamectin benzoate and Dinotefuran T13 to T16. All binary compositions are less effective for control of both insect-pest for control in compared to ternary compositions. Experiment for Bio-efficacy evaluation of composition of present invention: For the ternary and binary compositions based on Compound of Formula I, Emamectin benzoate and Dinotefuran evaluation under field conditions, the basic test composition as Compound of Formula I, Emamectin benzoate and Dinotefuran were manufactured specifically by the inventor. For ternary composition, Compound of Formula I 10.4% + Emamectin benzoate 1.6% + Dinotefuran 10% ME was used and for binary compositions, Compound of Formula I 10.4% + Emamectin benzoate 1.6% ME, Compound of Formula I 10.4% + Dinotefuran 10% ME and Emamectin benzoate 1.6% + Dinotefuran 10% ME and solo formulations of Compound of Formula I 10.4% ME, Emamectin benzoate 1.6% ME and Dinotefuran 10% ME were used. The market samples Tebuconazole 50% + Compound of Formula I 25% WG, Emamectin benzoate 01.90 % EC and Dinotefuran 70% WG were used for comparison. Example 2 - Evaluation of the composition of the present invention on Chilli The synergistic composition of the present invention Compound of Formula I 10.4% + Emamectin benzoate 1.6% + Dinotefuran 10% ME was evaluated on chilli crop variety Pusa jwala. The treatments application was done on at initiation of insect-pest in plots sown in Randomized Block Design (RBD) with three replications maintaining a distance of 75 cm x 75 cm between plants and rows. The observations were recorded for the following objectives. Objectives: 1. Bio-efficacy evaluation against Thrips on Chilli crop. 2. Bio-efficacy evaluation against Powdery mildew disease on Chilli crop. 3. Bio-efficacy evaluation based on per cent reduction in Thrips population over control. 4. Bio-efficacy evaluation based on percent reduction in Powdery mildew disease. 5. Bio-efficacy evaluation based on green Chilli yield. 6. Phytotoxicity evaluation on Chilli crop. Treatment details: Sr. Treatments No. Compound of Formula I 10.4% + Emamectin benzoate 1.6% + Dinotefuran 10% ME T1 @ 375ml / ha Compound of Formula I 10.4% + Emamectin benzoate 1.6% + Dinotefuran 10% ME T2 @ 500ml / ha Compound of Formula I 10.4% + Emamectin benzoate 1.6% + Dinotefuran 10% ME T3 @ 625ml / ha T4 Compound of Formula I 10.4% + Emamectin benzoate 1.6% ME @ 375ml / ha T5 Compound of Formula I 10.4% + Emamectin benzoate 1.6% ME @ 500ml / ha T6 Compound of Formula I 10.4% + Emamectin benzoate 1.6% ME @ 625ml / ha T7 Compound of Formula I 10.4% + Dinotefuran 10% ME @ 375ml / ha T8 Compound of Formula I 10.4% + Dinotefuran 10% ME @ 500ml / ha T9 Compound of Formula I 10.4% + Dinotefuran 10% ME @ 625ml / ha T10 Emamectin benzoate 1.6% + Dinotefuran 10% ME @ 375ml / ha T11 Emamectin benzoate 1.6% + Dinotefuran 10% ME @ 500ml / ha T12 Emamectin benzoate 1.6% + Dinotefuran 10% ME @ 625ml / ha T13 Compound of Formula I 10.4% ME @ 500ml / ha T14 Emamectin benzoate 1.6% ME @ 500ml / ha T15 Dinotefuran 10% ME @ 500ml / ha T16 Tebuconazole 50% + Compound of Formula I 25% WG @ 250gm / ha T17 Emamectin benzoate 01.90% EC @ 375ml / ha T18 Dinotefuran 70% WG @ 88gm / ha T19 Untreated control T20 Compound of Formula I 10.4% +Emamectin benzoate 1.6% + Dinotefuran 10% ME@ 1000ml / ha (For phyto- toxicity only) Methodology: The treatments T1 to T18 and T20 were used as foliar application whereas only water spray was done for T19 control treatment. The treatments were applied as foliar application at the ETL level of insect-pest. Each active component was applied in same ternary and binary compositions. Solo compositions were also taken for comparison. Observations for Thrips (Scirtothrips dorsalis) and Powdery mildew disease (Leveillula taurica) were recorded at Before spray, 7 and 15 days after sprays by observing 10 random hills per plot and based on number of Thrips and reduction over control was calculated and Powdery mildew disease per cent reduction was also calculated over control. The green chilli yield was recorded at harvest. The observations for phytotoxicity on chilli crop at 0, 3, 5, 7, 10 & 15 days after spray were also recorded. Results are presented in Table 2, 3, 4, and 5..

[0005] Results: Table 2: Field bio-efficacy evaluation of Compound of Formula I 10.4% + Emamectin benzoate 1.6% + Dinotefuran 10% ME against Thrips in Chilli crop. Sr. Treatments A.I. Dose Form Mean Thrips %ROC No. (g / ha) ulatio population / leaf (Reduction n (ml Over or Control) g / ha) Befor 7 15 7 15 e DAS DAS DAS DAS spray Compound of Formula I 10.4% + T1 Emamectin benzoate 1.6% + 39 + 6 + 80.7 91.0 E 37. 375 6.79 1.67 1.28 Dinotefuran 10% M 5 4 7 Compound of Formula I 10.4% + 52 + 8 + 86.2 94.0 T2 Emamectin benzoate 1.6% + 500 6.83 1.19 0.86 50 7 0 Dinotefuran 10% ME Compound of Formula I 10.4% + 65 + 10 + 88.7 95.0 T3 Emamectin benzoate 1.6% + 625 6.71 0.98 0.71 62.5 0 5 Dinotefuran 10% ME Compound of Formula I 10.4% + 43.2 58.6 T4 39 + 6 375 7.15 4.92 5.92 Emamectin benzoate 1.6% ME 5 9 Compound of Formula I 10.4% + 46.1 60.4 T5 52 + 8 500 6.85 4.67 5.67 Emamectin benzoate 1.6% ME 4 3 Compound of Formula I 10.4% + 50.0 61.8 T6 65 + 10 625 6.82 4.33 5.47 Emamectin benzoate 1.6% ME 6 3 Compound of Formula I 10.4% + 55.3 66.0 T7 39 + 37.5 375 6.81 3.87 4.87 Dinotefuran 10% ME 6 2 Compound of Formula I 10.4% + 57.6 67.4 T8 52 + 50 500 7.17 3.67 4.67 Dinotefuran 10% ME 7 1 Compound of Formula I 10.4% + 59.9 69.7 T9 65 + 62.5 625 6.90 3.47 4.33 Dinotefuran 10% ME 8 8 Emamectin benzoate 1.6% + 63.4 82.3 T10 6 + 37.5 375 7.15 3.17 2.53 Dinotefuran 10% ME 4 4 Emamectin benzoate 1.6% + 64.4 83.8 T11 8 + 50 500 7.10 3.08 2.31 Dinotefuran 10% ME 8 8 Emamectin benzoate 1.6% + 65.7 84.4 T12 10 + 62.5 625 6.85 2.97 2.23 Dinotefuran 10% ME 4 4 11.9 11.5 16.4 T13 Compound of Formula I 10.4% ME 52 500 6.12 7.67 8 3 0 31.7 45.2 T14 Emamectin benzoate 1.6% ME 8.0 500 6.80 5.92 7.84 2 9 38.5 53.4 T15 Dinotefuran 10% ME 50 500 7.27 5.33 6.67 2 5 Tebuconazole 50% + Compound of 11.6 15.4 18.5 T16 125 + 62.5 250 6.94 7.33 Formula I 25% WG 7 6 6 32.6 47.8 T17 Emamectin benzoate 01.90 % EC 07.13 375 7.00 5.84 7.47 4 7 39.6 55.8 T18 Dinotefuran 70% WG 61.2 88 7.20 5.23 6.33 8 3 14.3 T19 Untreated control - - 6.65 8.67 - - 3 S Em ± 0.12 0.09 0.12 - - CD (P=0.05) NS 0.22 0.31 - - DAS – Days after spray Table 3: Field bio-efficacy evaluation of Compound of Formula I 10.4% + Emamectin benzoate 1.6% + Dinotefuran 10% ME against Powdery mildew in Chilli crop. Sr. Treatments A.I. Dose Form Per cent disease % No. (g / ha) ulatio incidence (PDI) Reduction n Over (ml / ha Control ) Befor 7 15 7 15 e DAS DAS DAS DAS spray Compound of Formula I 10.4% + 39 + 6 + 12.8 53.5 74.0 T1 Emamectin benzoate 1.6% + 375 19.57 8.92 37.5 6 2 2 Dinotefuran 10% ME Compound of Formula I 10.4% + 52 + 8 + 11.6 57.8 78.6 T2 Emamectin benzoate 1.6% + 500 20.33 7.33 50 7 2 5 Dinotefuran 10% ME Compound of Formula I 10.4% + 65 + 10 + 11.3 59.0 80.0 T3 Emamectin benzoate 1.6% + 625 20.36 6.84 62.5 3 5 8 Dinotefuran 10% ME Compound of Formula I 10.4% + 17.2 15.9 37.6 53.6 T4 39 + 6 375 19.58 Emamectin benzoate 1.6% ME 4 1 9 6 Compound of Formula I 10.4% + 17.0 15.6 38.5 54.3 T5 52 + 8 500 20.34 Emamectin benzoate 1.6% ME 0 7 6 5 Compound of Formula I 10.4% + 16.2 14.8 41.3 56.6 T6 65 + 10 625 19.56 Emamectin benzoate 1.6% ME 2 9 8 3 Compound of Formula I 10.4% + 15.2 13.9 44.8 59.4 T7 39 + 37.5 375 19.59 Dinotefuran 10% ME 5 2 9 5 Compound of Formula I 10.4% + 15.0 13.6 45.4 60.1 T8 52 + 50 500 20.43 Dinotefuran 10% ME 9 7 6 8 Compound of Formula I 10.4% + 14.7 13.3 46.6 61.1 T9 65 + 62.5 625 19.19 Dinotefuran 10% ME 5 3 9 7 Emamectin benzoate 1.6% + 21.0 25.4 23.8 25.8 T10 6 + 37.5 375 20.13 Dinotefuran 10% ME 8 6 2 4 Emamectin benzoate 1.6% + 20.9 24.6 24.3 28.1 T11 8 + 50 500 20.25 Dinotefuran 10% ME 2 7 9 4 Emamectin benzoate 1.6% + 20.6 24.3 25.3 29.1 T12 10 + 62.5 625 20.18 Dinotefuran 10% ME 7 3 0 3 18.6 17.6 32.5 48.5 T13 Compound of Formula I 10.4% ME 52 500 20.65 7 7 3 3 23.6 27.3 14.4 20.3 T14 Emamectin benzoate 1.6% ME 8.0 500 20.26 7 3 6 9 22.9 26.6 16.9 22.3 T15 Dinotefuran 10% ME 50 500 21.45 7 7 9 1 Tebuconazole 50% + Compound of 17.6 17.0 36.1 50.2 T16 125 + 62.5 250 19.39 Formula I 25% WG 7 8 4 5 23.3 27.0 15.6 21.2 T17 Emamectin benzoate 01.90 % EC 07.13 375 20.38 3 2 8 9 22.7 26.3 17.7 23.3 T18 Dinotefuran 70 % WG 61.2 88 20.17 7 3 1 0 27.6 34.3 T19 Untreated control - - 18.75 - - 7 3 SEm ±0.12 0.09 0.12 - - CD (P=0.05)NS 0.22 0.31 - -DAS – Days after spray Table 4: Field bio-efficacy evaluation of Compound of Formula I 10.4% + Emamectin benzoate 1.6% + Dinotefuran 10% ME based on yield of green Chilli crop. Sr. Treatments A.I. Dose Formul Green % No. (g / ha) ation Chilli Increase (ml / ha) Yield against (kg / ha) control Compound of Formula I 10.4% + Emamectin 39 + 6 + T1 375 6395 66.36 benzoate 1.6% + Dinotefuran 10% ME 37.5 Compound of Formula I 10.4% + Emamectin T2 52 + 8 + 50 500 6538 70.08 benzoate 1.6% + Dinotefuran 10% ME Compound of Formula I 10.4% + Emamectin 65 + 10 + T3 625 6555 70.53 benzoate 1.6% + Dinotefuran 10% ME 62.5 Compound of Formula I 10.4% + Emamectin T4 39 + 6 375 5567 44.82 benzoate 1.6% ME Compound of Formula I 10.4% + Emamectin T5 52 + 8 500 5798 50.83 benzoate 1.6% ME Compound of Formula I 10.4% + Emamectin T6 65 + 10 625 5808 51.09 benzoate 1.6% ME Compound of Formula I 10.4% + Dinotefuran T7 39 + 37.5 375 5643 46.80 10% ME Compound of Formula I 10.4% + Dinotefuran T8 52 + 50 500 5877 52.89 10% ME Compound of Formula I 10.4% + Dinotefuran T9 65 + 62.5 625 5933 54.34 10% ME Emamectin benzoate 1.6% + Dinotefuran 10% T10 6 + 37.5 375 5387 40.14 ME Emamectin benzoate 1.6% + Dinotefuran 10% T11 8 + 50 500 5467 42.22 ME Emamectin benzoate 1.6% + Dinotefuran 10% T12 10 + 62.5 625 5492 42.87 ME T13 Compound of Formula I 10.4% ME 52 500 4344 13.01 T14 Emamectin benzoate 1.6% ME 8.0 500 4407 14.65 T15 Dinotefuran 10% ME 50 500 4534 17.95 Tebuconazole 50% + Compound of Formula I T16 125 + 62.5 250 4367 13.61 25% WG T17 Emamectin benzoate 01.90 % EC 07.13 375 4433 15.32 T18 Dinotefuran 70 % WG 61.2 88 4571 18.91 T19 Untreated control - - 3844 - S. Em. ± 154.33 - C.D at 5 % 463.00 - Table 5: Phytotoxicity evaluation of Compound of Formula I 10.4% + Emamectin benzoate 1.6% + Dinotefuran 10% ME on Chilli crop. Sr. Treatments A.I. Dose Formula Phytotoxicity parameters observed* No. (g / ha) tion (mean data recorded at 0, 3, 5, 7, 10 and (ml / ha) 15 days after application) L W N V E H Compound of Formula I 39 + 6 + T1 10.4% + Emamectin benzoate 375 0 0 0 0 0 0 37.5 1.6% + Dinotefuran 10% ME Compound of Formula I 52 + 8 + T2 10.4% + Emamectin benzoate 500 0 0 0 0 0 0 50 1.6% + Dinotefuran 10% ME Compound of Formula I 65 + 10 + T3 10.4% + Emamectin benzoate 625 0 0 0 0 0 0 62.5 1.6% + Dinotefuran 10% ME Compound of Formula I T4 10.4% + Emamectin benzoate 39 + 6 375 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.6% ME Compound of Formula I T5 10.4% + Emamectin benzoate 52 + 8 500 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.6% ME Compound of Formula I T6 10.4% + Emamectin benzoate 65 + 10 625 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.6% ME Compound of Formula I T7 10.4% + Dinotefuran 10% 39 + 37.5 375 0 0 0 0 0 0 ME Compound of Formula I T8 10.4% + Dinotefuran 10% 52 + 50 500 0 0 0 0 0 0 ME Compound of Formula I T9 10.4% + Dinotefuran 10% 65 + 62.5 625 0 0 0 0 0 0 ME Emamectin benzoate 1.6% + T10 6 + 37.5 375 0 0 0 0 0 0 Dinotefuran 10% ME Emamectin benzoate 1.6% + T11 8 + 50 500 0 0 0 0 0 0 Dinotefuran 10% ME Emamectin benzoate 1.6% + T12 10 + 62.5 625 0 0 0 0 0 0 Dinotefuran 10% ME Compound of Formula I T13 52 500 0 0 0 0 0 0 10.4% ME Emamectin benzoate 1.6% T14 8.0 500 0 0 0 0 0 0 ME T15 Dinotefuran 10% ME 50 500 0 0 0 0 0 0 Tebuconazole 50% + T16 Compound of Formula I 25% 125 + 62.5 250 0 0 0 0 0 0 WG Emamectin benzoate 01.90 % T17 07.13 375 0 0 0 0 0 0 EC T18 Dinotefuran 70% WG 61.2 88 0 0 0 0 0 0 T19 Untreated control - - 0 0 0 0 0 0 Compound of Formula I 10.4% + Emamectin benzoate 104+16+1 T20 1000 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.6% + Dinotefuran 10% ME 00 (For phyto- toxicity only) L – Leaf injury on tips / surface, W – Wilting, N – Necrosis, V – Vein clearing, E – Epinasty, H – Hyponasty *Based on 0-10 scale where: 0=0%, 1=1-10%, 2=11-20%, 3=21-30%, 4=31-40%, 5=41-50%, 6=51-60%, 7=61-70%, 8=71-80%, 9=81-90%,10=91-100% From the examples and tables, it is clearly seen that the ternary composition of the present invention is superior for Thrips (Scirtothrips dorsalis) at 7 and 15 days after spray (Table 2) and for controlling Powdery mildew disease (Leveillula taurica) at 7 and 15 days after spray (Table 3) in chilli crop as compared to the binary composition and solo component comprising at same 5 dosage levels. Other registered formulated products available in the market, Tebuconazole 50% + Compound of Formula I 25% WG, Emamectin benzoate 01.90% EC and Dinotefuran 70% WG evaluated were next in order of effectiveness after ternary composition products. The yield of chilli crop also improved in the ternary composition of Compound of Formula I 10.4% + Emamectin benzoate 1.6% + Dinotefuran 10% ME as compared to binary and solo compositions (Table 4). 0 The disclosed exemplary composition of the present invention i.e. Compound of Formula I 10.4% + Emamectin benzoate 1.6% + Dinotefuran 10% ME @ 375ml, 500ml, 625ml and 1000ml / ha further showed no phytotoxicity in the chilli crop even after 0, 3, 5, 7, 10 and 15 days after spray (Table 5). It is evident from the above tables and examples that the ternary composition of the present invention resulted in good control in Thrips and powdery mildew in chilli crop with higher respective yields as compared to the reference standard products (binary compositions and solo products). Hence, the composition of present invention has resulted in synergistic effect and is bio- efficacious. In particular, it has now been found, surprisingly that, for example, the pesticidal activity of the composition of present invention, compared with the pesticidal activity of individual components, is synergistic. In fact, various advantageous properties associated with the compositions according to the invention, include but are not limited to: no phytotoxicity and enhanced shelf life, stability of the composition. From the above investigations, it will be observed that numerous modifications and variations can be effectuated without departing from the true spirit and scope of the novel concepts of the present invention. It is to be understood that no limitations with respect to the specific embodiments illustrated is intended or should be inferred. It should be understood that all such modifications and improvements have been deleted herein for the sake of conciseness and readability but are properly within the scope of the following claims.

Claims

I CLAIM

1. . A stable synergistic pesticidal composition comprising: A) Compound of Formula I i.e. Methyl (E)-(methoxyimino) {α-({[(E)-1-(α,α,α-trifluoro-m- tolyl)ethylidene]amino}oxy)-o-tolyl}acetate or its agrochemically acceptable salts, esters and derivatives; B) Emamectin or its agrochemically acceptable salts, esters and derivatives or its agrochemically acceptable salts, esters and derivatives; and C) Dinotefuran or its agrochemically acceptable salts, esters and derivatives.

2. . The stable synergistic pesticidal composition as claimed in claim 1, comprising: A) Compound of Formula I i.e. Methyl (E)-(methoxyimino) {α-({[(E)-1-(α,α,α-trifluoro-m- tolyl)ethylidene]amino}oxy)-o-tolyl}acetate or its agrochemically acceptable salts, esters and derivatives, in the range of 0.1 to 90% by weight of the composition; B) Emamectin or its agrochemically acceptable salts, esters and derivatives or its agrochemically acceptable salts, esters and derivatives, in the range of 0.1 to 90% by weight of the composition and C) Dinotefuran or its agrochemically acceptable salts, esters and derivatives, in the range of 0.1 to 90% by weight of the composition.

3. . The stable synergistic pesticidal composition as claimed in claims 1 to 2, which further comprises one or more agrochemically acceptable excipients.

4. . The stable synergistic pesticidal composition as claimed in claim 3, wherein agrochemically acceptable excipients comprises surfactant(s), dispersing agent(s), co- dispersant(s), anti-freezing agent(s), emulsifier(s), anti-foaming agent / defoamer(s), wetting agent(s), biocide / antimicrobial / anti-bacterial agent(s), thickening agent / thickener(s), quick coating agent(s) or sticking agents / sticker(s), spreader(s), binder(s), pH-adjusting agent(s), anti- caking agent(s), adjuvant(s), filler(s) / suspension aid(s), colorant(s), carrier(s), buffering agent(s), rheology modifier(s), polymer(s), solvent(s), co-solvent(s) or a combination thereof.

5. . The stable synergistic pesticidal composition as claimed in claim 4, wherein the dispersing agent and / or co-dispersant is / are selected from the group comprising non-ionic proprietary surfactant, polyarylphenyl ether phosphate, tristyryl phenol ethoxylate, acrylic graft copolymer, ethoxylated tristryl phenol Sulphate, alkyl naphthalene formaldehyde condensate ,naphthalene sulfonic acid, sodium salt condensate with formaldehyde, sodium alkyl or aryl naphthalene sulfonate formaldehyde condensate, ethoxylated oleyl cetyl alcohol, polyalkelene glycol ether, ethoxylated fatty alcohol, Sodium polymethyl methacrylate, polymethyl methacrylate, sodium polyacrylate, sodium lignosulphonate, calcium lignosulphonate, alkylphenol polyoxyethylene ether, polycarboxylate, fatty alcohol polyoxyethylene ether, alcohol polyglycol ether or mixtures thereof and present in the range of 0.1-20% by weight of the composition.

6. . The stable synergistic pesticidal composition as claimed in claim 4, wherein the wetting agent is selected form the group comprising tristyrylphenol ethoxylate non-ionic emulsifier, mixture of non-ionic surfactants, alkoxylated alcohol, block copolymer, alcohol polyglycol ether, alkyl olefin sulphates, dioctyl sulpho succinate, alkyl naphthalene sulphate ,Di- isopropyl Napthalene sulphonate, Polyalkoxy ethers, alkyl phenol ethoxylates, tri-styrenated phenol ethoxylate, EO / PO block co-polymers, sodium lauryl sulphate, sodium ligno sulphates or mixtures thereof and present in the range of 0.1-20% by weight of the total composition.

7. . The stable synergistic pesticidal composition as claimed in claim 4, wherein the defoamer or antifoaming agent is selected from the group comprising silicon emulsion based anti- foam agents, Siloxane polyalkyleneoxide, Polydimethylsiloxane, trisiloxane ethoxylates, silicone oil, silicone compound, C10~C20 saturated fat acid compounds or C8~C10 aliphatic alcohols compound, vegetable oil based antifoam, tallow based fatty acids, polyalkyleneoxide polydimethylsiloxane and mixtures thereof and present in the range of 0.01-5.0 % by weight of the composition.

8. . The stable synergistic pesticidal composition as claimed in claim 4, wherein the anti- freezing agent is selected from the group comprising glycol, propylene glycol, mono ethylene glycol, glycerine, diethylene glycol, sorbitol, urea, mannitol, polyethylene glycol or mixtures thereof and present in the range of 1.0-20% by weight of the composition.

9. . The stable synergistic pesticidal composition as claimed in claim 4, wherein the filler is selected from the group comprising silicon dioxide, china-clay, kaolin, starch, bentonite, precipitated silica, fumed silica, anhydrous lactose, talcum powder, lactose, ammonium sulphate, water, sodium Sulphate, magnesium sulphate, sodium citrate, sodium chloride, potassium chloride and mixtures thereof and present in the range of 5-50 % by weight of the composition.

10. . The stable synergistic pesticidal composition as claimed in claim 4, wherein the anti- caking agent is selected from the group comprising of group of talc, hydrous magnesium silicate, magnesium carbonate, calcium carbonate, precipitate silica, hydrophobic fumed silica and mixtures thereof and present in the range of 2.0-10% by weight of the composition.

11. . The stable synergistic pesticidal composition as claimed in claim 4, wherein the carrier is selected from the group consisting of silicon dioxide, china clay, kaolin, starch, bentonite, precipitated silica, fumed silica, talcum powder, lactose, ammonium sulpha or mixture thereof and present in the range of 1.0-45 % by weight of the composition.

12. . The stable synergistic pesticidal composition as claimed in claim 4, wherein the biocide or anti-microbial agent(s) is / are selected from 1, 2,- Benzisothiazolin -3-one, blends of 1,2,- benzisothiazolin-3-one and 2-methyl-4-isothiazolin-3-one, 5-chloro-2-methyl-4-isothiazolin- 3-one, blends of 5-chloro-2-methyl-4-isothiazolin-3-one and 2-methyl-4-isothiazolin-3-one, zinc 1-hydroxy-2(1H)-pyridinethione, blends of zinc l-hydroxy-2(1H)-pyridinethione and zinc oxide, , poly-vinyl alcohol ,and 2-n-octyl-4- isothiazolin-3-one or mixtures thereof and present in the range of 0.01 to 10 % by weight of the composition.

13. . The stable synergistic pesticidal composition as claimed in claim 4, wherein the emulsifier(s) is / are selected from group consisting of araliphatic or aliphatic non-ionic emulsifier such as ethoxylated mono-, di- and trialkylphenols, ethoxylates of long-chain alcohols and polyethylene oxide / polypropylene oxide homo- and copolymers, EO / PO block copolymers. Ethoxylates of long-chain alkanols, ethoxylated monoalkylphenol, ethoxilates of cetyl alcohol and / or stearyl alcohol ; and Anionic emulsifier such as alkali metal and ammonium salts of alkyl sulfates, of hemisulfates of ethoxylated alkanols and ethoxylated alkylphenols, alkylsulfonic acids,bis(phenylsulfonic acid) ethers and their alkali metal or ammonium salts, sodiumlaurylsulfate, sodium (cetyl / stearyl) sulfate, blend of anionic and non-ionic or mixture thereof and present in the range of 0.1 -20 % by weight of the composition.

14. . The stable synergistic pesticidal composition as claimed in claim 4 wherein the solvent(s) and co-solvent are selected from polar and non-polar solvent from the group comprising heavy aromatic hydrocarbon, N methyl pyrollidone (NMP), Solvent Naphtha (Solvent C-9), Di methyl sulfoxide, Dimethylformamide (DMF), N- alcohol, polyvinyl alcohol, alkyl amide, vegetable oil, mineral oil, aromatic solvents, water or mixtures thereof and present in the range of 5.0 to 20.0 % by weight of the composition.

15. . The stable synergistic pesticidal composition as claimed in claim 4, wherein the polymer(s) is / are selected from polyisocyanate used is toluene-2, 4-diisocyanate (TDI), diethylenetriamine (DETA),ethylene diamine (EDA), triethylenetetramine (TETA), and / or hexamethylene diamine (HMDA), diethanolglycine sodium salt, ethanoldiglycine disodium salt, hydroxymonocarboxylic acid compounds, hydroxydicarboxylic acid compounds, tetrasodium N,N-bis(carboxylatomethyl)-L-glutamate (GLDA), methylene diisocyanate (MDI), and / or low molecular weight polydiisocynates and present in the range of 0.5- 5.0 % by weight of the composition.

16. . The stable synergistic pesticidal composition as claimed in claim 4, wherein the rheology modifier is / are selected from group comprising xanthan gum, gum arabic, gun ghatti, gum karaya, gum tragacanth, guar gum, or locust bean gum; silica, silicon dioxide, attagel, agar, alginic acid or mixture thereof and present in the range of 0.01-5.0 % by weight of the composition.

17. . The stable synergistic pesticidal composition as claimed in claim 1 to 16, wherein the use of said composition promotes plant health, growth and thus increases plant, crop yield in the field.

18. . The stable synergistic pesticidal composition as claimed in claim 1 to 16, provide one shot application of novel and effective synergistic pesticidal composition for killing / controlling highly resistant thrips, anthracnoseat lower application rates.

19. . The stable synergistic pesticidal composition as claimed in any one of the claims 1 to 16, wherein the composition is in form of Capsule suspension (CS), Dispersible concentrate (DC), Dustable powder (DP), Powder for dry seed treatment (DS), Emulsifiable concentrate (EC), Emulsifiable granule (EG), Emulsion water-in-oil (EO), Emulsifiable powder (EP), Emulsion for seed treatment (ES), Emulsion oil-in-water (EW), Flowable concentrate for seed treatment (FS), Granules (GR), Micro-emulsion (ME), Oil-dispersion (OD), Oil miscible flowable concentrate (OF), Oil miscible liquid (OL), Oil dispersible powder (OP), Suspension concentrate (SC), Suspension concentrate for direct application (SD), Suspo-emulsion (SE), Water soluble granule (SG), Soluble concentrate (SL), Spreading oil (SO), Water soluble powder (SP), Water soluble tablet (ST), Ultra-low volume (ULV) suspension, Tablet (TB), Ultra-low volume (ULV) liquid, Water dispersible granules (WG), Wettable powder (WP), Water dispersible powder for slurry seed treatment (WS), Water dispersible tablet (WT), a mixed composition of CS and SC (ZC), a mixed composition of CS and SE (ZE) or a mixed composition of CS and EW (ZW).

20. A kit-of-parts comprising a plurality of components, wherein said plurality of components comprises: A) Compound of Formula I i.e. Methyl (E)-(methoxyimino) {α-({[(E)-1-(α,α,α-trifluoro-m- tolyl)ethylidene]amino}oxy)-o-tolyl}acetate or its agrochemically acceptable salts, esters and derivatives; B) Emamectin or its agrochemically acceptable salts, esters and derivatives or its agrochemically acceptable salts, esters and derivatives; and C) Dinotefuran or its agrochemically acceptable salts, esters and derivatives.

21. . A method for controlling a plant disease caused by a plant-pathogens comprising applying to the plant or portion thereof or soil, a pesticidal effective amount of the pesticidal composition as claimed in any one of the claims 1 – 19.

22. . A process for preparing a stable synergistic pesticidal composition as claimed in claims 1-19.

Citation Information

Patent Citations

  • Synergetic antibacterial composition containing trifloxystrobin

    CN102204541A

  • Composite insecticide composition containing dinotefuran and emamectin benzoate and purpose thereof

    CN102415398A

  • Bactericidal composition containing trifloxystrobin and difenoconazole and application of bactericidal composition

    CN103947650A

  • An insecticidal composition and a process for preparation thereof

    WO2019171356A1