An intelligent review method and system for digital architectural design results

Abstract

The present invention discloses an intelligent review method and system for digital achievements of architectural design, belonging to the field of architecture. The present invention calls different review control points according to professions and review stages to prompt review contents, and reviewers can add / delete control points. Through the review process, built-in control points can be automatically updated and review experience can be reused; problems can be annotated in BIM models and CAD drawings in a cloud line manner, and corresponding built-in problem categories and levels can be selected and classified; the annotated problems can be automatically read and a problem list table can be formed, and the coordinate position of the problem can be automatically and quickly located through the form for easy modification; at the same time, relevant drawings and review data are sent to relevant personnel through an information process; receiving personnel receive drawings and review data through the process; information such as processing personnel, processing opinions and results, and time of the process is automatically recorded, and can be consulted, compared and traced.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] The present invention relates to the field of architecture, and in particular to an intelligent review method and system for digital architectural design results. Background Art

[0002] With the gradual maturity of digital technology in architectural design, digital design and digital submission of drawings have become a common practice in the construction industry. The commonly used digital tools for architectural design include CAD and REVIT software. Designers use digital tools to draw detailed two-dimensional drawings and BIM data models. Reviewers review drawings and models based on current national, local or industry specifications, standards and system requirements. According to the requirements of the quality management system, reviewers fill in the review opinions on the review form. Designers modify the drawings based on the opinions and verify them again. After the verification is passed, the designers and reviewers corresponding to the drawings sign and confirm on the review form respectively. As the degree of informatization in the design industry continues to increase, most design institutes have also moved the review process from offline to online.

[0003] Mistakes in the review process will lead to delays in the construction period and economic losses. Since the review of digital drawings relies too much on subjective judgment or experience, there are still many defects and shortcomings. Specifically, the experience of reviewers is difficult to reuse. When reviewing drawings, although reviewers have reference to relevant standards, due to insufficient review experience, understanding of standards and review time, there are deviations in the understanding of actual projects. Different reviewers will have their own review methods and standards, that is, review experience, when reviewing different projects with reference to standards.

[0004] However, in the existing review process, the review experience accumulated by the reviewers will be difficult to be reused by other personnel. When reviewers at different review stages review the same drawing, there may be situations where the review standards of two reviewers are roughly the same. If the reviewer of the next similar project cannot refer to or borrow the review standards or review experience of the previous reviewer of the same project during the review, it will cause duplication of work, waste time, and reduce the review efficiency. In addition, everyone's experience and understanding are different, resulting in different results for the same drawing by different reviewers. If the reviewer of the next similar project completely borrows the review standards or review experience of the previous reviewer of the same project, there will be omissions in the review, resulting in design changes, and the project will bear additional construction time and economic losses. Summary of the invention

[0005] The purpose of the present invention is to overcome the problems existing in the prior art in reviewing architectural drawings and models, and to provide an intelligent review method and system for digital architectural design results.

[0006] The objective of the present invention is achieved through the following technical solutions:

[0007] A method for intelligent review of digital architectural design results is mainly provided, and the method comprises:

[0008] Select different review stages to review the materials to be reviewed, wherein the review stages include proofreading, reviewing and verification;

[0009] According to the currently selected review stage, different control points are called to review the materials to be reviewed; the control points are used to prompt the content to be reviewed, and the control points include built-in standard control points, control points used in previous stages, and control points added or deleted in the current stage;

[0010] For the locations that do not meet the key control points during the proofreading, review and verification, cloud lines are used to annotate the problems in the original documents of the materials to be reviewed, forming a review opinion table;

[0011] During the proofreading, review and verification, the problem location is automatically located according to the review opinion form to make modifications, and the modification opinions are recorded and synchronously modified in the review opinion form;

[0012] The modifications are verified. If the verification fails, the modification is returned to be made until all the modifications are verified and the review is completed.

[0013] As a preferred option, a method for intelligent review of digital architectural design results, which automatically creates a project knowledge data file structure in a file server according to the project type before review, wherein the project knowledge data file structure includes data to be reviewed;

[0014] The review opinion form is automatically stored in the file server.

[0015] As a preferred option, a method for intelligently reviewing digital results of architectural design is provided, wherein the control points are classified into reviewed, unreviewed and ignored, and the number of control points in each category is counted.

[0016] As a preferred option, an intelligent review method for digital architectural design results, when annotating a problem, the reviewer circles the problem location in the original file of the material to be reviewed, fills in the specific problem through the lead line, and selects the classification and level of the corresponding problem.

[0017] As a preferred option, an intelligent review method for digital architectural design results automatically combines drawing marks of cloud lines, leaders, problems, problem classifications and problem levels into blocks, and automatically writes the block's spatial coordinates and the text content marked on the block into the block's attribute column.

[0018] As a preferred option, a smart review method for digitalized architectural design results, wherein the review information is automatically collected in the review opinion table, and the review information includes the review stage, drawing problem classification, reviewer, verification time, designer, modification opinion, modification time and verification time; when a row in the table is selected, it can automatically locate and switch to the block coordinate position and display it.

[0019] As a preferred option, a method for intelligent review of digital architectural design results, wherein the files generated in each review stage are stored in the project knowledge data file architecture, and the process information of each review stage is automatically recorded, wherein the process information includes the review stage of the process, process steps, processor, processing results, processing opinions, graphic files and processing time.

[0020] As a preferred option, a method for intelligent review of digital architectural design results, the method further includes:

[0021] Establishing connections between different reviewers for transferring the materials to be reviewed, wherein the reviewers include designers, proofreaders, auditors and approvers.

[0022] As a preferred option, an intelligent review method for digital architectural design results is used to review the newly added or deleted control points. The control points that have passed the review are automatically updated to the built-in standard control points. The control points that have not passed the review are not updated to the built-in standard control points, but are used as backups; the control points that need to be deleted are reviewed, and the control points that have passed the review will be deleted from the built-in standard control points, and the deleted control points will be recorded as backups. When the control points are called again, they will be displayed as the updated (added / deleted) built-in standard control points.

[0023] The present invention also provides an intelligent review method for digital architectural design results, the method comprising:

[0024] The reviewer receives the materials to be reviewed sent by the designer;

[0025] The reviewer calls different control points to review the materials to be reviewed according to the selected professional type and review stage; the control points are used to prompt the content to be reviewed, and the control points include the control points used by the previous reviewer and the control points added or deleted by the reviewer at the current stage;

[0026] The reviewer checks the materials to be reviewed one by one according to the prompts of the control points to see if there are any problems. If there are any, the reviewer annotates the problems, forms a review opinion form and sends it to the designer for modification;

[0027] The reviewer verifies the changes made by the designer. If the changes pass the verification, they are recorded and fed back into the review opinion form. If the changes fail the verification, the designer is asked to continue to make changes.

[0028] Until all modifications are verified, the reviewer completes the review and forms a review opinion form for the passed review.

[0029] As a preferred option, a method for intelligent review of digital architectural design results, the method further includes:

[0030] When reviewing the materials to be reviewed, reviewers can customize the addition / deletion of control points.

[0031] As a preferred option, a method for intelligently reviewing digital architectural design results is provided, wherein the reviewer reminds the designer to receive the file through a pop-up window and email.

[0032] As a preferred option, a method for intelligent review of digital architectural design results is provided, wherein the reviewer can forcibly suspend subsequent review processes according to project conditions.

[0033] The present invention also provides an intelligent review method for digital architectural design results, the method comprising:

[0034] The designer sends the materials to be reviewed to the reviewer;

[0035] The designer receives the review opinion form sent by the reviewer and modifies the review materials according to the review opinion form;

[0036] The designer sends the modification to the reviewer for verification. The modifications that pass the verification are recorded and fed back into the review opinion form; the designer continues to modify the modifications that fail the verification;

[0037] Until all modifications are verified and approved, the designer receives the review feedback form.

[0038] As a preferred option, a method for intelligently reviewing digital architectural design results is provided, wherein the designer reminds the reviewer to receive the file through a pop-up window and email.

[0039] The present invention also provides an intelligent review system for digital architectural design results, the system comprising:

[0040] A control point using module, which is used to select different review stages to review the materials to be reviewed, and according to the currently selected review stage, call different control points to review the materials to be reviewed;

[0041] A proofreading and commenting module, which is used to annotate the locations that do not meet the control points in the original document of the material to be reviewed by using cloud lines, and form a proofreading opinion table;

[0042] A review and modification module, which is used to automatically locate the location of the problem according to the review opinion form, make modifications, record the modification opinions, and synchronously modify them in the review opinion form;

[0043] The modification verification module is used to verify the modification. If the verification fails, the modification is returned to the review and modification module for modification until all the modifications are verified and the review is completed.

[0044] As a preferred option, a smart review system for digital architectural design results, the system also includes a project knowledge database creation module, the project knowledge database creation module is used to automatically create a project knowledge data file structure in a file server according to the project type before review, the project knowledge data file structure includes data to be reviewed.

[0045] As a preferred option, an intelligent review system for digitalized architectural design results, the system also includes a control point review module and a built-in control point library, the control point review module is used to review the control points to be added, and the control points that pass the review are automatically updated to the built-in control point library, and the control points that fail the review are not updated to the built-in control point library, but serve as a backup; the control point review module is also used to review the control points that are fed back to be deleted, and the control points that pass the review will be deleted from the built-in standard control point library, and the deleted control points are recorded as a backup.

[0046] As a preferred option, an intelligent review system for digitalized architectural design results, the system also includes a review data analysis and storage module, the review data analysis and storage module is used to summarize the data in the control point use module, the review and approval module, the review modification module and the modification verification module, and form a data analysis bar chart according to data category.

[0047] As a preferred option, an intelligent review system for digital architectural design results, the forms, models or drawings formed in the control point usage module, review and annotation module, review and modification module and modification verification module are automatically stored in the file server and automatically classified.

[0048] It should be further explained that the technical features corresponding to the above options can be combined or replaced with each other to form a new technical solution if there is no conflict.

[0049] Compared with the prior art, the present invention has the following beneficial effects:

[0050] (1) According to different review stages, different control points are called to review the materials to be reviewed; the control points are used to prompt the content to be reviewed, and the control points include built-in standard control points, control points used in previous stages, and control points added / deleted in the current stage. The newly added / deleted control points will be automatically updated and synchronously saved to the server. When the control points are called again, the updated content will be displayed. The reviewers of the next similar project can use the review experience of the reviewers of the previous similar project to realize the reuse of review experience, thereby improving the review efficiency and review quality. At the same time, the reviewers of each stage can increase their own review experience or ideas to realize the intelligent iteration of review experience, avoiding the phenomenon of missed review and the increase in construction period and economic losses caused by design changes.

[0051] (2) During proofreading, review and approval, any location that does not meet the key control points is annotated in the original document of the material to be reviewed using cloud lines to form a review opinion table. At the same time, during proofreading, review and approval, the location of the problem is automatically located according to the review opinion table for modification, and the modification opinions are recorded and modified synchronously in the review opinion table. The problem coordinates can be automatically and quickly located through the review opinion table for easy modification.

[0052] (3) The review information is automatically collected in the review opinion table, and the review information includes the review stage, drawing problem classification, reviewer, verification time, designer, modification comments, modification time and verification time. When a row in the table is selected, it can automatically switch to the block coordinate position and display it. When quality problems occur in the digital results, real-time query and traceability can be performed. Enterprises can quickly avoid quality risks and automatically match problems with people, indirectly improving design responsibility. At the same time, it can realize automatic collection, recording and positioning of problems, saving design time.

[0053] (4) The system of the present invention uses the review data analysis and storage module to summarize the data in the control point use module, the review and annotation module, the review modification module and the modification verification module, and forms a data analysis bar chart according to the data category, and automatically classifies and stores the forms, models or drawings formed in the control point use module, the review and annotation module, the review modification module and the modification verification module to the file server, so as to realize automatic uploading, downloading and saving of files, make the data collation efficient and accurate, combine informatization with design business process operations, integrate knowledge and business, from bottom to top, give priority to designers, avoid the traditional implementation method based on result management, and realize real-time updating and controllability of process control behavior data. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0054] The specific implementation methods of the present invention are further described in detail below in conjunction with the accompanying drawings. The accompanying drawings described herein are used to provide a further understanding of the present application and constitute a part of the present application. The same reference numerals are used in these drawings to represent the same or similar parts. The schematic embodiments of the present application and their descriptions are used to explain the present application and do not constitute improper limitations on the present application.

[0055] Figure 1 A flowchart of an intelligent review method for digital architectural design results according to the present invention;

[0056] Figure 2 Create a schematic diagram for the project knowledge document structure;

[0057] Figure 3 Call the schematic diagram for this control point;

[0058] Figure 4 It is a statistical diagram of key control points;

[0059] Figure 5 Annotate schematic diagrams for proofreading;

[0060] Figure 6 It is a schematic diagram of the property bar of the annotation block;

[0061] Figure 7 This is a schematic diagram of the review opinion form;

[0062] Figure 8 It is a schematic diagram for recording information of the review process;

[0063] Fig. 9 A schematic diagram of the analysis and storage of proofreading data;

[0064] Fig.10 This is a diagram of the proofreading process at the proofreading stage;

[0065] Fig.11 This is a schematic diagram of the entire review process;

[0066] Fig.12 This is a schematic diagram of an intelligent review system for digital architectural design results. DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0067] The technical solution of the present invention is described clearly and completely below in conjunction with the accompanying drawings. Obviously, the described embodiments are only part of the embodiments of the present invention, not all of the embodiments. Based on the embodiments of the present invention, all other embodiments obtained by ordinary technicians in this field without creative work are within the scope of protection of the present invention.

[0068] In addition, the technical features involved in the different embodiments of the present invention described below can be combined with each other as long as they do not conflict with each other.

[0069] The present invention mainly calls different control points to review the materials to be reviewed according to different review stages; the control points are used to prompt the content to be reviewed, the control points added / deleted in the current stage of the control points and the control points used in the previous stage, the newly added / deleted control points will be automatically updated and synchronously saved to the server, and when the control points are called again, they will be displayed as updated content, realizing the reuse and intelligent iteration of review experience, improving the review efficiency and review quality, and using control points to avoid missed reviews and increased construction period and economic losses caused by design changes. Real-time query and traceability can be achieved, enterprises can quickly avoid quality risks, automatically match problems with people, and indirectly improve design responsibility; problems are automatically collected, recorded and located, saving design time; files are automatically uploaded, downloaded and saved, making data collation efficient and accurate; combining informatization with design business process operations, integrating knowledge and business, from bottom to top, giving priority to designers, avoiding traditional implementation methods based on result management, and realizing real-time update and controllability of process control behavior data.

[0070] Example 1

[0071] In an exemplary embodiment, a method for intelligent review of digital architectural design results is provided. Figure 1 As shown, the method includes:

[0072] Select different review stages to review the materials to be reviewed, wherein the review stages include proofreading, reviewing and verification;

[0073] According to the currently selected review stage, different control points are called to review the materials to be reviewed; the control points are used to prompt the content to be reviewed, and the control points include built-in standard control points, control points used in previous stages, and control points added / deleted in the current stage;

[0074] For the locations that do not meet the key control points during the proofreading, review and verification, the problems are annotated in the original documents of the materials to be reviewed using cloud lines to form a review opinion table;

[0075] During the proofreading, review and verification, the problem location is automatically located according to the review opinion form to make modifications, and the modification opinions are recorded and synchronously modified in the review opinion form;

[0076] The modifications are verified. If the verification fails, the modification is returned to be made until all the modifications are verified and the review is completed.

[0077] Specifically, the built-in standard control points are the review specifications specified in accordance with relevant industry standards. When reviewers review drawings, although there are relevant standards for reference, the review experience accumulated by reviewers will be difficult to be reused by other personnel. Everyone's experience and understanding are different, resulting in different results for the same drawing under different reviewers.

[0078] The review process includes three stages, namely, the proofreading stage, the review stage and the approval stage, in which the proofreading stage can be the designer's self-proofing. The reviewers at each stage are different, and each person's judgment criteria are also different. Therefore, this application has built-in control points, which are used to prompt the content to be reviewed, including the standards that the drawing design has reached. According to different review stages, different control points are called to review the materials to be reviewed; the control points are used to prompt the content to be reviewed.

[0079] Furthermore, this method is not only used in different review stages of the same project, but also used in the review between multiple similar projects.

[0080] Furthermore, since the reviewers in each stage / project are different, and their judgment standards and experiences are also different, and the judgment standards of different reviewers in the same stage / project are different, the method of the present invention allows reviewers to customize and add new control points. The newly added control points will be automatically updated and synchronously saved to the server. When the control points are called again, the updated (added) content will be displayed.

[0081] Furthermore, the reviewers will request the deletion of useless and outdated control points in the built-in standard control points based on their experience, and review the control points that need to be deleted. The control points that have passed the review will be deleted from the built-in standard control points, and the deleted control points will be recorded as a backup. When the control points are called again, they will be displayed as the updated (deleted) built-in standard control points. By adding / deleting control points, experience sharing can be achieved while reducing unnecessary work and improving the efficiency and quality of drawing review.

[0082] According to different review stages, different control points are called to review the materials to be reviewed; the control points are used to prompt the content to be reviewed, and the control points include built-in standard control points, control points used in previous stages, and control points added / deleted in the current stage. The newly added / deleted control points will be automatically updated and synchronously saved to the server. When the control points are called again, the updated content will be displayed. The reviewers of the next stage or the next similar project can use the review experience of the reviewers of the previous stage or the previous similar project to realize the reuse of the review experience, thereby improving the review efficiency and quality. At the same time, the reviewers of each stage can increase their own review experience or ideas, realize the intelligent iteration of review experience, and avoid missed reviews and increased construction period and economic losses caused by design changes.

[0083] Example 2

[0084] Based on Example 1, a method for intelligent review of digital architectural design results is provided. Before review, a project knowledge data file structure is automatically created in a file server according to the project type. The project knowledge data file structure includes data to be reviewed. Specifically, Figure 2 As shown, according to the input project name, sub-item name, project number, project type and professional attributes, the project knowledge data file structure is automatically created in the file server; the drawings and their supporting documents at least in the review stage are automatically uploaded and automatically classified and stored in folders of corresponding categories; by searching for key content such as project attributes (such as: project name, project number, sub-item name, project type, profession, etc.), all projects corresponding to the attributes can be quickly queried, and the selected project data can be used.

[0085] The review opinion form is automatically stored in the file server.

[0086] Furthermore, an intelligent review method for digital architectural design results is provided. Figure 3 As shown, according to the currently selected review stage, different control points are called to review the data to be reviewed.

[0087] Furthermore, if Figure 4 As shown, the control points are classified into reviewed, unreviewed and ignored, and the number of control points in each category is counted. If the prompt content is not involved in the document, it will be counted as ignored; if it is circled and cited, it will be counted as reviewed, and the number of specific opinions will be counted. The remaining unused control points will be counted as unreviewed. At the same time, all statistical information will be saved together with the drawings and will not be affected by time and file closure.

[0088] Furthermore, in the prior art, drawings are separated from review opinions, which requires designers to spend a long time locating the positions described by review opinions in drawings. The efficiency of modifying drawings is significantly reduced, and the same is true when reviewers locate problems, causing unnecessary delays in the design schedule. For this reason, an intelligent review method for digital results of architectural design is proposed. When annotating problems, the reviewer circles the problem location in the original file of the material to be reviewed, fills in the specific problem through the lead line, and selects the classification and level of the corresponding problem. Specifically, after calling the control points, the review stage is selected. The review stage is divided into proofreading, review, and approval, such as Figure 5 As shown, according to the prompts of the control points, check the drawings or models one by one to see if there are any prompted problems. If not, do not annotate. If so, circle the problem location with a cloud line in the original CAD or BIM model file, and lead to fill in the specific questions, and select the classification and grading of the corresponding problems.

[0089] Furthermore, an intelligent review method for digital architectural design results automatically combines cloud lines, leaders, problems, problem classifications, and problem level drawing marks into blocks, and automatically writes the block space coordinates and the text content marked on the block into the attribute column of the block. Figure 6 shown.

[0090] Furthermore, a method for intelligent review of digital architectural design results is provided, wherein the review information is automatically collected in the review opinion form, and the review information includes the review stage, drawing problem classification, reviewer, review time, designer, modification opinion, modification time and verification time, so as to form a review opinion form, such as Figure 7 As shown in the figure, when a row in the table is selected, the block coordinates marked in the drawing or model can be automatically located and displayed. Among them, the problem level can be batch modified in this step. When the drawing is modified according to the review comments, the designer can reply to the review comments one by one, and the modification time is automatically recorded. When the reviewer checks the modification comments, he can export the data table and print it.

[0091] Furthermore, in an intelligent review method for digital architectural design results, the files generated in each review stage are stored in the file server and automatically correspond to the proofreading, review, and approval folders in the established project knowledge data file structure. If there are multiple files in one step, they will be automatically compressed and packaged for storage. When the recipient opens the process, the file is automatically downloaded to the set local file directory. In the process, the file can be directly opened or the local folder on which the file depends can be directly opened. There is no need to manually operate the above steps, saving manual operation time.

[0092] At the same time, in the existing technology, the division of responsibilities for drawing changes caused by designer errors is often based on the subjective judgment of managers' experience or project traceability. There is a lack of process data records and the version cannot be traced, which indirectly causes the lack of designer's sense of responsibility. In order to solve this problem, Figure 8 As shown, the process information of each review stage is automatically recorded, and the process information includes the review stage of the process, process steps, processors, processing results, processing opinions, graphic files and processing time. The graphic files of the corresponding steps can be opened, and the graphic files of different stages can be compared to form a traceability of the review quality.

[0093] Furthermore, the existing information software only informatizes the traditional offline process, mainly focusing on top-down result management, lacks timely problem data collection and feedback, and enterprises are unable to discover and solve problems in time during the design process. There is a lack of effective management and control means for the accumulation and reuse of enterprise knowledge. To solve this problem, Fig. 9 As shown, the project information, problems and other data of the review are automatically summarized and displayed in real time; data analysis bar charts are automatically formed according to project type, design specialty, design stage, and output volume; information charts can be exported, and further in-depth analysis and evaluation can be performed through other means. All forms, files and other data information generated in the review steps are automatically stored in the file database server.

[0094] Furthermore, the method also includes: establishing connections between different reviewers for transferring the materials to be reviewed, wherein the reviewers include designers, proofreaders, auditors and approvers.

[0095] Furthermore, an intelligent review method for digitalized results of architectural design reviews newly added / deleted control points. Specifically, reviewers can customize the addition and supplement of new control points or delete obsolete control points, and issue a request for adding / deleting control points. The control point administrator will receive a request reporting process for adding / deleting control points. The administrator organizes a review, and the control points that pass the review are automatically updated to the built-in control points. The control points that fail the review are not updated to the built-in standard control points, but are invalidated and automatically stored in the database server backup; when the control points are called again, they are displayed as the updated built-in standard control points.

[0096] Example 3

[0097] In this embodiment, a method for intelligent review of digital architectural design results is provided, the method comprising:

[0098] The reviewer receives the materials to be reviewed sent by the designer;

[0099] The reviewer calls different control points to review the materials to be reviewed according to the selected professional type and review stage; the control points are used to prompt the content to be reviewed, and the control points include the control points used by the previous reviewer and the control points added / deleted by the reviewer at the current stage;

[0100] The reviewer checks the materials to be reviewed one by one according to the prompts of the control points to see if there are any problems. If there are any, the reviewer annotates the problems, forms a review opinion form and sends it to the designer for modification;

[0101] The reviewer verifies the designer's modification. If the modification passes the verification, it will be recorded and fed back to the review opinion table. If the modification fails the verification, the designer will be asked to continue the modification. Specifically, the reviewer verifies the designer's modification opinions. If the verification passes, the verifier and verification time will be automatically recorded, and the data will be fed back to the review opinion table at the same time. If it fails, it will be automatically returned to allow the designer to continue the modification. At the same time, in this step, the reviewer can also forcibly terminate the subsequent review process according to the project's own situation. After completing this step, the process will automatically synchronize the review opinion data to the database server.

[0102] Until all modifications are verified, the reviewer completes the review and forms a review opinion form for the passed review.

[0103] Furthermore, the method further comprises:

[0104] When reviewing the materials to be reviewed, reviewers can customize and add control points.

[0105] Furthermore, the reviewer reminds the designer to receive the file through a pop-up window and email.

[0106] Furthermore, a method for intelligent review of digital architectural design results is provided, wherein the reviewer can forcibly terminate the subsequent review process according to the project situation, and after completing this step, the review opinion data will be automatically synchronized to the database server.

[0107] Example 4

[0108] In this embodiment, the present invention further provides a method for intelligent review of digital architectural design results, the method comprising:

[0109] The designer sends the materials to be reviewed to the reviewer;

[0110] The designer receives the review opinion form sent by the reviewer and modifies the review materials according to the review opinion form;

[0111] The designer sends the modification to the reviewer for verification. The modifications that pass the verification are recorded and fed back into the review opinion form; the designer continues to modify the modifications that fail the verification;

[0112] Until all modifications are verified and approved, the designer receives the review feedback form.

[0113] Specifically, if Fig.10 As shown, the default starting point is the proofreading stage, and the default initiator is the designer. The designer confirms and selects the project name, design stage, sub-item name, profession, project type, and drawing version, and determines the professional person in charge, proofreader, reviewer, and approver of this set of files in this step. The submitted graphic file automatically defaults to the currently opened file, and there is no need to search for the file again. When multiple files need to be submitted at the same time, find the file location and select the remaining files to add at will.

[0114] Furthermore, the designer receives the review opinion form sent by the reviewer, responds to the review opinions one by one, and automatically records the modification time. After completing this step, the process will automatically synchronize the review opinion data to the database server.

[0115] The designer reminds the reviewer to receive the file through a pop-up window and email.

[0116] Furthermore, if Fig.11 As shown, after the verification is passed, the designer prints the review opinion form, and each relevant person signs in the form. The designer uploads the scanned copy or picture of the signed review form in the process. After completing this step, the process will automatically synchronize the review opinion data to the database server, and the signed review form will be automatically stored in the proofreading folder in the project knowledge data file structure.

[0117] The completion of the process will be automatically sent to the person in charge of the discipline, and the above-mentioned proofreading and reviewing related steps will be repeated in the proofreading, reviewing and approval stages. After proofreading is completed, it will automatically transition to reviewing, and after reviewing is completed, it will automatically transition to approval. No skipping is allowed in between. After approval is completed, the proofreading information process of this document ends.

[0118] Example 5

[0119] In this embodiment, a smart review system for digital architectural design results is provided. Fig.12 As shown, the system comprises:

[0120] A control point usage module is used to select different review stages to review the materials to be reviewed, and according to the currently selected review stage, different control points are called to review the materials to be reviewed; specifically, different review control points are called according to the profession and review stage to prompt the review content and realize the reuse of review experience. Proofreaders can add new control points or delete useless control points. Through the review process, the built-in control points can be automatically updated and reused; statistical analysis of the use of control points.

[0121] The review and annotation module is used to annotate the locations that do not meet the control points in the original files of the materials to be reviewed by using cloud lines, and to form a review opinion table; specifically, cloud lines are used to annotate the problems in the BIM model and CAD drawings, and the corresponding built-in problem categories and levels are selected and classified.

[0122] The review and modification module is used to automatically locate the location of the problem according to the review opinion form to make modifications, record the modification opinions and synchronously modify them in the review opinion form; specifically, automatically read the annotated problems and form a problem list table; automatically and quickly locate the problem coordinates through the form, and can also export the form; after the problem is modified, record the modification opinions; the form automatically records data such as the review stage, problem classification, review opinions, reviewer, modifier, review and modification time.

[0123] The modification verification module is used to verify the modification. If the verification fails, the modification is returned to the review and modification module for modification until all the modifications are verified and the review is completed.

[0124] Furthermore, a smart review system for digital results of architectural design, the system also includes a project knowledge database creation module, the project knowledge database creation module is used to automatically create a project knowledge data file structure in a file server according to the project type before review, the project knowledge data file structure includes materials to be reviewed, and automatically uploads, classifies and stores drawings and supporting documents at least in the review stage into corresponding folders; by searching for key content such as project attributes, all projects corresponding to the attributes can be quickly queried, and the selected project data can be used.

[0125] Furthermore, the system also includes a control point review module and a built-in control point library. The control point review module is used to review the newly added / deleted control points. The control point administrator will receive a request process for adding / deleting control points. The administrator organizes a review. The control points that pass the review are automatically updated to the built-in control point library. The control points that fail the review are not updated to the built-in control point library, but are used as a backup.

[0126] Furthermore, an intelligent review system for digitalized architectural design results is provided, the system also including a review data analysis and storage module, the review data analysis and storage module is used to summarize the data in the control point use module, the review and approval module, the review modification module and the modification verification module, and form a data analysis bar chart according to data category.

[0127] Furthermore, the prior art has complicated processes for sending, receiving, opening, and saving drawings. It is easy to miss something when sending and receiving drawings through chat communication tools, and the information process requires manual efforts to save the drawings and review opinions separately, which causes confusion and time waste for users' local data. To solve this problem, there is also an information flow module for review data between the review data analysis and storage module and the modification verification module, which sends relevant drawings and review data to relevant personnel through the information process; the receiving personnel receive the drawings and review data through the process; the information such as the processing personnel, processing opinions and results, and time of the process is automatically recorded, and can be consulted, compared, and traced.

[0128] Furthermore, in an intelligent review system for digitalized architectural design results, the forms, models or drawings formed in the control point use module, review and annotation module, review and modification module and modification verification module are automatically stored in the file server and automatically classified.

[0129] The above specific implementation methods are detailed descriptions of the present invention. It cannot be determined that the specific implementation methods of the present invention are limited to these descriptions. For ordinary technicians in the technical field to which the present invention belongs, several simple deductions and substitutions can be made without departing from the concept of the present invention, which should be regarded as belonging to the protection scope of the present invention.

Claims

1. An intelligent review method for digital architectural design results, characterized in that: The method comprises: Select different review stages to review the materials to be reviewed, and the review stages include proofreading, reviewing and verifying in sequence; According to the currently selected review stage, different control points are called to review the materials to be reviewed; the control points are used to prompt the content to be reviewed, and the control points include built-in standard control points, control points used in previous stages, and control points added or deleted in the current stage; among them, the reviewer customizes the addition / deletion of control points and issues a request for adding / deleting control points. The control point administrator will receive the request reporting process for adding / deleting control points. The administrator organizes the review, and the control points that have passed the review are automatically added / deleted in the built-in control points. When the control points are called again, they are displayed as the updated built-in standard control points after adding / deleting; For the locations that do not meet the key control points during the proofreading, review and verification, cloud lines are used to annotate the problems in the original documents of the materials to be reviewed, forming a review opinion table; The control points are classified into reviewed, unreviewed and ignored, and the number of control points in each category is counted; if the document does not involve the content of the prompt, it is counted as ignored; if it is circled and cited, it is counted as reviewed, and the number of specific opinions is counted, and the remaining unused control points are counted as unreviewed; statistical analysis of the use of control points; During the proofreading, review and verification, the problem location is automatically located according to the review opinion form for modification, and the modification opinions are recorded and modified synchronously in the review opinion form; When annotating a problem, the reviewer circles the problem location in the original document of the material to be reviewed, fills in the specific problem through the leader line, and selects the category and level of the corresponding problem; the cloud line, leader line, problem, problem category and problem level drawing marks are automatically combined into a block, and the block space coordinates and the text content marked on the block are automatically written into the attribute column of the block; The review information is automatically collected in the review opinion table, and the review information includes the review stage, drawing problem classification, reviewer, review time, designer, modification opinion, modification time and verification time; when a row in the table is selected, it can automatically locate and switch to the block coordinate position and display it; The modifications are verified. If the verification fails, the modification is returned to be made until all the modifications are verified and the review is completed.

2. According to claim 1, the intelligent review method for digital architectural design results is characterized in that: Before review, a project knowledge document file structure is automatically created in a file server according to the project type, wherein the project knowledge document file structure includes the document to be reviewed; The review opinion form is automatically stored in the file server.

3. The intelligent review method for digital architectural design results according to claim 2 is characterized in that: The files generated in each review stage are stored in the project knowledge data file architecture, and the process information of each review stage is automatically recorded. The process information includes the review stage of the process, process steps, processors, processing results, processing opinions, graphic files and processing time.

4. A system for implementing the intelligent review method for digital architectural design results as claimed in claim 1, characterized in that: The system comprises: A control point use module, which is used to select different review stages to review the materials to be reviewed, and according to the currently selected review stage, call different control points to review the materials to be reviewed; the control points include built-in standard control points, control points used in previous stages, and control points added or deleted in the current stage; A proofreading and commenting module, which is used to annotate the locations that do not meet the control points in the original document of the material to be reviewed by using cloud lines, and form a proofreading opinion table; A review and modification module, which is used to automatically locate the location of the problem according to the review opinion form, make modifications, record the modification opinions, and synchronously modify them in the review opinion form; The modification verification module is used to verify the modification. If the verification fails, the modification is returned to the review and modification module for modification until all the modifications are verified and the review is completed.

5. The system according to claim 4, characterized in that The system also includes a project knowledge database creation module, which is used to automatically create a project knowledge data file structure in a file server according to the project type before review, and the project knowledge data file structure includes data to be reviewed.

6. The system according to claim 4, characterized in that The system also includes a review data analysis and storage module, which is used to summarize the data in the control point use module, the review and annotation module, the review modification module and the modification verification module, and form a data analysis bar chart according to data category.

Images