A method for blocking hole processing in sample detection and related device

Abstract

The application discloses a hole blocking processing method in sample detection and a related device, and relates to the technical field of sample detection. The hole blocking processing method comprises the following steps: after a sample completes a counting operation, recording a current hole blocking state to a set queue; wherein the hole blocking state comprises hole blocking and non-hole blocking; when it is determined that hole blocking occurs, performing a hole blocking elimination operation; after the hole blocking elimination operation is completed, performing a counting operation on a next sample, and executing the step of recording the current hole blocking state to the set queue after the sample completes the counting operation. In this way, the application can effectively avoid the inconvenience caused by manual hole blocking elimination operation and sample detection restart.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] This application relates to the technical field of sample testing, and in particular to a method and related apparatus for handling pore blockage in sample testing. Background Technology

[0002] In sample testing, it is often unavoidable to experience interruptions due to malfunctions, which frequently require manual intervention to troubleshoot and restart the current sample testing. This is especially true for sample testing that is prone to malfunctions, such as when using a blood analyzer to count cells in blood samples. Clogged wells, such as WBC (white blood cell) or RBC (red blood cell) wells, often cause the current cell counting to suddenly stop.

[0003] However, existing methods for handling blocked holes in sample testing lack suitable procedures for dealing with potential faults, leading to excessive reliance on manual intervention. This results in frequent start-ups and troubleshooting during the entire sample testing process, which is extremely inconvenient. Summary of the Invention

[0004] This application provides a method and related apparatus for handling blocked holes in sample testing, in order to solve the problem that the sample testing process relies too heavily on manual intervention, which requires frequent start-ups and shutdowns and troubleshooting throughout the entire sample testing process, causing great inconvenience.

[0005] To solve the above-mentioned technical problems, one technical solution adopted in this application is: a method for handling hole blockage in sample detection, wherein the method includes: after the sample counting operation is completed, recording the current hole blockage status to a set queue; wherein the hole blockage status includes hole blockage and no hole blockage; when hole blockage is determined to have occurred, performing a hole blockage removal operation; after the hole blockage removal operation is completed, performing a counting operation on the next sample, and executing the step of recording the current hole blockage status to a set queue after the sample counting operation is completed.

[0006] Specifically, the counting operation is terminated when the number of blocked holes recorded in the queue exceeds a first set threshold.

[0007] The step of terminating the counting operation when the number of blocked holes recorded in the queue exceeds a first set threshold also includes issuing an alarm indication.

[0008] The steps include counting the next sample after the hole-blocking removal operation is completed, and recording the current hole-blocking status to the set queue after the sample counting operation is completed. It also includes counting the next sample when the hole-blocking removal operation is successful.

[0009] The steps include: after the hole-blocking removal operation is completed, counting the next sample and recording the current hole-blocking status to the set queue after the sample counting operation is completed; and if the hole-blocking removal operation fails, stopping the current counting operation and performing the hole-blocking removal operation again.

[0010] Specifically, when the number of blocked hole states recorded in the set queue exceeds the second set threshold, the recorded data at the head of the set queue is deleted.

[0011] The second threshold is set at 10.

[0012] To solve the above-mentioned technical problems, another technical solution adopted in this application is: to provide a blood analyzer, wherein the blood analyzer includes a processor and a memory, a counting operation device, and a clogging removal device connected to the processor; wherein the processor is used to control the counting operation device to complete the counting operation on the sample, record the current clogging status in a set queue in the memory, and when it is determined that clogging has occurred, control the clogging removal device to perform a clogging removal operation, and after the clogging removal operation is completed, control the counting operation device to perform the counting operation on the next sample, and record the clogging status after the clogging removal operation is completed in the set queue; wherein the clogging status includes clogging and no clogging.

[0013] To solve the above-mentioned technical problems, another technical solution adopted in this application is: to provide a sample detection device, wherein the sample detection device includes a processor and a memory connected to the processor, the memory stores program data, and the processor is used to execute the program data to implement the hole blocking treatment method in sample detection as described in any of the above claims.

[0014] To solve the above-mentioned technical problems, another technical solution adopted in this application is to provide a computer-readable storage medium, wherein the computer-readable storage medium stores program data, and the program data can be executed to implement the pore-blocking treatment method in sample detection as described in any of the preceding claims.

[0015] The beneficial effects of this application are as follows: Unlike the prior art, the clogging handling method in the sample detection of this application records the current clogging status to a set queue after the sample counting operation is completed. This allows for clogging removal when clogging is detected. After the clogging removal operation is completed, the counting operation is performed on the next sample, and the process of recording the current clogging status to the set queue after the sample counting operation is completed is repeated. This ensures that the clogging removal operation can be automatically started continuously when clogging occurs during the counting operation. This effectively avoids the inconvenience caused by manual clogging removal and sample detection restart, greatly simplifies the entire sample detection process, and improves the efficiency of sample detection. Attached Figure Description

[0016] To more clearly illustrate the technical solutions in the embodiments of this application, the accompanying drawings used in the description of the embodiments will be briefly introduced below. Obviously, the accompanying drawings described below are only some embodiments of this application. For those skilled in the art, other drawings can be obtained based on these drawings without creative effort, wherein:

[0017] Figure 1 This is a flowchart illustrating the first embodiment of the hole-clogging treatment method in sample testing of this application;

[0018] Figure 2 This is a flowchart illustrating a specific embodiment of the hole-clogging treatment method in sample testing of this application;

[0019] Figure 3 This is a schematic diagram of the structure of an embodiment of the blood analyzer of this application;

[0020] Figure 4 This is a schematic diagram of the structure of an embodiment of the sample detection device of this application;

[0021] Figure 5 This is a schematic diagram of the structure of an embodiment of the computer-readable storage medium of this application. Detailed Implementation

[0022] To make the technical problems solved by this application, the technical solutions adopted, and the technical effects achieved clearer, the technical solutions of the embodiments of this application will be further described in detail below with reference to the accompanying drawings.

[0023] In this document, the term "embodiment" means that a particular feature, structure, or characteristic described in connection with an embodiment may be included in at least one embodiment of this application. The appearance of this phrase in various places throughout the specification does not necessarily refer to the same embodiment, nor is it a separate or alternative embodiment mutually exclusive with other embodiments. It will be explicitly and implicitly understood by those skilled in the art that the embodiments described herein can be combined with other embodiments.

[0024] Please see Figure 1 , Figure 1 This is a flowchart illustrating the first embodiment of the hole-clogging treatment method in sample testing of this application. This embodiment includes the following steps:

[0025] S11: After the sample counting operation is completed, the current hole blockage status is recorded to the set queue.

[0026] Specifically, in various sample testing, malfunctions are often unavoidable. For example, in the process of counting cells in a blood sample using a blood analyzer, malfunctions such as WBC (white blood cell) blockage and RBC (red blood cell) blockage are often unavoidable, causing the current cell counting to suddenly stop. Therefore, it is necessary to detect the possible malfunctions in sample testing in real time and set up automatic response measures.

[0027] In this embodiment, during the process of acquiring multiple samples to be tested and sequentially testing these samples—for example, after counting each blood sample among multiple blood samples—the method further includes: detecting the clogging status after each counting operation to record the current clogging status in a designated queue. Specifically, the clogging status includes clogging occurring and not clogging occurring. If it is determined that the current counting operation has resulted in clogging, i.e., the current counting operation is abnormal and not completed, the clogging occurrence is recorded in a designated queue. Conversely, if it is determined that the current counting operation has not resulted in clogging, i.e., the current counting operation is successfully completed, the absence of clogging (or, normal sample detection) is recorded in the designated queue.

[0028] Specifically, the set queue refers to a special type of linear list. Its special feature is that it only allows deletion operations at the front of the list and insertion operations at the rear. Like a stack, the set queue is a linear list with restricted operations, and the end where insertion operations are performed is called the rear of the queue, while the end where deletion operations are performed is called the front of the queue.

[0029] Understandably, the current counting operation corresponds to a blockage status, such as whether a blockage has occurred or not, and each has a corresponding number or text description, which can be recorded in the set queue. Thus, the blockage status of the current counting operation can be identified by the number or text description.

[0030] S12: Perform a blockage removal operation when a blockage is detected.

[0031] Specifically, when it is determined that a hole blockage has occurred during the current counting operation, the automatic hole blockage removal program is invoked to perform a pre-set hole blockage removal operation on the currently occurring hole blockage.

[0032] S13: After the hole plugging and removal operation is completed, the next sample is counted.

[0033] Furthermore, after the hole-blocking removal operation is completed, a counting operation is performed on the next sample, and the hole-blocking status after the hole-blocking removal operation is completed, that is, the hole-blocking status when the counting operation is performed on the next sample, is recorded in the set queue, and S11 is executed again.

[0034] The next sample can be the same as or different from the sample currently being counted. For example, if a blockage occurs before the current sample has finished counting and the blockage removal operation is successful, the counting of that sample can continue. If a blockage occurs only after the current sample has finished counting, the counting operation will proceed to the next sample. Alternatively, if a blockage occurs, the sample can be set aside so that the counting operation can proceed directly to the next sample after the blockage removal operation.

[0035] If the hole blockage removal operation is successful, the non-blockage will be recorded in the designated queue; if the hole blockage removal operation fails, the blockage will be recorded in the designated queue.

[0036] Furthermore, in one embodiment, the hole blockage handling method in the sample detection of this application further includes: terminating the counting operation when the number of hole blockages currently recorded in the set queue exceeds a first set threshold.

[0037] Specifically, the number of blocked holes recorded in the set queue in real time is detected. When it is determined that the number of blocked holes recorded in the set queue exceeds the first set threshold, that is, after at least one blocked hole removal operation has been performed, or the interval between the current blocked hole and the previous blocked hole is relatively close, and blocked hole is still detected in the current counting operation, the current counting operation is terminated, that is, the current sample detection program is exited, and manual intervention is required.

[0038] Optionally, the first set threshold can be any reasonable number such as 2, 3 or 4, so that when the number of faults recorded in the set queue exceeds the first set threshold, it can be determined that the number of faults in the current counting operation is too frequent, or that multiple automatic fault troubleshooting measures have not been effective. In this case, the current counting operation is terminated, that is, the current sample detection program is exited, and manual intervention is required to carry out a more powerful hole-blocking and troubleshooting operation.

[0039] Each of the multiple samples to be tested can also have a unique code. During the sequential counting operation, the corresponding counting data and its corresponding code can be recorded sequentially. For example, in cell counting of a blood sample, the corresponding cell count information and its corresponding code are recorded sequentially into a set list for storage and statistical analysis. This set list can be the same as the aforementioned set queue, or it can be a separate data list for recording. Understandably, if a blockage occurs during the current sample test, the sample test data recorded synchronously with the corresponding code of the sample can be 0 or a special number. Only after the test is normal will the corresponding sample test data be recorded into the set list.

[0040] Furthermore, in one embodiment, before the above-mentioned S11 of the sample detection clogging treatment method of this application, the following steps are specifically included: performing sample detection on the sample to be tested.

[0041] After acquiring multiple samples to be tested, counting operations are performed on multiple samples in sequence, and the blockage status in each counting operation is continuously detected. For example, it is detected whether each counting operation is successfully completed in order to determine whether the current counting operation has caused blockage.

[0042] Furthermore, in one embodiment, the above-mentioned S13 of the sample detection hole-blocking treatment method of this application further includes: when the hole-blocking removal operation is successful, counting operation is performed on the next sample.

[0043] If the blockage removal operation is successful, the counting operation for the current sample will continue, or the sample that has been blocked will be put aside, and the next sample will be tested.

[0044] Furthermore, in one embodiment, the above-mentioned S13 of the sample detection hole-blocking processing method of this application further includes: when the current hole-blocking removal operation fails, suspending the current counting operation and performing the hole-blocking removal operation again.

[0045] Specifically, when it is determined that the hole blockage removal operation has failed, that is, when the hole blockage is still not removed after one hole blockage removal operation, the current counting operation is stopped and the hole blockage removal operation is performed again.

[0046] Furthermore, in one embodiment, the hole-blocking processing method in the sample detection of this application further includes: deleting the recorded data at the head of the set queue when the number of hole-blocking states recorded in the set queue exceeds a second set threshold.

[0047] Understandably, during the continuous counting operation of multiple samples to be tested, frequent hole blockages—that is, too many hole blockages within a certain period—severely affect the efficiency of the current counting operation. Therefore, stronger hole blockage removal measures are needed to ensure the counting operation can proceed smoothly and efficiently. In this embodiment, since the current hole blockage status of each sample is recorded in a designated queue, the queue's characteristics can be used to limit the amount of recorded data after continuous sample testing. Specifically, whenever the number of currently recorded hole blockage states in the designated queue exceeds a second set threshold, the recorded data at the head of the designated queue is deleted to ensure that the currently recorded fault states never exceed the second set threshold. This stabilizes the amount of data currently recorded in the designated queue at a set value, serving as a basis for determining the frequency of hole blockages. In other words, if the number of currently recorded fault states in the designated queue does not exceed the second set threshold, but the number of hole blockages still exceeds the first set threshold, then it can be determined that the current counting operation is experiencing excessively frequent hole blockages.

[0048] Optionally, the second set threshold is 10. In other embodiments, the second set threshold can also be any reasonable number such as 9, 11, or 12, and this application does not limit it in this regard.

[0049] Furthermore, in one embodiment, the hole blockage handling method in the sample detection of this application further includes: when the number of hole blockages currently recorded in the set queue exceeds a first set threshold, terminating the counting operation and issuing an alarm indication.

[0050] Specifically, when it is determined that the number of blocked holes recorded in the set queue exceeds the first set threshold, that is, after at least one blocked hole removal operation has been performed, or the interval between the current blocked hole and the last blocked hole is relatively close, and a blocked hole is still detected in the current sample detection, the current counting operation is terminated, the current sample detection program is exited, and an alarm indication is issued. For example, an alarm device is used to issue an audible and visual alarm to remind the user to intervene manually and then adopt a more powerful blocked hole removal operation.

[0051] Optionally, the alarm device may be one or more of any reasonable alarm device such as a display screen, a flashing light, a voice assistant, and a buzzer, and this application does not limit it.

[0052] Please see Figure 2 , Figure 2 This is a flowchart illustrating a specific embodiment of the hole-clogging treatment method in sample testing according to this application. The hole-clogging treatment method in sample testing of this embodiment... Figure 1A detailed flowchart of a method for handling blocked pores in sample testing is shown below. In this embodiment, the corresponding counting operation specifically involves cell counting in the blood sample to be tested. The method for handling blocked pores in sample testing in this embodiment specifically includes the following steps:

[0053] S21: Determine whether a blockage has occurred during the cell counting of the blood sample being tested by the blood analyzer.

[0054] Specifically, during the process of counting cells in a blood sample using a blood analyzer, it is usually unavoidable that blockage faults such as WBC (white blood cell) blockage and RBC (red blood cell) blockage will occur, causing the current cell counting to suddenly stop. Therefore, it is necessary to detect the blockage faults that may occur in the corresponding cell counting in real time and set up automatic blockage removal measures.

[0055] In this embodiment, during the process of acquiring multiple blood samples to be tested and sequentially counting cells in the multiple blood samples to be tested, the method further includes: continuously detecting the pore blockage status of the current cell counting to determine whether pore blockage has occurred during the current cell counting.

[0056] If no blockage is detected during the current cell counting process, S22 is executed; if a blockage is detected during the current cell counting process, S23 is executed.

[0057] S22: Continue the current cell count.

[0058] Specifically, if it is determined that no pore blockage has occurred during the current cell count, the current pore blockage status, i.e., no pore blockage (or normal cell count), is recorded in the set queue, and the current cell count continues.

[0059] Understandably, both closed-hole cell counting and normal cell counting can be assigned a number or text description to be recorded in the designated queue, thereby allowing the closed-hole status of the current cell counting to be identified by the number or text description.

[0060] S23: Record the current pore blockage status to the set queue, stop the current cell counting, and perform the pore blockage removal operation.

[0061] Specifically, when it is determined that the current cell counting is blocked, the current blockage status, that is, the number or text description corresponding to the blockage, is recorded in a set queue, and the current cell counting is stopped. After the current cell counting is kept in a waiting state, the automatic fault troubleshooting program is called to perform a pre-set blockage removal operation on the current blockage, such as backflushing the blockage location of the blood analyzer or pressurized water washing, or any reasonable blockage removal measure.

[0062] S24: Determine whether the current hole blockage removal operation was successful.

[0063] Specifically, after determining that the current cell counting is blocked and a troubleshooting operation has been performed, it is further determined whether the current blockage removal operation was successful, that is, whether the current blockage has been eliminated.

[0064] If it is determined that the current hole removal operation is successful, then in response to the success of the current hole removal operation, S25 is executed; if it is determined that the current hole removal operation is unsuccessful, then in response to the failure of the current hole removal operation, S23 is executed again, and if it is determined that the current hole removal status recorded in the set queue is that the number of holes that have been blocked exceeds the first set threshold, then S26 is executed.

[0065] S25: Record the current pore blockage status to the set queue and continue the current cell counting.

[0066] Specifically, when it is determined that the current pore-blocking removal operation is successful, the current pore-blocking status, that is, the corresponding number or text description of normal cell count, is recorded in the set queue, and the current cell count continues, or the counting operation is performed on the next sample.

[0067] S26: Terminate the current cell count.

[0068] Specifically, when it is determined that the number of blocked cells recorded in the set queue exceeds the first set threshold, that is, after at least one blocked cell removal operation has been performed, or when the last blocked cell removal occurred recently, blocked cells are still detected during the current cell counting, the current cell counting is terminated, that is, the current cell counting program is exited, and manual intervention is required to carry out a more powerful blocked cell removal operation, such as eliminating the blocked cell fault by immersing the channel probe in liquid, so as to further eliminate the existence of blocked cells.

[0069] Optionally, the first set threshold can be any reasonable number such as 2, 3 or 4, so that when the number of blocked cells recorded in the set queue exceeds the first set threshold, it can be determined that the number of blocked cells in the current cell counting is too frequent, or that multiple automatic blocked cell removal measures have not been effective. In this case, the current cell counting is terminated, that is, the current cell counting program is exited, and manual intervention is required.

[0070] Based on the overall inventive concept, this application also provides a blood analyzer; please refer to [link to relevant documentation]. Figure 3 , Figure 3This is a schematic diagram of the structure of a blood analyzer according to an embodiment of the present application. The blood analyzer 30 in this embodiment includes a processor 31, a memory 32 connected to the processor 31, a counting operation device 33, and a clogging removal device 34.

[0071] The memory 32 stores a set queue and program data. The processor 31 can call the program data to control the counting operation device 33 to count cells in the blood sample to be tested. When a blockage occurs during the current cell counting, the blockage removal device 34 is called to remove the blockage. At the same time, the blockage status of the current cell counting and the blockage status after each blockage removal operation are recorded in the set queue of the memory 32.

[0072] Specifically, the processor 31 controls the counting operation device 33 to complete the counting operation on the sample, record the current hole blockage status in the set queue of the memory 32, and when it is determined that hole blockage has occurred, controls the hole blockage removal device 34 to perform hole blockage removal operation. After the hole blockage removal operation is completed, the processor 31 controls the counting operation device 33 to perform the counting operation on the next sample, and records the hole blockage status after the hole blockage removal operation is completed in the set queue. The hole blockage status specifically includes hole blockage and no hole blockage.

[0073] The processor 31, after determining that a hole blockage has occurred and controlling the hole blockage removal device 34 to perform a hole blockage removal operation, further includes: recording the current hole blockage status to a set queue, so that based on the result of this hole blockage removal operation, for example, if the processor 31 determines that the hole blockage removal operation performed by the hole blockage removal device 34 is successful, it controls the counting operation device 33 to continue the current cell counting; and if it determines that the hole blockage removal operation performed by the hole blockage removal device 34 is unsuccessful, it stops the current cell counting and controls the hole blockage removal device 34 to perform fault removal again, until the processor 31 determines that the number of faults recorded in the set queue exceeds a first set threshold, then it terminates the current cell counting performed by the counting operation device to exit the cell counting program; and if the number of faults does not exceed the first set threshold, it continues to perform cell counting or hole blockage removal operation.

[0074] Optionally, when the processor 31 determines that the number of fault states currently recorded in the setting queue of the memory 32 exceeds the second setting threshold, it further includes deleting the recorded data at the head of the setting queue so that the number of fault states currently recorded in the setting queue never exceeds the second setting threshold.

[0075] Optionally, the first threshold can be any reasonable number of two, three, or four, and this application does not limit it.

[0076] Optionally, the second threshold can be any reasonable number of 9, 10, or 11, and this application does not limit this.

[0077] Optionally, the blood analyzer 30 also includes an alarm device (not shown in the figure), which can be one or more of any reasonable alarm devices such as a display screen, a flashlight, a voice assistant, and a buzzer. When the number of faults recorded in the set queue exceeds a first set threshold, the alarm device can receive a corresponding alarm signal sent by the processor 31 to issue an alarm indication and remind the user to take more forceful troubleshooting measures, such as eliminating the blockage fault in the counting operation device 33 by immersing the channel probe in liquid, so as to further eliminate the existence of the blockage.

[0078] Optionally, the blood analyzer 30 also includes a display screen (not shown) that can display in real time one or more combinations of any reasonable data information, such as which blood sample is being tested, the current step of the program, the cell test data of the blood samples that have been tested, and the record data of the fault status currently stored in the set queue. The display screen can also integrate the program control panel of the processor 31 to allow the user to monitor the current testing status of the blood analyzer 30 at any time.

[0079] Based on the overall inventive concept, this application also provides a sample detection device, please refer to [link to relevant documentation]. Figure 4 , Figure 4 This is a schematic diagram of the structure of an embodiment of the sample detection device of this application. The sample detection device 40 in this embodiment includes a processor 41 and a memory 42 connected to the processor 41. The memory 42 stores program data, and the processor 41 is used to execute the program data to implement the hole-clogging treatment method in sample detection as described in any of the above claims.

[0080] Based on the overall inventive concept, this application also provides a computer-readable storage medium, please refer to... Figure 5 , Figure 5 This is a schematic diagram of a computer-readable storage medium according to an embodiment of the present application. The computer-readable storage medium 50 stores program data 501, which can be executed to implement the linkage function detection method as described in any of the preceding claims.

[0081] In one embodiment, the computer-readable storage medium 50 may be a storage chip in a terminal, a hard disk, or other readable and writable storage tools such as a portable hard disk, USB flash drive, or optical disc, or it may be a server, etc.

[0082] In the several embodiments provided in this application, it should be understood that the disclosed methods and apparatus can be implemented in other ways. For example, the apparatus implementations described above are merely illustrative. For instance, the division of processors or memory is only a logical functional division, and in actual implementation, there may be other division methods. For example, the functions implemented by at least two processors and memory may be combined or integrated into another system, or some features may be ignored or not executed. Furthermore, the mutual coupling or direct coupling or connection shown or discussed may be indirect coupling or connection through some interfaces, devices, or units, and may be electrical, mechanical, or other forms.

[0083] The units described as separate components may or may not be physically separate. The components shown as units may or may not be physical units; that is, they may be located in one place or distributed across at least two network units. Some or all of the units can be selected to achieve the purpose of this embodiment, depending on actual needs.

[0084] Furthermore, the functional units in the various embodiments of this application can be integrated into one processing unit, or each unit can exist physically separately, or two or more units can be integrated into one unit. The integrated unit can be implemented in hardware or as a software functional unit.

[0085] If the integrated unit is implemented as a software functional unit and sold or used as an independent product, it can be stored in a computer-readable storage medium. Based on this understanding, the technical solution of this application, in essence, or the part that contributes to the prior art, or all or part of the technical solution, can be embodied in the form of a software product. This computer software product is stored in a storage medium and includes several instructions to cause a computer device (which may be a personal computer, server, or network device, etc.) or processor to execute all or part of the steps of the methods of various embodiments of this application. The aforementioned storage medium includes various media capable of storing program code, such as USB flash drives, portable hard drives, read-only memory (ROM), random access memory (RAM), magnetic disks, or optical disks.

[0086] Unlike existing technologies, the clogging handling method in this application records the current clogging status to a set queue after the sample counting operation is completed. This allows for clogging removal when clogging is detected. After clogging removal, the counting operation is performed on the next sample, and the process of recording the current clogging status to the set queue is repeated after the sample counting operation is completed. This ensures that clogging removal can be automatically started continuously when clogging occurs during the counting operation. This effectively avoids the inconvenience caused by manual clogging removal and sample detection restart, greatly simplifies the entire sample detection process, and improves the efficiency of sample detection.

[0087] The above description is merely an embodiment of this application and does not limit the patent scope of this application. Any equivalent structural or procedural transformations made using the content of this application's specification and drawings, or direct or indirect applications in other related technical fields, are similarly included within the patent protection scope of this application.

Claims

1. A method for handling blocked apertures in sample testing, characterized in that, The method for handling pore blockage during sample detection includes: After the sample counting operation is completed, the current hole blockage status is recorded to a set queue; wherein, the hole blockage status includes hole blockage and hole blockage not occurring; When a blockage is detected, a blockage removal operation is performed; if the blockage removal operation is successful, the non-blockage is recorded in the set queue; if the blockage removal operation fails, the blockage is recorded in the set queue. After the hole-blocking removal operation is completed, the next sample is counted, and the step of recording the current hole-blocking status to the set queue after the sample counting operation is completed is executed. When the number of blocked hole states recorded in the set queue exceeds the second set threshold, the recorded data at the head of the set queue is deleted, and the amount of data currently recorded in the set queue is used as the basis for determining whether the current number of blocked hole occurrences is frequent. When the number of blocked holes recorded in the set queue exceeds a first set threshold, the counting operation is terminated.

2. The method for treating clogging in sample testing according to claim 1, characterized in that, After the step of terminating the counting operation when the number of blocked holes recorded in the set queue exceeds a first set threshold, the method further includes: Issue an alarm instruction.

3. The method for handling blocked holes in sample detection according to claim 1, characterized in that, The step of counting the next sample after the hole-blocking removal operation is completed, and recording the current hole-blocking status to the set queue after the sample counting operation is completed, further includes: If the plugging and unblocking operation is successful, the next sample will be counted.

4. The method for treating clogging in sample testing according to claim 1, characterized in that, The step of counting the next sample after the hole-blocking removal operation is completed, and recording the current hole-blocking status to the set queue after the sample counting operation is completed, further includes: If the current hole-blocking removal operation fails, the current counting operation is stopped, and the hole-blocking removal operation is executed again.

5. The method for treating clogging in sample testing according to claim 1, characterized in that, The second set threshold is 10.

6. A blood analyzer, characterized in that, The blood analyzer includes a processor and a memory, a counting operation device, and a plugging removal device connected to the processor. The processor controls the counting device to complete the counting operation on the sample, and then records the current blockage status to a set queue in the memory. The blockage status includes blockage occurring and no blockage occurring. When blockage is determined to have occurred, the processor controls the blockage removal device to perform a blockage removal operation. After the blockage removal operation is completed, the processor controls the counting device to count the next sample and records the blockage status after the blockage removal operation is completed to the set queue. When the number of blockage statuses recorded in the set queue exceeds a second set threshold, the processor deletes the recorded data at the head of the set queue and uses the current amount of data recorded in the set queue as the basis for whether the current number of blockage occurrences is frequent. When the number of blockage statuses recorded in the set queue exceeds a first set threshold, the counting operation is terminated.

7. A sample detection device, characterized in that, The sample detection device includes a processor and a memory connected to the processor. The memory stores program data, and the processor executes the program data to implement the pore-blocking treatment method in sample detection as described in any one of claims 1-5.

8. A computer-readable storage medium, characterized in that, The computer-readable storage medium stores program data that can be executed to implement the pore-blocking treatment method in sample detection as described in any one of claims 1-5.

Images