A method, apparatus and electronic device for security state assessment

Abstract

This invention discloses a method, apparatus, and electronic device for safety status assessment, belonging to the technical field of railway station building safety status assessment. It includes obtaining assessment value information based on collected monitoring data of target components; determining whether the target effect quantity information conforms to the preset threshold range based on a preset threshold range and component status information corresponding to the threshold range; the component status information includes a... u Level, b u Level, C u level and d u Level, the a u Level, b u Level, C u level and d u The levels decrease sequentially; if so, the corresponding component status information is used as the load-bearing capacity level of the target component; determine whether the load-bearing capacity level is a. u Level or b u If so, then based on the collected displacement deformation information of the target component and the preset design limit range, it is determined whether the displacement deformation information conforms to the preset design limit range. This invention achieves the technical effect of improving evaluation efficiency and enabling timely evaluation and processing.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] This invention belongs to the technical field of railway station building safety status assessment, and specifically relates to a method, device and electronic equipment for safety status assessment. Background Technology

[0002] Railway station buildings that adopt the "bridge-building" integrated system are built within the station yard. The track support layer is part of the station building. Trains can pass through the station building at high speed. The lower part of the track support layer is the building space for urban transportation transfer, waiting and passage functions, and the upper part of the track support layer is the waiting space. Safety and lifespan need to be assessed in the daily operation of railway station buildings.

[0003] Currently, existing railway station safety status assessment technologies typically employ manual on-site inspections. During the daily operation of railway stations, multiple teams of staff conduct manual inspections according to scheduled shifts. Staff observe and record damage at various locations within the station, and statistical analysts then perform a manual safety assessment based on the recorded damage. However, this manual on-site inspection process often requires a large number of personnel for observation and recording, consuming significant manpower and time, resulting in low efficiency in assessing the safety status of railway stations and hindering timely evaluation and intervention of the station's structural safety.

[0004] In summary, existing railway station safety status assessment technologies suffer from low assessment efficiency and difficulty in timely assessment and handling. Summary of the Invention

[0005] The technical problem to be solved by this invention is the low evaluation efficiency and the difficulty in making timely evaluations and processing.

[0006] To address the aforementioned technical problems, this invention provides a method for safety status assessment. The method includes: obtaining assessment value information based on collected monitoring data of a target component; and determining whether the target effect size information conforms to the preset threshold range based on a preset threshold range and component status information corresponding to the threshold range. The component status information includes a... u Level, b u Level, C u level and d u Level, the a u Level, b u Level, C u level and d u The levels decrease sequentially; if so, the corresponding component status information is used as the load-bearing capacity level of the target component; determine whether the load-bearing capacity level is a. u Level or b uIf so, then based on the collected displacement deformation information of the target component and the preset design limit range, it is determined whether the displacement deformation information conforms to the preset design limit range, which includes a first limit range and a second limit range; if it conforms to the first limit range, then a u The level is used as the displacement deformation level of the target component; if it meets the second limit range, then d u The displacement deformation level of the target component is determined by comparing the load-bearing capacity level and the displacement deformation level, and the smallest level is taken as the component status level of the target component.

[0007] Furthermore, the method further includes: determining whether the target structural sub-unit construction set conforms to a preset threshold range based on a multiple target structural sub-unit construction set, a preset evaluation interval, and sub-unit state information corresponding to the evaluation interval; the target structural sub-unit construction set includes the component state levels of multiple target components, and the sub-unit state information includes A. u Level B u Level C u Level and D u Level, the A u Level B u Level C u Level and D u The levels decrease sequentially; if so, the corresponding sub-unit status information is used as the sub-unit level of the target structure sub-unit construction set; the sub-unit levels of multiple target structure sub-unit construction sets are compared, and the smallest level is used as the safety status level of the overall station structure.

[0008] Further, the step of determining whether the target structural sub-unit construction set conforms to a preset threshold range based on multiple target structural sub-unit construction sets, preset evaluation intervals, and sub-unit status information corresponding to the evaluation intervals; if so, then using the corresponding sub-unit status information as the sub-unit level of the target structural sub-unit construction set includes: the preset evaluation intervals include a first main component standard interval, a second main component standard interval, a third main component standard interval, and a fourth main component standard interval, wherein A u The level corresponds to the standard range of the first major component, and the B... u The level corresponds to the standard range of the second main component, and the C u The level corresponds to the standard range of the third main component, and the D u The level corresponds to the fourth major component standard range; the target component includes the main components of the roof layer; the target structural sub-unit construction set includes the component status levels of multiple target components; determine whether the component status level of the target component conforms to the first major component standard range; if so, then set A... uThe level is used as the sub-unit level of the target structural sub-unit construction set; if not, it is determined whether the component status level of the target component conforms to the second main component standard range; if so, the B level is set as the sub-unit level of the target structural sub-unit construction set. u The level is used as the sub-unit level of the target structural sub-unit construction set; if not, it is determined whether the component status level of the target component conforms to the third main component standard range; if so, the C is set as the sub-unit level of the target structural sub-unit construction set. u The level is used as the sub-unit level of the target structural sub-unit construction set; if not, it is determined whether the component status level of the target component conforms to the fourth main component standard range; if so, the D is set as the sub-unit level of the target structural sub-unit construction set. u The level is the sub-unit level of the target structural sub-unit construction set.

[0009] Furthermore, the first primary component standard range includes those that do not contain c. u level and d u Level 1, containing no more than 30% b of the total level. u Level; the second major component standard range includes those that do not contain d. u Level, containing no more than 20% c of the total level. u Level; the third major component standard range includes no more than 50% of the total level c. u Level or no more than 15% of the total number of levels. u Level; the fourth main component standard range includes those containing c u level and d u Level, the c u The number of levels and the d u The number of levels is higher than that of C. u The prescribed quantity for each level.

[0010] Furthermore, obtaining the evaluation value information based on the collected monitoring data of the target component includes: the target component includes a main concrete structure; the monitoring data includes the main concrete structure effect quantity; and the ratio of the main concrete structure effect quantity to the preset main concrete structure resistance design value is used as the evaluation value information of the main concrete structure.

[0011] Further, the step of determining whether the target effect quantity information conforms to the preset threshold range based on the preset threshold range and the component status information corresponding to the threshold range; if so, then using the corresponding component status information as the load-bearing capacity level of the target component includes: the preset threshold range includes a first threshold range, a second threshold range, a third threshold range, and a fourth threshold range, wherein a u The level corresponds to the first threshold interval, and the b u The level corresponds to the second threshold interval, and the c uThe level corresponds to the third threshold interval, and the d u The level corresponds to the fourth threshold interval; determine whether the evaluation value information conforms to the first threshold interval; if so, then set a... u The grade is used as the load-bearing capacity level of the target component; if not, it is determined whether the evaluation value information meets the second threshold range; if so, the b is set as the load-bearing capacity level of the target component. u The grade is used as the load-bearing capacity level of the target component; if not, it is determined whether the evaluation value information meets the third threshold range; if so, the c is set as the load-bearing capacity level of the target component. u The grade is used as the load-bearing capacity level of the target component; if not, it is determined whether the evaluation value information meets the fourth threshold range; if so, the d is... u The grade is used as the load-bearing capacity level of the target component.

[0012] Further, the first threshold interval is T1, the second threshold interval is T2, the third threshold interval is T3, and the fourth threshold interval is T4; T1≥1, 1>T2≥0.95, 0.95>T3≥0.90, and T4<0.90.

[0013] Furthermore, based on the collected displacement deformation information of the target component and the preset design limit range, it is determined whether the displacement deformation information conforms to the preset design limit range. The design limit range includes a first limit range and a second limit range, wherein the first limit range is no greater than 80% of the limit specified in the design document, and the second limit range is greater than 80% and less than 100%. It is then determined whether the displacement deformation information conforms to the first limit range; if not, it is then determined whether the displacement deformation information conforms to the second limit range.

[0014] According to another aspect of the present invention, the present invention also provides a safety status assessment apparatus, the apparatus comprising: an assessment value acquisition module, configured to acquire assessment value information based on collected monitoring data of a target component; and a status judgment module, configured to determine whether the target effect size information conforms to the preset threshold range based on a preset threshold range and component status information corresponding to the threshold range, wherein the component status information includes a u Level, b u Level, C u level and d u Level, the a u Level, b u Level, C u level and d u The levels decrease sequentially; the load-bearing level determination module is used to determine the load-bearing capacity level of the target component if the load-bearing capacity level is a; the comparison and judgment module is used to determine whether the load-bearing capacity level is a. u Level or bu Level; Displacement deformation judgment module, used to determine whether the displacement deformation information conforms to the preset design limit range based on the collected displacement deformation information of the target component and the preset design limit range, wherein the design limit range includes a first limit range and a second limit range; First level determination module, used to determine whether a if it conforms to the first limit range. u The first level is used as the displacement deformation level of the target component; the second level determination module is used to determine d if it meets the second limit range. u The level is used as the displacement deformation level of the target component; the evaluation module is used to compare the magnitude of the bearing capacity level and the displacement deformation level, and take the smallest level as the component status level of the target component.

[0015] According to another aspect of the present invention, the present invention also provides an electronic device for safety status assessment, including a memory, a processor, and a computer program stored in the memory and executable on the processor. When the processor executes the program, it performs the following steps: obtaining assessment value information based on collected monitoring data of a target component; determining whether the target effect size information conforms to the preset threshold range based on a preset threshold range and component status information corresponding to the threshold range, wherein the component status information includes a u Level, b u Level, C u level and d u Level, the a u Level, b u Level, C u level and d u The levels decrease sequentially; if so, the corresponding component status information is used as the load-bearing capacity level of the target component; determine whether the load-bearing capacity level is a. u Level or b u If so, then based on the collected displacement deformation information of the target component and the preset design limit range, it is determined whether the displacement deformation information conforms to the preset design limit range, which includes a first limit range and a second limit range; if it conforms to the first limit range, then a u The level is used as the displacement deformation level of the target component; if it meets the second limit range, then d u The displacement deformation level of the target component is determined by comparing the load-bearing capacity level and the displacement deformation level, and the smallest level is taken as the component status level of the target component.

[0016] Beneficial effects:

[0017] This invention provides a method for safety status assessment, which obtains assessment value information based on collected monitoring data of target components; and determines whether the target effect size information conforms to the preset threshold range based on a preset threshold range and component status information corresponding to the threshold range. The component status information includes a u Level, b u Level, C u level and d u Level, the a u Level, b u Level, C u level and d u The levels decrease sequentially; if so, the corresponding component status information is used as the load-bearing capacity level of the target component; determine whether the load-bearing capacity level is a. u Level or b u If so, then based on the collected displacement deformation information of the target component and the preset design limit range, it is determined whether the displacement deformation information conforms to the preset design limit range, which includes a first limit range and a second limit range; if it conforms to the first limit range, then a u The level is used as the displacement deformation level of the target component; if it meets the second limit range, then d u The displacement deformation level of the target component is determined by comparing the load-bearing capacity level and the displacement deformation level, with the smaller level being taken as the component status level of the target component. In the daily operation of railway stations, by monitoring the target components to obtain their corresponding component status information, the load-bearing capacity level of the target component can be determined in real time to assess its load-bearing capacity, and the displacement deformation level can be determined in real time to assess displacements or deformations unsuitable for load-bearing. The component status level of the target component is determined according to the unfavorable level. The smallest level determined from the load-bearing capacity assessment and the assessment of unsuitable displacements or deformations is taken as the component status level. Maintenance and management units can then implement corresponding measures based on the component status level, thereby improving the efficiency of safety status assessments of railway stations and enabling timely assessment and handling of the station's structural safety. This achieves the technical effect of improving assessment efficiency and enabling timely assessment and handling. Attached Figure Description

[0018] To more clearly illustrate the technical solutions in the embodiments of the present invention or the prior art, the drawings used in the embodiments will be briefly introduced below. Obviously, the drawings described below are only some embodiments of the present invention. For those skilled in the art, other drawings can be obtained based on these drawings without creative effort.

[0019] Figure 1 A flowchart illustrating a method for safety status assessment provided in an embodiment of the present invention;

[0020] Figure 2 A structural block diagram of a safety status assessment device provided in an embodiment of the present invention;

[0021] Figure 3 This is a structural diagram of an electronic device for safety status assessment provided in an embodiment of the present invention. Detailed Implementation

[0022] This invention discloses a method for safety status assessment, which obtains assessment value information based on collected monitoring data of target components; and determines whether the target effect size information conforms to the preset threshold range based on a preset threshold range and the component status information corresponding to the threshold range. The component status information includes a u Level, b u Level, C u level and d u Level, the a u Level, b u Level, C u level and d u The levels decrease sequentially; if so, the corresponding component status information is used as the load-bearing capacity level of the target component; determine whether the load-bearing capacity level is a. u Level or b u If so, then based on the collected displacement deformation information of the target component and the preset design limit range, it is determined whether the displacement deformation information conforms to the preset design limit range, which includes a first limit range and a second limit range; if it conforms to the first limit range, then a u The level is used as the displacement deformation level of the target component; if it meets the second limit range, then d uThe displacement deformation level of the target component is determined by comparing the load-bearing capacity level and the displacement deformation level, with the smaller level being taken as the component status level of the target component. In the daily operation of railway stations, by monitoring the target components to obtain their corresponding component status information, the load-bearing capacity level of the target component can be determined in real time to assess its load-bearing capacity, and the displacement deformation level can be determined in real time to assess displacements or deformations unsuitable for load-bearing. The component status level of the target component is determined according to the unfavorable level. The smallest level determined from the load-bearing capacity assessment and the assessment of unsuitable displacements or deformations is taken as the component status level. Maintenance and management units can then implement corresponding measures based on the component status level, thereby improving the efficiency of safety status assessments of railway stations and enabling timely assessment and handling of the station's structural safety. This achieves the technical effect of improving assessment efficiency and enabling timely assessment and handling.

[0023] The technical solutions of the embodiments of the present invention will be clearly and completely described below with reference to the accompanying drawings. Obviously, the described embodiments are only some embodiments of the present invention, and not all embodiments. Based on the embodiments of the present invention, all other embodiments obtained by those skilled in the art are within the scope of protection of the present invention. The keyword "and / or" involved in this embodiment indicates two situations: and or. In other words, A and / or B mentioned in the embodiments of the present invention indicates two situations: A and B, or A or B. It describes three states of A and B. For example, A and / or B means: only A is included but not B; only B is included but not A; and A and B are included.

[0024] It should be understood that while the terms “first,” “second,” etc., may be used herein to describe various elements, components, regions, layers, and / or portions, these elements, components, regions, layers, and / or portions should not be limited by these terms. These terms are used only to distinguish one element, component, region, layer, or segment from another. Therefore, without departing from the teachings of the exemplary embodiments, the first element, component, region, layer, or portion discussed below may be referred to as the second element, component, region, layer, or portion. Spatially related terms, such as “below,” “above,” etc., may be used herein to facilitate the description of the relationship between one element or feature and another element or feature. It is understood that, in addition to the orientations shown in the figures, spatially related terms also include different orientations of the device in use or operation. For example, if the device in the figures is flipped, then an element or feature described as “below” will be oriented to be “above” other elements or features. Therefore, the exemplary term “below” may include both above and below orientations. The device may be oriented (rotated 90 degrees or in other orientations), and the spatially related descriptors used herein are interpreted accordingly.

[0025] In this embodiment of the invention, when a component is described as "fixed to" another component, it can be directly on the other component or an intermediate component may be present. When a component is considered to be "connected to" another component, it can be directly connected to the other component or an intermediate component may be present. When a component is considered to be "set on" another component, it can be directly set on the other component or an intermediate component may be present. The terms "vertical," "horizontal," "left," "right," and similar expressions used in this embodiment of the invention are for illustrative purposes only and are not intended to limit the invention.

[0026] Example 1

[0027] Please see Figure 1 , Figure 1 This is a flowchart illustrating a method for security status assessment provided by an embodiment of the present invention. The method for security status assessment provided by an embodiment of the present invention includes the following steps:

[0028] Step S100: Obtain evaluation value information based on the collected monitoring data of the target component;

[0029] The method of obtaining evaluation value information based on the collected monitoring data of the target component includes: the target component includes a main concrete structure; the monitoring data includes the effect quantity of the main concrete structure; and the ratio of the effect quantity of the main concrete structure to the preset resistance design value of the main concrete structure is used as the evaluation value information of the main concrete structure.

[0030] Specifically, the target components can include a main concrete structure, a general concrete structure, a main steel structure, and a general steel structure. The main concrete structure can include concrete components of the track layer. The general concrete structure refers to concrete components other than the main concrete structure. The main steel structure can include steel components of the roof and supporting columns. The general steel structure can include steel components other than the main steel structure, such as connecting beams and purlins between main load-bearing components. Monitoring data can also include the general concrete structure effect, the main steel structure effect, and the general steel structure effect. The ratio of the general concrete structure effect to a preset design resistance value for the general concrete structure is used as the evaluation value information for the general concrete structure. The ratio of the main steel structure effect to a preset design resistance value for the main steel structure is used as the evaluation value information for the main steel structure. The ratio of the general steel structure effect to a preset design resistance value for the general steel structure is used as the evaluation value information for the general steel structure. The primary concrete structure effect quantity refers to the concrete structure effect quantity monitored by sensors. Assuming the primary concrete structure effect quantity is S, the preset primary concrete structure resistance design value refers to the resistance design value of the primary concrete structure. Assuming the preset primary concrete structure resistance design value is R, then the evaluation value information of the primary concrete structure is R / S. Following the same calculation steps as for the evaluation value information of the primary concrete structure, evaluation value information for general concrete structures, primary steel structures, and general steel structures can be obtained separately.

[0031] Step S110: Based on a preset threshold range and the component state information corresponding to the threshold range, determine whether the target effect size information conforms to the preset threshold range. The component state information includes a u Level, b u Level, C u level and d u Level, the a u Level, b u Level, C u level and d u The levels decrease sequentially;

[0032] Step S120: If yes, then the corresponding component status information is used as the load-bearing capacity level of the target component;

[0033] The step of determining whether the target effect size information conforms to the preset threshold range and the component status information corresponding to the threshold range, and if so, using the corresponding component status information as the load-bearing capacity level of the target component, includes: the preset threshold range includes a first threshold range, a second threshold range, a third threshold range, and a fourth threshold range, wherein a u The level corresponds to the first threshold interval, and the b u The level corresponds to the second threshold interval, and the cu The level corresponds to the third threshold interval, and the d u The level corresponds to the fourth threshold interval; determine whether the evaluation value information conforms to the first threshold interval; if so, then set a... u The grade is used as the load-bearing capacity level of the target component; if not, it is determined whether the evaluation value information meets the second threshold range; if so, the b is set as the load-bearing capacity level of the target component. u The grade is used as the load-bearing capacity level of the target component; if not, it is determined whether the evaluation value information meets the third threshold range; if so, the c is set as the load-bearing capacity level of the target component. u The grade is used as the load-bearing capacity level of the target component; if not, it is determined whether the evaluation value information meets the fourth threshold range; if so, the d is... u The grade is used as the load-bearing capacity level of the target component. The first threshold interval is T1, the second threshold interval is T2, the third threshold interval is T3, and the fourth threshold interval is T4; T1≥1, 1>T2≥0.95, 0.95>T3≥0.90, T4<0.90.

[0034] Specifically, after obtaining the assessment values ​​of the main concrete structure, general concrete structure, main steel structure, and general steel structure in step S100 above, the assessment value of the main concrete structure can be compared with the first threshold interval, the second threshold interval, the third threshold interval, and the fourth threshold interval, respectively. For example, if the assessment value of the main concrete structure is 0.8, then the bearing capacity level of the main concrete structure is d. u Level. When comparing the assessment value of a general concrete structure with a preset threshold range, the preset threshold ranges can be T5≥1, 1>T6≥0.9, 0.9>T7≥0.85, and T8<0.85. If the assessment value of a general concrete structure is 0.92, then the bearing capacity level of the general concrete structure is b. u Level. When comparing the assessment values ​​of the main steel structure with the preset threshold ranges, the preset threshold ranges can be T9≥1, 1>T, etc. 10 ≥0.95, 0.95>T 11 ≥0.9, T 12 If the assessed value of the main steel structure is 0.96, then the load-bearing capacity level of the main steel structure is b. u Level. When comparing the evaluation value information of general steel structures with the preset threshold range, the preset threshold range can be T. 13 ≥1, 1>T 14 ≥0.9, 0.9>T 15 ≥0.85, T 16 <0.85. If the evaluation value for a general steel structure is 0.95, then the load-bearing capacity level of the general steel structure is b.u class.

[0035] Step S130: Determine whether the load-bearing capacity level is a. u Level or b u class;

[0036] Specifically, the bearing capacity level of the main concrete structure is obtained as d through the above steps S110 and S120. u Grade B, the bearing capacity grade of general concrete structures is b u Grade B, the load-bearing capacity grade of the main steel structure. u Grade B, the load-bearing capacity grade of general steel structures. u After classification, the bearing capacity levels of the main concrete structure, general concrete structure, main steel structure, and general steel structure are judged in sequence. For example, if the bearing capacity level of the general concrete structure is b... u If the bearing capacity level is d, then proceed to step S140 to determine whether the displacement and deformation information of the general concrete structure meets the preset design limit range. For example, if the bearing capacity level of the main concrete structure is d... u If the level is set to level 1, then it is not necessary to judge whether the displacement and deformation information of the main concrete structure meets the preset design limit range.

[0037] Step S140: If yes, then based on the collected displacement deformation information of the target component and the preset design limit range, determine whether the displacement deformation information conforms to the preset design limit range. The design limit range includes a first limit range and a second limit range.

[0038] The method involves determining whether the displacement deformation information of the target component meets the preset design limit range based on the collected displacement deformation information and the preset design limit range. The design limit range includes a first limit range and a second limit range, wherein the first limit range is no greater than 80% of the limit specified in the design document, and the second limit range is greater than 80% and less than 100%. The method then determines whether the displacement deformation information meets the first limit range; if not, it determines whether the displacement deformation information meets the second limit range.

[0039] Specifically, in step S130 above, the bearing capacity level of a general concrete structure is determined to be b. u After that, the design document limit refers to the standard values ​​required for the design. Assuming that the displacement deformation information of a general concrete structure obtained by the sensor is 70% of the design document limit, then it is determined that the displacement deformation information of the general concrete structure meets the first limit range.

[0040] Step S150: If the first limit range is met, then a uThe level is used as the displacement deformation level of the target component;

[0041] Specifically, after determining in step S140 that the displacement deformation information of a general concrete structure conforms to the first limit range, the displacement deformation level of the general concrete structure is then a. u class.

[0042] Step S160: If the second limit range is met, then d u The level is used as the displacement deformation level of the target component;

[0043] Specifically, if step S140 determines that the displacement deformation information of a general concrete structure conforms to the second limit range, then the displacement deformation level of the general concrete structure is d. u class.

[0044] Step S170: Compare the magnitudes of the bearing capacity level and the displacement deformation level, and take the smallest level as the component state level of the target component.

[0045] Specifically, after obtaining the bearing capacity level and displacement deformation level of the target component through the above steps S100, S110, S120, S130, S140, S150, and S160, such as the bearing capacity level of a general concrete structure being b... u The displacement deformation level of a typical concrete structure is d. u If the structural condition level is d, then the structural condition level of a typical concrete structure is d. u class.

[0046] The method for safety status assessment provided in this embodiment of the invention further includes: determining whether the target structural sub-unit construction set meets a preset threshold range based on a multiple target structural sub-unit construction set, a preset evaluation interval, and sub-unit status information corresponding to the evaluation interval. The target structural sub-unit construction set includes the component status levels of multiple target components, and the sub-unit status information includes A... u Level B u Level C u Level and D u Level, the A u Level B u Level C u Level and D u The levels decrease sequentially; if so, the corresponding sub-unit status information is used as the sub-unit level of the target structure sub-unit construction set; the sub-unit levels of multiple target structure sub-unit construction sets are compared, and the smallest level is used as the safety status level of the overall station structure.

[0047] The step of determining whether the target structural sub-unit construction set meets a preset threshold range based on multiple target structural sub-unit construction sets, preset evaluation intervals, and sub-unit status information corresponding to the evaluation intervals; if so, the corresponding sub-unit status information is used as the sub-unit level of the target structural sub-unit construction set. This includes: the preset evaluation intervals include a first main component standard interval, a second main component standard interval, a third main component standard interval, and a fourth main component standard interval, where A... u The level corresponds to the standard range of the first major component, and the B... u The level corresponds to the standard range of the second main component, and the C u The level corresponds to the standard range of the third main component, and the D u The level corresponds to the fourth major component standard range; the target component includes the main components of the roof layer; the target structural sub-unit construction set includes the component status levels of multiple target components; determine whether the component status level of the target component conforms to the first major component standard range; if so, then set A... u The level is used as the sub-unit level of the target structural sub-unit construction set; if not, it is determined whether the component status level of the target component conforms to the second main component standard range; if so, the B level is set as the sub-unit level of the target structural sub-unit construction set. u The level is used as the sub-unit level of the target structural sub-unit construction set; if not, it is determined whether the component status level of the target component conforms to the third main component standard range; if so, the C is set as the sub-unit level of the target structural sub-unit construction set. u The level is used as the sub-unit level of the target structural sub-unit construction set; if not, it is determined whether the component status level of the target component conforms to the fourth main component standard range; if so, the D is set as the sub-unit level of the target structural sub-unit construction set. u The level is used as the sub-unit level of the target structural sub-unit construction set. The first major component standard range includes those that do not contain c. u level and d u Level 1, containing no more than 30% b of the total level. u Level, that is, the sub-unit level of the target structural sub-unit construction set, assuming there is 1 a u Level, 1 b u Level, 1 C u level and 1 d u Level, then b u There is one level, and a total of four levels, containing b. u Level 20% constitutes 20% of the total number of levels, at which point it contains no more than 30% b of the total number of levels. u Level. The second major component standard range includes those that do not contain d. u Level, containing no more than 20% c of the total level. u Level; the third major component standard range includes no more than 50% of the total level c.u Level or no more than 15% of the total number of levels. u Level; the fourth main component standard range includes those containing c u level and d u Level, the c u The number of levels and the d u The number of levels is higher than that of C. u The prescribed quantity for each level.

[0048] Specifically, the overall structure of the station building may include multiple target structural sub-units, such as a roof layer and a rail-bearing layer. If the target structural sub-unit is a roof layer, the target structural sub-unit assembly may include the main concrete structure, general concrete structure, main steel structure, and general steel structure within the roof layer. If the target structural sub-unit is a rail-bearing layer, the target structural sub-unit assembly may include the main concrete structure, general concrete structure, main steel structure, and general steel structure within the rail-bearing layer. When the target structural sub-unit is a roof layer, assuming the component state level of the main concrete structure in the target structural sub-unit assembly is 'a'... u Grade B, the component condition level of general concrete structures is b. u Grade B, the structural condition of the main steel structure components is B. u Grade 1, general steel structure component condition level is d u At level 1, the target structural sub-unit construction set includes a u Level, b u Level, b u Level, d u At level 1, the target structural sub-unit construction set is compared with the standard intervals of the first, second, third, and fourth main components, respectively. If the target structural sub-unit construction set conforms to the standard interval of the third main component, the sub-unit state information of the target structural sub-unit construction set is C. u Level. If the multiple target structural sub-units contained in the overall structure of the station building are the roof layer and the rail bearing layer, and the sub-unit state information of the target structural sub-unit construction set corresponding to the roof layer is C. u The sub-unit state information of the target structural sub-unit construction set corresponding to the rail bearing layer is A. u Therefore, the safety status level corresponding to the overall structure of the station building is C. u At this time, a red alert can be sent to the maintenance and management unit via SMS, email, or other online means. The maintenance and management unit should take emergency management measures, conduct key inspections and assessments of the damaged parts, and take effective measures to repair the damage and eliminate safety hazards before putting it back into use.

[0049] This invention provides a method for safety status assessment, which obtains assessment value information based on collected monitoring data of target components; and determines whether the target effect size information conforms to the preset threshold range based on a preset threshold range and component status information corresponding to the threshold range. The component status information includes a u Level, b u Level, C u level and d u Level, the a u Level, b u Level, C u level and d u The levels decrease sequentially; if so, the corresponding component status information is used as the load-bearing capacity level of the target component; determine whether the load-bearing capacity level is a. u Level or b u If so, then based on the collected displacement deformation information of the target component and the preset design limit range, it is determined whether the displacement deformation information conforms to the preset design limit range, which includes a first limit range and a second limit range; if it conforms to the first limit range, then a u The level is used as the displacement deformation level of the target component; if it meets the second limit range, then d u The displacement deformation level of the target component is determined by comparing the load-bearing capacity level and the displacement deformation level, with the smaller level being taken as the component status level of the target component. In the daily operation of railway stations, by monitoring the target components to obtain their corresponding component status information, the load-bearing capacity level of the target component can be determined in real time to assess its load-bearing capacity, and the displacement deformation level can be determined in real time to assess displacements or deformations unsuitable for load-bearing. The component status level of the target component is determined according to the unfavorable level. The smallest level determined from the load-bearing capacity assessment and the assessment of unsuitable displacements or deformations is taken as the component status level. Maintenance and management units can then implement corresponding measures based on the component status level, thereby improving the efficiency of safety status assessments of railway stations and enabling timely assessment and handling of the station's structural safety. This achieves the technical effect of improving assessment efficiency and enabling timely assessment and handling.

[0050] To provide a detailed description of the apparatus for safety status assessment provided by the present invention, the above embodiment 1 provides a detailed description of a method for safety status assessment. Based on the same inventive concept, this application also provides an apparatus for safety status assessment, as detailed in embodiment 2.

[0051] Example 2

[0052] Please see Figure 2 , Figure 2 This is a structural block diagram of a safety status assessment device provided in an embodiment of the present invention. Embodiment two of the present invention provides a safety status assessment device, including an assessment value acquisition module 200, used to obtain assessment value information based on collected monitoring data information of the target component;

[0053] The state determination module 210 is used to determine whether the target effect size information conforms to the preset threshold range based on a preset threshold range and component state information corresponding to the threshold range. The component state information includes a u Level, b u Level, C u level and d u Level, the a u Level, b u Level, C u level and d u The levels decrease sequentially;

[0054] The load-bearing capacity determination module 220 is used to determine the load-bearing capacity level of the target component if the condition is met.

[0055] The comparison and judgment module 230 is used to determine whether the load-bearing capacity level is a. u Level or b u class;

[0056] The displacement deformation judgment module 240 is used to determine whether the displacement deformation information conforms to the preset design limit range based on the collected displacement deformation information of the target component and the preset design limit range. The design limit range includes a first limit range and a second limit range.

[0057] The first-level determination module 250 is used to determine if a meets the first limit range. u The level is used as the displacement deformation level of the target component;

[0058] The second-level determination module 260 is used to determine d if the second limit range is met. u The level is used as the displacement deformation level of the target component;

[0059] Evaluation module 270 is used to compare the magnitude of the bearing capacity level and the displacement deformation level, and take the smallest level as the component status level of the target component.

[0060] This invention provides a device for safety status assessment. An assessment value acquisition module 200 obtains assessment value information based on collected monitoring data of a target component. A status judgment module 210 determines whether the target effect quantity information conforms to a preset threshold range based on a preset threshold range and component status information corresponding to the threshold range. The component status information includes a... u Level, b u Level, C u level and d u Level, the a u Level, b u Level, C u level and d u The levels decrease sequentially; the load-bearing capacity level determination module 220 is used to determine, if yes, the corresponding component status information as the load-bearing capacity level of the target component; the comparison and judgment module 230 is used to determine whether the load-bearing capacity level is a. u Level or b u The displacement deformation judgment module 240 is used to determine whether the displacement deformation information conforms to the preset design limit range based on the collected displacement deformation information of the target component and the preset design limit range. The design limit range includes a first limit range and a second limit range. The first level determination module 250 is used to determine whether a is within the first limit range if the first limit range is met. u The first level is used as the displacement deformation level of the target component; the second level determination module 260 is used to determine the displacement deformation level of the target component if it meets the second limit range. u The load-bearing capacity level and the displacement deformation level are compared, and the smaller level is taken as the component status level of the target component. In the daily operation of railway stations, by monitoring the target component to obtain its corresponding component status information, the load-bearing capacity level of the target component is determined in real time to assess its load-bearing capacity, and the displacement deformation level of the target component is determined in real time to assess displacements or deformations unsuitable for load-bearing. The component status level of the target component is determined according to the unfavorable level. The smallest level determined from the load-bearing capacity assessment and the assessment of displacements or deformations unsuitable for load-bearing is taken as the component status level of the target component. Maintenance and management units can then implement corresponding measures based on the component status level, thereby improving the efficiency of safety status assessment of railway stations and enabling timely assessment and handling of the structural safety of the station. This achieves the technical effect of improving assessment efficiency and enabling timely assessment and handling.

[0061] To provide a detailed description of the electronic device for safety status assessment provided by the present invention, the above embodiment 1 provides a detailed description of a method for safety status assessment. Based on the same inventive concept, this application also provides an electronic device for safety status assessment, as detailed in embodiment 3.

[0062] Example 3

[0063] Please see Figure 3 , Figure 3 This is a structural diagram of an electronic device for security status assessment provided in an embodiment of the present invention. Embodiment three of the present invention provides an electronic device for security status assessment, including a memory 310, a processor 320, and a computer program 311 stored in the memory 310 and executable on the processor 320. When the processor executes the program, it performs the following steps:

[0064] Evaluation values ​​are obtained based on the monitoring data of the target components.

[0065] Based on a preset threshold range and the component state information corresponding to the threshold range, it is determined whether the target effect size information conforms to the preset threshold range. The component state information includes a u Level, b u Level, C u level and d u Level, the a u Level, b u Level, C u level and d u The levels decrease sequentially;

[0066] If so, the corresponding component status information will be used as the load-bearing capacity level of the target component;

[0067] Determine whether the load-bearing capacity level is a. u Level or b u class;

[0068] If so, the displacement deformation information of the target component and the preset design limit range are used to determine whether the displacement deformation information meets the preset design limit range. The design limit range includes a first limit range and a second limit range.

[0069] If it meets the first limit range, then a u The level is used as the displacement deformation level of the target component;

[0070] If it meets the second limit range, then d u The level is used as the displacement deformation level of the target component;

[0071] By comparing the magnitudes of the load-bearing capacity level and the displacement deformation level, the smallest level is taken as the component state level of the target component.

[0072] This invention provides an electronic device for safety status assessment, which obtains assessment value information based on monitoring data of a target component; and determines whether the target effect size information conforms to the preset threshold range based on a preset threshold range and component status information corresponding to the threshold range. The component status information includes a u Level, b u Level, C u level and d u Level, the a u Level, b u Level, C u level and d u The levels decrease sequentially; if so, the corresponding component status information is used as the load-bearing capacity level of the target component; determine whether the load-bearing capacity level is a. u Level or b u If so, then based on the collected displacement deformation information of the target component and the preset design limit range, it is determined whether the displacement deformation information conforms to the preset design limit range, which includes a first limit range and a second limit range; if it conforms to the first limit range, then a u The level is used as the displacement deformation level of the target component; if it meets the second limit range, then d u The displacement deformation level of the target component is determined by comparing the load-bearing capacity level and the displacement deformation level, with the smaller level being taken as the component status level of the target component. In the daily operation of railway stations, by monitoring the target components to obtain their corresponding component status information, the load-bearing capacity level of the target component can be determined in real time to assess its load-bearing capacity, and the displacement deformation level can be determined in real time to assess displacements or deformations unsuitable for load-bearing. The component status level of the target component is determined according to the unfavorable level. The smallest level determined from the load-bearing capacity assessment and the assessment of unsuitable displacements or deformations is taken as the component status level. Maintenance and management units can then implement corresponding measures based on the component status level, thereby improving the efficiency of safety status assessments of railway stations and enabling timely assessment and handling of the station's structural safety. This achieves the technical effect of improving assessment efficiency and enabling timely assessment and handling.

[0073] Finally, it should be noted that the above specific embodiments are only used to illustrate the technical solutions of the present invention and not to limit it. Although the present invention has been described in detail with reference to examples, those skilled in the art should understand that modifications or equivalent substitutions can be made to the technical solutions of the present invention without departing from the spirit and scope of the technical solutions of the present invention, and all such modifications or substitutions should be covered within the scope of the claims of the present invention.

Claims

1. A method of security state assessment, characterized by, The method comprises: obtaining evaluation value information according to monitoring data information of the target component collected; According to the preset threshold interval and the component state information corresponding to the threshold interval, it is judged whether the target effect quantity information conforms to the preset threshold interval, wherein the component state information includes a u level, b u level, c u level and d u level, the a u level, b u level, c u level and d u level are sequentially reduced. if yes, corresponding component state information is taken as a bearing capacity level of the target component; determining whether the load-carrying capacity class is a u or b u class; if yes, whether the displacement deformation information conforms to a preset design limit value interval is judged according to the displacement deformation information of the target component collected and the preset design limit value interval, the design limit value interval comprising a first limit value interval and a second limit value interval; If the first limit interval is met, a u level as the target member displacement deformation level; If the second limit interval is met, d u level as the target member displacement deformation level; the size of the bearing capacity level and the displacement deformation level is compared, and the smallest level is taken as a component state level of the target component; the method of obtaining evaluation value information according to monitoring data information of the target component collected comprises: the target component comprises a main concrete structure; the monitoring data information comprises a main concrete structure effect quantity; a ratio of the main concrete structure effect quantity to a preset main concrete structure resistance design value is taken as the evaluation value information of the main concrete structure; whether the displacement deformation information conforms to a preset design limit value interval is judged according to the displacement deformation information of the target component collected and the preset design limit value interval, the design limit value interval comprising a first limit value interval and a second limit value interval, which comprises: the first limit value interval is not greater than 80% of a design file limit, and the second limit value interval is greater than 80% and less than 100%; whether the displacement deformation information conforms to the first limit value interval is judged; if not, whether the displacement deformation information conforms to the second limit value interval is judged.

2. The method of safety state assessment of claim 1, wherein, The method further comprises: According to a plurality of target structure subunit construction sets, a preset evaluation interval, and subunit state information corresponding to the evaluation interval, it is determined whether the target structure subunit construction set conforms to a preset threshold interval, the target structure subunit construction set including component state levels of a plurality of target components, and the subunit state information including A u level, B u level, C u level, and D u level, the levels of the A u level, B u level, C u level, and D u level are sequentially reduced. if yes, corresponding subunit state information is taken as a subunit level of the target structure subunit construction set; the size of the subunit levels of multiple target structure subunit construction sets is compared, and the smallest level is taken as a safety state level of the station building overall structure.

3. The method of safety state assessment of claim 2, wherein, whether the target structure subunit construction set conforms to a preset threshold interval is judged according to the multiple target structure subunit construction sets, the preset evaluation interval and the subunit state information corresponding to the evaluation interval; if yes, corresponding subunit state information is taken as a subunit level of the target structure subunit construction set, which comprises: The preset evaluation interval includes a first primary component standard interval, a second primary component standard interval, a third primary component standard interval, and a fourth primary component standard interval, the A u level corresponds to the first primary component standard interval, the B u level corresponds to the second primary component standard interval, the C u level corresponds to the third primary component standard interval, and the D u level corresponds to the fourth primary component standard interval; the target component includes a roof layer primary component; the target structure subunit construction set includes component state levels of multiple target components. whether the component state level of the target component conforms to a first main component standard interval is judged; If so, the A u level as a subunit level of the target structure subunit construction set; if not, whether the component state level of the target component conforms to a second main component standard interval is judged; If so, the B u level as a subunit level of the target structure subunit construction set; if not, whether the component state level of the target component conforms to a third main component standard interval is judged; If so, the C u level as a subunit level of the target structure subunit construction set. if not, whether the component state level of the target component conforms to a fourth main component standard interval is judged; If so, the D u level as a subunit level of the target structure subunit construction set.

4. The safety state evaluation method according to claim 3, wherein: said first main component standard interval comprises no more than 30% b u grade and no more than 30% d u grade; and no more than 30% b u grade. The second main component standard interval includes not containing d u grade, containing not higher than 20% c u grade; The third main component standard interval includes a content of not higher than 50% of the total amount of grades u or not higher than 15% of the total amount of grades u ​ The fourth main component standard interval includes c u level and d u level, the number of c u level and the number of d u level are higher than the specified number of C u level.

5. The method for security state assessment of claim 1, wherein, whether the target effect quantity information conforms to a preset threshold interval is judged according to the preset threshold interval and the component state information corresponding to the threshold interval; if yes, corresponding component state information is taken as a bearing capacity level of the target component, which comprises: The preset threshold interval includes a first threshold interval, a second threshold interval, a third threshold interval and a fourth threshold interval, the a u level corresponds to the first threshold interval, the b u level corresponds to the second threshold interval, the c u level corresponds to the third threshold interval, and the d u level corresponds to the fourth threshold interval. whether the evaluation value information conforms to a first threshold interval is judged; If so, the a u level as the load-carrying capacity level of the target member; if not, whether the evaluation value information conforms to a second threshold interval is judged; If so, the b u level as the load-carrying capacity level of the target member; if not, whether the evaluation value information conforms to a third threshold interval is judged; If so, the c u level as the load capacity level of the target member; If not, it is judged whether the evaluation value information conforms to a fourth threshold interval; If so, the d u level is the load-carrying capacity level of the target member.

6. The method for safety state evaluation according to claim 5, wherein: The first threshold interval is T1, the second threshold interval is T2, the third threshold interval is T3, and the fourth threshold interval is T4; T1≥1, 1>T2≥0.95, 0.95>T3≥0.90, and T4<0.

90.

7. An apparatus for security state evaluation based on the method for security state evaluation according to any one of claims 1 to 6, characterized by The device comprises: An evaluation value obtaining module, configured to obtain evaluation value information according to the monitoring data information of the target component collected; A state judging module is configured to judge whether the target effect information meets the preset threshold interval according to a preset threshold interval and component state information corresponding to the threshold interval, wherein the component state information includes a u level, b u level, c u level, and d u level, the a u level, b u level, c u level, and d u level are sequentially decreased. A bearing capacity level determining module, configured to, if yes, take the corresponding component state information as the bearing capacity level of the target component; A comparison judging module is configured to judge whether the bearing capacity level is a u or b u level. A displacement deformation judging module, configured to, if yes, judge whether the displacement deformation information collected from the target component conforms to a preset design limit value interval according to the displacement deformation information and the preset design limit value interval, the design limit value interval comprising a first limit value interval and a second limit value interval; a first level determination module, configured to determine a level of displacement deformation of the target member as the target level if the first limit interval is met; and u a second level determination module, configured to determine a level of displacement deformation of the target member as the target level if the second limit interval is met. a second level determination module, configured to determine the displacement level of the target member as the target displacement level if the second limit interval is met. u a second level determination module, configured to determine the displacement level of the target member as the target displacement level if the second limit interval is met. An evaluation module, configured to compare the bearing capacity level and the displacement deformation level, and take the minimum level as the component state level of the target component.

8. An electronic device for security state assessment, comprising a memory, a processor, and a computer program stored on the memory and executable on the processor, wherein, The processor implements the method for safety state evaluation according to any one of claims 1 to 6 when executing the program.

Images