Evaluation methods, devices and electronic equipment for wind power bases

Abstract

This disclosure relates to a method, apparatus, and electronic equipment for evaluating wind power bases. The method involves determining evaluation indicators and their values ​​for the wind power base. These indicators include: power generation evaluation indicators, power curtailment evaluation indicators, and the rate of non-compliance with cross-sectional utilization standards. The evaluation indicator values ​​are input into a wind power base indicator scoring calculation model to calculate the corresponding score values ​​for each indicator. Based on the wind power base's electricity consumption information, the weight information of the evaluation indicators is determined. Finally, based on the weight information, the score values ​​of the wind power base are weighted and summed to obtain the overall evaluation value. Therefore, by evaluating the wind power base based on its evaluation value, not only is the evaluation and judgment of the wind power base realized, but the direction of adjustment for the wind power base when adjustments are needed is also determined.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] This disclosure relates to the field of wind power generation technology, and in particular to an evaluation method, apparatus and electronic equipment for wind power bases. Background Technology

[0002] Currently, with the continuous development of wind power generation technology, a comprehensive evaluation of wind power bases is needed when constructing them to determine whether the constructed wind power bases meet the expected goals.

[0003] Therefore, how to determine whether a wind power base meets the expected goals, and how to make adjustments when a wind power base does not meet the expected goals, are problems that need to be solved at present. Summary of the Invention

[0004] To overcome the problems existing in related technologies, this disclosure provides an evaluation method, apparatus and electronic equipment for wind power bases.

[0005] According to a first aspect of the present disclosure, a method for evaluating a wind power base is provided, comprising: determining evaluation indicators and evaluation indicator values ​​for the wind power base; wherein the evaluation indicators include: power generation evaluation indicators, power curtailment evaluation indicators, and cross-sectional utilization rate non-compliance rate; inputting the evaluation indicator values ​​into a wind power base indicator scoring calculation model to calculate the score value corresponding to the evaluation indicator of the wind power base; determining the weight information of the evaluation indicators of the wind power base based on the electricity consumption information of the wind power base; and performing a weighted summation of the score values ​​of the wind power base based on the weight information of the evaluation indicators to obtain the evaluation value of the wind power base.

[0006] According to a second aspect of the present disclosure, an evaluation device for a wind power base is provided, comprising: a first determining module, configured to determine evaluation indicators and evaluation indicator values ​​for the wind power base, wherein the evaluation indicators include: power generation evaluation indicators, power curtailment evaluation indicators, and cross-sectional utilization rate non-compliance rate; a calculation module, configured to input the evaluation indicator values ​​into a wind power base indicator scoring calculation model to calculate the score value corresponding to the evaluation indicator of the wind power base; a second determining module, configured to determine the weight information of the evaluation indicators of the wind power base based on the electricity consumption information of the wind power base; and a summing module, configured to perform a weighted summation of the score values ​​of the wind power base based on the weight information of the evaluation indicators to obtain the evaluation value of the wind power base.

[0007] According to a third aspect of the present disclosure, an electronic device is provided, comprising: a processor; and a memory for storing processor-executable instructions; wherein the processor is configured to implement the steps of the wind power base evaluation method provided in the first aspect of the present disclosure.

[0008] According to a fourth aspect of the present disclosure, a computer-readable storage medium is provided that stores computer program instructions thereon, which, when executed by a processor, implement the steps of the wind power base evaluation method provided in the first aspect of the present disclosure.

[0009] According to a fifth aspect of the present disclosure, a computer program product is provided that, when executed by a processor of an electronic device, enables the electronic device to perform the steps of the wind power base evaluation method proposed in the first aspect of the present disclosure.

[0010] The technical solutions provided by the embodiments of this disclosure may include the following beneficial effects:

[0011] By determining the evaluation indicators and their values ​​for wind power bases, including power generation evaluation indicators, power curtailment evaluation indicators, and the rate of non-compliance with cross-sectional utilization standards, the evaluation indicator values ​​are input into a wind power base indicator scoring calculation model to calculate the corresponding score values ​​for each indicator. Based on the power consumption information of the wind power base, the weight information of the evaluation indicators is determined. Finally, based on the weight information of the evaluation indicators, the score values ​​of the wind power base are weighted and summed to obtain the evaluation value of the wind power base. Therefore, by evaluating the wind power base based on its evaluation value, not only is the evaluation and judgment of the wind power base realized, but the direction of adjustment for the wind power base can also be determined when adjustments are needed.

[0012] It should be understood that the above general description and the following detailed description are exemplary and explanatory only, and are not intended to limit this disclosure. Attached Figure Description

[0013] The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and form a part of this specification, illustrate embodiments consistent with this disclosure and, together with the description, serve to explain the principles of this disclosure.

[0014] Figure 1 This is a flowchart illustrating an evaluation method for a wind power base according to an exemplary embodiment;

[0015] Figure 2 This is a flowchart illustrating another method for evaluating wind power bases according to an exemplary embodiment;

[0016] Figure 3 This is a block diagram illustrating an evaluation device for a wind power base according to an exemplary embodiment;

[0017] Figure 4 This is a block diagram illustrating an electronic device for implementing a method according to an exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure. Detailed Implementation

[0018] Exemplary embodiments will now be described in detail, examples of which are illustrated in the accompanying drawings. When the following description relates to the drawings, unless otherwise indicated, the same numerals in different drawings denote the same or similar elements. The embodiments described in the following exemplary embodiments do not represent all embodiments consistent with this disclosure. Rather, they are merely examples of apparatuses and methods consistent with some aspects of this disclosure as detailed in the appended claims.

[0019] It should be noted that all actions involving the acquisition of signals, information, or data in this disclosure are carried out in compliance with the relevant data protection laws and policies of the country where the location is situated, and with authorization from the owner of the relevant device.

[0020] Figure 1 This is a flowchart illustrating an evaluation method for wind power bases according to an exemplary embodiment. It should be noted that the evaluation method for wind power bases in this embodiment is executed by an evaluation device for wind power bases. This evaluation device can be implemented by software and / or hardware and can be configured in an electronic device. This electronic device can be any device with computing capabilities, such as a personal computer (PC), mobile terminal, server, etc. The mobile terminal can be, for example, an in-vehicle device, mobile phone, tablet computer, personal digital assistant, wearable device, or other hardware device with various operating systems, touchscreens, and / or displays. The following description uses an electronic device as the execution subject.

[0021] like Figure 1 As shown, the evaluation method for wind power bases includes the following steps:

[0022] In step S101, the evaluation indicators and evaluation indicator values ​​of the wind power base are determined. The evaluation indicators include: power generation evaluation indicators, power curtailment evaluation indicators, and cross-sectional utilization rate non-compliance rate.

[0023] In this embodiment of the disclosure, the power generation evaluation indicators include: the power generation of the wind power base and the proportion of power generation of the wind power base; the power curtailment evaluation indicators include: the amount of power curtailed at the wind power base and the power curtailment rate of the wind power base.

[0024] Among them, the failure rate of cross-section utilization rate indicates that the cross-section utilization rate is not up to standard when it is less than 90%.

[0025] As one possible approach, power generation evaluation indicators include: the power generation of the wind power base and the proportion of power generation of the wind power base; determining the evaluation indicators and values ​​of the wind power base, including: determining the actual power and power load of the wind power base; calculating the power generation of the wind power base based on the actual power of the wind power base; and determining the ratio of the power generation of the wind power base to the power load as the proportion of power generation of the wind power base.

[0026] Optionally, the power generation of the wind power base can be calculated according to formula (1). Where Q represents the power generation of the wind power base, Δt is the time resolution; if the time resolution is 15 minutes, then Δt = 15, and T = 96; if the time resolution is 60 minutes, then Δt = 60, and T = 24; P t This represents the actual power output of the wind power at the base at time t.

[0027] Optionally, the power generation ratio of the wind power base can be calculated according to formula (2). Where R represents the proportion of power generation from the wind power base, and L represents the power load for the day.

[0028] As one possible approach, the power curtailment evaluation indicators include: the amount of power curtailed at the wind power base and the curtailment rate of the wind power base; determining the evaluation indicators and values ​​for the wind power base, including: determining the theoretical power of the wind power base; calculating the amount of power curtailed at the wind power base based on the actual power and theoretical power of the wind power base; and determining the curtailment rate of the wind power base as the ratio of the amount of power curtailed at the wind power base to the power load.

[0029] Optionally, the curtailment of the wind power base can be calculated according to formula (3). Among them, P theory，t This represents the theoretical power output of the wind power at the base at time t.

[0030] Optionally, the curtailment rate of the wind power base can be calculated according to formula (4). Among them, R limit This indicates the curtailment rate of wind power bases.

[0031] As one possible implementation method, the evaluation index includes: the rate of failure to meet the cross-sectional utilization standard; the rate of failure to meet the cross-sectional utilization standard is calculated using the following formula: Among them, R use Δt represents the rate of substandard cross-sectional utilization, and Δt represents the time resolution.

[0032] Among them, when the cross-sectional utilization rate is less than 90%, N t =1.

[0033] In step S102, the evaluation index values ​​are substituted into the wind power base index scoring calculation model to calculate the score values ​​corresponding to the evaluation indexes of the wind power base.

[0034] The scoring values ​​for wind power bases include: the scoring values ​​corresponding to power generation evaluation indicators, the scoring values ​​corresponding to power curtailment evaluation indicators, and the scoring values ​​corresponding to the non-compliance rate of cross-section utilization.

[0035] As one possible approach, the power generation evaluation indicators, power curtailment evaluation indicators, and the non-compliance rate of cross-section utilization are substituted into the wind power base indicator scoring calculation model to calculate the corresponding score values ​​for each evaluation indicator.

[0036] In step S103, the weight information of the evaluation indicators of the wind power base is determined based on the electricity consumption information of the wind power base.

[0037] As a possible approach, since the evaluation indicators for wind power bases include: the power generation of the wind power base, the proportion of power generation of the wind power base, the curtailment of the wind power base, the curtailment rate of the wind power base, and the non-compliance rate of the cross-section utilization rate, the weight information of the evaluation indicators for wind power bases includes the weights corresponding to the above five indicators.

[0038] α+β+γ+δ+ε=100(6)

[0039] In formula (6), α, β, γ, δ and ε are the weights of the power generation of the wind power base, the proportion of the power generation of the wind power base, the power curtailment of the wind power base, the curtailment rate of the wind power base and the non-compliance rate of the cross-section utilization rate, respectively.

[0040] The electricity consumption information for wind power bases can include: the electricity demand in the areas supplied by the wind power bases. For example, in areas with severe power curtailment, the weight of the amount of power curtailed by the wind power base and the curtailment rate of the wind power base are relatively high. In areas without power curtailment, the weight of the power generation of the wind power base, the weight of the proportion of power generation of the wind power base, and the weight of the rate of non-compliance of the cross-sectional utilization rate are relatively high.

[0041] In step S104, the scores of the wind power base are weighted and summed according to the weight information of the evaluation indicators to obtain the evaluation value of the wind power base.

[0042] S=αS Q +βS R +γS Qlimit +δS Rlimit +εS Ruse (7)

[0043] In formula (7), S Q S R , and These represent the scores for the power generation of the wind power base, the percentage of power generation of the wind power base, the power curtailment of the wind power base, the curtailment rate of the wind power base, and the non-compliance rate of the cross-section utilization rate, respectively.

[0044] In this embodiment, the scores and corresponding weights of the various evaluation indicators of the wind power base are substituted into formula (7) to calculate the evaluation value of the wind power base. Therefore, the evaluation value can be used to determine whether the wind power base meets the expected goals, and the adjustment direction of the wind power base can be determined based on the evaluation value.

[0045] In summary, by determining the evaluation indicators and their values ​​for wind power bases—including power generation evaluation indicators, power curtailment evaluation indicators, and the rate of non-compliance with cross-sectional utilization standards—the evaluation indicator values ​​are input into the wind power base indicator scoring calculation model to calculate the corresponding score values ​​for each indicator. Based on the power consumption information of the wind power base, the weight information of the evaluation indicators is determined. Then, based on the weight information of the evaluation indicators, the score values ​​of the wind power base are weighted and summed to obtain the evaluation value of the wind power base. Therefore, by evaluating the wind power base based on its evaluation value, not only is the evaluation and judgment of the wind power base achieved, but the direction of adjustment for the wind power base when necessary is also determined.

[0046] Figure 2 This is a flowchart illustrating another method for evaluating wind power bases according to an exemplary embodiment.

[0047] like Figure 2 As shown, the evaluation method for this wind power base includes the following steps:

[0048] In step S201, the evaluation indicators and evaluation indicator values ​​of the wind power base are determined. The evaluation indicators include: power generation evaluation indicators, power curtailment evaluation indicators, and cross-sectional utilization rate non-compliance rate.

[0049] In step S202, the power generation evaluation index value is substituted into the base positive index scoring calculation model to calculate the power generation index score value.

[0050] As one possible approach, the planned power generation of the wind power base is determined. If the power generation of the wind power base is less than the planned power generation, the ratio of the power generation to the planned power generation is used as the power generation score of the wind power base. If the power generation of the wind power base is greater than or equal to the planned power generation, the power generation score is 1.

[0051] Optionally, the power generation score of the wind power base can be calculated according to formula (8). Among them, S Q Q represents the score indicating the power generation of a wind power base. design This indicates the planned power generation capacity of the wind power base.

[0052] As one possible approach, the planned power generation ratio of the wind power base is determined. If the planned power generation ratio of the wind power base is less than the planned power generation ratio, the ratio of the planned power generation ratio to the actual power generation ratio is used as the score for the wind power base's power generation ratio. If the planned power generation ratio of the wind power base is greater than or equal to the actual power generation ratio, the score for the wind power base's power generation ratio is 1.

[0053] Optionally, the score for the power generation ratio of the wind power base can be calculated according to formula (9). Among them, S R R represents the score indicating the proportion of electricity generated by the wind power base. design The planned power generation ratio for the base.

[0054] In step S203, the power curtailment evaluation index value is substituted into the base negative index scoring calculation model to calculate the power curtailment index score value.

[0055] As one possible implementation, the planned maximum power curtailment of the wind power base is determined; if the power curtailment of the wind power base is greater than the planned maximum power curtailment, the ratio of the first difference to the power curtailment of the wind power base is determined, and the difference between 1 and the ratio of the first difference to the power curtailment of the wind power base is used as the score of the power curtailment of the wind power base, where the first difference is the difference between the power curtailment of the wind power base and the planned maximum power curtailment of the wind power base; if the power curtailment of the wind power base is less than or equal to the planned maximum power curtailment, the score of the power curtailment of the wind power base is 1.

[0056] Optionally, the score for the curtailment of the wind power base can be calculated according to formula (10).

[0057]

[0058] Among them, S Qlimit Q represents the score for the curtailment of electricity at a wind power base. limit，design This indicates the maximum planned power limit for the base.

[0059] As one possible approach, the planned maximum curtailment rate of the wind power base is determined. If the curtailment rate of the wind power base is greater than the planned maximum curtailment rate, the ratio of the second difference to the curtailment rate of the wind power base is determined. The difference between 1 and the ratio of the second difference to the curtailment rate of the wind power base is used as the score of the curtailment rate of the wind power base, where the second difference is the difference between the curtailment rate of the wind power base and the planned maximum curtailment rate of the wind power base. If the curtailment rate of the wind power base is less than or equal to the planned maximum curtailment rate, the score of the curtailment rate of the wind power base is 1.

[0060] Optionally, the curtailment rate score of the wind power base can be calculated according to formula (11).

[0061]

[0062] S Rlimit R represents the rating of the curtailment rate of a wind power base. limit，design This indicates the maximum planned power curtailment rate for the base.

[0063] In step S204, the score value of the section utilization rate failure rate is calculated based on the section utilization rate failure rate.

[0064] As one possible approach, the difference between 1 and the cross-section utilization failure rate can be used as the score for the cross-section utilization failure rate.

[0065] Optionally, the score for the failure rate of cross-sectional utilization can be calculated according to formula (12).

[0066] S Ruse =1-R use (12), where S Ruse The score indicates the rate at which the cross-sectional utilization rate fails to meet the standard.

[0067] In step S205, the weight information of the evaluation indicators of the wind power base is determined based on the electricity consumption information of the wind power base.

[0068] In step S206, the scores of the wind power base are weighted and summed according to the weight information of the evaluation indicators to obtain the evaluation value of the wind power base.

[0069] It should be noted that for detailed descriptions of 201, 205 and 206, please refer to the descriptions in other embodiments of this disclosure, and they will not be described in detail here.

[0070] The wind power base evaluation method of this disclosure involves determining evaluation indicators and their values. These indicators include: power generation evaluation indicators, power curtailment evaluation indicators, and cross-sectional utilization rate non-compliance rate. The power generation evaluation indicator values ​​are substituted into a positive indicator scoring model to calculate the power generation indicator score. Similarly, the power curtailment evaluation indicator values ​​are substituted into a negative indicator scoring model to calculate the power curtailment indicator score. The cross-sectional utilization rate non-compliance rate score is calculated. The weighting information of the evaluation indicators for the wind power base is determined based on its electricity consumption information. Finally, the scores of the wind power base are weighted and summed to obtain the overall evaluation value. Therefore, by evaluating the wind power base based on its evaluation value, not only is the evaluation and judgment of the wind power base realized, but the adjustment direction of the wind power base can also be determined when adjustments are needed.

[0071] Figure 3This is a block diagram illustrating an evaluation device for a wind power base according to an exemplary embodiment. (Refer to...) Figure 3 The device 300 includes: a first determining module 310, a calculation module 320, a second determining module 330, and a summing module 340.

[0072] The first determining module 310 is used to determine the evaluation indicators and evaluation indicator values ​​of the wind power base. The evaluation indicators include: power generation evaluation indicators, power curtailment evaluation indicators, and cross-sectional utilization rate non-compliance rate.

[0073] The calculation module 320 is used to input the evaluation index value into the wind power base index scoring calculation model to calculate the score value corresponding to the evaluation index of the wind power base.

[0074] The second determining module 330 is used to determine the weight information of the evaluation indicators of the wind power base based on the electricity consumption information of the wind power base.

[0075] The summation module 340 is used to perform a weighted summation of the scores of the wind power base according to the weight information of the evaluation indicators, so as to obtain the evaluation value of the wind power base.

[0076] As one implementation of this disclosure, the power generation evaluation indicators include: the power generation of the wind power base and the power generation ratio of the wind power base; the first determining module 310 is specifically used to: determine the actual power and power load of the wind power base; calculate the power generation of the wind power base based on the actual power of the wind power base; and determine the ratio of the power generation of the wind power base to the power load as the power generation ratio of the wind power base.

[0077] As one implementation of this disclosure, the power curtailment evaluation indicators include: the power curtailment amount of the wind power base and the power curtailment rate of the wind power base; the first determining module 310 is specifically used to: determine the theoretical power of the wind power base; calculate the power curtailment amount of the wind power base based on the actual power of the wind power base and the theoretical power of the wind power base; and determine the power curtailment rate of the wind power base as the ratio of the power curtailment amount of the wind power base to the power load.

[0078] As one implementation of this disclosure, the evaluation index includes: the cross-sectional utilization rate failure rate; the cross-sectional utilization rate failure rate is calculated using the following formula: Among them, R use This indicates the rate at which the cross-sectional utilization rate fails to meet the standard, and Δt represents the time resolution. This indicates the number of times the cross-sectional utilization rate failed to meet the standard.

[0079] As one implementation of this disclosure, the calculation module 320 includes: a first calculation unit, a second calculation unit, and a third calculation unit; wherein, the first calculation unit is used to substitute the power generation evaluation index value into the base positive index scoring calculation model to calculate the power generation index score value; the second calculation unit is used to substitute the power curtailment evaluation index value into the base negative index scoring calculation model to calculate the power curtailment index score value; and the third calculation unit is used to calculate the score value of the cross-section utilization rate non-compliance rate based on the cross-section utilization rate non-compliance rate.

[0080] In one implementation of this disclosure, the first calculation unit is specifically used to: determine the planned power generation of the wind power base; if the power generation of the wind power base is less than the planned power generation of the wind power base, use the ratio of the power generation of the wind power base to the planned power generation of the wind power base as the score value of the power generation of the wind power base; if the power generation of the wind power base is greater than or equal to the planned power generation of the wind power base, the score value of the power generation of the wind power base is 1.

[0081] In one implementation of this disclosure, the first calculation unit is specifically used to: determine the planned power generation ratio of the wind power base; if the power generation ratio of the wind power base is less than the planned power generation ratio of the wind power base, use the ratio of the power generation ratio of the wind power base to the planned power generation ratio of the wind power base as the score value of the power generation ratio of the wind power base; if the power generation ratio of the wind power base is greater than or equal to the planned power generation ratio of the wind power base, the score value of the power generation ratio of the wind power base is 1.

[0082] In one implementation of this disclosure, the second calculation unit is specifically used to: determine the planned maximum power restriction of the wind power base; if the power restriction of the wind power base is greater than the planned maximum power restriction of the wind power base, determine the ratio of a first difference to the power restriction of the wind power base, and use 1 and the difference between the first difference and the ratio of the first difference to the power restriction of the wind power base as the score value of the power restriction of the wind power base, wherein the first difference is the difference between the power restriction of the wind power base and the planned maximum power restriction of the wind power base; if the power restriction of the wind power base is less than or equal to the planned maximum power restriction of the wind power base, the score value of the power restriction of the wind power base is 1.

[0083] In one implementation of this disclosure, the second calculation unit is specifically used to: determine the planned maximum curtailment rate of the wind power base; if the curtailment rate of the wind power base is greater than the planned maximum curtailment rate of the wind power base, determine the ratio of a second difference to the curtailment rate of the wind power base, and use 1 and the difference between the second difference and the ratio of the second difference to the curtailment rate of the wind power base as the score value of the curtailment rate of the wind power base, wherein the second difference is the difference between the curtailment rate of the wind power base and the planned maximum curtailment rate of the wind power base; if the curtailment rate of the wind power base is less than or equal to the planned maximum curtailment rate of the wind power base, the score value of the curtailment rate of the wind power base is 1.

[0084] As one implementation of this disclosure, the third calculation unit is specifically used to take the difference between 1 and the cross-sectional utilization rate non-compliance rate as the score value of the cross-sectional utilization rate non-compliance rate.

[0085] Regarding the apparatus in the above embodiments, the specific manner in which each module performs its operation has been described in detail in the embodiments related to the method, and will not be elaborated upon here.

[0086] The wind power base evaluation device of this embodiment determines the evaluation indicators and their values ​​for the wind power base. These evaluation indicators include: power generation evaluation indicators, power curtailment evaluation indicators, and the rate of non-compliance with cross-sectional utilization standards. The evaluation indicator values ​​are input into a wind power base indicator scoring calculation model to calculate the corresponding score values ​​for each evaluation indicator. Based on the wind power base's electricity consumption information, the weight information of the evaluation indicators is determined. The score values ​​of the wind power base are then weighted and summed according to the weight information to obtain the overall evaluation value of the wind power base. Therefore, by evaluating the wind power base based on its evaluation value, not only is the evaluation and judgment of the wind power base realized, but the adjustment direction of the wind power base can also be determined when adjustments are needed.

[0087] To implement the above embodiments, this disclosure also provides an electronic device, a readable storage medium, and a computer program product.

[0088] The electronic device includes: a processor 420; and a memory 410 for storing executable instructions of the processor 420; wherein the processor 420 is configured to execute the wind power base evaluation method proposed in the first aspect of the present disclosure as described above.

[0089] As an example, Figure 4 This is a block diagram illustrating an electronic device for implementing a method according to an exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure, such as... Figure 4 As shown, the above-mentioned electronic device 400 may include:

[0090] The system includes a memory 410 and a processor 420, and a bus 430 connecting different components (including the memory 410 and the processor 420). The memory 410 stores a computer program that, when executed by the processor 420, implements the wind power base evaluation method proposed in the first aspect of the present disclosure as described above.

[0091] Bus 430 represents one or more of several bus architectures, including a memory bus or memory controller, a peripheral bus, a graphics acceleration port, a processor, or a local bus using any of the various bus architectures. Examples of these architectures include, but are not limited to, the Industry Standard Architecture (ISA) bus, the Micro Channel Architecture (MAC) bus, the Enhanced ISA bus, the Video Electronics Standards Association (VESA) local bus, and the Peripheral Component Interconnect (PCI) bus.

[0092] Electronic device 400 typically includes a variety of computer-readable media. These media can be any available media that can be accessed by electronic device 400, including volatile and non-volatile media, removable and non-removable media.

[0093] Memory 410 may also include computer system readable media in the form of volatile memory, such as random access memory (RAM) 440 and / or cache 450. Electronic device 400 may further include other removable / non-removable, volatile / non-volatile computer system storage media. By way of example only, storage system 460 may be used to read and write non-removable, non-volatile magnetic media (… Figure 4 Not shown; usually referred to as a "hard drive"). Although Figure 4 Not shown, a disk drive for reading and writing to a removable non-volatile disk (e.g., a "floppy disk") and an optical disk drive for reading and writing to a removable non-volatile optical disk (e.g., a CD-ROM, DVD-ROM, or other optical media) may be provided. In these cases, each drive may be connected to bus 430 via one or more data media interfaces. Memory 410 may include at least one program product having a set (e.g., at least one) of program modules configured to perform the functions of the embodiments of this disclosure.

[0094] A program / utility 480 having a set (at least one) of program modules 470 may be stored, for example, in memory 410. Such program modules 470 include—but are not limited to—an operating system, one or more application programs, other program modules, and program data. Each or some combination of these examples may include an implementation of a network environment. Program modules 470 typically perform the functions and / or methods described in the embodiments of this disclosure.

[0095] Electronic device 400 can also communicate with one or more external devices 490 (e.g., keyboard, pointing device, display 491, etc.), and with one or more devices that enable a user to interact with the electronic device 400, and / or with any device that enables the electronic device 400 to communicate with one or more other computing devices (e.g., network card, modem, etc.). This communication can be performed through input / output (I / O) interface 492. Furthermore, electronic device 400 can also communicate with one or more networks (e.g., local area network (LAN), wide area network (WAN), and / or public networks, such as the Internet) through network adapter 493. Figure 4 As shown, network adapter 493 communicates with other modules of electronic device 400 via bus 430. It should be understood that, although... Figure 4 As not shown, other hardware and / or software modules may be used in conjunction with electronic device 400, including but not limited to: microcode, device drivers, redundant processing units, external disk drive arrays, RAID systems, tape drives, and data backup storage systems.

[0096] The processor 420 performs various functional applications and data processing by running programs stored in the memory 410.

[0097] It should be noted that the implementation process and technical principles of the electronic equipment in this embodiment are explained in the foregoing description of the evaluation method for wind power bases in this disclosure embodiment, and will not be repeated here.

[0098] The electronic device provided in this embodiment determines the evaluation indicators and values ​​of a wind power base. These evaluation indicators include: power generation evaluation indicators, power curtailment evaluation indicators, and the rate of non-compliance with cross-sectional utilization standards. The evaluation indicator values ​​are input into a wind power base indicator scoring calculation model to calculate the corresponding score values ​​for each evaluation indicator. Based on the power consumption information of the wind power base, the weight information of the evaluation indicators is determined. Based on the weight information of the evaluation indicators, the score values ​​of the wind power base are weighted and summed to obtain the evaluation value of the wind power base. Therefore, by evaluating the wind power base based on its evaluation value, not only is the evaluation and judgment of the wind power base realized, but the direction of adjustment for the wind power base is also determined when adjustments are needed.

[0099] To implement the above embodiments, this disclosure also proposes a computer-readable storage medium, wherein when the instructions in the computer-readable storage medium are executed by a processor of an electronic device, the electronic device is able to perform the wind power base evaluation method proposed in the first aspect of the present disclosure as described above.

[0100] To implement the above embodiments, this disclosure also provides a computer program product that, when executed by the processor of an electronic device, enables the electronic device to perform the wind power base evaluation method proposed in the first aspect of the present disclosure as described above.

[0101] In the description of this specification, the description with reference to the terms "one embodiment", "some embodiments", "example", "specific example", or "some examples" means that the specific features, structures, materials or characteristics described in conjunction with the embodiment or example are included in at least one embodiment or example of the present disclosure. In this specification, the schematic representations of the above terms do not necessarily refer to the same embodiment or example. Moreover, the specific features, structures, materials or characteristics described may be combined in any one or more embodiments or examples in a suitable manner. In addition, those skilled in the art may combine and combine different embodiments or examples described in this specification and features of different embodiments or examples, unless they are mutually inconsistent.

[0102] Furthermore, the terms "first" and "second" are used for descriptive purposes only and should not be construed as indicating or implying relative importance or implicitly specifying the number of technical features indicated. Thus, a feature defined as "first" or "second" may explicitly or implicitly include at least one of that feature. In the description of this disclosure, "a plurality of" means at least two, such as two, three, etc., unless otherwise explicitly specified.

[0103] Any process or method description in the flowchart or otherwise herein can be understood as representing a module, segment, or portion of code comprising one or more executable instructions for implementing custom logic functions or processes, and the scope of preferred embodiments of this disclosure includes additional implementations in which functions may be performed not in the order shown or discussed, including substantially simultaneously or in reverse order depending on the functions involved, as will be understood by those skilled in the art to which embodiments of this disclosure pertain.

[0104] The logic and / or steps represented in the flowcharts or otherwise described herein, for example, can be considered as a sequenced list of executable instructions for implementing the logical functions, and can be embodied in any computer-readable medium for use by, or in conjunction with, an instruction execution system, apparatus, or device (e.g., a computer-based system, a system including a processor, or other system that can fetch and execute instructions from an instruction execution system, apparatus, or device). For purposes of this specification, a "computer-readable medium" can be any device that can contain, store, communicate, propagate, or transport a program for use by, or in conjunction with, an instruction execution system, apparatus, or device. More specific examples (a non-exhaustive list) of computer-readable media include the following: an electrical connection with one or more wires (electronic devices), a portable computer disk cartridge (magnetic device), random access memory (RAM), read-only memory (ROM), erasable and programmable read-only memory (EPROM or flash memory), fiber optic devices, and a portable compact disc read-only memory (CDROM). Furthermore, the computer-readable medium may even be paper or other suitable medium on which the program is printed, since the program may be obtained electronically, for example, by optically scanning the paper or other medium and then editing, interpreting or processing it in another suitable manner if necessary, and then storing it in a computer memory.

[0105] It should be understood that various parts of the present disclosure can be implemented using hardware, software, firmware, or a combination thereof. In the above embodiments, multiple steps or methods can be implemented using software or firmware stored in a memory and executed by a suitable instruction execution system. For example, if implemented using hardware, as in another embodiment, any one of the following technologies known in the art or a combination thereof can be used to implement: a discrete logic circuit having a logic gate circuit for implementing a logic function on a data signal, an application-specific integrated circuit having a suitable combination of logic gate circuits, a programmable gate array (PGA), a field programmable gate array (FPGA), etc.

[0106] Those skilled in the art will understand that all or part of the steps in the method of the above embodiment can be completed by instructing related hardware through a program, and the program can be stored in a computer-readable storage medium. When the program is executed, it includes one or a combination of the steps of the method embodiment.

[0107] Furthermore, the functional units in the various embodiments of this disclosure can be integrated into a processing module, or each unit can exist physically separately, or two or more units can be integrated into a module. The integrated module can be implemented in hardware or as a software functional module. If the integrated module is implemented as a software functional module and sold or used as an independent product, it can also be stored in a computer-readable storage medium.

[0108] The storage medium mentioned above can be a read-only memory, a disk, or an optical disk, etc. Although embodiments of the present disclosure have been shown and described above, it is to be understood that the above embodiments are exemplary and should not be construed as limiting the present disclosure. Those skilled in the art can make changes, modifications, substitutions, and variations to the above embodiments within the scope of the present disclosure.

[0109] Other embodiments of this disclosure will readily occur to those skilled in the art upon consideration of the specification and practice of this disclosure. This disclosure is intended to cover any variations, uses, or adaptations of this disclosure that follow the general principles of this disclosure and include common knowledge or customary techniques in the art not disclosed herein. The specification and examples are to be considered exemplary only, and the true scope and spirit of this disclosure are indicated by the following claims.

[0110] It should be understood that this disclosure is not limited to the precise structures described above and shown in the accompanying drawings, and various modifications and changes can be made without departing from its scope. The scope of this disclosure is limited only by the appended claims.

Claims

1. A method for evaluating wind power bases, characterized in that, include: The evaluation indicators and their values ​​for wind power bases are determined, including: power generation evaluation indicators, power curtailment evaluation indicators, and the rate of non-compliance of cross-sectional utilization. The power generation evaluation index value is substituted into the base positive index scoring calculation model to calculate the power generation index score value; the power curtailment evaluation index value is substituted into the base negative index scoring calculation model to calculate the power curtailment index score value; and the cross-section utilization rate non-compliance rate score value is calculated based on the cross-section utilization rate non-compliance rate. Based on the electricity consumption information of the wind power base, determine the weight information of the evaluation indicators of the wind power base; Based on the weight information of the evaluation indicators, the scores of the wind power base are weighted and summed to obtain the evaluation value of the wind power base.

2. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that, The power generation evaluation indicators include: the power generation of the wind power base and the proportion of power generation of the wind power base; the determination of the evaluation indicators and evaluation indicator values ​​for the wind power base includes: Determine the actual power output and electrical load of the wind power base; The power generation of the wind power base is calculated based on its actual power output. The ratio of the power generation of the wind power base to the power load is determined as the power generation percentage of the wind power base.

3. The method according to claim 2, wherein the power curtailment evaluation indicators include: Power curtailment at wind power bases and curtailment rate at wind power bases; The evaluation indicators and values ​​for determining wind power bases include: Determine the theoretical power output of the wind power base; Calculate the power curtailment limit of the wind power base based on its actual power and theoretical power. The ratio of the curtailed power capacity of the wind power base to the power load is determined as the curtailment rate of the wind power base.

4. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that, The evaluation indicators include: the rate of failure to meet the cross-sectional utilization standard; the rate of failure to meet the cross-sectional utilization standard is calculated using the following formula: ,in, This indicates the rate at which the cross-sectional utilization rate did not meet the standard. Indicates time resolution. This indicates the number of times the cross-sectional utilization rate failed to meet the standard.

5. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that, The step of substituting the power generation evaluation index value into the base positive index scoring calculation model to calculate the power generation index score value includes: Determine the planned power generation capacity of the wind power base; If the power generation of the wind power base is less than the planned power generation of the wind power base, the ratio of the power generation of the wind power base to the planned power generation of the wind power base will be used as the score of the power generation of the wind power base. If the power generation of the wind power base is greater than or equal to the planned power generation of the wind power base, the power generation score of the wind power base is 1.

6. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that, The step of substituting the power generation evaluation index value into the base positive index scoring calculation model to calculate the power generation index score value includes: Determine the planned power generation ratio of wind power bases; If the power generation ratio of the wind power base is less than the planned power generation ratio of the wind power base, the ratio of the power generation ratio of the wind power base to the planned power generation ratio of the wind power base will be used as the score of the power generation ratio of the wind power base. If the power generation ratio of the wind power base is greater than or equal to the planned power generation ratio of the wind power base, the power generation ratio of the wind power base is scored as 1.

7. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that, The step of substituting the power curtailment evaluation index value into the base's negative index scoring calculation model to calculate the power curtailment index score value includes: Determine the maximum planned power capacity for wind power bases; If the power restriction of the wind power base is greater than the planned maximum power restriction of the wind power base, determine the ratio of the first difference to the power restriction of the wind power base, and use the difference between 1 and the ratio of the first difference to the power restriction of the wind power base as the score of the power restriction of the wind power base, wherein the first difference is the difference between the power restriction of the wind power base and the planned maximum power restriction of the wind power base. If the power curtailment of the wind power base is less than or equal to the planned maximum power curtailment of the wind power base, the power curtailment score of the wind power base is 1.

8. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that, The step of substituting the power curtailment evaluation index value into the base's negative index scoring calculation model to calculate the power curtailment index score value includes: Determine the maximum planned curtailment rate for wind power bases; If the curtailment rate of the wind power base is greater than the planned maximum curtailment rate of the wind power base, determine the ratio of the second difference to the curtailment rate of the wind power base, and use the difference between 1 and the ratio of the second difference to the curtailment rate of the wind power base as the score of the curtailment rate of the wind power base, wherein the second difference is the difference between the curtailment rate of the wind power base and the planned maximum curtailment rate of the wind power base; If the curtailment rate of the wind power base is less than or equal to the planned maximum curtailment rate of the wind power base, the curtailment rate score of the wind power base is 1.

9. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that, The calculation of the score value for the non-compliance rate of cross-section utilization based on the non-compliance rate includes: The difference between 1 and the non-compliance rate of the cross-section utilization rate is used as the score value of the non-compliance rate of the cross-section utilization rate.

Images