Anvil seat and method of making

Abstract

A manufacturing method of a nail seat, characterized in that it comprises the following steps: (1) mixing and smelting under the condition of oxygen isolation to form small blocks; (2) pressure casting under the condition of oxygen isolation to obtain a pressure casting blank. A pressure casting nail seat, characterized in that it comprises the following components in weight parts: zirconium 60-65.5 parts, copper 23.5-28.5 parts, nickel 5.7-7.2 parts, titanium 0.8-1.9 parts, aluminum 3.1-4.1 parts, yttrium 0-1.1 parts.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] This invention relates to the field of amorphous alloy die casting technology, and particularly to an anvil manufactured using an amorphous alloy die casting process. Background Technology

[0002] Surgical staplers are mainly used in minimally invasive surgical procedures. In recent years, with the increasing penetration rate of minimally invasive technology, the surgical stapler industry has also developed rapidly. Compared with foreign countries, the penetration rate of minimally invasive technology in China is relatively low, indicating huge potential for future growth, and the market size of staplers will also increase accordingly. Currently, the manufacturing process of medical anvils is as follows: CNC machining to form the mounting groove and body shape; stamping the stapler recess; forming the stapler cover and shaping its side wings; welding the stapler body and cover; CNC machining the cutting groove; heat treatment; grinding and cleaning; and plating. This process is costly, time-consuming, and inefficient. Furthermore, 1. due to its complex structure, it usually requires extensive CNC machining; 2. because the stapler recess structure is too small, it can only be achieved through stamping; 3. key indicators such as the position and contour of the recess become unstable with the increasing use of the stamping die. Therefore, there is an urgent need in the market for a low-cost processing technology that can meet product performance requirements, improve production efficiency, and provide stability. Summary of the Invention

[0003] This invention provides an anvil and a method for manufacturing it.

[0004] The technical solution adopted in this invention is: a method for manufacturing an anvil, characterized by the following steps: (1) mixing materials and melting them under oxygen-isolated conditions to form small pieces; (2) die casting them under oxygen-isolated conditions to obtain a die casting blank.

[0005] The specific features of this solution also include the following die-casting molding parameters: mold temperature: 175℃-210℃, high-frequency heating temperature: 915℃-960℃, high-speed position: 289mm-302mm, high-speed speed: 0.7m / s-1.4m / s, and pressure boosting position: 304mm-311mm.

[0006] Die casting parameters include: mold temperature: 180℃-200℃, high frequency heating temperature: 920℃-950℃, high speed position: 290mm-300mm, high speed: 0.8m / s-1.2m / s, and pressure boosting position: 305mm-309mm.

[0007] Step (1) Mixing and melting the materials under oxygen-isolated conditions to form small blocks refers to weighing zirconium powder, copper powder, nickel powder, titanium powder, aluminum powder, and yttrium powder according to their mass proportions; placing them in an oxygen-isolated melting furnace and raising the temperature to 1000-1200℃; melting them into a liquid state and then injecting them into the mold cavity to cool into solid blocks.

[0008] Zirconium 60-65.5 parts, copper 23.5-28.5 parts, nickel 5.7-7.2 parts, titanium 0.8-1.9 parts, aluminum 3.1-4.1 parts, yttrium 0-1.1 parts.

[0009] Zirconium powder 61-65 parts, copper powder 23.5-27.5 parts, nickel powder 5.8-7 parts, titanium powder 0.9-1.7 parts, aluminum powder 3.2-3.9 parts, yttrium powder 0.1-0.9 parts.

[0010] Step (2) Die casting to obtain a die casting blank under oxygen-isolated conditions refers to placing small pieces of raw material into the storage bin of the die casting equipment, heating the small pieces of raw material to 915℃-960℃ by high-frequency heating, and pouring them into the injection chamber after the small pieces of raw material have completely melted. The melt is then injected into the mold at a high speed and high pressure of 0.7m / s-1.4m / s. The mold temperature is selected as 175℃-210℃, the pressure boosting position is selected as 304mm-311mm, and the high speed position is selected as 289mm-302mm to obtain the anvil die casting blank.

[0011] The preparation method of the anvil seat also includes the following steps: (3) laser engraving blanking; (4) deburring; (5) CNC machining; (6) polishing; (7) grinding; (8) PVD coating.

[0012] Step (3) Laser engraving blanking refers to placing the die-cast anvil blank, which is connected to the flow channel and the material handle, into the positioning fixture for laser engraving. The positioning fixture is placed on the worktable of the laser engraving machine. The laser engraving program of the anvil is opened, the processing pedal is started, and the set program is automatically started. The laser engraving machine emits a laser to cut the flow channel on the anvil. The cutting position is 0.1mm away from the anvil for the next processing step. After cutting, the blank of the anvil is obtained.

[0013] Step (4) Deburring refers to manually removing the burrs at the joint line of the anvil seat and the mold parting lines on both sides after laser engraving is completed using a deburring tool.

[0014] Step (5) CNC machining refers to placing the anvil blank on the machining platform of the Brother CNC machine tool, starting the machining program of the machining tool, removing the machining allowance reserved for the anvil blank, and performing high-precision machining on important control dimensions.

[0015] Step (6) Polishing refers to hand-holding the CNC-machined anvil close to the polishing wheel, preferably with a speed of 800-1000 r / min, and preferably with a nylon wheel as the polishing wheel material, to process the blank until the anvil blank is obtained.

[0016] Step (7) Grinding refers to placing the polished anvil, grinding stone, and grinding fluid into a high-powered high-speed centrifugal grinding machine for grinding and cleaning to remove the rolled edges after CNC machining and the dirt after polishing. Start the high-powered high-speed centrifugal grinding machine, preferably using green silicon carbide 3*3 as the grinding stone material, preferably using a speed of 120 r / min, and a time of 30 min. After processing is completed, remove the anvil, clean it, and pick out the grinding stone from the gap between the anvils.

[0017] Step (8) PVD coating refers to cleaning the ground anvil blank and placing it on an electroplating fixture. After heating in the furnace, the surface is treated. After the time is up, the product is taken out of the furnace and a film will be formed on the product surface, which can greatly improve the roughness of the product's nail pit. The coating is then complete.

[0018] A die-cast anvil, characterized in that it comprises the following components in parts by weight: 60-65.5 parts zirconium, 23.5-28.5 parts copper, 5.7-7.2 parts nickel, 0.8-1.9 parts titanium, 3.1-4.1 parts aluminum, and 0-1.1 parts yttrium.

[0019] An anvil, characterized in that it comprises the following components by weight, formed by an amorphous alloy die casting process: 60-65.5 parts copper, 23.5-28.5 parts nickel, 5.7-7.2 parts titanium, 0.8-1.9 parts aluminum, 3.1-4.1 parts yttrium, and 0-1.1 parts yttrium.

[0020] A method for manufacturing an anvil, characterized by comprising the following steps: (1) mixing materials and melting them under oxygen-free conditions to form small pieces; (2) die casting them under oxygen-free conditions to obtain a die casting blank; (3) laser engraving blanking; (4) deburring; (5) CNC machining; (6) polishing; (7) grinding; (8) PVD coating.

[0021] The beneficial effects of the present invention are: (1) The present invention uses amorphous alloy process to prepare the anvil, which has a high raw material utilization rate and greatly reduces the production cost; the anvil pit and the main structure of the anvil can be die-cast in one piece and perfectly replicate the precision of the mold, with high dimensional accuracy, which fully guarantees the position of the anvil pit and the consistency of the contour structure, requiring only a small amount of auxiliary CNC machining; the hardness is high, the hardness of the base material is about HRC50, and it can meet the usage requirements without heat treatment; the material is safe and has good biocompatibility. After a large number of verifications and experiments, the present invention comprehensively considers performance requirements, production efficiency, cost and other factors, and obtains a high hardness, high strength and extremely high safety anvil blank through amorphous alloy die-casting process. (2) The production process is simple, which greatly reduces the cost and manpower, and the molding capacity is high, which can promote the development of automated large-scale production. Attached Figure Description

[0022] Figure 1 This is a front view of the anvil. Figure 2 for Figure 1 Top view. Figure 3 This is a schematic diagram of the clamping fixture structure. Figure 4 A schematic diagram of the test state for clamping six layers of foam with the anvil seat.

[0023] In the diagram: 1-stop plate, 2-cylinder, 3-baffle, 4-screw, 5-connector, 6-fixing pin, 7-fixing pin, 8-fixing block, 9-moving rod, 10-fixing rod, 11-fixing pin, 12-stop pin seat, 13-disposable nail box, 14-nail magazine, 15-foam. Detailed Implementation

[0024] Example 1: A method for manufacturing an anvil includes the following steps: (1) mixing and melting materials to form small blocks; (2) die casting; (3) laser engraving blanking; (4) deburring; (5) CNC machining; (6) polishing; (7) grinding; (8) PVD coating.

[0025] The specific steps are as follows:

[0026] (1) Mix and melt the materials and then make small pieces. Weigh the following materials according to the mass ratio: 63 parts zirconium powder, 25.5 parts copper powder, 6 parts nickel powder, 1.5 parts titanium powder, 3.5 parts aluminum powder, and 0.5 parts yttrium powder. Place them in a melting furnace and heat the temperature to 1000-1200℃. To prevent the raw materials in the melting furnace from oxidizing, evacuate the furnace and use argon gas to protect them from oxygen. After melting into a liquid state, inject the mixture into the mold cavity for making the feed. The mold is equipped with cooling circulating water. The liquid feed enters the mold cavity and is quickly cooled into solid blocks. Then, the mixture is taken out and processed into small pieces of raw material less than 20mm by a crusher.

[0027] (2) Die casting. The raw material, which is broken into small pieces of less than 20 mm, is placed into the storage bin of the die casting equipment, which uses a Japanese Toyo 250T die casting machine. The vacuum is evacuated to below 50 Pa. Under this vacuum or argon protection, the raw material is heated to 950°C by high frequency heating. After the raw material is completely melted, it is automatically poured into the injection chamber. The melt is injected into the mold at a high speed and high pressure of 0.9 m / s. The mold temperature is selected as 200°C, the pressure boosting position is selected as 308 mm, the high speed position is selected as 290 mm, the barrel insulation temperature is selected as 120°C, and the clamping force is selected as 2300 KN. After the mold is ejected, the die casting blank with the anvil connected to the material shank and the runner is obtained.

[0028] (3) Laser engraving blanking. Place the die-cast blank of the anvil seat, which is connected to the flow channel and the material handle, into the positioning fixture for laser engraving. The positioning fixture is placed on the worktable of the laser engraving machine. Open the laser engraving program of the anvil seat, start the processing pedal, and the set program will start automatically. The laser engraving machine will emit a laser to cut the flow channel on the anvil seat. Leave a 0.1mm margin between the cutting position and the anvil seat for the next processing step. After cutting, the blank of the medical anvil seat is obtained.

[0029] (4) Remove burrs. Use a burr remover to manually remove the burrs at the anvil inlay line and the two side mold lines after laser engraving.

[0030] (5) CNC machining. Place the anvil blank on the machining platform of the Brother CNC machine tool, start the machining program of the machine tool, remove the machining allowance reserved for the anvil blank, and perform high-precision machining on important control dimensions.

[0031] (6) Polishing. Hold the CNC-machined anvil close to the polishing wheel, preferably with a speed of 800-1000 r / min, and choose a nylon wheel as the polishing wheel material. Process the blank until the anvil blank is obtained.

[0032] (7) Grinding. Place the polished anvil, grinding stone, and grinding fluid into a high-power high-speed centrifugal grinder for grinding and cleaning to remove the rolled edges from CNC machining and the dirt from polishing. Start the high-power high-speed centrifugal grinder, select green silicon carbide 3×3 as the grinding stone material, select a speed of 120 r / min, and a time of 30 min. After processing is completed, take it out for cleaning and pick out the grinding stone in the gap of the anvil.

[0033] (8) PVD coating. After cleaning the ground anvil blank, place it on the electroplating fixture, heat it in the furnace and perform surface treatment; after the time is up, take it out of the furnace and a coating will be formed on the product surface, which can greatly improve the roughness of the product's nail pits. The coating is then complete.

[0034] Due to the continuous improvement of medical technology in my country, existing industry standards are no longer sufficient to meet the testing requirements of existing anvils. Therefore, we have added a new testing fixture for clamping six layers of foam to the anvil to test its strength. This fixture accurately simulates the working conditions of the anvil and can further test its strength, precisely measuring the performance impact of different raw material ratios on anvils.

[0035] like Figure 3 As shown, the test fixture for clamping six layers of foam with an anvil is set up to simulate actual working conditions. It includes a fixed block 8, a movable rod 9, and a fixed rod 10. The medical anvil and staple cartridge are fixed together between the movable rod 9 and the fixed rod 10 using a fixing pin 11. The fixed rod 10 is fixed to the fixed block 8 using a fixing pin 7. The baffle 3 and the fixed block 8 are fixed to the abutment 1 with screws. A cylinder 2 is set behind the baffle and fixed to the baffle with screws 4. A connector 5 is set between the movable rod 9 and the cylinder 2. Under the pushing action of the cylinder 2, the movable rod 9 also moves forward, causing the anvil to clamp downwards. As shown in the figure, an electromagnetic control valve is installed behind the cylinder. The electromagnetic control valve controls the air intake of the two air intake pipes A and B to control the forward and backward movement of the cylinder 2. When the switch is pressed, air intake is introduced through air pipe B, and the cylinder moves forward, with the anvil clamping the foam. When the switch is released, air intake is introduced through air pipe A, and the cylinder moves backward, with the anvil releasing the foam. One reciprocating motion is recorded as one cycle. The number of times the anvil clamps the foam is used to determine whether the strength meets the standard requirements.

[0036] Clamping force test: Clamping six layers of foam and performing 12 repeated clamping tests, with no breakage or cracks. A clamping test with more than 12 clamping cycles without breakage or cracks is considered excellent; a clamping test with more than 6 clamping cycles without breakage or cracks is considered acceptable.

[0037] In Examples 2-63, because zirconium constitutes a large proportion, the proportion of copper, nickel, titanium, aluminum, and yttrium was adjusted freely. Only one element was changed in each example, and the optimal range was tested in increments of one unit. The suitable range for each element was determined by testing the clamping force of the anvil 12 times, clamping six layers of foam.

[0038] Example 2: The similarities to Example 1 will not be repeated here, except for the raw material ratio: 65.5 parts zirconium powder, 23 parts copper powder, 6 parts nickel powder, 1.5 parts titanium powder, 3.5 parts aluminum powder, and 0.5 parts yttrium powder. The anvil holding six layers of foam was tested 6 times, and the product broke.

[0039] Example 3: The similarities between this example and Example 1 will not be repeated. The difference lies in the raw material ratio: 65 parts zirconium powder, 23.5 parts copper powder, 6 parts nickel powder, 1.5 parts titanium powder, 3.5 parts aluminum powder, and 0.5 parts yttrium powder. The anvil holding six layers of foam was tested more than 12 times, with no breakage or cracks.

[0040] Example 4: The similarities between this example and Example 1 will not be repeated. The difference lies in the raw material ratio: 64.5 parts zirconium powder, 24 parts copper powder, 6 parts nickel powder, 1.5 parts titanium powder, 3.5 parts aluminum powder, and 0.5 parts yttrium powder. The anvil holding six layers of foam was tested more than 12 times without breakage or cracks.

[0041] Example 5: The similarities between this example and Example 1 will not be repeated. The difference lies in the raw material ratio: 64 parts zirconium powder, 24.5 parts copper powder, 6 parts nickel powder, 1.5 parts titanium powder, 3.5 parts aluminum powder, and 0.5 parts yttrium powder. The anvil holding six layers of foam was tested more than 12 times, with no breakage or cracks.

[0042] Example 6: The similarities between this example and Example 1 will not be repeated. The difference lies in the raw material ratio: 63.5 parts zirconium powder, 25 parts copper powder, 6 parts nickel powder, 1.5 parts titanium powder, 3.5 parts aluminum powder, and 0.5 parts yttrium powder. The anvil holding six layers of foam was tested more than 12 times, with no breakage or cracks.

[0043] Example 7: The similarities between this example and Example 1 will not be repeated. The difference lies in the raw material ratio: 62.5 parts zirconium powder, 26 parts copper powder, 6 parts nickel powder, 1.5 parts titanium powder, 3.5 parts aluminum powder, and 0.5 parts yttrium powder. The anvil holding six layers of foam was tested more than 12 times, with no breakage or cracks.

[0044] Example 8: The similarities between this example and Example 1 will not be repeated. The difference lies in the raw material ratio: 62 parts zirconium powder, 26.5 parts copper powder, 6 parts nickel powder, 1.5 parts titanium powder, 3.5 parts aluminum powder, and 0.5 parts yttrium powder. The anvil holding six layers of foam was tested more than 12 times, with no breakage or cracks.

[0045] Example 9: The similarities between this example and Example 1 will not be repeated. The difference lies in the raw material ratio: 61.5 parts zirconium powder, 27 parts copper powder, 6 parts nickel powder, 1.5 parts titanium powder, 3.5 parts aluminum powder, and 0.5 parts yttrium powder. The anvil holding six layers of foam was tested more than 12 times without breakage or cracks.

[0046] Example 10: The similarities between this example and Example 1 will not be repeated. The difference lies in the raw material ratio: 61 parts zirconium powder, 27.5 parts copper powder, 6 parts nickel powder, 1.5 parts titanium powder, 3.5 parts aluminum powder, and 0.5 parts yttrium powder. The anvil holding six layers of foam was tested more than 12 times, with no breakage or cracks.

[0047] Examples 3 to 10: Zirconium was used as a free element, and the proportion of copper was gradually varied to verify and determine the range of copper element formulation. Tests showed that the anvils with a copper element ratio of 23.5-27.5 parts all passed more than 12 clamping tests without breakage or cracking.

[0048] Example 11: The similarities between this example and Example 1 will not be repeated here. The difference lies in the raw material ratio: 60.5 parts zirconium powder, 28 parts copper powder, 6 parts nickel powder, 1.5 parts titanium powder, 3.5 parts aluminum powder, and 0.5 parts yttrium powder. The anvil holding six layers of foam was tested 10 times, and the product broke.

[0049] Example 12: The similarities to Example 1 will not be repeated here, except for the raw material ratio: 60 parts zirconium powder, 28.5 parts copper powder, 6 parts nickel powder, 1.5 parts titanium powder, 3.5 parts aluminum powder, and 0.5 parts yttrium powder. The anvil holding six layers of foam was tested 8 times, and the product broke.

[0050] Examples 11 and 12: Zirconium was used as a freely variable element, and the copper element ratio was gradually varied to verify and determine the range of copper element formulation. The resulting anvil clamping tests showed that copper elements of ≤23 or ≥28 parts had a negative impact on anvil clamping.

[0051] Example 13: The similarities between this example and Example 1 will not be repeated. The difference lies in the raw material ratio: 63.2 parts zirconium powder, 25.5 parts copper powder, 5.8 parts nickel powder, 1.5 parts titanium powder, 3.5 parts aluminum powder, and 0.5 parts yttrium powder. The anvil holding six layers of foam was tested more than 12 times, with no breakage or cracks.

[0052] Example 14: The similarities between this example and Example 1 will not be repeated. The difference lies in the raw material ratio: 63.1 parts zirconium powder, 25.5 parts copper powder, 5.9 parts nickel powder, 1.5 parts titanium powder, 3.5 parts aluminum powder, and 0.5 parts yttrium powder. The anvil holding six layers of foam was tested more than 12 times, with no breakage or cracks.

[0053] Example 15: The similarities between this example and Example 1 will not be repeated. The difference lies in the raw material ratio: 63 parts zirconium powder, 25.5 parts copper powder, 6 parts nickel powder, 1.5 parts titanium powder, 3.5 parts aluminum powder, and 0.5 parts yttrium powder. The anvil holding six layers of foam was tested more than 12 times, with no breakage or cracks.

[0054] Example 16: The similarities between this example and Example 1 will not be repeated. The difference lies in the raw material ratio: 62.9 parts zirconium powder, 25.5 parts copper powder, 6.1 parts nickel powder, 1.5 parts titanium powder, 3.5 parts aluminum powder, and 0.5 parts yttrium powder. The anvil holding six layers of foam was tested more than 12 times, with no breakage or cracks.

[0055] Example 17: The similarities between this example and Example 1 will not be repeated. The difference lies in the raw material ratio: 62.8 parts zirconium powder, 25.5 parts copper powder, 6.2 parts nickel powder, 1.5 parts titanium powder, 3.5 parts aluminum powder, and 0.5 parts yttrium powder. The anvil holding six layers of foam was tested more than 12 times, with no breakage or cracks.

[0056] Example 18: The similarities between this example and Example 1 will not be repeated here. The difference lies in the raw material ratio: 62.7 parts zirconium powder, 25.5 parts copper powder, 6.3 parts nickel powder, 1.5 parts titanium powder, 3.5 parts aluminum powder, and 0.5 parts yttrium powder. The anvil holding six layers of foam was tested more than 12 times, with no breakage or cracks.

[0057] Example 19: The similarities between this example and Example 1 will not be repeated. The difference lies in the raw material ratio: 62.6 parts zirconium powder, 25.5 parts copper powder, 6.4 parts nickel powder, 1.5 parts titanium powder, 3.5 parts aluminum powder, and 0.5 parts yttrium powder. The anvil holding six layers of foam was tested more than 12 times, with no breakage or cracks.

[0058] Example 20: The similarities between this example and Example 1 will not be repeated. The difference lies in the raw material ratio: 62.5 parts zirconium powder, 25.5 parts copper powder, 6.5 parts nickel powder, 1.5 parts titanium powder, 3.5 parts aluminum powder, and 0.5 parts yttrium powder. The anvil holding six layers of foam was tested more than 12 times, with no breakage or cracks.

[0059] Example 21: The similarities between this example and Example 1 will not be repeated. The difference lies in the raw material ratio: 62.4 parts zirconium powder, 25.5 parts copper powder, 6.6 parts nickel powder, 1.5 parts titanium powder, 3.5 parts aluminum powder, and 0.5 parts yttrium powder. The anvil holding six layers of foam was tested more than 12 times, with no breakage or cracks.

[0060] Example 22: The similarities between this example and Example 1 will not be repeated. The difference lies in the raw material ratio: 62.3 parts zirconium powder, 25.5 parts copper powder, 6.7 parts nickel powder, 1.5 parts titanium powder, 3.5 parts aluminum powder, and 0.5 parts yttrium powder. The anvil holding six layers of foam was tested more than 12 times, with no breakage or cracks.

[0061] Example 23: The similarities between this example and Example 1 will not be repeated here. The difference lies in the raw material ratio: 62.2 parts zirconium powder, 25.5 parts copper powder, 6.8 parts nickel powder, 1.5 parts titanium powder, 3.5 parts aluminum powder, and 0.5 parts yttrium powder. The anvil holding six layers of foam was tested more than 12 times, with no breakage or cracks.

[0062] Example 24: The similarities between this example and Example 1 will not be repeated. The difference lies in the raw material ratio: 62.1 parts zirconium powder, 25.5 parts copper powder, 6.9 parts nickel powder, 1.5 parts titanium powder, 3.5 parts aluminum powder, and 0.5 parts yttrium powder. The anvil holding six layers of foam was tested more than 12 times, with no breakage or cracks.

[0063] Example 25: The similarities between this example and Example 1 will not be repeated. The difference lies in the raw material ratio: 62 parts zirconium powder, 25.5 parts copper powder, 7 parts nickel powder, 1.5 parts titanium powder, 3.5 parts aluminum powder, and 0.5 parts yttrium powder. The anvil holding six layers of foam was tested more than 12 times, with no breakage or cracks.

[0064] Examples 13 to 25: Zirconium was used as a freely variable element, and the nickel element ratio was gradually varied to verify and determine the range of nickel element formulation. Tests showed that the anvils with a nickel element ratio of 5.8-7 parts all passed more than 12 clamping tests without breakage or cracking.

[0065] Example 26: The similarities between this example and Example 1 will not be repeated here. The difference lies in the raw material ratio: 63.3 parts zirconium powder, 25.5 parts copper powder, 5.7 parts nickel powder, 1.5 parts titanium powder, 3.5 parts aluminum powder, and 0.5 parts yttrium powder. The anvil holding six layers of foam was tested 7 times, and the product broke.

[0066] Example 27: The similarities between this example and Example 1 will not be repeated here. The difference lies in the raw material ratio: 61.9 parts zirconium powder, 25.5 parts copper powder, 7.1 parts nickel powder, 1.5 parts titanium powder, 3.5 parts aluminum powder, and 0.5 parts yttrium powder. The product broke after six tests of clamping six layers of foam with the anvil.

[0067] Example 28: The similarities between this example and Example 1 will not be repeated here. The difference lies in the raw material ratio: 61.8 parts zirconium powder, 25.5 parts copper powder, 7.2 parts nickel powder, 1.5 parts titanium powder, 3.5 parts aluminum powder, and 0.5 parts yttrium powder. The anvil holding six layers of foam was tested four times, and the product broke.

[0068] Examples 26 to 28: Zirconium was used as a freely variable element, and the nickel element ratio was gradually varied to verify and determine the range of nickel element formulation. The resulting anvil clamping tests showed that nickel content of ≤5.7 parts or ≥7.1 parts had a negative impact on anvil clamping.

[0069] Example 29: The similarities between this example and Example 1 will not be repeated. The difference lies in the raw material ratio: 63.6 parts zirconium powder, 25.5 parts copper powder, 6 parts nickel powder, 0.9 parts titanium powder, 3.5 parts aluminum powder, and 0.5 parts yttrium powder. The anvil holding six layers of foam was tested more than 12 times, with no breakage or cracks.

[0070] Example 30: The similarities between this example and Example 1 will not be repeated. The difference lies in the raw material ratio: 63.5 parts zirconium powder, 25.5 parts copper powder, 6 parts nickel powder, 1 part titanium powder, 3.5 parts aluminum powder, and 0.5 parts yttrium powder. The anvil holding six layers of foam was tested more than 12 times, with no breakage or cracks.

[0071] Example 31: The similarities between this example and Example 1 will not be repeated. The difference lies in the raw material ratio: 63.4 parts zirconium powder, 25.5 parts copper powder, 6 parts nickel powder, 1.1 parts titanium powder, 3.5 parts aluminum powder, and 0.5 parts yttrium powder. The anvil holding six layers of foam was tested more than 12 times, with no breakage or cracks.

[0072] Example 32: The similarities between this example and Example 1 will not be repeated. The difference lies in the raw material ratio: 63.3 parts zirconium powder, 25.5 parts copper powder, 6 parts nickel powder, 1.2 parts titanium powder, 3.5 parts aluminum powder, and 0.5 parts yttrium powder. The anvil holding six layers of foam was tested more than 12 times, with no breakage or cracks.

[0073] Example 33: The similarities between this example and Example 1 will not be repeated. The difference lies in the raw material ratio: 63.2 parts zirconium powder, 25.5 parts copper powder, 6 parts nickel powder, 1.3 parts titanium powder, 3.5 parts aluminum powder, and 0.5 parts yttrium powder. The anvil holding six layers of foam was tested more than 12 times, with no breakage or cracks.

[0074] Example 34: The similarities between this example and Example 1 will not be repeated. The difference lies in the raw material ratio: 63.1 parts zirconium powder, 25.5 parts copper powder, 6 parts nickel powder, 1.4 parts titanium powder, 3.5 parts aluminum powder, and 0.5 parts yttrium powder. The anvil holding six layers of foam was tested more than 12 times, with no breakage or cracks.

[0075] Example 35: The similarities between this example and Example 1 will not be repeated here. The difference lies in the raw material ratio: 63 parts zirconium powder, 25.5 parts copper powder, 6 parts nickel powder, 1.5 parts titanium powder, 3.5 parts aluminum powder, and 0.5 parts yttrium powder. The anvil holding six layers of foam was tested more than 12 times, with no breakage or cracks.

[0076] Example 36: The similarities between this example and Example 1 will not be repeated. The difference lies in the raw material ratio: 62.9 parts zirconium powder, 25.5 parts copper powder, 6 parts nickel powder, 1.6 parts titanium powder, 3.5 parts aluminum powder, and 0.5 parts yttrium powder. The anvil holding six layers of foam was tested more than 12 times, with no breakage or cracks.

[0077] Example 37: The similarities between this example and Example 1 will not be repeated. The difference lies in the raw material ratio: 62.8 parts zirconium powder, 25.5 parts copper powder, 6 parts nickel powder, 1.7 parts titanium powder, 3.5 parts aluminum powder, and 0.5 parts yttrium powder. The anvil holding six layers of foam was tested more than 12 times, with no breakage or cracks.

[0078] Examples 29 to 37: Zirconium was used as a freely variable element, and the proportion of titanium was gradually varied to verify and determine the range of titanium element formulation. Tests showed that the anvils with a titanium element ratio of 0.9-1.7 parts all passed more than 12 clamping tests without breakage or cracking.

[0079] Example 38: The similarities between this example and Example 1 will not be repeated here. The difference lies in the raw material ratio: 63.7 parts zirconium powder, 25.5 parts copper powder, 6 parts nickel powder, 0.8 parts titanium powder, 3.5 parts aluminum powder, and 0.5 parts yttrium powder. The anvil holding six layers of foam was tested three times, and the product broke.

[0080] Example 39: The similarities between this example and Example 1 will not be repeated here. The difference lies in the raw material ratio: 62.7 parts zirconium powder, 25.5 parts copper powder, 6 parts nickel powder, 1.8 parts titanium powder, 3.5 parts aluminum powder, and 0.5 parts yttrium powder. The product broke after 9 tests of clamping six layers of foam with the anvil seat.

[0081] Example 40: The similarities between this example and Example 1 will not be repeated here. The difference lies in the raw material ratio: 62.6 parts zirconium powder, 25.5 parts copper powder, 6 parts nickel powder, 1.9 parts titanium powder, 3.5 parts aluminum powder, and 0.5 parts yttrium powder. The product broke after 7 tests of clamping six layers of foam with the anvil seat.

[0082] Examples 38 to 40: Zirconium was used as a freely variable element, and the titanium element ratio was gradually varied to verify and determine the range of titanium element formulation. The resulting anvil clamping tests showed that titanium elements of ≤0.8 or ≥1.8 parts had a negative impact on anvil clamping.

[0083] Example 41: The similarities between this example and Example 1 will not be repeated here. The difference lies in the raw material ratio: 63.3 parts zirconium powder, 25.5 parts copper powder, 6 parts nickel powder, 1.5 parts titanium powder, 3.2 parts aluminum powder, and 0.5 parts yttrium powder. The anvil holding six layers of foam was tested more than 12 times, with no breakage or cracks.

[0084] Example 42: The similarities between this example and Example 1 will not be repeated. The difference lies in the raw material ratio: 63.2 parts zirconium powder, 25.5 parts copper powder, 6 parts nickel powder, 1.5 parts titanium powder, 3.3 parts aluminum powder, and 0.5 parts yttrium powder. The anvil holding six layers of foam was tested more than 12 times, with no breakage or cracks.

[0085] Example 43: The similarities between this example and Example 1 will not be repeated. The difference lies in the raw material ratio: 63.1 parts zirconium powder, 25.5 parts copper powder, 6 parts nickel powder, 1.5 parts titanium powder, 3.4 parts aluminum powder, and 0.5 parts yttrium powder. The anvil holding six layers of foam was tested more than 12 times, with no breakage or cracks.

[0086] Example 44: The similarities between this example and Example 1 will not be repeated. The difference lies in the raw material ratio: 63 parts zirconium powder, 25.5 parts copper powder, 6 parts nickel powder, 1.5 parts titanium powder, 3.5 parts aluminum powder, and 0.5 parts yttrium powder. The anvil holding six layers of foam was tested more than 12 times, with no breakage or cracks.

[0087] Example 45: The similarities between this example and Example 1 will not be repeated. The difference lies in the raw material ratio: 62.9 parts zirconium powder, 25.5 parts copper powder, 6 parts nickel powder, 1.5 parts titanium powder, 3.6 parts aluminum powder, and 0.5 parts yttrium powder. The anvil holding six layers of foam was tested more than 12 times, with no breakage or cracks.

[0088] Example 46: The similarities between this example and Example 1 will not be repeated. The difference lies in the raw material ratio: 62.8 parts zirconium powder, 25.5 parts copper powder, 6 parts nickel powder, 1.5 parts titanium powder, 3.7 parts aluminum powder, and 0.5 parts yttrium powder. The anvil holding six layers of foam was tested more than 12 times, with no breakage or cracks.

[0089] Example 47: The similarities between this example and Example 1 will not be repeated. The difference lies in the raw material ratio: 62.7 parts zirconium powder, 25.5 parts copper powder, 6 parts nickel powder, 1.5 parts titanium powder, 3.8 parts aluminum powder, and 0.5 parts yttrium powder. The anvil holding six layers of foam was tested more than 12 times, with no breakage or cracks.

[0090] Example 48: The similarities between this example and Example 1 will not be repeated. The difference lies in the raw material ratio: 62.6 parts zirconium powder, 25.5 parts copper powder, 6 parts nickel powder, 1.5 parts titanium powder, 3.9 parts aluminum powder, and 0.5 parts yttrium powder. The anvil holding six layers of foam was tested more than 12 times, with no breakage or cracks.

[0091] Examples 41 to 48: Zirconium was used as a freely variable element, and the aluminum element ratio was gradually varied to verify and determine the range of aluminum element formulation. Tests showed that the anvils with an aluminum element ratio of 3.2-3.9 parts all passed more than 12 clamping tests without breakage or cracking.

[0092] Example 49: The similarities between this example and Example 1 will not be repeated here. The difference lies in the raw material ratio: 63.4 parts zirconium powder, 25.5 parts copper powder, 6 parts nickel powder, 1.5 parts titanium powder, 3.1 parts aluminum powder, and 0.5 parts yttrium powder. The product broke after 10 tests of clamping six layers of foam with the anvil seat.

[0093] Example 50: The similarities between this example and Example 1 will not be repeated here. The difference lies in the raw material ratio: 62.5 parts zirconium powder, 25.5 parts copper powder, 6 parts nickel powder, 1.5 parts titanium powder, 4 parts aluminum powder, and 0.5 parts yttrium powder. The product broke after 10 tests of clamping six layers of foam with the anvil seat.

[0094] Example 51: The similarities between this example and Example 1 will not be repeated here. The difference lies in the raw material ratio: 62.4 parts zirconium powder, 25.5 parts copper powder, 6 parts nickel powder, 1.5 parts titanium powder, 4.1 parts aluminum powder, and 0.5 parts yttrium powder. The anvil holding six layers of foam was tested 10 times, and the product broke.

[0095] Examples 49 to 51: Zirconium was used as a freely variable element, and the aluminum element ratio was gradually varied to verify and determine the range of aluminum element formulation. The resulting anvil clamping tests showed that aluminum elements of ≤3.1 parts or ≥4 parts had a negative impact on anvil clamping.

[0096] Example 52: The similarities between this example and Example 1 will not be repeated. The difference lies in the raw material ratio: 63.4 parts zirconium powder, 25.5 parts copper powder, 6 parts nickel powder, 1.5 parts titanium powder, 3.5 parts aluminum powder, and 0.1 parts yttrium powder. The anvil holding six layers of foam was tested more than 12 times, with no breakage or cracks.

[0097] Example 53: The similarities between this example and Example 1 will not be repeated. The difference lies in the raw material ratio: 63.3 parts zirconium powder, 25.5 parts copper powder, 6 parts nickel powder, 1.5 parts titanium powder, 3.5 parts aluminum powder, and 0.2 parts yttrium powder. The anvil holding six layers of foam was tested more than 12 times, with no breakage or cracks.

[0098] Example 54: The similarities between this example and Example 1 will not be repeated. The difference lies in the raw material ratio: 63.2 parts zirconium powder, 25.5 parts copper powder, 6 parts nickel powder, 1.5 parts titanium powder, 3.5 parts aluminum powder, and 0.3 parts yttrium powder. The anvil holding six layers of foam was tested more than 12 times, with no breakage or cracks.

[0099] Example 55: The similarities between this example and Example 1 will not be repeated. The difference lies in the raw material ratio: 63.1 parts zirconium powder, 25.5 parts copper powder, 6 parts nickel powder, 1.5 parts titanium powder, 3.5 parts aluminum powder, and 0.4 parts yttrium powder. The anvil holding six layers of foam was tested more than 12 times, with no breakage or cracks.

[0100] Example 56: The similarities between this example and Example 1 will not be repeated. The difference lies in the raw material ratio: 63 parts zirconium powder, 25.5 parts copper powder, 6 parts nickel powder, 1.5 parts titanium powder, 3.5 parts aluminum powder, and 0.5 parts yttrium powder. The anvil holding six layers of foam was tested more than 12 times, with no breakage or cracks.

[0101] Example 57: The similarities between this example and Example 1 will not be repeated. The difference lies in the raw material ratio: 62.9 parts zirconium powder, 25.5 parts copper powder, 6 parts nickel powder, 1.5 parts titanium powder, 3.5 parts aluminum powder, and 0.6 parts yttrium powder. The anvil holding six layers of foam was tested more than 12 times, with no breakage or cracks.

[0102] Example 58: The similarities between this example and Example 1 will not be repeated here. The difference lies in the raw material ratio: 62.8 parts zirconium powder, 25.5 parts copper powder, 6 parts nickel powder, 1.5 parts titanium powder, 3.5 parts aluminum powder, and 0.7 parts yttrium powder. The anvil holding six layers of foam was tested more than 12 times, with no breakage or cracks.

[0103] Example 59: The similarities between this example and Example 1 will not be repeated. The difference lies in the raw material ratio: 62.7 parts zirconium powder, 25.5 parts copper powder, 6 parts nickel powder, 1.5 parts titanium powder, 3.5 parts aluminum powder, and 0.8 parts yttrium powder. The anvil holding six layers of foam was tested more than 12 times, with no breakage or cracks.

[0104] Example 60: The similarities between this example and Example 1 will not be repeated. The difference lies in the raw material ratio: 62.6 parts zirconium powder, 25.5 parts copper powder, 6 parts nickel powder, 1.5 parts titanium powder, 3.5 parts aluminum powder, and 0.9 parts yttrium powder. The anvil holding six layers of foam was tested more than 12 times, with no breakage or cracks.

[0105] Examples 52 to 60: Zirconium was used as a freely variable element, and the yttrium element ratio was gradually varied to verify and determine the range of yttrium element formulation. Tests showed that the anvils with a yttrium element ratio of 0.1-0.9 parts all passed more than 12 clamping tests without breakage or cracking.

[0106] Example 61: The similarities between this example and Example 1 will not be repeated here. The difference lies in the raw material ratio: 63.5 parts zirconium powder, 25.5 parts copper powder, 6 parts nickel powder, 1.5 parts titanium powder, 3.5 parts aluminum powder, and 0 parts yttrium powder. The anvil holding six layers of foam was tested twice; the product broke.

[0107] Example 62: The similarities to Example 1 will not be repeated here, except for the raw material ratio: 62.5 parts zirconium powder, 25.5 parts copper powder, 6 parts nickel powder, 1.5 parts titanium powder, 3.5 parts aluminum powder, and 1 part yttrium powder. The anvil holding six layers of foam was tested 9 times, and the product broke.

[0108] Example 63: The similarities to Example 1 will not be repeated here, except for the raw material ratio: 62.4 parts zirconium powder, 25.5 parts copper powder, 6 parts nickel powder, 1.5 parts titanium powder, 3.5 parts aluminum powder, and 1.1 parts yttrium powder. The anvil holding six layers of foam was tested 7 times, and the product broke.

[0109] Examples 61 to 63: Zirconium element is used as a free combination, and the proportion of yttrium element is gradually changed to verify and determine the formula range of yttrium element. The obtained anvil holder clamping test shows that the conclusion is that 0 parts ≤ yttrium element or ≤ 1 part has an adverse effect on the clamping of the anvil holder.

[0110] According to the examples passing the test, the appropriate range of zirconium powder is summarized as: 61 parts - 65 parts.

[0111] To make the product have a more excellent effect of clamping the foam, the following examples are made for the die-casting process.

[0112] Example 64: An anvil holder, taking the raw material ratio composition of Example 1 above for the die-casting process, including 63 parts of zirconium powder, 25.5 parts of copper powder, 6 parts of nickel powder, 1.5 parts of titanium powder, 3.5 parts of aluminum powder, and 0.5 parts of yttrium powder. It is made by the die-casting process of high temperature, high speed, and forming position: Die-casting means putting the raw materials broken into small pieces below 20mm into the storage bin of the die-casting equipment, evacuating to below 50Pa, and under this vacuum degree or argon protection state, heating the raw materials to 950°C by high-frequency heating. After all the raw materials are melted, they are automatically poured into the injection chamber, and the melt is injected into the mold at a high speed of 0.9m / s under high pressure. The mechanical button of the equipment is rotated to the high-speed boosting position, the mold temperature is selected as 200°C, the boosting position is selected as 308mm, the high-speed position is selected as 290mm, the barrel heat preservation temperature is selected as 120°C, the clamping force is selected as 2300KN. After the mold is ejected, a die-cast blank of a medical stapler connected with a handle and a runner is obtained. The die-casting method for making an anvil holder by the amorphous alloy die-casting process includes the following steps: Mold heating: Heating the mold temperature to about 200°C. Debugging the clamping force: Debugging the clamping force of the equipment to 2300KN. Turning on the peripheral equipment: Turning on the vacuum pump, high-frequency power supply and other equipment. Debugging the melting temperature of the material: Adjusting the melting temperature of the material to 950°C. Debugging the forming parameters: Setting the high-speed position at 290mm and setting the boosting position at 308mm. Feeding the raw materials: Feeding a certain weight of raw materials into the storage bin. Closing the mold: Closely fitting the front and rear molds of the mold. Evacuating: Starting the vacuum pump to evacuate, evacuating to below 50Pa. Melting the material: Melting the raw materials in the storage bin by heating with a high-frequency power supply. Pouring: Pouring the melted raw materials into the constant-temperature barrel. Injecting: Rapidly injecting the melted raw materials into the mold cavity through the injection rod. Opening the mold: Automatically opening the mold after injection. Ejecting: Separating the die-cast product after injection from the mold cavity by the way of ejecting with an ejector pin. Taking the material: Taking out the die-cast product after ejection. Testing: The testing method is shown in the attached drawing description, and the specific operation will not be elaborated.

[0113] Clamping force test: Clamping six layers of foam, and conducting 12 repeated clamping tests, without breakage or cracks. If the clamping times > 12 times without breakage or cracks, it is qualified.

[0114] Examples 65-108 involve freely combining all parameters. For each example, only one parameter is changed, adjusting the mold temperature, high-frequency heating temperature, high-speed position, high-speed speed, and pressurization position. The optimal range is tested by incrementally increasing the value of each parameter. Using the anvil clamping force test 12 times, clamping six layers of foam as a standard, suitable ranges for each element are defined.

[0115] Example 65: This example is similar to Example 64 and will not be repeated here. The difference lies in the parameter adjustments: mold temperature 175℃, high-frequency heating temperature 950℃, high-speed position 290mm, high-speed speed 0.8m / s, and pressure boosting position 306mm. The anvil holding six layers of foam was tested 7 times, and the product broke.

[0116] Example 66: The similarities between this example and Example 64 will not be repeated here. The difference lies in the parameter adjustments: mold temperature 180℃, high-frequency heating temperature 950℃, high-speed position 290mm, high-speed speed 0.8m / s, and pressure boosting position 306mm. The anvil holding six layers of foam was tested more than 12 times without any breakage or cracks.

[0117] Example 67: The similarities between this example and Example 64 will not be repeated here. The difference lies in the parameter adjustments: mold temperature 185℃, high-frequency heating temperature 950℃, high-speed position 290mm, high-speed speed 0.8m / s, and pressure boosting position 306mm. The anvil holding six layers of foam was tested more than 12 times without any breakage or cracks.

[0118] Example 68: The similarities between this example and Example 64 will not be repeated here. The difference lies in the parameter adjustments: mold temperature 190℃, high-frequency heating temperature 950℃, high-speed position 290mm, high-speed speed 0.8m / s, and pressure boosting position 306mm. The anvil holding six layers of foam was tested more than 12 times without any breakage or cracks.

[0119] Example 69: The similarities between this example and Example 64 will not be repeated here. The difference lies in the parameter adjustments: mold temperature 195℃, high-frequency heating temperature 950℃, high-speed position 290mm, high-speed speed 0.8m / s, and pressure boosting position 306mm. The anvil holding six layers of foam was tested more than 12 times without any breakage or cracks.

[0120] Example 70: The similarities between this example and Example 64 will not be repeated. The difference lies in the parameter adjustments: mold temperature 200℃, high-frequency heating temperature 950℃, high-speed position 290mm, high-speed speed 0.8m / s, and pressure boosting position 306mm. The anvil holding six layers of foam was tested more than 12 times without any breakage or cracks.

[0121] Examples 66 to 70: The mold temperature parameters were verified by gradual variation to determine the mold temperature range. Tests showed that the anvil clamping tests conducted when the mold temperature was within the range of 180℃-200℃ all exceeded 12 cycles without breakage or cracking.

[0122] Example 71: This example is similar to Example 64 and will not be repeated here. The difference lies in the parameter adjustments: mold temperature 205℃, high-frequency heating temperature 950℃, high-speed position 290mm, high-speed speed 0.8m / s, and pressure boosting position 306mm. The anvil holding six layers of foam was tested 10 times, and the product broke.

[0123] Example 72: This example is similar to Example 64 and will not be repeated here. The difference lies in the parameter adjustments: mold temperature 210℃, high-frequency heating temperature 950℃, high-speed position 290mm, high-speed speed 0.8m / s, and pressure boosting position 306mm. The anvil holding six layers of foam was tested 7 times, and the product broke.

[0124] Examples 71 and 72: The mold temperature range was determined by gradually varying the mold temperature parameters. The resulting anvil clamping test concluded that a mold temperature ≤175℃ or ≥205℃ has a negative impact on anvil clamping.

[0125] Example 73: The similarities between this example and Example 64 will not be repeated. The difference lies in the parameter adjustments: mold temperature 180℃, high-frequency heating temperature 920℃, high-speed position 290mm, high-speed speed 0.8m / s, and pressure boosting position 306mm. The anvil holding six layers of foam was tested more than 12 times without any breakage or cracks.

[0126] Example 74: The similarities between this example and Example 64 will not be repeated. The difference lies in the parameter adjustments: mold temperature 180℃, high-frequency heating temperature 925℃, high-speed position 290mm, high-speed speed 0.8m / s, and pressure boosting position 306mm. The anvil holding six layers of foam was tested more than 12 times without any breakage or cracks.

[0127] Example 75: The similarities between this example and Example 64 will not be repeated here. The difference lies in the parameter adjustments: mold temperature 180℃, high-frequency heating temperature 930℃, high-speed position 290mm, high-speed speed 0.8m / s, and pressure boosting position 306mm. The anvil holding six layers of foam was tested more than 12 times without any breakage or cracks.

[0128] Example 76: The similarities between this example and Example 64 will not be repeated here. The difference lies in the parameter adjustments: mold temperature 180℃, high-frequency heating temperature 935℃, high-speed position 290mm, high-speed speed 0.8m / s, and pressure boosting position 306mm. The anvil holding six layers of foam was tested more than 12 times without any breakage or cracks.

[0129] Example 77: The similarities between this example and Example 64 will not be repeated here. The difference lies in the parameter adjustments: mold temperature 180℃, high-frequency heating temperature 940℃, high-speed position 290mm, high-speed speed 0.8m / s, and pressure boosting position 306mm. The anvil holding six layers of foam was tested more than 12 times without any breakage or cracks.

[0130] Example 78: The similarities between this example and Example 64 will not be repeated. The difference lies in the parameter adjustments: mold temperature 180℃, high-frequency heating temperature 945℃, high-speed position 290mm, high-speed speed 0.8m / s, and pressure boosting position 306mm. The anvil holding six layers of foam was tested more than 12 times without any breakage or cracks.

[0131] Examples 73 to 78: The high-frequency heating temperature range was determined by gradually varying the high-frequency heating temperature parameters. Tests showed that the anvils held within the high-frequency heating temperature range of 920℃-950℃ underwent more than 12 cycles of clamping without any breakage or cracking.

[0132] Example 79: The similarities between this example and Example 64 will not be repeated here. The difference lies in the parameter adjustments: mold temperature 180℃, high-frequency heating temperature 915℃, high-speed position 290mm, high-speed speed 0.8m / s, and pressure boosting position 306mm. The anvil holding six layers of foam was tested 6 times, and the product broke.

[0133] Example 80: The similarities between this example and Example 64 will not be repeated here. The difference lies in the parameter adjustments: mold temperature 180℃, high-frequency heating temperature 955℃, high-speed position 290mm, high-speed speed 0.8m / s, and pressure boosting position 306mm. The anvil holding six layers of foam was tested 11 times, after which the product broke.

[0134] Example 81: The similarities between this example and Example 64 will not be repeated here. The difference lies in the parameter adjustments: mold temperature 180℃, high-frequency heating temperature 960℃, high-speed position 290mm, high-speed speed 0.8m / s, and pressure boosting position 306mm. The anvil holding six layers of foam was tested 9 times, and the product broke.

[0135] Examples 79 to 81: The high-frequency heating temperature range was determined by gradually varying the high-frequency heating temperature parameters. The resulting anvil clamping test concluded that a high-frequency heating temperature ≤915℃ or ≥955℃ has a negative impact on anvil clamping.

[0136] Example 82: The similarities between this example and Example 64 will not be repeated. The difference lies in the parameter adjustments: mold temperature 180℃, high-frequency heating temperature 950℃, high-speed position 291mm, high-speed speed 0.8m / s, and pressure boosting position 306mm. The anvil holding six layers of foam was tested more than 12 times without any breakage or cracks.

[0137] Example 83: The similarities between this example and Example 64 will not be repeated. The difference lies in the parameter adjustments: mold temperature 180℃, high-frequency heating temperature 950℃, high-speed position 292mm, high-speed speed 0.8m / s, and pressure boosting position 306mm. The anvil holding six layers of foam was tested more than 12 times without any breakage or cracks.

[0138] Example 84: The similarities between this example and Example 64 will not be repeated. The difference lies in the parameter adjustments: mold temperature 180℃, high-frequency heating temperature 950℃, high-speed position 293mm, high-speed speed 0.8m / s, and pressure boosting position 306mm. The anvil holding six layers of foam was tested more than 12 times without any breakage or cracks.

[0139] Example 85: The similarities between this example and Example 64 will not be repeated here. The difference lies in the parameter adjustments: mold temperature 180℃, high-frequency heating temperature 950℃, high-speed position 294mm, high-speed speed 0.8m / s, and pressure boosting position 306mm. The anvil holding six layers of foam was tested more than 12 times without any breakage or cracks.

[0140] Example 86: The similarities between this example and Example 64 will not be repeated here. The difference lies in the parameter adjustments: mold temperature 180℃, high-frequency heating temperature 950℃, high-speed position 295mm, high-speed speed 0.8m / s, and pressure boosting position 306mm. The anvil holding six layers of foam was tested more than 12 times without any breakage or cracks.

[0141] Example 87: The similarities between this example and Example 64 will not be repeated here. The difference lies in the parameter adjustments: mold temperature 180℃, high-frequency heating temperature 950℃, high-speed position 296mm, high-speed speed 0.8m / s, and pressure boosting position 306mm. The anvil holding six layers of foam was tested more than 12 times without any breakage or cracks.

[0142] Example 88: The similarities between this example and Example 64 will not be repeated here. The difference lies in the parameter adjustments: mold temperature 180℃, high-frequency heating temperature 950℃, high-speed position 297mm, high-speed speed 0.8m / s, and pressure boosting position 306mm. The anvil holding six layers of foam was tested more than 12 times without any breakage or cracks.

[0143] Example 89: The similarities between this example and Example 64 will not be repeated here. The difference lies in the parameter adjustments: mold temperature 180℃, high-frequency heating temperature 950℃, high-speed position 298mm, high-speed speed 0.8m / s, and pressure boosting position 306mm. The anvil holding six layers of foam was tested more than 12 times without any breakage or cracks.

[0144] Example 90: The similarities between this example and Example 64 will not be repeated here. The difference lies in the parameter adjustments: mold temperature 180℃, high-frequency heating temperature 950℃, high-speed position 299mm, high-speed speed 0.8m / s, and pressure boosting position 306mm. The anvil holding six layers of foam was tested more than 12 times without any breakage or cracks.

[0145] Example 91: The similarities between this example and Example 64 will not be repeated here. The difference lies in the parameter adjustments: mold temperature 180℃, high-frequency heating temperature 950℃, high-speed position 300mm, high-speed speed 0.8m / s, and pressure boosting position 306mm. The anvil holding six layers of foam was tested more than 12 times without any breakage or cracks.

[0146] Examples 82 to 91: The high-speed position range was determined by verifying the gradual change of high-speed position parameters. Tests showed that the anvil clamping tests conducted at high-speed positions within the range of 290mm-300mm exceeded 12 cycles without any breakage or cracking.

[0147] Example 92: The similarities between this example and Example 64 will not be repeated here. The difference lies in the parameter adjustments: mold temperature 180℃, high-frequency heating temperature 950℃, high-speed position 289mm, high-speed speed 0.8m / s, and pressure boosting position 306mm. The anvil holding six layers of foam was tested 8 times, and the product broke.

[0148] Example 93: The similarities between this example and Example 64 will not be repeated here. The difference lies in the parameter adjustments: mold temperature 180℃, high-frequency heating temperature 950℃, high-speed position 301mm, high-speed speed 0.8m / s, and pressure boosting position 306mm. The anvil holding six layers of foam was tested 10 times, and the product broke.

[0149] Example 94: The similarities between this example and Example 64 will not be repeated here. The difference lies in the parameter adjustments: mold temperature 180℃, high-frequency heating temperature 950℃, high-speed position 302mm, high-speed speed 0.8m / s, and pressure boosting position 306mm. The anvil holding six layers of foam was tested 8 times, and the product broke.

[0150] Examples 92 to 94: The high-speed position range was determined by verifying the gradual change of high-speed position parameters. The resulting anvil clamping test concluded that a high-speed position of 289mm ≤ or ≥ 301mm has a negative impact on anvil clamping.

[0151] Example 95: The similarities between this example and Example 64 will not be repeated here. The difference lies in the parameter adjustments: mold temperature 180℃, high-frequency heating temperature 950℃, high-speed position 290mm, high-speed speed 0.9m / s, and pressure boosting position 306mm. The anvil holding six layers of foam was tested more than 12 times without any breakage or cracks.

[0152] Example 96: The similarities between this example and Example 64 will not be repeated. The difference lies in the parameter adjustments: mold temperature 180℃, high-frequency heating temperature 950℃, high-speed position 290mm, high-speed speed 1.0m / s, and pressure boosting position 306mm. The anvil holding six layers of foam was tested more than 12 times without breakage or cracks.

[0153] Example 97: The similarities between this example and Example 64 will not be repeated. The difference lies in the parameter adjustments: mold temperature 180℃, high-frequency heating temperature 950℃, high-speed position 290mm, high-speed speed 1.1m / s, and pressure boosting position 306mm. The anvil holding six layers of foam was tested more than 12 times without any breakage or cracks.

[0154] Example 98: The similarities between this example and Example 64 will not be repeated here. The difference lies in the parameter adjustments: mold temperature 180℃, high-frequency heating temperature 950℃, high-speed position 290mm, high-speed speed 1.2m / s, and pressure boosting position 306mm. The anvil holding six layers of foam was tested more than 12 times without any breakage or cracks.

[0155] Examples 95 to 98: The high-speed speed range was determined by gradually varying the high-speed parameters. Tests showed that the anvil clamping tests conducted at high speeds in the range of 0.8 m / s to 1.2 m / s all exceeded 12 cycles without any breakage or cracking.

[0156] Example 99: The similarities between this example and Example 64 will not be repeated here. The difference lies in the parameter adjustments: mold temperature 180℃, high-frequency heating temperature 950℃, high-speed position 290mm, high-speed speed 0.7m / s, and pressure boosting position 306mm. The anvil holding six layers of foam was tested 5 times, and the product broke.

[0157] Example 100: This example is similar to Example 64 and will not be repeated here. The difference lies in the parameter adjustments: mold temperature 180℃, high-frequency heating temperature 950℃, high-speed position 290mm, high-speed speed 1.3m / s, and pressure boosting position 306mm. The anvil holding six layers of foam was tested 5 times, and the product broke.

[0158] Example 101: The similarities between this example and Example 64 will not be repeated here. The difference lies in the parameter adjustments: mold temperature 180℃, high-frequency heating temperature 950℃, high-speed position 290mm, high-speed speed 1.4m / s, and pressure boosting position 306mm. The anvil holding six layers of foam was tested 5 times, and the product broke.

[0159] Examples 99 to 101: The high-speed range was determined by verifying the gradual variation of high-speed parameters. The resulting anvil clamping test concluded that high-speed speeds of 0.7 m / s ≤ or ≥ 1.3 m / s have a negative impact on anvil clamping.

[0160] Example 102: The similarities between this example and Example 64 will not be repeated. The difference lies in the parameter adjustments: mold temperature 180℃, high-frequency heating temperature 950℃, high-speed position 290mm, high-speed speed 0.8m / s, and pressure boosting position 305mm. The anvil holding six layers of foam was tested more than 12 times without any breakage or cracks.

[0161] Example 103: The similarities between this example and Example 64 will not be repeated here. The difference lies in the parameter adjustments: mold temperature 180℃, high-frequency heating temperature 950℃, high-speed position 290mm, high-speed speed 0.8m / s, and pressure boosting position 307mm. The anvil holding six layers of foam was tested more than 12 times without any breakage or cracks.

[0162] Example 104: The similarities between this example and Example 64 will not be repeated. The difference lies in the parameter adjustments: mold temperature 180℃, high-frequency heating temperature 950℃, high-speed position 290mm, high-speed speed 0.8m / s, and pressure boosting position 308mm. The anvil holding six layers of foam was tested more than 12 times without any breakage or cracks.

[0163] Example 105: The similarities between this example and Example 64 will not be repeated here. The difference lies in the parameter adjustments: mold temperature 180℃, high-frequency heating temperature 950℃, high-speed position 290mm, high-speed speed 0.8m / s, and pressure boosting position 309mm. The anvil holding six layers of foam was tested more than 12 times without any breakage or cracks.

[0164] Examples 102 to 105: The pressure boosting position parameters were gradually varied to verify and determine the pressure boosting position range. Tests showed that the anvil clamping tests conducted when the pressure boosting position was in the range of 305mm-309mm all exceeded 12 cycles without breakage or cracking.

[0165] Example 106: The similarities between this example and Example 64 will not be repeated here. The difference lies in the parameter adjustments: mold temperature 180℃, high-frequency heating temperature 950℃, high-speed position 290mm, high-speed speed 0.8m / s, and pressure boosting position 304mm. The anvil holding six layers of foam was tested 10 times, and the product broke.

[0166] Example 107: The similarities between this example and Example 64 will not be repeated here. The difference lies in the parameter adjustments: mold temperature 180℃, high-frequency heating temperature 950℃, high-speed position 290mm, high-speed speed 0.8m / s, and pressure boosting position 310mm. The anvil holding six layers of foam was tested 6 times, and the product broke.

[0167] Example 108: The similarities between this example and Example 64 will not be repeated here. The difference lies in the parameter adjustments: mold temperature 180℃, high-frequency heating temperature 950℃, high-speed position 290mm, high-speed speed 0.8m / s, and pressure boosting position 311mm. The anvil holding six layers of foam was tested four times, and the product broke.

[0168] Examples 106 to 108: The pressure boosting position parameters were gradually varied to verify and determine the pressure boosting position range. The resulting anvil clamping tests showed that a pressure boosting position of 304mm ≤ or ≥ 310mm had a negative impact on anvil clamping.

Claims

1. An amorphous alloy die-casting process for anvil seats, characterized in that, Including the following step: (1) Mix the materials and melt them under oxygen-free conditions to form small blocks; this refers to the zirconium powder, copper powder, nickel powder, titanium powder, aluminum powder, and yttrium powder weighed according to the mass fractions; put them into an oxygen-free melting furnace and raise the temperature to 1000-1200℃; melt them into liquid and inject them into the mold cavity to make the feeding mold and cool them into solid blocks; when mixing the materials: 61-65 parts zirconium powder, 23.5-27.5 parts copper powder, 5.8-7 parts nickel powder, 0.9-1.7 parts titanium powder, 3.2-3.9 parts aluminum powder, and 0.1-0.9 parts yttrium powder; (2) The die casting blank is obtained by die casting under oxygen-isolated conditions. This means that a small piece of raw material is placed in the storage bin of the die casting equipment and heated to 920℃-950℃ by high frequency heating. After the small piece of raw material is completely melted, it is poured into the injection chamber and the melt is injected into the mold at a high speed and high pressure of 0.8m / s-1.2m / s. The mold temperature is selected as 180℃-200℃, the pressure boosting position is selected as 305mm-309mm, and the high speed position is selected as 290mm-300mm to obtain the anvil die casting blank.

2. The method for manufacturing the anvil according to claim 1, characterized in that, The preparation method of the anvil seat also includes the following steps: (3) laser engraving blanking; (4) deburring; (5) CNC machining; (6) polishing; (7) grinding; (8) PVD coating.

3. An anti-pin seat, characterized in that, It is made by die casting of the amorphous alloy according to claim 1 using the following components in parts by mass: 61-65 parts zirconium powder, 23.5-27.5 parts copper powder, 5.8-7 parts nickel powder, 0.9-1.7 parts titanium powder, 3.2-3.9 parts aluminum powder, and 0.1-0.9 parts yttrium powder.

Images