Verification service work quantification method, device, electronic device and storage medium

Abstract

The present application provides a verification service workload quantification method, device, electronic device and storage medium. The method includes: obtaining data sets such as the current basic data, current accounting boundaries and monitoring data of the object to be verified, and the object to be verified includes at least one accounting subject; based on the pre-established mapping relationship between basic data, accounting boundaries and workload, determining the workload corresponding to the current basic data and current accounting boundaries of each accounting subject as the first workload of each accounting subject; based on the monitoring data of each accounting subject, through a preset accounting algorithm, determining the second workload of each accounting subject; according to the first workload and the second workload of each accounting subject, obtaining a quantified result. In this way, the workload of the verification service of the verification object can be quantified, which is convenient for users to intuitively view the specific workload of different verification objects when performing verification services.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] The present invention relates to the field of computer data processing technology, and in particular to a verification service work quantification method, device, electronic equipment and storage medium. Background Art

[0002] At present, the accounting entities of carbon market control need to carry out carbon emission verification work regularly (such as every year). The pricing of verification work of each accounting entity is determined by the provincial / municipal competent authorities through the initial budget setting, and then basically evenly distributed to each accounting entity. The price difference is mainly caused by the different bids of each verification service unit. This method will lead to the verification service unit to obtain basically the same service fee regardless of whether it is verifying a simple accounting entity (small verification workload) or a complex accounting entity (large verification workload), which is unreasonable. In addition, this verification method will also affect the quality of the final verification results to a certain extent. In the field of carbon emission verification, there is no literature on the quantitative mechanism of verification work, which makes it impossible for relevant personnel to clearly understand the workload of verification services. Summary of the invention

[0003] In view of this, the purpose of the embodiments of the present application is to provide a method, device, electronic device and storage medium for quantifying verification service work, which can improve the problem that users cannot clearly understand the workload of the verification service.

[0004] In order to achieve the above technical objectives, the technical solutions adopted in this application are as follows:

[0005] In a first aspect, an embodiment of the present application provides a method for quantifying verification service work, the method comprising:

[0006] Acquire a data set of an object to be verified, the data set including current basic data, current accounting boundary and monitoring data of the object to be verified, the object to be verified including at least one accounting subject;

[0007] Based on the pre-established mapping relationship between basic data, accounting boundaries and workload, determine the workload corresponding to the current basic data and the current accounting boundaries of each accounting subject as the first workload of each accounting subject;

[0008] Based on the monitoring data of each accounting subject, the second workload of each accounting subject is determined by a preset accounting algorithm;

[0009] A quantitative result is obtained according to the first workload and the second workload of each accounting subject, and the quantitative result includes the total workload of the verification service of the object to be verified.

[0010] In combination with the first aspect, in some optional implementations, based on the monitoring data of each accounting subject, the second workload of each accounting subject is determined by a preset accounting algorithm, including:

[0011] Input the monitoring data of each accounting subject into the accounting formula of the accounting unit pre-configured by each accounting subject to obtain the carbon emissions statistically calculated for each accounting unit, wherein the accounting formula includes a primary formula, a secondary formula and a tertiary formula;

[0012] The primary formula is:

[0013]

[0014] The secondary formula is:

[0015] A i =B i ×EF i (2)

[0016] The three-level formula is:

[0017] EF i =C i ×λ1 (3)

[0018] Among them, A i is the emission of the ith carbon source flow in the accounting unit; n is the total number of carbon source flows; B i is the consumption or production of the i-th carbon source flow in the accounting unit within the accounting period; EF i is the emission factor of the ith carbon source flow in the accounting unit within the accounting period; C i is the emission factor calculation parameter of the i-th carbon source flow in the calculation unit within the calculation period; λ1 is a preset constant;

[0019] The workload N of the accounting formula in each accounting unit is determined by the preset work quantification formula, which is expressed as:

[0020] N=n1+n2+n3 (4)

[0021] Among them, n1 is the workload of the first-level formula in the accounting unit; n2 is the workload of the second-level formula in the accounting unit; n3 is the workload of the third-level formula in the accounting unit;

[0022] Based on the workload of the accounting formula, the workload G of greenhouse gas emissions accounting in each accounting entity is determined, expressed as:

[0023]

[0024] Among them, N g Indicates the workload corresponding to the g-th accounting unit;

[0025] Based on the monitoring data of each accounting subject, the workload M of the monitoring level parameters of each accounting subject is determined, which is expressed as:

[0026]

[0027] H h =λ2+X h (7)

[0028] D d =λ3 (8)

[0029] Among them, the second workload of each accounting subject is G+M, H h Refers to the workload corresponding to the monitoring-level parameter of the hth measured value in the monitoring data; X h Refers to the workload corresponding to the supporting materials involved in the monitoring-level parameter of the hth measured value; D d Refers to the workload corresponding to the monitoring level parameter of the dth default value; λ2 refers to the first preset workload within the accounting period; λ3 refers to the second preset workload corresponding to the default value.

[0030] In combination with the first aspect, in some optional implementations, the workload n1 of the primary formula is the product of the total number of operators in the primary formula and a reference workload, and the reference workload is the workload corresponding to verifying the basic data of a single accounting entity;

[0031] The workload n2 of the secondary formula is the product of the total number of operators in the secondary formula and the reference workload;

[0032] The workload n3 of the three-level formula is the product of the total number of operators in the three-level formula and the reference workload.

[0033] In combination with the first aspect, in some optional implementations, a quantitative result is obtained according to the first workload and the second workload of each accounting subject, including:

[0034] According to the first workload and the second workload of each accounting subject, the total workload w of the verification service of each accounting subject is determined, which is expressed as:

[0035] w=I+(G+M) (8)

[0036] Where I is the first workload of the accounting subject;

[0037] According to the total workload w of each accounting subject, a quantitative result is obtained, and the quantitative result includes the total workload W of the verification service of the object to be verified, which is expressed as:

[0038]

[0039] Among them, w k is the total workload of the kth accounting subject in the object to be verified, and K is the total number of accounting subjects in the object to be verified.

[0040] In combination with the first aspect, in some optional implementations, the method further includes:

[0041] Determine the total carbon emissions of the object to be verified based on the carbon emissions counted by the accounting units in each accounting entity;

[0042] When the total carbon emissions exceed a preset threshold, an alarm is sent to the management terminal.

[0043] In combination with the first aspect, in some optional implementations, the method further includes:

[0044] Based on the total workload of the object to be checked and the preset overhead corresponding to the unit workload, the accounting overhead of the object to be checked is determined.

[0045] In conjunction with the first aspect, in some optional implementations, the current basic data includes designated information on the organization name, geographic location, and industry of the object to be verified;

[0046] The current accounting boundary includes the geographical boundary range, equipment / facility range and greenhouse gas types of the object to be verified;

[0047] The monitoring data includes greenhouse gas emissions.

[0048] In a second aspect, an embodiment of the present application further provides a verification service work quantification device, the device comprising:

[0049] an acquisition unit, configured to acquire a data set of an object to be verified, wherein the data set includes current basic data, current accounting boundaries and monitoring data of the object to be verified, and the object to be verified includes at least one accounting subject;

[0050] A first determining unit is used to determine the workload corresponding to the current basic data and the current accounting boundary of each accounting subject based on the pre-established mapping relationship between the basic data, the accounting boundary and the workload, so as to serve as the first workload of each accounting subject;

[0051] A second determination unit, configured to determine a second workload of each accounting subject through a preset accounting algorithm based on the monitoring data of each accounting subject;

[0052] The quantification unit is used to obtain a quantification result according to the first workload and the second workload of each accounting subject, and the quantification result includes the total workload of the verification service of the object to be verified.

[0053] In a third aspect, an embodiment of the present application further provides an electronic device, comprising a processor and a memory coupled to each other, wherein a computer program is stored in the memory, and when the computer program is executed by the processor, the electronic device executes the above method.

[0054] In a fourth aspect, an embodiment of the present application further provides a computer-readable storage medium, wherein a computer program is stored in the computer-readable storage medium. When the computer program is executed on a computer, the computer executes the above method.

[0055] The invention adopting the above technical solution has the following advantages:

[0056] In the technical solution provided by the present application, based on the pre-established mapping relationship between basic data, accounting boundaries and workload, the current basic data of each accounting subject and the workload corresponding to the current accounting boundary are determined as the first workload of each accounting subject; then based on the monitoring data of each accounting subject, the second workload of each accounting subject is determined through a preset accounting algorithm; and a quantitative result is obtained based on the first workload and the second workload of each accounting subject. In this way, the workload of the verification service of the verification object can be quantified, which is convenient for users to intuitively view the specific workload of different verification objects when performing verification services. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0057] The present application may be further described by the non-limiting embodiments given in the accompanying drawings. It should be understood that the following drawings only illustrate certain embodiments of the present application and therefore should not be regarded as limiting the scope. For those of ordinary skill in the art, other relevant drawings may be obtained based on these drawings without creative effort.

[0058] Figure 1 A flowchart of a verification service work quantification method provided in an embodiment of the present application.

[0059] Figure 2 The basic process of accounting for a single accounting entity provided in the embodiment of the present application.

[0060] Figure 3 A block diagram of a verification service work quantification device provided in an embodiment of the present application.

[0061] Icons: 200 - verification service work quantification device; 210 - acquisition unit; 220 - first determination unit; 230 - second determination unit; 240 - quantification unit. DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0062] The present application will be described in detail below in conjunction with the accompanying drawings and specific embodiments. It should be noted that in the drawings or descriptions, similar or identical parts use the same figure numbers, and the implementation methods not shown or described in the drawings are forms known to ordinary technicians in the relevant technical field. In the description of this application, the terms "first", "second", etc. are only used to distinguish the description and cannot be understood as indicating or implying relative importance.

[0063] The embodiment of the present application provides an electronic device, which may include a processing module and a storage module. The storage module stores a computer program, and when the computer program is executed by the processing module, the electronic device can perform the corresponding steps in the following verification service work quantification method. The electronic device may be, but is not limited to, a personal computer, a server, and other devices.

[0064] Specifically, the electronic device may be built with a SaaS (Software as a Service) platform system, and each step of the method may be implemented using the SaaS platform system.

[0065] Please refer to Figure 1 and Figure 2 The present application also provides a verification service work quantification method. The verification service work quantification method may include the following steps:

[0066] Step 110, obtaining a data set of the object to be verified, wherein the data set includes current basic data, current accounting boundaries and monitoring data of the object to be verified, and the object to be verified includes at least one accounting subject;

[0067] Step 120, based on the pre-established mapping relationship between basic data, accounting boundaries and workload, determine the workload corresponding to the current basic data and the current accounting boundaries of each accounting subject as the first workload of each accounting subject;

[0068] Step 130, based on the monitoring data of each accounting subject, determine the second workload of each accounting subject through a preset accounting algorithm;

[0069] Step 140, obtaining a quantitative result according to the first workload and the second workload of each accounting subject, wherein the quantitative result includes the total workload of the verification service of the object to be verified.

[0070] The following is a detailed description of the various steps of the verification service work quantification method, as follows:

[0071] First, the emission-controlled enterprise or the outsourced carbon management service unit (i.e. the object to be verified) shall improve the basic information of the enterprise, define the accounting boundaries, edit the accounting methods, and then enter the corresponding data and supporting materials according to the actual situation of the enterprise and the requirements of the corresponding carbon market. Secondly, in order to ensure the accuracy and fairness of the verification results, a third-party verification agency can be introduced to conduct verification and determination. Finally, the results of the verification and determination serve the policy formulation of the competent authority. The basis of this series of operations is the information entered by the enterprise (including text, data and supporting materials). Therefore, the information entered by the enterprise is used as a quantified object.

[0072] In step 110, the object to be verified may be an organization such as a company / enterprise, which may be flexibly determined according to actual conditions. The electronic device may obtain a data set from supporting materials and other materials provided by the enterprise. The data set may include but is not limited to the current basic data, current accounting boundaries and monitoring data of the object to be verified.

[0073] The current basic data may include, but is not limited to, the organization name, geographic location, and industry-specified information of the object to be verified, wherein the industry-specified information may be the business license or other information of the enterprise.

[0074] The current accounting boundary may include, but is not limited to, the geographical boundary of the object to be verified, the scope of equipment / facility, and the types of greenhouse gases. The types of greenhouse gases may include, but are not limited to, carbon dioxide, methane, etc. The accounting boundary may determine which facilities / equipment generate greenhouse gas emissions that need to be accounted for based on the actual situation of the enterprise.

[0075] The monitoring data is the data collected by the emission control enterprise through monitoring equipment. For example, the monitoring data can be the parameter B in the following formulas (2) and (3): i and C i Specifically, the monitoring data may be the power consumption and power emission factor of relevant equipment in the emission control enterprise.

[0076] In step 120, the mapping relationship between basic data, accounting boundaries and workload can be flexibly determined according to actual conditions. As an example, since the basic data includes common information such as company name, geographical location, industry, etc., the basic data is mainly verified by comparing the supporting materials provided by the company, such as business licenses, etc. The basic data verification is basically the same as the verification of a default value parameter in terms of verification difficulty and time. For the convenience of calculation, the workload of a basic information verification can be directly fixed as a standard workload.

[0077] It should be noted that one standard workload can be flexibly defined according to actual conditions and is not limited to the workload of one basic information verification. One standard workload can be proportionally enlarged or reduced based on the workload of one basic information verification. For example, in other embodiments, one standard workload can be the workload of two basic information verifications.

[0078] Since the accounting boundary includes the geographical boundary range, equipment / facility range, greenhouse gas types and other information of the accounting object, it is mainly determined based on the supporting materials provided by the enterprise, such as business license, process flow chart and description, combined with the requirements of the "Industry Guidelines" and "Quota Allocation Plan". The verification of the accounting boundary is slightly more professional than the verification of one default value parameter, but is basically the same in terms of verification time. Therefore, the workload of the verification of the accounting boundary can be directly fixed at 2 standard workloads.

[0079] Among them, a standard unit of workload represents the workload corresponding to each completion of the reporting or verification of a default value parameter in the SaaS platform system. The standard workload unit definition can be "Te" (Task Equivalent), which means: the time required to complete the reporting or verification of a default value parameter in the SaaS platform system, and to a certain extent reflects the professionalism and difficulty of the operation. Default value parameters may include default values ​​of commonly used fossil fuel-related parameters, which are pre-calibrated conventional data. As an example, the default values ​​of some commonly used fossil fuel-related parameters may include the data in Table 1 below.

[0080] Table 1:

[0081]

[0082] In step 130, the accounting subject may be, but is not limited to, a carbon emission subject, wherein the carbon emission subject refers to an organization involved in greenhouse gas emissions, including enterprises, institutions, companies, commercial service units, etc.

[0083] Monitoring parameters are monitoring-level parameters, which are usually parameters directly obtained through measurement and analysis by measuring instruments or analytical instruments for calculating carbon emissions. In addition, default value parameters and values ​​derived through common sense (such as chemical molecular formulas) are also monitoring-level parameters.

[0084] The accounting algorithm can be flexibly determined according to actual conditions. For example, in this embodiment, in step 130, based on the monitoring data of each accounting subject, the second workload of each accounting subject is determined by a preset accounting algorithm, which may include:

[0085] Input the monitoring data of each accounting subject into the accounting formula of the accounting unit pre-configured by each accounting subject to obtain the carbon emissions statistically calculated for each accounting unit, wherein the accounting formula includes a primary formula, a secondary formula and a tertiary formula;

[0086] The primary formula is:

[0087]

[0088] The secondary formula is:

[0089] A i =B i ×EF i (2)

[0090] The three-level formula is:

[0091] EF i =C i ×λ1 (3)

[0092] Among them, A i is the emission of the ith carbon source flow in the accounting unit; n is the total number of carbon source flows; carbon source flows refer to fossil fuels, carbon-containing raw materials, carbon-containing products or carbon-containing wastes flowing into or out of a certain accounting unit; B i EF is the consumption or production of the i-th carbon source flow in the accounting unit within the accounting period (an accounting period can be flexibly determined according to actual conditions, usually one year); i is the emission factor of the ith carbon source flow of the accounting unit in the accounting period; the emission factor refers to the greenhouse gas emission coefficient of a carbon source flow representing unit consumption or production; C i is the emission factor calculation parameter of the i-th carbon source flow of the core calculation unit in the calculation period, which can be obtained through monitoring; λ1 is a preset constant, which can be obtained through pre-calibration;

[0093] The workload N of the accounting formula in each accounting unit is determined by the preset work quantification formula, which is expressed as:

[0094] N=n1+n2+n3 (4)

[0095] Among them, n1 is the workload of the first-level formula in the accounting unit; n2 is the workload of the second-level formula in the accounting unit; n3 is the workload of the third-level formula in the accounting unit;

[0096] In the accounting formula, one operation symbol corresponds to one standard workload. Specifically, the workload n1 of the first-level formula is the product of the total number of operators in the first-level formula and the reference workload. The reference workload is the workload corresponding to the basic data of a single accounting entity, that is, the reference workload is a standard workload; the workload n2 of the second-level formula is the product of the total number of operators in the second-level formula and the reference workload; the workload n3 of the third-level formula is the product of the total number of operators in the third-level formula and the reference workload;

[0097] If an accounting unit involves n carbon source flows, based on the above formula (4), the calculation formula for the workload of the accounting unit is N = (n-1) + n + n; in this formula, n1 = (n-1), which is the workload corresponding to the first-level formula, because the first-level formula contains (n-1) operators "+"; n2 = n, that is, the second "n" in the formula, represents the workload corresponding to the second-level formula, because the second-level formula contains n operator multiplication signs "×"; n3 = n, that is, the third "n" in the formula, represents the workload corresponding to the third-level formula, because the third-level formula contains n operator multiplication signs "×";

[0098] Based on the workload of the accounting formula, the workload G of greenhouse gas emissions accounting in each accounting entity is determined, expressed as:

[0099]

[0100] Among them, N g Indicates the workload corresponding to the g-th accounting unit;

[0101] Based on the monitoring data of each accounting subject, the workload M of the monitoring level parameters of each accounting subject is determined, which is expressed as:

[0102]

[0103] H h =λ2+X h (7)

[0104] D d =λ3 (8)

[0105] Among them, the second workload of each accounting subject is G+M, H h Refers to the workload corresponding to the monitoring-level parameter of the hth measured value in the monitoring data; X h Refers to the workload corresponding to the supporting materials involved in the monitoring-level parameter of the hth measured value; D d Refers to the workload corresponding to the monitoring level parameter of the dth default value; λ2 refers to the first preset workload within the accounting period; λ3 refers to the second preset workload corresponding to the default value.

[0106] Understandably, determining the correct accounting method is the core of the entire verification service work quantification process. The accounting method is determined by the basic data and the accounting boundary, and the accounting method determines the parameters that need to be monitored and the final emissions. Throughout the process, the workload is mainly concentrated on determining the accounting method corresponding to the emission accounting and the data of the monitoring parameters included. Based on the accounting guidelines and quota allocation plan requirements of the existing carbon market, the greenhouse gas emissions accounting of an enterprise can be for the entire plant or for each process / device. Therefore, the workload design of the accounting method is implemented in the accounting unit configured by the accounting subject in the SaaS platform system. The workload of an accounting subject's accounting method is the sum of the workload of the accounting methods of all accounting units configured in the SaaS platform system, where the accounting method of an accounting unit includes the above-mentioned first-level formula, second-level formula and third-level formula.

[0107] As an example, assuming that the emission accounting formula of the accounting unit involves three carbon source flows, and the emission calculation formula of each carbon source flow is the same as the secondary and tertiary formulas mentioned above, and each level of the formula has only one operation symbol, then using the SaaS platform system on the electronic device, the workload N of the management / verification of this accounting unit can be automatically calculated through formula (4) as shown in Table 2 below.

[0108] Table 2:

[0109]

[0110] Regarding the calculation of the workload of detection data, for an accounting subject, monitoring-level parameters include measured values ​​and default values. According to the existing carbon market management requirements, the accounting cycle of an accounting subject is usually a natural year. The SaaS platform system allows the accounting subject to enter data on an annual or monthly basis. When entering data on an annual basis, although the accounting subject only enters one data, a monthly report is formed due to its management (internal and external) needs, which is actually still the sum of the data for December. The verification work of a monitoring parameter, that is, the statistics and comparison of data and corresponding supporting materials, has different requirements for the monitoring record frequency (per shift, daily, per batch, monthly) of different monitoring parameters in the accounting guidelines. Therefore, the workload of a monitoring-level parameter includes two aspects: data and supporting materials. Among them, the workload corresponding to the data, considering that 12 data are involved, is calculated according to 12 standard workloads. Although the monitoring record frequency of some monitoring parameters is greater than monthly, resulting in more than 12 data, considering that it can be easily realized with the help of calculation tools, all are calculated as 12 standard workloads; the corresponding workload of supporting materials is calculated as 1 standard workload for 1 supporting material. In addition, when the monitoring record frequency is (per shift, per day, per batch), the number of supporting materials involved is relatively large. The number of supporting materials will be determined according to the sampling rules designed according to "GB / T 2828.1-2012 Attribute Sampling Inspection Procedure Part 1: Batch Inspection Sampling Plan Retrieved by Acceptance Quality Limit (AQL)" (Status: Current) embedded in the SaaS platform system. The default value parameter is 1 standard workload, and no supporting materials are involved.

[0111] Therefore, the corresponding workload M statistics of the monitoring parameters of an accounting subject can be calculated by the above formulas (6), (7), and (8). Among them, λ2 can be taken as 12 standard workloads, and λ2 can be taken as 1 standard workload.

[0112] In step 140, a quantitative result is obtained according to the first workload and the second workload of each accounting subject, including:

[0113] According to the first workload and the second workload of each accounting subject, the total workload w of the verification service of each accounting subject is determined, which is expressed as:

[0114] w=I+(G+M) (8)

[0115] Where I is the first workload of the accounting subject;

[0116] According to the total workload w of each accounting subject, a quantitative result is obtained, and the quantitative result includes the total workload W of the verification service of the object to be verified, which is expressed as:

[0117]

[0118] Among them, w k is the total workload of the kth accounting subject in the object to be verified, and K is the total number of accounting subjects in the object to be verified.

[0119] Understandably, since an object to be verified may include multiple accounting entities, for each accounting entity, after calculating the first workload and the second workload of the verification service of the accounting entity, the total workload of the verification service of the single accounting entity can be obtained, and then, by accumulating the workload of all accounting entities, the total workload of the verification service of the object to be verified can be obtained, thereby realizing the quantification of the workload of the verification service of the object to be verified by the enterprise.

[0120] In this embodiment, the method may further include:

[0121] Determine the total carbon emissions of the object to be verified based on the carbon emissions counted by the accounting units in each accounting entity;

[0122] When the total carbon emissions exceed a preset threshold, an alarm is sent to the management terminal.

[0123] In this embodiment, the preset threshold can be flexibly set according to the actual situation, and can be one or more. That is, the user can set multiple thresholds according to different warning requirements, so that graded warnings can be performed for different carbon emissions. If the total carbon emissions of the object to be verified exceed the corresponding preset threshold, it means that the carbon emissions are too much. At this time, an alarm prompt is sent to the management terminal, which is conducive to the relevant personnel to intuitively understand the abnormal problems of carbon emissions. Among them, the content of the alarm prompt can be flexibly set according to the actual situation, which is used to prompt that the carbon emissions of the object to be verified are too much or exceed the standard.

[0124] The management terminal can be, but is not limited to, a smart phone, a tablet computer or other personal smart terminals, and can be flexibly determined based on actual conditions.

[0125] Based on the above design, users can intuitively view the specific workload of different verification objects when performing verification services through the management terminal. The total workload of the objects to be verified can provide a data basis for platform users in terms of pricing and work allocation of verification services.

[0126] In this embodiment, the method may further include:

[0127] Based on the total workload of the object to be checked and the preset overhead corresponding to the unit workload, the accounting overhead of the object to be checked is determined.

[0128] The expenses can be service fees, and the expenses corresponding to a unit of workload can be set according to the actual situation. In this way, determining the service fees based on the workload of the verification service is conducive to improving the rationality of the cost allocation, and avoiding the situation where the verification service unit will receive basically the same service fee regardless of whether it is verifying a simple accounting entity (small verification workload) or a complex accounting entity (large verification workload), which will lead to unreasonable cost allocation and affect the verification quality.

[0129] Please refer to Figure 3 The present application also provides a verification service work quantification device 200, which includes at least one software function module that can be stored in a storage module or fixed in an operating system (OS) in the form of software or firmware. The processing module is used to execute the executable module stored in the storage module, such as the software function module and computer program included in the verification service work quantification device 200.

[0130] The functions of each unit in the verification service work quantification device 200 may be as follows:

[0131] An acquisition unit 210 is used to acquire a data set of an object to be verified, wherein the data set includes current basic data, current accounting boundaries and monitoring data of the object to be verified, and the object to be verified includes at least one accounting subject;

[0132] A first determining unit 220 is used to determine the workload corresponding to the current basic data and the current accounting boundary of each accounting subject based on the pre-established mapping relationship between the basic data, the accounting boundary and the workload, so as to serve as the first workload of each accounting subject;

[0133] The second determination unit 230 is used to determine the second workload of each accounting subject through a preset accounting algorithm based on the monitoring data of each accounting subject;

[0134] The quantification unit 240 is used to obtain a quantification result according to the first workload and the second workload of each accounting subject, and the quantification result includes the total workload of the verification service of the object to be verified.

[0135] Specifically, the second determining unit 230 may be used to execute the operation content corresponding to step 130, such as:

[0136] Input the monitoring data of each accounting entity into the accounting formula of the accounting unit pre-configured by each accounting entity to obtain the carbon emissions statistics of each accounting unit.

[0137] Determine the workload N of the accounting formula in each accounting unit through the preset work quantification formula;

[0138] Based on the workload of the accounting formula, determine the workload G of greenhouse gas emissions accounting in each accounting entity;

[0139] Based on the monitoring data of each accounting entity, the workload M of the monitoring level parameters of each accounting entity is determined.

[0140] The quantification unit 240 may be used to perform the operation content corresponding to step 140. For example, the quantification unit 240 may be used to determine the total workload w of the verification service of each accounting entity according to the first workload and the second workload of each accounting entity.

[0141] According to the total workload w of each accounting subject, a quantitative result is obtained, and the quantitative result includes the total workload W of the verification service of the object to be verified.

[0142] Optionally, the service work verification quantification device 200 may further include an alarm unit and a third determination unit.

[0143] The alarm unit is used to determine the total carbon emissions of the object to be verified based on the carbon emissions counted by the accounting units in each accounting subject, and to send an alarm prompt to the management terminal when the total carbon emissions exceed a preset threshold.

[0144] The third determining unit is used to determine the accounting overhead of the object to be verified based on the total workload of the object to be verified and the preset overhead corresponding to the unit workload.

[0145] In this embodiment, the processing module may be an integrated circuit chip having the ability to process signals. The above-mentioned processing module may be a general-purpose processor. For example, the processor may be a central processing unit (CPU), a digital signal processor (DSP), an application-specific integrated circuit (ASIC), a field-programmable gate array (FPGA) or other programmable logic devices, discrete gates or transistor logic devices, discrete hardware components, and may implement or execute the disclosed methods, steps and logic block diagrams in the embodiments of the present application.

[0146] The storage module may be, but is not limited to, a random access memory, a read-only memory, a programmable read-only memory, an erasable programmable read-only memory, an electrically erasable programmable read-only memory, etc. In this embodiment, the storage module may be used to store data sets such as the current basic data of the object to be verified, the current accounting boundary and monitoring data, and to store the quantitative results of the object to be verified. Of course, the storage module may also be used to store a program, and the processing module executes the program after receiving the execution instruction.

[0147] It should be noted that those skilled in the art can clearly understand that, for the convenience and brevity of description, the specific working process of the electronic device described above can refer to the corresponding process of each step in the aforementioned method, and will not be elaborated here.

[0148] The embodiment of the present application also provides a computer-readable storage medium. The computer-readable storage medium stores a computer program, and when the computer program is executed on a computer, the computer executes the verification service work quantification method as described in the above embodiment.

[0149] Through the description of the above implementation methods, technical personnel in this field can clearly understand that the present application can be implemented by hardware, and can also be implemented by means of software plus a necessary general hardware platform. Based on such an understanding, the technical solution of the present application can be embodied in the form of a software product, which can be stored in a non-volatile storage medium (which can be a CD-ROM, a USB flash drive, a mobile hard disk, etc.), including a number of instructions for enabling a computer device (which can be a personal computer, an electronic device, or a network device, etc.) to execute the methods described in each implementation scenario of the present application.

[0150] In the embodiments provided in the present application, it should be understood that the disclosed devices, equipment and methods can also be implemented in other ways. The above-described device, equipment and method embodiments are merely schematic, for example, the flowcharts and block diagrams in the accompanying drawings show the possible architecture, functions and operations of the systems, methods and computer program products according to the multiple embodiments of the present application. In this regard, each box in the flowchart or block diagram can represent a part of a module, a program segment or a code, and a part of the module, program segment or code contains one or more executable instructions for implementing the specified logical function. It should also be noted that each box in the block diagram and / or the flowchart, and the combination of the boxes in the block diagram and / or the flowchart can be implemented by a dedicated hardware-based system that performs the specified function or action, or can be implemented by a combination of dedicated hardware and computer instructions. In addition, each functional module in each embodiment of the present application can be integrated together to form an independent part, or each module can exist separately, or two or more modules can be integrated to form an independent part.

[0151] The above description is only an embodiment of the present application and is not intended to limit the protection scope of the present application. For those skilled in the art, the present application may have various modifications and variations. Any modification, equivalent replacement, improvement, etc. made within the spirit and principle of the present application shall be included in the protection scope of the present application.

Claims

1. A verification service work quantification method, characterized in that: The method comprises: Acquire a data set of an object to be verified, the data set including current basic data, current accounting boundary and monitoring data of the object to be verified, the object to be verified including at least one accounting subject; Based on the pre-established mapping relationship between basic data, accounting boundaries and workload, determine the workload corresponding to the current basic data and the current accounting boundaries of each accounting subject as the first workload of each accounting subject; Based on the monitoring data of each accounting subject, the second workload of each accounting subject is determined by a preset accounting algorithm; According to the first workload and the second workload of each accounting subject, a quantitative result is obtained, wherein the quantitative result includes the total workload of the verification service of the object to be verified; Based on the monitoring data of each accounting subject, the second workload of each accounting subject is determined through a preset accounting algorithm, including: Input the monitoring data of each accounting subject into the accounting formula of the accounting unit pre-configured by each accounting subject to obtain the carbon emissions statistically calculated for each accounting unit, wherein the accounting formula includes a primary formula, a secondary formula and a tertiary formula; The primary formula is: The secondary formula is: A i =B i ×EF i (2) The three-level formula is: EF i =C i ×λ1 (3) Among them, A i is the emission of the ith carbon source flow in the accounting unit; n is the total number of carbon source flows; B i is the consumption or production of the i-th carbon source flow in the accounting unit within the accounting period; EF i is the emission factor of the ith carbon source flow in the accounting unit within the accounting period; C i is the emission factor calculation parameter of the i-th carbon source flow in the calculation unit within the calculation period; λ1 is a preset constant; The workload N of the accounting formula in each accounting unit is determined by the preset work quantification formula, which is expressed as: N=n1+n2+n3 (4) Among them, n1 is the workload of the first-level formula in the accounting unit; n2 is the workload of the second-level formula in the accounting unit; n3 is the workload of the third-level formula in the accounting unit; Based on the workload of the accounting formula, the workload G of greenhouse gas emissions accounting in each accounting entity is determined, expressed as: Among them, N g Indicates the workload corresponding to the g-th accounting unit; Based on the monitoring data of each accounting subject, the workload M of the monitoring level parameters of each accounting subject is determined, which is expressed as: H h =λ2+X h (7) D d =λ3 (8) Among them, the second workload of each accounting subject is G+M, H h Refers to the workload corresponding to the monitoring-level parameter of the hth measured value in the monitoring data; X h Refers to the workload corresponding to the supporting materials involved in the monitoring-level parameter of the hth measured value; D d refers to the workload corresponding to the monitoring level parameter of the dth default value; λ2 refers to the first preset workload within the accounting period; λ3 refers to the second preset workload corresponding to the default value; The workload n1 of the primary formula is the product of the total number of operators in the primary formula and the reference workload, the reference workload is the workload corresponding to verifying the basic data of a single accounting entity, the reference workload is a standard workload, and the standard workload represents the time required to complete the reporting or verification of one default value parameter in the SaaS platform system; The workload n2 of the secondary formula is the product of the total number of operators in the secondary formula and the reference workload; The workload n3 of the third-level formula is the product of the total number of operators in the third-level formula and the reference workload; Based on the total workload of the object to be checked and the preset overhead corresponding to the unit workload, the accounting overhead of the object to be checked is determined.

2. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that: According to the first workload and the second workload of each accounting subject, the quantitative results are obtained, including: According to the first workload and the second workload of each accounting subject, the total workload w of the verification service of each accounting subject is determined, which is expressed as: w=I+(G+M) (8) Where I is the first workload of the accounting subject; According to the total workload w of each accounting subject, a quantitative result is obtained, and the quantitative result includes the total workload W of the verification service of the object to be verified, which is expressed as: Among them, w k is the total workload of the kth accounting subject in the object to be verified, and K is the total number of accounting subjects in the object to be verified.

3. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that The method further comprises: Determine the total carbon emissions of the object to be verified based on the carbon emissions counted by the accounting units in each accounting entity; When the total carbon emissions exceed a preset threshold, an alarm is sent to the management terminal.

4. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that: The current basic data includes the organization name, geographical location and industry information of the object to be verified; The current accounting boundary includes the geographical boundary range, equipment / facility range and greenhouse gas types of the object to be verified; The monitoring data includes greenhouse gas emissions.

5. A verification service work quantification device, characterized in that: The device comprises: an acquisition unit, configured to acquire a data set of an object to be verified, wherein the data set includes current basic data, current accounting boundaries and monitoring data of the object to be verified, and the object to be verified includes at least one accounting subject; A first determining unit is used to determine the workload corresponding to the current basic data and the current accounting boundary of each accounting subject based on a pre-established mapping relationship between basic data, accounting boundary and workload, so as to serve as the first workload of each accounting subject; A second determination unit, configured to determine a second workload of each accounting subject through a preset accounting algorithm based on the monitoring data of each accounting subject; A quantification unit, configured to obtain a quantification result according to the first workload and the second workload of each accounting subject, wherein the quantification result includes the total workload of the verification service of the object to be verified; The second determining unit is further configured to: Based on the monitoring data of each accounting subject, the second workload of each accounting subject is determined through a preset accounting algorithm, including: Input the monitoring data of each accounting subject into the accounting formula of the accounting unit pre-configured by each accounting subject to obtain the carbon emissions statistically calculated for each accounting unit, wherein the accounting formula includes a primary formula, a secondary formula and a tertiary formula; The primary formula is: The secondary formula is: A i =B i ×EF i The three-level formula is: EF i =C i ×λ1 Among them, A i is the emission of the ith carbon source flow in the accounting unit; n is the total number of carbon source flows; B i is the consumption or production of the i-th carbon source flow in the accounting unit within the accounting period; EF i is the emission factor of the ith carbon source flow in the accounting unit within the accounting period; C i is the emission factor calculation parameter of the i-th carbon source flow in the calculation unit within the calculation period; λ1 is a preset constant; The workload N of the accounting formula in each accounting unit is determined by the preset work quantification formula, which is expressed as: N=n1+n2+n3 Among them, n1 is the workload of the first-level formula in the accounting unit; n2 is the workload of the second-level formula in the accounting unit; n3 is the workload of the third-level formula in the accounting unit; Based on the workload of the accounting formula, the workload G of greenhouse gas emissions accounting in each accounting entity is determined, expressed as: Among them, N g Indicates the workload corresponding to the g-th accounting unit; Based on the monitoring data of each accounting subject, the workload M of the monitoring level parameters of each accounting subject is determined, which is expressed as: H h =λ2+X h D d =λ3 Among them, the second workload of each accounting subject is G+M, H h Refers to the workload corresponding to the monitoring-level parameter of the hth measured value in the monitoring data; X h Refers to the workload corresponding to the supporting materials involved in the monitoring-level parameter of the hth measured value; D d refers to the workload corresponding to the monitoring level parameter of the dth default value; λ2 refers to the first preset workload within the accounting period; λ3 refers to the second preset workload corresponding to the default value; The workload n1 of the primary formula is the product of the total number of operators in the primary formula and the reference workload, the reference workload is the workload corresponding to verifying the basic data of a single accounting entity, the reference workload is a standard workload, and the standard workload represents the time required to complete the reporting or verification of one default value parameter in the SaaS platform system; The workload n2 of the secondary formula is the product of the total number of operators in the secondary formula and the reference workload; The workload n3 of the third-level formula is the product of the total number of operators in the third-level formula and the reference workload; The third determining unit is used to determine the accounting overhead of the object to be verified based on the total workload of the object to be verified and the preset overhead corresponding to the unit workload.

6. An electronic device, characterized in that: The electronic device comprises a processor and a memory coupled to each other, wherein the memory stores a computer program. When the computer program is executed by the processor, the electronic device executes the method according to any one of claims 1 to 4.

7. A computer-readable storage medium, characterized in that: The computer-readable storage medium stores a computer program, and when the computer program is executed on a computer, the computer is enabled to execute the method according to any one of claims 1 to 4.

Images