A regulatory control evaluation method and device, and an electronic device

Abstract

The application is suitable for the technical field of urban physical examination evaluation, and provides a regulatory evaluation method and device and electronic equipment, which comprises the following steps: acquiring a plurality of planning implementation data related to a target regulatory in an evaluation period; performing evaluation on the target regulatory in the evaluation period in at least one dimension according to the plurality of planning implementation data, obtaining at least one planning evaluation result; and determining an overall evaluation result of the target regulatory in the evaluation period according to the at least one planning evaluation result. The application can solve the technical problem that the existing planning evaluation method cannot effectively monitor and warn.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] This application belongs to the field of urban health assessment technology, and in particular relates to an assessment method and device for urban planning control, as well as electronic equipment. Background Technology

[0002] With the comprehensive transformation of urban planning towards implementation, the system of detailed control planning has also been improved. The closed-loop operation from preparation, approval and implementation to monitoring, evaluation and maintenance is more conducive to the effective implementation of urban planning.

[0003] Among these, "monitoring and evaluation" is a crucial step. Monitoring and evaluation involves acquiring relevant data and information during the preparation, approval, and implementation of urban control plans to evaluate the urban plan, provide adjustment suggestions to the planning, approval, and implementation stages, and then carry out maintenance and operation.

[0004] Current "monitoring and evaluation" mainly focuses on the necessity of individual planning control modification projects, and has not formed a normalized, proactive evaluation. Furthermore, the existing "monitoring and evaluation" content is too complex and does not fully match the effectiveness of the evaluation results, resulting in planning evaluations often being done merely to fulfill procedures and failing to effectively monitor and provide early warnings. Summary of the Invention

[0005] This application provides a method, apparatus, and electronic device for evaluating planning control, which can solve the technical problem that existing planning evaluation methods cannot effectively monitor and provide early warning.

[0006] In a first aspect, embodiments of this application provide a method for evaluating regulatory rules, including:

[0007] Obtain implementation data from multiple plans related to the target control plan during the evaluation period;

[0008] Based on multiple planning implementation data, the target control plan is evaluated in at least one dimension during the evaluation period to obtain at least one planning evaluation result;

[0009] Based on at least one of the aforementioned planning assessment results, determine the overall assessment results of the target control plan during the assessment period.

[0010] In one possible implementation of the first aspect, acquiring multiple planning implementation data related to the target control plan during the evaluation period includes:

[0011] Determine the regulatory planning evaluation database pre-constructed based on the target area;

[0012] From the planning control assessment database, obtain multiple planning control data related to the target planning control during the assessment period; the multiple planning control data include: historical approved planning control data, current approved planning control data, planning control adjustment record data, urban status operation data, and planning control external environment change data. The historical approved planning control data refers to the planning control data approved for the target area at the start time of the assessment period; the current approved planning control data refers to the planning control data approved for the target area at the end time of the assessment period; the planning control adjustment record data refers to the planning control adjustment data for the target area during the assessment period; the urban status operation data refers to the urban operation data for the target area at the end time of the assessment period; and the planning control external environment change data refers to the external environment change data for the target area during the assessment period.

[0013] In one possible implementation of the first aspect, the at least one dimension includes: planning results, adjustment rules, and implementation status; the step of evaluating the target control plan based on multiple planning implementation data in the evaluation period for at least one dimension to obtain at least one planning evaluation result includes at least one of the following steps:

[0014] Based on the external environment change data of the control plan and the data of the currently approved control plan, the applicability of the planning results of the target control plan is evaluated, and the evaluation results of the planning results of the target control plan in the target area during the evaluation period are obtained.

[0015] Based on the control plan adjustment record data, the historical approved control plan results data, and the current approved control plan results data, the applicability of the adjustment rules of the target control plan is evaluated, and the evaluation result of the adjustment rules of the target control plan in the target area during the evaluation period is obtained.

[0016] Based on the current urban operation data, the implementation status of the target control plan is evaluated to obtain the evaluation results of the implementation status of the target control plan in the target area during the evaluation period.

[0017] In one possible implementation of the first aspect, the step of evaluating the applicability of the planning results of the target control plan based on the external environment change data of the control plan and the currently approved control plan results data, to obtain the evaluation result of the planning results of the target control plan in the target area during the evaluation period, includes:

[0018] The external environment change data of the control plan are translated to obtain planning result evaluation rules, which include evaluation rules for conflicting plots and evaluation rules for conflicting units.

[0019] Based on the land parcel data in the currently approved control plan results data and the evaluation rules for conflicting land parcels, an evaluation is conducted on whether each land parcel in the target area is in conflict, and the conflict evaluation results for each land parcel are obtained.

[0020] Based on the unit result data in the currently approved control plan result data and the evaluation rules of the conflict unit, as well as the conflict evaluation results of all the plots included in each unit, the unit conflict degree corresponding to each unit in the target area is calculated.

[0021] Based on the degree of conflict of each unit, the applicability of the planning results of each unit is evaluated, and the evaluation results of the planning results of each unit are obtained.

[0022] Based on the evaluation results of the planning outcomes of all the units within the target area, the evaluation results of the target control plan within the target area during the evaluation period are determined.

[0023] In one possible implementation of the first aspect, the step of calculating the unit conflict degree corresponding to each of the units within the target area based on the unit result data in the currently approved control plan result data and the evaluation rules of the conflict units, as well as the conflict evaluation results of all the plots included in each unit, includes:

[0024] Based on the evaluation rules of the conflict unit, multiple evaluation factors for the conflict unit are determined;

[0025] Based on each of the evaluation factors of the conflict unit, the conflict status of each unit in the target area is evaluated to obtain the conflict evaluation result of each unit under each evaluation factor.

[0026] Based on the conflict assessment results of each unit under each assessment factor, the number of conflicts for each unit is calculated.

[0027] The average number of unit conflicts is calculated based on the number of conflicts of all the units within the target area;

[0028] The unit conflict degree of each unit in the target area is calculated based on the number of conflicts of each unit, the average number of conflicts of the units, and the conflict assessment results of all the plots in the target area.

[0029] In one possible implementation of the first aspect, the step of evaluating the applicability of the adjustment rules of the target control plan based on the control plan adjustment record data, the historical approved control plan results data, and the current approved control plan results data, to obtain the adjustment rule evaluation result of the target control plan in the target area during the evaluation period, includes:

[0030] Based on the control plan adjustment record data, the adjustment indicators for the adjustment type, adjustment reason, and adjustment content of the target control plan are statistically analyzed to obtain the indicator values ​​for the adjustment type, adjustment reason, and adjustment content of the target control plan.

[0031] The applicability of the adjustment process of the target control plan is evaluated based on the indicator values ​​of the adjustment type, the adjustment reason, and the adjustment content of the target control plan, respectively, to obtain the evaluation result of the adjustment process of the target control plan in the target area during the evaluation period;

[0032] Based on the historical indicator values ​​in the historical approved control plan results data and the current indicator values ​​in the current approved control plan results data, the adjustment information of the target control plan during the evaluation period is statistically analyzed;

[0033] Based on the overall indicator setting values ​​in the master plan and the adjustment information of the target control plan during the evaluation period, the rationality of the indicator adjustment direction of the target control plan is evaluated, and the evaluation result of the indicator adjustment direction of the target control plan in the target area during the evaluation period is obtained.

[0034] Based on the evaluation results of the adjustment process of the target control regulation in the target area and the evaluation results of the indicator adjustment direction during the evaluation period, the applicability of the adjustment rules of the target control regulation during the evaluation period is evaluated, and the evaluation results of the adjustment rules of the target control regulation in the target area during the evaluation period are obtained.

[0035] In one possible implementation of the first aspect, the step of assessing the implementation status of the control plan based on the current urban operational data to obtain the assessment result of the implementation status of the target control plan in the target area during the assessment period includes:

[0036] Based on the pre-built standard indicator library of each unit in the target area, standard indicators of multiple unit development indicators corresponding to each unit are obtained, wherein the unit development indicators are the unit development indicators established by the control plan.

[0037] Based on the current operation data of the city, the indicator values ​​of the multiple unit development indicators corresponding to each unit are statistically analyzed to obtain the current statistical values ​​of the multiple unit development indicators corresponding to each unit.

[0038] Based on the current statistical values ​​of the multiple unit development indicators corresponding to each unit and the standard indicators of the multiple unit development indicators, the implementation status of each unit in the target area is evaluated to obtain the evaluation results of the implementation status of the target control plan in the target area during the evaluation period.

[0039] In one possible implementation of the first aspect, the step of evaluating the implementation status of each unit in the target area based on the current statistical values ​​of the plurality of unit development indicators corresponding to each unit and the standard indicators of the plurality of unit development indicators, to obtain the evaluation result of the implementation status of the target control plan in the target area during the evaluation period, includes:

[0040] Based on the current statistical values ​​of the multiple unit development indicators corresponding to the unit and the standard indicators of the multiple unit development indicators corresponding to the unit, the deviation of the multiple unit development indicators corresponding to the unit is calculated respectively to obtain the deviation value of the multiple unit development indicators corresponding to the unit.

[0041] Based on the deviation values ​​of the multiple unit development indicators corresponding to the unit, an assessment is made as to whether the implementation status of the unit has become abnormal, and the implementation status assessment result of the unit is obtained.

[0042] Based on the assessment results of the implementation status of all the units in the target area, the assessment results of the implementation status of the target control plan in the target area during the assessment period are determined.

[0043] Secondly, embodiments of this application provide a regulatory evaluation apparatus, comprising:

[0044] The data acquisition module is used to acquire multiple planning implementation data related to the target control plan during the evaluation period;

[0045] The planning evaluation module is used to evaluate the target control plan in at least one dimension during the evaluation period based on multiple planning implementation data, and obtain at least one planning evaluation result.

[0046] An assessment summary module is used to determine the overall assessment result of the target control plan during the assessment period based on at least one of the planning assessment results.

[0047] Thirdly, embodiments of this application provide an electronic device, including a memory, a processor, and a computer program stored in the memory and executable on the processor, wherein the processor executes the computer program to implement the method described in any of the above-mentioned embodiments.

[0048] Fourthly, embodiments of this application provide a computer-readable storage medium storing a computer program that, when executed by a processor, implements the method described in any of the preceding claims.

[0049] Fifthly, embodiments of this application provide a computer program product that, when run on a terminal device, causes the terminal device to execute any of the methods described above.

[0050] The beneficial effects of this application embodiment compared with the prior art are as follows: By acquiring multiple planning implementation data related to the target control plan within the evaluation period, and evaluating the target control plan in at least one dimension based on the acquired multiple planning implementation data, at least one planning evaluation result is obtained. Relevant planning implementation data can be quickly acquired according to the dimensions to be evaluated, and the planning implementation data within the evaluation period can be quickly evaluated to generate planning evaluation results. Based on the obtained planning evaluation results, the overall evaluation result of the target control plan during the evaluation period is determined, thereby improving the effectiveness of the overall evaluation result of the target control plan. This achieves the evaluation of the target control plan, identifies problems existing in the target control plan within that dimension during the evaluation period, provides timely warnings, and offers suggestions for the subsequent preparation, approval, and implementation of the target control plan. This solves the technical problem of existing planning evaluation methods being unable to perform monitoring and early warning. Attached Figure Description

[0051] To more clearly illustrate the technical solutions in the embodiments of this application, the drawings used in the description of the embodiments or the prior art will be briefly introduced below. Obviously, the drawings described below are only some embodiments of this application. For those skilled in the art, other drawings can be obtained based on these drawings without creative effort.

[0052] Figure 1 This is a flowchart illustrating an evaluation method for regulatory regulations provided in an embodiment of this application;

[0053] Figure 2 This is a schematic diagram of the structure for evaluating a control regulation according to another embodiment of this application;

[0054] Figure 3 This is a schematic diagram of the evaluation results of a regulatory regulation assessment provided in another embodiment of this application;

[0055] Figure 4 This is a schematic diagram of the structure of a regulatory evaluation device provided in one embodiment of this application. Detailed Implementation

[0056] In the following description, specific details such as particular system architectures and techniques are set forth for illustrative purposes and not for limitation, in order to provide a thorough understanding of the embodiments of this application. However, those skilled in the art will understand that this application may also be implemented in other embodiments without these specific details. In other instances, detailed descriptions of well-known systems, apparatuses, circuits, and methods have been omitted so as not to obscure the description of this application with unnecessary detail.

[0057] It should be understood that, when used in this application specification and the appended claims, the term "comprising" indicates the presence of the described features, integrals, steps, operations, elements and / or components, but does not exclude the presence or addition of one or more other features, integrals, steps, operations, elements, components and / or a collection thereof.

[0058] It should also be understood that the term “and / or” as used in this application specification and the appended claims means any combination of one or more of the associated listed items and all possible combinations, and includes such combinations.

[0059] As used in this application specification and the appended claims, the term "if" may be interpreted, depending on the context, as "when," "once," "in response to determination," or "in response to detection." Similarly, the phrase "if determined" or "if detected [the described condition or event]" may be interpreted, depending on the context, as meaning "once determined," "in response to determination," "once detected [the described condition or event]," or "in response to detection [the described condition or event]."

[0060] Furthermore, in the description of this application and the appended claims, the terms "first," "second," "third," etc., are used only to distinguish descriptions and should not be construed as indicating or implying relative importance.

[0061] References to "one embodiment" or "some embodiments" as described in this specification mean that one or more embodiments of this application include a specific feature, structure, or characteristic described in connection with that embodiment. Therefore, the phrases "in one embodiment," "in some embodiments," "in other embodiments," "in still other embodiments," etc., appearing in different parts of this specification do not necessarily refer to the same embodiment, but rather mean "one or more, but not all, embodiments," unless otherwise specifically emphasized. The terms "comprising," "including," "having," and variations thereof mean "including but not limited to," unless otherwise specifically emphasized.

[0062] The main purpose of the control plan is to conduct detailed planning and control over the use, development intensity, spatial layout and environmental quality of multiple control plots in a local area or multiple control plan units under the guidance of the city's overall plan, so as to ensure the implementation of the overall plan and safeguard the city's construction and development.

[0063] This application provides a method for evaluating regulatory rules, see [link to relevant documentation]. Figure 1 , Figure 1 This is a flowchart illustrating a regulatory assessment method provided in an embodiment of this application, including:

[0064] Step S11: Obtain multiple planning implementation data related to the target control plan during the evaluation period;

[0065] Step S12: Based on multiple planning implementation data, evaluate the target control plan in at least one dimension during the evaluation period to obtain at least one planning evaluation result;

[0066] Step S13: Based on at least one planning evaluation result, determine the overall evaluation result of the target control plan during the evaluation period.

[0067] Specifically, multiple planning implementation data related to the target regulatory plan are obtained from the regulatory plan assessment database within the assessment period, where the assessment period is the time frame for assessing the target regulatory plan. The target regulatory plan can be the specific implementation status of land, resources, etc., in the target area to be assessed. The target area can be a city, a township, a county, or a district, etc.

[0068] The regulatory planning assessment database includes all data generated during the process of drafting, adjusting, approving, and implementing the master plan and regulatory plans, as well as urban operation data at multiple time points within the target area. Multiple planning implementation data related to the target regulatory plan during the assessment period include: planning implementation data related to the target regulatory plan generated from the start time of the assessment period to the end time of the assessment period.

[0069] In an optional example, multiple planning implementation data related to the target control plan are obtained within 2014. The evaluation period is 2014, with the evaluation period starting on January 1, 2014, and ending on December 31, 2014.

[0070] It should be noted that the evaluation period can be set according to specific evaluation needs, and the time span can be quarterly, annual, two-year, five-year, etc. This embodiment does not make specific limitations on the evaluation period.

[0071] Specifically, the assessment of the target control plan in at least one dimension during the aforementioned assessment period may include one or more of the following: assessment of the applicability of the planning results, assessment of the applicability of the adjustment rules, and assessment of the current status of unit implementation.

[0072] Based on the multiple planning implementation data obtained above, the target control plan is evaluated in at least one dimension during the evaluation period, resulting in one or more planning evaluation results. These evaluation results can include one or more aspects such as whether the planning outcomes generated during the evaluation period are applicable, whether the adjustment rules are applicable, and whether problems have arisen in the current implementation status.

[0073] When a target control plan is evaluated in one dimension within the evaluation period, a single planning evaluation result is obtained. When a target control plan is evaluated in multiple dimensions within the evaluation period, multiple planning evaluation results are obtained. Based on one or more planning evaluation results of the target control plan, the overall evaluation result of the target control plan for the evaluation period is determined.

[0074] Based on the overall evaluation results of the aforementioned target control plan during the evaluation period, an evaluation report of the control plan can be generated to optimize the processes of its preparation, approval, and implementation. For example, when conducting an applicability assessment of the planning results, problems existing in the planning results can be identified. For instance, applicable and inapplicable approved control plan data can be identified, and based on the inapplicable approved control plan data, the need for adjustments to the target control plan can be suggested.

[0075] It is understood that the technical solution provided in this embodiment acquires multiple planning implementation data related to the target control plan within the evaluation period. Based on the acquired multiple planning implementation data, it evaluates the target control plan in at least one dimension within the evaluation period, obtaining at least one planning evaluation result. It can quickly acquire relevant planning implementation data according to the data of the dimension to be evaluated, quickly evaluate the dimension within the evaluation period, generate planning evaluation results, and determine the overall evaluation result of the target control plan within the evaluation period based on the obtained planning evaluation results. This improves the effectiveness of the overall evaluation result of the target control plan, realizes the evaluation of the target control plan, identifies the problems existing in the target control plan in that dimension within the evaluation period, provides timely warnings, and makes suggestions for the subsequent preparation, approval, and implementation of the target control plan. This solves the technical problem that existing urban planning evaluation methods cannot effectively monitor and warn.

[0076] In one possible implementation, step S11 involves acquiring multiple planning implementation data related to the target control plan during the evaluation period, including:

[0077] Determine the regulatory planning evaluation database pre-constructed based on the target area;

[0078] From the regulatory planning assessment database, obtain multiple planning implementation data related to the target regulatory plan during the assessment period. These multiple planning implementation data include: historical approved regulatory plan results data, current approved regulatory plan results data, regulatory plan adjustment record data, urban status operation data, and regulatory plan external environment change data. Among them, the historical approved regulatory plan results data are the regulatory plan data approved for the target area at the start time of the assessment period; the current approved regulatory plan results data are the regulatory plan data approved for the target area at the end time of the assessment period; the regulatory plan adjustment record data are the regulatory plan adjustment data for the target area during the assessment period; the urban status operation data are the urban operation data for the target area at the end time of the assessment period; and the regulatory plan external environment change data are the external environment change data for the target area during the assessment period.

[0079] Specifically, data on the implementation of multiple plans related to the target control plan during the evaluation period will be obtained, including:

[0080] A pre-constructed regulatory planning evaluation database based on the target area is established. This database includes data on approved regulatory plans, regulatory plan adjustment records, urban operation data, and data on changes in the external environment related to the regulatory plans.

[0081] The approved control plan data refers to the approved control plan data within the target area, which can be retrieved from the basic information platform or from the control plan result GIS (Geographic Information System) database. This embodiment does not specifically limit the data acquisition method. The approved control plan data includes control plan unit layers, land use layers, road network layers, and public facility point layers, etc.

[0082] The control planning unit layer includes unit result data for multiple units within the target area. The unit result data for a single unit includes quantitative indicators such as the planned geographical boundaries, total population, total building volume, and total supporting facilities, which are used to guide construction activities within the unit.

[0083] The map layer contains land parcel output data for multiple plots within the target area. The land parcel output data for a single plot includes information such as the planned geographical boundaries, land use, compatibility, floor area ratio, building density, and green space ratio.

[0084] The road network includes the results data of the control planning roads in the target area, including information such as road alignment, grade, and right-of-way width.

[0085] The public service facility point layer includes the resulting data of public service facilities planned for the target area, such as the location, scale, and population served by different types of public service facilities, including education, healthcare, culture, and sports.

[0086] The regulatory planning adjustment record data refers to the regulatory planning adjustment data for the target area, including the regulatory planning adjustment archive data for each project. This data can be retrieved from the information system. The regulatory planning adjustment data includes information such as the adjustment type, reason, content, distribution, before-and-after comparison chart, and duration of each adjustment for each project.

[0087] The adjustment types can be categorized into revisions, partial adjustments, and technical corrections. The reasons for adjustments can be categorized into changes to higher-level plans, alignment with special plans, impact of major construction projects, needs for public welfare projects, needs for industrial projects, needs for commercial projects, and the need for updates based on assessments. The content of adjustments can be categorized into land boundaries, land use nature, plot ratio, and other land indicators, and can be further subdivided based on high-frequency local conditions; for example, land use nature adjustments can be subdivided into industrial to residential, industrial to commercial, and other land use nature adjustments. The adjustment distribution includes information such as the spatial location of the adjusted project. The adjustment duration represents the total time from project initiation to approval and subsequent filing, as well as the duration of each sub-stage.

[0088] Urban operation data represents the operational data of a target area at a specific point in time. Operational data can be obtained from open online resources, and after cleaning and merging, it can be obtained as urban operation data. For target areas with complete data, urban operation data can be retrieved from the target area's basic information platform. Urban operation data includes: actual population data at the unit / community level, actual land use data, actual building volume data, actual road network data, actual data on the location of public facilities, and actual economic census data, etc.

[0089] The external environment change data for the control plan refers to the data on changes in the external environment of the target area, including: vector data of the results of higher-level plans (generally the master plan) and special plans, the city's recent or annual construction project database, land use policies, new clauses of standards and regulations, and information on the implementation lines of infrastructure projects. Among these, the vector data of the results of higher-level plans and special plans can be retrieved from the spatial basic information platform of the target area, while the city's recent or annual construction project database, land use policies, new clauses of standards and regulations, and implementation lines of infrastructure projects can be obtained from shared information.

[0090] Obtain implementation data from multiple plans related to the target regulatory plan within the assessment period from the regulatory plan assessment database. (Reference) Figure 3 , Figure 3 This is a schematic diagram illustrating the evaluation results of a control plan assessment provided in another embodiment of this application. Multiple planning implementation data related to the target control plan during the evaluation period include: historical approved control plan outcome data (attached). Figure 3 P1 in the document), currently approved control plan results data (attached) Figure 3P2 in the document), control plan adjustment record data (attached) Figure 3 (T12 in the text) and current urban operation data (attached) Figure 3 X2 in the data and external environmental change data of the control plan (attached) Figure 3 (W12 in the middle).

[0091] The assessment period is the time from the start time of the assessment to the end time of the assessment. The aforementioned historical approved control plan data refers to the control plan data of the target area that has been approved at the start time of the assessment period; the current approved control plan data refers to the control plan data of the target area that has been approved at the end time of the assessment period.

[0092] The data recorded in the control plan adjustment record are the control plan adjustment data of the target area during the assessment period; the data on the current operation of the city are the urban operation data of the target area at the end of the assessment period; and the data on changes in the external environment of the control plan are the data on changes in the external environment of the target area during the assessment period.

[0093] In one possible implementation, step S12 includes at least one dimension: planning results, adjustment rules, and implementation status. Based on multiple planning implementation data, the target control plan is evaluated in at least one dimension during the evaluation period to obtain at least one planning evaluation result, including at least one of the following steps:

[0094] Step S121: Based on the data on changes in the external environment of the control plan and the data on the currently approved control plan results, assess whether the planning results of the target control plan are applicable, and obtain the assessment results of the planning results of the target control plan in the target area during the assessment period.

[0095] Step S122: Based on the control plan adjustment record data, historical approved control plan results data and current approved control plan results data, assess whether the adjustment rules of the target control plan are applicable, and obtain the assessment results of the adjustment rules of the target control plan in the target area during the assessment period;

[0096] Step S123: Based on the current urban operation data, assess the implementation status of the target control plan to obtain the assessment results of the implementation status of the target control plan in the target area during the assessment period.

[0097] Specifically, at least one dimension includes one or more of the following: planning outcomes, rule adjustments, and current implementation status.

[0098] When evaluating at least one dimension generated by the target control plan during the evaluation period based on multiple planning implementation data, and obtaining at least one planning evaluation result, the process includes one or more of the following steps:

[0099] refer to Figure 2 , Figure 2This is a schematic diagram illustrating the structure of a regulatory plan evaluation according to another embodiment of this application, including a drafting stage, an approval stage, an implementation stage, and an evaluation stage. In the evaluation stage, reference is made to... Figure 3 When evaluating planning outcomes generated based on the target control plan during the evaluation period, the applicability of the target control plan's planning outcomes is assessed based on data on changes in the external environment of the control plan and data on currently approved control plan outcomes. The evaluation identifies inapplicable and applicable planning outcomes from the currently approved control plan data, resulting in the evaluation results of the target control plan's planning outcomes in the target area during the evaluation period. These evaluation results include the degree of conflict between individual units and conflicting land parcels within the target area. Based on the inapplicable and applicable planning outcomes, issues with the control plan can be identified, and adjustment needs can be suggested.

[0100] During the evaluation phase, when assessing the adjustment rules generated based on the target control plan during the evaluation period, the evaluation is conducted using control plan adjustment record data, historical approved control plan outcome data, and current approved control plan outcome data. This involves evaluating whether the operation process and results of the target control plan under the current management rules meet the expected goals and development needs of the rule formulation, assessing the applicability of the target control plan's adjustment rules, identifying inapplicable and applicable adjustment rules, and obtaining the adjustment rule evaluation results for the target control plan in the target area during the evaluation period. The adjustment rule evaluation results may include an adjustment summary report and a cumulative adjustment change report. Based on the inapplicable and applicable adjustment rules, the most common adjustment scenarios and adjustment durations during the target control plan's adjustment process are identified, determining whether the adjustment rules are applicable and whether the control plan's review and approval process needs optimization.

[0101] During the evaluation phase, when assessing the implementation status of the target control plan within the evaluation period, the current operational data of the city is used to analyze various current status indicators of each unit in the target area. This evaluation assesses whether any anomalies have occurred in the implementation of each current status indicator in each unit, identifies existing problems in each unit, and issues early warnings. The resulting evaluation of the implementation status of the target control plan in the target area within the evaluation period includes early warnings for problems in each unit. When anomalies occur in the implementation status of a unit, an early warning is issued, prompting the user to take action. Based on the implementation status of the anomaly-affected unit, feedback is provided on the actions that need to be implemented in the plan, thereby improving the current problems in the target area.

[0102] It should be noted that one or more of the current control plan implementation data can be evaluated as needed, and this embodiment does not specifically limit this.

[0103] In one possible implementation, step S121 involves assessing the applicability of the target control plan's planning results based on data on changes in the external environment of the control plan and the currently approved control plan's results, thereby obtaining the assessment results of the target control plan's planning results in the target area during the assessment period, including:

[0104] Step S1211: Translate the data on changes in the external environment of the control plan to obtain the planning result evaluation rules. The planning result evaluation rules include the evaluation rules for conflicting plots and the evaluation rules for conflicting units.

[0105] Step S1212: Based on the land parcel data in the currently approved control plan results data and the evaluation rules for conflicting land parcels, evaluate whether each land parcel in the target area has a conflict, and obtain the conflict evaluation results for each land parcel.

[0106] Step S1213: Based on the unit result data and the evaluation rules of conflict units in the currently approved control plan result data, as well as the conflict evaluation results of all plots included in each unit, calculate the unit conflict degree corresponding to each unit in the target area.

[0107] Step S1214: Based on the conflict degree of each unit, evaluate whether the planning results of each unit are applicable, and obtain the evaluation results of the planning results of each unit.

[0108] Step S1215: Based on the evaluation results of the planning results of all units within the target area, determine the evaluation results of the target control plan in the target area during the evaluation period.

[0109] Specifically, based on data on changes in the external environment of the control plan and data on currently approved control plans, an assessment is conducted to determine the applicability of the target control plan's planning outcomes. When obtaining the assessment results of the target control plan's planning outcomes in the target area during the assessment period, the following should be included:

[0110] The data on changes in the external environment of the control plan are translated to obtain the planning outcome evaluation rules. These rules represent the evaluation rules for various indicators of the planning outcome, including evaluation rules for conflicting plots and conflicting units. The evaluation rules for conflicting plots represent various rules for assessing whether a plot is in conflict. The evaluation rules for conflicting units represent various rules for assessing whether a unit is in conflict.

[0111] In an optional example, the external environment change data for the regulatory plan can be the master plan, which establishes a series of control requirements such as control lines, unit transmission indicators, and special facilities. Specifically, the control requirements for control lines are translated into an assessment rule that "a land parcel of a certain land use type intersecting with the control line is designated as a conflict parcel." The control requirements for unit transmission indicators are transformed into an assessment rule that "if the sum of all relevant indicators of all parcels within a unit exceeds the standard value of the unit transmission indicator, it is marked as a conflict unit." The control requirements for special facilities are translated into corresponding assessment rules based on different transmission requirements such as "fixed point, fixed line, and fixed boundary," through buffer zones or strict comparison methods.

[0112] Specifically, the currently approved control plan data includes land parcel data for each plot in the target area, such as land use, transportation lines, and facility point layers. The assessment rules for conflicting plots mainly include in-depth assessment rules, such as conflict assessment standards for various control requirements, including: whether they comply with control lines, whether they implement the special facilities clearly defined in the master plan or special plan, whether they comply with intensity zoning, whether they comply with the recent project red line, whether they meet the minimum floor area ratio requirements for industrial land, and whether they connect to the latest implementation lines of transportation and water conservancy facilities.

[0113] According to the assessment rules for conflicting land parcels, the land parcel data in the currently approved control plan results are evaluated to determine whether the land parcel data meets the land parcel conflict assessment standards for various control requirements. If the land parcel data meets the land parcel conflict assessment standards for control requirements, the land parcel is determined to be in conflict, and the conflict assessment result for the land parcel is determined to be a conflicting land parcel. If the land parcel data does not meet the land parcel conflict assessment standards for control requirements, the land parcel is determined to be not in conflict, and the conflict assessment result for the land parcel is determined to be a non-conflicting land parcel. Thus, the conflict assessment results for each land parcel are obtained.

[0114] The currently approved control plan results data include unit results data for each unit of the target area. The assessment rules for conflict units mainly include assessment rules for units that cannot be implemented to the depth of the land parcels. For example, the unit conflict assessment standards for various control requirements include: whether the sum of indicators of each parcel in the unit exceeds the unit transmission indicators, whether the land use ratio in the unit is consistent with the zoning control requirements of the overall plan, whether the direction and width of linear facilities in the unit meet the requirements of the overall plan or special plan, and whether the point facilities for fixed-point transmission are implemented in the unit, etc.

[0115] Based on the unit data and conflict unit evaluation rules in the currently approved control plan data, as well as the conflict evaluation results of all plots included in each unit, the unit data of each unit in the currently approved control plan data is evaluated to determine whether a conflict has occurred. Each time a conflict is identified in the evaluation, the unit is marked as a conflict unit. The total number of times a unit is marked as a conflict unit is obtained, which is taken as the conflict count for that unit, and thus the unit conflict degree is calculated. The unit conflict degree for each unit within the target area is calculated using the same method.

[0116] Based on the conflict degree of each unit within the target area, the applicability of the planning results of each unit is evaluated, and the evaluation results of the planning results of each unit are obtained. When the conflict degree of a unit is 0, the evaluation result of the planning results of that unit is deemed applicable; when the conflict degree of a unit is greater than 0, the evaluation result of the planning results of that unit is deemed inapplicable.

[0117] Based on the evaluation results of the planning outcomes of all units within the target area, determine the evaluation results of the target control plan within the target area during the evaluation period.

[0118] Based on the degree of conflict of all units, and following the principle that "the greater the degree of conflict, the stronger the inapplicability", the distribution area and indicators of one or more units that are least applicable are determined, and the control plan of one or more units that are least applicable is revised or adjusted.

[0119] Understandably, when a conflicting plot is not in the least suitable unit, the control plan can be partially adjusted as needed based on the plot information of the conflicting plot, so as to reduce the degree of conflict in the control plan of the unit.

[0120] In one possible implementation, in step S1213, based on the unit result data and the evaluation rules of conflicting units in the currently approved control plan result data, as well as the conflict evaluation results of all plots included in each unit, the unit conflict degree corresponding to each unit within the target area is calculated, including:

[0121] Based on the assessment rules of the conflict unit, multiple assessment factors for the conflict unit are determined;

[0122] Based on each assessment factor of the conflict unit, the conflict assessment results of each unit in the target area are obtained to determine whether a conflict has occurred.

[0123] Based on the conflict assessment results of each unit under each assessment factor, the number of conflicts for each unit is calculated.

[0124] The average number of unit conflicts is calculated based on the number of conflicts of all units within the target area;

[0125] Based on the number of conflicts in each unit, the average number of conflicts in each unit, and the conflict assessment results of the plots within the target area, the unit conflict degree of each unit within the target area is calculated.

[0126] Specifically, based on the unit data and conflict unit evaluation rules in the currently approved control plan results, as well as the conflict evaluation results of all plots included in each unit, the unit conflict degree corresponding to each unit within the target area is calculated, including:

[0127] Based on the assessment rules for conflict units, several assessment factors for conflict units are determined, such as: unit transmission indicators, land use ratio, orientation and width of linear facilities within the unit, and point facilities for fixed-point transmission.

[0128] For any unit in the target area, based on any evaluation factor, assess whether the unit is in conflict. The result for that unit under that evaluation factor is either "conflict occurred" or "no conflict occurred." When the unit is identified as having a conflict under that evaluation factor, it is marked as a conflict unit once, and the unit is considered to have experienced a conflict once. This process is repeated for all evaluation factors, and the total number of times the unit is marked as a conflict unit is obtained. This total number is then used to calculate the number of conflicts for that unit.

[0129] The average number of unit conflicts in the target area is calculated based on the number of conflicts of all units within the target area.

[0130] Since each unit includes one or more land parcels, for any unit i in the target area, the unit conflict degree C of unit i in the target area is calculated according to the following formula, based on the number of conflicts in that unit, the average number of unit conflicts, and the conflict assessment results of the land parcels in the target area. i :

[0131]

[0132] Among them, SC i S represents the total area of ​​conflicting plots in unit i. i FC represents the area of ​​cell i. i This indicates the number of collisions in cell i. This represents the average number of cell collisions in the target region.

[0133] In one possible implementation, in step S122, based on the control plan adjustment record data, historical approved control plan results data, and current approved control plan results data, the applicability of the adjustment rules for the target control plan is assessed to obtain the assessment results of the adjustment rules for the target control plan in the target area during the assessment period, including:

[0134] Based on the data of the control plan adjustment records, the adjustment indicators of the adjustment type, adjustment reason and adjustment content of the target control plan are statistically analyzed to obtain the indicator values ​​of the adjustment type, adjustment reason and adjustment content of the target control plan.

[0135] The applicability of the adjustment process of the target control plan is evaluated based on the indicator values ​​of the adjustment type, the adjustment reason, and the adjustment content of the target control plan, respectively, and the evaluation results of the adjustment process of the target control plan in the target area are obtained during the evaluation period.

[0136] Based on the historical indicator values ​​in the historical approved control plan results data and the current indicator values ​​in the current approved control plan results data, the adjustment information of the target control plan during the evaluation period is statistically analyzed;

[0137] Based on the overall indicator setting values ​​in the master plan and the adjustment information of the target control plan during the evaluation period, the rationality of the indicator adjustment direction of the target control plan is evaluated, and the evaluation results of the indicator adjustment direction of the target control plan in the target area during the evaluation period are obtained.

[0138] Based on the evaluation results of the adjustment process and indicator adjustment direction of the target control plan in the target area during the evaluation period, the applicability of the adjustment rules of the target control plan during the evaluation period is evaluated, and the evaluation results of the adjustment rules of the target control plan in the target area during the evaluation period are obtained.

[0139] Specifically, based on the data from the control plan adjustment records, historical approved control plan results, and current approved control plan results, an assessment is conducted to determine the applicability of the adjustment rules for the target control plan. This yields the assessment results of the adjustment rules for the target control plan within the target area during the assessment period, including:

[0140] The control plan adjustment record data includes the adjustment type, reason, and content of each adjustment, as well as the duration of each adjustment. Adjustment frequency and timeliness are used as adjustment indicators. Based on all control plan adjustment types and the duration of each adjustment, the number of adjustments and the duration of each adjustment category are statistically analyzed. Based on the number of adjustments and the duration, the adjustment timeliness and frequency of each adjustment category are calculated, serving as the indicator values ​​for each adjustment category.

[0141] Based on the reasons for all regulatory planning adjustments and the duration of each adjustment, the number of adjustments and the duration of each reason category are statistically analyzed. Based on the number of adjustments and the duration of adjustments, the adjustment timeliness and frequency of each reason category are calculated, which serve as the indicator values ​​for the adjustment indicators of each reason category.

[0142] Based on the content of all regulatory planning adjustments and the duration of each adjustment, the number of adjustments and the duration of each content category are statistically analyzed. Based on the number of adjustments and the duration of each adjustment, the adjustment timeliness and frequency of each content category are calculated, which serve as the indicator values ​​for the adjustment indicators of each content category.

[0143] Based on various combinations of adjustment reasons and adjustment content, the number of adjustments and adjustment durations under each combination of adjustment reasons and adjustment content are statistically analyzed. Based on the number of adjustments and adjustment durations, the adjustment timeliness and adjustment frequency for each combination of adjustment reasons and content are calculated, serving as the indicator values ​​for the adjustment indicators for each combination of adjustment reasons and content.

[0144] Among them, adjustment frequency refers to the number of times each adjustment category, each reason category, or each content category occurs within the evaluation period, and adjustment duration refers to the average, maximum, or minimum adjustment duration of each adjustment category, each reason category, or each content category within the evaluation period.

[0145] Based on the indicator values ​​of adjustment indicators for each adjustment category, each cause category, and each content category of the target control plan, a combined analysis is performed to determine the common adjustment categories, cause categories, and / or content categories in the adjustment process of the target control plan, as well as the indicator values ​​of adjustment indicators for these common categories. Based on the indicator values ​​of adjustment indicators for these common categories, causes, and / or content categories, the applicability of the adjustment process is assessed, resulting in an evaluation of the target control plan's adjustment process in the target area within the evaluation period. For inapplicable adjustment processes, a prompt message is issued to remind users to make improvements.

[0146] In one optional example, the adjustment type with the highest frequency of adjustment is the adjustment of the plot ratio and various specific indicators of industrial land required for the implementation of industrial projects. If the adjustment time required for the implementation of industrial projects is higher than the time threshold that is conducive to the implementation of projects (e.g., 2 months), then it can be considered that there is a problem with the adjustment rule and that it conflicts with the needs of urban development. In this case, the user can be reminded to adjust and optimize the approval process required for the implementation of industrial projects.

[0147] It is understandable that, such as Figure 3As shown, the evaluation results of the adjustment process of the target control plan in the target area during the evaluation period can generate an adjustment summary report. This report, presented in the form of pie charts and other statistical graphs, displays the adjustment frequency and timeliness of different adjustment categories, the adjustment frequency and timeliness of different adjustment reason categories, the adjustment frequency and timeliness of different content categories, the adjustment frequency and timeliness of typical combinations of adjustment reasons and content, and the spatial distribution of the adjustment project scope. The adjustment summary report can include the most common types, reasons, content, characteristics, timeliness, and frequency of control plan adjustments during the process, thereby helping to reveal existing problems in the adjustment process.

[0148] Specifically, statistical analysis is conducted on the land use layer (in addition to land type and building volume, the planned population in the control plan can also be counted in reverse) of the approved control plan results data and the current approved control plan results data to obtain historical indicator values ​​in the historical approved control plan results data and the current approved control plan results data.

[0149] Based on historical indicator values ​​from approved historical control plan data and current indicator values ​​from approved current control plan data, statistical analysis is conducted on the adjustment information of the target control plan during the evaluation period to obtain information on land use structure adjustment, building volume structure adjustment, public facility adjustment, and road network density adjustment.

[0150] Since the master plan includes overall indicator settings, which include overall indicators for land use structure, building volume structure, public facilities, and road network density, these overall indicator settings are compared one by one with the land use structure adjustment information, building volume structure adjustment information, public facilities adjustment information, and road network density adjustment information in the target control plan during the evaluation period.

[0151] By comparing the overall land use structure indicators set in the master plan with the land use structure adjustment information in the control plan during the assessment period, we assess whether the adjustment direction of the land use structure deviates from the development needs, identify the adjustments in the land use structure that deviate from the development needs, and obtain the assessment results of the adjustment direction of the land use structure.

[0152] By comparing the overall building volume and structure indicators set in the master plan with the building volume and structure adjustment information in the control plan during the assessment period, the assessment is conducted to determine whether the adjustment direction of the building volume and structure deviates from the development needs. Adjustments in the building volume and structure that deviate from the development needs are identified, and the assessment results of the adjustment direction of the building volume and structure are obtained.

[0153] By comparing the overall target values ​​for public facilities in the master plan with the information on adjustments to public facilities in the control plan during the evaluation period, an assessment is conducted to determine whether the direction of adjustments to public facilities deviates from development needs. Adjustments to public facilities that deviate from development needs are identified, and the assessment results of the direction of adjustments to public facilities are obtained.

[0154] By comparing the overall road network density target setpoint in the master plan with the road network density adjustment information in the control plan during the evaluation period, the direction of road network density adjustment is evaluated to determine whether it deviates from development needs. Adjustments in road network density that deviate from development needs are identified, and the evaluation results of the direction of road network density adjustment are obtained.

[0155] Based on the assessment results of the adjustment directions of land use structure, building volume structure, public facilities, and road network density, the overall assessment results of the adjustment directions of the control plan indicators in the target area during the assessment period are obtained.

[0156] Based on the evaluation results of the adjustment process of the target control plan in the target area and the overall evaluation results of the indicator adjustment direction during the evaluation period, problems or omissions in the current adjustment rules can be identified, and the evaluation results of the adjustment rules of the target control plan in the target area during the evaluation period can be obtained.

[0157] In an optional example, the master plan often sets specific requirements for the total amount of a certain type of land use, the proportion of a certain type of construction land, the per capita construction land of a certain type (e.g., park green space), the per capita building volume of a certain type (e.g., residential building area, commercial building area), the per capita facility volume (e.g., school places per thousand people), the service radius coverage of facilities, and road network density, based on the development needs of the target area. For example, the master plan requires that the proportion of industrial land be no less than 30%. However, if the historical approved control plan data shows that the proportion of industrial land was 25%, and the current approved control plan data shows that the proportion of industrial land has further decreased to 20%, then it can be considered that the adjustment direction of industrial land during the assessment period deviates from the needs of urban development.

[0158] Understandably, by identifying adjustments in the adjustment rules that deviate from development needs, a cumulative adjustment change report of the target control plan during the evaluation period can be output. The report can include historical approved control plan results data for each adjustment, current approved control plan results data, and comparison charts of the overall indicator settings of the overall plan. It can also issue warnings for situations that continuously deviate from the overall indicator settings, prompting users that the adjustment direction is abnormal and reminding users to take measures to adjust the deviation.

[0159] In one possible implementation, step S123 involves assessing the current implementation status of the control plan based on existing urban operational data, obtaining the assessment results of the target control plan's implementation status in the target area during the assessment period, including:

[0160] Step S1231: Based on the pre-built standard indicator library of each unit in the target area, obtain the standard indicators of multiple unit development indicators corresponding to each unit. The unit development indicators are the unit development indicators established by the control plan.

[0161] Step S1232: Based on the current operation data of the city, statistically analyze the indicator values ​​of multiple unit development indicators corresponding to each unit to obtain the current statistical values ​​of multiple unit development indicators corresponding to each unit.

[0162] Step S1233: Based on the current statistical values ​​of multiple unit development indicators corresponding to each unit and the standard indicators of multiple unit development indicators, evaluate the implementation status of each unit in the target area to obtain the evaluation results of the implementation status of the target control plan in the target area during the evaluation period.

[0163] Specifically, based on current urban operational data, the implementation status of the control plan is assessed to obtain the assessment results of the implementation status of the target control plan in the target area during the assessment period, including:

[0164] For each unit within the target area, it is also necessary to monitor the current status of the unit in order to promptly identify problems in the target control plan and issue early warnings.

[0165] A standard indicator library is pre-built for each unit within the target area. The standard indicator library includes multiple indicators, such as unit development indicators for each unit, and standard indicators for these multiple indicators. The standard indicators are the target values, standard specifications, or average values ​​within the target area.

[0166] The development indicators for each unit can be set based on the city's basic data, and generally consist of general indicators and specific indicators established by the control plan for each unit. General indicators aim to characterize the ideal level of spatial development within a unit, including: rational functional organization (e.g., commuting time), comprehensive service functions (e.g., school place satisfaction rate, per capita public land use index, public facility service radius coverage rate, and the completeness of facilities within the 15-minute living circle), infrastructure support (e.g., road network density, road traffic congestion index), and economic efficiency (e.g., added value per unit of industrial land). Spatial quality indicators (e.g., green coverage rate, streetscape quality evaluation) can also be added. Specific indicators are proposed by the control plan for each unit based on its unique characteristics, such as business district vitality and job-housing balance index.

[0167] Obtain standard indicators for multiple unit development indicators corresponding to each unit from the standard indicator library of each unit within the target area.

[0168] For any unit within the target area, based on the current urban operational data, the current values ​​of multiple unit development indicators corresponding to that unit are statistically analyzed to obtain the current statistical values ​​of the multiple unit development indicators corresponding to that unit. The current statistical values ​​of the unit development indicators are the statistical values ​​of the unit development indicators at the end of the evaluation period.

[0169] In an optional example, the current statistical values ​​of multiple unit development indicators can be obtained or calculated from multiple channels based on current urban operational data. For example: commuting time statistics can be obtained from the internet; the job-housing balance index can be calculated based on the proportion of employed people residing in the area, or based on the ratio of residents to employed people within a unit, supported by big data; service function improvement indicators such as school place satisfaction rate can be calculated using fine-grained population big data and population grid data, as well as data from the completed facility ledger verified by planning; infrastructure statistics can be obtained using road big data; economic efficiency indicators can be calculated by fusing current land use data, enterprise data, and enterprise location big data; and spatial quality indicators can be calculated using publicly available big data online. Alternatively, open online data can be fully utilized to roughly replace the statistical values ​​of relevant indicators. For example, the statistical value of the completeness of facilities in a 15-minute living circle can be obtained by crawling the network to collect data on residential communities and facilities POIs (Points of Interest). Then, taking the residential community as the center point and the 15-minute walking isochronous circle as the range, the richness of various facilities that can be obtained within the isochronous circle of each residential community can be calculated, and then the data can be integrated to form the statistical value of the overall index of the completeness of facilities in the unit living circle.

[0170] Specifically, for any unit within the target area, the current statistical values ​​of multiple unit development indicators for that unit are compared one by one with the standard indicators for the corresponding multiple unit development indicators. The implementation status of the unit is assessed, evaluating whether each indicator deviates from the standard indicators. If an indicator deviates from the standard indicators, a timely warning is issued to prompt the user to take measures to improve that indicator. After assessing the implementation status of all units, the implementation status assessment results of the target control plan in the target area for the assessment period are obtained.

[0171] It should be noted that when assessing the current implementation status of a unit, data on approved but not yet constructed projects can be added. This data can be supplemented into the current planning outcome data of the unit by using a predictive model (inputting project location, project type, and project construction timeline, and outputting the expected increase in population and new facilities for the unit over the next one to several years). This allows for the prediction of statistical values ​​for indicators for the unit over the next one to several years, enabling early assessment of the unit's indicators, identification of indicators deviating from standard indicators, and early warnings. This facilitates users taking preventative measures, such as constructing projects in the unit ahead of time, effectively preventing abnormal situations from occurring in the unit.

[0172] In one possible implementation, step S1233 involves assessing the implementation status of each unit in the target area based on the current statistical values ​​of multiple unit development indicators corresponding to each unit and the standard indicators of the multiple unit development indicators, thereby obtaining the assessment results of the implementation status of the target control plan in the target area during the assessment period, including:

[0173] Based on the current statistical values ​​of multiple unit development indicators corresponding to a unit and the standard indicators of the multiple unit development indicators corresponding to that unit, the deviation of the multiple unit development indicators corresponding to the unit is calculated to obtain the deviation value of the multiple unit development indicators corresponding to the unit.

[0174] Based on the deviation values ​​of multiple unit development indicators corresponding to the unit, an assessment is conducted to determine whether any abnormalities have occurred in the implementation status of the unit, thus obtaining the assessment results of the implementation status of the unit.

[0175] Based on the assessment results of the implementation status of all units in the target area, the assessment results of the implementation status of the target control plan in the target area during the assessment period are determined.

[0176] Specifically, based on the current statistical values ​​of multiple unit development indicators corresponding to each unit and the standard indicators of multiple unit development indicators, the implementation status of each unit in the target area is assessed, and the assessment results of the implementation status of the target control plan in the target area during the assessment period are obtained, including:

[0177] For any given unit and any given unit development indicator, compare the current statistical value of that unit development indicator with the standard indicator for that unit, calculate the deviation of that unit development indicator, and obtain the deviation value. For all unit development indicators of that unit, calculate the corresponding deviation value.

[0178] It should be noted that the standard indicators for a unit development index may include the target value, the specified value, and the average value of the unit development index. The target value is the target value of the unit development index set in the unit control plan, the specified value is the value of the unit development index in the technical specification, and the average value is the average value of the unit development index in the entire target area. The deviation of the unit development index corresponding to the unit can be calculated based on any one or more of the target value, specified value, and average value of the unit development index; this embodiment does not impose specific limitations on this.

[0179] Based on the deviation values ​​of multiple unit development indicators corresponding to a unit, the implementation status of the unit is assessed to determine whether any anomalies have occurred. When the deviation value of one or more of the multiple unit development indicators exceeds a preset threshold, the implementation status of the unit is determined to be abnormal, the assessment result for the unit's implementation status is abnormal, and an early warning is issued. When the deviation values ​​of all transmitted control indicators and all unit development indicators corresponding to the unit are not greater than the preset threshold, the implementation status of the unit is determined to be normal, and the assessment result for the unit's implementation status is normal.

[0180] Based on the assessment results of the implementation status of each unit in the target area, the assessment results of the implementation status of the target control plan in the target area during the assessment period are determined, thereby prompting users to take implementation actions, maintain or construct new projects, and reminding users to take implementation actions in the implementation process of the control plan.

[0181] Furthermore, if the statistical values ​​of the unit development indicators at the start of the assessment are included in the comparison, the improvement of the unit space quality during the assessment period can be analyzed, which helps to assess the effectiveness of the implementation of the control plan.

[0182] It should be understood that the sequence number of each step in the above embodiments does not imply the order of execution. The execution order of each process should be determined by its function and internal logic, and should not constitute any limitation on the implementation process of the embodiments of this application.

[0183] Corresponding to the method in the above embodiments, Figure 4 The diagram shows a structural schematic of a regulatory evaluation device provided in an embodiment of this application. For ease of explanation, only the parts related to the embodiment of this application are shown.

[0184] Reference Figure 4 The device includes:

[0185] Data acquisition module 21 is used to acquire multiple planning implementation data related to the target control plan during the evaluation period;

[0186] The planning evaluation module 22 is used to evaluate the target control plan in at least one dimension during the evaluation period based on multiple planning implementation data, and obtain at least one planning evaluation result.

[0187] The assessment summary module 23 is used to determine the overall assessment results of the target control plan during the assessment period based on at least one planning assessment result.

[0188] It should be noted that the information interaction and execution process between the above-mentioned devices / units are based on the same concept as the method embodiments of this application. For details on their specific functions and technical effects, please refer to the method embodiments section, and they will not be repeated here.

[0189] Those skilled in the art will clearly understand that, for the sake of convenience and brevity, the above-described division of functional units and modules is merely an example. In practical applications, the above functions can be assigned to different functional units and modules as needed, that is, the internal structure of the device can be divided into different functional units or modules to complete all or part of the functions described above. The functional units and modules in the embodiments can be integrated into one processing unit, or each unit can exist physically separately, or two or more units can be integrated into one unit. The integrated unit can be implemented in hardware or as a software functional unit. Furthermore, the specific names of the functional units and modules are only for easy differentiation and are not intended to limit the scope of protection of this application. The specific working process of the units and modules in the above system can be referred to the corresponding process in the foregoing method embodiments, and will not be repeated here.

[0190] This application also provides an electronic device, which includes: at least one processor, a memory, and a computer program stored in the memory and executable on the at least one processor, wherein the processor executes the computer program to implement the steps in any of the above method embodiments.

[0191] This application also provides a computer-readable storage medium storing a computer program, which, when executed by a processor, implements the steps described in the various method embodiments above.

[0192] This application provides a computer program product that, when run on a mobile terminal, enables the mobile terminal to implement the steps described in the above-described method embodiments.

[0193] If the integrated unit is implemented as a software functional unit and sold or used as an independent product, it can be stored in a computer-readable storage medium. Based on this understanding, all or part of the processes in the methods of the above embodiments of this application can be implemented by a computer program instructing related hardware. The computer program can be stored in a computer-readable storage medium, and when executed by a processor, it can implement the steps of the various method embodiments described above. The computer program includes computer program code, which can be in the form of source code, object code, executable files, or certain intermediate forms. A computer-readable medium can include at least: any entity or device capable of carrying computer program code to a photographic device / terminal device, a recording medium, a computer memory, a read-only memory (ROM), a random access memory (RAM), an electrical carrier signal, a telecommunication signal, and a software distribution medium. Examples include USB flash drives, portable hard drives, magnetic disks, or optical disks. In some jurisdictions, according to legislation and patent practice, computer-readable media cannot be electrical carrier signals or telecommunication signals.

[0194] In the above embodiments, the descriptions of each embodiment have different focuses. For parts that are not described in detail or recorded in a certain embodiment, please refer to the relevant descriptions of other embodiments.

[0195] Those skilled in the art will recognize that the units and algorithm steps of the various examples described in conjunction with the embodiments disclosed herein can be implemented in electronic hardware, or a combination of computer software and electronic hardware. Whether these functions are implemented in hardware or software depends on the specific application and design constraints of the technical solution. Those skilled in the art can use different methods to implement the described functions for each specific application, but such implementation should not be considered beyond the scope of this application.

[0196] In the embodiments provided in this application, it should be understood that the disclosed apparatus / network devices and methods can be implemented in other ways. For example, the apparatus / network device embodiments described above are merely illustrative. For instance, the division of modules or units is only a logical functional division, and in actual implementation, there may be other division methods. For example, multiple units or components may be combined or integrated into another system, or some features may be ignored or not executed. Furthermore, the coupling or direct coupling or communication connection shown or discussed may be through some interfaces; the indirect coupling or communication connection between apparatuses or units may be electrical, mechanical, or other forms.

[0197] The units described as separate components may or may not be physically separate. The components shown as units may or may not be physical units; that is, they may be located in one place or distributed across multiple network units. Some or all of the units can be selected to achieve the purpose of this embodiment according to actual needs.

[0198] The above embodiments are only used to illustrate the technical solutions of this application, and are not intended to limit them. Although this application has been described in detail with reference to the foregoing embodiments, those skilled in the art should understand that modifications can still be made to the technical solutions described in the foregoing embodiments, or equivalent substitutions can be made to some of the technical features. Such modifications or substitutions do not cause the essence of the corresponding technical solutions to deviate from the spirit and scope of the technical solutions of the embodiments of this application, and should all be included within the protection scope of this application.

Claims

1. A method for evaluating regulatory plans, characterized in that, include: Obtain implementation data from multiple plans related to the target control plan during the evaluation period; The planning implementation data includes: historical approved control plan results data, current approved control plan results data, control plan adjustment record data, urban status operation data, and control plan external environment change data. Specifically, the historical approved control plan results data refers to the control plans approved for the target area at the start time of the evaluation period; the current approved control plan results data refers to the control plans approved for the target area at the end time of the evaluation period; the control plan adjustment record data refers to the control plan adjustments made to the target area during the evaluation period; the urban status operation data refers to the urban operation data of the target area at the end time of the evaluation period; and the control plan external environment change data refers to the external environment changes of the target area during the evaluation period. Based on multiple planning implementation data, the target control plan is evaluated in at least one dimension during the evaluation period to obtain at least one planning evaluation result; the at least one dimension includes: planning outcomes, adjustment rules, and implementation status; the step of evaluating the target control plan in at least one dimension during the evaluation period based on multiple planning implementation data to obtain at least one planning evaluation result includes at least one of the following steps: Based on the external environment change data of the control plan and the data of the currently approved control plan, the applicability of the planning results of the target control plan is evaluated, and the evaluation results of the planning results of the target control plan in the target area during the evaluation period are obtained. Based on the regulatory planning adjustment record data, the historical approved regulatory planning results data, and the current approved regulatory planning results data, an assessment is made as to whether the adjustment rules of the target regulatory planning are applicable, resulting in an assessment result of the adjustment rules of the target regulatory planning in the target area during the assessment period. Specifically, this includes: based on the regulatory planning adjustment record data, statistically analyzing the adjustment indicators for the adjustment type, adjustment reason, and adjustment content of the target regulatory planning, obtaining indicator values ​​for the adjustment type, adjustment reason, and adjustment content of the target regulatory planning; and based on the indicator values ​​for the adjustment type, adjustment reason, and adjustment content of the target regulatory planning, an assessment is made as to whether the adjustment process of the target regulatory planning is applicable, resulting in an assessment of the adjustment rules of the target regulatory planning in the target area during the assessment period. The process evaluation results include: Based on historical indicator values ​​in the historical approved control plan data and current indicator values ​​in the current approved control plan data, statistical analysis of the adjustment information of the target control plan during the evaluation period is performed; based on the total indicator settings in the master plan and the adjustment information of the target control plan during the evaluation period, the rationality of the indicator adjustment direction of the target control plan is evaluated, resulting in an evaluation result of the indicator adjustment direction of the target control plan in the target area during the evaluation period; based on the process evaluation results and indicator adjustment direction evaluation results of the target control plan in the target area during the evaluation period, the applicability of the adjustment rules of the target control plan during the evaluation period is evaluated, resulting in an evaluation result of the adjustment rules of the target control plan in the target area during the evaluation period. Based on the current urban operation data, the implementation status of the target control plan is evaluated to obtain the evaluation results of the implementation status of the target control plan in the target area during the evaluation period; Based on at least one of the planning assessment results, determine the overall assessment result of the target control plan during the assessment period.

2. The evaluation method for regulatory planning as described in claim 1, characterized in that, The acquisition of multiple planning implementation data related to the target control plan during the evaluation period includes: Determine the regulatory planning evaluation database pre-constructed based on the target area; From the control plan evaluation database, obtain multiple planning implementation data related to the target control plan during the evaluation period.

3. The method for evaluating control regulations as described in claim 2, characterized in that, The assessment of the applicability of the target control plan's planning results based on the external environment change data and the currently approved control plan results data, to obtain the assessment results of the target control plan's planning results in the target area during the assessment period, includes: The external environment change data of the control plan are translated to obtain planning result evaluation rules, which include evaluation rules for conflicting plots and evaluation rules for conflicting units. Based on the land parcel data in the currently approved control plan results data and the evaluation rules for conflicting land parcels, an evaluation is conducted on whether each land parcel in the target area is in conflict, and the conflict evaluation results for each land parcel are obtained. Based on the unit result data in the currently approved control plan result data and the evaluation rules of the conflict unit, as well as the conflict evaluation results of all the plots included in each unit, the unit conflict degree corresponding to each unit in the target area is calculated. Based on the degree of conflict of each unit, the applicability of the planning results of each unit is evaluated, and the evaluation results of the planning results of each unit are obtained. Based on the evaluation results of the planning outcomes of all the units within the target area, the evaluation results of the target control plan within the target area during the evaluation period are determined.

4. The method for evaluating control regulations as described in claim 3, characterized in that, The step of calculating the unit conflict degree corresponding to each unit within the target area based on the unit result data in the currently approved control plan result data and the evaluation rules of the conflict units, as well as the conflict evaluation results of all the plots included in each unit, includes: Based on the evaluation rules of the conflict unit, multiple evaluation factors for the conflict unit are determined; Based on each of the evaluation factors of the conflict unit, the conflict status of each unit in the target area is evaluated to obtain the conflict evaluation result of each unit under each evaluation factor. Based on the conflict assessment results of each unit under each assessment factor, the number of conflicts for each unit is calculated. The average number of unit conflicts is calculated based on the number of conflicts of all the units within the target area; The unit conflict degree of each unit in the target area is calculated based on the number of conflicts of each unit, the average number of conflicts of the units, and the conflict assessment results of all the plots in the target area.

5. The method for evaluating control regulations as described in claim 2, characterized in that, The assessment of the implementation status of the control plan based on the city's current operational data, to obtain the assessment results of the implementation status of the target control plan in the target area during the assessment period, includes: Based on the pre-built standard indicator library of each unit in the target area, standard indicators of multiple unit development indicators corresponding to each unit are obtained, wherein the unit development indicators are the unit development indicators established by the control plan. Based on the current operation data of the city, the indicator values ​​of the multiple unit development indicators corresponding to each unit are statistically analyzed to obtain the current statistical values ​​of the multiple unit development indicators corresponding to each unit. Based on the current statistical values ​​of the multiple unit development indicators corresponding to each unit and the standard indicators of the multiple unit development indicators, the implementation status of each unit in the target area is evaluated to obtain the evaluation results of the implementation status of the target control plan in the target area during the evaluation period.

6. The method for evaluating control regulations as described in claim 5, characterized in that, The step of evaluating the implementation status of each unit in the target area based on the current statistical values ​​of the multiple unit development indicators corresponding to each unit and the standard indicators of the multiple unit development indicators, and obtaining the evaluation result of the implementation status of the target control plan in the target area during the evaluation period, includes: Based on the current statistical values ​​of the multiple unit development indicators corresponding to the unit and the standard indicators of the multiple unit development indicators corresponding to the unit, the deviation of the multiple unit development indicators corresponding to the unit is calculated respectively to obtain the deviation value of the multiple unit development indicators corresponding to the unit. Based on the deviation values ​​of the multiple unit development indicators corresponding to the unit, an assessment is made as to whether the implementation status of the unit has become abnormal, and the implementation status assessment result of the unit is obtained. Based on the assessment results of the implementation status of all the units in the target area, the assessment results of the implementation status of the target control plan in the target area during the assessment period are determined.

7. A regulatory planning evaluation device, characterized in that, include: The data acquisition module is used to acquire multiple planning implementation data related to the target control plan during the evaluation period; The planning implementation data includes: historical approved control plan results data, current approved control plan results data, control plan adjustment record data, urban status operation data, and control plan external environment change data. Specifically, the historical approved control plan results data refers to the control plans approved for the target area at the start time of the evaluation period; the current approved control plan results data refers to the control plans approved for the target area at the end time of the evaluation period; the control plan adjustment record data refers to the control plan adjustments made to the target area during the evaluation period; the urban status operation data refers to the urban operation data of the target area at the end time of the evaluation period; and the control plan external environment change data refers to the external environment changes of the target area during the evaluation period. The planning evaluation module is used to evaluate the target control plan in at least one dimension during the evaluation period based on multiple planning implementation data, and obtain at least one planning evaluation result; the at least one dimension includes: planning results, adjustment rules, and implementation status; The planning and evaluation module is specifically used for: Based on the external environment change data of the control plan and the data of the currently approved control plan, the applicability of the planning results of the target control plan is evaluated, and the evaluation results of the planning results of the target control plan in the target area during the evaluation period are obtained. Based on the regulatory planning adjustment record data, the historical approved regulatory planning results data, and the current approved regulatory planning results data, an assessment is made as to whether the adjustment rules of the target regulatory planning are applicable, resulting in an assessment result of the adjustment rules of the target regulatory planning in the target area during the assessment period. Specifically, this includes: based on the regulatory planning adjustment record data, statistically analyzing the adjustment indicators for the adjustment type, adjustment reason, and adjustment content of the target regulatory planning, obtaining indicator values ​​for the adjustment type, adjustment reason, and adjustment content of the target regulatory planning; and based on the indicator values ​​for the adjustment type, adjustment reason, and adjustment content of the target regulatory planning, an assessment is made as to whether the adjustment process of the target regulatory planning is applicable, resulting in an assessment of the adjustment rules of the target regulatory planning in the target area during the assessment period. The process evaluation results include: Based on historical indicator values ​​in the historical approved control plan data and current indicator values ​​in the current approved control plan data, statistical analysis of the adjustment information of the target control plan during the evaluation period is performed; based on the total indicator settings in the master plan and the adjustment information of the target control plan during the evaluation period, the rationality of the indicator adjustment direction of the target control plan is evaluated, resulting in an evaluation result of the indicator adjustment direction of the target control plan in the target area during the evaluation period; based on the process evaluation results and indicator adjustment direction evaluation results of the target control plan in the target area during the evaluation period, the applicability of the adjustment rules of the target control plan during the evaluation period is evaluated, resulting in an evaluation result of the adjustment rules of the target control plan in the target area during the evaluation period. Based on the current urban operation data, the implementation status of the target control plan is evaluated to obtain the evaluation results of the implementation status of the target control plan in the target area during the evaluation period; An assessment summary module is used to determine the overall assessment result of the target control plan during the assessment period based on at least one of the planning assessment results.

8. An electronic device comprising a memory, a processor, and a computer program stored in the memory and executable on the processor, characterized in that, When the processor executes the computer program, it implements the method as described in any one of claims 1 to 6.

Images