Method and system for evaluating design workload of nuclear power plant

Abstract

The invention discloses a method and a system for evaluating the design workload of a nuclear power plant. The method comprises the steps that the total organization work amount and the per capita equivalent workload of an organization in each period are acquired; based on the total organization work amount and the equivalent per capita workload of the organization in multiple continuous cycles, respectively constructing a total organization work amount broken line and an equivalent per capita broken line in a chart form; obtaining the distribution pattern of the total organization work amount broken line and the per capita equivalent broken line in adjacent weeks; and outputting an organization workload evaluation result in the adjacent weeks according to the distribution forms of the organization work total amount broken line and the per capita equivalent broken line in the adjacent weeks and a preset per capita standard workload. According to the method, the design workload of the organization is quantified according to the period, the organization workload state and the organization manpower interference and shortage condition are dynamically analyzed, and a reliable management basis is provided for an organization manager to adjust manpower resource configuration in time.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] The present invention relates to the field of digital design management, and in particular to a method and system for evaluating the design workload of a nuclear power plant. Background Art

[0002] In the field of nuclear power plant design management, design documents are the main carrier of design work and the main form of design results. The publication of design documents requires the investment of appropriate human resources to match the equivalent workload of document publication. However, there is currently a lack of evaluation methods and means to determine whether the human resources invested match the equivalent workload, resulting in a series of design management and human resource management problems. Therefore, a set of evaluation methods for design equivalent workload and employee workload is needed. On the one hand, it provides a scientific method and basis for the organization to reasonably allocate employee workload. On the other hand, the organization can also match the appropriate design human resources according to the equivalent workload of document publication. Especially in the period of significant changes in the design equivalent workload, it is very necessary to dynamically evaluate the employee workload and the surplus and shortage of organizational human resources, and to adjust the human resource allocation in a timely and scientific manner. Summary of the invention

[0003] The purpose of the present invention is to provide a method and system for evaluating the design workload of a nuclear power plant, aiming to solve the problems of inadequate management and lack of basis for human resource management in existing nuclear power design management due to the lack of an evaluation method for the design workload.

[0004] In a first aspect, an embodiment of the present invention provides a method for evaluating a design workload of a nuclear power plant, comprising:

[0005] Obtain the total amount of organizational work and the equivalent workload per person in the organization in each cycle;

[0006] Based on the total amount of organizational work and the equivalent workload per person in the organization for multiple consecutive periods, the individual equivalent line, the total amount of organizational work line and the equivalent workload per person are constructed in the form of charts.

[0007] Obtain the distribution patterns of the total workload of the organization and the per capita equivalent workload in adjacent periods;

[0008] According to the distribution patterns of the organizational workload total amount polyline and the per capita equivalent polyline between adjacent periods and the preset per capita standard workload, the organizational workload assessment results between adjacent periods are output.

[0009] In a second aspect, an embodiment of the present invention provides a system for evaluating a design workload of a nuclear power plant, comprising:

[0010] The workload acquisition unit is used to obtain the total amount of organizational workload and the equivalent workload per person in the organization in each cycle;

[0011] A broken line construction acquisition unit is used to construct an individual equivalent broken line, an organizational work total broken line and a per capita equivalent broken line in the form of a chart based on the organizational work total amount and the organizational per capita equivalent workload of multiple consecutive periods;

[0012] A morphology acquisition unit, used to acquire the distribution morphology of the total organizational workload polyline and the per capita equivalent polyline in adjacent periods;

[0013] The evaluation unit is used to output the organizational workload evaluation results between adjacent cycles based on the distribution patterns of the organizational total workload line and the per capita equivalent workload line between adjacent cycles and the preset per capita standard workload.

[0014] The beneficial effects of the embodiments of the present invention are: quantifying the designed workload of an organization on a periodic basis, and dynamically analyzing the workload status of the organization and the surplus and shortage of human resources in the organization, thereby providing a reliable management basis for the organization managers to adjust the human resource allocation in a timely manner. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0015] In order to more clearly illustrate the technical solutions of the embodiments of the present invention, the following briefly introduces the drawings required for use in the description of the embodiments. Obviously, the drawings described below are some embodiments of the present invention. For ordinary technicians in this field, other drawings can be obtained based on these drawings without paying creative work.

[0016] Figure 1 A schematic flow chart of a method for evaluating a nuclear power plant design workload provided by an embodiment of the present invention.

[0017] Figure 2 A schematic diagram of a sub-process of step S101 provided in an embodiment of the present invention.

[0018] Figure 3 A schematic diagram of a sub-flow chart of step S103 provided in an embodiment of the present invention.

[0019] Figure 4 A schematic block diagram of a system for evaluating a nuclear power plant design workload provided by an embodiment of the present invention.

[0020] Figure 5 A schematic diagram of the workload of a department (organization) provided in an embodiment of the present invention;

[0021] Figure 6 An example chart of a coordinate system for the first type of total organizational workload and per capita equivalent workload provided in an embodiment of the present invention.

[0022] Figure 7 A schematic diagram of the first distribution pattern between the total organizational work amount line and the per capita equivalent line during adjacent weeks provided in an embodiment of the present invention.

[0023] Figure 8 A schematic diagram of the second distribution pattern between the total organizational work amount line and the per capita equivalent line during adjacent weeks provided in an embodiment of the present invention.

[0024] Fig. 9 An example chart of a coordinate system for the second type of total organizational workload and per capita equivalent workload provided in an embodiment of the present invention.

[0025] Fig.10 A schematic diagram of the third distribution form between the total organizational work amount line and the per capita equivalent line during adjacent periods provided in an embodiment of the present invention.

[0026] Fig.11 A schematic diagram of the fourth distribution pattern between the total organizational work amount line and the per capita equivalent line during adjacent periods provided in an embodiment of the present invention.

[0027] Fig.12 An example chart of a coordinate system for the third type of total organizational workload and per capita equivalent workload provided in an embodiment of the present invention.

[0028] Fig.13 A schematic diagram of the fifth distribution pattern between the total organizational work amount line and the per capita equivalent line during adjacent cycles provided in an embodiment of the present invention.

[0029] Fig.14 A schematic diagram of the sixth distribution pattern between the total organizational work amount line and the per capita equivalent line during adjacent periods provided in an embodiment of the present invention.

[0030] Fig.15 A fourth example chart of the coordinate system for the total amount of organizational work and per capita equivalent workload provided in an embodiment of the present invention.

[0031] Fig.16 A schematic diagram of the seventh distribution pattern between the total organizational work amount line and the per capita equivalent line during adjacent periods provided in an embodiment of the present invention.

[0032] Fig.17 A schematic diagram of the eighth distribution pattern between the total organizational work amount line and the per capita equivalent line during adjacent periods provided in an embodiment of the present invention.

[0033] Fig.18 A schematic diagram of individual workload provided by an embodiment of the present invention.

[0034] Fig.19 A schematic diagram of room-level workload provided by an embodiment of the present invention. DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0035] The following will be combined with the drawings in the embodiments of the present invention to clearly and completely describe the technical solutions in the embodiments of the present invention. Obviously, the described embodiments are part of the embodiments of the present invention, not all of the embodiments. Based on the embodiments of the present invention, all other embodiments obtained by ordinary technicians in this field without creative work are within the scope of protection of the present invention.

[0036] It should be understood that when used in this specification and the appended claims, the terms "include" and "comprises" indicate the presence of described features, integers, steps, operations, elements and / or components, but do not exclude the presence or addition of one or more other features, integers, steps, operations, elements, components and / or combinations thereof.

[0037] It should also be understood that the terms used in this specification of the present invention are only for the purpose of describing specific embodiments and are not intended to limit the present invention. As used in the specification of the present invention and the appended claims, the singular forms "a", "an" and "the" are intended to include plural forms unless the context clearly indicates otherwise.

[0038] It should be further understood that the term "and / or" used in the present description and the appended claims refers to any and all possible combinations of one or more of the associated listed items, and includes these combinations.

[0039] See also Figure 1 , Figure 1 A schematic flow chart of a method for evaluating a nuclear power plant design workload provided by an embodiment of the present invention;

[0040] like Figure 1 As shown, the method includes steps S101 to S104.

[0041] S101. Obtain the total amount of organizational work and the equivalent workload per person in each period;

[0042] In this step, the month can be used as a cycle, with one month corresponding to one cycle. First, the individual equivalent workload of each month is obtained, and then the total organizational workload is calculated based on the individual equivalent workload of all individuals. Finally, the per capita equivalent workload of the organization is calculated based on the total organizational workload.

[0043] S102, based on the total organizational workload and the average organizational workload per capita in a plurality of consecutive periods, constructing a total organizational workload line and an average organizational workload per capita equivalent line in the form of a chart;

[0044] In this step, statistics on the work status of multiple consecutive cycles can help to improve the accuracy of the organization's workload assessment more comprehensively; the use of charts can more intuitively display the relationship between the organization's per capita equivalent and the organization's total amount, making it easier for organization managers to intuitively view the assessment results.

[0045] S103, obtaining the distribution patterns of the total amount of organizational work and the per capita equivalent amount in adjacent periods;

[0046] S104, outputting the organizational workload assessment results between adjacent cycles according to the distribution patterns of the organizational workload total amount polyline and the per capita equivalent polyline between adjacent cycles and the preset per capita standard workload;

[0047] In steps S103 to S104, the different directions of the total organizational work volume curve and the per capita equivalent curve in adjacent weeks can form different distribution patterns. Different distribution patterns are used to represent the relationship between the total organizational work volume and the organizational per capita equivalent, and can be compared with the preset per capita standard workload to evaluate the organizational workload.

[0048] In this embodiment, based on the process of steps S101 to S104, the organization's monthly design workload is quantified, and the organization's workload status and the organization's manpower surplus and shortage are dynamically analyzed, providing a reliable management basis for organization managers to adjust human resource allocation in a timely manner.

[0049] In this embodiment, an organization may refer to a professional group including multiple individuals, or a department including multiple professional groups, or a department including multiple departments. Figure 5 Example of workload chart for XX department, Figure 5 The department in the example is composed of multiple rooms, and the total amount of each room is displayed in the form of a histogram. Figure 5 The blue line in the figure is the total amount of organizational work, and the orange line is the per capita equivalent.

[0050] In one embodiment, if Figure 2 As shown, step S101 includes:

[0051] S201. Count the sum of the workload of preparing standards, the workload of checking standards, and the workload of reviewing standards for each individual in each cycle as the individual equivalent workload of each individual in each cycle;

[0052] S202. Count the sum of the individual equivalent workloads of all individuals in each cycle as the total organizational workload of each cycle;

[0053] S203. Calculate the ratio of the total organizational workload in each cycle to that of all individuals to obtain the average organizational workload per person in each cycle.

[0054] In this embodiment, the standard workload of a design document can be understood as the reasonable working hours that need to be invested according to the factors such as the difficulty and volume of the document, so as to avoid the distortion of the statistical data of working hours due to the individual factors of the designers, and to calibrate the corresponding standard workload of various design documents in advance, wherein the publication of design documents usually includes three stages: preparation, verification and review. Therefore, the sum of the preparation standard workload, verification standard workload and review standard workload of each individual in the calculation cycle can be used as the individual equivalent workload of each individual in the cycle, that is, the actual workload of each individual in the cycle. Then, the sum of the individual equivalent workload of all individuals in the organization in the calculation cycle can be used as the total organizational work of the organization in the cycle. Then, the total organizational work is divided by the number of all individuals (that is, all people involved in the preparation, verification and review work) to obtain the equivalent workload per capita of the organization.

[0055] In one embodiment, if Figure 3 As shown, step S103 may include:

[0056] S301, obtaining the trends of the total amount of organizational work and the per capita equivalent in adjacent periods;

[0057] S302: When the total amount of organizational work and the per capita equivalent amount are in a convergent distribution, the output is in a convergent form, and it is determined that the input manpower is decreasing;

[0058] S303. When the total amount of organizational work and the per capita equivalent are distributed in a divergent manner, the output is in a divergent form, and it is determined that the manpower input is increasing.

[0059] This embodiment provides a method for evaluating the design workload. According to the distribution pattern of the total organizational work amount line and the per capita equivalent line in adjacent cycles, the matching of production manpower input and workload is dynamically analyzed to evaluate the organizational workload status and organizational manpower surplus and shortage situation in adjacent cycles. The specific method may be: by adjusting the coordinate relationship between the total organizational work amount and the per capita workload, the total organizational work amount line and the per capita equivalent line are parallel to each other in adjacent cycles when the manpower input remains unchanged, and the per capita equivalent line is below the total work amount line. Then, the change of manpower input between cycles is considered. At this time, the total organizational work amount line and the per capita equivalent line present a convergent or divergent pattern, and the matching relationship between the total organizational work amount and the change of manpower input is outputted.

[0060] See also Figures 6 to 17 The following specifically introduces eight distribution patterns between the total organizational workload line and the per capita equivalent line in adjacent cycles in step S104, as well as eight organizational workload assessment results under the eight distribution patterns.

[0061] First of all, it should be noted that the per capita equivalent workload can be a specific value or a specific range; the workload assessment result under each distribution form needs to consider whether the per capita equivalent workload of the previous cycle in the adjacent cycle reaches the preset per capita standard workload, which is a prerequisite for ensuring the accuracy of the assessment result; specifically, there are three prerequisites for the per capita equivalent workload of the previous cycle in the adjacent cycle;

[0062] The first prerequisite is that the per capita equivalent workload in the previous cycle of the adjacent cycle has reached (i.e., is equal to a specific value or is within a specific range) the per capita equivalent workload;

[0063] The second prerequisite is that the per capita equivalent workload in the previous cycle of the adjacent cycle is greater than the per capita equivalent workload;

[0064] The third prerequisite is that the per capita equivalent workload in the previous cycle in the adjacent cycle is less than the per capita equivalent workload.

[0065] It should also be noted that, in order to ensure the establishment of steps S302 and S303, when constructing the chart of the total organizational work and per capita equivalent work, it is necessary to adjust the coordinate system of the total organizational work and per capita equivalent work on the basis of the unchanged input of manpower during the period, so that the total organizational work and per capita equivalent work are parallel to each other (please refer to Figure 6 , Fig. 9 , Fig.12 and Fig.15 The coordinate example charts of four types of total organizational workload and per capita equivalent workload are shown. Under this adjusted coordinate system relationship, distribution pattern analysis is performed based on the actual total organizational workload and per capita equivalent workload, thereby accurately outputting the organizational workload status and organizational manpower surplus and shortage situation.

[0066] See also Figures 6 to 11 Under the first premise, there are two coordinate relationships between the total amount of organizational work and the equivalent workload per person and four workload assessment results, as follows:

[0067] See also Figure 6 The first example of a coordinate system diagram of the total amount of organizational work and the equivalent workload per person is provided. Figure 6 What is shown in the figure is that the total amount of organizational work has increased and the per capita equivalent workload in the previous period has reached the preset per capita standard workload.

[0068] See also Figure 7 An example graph of the distribution pattern corresponding to the first workload evaluation results is provided.

[0069] When the per capita equivalent workload of the previous cycle in the adjacent cycle has reached the preset per capita standard workload (i.e. Figure 7The per capita value corresponding to the middle blue dotted line), and the distribution form of the total amount of organizational work and the per capita equivalent line is divergent;

[0070] If the total amount of organizational work and the per capita equivalent are both in an upward trend, please refer to Figure 7 The distribution patterns of the blue line (total organizational workload), the red line (per capita equivalent line 1) and the blue dotted line (preset per capita standard line) in the figure show that the organizational workload is increasing, the per capita workload is also increasing and exceeds the per capita standard line after the increase, so the current manpower increment is insufficient. Therefore, the evaluation result of "the per capita workload has reached the standard workload in X month (the previous cycle, such as February in the figure), the organizational workload and manpower increased between X month and X+1 month (the cycle interval, such as February to March in the figure), and the manpower input is insufficient in X+1 month (the later cycle, such as March in the figure)" can be output.

[0071] If the total amount of organizational work is trending upward, and the per capita equivalent is trending flat, please refer to Figure 7 The distribution patterns of the blue line and the blue dotted line in the figure, where the per capita equivalent line (not shown) overlaps with the blue dotted line; it can be seen that the organizational workload is increasing, the human resources input is also increasing, and the per capita workload after the human resources input remains unchanged, so the current human resources increment is appropriate, and therefore the evaluation result of "the per capita workload has reached the standard workload in X month, the organizational workload and human resources have increased from X month to X+1 month, and the human resources input in X+1 month is appropriate" can be output;

[0072] If the total amount of organizational work is trending upward, and the per capita equivalent is trending downward, please refer to Figure 7 From the distribution patterns of the blue line, green line (per capita equivalent line 2) and blue dotted line, it can be seen that the organizational workload is increasing, the human resource input is also increasing, and the increased per capita workload is lower than the per capita standard line. Therefore, the current human resource increment is excessive. Therefore, the evaluation result of "the per capita workload in X month has reached the standard workload, the organizational workload and manpower increased from X month to X+1 month, and the human resource input was excessive in X+1 month" can be output.

[0073] See also Figure 8 A sample graph of the distribution patterns for the second workload assessment results is provided.

[0074] When the per capita equivalent workload of the previous cycle in the adjacent cycle has reached the preset per capita standard workload (i.e. Figure 8 The per capita value corresponding to the middle blue dotted line), and the distribution patterns of the total organizational work line and the per capita equivalent line are convergent;

[0075] If the total amount of organizational work and the per capita equivalent are both in an upward trend, please refer to Figure 8The distribution patterns of the blue line, red line and blue dotted line in the figure show that the organizational workload is increasing, but the manpower input is decreasing, and the workload after the manpower reduction is far more than the per capita standard line. Therefore, the evaluation result of "the per capita workload has reached the standard workload in X month, the organizational workload has increased and the manpower has decreased from X month to X+1 month, and the manpower input is insufficient in X+1 month" can be output.

[0076] See also Fig. 9 The second example chart of the coordinate system of the total amount of organizational work and the equivalent workload per person is provided. Fig. 9 What is shown in the figure is that the total amount of organizational work has decreased and the per capita equivalent workload in the previous period has reached the preset per capita standard workload.

[0077] See also Fig.10 A sample graph of the distribution of the third workload assessment results is provided.

[0078] When the per capita equivalent workload of the previous cycle in the adjacent cycle has reached the preset per capita standard workload (i.e. Fig.10 The per capita value corresponding to the middle blue dotted line), and the distribution form of the total amount of organizational work and the per capita equivalent line is divergent;

[0079] If the total amount of organizational work and the per capita equivalent are both trending downward, please refer to Fig.10 The distribution patterns of the blue line, red line and blue dotted line in the figure show that the organizational workload is decreasing, but the manpower input is increasing, and after the increase in manpower, the workload is far below the per capita standard line. Therefore, the evaluation result of "the per capita workload has reached the standard workload in X month, the organizational workload has decreased and the manpower has increased from X month to X+1 month, and there is an excess of manpower input in X+1 month" can be output.

[0080] See also Fig.11 A sample chart of the distribution pattern of the fourth workload assessment results is provided.

[0081] When the per capita equivalent workload of the previous cycle in the adjacent cycle has reached the preset per capita standard workload (i.e. Fig.11 The per capita value corresponding to the middle blue dotted line), and the distribution patterns of the total organizational work line and the per capita equivalent line are convergent;

[0082] If the total amount of organizational work is in a downward trend, and the per capita equivalent is in an upward trend, please refer to Fig.11 The distribution patterns of the blue, red and blue dotted lines in the figure show that the organizational workload is decreasing and the human input is also decreasing. However, after the human input is reduced, the workload is still greater than the per capita standard line. Therefore, the evaluation result can be output as "the per capita workload has reached the standard workload in X month, the organizational workload and human resources have decreased from X month to X+1 month, and the human input is insufficient in X+1 month".

[0083] If the total amount of organizational work is in a downward trend, and the per capita equivalent is in a flat trend, please refer to Fig.11 The distribution patterns of the blue line and the blue dotted line in the figure are shown in Figure 1. The per capita equivalent line (not shown) overlaps with the blue dotted line. It can be seen that the organizational workload is decreasing and the human input is also decreasing. However, after the human input is reduced, the workload is just on the per capita standard line. Therefore, the evaluation result of "the per capita workload has reached the standard workload in month X, the organizational workload and manpower have decreased from month X to month X+1, and the human input in month X+1 is appropriate" can be output.

[0084] If the total amount of organizational work and the per capita equivalent are both trending downward, please refer to Fig.11 From the distribution patterns of the blue line, green line and blue dotted line, it can be seen that the organizational workload is decreasing and the human input is also decreasing. However, the workload after the reduction in human input is lower than the per capita standard line. Therefore, the evaluation result of "the per capita workload has reached the standard workload in X month, the organizational workload and manpower have decreased from X month to X+1 month, and there is excess human input in X+1 month" can be output.

[0085] See also Figures 12-14 Under the second premise, there is a coordinate system relationship between the total amount of organizational work and the per capita equivalent workload and two workload assessment results, as follows:

[0086] See also Fig.12 The third example chart of the coordinate system of the total amount of organizational work and the equivalent workload per person is provided. Fig.12 What is shown in the figure is that the total amount of organizational work first increases and then decreases, and the per capita equivalent workload in the previous period has exceeded the preset per capita standard workload.

[0087] See also Fig.13 The fifth type of workload assessment result provides an example chart of the distribution pattern corresponding to the result. This chart evaluates whether the additional manpower can match the existing total workload when the employees are under high workload (note that the total workload does not necessarily increase at this time. When the total workload remains unchanged, the following principles can also be used to determine whether the additional manpower can match the existing total workload).

[0088] When the per capita equivalent workload of the previous cycle in the adjacent cycle is greater than the preset per capita standard workload (i.e. Fig.13 The per capita value corresponding to the middle blue dotted line), and the distribution form of the total amount of organizational work and the per capita equivalent line is divergent;

[0089] If the total amount of organizational work is in an upward or horizontal trend (the upward trend is taken as an example in this embodiment), the per capita equivalent line is in a downward trend and is higher than the preset per capita standard line after sinking. Fig.13 The distribution patterns of the blue, red and blue dotted lines in the figure show that the organizational workload is increasing and the human input is increasing, but the average workload per person after the increase in human input still exceeds the average standard line. Therefore, the current human resource increment is insufficient. Therefore, the evaluation result of "the average workload per person in month X has exceeded the standard workload, the organizational manpower has increased from month X to month X+1, and the human resource input in month X+1 is insufficient" can be output;

[0090] If the total amount of organizational work is in an upward or horizontal trend, the per capita equivalent line is in a downward trend and is flush with the preset per capita standard line after sinking. For details, please refer to Fig.13 The distribution patterns of the blue, green and blue dotted lines in the figure show that the organizational workload is increasing, the human resources input is increasing, and the average workload per person after the increase in human resources input is just on the average standard line. Therefore, the current human resources increment is sufficient. Therefore, the evaluation result of "the average workload per person in X month has exceeded the standard workload, the organizational manpower has increased from X month to X+1 month, and the human resources input in X+1 month is appropriate" can be output;

[0091] If the total amount of organizational work is in an upward or horizontal trend, and the per capita equivalent line is in a downward trend and is lower than the preset per capita standard line after sinking, please refer to Fig.13 The distribution patterns of the blue line, orange line and blue dotted line in the figure show that the organizational workload is increasing and the human input is increasing, but the per capita workload after the increase in human input is lower than the per capita standard line. Therefore, the current human resource increase is too much. Therefore, the evaluation result of "the per capita workload in X month has exceeded the standard workload, the organizational manpower has increased from X month to X+1 month, and the human resource input in X+1 month is excessive" can be output.

[0092] See also Fig.14 An example chart of the distribution pattern corresponding to the sixth workload assessment result is provided. This chart assesses whether the reduction in total workload can match the existing manpower when employees are under high workload (note that the manpower does not necessarily decrease at this time. If the manpower remains unchanged, the following principle can also be used to determine whether the reduction in total workload can match the existing manpower).

[0093] When the per capita equivalent workload of the previous cycle in the adjacent cycle is greater than the preset per capita standard workload (i.e. Fig.14 The per capita value corresponding to the middle blue dotted line), and the distribution patterns of the total organizational work line and the per capita equivalent line are convergent;

[0094] If the total amount of organizational work and the per capita equivalent are both trending downward, and the per capita equivalent is higher than the preset per capita standard line after sinking, please refer to Fig.14The distribution patterns of the blue, red and blue dotted lines in the figure show that the organizational workload is decreasing, the human input is decreasing, but the average workload per person still exceeds the average workload per person standard line, so the current human resource reduction is too much. Therefore, the evaluation result of "the average workload per person in month X has exceeded the standard workload, the organizational workload has decreased from month X to month X+1, and the human resource input in month X+1 is insufficient" can be output;

[0095] If the total amount of organizational work and the per capita equivalent are both trending downward, and the per capita equivalent line is flush with the preset per capita standard line after sinking, please refer to Fig.14 The distribution patterns of the blue line, green line and blue dotted line in the figure show that the organizational workload is decreasing, the human input is decreasing, and the average workload per person after the reduction in human input is just on the average standard line. Therefore, the current reduction in human resources is appropriate. Therefore, the evaluation result of "the average workload per person in month X has exceeded the standard workload, the organizational workload has decreased from month X to month X+1, and the human input in month X+1 is appropriate" can be output;

[0096] If the total amount of organizational work and the per capita equivalent are both trending downward, and the per capita equivalent is lower than the preset per capita standard line after sinking, please refer to Fig.14 The distribution patterns of the blue line, orange line and blue dotted line in the figure show that the organizational workload is decreasing and the human input is decreasing. However, the average workload per person after the reduction in human input is lower than the average standard line. Therefore, the current reduction in manpower is not enough. Therefore, the evaluation result of "the average workload per person in X month has exceeded the standard workload, the organizational workload has decreased from X month to X+1 month, and the human input in X+1 month is in excess" can be output.

[0097] See also Figures 15 to 17 Under the third premise, there is a coordinate system relationship between the total amount of organizational work and the per capita equivalent workload and two workload assessment results, as follows:

[0098] See also Fig.15 The third example chart of the coordinate system of the total amount of organizational work and the equivalent workload per person is provided. Fig.15 What is shown in the figure is that the total amount of organizational work first increases and then decreases, and the per capita equivalent workload in the previous period is lower than the preset per capita standard workload.

[0099] See also Fig.16 The provided distribution pattern example chart corresponding to the seventh workload assessment result evaluates whether the increase in total workload can match the existing manpower when the employees are under low workload (note that the manpower does not necessarily increase at this time. When the manpower remains unchanged, the following principle can also be used to determine whether the increase in total workload can match the existing manpower).

[0100] When the per capita equivalent workload of the previous cycle in the adjacent cycle is less than the preset per capita standard workload (i.e. Fig.16 The per capita value corresponding to the middle blue dotted line), and the distribution form of the total amount of organizational work and the per capita equivalent line is divergent;

[0101] If the total amount of organizational work and the per capita equivalent are both in an upward trend, and the per capita equivalent is higher than the preset per capita standard line after rising, please refer to Fig.16 The distribution patterns of the blue, red and blue dotted lines in the figure show that the organizational workload is increasing and the human input is increasing, but the average workload per person after the increase in human input is higher than the average standard line. Therefore, the current increase in human resources is not enough. Therefore, the evaluation result of "the average workload per person in X month is lower than the standard workload, the organizational workload increases from X month to X+1 month, and the human input is insufficient in X+1 month" can be output;

[0102] If the total amount of organizational work and the per capita equivalent are both in an upward trend, and the per capita equivalent is flush with the preset per capita standard line after rising, please refer to Fig.16 The distribution patterns of the blue line, green line and blue dotted line in the figure show that the organizational workload is increasing, the human input is increasing, and the average workload per person after the increase in human input is just on the average standard line. Therefore, the current human resource increment is appropriate. Therefore, the evaluation result of "the average workload per person in X month is lower than the standard workload, the organizational workload increases from X month to X+1 month, and the human resource input in X+1 month is appropriate" can be output;

[0103] If the total amount of organizational work and the per capita equivalent are both in an upward trend, and the per capita equivalent is lower than the preset per capita standard line after rising, please refer to Fig.16 The distribution patterns of the blue line, orange line and blue dotted line in the figure show that the organizational workload is increasing, the human input is increasing, and the per capita workload after the increase in human input is lower than the per capita standard line. Therefore, the current human resource increment is too much. Therefore, the evaluation result of "the per capita workload in X month is lower than the standard workload, the organizational workload increases from X month to X+1 month, and the human input is excessive in X+1 month" can be output.

[0104] See also Fig.17 The provided distribution pattern example chart corresponding to the eighth workload assessment result evaluates whether the existing total workload can be matched after reducing manpower when employees are under low workload (it should be noted that the total workload does not necessarily decrease at this time. When the total workload remains unchanged, it can also be determined whether the existing total workload can be matched after reducing manpower according to the following principles).

[0105] When the per capita equivalent workload of the previous cycle in the adjacent cycle is less than the preset per capita standard workload (i.e. Fig.17 The per capita value corresponding to the middle blue dotted line), and the distribution patterns of the total organizational work line and the per capita equivalent line are convergent;

[0106] If the trend of the total amount of organizational work is sinking or horizontal (this embodiment takes the sinking trend as an example), the trend of the per capita equivalent line is rising and is higher than the preset per capita standard line after rising. Fig.17 The distribution patterns of the blue, red and blue dotted lines in the figure show that the organizational workload is decreasing, the human input is decreasing, and the average workload per person after the reduction in human input is higher than the average standard line. Therefore, the current reduction in human resources is too much. Therefore, the evaluation result of "the average workload per person in X month is lower than the standard workload, the organizational manpower has decreased from X month to X+1 month, and the human input in X+1 month is insufficient" can be output;

[0107] If the total amount of organizational work is in a downward or horizontal trend, the per capita equivalent line is in an upward trend and is flush with the preset per capita standard line after rising. For details, please refer to Fig.17 The distribution patterns of the blue, green and blue dotted lines in the figure show that the organizational workload is decreasing, the human input is decreasing, and the average workload per person after the reduction in human input is just on the average standard line. Therefore, the current reduction in human resources is appropriate. Therefore, the evaluation result of "the average workload per person in X month is lower than the standard workload, the organizational manpower is reduced from X month to X+1 month, and the human input in X+1 month is appropriate" can be output;

[0108] If the total amount of organizational work is in a downward or horizontal trend, and the per capita equivalent line is in an upward trend and is lower than the preset per capita standard line after the upward trend, please refer to Fig.17 The distribution patterns of the blue line, orange line and blue dotted line in the figure show that the organizational workload is decreasing, the human input is decreasing, and the per capita workload after the reduction in human input is lower than the per capita standard line. Therefore, the current reduction in manpower is not enough. Therefore, the evaluation result of "the per capita workload in X month is lower than the standard workload, the organizational manpower is reduced from X month to X+1 month, and the human input is excessive in X+1 month" can be output.

[0109] Based on the above eight distribution forms of workload assessment structure, the workload assessment results of various organizations are intuitively displayed in a visual way, which helps organizational managers to view the current human resource surplus and shortage situation of the organization, provides data basis for timely adjustment of human resource allocation, and helps to scientifically and rationally adjust human resources within the organization, tap potential, and improve quality and efficiency.

[0110] See also Fig.18 As shown, in the evaluation method of the nuclear power plant design workload of the embodiment of the present invention, a histogram comparison between individuals and organizations can also be performed in a visualized manner, specifically including:

[0111] Based on the individual equivalent workload and the average equivalent workload of the professional group for multiple consecutive periods (it should be noted that the professional group is a small group in the organization), a chart of individual equivalent-average workload of the professional group is constructed in the form of a chart; Fig.18 As shown in the figure, a histogram is used to show the workload comparison between the individual equivalent workload and the average equivalent workload of the professional group in multiple consecutive cycles, so as to intuitively analyze the difference between the individual equivalent and the average workload of the professional group, and provide a basis for timely adjustment and improvement of individual work methods. In addition, the cumulative workload of an individual in multiple consecutive cycles can be counted in the histogram, and connected with a broken line, and the workload status of the individual can be dynamically evaluated through the trend of the broken line.

[0112] See also Fig.19 As shown, in the evaluation method of the nuclear power plant design workload of the embodiment of the present invention, a histogram comparison of the per capita and organizational workload charts can also be performed in a visualized manner, specifically including:

[0113] Based on the average workload per person of each professional group and the average equivalent workload per person of the organization for multiple consecutive periods, a chart of the average workload per person of each professional group is constructed in the form of a graph; a histogram is used to show the workload comparison of each professional group in the organization, so as to intuitively analyze the differences between each professional group; in addition, the histogram shows the broken line comparison between the room levels where each professional group is located, so as to dynamically evaluate the recent work intensity, employee load and manpower surplus and shortage of each room, adjust the manpower allocation in a timely manner, and thus carry out human resource management scientifically and rationally.

[0114] The embodiment of the present invention further provides a system for evaluating the design workload of a nuclear power plant, and the system for evaluating the design workload of a nuclear power plant is used to execute any embodiment of the evaluation method for the design workload of a nuclear power plant. Figure 4 , Figure 4 It is a schematic block diagram of a system for evaluating a nuclear power plant design workload provided by an embodiment of the present invention.

[0115] like Figure 4 As shown, the evaluation system 400 for the design workload of a nuclear power plant includes: a workload acquisition unit 401 , a broken line construction acquisition unit 402 , a morphology acquisition unit 403 and an evaluation unit 404 .

[0116] The workload acquisition unit 401 is used to acquire the total workload of the organization and the average workload per person in the organization in each cycle;

[0117] A broken line construction acquisition unit 402 is used to construct an individual equivalent broken line, an organizational total broken line and a per capita equivalent broken line in the form of a chart based on the organizational total workload and the organizational per capita equivalent workload of multiple consecutive periods;

[0118] A shape acquisition unit 403 is used to acquire the distribution shape of the total amount of organizational work and the per capita equivalent in adjacent periods;

[0119] The evaluation unit 404 is used to output the evaluation results of the organizational workload between adjacent cycles according to the distribution patterns of the organizational workload total amount polyline and the per capita equivalent polyline between adjacent cycles and the preset per capita standard workload.

[0120] The system quantifies the organization's designed workload each month and dynamically analyzes the organization's workload status and the organization's manpower surplus and shortage situation, providing a reliable management basis for organizational managers to adjust human resource allocation in a timely manner.

[0121] Those skilled in the art can clearly understand that, for the convenience and brevity of description, the specific working processes of the systems and units described above can refer to the corresponding processes in the aforementioned method embodiments and will not be repeated here.

[0122] The above is only a specific embodiment of the present invention, but the protection scope of the present invention is not limited thereto. Any technician familiar with the technical field can easily think of various equivalent modifications or replacements within the technical scope disclosed by the present invention, and these modifications or replacements should be included in the protection scope of the present invention. Therefore, the protection scope of the present invention shall be based on the protection scope of the claims.

Claims

1. A method for evaluating the design workload of a nuclear power plant, characterized in that: include: Obtain the total amount of organizational work and the equivalent workload per person in the organization in each cycle; Based on the total organizational workload and the equivalent workload per person in multiple consecutive periods, the total organizational workload line and the equivalent workload per person line are constructed in the form of charts. Obtain the distribution patterns of the total workload of the organization and the per capita equivalent workload in adjacent periods; According to the distribution patterns of the organizational workload total amount polyline and the per capita equivalent polyline between adjacent periods and the preset per capita standard workload, the organizational workload assessment results between adjacent periods are output.

2. The method for evaluating the design workload of a nuclear power plant according to claim 1, characterized in that: The total amount of organizational work and the equivalent workload per person in each period are obtained, including: The sum of the workload of preparing standards, checking standards and reviewing standards for each individual in each cycle is calculated as the individual equivalent workload of each individual in each cycle; The sum of the individual equivalent workload of all individuals in each cycle is calculated as the total organizational workload of each cycle; Calculate the ratio of the total organizational workload in each cycle to that of all individuals to obtain the average organizational workload per person in each cycle.

3. The method for evaluating the design workload of a nuclear power plant according to claim 1, characterized in that: The obtaining of the distribution forms of the total amount of organizational work and the per capita equivalent amount of work in adjacent periods includes: Obtain the trends of the total amount of work of the organization and the per capita equivalent amount of work in adjacent periods; When the total amount of organizational work and the per capita equivalent amount are in a convergent distribution, the output is in a convergent form, and it is determined that the input manpower is decreasing; When the broken line trends of the total organizational work volume and the per capita equivalent broken line are divergent, the output is in a divergent form, and it is determined that the manpower input is increasing.

4. The method for evaluating the design workload of a nuclear power plant according to claim 3, characterized in that: Outputting the organizational workload assessment results between adjacent cycles according to the distribution patterns of the organizational workload total amount polyline and the per capita equivalent polyline between adjacent cycles and the preset per capita standard workload includes: When the per capita equivalent workload of the previous cycle in the adjacent cycle has reached the preset per capita standard workload, and the distribution form of the total organizational workload line and the per capita equivalent line is a divergent form; If the total amount of organizational work and the per capita equivalent are both in an upward trend, the evaluation result of "the per capita workload in the previous period has reached the standard workload, the organizational workload and manpower increased during the period, and the manpower input in the next period is insufficient" is output; If the total amount of organizational work is in an upward trend, and the per capita equivalent is in a flat trend, then the evaluation result of "the per capita workload in the previous period has reached the standard workload, the organizational workload and manpower have increased during the period, and the manpower investment in the next period is appropriate" is output; If the total organizational workload is in an upward trend and the per capita equivalent workload is in a downward trend, then the evaluation result of "the per capita workload in the previous period has reached the standard workload, the organizational workload and manpower increased between periods, and there is an excess of manpower in the next period" is output.

5. The method for evaluating the design workload of a nuclear power plant according to claim 3, characterized in that: Outputting the organizational workload assessment results between adjacent cycles according to the distribution patterns of the organizational workload total amount polyline and the per capita equivalent polyline between adjacent cycles and the preset per capita standard workload includes: When the per capita equivalent workload of the previous cycle in the adjacent cycle has reached the preset per capita standard workload, and the distribution patterns of the total organizational workload line and the per capita equivalent line are convergent; If the total organizational workload and the per capita equivalent workload are both in an upward trend, the output evaluation result is "the per capita workload in the previous period has reached the standard workload, the organizational workload during the period has increased and the manpower has decreased, and the manpower input in the next period is insufficient." 6. The method for evaluating the design workload of a nuclear power plant according to claim 3, characterized in that: Outputting the organizational workload assessment results between adjacent cycles according to the distribution patterns of the organizational workload total amount polyline and the per capita equivalent polyline between adjacent cycles and the preset per capita standard workload includes: When the per capita equivalent workload of the previous cycle in the adjacent cycle has reached the preset per capita standard workload, and the distribution form of the total organizational workload line and the per capita equivalent line is a divergent form; If the total organizational workload and the per capita equivalent workload are both trending downward, the output evaluation result is "the per capita workload in the previous cycle has reached the standard workload, the organizational workload during the cycle has decreased and the manpower has increased, and there is an excess of manpower in the next cycle." 7. The method for evaluating the design workload of a nuclear power plant according to claim 3, characterized in that: Outputting the organizational workload assessment results between adjacent cycles according to the distribution patterns of the organizational workload total amount polyline and the per capita equivalent polyline between adjacent cycles and the preset per capita standard workload includes: When the per capita equivalent workload of the previous cycle in the adjacent cycle has reached the preset per capita standard workload, and the distribution patterns of the total organizational workload line and the per capita equivalent line are convergent; If the total amount of organizational work is in a downward trend, and the per capita equivalent is in an upward trend, then the evaluation result of "the per capita workload in the previous period has reached the standard workload, the organizational workload and manpower have decreased during the period, and the manpower input in the next period is insufficient" is output; If the total amount of organizational work is in a downward trend, and the per capita equivalent is in a flat trend, then the evaluation result of "the per capita workload in the previous cycle has reached the standard workload, the organizational workload and manpower during the cycle have decreased, and the manpower investment in the next cycle is appropriate" is output; If the total organizational workload and the per capita equivalent workload are both in a downward trend, the output evaluation result is "the per capita workload in the previous period has reached the standard workload, the organizational workload and manpower have decreased between periods, and there is an excess of manpower in the next period." 8. The method for evaluating the design workload of a nuclear power plant according to claim 3, characterized in that: Outputting the organizational workload assessment results between adjacent cycles according to the distribution patterns of the organizational workload total amount polyline and the per capita equivalent polyline between adjacent cycles and the preset per capita standard workload includes: When the per capita equivalent workload of the previous cycle in the adjacent cycle is greater than the preset per capita standard workload, and the distribution form of the total organizational workload line and the per capita equivalent line is a divergent form; If the total amount of organizational work is trending upward or horizontal, and the per capita equivalent is trending downward and is higher than the preset per capita standard line after sinking, then the evaluation result of "the per capita workload in the previous cycle has exceeded the standard workload, the organizational manpower has increased during the cycle, and the manpower input in the next cycle is insufficient" is output; If the total amount of organizational work is trending upward or horizontal, and the per capita equivalent is trending downward and is flush with the preset per capita standard line after sinking, then the evaluation result of "the per capita workload in the previous cycle has exceeded the standard workload, the organizational manpower has increased during the cycle, and the manpower investment in the next cycle is appropriate" is output; If the total organizational workload is trending upward or horizontally, and the per capita equivalent workload is trending downward and is lower than the preset per capita standard line after falling, then the evaluation result of "the per capita workload in the previous period has exceeded the standard workload, the organizational manpower has increased between periods, and the manpower investment in the next period is in excess" is output.

9. The method for evaluating the design workload of a nuclear power plant according to claim 3, characterized in that: Outputting the organizational workload assessment results between adjacent cycles according to the distribution patterns of the organizational workload total amount polyline and the per capita equivalent polyline between adjacent cycles and the preset per capita standard workload includes: When the per capita equivalent workload of the previous cycle in the adjacent cycle is greater than the preset per capita standard workload, and the distribution patterns of the total organizational workload line and the per capita equivalent line are convergent; If the total amount of organizational work and the per capita equivalent are both in a downward trend, and the per capita equivalent is higher than the preset per capita standard line after sinking, then the evaluation result of "the per capita workload in the previous cycle has exceeded the standard workload, the organizational workload during the cycle has decreased, and the human resources input in the next cycle is insufficient" is output; If the total amount of organizational work and the per capita equivalent are both in a downward trend, and the per capita equivalent is flush with the preset per capita standard line after sinking, then the evaluation result of "the per capita workload in the previous period has exceeded the standard workload, the organizational workload during the period has decreased, and the human resources investment in the next period is appropriate" is output; If the total organizational workload and the per capita equivalent workload are both in a downward trend, and the per capita equivalent workload is lower than the preset per capita standard line after sinking, then the evaluation result of "the per capita workload in the previous period has exceeded the standard workload, the organizational workload between periods has decreased, and the human resource input in the next period is in excess" is output.

10. The method for evaluating the design workload of a nuclear power plant according to claim 3, characterized in that: Outputting the organizational workload assessment results between adjacent cycles according to the distribution patterns of the organizational workload total amount polyline and the per capita equivalent polyline between adjacent cycles and the preset per capita standard workload includes: When the per capita equivalent workload of the previous cycle in the adjacent cycle is less than the preset per capita standard workload, and the distribution form of the total organizational workload line and the per capita equivalent line is a divergent form; If the total organizational workload and per capita equivalent workload are both in an upward trend, and the per capita equivalent workload is higher than the preset per capita standard line after rising, then the evaluation result of "the per capita workload in the previous cycle is lower than the standard workload, the organizational workload between cycles increases, and the human resources input in the next cycle is insufficient" is output; If the total organizational workload and per capita equivalent workload are both in an upward trend, and the per capita equivalent workload is flush with the preset per capita standard line after rising, then the evaluation result of "the per capita workload in the previous period is lower than the standard workload, the organizational workload between periods has increased, and the human resources investment in the next period is appropriate" is output; If the total organizational workload and the per capita equivalent workload are both in an upward trend, and the per capita equivalent workload is lower than the preset per capita standard line after rising, then the evaluation result of "the per capita workload in the previous period is lower than the standard workload, the organizational workload between periods increases, and the human resource input in the next period is excessive" is output.

11. The method for evaluating the design workload of a nuclear power plant according to claim 3, characterized in that: Outputting the organizational workload assessment results between adjacent cycles according to the distribution patterns of the organizational workload total amount polyline and the per capita equivalent polyline between adjacent cycles and the preset per capita standard workload includes: When the per capita equivalent workload of the previous cycle in the adjacent cycle is less than the preset per capita standard workload, and the distribution patterns of the total organizational workload polyline and the per capita equivalent polyline are convergent patterns; If the total amount of organizational work is trending downward or horizontal, and the per capita equivalent is trending upward and is higher than the preset per capita standard line after rising, then the evaluation result of "the per capita workload in the previous cycle is lower than the standard workload, the organizational manpower has decreased during the cycle, and the manpower in the next cycle is insufficient" is output; If the total amount of organizational work is trending downward or horizontal, and the per capita equivalent is trending upward and is flush with the preset per capita standard line after rising, then the evaluation result of "the per capita workload in the previous cycle is lower than the standard workload, the organizational manpower has decreased during the cycle, and the manpower in the next cycle is appropriate" is output; If the total amount of organizational work is trending downward or horizontally, and the per capita equivalent is trending upward and is lower than the preset per capita standard line after rising, then the evaluation result of "the per capita workload in the previous period is lower than the standard workload, the organizational manpower is reduced during the period, and there is a surplus of manpower in the next period" is output.

12. The method for evaluating the design workload of a nuclear power plant according to claim 1, characterized in that: Also includes: Based on the individual equivalent workload and the average equivalent workload of professional groups in multiple consecutive periods, a chart of individual equivalent workload and average workload of professional groups is constructed in the form of a chart; Based on the average workload per professional group and the average equivalent workload per organization over multiple consecutive periods, a chart of the average workload per professional group is constructed in the form of a graph.

13. A nuclear power plant design workload assessment system, characterized in that: include: The workload acquisition unit is used to obtain the total amount of organizational workload and the equivalent workload per person in the organization in each cycle; A broken line construction acquisition unit is used to construct an individual equivalent broken line, an organizational work total broken line and a per capita equivalent broken line in the form of a chart based on the organizational work total amount and the organizational per capita equivalent workload of multiple consecutive periods; A morphology acquisition unit, used to acquire the distribution morphology of the total organizational workload polyline and the per capita equivalent polyline in adjacent periods; The evaluation unit is used to output the organizational workload evaluation results between adjacent cycles based on the distribution patterns of the organizational total workload line and the per capita equivalent workload line between adjacent cycles and the preset per capita standard workload.

Images