Safety supervision method, device and equipment for building construction and storage medium

Abstract

The invention provides a safety supervision method, device and equipment for building construction and a storage medium, and relates to the technical field of constructional engineering quality acceptance, and the method comprises the steps: formulating a safety evaluation scheme according to construction planning data; dividing the acceptance region to obtain a plurality of sub-regions, collecting real-time data of each sub-region, and obtaining an evaluation index value according to the real-time data; determining a preset standard value corresponding to each sub-region according to the security evaluation scheme; comparing the evaluation index value of each sub-region with a corresponding preset standard value, and judging whether the security acceptance of each sub-region is passed or not according to a comparison result; if all the sub-regions pass the safety acceptance check, entering the next process; and if the target sub-region does not pass safety acceptance, calculating a difference value between the evaluation index value of the target sub-region and a corresponding preset standard value, and executing a safety compensation measure and modifying a related construction plan according to the difference value. The technical effect of the invention is that the accuracy of the monitoring result is improved.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] The present application relates to the technical field of construction project quality acceptance, and specifically to a construction safety supervision method, device, equipment and storage medium. Background Art

[0002] As construction projects continue to expand in scale and become more complex, construction safety management faces unprecedented challenges. Traditional safety supervision methods often rely on manual inspections and empirical judgments, which make it difficult to detect potential safety hazards in a timely manner, and it is also impossible to conduct comprehensive and continuous monitoring of all areas of large-scale engineering projects.

[0003] To address the above issues, some safety monitoring systems based on sensor networks and data analysis are usually used. These systems can collect various parameters of the construction site in real time and issue alarm prompts through preset thresholds. However, in actual applications, the above technologies often use unified safety standards, ignoring the particularities of different construction areas and construction stages. The safety risks in some areas may be underestimated or overestimated, resulting in inaccurate monitoring results. Summary of the invention

[0004] The present application provides a construction safety supervision method, device, equipment and storage medium for improving the accuracy of monitoring results.

[0005] In a first aspect, the present application provides a method for safety supervision of construction, the method comprising: obtaining construction planning data of a project to be monitored, and formulating a safety assessment plan based on the construction planning data; dividing the predetermined acceptance area of ​​the project to be monitored into multiple sub-areas, and collecting real-time data of each of the sub-areas, and obtaining an assessment index value of each of the sub-areas based on the real-time data; determining a preset standard value corresponding to each of the sub-areas based on the safety assessment plan; comparing the assessment index value of each of the sub-areas with the preset standard value corresponding to each of the sub-areas, and judging whether the safety acceptance of each of the sub-areas has passed based on the comparison result; if all of the sub-areas have passed the safety acceptance, proceeding to the next process; if there is a target sub-area that has not passed the safety acceptance, calculating the difference between the assessment index value of the target sub-area and the preset standard value corresponding to the target sub-area, executing safety compensation measures based on the difference and modifying relevant construction plans.

[0006] By adopting the above technical solution, the accuracy and coverage of safety monitoring are improved through fine division of the scheduled acceptance area and real-time data collection. The use of personalized preset standard values ​​for comparison and evaluation avoids underestimation or overestimation of safety risks. The introduction of a dynamic safety management mechanism implements compensation measures and modifies the construction plan in a timely manner for areas that fail to pass the acceptance, ensuring the timeliness and effectiveness of safety management. The above method also has the characteristics of self-optimization, and can continuously improve the safety management strategy as the project progresses. It significantly improves the accuracy and efficiency of safety management, effectively reduces safety risks during construction, and improves the overall project quality and construction efficiency.

[0007] Optionally, the predetermined acceptance area of ​​the engineering project to be monitored is divided into multiple sub-areas, including: acquiring engineering structure data of the predetermined acceptance area; identifying key structural units of the predetermined acceptance area based on the engineering structure data; dividing the predetermined acceptance area based on the key structural units to obtain multiple functional sub-areas; dividing the multiple functional sub-areas according to the characteristics and safety requirements of each of the functional sub-areas to obtain multiple sub-areas.

[0008] By adopting the above technical solution, the scientific division of the scheduled acceptance area is achieved by obtaining the engineering structure data and identifying the key structural units. The functional sub-areas are divided based on the key structural units, and then further subdivided according to the characteristics and safety requirements of each functional sub-area to obtain the final multiple sub-areas. This multi-level and targeted division method improves the accuracy and pertinence of safety supervision. It makes the safety assessment of each sub-area more in line with the actual situation and avoids the omissions that may be caused by general division. At the same time, this method also optimizes resource allocation, so that safety supervision measures can be more effectively applied to areas that really need to be focused on. By combining the structural characteristics of the project with safety requirements, the solution provides a more reliable and effective basis for subsequent safety assessment and management, thereby improving the overall safety supervision effect.

[0009] Optionally, the construction planning data includes construction drawings, construction procedures and construction schedule, and formulating a safety assessment plan based on the construction planning data includes: determining key safety control points for each construction stage during the construction process based on the construction drawings, the construction procedures and the construction schedule; formulating safety assessment indicators and assessment standards corresponding to each construction stage based on the key safety control points of each construction stage; formulating a safety monitoring plan based on the safety assessment indicators and the assessment standards, and the safety monitoring plan includes monitoring parameters, monitoring equipment, monitoring locations, monitoring frequencies and data transmission methods.

[0010] By adopting the above technical solutions, the key safety control points of each construction stage were determined through comprehensive analysis of construction drawings, processes and schedules, providing clear goals for safety assessment. Based on these control points, specific safety assessment indicators and standards for each construction stage were formulated to ensure the comprehensiveness and pertinence of the assessment. Further combined with the assessment indicators and standards, a detailed safety monitoring plan was formulated, including monitoring parameters, equipment, location, frequency and data transmission methods, to achieve the systematization and refinement of safety monitoring. This comprehensive safety assessment plan from macro planning to micro implementation not only improves the accuracy and efficiency of safety monitoring, but also can timely detect potential risks, providing reliable data support for dynamic safety management during the construction process. By closely combining construction planning with safety assessment, the safety of the entire construction process is significantly enhanced, while optimizing resource allocation and improving construction efficiency.

[0011] Optionally, obtaining evaluation index values ​​for each of the sub-areas based on the real-time data includes: extracting construction site environmental parameters, construction equipment operating parameters and construction personnel behavior parameters for each of the sub-areas based on the real-time data; performing weighted calculation on the construction site environmental parameters, the construction equipment operating parameters and the construction personnel behavior parameters according to preset weight coefficients to obtain a comprehensive safety index value for each of the sub-areas; and using the comprehensive safety index value as the evaluation index value for each of the sub-areas.

[0012] By adopting the above technical solution, by extracting the construction site environmental parameters, equipment working parameters and personnel behavior parameters from the real-time data, the key factors affecting construction safety are fully covered. The preset weight coefficient is used for weighted calculation to obtain the comprehensive safety index value, which realizes the quantitative evaluation of the safety status of each sub-area. This method not only takes into account various safety factors, but also reflects the relative importance of different parameters through weight distribution, making the evaluation results more objective and accurate. Using the comprehensive safety index value as the evaluation index value provides a reliable data basis for subsequent safety judgments and decisions, improves the accuracy and comprehensiveness of safety monitoring, can better identify potential risks, and provides strong support for timely and targeted safety measures, thereby effectively improving the overall construction safety level.

[0013] Optionally, the comparison of the evaluation index value of each sub-area and the corresponding preset standard value of each sub-area, and judging whether the safety acceptance of each sub-area has been passed according to the comparison result, include: calculating the difference between the evaluation index value of each sub-area and the corresponding preset standard value; if there is a first sub-area where the difference between the evaluation index value and the corresponding preset standard value is not greater than a preset safety threshold, then the first sub-area passes the safety acceptance; if there is a second sub-area where the difference between the evaluation index value and the corresponding preset standard value is greater than the preset safety threshold, then the second sub-area fails the safety acceptance.

[0014] By adopting the above technical solution, by calculating the difference between the evaluation index value of each sub-area and the preset standard value, and comparing it with the preset safety threshold, an accurate judgment of the safety status is achieved. This method not only considers whether the evaluation index value meets the standard, but also introduces an acceptable error range, which improves the flexibility and practicality of the evaluation. For sub-areas whose difference is not greater than the safety threshold, it is judged to have passed the safety acceptance, while sub-areas whose difference exceeds the threshold have not passed the acceptance. This judgment method based on quantitative indicators and preset thresholds makes the safety acceptance process more objective and reduces the deviation of human judgment. At the same time, this refined evaluation method can accurately identify areas that need to be focused on, which helps the rational allocation of resources and the implementation of targeted safety measures.

[0015] Optionally, executing safety compensation measures based on the difference and modifying relevant construction plans include: if the difference is within a preset range, executing mild safety compensation measures, and the mild safety compensation measures include one or more of increasing the monitoring frequency, adjusting construction parameters, and strengthening on-site management; if the difference is not within the preset range, executing severe safety compensation measures, and the severe safety compensation measures include one or more of suspending relevant construction activities, replacing construction equipment, and re-formulating construction plans; and modifying the construction schedule accordingly based on the implemented safety compensation measures.

[0016] By adopting the above technical solutions, the solution realizes the refinement and dynamic adjustment of safety management by introducing difference evaluation and graded compensation mechanism. According to whether the difference is in the preset range, mild or severe safety compensation measures are taken, which reflects the pertinence and hierarchy of risk control. Mild compensation measures such as increasing the monitoring frequency, adjusting construction parameters and strengthening on-site management can improve the safety level without significantly affecting the construction progress. Severe compensation measures such as suspending construction activities, replacing equipment and re-formulating plans can deal with more serious safety hazards. This graded response mechanism ensures the effectiveness of safety management and avoids the impact of excessive intervention on construction efficiency. At the same time, the construction schedule is modified accordingly according to the implemented compensation measures, achieving a dynamic balance between safety management and construction progress.

[0017] Optionally, after executing the safety compensation measures according to the difference and modifying the relevant construction plan, it also includes: acquiring real-time data of the target sub-area, and obtaining an updated evaluation index value of the target sub-area based on the real-time data; comparing the updated evaluation index value with a preset standard value corresponding to the target sub-area; if the difference between the updated evaluation index value and the preset standard value is not greater than the preset safety threshold, determining that the target sub-area has passed the safety acceptance; if the difference between the updated evaluation index value and the preset standard value is still greater than the preset safety threshold, repeating the safety compensation measures and further modifying the relevant construction plan until the target sub-area passes the safety acceptance.

[0018] By adopting the above technical solution and introducing a feedback loop mechanism, continuous optimization and dynamic adjustment of safety management are achieved. After executing safety compensation measures and modifying the construction plan, timely evaluation of the effectiveness of compensation measures is achieved by reacquiring real-time data of the target sub-area and updating the evaluation index value. By comparing the updated evaluation index value with the preset standard value, it is determined whether the safety acceptance standard is met, thereby ensuring the effectiveness of the compensation measures. If the standard is still not met, the compensation measures and plan modifications are repeated until the safety acceptance is passed, forming a closed-loop safety management process. This iterative optimization method not only improves the accuracy and effectiveness of safety management, but also ensures that safety issues are thoroughly resolved.

[0019] In a second aspect, the present application provides a safety supervision device for a construction project, the device comprising: an acquisition module, a division module, a determination module, a comparison module, a first output module and a second output module; wherein the acquisition module is used to acquire construction planning data of the project to be monitored, and formulate a safety assessment plan based on the construction planning data; the division module is used to divide the predetermined acceptance area of ​​the project to be monitored into multiple sub-areas, and collect real-time data of each of the sub-areas, and obtain the evaluation index value level of each of the sub-areas based on the real-time data; the determination module is used to determine the evaluation index value level of each of the sub-areas based on the safety assessment plan The scheme determines the preset standard value corresponding to each of the sub-areas; the comparison module is used to compare the evaluation index value of each of the sub-areas with the preset standard value corresponding to each of the sub-areas, and judge whether the safety acceptance of each of the sub-areas has been passed according to the comparison result; the first output module is used to enter the next process if all of the sub-areas have passed the safety acceptance; the second output module is used to calculate the difference between the evaluation index value of the target sub-area and the preset standard value corresponding to the target sub-area if there is a target sub-area that has not passed the safety acceptance, and execute safety compensation measures and modify relevant construction plans according to the difference.

[0020] In the third aspect, the present application provides an electronic device, adopting the following technical solution: including a processor, a memory, a user interface and a network interface, the memory is used to store instructions, the user interface and the network interface are used to communicate with other devices, and the processor is used to execute the instructions stored in the memory so that the electronic device executes a computer program such as any of the above-mentioned construction safety supervision methods.

[0021] In a fourth aspect, the present application provides a computer-readable storage medium, which adopts the following technical solution: a computer program that can be loaded by a processor and execute any of the above-mentioned construction safety supervision methods is stored.

[0022] In summary, the present application includes at least one of the following beneficial technical effects: 1. The accuracy and coverage of safety monitoring are improved through refined division of the scheduled acceptance area and real-time data collection. The use of personalized preset standard values ​​for comparison and evaluation avoids underestimation or overestimation of safety risks. The introduction of a dynamic safety management mechanism ensures timely implementation of compensation measures and modification of construction plans for areas that fail to pass acceptance, ensuring the timeliness and effectiveness of safety management.

[0023] 2. It has the characteristics of self-optimization and can continuously improve the safety management strategy as the project progresses. It significantly improves the accuracy and efficiency of safety management, effectively reduces the safety risks in the construction process, and improves the overall project quality and construction efficiency. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0024] Figure 1 It is a flowchart of a construction safety supervision method provided by an embodiment of the present application; Figure 2 It is a structural schematic diagram of a safety supervision device for building construction provided in an embodiment of the present application; Figure 3 It is a structural schematic diagram of an electronic device provided in an embodiment of the present application.

[0025] Description of reference numerals: 1000, electronic device; 1001, processor; 1002, communication bus; 1003, user interface; 1004, network interface; 1005, memory. DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0026] In order to enable those skilled in the art to better understand the technical solutions in this specification, the technical solutions in the embodiments of this specification will be clearly and completely described below in conjunction with the drawings in the embodiments of this specification. Obviously, the described embodiments are only part of the embodiments of this application, not all of the embodiments.

[0027] In the description of the embodiments of the present application, words such as "illustrative", "for example" or "for example" are used to indicate examples, illustrations or descriptions. Any embodiment or design described as "illustrative", "for example" or "for example" in the embodiments of the present application should not be interpreted as being more preferred or more advantageous than other embodiments or designs. Specifically, the use of words such as "illustrative", "for example" or "for example" is intended to present related concepts in a concrete way.

[0028] Figure 1 Schematic diagram of a safety supervision method for building construction provided by the embodiment of the present application. The present application discloses a safety supervision method for building construction, such as Figure 1 As shown, the method includes S101-S106.

[0029] S101, obtaining construction planning data of the project to be monitored, and formulating a safety assessment plan based on the construction planning data.

[0030] During the specific implementation, the construction unit will upload the complete construction planning data, including construction drawings, construction processes and construction schedules, to the database of the safety supervision system. The intelligent algorithm running on the server automatically analyzes these digital data to fully understand the characteristics, complexity and potential risks of the project. The system uses image recognition technology to analyze the construction drawings and identify the key parts and construction difficulties of the building structure; it uses data analysis algorithms to analyze the construction process and predict the potential safety hazards at each stage; at the same time, it uses data mining technology to process the construction schedule and determine the key supervision objects in different periods.

[0031] After completing the digital analysis of the construction planning data, the server begins to automatically formulate a safety assessment plan. First, based on the preset safety rules and historical data analysis, the system automatically determines the key safety control points of each construction stage during the construction process according to the construction drawings, construction procedures and construction schedule. These control points are obtained by analyzing historical data and evaluating potential risk scenarios. Then, for each key safety control point, the system uses the built-in expert knowledge base and data analysis algorithm to automatically generate the corresponding safety assessment indicators and evaluation standards. These indicators and standards are quantifiable digital parameters, which facilitate subsequent automated monitoring and evaluation.

[0032] Finally, the computer system automatically develops a detailed safety assessment plan based on the generated safety assessment indicators and assessment standards. The plan includes specific contents such as monitoring parameters, monitoring equipment, monitoring location, monitoring frequency and data transmission method. For example, for high-altitude work areas, the system may set up electronic sensors to monitor the use of workers' safety belts in real time and arrange regular detection of surrounding wind speed; for underground construction areas, intelligent deformation monitoring systems and automated groundwater level monitoring equipment may be deployed.

[0033] Based on the above embodiment, as an optional implementation, in S101, the construction planning data includes construction drawings, construction procedures and construction progress plan, and formulating the safety assessment plan according to the construction planning data specifically includes S201-S203; S201, determine the key safety control points of each construction stage during the construction process based on the construction drawings, construction procedures and construction schedule.

[0034] In one example, the process of identifying critical safety control points begins with an in-depth study of construction drawings. The engineering team needs to carefully review the building's structural design, equipment layout, material specifications and other information to identify structural parts or construction links that may pose safety hazards. For example, high-altitude working areas, large equipment installation locations, special structural connection points, etc. may all become potential critical safety control points.

[0035] Next, the construction process needs to be analyzed. Each construction stage has its own specific processes and technical requirements. By analyzing these processes one by one, we can identify which links have higher safety risks. For example, in the foundation construction stage, deep foundation pit support, groundwater treatment and other links may become key safety control points; in the main structure construction stage, concrete pouring, steel structure installation and other links may need to be focused on.

[0036] At the same time, it is also necessary to analyze it in conjunction with the construction schedule. By studying the construction schedule, we can foresee the cross-operation situation, resource allocation situation and possible pressure points in the construction period at different construction stages. These factors may affect construction safety, so it is necessary to set safety control points at these key time nodes.

[0037] When determining key safety control points, the following aspects also need to be considered: first, construction environment factors, such as geological conditions, climate characteristics, etc.; second, the difficulty and innovation of construction technology. The application of new technologies or complex processes may increase safety risks; third, personnel factors, such as the density of personnel during peak hours, the operating requirements of special types of work, etc.; finally, equipment factors must also be considered, such as the use of large machinery and the erection of temporary facilities.

[0038] By comprehensively considering the above factors, the engineering team can systematically identify and determine the key safety control points in each construction stage. These control points usually include but are not limited to: support system installation points in the foundation excavation stage, formwork support system inspection points in the main structure construction stage, safety protection facility inspection points in the high-altitude working area, safety preparation inspection points before the implementation of special processes, and key nodes for the installation of large equipment.

[0039] After determining the key safety control points, the engineering team will develop a detailed checklist and safety management measures for each control point. These measures include specific inspection items, inspection frequency, responsible personnel, emergency plans, etc. At the same time, these control points will be marked on the construction schedule and associated with the digital engineering model for visual management and dynamic tracking.

[0040] S202: Based on the key safety control points of each construction stage, formulate safety assessment indicators and assessment standards corresponding to each construction stage.

[0041] In one example, the process of developing safety assessment indicators and evaluation standards begins with an in-depth analysis of key safety control points at each construction stage. The engineering team needs to consider the characteristics, potential risks, and safety requirements of each key safety control point to determine the corresponding evaluation indicators. These indicators should be able to fully reflect the safety status of the control point, including both quantitative and qualitative indicators.

[0042] When determining evaluation indicators, the following aspects are usually considered: first, regulations and standard requirements, such as national and industry-related safety regulations, technical standards, etc.; second, project characteristics, including structural type, construction technology, environmental conditions, etc.; third, historical experience and best practices, drawing on the safety management experience of similar projects; finally, operability and quantifiability must be considered to ensure that these indicators can be effectively implemented and accurately evaluated in actual applications.

[0043] For example, for the key safety control point of deep foundation pit support, the following evaluation indicators may be formulated: strength and stability of the support structure, surface settlement around the foundation pit, groundwater level change, displacement of the support structure, inclination of surrounding buildings, etc. These indicators include both quantitative indicators that can be accurately measured and qualitative indicators that require professional judgment.

[0044] After determining the evaluation indicators, the next step is to formulate the corresponding evaluation standards. The evaluation standards are the basis for judging the safety status, and specific thresholds or judgment criteria need to be set for each evaluation indicator. The formulation of these standards requires comprehensive consideration of regulatory requirements, engineering characteristics, safety margins and other factors. Continuing to take deep foundation pit support as an example, its evaluation standards may include: the displacement of the support structure shall not exceed 80% of the design value, the maximum settlement of the surrounding surface shall not exceed 30mm, and the groundwater level change shall not exceed 1m.

[0045] In addition, the formulation of evaluation standards also needs to consider the characteristics and requirements of different construction stages. For example, in the foundation construction stage, the requirements for foundation bearing capacity may be more stringent; while in the main structure construction stage, the requirements for the verticality and flatness of structural components may be higher. Therefore, the evaluation standards should be dynamically adjusted according to the progress of the construction process.

[0046] In the process of developing evaluation indicators and standards, the engineering team also needs to consider the interrelationships and weightings between indicators. Some indicators may be more important than others and need to be given higher weights. For example, in the safety assessment of high-altitude work, the integrity of safety protection facilities may be more critical than the safety awareness training records of workers, so it should be given a higher weight.

[0047] S203, formulate a safety monitoring plan in combination with safety assessment indicators and assessment standards, the safety monitoring plan including monitoring parameters, monitoring equipment, monitoring location, monitoring frequency and data transmission method.

[0048] In one example, the engineering team needs to carefully review each safety assessment indicator and determine which indicators need to obtain data through real-time monitoring. For example, among the safety assessment indicators of deep foundation pit support, quantitative indicators such as support structure displacement and surface settlement need to be continuously monitored, while qualitative indicators such as support structure strength may be evaluated through regular testing.

[0049] Next, select the corresponding monitoring parameters according to each evaluation indicator that needs to be monitored. For example, for the evaluation indicator "support structure displacement", it may be necessary to monitor the horizontal displacement and vertical displacement parameters. For the indicator "groundwater level change", it is necessary to monitor the groundwater level elevation parameter.

[0050] Based on the determination of monitoring parameters, appropriate monitoring equipment is selected. The selection of equipment needs to take into account the accuracy requirements specified in the evaluation standards. For example, if the evaluation standards require the measurement accuracy of the support structure displacement to be ±1mm, then an automated inclinometer that can meet this accuracy requirement needs to be selected.

[0051] The determination of monitoring locations also needs to be closely integrated with the evaluation indicators and standards. For example, if the evaluation standard stipulates that "the maximum settlement within 10 meters around the foundation pit shall not exceed 30 mm", then a sufficient number of settlement monitoring points need to be arranged within 10 meters around the foundation pit to ensure that the maximum settlement value can be accurately captured.

[0052] The setting of monitoring frequency also needs to consider the requirements of the evaluation standard. If the evaluation standard requires "the maximum displacement rate of the support structure shall not exceed 2mm / day", then the monitoring frequency needs to be at least once a day in order to accurately calculate the displacement rate. For some key indicators, a higher monitoring frequency may be required to ensure that potential safety issues can be captured in a timely manner.

[0053] S102, dividing the scheduled acceptance area of ​​the project to be monitored into multiple sub-areas, collecting real-time data of each sub-area, and obtaining evaluation index values ​​of each sub-area based on the real-time data.

[0054] In one example, the engineering structure data of the scheduled acceptance area is obtained. This data is usually contained in the previously uploaded construction drawings and related documents. The computer system uses image recognition and data analysis algorithms to automatically identify the key structural units of the scheduled acceptance area. These key structural units may include load-bearing walls, beams, columns, floor slabs and other parts that are critical to building safety.

[0055] After identifying the key structural units, the scheduled acceptance area is divided into multiple functional sub-areas based on these units. This division method takes into account the characteristics and functions of the building structure and ensures that each sub-area has relatively independent structural characteristics and safety requirements. For example, the system may divide a multi-story building into functional sub-areas such as the foundation area, the main structure area, and the roof area.

[0056] Next, the system further subdivides these functional sub-areas into multiple sub-areas based on the characteristics and safety requirements of each functional sub-area. This step takes into account more detailed factors, such as construction technology, material characteristics, environmental conditions, etc. For example, the main structure area may be further divided into sub-areas such as concrete pouring area, steel bar binding area, and formwork installation area. This refined division enables the system to formulate corresponding monitoring strategies for the specific risks and safety requirements of each sub-area.

[0057] After the area division is completed, the system begins to collect real-time data from each sub-area. This process is automatically completed through various sensors and monitoring equipment deployed on site. According to the previously formulated safety monitoring plan, the system may collect multiple parameters such as temperature, humidity, vibration, displacement, stress, etc. For example, in the concrete pouring area, the system may monitor the temperature and humidity of the concrete in real time; in the high-altitude working area, it may focus on monitoring the wind speed and the use of workers' safety belts.

[0058] After collecting real-time data, the evaluation index values ​​of each sub-area are calculated based on these data. First, the construction site environmental parameters, construction equipment working parameters and construction personnel behavior parameters are extracted from the real-time data. Then, according to the preset weight coefficient, these parameters are weighted and calculated to obtain the comprehensive safety index value of each sub-area. This comprehensive safety index value is the evaluation index value of the sub-area, which fully reflects the safety status of the area.

[0059] Based on the above embodiment, as an optional implementation, in S102, the predetermined acceptance area of ​​the project to be monitored is divided into multiple sub-areas, specifically including S301-S304: S301, obtaining engineering structure data of a predetermined acceptance area.

[0060] S302, identifying key structural units of a predetermined acceptance area based on the engineering structure data.

[0061] In one example, it is necessary to load the engineering structure data of the scheduled acceptance area. These data include but are not limited to architectural design drawings, structural calculations, material lists, construction records, etc. Through advanced data processing algorithms, these complex engineering data are parsed and integrated to form a complete digital engineering model. This model not only contains the geometric information of the building, but also includes key information such as the mechanical properties, material properties, and construction technology of each structural unit.

[0062] Next, the digital engineering model is analyzed according to the preset key structural unit identification rules. These rules are based on building structure theory, engineering experience and relevant specifications, and include the following main aspects: Structural importance: Identify those units that play a key role in the overall structural stability, such as main beams, columns, shear walls, etc. Load bearing: Structural units that bear the main load will be identified as key units first. Construction difficulty: Structural units with special construction requirements or high technical difficulty will also be listed as key units. Use function: Structural units directly related to the main use function of the building will be given special attention. Historical problems: Structural units that have had problems or require special attention during the construction process will be marked as key units.

[0063] During the identification process, not only the characteristics of the individual structural elements are taken into account, but also the mutual relationships and influences between the structural elements are analyzed. For example, in the case of a multi-story building, special attention is paid to the load-bearing structures on the ground floor, because these structures play a decisive role in the stability of the entire building.

[0064] Based on the automatic identification, a preliminary list of key structural units will be generated. This list will be sent to the engineering expert team for review and supplementation. Experts can review the identification results and modify or add to the list based on their professional judgment. This combination of automatic analysis and manual judgment not only utilizes efficient data processing capabilities, but also incorporates the experience and wisdom of human experts, ensuring the accuracy and comprehensiveness of the identification results.

[0065] The final list of key structural units will be recorded and associated with the engineering digital model. A detailed information card will be generated for each key structural unit, including its location in the overall structure, importance description, key parameters, acceptance focus, etc. These information cards will become important reference materials for subsequent acceptance work.

[0066] S303, based on the key structural units, the scheduled acceptance area is divided into multiple functional sub-areas.

[0067] In one example, the key structural unit is taken as the core to determine the influence range of each unit. For example, for a main load-bearing column, its influence range may include the connected beams, floor slabs and surrounding non-load-bearing walls. These related structural elements will be initially divided into the same functional sub-area.

[0068] Next, consider the building's function. For example, in a multi-functional building, areas with different functions, such as office areas, commercial areas, and equipment rooms, will be divided into different functional sub-areas, even though they may be structurally connected. This is because different functional areas usually have different acceptance criteria and requirements.

[0069] Then, further subdivision is performed based on the construction technology and material characteristics. For example, areas using precast components and areas using cast-in-place concrete may be divided into different functional sub-areas because of the differences in their construction methods and acceptance priorities.

[0070] In addition, the spatial layout and geometric characteristics of the building need to be considered. For example, areas on different floors and in different orientations may be divided into independent functional sub-areas for better targeted acceptance.

[0071] During the division process, attention should also be paid to the size and number of functional sub-areas. The sub-areas should not be too large, so as not to affect the precision of the acceptance; nor should they be too small, so as not to increase unnecessary complexity and workload. Usually, the entire scheduled acceptance area will be divided into 10 to 20 functional sub-areas according to the scale and complexity of the building.

[0072] After the division is completed, each functional sub-area will be assigned a unique identification code and marked in the digital engineering model. At the same time, a detailed information table will be generated for each functional sub-area, including the location description of the area, the key structural units included, the main functions, special acceptance requirements, etc. This information will provide an important reference for subsequent acceptance work.

[0073] S304: Divide the multiple functional sub-areas according to the characteristics and safety requirements of each functional sub-area to obtain multiple sub-areas.

[0074] In one example, a preliminary division is made based on the structural characteristics of the functional sub-area. For example, in a functional sub-area containing multiple structural forms, the frame structure part, the shear wall part, and the long-span structure part can be divided into different sub-areas, because these different structural forms often have different acceptance focuses and standards.

[0075] Next, consider the differences in usage functions. Even within the same functional sub-area, there may be different usage requirements. For example, in an office functional sub-area, general office areas, meeting rooms, archives, etc. may be divided into different sub-areas because they may differ in space requirements, equipment configurations, and safety standards.

[0076] Then, it is further subdivided according to the security level. Some areas in the building may require higher security standards, such as fire escapes, emergency evacuation stairs, equipment rooms, etc. These areas are usually divided into independent sub-areas to ensure that they can receive more stringent acceptance and management.

[0077] In addition, construction technology and material characteristics need to be considered. For example, within the same functional sub-area, parts that use different construction technologies or special materials may be divided into separate sub-areas. This is done to facilitate specialized acceptance for specific construction technology or materials.

[0078] In the process of division, attention should also be paid to the size and number of sub-areas. The sub-area should not be too small to avoid excessive fragmentation of the acceptance work; nor should it be too large to ensure that each sub-area can receive adequate attention. Usually, a functional sub-area may be divided into 3 to 5 sub-areas, and the specific number depends on the complexity and importance of the functional sub-area.

[0079] After the division is completed, each sub-area will be assigned a unique identification code and accurately marked in the digital engineering model. At the same time, a detailed information table will be generated for each sub-area, including the specific location, structural characteristics, usage functions, safety requirements, special acceptance criteria, etc. This information will provide precise guidance for subsequent acceptance work.

[0080] Based on the above embodiment, as an optional implementation, in S102, obtaining the evaluation index value of each sub-region according to the real-time data specifically includes S401-S403: S401, extracting construction site environmental parameters, construction equipment working parameters and construction personnel behavior parameters of each sub-area based on real-time data.

[0081] In one example, an intelligent sensing network covering the entire construction site is established, including various sensors, cameras, RFID tags and other equipment. Then, the construction site is divided into several sub-areas, each of which is equipped with corresponding data collection equipment. Through these devices, environmental parameters (such as temperature, humidity, dust concentration), equipment operating parameters (such as the lifting weight and amplitude of the tower crane) and personnel behavior parameters (such as location and activity status) are collected in real time.

[0082] S402: Perform weighted calculation on the construction site environmental parameters, construction equipment operating parameters and construction personnel behavior parameters according to preset weight coefficients to obtain a comprehensive safety index value for each sub-area.

[0083] In one example, the setting of weight coefficients is usually based on expert experience, historical data analysis, and risk assessment results. For example, in high-altitude work areas, construction worker behavior parameters may be given a higher weight because human factors play a decisive role in high-altitude work. In underground construction areas, more attention may be paid to environmental parameters such as air quality and geological conditions. The weight of equipment operating parameters may be higher in mechanically intensive work areas.

[0084] The determination of weight coefficients is a dynamic process and needs to be adjusted according to the progress of the project and the actual situation. For example, in the early stage of the project, more attention may be paid to environmental parameters and equipment parameters, while as the project advances to the fine construction stage, the weight of personnel behavior parameters may be increased accordingly. This dynamic adjustment ensures that the comprehensive safety indicators can accurately reflect the actual safety status at each stage.

[0085] The specific weighted calculation process can be expressed as: comprehensive safety index = W1*environmental parameters + W2*equipment parameters + W3*personnel behavior parameters, where W1, W2, and W3 represent the weight coefficients of environmental parameters, equipment parameters, and personnel behavior parameters, respectively, and W1+W2+W3=1.

[0086] Each type of parameter may also need to be weighted. For example, environmental parameters may include multiple indicators such as temperature, humidity, and dust concentration, and these indicators also need to be weighted according to their importance. Similarly, equipment parameters may include equipment operating time, load rate, failure frequency, etc., and personnel behavior parameters may include safe operation completion rate, labor intensity, fatigue, etc. These sub-items also need to be weighted internally.

[0087] During the calculation process, parameters of different dimensions need to be standardized to ensure that they can be effectively weighted. Commonly used standardization methods include minimum-maximum standardization. The standardized parameter values ​​are usually converted to a range of 0 to 1 or -1 to 1 to facilitate subsequent weighting and comparison.

[0088] After the weighted calculation is completed, the comprehensive safety index value is usually standardized to a range of 0 to 100, where 100 represents the safest state and 0 represents the least safe state. This standardization allows the safety conditions of different sub-regions and different periods to be compared intuitively.

[0089] S403: Using the comprehensive safety index value as the evaluation index value of each sub-area.

[0090] S103: Determine the preset standard value corresponding to each sub-area according to the safety assessment scheme.

[0091] In one example, the safety assessment solution database is first accessed to extract the characteristic information and safety requirements of each sub-area. This information includes the functional type, structural characteristics, construction process, material properties, etc. of the sub-area. At the same time, the system also considers relevant regulatory standards and industry best practices. For example, for the concrete pouring area, the concrete strength standard, pouring temperature requirements, etc. are considered; for the high-altitude working area, the safety belt use specifications, maximum allowable wind speed, etc. are referenced.

[0092] Next, a comprehensive set of preset standard values ​​is generated for each sub-area. These standard values ​​cover multiple safety-related parameters, such as environmental parameters (temperature, humidity, wind speed, etc.), structural parameters (stress, deformation, etc.), equipment parameters (operating status, load, etc.), and personnel behavior parameters (use of safety equipment, compliance with operating regulations, etc.).

[0093] In the process of generating preset standard values, the system takes multiple factors into consideration. First, it refers to national and industry-related safety standards to ensure that all preset values ​​meet regulatory requirements. Second, it analyzes historical project data to extract best practices and lessons learned to optimize preset values. In addition, it also considers the specific conditions of the current project, such as geographical location, climate conditions, construction difficulty, etc., and adjusts the preset values ​​accordingly.

[0094] In order to adapt to different situations that may occur during the construction process, an allowable range is set for each parameter instead of a single fixed value. This range usually includes ideal value, warning value and critical value. The ideal value represents the best safety state, the warning value indicates the state that requires attention, and the critical value represents the dangerous state that requires immediate action.

[0095] For example, for the temperature parameters of the concrete pouring area, the system may set the following preset standard values: the ideal value range is 18-22°C, the warning value is 15°C or 25°C, and the critical value is 10°C or 30°C. Such settings take into account the optimal conditions for concrete solidification and leave room for temperature fluctuations that may occur in actual construction.

[0096] S104, comparing the evaluation index value of each sub-area with the preset standard value corresponding to each sub-area, and judging whether the safety acceptance of each sub-area has passed according to the comparison result.

[0097] In one example, the system retrieves the previously calculated evaluation index values ​​of each sub-area and the corresponding preset standard values ​​from the database. The evaluation index values ​​reflect the actual current safety status of the sub-area, while the preset standard values ​​represent the baseline for safety acceptance. The system systematically compares and analyzes these two sets of data. This process not only considers the comparison of a single parameter, but also comprehensively considers the relationship between multiple related parameters to ensure the comprehensiveness and accuracy of the evaluation.

[0098] During the comparison process, the system will conduct a detailed analysis of each safety parameter in each sub-area. For example, for the concrete pouring area, the actual measured parameters such as concrete strength, temperature, humidity, etc. are compared with the preset standard values. The system not only pays attention to whether the parameters are within the allowable range, but also analyzes the changing trends of the parameters and evaluates potential safety risks.

[0099] When making specific comparisons, the system uses a multi-level threshold judgment mechanism. If the evaluation index value of a parameter is within the ideal range of the preset standard value, the system will mark the parameter as "safe". If the index value falls into the warning range, the system will mark it as "need attention" and generate corresponding early warning information. If the index value reaches or exceeds the critical value, the system will immediately mark it as "dangerous" and trigger the emergency response mechanism.

[0100] The system also considers the mutual influence and combined effects between parameters. For example, in a high-altitude work area, even if the wind speed does not exceed the critical value, if it still shows potential risks after comprehensive consideration of other parameters such as temperature and humidity, the system will give a corresponding warning. This multi-dimensional analysis ensures the comprehensiveness and accuracy of the safety assessment.

[0101] After the comparison is completed, the safety acceptance status of each sub-area is automatically judged according to the preset judgment rules. Generally, only when all key safety parameters are in the "safe" state and no important parameters are in the "need attention" or "dangerous" state, the sub-area will be judged as having passed the safety acceptance. If any key parameter is in the "dangerous" state, or multiple important parameters are in the "need attention" state, the sub-area will be judged as failing the safety acceptance.

[0102] For sub-areas that fail safety acceptance, a detailed problem report is generated, including which specific parameters do not meet the standards, the degree of deviation, and possible reasons. This information provides clear guidance for subsequent corrective measures. At the same time, the system will automatically send an alert to the relevant responsible person based on the urgency of the problem to ensure that the problem can be handled in a timely manner.

[0103] Based on the above embodiment, as an optional implementation, in S104, comparing the evaluation index value of each sub-area with the preset standard value corresponding to each sub-area, and judging whether the safety acceptance of each sub-area has passed according to the comparison result specifically includes S501-S503: S501, calculating the difference between the evaluation index value of each sub-region and the corresponding preset standard value.

[0104] S502: If the difference between the evaluation index value of the first sub-region and the corresponding preset standard value is not greater than the preset safety threshold, the first sub-region passes the safety acceptance.

[0105] S503: If the difference between the evaluation index value of the second sub-region and the corresponding preset standard value is greater than the preset safety threshold, the second sub-region fails the safety acceptance.

[0106] In one example, preset standard values ​​need to be set for each sub-area. These standard values ​​are usually based on industry specifications, historical data, and expert experience, and represent ideal or acceptable safety states. The preset standard values ​​may vary depending on the characteristics of the sub-area. For example, the high-altitude working area and the underground construction area may have different standard values.

[0107] At the same time, it is necessary to determine the preset safety threshold. The safety threshold represents the maximum acceptable gap between the actual evaluation index value and the preset standard value. The setting of this threshold needs to balance the safety requirements and the feasibility of actual operation.

[0108] S105: If all sub-areas pass the safety inspection, proceed to the next process.

[0109] S106: If there is a target sub-area that fails the safety acceptance, the difference between the evaluation index value of the target sub-area and the preset standard value corresponding to the target sub-area is calculated, and safety compensation measures are implemented according to the difference and the relevant construction plan is modified.

[0110] In one example, the system automatically identifies target sub-areas that have not passed safety acceptance. For each target sub-area, the system accurately calculates the difference between its evaluation index value and the preset standard value. This difference not only reflects the degree to which the safety condition deviates from the standard, but also provides a quantitative basis for formulating targeted compensation measures. For example, if the actual strength of the concrete pouring area is lower than the preset standard value, the system will calculate the specific strength difference; if the use rate of safety belts in the high-altitude working area is lower than the standard, the system will calculate the specific deviation percentage of the use rate.

[0111] After calculating the difference, the corresponding compensation measures are automatically generated according to the pre-set safety compensation strategy library. These compensation measures are based on historical data, expert experience and best practices, and provide systematic solutions for safety issues of different types and degrees. For example, for the problem of insufficient concrete strength, the system may recommend extending the curing time or adjusting the concrete mix; for the problem of low safety belt usage, the system may recommend strengthening safety education and training or increasing the number of supervisors.

[0112] At the same time, the system will evaluate the potential impact of these compensatory measures on the construction plan. It will analyze the time and resources required for the compensatory measures and the possible chain reactions on other construction links. Based on these analyses, the system will automatically generate revised construction plan suggestions, including adjusting the construction sequence, reallocating resources, or extending the completion time of certain processes. These suggestions are designed to minimize the impact on the overall construction schedule while ensuring safety.

[0113] The generated compensation measures and revised construction plan will be automatically sent to the project management team and relevant responsible persons. This information is pushed to relevant personnel through the project management system's message module or mobile application to ensure that the information can be delivered in a timely manner. The project management team can view detailed problem analysis, compensation measures and revised construction plans on the system interface.

[0114] After receiving the system's suggestions, the project management team can evaluate, modify or confirm the suggestions directly on the system. If the management team believes that the system's suggestions need to be adjusted, they can enter the modification opinions in the system, and the system will recalculate and generate the optimization plan based on these new inputs. This human-computer collaboration method not only utilizes the efficient computing power of the computer system, but also incorporates the experience and judgment of human experts, ensuring the scientificity and feasibility of the final decision.

[0115] Once the compensation measures and the revised construction plan are confirmed, the system will automatically update the project management database and distribute the new instructions to the relevant departments and construction teams. At the same time, the system will start the tracking and monitoring mechanism to continuously monitor the implementation effect of the compensation measures and the execution of the revised construction plan. If new problems or deviations are found during the implementation process, the system will adjust the strategy in time to ensure that the safety issues are effectively resolved.

[0116] Based on the above embodiment, as an optional implementation, in S106, executing safety compensation measures according to the difference and modifying the relevant construction plan specifically includes S601-S603: S601: If the difference is within a preset range, a mild safety compensation measure is performed, where the mild safety compensation measure includes one or more of increasing the monitoring frequency, adjusting the construction parameters, and strengthening the on-site management.

[0117] S602: If the difference is not within the preset range, severe safety compensation measures are implemented, and severe safety compensation measures include one or more of suspending relevant construction activities, replacing construction equipment, and re-formulating a construction plan.

[0118] S603 Modify the construction schedule accordingly according to the implemented safety compensation measures.

[0119] After executing safety compensation measures according to the difference and modifying the relevant construction plan, it also includes: acquiring real-time data of the target sub-area, and obtaining an updated evaluation index value of the target sub-area according to the real-time data; comparing the updated evaluation index value with the preset standard value corresponding to the target sub-area; if the difference between the updated evaluation index value and the preset standard value is not greater than the preset safety threshold, the target sub-area is determined to have passed the safety acceptance; if the difference between the updated evaluation index value and the preset standard value is still greater than the preset safety threshold, the safety compensation measures are repeatedly executed and the relevant construction plan is further modified until the target sub-area passes the safety acceptance.

[0120] In one example, the real-time data of the target sub-area needs to be re-acquired first. This data may include environmental parameters (such as temperature, humidity, noise, etc.), equipment operating status, personnel behavior and other information. Data collection can be completed automatically through various sensors, cameras or other monitoring equipment deployed on site, or it can be obtained through manual inspections. The real-time data obtained should cover the key indicators of previously discovered safety issues to ensure that the effectiveness of compensation measures can be fully evaluated.

[0121] Next, based on the acquired real-time data, the same calculation method as before is used to obtain the updated evaluation index value of the target sub-area. Then, the updated evaluation index value is compared with the preset standard value corresponding to the target sub-area. This comparison process is consistent with the previous safety acceptance judgment method, that is, the difference between the updated evaluation index value and the preset standard value is calculated, and this difference is compared with the preset safety threshold.

[0122] If the difference between the updated evaluation index value and the preset standard value is not greater than the preset safety threshold, it can be determined that the target sub-area has passed the safety acceptance. This indicates that the implemented safety compensation measures have effectively solved the previously existing safety problems and the safety status of the target sub-area has reached an acceptable level. In this case, the normal construction progress can be resumed, but continuous monitoring is still required to prevent new safety problems from arising.

[0123] However, if the difference between the updated evaluation index value and the preset standard value is still greater than the preset safety threshold, this means that the previously implemented safety compensation measures have not completely resolved the existing safety hazards. In this case, it is necessary to repeat the safety compensation measures and further modify the relevant construction plan. This may involve taking more stringent safety measures, such as adding safety protection equipment, adjusting construction methods, strengthening personnel training, etc. At the same time, the construction plan also needs to be adjusted accordingly, which may include extending the time of certain processes, changing the construction sequence, or suspending some construction activities.

[0124] Based on the above method, the present application also discloses a safety supervision device for building construction, such as Figure 2 As shown, Figure 2 1. It is a structural schematic diagram of a safety supervision device for building construction provided by an embodiment of the present application, and the device includes: an acquisition module, a division module, a determination module, a comparison module, a first output module and a second output module; wherein the acquisition module is used to acquire the construction planning data of the project to be monitored, and formulate a safety assessment plan according to the construction planning data; the division module is used to divide the predetermined acceptance area of ​​the project to be monitored into multiple sub-areas, and collect real-time data of each sub-area, and obtain the evaluation index value level of each sub-area according to the real-time data; the determination module is used to determine the preset standard value corresponding to each sub-area according to the safety assessment plan; the comparison module is used to compare the evaluation index value of each sub-area with the preset standard value corresponding to each sub-area, and judge whether the safety acceptance of each sub-area is passed according to the comparison result; the first output module is used to enter the next process if all sub-areas have passed the safety acceptance; the second output module is used to calculate the difference between the evaluation index value of the target sub-area and the preset standard value corresponding to the target sub-area if there is a target sub-area that has not passed the safety acceptance, and execute safety compensation measures according to the difference and modify the relevant construction plan.

[0125] It should be noted that: when the device provided in the above embodiment realizes its function, only the division of the above functional modules is used as an example. In actual application, the above functions can be assigned to different functional modules as needed, that is, the internal structure of the device is divided into different functional modules to complete all or part of the functions described above. In addition, the device and method embodiments provided in the above embodiment belong to the same concept, and the specific implementation process is detailed in the method embodiment, which will not be repeated here.

[0126] See also Figure 3 , is a schematic diagram of the structure of an electronic device provided in an embodiment of the present application. Figure 3 As shown, the electronic device 1000 may include: at least one processor 1001 , at least one network interface 1004 , a user interface 1003 , a memory 1005 , and at least one communication bus 1002 .

[0127] The communication bus 1002 is used to realize the connection and communication between these components.

[0128] The user interface 1003 may include a display screen (Display) and a camera (Camera). Optionally, the user interface 1003 may also include a standard wired interface and a wireless interface.

[0129] The network interface 1004 may optionally include a standard wired interface or a wireless interface (such as a WI-FI interface).

[0130] Among them, the processor 1001 may include one or more processing cores. The processor 1001 uses various interfaces and lines to connect various parts in the entire server, and executes various functions of the server and processes data by running or executing instructions, programs, code sets or instruction sets stored in the memory 1005, and calling data stored in the memory 1005. Optionally, the processor 1001 can be implemented in at least one hardware form of digital signal processing (Digital Signal Processing, DSP), field programmable gate array (Field-Programmable Gate Array, FPGA), and programmable logic array (Programmable Logic Array, PLA). The processor 1001 can integrate one or a combination of a central processing unit (Central Processing Unit, CPU), a graphics processing unit (Graphics Processing Unit, GPU) and a modem. Among them, the CPU mainly processes the operating system, user interface and application programs; the GPU is responsible for rendering and drawing the content to be displayed on the display screen; the modem is used to process wireless communications. It can be understood that the above-mentioned modem may not be integrated into the processor 1001, and it can be implemented separately through a chip.

[0131] Among them, the memory 1005 may include a random access memory (Random Access Memory, RAM) and may also include a read-only memory (Read-Only Memory). Optionally, the memory 1005 includes a non-transitory computer-readable storage medium. The memory 1005 can be used to store instructions, programs, codes, code sets or instruction sets. The memory 1005 may include a program storage area and a data storage area, wherein the program storage area may store instructions for implementing an operating system, instructions for at least one function (such as a touch function, a sound playback function, an image playback function, etc.), instructions for implementing the above-mentioned various method embodiments, etc.; the data storage area may store data involved in the above-mentioned various method embodiments, etc. The memory 1005 may optionally also be at least one storage device located away from the aforementioned processor 1001. As Figure 3 As shown, the memory 1005 as a computer storage medium may include an operating system, a network communication module, a user interface module, and an application program of a construction safety supervision method.

[0132] exist Figure 3 In the electronic device 1000 shown, the user interface 1003 is mainly used to provide an input interface for the user and obtain data input by the user; and the processor 1001 can be used to call an application program for a construction safety supervision method stored in the memory 1005. When executed by one or more processors, the electronic device executes one or more of the methods described in the above embodiments.

[0133] An electronic device readable storage medium stores instructions, which, when executed by one or more processors, enable the electronic device to execute one or more of the methods described in the above embodiments.

[0134] It should be noted that, for the aforementioned method embodiments, for the sake of simplicity, they are all described as a series of action combinations, but those skilled in the art should be aware that the present application is not limited by the order of the actions described, because according to the present application, certain steps can be performed in other orders or simultaneously. Secondly, those skilled in the art should also be aware that the embodiments described in the specification are all preferred embodiments, and the actions and modules involved are not necessarily required for the present application.

[0135] In the above embodiments, the description of each embodiment has its own emphasis. For parts that are not described in detail in a certain embodiment, reference can be made to the relevant descriptions of other embodiments.

[0136] In the several embodiments provided in the present application, it should be understood that the disclosed devices can be implemented in other ways. For example, the device embodiments described above are only schematic, such as the division of the units, which is only a logical function division. There may be other division methods in actual implementation, such as multiple units or components can be combined or integrated into another system, or some features can be ignored or not executed. Another point is that the mutual coupling or direct coupling or communication connection shown or discussed can be through some service interfaces, and the indirect coupling or communication connection of devices or units can be electrical or other forms.

[0137] The units described as separate components may or may not be physically separated, and the components shown as units may or may not be physical units, that is, they may be located in one place or distributed on multiple network units. Some or all of the units may be selected according to actual needs to achieve the purpose of the solution of this embodiment.

[0138] In addition, each functional unit in each embodiment of the present application may be integrated into one processing unit, or each unit may exist physically separately, or two or more units may be integrated into one unit. The above-mentioned integrated unit may be implemented in the form of hardware or in the form of software functional units.

[0139] If the integrated unit is implemented in the form of a software functional unit and sold or used as an independent product, it can be stored in a computer-readable memory. Based on this understanding, the technical solution of the present application, or the part that contributes to the prior art, or all or part of the technical solution can be embodied in the form of a software product, which is stored in a memory and includes several instructions for a computer device (which can be a personal computer, server or network device, etc.) to execute all or part of the steps of the method described in each embodiment of the present application. The aforementioned memory includes: various media that can store program codes, such as USB flash drives, mobile hard drives, magnetic disks or optical disks.

[0140] The above is only an exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure, and the scope of the present disclosure cannot be limited thereto. That is, any equivalent changes and modifications made according to the teachings of the present disclosure are still within the scope of the present disclosure. After considering the specification and practicing the disclosure here, those skilled in the art will easily think of other embodiments of the present disclosure. This application is intended to cover any modification, use or adaptation of the present disclosure, which follows the general principles of the present disclosure and includes common knowledge or customary technical means in the technical field not recorded in the present disclosure. The description and examples are only regarded as exemplary, and the scope and spirit of the present disclosure are defined by the claims.

Claims

1. A safety supervision method for building construction, characterized in that: The method comprises: Obtaining construction planning data of the project to be monitored, and formulating a safety assessment plan based on the construction planning data; Divide the predetermined acceptance area of ​​the engineering project to be monitored into multiple sub-areas, collect real-time data of each sub-area, and obtain evaluation index values ​​of each sub-area based on the real-time data; According to the safety assessment scheme, determining the preset standard value corresponding to each of the sub-areas; Comparing the evaluation index value of each sub-area with the preset standard value corresponding to each sub-area, and judging whether the safety acceptance of each sub-area has passed according to the comparison result; If all the sub-areas pass the safety acceptance, proceed to the next process; If there is a target sub-area that fails the safety acceptance, the difference between the evaluation index value of the target sub-area and the preset standard value corresponding to the target sub-area is calculated, and safety compensation measures are executed according to the difference and the relevant construction plan is modified.

2. The construction safety supervision method according to claim 1, characterized in that: The predetermined acceptance area of ​​the project to be monitored is divided into multiple sub-areas, including: Obtain engineering structure data of the scheduled acceptance area; According to the engineering structure data, identifying key structural units of the predetermined acceptance area; Based on the key structural unit, the predetermined acceptance area is divided to obtain a plurality of functional sub-areas; The multiple functional sub-areas are divided according to the characteristics and safety requirements of each functional sub-area to obtain multiple sub-areas.

3. The construction safety supervision method according to claim 1, characterized in that: The construction planning data includes construction drawings, construction procedures and construction progress plan. The safety assessment plan is formulated based on the construction planning data, including: Determine the key safety control points of each construction stage during the construction process according to the construction drawings, the construction process and the construction schedule; According to the key safety control points of each construction stage, formulate safety assessment indicators and assessment standards corresponding to each construction stage; In combination with the safety assessment indicators and the assessment standards, a safety monitoring plan is formulated, and the safety monitoring plan includes monitoring parameters, monitoring equipment, monitoring locations, monitoring frequencies and data transmission methods.

4. The construction safety supervision method according to claim 1, characterized in that: The step of obtaining the evaluation index value of each sub-region according to the real-time data includes: Extracting construction site environmental parameters, construction equipment operating parameters and construction personnel behavior parameters of each sub-area according to the real-time data; According to a preset weight coefficient, the construction site environmental parameters, the construction equipment working parameters and the construction personnel behavior parameters are weighted and calculated to obtain a comprehensive safety index value for each sub-area; The comprehensive safety index value is used as the evaluation index value of each sub-area.

5. The construction safety supervision method according to claim 1, characterized in that: The comparing the evaluation index value of each sub-area with the preset standard value corresponding to each sub-area, and judging whether the safety acceptance of each sub-area has passed according to the comparison result, includes: Calculate the difference between the evaluation index value of each sub-region and the corresponding preset standard value; If the difference between the evaluation index value of the first sub-region and the corresponding preset standard value is not greater than the preset safety threshold, the first sub-region passes the safety acceptance; If the difference between the evaluation index value of the second sub-area and the corresponding preset standard value is greater than the preset safety threshold, the second sub-area fails the safety acceptance.

6. The construction safety supervision method according to claim 1, characterized in that: The executing of safety compensation measures according to the difference and modifying the relevant construction plan include: If the difference is within a preset range, a mild safety compensation measure is performed, wherein the mild safety compensation measure includes one or more of increasing the monitoring frequency, adjusting the construction parameters, and strengthening the on-site management; If the difference is not within the preset range, severe safety compensation measures are implemented, and the severe safety compensation measures include one or more of suspending relevant construction activities, replacing construction equipment, and re-formulating a construction plan; Modify the construction schedule accordingly based on the safety compensation measures implemented.

7. The construction safety supervision method according to claim 1, characterized in that: After executing the safety compensation measures according to the difference and modifying the relevant construction plan, the method further includes: Acquire real-time data of the target sub-region, and obtain an updated evaluation index value of the target sub-region according to the real-time data; Comparing the updated evaluation index value with the preset standard value corresponding to the target sub-region; If the difference between the updated evaluation index value and the preset standard value is not greater than the preset safety threshold, it is determined that the target sub-area has passed the safety acceptance; If the difference between the updated evaluation index value and the preset standard value is still greater than the preset safety threshold, the safety compensation measures are repeatedly executed and the relevant construction plan is further modified until the target sub-area passes the safety acceptance.

8. A safety supervision device for building construction, characterized in that: The device comprises: an acquisition module, a division module, a determination module, a comparison module, a first output module and a second output module; wherein, The acquisition module is used to acquire the construction planning data of the project to be monitored and formulate a safety assessment plan based on the construction planning data; The division module is used to divide the predetermined acceptance area of ​​the project to be monitored into multiple sub-areas, collect real-time data of each sub-area, and obtain the evaluation index value level of each sub-area based on the real-time data; The determination module is used to determine the preset standard value corresponding to each of the sub-areas according to the safety assessment scheme; The comparison module is used to compare the evaluation index value of each sub-area with the preset standard value corresponding to each sub-area, and determine whether the safety acceptance of each sub-area has passed according to the comparison result; The first output module is used to enter the next process if all the sub-areas pass the safety acceptance; The second output module is used to calculate the difference between the evaluation index value of the target sub-area and the preset standard value corresponding to the target sub-area if there is a target sub-area that fails the safety acceptance, and to execute safety compensation measures and modify relevant construction plans according to the difference.

9. An electronic device, characterized in that: It includes a processor, a memory, a user interface and a network interface, the memory is used to store instructions, the user interface and the network interface are used to communicate with other devices, and the processor is used to execute the instructions stored in the memory so that the electronic device executes the method as described in any one of claims 1-7.

10. A computer-readable storage medium, characterized in that: A computer program is stored which can be loaded by a processor and execute the method according to any one of claims 1 to 7.

Images