Comprehensive evaluation method and device for regional natural resources

Abstract

The invention discloses a comprehensive evaluation method and device for regional natural resources, and the method comprises the steps: building a comprehensive evaluation system based on a plurality of resources of preset types, and the plurality of resources comprise land resources, forest resources, grassland resources, water resources, wetland resources and mineral resources; obtaining a current situation analysis result, a development situation evaluation result and a development potential evaluation result of the multiple resources corresponding to each evaluation area in the to-be-divided range by using the comprehensive evaluation system, and obtaining a comprehensive evaluation result for the evaluation areas based on the results; and determining the functional region type of the evaluation region based on the comprehensive evaluation result so as to complete resource utilization partitioning of the to-be-divided range. According to the method, the comprehensive evaluation system is constructed from the three dimensions of the current natural resource situation, the development and utilization situation and the developable potential, and the functional region type of the evaluation region is determined according to the comprehensive evaluation result of the comprehensive evaluation system, so that the problem that the main functional region is weak in the comprehensive evaluation of the current natural resource field is solved.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] The present application relates to the technical field of regional management of natural resources, and in particular to a comprehensive evaluation method and device for regional natural resources. Background Art

[0002] At present, the research on comprehensive evaluation of natural resources mainly focuses on resource environment or ecological carrying capacity evaluation, land space development suitability, and efficient and intensive utilization of natural resources. These different studies mostly focus on a certain policy goal and key points.

[0003] The reason is that the various evaluation subjects currently use condition-oriented evaluation methods rather than evaluations based on main functional areas. They cannot truly and objectively and comprehensively reflect the basic characteristics of natural resources and their key role in supporting and serving national land space planning, and thus cannot solve the problem of weak regional main functions in the current comprehensive evaluation. Summary of the invention

[0004] In order to solve the above technical problems, the embodiments of the present application provide a method and device for comprehensive evaluation of regional natural resources, an electronic device, a computer-readable storage medium, and a computer program product.

[0005] In the first aspect, in order to solve the above technical problems, the present application provides a comprehensive evaluation method of regional natural resources, including:

[0006] Constructing a comprehensive evaluation system based on multiple resources of preset types, including land resources, forest resources, grassland resources, water resources, wetland resources and mineral resources;

[0007] Using the comprehensive evaluation system, obtaining the status analysis results, development status evaluation results and development potential evaluation results of the plurality of resources corresponding to each evaluation area within the scope to be divided;

[0008] Based on the status analysis results, the development status evaluation results and the development potential evaluation results of the multiple resources, a comprehensive evaluation result for the evaluation area is obtained;

[0009] The functional area type of the evaluation area is determined based on the comprehensive evaluation result to complete the resource utilization zoning of the range to be divided.

[0010] The beneficial effects are:

[0011] In the technical solution provided in the embodiments of the present application, a comprehensive evaluation system for natural resources for comprehensive management is constructed from three dimensions: the current status of natural resources, the status of development and utilization, and the potential for development. The comprehensive evaluation system is used to quantitatively obtain the current status, development and utilization, and potential for development of various types of natural resources in the evaluation area, and then obtain a comprehensive evaluation result of the evaluation area in the above three dimensions, so as to determine the type of functional area in the evaluation area, complete the resource utilization zoning of the area to be divided, provide basic support for the unified management, rational development and utilization, and spatial optimization allocation of natural resources, and solve the problem of weak performance of the main functional areas in the current comprehensive evaluation of natural resources.

[0012] In a second aspect, the present invention provides a comprehensive evaluation device for regional natural resources, comprising an evaluation system unit, an evaluation unit, a comprehensive evaluation unit, and a zoning unit;

[0013] An evaluation system unit, for constructing a comprehensive evaluation system based on a plurality of resources of preset types, wherein the plurality of resources include land resources, forest resources, grassland resources, water resources, wetland resources and mineral resources;

[0014] An evaluation unit, used to obtain, by using the comprehensive evaluation system, status analysis results, development status evaluation results and development potential evaluation results of the plurality of resources corresponding to each evaluation area within the scope to be divided;

[0015] A comprehensive evaluation unit, configured to obtain a comprehensive evaluation result for the evaluation area based on the status analysis results, the development status evaluation results and the development potential evaluation results of the plurality of resources;

[0016] A partitioning unit is used to determine the type of functional area of ​​the evaluation area based on the comprehensive evaluation result to complete the resource utilization partitioning of the range to be divided.

[0017] In a third aspect, the present application also provides an electronic device, comprising: one or more processors; a storage device for storing one or more programs, wherein when the one or more programs are executed by the one or more processors, the electronic device implements the comprehensive evaluation method of regional natural resources as described above.

[0018] In a fourth aspect, the present application also provides a computer-readable storage medium having computer-readable instructions stored thereon. When the computer-readable instructions are executed by a processor of a computer, the computer executes the comprehensive evaluation method of regional natural resources as described above.

[0019] In a fifth aspect, the present application also provides a computer program product or a computer program, which includes a computer instruction stored in a computer-readable storage medium. A processor of a computer device reads the computer instruction from the computer-readable storage medium, and the processor executes the computer instruction, so that the computer device executes the comprehensive evaluation method of regional natural resources provided in the above various optional embodiments.

[0020] It should be understood that the foregoing general description and the following detailed description are exemplary and explanatory only and are not restrictive of the present application. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0021] The drawings herein are incorporated into the specification and constitute a part of the specification, showing embodiments consistent with the present application, and together with the specification, are used to explain the principles of the present application. Obviously, the drawings described below are only some embodiments of the present application, and for those of ordinary skill in the art, other drawings can be obtained based on these drawings without creative work. In the drawings:

[0022] Figure 1 is a flow chart of a comprehensive evaluation method of regional natural resources shown in an exemplary embodiment of the present application;

[0023] Figure 2 is a schematic diagram of a comprehensive evaluation system in an exemplary embodiment of the present application;

[0024] Figure 3 is a block diagram of a comprehensive evaluation device for regional natural resources shown in an exemplary embodiment of the present application;

[0025] Figure 4 It is a structural diagram of a computer system suitable for implementing an electronic device of an embodiment of the present application. DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0026] Here, exemplary embodiments will be described in detail, examples of which are shown in the accompanying drawings. When the following description refers to the drawings, unless otherwise indicated, the same numbers in different drawings represent the same or similar elements. The implementations described in the following exemplary embodiments do not represent all implementations consistent with the present application. Instead, they are only examples of devices and methods consistent with some aspects of the present application as detailed in the attached claims.

[0027] The block diagrams shown in the accompanying drawings are merely functional entities and do not necessarily correspond to physically independent entities. That is, these functional entities may be implemented in software form, or in one or more hardware modules or integrated circuits, or in different networks and / or processor devices and / or microcontroller devices.

[0028] The flowcharts shown in the accompanying drawings are only exemplary and do not necessarily include all the contents and operations / steps, nor must they be executed in the order described. For example, some operations / steps can be decomposed, and some operations / steps can be combined or partially combined, so the actual execution order may change according to actual conditions.

[0029] The term "multiple" as used in this application refers to two or more than two. "And / or" describes the relationship between related objects, indicating that three relationships can exist. For example, A and / or B can mean: A exists alone, A and B exist at the same time, and B exists alone. The character " / " generally indicates that the related objects are in an "or" relationship.

[0030] In order to solve the problem that various current resource evaluation methods cannot truly objectively and comprehensively reflect the basic characteristics of natural resources and the key role of supporting and serving national land space planning, and thus cannot solve the problem of weak regional main functions in the current comprehensive evaluation, the embodiments of the present application propose a comprehensive evaluation method and device for regional natural resources, an electronic device, and a computer-readable storage medium, which mainly involve a comprehensive evaluation method technology for regional natural resources included in the natural resource regional management technology. These embodiments will be described in detail below.

[0031] First see Figure 1 , Figure 1 This is a flowchart of a comprehensive evaluation method of regional natural resources shown in an exemplary embodiment of the present application. The method can be specifically executed by a server, which can be an independent server or a cloud server that provides basic cloud computing services such as cloud services, cloud databases, cloud computing, cloud functions, cloud storage, network services, cloud communications, middleware services, domain name services, security services, content delivery networks (CDNs), and big data and artificial intelligence platforms, and is not limited here.

[0032] like Figure 1 As shown, in an exemplary embodiment, the comprehensive evaluation method of the regional natural resources may include steps S101 to S104, which are described in detail as follows:

[0033] Step S101, constructing a comprehensive evaluation system based on multiple resources of preset types, the multiple resources including land resources, forest resources, grassland resources, water resources, wetland resources and mineral resources.

[0034] Step S102, using a comprehensive evaluation system, obtain the status analysis results, development status evaluation results and development potential evaluation results of multiple resources corresponding to each evaluation area within the scope to be divided.

[0035] Step S103, based on the status analysis results, development status evaluation results and development potential evaluation results of multiple resources, a comprehensive evaluation result for the evaluation area is obtained.

[0036] In this embodiment, a comprehensive evaluation system is constructed based on six preset categories of natural resources, namely land, forest, grassland, water body, wetland and minerals. Starting from the three dimensions of the current status of natural resources, development and utilization status and development potential, single category of resources can be evaluated, and the comprehensive situation of natural resources in the evaluation area can be integrated and evaluated to obtain comprehensive evaluation results, which improves the deficiency that single indicators and comprehensive evaluation cannot be organically combined in the traditional resource and environmental carrying capacity and land space suitability evaluation index system.

[0037] Step S104, determining the functional area type of the evaluation area based on the comprehensive evaluation result to complete the resource utilization zoning of the range to be divided.

[0038] After obtaining the comprehensive evaluation result of the evaluation area, this embodiment determines the type of functional area that matches the zoning requirements from the multiple functional areas corresponding to the zoning requirements based on the comprehensive evaluation result, thereby completing the resource utilization zoning of the range to be divided where the evaluation area is located.

[0039] From the above, it can be seen that in the method provided in this embodiment, a comprehensive evaluation system for natural resources for comprehensive management is constructed from the three dimensions of natural resource status, development and utilization status, and development potential. The comprehensive evaluation system is used to quantitatively obtain the resource status, development and utilization status, and development potential of various categories of natural resources in the evaluation area, and then obtain a comprehensive evaluation result of the evaluation area for the above three dimensions, so as to determine the type of functional area in the evaluation area, complete the resource utilization zoning of the area to be divided, and provide basic support for the unified management, rational development and utilization, and spatial optimization allocation of natural resources, and solve the problem of weak performance of the main functional areas in the current comprehensive evaluation of natural resources.

[0040] This application focuses on the current status of development, protection and utilization of various natural resources and the evaluation of the development and utilization potential of various natural resource endowments. It analyzes the current status and development and utilization level of various natural resources in the evaluation area, clarifies the advantages and disadvantages of the overall regional resources, and on this basis, further combines the potential in comprehensive directions such as production, economy, and ecology shown by the interaction between factors for integrated evaluation. It provides a scientific solution to the problem of weak regional main functions in the current comprehensive evaluation, which is of great significance for further promoting the optimization of the regional land space development pattern and achieving regional coordinated and sustainable development.

[0041] In an exemplary embodiment provided by the present application, based on the single-category resource indicators corresponding to each resource in the multiple resources, the evaluation of the three dimensions of the current status, development and utilization status, and development potential of the natural resources in the evaluation area is completed. The specific steps may include:

[0042] Determine the single-category resource indicators of multiple resources in the comprehensive evaluation system. The single-category resource indicators include current status indicators, development status indicators and development potential indicators;

[0043] Based on the status indicators of multiple resources, the status analysis results of multiple resources corresponding to each evaluation area within the scope to be divided are obtained;

[0044] Based on the development status indicators of multiple resources, the development status evaluation results of multiple resources corresponding to the evaluation area are obtained;

[0045] Based on the development potential indicators of multiple resources, the development potential evaluation results of multiple resources corresponding to the evaluation area are obtained.

[0046] See also Figure 2 , Figure 2 is a schematic diagram of a comprehensive evaluation system in an exemplary embodiment of the present application. Figure 2 As shown, multiple resources include land resources, forest resources, grassland resources, water resources, wetland resources and mineral resources. Among the single-category resource indicators of land resources, the current status indicators include the superiority of land resources, the development status indicators include the development and utilization evaluation, and the development potential indicators include the developable potential; among the single-category resource indicators of forest resources, the current status indicators include the superiority of forest resources, the development status indicators include the development and utilization efficiency and the ecological protection benefit, and the development potential indicators include the developable potential; among the single-category resource indicators of grassland resources, the current status indicators include the superiority of grassland resources, the development status indicators include the development and utilization efficiency and the ecological protection benefit, and the development potential indicators include the developable potential; among the single-category resource indicators of water resources, the current status indicators include the superiority of water resources, the development status indicators include the development and utilization evaluation, and the development potential indicators include the developable potential; among the single-category resource indicators of wetland resources, the current status indicators include the superiority of wetland resources, the development status indicators include the ecological protection evaluation, and the development potential indicators include the developable potential; among the single-category resource indicators of mineral resources, the current status indicators include the superiority of mineral resources, the development status indicators include the degree of development and utilization, and the development potential indicators include the developable potential.

[0047] This embodiment uses Figure 2 The comprehensive evaluation system shown, for each evaluation area within the scope to be divided, obtains the current status analysis results of each resource based on the current status indicators corresponding to multiple resources, obtains the development status evaluation results of each resource based on the corresponding development status indicators, and obtains the development potential evaluation results of each resource based on the corresponding development potential indicators.

[0048] Depend on Figure 2 It can be seen from the comprehensive evaluation system of the illustrated embodiment that, using the comprehensive evaluation system, after obtaining the evaluation results of the three dimensions of the status quo of natural resources, development and utilization status, and development potential of various resources in the evaluation area, it is possible to obtain a comprehensive analysis of the status quo of natural resources, a comprehensive evaluation of the development and utilization of natural resources, and a comprehensive evaluation of the potential of natural resources through all evaluation results of the same dimension, thereby obtaining a comprehensive evaluation result of the evaluation area. Therefore, in another exemplary embodiment provided by the present application, the specific steps of obtaining a comprehensive evaluation result for the evaluation area from the status quo analysis results, development status evaluation results, and development potential evaluation results of multiple resources may include:

[0049] Get the resource weight of each resource among multiple resources;

[0050] Based on the resource weights, the current status analysis results of multiple resources are weighted and summed to obtain the first comprehensive result of the evaluation area;

[0051] Based on the resource weights, the development status evaluation results of multiple resources are weighted and summed to obtain the second comprehensive result of the evaluation area;

[0052] Based on the resource weights, the development potential evaluation results of multiple resources are weighted and summed to obtain the third comprehensive result of the evaluation area;

[0053] A comprehensive evaluation result of the evaluation area is obtained based on the first comprehensive result, the second comprehensive result and the third comprehensive result.

[0054] In this embodiment, the comprehensive results of different dimensions are usually obtained by weighted summation. The resource weight of each resource in the multiple resources can be obtained by expert consultation, or it can be set based on zoning requirements. For example, when the importance of six types of natural resources in the regional development and utilization process is consistent, the quantitative mean method is used to determine that the resource weight of each natural resource in the dimension of development and utilization status is 1 / 6. The specific formula is as follows:

[0055]

[0056] Among them, EIS is the second comprehensive result of the evaluation area; S L is the evaluation result of the development status of land resources; S F is the evaluation result of the development status of forest resources; S G is the evaluation result of the development status of grassland resources; S W1 is the evaluation result of the development status of water resources; S W2 is the evaluation result of the development status of wetland resources; S MThe evaluation results of the development status corresponding to the mineral resources.

[0057] In an exemplary embodiment provided by the present application, the specific steps of obtaining the status analysis results of multiple resources corresponding to the evaluation area may include:

[0058] For each evaluation area within the scope to be divided, the maximum value standardization method is used to assign values ​​to the status indicators to obtain the status values ​​of multiple resources in the evaluation area;

[0059] Based on the current status, the dominance of the evaluation area within the scope to be divided is obtained;

[0060] The current status analysis results of the evaluation area are obtained based on the dominance.

[0061] In this embodiment, the status analysis result of the evaluation area includes the status analysis results corresponding to each resource. Therefore, when obtaining the status analysis results of multiple resources corresponding to the evaluation area, the status analysis results corresponding to different resources are obtained by taking each resource in the multiple resources as a unit.

[0062] Taking each resource in multiple resources as a unit, the status analysis results corresponding to different resources are obtained. Specifically, the status indicators are assigned points using the maximum value standardization method. The score interval of the status value is [0, 100]. The higher the value, the stronger the advantage of the resource in the entire evaluation area. From this, the advantage of the evaluation area under this resource in the range to be divided can be obtained. The larger the value of the advantage, the greater the degree of support for the resource endowment of the evaluation area. The calculation formula for the status analysis result is:

[0063]

[0064] Among them, S ki represents the status analysis result of the k-th resource in the evaluation area i, y ki represents the dominance of the k-th resource evaluation area i, Max(y ki ) represents the maximum value of all dominances of the kth resource in the n evaluation areas to be divided.

[0065] In an exemplary embodiment provided by the present application, the specific steps of obtaining the development status evaluation results of multiple resources corresponding to the evaluation area may include:

[0066] For each evaluation area within the scope to be divided, the development status index is assigned a value to obtain the development status scores of multiple resources in the evaluation area;

[0067] Compare the development status scores of all the evaluation areas within the scope to be divided to obtain the highest and lowest scores;

[0068] Obtain the distance relationship between the development status score corresponding to the evaluation area and the highest score and the lowest score;

[0069] The development status evaluation results of the evaluation area are obtained based on the distance relationship and the score.

[0070] In this embodiment, the development status evaluation results of the evaluation area include the development status evaluation results corresponding to each resource. Therefore, when obtaining the development status evaluation results of multiple resources corresponding to the evaluation area, the development status evaluation results corresponding to different resources are obtained by taking each resource in the multiple resources as a unit.

[0071] Taking each resource among multiple resources as a unit, the development status evaluation results corresponding to different resources are obtained, which may specifically include: firstly assigning values ​​to the development status indicators to obtain the development status scores of multiple resources in the evaluation area, and then finding the best ideal value of the development status indicator of the resource according to the existing policy documents and planning texts, so as to obtain the highest score (i.e. the development status score closest to the ideal value) and the lowest score.

[0072] Furthermore, according to the distance relationship between the development status score corresponding to the evaluation area and the highest score and the lowest score, the development status evaluation result of the evaluation area is determined. The specific process is as follows:

[0073] ① For a resource, the development status score xi of the i-th evaluation area and the highest score Distance relationship The calculation formula is as follows:

[0074] ② For a resource, the development status score xi of the i-th evaluation area and the minimum score Distance relationship The calculation formula is as follows:

[0075]

[0076] ③ The distance relationship between the development status score xi of the i-th evaluation area under a certain resource and the highest and lowest scores, and the new standardized score is defined as the development status evaluation result S i , the calculation formula is as follows:

[0077]

[0078] In an exemplary embodiment provided by the present application, the specific steps of obtaining the development potential evaluation results of multiple resources corresponding to the evaluation area may include:

[0079] For each evaluation area within the scope to be divided, the development potential values ​​of multiple resources in the evaluation area are obtained based on the development status indicators;

[0080] Compare the development potential values ​​corresponding to all the evaluation areas within the to-be-divided range, and determine the first area and the second area corresponding to the highest development potential value and the lowest development potential value;

[0081] Obtaining a first distance value and a second distance value between the evaluation area and the first area and the second area;

[0082] A development potential evaluation result of the evaluation area is obtained based on the first distance value and the second distance value.

[0083] In this embodiment, the development potential evaluation results of the evaluation area include the development potential evaluation results corresponding to each resource. Therefore, when obtaining the development potential evaluation results of multiple resources corresponding to the evaluation area, the development potential evaluation results corresponding to different resources are obtained by taking each resource in the multiple resources as a unit.

[0084] Taking each resource among the multiple resources as a unit, obtaining the development potential evaluation results corresponding to different resources may specifically include obtaining the development potential value of the single resource in the evaluation area based on the development status index, and comparing the development potential values ​​corresponding to all evaluation areas within the range to be divided to determine the first area and the second area corresponding to the highest development potential value and the lowest development potential value. If the evaluation area is closer to the first area and farther from the second area, there is reason to believe that the potential value of this evaluation area is higher.

[0085] On this basis, the first distance value and the second distance value between the evaluation area and the first area and the second area are obtained. The specific formula is as follows:

[0086] For the i-th evaluation area Z i , calculate the distance between the evaluation area and the first area corresponding to the highest development potential value:

[0087] Calculate the evaluation area Z i Distance between the second areas corresponding to the lowest development potential value:

[0088]

[0089] Thus, the development potential evaluation result S of a resource in the i-th evaluation area is obtained. i :

[0090]

[0091] In another exemplary embodiment, the development status indicator includes multiple sub-indicators, and the multiple sub-indicators include resource attributes, natural conditions, regional conditions, and service functions. Therefore, the specific steps of obtaining the development potential values ​​of multiple resources in the evaluation area based on the development status indicator in the above embodiment may include:

[0092] Obtain the indicator index of multiple sub-indicators corresponding to each evaluation area within the range to be divided, and the weight value corresponding to each sub-indicator in the multiple sub-indicators;

[0093] Based on the weight values ​​of multiple sub-indicators, the indicator index is weighted and summed to obtain the development potential values ​​of multiple resources in the evaluation area.

[0094] In this embodiment, the development status index includes multiple sub-indicators, and the multiple sub-indicators include resource attributes, natural conditions, regional conditions and service functions. A single category resource development potential evaluation system can be constructed based on the indicators of the above four dimensions.

[0095] After determining multiple sub-indicators of the development status indicator, the scoring criteria for each sub-indicator are determined by combining the hierarchical scoring method and the maximum value standardization method. The higher the score, the greater the support degree of the sub-indicator for the development potential of this type of resource. Based on the raster spatial data of each sub-indicator and the indicator scoring calculation table, the raster calculator and other tools in the ArcGIS software are used to calculate the indicator index of each sub-indicator, thereby obtaining the development potential value of the resource in the evaluation area:

[0096] EP=α*A+β*B+γ*C+δ*D

[0097] Where EP is the development potential value of a single resource, A is the resource attribute index, B is the natural condition index, C is the location condition index, D is the service function index, α is the weight of resource attributes, β is the weight of natural conditions, γ is the weight of location conditions, and δ is the weight of service functions.

[0098] In an exemplary embodiment provided by the present application, the types of functional areas include single functional areas and composite functional areas. The specific steps of determining the types of functional areas of the evaluation area based on the comprehensive evaluation results may include:

[0099] Determine whether the evaluation area matches the preset main function based on the comprehensive evaluation results. If so, determine the evaluation area as a single functional area that realizes the corresponding main function;

[0100] If not, the evaluation area is determined to be a composite functional area, and the composite functional category of the evaluation area is obtained using a comprehensive evaluation system.

[0101] In this embodiment, the single functional areas corresponding to the preset main functions include ecological protection areas, agricultural production areas, urban construction areas and other single functional areas. In this way, combined with the comprehensive evaluation results, the regional resource and environmental endowments, ecological environmental characteristics and social and economic development factors are comprehensively considered. The main functions of each evaluation area are taken as the guide, the "ecological priority" evaluation orientation is highlighted, the bottom line concept of "red line of cultivated land" is implemented, the "urban construction" development mechanism is encouraged, and the single functional areas such as ecological protection areas, agricultural production areas, and urban construction areas are delineated.

[0102] In another exemplary embodiment, the specific steps of obtaining the composite function category of the evaluation area as the composite function area by using the comprehensive evaluation system may include:

[0103] Using the comprehensive evaluation system, obtain the target status analysis results and target development potential evaluation results of the target resources in the multiple resources corresponding to the evaluation area;

[0104] Obtain the proportion information of the target industry corresponding to the target resources in the evaluation area;

[0105] The composite functional category of the evaluation area is obtained based on the proportion information, target status analysis results and target development potential evaluation results.

[0106] In this embodiment, the target resources include wetland resources, grassland resources and mineral resources. For some remaining evaluation areas whose main functions have not been determined, by combining the analysis results of wetland, cultivated land, minerals, etc., the target development potential evaluation results, and information on the proportion of the three industries and other data, they are comprehensively confirmed as composite functional areas such as ecology + agricultural products, ecology + urbanization, agriculture + urbanization, ecology + agricultural products + urbanization, etc.

[0107] Figure 3 FIG. 3 is a block diagram of a comprehensive evaluation device 300 for regional natural resources, shown as an exemplary embodiment of the present application. Figure 3 As shown, the device comprises:

[0108] An evaluation system unit 301 is used to construct a comprehensive evaluation system based on a plurality of resources of preset types, wherein the plurality of resources include land resources, forest resources, grassland resources, water resources, wetland resources and mineral resources;

[0109] Evaluation unit 302, used to obtain status analysis results, development status evaluation results and development potential evaluation results of multiple resources corresponding to each evaluation area within the scope to be divided by using a comprehensive evaluation system;

[0110] A comprehensive evaluation unit 303, used to obtain a comprehensive evaluation result for the evaluation area based on the status analysis results, development status evaluation results and development potential evaluation results of multiple resources;

[0111] The partitioning unit 304 is used to determine the type of functional area of ​​the evaluation area based on the comprehensive evaluation result to complete the resource utilization partitioning of the range to be divided.

[0112] The device applies the comprehensive evaluation method of regional natural resources provided by the present application, and constructs a comprehensive evaluation system for natural resources for comprehensive management from three dimensions: the current status of natural resources, development and utilization status, and development potential through the evaluation system unit 301. The evaluation unit 302 uses the comprehensive evaluation system to quantitatively obtain the resource status, development and utilization status, and development potential of various categories of natural resources in the evaluation area. Then the comprehensive evaluation unit 303 obtains the comprehensive evaluation results of the evaluation area in terms of the above three dimensions, so that the zoning unit 304 can determine the type of functional area in the evaluation area and complete the resource utilization zoning of the range to be divided, providing basic support for the unified management, rational development and utilization, and spatial optimization allocation of natural resources, and solving the problem of weak performance of the main functional areas in the current comprehensive evaluation of natural resources.

[0113] In another exemplary embodiment, the evaluation unit 302 is also used to determine the single-category resource indicators of multiple resources in the comprehensive evaluation system, and the single-category resource indicators include current status indicators, development status indicators and development potential indicators; based on the current status indicators of multiple resources, the current status analysis results of the multiple resources corresponding to each evaluation area within the to-be-divided range are obtained; based on the development status indicators of multiple resources, the development status evaluation results of the multiple resources corresponding to the evaluation area are obtained; based on the development potential indicators of multiple resources, the development potential evaluation results of the multiple resources corresponding to the evaluation area are obtained.

[0114] In another exemplary embodiment, the evaluation unit 302 is also used to assign a value to the status indicator for each evaluation area within the range to be divided by using a maximum value normalization method to obtain the status values ​​of multiple resources in the evaluation area; obtain the dominance of the evaluation area within the range to be divided based on the status value; and obtain the status analysis result of the evaluation area based on the dominance.

[0115] In another exemplary embodiment, the evaluation unit 302 is also used to assign a development status indicator to each evaluation area within the range to be divided, and obtain development status scores of multiple resources in the evaluation area; compare the development status scores corresponding to all evaluation areas within the range to be divided, and obtain the highest score and the lowest score; obtain the distance relationship between the development status score corresponding to the evaluation area and the highest score and the lowest score; and obtain the development status evaluation result of the evaluation area based on the distance relationship and the score.

[0116] In another exemplary embodiment, the evaluation unit 302 is also used to obtain, for each evaluation area within the range to be divided, development potential values ​​of multiple resources in the evaluation area based on the development status index; compare the development potential values ​​corresponding to all evaluation areas within the range to be divided, and determine the first area and the second area corresponding to the highest development potential value and the lowest development potential value; obtain the first distance value and the second distance value between the evaluation area and the first area and the second area; and obtain the development potential evaluation result of the evaluation area based on the first distance value and the second distance value.

[0117] In another exemplary embodiment, the development status indicator includes multiple sub-indicators, and the multiple sub-indicators include resource attributes, natural conditions, regional conditions and service functions; the evaluation unit 302 is also used to obtain the indicator index of the multiple sub-indicators corresponding to each evaluation area within the range to be divided, and the weight value corresponding to each sub-indicator in the multiple sub-indicators; the indicator index is weighted and summed based on the weight values ​​of the multiple sub-indicators to obtain the development potential values ​​of multiple resources in the evaluation area.

[0118] In another exemplary embodiment, the comprehensive evaluation unit 303 is also used to obtain the resource weight of each resource in the multiple resources; perform weighted summation processing on the current status analysis results of the multiple resources based on the resource weights to obtain a first comprehensive result of the evaluation area; perform weighted summation processing on the development status evaluation results of the multiple resources based on the resource weights to obtain a second comprehensive result of the evaluation area; perform weighted summation processing on the development potential evaluation results of the multiple resources based on the resource weights to obtain a third comprehensive result of the evaluation area; obtain a comprehensive evaluation result of the evaluation area based on the first comprehensive result, the second comprehensive result and the third comprehensive result.

[0119] In another exemplary embodiment, the types of functional areas include single functional areas and composite functional areas; the partitioning unit 304 is also used to determine whether the evaluation area matches the preset main function based on the comprehensive evaluation results. If so, the evaluation area is determined to be a single functional area that realizes the corresponding main function; if not, the evaluation area is determined to be a composite functional area, and the composite functional category of the evaluation area is obtained using the comprehensive evaluation system.

[0120] In another exemplary embodiment, the partitioning unit 304 is also used to use the comprehensive evaluation system to obtain target status analysis results and target development potential evaluation results of target resources among multiple resources corresponding to the evaluation area; obtain the proportion information of target industries corresponding to the target resources in the evaluation area; and obtain the composite functional category of the evaluation area based on the proportion information, the target status analysis results and the target development potential evaluation results.

[0121] It should be noted that the comprehensive evaluation device for regional natural resources provided in the above embodiment and the comprehensive evaluation method for regional natural resources provided in the above embodiment belong to the same concept, wherein the specific manner in which each module and unit performs the operation has been described in detail in the method embodiment and will not be repeated here. In practical applications, the comprehensive evaluation device for regional natural resources provided in the above embodiment can distribute the above functions to different functional modules as needed, that is, divide the internal structure of the device into different functional modules to complete all or part of the functions described above, and this is not limited here.

[0122] An embodiment of the present application also provides an electronic device, comprising: one or more processors; a storage device for storing one or more programs, when the one or more programs are executed by one or more processors, the electronic device implements the comprehensive evaluation method of regional natural resources provided in the above-mentioned embodiments.

[0123] Figure 4 The structure diagram of the computer system suitable for implementing the electronic device of the embodiment of the present application is shown. It should be noted that: Figure 4 The computer system 400 of the electronic device shown is only an example and should not bring any limitation to the functions and scope of use of the embodiments of the present application.

[0124] like Figure 4 As shown, the computer system 400 includes a central processing unit (CPU) 401, which can perform various appropriate actions and processes according to the program stored in the read-only memory (ROM) 402 or the program loaded from the storage part 408 to the random access memory (RAM) 403, such as executing the method in the above embodiment. In the RAM 403, various programs and data required for system operation are also stored. The CPU 401, ROM 402 and RAM 403 are connected to each other through a bus 404. An input / output (I / O) interface 405 is also connected to the bus 404.

[0125] The following components are connected to the I / O interface 405: an input section 406 including a keyboard, a mouse, etc.; an output section 407 including a cathode ray tube (CRT), a liquid crystal display (LCD), etc., and a speaker, etc.; a storage section 408 including a hard disk, etc.; and a communication section 409 including a network interface card such as a LAN (Local Area Network) card, a modem, etc. The communication section 409 performs communication processing via a network such as the Internet. A drive 410 is also connected to the I / O interface 405 as needed. A removable medium 411, such as a magnetic disk, an optical disk, a magneto-optical disk, a semiconductor memory, etc., is installed on the drive 410 as needed so that a computer program read therefrom is installed into the storage section 408 as needed.

[0126] In particular, according to an embodiment of the present application, the process described above with reference to the flowchart can be implemented as a computer software program. For example, an embodiment of the present application includes a computer program product, which includes a computer program carried on a computer-readable medium, and the computer program includes a computer program for executing the method shown in the flowchart. In such an embodiment, the computer program can be downloaded and installed from a network through a communication section 409, and / or installed from a removable medium 411. When the computer program is executed by a central processing unit (CPU) 401, various functions defined in the system of the present application are executed.

[0127] It should be noted that the computer-readable medium shown in the embodiment of the present application can be a computer-readable signal medium or a computer-readable storage medium or any combination of the above two. The computer-readable storage medium can be, for example, an electrical, magnetic, optical, electromagnetic, infrared, or semiconductor system, device or device, or any combination of the above. More specific examples of computer-readable storage media can include, but are not limited to: an electrical connection with one or more wires, a portable computer disk, a hard disk, a random access memory (RAM), a read-only memory (ROM), an erasable programmable read-only memory (EPROM), a flash memory, an optical fiber, a portable compact disk read-only memory (CD-ROM), an optical storage device, a magnetic storage device, or any suitable combination of the above. In the present application, a computer-readable signal medium may include a data signal propagated in a baseband or as part of a carrier wave, wherein a computer-readable computer program is carried. This propagated data signal can take a variety of forms, including but not limited to an electromagnetic signal, an optical signal, or any suitable combination of the above. A computer-readable signal medium may also be any computer-readable medium other than a computer-readable storage medium, which may send, propagate or transmit a program for use by or in conjunction with an instruction execution system, apparatus or device. A computer program contained on a computer-readable medium may be transmitted using any appropriate medium, including but not limited to: wireless, wired, etc., or any suitable combination of the above.

[0128] The flowchart and block diagram in the accompanying drawings illustrate the possible architecture, functions and operations of the system, method and computer program product according to various embodiments of the present application. Wherein, each box in the flowchart or block diagram can represent a module, a program segment, or a part of the code, and the above-mentioned module, program segment, or a part of the code contains one or more executable instructions for realizing the specified logical function. It should also be noted that in some alternative implementations, the functions marked in the box can also occur in a different order from the order marked in the accompanying drawings. For example, two boxes represented in succession can actually be executed substantially in parallel, and they can sometimes be executed in the opposite order, depending on the functions involved. It should also be noted that each box in the block diagram or flowchart, and the combination of boxes in the block diagram or flowchart can be implemented with a dedicated hardware-based system that performs a specified function or operation, or can be implemented with a combination of dedicated hardware and computer instructions.

[0129] The units involved in the embodiments described in this application may be implemented by software or hardware, and the units described may also be set in a processor. The names of these units do not constitute limitations on the units themselves in some cases.

[0130] Another aspect of the present application provides a computer-readable storage medium having a computer program stored thereon, which implements the above-mentioned comprehensive evaluation method of regional natural resources when executed by a processor. The computer-readable storage medium may be included in the electronic device described in the above embodiment, or may exist independently without being assembled into the electronic device.

[0131] Another aspect of the present application also provides a computer program product or a computer program, which includes a computer instruction stored in a computer-readable storage medium. A processor of a computer device reads the computer instruction from the computer-readable storage medium, and the processor executes the computer instruction, so that the computer device executes the comprehensive evaluation method of regional natural resources provided in each of the above embodiments.

[0132] The above are only preferred embodiments of the present application and are not intended to limit the present application. Any modifications, equivalent substitutions or improvements made within the spirit and principles of the present application should be included in the protection scope of the present application.

Claims

1. A comprehensive evaluation method for regional natural resources, characterized in that: The method comprises: Constructing a comprehensive evaluation system based on multiple resources of preset types, including land resources, forest resources, grassland resources, water resources, wetland resources and mineral resources; Using the comprehensive evaluation system, obtaining the status analysis results, development status evaluation results and development potential evaluation results of the plurality of resources corresponding to each evaluation area within the scope to be divided; Based on the status analysis results, the development status evaluation results and the development potential evaluation results of the multiple resources, a comprehensive evaluation result for the evaluation area is obtained; The functional area type of the evaluation area is determined based on the comprehensive evaluation result to complete the resource utilization zoning of the range to be divided.

2. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that: The comprehensive evaluation system is used to obtain the status analysis results, development status evaluation results and development potential evaluation results of the plurality of resources corresponding to each evaluation area within the scope to be divided, including: Determine the single-category resource indicators of the multiple resources in the comprehensive evaluation system, wherein the single-category resource indicators include current status indicators, development status indicators and development potential indicators; Based on the status indicators of the multiple resources, obtaining status analysis results of the multiple resources corresponding to each evaluation area within the to-be-divided range; Based on the development status indicators of the multiple resources, obtaining development status evaluation results of the multiple resources corresponding to the evaluation area; Based on the development potential indicators of the multiple resources, development potential evaluation results of the multiple resources corresponding to the evaluation area are obtained.

3. The method according to claim 2, characterized in that The status indicators based on the multiple resources are used to obtain status analysis results of the multiple resources corresponding to each evaluation area within the to-be-divided range, including: For each evaluation area within the range to be divided, the current status index is assigned a value by using a maximum value standardization method to obtain the current status values ​​of the multiple resources in the evaluation area; Obtaining the dominance of the evaluation area within the to-be-divided range based on the current status value; A current status analysis result of the evaluation area is obtained based on the dominance.

4. The method according to claim 2, characterized in that The step of obtaining development status evaluation results of the multiple resources corresponding to the evaluation area based on the development status indicators of the multiple resources includes: For each evaluation area within the range to be divided, assigning a value to the development status indicator to obtain a development status score of the plurality of resources in the evaluation area; Compare the development status scores corresponding to all the evaluation areas within the to-be-divided range to obtain the highest score and the lowest score; Obtaining the distance relationship between the development status score corresponding to the evaluation area and the highest score and the lowest score; A development status evaluation result of the evaluation area is obtained based on the distance relationship and the score.

5. The method according to claim 2, characterized in that: The step of obtaining the development potential evaluation results of the multiple resources corresponding to the evaluation area based on the development potential indicators of the multiple resources includes: For each evaluation area within the to-be-divided range, obtaining development potential values ​​of the plurality of resources in the evaluation area based on the development status index; Compare the development potential values ​​corresponding to all the evaluation areas within the to-be-divided range to determine the first area and the second area corresponding to the highest development potential value and the lowest development potential value; Acquire a first distance value and a second distance value between the evaluation area and the first area and the second area; A development potential evaluation result of the evaluation area is obtained based on the first distance value and the second distance value.

6. The method according to claim 5, characterized in that The development status indicator includes multiple sub-indicators, and the multiple sub-indicators include resource attributes, natural conditions, regional conditions and service functions; The step of obtaining the development potential values ​​of the plurality of resources in the evaluation area based on the development status index for each evaluation area within the to-be-divided range includes: Obtaining the indicator index of the plurality of sub-indicators corresponding to each evaluation area within the to-be-divided range, and the weight value corresponding to each of the plurality of sub-indicators; The indicator index is weighted and summed based on the weight values ​​of the multiple sub-indicators to obtain the development potential values ​​of the multiple resources in the evaluation area.

7. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that Based on the status analysis results, development status evaluation results and development potential evaluation results of the plurality of resources, a comprehensive evaluation result for the evaluation area is obtained, including: Obtaining a resource weight of each resource among the multiple resources; Performing weighted sum processing on the status analysis results of the multiple resources based on the resource weights to obtain a first comprehensive result of the evaluation area; Performing weighted sum processing on the development status evaluation results of the plurality of resources based on the resource weights to obtain a second comprehensive result of the evaluation area; Performing weighted summation processing on the development potential evaluation results of the plurality of resources based on the resource weights to obtain a third comprehensive result of the evaluation area; A comprehensive evaluation result of the evaluation area is obtained based on the first comprehensive result, the second comprehensive result and the third comprehensive result.

8. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that: The types of functional areas include single functional areas and composite functional areas; The determining the type of functional area of ​​the evaluation area based on the comprehensive evaluation result includes: Determine whether the evaluation area matches the preset main function based on the comprehensive evaluation result, and if so, determine that the evaluation area is a single functional area that realizes the corresponding main function; If not, the evaluation area is determined to be a composite functional area, and the composite functional category of the evaluation area is obtained using the comprehensive evaluation system.

9. The method according to claim 8, characterized in that The method of obtaining the composite functional category of the evaluation area by using the comprehensive evaluation system includes: Using the comprehensive evaluation system, obtaining target status analysis results and target development potential evaluation results of target resources among the multiple resources corresponding to the evaluation area; Obtaining the proportion information of the target industry corresponding to the target resources in the evaluation area; The composite functional category of the evaluation area is obtained based on the proportion information, the target status analysis result and the target development potential evaluation result.

10. A comprehensive evaluation device for regional natural resources, characterized in that: include: An evaluation system unit, for constructing a comprehensive evaluation system based on a plurality of resources of preset types, wherein the plurality of resources include land resources, forest resources, grassland resources, water resources, wetland resources and mineral resources; An evaluation unit, used to obtain, by using the comprehensive evaluation system, status analysis results, development status evaluation results and development potential evaluation results of the plurality of resources corresponding to each evaluation area within the scope to be divided; A comprehensive evaluation unit, configured to obtain a comprehensive evaluation result for the evaluation area based on the status analysis results, the development status evaluation results and the development potential evaluation results of the plurality of resources; A partitioning unit is used to determine the type of functional area of ​​the evaluation area based on the comprehensive evaluation result to complete the resource utilization partitioning of the range to be divided.

Images