Optimal professional culture scheme screening method, device, equipment, medium and product

Abstract

The invention discloses an optimal professional cultivation scheme screening method, device, equipment, medium and product, and relates to the field of optimal professional cultivation scheme screening, and the method comprises the steps: constructing a professional knowledge graph according to professional knowledge data in a professional cultivation scheme; the professional knowledge data comprises professional-related knowledge points, ability requirements, course contents and expected learning results; based on the professional knowledge graph, calculating an evaluation index of a professional cultivation scheme; the evaluation indexes comprise professional goal achievement degree, knowledge system association degree, semester distribution balance degree and professional course arrangement conflict rate; evaluating all professional cultivation schemes according to the evaluation indexes, and determining a comprehensive evaluation score of each professional cultivation scheme; and determining the professional cultivation scheme with the highest comprehensive evaluation score as the optimal professional cultivation scheme. According to the method and the device, the accuracy of the optimal professional cultivation scheme is improved.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] The present application relates to the field of screening for optimal professional training programs, and in particular to a method, device, equipment, medium and product for screening for optimal professional training programs. Background Art

[0002] With the in-depth development of educational informatization, how to effectively integrate and utilize massive educational data and improve educational quality and efficiency has become an important challenge facing the education field. The national education department encourages vocational colleges to optimize professional talent training programs, strengthen practical links, strictly enforce graduation requirements, promote the integration of books and certificates, and strengthen classified guidance.

[0003] However, with the diversification and dynamic changes in society's demand for professional talents, traditional professional training programs are difficult to adapt to new talent training needs. When selecting the best professional training program among many professional training programs, people often rely on expert experience to determine the best professional training program. The screening method relying on expert experience lacks systematic and scientific evaluation methods, and the evaluation results are subjective and one-sided, resulting in inaccurate selection of the best professional training program. Summary of the invention

[0004] The purpose of this application is to provide a method, device, equipment, medium and product for screening the best professional training program, so as to solve the problem that the method of relying on expert experience to screen the best professional training program has subjectivity and one-sidedness in the evaluation results, resulting in low accuracy in screening the best professional training program.

[0005] To achieve the above objectives, this application provides the following solutions:

[0006] In the first aspect, the present application provides a method for screening an optimal professional training program, comprising:

[0007] Constructing a professional knowledge map based on professional knowledge data in the professional training program; the professional knowledge data includes professional-related knowledge points, ability requirements, course content, and expected learning outcomes;

[0008] Based on the professional knowledge map, the evaluation indicators of the professional training program are calculated; the evaluation indicators include the degree of achievement of professional goals, the relevance of the knowledge system, the balance of semester allocation, and the conflict rate of professional course arrangement;

[0009] Evaluate all professional training programs separately according to the evaluation indicators and determine the comprehensive evaluation score of each professional training program;

[0010] The professional training program with the highest comprehensive evaluation score is determined as the optimal professional training program.

[0011] In a second aspect, the present application provides an optimal professional training program screening device, comprising:

[0012] A professional knowledge map construction module is used to construct a professional knowledge map based on professional knowledge data in the professional training program; the professional knowledge data includes professional-related knowledge points, ability requirements, course content, and expected learning outcomes;

[0013] An evaluation index calculation module is used to calculate the evaluation index of the professional training program based on the professional knowledge map; the evaluation index includes the degree of achievement of professional goals, the relevance of the knowledge system, the balance of semester allocation, and the conflict rate of professional course arrangement;

[0014] The comprehensive evaluation score module is used to evaluate all professional training programs according to the evaluation indicators and determine the comprehensive evaluation score of each professional training program;

[0015] The optimal professional training program determination module is used to determine the professional training program with the highest comprehensive evaluation score as the optimal professional training program.

[0016] In a third aspect, the present application provides a computer device comprising: a memory, a processor, and a computer program stored in the memory and executable on the processor, wherein the processor executes the computer program to implement any of the above-described optimal professional training program screening methods.

[0017] In a fourth aspect, the present application provides a computer-readable storage medium having a computer program stored thereon, which, when executed by a processor, implements any of the above-described methods for screening optimal professional training programs.

[0018] In a fifth aspect, the present application provides a computer program product, including a computer program, which, when executed by a processor, implements any of the above-mentioned optimal professional training program screening methods.

[0019] According to the specific embodiments provided by this application, this application discloses the following technical effects: This application constructs a professional knowledge map, calculates the evaluation index of the professional training program, and evaluates all professional training programs according to the evaluation index to obtain the comprehensive evaluation score of each professional training program, and finally selects the professional training program with the highest comprehensive evaluation score as the optimal professional training program. This application realizes the standardization and normalization of the evaluation process through the structured characteristics of the knowledge map, improves the objectivity and accuracy of the evaluation, and thus improves the accuracy of the optimal professional training program. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0020] In order to more clearly illustrate the embodiments of the present application or the technical solutions in the prior art, the drawings required for use in the embodiments will be briefly introduced below. Obviously, the drawings described below are only some embodiments of the present application. For ordinary technicians in this field, other drawings can be obtained based on these drawings without paying creative work.

[0021] Figure 1 This is a flow chart of a method for screening an optimal professional training program in one embodiment of the present application;

[0022] Figure 2 This is a schematic diagram of the architecture of an optimal professional training program screening method in one embodiment of the present application. DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0023] The following will be combined with the drawings in the embodiments of the present application to clearly and completely describe the technical solutions in the embodiments of the present application. Obviously, the described embodiments are only part of the embodiments of the present application, not all of the embodiments. Based on the embodiments in the present application, all other embodiments obtained by ordinary technicians in this field without creative work are within the scope of protection of this application.

[0024] In order to make the above-mentioned objects, features and advantages of the present application more obvious and easy to understand, the present application is further described in detail below with reference to the accompanying drawings and specific implementation methods.

[0025] The embodiment of the present application provides a method for screening an optimal professional training program, which is executed by a computer device, and can be specifically executed by a computer device such as a terminal or a server alone, or can be executed by a terminal and a server together. In the embodiment of the present application, Figure 1-Figure 2 As shown, the method includes the following steps.

[0026] S101: Construct a professional knowledge map based on professional knowledge data in the professional training program; the professional knowledge data includes professional-related knowledge points, ability requirements, course content, and expected learning outcomes.

[0027] S102: Based on the professional knowledge map, the evaluation indicators of the professional training program are calculated; the evaluation indicators include the degree of achievement of professional goals, the relevance of the knowledge system, the balance of semester allocation, and the conflict rate of professional course arrangement.

[0028] S103: Evaluate all professional training programs separately according to the evaluation indicators to determine the comprehensive evaluation score of each professional training program.

[0029] S104: Determine the professional training program with the highest comprehensive evaluation score as the optimal professional training program.

[0030] In an exemplary embodiment, S101 specifically includes:

[0031] 1) Collect and organize data on professional knowledge points, competency requirements, course content, expected learning outcomes (ILos), etc.

[0032] 2) Use Neo4j to build a graph, represent knowledge points, competency requirements, course content, etc. in the form of nodes, and determine the relationships between them.

[0033] 3) Use professional knowledge maps to organize and optimize educational resources and provide data support for subsequent evaluation.

[0034] In an exemplary embodiment, the calculation process of the professional goal achievement degree specifically includes: grading the professional training program according to the professional goals, graduation requirements and expected learning outcomes of the course; calculating the number of knowledge points in the professional knowledge map; calculating the total number of knowledge points contained in the expected learning outcomes checked in each graduation requirement column; based on the number of knowledge points and the total number of knowledge points, calculating the ratio of the total number of all knowledge points contained in each graduation requirement to the total number of knowledge points of all courses; the total number of knowledge points of all courses is the number of knowledge points in the professional knowledge map; the ratio is the proportion of graduation requirement knowledge points; calculating the support degree of each graduation requirement for each training goal; determining the professional goal achievement degree based on the proportion of graduation requirement knowledge points and the support degree.

[0035] Furthermore, the degree of achievement of professional goals is calculated.

[0036] 1) The professional training programs are graded from top to bottom: professional objectives - graduation requirements - expected learning outcomes of the course.

[0037] 2) Calculate the number of knowledge points in the full professional knowledge graph Knows sum , including first-level knowledge points and second-level knowledge points, are all recorded as 1.

[0038] 3) Taking Industrial Engineering as an example, calculate the total number of knowledge points included in the expected learning outcomes (ILOs) checked in each graduation requirement column Know n (There are 12 graduation requirements for the Industrial Engineering major, from requirement one to requirement twelve, with n values ​​ranging from 1 to 12 respectively); the first-level knowledge points and the second-level knowledge points are recorded as quantity 1, and the chapter knowledge is calculated by adding up the quantity of knowledge points at each level within it.

[0039] 4) Calculate the ratio of the total number of knowledge points included in each graduation requirement to the total number of knowledge points in all courses

[0040]

[0041] 5) Calculate the support degree of graduation requirements for training objectives. The support degree of each graduation requirement for the jth training objective is S j , the support is a discrete value, H represents a high support, which can be quantified by a numerical value, such as M represents the medium support degree, Quantification, L represents low support, with Quantification. The support degree S of each graduation requirement for the total training objectives (the number is q) is the total support degree S of all S j sum.

[0042] 6) Graduation requirement knowledge points ratio kno The product of this value and the corresponding support degree S for the overall goal is the contribution value of this graduation requirement to the achievement of the professional goal. Since there are m graduation requirements in total, the contribution value of each graduation requirement to the achievement of the professional goal is divided by m and the sum is recorded as the total professional goal achievement degree.

[0043] That is, the calculation formula for the professional goal achievement degree A is: Among them, p is the total number of graduation requirements in the professional training program, h is the serial number of the graduation requirement, q is the total number of training objectives in the professional training program, and j is the serial number of the training objective.

[0044] In an exemplary embodiment, the calculation process of the knowledge system correlation specifically includes: calculating the course correlation between courses in the professional training program and the knowledge correlation between knowledge points in each course; and determining the knowledge system correlation based on the course correlation and the knowledge correlation.

[0045] Furthermore, the correlation between courses and between courses in the professional training system is analyzed by calculating the correlation of the knowledge system.

[0046] 1) Calculate the correlation between courses, that is, the course correlation R cou : Among them, Cou real is the actual number of associated courses, Cou max is the maximum possible number of course associations.

[0047] 2) Calculate the correlation between knowledge points in each course, that is, the knowledge correlation R kno : Among them, Kno real is the actual number of associated courses, Kno max is the maximum possible number of course associations.

[0048] 3) Calculate the correlation of knowledge systems.

[0049] Calculate R for all courses in the professional training program kno , averaging them to get Afterwards with R cou Multiply them to get the knowledge system relevance R tot .

[0050] Among them, n is the total number of courses in the professional training program, is the correlation between knowledge points of the i-th course.

[0051] In an exemplary embodiment, the calculation process of the semester distribution balance specifically includes: calculating the learning distribution balance based on the total number of semesters in the professional training program, the number of credits in each semester, the average number of credits in each semester, and the total number of credits in the professional training program.

[0052] Furthermore, the semester allocation balance is calculated and normalized.

[0053] 1) Analyze the course settings and credit distribution for each semester.

[0054] 2) Calculate the semester distribution balance B dis , evaluate whether the distribution of courses and credits in different semesters is reasonable.

[0055] Where N is the total number of semesters, x r is the number of credits in the rth semester, μ is the average number of credits per semester, X sum It is the total credits of the professional training program.

[0056] 3) To normalize the balance of semester distribution, the standard deviation normalization method can be used to convert the data into a distribution with a mean of 0 and a standard deviation of 1.

[0057] In an exemplary embodiment, the calculation process of the professional course arrangement conflict rate specifically includes: analyzing the time arrangement of professional courses in the professional training program, and calculating the professional course arrangement conflict rate according to the number of conflicting courses and the total number of courses.

[0058] Furthermore, the conflict rate of professional course arrangement is calculated and normalized.

[0059] 1) Analyze the schedule of professional courses and check whether there are any conflicts in course time.

[0060] 2) Calculate the conflict rate of professional course arrangement and evaluate the rationality of course arrangement. conflict The calculation formula is as follows:

[0061] Among them, C conflict The number of conflicting courses.

[0062] 3) Normalize the conflict rate of professional course arrangement and use the Boolean normalization method to convert the conflict rate into a value of 0 (no conflict) or 1 (conflict).

[0063] In an exemplary embodiment, all professional training programs are evaluated separately according to the evaluation indicators to determine the comprehensive evaluation score of each professional training program, which specifically includes: constructing a hierarchical model; the hierarchical model includes a target layer, a criterion layer and a scheme layer; the target layer includes a comprehensive evaluation of professional arrangement schemes; the criterion layer includes evaluation indicators; the scheme layer is all professional training programs; based on the hierarchical model, the importance of each evaluation indicator of the criterion layer to the target layer is compared pairwise to construct a judgment matrix; the judgment matrix is ​​checked for consistency to determine an adjusted judgment matrix; the index value of the evaluation indicator is calculated according to the adjusted judgment matrix; the information entropy of each evaluation indicator is calculated, and the weight is determined according to the information entropy; the weight of each evaluation indicator is adjusted to determine the adjusted weight; the comprehensive evaluation score is calculated according to the adjusted weight of each evaluation indicator and the corresponding index value.

[0064] Furthermore, a comprehensive evaluation was conducted through an improved analytic hierarchy process.

[0065] 1) Build a hierarchical model

[0066] Target level: Comprehensive evaluation of professional training programs.

[0067] Criteria layer: includes four evaluation indicators, namely, the degree of achievement of professional goals (A), the relevance of knowledge system (B), the balance of semester allocation (C), and the conflict rate of professional course arrangement (D).

[0068] Program level: different professional training programs or different versions of professional training programs.

[0069] 2) Construct a judgment matrix

[0070] By using expert scoring, data analysis results or other methods, the importance of each indicator in the criterion layer relative to the target layer is compared pairwise, and a judgment matrix is ​​constructed. The judgment matrix is ​​a square matrix with elements a ij Indicates the importance of indicator i relative to indicator j.

[0071] Taking the three-scale method as an example, assuming that the degree of professional goal achievement (A) is more important than the degree of knowledge system relevance (B), then α AB =2,α BA =0.5.

[0072] The established judgment matrix E is as follows:

[0073]

[0074] Among them, "1" in the judgment matrix E indicates that there is no obvious difference in importance between the corresponding two indicators.

[0075] 3)Consistency check:

[0076] Calculate the maximum eigenvalue λ of the judgment matrix max and the corresponding eigenvectors.

[0077] Calculate the consistency index (CI): Where t is the order of the judgment matrix.

[0078] Calculate the consistency ratio (CR): Where RI is the random consistency index, which varies according to the order of the judgment matrix.

[0079] If CR is less than 0.1, the judgment matrix is ​​considered to have satisfactory consistency; if it is greater than 0.1, the judgment matrix needs to be adjusted.

[0080] 4) Entropy weight method to calculate weights: Entropy weight method is an objective weighting method that determines weights by calculating the information entropy of each indicator. The smaller the entropy, the greater the weight. Combining entropy weight method can reduce subjectivity and improve the objectivity of weight calculation.

[0081] The calculation steps are as follows:

[0082] Calculate the information entropy of each indicator Among them, p ab is the weight of the bth evaluation index in the ath professional training program, k is a constant, and f is the number of programs.

[0083] Calculating weights Among them, ω b is the weight of the bth evaluation index; c is the total number of evaluation indicators.

[0084] 5) Adjust weight: Since the professional goal achievement (A) is more important, the weight of the professional goal achievement (A) is adjusted to A Multiply by the magnification factor (e.g. 1.5): ω′ A =1.5×ω A ; Among them, ω′ A It is the adjusted weight corresponding to the professional goal achievement degree A.

[0085] Normalize all adjusted weights: Among them, ω′ X is the adjusted weight corresponding to the Xth evaluation indicator, X is A, B, C or D; X is a virtual index. Represents the sum of the adjusted weights corresponding to A to D.

[0086] 6) Combine weights and index values: Multiply the adjusted weights by the normalized index values ​​to obtain the weighted index values. Calculate the comprehensive evaluation score Soc: Soc = ω′ A '·A+ω' B ′·B+ω′ C ′·C+ω′ D ′·D, where ω" X It is the normalized weight corresponding to the evaluation index X.

[0087] According to the comprehensive evaluation scores, different professional training programs are ranked or scored, and the program with the highest score is selected as the optimal professional training program.

[0088] This application has the following advantages:

[0089] 1) Improving the objectivity and accuracy of evaluation: The existing technology often relies on the subjective evaluation of experts, while the present invention realizes the standardization and regularization of the evaluation process by constructing a professional knowledge map.

[0090] By calculating key indicators such as the correlation of knowledge systems, the balance of semester allocations, the conflict rate of professional course arrangements, and the achievement of professional goals, and normalizing them, the consistency and comparability of the evaluation are ensured.

[0091] 3) Enhance the scientificity and systematicness of the evaluation: This application adopts a multi-dimensional evaluation, which not only considers the relevance of the course content, but also includes the balance of semester allocation and the rationality of course time arrangement, providing a comprehensive evaluation perspective for professional training programs.

[0092] By constructing a knowledge graph, knowledge points in the field of education and the relationships between them are systematically organized.

[0093] 3) Support dynamic adjustment and decision-making: This application can be updated and adjusted in real time to adapt to changes in educational needs and provide dynamic evaluation and improvement suggestions for professional training programs.

[0094] The indicator weights calculated by the improved hierarchical analysis method can be dynamically adjusted to adapt to different education policies and market demands.

[0095] Based on the same inventive concept, the embodiment of the present application also provides an optimal professional training program screening device for implementing the optimal professional training program screening method involved above. The implementation scheme for solving the problem provided by the device is similar to the implementation scheme recorded in the above method, so the specific limitations in one or more optimal professional training program screening device embodiments provided below can refer to the limitations of the optimal professional training program screening method above, and will not be repeated here.

[0096] In an exemplary embodiment, a device for screening an optimal professional training program is provided, comprising:

[0097] The professional knowledge map construction module is used to construct a professional knowledge map based on the professional knowledge data in the professional training program; the professional knowledge data includes professional-related knowledge points, ability requirements, course content and expected learning outcomes.

[0098] An evaluation index calculation module is used to calculate the evaluation index of the professional training program based on the professional knowledge map; the evaluation index includes the degree of achievement of professional goals, the relevance of the knowledge system, the balance of semester allocation and the conflict rate of professional course arrangement.

[0099] The comprehensive evaluation scoring module is used to evaluate all professional training programs according to the evaluation indicators and determine the comprehensive evaluation score of each professional training program.

[0100] The optimal professional training program determination module is used to determine the professional training program with the highest comprehensive evaluation score as the optimal professional training program.

[0101] Evaluation standardization: Through the structured characteristics of the knowledge graph, the evaluation process can be standardized and normalized to improve the objectivity and accuracy of the evaluation.

[0102] Optimal resource allocation: Use knowledge graphs to effectively integrate teaching resources to achieve optimal allocation and utilization of resources.

[0103] Dynamic adjustment: The knowledge graph can be updated and adjusted in real time to adapt to changes in educational needs and provide dynamic evaluation and improvement suggestions for professional training programs.

[0104] Decision support: Knowledge graphs can provide decision support for education managers, helping them better understand the current status of professional training, predict future trends, and formulate scientific and reasonable education policies.

[0105] In an exemplary embodiment, a computer device is provided, which may be a server or a terminal. The computer device includes a processor, a memory, an input / output interface (I / O for short) and a communication interface. Wherein, the processor, the memory and the input / output interface are connected via a system bus, and the communication interface is connected to the system bus via the input / output interface. Wherein, the processor of the computer device is used to provide computing and control capabilities. The memory of the computer device includes a non-volatile storage medium and an internal memory. The non-volatile storage medium stores an operating system, a computer program and a database. The internal memory provides an environment for the operation of the operating system and the computer program in the non-volatile storage medium. The database of the computer device is used to store optimal professional training program screening data. The input / output interface of the computer device is used to exchange information between the processor and an external device. The communication interface of the computer device is used to communicate with an external terminal via a network connection. When the computer program is executed by the processor, a method for screening an optimal professional training program is realized.

[0106] In an exemplary embodiment, a computer device is provided, including a memory and a processor, wherein a computer program is stored in the memory, and the above method is implemented when the processor executes the computer program.

[0107] In an exemplary embodiment, a computer-readable storage medium is provided, storing a computer program, which implements the above method when executed by a processor.

[0108] In an exemplary embodiment, a computer program product is provided, including a computer program, which implements the above method when executed by a processor.

[0109] Those skilled in the art can understand that all or part of the processes in the above-mentioned embodiment methods can be completed by instructing the relevant hardware through a computer program, and the computer program can be stored in a non-volatile computer-readable storage medium. When the computer program is executed, it can include the processes of the embodiments of the above-mentioned methods. Among them, any reference to the memory, database or other medium used in the embodiments provided in the present application can include at least one of non-volatile and volatile memory. Non-volatile memory can include read-only memory (ReadOnlyMemory, ROM), magnetic tape, floppy disk, flash memory, optical memory, high-density embedded non-volatile memory, resistive random access memory (ReRAM), magnetic random access memory (Magnetoresistive RandomAccess Memory, MRAM), ferroelectric random access memory (Ferroelectric RandomAccess Memory, FRAM), phase change memory (Phase Change Memory, PCM), graphene memory, etc. Volatile memory can include random access memory (RandomAccess Memory, RAM) or external cache memory, etc. By way of illustration and not limitation, RAM may be in various forms, such as static random access memory (SRAM) or dynamic random access memory (DRAM).

[0110] In this application, all actions to obtain signals, information or data are carried out in compliance with the relevant data protection laws and policies of the country where they are located and with the authorization given by the owner of the corresponding device.

[0111] The database involved in each embodiment provided in this application may include at least one of a relational database and a non-relational database. The non-relational database may include a distributed database based on blockchain, etc., but is not limited thereto. The processor involved in each embodiment provided in this application may be a general-purpose processor, a central processing unit, a graphics processor, a digital signal processor, a programmable logic device, a data processing logic device based on quantum computing, etc., but is not limited thereto.

[0112] The technical features of the above embodiments may be combined arbitrarily. To make the description concise, not all possible combinations of the technical features in the above embodiments are described. However, as long as there is no contradiction in the combination of these technical features, they should be considered to be within the scope of this specification.

[0113] This article uses specific examples to illustrate the principles and implementation methods of this application. The description of the above embodiments is only used to help understand the method and core ideas of this application. At the same time, for those skilled in the art, according to the ideas of this application, there will be changes in the specific implementation methods and application scope. In summary, the content of this specification should not be understood as limiting this application.

Claims

1. A method for screening an optimal professional training program, characterized in that: The optimal professional training program screening method includes: Constructing a professional knowledge map based on professional knowledge data in the professional training program; the professional knowledge data includes professional-related knowledge points, ability requirements, course content, and expected learning outcomes; Based on the professional knowledge map, the evaluation indicators of the professional training program are calculated; the evaluation indicators include the degree of achievement of professional goals, the relevance of the knowledge system, the balance of semester allocation, and the conflict rate of professional course arrangement; Evaluate all professional training programs separately according to the evaluation indicators and determine the comprehensive evaluation score of each professional training program; The professional training program with the highest comprehensive evaluation score is determined as the optimal professional training program.

2. The optimal professional training program screening method according to claim 1 is characterized in that: The calculation process of the professional goal achievement degree specifically includes: Grading professional training programs according to professional goals, graduation requirements, and expected learning outcomes of courses; Calculating the number of knowledge points in the professional knowledge graph; Calculate the total number of knowledge points included in the expected learning outcomes checked in each graduation requirement column; According to the number of knowledge points and the total number of knowledge points, calculate the ratio of the total number of all knowledge points included in each graduation requirement to the total number of knowledge points in all courses; the total number of knowledge points in all courses is the number of knowledge points in the professional knowledge map; the ratio is the ratio of knowledge points in the graduation requirement; Calculate the support degree of each graduation requirement for each training objective; The degree of achievement of the professional goal is determined based on the proportion of knowledge points in the graduation requirement and the support degree.

3. The optimal professional training program screening method according to claim 1 is characterized in that: The calculation process of the relevance of the knowledge system specifically includes: Calculate the course correlation between courses in the professional training program and the knowledge correlation between knowledge points in each course; The knowledge system relevance is determined according to the course relevance and the knowledge relevance.

4. The optimal professional training program screening method according to claim 1 is characterized in that: The calculation process of the semester allocation balance specifically includes: The degree of learning distribution balance is calculated based on the total number of semesters in the professional training program, the number of credits in each semester, the average number of credits in each semester, and the total number of credits in the professional training program.

5. The optimal professional training program screening method according to claim 1 is characterized in that: The calculation process of the professional course arrangement conflict rate specifically includes: The time arrangement of professional courses in the professional training program is analyzed, and the professional course arrangement conflict rate is calculated according to the number of conflicting courses and the total number of courses.

6. The optimal professional training program screening method according to claim 1 is characterized in that: All professional training programs are evaluated separately according to the evaluation indicators to determine the comprehensive evaluation score of each professional training program, including: Constructing a hierarchical model; the hierarchical model includes a target layer, a criterion layer and a program layer; the target layer includes a comprehensive evaluation of professional arrangement programs; the criterion layer includes evaluation indicators; the program layer is all professional training programs; Based on the hierarchical structure model, the importance of each evaluation index of the criterion layer to the target layer is compared in pairs to construct a judgment matrix; Performing a consistency check on the judgment matrix to determine an adjusted judgment matrix; Calculating the index value of the evaluation index according to the adjusted judgment matrix; Calculate the information entropy of each evaluation indicator and determine the weight according to the information entropy; Adjust the weight of each evaluation indicator and determine the adjusted weight; The comprehensive evaluation score is calculated based on the adjusted weights of each evaluation indicator and the corresponding indicator value.

7. An optimal professional training program screening device, characterized in that: The optimal professional training program screening device comprises: A professional knowledge map construction module is used to construct a professional knowledge map based on professional knowledge data in the professional training program; the professional knowledge data includes professional-related knowledge points, ability requirements, course content, and expected learning outcomes; An evaluation index calculation module is used to calculate the evaluation index of the professional training program based on the professional knowledge map; the evaluation index includes the degree of achievement of professional goals, the relevance of the knowledge system, the balance of semester allocation, and the conflict rate of professional course arrangement; The comprehensive evaluation score module is used to evaluate all professional training programs according to the evaluation indicators and determine the comprehensive evaluation score of each professional training program; The optimal professional training program determination module is used to determine the professional training program with the highest comprehensive evaluation score as the optimal professional training program.

8. A computer device comprising: A memory, a processor, and a computer program stored in the memory and executable on the processor, wherein the processor executes the computer program to implement the optimal professional training program screening method described in any one of claims 1 to 6.

9. A computer-readable storage medium having a computer program stored thereon, characterized in that: When the computer program is executed by a processor, the optimal professional training program screening method described in any one of claims 1 to 6 is implemented.

10. A computer program product, comprising a computer program, characterized in that When the computer program is executed by a processor, the optimal professional training program screening method described in any one of claims 1 to 6 is implemented.

Images